12 50 1396 https://highway89.org/files/original/42fdb10dbd203b43360306ea5ce6c384.pdf 210433ebebf259d35cf10b755f31b33c PDF Text Text u.s. .. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION REGION EIGHT UTAH DIVISION P.O. Box 11563 Salt Lake City, Utah 84147 . Decembe r 12, 1979 • IN REPLY REFER TO: HBR-UT Mr. Brian Beard, President Utah Chapter Sierra Club 93 East First South Logan, Utah 84321 Dear Mr. Beard: Reference is made to your letter of November 21, 1979, regarding the proposed construction activities in Logan Canyon, Utah. In accordance with Federal laws, the methods and procedures followed in the development of highway projects from initial conception to the point of advertising for construction are contained in the State's approved Action Plan. The purpose of this plan is to define how the State intends to comply with various legislative requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In addition, the plan also outlines how the State will coordinate with other government entities and the public in developing plans for highway projects. For a clearer understanding of the process, a copy of the Action Plan may be obtained from the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations 500, et seq.), as provided in section 1506.12, were effective July 30, 1979, for direct Federal projects; however, agencies administering programs under section 102(2)D of NEPA are allowed an additional 4 months for State agencies to adopt implementing procedures. Consequently, for the Federal-aid highway program, the effective date of the CEQ regulations is November 30, 1979. . As a result of the CEQ regulations, the UDOT's Action Plan is currently being revised to incorporate the latest environmental changes. Although the revisions are not completely documented in the Action Plan at this time, all projects (including Logan Canyon) processed through the State and this office after November 30, 1979, will be in full compliance with the CEQ and all other appropriate environmental regulations. Since these regulations have just gone into effect, it is considered somewhat premature to imply that the UDOT is not in compliance with the CEQ regulations or is in apparent violation of public law. There has not been, nor will there be, any violations on environmental regulations with respect to our actions on this or any other project. �2 After a recent meeting with the UDOT regarding the scope of the project and in accordance with Federal Highway Administration policy, a review of the project and category assignment was undertaken. The currently proposed improvement is of the type normally considered a nonmajor action (categorical exclusion). However, the continuing controversy regarding this proposal has convinced us that it merits special consideration. We have concluded that the project should not be processed as a nonmajor action (categorical exclusion) and have withdrawn our concurrence in the ~ategory I I I assignment. The UDOT has been informed of this action. We trust this response has addressed your concerns regarding this project. Should you have any further questions concerning the project or its future development, we suggest you contact the Utah Department of Transportation. Sincerely yours, ftKL W. Bohn � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/148">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/148</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 549439783 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 1051380 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from George Bohn to Brian Beard, December 12, 1979 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from George Bohn to Brian Beard defining the action plan which must comply with various legislative requirements such as NEPA, and outline how the State will coordinate with other government entities and the public in developing plans for highway projects, and that the proposed construction activites in Logan Canyon were withdrawn from nonmajor action. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Bohn, George W. Subject The topic of the resource Environmental policy Logan Canyon (Utah) Government agencies Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1979-12-12 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 28 Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_12.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/a12b0012f144e5a72d9e206851045ab4.pdf 672f6fad409f71743ace78bbbc89bbc9 PDF Text Text January 11, 1988 Mr. James Naegle Utah Department of Transportation 4501 So. 2700 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Dear Jim: Thank you for your recent letter concerning my efforts in the Logan Canyon DEIS study. While I appreciate your comments, I find them inconsistent with your actions. After spending the better part of two years attending meetings, reading documents, checking calculations, etc., I consider it an insult not to be provided with a copy of the preliminary DEIS. It cost us (Sierra Club, Audubon Society, Utah Wilderness Association) $20.00 to duplicate the Forest Service copy, which I understand was made available to us only reluctantly and at the insistence of the Forest Service. So much for the good faith of UDOT. I also wish to make some comments on the role of the 10 team in this study. It was agreed early on that all technical memos would be approved by the team. This has not been done. It was my understanding the DEIS would be approved by the team. This is clearly not to be done. Finally, it was also my understanding the 10 team would make recommendations concerning a preferred alternative. Again, this is clearly not to be done. I regard this as a breach of faith by both UDOT and CH2M Hill. The preliminary DEIS has several major problems: I.The Spot Improvement Alternative must be considered as encompassing all 35 spot improvements. It is a violation of NEPA requirements to present a shopping list, with UDOT selecting some number of improvements from the list at a later date. 2.In view of this, there is no environmentally acceptable alternative in the preliminary DElS except No Action. 3.NEPA requirements have not been met with respect to a range of alternatives. The Spot Improvement alternative with all 35 projects at the level described is essentially the same as Alternative C. Unless our alternative (now in the Appendix), or a reasonably similar alternative, is included as a legitimate alternative, we will oppose all alternatives except No Action, or request that the DEIS be rejected as not meeting NEPA requirements. Legal action with respect to this request may also be pursued. I regret the culmination of two years of effort has resulted in this situation. The environmental representatives on the 10. team have repeatedly tried to convince UDOT and CH2M Hill that �their concerns need serious attention. It is clear we have failed, and the present situation must be regarded as adversary. Sincerely, jad;~~1 cL cc:Dale Bosworth Dave Baumgartner Lynn Zollinger Stan Nuffer UWA Rudy Lukez, Sierra Club Steve Flirit, Audubon Society I Jack T. Spence \/ 361 Blvd. Logan, Ut 84321 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/149">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/149</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 4051767304 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 694873 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Dick Carter to Dale Bosworth, April 24, 1987 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Dick Carter to Dale Bosworth about use of the forest plan in the proposed improvements on Logan Canyon. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Carter, Dick Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Environmental policy Government agencies Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-04-24 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_19.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/3b950c464c1594d3f6bd96be50813c5b.pdf 052cbeb23463b406797d49f3ff9f416f PDF Text Text an any n �Logan Canyon Coalition is an organization dedicated to promoting reasonable road improvement while protecting the canyon's scenic and environmental resources. Conservationists' Alternative: favored by: • The three bridges will be replaced. • Maintain present 26 ft. width throughout the Middle Canyon. • No construction into mountains or hillsides is proposed. No retaining walls are necessary. • The dangerous curve at Lower Twin Bridge at the Dugway will be straightened and visibility improved. No other curve cuts are needed. • Highway signs will be added to alert drivers to features of the highway. Logan Canyon Coalition Utah Rivers Conservation Council UPPER CANYON COMPARE The Conservationists' Alternative Guard"tO ,Summit) The "Modified" Preferred Alternative favored by: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Cache Chamber of Commerce JlIDDLE CANYON (Right Hand Fork to Cattle Guard above Ricks Springs) "Modified" Preferred Alternative: • Burnt Bridge, Lower Twin and Upper Twin Bridges will be replaced. • Present width of 26 ft. will be maintained for the first four miles. Above Lower Twin Bridge, the highway will be widened to 34 ft. • To accommodate the wider highway along the Dugway, a 4 to 8 ft. cut will be made into the steep mountain slope for about 3/4 of a mile. A retaining wall is planned for the mountainside. • A turning lane will be constructed at Temple Fork intersection, requiring substantial construction into the hillside. • Straightening the highway will require eight curve cuts in the Middle Canyon. "Modified" Preferred Alternative: • Red Banks bridge and various culverts will be replaced. • Highway width will be 34 ft. to the Beaver Mountain intersection, then 40 ft. continuing on to the summit. • Over six miles of passing lanes will be constructed. One passing lane will be placed in wetlands below the Tony Grove intersection. With passing lanes, the highway below Beaver Mountain will be 44 ft. wide. Above Beaver Mountain, the width will be 47ft. • Vaguely defined "clear zones" will stretch an additional 18 to 22 ft. on either side of the highway. Above Beaver Mountain, the affected area will be 80 ft. wide. • Over 1700 ft. of retaining walls will be constructed along Beaver Creek. • Left and right turning lanes will be constructed at the Tony Grove, Beaver Mountain, Franklin Basin intersections, the Red Banks Campground, UDOT maintenance sheds turnoff, and the Forest Service access road at the summit. • Straightening the highway will create three additional curve cuts. (Continued) �Upper Canyon (Continued) Conservationists' Alternative: • The Red Banks bridge and the culverts will be replaced. • Present highway width of 26 ft. will be maintained. • 1.6 miles of passing lanes will be placed to avoid damage to wetlands. • Left and right turning lanes will be constructed at the Tony Grove and Beaver Mountain intersections. • No curve cuts or retaining walls are proposed. • Highway signs will be added. Comparison Estimated Cost Preferred Alternative: Over $34 Million Conservationists' Alternative: $16 Million Travel Time The difference in average travel time through Logan Canyon between these two alternatives is less than 10 minutes! (UDOT's estimate) Safety • UDOT has not demonstrated that the Preferred Alternative will enhance highway safety. • UDOT engineers have called their safety data "garbage"and "problematic." • The Preferred Alternative will in fact result in a more dangerous highway. A faster, straighter highway will increase the number of severe accidents, including fatalities. Logan Canyon ,i:s currently recognized and listed as a w National Scenic Byway. Environmental and Economic Impacts "Modified" Preferred Alternative: • Over 9 acres of wetlands will be eliminated. • Up to 10% of riverbank vegetation will be removed (UDOT's estimate). • Up to 2000 ft. of rip rap (rock and concrete debris) will be placed along riverbanks at bridges and culverts. • Over 1700 ft. of retaining walls will be constructed, including one for the mountain at the Dugway. • Estimated reduction in scenic values of up to 71 % (UDOT's estimate). • Approximately one-half of the mature Douglas Fir and Limber Pine forest at the summit will be removed. • Unknown impact on trout populations. UDOT's estimate is an uneducated guess based on inadequate data. Construction in the Lower Canyon reduced the trout populations in some areas by 80%. • Unknown impact on wildlife. UDOT has not estimated the increase in vehicle-animal collisions that will result from a faster, straighter highway. • Unknown impact on water quality in Logan River. UDOT has not provided an adequate analysis of increased sedimentation and turbidity. • Unknown impact on local economies. The negative economic impacts of this 15 to 20 year construction project have not been estimated. Conservationists' Alternative: • Minimal environmental impacts. Scenic quality is maintained. • Fish and wildlife are protected. • Safety issues are addressed with viable construction alternatives. • Less construction means minimal negative impacts to local economies. �ou prefer? Logan Canyon Coalition believes that UDOT's construction proposal is a pork barrel project, without demonstrated purpose and need, that will in fact make the highway less safe. It will have extensive and unnecessary environmental and economic impacts. Logan Canyon Coalition is preparing to take legal action. You Can Help! Consider joining the Logan Canyon Coalition, a grassroots organization devoted to protecting Logan Canyon. Please donate to our canyon defense fund. All donations will be used in our legal fight to save Logan Canyon. u Time is running out for LOGAN CANYON! Contact us at: Working for the Protection of Logan Canyon USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 (801) 753-0497 @ Printed on recycled paper � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/150">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/150</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3160133110 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 4298306 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Pamphlet to save Logan Canyon Description An account of the resource Pamphlet to save Logan Canyon. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Logan Canyon Coalition Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Logan Canyon Coalition Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 4 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd4_Item_1.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/622543e71c79983caabcc32fa67014a5.pdf 67cf27adc04ee385ea78b31b0fc949f1 PDF Text Text ��I4l -.004 , ~ . ~-J. ���03 / 30 / 95 141007 LOGAN RANGER DST THU 10:06 FAX 801 755 3639 MESSAGE SCAN FOR STAN MILLER To K.ANDERSON Be STAN MILLER From: STAN MILLER Postmark: Mar 27.95 Status: Certified 1!46 PM Delivered: Mar 27t95 1;46 PM Subject: SPECIALIST REQUEST FOR REISSUANCE OF GRAZING PERMITS. Comments: KATHY: THIS IS OUR INTENT FOR REISSUANCE OF GRAZING PERMITS ON THE LOGAN DISTRICT. IN AN EARLIER DOCUMENT WE FIGURED A MINIMUM OF 2 DAYS/ALLOTMENT FOR EACH SPECIALISTS TIME. WE FIGURED ON MOST WE WOULD NEED AT LEAST 5 DAYS/ALLOTMENT FOR EACH SPECIALIST. THERE WERE A COUPLE OF ALLOTMENTS WITH POOR ACCESS ETC. WHICH WE FIGURED MORE TIME WOULD BE NEEDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS aIVE ME A CALL. STAN -------=;=;;=~~x====---~------- t\c--~ ~ "'- ~ ~>(""'C>"'- - \< ~ ~L.o...- ~ L,U' \.\. \ \.~_"> """"- ~~\\~~ c..D~"~ S~~ ~~fQ...1\J\. . \0 O"'"~""- ~~c:..~ S~o....V\.. ~~~~ ~e.-o.~~, ~u."'\~~~ ~~'P"-~- ~~(e~ ~ov...\~~ ~w..~*lL~"l LovU\.~:1 C6..\A.\O~ t:.lK ~~\\o~ ~\.·c..~S ~~~'oC!.\ E \ \<.. \.)0-" ~~'\ Sou..'",- <:O~o~U,.)oe ~ ~\~~~ \\o\\o~ Lo~ ~ CD'oM,"\."",,~~v..\~ C~Ll.~ -- T\""'"e.~ \V\"'\-<.N\O-~\~ ~e.~c-~ V'C 0. ~-'- ~ "CZ.. ""'--0.. '€.. N\\.\\~~\\~ ~~\.\~ \Zoe-",- w \, \~<i!!C\M:L~~ ~CM..~ t\~~"'- ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~\~ c....o~c'-'~c~ !.. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/151">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/151</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 2886902054 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 7502688 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Reissuance of grazing permits, March 30, 1995 Description An account of the resource Fax from Stan Miller to Kathy Anderson about the reissuance of grazing permits in the Cache Valley and Rich County areas. Also, inlcudes maps of the specific areas. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Miller, Stan Subject The topic of the resource Wilderness areas Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1995-03-30 1995-03-27 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Box Elder County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_6.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/353d2c0f249ddc22f881107f5a0d721a.pdf 2f75124efac04345ff4790cf127e1398 PDF Text Text TRANSPORTATION COMMIS~IO~ EUGENE H. FIND LAY , CPA SAMUEL J . TAYLOR DIRECTOR CHAIRMAN GENE STURZENEGGER, P.E. WAYNE S. WINTERS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR VICE CHAIRMAN R. LAVAUN COX TODD G. WESTON JAMES G. LARKIN ELVA H. ANDERSON SECRETARY UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4501 South 2700 West Salt Lake City, Utah 841 19 December 14, 1987 Rudy Lukez Sierra Club P.O. Box 3580 Logan, Utah 84321 Dear Mr. Lukez: On behalf of the three agencies involved in preparation of the draft EIS for Logan Canyon, I express appreciation for your effort in the study. During a 'meeting on Friday, December 11, the consultant presented a preliminary draft of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S.D.A. Forest Service (Forest Service), and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). Great respect was voiced for your technical and judgmental input and it was recognized as being very beneficial to the study. Fulfillment of the charge given to the 10 team to assemble and review the technical data will have an influence in selection 0 f a preferred al ternati ve. Thank you for your personal dedication of time and money to this effort. Now FHWA , the Forest Service and UDOT will proceed in selecting a preferred al ternati ve considering all issues you have helped identify. Al though the task of the 10 team has been completed, we will be most interested in your comments as the public review process continues. The agencies agreed that since the Draft EIS is still in the development stage, release of the preliminary document might be premature and cause confusion . Therefore, the preliminary draft will not be released at this time but copies will be available at the FHWA in Salt Lake, the Forest Service in Salt Lake and Logan, UDOT in Salt Lake and Ogden, and the consultant's offices in Salt Lake and Logan for review. Thank you again for your efforts in putting together the technical information which makes possible a rational decision on the improvements to be made. E~~or le, ' poEo, Environmental ~~dies RJN/ps � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/152">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/152</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3577483338 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 879286 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from James Naegle to Rudy Lukez, December 14, 1987 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from James Naegle to Rudy Lukez stating the intent to not release the Draft Environmental Impact Statement to avoid any unnecessary confusion. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Naegle, R. James Subject The topic of the resource Environmental policy Logan Canyon Environmental Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-12-14 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 27.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/fa769dd6dde8d2c0de96f2adba06989b.pdf 51408f3328f7cdbaa9a51c4227254d9c PDF Text Text I _ _ Engineers Planners l-::f,~IIII" Economists _ Scientists July 25, 1986 B21163.DO Rudy Lukez P.O. Box 3580 Logan, Utah 84321 The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) has contracted with CH2M HILL to conduct a study of Highway 89 through Logan Canyon. An important part of this work is a public involvement program to inform interested groups and individuals about the study and to obtain citizen input. Your name has been included on our mailing list to receive information. Enclosed is a copy of our first publication, a study introduction. This is intended to explain what the study will entail, why it is being done, and the schedule. The public involvement plan is also described. Please review this and pass it on to others who may be interested. In the future you will receive similar publications and meeting notices regarding the study. Questions concerning the study are encouraged and should be directed to me or Sheldon Barker at CH2M HILL in Salt Lake City (801) 363-0200 or to Gale Larson at Valley Engineering, Inc. in Logan (801) 753-0153. Thank you for your interest and participation. Sincerely, ~~b Stanton S. Nuffer Project Manager SLC79/d.401 Enclosures CH2M HILL Intermountain Region Boise 700 Clearwater Lane, P.o. Box 8748, Boise, Idaho 83707 Salt Lake City Associated Plaza, Suite 500, 349 South 200 East P.o. Box 2218, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 208.345.5310 801 .363.0200 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/153">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/153</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3228110164 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 536285 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Stan Nuffer to Rudy Lukez, July 25, 1986 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Stan Nuffer to Rudy Lukez, explaining that Lukez's name has been included in the mailing list to receive information on Logan Canyon study with an enclosed introduction to the study (not included with this item). Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Nuffer, Stanton S. Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available CH2M Hill (Firm : Salt Lake City, Utah) Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1986-07-25 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 20.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/eb4a38d54c5030179e62c77a81620dde.pdf 1cda352bf5267f06300960657e5c4912 PDF Text Text From __~~e~_~~.--'" ..n. Desmond L L Anderson 107 S 3rd E Logan ur 84321 12 5 J /'L- ~l " IJ~ ~s\ +t> r~ UTAH WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION 455 East 400 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 · �A MEMBER OFTHE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK 632 NORTH MAIN LOGAN , UT 84321 BUS , (801) 752-8571 RES . (801) 752-1041 COLDWeLL BANl(eRm [H REAlTOFr BAUGH & ASSOCIATES I 07 ~ dQ,1+ 1- () G--+ N DESMONDLANDERSON Exec utive Vice President "/I-h!<-t> ~ AS, S ' ] #&1 ' An Independently Owned and Operated Member 01 Coldwell Banker Residentiat Affitiates, Inc. ''!fC- �3NOHd SS3110nV 3WYN Lff1 - 6~[(I081 / 111~8 JJl'h~!J ,)'(<'1 ~1[>$ / 90[1 'nnDS OO~ ~SI?::I SSt ~1IIiii-liia U011D1:lOSSV'---,_. -. sSauJapl1M qDI~n "We can obtain wildlerness under the most difficult political conditions" -- Dick Carter, UW)~ Coordinator The Utah Wilderness Association Our public lands are in danger! Utah's wildlife is fighting to survive the destruction of habitat by energy development, timber sales and overgrazing. Our last stretches of wild river are threatened wiID reservoirs. In every I------~ e ~~--of Utah needless development schemes abound. r· -m ote corner ~ The Utah Wilderness Association has led the battle to preserve the natural values of the public lands in Utah. From the establishment of the Lone Peak Wilderness in 1978 to the Utah Wilderness Act of 1984 and the Bureau of Land Management wilderness n~view, the history of wilderness and preservation in Utah has been the history ofUWA. But UWA's interests go beyond wilderness. We have led the battle to force the Forest Service to reduce timber harvesting in unroaded areas critical to wildlife on the Wasatch, Ashley and Dixie National Forests. We have challenged BLM and Forc~t Service proposals to allow oil and gas exploration in critical roadless areas. 'Ve have fought to protect desert bighorn sheep habitat from been exploited by off road vehicles and overgrazing by domestic livestock. Our efforts are directed at ~every BLM and Forest Service land management plan and proposal. UWA has been at the forefront of public land decisions in Utah. We have a full-time professional staff and an office in Salt Lake City. We have built a volunteer network and as a member you will have an opportunity to participate . in managing your lands. V~on't you join us? Wilderness is the Egljtorne of Multiple Use The last remnants of the~ frontier are the roadless areas of the national forests, parks, wildlife refuges and BLM lands. These places of the West are closing up rapidly due to the orf'.c;sures of development. It is now time to recognize the value of wilderness before it is too late. Wilderness protects resources which may prove to be the most valuable of all--scenic vistas, solitude, wildlife habitat, clean air, undisturbed watersheds and biological diversity. Literally, wilderness provides a buffer to our constant homogenizing of life. The recreation value of wilderness for hiking, hunting, fishing, horse-packing or cross country skiing is obvious. But wilderness also provides ecosystem reserves for research that may improve the quality of life. Wilderness protects the last refuge of wild species such as bighorn sheep, elk, moos(\ black bear, cougaif, pine marten, river otter, wolverine and bald eagle. Ultimately wilderness acts as a barometer of our humaneness. Can we share this planet with majestic mountain ranges, virgin forests and free-flowing rivers? Or must we be the sole inhabitants of a state or a world and be forced to experience the magic of our red rock canyons and mountains in books? Indeed, wilderness is the epitome of multiple use. �The High Uintas Wilderne" s s IhUJtah Wilderness Act of 1984 "High peaks thrust into the sky, snow fields glistening like lakes of molten silver .. .forests and rocklands blended into one grand view. "That's how John Wesley Powell described the High Uintas when he saw them in 1869. The incomparable Uinta Mountains, including King's Peak, Utah's highest, are now protected as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. With 'Wasatch Front areas like Mt Naomi, Timpanogos, Mt. Olympus, Wellsville, Lone Peak and Twin Peaks, and southern Utah areas like Dark Canyon, Box-Death Hollow, the Pine Valley Mts. and Paria Canyon, the Uintas form the foundation of a diverse system of Utah wilderness. Utah's fifteen wilderness areas constitute just 2.5% of our state's public lands. 'The wilderness agenda remains unfulfilled. For example, roadless areas just outside wilderness boundaries are threatened with timber sales and new roads for oil and gas exploration--Iands which should have been included in the wildemess designation. Mill!nremams toDe one. Wil l'i your elp roresf Servlce wilderness designations will continue and the BLM wilderness issue will begin. We; need patience, knowledge of the land and public participation. But of most importance you are needed to initiate the vision and the path toward wilderness ~~!liIP~~~ pr~servation. ~BLM Wilderness Reyiew With millions of acres of roadless country at stake, the BLM wilderness review promises to be the focal point of Utah's wilderness battle for many years to come. UW'A was born with the BLM wilderness review. Initiated in the late 1970s the BLM wilderness review has been a massive undertaking highlighted with controversy. Of 22 million acres of BLM land in Utah the agency originally recommended only 2.6 million acres for wilderness study area (WSA) status. UWA organized the largest forma1l wilderness appeal ever filed (925,000 acres) before the Departtnent of Interior. This appeal and a subsequeI).t UWA appeal resulted in over 600,000 additional acres of wildlands being given wilderness study area status. Unfor1tunately, the problems did not stop there. Of these 3.2 million aCf(~S of WSAs BLM has preliminarily recommended a mere 1.9 million acres for wilderness designation, an ar~~ smaller than Yellowstone National Park. U\VA has countered with a wilderness proposal on BLM lands in nine integral ecological regions: the West Desert featuring the "island" ecosystems of the 12,000 foot Deep Creek Mts. and other Great Basin Ranges; the renowned river running and wildlife-rich DesolationlBook Cliffs country; the San Rafael, a composite of Utah's canyon country and proposed for years as a national park; the high plateaus and deep canyons of the Kaip~nrowits Plateau; the Escalante's unspoiled redrock canyons; the geologically and ecologically unique Henry Mts.; the incised canyons of the Dirty Devil/Canyonlands country, including the lower Green River, the Colorado River and the Dirty Devil as well as all of the country surrounding Canyonlands National Park; the archeologically rich Grand Gulch Plateau; and the diverse slickrock canyons and ponderosa pine plateaus of the Zion/Cannan Mt. region. Ow: desert lands literally represent the most unique places on this earlth. They hold a secret of survival, an aesthetic resource unmatched and they tell us of our past. They hold the potential for large and ecologically intact additions to the wilderness system. With your help we can preserve these lands. lmAT OTHERS THINK OF JJWA: "Thl~ UWA does a good, effective and essential job in defending what remains of the most beautiful and unusual landsc:ape in the U.S. The UWA deserves the support of all Americans who care about our best traditions." Edward ~[ "Th~e UWA has sought reasonable solutions to complex public lands issues and has provided a vital counterpoint to traditional government and industry views. UW A has impressed us with its persistent and effective work on behalf of Utah wild lands." Governor Scott Matheson "Th~e UW A has worked skillfully and dil igently over the years to protect the best natural areas in the state, and its success is nearly unbelieveable. Without the UW A we would not have had a Utah Forest Service wilderness bill in 1984." Joe Hauman. Deseret News Environmental Writer ~{jL-." ~' . ~~ ~h lt~~7d~ .. I"-=. i. 1:'; ~~ Ci [" ~ W' .. vv ,,-,SIDe IN J1 W a ~(, ~ d . .-l 6.ft-JAA1l 'oj) cI I/{.., invite you to join in this effort . . the hi-monthly UW A Review and freque ( ":>-/, ~ 11 - ~ rec.eiVe::=:=()r;:;;I_yr&~t;1 ler lit, 7r~ Ucut.i/o&, A members ssue alerts. UW A hosts an annual rendezvous which has featured Ed Abbey, Barry Lopez, Governor Scott Matheson, Senator Jake Gam, Rod Nash, Phil Fradkin, Michael Frome and a host of others. UW A workshops, river trips, seminars, the poetry contest and other events offer ~!S to meet people and get involved. Please join with us! , .(J iJ) . a mI 0 o Tax deductible donatio I 11 $ ~ ~ ----~~ 4 L ')P a..