what does this appear like?
Search using this query type:

Search only these record types:






Advanced Search (Items only)

Browse Items (20 total)

  • Subject is exactly "Environmental policy"

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 16.pdf
Correspondence from Stephan Flint to Wes Wilson, June 17, 1987

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_9.pdf
Correspondence from Keith Lautenbach (on behalf of Daniel Watt) to Brian Beard, (with Lautenbach's signature) in response to Beard's previous correspondence about the FHWA's compliance with NEPA and other agency regulations.

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 17.pdf
Correspondence from Dale Bosworth to Daniel Dake explaining the position of the Forest Service position concerning the Logan Canyon project.

USU_MSS148VIIIB29Fd6_Item 27.pdf
Correspondence from James Naegle to Rudy Lukez stating the intent to not release the Draft Environmental Impact Statement to avoid any unnecessary confusion.

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_12.pdf
Correspondence from George Bohn to Brian Beard defining the action plan which must comply with various legislative requirements such as NEPA, and outline how the State will coordinate with other government entities and the public in developing plans…

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_16.pdf
Correspondence from Brian Beard to Information Officer requesting the regulations that the Utah Department of Transportation uses for implenting NEPA.

USU_MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 6.pdf
Correspondence from Jean Launer to Rudy Lukez giving examples of projects in other states where administrative changes in design standards were changed for environmental reasons.

USU_MSS148VIIIB29Fd6_Item 23.pdf
Correspondence from Daniel Dake to William Hurley discussing the need for an Environmental Impact Statement and the conditions for turning the EIS into an Environmental Assessment.

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 13.pdf
Correspondence from Jack Spence to Dale Bosworth discussing the Agency Alternative for the Logan Canyon improvements project.

USU_MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_2.pdf
Encouraging citizens to write to James Naegle requesting copies of the draft Environmental Impact Statement and support the protection of Logan Canyon.

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 11.pdf
Correspondence from Jack Spence to R. James Naegle identifying the problems with the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_6.pdf
Detailing the concerns, particularly from environmental groups, of the expansion and reduction of curves in Logan Canyon including a general summary, traffic growth factors, safety factors, and environmental factors. Important addresses and questions…

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_17.pdf
Correspondence from Brian Beard to David Watt asking for a copy of the "finding of no significant impact" and asking for information as to why UDOT decided to proceed without an Environmental Assessment as required by CEQ NEPA.

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 15.pdf
Correspondence from Dick Carter to Dave Baumgartner, expressign concern over the maintaining the existing values of Logan Canyon and coming to a reasonable solution for all agencies involved.

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_5.pdf
Correspondence from Keith P. Lautenbach to Brian Beard of the Sierra Club in response to Beard's previous correspondence about the FHWA's compliance with NEPA and other agency regulations.

USU_MSS200ForestServiceSeriesWasatchNFBx6_Item 12.pdf
Correspondence from Fern Shepard to Clinton Topham requesting a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and for the days for comment to be extended to 120 rather than 30 days.

USU_MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_21.pdf
Correspondence from Jack Spence to James Naegle expressing his concerns about the role of the Interdisciplinary team, concerns about the Environmental Impact Statement, and concerns about his faith in UDOT and CH2M Hill.

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_18.pdf
Correspondence from Brian Beard to George Bohn requesting that any and all information regarding Utah Department of Transportation's compliance with NEPA be sent for review, espeicially as to why Logan Canyon was removed from a Category I and put in…

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_19.pdf
Correspondence from Brian Beard to Vern Hamre questioning who is the lead agency - UDOT or the Forest Service - in the road construction activities proposed for Logan Canyon. He also requests an evaluation of the environmental issues.

USU_MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_2.pdf
Correspondence from Brian Beard to M.J. Roberts regarding the camp grounds that are proposed for construction parallel with the road construction and asking what is to be done regarding the disposal of fill material. Also asks how they intend to…
Output Formats

atom, dc-rdf, dcmes-xml, json, omeka-xml, rss2