# ~~ . t1-:? " �455 East 400 South t306/Salt Lake City,UT 84111/(801}359-1337 November 1988 Dear friend of Utah wilderness: As a friend and supporter of Utah's outdoors, you know of our state's incredible natural treasures. From the power of the roaring Colorado in Canyonlands National Park to the 13,000 ft. peaks of the High Uintas; from the archaeologically unique Grand Gulch to the slickrock canyons of the Escalante; from the wildlife-rich Book Cliffs to the island ecosystems of the Great Basin mountain ranges; no other state is so richly endowed with this diversity of wildlands. Indeed, our quality of life centers upon these treasures. The survival of these wild places cannot be taken for granted. During the past two years, the Forest Service has initiated damaging logging, roading and oil and gas exploration in exceptional wildlands on the North Slope of the High Uinta Mountains .... On the spectacular San Rafael Swell, uncontrolled off-road vehicle use is threatening bighorn sheep populations and damaging the Swell's fragile soils and many threatened and endangered plant species ... .In eastern Utah's Book Cliffs, the Bureau of Land Management wants to open one-half million acres of critical wildlife habitat and potential wilderness to oil and gas development. ... Along the Wasatch Front, overdevelopment threatens to urbanize our canyons by expanding into the few remaining undeveloped areas. You get the picture--if we, you and I, don't act to protect our wildlands, the things we love most about Utah are going to disappear. That's why I'm asking you to join the Utah Wilderness Association. UWA is Utah's most effective voice for sound public land management. In 1980 we intitiated the first major push for Forest Service wilderness designation in Utah. And in 1984 we found success in the passage of the Utah Wilderness Act. The Act may have been the single most important piece of conservation legislation in our state's history. It designated 12 wildernesses, led by the massive High Uintas Wilderness and including areas as diverse and unique as Mt. Naomi, Mt. Olympus, Twin Peaks, Deseret Peak, Mt. Nebo, Dark Canyon, Box-Death Hollow and a host of others. Today that battle continues with our efforts focussing on protecting areas which should have been designated wilderness in 1984. They include additions to the North Slope of the Uintas, the Whiterocks River drainage on the eastern end of the range, the Mt. Watson area on the western end, The Tushar Mts., Wayne Wonderland, additions to the Pine Valley Mts. Wilderness and others. In late-1986 we appealed the Dixie and Manti-LaSal forest plans because they failed to protect important unroaded areas. The result of the appeals? After more than a year of negotiations, over 300,000 acres of unroaded areas are now protected from logging, ORV use and other surface disturbing activities! But it won't end there. We will never back away from our decade-long commitment to designate as Wilderness all deserving lands on our national forests. �In 1980, with the BlM wilderness review floundering due to BlM's timid attitude toward preserving wilderness, we organized the largest formal appeal ever filed before the Department of Interior--925,000 acres. As a result, 90% of these lands were kept in the BlM wilderness review. The 3,000-page appeal, dotted with hundreds of maps and photos and written by over 100 affiants, wound its way through the appeal process for four years. During that time over 800,000 acres were put back into the wilderness inventory. In March 1985, after five years in the making, UWA's visionary proposal for almost 4 million acres of wilderness on Utah's BlM lands was released. The proposal focusses on nine integral geographical and ecological regions within the state in order to assure preservation of our most important biological and recreational areas. It also has the endorsement of a host of environmental groups within Utah. But gaining congressional support will not be easy. We'll need your help to assure that Utah's world-class desert wilderness will get the protection it deserves. The Utah Wilderness Association works on more than just designating wilderness. We have led the battle to prevent overcutting of timber on our national forests and overgrazing on all public lands. We have fought agency proposals to allow oil and gas exploration in critical roadless areas. We have battled to protect bighorn sheep from exploitation by off-road vehicles. We have fought for wildlife and wild rivers. And we do all of this with an active and vocal membership. We conduct fieldtrips and workshops ranging from wilderness role-playing events to special presentations on Utah's predators. We prepare a bi-monthly newsletter, the UWA Review. Every year we host a membership rendezvous and conduct seminars with a variety of guest speakers such as Ed Abbey, Barry lopez, Roderick Nash, Michael Frome and Phil Fradkin, Congressman Wayne Owens, Senator Jake Garn and former Governor Scott Matheson. We sponsor an annual poetry contest which receives hundreds of entries from throughout the West. By joining the Utah Wilderness Association not only do you contribute toward the preservation of wilderness but you gain the opportunity to learn a lot about the issues and how to get involved. NOT A BAD DEAL FOR $20 A YEAR! The future of our public lands depends upon our willingness to act. Those who want to exploit these lands purely for economic gain will certainly be heard. As a member of UWA you can be sure your voice will also be heard. Best regards, ~~ Dick Carter Coordinator �,. t � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/154">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/154</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 2882706457 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 4992458 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Corresponsence from Utah Wilderness Association to Desmond Anderson, February 2, 1989 Description An account of the resource Corresponsence from Utah Wilderness Association to Desmond Anderson explaining the benefits of membership with the Utah Wilderness Association. Anderson agrees to join so long as the UWA opposes UDOT's proposed changes to Logan Canyon. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Carter, Dick Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Anderson, Desmond L. Subject The topic of the resource Wilderness areas Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah Wilderness Association Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1989-02-02 1988-11 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Utah United States Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_7.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/2450d6fe4614645d30d1695b96b69090.pdf e1d6c57af142bec0820a55d2858a7cf3 PDF Text Text UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Logan Ranger District P.O. Box 448 Logan, Utah 84321 7750 December 20, 1979 Ms. Marta Tollerup P.O. Box 3561 Logan, Utah 84321 L Dear Ms. Tollerup: Your letter of November 24, 1979 on the realignment of the Logan Canyon Highway has been referred to our office by the Branch Chief of Recreation. In reply to your questions: There would be changes in the China Row picnic site, Woodcamp campground, Cottonwood picnic site, Twin Bridges campground, and two summer recreation residences. All of these facilities could be affected by road construction in one way or another. According to the Environmental Analysis Re port for the Third ~hase of Construction of th e Logan Can y on Hi ghway the following recommendations were made : 22. Pres e rve the Ch i na Row Sprin g and provide roadside turn-out sp a c e fo r t wo automobiles. 23. Desi gn suitabl e a cc e s s int o th e new hi ghway at the followin g locations: a. b. c. d. e. f. Ri ght Fork Road Junc t i on W o dcamp Re c r e ation Site o Lo gan Cave Parking Co tt onwood Ca n yo n Re crea tion Site Brach iopod Summe r Re cre ation Area Twi n Brid ge s Re creation Sit e The Logan Cave p a rkin g and the Cottonwood Canyon Recreation Site parking can b e combined into one parkin g area. Attached are copies of three page s covering Recreation and Aesthetics out of the En v ironmental Analysis Report on the Logan Canyon Highway. I would like t o call your attention to the list of turn-outs and parking ar e as for use by people fishing, bird watching, etc. These p o pular pull-outs wo uld b e preserved if at all possible. 6200- 11 (1 /69) ;. .. .:.........A '- �Possible uses of excess cut material from the proposed Third Phase Highway Improvement program may be similar to previous phases or hauled out of the canyon. We have looked at and are still looking at possible beneficial uses should the road work be undertaken. The Cowley Canyon road could benefit from additional material to improve the driving surface as well as to lift the road above the drainage channel and improve water quality. There may also be a similar opportunity for improvement to the Temple Fork road. There may also be an opportunity to utilize clean rock to stabilize stream channels in Logan Canyon and side drainages. Perhaps the fisheries of Logan River, Right Fork, and Temple Fork could be impro v e d with appropriat ely designed structures utilizing clean rock. There may be other uses as well, but environmental assessments of each would be necessary before any undertaking. The same with any actual waste sites selected. Some waste disposal sites looked at to date include the Twin Bridges, both the upper and lower end; the Woodcamp area; the draw immediately below. the lower bridge at Twin Bridges; and the bench at the present site of the Logan Cattle Allotment corral. There has been no definite selection as yet and there would be an environmental assessment made to determine if there is an appropriate waste site. Attached is a copy of the past ten year's recreational use Logan Canyon. These figures represent the visitor day use the boundaries of the canyon. The definition of a visitor is one individual for a period of 12 hours or some type of combination. in within day similar If you have any questions on the above information or any other question pertaining to this subject, please call the of f ice or feel free to stop \ in and look at the Environmental An a lysis Report. Sincerely, ~?7Zj ; ): 0 _ 1'_ -vv~ ) M. J. Roberts District Forest Ranger Attachments f~'---::'­ l.: ' ~' , .. �-20- Recreation and Aesthettcs Oltdoor life is a fundamental part of the A!l'lerican tradition. There is a des:Lre in most people for opportunities to have direct contact with nature and the outdoor elements. Logan Canyon is fa!l'led for its natural beauty and scenic features. Major attractions are the beautiful Logan River winding down canyon through lush green vegetation of the spring and SUll:ner and the brilliant flaming colors of the fall season . There are magnificient scenes of rugged mountains rising abruptly from the canyon bottom that is barely wide enough to accommodate the river and the canyon highway. And there are picturesque rock outcrops into which are growing evergreen and mountain shrubbery. A good variety of wildlife abounds in the canyon and can often be seen by !l'lotorists travelling into the canyon. Deer and elk winter at lower elevations and ~ny sightseers make the trip into the canyon to watch these an i ~ls browsing and !l'loving about i n their natural habitat. SOlIe water fowl can be seen propagating young in the !l'lore still waters of Logan R.iver. The geology of Logan Canyon is very interesting because of the variety of natural features such as Ricks Spring, the Arches or Wind Caves, the China Wall, which is an exposed li~estone fault, the Logan Cave and the Brachiopod Rock. Dlring a drive through Logan Canyon one passes by an ancient aquarium of fossilized plant and anill8.1 life. Land forms are present that give evidence of the once present Lake Bonneville. Still growing after more than 3,200 years on a rocky crag overlooking Logan Canyon is the great Rocky Mountain Juniper, Jardine. People living in New York, Los Angeles, and other parts of the country have telephoned the Logan Ranger's Office to inquire ~~ of the turning of fall colors so they can properly time a trip to see the canyon in its most vivid colors. ~, Recreation values are very high in Logan Canyon. The canyon is within one and one-half hours driving ti~e fro:n the State Capitol and is used extensively by Utah people as well as by vacationeers fro~ all parts of the country. The recreatton Use continues to increase each year as more and more people travel to the canyon. Approximately 336,000 visits were made to the recreation areas in Logan Canyon during 1969, most of which were campers and picnickers. In addition to these visits, :TIany people enjoyed fishing, hunting, sightseeing, swi:n~ing, skiing, hiking, cycling, nature study, photography, horseback riding, berry picktng, -and use of SU~!11er hO!11es located in the canyon. Highway 89 through the canyon has beco!!le a popular route for tourists travelli.ng to other National Forests and National Parks such as the Yellowstone and Teton area ·. Logan Canyon is -well-known for ' i ts natural beauty. It is es·p ecially beautiful i n the fall when leaves are changing color. There are 26 developed forest recreation sites in Logan Can,yon, 8S suamer cabins on National Forest land and 7 on private land in the canyon, L~ organi ·z at ion camps, one major developed winter sports area, and 2 lodges, one of which is on private land. Even with this nU!l'lber of developed recreation sites, there still are not nearly enough to ~eet public demands and it is eSsential that encroachl1ent onto f$;'.'1I~' ~}(' ~;. ,~.- " ��3. Station 666 • Across from Wood 4. Station 675 - Above Wood 5. Station 698 - Bend below Burnt Bridge 6. Station 706 7. Station 718 - Approaching Burnt Bridge 8. Station 725 - Above Burnt Br1.dge 9. Station 755 - Logan Cave Ca~p Ca~p 10. Station 761 - Cottonwood (South) 11. Station 763 - 12. Station 709 - Below Brachiopod (North) 13. Station 770 - (South) Below Brachiopod 14. Station 793 - (North) Bend above Brachiopod 15. Station 796 - (South) Bend above Brachiopod 16. Station 802 - Bend below Twin Bridges 17. Station 809 - (North) Just below 'I\Jln Bridges 18. Station 810 19. Station 821 - Cut just below Twin Bridges 20. Station 835 - Twin Bridges ~uth Cotton\lood (South) Just below Twin Bridges Durtng construction, access roads should be kept open to recreation sites including summer recreation residences and adequate and safe access to these sites must be developed in conjunction with the high\lay i~rove~ent project. ~ Narrow bands of vegetation presently separa.te the highway fro~ recreation sites and residences. Roa.d construction will remove 'portions of this vegetative screen and every effort should be :nade to protect or restore the screening. Abandoned road sections should be obliterated, and revegetated to restore as near to natural conditions as practical. The aesthetic value will be subjected to intensive change by the rightof-way cleartqg. Careful attention must be given to this operation to preserve individual trees and shrubs on the fringe of the clearing boundary. Tree stUT.pS should be cut as near ground surface as possible where stumps are not taken out c~mpletely. Trees taken out with the right-or-way clearing can best ~ disposed of by chipping the branches and cutting the trunk into lengths of 8 feet or less and stockpiling for campground use . . - ~ �Recreation Use- Logan Canyon Management Composite Year 1969 Visitor-Day Use 1000) 208. 7 Recreation Visitor (x 1000) ex 1970 220.0 1971 228.2 1972 264.4 1973 295.3 1974 308.5 1975 210.3 249.8 1976 317.6 270.6 1977 357.7 266.3 1978 37 L 4 •• 300.1 1979 398.8 334.1 I 1 ~ I I I , ! 1 i "/ II 12/19/79 ' \" F.R.L. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/155">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/155</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 1052141489 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 4283387 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from M.J. Roberts to Marta Tollerup, December 20, 1979 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from M.J. Roberts to Marta Tollerup discussing the changes to China Row picnic site, Woodcamp campground, Cottonwood picnic site, Twin Bridges campground, and two summer recreation residences including the aspects of recreation and aesthetics of these locations. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Roberts, M.J. Subject The topic of the resource Outdoor recreation Logan Canyon (Utah) Traffic engineering Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available United States. Forest Service Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1979-12-20 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 28 Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_7.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/6e640579d9935024a7c82173bb63b30f.pdf 2a212dab91711c6e28a9254fd6d7eaf6 PDF Text Text transportation news Contact: Kim Morris 965-4390 August 1, 1986 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE STUDY PLANNED FOR LOGAN CANYON US 89 in Logan Canyon is suffering from old age. Bridges and road surfaces have deteriorated to the point that major repairs are needed. The Utah Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the United States Forest Service, commissioned the consulting firm of CH2M Hill to help develop a plan to address the present and future needs of the road through the canyon. The study, which began in early June, will analyze transportation needs, conduct location studies and prepare an environmental analysis of potential improvements. Similar studies have been done in the past, but none which go to the extent of this analysis. The current study differs from previous efforts in that neither the project alternatives nor the preferred alternative have been defined. Results of the study will aid in selecting a highway plan for the canyon. Use of a third party consultant is expected to add credibility and objectivity to the project. 1 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (more) 4501 South 2700 West 109 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Phone 965-4104 �A public involvement plan has also been included to provide an opportunity for improved two-way communication during the study. CH2M - Hill plans to use news releases, fact sheets, town meetings and group meetings to explain the various project alternatives and to hear concerns of citizens. According to L. Sheldon Barker, Utah area manager of CH2M Hill, the study should be completed in the summer of 1987. # KB/jj # # 109 1 ( � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/156">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/156</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3137156444 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 884010 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource UDOT transportation news for study of Logan Canyon Description An account of the resource UDOT transportation news for study of Logan Canyon and the public involvement meeting to be held to better improve the canyon. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Morris, Kim Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Barker, Sheldon Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Logan Canyon Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1986-08-01 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 21.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/dcdf2ec0c0be7aaf4c543c23d4062d42.pdf fedd069da0646cbe5e5093ede8f28b18 PDF Text Text If / �� Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/157">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/157</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 4032967712 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 269162 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Discussion with Dale Bosworth about Forest Plan and EIS, May 1, 1987 Description An account of the resource Discussion with Dale Bosworth about the consistency of the Forest Plan with the draft environmental impact statement. Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Environmental policy Government agencies Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-05-01 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_18.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/d4a53434e33ed17e552386db7cbf3903.pdf 60c41e1ee105eb90c65d9191e6745aa4 PDF Text Text EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BEAR RIVER ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Roger C. Jones _ 170 North Main Logan, Utah 84321 (801) 752-7242 Box Elder, Cache, Rich Counties CHAIRMAN Jay A. Monson Harch 28, 1987 Rudy Lukez P.O. Box 423 Logan, UT 84321 Dear Rudy, Enclosed are the two documents you requested: 1. 2. My analysis of the Logan Canyon improvement issue for use by the BRAG Governing Board in commenting for the scoping meetings; and Comments in letter form from the Board. Please note that Cindy Yurth's article in the Herald Journal was incorrect. The Board did not "suggest" improvements. Rather, they asked UDOT to consider the entire range of improvements. They wish to see what the impacts of the alternatives will be before endorsing one or another alternative. Also be aware that Jack Spence has made several comments on my analysis. Specifically, he thinks: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. I understated the role which the Forest Service will play; no mention was made that some people want the highway designated as a national scenic highway; the USFS will not allow a 40 mph highway; I was not clear that most of the traffic occurs only in summer; it 1'5 wrong to be concerned with safety issues for which there is no data (such as ' whether bicyclists are deterred from using the highway by a "feeling" of danger);' , Figure 2 ' is improper since it does not show that most ·of the accidents occur in only a few spots. Suffice it to say that Jack and I disagree on several of ':t-hese polnts, which I would be happy to discuss with you at iyour convenience. I do think the BRAG Governing Board is taking a ' responsible position on this' issue. . They want all of the suggested al ternati ves analyzed because they have constituents who come from both extremes on these- issues. Once the draft EIS is developed and CH2H Hill presents the results in a meaningful way, I think the Board will adopt a reasonable and responsible position. trul Y, ¥i . Bry Box Elder County Frank 0 , Nishiguchi Don E. Chase James J . White Larry Howe ll Peter C , Knudson ... !i))~ Dixon GOVERNING BOARD Cache County Bruce G . King Jay A. Monson, Chairman Darrel J . Gibbons Newel Daines Bruce Darley Rich County Ken Brown Blair R. Francis Dee Johnson Rick Argyle, V. Chairman Bryce Nielson �~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Roger C . Jones BEAR RIVER ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ~. ~.~. " .Ox Elder, Cache, Rich 170 North Main Logan, Utah 84321 (801 ) 752·7242 Counties CHAIRMAN Jay A . Monson March 17, 1987 James Naegle Utah Department of Transportation 4501 South 2700 West Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Dear Mr. Naegle, On behalf of the Governing Board of the Bear River Association of Governments, I would like to comment on the scope of the environmental analysis being undertaken for the proposed improvements to State Highway 89 through Logan Canyon. As you may know, BRAG is charged with reviewing projects being undertaken in northern Utah which may affect more than one community. As such, we feel it our responsibility to ensure that all of the interests of our citizens are represented, and therefore offer these comments. ) The highway through Logan Canyon serves our citizens as both a recreational resource and a major arterial. Rich and Cache Counties rely on many of the same attributes. The canyon is itself a scenic resource for those driving through, and also provides access to more active forms of recreation such as fishing, hunting, hiking, skiing, etc., as well as access to the recreation resources around Bear Lake. These resources benefit our citizens directly, but also attract tourism, on which we rely for part of our local economy. Logan Canyon is also a critical link for almost 10,000 residents from around Bear Lake (from Utah, Idaho and .:Wyoming) · to. the amenities and necessities offered by Cache Valley (such as access to emergency health care). Hence, we feel our ci~izens want to preserve the aesthetic value of the canyon, but not so much that the transportation capabilities deteriorate to unsafe or seriously inconvenient levels. We recognize that, as the population naturally increases, the dema nds on the highway:.:will increase, and we should attempt to foresee this demand and compromise between the need to preserve a pristine environment and the desire for maximum convenience. It is difficult, however, to favor a particular alternative without knowing the probable impact of our choices. We therefore wish to make the following requests: 1. 2. Please proceed as rapidly as possible to repair or rep l ace those bridges in the canyon which are deteriorating or are narrower than the existing roadway. In the middle section of the canyon between Right Hand Fork and Ric ks Springs, please conside r an alternatives which increase the design spee d from the existing minimum of 25 mph t o 35 or 40 mph. rio >.. boer C.O U nt ~. r- r ~} !lri 0 r4 ,. . l1lquCI :: i It .r. ~ _ L T' d" J<1rTit , :- . i I V lln l l (' ~rr~' HI.)',• •. .' y' '' lt '!' C t-\IHl{l':> P" GO V ER N ING B O ARD Cac h e C oun t\,! bru c!.: G . h m·c Jjl \1 A Mon~ ll n . Chj~lrn"\tJ l) /).,, 11:1 J (;" , ()O"~I ".J.. ""' ! U.un,· Hl tHl ' [)..,l lt'? Rich Count~..' b l.1!! K f ra rK!> Un JonllM Hl Hu " t\1 ~ ;" . \ ' Chdlr n ),,' . ~ "'C (" N " 'I~() �James Naegle March 17, 1987 Page 2 3. 4. 5. In the section between Ricks Springs and the summit of the canyon, please consider alternatives which W9uld increase design speeds to 60 mph. In the section between the summit of the canyon and Garden City, please consider alternatives which increase the design speeds to either 40 or 50 mph, but which use the existing alignment as much as possible. Please consider turnouts at frequent intervals and changes in highway patrol policies which would ensure that slow moving vehicles would allow trailing vehicles to pass. Please consider passing lanes where the canyon allows but which do not require severe cuts. Finally, please analyze the impacts to the aesthetic and ecological character of the highway necessary to achieve these improvements to driving safety and convenience and inform us in a way which allows us to determine how severe the impacts might be. We will then be much more able to tell you which compromises would serve our citizens the best. We look forward to your timely report. ·.- • Yours truly, ~cff! ./ -yJ.4 ·//I/)~ Jd A. Monson Chairman Bear River Association of Governments �LOGAN HIGHW PROJECT AY STATUS fu~D IS SUES Prepared for Elected Officia l s i n the Bear River Reg i on Februar y 18, 1987 Bryan Dixon Ck Y ON ~ The proposed improvements to state Route 89 through Logan Canyon have generated substantial controversy. However, those "for improvements" and those "against improvements" may agree more than f irst appears. Most residents in Cache and Rich Counties wou l d probably favor some improvements to the highway. The road is very narrow in places, and several bridges are obviously deteriorating. The fundamental disagreements concern the extent of work which should be undertaken. Neither opponents nor proponents wish to see the beauty of the canyon marred by thoughtless construction, neither want decisions thrust upon them, yet both want safety and convenience. Whether one considers the canyon primarily as a recreational resource or a transportation corridor is perhaps the main determinant of one's support for major improvements. The process of public review requisite in any federally supported highway project provides opportunities for individual opinions, prejudices and wishes to influence what will eventually be done. There will be a separate public hearing for local elected officials to provide input, in order to ensure that a broad constituency - not just the most vocal - is heard. Indeed, the fact that everyone should have the same opportunity to influence the project is one of the privileges and treasures of American society. This analysis is intended to summarize the status and major issues surrounding the project, and encourage the informed debate necessary for the public interest to be fair+y articulated. Introduction to the Federal Environmental Review Process Part of the review required of any major federal project is that the impacts on the environment be considered. The intent is primarily to prevent agencies from ignoring those impacts. However noble, the environmental review process (as indeed could any process) has been abused in the past to stall projects, despite reasonable opportunities for public input. In the case of Logan Canyon, the decision whether to do an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has not yet been made. Although the Utah Department of Transportation has conducted a number of analyses so far, the period for constructive public input is just beginning. There will be a public hearing for elected officials Wednesday, March 4, 1987 at 10:00 a.m. in the Logan City Hall, 255 North Main, Logan. Hearings for the general public are scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on March 3 in the Mountain Fuel Auditorium and at 7:00 p.m. on March 4 in the Garden City Hall. History of the Project (See the attached map for geographical references.) 1961 Road widened and straightened from mouth of Logan Canyon to Dewitt Springs. 1968 Redesign work from Right Hand Fork to Ricks Springs completed. 1969 Road widened and straightened from Dewitt Springs to Right Hand Fork. 1969 National Environmental Policy Act enacted, requiring that all "major federal projects having a significant impact on the environment" draft a �1972 1979 1980 1986 statement desc r i bing t he env i ronment a l impacts a nd poss ible w ays to mitigate t hose impacts. Federa l Highway A dministration (FHWA ) determ i ned that a f our l ane hi ghway through Logan Canyon would require an EIS. Project from Right H and For k to G arden City down-si zed f rom f our l ane h i ghway to lane widening from 22 feet t o 34 feet; i ncrease from 35 mph t o 40 mph design speed. FHWA r eclassified the project t o requ ir e onl y an EA. Environmental analysis suspended while guidelines relating to ErS's were amended. Project resumed, environmental analyses continued. The Environmenta l Review Process For Logan Canyon The principal concern of the proponents is the schedule. They believe the road should be improved, and are frustrated by the possibility of endless delays caused by meaningless reviews. In fact, Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) officials have estimated that if an EIS is deemed necessary the schedule could ta ke one extra year. The delay is due primarily to the increased time for review by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA ) in Washington - as opposed to only regional FHWA review required for an EA. UDOT fully intends to do some work on the canyon road, however. In anticipation of the possibility of significant impacts, UDOT has approached the project as if it would require an EIS, with public input, environmental analyses and intensive review at the level required by an EIS. If possible, they wish to limit FHWA review to an EA. The decision whether to require an EIS will be made by the FHWA after some prelimi nary work is completed. UDOT will narrow the range of desired alternatives by soliciting public input (in scoping meetings in March). They will then complete enough design work on a few alternatives to determine the scale of the environmental impacts of each. These, together with a "preferred alternative" will be reported in a "preliminary" Draft Environmental Impact statement. This preliminary DEIS will be distributed for public comment. The results of this DEIS will determine the depth of subsequent review. If the environmental impacts are not significant or can be mitigated, the FHWA may decide that an Environmental Assessment would suffice. If so, the DEIS will be published as the Final Environmental Assessment and the final design work will be completed, and construction begun. If, after the preliminary DEIS is completed, the FHWA believes that the project is too controversial or the impacts are significant or cannot be entirely mitigated, they may require the completion of an EIS. In this case, the public comments on the preliminary Draft Ers will be incorporated into a final Draft EIS. The final Draft EIS will be reviewed by not only the regional FHWA, but also by the Washington, D.C. office. (It is this latter process which could add up to a year to the project.) After FHWA review is completed, the Final ErS, together with the chosen alternative, and an explanation as to how the public's comments have been addressed will be published. Final design work will be completed and construction will follow. 2 �UDOT officials have estimated the time necessary for the environmental review. They estimate t hat the preliminary Draft Ers could be completed by summer of 1987. If the impacts are not judged significant or can be mitigated, the EA will be published, final design work could begin in September 1987, with construction beginning in spring of 1988. If an EIS is judged to be necessary, the Draft EIS could be submitted to FHWA in July 1987 , with a fina l decision on an alternative in early summer of 1988. Design work could then be completed i n fall 1988, and construction could begin in spring 1989. Alternatives Being Considered UDOT believes that some work is inevitable. In fact, the "no action" alternative includes repair or replacement of four bridges. These four bridges include Burnt Bridge, Lower and Upper Twin Bridge, and the Logan River Bridge (Red Banks Bridge at mile 394.5). Whether more extensive alternatives will be pursued depends primarily on whether the public wants grEater design speeds, increased parking capacity, and passing lanes. Because different sections have different degrees of sensitivity, preliminary alternatives ' have been outlined for each section (note that a four lane highway is no longer being considered): Section I: Right Hand Fork to Ricks Springs A. No action (includes bridge repair/replacement) B. spot improvements such as turnouts, parking, minor realignments, perhaps a climbing lane between Lower and Upper Twin bridges C. Widening along existing alignment and spot improvements D. Widening and new alignments with spot improvements to increase design speeds to 35-40 mph Section 2: Ricks Springs to Summit of Canyon A. No action (includes bridge repair/replacement) B. spot improvements such as turnouts, parking, minor realignments, ,and climbing lanes along existing alignments D. Widening and new alignments with spot improvements to increase design speeds to 50-60 mph Section 3: Summit of Canyon to Garden City A. No action (includes bridge repair/replacement) B. spot improvements such as turnouts, parking, minor realignments, and climbing lanes along existing alignment D. Widening existing alignments with spot improvements to increase design speeds to 35-40 mph E/F. Widening along one of two new alignments north of existing highway to increase design speeds to 40-50 mph (existing road to be maintained by Rich County) G. Widening along new alignment south of existing highway to increase design speeds to 40-50 mph (existing road to be maintained by Rich County) Justification for Improvements A major point of debate is whether to increase design speeds by straightening curves and widening the road. Important factors include: 1) public safety, 2} convenience, and 3) environmental degradation. 3 �UDOT and CH2M Hill (the firm hired to write the DEIS) have assembled data on accidents and traffic volumes in Logan Canyon. However, the data are not conclusive because of i ncomp l ete records, l imited number of data collection points, and l ack of similar data comparing Logan Canyon with other canyons. (That is, given that accidents occur, how serious is the problem?) Figure 1 was produced from data published by UDOT and CH2M Hill and shows average number of accidents per mile during 1980-35 for each of the 13 sections designated f rom Logan to Garden City. If the data are reliable, the sections between Right Hand Fork and Ricks Springs are clearly the most hazardous, as evidenced by a much higher than average number of accidents per mile. Figure 2 brea ks down the accidents in each section by type. The major type of accident in almost every section of the canyon is simply running off the road. This cause greatly exceeds other causes in the Right Hand Fork-Ricks Springs sections. Hitting other vehicles occurs primarily at intersections such as Franklin Basin (Section 2c). Hitting animals is the major cause only in Sections 2a and 2b, where the road is relatively straight and open, but where there is also open range. (Data on the type of animal struck was not available.) The calculations of ' accidents per mile are not entirely reliable because the only traffic counter in the canyon was at the Card Guard Station in "Section Ob" (moved in 1982 to west of Garden City). It is unknown, for example, how many motorists from Logan turn around before reaching Garden City. Some have concluded that there are not in fact many serious accidents - there were only five fatalities and 86 incapacitating injuries between 1980 and 1985, out of almost 4 million trips in the canyon. The rest of the 512 accidents involved property damage or minor injuries. However, "danger" is the possibility of accident. There is no way to know what price this exacts on the mental well-being of drivers, bicyclists, or pedestrians. There is certainly some value in reducing this danger. And, even though no data are available, it seems intuitive that many may avoid sections of Logan Canyon during certain times or seasons simply due to the threat of accident. A factor not measured is public convenience. While Cache County residents may use Logan Canyon primarily for recreation, some residents in Rich County depend on the road for access to medical, retail and other services not found in Rich County. For them, Logan Canyon may represent more of a barrier to the essentials of life than an avenue to recreation, especially during winter. Lacking good data either on comparable seriousness of accidents or perceived inconvenience, UDOT has tried to determine what improvements should be made based on the desired "level of service" (a partially subjective scale of driving convenience) and projections of traffic volumes. These could then be compared to standards used by traffic engineers. If valid, it may be possible to base construction alternatives on a rational model of service quality desired by drivers. They have attempted to project traffic volumes to the year 2010 by extrapolating from historical data. Unfortunately, not only are there inadequate traffic counts, but the period to be forecast is several times longer than the period over which data has been collected, making oxtrapolat · ons en'QUS at best. Moreover/ there is disagreement about what kind of funct i on would best fit the data. UDOT suggests an exponential extrapolation, but assumes an upward sloping curve, and offers no theoretical 4 �reason why that curve is better than some other curve (such as an exponential curve with an ex ponent le ss than one which would imply that traffic volumes would approach some upper limit, or asymptote). In the end, UDOT has concluded that the level of service is already very low during the summer (presently "D"), with sUbstantial delays due to the volume of traffic and the numbers of recreational vehicles. (See Table 1 for descriptions of Levels of Service.) Any of the population and traffic projections with any of the viable road improvement alternatives preclude the best levels of service. In an effort to maintain a level with only "noticeable ... passing impediments" during normal traffic flows, and delays no more than 60\ of the time during heavy flows (i.e. "C"), UDOT believes it will be necessary to widen lanes and shoulders, and provide turnouts and passing lanes to enable autos to pass recreational vehicles in the summer. The crucial question is where would such improvements be acceptable in the canyon. Although these needs could be met with improvements to Logan Canyon, there is also value in preserving the beauty of the Canyon, part of which comes from a narrow, confined corridor. Unfortunately, changes to the road such as excessive bank cuts, lane widening or passing lanes (in some places) might reduce scenic vistas and destroy a feeling of seclusion created by vegetation and steep rock walls close to the road. The tight twisting nature of the road might help some people forget the hectic pace of life left in the city. Campers and hikers near the road would certainly not appreciate greater road noise from higher speeds. Fishermen wish to leave the river unchanneled and free, making for better trout habitat. Some have mentioned an endangered plant in the canyon (though it is still unclear it road changes would in fact threaten the plant). Summary The ideal alternative is clearly a compromise between the additional safety and inconvenience of a major widening, and the desire to preserve interesting vistas and drives. Since the data on traffic projections and levels of service are inexact at best, the decision will depend heavily on public input during the Draft Environmental Impact Statement phase. In closing, however, it should be noted that the real delays may come when funding for construction is sought. Elected officials concerned about the road improvements are encouraged to contact the staff at BRAG for a information on the studies and alternatives. Detailed information on alternatives to be considered is just now emerging. BRAG staff could present a statement at the public hearings. In preparation, BRAG staff could arrange a tour of the canyon scheduled for Tuesday, March 3, to allow elected officials to meet UDOT and U.S. Forest Service officials and discuss particular highway sections of concern. BRAG staff would like input from officials about how their constituents might weigh the needs for safety and convenience and how sensitive they would be to changes in the canyon near the road. Elected officials may be the only source of input by the unrepresented public. For more information please contact Bryan Dixon at 7527242. 5 �'J REFERENCES This report was based on personal contacts with the following: Lynn Zollinger, Assistant District Engineer, Utah Department of Transportation Duncan Silver, Federal Highway Administration, Salt Lake City Todd Weston, member of UDOT Transportation Committee and Interdisciplinary Team Gale Larsen, Valley Engineering, as local consultant for public input and traffic analyses in the canyon Stan Nuffer and Cliff Forsgren, CH2M Hill, as engineering consultants Dave Baumgartner and Fred Labar, U.S. Forest Service, Logan District of Wasatch- Cache Forest Jack Spence, Rudy Lukez, "and Steve Flint, environmental representatives on Interdisciplinary Team, and representing "Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon" and the following documents: Draft Traffic Forecast, August, 1986, (auth~r not indicated) CH2M Hill, Draft US-89 Logan Canyon study, Technical Memoranda, December, 1986 Various maps 6 �S T M~DARDS TABLE 1 O LEVELS OF SERVICE F Level of Ser vice - "A" M or i sts dri ve at desired s peed ot Drivers delayed no more than 30% of the t i m by s lo w m i ng ve hicle s e ov No "platoons" of t hree or more vehicles Level of Service - "B" Slightly slower speeds than above Passing demand approximates capacity Drivers delayed up t o 45% of the time Numbers of "platoons" increase dramatically above this level Level of Service - "c" Slow moving vehic l es cause congestion Significant reduction in passing capacity Drivers delayed up to 60% of the time Chains of "platoons" begin to f orm Level of Service - "D" Unstable traffic flow Passing extreme l y d ifficult Drivers delayed up to 75% of :the time Hean "platoon" size of 5-10 vehicles are common Level of Service - "E" Orderly traffic flow begins to break down Passing virtually impossible Drivers delayed over 75% of the time Level of Service - "F" Speeds well below capacity Heavy congestion Level E seldom reached (adapted from CH2M Hill, Draft US-89 Logan Canyon Study. Technical Memoranda, December, 1986, page 6-3, originally from Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council) 7 �, i L L L L L L L L I .' i "" ~ " :cit "." (. ', IJ';·":"' - "::, ( .../' .. ~ -r-" " MILE POST FIGURE 6 " SAFETY EVALUATION HIGHWAY SEGMENTS LOG AN CAN YON STUOY . :. MAP - Logan Canyon, From Draft US 89 Logan Canyon Study, Technical Memoranda, CH2M Fill, Decerrb er 1986 Showing section of canyon used :'_n ~naysis . '. .... ~ . " • • ~ '.. ~';' ~I \ �~\J O. ~ r · r- ; Ii 0 + n C' ,........ .,_. ',-, I \..-l "'-' I I ~ •.J P PoJ" fi ' t i\ A; I A I V I I 1 ../ iI n ; \ I V '.::j n r ... n L '-..A ......, I I 1980- 85, By Sedion of Log an Carryon 32 30 RT HD FO RI< I ~ , -t RiCK'S SPRiNG /\\. 28 r \\ I I 26 2 4E ~ ~;~ +' c ~ 7J 20 18 "0 0 ~ ...... 0 \... iJ IJ \ \ 22 \ .ll \ \ Ave rage Far Enti re Canyon 12 :J \ I L¥\ 14 \\ 1 / V LOGAN 16 / I 10 c .... Z \ GARDEN CITY ~ :i 2 0 00 Ob 10 1b 1c ~t ia n 2b .1d of Logan Canyon FI GURE 1 2d ·30 .3 b �,'\J 0 . J\ c c ide n t s Per ~jl i Ie: Log a n Can yon 1980-85, By Section and Type 26 24 22 (J 20 .2 \.. () u.. 'c" 1A 14 u {J ~ 12 '0 ~ .0 E .2 .L. ~ RT HD FORK ~ ~ 16 ..... t.I -.::J I 10 -4 i 1 LOGAN 8-1 :1 :2 0 Oa Ob 1a 1b 1c ;1d 20 2b 2c 2d 30 .3 b .x Section of HighwO"t Run off Road ~ Hit Other Vehicle FIGURE ~ Hit ~ Animal 2 ~ Other � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/158">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/158</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 1561002923 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 9834544 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence and status update on Logan Canyon Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Bryan Dixon to Rudy Lukez, March 28, 1987, correspondence from Jay A. Monson to James (Jim) Naegle, and the Logan Canyon Highway project status and issues with a history of the project, timline, alternatives being considered, justification of improvements, map of area, bar and dot graphs of accidents per mile from 1980-1985. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Dixon, Bryan Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Monson, Jay A. Subject The topic of the resource Traffic engineering Environmental policy Roads Improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon Logan Canyon Environmental Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-03-28 1987-03-17 1987-02-18 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 24.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/6f05335e76d97b4c65650df77b6ecd1a.pdf b7f5ed30584e80515047302111f5f8be PDF Text Text August 12, 1994 Mr. Dave Berg Utah Department of Transportation 4501 South 2700 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Dear Dave: Enclosed are the responses of Bruce Pendery, Steve Flint, and Shawn Swaner to the working copy of the Logan Canyon Highway Record of Decision (ROD) that you provided us with. We thank you for the opportunity to review the ROD before it is signed. Sincerely, Bruce Pendery cc: Nathan Hult Jeff Appel EPA Denver Office EPA Washington Office FHWA Region Office FHWA Washington Office �COMMENTS OF BRUCE PENDERY REASONS WHY A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SEIS) SHOULD BE PREPARED The extreme deficiencies in the Logan Canyon Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS and FEIS) that indicate an SEIS should be prepared have been brought to your attention previously (see letters from EPA, Haley and Stolebarger, and Appel and Mattsson, among others, submitted in response to the DEIS and FEIS). More particularly, the letter from Appel and Mattsson (see Appendix B of the ROD) pointed out that this whole process has been "out of sync" with what NEPA requires since the DEIS was essentially a scoping document, the FEIS functioned as DEIS, and so forth. This is not a matter of quibbling over details. At the core of the NEPA process is a policy that decisions significantly affecting the human environment will not be made arbitrarily and capriciously, and will be made with opportunities for informed public participation. By placing the whole NEPA process with regard to Logan Canyon out of sync, UDOT has violated those fundamental principles, thus the need for an SEIS. Safety provides a major illustration for this contention. Safety is a purpose and need identified for this project (see ROD, FEIS, DEIS). to the project. It is not a peripheral concern, it is central It is not a stretch to say that for many people the whole Logan Canyon project boils down to weighing environmental impacts of the project versus safety impacts. 1 Yet �the safety data which are used to support and rationalize the safety purpose and need (and the attendant preferred alternative) have been and continue to be seriously in error. As early as a 1986 public hearing, UDOT attempted to present incorrect safety data to the public as a justification for the project, despite knowing the data were flawed. Environmentalists were forced to point this error out at the public hearing so as to get UDOT not to use it. And even at this late date in the process, the safety data in the FEIS has had to be recalculated for presentation in the ROD because once again environmentalists pointed out the obvious flaws plaguing the data presented in the FEIS (see Bridgerland Audubon Society, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon, and Ron Lanner letters in ROD Appendix B). Thus, the safety data in the ROD is new information that has never been presented to the public (see Appendix A of the ROD as well as the ROD itself which have large sections devoted to explaining what went wrong with the safety analysis in the FEIS). Moreover, and most shockingly, the safety data in the ROD are still wrong, as the letter from Steve Flint, contained herein, points out. So at this almost terminal date in the NEPA process we still have flawed data being used to support a major purpose and need for the Logan Canyon Project. And the significance of this is that informed public participation in this process cannot take place. All the hundreds of people who commented on the DEIS and FEIS were presented with safety information that was wrong, as 2 �the need to correct this information in the ROD demonstrates. And the ROD--even if the safety data in it were now correct--will not be seen by the vast majority of people who are concerned about this project. ROD's--almost by definition--are not intended to be vehicles for public participation. Thus, the significance of UDOT's out of sync approach to the NEPA process becomes clear: not only is the process out of sync, but with each step up the NEPA ladder toward project approval fewer and fewer people are able to review the project, and those who previously reviewed the project were presented with incorrect data purporting to support UDOT's preferred alternative. Therefore, an SEIS is needed not only because the data presented have been repeatedly wrong in the past, but also because each time UDOT presents the "corrected" data, fewer people are able to participate in the evaluating the decision the data supposedly supports. UDOT tries to avoid the need for preparing an SEIS, with its attendant wide-ranging public participation, by stating that certain individuals have been closely involved in the development of the modified preferred alternative (see, e.g., ROD Appendix B page 39, but this same statement appears in numerous other places in the ROD). But involving five individuals (Bruce Pendery, Shawn Swaner, Steve Flint, Nathan Hult, Jeff Appel) in this process--while greatly appreciated and we believe productive-simply cannot substitute for full-scale public involvement in an SEIS process. As has become clear recently, public sentiment 3 �regarding this project is simply too diverse and widespread to believe that the above five people adequately provide for "public involvement" when a basic purpose and need for the project has never been adequately presented to the public. While we are viewed as knowledgeable about this project in the environmental community and to some extent are considered leaders, we simply cannot and do not represent the concerns of the hundreds--perhaps thousands--of people concerned about Logan Canyon. If UDOT wants informed public participation in this NEPA process it must provide for that via and SEIS. In addition to the fact informed public participation has been hampered, UDOT's modified preferred alternative is a arbitrary and capricious decision. The DEIS, FEIS, and ROD all make much of the fact safety will be improved if the preferred alternative is implemented., But what basis can there be for that assertion when the information it is based on has been flawed since at least 1986 and continues to be flawed? I have largely exhausted the topic of why an SEIS is needed. However, I will point out that the same analysis applies to 4(f) sites and to wildlife. The 4(f) documentation in the FEIS was also wrong in a number of instances and a has had to be corrected (see ROD Appendix A, 4(f) Map section, as well as the ROD itself). Likewise, UDOT presented essentially no information in the FEIS about the numerous sensitive species in Logan Canyon (see ROD Appendix B pages 28 and 35). The ROD contains some information on these species (see ROD Appendix A, USFS Biological 4 �Assessment). Thus, just as for safety, informed public participation could not take place in regard to these critical issues because the information was wrong or absent. Moreover, simply presenting the information in the largely nonpublic ROD phase of the NEPA process does not correct the problem. CURRENT LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE MODIFIED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY Repeatedly in the ROD UDOT states that consensus has been reached with the environmental community with regards to the modified preferred alternative. That is an incorrect statement, which we have made clear to UDOT. Not only is it incorrect, it makes it more unlikely compromise will be reached because those most opposed to the project would deeply resent UDOT unilaterally announcing that consensus exists. Let me be clear. discussions with UDOT. Since last December we have had a several The tone of those meetings has been constructive and positive. I personally want that process to continue because I believe compromise is preferable to confrontation. However, it is my opinion that a fully acceptable compromise has not been reached yet. Let me explain why. As the modified preferred alternative stands, conservationists would get most of what they want in 14% of the canyon (road stays on current width and alignment between mileposts 383.5 to 387.5, although there could be some curve cuts we don't believe are necessary). UDOT gets everything it wants 5 �in 42% of the canyon (full u.s. highway standard between mileposts 399.8 to 411.8, with almost 8 miles of that 12 miles having a passing lane). Neither UDOT or conservationists get exactly what they want in 43% of the project area (mileposts 387.5 to 399.8). At a meeting in early July Dave Berg asked me how far along toward compromise we were. Based on the above considerations, I said I thought we were 75% of the way there. about where we still stand. I believe that's Seventy-five percent of a potential compromise does not equal compromise, let alone consensus. Moreover, as we found out at a meeting we convened in July there is a significant group of conservationists in Cache Valley who believe we are not even seventy-five percent of the way toward compromise. This information was conveyed to UDOT in a timely manner. To summarize, I believe that a generally acceptable compromise is possible, but it can only be reached by continued hard work seeking to narrow the differences that still exist, not by premature and unilateral statements that consensus has been reached. RESPONSE TO BRIDGERLAND AUDUBON LETTER (APPENDIX B PAGE 16) The Bridgerland Audubon Society (BAS) provided extensive comments on the FEIS. I was the author of that letter, although I no longer hold an official position with BAS. Unfortunately, I believe most of the concerns that were raised in the BAS letter were dismissed with conclusory statements using circular 6 �reasoning. While UDOT may feel it has adequately addressed this letter, I hope the FHWA and EPA will make an independent assessment of these concerns and how well UDOT has responded to them. What follows are items related to the BAS letter that I feel are particularly significant. It is not nearly an exhaustive list. 1. Since AASHTO allows for design exceptions, they are not genuinely standards. Thus, the "written-in-stone" portrayal UDOT has given to the public over the years is incorrect. Moreover, UDOT still fails to state what legal authority AASHTO has, perhaps because it has no legal authority (Appendix B, page 17). 2. On Appendix B page 25 it is stated that treatment of clear zones has been more clearly defined in the ROD. Even if true, this is yet another case of not presenting the public with correct (or clear) information until the public is largely no longer part of the process. prepare an SEIS. That is, its yet another reason to Moreover, BAS Table 3 was correct, what was wrong was that UDOT had failed to explain what "typical improved area" means in its FEIS, thus defeating informed public participation. 3. On Appendix B page 27, UDOT indicates that recreation isn't emphasized in Logan Canyon, and that it isn't a recreation area. That analysis ignores the Forest Service signs welcoming visitors to the "Logan Canyon Recreation Area," it ignores the Forest Service's attempts to get highway enhancement funds to show off Logan Canyon's many recreational attractions, it ignores 7 �the brown (i.e., recreational) FHWA or UDOT signs pointing the way to Logan Canyon, it ignores the clear direction in the Forest plan that Logan Canyon will be managed primarily for recreation. Under UDOT's constrained analysis, the Sawtooth National Recreation Area (also managed by the Forest Service) would not be a recreation area because its not absolutely only used for recreation (grazing is allowed in some areas). I prefer the more pragmatic duck test: if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc., it is a duck. area. Under that test Logan Canyon is a recreation And neither UDOT or the Forest Service can reinterpret the law in an inappropriately constrained way--and the law makes it clear that when the managing agency designates an area a recreation area in its plans, that area must be treated as a 4(f) area. 4. On Appendix B page 28 UDOT frets about having to concern itself with "hundreds" of species. Only 27 species were asked about, and now with the public largely removed from this process something has finally been said about them (see Appendix A, USFS Biological Assessment). Moreover, not only does the Forest Service have to do a biological assessment before a decision document is signed, it must do the assessment before the decision is made which certainly has not been the case here. 5. UDOT says on Appendix B page 29 only a Forest Plan Amendment will be required, not a revision. However, conservationists have long contended a much more significant revision will be required. Revisions are required when the basic 8 �output of goods and services from a forest are altered. I believe the modified preferred alternative will meet that test by transforming Logan Canyon into yet another Wasatch-Cache National Forest high-speed conduit, rather than the singular peaceful and quiet ride in a major canyon that it currently is. In fact, Logan Canyon's beauty is not only of forest-wide singularity, it is of national significance, as a soon-to-be-released national article will demonstrate. 6. Some pages are duplicated incorrectly beginning on about Appendix B page 29 to 31. 7. While the Forest Service has evaluated the Logan River for Wild and Scenic status (Appendix B pages 29 to 31), it has also said that new information could cause a reevaluation. Such information was recently provided by Mr. Drew Parkin who is one of the nation's premier experts on wild and scenic rivers. He concluded most of the Logan River within the highway project area qualifies as a recreational river. to the Forest Service. His report has been submitted UDOT should more fully consider the ramifications of such a designation, and not just state that there will be no effect due to the project. 8. Appendix B page 32 indicates it would be speculative to worry about land use changes if the land exchange occurs. The land exchange will occur because authorizing legislation has been passed by Congress and signed by the President. And to compare Forest Service land use policy with Utah State Lands Board policy is like comparing night and day (I'll leave it to you to decide 9 �which is the benighted agency). There will be changes in land management and it is disingenuous to ignore that fact. In particular, the need for "laydown" fencing should be reconsidered because it is unlikely there will be cows to keep off the highway. 9. On Appendix B page 33 UDOT responds improperly to the 4(f) issues that are raised. As indicated above, all of Logan Canyon is a recreation area, its not a few parking sites. Moreover, the reason for selecting the 4(f) sites was not to protect parking, but rather to protect aesthetics, hiking, and exploration. These are the protected features or activities (see Appendix B page 34). Furthermore, not only is the conservationists' alternative feasible and prudent, it also does not produce any genuinely unusual situations precluding its selection. And when a feasible and prudent alternative fails to meet transportation needs, the needs must be reassessed, which UDOT has not done. Failure to meet transportation needs does not mean an alternative automatically causes an unusual situation precluding its selection. 10. The concerns raised on Appendix B page 35 are indeed specific to the Logan Canyon Highway project since these species occur nowhere else, and failure to address the question runs contrary to Eugene Kleckley's (FHWA) written assurance that all of our concerns would be addressed. 11. Over the years UDOT has repeatedly refused to consider 10 �slow vehicle turnouts as an alternative to passing lanes. However, these are a practicable alternative to the passing lanes contemplated between mileposts 391.6 to about milepost 396.5 that would avoid wetlands impacts (see Appendix B page 36 and ROD pages 32 to 34). As we have often pointed out to UDOT, slow vehicle turnouts are successfully used in several states. And UDOT has told us that they have the statutory authority to use slow vehicle turnouts. Therefore, they must be used in preference to passing lanes where wetlands impacts will occur. Additionally, while UDOT partially responded to BAS's concerns on Appendix B page 36 by reducing the road width to 34feet between mileposts 391.6 and 399.8, this response was incomplete. UDOT fails to point out why it does not plan to leave roadway width at 26-feet in section 1b of the canyon (mileposts 387.5 to 391.6). If 26-feet is a practicable alternative in section 1a (mileposts 383.5 to 387.5), why is that not practicable in section 1b, where the canyon is virtually as narrow and wetlands/riparian impacts likely as great? Furthermore, UDOT dismisses BAS's concerns about wetlands mitigation in sections 1a and 1b by saying "the commentor . . . felt" (ROD page 33)there was a poor likelihood of revegetation success. However, it was not a matter that I poor likelihood of success. "felt" there was a Rather, I cited recent scientific - iterature--produced by scientists working for the very agency l whose land will be impacted (the Forest Service)--stating there is a poor likelihood revegetation will be successful in areas 11 �such as sections 1a and 1b (see Appendix B page 37). If the scientific literature that I cited is somehow flawed UDOT should cite "better" information. That's how science works. demands the use of good science. And NEPA Until then, it appears UDOT has no scientific basis for claiming it can reclaim the kinds of wetlands that exist in sections 1a and lb. Finally, UDOT still feels simply stating best management practices will be used is sufficient to meet water quality mandates (Appendix B page 37, see also ROD page 32). otherwise. The law is Moreover, UDOT has failed to adequately coordinate with the Utah Division of Water Rights (see Appendix B page 6) which feels UDOT has likely understated the water quality impacts of the project. Thus, UDOT is too vague about how it will mitigate water quality impacts and has likely underestimated those impacts, yet UDOT wants approval to proceed with this project. That is not how NEPA intends environmental review to proceed. 12. An inability to do a "before and after" (ie, cumulative) comparison of wetlands and aesthetic impacts in the already-widened section of Logan Canyon with the project area would be unfortunate (Appendix B page 38). However, I believe that if future aesthetic conditions of the road can be predicted in the project area, past conditions in the already-widened ' section can also be estimated. For example, there are certainly many old photos of the canyon that could be used for aesthetic comparisons, and many of the old wetlands have left "footprints" 12 �of their existence. While not an ideal scientific situation, to simply state that no useful cumulative comparisons can be made between the project area and the lower canyon overstates the situation. UDOT says the Forest Service feels the presentation of visual quality data was more meaningful when presented in a way unlike that in the rest of the FEIS (Appendix B page 38). Why did UDOT let the Forest Service dictate this approach when BAS-and several others--made it clear in their comments on the DEIS that this was not a more illuminating approach? MAJOR FLAWS APPARENT IN THE ROD What follows are additional major flaws that I perceive in the ROD. 1. Again, this is not an exhaustive list. On page 40 of the ROD UDOT mistakenly thinks only an irreversible commitment of resources can invoke NEPA relative to 4(f) designation. Actually the test is whether designating a 4(f) site is a Federal action significantly affecting the human environment. The selection--or more importantly, lack of selection--of 4(f) sites in Logan Canyon meets that test and certainly warranted at least a FONSI or an EA. 2. On page 18 of the ROD UDOT says the Forest Service will issue a transportation easement not the special use permit described in the FEIS. What is the significance of that change? If one of these involves the Forest Service conveying a property right while the other is merely a license, this is a significant 13 �change, and the public has not had a chance to comment or be involved in this decision. 3. As I have discussed in several of our meetings, the exact location and size of staging areas must be spelled out. This is a major project impact that has not been previously addressed. 4. I have already mentioned the tendency towards unwarranted conclusory statements in regards to how the BAS letter was addressed. That same problem is particularly evident in the defensive discussion on purpose and need on pages 27 to 29 of the ROD. As I said above, the safety data were wrong in the FEIS, are still wrong, and question begging rhetoric does not alleviate that problem. Likewise, the discussions related to traffic volume predictions, the associated level of service, the utility of SR 14 as a comparison to u.S. Highway 89, and AASHTO standards are mostly just defensive and conclusory. 5. On Appendix A page 7 there is a critical UDOT memorandum. First, under the logic developed in this memorandum, there is little or no safety rationale for the 40-feet wide road UDOT still proposes in much of the canyon. All of the remaining proposed 40-feet wide highway could just as well be 34-feet wide. UDOT should strongly consider this fact as a means of reaching a generally acceptable compromise in the canyon. However there is also a very disturbing remark made in this memo. It is stated: "[A]nd given the fact that we would be able to proceed with the construction of the project . . ." if the 14 �road width is reduced to 34-feet, going to five foot shoulders is acceptable. Did UDOT decide to go to a 34-feet width instead of a 40-feet between mileposts 391.6 to 399.8 because of its goodfaith discussions with conservationists or because EPA and/or the Corps of Engineers told UDOT they would not get a 404 permit if they did not make this change? The sentence quoted above certainly implies that someone was holding a very big stick over UDOT's head, and frankly I doubt that it was conservationists. 6. The letters from the EPA and the Utah Division of Water Rights on Appendix B pages 1 to 6 are a must read. In essence, not only has UDOT failed to insure an approved wetlands permit is acquired before the project is authorized, it has also put off significant input on water quality impacts until the as yet nonexistent design phase. We mentioned earlier how UDOT has marginalized the public's ability to participate in this process by its out of sync NEPA process. It appears UDOT is doing the same with expert agencies that should have input to this project prior to its approval, not after. A SUGGESTION FOR COMPROMISE Many of my comments in this letter have been critical of UDOT's approach to the Logan Canyon project. That's because I feel the ROD is as flawed a decision document as were the DEIS and FEIS. However, in the spirit of compromise let me offer a suggested approach. When the final ROD is issued it should only approve 15 �construction of the bridges, namely Burnt Bridge, and Upper and Lower Twin Bridges. These are the "scary" bridges in many people's opinion, and as I understand it the ones that are in need of replacement due to their age. UDOT apparently has funding to reconstruct these bridges and UDOT has indicated that replacing these bridges would take about two years. During that two year period an SEIS could be prepared for the remainder of the project, wherein the public and concerned agencies are given a full opportunity to participate before a decision is made and when it can still have a major effect. Many of the major flaws that I have pointed out in this letter and my letters submitted on behalf of BAS regarding the FEIS and DEIS could be corrected in this process. The numerous other flaws pointed out by other commentors could also be addressed. The EPA's deep concern regarding segmenting a project (see Appendix B pages 1 to 4) might be addressed. Additionally, the constructive and positive discussions UDOT has had with conservationists could continue in a effort to narrow remaining differences. In any event, UDOT does not have funding for nonhridge portions of the project yet, so taking a couple of more years to "get it right" should not be a major problem for UDOT fiscally. You will note that I did not include the Red Banks, Franklin Basin, or Amazon Hollow structures/bridges in this proposal. There is simply too much controversy associated with them (due to their extreme width and wetlands impacts) to expect that they would meet with general acceptance, unlike the three bridges 16 �mentioned above. Moreover, as far as I know, the only "problem" with these bridges is that they are not as wide as UDOT would like. However, they do not seem to be as narrow as the bridges mentioned above (they certainly are not "scary"), and they are not nearing the end of their useful life so far as I know. Thank you for this opportunity to provide these comments on the ROD, and I hope that UDOT and the FHWA will consider this compromise proposal so that a generally acceptable compromise might be reached for the Logan Canyon project. Sincerely, Bruce Pendery 755 Canyon Rd. Logan, Utah 84321 17 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/159">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/159</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3787997956 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 10610610 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Bruce Pendery to Dave Berg, August 12, 1994 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Bruce Pendery to Dave Berg stating the reasons why a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) should be prepared, explaining that flawed data and lack of public involvement have made the current EIS unusable. Suggests a compromise in which the three "scary" bridges be modified as UDOT has stated while the SEIS is prepared. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Pendery, Bruce Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Natural resources conservation areas Traffic engineering Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon Logan Canyon Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994-08-12 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 27 Folder 10 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB28_Fd10_Page_1.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/ccd2389a2527e88f11a25cf3398d74ad.pdf b9b5bde4ad5ca966daa516248f78af5d PDF Text Text rne ~, s .. .a:=~~!!~ ~ 4~.s East 400 South B-4:) ·on alt Lake City. UT 841 11/(80 1 ) ~59- 1 ?37 April 24, 1987 Mr . Dale Bosworth Forest Supervisor Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt LaKe City, ' Utah 84138 Dear Dale: Considerable concern has recently b e en expressed about the Logan Canyon highway issues. DicK P i ne ha~ expr~ssed strong and positive concern arid support to both Geo r ge Nickas and me at preventing a widening g a p as 'this issue progresses. We have, indeed, experien~ed this concern a~ well and 1 ik r ly harbor simil iar fears a £ t o the leJel of acrimony which ·may dev.lop over Logan C ~ny ~ n. Up on i suggestion f r om Georgs NicKas, DicK Pi~. ~ a ~ set up a me et i ng with the p~ i ncipal envir' onmental or' g ,~ I '. i .;~.1.ti ,ons and i nd i viduals, you and your staff to discuss t hi s issue. In anticipation c,f suc. h a meet i ng l 'et me outl ine O'Jr concerns. Rathe r th &n d iscussing the impacts to th~ canyon environment from major road development, whi ~ are s +ron 0 1) ' documented, I want to re .\ ay to yo our c o ncer' ns wi t t.'';'' I")rt;st Service involvement j n t ~ e issue. We see the forest plan a i. guidance on Logan Canyon. Thus we se~ th. Forest Service nn ~ a ~ a neut al parti~ipant but as an advocate of the publi : s ' .f nterest _ . ~ ~xpressed in the Logan Canyon Managemen t A\i... . a ~'i tandar d 's flo nd gu i de 1 i nes •.., i t~'l i n the forest pl an. As a re s u 1 t u f the : I te n·t of the ~an agerne n t ar eo a, its de s c r ip -\: .: on "'rn d ma rl a geme n t stan dar-ds , -here is no ..doubt. that onl y mi no r i d; s t ur- ba nces a:::.soc i ated . w r th the Logan C~. nyon hi ghW fi Y. ca n be imp 1 emen t ~~ d . Th i s firm u nderstand i ng of the forest \ p·l a n "'J a ~, fu 1 1 sup fJ or t ed by conservationists and undersiood i n the a bove c u ntext. And it has been consis t ently relayed in t hat ma n ner b y th @ Forest Servic •• Only recently have we h eard different not l ons and that is rather disturbi~g. .I It is within the context of the intent of t he f~re s t plan that a franK discussion would be beneficial . I suspect it would be helpful with I . esp~ct to a number o i issues a ~ well. . ». Thanks very rdially, . '.(*'/~I.tr' i." r' . ,:. t : I ::1. mu ~ h . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/160">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/160</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3951184436 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 1300747 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Dale Bosworth to Daniel Dake, May 28, 1987 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Dale Bosworth to Daniel Dake explaining the position of the Forest Service position concerning the Logan Canyon project. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Bosworth, Dale Subject The topic of the resource Environmental policy Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available United States. Department of Agriculture Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-05-28 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_17.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/380822394fd322ed02e46480eefca49e.pdf 0b7f22b764080bf1829f671a64abfe3d PDF Text Text J Wed. July 1 Dear Rudy, When I finally got hold of Neiman Marcus (Monday morning) the travel agency person said that the tour I was interested in was sold nation wide and that my best bet was to get a brochure locally. occured to me . mnd the That was a solution that had not So I went down to Trave l Time lady there remembered me from a previous meeting and there was no trouble getting the brochure. So I thought to expedite matters I would phone you at work and ask you what to do with it. who answered the phone forgot. since Bill I guess the man Anyway I decided, and I are going back packing in the Uintas beginning tomorrow, to give this to you on your doorstep. Sorry about the delay. I am including a J:I0 (,8 you can send to the appropriate agency, if you think it -useful. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/161">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/161</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 3564865463 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 423306 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Marjorie Lewis to Rudy Lukez, July 1 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Marjorie Lewis to Rudy Lukez mentioning a tour and brochure. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Lewis, Marjorie Subject The topic of the resource Outdoor Recreation Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 1.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/c2655cf3f9b4674feb9edff3c00e94c0.pdf 4f27031cc2004e2a88dab133bddd15ca PDF Text Text u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION REGION EIGHT 555 Zang Street P. O. Box 25246 Denver, Colorado 80225 December 18, 1979 eMr . Brian Beard, President Sierra Club, Utah Chapter 93 East 1st South Logan, Utah 84321 IN REP L Y REFER T O: HED- 08 Dear M Beard : r. In your letters of November 20 and 21 , 1979, you requested copies of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) . Also , you requested support documentation for determining that highway construction activities proposed for Logan Canyon , Utah , w ill have no significant impacts. Regarding the request for agency implementing regulations, we have enclosed copies of DOT Order 5610 . 1C : Procedures for considering Environmental Impacts , and the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Federal H ghway Administration 23 CFR 771 as contained i n the i October 15 , 1979 Federal Register . For all NEPA- related activities and documents processed by FHWA after November 30 , 1979, there must be compliance with the CEQ regulations and DOT Order. Also , the proposed FHWA procedur~s should be used as supplemental guidance . Concerning the Logan Canyon construction activities , ~"e are enclosing a December 10 , 1979 memorandum from Federal Highway Division Adminis trator Bohn to UDOT Director Hurley rescinding FHWA concurrence in the preliminary Category III assignment to th i s project . We believe the information provided addresses your concerns . If you have any further questions , please feel free to contact Administrator Bohn or our office . Sincerely yours , r -$di?/~d Daniel Watt Regional Federal H ghwway Administrator i � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/162">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/162</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 2848903558 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 497059 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Keith Lautenbach to Brian Beard, December 18, 1979 (with signature) Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Keith Lautenbach (on behalf of Daniel Watt) to Brian Beard, (with Lautenbach's signature) in response to Beard's previous correspondence about the FHWA's compliance with NEPA and other agency regulations. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Lautenbach, Keith P. Subject The topic of the resource Environmental policy Government agencies Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Colorado. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1979-12-18 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_9.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/05f1cb8a536173a573fc7110ef14dab2.pdf 45244ee0d7c83719fa6aa5ff3d498b70 PDF Text Text Conservationists' Spot Improvement Alternative for Sections 1 and 2, Logan Can:yon August, 1987 We consider the most important issues involved here to be safety , scenic values, and ecological integrity. Our alternative is based on the premise that rrodifications which alone or in the aggregate ltX)uld appreciably increase traffic speed in the Middle Canyon must be avoided. liVe believe that increased speed in this section 'iNOuld be likely to lead to more (and more serious) accidents. increasing the traffic speed v~uld The construction involved in seriously disrupt the scenic values for which this canyon is nationally knOtm, and wuuld seriously degrade the ecolC>g"ical integrity of the Canyon, particularly in the riparian zone. Our goal is a highway t.1rat fits into Logan Canyon with minimal ecological disturbance and maxiInum safety, rather t.~an a highway that purports to move the greatest number of people through the area at the highest rate of speed. Consistent with this emphasis, we strongly recommend enforceITent of speed limits and substantial improverrents in signing as an important part of our proposal. As a corollary, changes in the roadway in the Upper Canyon should not be so drastic as to encourage high speeds in that area and thus a possible difficulty of driver adjustment to the lower speeds of the Middle Canyon. v~ have identified several gravel turnouts which should 1:e paved, and plowed consistently in winter, to aid the Utah Pighway Patrol in pulling over speeders and to aid in the passage of the occasional emergency vebicle. �"'JD("\~fq) I i l ACTIOl',} 1 D7\ 'T TOr-..T7\ TP_ _ _"i-'._i.L :E-1PACTS ALTEP~~T rlES 1 R.."SJECI'EDA. \[) PROBLE11S WITH ] I\r"\ -------~ ---------- - ------- ----j " i 100' taper from bridge; sign: "Right Fork 1/4" Pight Hand Fork safety curve at 384. a ' preliminary sign: "NarrON winding road next 7 mi. advisory speed sign; specific curve notation I (no change in alignment) safety visual sensitivity ; erosion into river; spoil disposal safety visual sensitivity (6); impacts on river Maguire Primrose threat to threatened species II ; I I I Wcx>d Camp turnout! sign: I!~bod Camp 1/4"; and intersection plow parking area in winter above v, od Carrp, b slON veh. turnout I no change '\ -~-TI I I i pave present gravel turnout; plow in winter ! ', downstream of Burnt Bridge I not applicable law enforcement; scenic vista; parking distressed vehicles I ~------------------~------------------------_--~I------_ __-.------ -----------+-------------______________ Burnt ?ridge \ not applicable structural integrity ! widen to 28' on salle alignment; clear span 1 \ - ------------r----_--_.-----.---._ -------.----1-- -- ------· -----.. - - I i 1 - - ---·--- logan Cave I 1 I I I . - -- '--.- 1 - - Cottonwood area: (a) structure (b) parking 1 UI sign: "dangerous curve"; sign: "no parking" sign: advisory speed; no alig~nt safety change -- 1 ____ visual sensi t ivi ty; darnage to river , -+-~-__- _ _- - - - - _ I I i widen to 28' on sarre alignment I ! safety damage to river; visual sensitivity (7) I ! I pave two areas: one on visitor access to cave river side downstream \ from structure, 150' X ZO; one on rrountain side at bld Cottonwood road, 100' X :35', I tapering downstreChTTl to ! I 100' X 20'. PION in i I winter. I Forest Service and vol- ! I unteer groups construct trail to cave entrance. I I I -abo--"VI-e-c-o-t-t-o-nwood-----;If---n-o--a~:gnne::·:~e; (386.6) r~place 20 mph advisory ---------------------------~------------------------II ' safety I slgn damage to river; spoil disposal; visual sensitivity 1 - - - --- - -- -- --- - --- --------.-,- ..._ ----- --.-- ------:. . .- ---- ---.--- ...-- - ---- ---.. ------ -------f----- - - - - - - - - - - - , . 1 above Cottonwood (387.1) no alignment change I safety (avoid increasin: speed) erosion from lcx>se material �P~OPOSED - r ACT'IO!'J IMPAcrS M ID PROBID1S ~-vrTH REJEcrED ALTERNATIVES RAT I Ot--TALE I +----- -- -------- ---+\---------- ------ --- ------I "Table 2-5," continued: Intersections: ~a) Tony Grove : as in B-1 safety (b) Red Banks ro change insufficient traffic I i (c) FraTh~lin Bisin (d) Beaver no change no need (wide enough as is) as in B-1 would necessitate 3-lane bridge over Beaver Creek I Climbing Lanes: ; I (a) Red Banks to near Franklin Basin road Add clllnbing lane from m.p. 395 to cattle guard I Safety problems with high-speed traffic approaching both Red P..anks and Franklin Basin turnoff s ; damage to river and riparian zone safety; minimize cut visual quality damage I i (b) St1.ID1p HollON I Add climbing lane from just al:::ove Amazon I Hollow fill (401.5) to I to maintenance shed I 402.1. (c) to safety; minimize cut; safeguard river and riparian zone I summit Add climbing lane fromJ 404.1 to short of Sink~ Road I excessive spoil; danger at snowmobile parking safety; mini..mize cut area I i Note: Passing lane musti end short of summit, and ; there must re adrate signing, regarding the ; transition back D 2-lane road, to safeguard ; the Limber Pine ___!rail turnoff. : Signs: "Sinks 1 Sunrise Campgro4nd I I I rrable 2-6: d 1/4"; "Limber Pine Trail l f 4 " no chan:Je safety I I I I driver confusion possible 2 skewed approaches as & stripe) Overlook in B-1 (sign 1-----------------4------------------------I-----------------------·--~------------------------- multipuq:ose parking: (a) m.p. 392 pave; plow in winter (on side 0pp. river) safety (b) Bunchgrass pave; plow in winter (on river side of road) safety -r--__________________ -______ ~------------- ------- ---------~--------------------------1 r- -________________ added sign: l:elow Ricks Spring "Narrow winding road next 7 mi." safety �P~POSED ACTI ON I.J"X:ATIOtT I r I ----- - -- - ---------.- ---i --.:bel\~;} o I Lower 1\'lln Bridge; Lower 'I\-lin Bridge Move roadway Jl'aX. i I 20' replacement of bridge I °th 1east enVlronI Wl \ mental damage, consis- ~ tent with safety I toward river t:efore curV.e begi ns; widen existing cut so alignment meets new bridge parallel to present bridge. 28' width; no pier in river 0 i less cutting; rrore Slgh tI j distance o I 1- -- No Change prevent excessive speed I ' l -top-of-Du~aY--r-------- tb-Change ------ Bridge prevent excessive speed visual impacts; excessive spoil damage to river; daTffige to visual quality 1 i '--Upper -TWlr1'- - - _______________ visual impacts; excessive spoil \ above Lower Twinl place downstream of Bridge--slav vej . bridge, where present turnout road goes through cut Dugway cli.rnbing lane ' IMPACTS AND PROBID1S ~\1JTH FATIONALE ______ _ ~ REJECI'ED ALTERNATIVES _ darrage to visual quality; excessive ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._Jlr __--S-po-i-l-------- widen to 28' on new : alignment immediately downstream of present bridge. No pier in river. stIuctural integrity; safety /----~----------~+-------.--------------------- -- above Upper Ywir Bridge (387.7) Temple Fork intersection 28' on sarre alignment damage to visual quali ty i excessive spoil safety advance signing: "Temple Fork 1/4" Ricks Spring area: (a) bridge safety !: !: (b) alignment (c) parking safety no change in alignment; add signs: curve; icy road safety add sign: "No Passing", safety roaintain as is (roth sides); add signs: "Ricks Spring 1/4" "Pedestrian Crossing" vehicles crossing traffic lanes to park r-----------------~---------------------------~------- "Table 2-5," B-1: bridges and structpres 28 ' iI I maintain uniformity of bridge widths alignrrents: relow North Sink no change safety encourages excessive speed below Middle SinK IX) change safety encourages excessive speed � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/163">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/163</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 1358177675 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 2337958 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Conservationists' spot improvement alternative for sections 1 and 2, August 1987 Description An account of the resource Conservationists' spot improvement alternative for locations within Logan Canyon with proposed action, rationale, and impacts and problems with rejected alternatives. Subject The topic of the resource Traffic engineering Roads--Design and construction Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-08 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 29 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB29_Fd6_Item 2.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/90f397d662aa859d917a077a039735f5.pdf 44f3f702a61ea224570d3ba4f2b8577b PDF Text Text 5/1/87 A number of us met with Dale Bosworth, W. N. F. Sup., and his staff concerning the issues in Logan Cyn. We talked about the fact that the forest plan which highl ights the Logan Canyon as a managmeent area to be mainatined in the existijng condition should dictate the Forest Service position on the FHA and UDOT proposals to upgrade the canyon. In other words some alternatives whioch would not meet the constraints of the management area in the forest plan simply should be upfront discarded by the Forest Service because they are not consitent with the forest plan. We also impressed the staff with the impacts of any development proposals and the fact that the Forest Service is not being aggressive enough in the issue. seemed to 1 isten and genuinely be concerned about the imapcts and the concerns of failure in making the Forest Service aggressive. He was unwill ing to terminate at the top alternatives in the FHA d. EIS which are not consitent witht he forst plan. He argued through mitigation you may be able to solve soime issues. He would not interpret the plan as to what it meant. he kept saying different interp. of the plan eXIst. finally got mad and said damnit it's your plan what does it say--no answer but it had an impact. 80S. He will send a letter to all cocnerned assuring them F)S) will get serious. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/164">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/164</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 1740859882 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 1586111 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Stephan Flint to Wes Wilson, June 17, 1987 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Stephan Flint to Wes Wilson, June 17, 1987 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Flint, Stephan D. Subject The topic of the resource Environmental policy Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987-06-17 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1980-1989 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Utah Wilderness Association Records, 1980-2000, COLL MSS 200 Forest Service Series III Box 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv75259</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS200_Forest Ser_Item_16.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/6607ecfe1d5cbb975b2087a3da50f2a9.pdf 42966d9d34139a5c3f5d09d3fa1b800c PDF Text Text UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRI C UL.TURE FOREST SERVICE W asatch National Forest 8226 Federal Bldg., 125 So. State· Salt Lake City, Utah 84138 7720 December 6, 1979 Marta Douma Tollerup P.O. Box 3561 Logan, Utah 84321 L Dear Ms. Tollerup: We appreciate your interest in the Logan Canyon Highway project and commend you for wanting to be adequately informed to give realistic input. In response to your letter we will follow the same numerical sequence. 1. An Envirornnental Assessme.nt Report cons ti tutes a Forest Service Decision Document. The decision by the Forest Service to allow the proposed project to proceed in and through National Forest land was made April 20, 1971, when the Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) was approved. This approval was given subj ect to, 12 "Special and Functional Considerations" listed on page 29 and 30, and 53 "Recommendations listed on page 37, 38, and 39 of that report. The 1971 EAR was given to Utah Department of Highway officials on May 18, 1971, in a meeting which was held to discuss the · contents of that report. That · report was for their use in prepa.ring an Environmental Statement . On October 15-18 of 1979 an Interdisciplinary Team from the Wasatch National Forest conducted an ·evaluation of 3 different alignments for improving the Logan Canyon Highway. All three alignments were very close to the existing road alignment. The basic difference between the three alternatives was the radius of the curves. That evaluation was forwarded to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) on November 26, 1979, and a copy is attached for your reference. 2. A copy of the EAR which was approved in 1971 and given to UDOT is also enclosed. To reduce printing costs the appendix material is not included. It can be reviewed in the Logan District Ranger's offiee located at 21 West Center Street, Logan, Utah. Phone number 752-9533. : .... . J �The environme ntal effects were disc us sed in the 1971 EA, again in our evaluation report submitted in November of 1979 and will be discussed again by the UDOT in the Environmental Assessment they are preparing. The significance of environmental effects will vary by alternatives. , We have recognized scenic, recreation, fisheries, and total river environmen't values as being the most · significant resource . concerns to be considered. Alternatives ' which were considered in the 1971 EAR (page 32) by the Forest Service are: 1. No Reconstruction. 2. Resurfacing on the existing alignment. 3. Alternate Routes. a. Through Blacksmith Fork Canyon. b. Strawberry-Sharen Forest Highway. Our evaluation report prepared in November 1979 considered three alignments within the existing Logan Canyon Highway corridor. ~ The Forest Service has not requested an Environmental Statement to be prepared .. 3. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lea,d agency, since they are the Funding Agency. The UDOT is preparing the EA for submission to FHWA who will make the decision on funding. We will continue evaluation to achieve compliance with constraints we think appropriate for the project. 4. Enclosed is a copy of the Forest Service proc.edures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act as published . in the Federal Register July 30, 1979. The Forest Service method used to determine major actions which significantly affect the quality of human environment and require an Environmental Impact Statement is the Environmental Analysis. The .significance of effects must be considered in terms of context and intensity. A discussion of those things to be considered are contained in Section 1951.8 of the Forest Service procedures. Those actions requiring an EIS are outlined in Section 1952.2. We will use the UDOT data and EA to insure compliance with . NEPArequirements. t ' I • or " t .: .... - •• ' .'" ' �We b~lieve that the route · through Logan Canyon needs to be improved enough so it can safely serve the traveling public, while maintaining the scenic, recreation, fisheries and other ·ecological values. It it should be necessary, in order to adequately safeguard these values, the . Forest Service can, for the portions of the H~ghway traversing National Forest lands, insist that adequate safeguards be used and needed adjustments made. We believe the proper care has been defined in the above mentioned documents which are enclosed. We also believe, in our contacts with UDOT, that proper consideration will be given to protecting the critical resource values in any project proposal. ."1<- Thank you again for your answered your questions. inte~est. We h ope we have satisfactorily If not, .please let us know. Sincerely, Ovr )f.~ Yv CHANDLER P. ST. JOHN Forest Supervisor , , . . -' . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/165">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/165</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Checksum 4269731421 File Size Size of the file in bytes. 1811937 Bytes Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Chandler St. John to Marta Tollerup, Deccember 6, 1979 Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Chandler St. John to Marta Tollerup discussing the Environmental Assessment Report approved in April 1971 used in preparing another more current report, noting that three sections of the road through Logan Canyon was in need of alignment changes in the radius of the curves, and that Logan Canyon Road (US Highway 89) needs to be improved so it can safely serve the traveling public while maintaining scenic, recreation, fisheries, and other ecological values. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource St. John, Chandler P. Subject The topic of the resource Government agencies Environmental policy Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1979-12-06 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 28 Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS148VIIIB28_Fd8_Page_13.pdf Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/6a59b172664ab1f278f02da13669b77b.pdf 13b506706d24a2e094877e8d35015b73 PDF Text Text US-89 LOGAN CANYON Preferred Alternative �such a design is not compatible with the environmental concerns of the canyon, the committee had to identify where compromises could be made. Briefly! ~ resulted in no change in the present ~way width in the first four miles above Right Rand Pork and numerous other compro mises throughout the remainder of the canYOD. The committee fell tbat if the roadway was improved through the remainder of the canyon, by providing passing lanes, intersection channelization and improved alignment, the existin~ alignme nt in the farst four miles above Ri~t Hand Fo rk (the most environmentally SCILSItive area of the canyon) would be acceptable. US-89 LOGAN CANYON Prererred Alternatiye BACKGROUND: US-89 through Logan Canyon (between Logan and Garden City) has been destgnated as a Scenic Byway and was originally constructed in the 1930's. The ~l nine miles of the canyon (from Logan to Right Hand Fo rk) were widened in the 1960's, and" the remairuns: 28 miles from Right Hand Fork to Garden City have not been improved to meet current standards. The roadway is very narrow, traversing a steep canyon environment. Numerous sbarp curves limit sight distance and oPl?Ortunities 10 pass. The pavement needs major rehabilitation and the bridges and other PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE: In general, the Preferred Alternative incorporates ele ments of the Composite Alternative, but adds additional detail andlor refinement. Most of the elements of the Preferred Alternative would require amendme nts to the Forest Plan with respect to visual, wetland and/o r riparian resources o n National Forest Lands. New structures would be protected with parapet walls. Other hazardous locations would be protected with guardrail or other acceptable devices. Present parking turnouts would be improved and new turno uts would be placed in recognition of any eliminated turnouts. Additional turno uts which attain at least two parking stalls with adequate sight distance would also be considered. Exact locations would be determined d uring final design and in conjunction with U SPS recomme ndations. The specific ele ments of the Preferred Alternative are presented below as they pertain to each section of the project. A map (Figure 1) is also rrovided to help identify the location 0 improvements. drainage structures are narrow and have restriClcd capacity. The most recent highway improvement studies in Logan Canyon have been in progress for the past six years. During this time, input has been sought from federal, stale and local agencies, concerned o rganizations and private individuals. Considerable time and funding resources have been spent holding numerous meetings with interested groups and evaluating the needs, desires, and potential impacts. In November 1990, the draft E IS fo r this project was circulated and a public hearing was held in January, 1991. Though some differing opinions still exist, there is general recognitioD that the highway facility Deeds to be improved and that those Improvements should consider tbc sensitive beauty of the canyon and its environment. SELECfION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE: A committee representing the FHWA, UDOT, and USPS was formed to develop tbe Preferred Alternative by carefully balanCing the diffe rent and conflicting ~oals. The committee gave careful consideralion 10 the following: • • • • entire length of this section would be a subject of fmal design; and. the location would be evaluated and carefully considered with respect to impacts on the following highway factors: • • • • • Features of this Section lA include: • a. Curve #5 at mp 384 andlor Curve #29 near mp 387 would be flattened if a 3 year accident analysis at the time of construction shows a concentration of curve related accidents (at either location) in excess of the Statewide accident average for arterial roadways. h. Burnt Brid~e ( mp 385.5) would be replaced With a new structure o n the sayte alignment. Structure width would be .ao. ft (approximately 4 fi wider than the '5lf approaching roadway). A detour is req,wred as the present bridge must be entirely removed before a new structure can be constructed. Ve$etation removal and river bank modificallon are required. c. Comments received on tbe draft EIS Service to the traveli~ public En,uonmenlal sensitiVIty of the canyon Practicability of construction Since US·89 is classified as a minor arterial, it would normally warrant a consistent SO mph design thro ughout the canyon. However, since Page 1 Roadway elevation would be raised about 3 fl at Logan Cave (mp 386.2), for a total length of 1000 ft. The grade e levation would allow the roadway to be placed several feet closer to the mountain and somewhat flattcn Curve #22. The river bank would be protected and revegetated as appropriate. d. A parking area would be constructed for Logan Cave visitors at mp 386.3 to accommodate as many vehicles as practical. A foot path to the cave would be constructed by the USPS in consultation with UDOT. e. Cottonwood Creek culvert (mp 386.4) would be replaced on the same alignment. SEcrION lA! This section begins at Right Hand Fork!i!m 383.47) and extends to mp 387.47, a len of 4.0 miles. Present design speed, J?OSt speed and ~ ting roadway width of 26 ft would remaJn unchanged. No features outside the existing roadway would be disturbed, except as noted below. Portions of the section havmg design speeds lower than the present speed limit would be appropriately signed. Placement of concrete curb and gutter, or gutter only, along one or both sides of the roadway in portions of or along the Roadside drainage channels Maintenance operations Protection of roadside hazards Access require me nts R olled curb applications for bicycle safety roadway during freezing conditions of the river or other higb· water events. SEcnON 1B: This section begins at my' 387.47 and extends to the end of the Middle Canyon Section (at mp 391.6), a len2th of 4.13 miles. A 34-fi roadway section woufd be constructed with a design speed of 35 mph. The maximum degree of curve would be 1S'3O', and the clear zone requirement would be 18 ft. Milepost 387.47 marks the be~ of a transition from the 2.6-ft roadway WIdth of Section lA to a 4()..ft roadway width of Section 2. For down·caoyon traffic, Section 1B would prepare drivers leaving the 50 mph design speed of Section 2 for the lower design saeed in Section 1A. Section 1B has been defined as an area which could absorb more roadway widening with less negative effect than Section lA. Features of Section 1B include: a. Curve #33 (mp 387.7) would be flattened by removing rock materiru. and creating a new cut. b. Lower Twin Bridge (mp 387.76) would be replaced on new alignment immediately upstream of the present bridge, c1eaNpanning the river. The new structure would be 38--ft wide; and the present structure would be removed when the new structure is placed in service. c. Curve #37 (mp 388.5) would be flattened by creating a new excavation into the mountain. Design and construction would be similar to Curve #33. d. Upper Twin Bridge (mp 388.76) would be replaced with a JS.ft wide structure on new alignment, immediately downstream of and about 10 ft higher than the existing bridge The present bridge and road way would serve as a detour during construction. e. Ctuves #39 and #40 (mp 388.8) would be flattened. f. At mp 386.6, the roadway elevation would be raised about 3 ft for 500 ft. This sbo uld eliminate occasional fl ooding of the Page 2 f. Tem.l?le Fork Road intersection (mp 389.2) would be improved to provide a �US-89 LOGAN CANYON Preferred Alternative Figure 1 Note.: Due to the small scale of this map. curve and milepost numbers have not been provided. Instead, the map correlates to lext by using the leUer that relates to the specific urea of improvement Cor each section of the eunyon. (The maps In the fin al EIS will show the curve and milepost numbers.) Scale In Miles ,- - o- ,- - 2 \ '--- , @ ( 6\ /!!:. '0, f ~S1~~ ~~3 8EI~O I.J PI( BEGIN PROJECT (RighI Hand Fork) �safer access. Improvements include left and right turn lanes and new river crossing. A parking area would be constructed and accessed from Temple Fork Road in a location current~ used as parkiug. The parkin.s area woul be made as large as possible 10 accordance with USFS recommendations, without e.ncroaching upon the roadway or the nver. g. In the Ricks Springs Area (mp 389.8), the roadway width would be 46 ft , which provides a 12-ft Jeft tum lane for northbound traffic. The Ricks Springs structure would be replaced. Hydraulic and clear zone requirements would be considered, with an ~nment shift toward the river recommend . All parking areas would be tt0vided On the west side of the roadway. aterial would be removed andlor retainin& walls constructed in accordance wi good desifi:i practice to provide the maximum feasl Ie parking area: All ~throvements would be coDS1Stent WI USFS recommendations. a. h. •• J. d. I. At Tony Grove intersection, left and right turn deceleration and storage lane for turns would be provided into Tony Grove Area (mp 393.7). To~ Grove Cr~ek culvert (mp 393.8) wo d be replaced on original alignment. The new crossing would be 4 ft wider than the approach roadway. Bunch Grass Creek Culvert (mp 394.2) would be replaced. •• g. Beaver Creek Structure at Franklin Basin Road ~m£in~.9) would be replaced on origin . ent. Pavement width transitions would affect total structure width, requiring a mWmum width of 58 h. Franklin Basin intersection )mp 397.0) would be improved as in (c above. L Beaver Creek Structure (mp 397.5) would be replaced on same alignment. New structure width is 44 ft. Vertical rock material (at mp 399.11 which lies within 31 ft of the centerline 0 the proposed roadway would be removed. Upbill passing lane from Garden City would end at mp 404.6, about 500 ft on the Cache County side of the Summit. Access to Limber Pine T railhead would be relocated to the StunD1.it (mp 404.75) in oonnection with the existing forest access road. US-89 would be modified to xrovide left and ri~t tum lanes. Wi th transitions are 1Ocluded. u. The drainage box culvert at Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and s urroun~ area (mp 399.6) would be rdclaced an widened to accommodate wi er roadway and pavement transitions (or the Beaver Mountain Road intersection. A width of 20 ft from the shoulder line to headwall on each side is required to avoid the need for fcfardrail protection. Total width wou d be at least 64 ft. Allowance would be made for snowmobile crossings to continue to occur at or near present use locations. SECfION 3A, This section is from Bear Lake Summit to Brid~erland Subdivision intersection (mp 404. 5 to 409.4), a length of 4.6 mile!:. Design speed would be 40 mph and roadway width with raassing lane would be 47 ft (three 12-ft traffic anes, One 8-ft shoulder and one 3-ft sbouldil?' This section would have a continuous uph' passing lane. Features of Section 3A include: 243, at mp 399.75) would be realigned and channelized to r0vide lert and rirt deceleration an storage lanes wit appropriate tapers on SR-243 and US-89. replaced on origmal . ent. Structure width would be 44 ft unless tapers for cam~ound widening run Onto bridge, creaUng a need for additional width. A detour for traffic and a temcorary brid3e are necessary. Red Banks ampgroun intersection (mp 394.6) would be improved as in (c) above. A climbing lane would begin at mp 394.9 and end at mp 396.5, a length of 1.6 miles. 1. m. Beaver Mountain Road intcrsection (SR- Red Baub Bri~e (",:~:.5) would be ft. Page 3 k. down" type fencing would be provided in open range area from the cattle guard near mp 391.6 to the Franklin Basin area near mp 397.2 along both sides of the roadway. Fence design would conform to USFS recommendations. c. f. SECTION 2: This section begins at mp 391.6 and extends to the Bear Lake Summit (mp 404.75), a length of 13.15 miles. There would be a 50 mph design speed and a 4O-ft paved roadway Width. except as modified by passing lanes. The 4O-ft roadw:k section would provide for two 12-ft lr IC lanes and two 8-Ct shoulders. The passing lane section would allow for three 12-ft traffic Janes and one 8-ft shou!der.Jdown!till side) and one 3-ft shoulder h~phill Sl e), With a total roadway width of 47 Retaining wall would be constructed between Beaver Creek and roadwd; at mp 398.1, 398.3, 398.6 and 398.9 to re uce impact on the creek. Roadway widening can be obtained by constructing to the retaininJ wall and placing some fLll materi on the east side of the roadway. ~Lay Cwve #45 (rop 390.1) would be flattened and existina &cassing lane from mp 390.1 to 390.7 woul removed. Roadway elevation, in the area of mp 390.2 to 391.1, would be raised about 2 ft to eliminate floodin~ of the roadway , crcated during freezmg conditions of the river or other high-water events. J. A passing lane from mp 391.6 to 3933 would be constructed, 10cludina pavement width tapers, a length of 1.7 mdes. Curve # 43 (mp 389.4) would be flattened (moving the highway down bill). h. Features of Section 2 include: n. Climbi11ane would begin at mp 399.8 and en at mp 403. 0. a. The roadway would be realigned through Curve #69, #70 and #71 (mp 400 to 400.6) to auain 50 mph design speed curves. h. ~ p. Highway widening from mp 400.6 to 402 would be obtained by removing rock material OD the up-canyon (northerly) side of the present roadway. q. ,. s. c. Curve #85 (mp 405.1) would be flattened which would require a new fill section. The existing roadway alignment would be removed and origi.nal contour elevations and vegetation restored. Present alignment would be retained at 405.2) and roadway be constructed on the do . slope. Tree removal is required and impact to aesthetics would be reviewed with the USFS throughout the design and construction process. (m s Curve Il~ wi~ tH woul Access would be provided into Sunrise ~ound }mp 4055) w;!h ,oadwa{. m cations or right and left tum anes. Access into Bear Lake View Area (mp 405.5) would be relocated to Sunrise Campground Road. AP,opriate turn lane and signinJ would Scrovided. View area wo d be re-gra ed (raise elevation), enlarged and re-Iandscaped according to USPS recommendations. Curve #76 (mp 402.2), would be flattened horizontally and vertically, to auain design speecJ. Access [Q UDOT Maintenance Station (rop 402.38) would be improved by providing left and right tum lanes. Curve #80 (mp 404) would be fl attened to attain design speed. d. Page 4 Curve #88 (mp ~ would be flattened to attain design s . A centerline shift of about 200 ft With accompanying �SECfION 3D: This section is fro m Bridjcrland Subdivision to Garden City (mp 409. to 411.75), a length of 2.75 miles. Design speed wouJd be increased to 50 mph, with a maximum roadwa width of 40 ft (47 ft in passing lane areas). oadway widening in this section would consist of approximately equal amount of cut and fill areas. earthwo rk (excavation) would be required. e. f. g. h. (7 Curves #89, #92, #94, and #95 405.9, 406.2, 406.9, and 407.2) woul be flatt ened 10 attain desiFcD speed. The prese nt alignment WOll d be removed and original contours and vegetation restored upon completion. k Features of Section 3B include: Landslide area (mp 407.5) would be stabi lize~ br a ~li~atio n of appropriate geotechmca te ruques. a. b. Begin uphill climbing lane at mp 410.6. d. Curve # 116 (mp 411.2) would be flattened to attain design speed . Accesses at mp 411.2 would be redesigned. e. Curves #101 and #102 ~mp 408.3 and would be flau ene to attain design spec . The present alignment would be removed and original contours and vegetation restored upon completion. Access at mp 410.6 would be rolocated by closing prescot access and providing a new access from anotber public strect, if possible. If tbe access cannot be closed, tben it would be relocated to an improved location, providing the best design possible. A combination with the access at mp 410.7 ma~ be practicable. The access at mp 410. would be considerC":d according to the same criteria as the access at mp 410.6. c. Curve 898 ( mp 407.~ would be flattened to altain design s~e . A centerline shift of about 670 ft WIth accompanyi1. earthwork (excavation) is require . Roadway gradient stee~ns to about 7% in this area as a result 0 the curve realignment. The present alignment would be removed and original contours and vegetation restored upon completion. Curves #109, #110, #111, and :# 112 (mp 400.7, 400.8, 410.0, and 410.1) would be flattened to attain design speed. The intersection with SR-30 at mp 4 11.75 ~d of project) would be redesigned. ft and right-turn lanes, curb, gutter and sidewalk would be provided on US-89 and SR-30 in the VIcinity of this intersection. 408.~ .. Current access to B ri~erl and Subdivision (mp 408.6) would be osed. All subdivision access would be provided as described in (k) below. J. eu""" k. Alignment from Curve # 105 to Curve # 109 (rop 409.4) would be relocated. Also, an intersection for the Btidgerland Subdivision would be constructed wilh additional pavement widening for protected left and right-turn movements. The present alignment would be removed and restored to original contour and vegetation. Intersection improvements to other subdivision access would be considered, based on use rcguirements. roadway widening possibilities, and other factors. # 103, # 104, and #105 (mp 408.8) would be fl auened into a single curve, d e~n din on the alignment shirt of (k) t be ow. rthwork q uantities appear to be minimal. NOTE: The fmal E IS will further address and evaluate the impacts and potential mitigation measures for the Preferred Alternative, as well as the No Action Alternative, Standard ArLerial Alternative, Conservationist's Alternative. Pag e 5 �The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Utah Department of Transportation (DDOT) and the US Forest Service (USPS). through their public involvement efforts realize that the public bas a great interest in regard 10 this unique project along US-89 which travels through the beautiful Logan Canyon in close proximity to Logan River. Therefore, this brochure has been developed 10 provide the public a brief, but detailed descnption of the Preferred Alternative that will be presented in final Environmental Impact Statemenl (EIS). Copies of the final EIS will be available for reVIew at the following locations: UDOT District One Headquarters 169 Wall Ave Ogden, Utah (801) 399-5921 UDOT Location & Environmental Studies 4501 South 2700 West Salt Lake City, Utah (801) 9115-4159 FHWA Division Headquarters 2520 South 4700 South, Suite 9-A Salt Lake C;ty, Utah USFS Logan Ranger Station 860 North 1200 East Logan, Utah ~ City Library 90 North 100 East Logan, Utah Garden City Hall 145 West Logan Road Garden City, Utah � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2585 Image Width Image Width in pixels 1125 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/172">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/172</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1763927536 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource UDOT pamphlet, "US-89 Logan Canyon Preferred Alternative" Description An account of the resource Pamphlet explaining the preferred alternative in detail for Logan Canyon. Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Pamphlets Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 13 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd13 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/c2426fa2e227f35a667fc7101ded784e.pdf c9f2681871dc67d47bca3d7ce872f5be PDF Text Text · /: , Pete Morton, Ph.D. Environmental Consultant 9390 W. 14th Avenue Lakewood, CO 80215 (303) 202-0442 pmorton@du.edu February 27, 1996 Peggy Wood 67 1/ 2 S. 500 West Logan, UT 84321 Dear Peggy: Thanks for your phone call, I was hoping you would find me, as I had lost your number and address. Jill and I hope to close on our new home soon -- at which time our address and phone number will change -- so e - mail may be the best form of communication until then. As I mentioned on the phone I thought the Appeal to the Chief was excellent and raised some important and valid points. had some time to pull together environmental audit of t h e FEIS. the following pages. my initial I thoughts finally for an I will briefly outline them on If the Coalition would like me to expand the analYSis , I will have some time later this spring, but my summer and fall schedule is filling up quickly. Let me know. t1: re , Pete Morton P.S. Have you been able to obtain the Environmental Grant book from Island Press? �PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LOGAN CANYON HIGHWAY Prepared by Pete Morton, Ph.D. 1. page 9-1 1. (9.3.2.12) . The cost-benefi t analysis was deleted in the FEIS because of the difficulty of assigning costs and benefits of aesthetic values. Although t he se non-market costs and benefits are difficult to estimate, there are many economic studies published in peer-reviewed journal s that estimate recreation, environmental and aesthetic va lues. People may also be willing to pay to insure that Logan Canyon will exist in its present form for future generations to enjoy. Such non-use, intangible benefits have also been recogn i zed in the economic literature and are included in es timates of total economic value . Some discussi on on n on-use benefits and total economic value of recreation in Logan Canyon seems warranted . 2. page 9-12 (9.3 .2.13) The traffic growth rates should be carefully examine. Do these rates take into cons ideration transportation imp'rovements planned elsewhere in the regi on? Are individual projects double counting? The r-squared may be too low and there may be other problems with the regression. How many years o f data were u sed to calibrate the regression used for the projections? 3. page 9- 1 2 (9 . 3.2.14) Forest Plan compli ance . Is this based on compliance with t h e old forest plan? The forest plans developed during the fir st round of forest planning t h at I have reviewed need serious revisions . A better question to ask is whet her the planned construction is conSistent with ecosystem management and the new concepts (e . g. landscape analysis, etc.) that should be used to develop new forest pl ans. 4. The FEIS makes assurances that a revegetation plan will be prepared and implemented to mitigate the direct and indire ct impacts to wildlife . How much will the revegetation plan cost? Where will the money come from ? What budget constrai nt s exist that will prevent full implementation of the plan? In the past , federal agencies have ignored budget constraints in planning. This failure should be a concern in these times of s h rin king federal a nd state budgets. Logan Ca nyon FEIS Morton Page 1 �5. page 9-39. The DEIS stated that mining and logging were major use s along the project area. Although this was revised in the FEIS, did this statement impact the Forest Service decision to approve the project? 6. page 9 -4 2 . The issue of noise was raised a nd its impact on recreation experiences. How did they evaluate noise impacts to determine they were less than 3 dBA? Construction projects involving heavy equipment will decrease the quality of the recreational experience . Even if temporary, the decline in recreation experiences during construction should be included as an economic cost in the benefit-cost analysis. 7. page 9-42. One of the important facto rs contribut ing to a quality recreationa l experience (whet her fishing, hiking or driving for pleasure) is scenic beauty, or visual quality . Scenic beauty should be an important management consideration because of the steep slopes in Logan Canyon. Steep slopes are c l assified by landscape architects as "visually vulnerable", meaning they have an inherent resistance or susceptibili ty to degrading visual impacts. The steeper the slope, the greater its visible surface and the greater the potential for increased visual disruption. 8. page 9-43. Conunent pl23. The FEIS states that UDOT ' s deCision not to undertake visual quality improvements for the Conservationist's alternative was because the improvements did not justify the costs. This decision cannot be made without a benefit-cost analysis -- which was dropped from the FEIS. If a B-C analysis was completed, what benefits were attributed to improvements in visual quality? The improved visual quality in the Conservationist's alternative should be counted as a benefit in a B-C ana l ysis, while the costs of decreased visual quality in the preferred a lte r native shou ld be counted as a cost. 9. page 9-45. The short term loss of Class II fisheries is a cost that should be counted as such in a B- C analysis . Will budget constraints prevent full rehabilitation of the fisheries: There is also some risk that the mitigation and rehabilitation efforts will fail . If rehabilitation efforts incl ud e the replacement of native fish with stocked fish there may be some loss of genetic diversity and some long-te rm costs in terms of a potential decline in the health of native fish populations. Page 2 Morton Logan Canyon FEIS �10. page 9-65. As pointed out by the Mayor will be significant economic impacts construction. How long is the proposed Will the Conservation Alternative be a of Garden City , there during the proposed construction project? shorter project? I did not see much discussion of the economic impacts on local communities. These impacts may be very significant for small businesses unable to survive the con s tru c ti o n-indu ced recession . The discussion of employment impacts should focus on net j ob change -- job creation l ess potential job losses . Also, not all jobs are equal. Small business owners and employees that live and spend money in a community are more important to a local economy ( may have a higher multiplier) than temporary, non-local construction workers that live and spend their paychecks elsewhere -- and who may move on after the project is completed . 11. page 9-75. Dr . Wilson points out the potential long-term impacts on fish populations from channelization, etc. Once again, these impacts represent economic costs that should be included in the benefit-cost analysis . 12. page 9-79 . Although the B-C was not included in the FEIS, Ken Theis points out that it undervalued the recreation time spent in the canyon and overesti mates the benefits of speed. This is probably correct. Researchers have estimated the benefits of recreation and an economic analysis of those recreation benefits in Logan Canyon could be completed . One method u sed is the travel cost method where recreation benefits are partially based on travel time . Typically travel time is multipli ed by a percentage of hourly wage to estimate the recreation benefits from travel . A decrease in travel time as a result of the construction may actually represent an economic cost from a recreation standpoint. In addition, if the construction increases speed, and if "speed kills", than there may be a safety cost associated with the construction. Accidents at higher speeds can be more severe and frequent. Are there any studies that contrast the safety records of wider, faster highways with slower highways with pullouts through canyons? Logan Canyon FEIS Morton Page 3 �13 . page 9-87. Comments from Brad Lengas , a doctoral student at Utah State, indicate that the FEIS ignored the impacts of the large -scale highway con s truction di s turbances o n populations of 9 different bat species. This could be significant as bats provide an ins ect control service to humans -- a service with potentially significant economic benefits. HBats consume all type s of insects, including those which are obnoxi ous to humans (one Little Brown bat can con sume 600 mosquito s per hour) and tho s e which can cause crop damag e (various beetles and bugs)." Sc ientists note that predation plays an important role i n ending pest e pidemics and in lengt hening the periods between pes t outbreaks. If the bat populations decline, insect infestations may be longe r, more frequent and mor e intense. In a ddition to increased crop damage, increased insect populations will decrease the quality o f all forms of n onwinter recreation, with a r esulting l oss of benefits. The FEIS should address the impact of constru ction on b at populations, the potential benefits of sustaining ba t s and t h e ir habita t , and the costs of not doing so. 14. page 9-89 . Scott George provides an e x ce lle n t critique of the DE IS . He raises an interesting alternative of build i ng a n add iti onal medical facility rather than extensive highway improveme nt s . How g reat is the emergency med ica l n eed of Rich County res idents? Can a small satellite c lini c or h ospital handle this n eed? What are the costs of bu ildi ng such a fac ili ty and how do they compare to the additional hi g hway constr uction costs of the chosen alterna ti ve? Potential benefits of the hospital construction al t ernative include: 1) short term con stru ction jobs ; 2) long-term, hi g h paying me dic a l jobs and residentiary se r vice jobs; and 3) improved i nfrastruc ture a nd health serv i ces that will enhance future economic development potential in Rich County. 15. page 9 -1 30 . Comme nt s by Ken Theis poi nt o u t t h e appa ren t bias in the benef it- cost calcu lus. His observations seems to be correct . Miti gat ion costs should be incl u ded in the B/C, and the recreation benefits shou l d be f ully accounted for. Page 4 Morton Logan Canyon FEIS �,I May 10, 1995 Mr. Jack Ward Thomas, Chief USDA Forest Service P.O. Box 96090 Washington, D.C. 20090-6090 Re: Notice of Appeal and Statement of Reasons USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Record of Decision U.S. Higbway 89, Logan Canyon Wasatcb-Cacbe National Forest Dear Mr. Thomas, Pursuant to 36 CFR part 215, the Logan Canyon Coalition and the Utah Rivers Conservation Council hereby appeals the USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Record of Decision concerning U.S. 89 through Logan Canyon in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. This decision was signed on March 31 , 1995 by Dale N. Bosworth, Regional Forester. This decision amends the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan so that it is consistent with the Utah Department of Transponation's (UDOn modified Preferred Alternative, as described in UDOT' s Record of Decision. The Forest Service is also granting a transportation easement across the Wasatch-Cache National Forest to UDOT for the sake of this project. Appellants base their appeal of this decision on the reasons included herein. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, enclosure Kevin Kobe, President Logan Canyon Coalition (801) 753-5031 �NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF REASONS Pursuant to 36 C.F.R., Part 215 Appellants: Logan Canyon Coalition U.S.U. Box 1674 Logan, UT 84322-0199 (801) 753-5031 (80 I) 753-0497 Kevin Kobe, President Jaynan Chancellor, Treasurer Dr. Gordon Steinhoff Tim Wagner, Vice-President Dan Miller, Secretary Dr. Thomas J. Lyon Steve Flint Don R. Hickman Utah Rivers Conservation Council 1471 South llOO East Salt Lake City, UT 84105 (80 I) 486-3161 Zachary Frankel, Director Counsel for Appellants: Ms. Kate Zimmerman 1320 Claremont Drive, Boulder, CO 80303 (303) 494-1706 Decision Document: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Record of Decision, March 31, 1995 U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon Wasatch-Cache National Forest Deciding Officer: Dale N. Bosworth, Regional Forester, Intermountain Region 2 �Decision Appealed: We appeal the decision to: (i.) amend the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan so that it is consistent with the Utah Department of Transportation's (UDOT) modified Preferred Alternative, as described in UDOT's Record of Decision, and, (ii.) grant a transportation easement across the Wasatch-Cache National Forest to UDOT for the purpose of implementing the modified Preferred Alternative. We seek the reversal of this decision until UDOT provides a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement in which they better document the need for, and the environmental and economic impacts of, the modified Preferred Alternative. Also, we seek the reversal of this decision until UOOT scales down its construction proposal so as to present a genuine compromise between desired Level of Service and environmental constraints. UDOT should reconsider the Conservationists' Alternative, as described in Appendix A of this appeal. Finally, we seek the reversal of this decision until the Forest Service has reevaluated the segment of the Logan River from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek for Wild and Scenic River status. Reasons for Objecting: Appellants believe that UDOT has not adequately justified the need for its modified Preferred Alternative through considerations of safety, AASHTO design standards, traffic flow, or Level of Service. UDOT has not adequately assessed impacts to wildlife, the fishery, wetlands, or water quality in Logan River. Negative economic impacts have not been evaluated. UOOT's Record of Decision introduces aspects of road construction, such as batch plants and haul roads, which were not evaluated in the FEIS. Visual quality will be impaired in a manner inconsistent with guidelines contained in the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan. Furthermore, the Forest Service has agreed that the segment of the Logan River from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek might be eligible for Wild and Scenic River status, and that it should be reevaluated. A segment of the Logan River has been identified as having, potentially, more outstandingly remarkable values than any other river in the Wasatch-Cache Forest. Appellants are concerned that construction of UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative, with its associated impacts to the river and to the scenery, will degrade this river segment enough that it will no longer qualify for Wild and Scenic status. The Conservationists' Alternative improves the highway to an adequate extent, while minimizing environmental and economic impacts. UDOT's modified Preferred 3 �Alternative is, therefore, neither reasonable nor necessary. Appellants believe that the Forest Service's Record of Decision violates guidelines within the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resources Management Plan concerning wildlife, fisheries habitat, road construction, water quality, and economic impacts. The Forest Service is therefore in violation of the National Forest Management Act. The Forest Service is also in violation of the Federal Clean Water Act Antidegredation Policy that protects water quality and designated uses of Logan River. With its dec ision to allow extensive construction before Logan River is reevaluated for Wild and Scenic River status, the Forest Service is in violation of the 5(d) planning requirements of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Forest Service is also violating guidelines and objectives within its Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan. Finally, with its inadequate designation of 4(f) sites within Logan Canyon, the Forest Service is in violation of the National Transportation Act. Appellant's objections and reasons are described in more detail below. On January 11 , 1995, representatives of the Logan Canyon Coalition, appellants, met with Mr. Reese Pope, Forest Planner for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. We handed Mr. Pope a copy of our agenda for the meeting that outlined our concerns with UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative. We told Mr. Pope that UDOT's safety discussions in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) appear to be based upon flawed traffic and accident data. Mr. Pope told us that traffic and accident data is "not our province," referring to the Forest Service. Appellants believe, however, that ensuring the accuracy of traffic and accident data;s within the province of the Forest Service when a citizen's group that can document serious study of this data indicates that this data is problematic. Our concern is that the Fores t Service is permitting an extensive construction project in the National Forest that is unnecessary. We also told Mr. Pope of our concern that UDOT' s assessment of fishery impacts is inadequate. We told him that we are worried, for example, that UDOT has underestimated fish mortality by providing a simplistic account of the effects of increased sedimentation. Mr. Pope replied that the predicted decrease in HCI value appears to be within acceptable limits. Appellants still believe, however, that UDOT's fishery discussion, induding its analysis of HCI, is inadequate. Finally, we told Mr. Pope of our concern that proposed road construction will hann the scenic and free-flowing characteristics of the Logan River enough that it will not qualify for Wild and Scenic status when it is reevaluated. Mr. Pope expressed his opinion th at proposed construction will not hann the eligibility of this river. 4 �Appellants respectfully disagree, and will argue in this appeal that the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires that the Logan River receive interim protection until it is reevaluated. Several individual appellants, Dr. Thomas J. Lyon, Steve Flint, and Dr. Gordon Steinhoff, can document long-standing interest in UDOT's construction plans in Logan Canyon. We have been involved in early scoping hearings and on a UDOT interdisciplinary team. We have written many letters to UDOT and other agencies concerning UDOT' s DEIS, FEIS, and its Record of Decision. The Utah Rivers Conservation Council, an appellant, is a non-profit organization dedicated to achieving Wild and Scenic status for those rivers in Utah that qualify. The long-standing interest of this organization in Logan River is documented within the book A Citizen's Proposal to Protect the Wild Rivers of Utah, written and researched by Zachary Frankel, Director of the Utah Rivers Conservation Council. STATEMENT OF REASONS This Statement consists of the following sections: I. History and Background, 2. Safety Issues, 3. AASHTO Standards and Highway Design, 4. Wild and Scenic Rivers Issues, 5. Fishery Impacts, 6. Wildlife Impacts and Sensitive Species, 7. Visual Retention, 8. Economic Impacts, 9. Wetlands, 10. Water Quality, 11. Construction Impacts Not Evaluated in the FEIS, 12. 4(f) Sites. There is also an Appendix that contains: A. a map of Logan Canyon Highway 89, B. a description of the Conservationists' Alternative, C. photos of the sensitive areas discussed in this appeal. 1. WSTQRY AND BACKGROUND The Logan Canyon project was originally envisioned as a bridge replacement project, and has gradually evolved into a more extensive, 15 to 20 year construction project. The scale of the project has generated massive opposition by area residents, as evidenced by 309 letters in support of a lesser alternative, as opposed to 21 in support of the Modified Standard, an alternative similar to the Preferred Alternative (FEIS, Table 9-1). Hundreds of additional opposing letters were sent to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) in response to UDOT's adoption of the Preferred Alternative as described in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) (on file with Nadene Steinhoff, Bridgerland Audubon Society). Numerous letters to the editor and local 5 �newspaper editorials opposing the Preferred Alternative have been published (Herald JourfUJl, Cache Citizen, The Statesman, 1988-95). Four hundred protesters rallied in the canyon in 1992 (Salt Lake Tribune, Deseret News , Herald Journal, Cache Citizen, KTVX Channel 4 News (ABC), KUTV Channel 2 News (NBC), April 25 and 26, 1992; High Country News, June 1, 1992). UDOT received 682 signatures supporting a lesser alternative prior to 1993, and hundreds of petition signatures after the release of the FEIS, including petitions from Business People for the Canyon, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon, Logan Environmental Action Force, the Cache Sierra Club, and Bridgerland Audubon Society (FEIS, Table 9-1). Early in the process, citizens groups submitted their own highway improvement alternative. The Conservationists' Alternative is described in Appendix B. Appellants believe that the Utah Department of Transportation has never justified the need for a project as extensive as the Preferred Alternative. even as it has been modified in UDOT's Record of Decision. In the "Purpose and Need" section of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), UDOT relied heavily on the need for a reduction in travel time, pointing to the economic benefits of travelers being able to cut 4 to 8 minutes off their trip. Their costlbenefit analysis was based on inappropriate assumptions that undervalued the time spent in the canyon and overvalued the speed with which travelers moved through the canyon (DElS, Table 47). Logan Canyon has been recognized in numerous national magazines, for example, the recent Audubon magazine (Bass, 1994). It was one of the first designated Forest Service Scenic Byways. It is not merely a traffic conduit. After an extensive barrage of public criticism at the idea of trading serious environmental impacts for a 4 to 8 minute reduction in travel time, UDOT abandoned its rhetoric about the time savings (FEIS, pages 9-3 to 9-151). Travel time is not mentioned in the FEIS as a justification for this project. Rather, UDOT relies on considerations of safety and Level of Service (FEIS, 1-3 to 1-18). The DEIS clearly stated, however, that "safety is not a primary reason for this project" (DEIS, page 1-22). Less than two pages were devoted to safety in the DEIS. Appellants believe that this shift in attempts to justify the project between the DEIS and FEIS is evidence that this project is not clearly justified. The modified Preferred Alternative is, literally, a construction project in search of a justification. UDOT's traffic and accident data is seriously flawed, and yet the Forest Service has accepted this construction project even after being informed of these flaws (Bridgerland Audubon Society letter to the Forest Service dated May 2, 1993; Logan Canyon Coalition meeting with Reese Pope, Jan. 11 , 1995). UDOT's accident severity data show a correlation between high speeds and high numbers of fatalities and serious accidents on the already widened and straightened section of highway in the Lower 6 �Canyon. Appellants are concerned that the Forest Service is permitting UDOT to build a more dangerous highway. The gain in Level of Service with the modified Preferred Alternative over the Conservationists' Alternative is marginal. and comes at the cost of greater environmental destruction (FEIS, Table 2-1). UDOT and the Forest Service are not taking advantage of flexibility allowed by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and by the Federal Highway Administration, in order to protect scenic and environmental resources. UDOT and the Forest Service also ignore recommendations from the Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), caUing for greater emphasis on public involvement in highway design, preservation of scenic beauty, recognition and preservation of Scenic Byways, and prevention of adverse effects on water quality and wetlands. UDOT has attempted to portray the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway, classified as a minor arterial, as a critical link in the nation 's highway system. This attempt to justify the project is dishonest. The FEIS displays maps portraying U.S. 89 through Logan Canyon as a critical undeveloped link in a highway system connecting Mexico with Canada (FEIS, Figure I-I). Logan Canyon is actually a small mountain highway that will never provide a critical link due to its mountainous, steep terrain and the fact that it has already been bypassed by alternative routes. 1- 15 is the highway that is of primary importance in the area, connecting all points south, including Provo, Salt Lake City and Ogden, with all points north, including Pocatello, Idaho Falls, Butte and Helena. 1-80 is the major east to west route for commerce, not Logan Canyon (see Appendix A). As a route from Salt Lake City and Ogden to Yellowstone and the Grand Tetons, Idaho State Highway 34 will always be faster than the Logan Canyon highway due to the more rugged terrain of Logan Canyon. Garden City, at the other end of the Logan Canyon highway, is a small town of 193 people (1990 census), down from a 1980 population of 259. UDOT is proposing extensive widening and straightening of a highway that has already been bypassed by faster, alternative routes, and that serves a town of 193 residents, with a population that has declined by 25% over the past ten years. The entire population of Rich County (in which Garden City is located) has been declining over the past ten years. The 1990 population was 1,725, down from the 1980 population of 2,100, a reduction of almost 18 %, with several key industries moving away from Rich County in recent years (Bureau of the Census 1994; Utah Governor's Office of Planning and Budget 1993). Appellants believe that this steady population decline is a good indication that High way 89 does not require the extensive modifications UDOT is proposing. By accepting UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative, without adequate justification, the Forest Service is in violation of guidelines in the Wasatch-Cache 7 �National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan concerning unnecessary road construction (1985, page IV-44). Much attention has focused on the modifications UDOT has introduced into the Preferred Alternative as it is described in UDOT's Record of Decision. We believe that these modifications don't go far enough when viewed in tenns of the countervailing requirements of the Management Plan and federal laws. Literature Cited Bass, R. 1994. Keeping Logan Canyon. Audubon Magazine, Nov.lDec. Bitton, M. 1992. Partisans of Logan Canyon protest a widened road. High Country News, June I, 1992. Lyon, Dr. Thomas J. 1992. The road gang wants to wreck Logan Canyon. High Country News, June I, 1992. USDA Forest Service. 1995. Record of Decision (ROD), U.S. Highway 89. United States Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Utah Department of Transportation (UDO"D. 1990. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation (UOO"D. 1995. Record of Decision (ROD), U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. Utah Governor' s Office of Planning and Budget. 1993. Utah Demographic Report. 2. SAFETY 1SSUF.5 1. The Forest Service has adopted the FEIS, as is mentioned on page 1 of its Record of Decision. The FEIS, in its purpose and need section, uses a clearly flawed safety analysis (in violation of the requirement for agencies to insure scientific integrity of analyses as stated in 40 CFR, Ch. 5, 1502.24). Thus the Forest Service's decision to 8 �• adopt the FEIS is arbitrary and capricious, as the FEIS does not meet the "standards for an adequate statement" (40 CFR, Ch. 5, 1506.3a). 2. We have evidence that the proposed construction will result in a more dangerous road, thus violating the requirements of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan that "public safety needs" be considered regarding the Logan Canyon highway (1985, page IV-311) . The Management Plan says about the Logan Canyon highway, "The road will not be raised to a higher standard than existing" (1985a, page 236; FEIS, page 9-88). Thus the only true justifications for highway modifications are improvements necessary for safety and replacement of deteriorated structural elements. However, the Forest Service has blindly accepted the UDOT safety analysis, despite the fact that the public had openly disputed UDOT's analysis of safety literally for two decades. The current UDOT analysis utilizes artificially inflated and manipulated traffic volumes, inconsistent with UDOT's own traffic counts, in an attempt to make the previously widened portion of the road (Lower Canyon) appear safer than the unwidened sections. In addition, UDOT has refused to make any reasonable comparisons of accident severity, although these data are available in the technical memorandums. Citizens have long contended that the type of highway modifications proposed here will make the roadway less safe. Our analysis supports this position. Accident rates are simply accidents per million vehicle miles. Only elementary arithmetic is needed for their calculation. What is being questioned here is not the method of calculation but the numbers used in these calculations. In 1986, the Interdisciplinary Team was presented with accident rate data in the fann of computer printouts. These printouts contained accident rates for specific sections, and also the section length, traffic flow, and accident numbers--all the infonnation necessary to calculate accident rates. The representatives of the environmental community on the tearn at that time (Rudy Lukez, Jack Spence, Bill Helm, and Steve Flint) discovered that the printed accident rates could not be derived from the accompanying data. The consultants, CH2M Hill, were informed of this, but presented the flawed data at the September 1986 public meeting in Logan. Rudy Lukez had to interrupt the presentation to remind the consultants of the problems with the data. At that time, UDOT and their consultants withdrew the accident rate data since they found the errors intractable. Subsequently, accident rates were never mentioned for over six and one half years. During this time the December 1990 DEIS stated, " .. . safety is not a primary reason for the project ... " (DEIS, page 1-22). Accident rates were not mentioned in the DEIS, but they suddenly appeared in Table 1-2 of the March 1993 FEIS. 9 �, It appears that the accident rates were introduced into the FEIS for two reasons. One was an attempt to make the Lower Canyon look like the safest part of the road. This was done by manipulating the traffic volumes in the Lower Canyon upward, thus reducing the calculated accident rates (the higbway here was widened in the 1960's). The second use of accident rates was to make it look like the road was quickly becoming much more dangerous. This was done by drastically reducing traffic flows in recent years along the rest of the highway. This caused the accident rates to rise, giving the appearance of a much more dangerous road in recent years. UDOT claimed a 44% increase in the accident rate as one went from the 1980-'85 period to the 1986-'90 period (page 1- 10 of the FEIS). It is a straightforward procedure to backcalculate the traffic flows (average annual daily traffic, abbreviated as ADT or AADlj used in calculating the accident rates in Table 1-2 of the FEIS. These data are shown in our Table I for each section of the highway, and the percent change in traffic flow is calculated. Clearly, if one could believe these data, there are massive reductions in traffic in Logan Canyon in recent years. In one section of the Middle Canyon, for example, the reduction in recent years is supposedly almost 80%! Since such massive reductions is clearly not the case (measured traffic flow is discussed below), the UDOT safety argument based on these accident rates is meaningless. The response of UDOT to the presentation of tbese ADT derived from their table was to issue the statement, "The ADT presented in Revised Table 1-2 are estimates made by UDOT and are used to calculate the accident rates in segments. However, estimates are changed periodically as additional information concerning census and other data is made available. The two periods shown on the table may be misinterpreted to indicate that there has been a decrease in traffic in the canyon between the two periods studied. To determine actual usage of the canyon you should examine the actual traffic count information measured in the canyon. Year to year counts should also be examined to determine the trends since variations in traffic usage occurs each year." (October 15, 1993 UDOT press release, distributed at the meeting of the State Transportation Commission). Why UDOT believes it should be able to take measured traffic counts for past years and adjust them according to census and other information is beyond belief. Clearly, they do not know wbat they are doing. At the time they issued the above statement, they issued a revision of Table 1-2, correcting some of the grossest errors for the 1980-'85 period. In examining our Table I, you will note that there appear to be periodic massive infusions and deletions of traffic from the highway. These are clearly spurious since only unpaved roads 10 �intersect this highway between Logan and Garden City. Their revised Table 1-2 corrects this, but still shows decreases in more recent years. We show this in our Table 2. Since UDOT provided ADT in the revised table, we did not need to backcalculate it from the accident rates. Actual traffic flow can be found in Figure 1-4 of the FEIS . While the FEIS does not provide a location in the canyon where these traffic volumes are reported to occur, referring to the 1987 Technical Memorandums makes it absolutely clear that these numbers represent traffic at Card Canyon (within the mp 378-383.3 section). For all other Iccations in the canyon, this number is scaled either up or down by a factor. UDOT has never provided these factors to the public, however they can be backcalculated from the traffic flow data used in the accident rate calculations. We have found that these factors vary in a curious manner from table to table. For example, in the traffic flow projections figure (FEIS, Table 1-5), the decrease in traffic flow as one goes "up" the canyon (to higher milepost numbers) is much less than is evident from the accident rate data. Thus UDOT is using vastly different factors at different times. When they want low traffic in the unwidened portion of the canyon (to make accident rates high), they use large factors. When they want high traffic in the unwidened portions of the canyon (to justify highway widening) they use small factors . Taking averages for Card Canyon, from Figure 1-4, gives 1812 cars per day for 1980-'85 and 1844 for 1986-'90. This shows a small increase of 1.8 % in the measured average annual traffic flow between these two periods, rather than the decrease shown by UDOT's accident rate data (our Tables I and 2) . It also shows that UDOT is using a traffic flow value in its accident rate calculation for the mp 378-383.3 section that is 1.6 times the measured value in Figure 1-4. There is no logical reason for this discrepancy. This high traffic flow very effectively decreases the accident rate in this section. It is blatant fabrication of data that cannot be ignored. The distortion for the section immediately below, the lower Lower Canyon, mp 374.64-378, is even greater. (UDOT has never produced a method we consider reasonable for detennining traffic flow in the lower Lower Canyon .) UDOT claims to have calculated this traffic flow using a method described on page 5 of the Appendix to their Record of Decision. A traffic flow of 14,000 cars per day is reported for the section of Highway 89 that lies below Logan Canyon, south of Utah State University (page 5 of the Appendix to the ROD, mp 373 approximately). Although this section is well outside Logan Canyon, the traffic flow for this section, representing heavy University traffic, is artificially "extended" up the canyon to increase the traffic flow in the lower Lower Canyon, mp 374.64-378 . The rate of 14,000 cars per day is averaged using a weighting method with a traffic flow of 3,000 cars per day claimed for the Lower Canyon. This calculation is reported by UDOT to yield a weighted 11 �traffic flow for the lower Lower Canyon, mp 374.64-378, of 7500 cars per day. However, adhering strictly to the formula for this calculation presented on page 5 of the Appendix actually produces a value of 4,015 cars per day. UDOT is not only "extending" University traffic up the canyon to artificially inflate the traffic flow in the lower Lower Canyon, it has also miscalculated this traffic flow to obtain a value nearly twice what the formula actually provides. We would expect to see this number, 4,015 cars per day, in subsequent tables, yet it never appears. Values of over 6 and 7 thousand cars per day are given in revised Table 1-2,4510 is used in the accident severity table (page 7 of the Appendix), and 3367 is used in the new accident rate table (page 3 of the Appendix). Part of the problem is that the milepost section shown on page 5 of the Appendix coincides with the milepost section in Table 1-2, but does not coincide with section designations in the other tables. Rather than attempting to guess how these errors occurred, we will argue that all of the traffic flows provided by UDOT for the lower Lower Canyon are excessive. The calculation method presented on page 5 of the Appendix (ROD) has no basis in reality. What it has done is take a "commuter roadway" outside of Logan Canyon (U.S. 89 south of Utah State University) and use that traffic flow for the first 0.31 miles of Logan Canyon--an area with DO intersecting roads. The only realistic traffic flow for the lower Lower Canyon would be something slightly greater than the traffic flow reported in Figure 1-4 of the FEIS. Despite ten years of time to do this, UDOT has instead fabricated elaborate methods designed to intimidate the reader (for example, the material on page 5 of the Appendix to the ROD). Their data showing literally thousands of cars daily driving into the canyon and turning around in the first few miles (there are no intersecting roads here) is blatantly absurd to anyone familiar with the location. In UDOT's Record of Decision, another attempt is made to analyze accident rates. This was done because of our repeated questioning of both the original and revised accident rate data in Table 1-2. (During negotiations with UDOT in 1994, Dave Berg ofUDOT admitted that UDOT's traffic flow data was literally "garbage," hence this additional effort to salvage the safety argument in order to show purpose and need). This new analysis is conducted for a more recent period, 1989-'93 (ROD, Appendix, page 3). This new analysis appears to be based on one day's traffic count in 1994, and gives a value of 3367 cars per day for the Lower Canyon where the counter is located. This is greatly in excess of the 1869 cars per day (1990 data) shown in Figure 1-4 of the FEIS. Clearly, one day cannot be selected to represent a 5 year period of traffic flow, because both absolute numbers of cars and the proportional change in traffic through the canyon differs during different seasons. To further complicate any reasonable comparison of data, this new analysis subdivides the road 12 �< into different segments than we find in Table 1-2 (which was retained in the ROD). How can any comparisons be made with the 1980's data? Clearly, given UDOT's inability to count cars accurately over this ten year period, we question whether any UDOT traffic flow data can legitimately be used in this EIS. Accident severity is a much more important parameter than simple accident rate. (Refer to the minutes of the interdisciplinary team meeting of August II, 1986, item #6, review of accident data. From page 3: "Duncan Silver (FHW A) said that a goal should be statistical reliance and that the number of accidents was not as important as the severity of the accidents.") In their Record of Decision, UDOT presents accident severity data for the first time since the 1987 Technical Memorandums (UDOT's ROD, Appendix, page 7). Their analysis is flawed in two ways. One flaw is that only fatalities are analyzed. Fatalities are fortunately so infrequent in Logan Canyon (8 fatal accidents for the period UDOT analyzed) that their distribution is statistically random. The second flaw is that UDOT attempted again to tie them to traffic flow, calculating a fatal accident rate. Again, the traffic volumes are inflated for the Lower Canyon (4,510 cars per day for a section with a measured traffic flow of scarcely over 1,800 cars per day). It is clear that UDOT is unable to provide any consistency in traffic flow data collection, and thus safety cannot be evaluated by any technique requiring traffic flow data. This continual manipulation of data has made a mockery of the directive for agencies to use "scientific integrity" in the process outlined in the National Environmental Protection Act, 40 CFR, Ch. 5, 1502.24. Thus, this FEIS does not meet the "standards for an adequate document" which 40 CFR, Ch. 5, 1506.3a requires for an agency to adopt an EIS. Hence, the Forest Service's adoption of this FEIS is arbitrary and capricious. We propose average accident severity as a measure of highway safety. This comparison is numerically independent of traffic flow. UDOT made these calculations in the 1987 Safety Technical Memorandum, in Table 3-7. The greatest accident severity was found in the widened section of the highway. (However, it is not clear how these calculations were done; attempting to repeat them by averaging the data in Table 3-8 of the Technical Memorandum does not produce the same average accident severity values as given by UDOT in Table 3-7.) One could argue that the more severe the accident, the greater the "weighting" it should be given. Of course these weightings are arbitrary, but it appears that the method UDOT used was strictly incremental. We have used a method of increasing the "weight" given a more severe accident in our Table 3. Again, the widened section of the highway has the most severe accidents. Clearly, driving at a speed inappropriate for a section of highway is the 13 �overriding cause of accidents (1987, Table 3-4). Widening and straightening a highway, without a large concomitant commitment to speed limit enforcement, simply increases the speed at which it is traveled. It is no surprise the severity of accidents increases. The issue of speed limit enforcement as a means of improving safety was raised during the EIS process, but UDOT ignored it. The construction alternative endorsed by the Forest Service will produce a more dangerous highway, and as a consequence, the Forest Services' s Record of Decision violates the stipulation of the Management Plan requiring that safety needs be considered for the Logan Canyon highway (page IV-3111). Literature Cited USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. USDA Forest Service. 1985a. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan; Final Environmental Impact Statement, Ch.6. Utah Department of Transportation (UOOn. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. Utah Department of Transportation. 1993 . (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1987. Technical Memoranda. Prepared by CH2M Hill. 14 �• Table 1 . Average daily traffic (ADT) bacKcalculated from Table 1-2 in th e FEIS , and the percent change as one goes from the early ' 80 ' 5 to the late '80's . sections and mileposts Lower 3 7 4. 6 4 378 . 00 Middle 383.00 384.40 387.00 388.40 Upper 39 1. 60 392.70 395 . 60 399.40 Rich 404. 75 408.20 410.10 ADT ' 80 - '8 5 from Tab 1 - 2 ADT '8 6 -' 90 from Tab 1 - 2 5710 2820 4693 2969 -17.8 5.3 2004 1815 8323 2990 2372 1815 1742 1781 18 . 4 - 0.0 - 79.1 - 40.4 5239 1840 1979 122 5 1811 1631 1614 1259 - 65.4 -11.4 - 1 8.4 2.8 1383 2247 1277 1164 1292 1228 - 15.8 - 42.5 -3. 8 Percent Change canyon - 378.00 - 383.30 - Canyon 384 . 40 387.00 388.40 391.60 Canyon 392 ;70 - 395.60 399.40 - 404.75 - County 408.20 410 . 10 - 411.87 - - �• Table 2. Percent change from the early to late 1980's using UDOT's revised average daily tra ffic (ADT) as contained in their revised Ta ble 1-2 of t he October '93 press release and (except for values with *) in their Janu a ry ' 95 ROD. The percent change for the values changed in the ROD are given in parentheses. section and '80-'85 mileposts ADT ' 86 -' 90 Percent Change ADT Lower 374.64 378.00 Canyon 378.00 383.30 6865 2824 7417* 3019 Middle 383.00 384.40 387.00 388.40 Canyon 384.40 387.00 388.40 391. 60 2824 1888 1847 1847 3019 1864 1809 1809 6.9 - 1. 3 - 2.1 -2.1 Upper 391. 60 392.70 395 . 60 399.40 Canyon 392.70 1809 16 80 1613 1257 -2.1 399.40 404.75 1847 1826 1815 1351 - 11.1 - 7.0 Rich 404.75 408.20 410.10 County 408.20 410 . 10 411.87 1299 1298 13 96* 1246 1292 1295 -4.1 - 0.4 -7. 2 395.60 8.0 6.9 (5.3) - 8.0 (-1. 8) �Table 3. An index of average accident severity using data from Table 3-8 of the 1986 Safety Technical Memorandum (the Technical Memorandums, all from about 1986, are considered the "backbone" of the EIS). We have used an increasing scale for accident severity, weighting "property damage only" as 1 , "possible injury" as 3, "nonincapacitating injury " as 7, "incapacitating injury" as 15, and "fatality" as 31. Average Accident Severity Widened roadway: Lower Canyon (section 0) 6.03 Middle Canyon (section 1) 5.00 Upper canyon (section 2) 4.07 Rich county (section 3) 3.89 Unmodified roadway: �3, AASHfO STANDARDS AND IDGHWAY DESIGN UDOT argues that they must widen and straighten the Logan Canyon Highway, and add passing lanes, in order to accomplish four major goals. They argue that they must enhance safety, satisfy AASHIO standards, improve traffic flow, and improve the capacity of the road to accommodate projected future traffic volumes (FEIS, page 1-3). We have dealt with safety issues in the previous section of this appeal. In this section we will discuss the other three goals. By accepting UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative, the Forest Service is accepting a road design that allows for unnecessary and unjustified construction in environmentally sensitive areas of the canyon. The Wasatch-Cache National Forest Management Plan specifies, as a guideline, that design speeds allowed on roads in this Forest shall be a "compromise" between desired travel speed and constraints imposed by the environment (page IV-44). Road design in the Forest must, therefore, also be a compromise between desired travel speed and environmental constraints. We shall argue that the road design the Forest Service is accepting in Logan Canyon, with its decision in favor of the modified Preferred Alternative, does not represent such a compromise. The Forest Service is therefore in violation of its Management Plan. Guidelines within this plan are to be "applied in all situations unless some overriding reason to abandon" them is supported by a Forest Service interdisciplinary analysis (page IV -24). AASHTO Standards UDOT attempts to justify the modified Preferred Alternative by appeal to safety standards that have been devised by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHIO). AASHTO standards are environmentally friendlier than UDOT admits. AASHTO recommends flexibility in the design of arterial roads in mountainous areas where the terrain limits road design. Our first criticism of UDOT's use of AASHIO standards is that UDOT is not taking advantage of the flexibility in road design that is allowed by AASHIO. In the FEIS, UDOT claims that the recommended minimum design speed for a minor arterial road is 50 miles per hour. Based on this claim, UDOT condemns the entire Logan Canyon highway, asserting that " the existing highway is therefore substandard" (FEIS, page 1-8). In the special circumstances of mountainous terrain, however, AASHTO relaxes the minimum design speed for a minor arterial to 40 miles per hour, down from 50 miles per hour, when, as in Logan Canyon, the daily hourly volume is over 400 (UDOT 1987, page 7-12; Claire Hendrickson, FHWA, personal 15 �communication), The current design speed for the section of highway through the Upper Canyon, 40 to 55 miles per hour, actually complies with standards allowed by AASHTO for mountainous terrain. UDOT has set the design speed from the Beaver Mountain intersection to over the canyon's summit at 50 miles per hour. By AASHTO standards, this design speed makes necessary a wider. straighter road. UDOT is insisting on a design speed, however, which is higher than the minimum allowed by AASHTO for mountainous terrain. In this section of highway the conditions are not appropriate for a uniform design speed of 50 miles per hour. This is particularly true at the summit, where UDOT plans to widen the road to 40 flo, and put in a passing lane and 22 ft. "clear zones" on either side of the highway. There is a beautiful grove of mature Douglas Fir at the summit. The road now winds through this grove, which has appropriately been called a "cathedral" (Bass 1994). As UDOT plans it now, in its legally-binding FEIS and ROD, a side canyon will be filled, and roughly one half of these mature trees will be torn out to make room for the widening and a big curve-cut at the summit. (please see the photo of the summit we have included in the appendix of this appeaL) The resulting destruction to the side canyon, the trees and the views at the summit strongly suggests, we believe, that conditions in the Upper Canyon do not warrant using the 50 miles per hour design speed, plus a passing lane, through this area. UDOT is using AASHTO standards inflexibly, when AASHTO allows flexibility in design in special circumstances such as these. Our second criticism of UDOT's use of AASHTO standards is that they use these standards in a manner that is arbitrary and capricious. For example, UDOT plans to widen the highway in the Upper Canyon, from the Beaver Mountain intersection to over the summit, to 40 flo The design speed is set at 50 miles per hour. Below this intersection, for about eight miles, UDOT is planning a design speed of 50 miles per hour, but they intend to widen the road to only 34 flo For this design speed, a road width of 34 ft. is below AASHTO standards (Roy Nelson, FHW A, personal communication). Exemptions from AASHTO standards are occasionally granted by the Federal Highway Administration. Why does UDOT apply AASHTO standards in this flexible fashion in the lower Upper Canyon, but insist on strictly applying full AASHTO standards above Beaver Mountain? UDOT's ROD includes an internal memo from a UDOT safety engineer, who asserts that a 34 flo road width at this design speed is adequately safe. He cites studies that report "little change on accident rate when going from 5 to 8 foot shoulder," in other words, when going from a 34 flo road width to a 40 ft. width. This safety engineer concludes that while keeping to a 34 ft. width may be substandard, "for this project" 16 �, this width "would be acceptable" (UDOT 1995, Appendix A, pages 9 and 10). We have included a copy of this memo at the end of this section of our appeal. In its 1987 Technical Memoranda, UDOT further defends the use of the 34 ft. width. They write, "A reduction from the standard 8-foot shoulder to the 5-foot shoulder can be justified in that while the 8-foot width is desirable for parking, a distressed vehicle can get out of the traffic stream yet remain on the paved surface with a 5-foot shoulder. The narrower shoulder also provides enough room for cyclists and pedestrians, with minimal interference with motorized vehicles." (1987, page 7-7) UDOT is arguing here that a 34 ft. road width is adequately safe and acceptable. In the FEIS, UDOT praises the safety record of the already "improved" highway in the Lower Canyon. As UDOT points out, this section of highway has a safety record that exceeds expectations (FEIS, page 1-9). This section of highway is 34 ft. wide. As we have described above, the summit of Logan Canyon is particularly beautiful; the road winds through magnificent old Douglas Fir. Roughly one-half of these trees will be lost if UDOT widens the road here to 40 ft. and puts in the planned passing lane and 22 ft. "clear wnes," following the alignment specified in the FEIS and the ROD. UDOT is relaxing AASHTO standards in order to use the 34 ft. width in the lower Upper Canyon, below Beaver Mountain. A UDOT safety engineer has argued that a 34 ft . width is "acceptable" from a safety standpoint, citing studies that show this. The "improved" highway in the Lower Canyon, which is 34 ft. wide, exceeds safety expectations. Exemptions from strict AASHTO standards are granted. It seems the most arbitrary and capricious of decisions to end the 34 ft. width at Beaver Mountain, and insist upon a 40 ft. width above Beaver Mountain, with the resulting unacceptable destruction to a side canyon, trees and scenery at the summit. Another example of UDOT's arbitrary and capricious use of AASHTO standards is in their plans for the highway in the Middle Canyon. In the lower Middle Canyon, up to Lower Twin Bridge, UDOT intends to maintain the current design speed of 25 miles per hour, and the current width of 26 ft. They intend to widen the road above Lower Twin Bridge to 34 ft. , increasing the design speed to a uniform 35 miles per hour. A design speed of 35 miles per hour is below AASHTO standards for a minor arterial highway, but, UDOT argues, this design speed is closer to design speeds recommended by AASHTO. UDOT attempts to justify ending the 26 ft. road width at Lower Twin Bridge by saying that "the roadway begins to move further away from the river at this point" (UDOT 1995a). This statement is patently false. The highway closely follows the river throughout much of the Middle Canyon above Lower Twin Bridge, particularly 17 �along the Dugway and at Temple Fork intersection, where the highway closely parallels the river, rising ahove the river on a very steep slope. (Please see the photos we have provided in the Appendix to this appeal.) Widening the highway in this section of Logan Canyon will negatively affect the scenery, water quality, and the fishery. These impacts could be quite serious. UDOT plans to cut 4 to 8 feet into the mountain at the Dugway for 3/4 of a mile, with extensive widening and curve cuts at and below the Temple Fork intersection. They plan to place a retaining wall in one section of the Dugway. There is the risk of extensive retaining walls being placed throughout the Middle Canyon. UDOT has told us that whenever they cannot revegetate a slope, they must install retaining walls (Lynn Zollinger, UDOT engineer, personal communication) . Located just below Lower Twin Bridge is a documented brown trout spawning area. Good conditions for trout spawning are relatively rare in Logan River. Fisheries biologists have informed us that road widening in the Middle Canyon, with associated curve cuts, will possibly increase the level of sedimentation below Lower Twin Bridge to the point that there will be significant loss of trout eggs, a sharp decline in food production for trout, and loss of juvenile brown and cutthroat trout due to clogged gills. UDOT has refused to do a quantitative analysis of sediment-related impacts, even when publicly asked to do so by the Forest Service. The possibility of serious impacts to the scenery and the fishery can be minimized by extending the 26 ft. width another four miles up to ahove the Temple Fork intersection. This would mean leaving the upper Middle Canyon at its current design speed of 25 to 35 miles per hour. Considering that the highway closely parallels the river in the Middle Canyon above Lower Twin Bridge, and considering the possibility of serious negative impacts in this narrow section of the canyon if the road is widened and straightened, it is arbitrary and capricious to end the 26 ft. section at Lower Twin Bridge. Let us summarize our concerns so far with UDOT's use of AASIITO standards. UDOT insists upon using full AASIITO standards in an area where unacceptable environmental destruction will result, even though AASIITO allows flexibility when designing a road in mountainous areas where the terrain limits what can be done. It is not the intent of AASHTO to sanction unnecessary environmental destruction (Amy Steiner, AASIITO, personal communication). Also, UDOT applies AASHTO standards in an arbitrary and capricious fashion, without good justification for decisions to apply these standards in a stricter rather than in a more flexible fashion. UDOT portrays the curves in the upper Middle Canyon section of highway, ahove the Lower Twin Bridge, as being unsafe according to AASHTO standards. On page 2-23 in the FEIS, UDOT criticizes the Conservationists' Alternative for failing to 18 �bring these curves up to AASHTO standards for the posted speed. In Utah, however, a highway' s posted speed is often a compromise between design speed and the speed that drivers actually attain. When not federally mandated, posted speed is determined by calculating the speed that 85 percent of drivers are going. UDOT's proposed design speed for the upper Middle Canyon is a uniform 35 miles per hour, with extensive widening and straightening of the road. Drivers would very likely feel comfortable driving at speeds higher than 35 miles per hour on this widened and straightened stretch of highway. After all, the current posted speed is 35 miles per hour. Following standard practice in Utah, the posted speed may again inch up above design speed, as posted speed is brought more in line with the speed that drivers actually attain. After UDOT's "improvement" of this highway, these curves would still fail to satisfy AASHTO standards for the posted speed. Even if UDOT were to keep to a 35 mile per hour posted speed, as they say they will do in their ROD, the curves in the upper Middle Canyon would fail to meet AASHTO standards for the speeds that drivers will very likely be doing through this section of highway. The problem UDOT points to in its criticism of the Conservationists' Alternative, that the curves are unsafe according to AASHTO standards, will not really be solved by the modified Preferred Alternative. The real problem, of course, is that drivers tend to exceed the speed a road is designed for. This problem will likely only be made worse as UDOT widens and straightens this section of highway. Improve Capacity of tbe Higbway to Accommodate Projected Traffic Volumes UDOT uses a range of projected traffic volumes to argue, for example, that the present highway, without improvements, will provide a dangerously low level of service by the year 2010, and that continuous passing lanes are justified throughout the canyon above Right Hand Fork (1987, page 7-11). UDOT obtains its projections of traffic volumes by fitting a linear equation to past measurements of traffic volumes on the Logan Canyon highway, and by fitting a linear equation to past measurements of the population in northern Utah, in Cache, Box Elder, and Rich Counties. UDOT obtains a range of projected traffic volumes through the year 2010 by using these linear equations to project into the future. UDOT argues that linear equations should be used, rather than exponential, logarithmic and power equations, because linear equations have been found to best fit the data (1987, pages 4- 6 through 4-11). UDOT's projections are of future swnmer traffic volumes. Since 1973, annual traffic volumes have remained constant (FEIS, Figure 1-4). UDOT is designing the canyon highway purely for anticipated summer traffic, and more exactly, for anticipated summer weekend traffic. UDOT reports that summer weekend traffic is currently double that of weekday traffic (FEIS, page 1-16). 19 �We have fit a quadratic equation to the summer traffic data UDOT provides in the FEIS, Figure 1-4, and have found that a quadratic equation fits this data slightly better than does a linear equation. According to the quadratic equation, summer traffic volumes level off over time to values that are significantly lower in 20 10 than the values predicted by a linear equation. UDOT chooses a linear equation based upon its better fit to the data over exponential, logarithmic and power equations. Consistent with this method, UDOT should choose to use a quadratic equation, with its significantly lower predictions, based upon the better fit this equation provides to the data. We have made this point in a letter to UDOT from the Bridgerland Audubon Society, dated May 2, 1993 (UDOT's ROD 1995, Appendix, Response to Comments on FEIS, page 18). In response, UDOT says, "A linear model is an accepted and reasonable model used to project traffic." We are not arguing this claim. Our statistical results show, however, that in the case of Logan Canyon. a quadratic equation is the most reasonable equation to use, based on the better fit it provides to the data. There are other indications that summer traffic volumes in Logan Canyon are leveling off over time. We have run regression analyses on the summer traffic data UDOT provides in the FEIS, Figure 1-4, dividing the data into two categories, 1980 to 1985, and 1986 to 1990. From 1980 to 1985, there is a significant increase in traffic volume with time (r2=.82, P=.02). From 1986 to 1990, on the other hand, there is not a significant correlation between traffic volume and time (r2=.46, P=.21). This means that while in the early 1980's summer traffic increased with time, since 1986 there has been no significant increase in summer traffic volume with time. This is a good indication that summer traffic volumes are leveling off. We have also made this point in a letter to UDOT. They have replied that in predicting traffic volumes it is invalid to divide the data into small sets of "selected years" (Response to-Comments on FEIS, page 17). We are not suggesting, however, that UDOT use five years of data to predict traffic volumes. Our point is, rather, that we have here another indication that summer traffic volumes are leveling off with time, and that UOOT's use of a linear equation to predict summer traffic volumes is therefore invalid, yielding predictions that are too high. The trend shown by the later traffic data suggests that UDOT is planning to build a highway that is too big for actual future needs. The fact that a quadratic equation better fits the entire data set also supports this suggestion. Finally, from Bureau of the Census reports we have found that the population in Rich County, on the other side of the canyon, has been declining over the past ten years. In 1990, the population was 1725 in the entire county, down from the 1980 population of 2100. This is a decline of 17.9%. The population of Garden City, at the 20 �other end of the canyon highway, was 193 in 1990, down from 259 in 1980, a decline of 25.5% (Bureau of the Census 1994). The population of Rich County is probably a good indicator of demand on the Logan Canyon highway, as fewer people in Rich County mean fewer reasons for people to travel back and forth along the highway between Logan and Rich County. It is unfortunate that UDOT has not provided data that shows the percentage of vehicles moving through Logan Canyon that end their journey in Rich County, and the percentage that continue past Rich County into Idaho or Wyoming. Utah motorists moving to and from more northerly destinations such as Montpelier and Yellowstone have several alternate routes, including Idaho highways 34 and 36. Salt Lake and Ogden area motorists moving to and from destinations in Wyoming such as Evanston and Rock Springs have an alternate and more direct route on Interstate 80. Most traffic through Logan Canyon is likely local traffic between Cache and perhaps Box Elder Counties, and Rich County. With the population of Rich County declining over the past ten years, the demand on the Logan Canyon highway should at least level off over time, as the 1986 to 1990 data suggests is happening. This means, again, that UDOT is planning to build a highway based on predictions of traffic volumes that are too high. UDOT uses its projections of summer traffic volumes to determine future Level of Service values for the alternative construction proposals it considers in the FEIS. UDOT argues that the Preferred Alternative would improve the future Level of Service "to a much greater extent" than would the Conservationists' Alternative (FEIS, page 99). This argument is flawed, however, given the above indications that UDOT's predictions of summer traffic volumes are too high. Likely, the highway will not have to bear the burden of traffic UDOT is predicting. Even if, for the sake of argument, we accept UDOT's predictions, it isn' t the case that the Preferred Alternative would provide a "much greater" Level of Service (LOS) than would the Conservationists' Alternative. In the Upper Canyon, the Preferred Alternative is expected to provide a LOS of C/O in the year 2010. C/O means something between C and D. The Conservationists' Alternative is expected to provide a LOS of D. Please see Table I. The Preferred Alternative provides only an incremental increase in LOS over the Conservationists' Alternative. For the upper Middle Canyon, by the year 2010 the Preferred Alternative is expected to provide a LOS of D, while the Conservationists' Alternative is expected to provide a LOS of DIE. The gain in Level of Service with the Preferred Alternative is again quite marginal. According to UDOT's descriptions of Levels of Service, in the Upper Canyon the Preferred Alternative is expected to bring about "noticeable increases in platoon formation" and "platoon size," with passing being something between "significantly reduced" and "extremely difficult" (FEIS, page 1-18). With the Conservationists' Alternative, passing is expected to be "extremely difficult." How much better off will . 21 �we be to have passing that is slightly better than "extremely difficult," as opposed to being simply "extremely difficult"? In the upper Middle Canyon, the Preferred Alternative is expected to result in "unstable traffic flow," with passing being "extremely difficult." The Conservationists' Alternative is expected to provide passing that is something between "extremely difficult" and "virtually impossible." How much better off will we be with passing that is still "extremely difficult"? It is expected that by the year 2010, both alternatives will provide Levels of Service that fall below the va lue that is professionally acceptable. "LOS C is the minimum desirable LOS for a rural highway" (page 1-19). The marginal gains with the modified Preferred Alternative, with Levels of Service that are still below the "minimum desirable,'" are not worth the much greater cost and environmental destruction. Table 1 Projected LOS by year 2010 (from FElS, Table 2-1) Preferred Alternative Conservationists' Alternative Middle Canyon (lower) Rt. Hand Fork to Lower Twin Bridge (upper) Lower Twin Bridge to Cattle Guard (MP 391.6) DIE DIE D DIE Upper Canyon C/O D We have made this point to UDOT in several letters. Their response is that the difference between the LOS values C/O and D, for example, represents a significant improvement (UDOT's ROD, Response to Comments on FEIS, page 80). This claim is unbelievable, especially given the fact that both alternatives fall below the "minimum desirable" LOS. UDOT adds that we must evaluate construction alternatives on a "corridor-wide" basis (page 22). Considering the environmental impacts of the modified Preferred Alternative in the Middle and Upper sections of the canyon, however, and considering that the gains in LOS with the modified Preferred Alternative are quite marginal in these sections of the canyon, there is good reason for UDOT to scale back its plans in these sections. The corridor-wide LOS would still be enhanced. We are not protesting UDOT's proposals for the Rich County section of highway, past the Bear Lake overlook, for example. UDOT should minimize environmental destruction in the most sensitive areas of the canyon, given the fact that less destructive, yet practicable, alternatives are available in these areas. It is likely, however, that neither alternative will bring about the reduced LOS that UDOT is predicting. since, according to severa l indications, summer traffic 22 �volumes are leveling off over time. For these reasons, flawed traffic projections, and only marginal gains in predicted Levels of Service, UDOT has not justified its choice of the modified Preferred Alternative on the basis of its traffic projections. Improve Traffic Flow According to UDOT, factors that influence traffic flow include speed and travel time, passing ability, and "traffic interruptions" (UDOT 1987, page 6-2). These factors are used to derme the qualitative measure, Level of Service. Level of Service is a slightly broader concept than traffic flow , also taking into account safety, and driver "comfort and convenience." We will briefly compare the modified Preferred Alternative and the Conservationists' Ahemative with respect to the individual factors that enter into traffic flow. While the modified Preferred Alternative raises design speeds and increases opportunities for passing, overall traffic flow is enhanced only marginally when compared to the Conservationists' Alternative, and at the cost of unnecessary environmental destruction. The Conservationists' Alternative represents a good compromise between improving traffic flow and protecting environmentally sensitive areas of the canyon. In the FEIS, UDOT does not compare the Preferred Alternative and the Conservationists ' Alternative with respect to travel time through th e canyon (Table 21). This is unfortunate, since the difference in travel time between the two alternatives is strikingly minimal. In response to letters, UDOT has admitted that the difference is !O minutes or less (FEIS, page 9-9). Proposed design speeds for the highway are generally higher in the modified Preferred Alternative than the Conservationists' Alternative. AASHTO standards detertOine the width and curvature of a road once a design speed is chosen (Amy Steiner, AASHTO, personal communication). With a lower design speed, environmental impacts are lessened. UDOT insists upon a unifortO 50 mile per hour design speed in the Upper Canyon, even though designing for this speed will result in destruction at the summit to a side canyon, the mature trees and the scenic views. UDOT has the alternative, allowed by AASHTO standards, of leaving the design speed at its present 40 to 55 miles per hour. In the upper Middle Canyon, UDOT insists upon a unifortO 35 mile per hour design speed, even though designing for this speed will mean extensive widening and curve cuts , with a retaining wall. The fishery is placed at risk through the possibility of significantly increased sedimentation and turbidity, a risk which has not been adequately analyzed. These impacts and possible impacts are simply not necessary. As they are doing in the lower Middle Canyon, UDOT has the option of maintaining the current design speed, and so designing a less destructive road. With an increase in travel time through the canyon of less than 10 minutes, the environmental impacts to the Middle and Upper Canyons are not necessary. 23 �In their Technical Memoranda, UDOT claims that "the imposition of the lower speed limits onto the sections which can easily accommodate higher speeds would increase travel time and driver irritation" (1987, page 7-13). This is, in fact, UDOT's only defense of the higher design speeds they have chosen, other than their misleading claim that the AASHTO standard for a minor arterial road is 50 miles per hour (FEIS, page 1-8). Since the improvement in travel time is minimal, UDOT' s defense comes down to "driver irritation." UDOT is designing this highway purely for the sake of drivers being able to "go fast," regardless of the minimal savings in travel time, and regardless of the environmental destruction. The modified Preferred Alternative proposes a little over 6.5 miles of new passing lanes in the Upper Canyon, along half of the highway in the Upper Canyon. Below the Beaver Mountain intersection, UDOT is proposing over 3 miles of new passing lanes. UDOT claims that below the Beaver Mountain intersection, in the Upper Canyon, the highway will be widened to 34 ft. , rather than to the originally proposed 40 ft. They label the 34 ft. width a "compromise" for the sake of protecting wetlands (UDOT 1995a). Their claim that the highway in this section will be widened to 34 ft. is misleading, however, since for over 3 miles of this 8 mile section UDOT is proposing passing lanes that will extend the width of the road to 44 ft. UDOT plans to place the 3 miles of passing lanes proposed for below Beaver Mountain in wetlands along Red Banks and below the Tony Grove intersection. Through these wetlands, UDOT's "compromise" widens the highway to 44 ft. , rather than 47 ft. The Conservationists' Alternative proposes 1.6 miles of new passing lanes in the entire Upper Canyon, avoiding impacts to wetlands. With the minimal improvement in travel time achieved with the modified Preferred Alternative, the extensive passing lanes UOOT is proposing are not worth the extra cost and environmental impact. UDOT argues that construction alternatives cannot be judged by travel time alone, but must be evaluated in terms of the wider concept, Level of Service (LOS). As we have argued, however, by UDOT's own estimate the future LOS we achieve with the modified Preferred Alternative is only an incremental improvement over the LOS provided by the Conservationists' Alternative. Considering both travel time and Level of Service, the marginal improvement we achieve with the modified Preferred Alternative does not warrant either the high design speeds or the extensive passing lanes proposed in this alternative. We have asked UDOT to consider using slow vehicle turnouts, along with a single, more modest passing lane, in the section of highway along Red Banks and below the Tony Grove intersection, for the sake of protecting wetlands. UDOT refuses to propose slow vehicle turnouts. In their Technical Memorandum, UDOT admits that turnouts are "safe when properly used," and that, "A series of turnouts at regular 24 �intervals can provide considerable delay reduction" (1987, page 7-30). UDOT acknowledges that slow vehicle turnouts are used in other western states along highways in mountainous terrain. UDOT writes that, "Turnouts are not a substitute for a passing or climbing lane of adequate length." This may be true, in the proper circumstances. Along Red Banks and below the Tony Grove intersection , however, one or two adequately placed slow vehicle turnouts, with a more modest passing lane, would be a good compromise for the sake of protecting wetlands. Considering the minimal gain in travel time and Level of Service that would be achieved by placing passing lanes along half of the highway in the Upper Canyon, there is room here for a genuine compromise for the sake of environmental protection. By "traffic interruptions," we assume that UDOT is referring to such control measures as stop and yield signs, and traffic lights. Neither the modified Preferred Alternative nor the Conservationists' Alternative propose that such measures be used along this highway. UDOT has chosen the modified Preferred Alternative, in part, because, they say, it better improves driver "comfort and convenience.'" It appears that the modified Preferred Alternative is motivated simply by the desire to build a big highway on which drivers can "go fast," without the "irritation" of having to drive at lower speeds in some areas of the canyon, and without the "inconvenience" of having to adjust speeds slightly when negotiating some curves, perhaps having to shift gears. We are arguing that, given the minimal improvements in traffic flow provided by the modified Preferred Alternative, genuine compromise can and should be made for the sake of protecting the scenery, wetlands, the fishery, and wildlife. The Forest Service has designated Logan Canyon a National Scenic Byway. Logan Canyon was once proposed as a National Park. It has received national attention, for example, in the recent Audubon magazine article by Rick Bass (1994). Given the tremendous beauty and recreational value of this canyon, compromise can and should be reached, even if drivers are constrained from rocketing through the canyon to save fewer than 10 minutes, and even though drivers may be constrained to adjust speeds slightly through some curves. Logan Canyon is uniquely splendid, and irreplaceable. The Wasatch-Cache National Forest Management Plan includes several guidelines that call for a compromise in road design in this Forest. One guideline states, "Design speed must be a compromise between the travel speed desired and that which the terrain will permit within the environmental constraints" (page IV-44). This means that road design must also be a compromise between desired travel speed and environmental constraints. Design speeds proposed by UDOT, and highway design in general, throughout the Middle and Upper Canyons, is not a good compromise with environmental constraints. UDOT has designed the highway in accordance with projections of future traffic volumes that appear to be arbitrarily high. There are 25 �several indications that summer traffic volumes are leveling off in Logan Canyon. In defense of its design, UDOT often appeals to AASHTO safety standards. In a sensitive area of the canyon, however, UDOT is using AASHTO standards in an inappropriately strict fashion, counter to allowa."ces made by AASHTO for mountainous regions. UDOT has designed this highway in an arbitrary and capricious fashion, without good justification for decisions to apply AASHTO standards in a stricter rather than in a more flexible manner, for example, at the summit and through the upper Middle Canyon. Design speeds have been chosen by UDOT, it seems, purely for the sake of drivers being able to attain high speeds through the canyon, without a significant improvement in travel time or Level of Service. By accepting UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative, without good justification for the proposed construction, the Forest Service is violating the above guideline in its Management Plan. Another guideline states, "The alignment shall lay light on the land ... Except for necessary stream crossings, riparian areas shall not be disturbed" (page IV-44). The modified Preferred Alternative cannot be said to lay "light" on the land. A 47 ft. wide swath through the mature trees and a side canyon at the summit, with 22 ft. wide "clear zones" on either side, for a total "affected" width of 80 ft. , does not count as laying "light" on the land. Extensive widening and curve cuts through the upper Middle Canyon, with hillside excavations and a 4-8 ft. cut into the mountain along the Dugway for 3/4 of a mile, complete with a retaining wall, will not produce a road that lays "light" on the land. UDOT plans 1,740 ft. of retaining walls that will be anchored in riparian areas along Beaver Creek. Such destruction of riparian areas is not necessary. The Conservationists' Alternative improves traffic flow to an adequate extent, without such unacceptable impacts upon the canyon and river. By accepting UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative when an adequate alternative design is available, the Forest Service is violating the above guideline in its Management Plan concerning unnecessary impacts of a road on the landscape and riparian areas. The modified Preferred Alternative is neither reasonable nor necessary. It is not reasonable, because this highway design has not been adequately justified. It is not necessary, because there is an adequate and less damaging alternative, the Conservationists' Alternative. By violating the two guidelines quoted above, the Forest Service is in violation of the National Forest Management Act. These guidelines are not to be violated "unless some overriding reason to abandon" them is supported by a Forest Service interdisciplinary analysis (page IV-24). Such an interdisciplinary analysis for the purpose of abandoning these guidelines has not been done. Finally, in a response to a comment on its Management Plan, the Forest Service stated, "Improvements to Logan Canyon Highway will be only minor. There is a need to provide safe bridges and some passing lanes. The road will not be raised to a higher 26 �standard than existing" (Forest Service 1985a, p.236). In violating this commitment to the public, the Forest Service is acting in bad faith . We urge the Forest Service to insist that UDOT scale down its proposal to achieve a genuine compromise between the requirements of traffic flow and Level of Service, and environmental constraints. A scaled-down proposal should be submitted before the Forest Service amends the Management Plan and grants the required easement allowing highway construction in Logan Canyon. We also urge the Forest Service to insist that UDOT reconsider the Conservationists' Alternative for the Logan Canyon highway. Literature Cited Bass, R. 1994. Keeping Logan Canyon. Audubon Magazine, Nov.lDec. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. USDA Forest Service. 1985a. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan; Final Environmental Impact Statement, Ch.6. United States Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOD. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. Utah Department of Transportation. 1995a. U.S. 89 in Logan Canyon (pamphlet describing the Preferred Alternative). Utah Department of Transportation . 1993. (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CHZM Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1987. Technical Memoranda. Prepared by CHZM Hill. 27 �Service, and environmental constraints. A scaled-down proposal should be submitted before the Forest Service amends the Management Plan and grants the required easement aUowing highway construction in Logan Canyon. We also urge the Forest Service to insist that UDOT reconsider the Conservationists' Alternative for the Logan Canyon highway. Literature Cited Bass, R. 1994. Keeping Logan Canyon. Audubon Magazine, Nov.lDec. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan . USDA Forest Service. 1985a. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan; Final Environmental Impact Statement, Ch.6. United States Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Utah Department of Transportation (UD01). 1995. Through Logan Canyon. (RO~) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Utah Department of Transportation. 1995a. U.S. 89 in Logan Canyon (pamphlet describing the Preferred Alternative). Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M HiU. Utah Department of Transportation. 1987. Technical Memoranda. CH2M Hill. 4. WILD AND SCENIC RIVER PLANNING Section 5(d) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Pub. L. No. 90-542, 16 U.S.C., 127 1 !:UJ;g.) requires all federal agencies to consider potential national wild, scenic, and recreational river areas in all planning for the use and development of water and related land resources. The planning responsibility imposed by 5(d) plainly requires the Forest Service to assess the values of potential Wild and Scenic Rivers on National Forest lands during the preparation of land and resource management plans pursuant 28 �to the National Forest Management Act (16 U.S.C., 1600 ~.). Section 1924 of the Forest Management Act recognizes the Forest Service's responsibility in this regard: "Consideration of potential wild and scenic rivers is an inherent part of the ongoing land and resource management planning process." According to Chapter 8 of the Forest Service Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, rivers are identified for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System by several means, including the land management planning process. The Forest Service has elected to conduct wild and scenic river inventories as a part of its Forest Management Plan revision process. The Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan is currently being revised. Forest Service precedent is to complete the eligibility stage of the wild and scenic river inventory in a separate document prior to completion of the Management Plan revision. The suitability stage of the inventory is completed and included in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Management Plan revision. In November of 1993, the Wasatch-Cache Forest issued an inventory document identifying eligible wild and scenic rivers on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. This Inventory identified the Stillwater Fork of the Bear River as being eligible for stream wild and scenic river status. Appellants are concerned that, initially, only on the entire Wasatch-Cache National Forest, the Stillwater Fork of the Bear River, was .found to eligible for interim protection until a suitability study was performed. Appellants were involved with studying the Logan River and Beaver Creek, using the eligibility requirements from the Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook. Even though over 50 pages of information was provided to the Inventory Team (Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon, 1993), no reference was made to this material in the Inventory except a footnote. = Appellants found that certain segments of the Logan River might possess the free-flowing characteristics and outstandingly remarkable qualities for eligibility if the evaluation was corrected to use current evaluation techniques. These techniques were detailed in two letters to the Forest Supervisor (J. Logan, in a 3 page, single-spaced letter to Ms. Susan Giannettino, Forest Supervisor, 18 January 1994; also D. Parkin, in a 23 page, single-spaced letter to Ms. Susan Giannettino, 18 February 1994). These letters concurred in the opinion that the forest planners used an honest and systematic approach in preparing the Inventory. However, the main thrust of these letters was that there were "significant flaws in both the methodology and interpretation of policy guidelines" (Parkin, 1994). In response, the Wasatch-Cache Forest issued a supplemental report entitled LMP Revision Planning Record Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Evaluation. This 29 �• Supplement amended portions of the November 1993 inventory. Departing from planning criteria set forth in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (p.L. 90-542, 81 Stat. 906, as amended: 16 U.S.C. 1271 (Note), 1271-1287), the USDA-USDI Guidelines for implementing the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (USDA-USDI 1982), Forest Service Manual 1924, and Forest Service Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook (Ch. 8), the Wasatch-Cache Forest included an amendment to Appendix D which identified river segments that were "Likely to be Outstandingly Remarkable." The Forest identification team denoted with an "M" rivers that might possess outstandingly remarkable values and that require subsequent study. In this Supplement, the Logan River was resegmented into two segments, Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek and Beaver Creek to its source. The segment from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek was given five out of nine "might possess outstandingly remarkable values." This segment lies within the Utah Department of Transportation' s (UDOT) Highway 89 expansion project. This segment was identified for further study due to outstanding geologic and hydrologic, scenic, general recreational, fishery and ecological values. Eighty-two rivers andlor river segments were identified in the Supplement's reevaluation, and the only river segment that comes close in score to the Logan River segment from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek is the East Fork of the Smith's Fork, which scored only three "might possess outstandingly remarkable values" (Supplement 1994). Although no precedent has been set for rivers that "might possess outstandingly remarkable values," the Forest Service Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook provides interim protection guidelines for river segments examined in this Supplement. According to section 8.12 of this Handbook: "Interim Managment of Study Rivers. Management prescriptions for river corridors identified in the National River Inventory, or otherwise identified for study [emphasis added] should provide protection in the following ways: 1. To the extent the Forest Service is authorized under Jaw to control stream impoundments and diversions, the free-flowing characteristics of the identified river cannot be modified. 2. Outstandingly remarkable values of the identified river area must be protected and, to the extent practicable, enhanced. 3. Management and development of the identified river and its corridor cannot be modified to the degree that eligibility or classification would be affected (i.e. classification cannot be changed from wild to scenic, or scenic to recreational). 30 �• Specific management guidelines for each of the river classifications can be found in the revised USDA-USDI Guidelines for Eligibility, Classification, and Management of River Areas, and in the additional standards for study river assessment and management in section 8.2 of this chapter. These management guidelines should be followed, to the extent of Forest Service authority, for all identified study rivers. The protection requirements specified above must be documented in the forest plan prescriptions and continued until a decision is made as to the future use of the river and adjacent lands." The segment of the Logan River from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek has been "otherwise identified for study" by the Forest Service in its Supplement. It therefore qualifies for interim protection under the Management Planning Handbook. L Tbe Forest Service's Record of Decision violates Interim Protection Requirements to Maintain tbe Free-Flowing Nature of tbe Eligible Logan River. According to section 8.21(b) of the Forest Service Management Planning Handbook, free-flowing is defined as: "existing or flowing in a natural condition without impoundment, diversion, straightening. rip-rapping. or other minor structures at the time any river is proposed for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic Rivers System does not automatically disqualify it for designation, but future construction of such structures is not allowed" (emphasis added). The FEIS indicates that cement retaining walls will be used in riparian areas at Beaver Creek, and that riprap may be required wherever the river is adjacent to highway expansion. These modifications are in direct conflict with the interim protection mandated by the Management Planning Handbook. U. Tbe Record of Decision Violates tbe Forest Service's Interim Protection Requirements to Maintain tbe Outstandingly Remarkable Values of tbe Logan River. A. One of the values identified for the Logan River is its outstandingly remarkable fishery . According to the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Logan River fishery is a Class I and II fishery that is ranked as being in the top 5% of all stream fisheries in the state. This fishery is also considered by the Utah Division of Water Rights to be one of four major fisheries in the state (Greg Mladenka, Utah Division of Water Rights, personal communication). According to the FEIS, between 4.4 and 7.6% of brown and cutthroat trout will be lost in the Middle and Upper Canyons through streambank vegetation removal. Where stream bank vegetation is 31 �• removed, the FEIS estimates a 40 to 70% loss of brown and cutthroat trout. As discussed in the fishery impacts section of this appeal, however, fish mortality will likely be greater than this. UDOT has not adequately addressed sediment-related impacts on this fishery. It is obvious that UDOT's construction project will decrease the quality of this outstanding fishery. The Forest Service Management Planning Handbook clearly mandates maintenance, if not improvement of, all outstandingly remarkable values. Unless, subsequent to this appeal, the Wasatch-Cache Forest finds the Logan River ineligible, unsuitable, or Congress formally elects not to designate the Logan River a wild and scenic river, the Forest Service has a statutory requirement to ensure that the outstandingly remarkable fishery value of the Logan River is maintained in its existing state. B. Another value identified for the Logan River is its outstandingly remarkable ecological value. The FEIS states, "The single most important wildlife habitat type within the project area is woody riparian habitat consisting of forested and scrub/shrub wetlands and riparian communities that occur along the river and streams." According to the Environmental Protection Agency, as much as 80% of all wildife species are dependant upon riparian zones for at least a portion of their life cycles. Riparian zones thus fulfill an important function in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The FEIS estimates that highway construction will require the removal of 3.5 acres, which equals 1.8 miles, of riparian habitat. An additional 11.2 acres of associated wetlands will be impacted. Riparian zones will be destroyed through canopy removal, the addition of fill, and rip rap or retaining walls placed throughout the eligible wild and scenic Logan River segment. This expected 1.8 miles of riparian habitat removal represents roughly 20% of the eligible wild and scenic section of the Logan River. The FEIS summarizes these impacts as follows: "The permanent loss of riparian and wetland habitat has one of the greatest impacts on wildlife. Most of the habitat loss that occurs as a result of ongoing highway maintenance activities or that would result from construction of one of the aIternatives will be permanent. Roadway surfaces along with retaining walls, parking areas, flattened curves, new alignments, etc., all permanently eliminate wildlife habitat." The FEIS further estimates that 149.3 acres of upland habitat will be impacted. This could lead to "habitat fagmentation [that] can be a significant problem for songbirds, amphibians, or small mammals." In summary, with its decision to permit proposed highway construction, the 32 �Forest Service is not managing identified outstandingly remarkable ecological values of the Logan River in the interim period as required by the Management Planning Handbook and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, pending suitability studies or Congressional decision. C. The Logan River was also identified as requiring further study for its outstandingly remarkable scenic values. The FEIS estimates that construction will destroy 38 % and 9 % of the most visually sensitive areas within the eligible wild and scenic river segment, and 58% and 71 % of the moderately visually sensitive areas. UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative will not comply with the Visual Quality Objectives established in the Wasatch-Cache Forest Management Plan. If construction proceeds as planned, the Logan River will no longer possess the outstandingly remarkable scenic values needed to qualify for Wild and Scenic status. The "Dugway" will be excavated up to 8 ft. into the mountain, creating a huge road cut and the need for at least one planned retaining wall. Up canyon from the Dugway, the curve will be flattened and realignment will start for the replacement of the Upper Twin Bridge, producing another large road cut. Other road cuts will be made just below the Temple Fork intersection. The 8 miles of the Upper Canyon (from mp 391.6 to the Beaver Mountain intersection) will be widened to 34 ft., and areas with passing lanes, up to 3 miles in length, will be widened to 44 ft. These construction segments will produce large amounts of cut and fill and a large road base, further degrading the scenic value. Although the supplemental study indicated that the eligible Logan River segment was considered outstandingly scenic because it "Contain[s) a National Scenic Byway where the river conidor contributes significantly to the road's designation," the Forest Service is not managing the segment of the Logan River in the interim period to maintain its existing outstandingly remarkable scenic value. DL Tbe Record of Decision Violates tbe Forest Service's Interim Protection Requirements to Protect the Current Classification Status of the Eligible Logan River. In the Supplement to the Inventory released by the Wasatch-Cache Forest, no classification scheme was recommended for either stretch of the Logan River. It is the contention of the Utah Rivers Conservation Council, appellants, that the Logan River should be classified as a SCENIC river under the Wild and Scenic River System. According to the WiJd and Scenic Rivers Act, classification defmitions are as follows: 33 �• "Scenic river areas--Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of . impoundments, with shorelines or watersheds still largely primitive and shorelines largely undeveloped, but accessible in places by roads. Recreational river areas--Those rivers or sections of rivers that are readily accessible by road or railroad, that may have some development along their shorelines, and that may have undergone some impoundment or diversion in the past." The USDA-USDI NWSRS Final Revised Guidelines for Eligibility, CFR 39458, discusses interpretation of development by stating: "Existing low dams , diversion works, rip-rap. and other minor structures will not bar recreational classification, provided the watetway remains generally natural and riverine in appearance." Appellants are concerned that the Logan River segment from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek, which "might possess outstandingly remarkable values" as indicated in the Supplement, will be exposed to inappropriate levels of disturbance by UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative highway proposal. This Logan River segment is eligible for Wild and Scenic status, and, therefore, until an adequate evaluation is complete, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act mandates no degradation of values. UDOT's Record of Decision states, "The FEIS recognizes that some screening vegetation along the river may be disturbed, but again this is estimated in the EIS to be minor and mostly temporary in nature ... the road reconstruction project will not affect the potential eligibility or classification of the Logan River" (page 38). "The FEIS also evaluated the effects of the alternatives on the resources and characteristics affecting the scenic, historic, recreation, wildlife and fish, cultural and other values associated with the river and river corridor ... there will be either no or only minor effects from the Preferred Alternative on these values" (page 37). Appellants beHeve, however, that there are numerous construction components in the Preferred Alternative that will result in significant depreciation of wild and scenic values and will in fact jeopardize the potential classification of the Logan River and Beaver Creek. Some of these construction components are described above. Appellants are concerned that UDOT's "minor effects" will be enough to change the existing classification from scenic to recreational, or from recreational to ineligibility. This is explicitly contrary to requirements specified in the Forest Service Management Planning Handbook and in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. IV_ The Forest Service's Record of Decision Violates The National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Forest Service Administrative Direction for Compliance with that Act. 34 �With its Record of Decision, the Forest Service is in general failing to grant interim protection to the Logan River segment that has been found eligible for Wild and Scenic River status. The Forest Service is therefore in violation of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and its Forest Service Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, Chapter 8. Appellants are also concerned that the planning team did not assess all resource values that would qualify the Logan River for inclusion as an eligible Wild and Scenic River. Most notably, there is ample evidence to indicate that the Logan River possesses outstandingly remarkable water oriented recreation, botanical, and wildlife values (CPLC, 1993). Appellants are concerned that the Supplement does not evaluate significant tributaries of the Logan River, most notably Beaver Creek. Study and protection of tributary streams is an important component of the wild and scenic planning process because such streams and creeks are integral components of river systems. The goals of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act can best be achieved through preservation and recognition of river systems as integral wholes, with full recognition of the contribution of tributary steams. Also, management of such tributaries as Wild and Scenic Rivers will enhance the Forest Service's ability to maintain and enhance downstream riverine values. V. Tbe Forest Service Failed to Adequately Involve tbe Concerned Public in tbe Inventory Process. Although Logan Canyon is of high local and national interest, the original Inventory received a very limited distribution (Bass 1994). Even so, of those interested parties who responded, the overwhelming majority were critical of the Inventory. Of those who responded, none were notified of the subsequent reevaluation or the changes incorporated in the Table of Appendix D in the 1994 Supplement. The Forest Service has not provided sufficient documentation required for the concerned public to evaluate the criteria used to draw conclusions in the original Inventory. The Inventory refers to "detailed field surveys' (1993, pages A-19). In the Supplement we find the statement, "documentalion used to facilitate judging the merits of further study have been incorporated in this supplement...· (pages 1-10). Yet when appellants requested access to this "documentation," all that was forthcoming were copies of maps with largely unintelligible notations. Apparently, there exists no clear documentation that can be reviewed by the concerned pUblic. It is irresponsible for the Forest Service to agree to any depreciation of wild and scenic values without full involvement of the concerned public. 35 �The Utah Rivers Conservation Council has recommended that the entire Utah portion of the Logan River conidor be designated as a Scenic river under the NWSRS. This recommendation was made through A Citizen's Proposal to Protect the Wild Rivers of Utah, published by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. The WasatchCache Forest has not responded to this recommendation, other than by violating its (5d) Wild and Scenic River Act planning requirements through issuing its Record of Decision. Literature Cited Bass, R. 1994. Keeping Logan Canyon. Audubon Magazine, Nov.lDec. Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon. 1993. Letter of October 7, 1993, with numerous attachments containing information about Logan River, Logan Canyon and Beaver Creek. Logan, J. 1994. Letter of January 18 to Susan Giannettino, Forest Supervisor, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Parkin, D. 1994. Letter of February 18 to Susan Giannettino, Forest Supervisor, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1994. Supplement to Inventory of Rivers on the WasatchCache National Forest Eligible for Inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT. USDA Forest Service. 1993. Inventory of Rivers on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Eligible for Inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the WasatchCache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOn. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. Utah Rivers Conservation Council. A Citizen's Proposal to Protect the Wild Rivers of Utah, published by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. 36 �S. FlSHERY IMPACTS The Utah Department of Transportation and the Forest Service are accepting an analysis of fishery impacts that is inadequate. There is no scientific justification whatsoever for claims in UDOT's FEIS that trout populations will be reduced 4 to 8%, and that the effects of increased sedimentation will be "relatively minor and short term." From the FEIS and supporting documentation, we have no idea what impact UDOT's Preferred Alternative will have upon fish populations in Logan River. The Forest Service is also in violation of its Management Plan in not obtaining adequate analyses of required habitat indices. According to a guideline in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Management Plan, the Forest Service must monitor BCI and HCI indices for Logan River to ensure the continuing quality of fish habitat. As amended in the Forest Service' s Record of Decision (1995), this guideline states,"ln all streams maintain the existing HCI and BCI where they exceed the minimum of 42 and 75 respectively. Allow decreases not exceeding 5% of existing condition ... " (page IV-3(0). (These indices are described in Appendix 0 of the Plan.) No BCI analysis has been done by the Forest Service or by UDOT, predicting the effect of UDOT's construction upon this index for Logan River. No macroinvertibrate baseline data is reported for Logan River. An HCI analysis is briefly reported in the FEIS, but it is, as we shall show, inadequate. By failing to obtain adequate analyses of BCI and HCI habitat indices, and by failing to commit to proper monitoring of these indices, the Forest Service is in violation of its Management Plan. The Forest Service is therefore in violation of the National Forest Management Act. The Logan River has been designated a Class I and Class II waterway on the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources' Unique Streams List. As such, the fishery in Logan River is among the top 5% of stream fisheries in the state of Utah. This fishery is considered by the Utah Division of Water Rights to be one of four major fisheries in the state (Greg Mladenka, Division of Water Rights, personal communication). The Logan River supports naturally-reproducing populations of brown and cutthroat trout, and mountain whitefish. Logan River riparian habitat is considered among the "best preserved in the state" (FEIS, page 9-59). Due to the quality of its fishery, the quality of the fishing experience in relatively pristine conditions, and accessibility, the Logan River is a favorite with anglers throughout northern Utah. Anglers who fish the Logan bring $4 million annually into the local economy (estimate for 1990, UDOT 1987, Table 7, page 18). UDOT's analysis of fish loss due to construction begins with an estimate of the length of stream bank that will be impacted by the removal of vegetation. From studies by the Division of Wildlife Resources, we have available the number of fish that are located along each foot of stream bank. This value is multiplied by the 35 ., ~ e- r ~ ~".;it ( Ci rL. c f (' .. -r\"r.N~1;., ~ <.r<.-j �number of feet of stream bank that will be impacted. We now have the number of fish that are located along the length of impacted stream bank. This number is multiplied by 40% and by 70% to obtain a range of numbers of fish that will be lost in the impacted areas. The 40% and 70 % are fish mortality rates that have been borrowed from a Utah Division of Wildlife Resources study done in 1973 on the effects of the removal of stream bank vegetation. The numbers of fish lost in the impacted areas are divided by the total number of fish in the river, to give us a range of percentages of fish lost through construction. The FEIS concludes that in the Middle Canyon, 4.4 to 7.6% of brown trout will be lost, and the same percentages of cutthroat trout will be lost. In the Upper Canyon, again 4.4 to 7.6 % of each population will be lost (FEIS, Table 4.8, pages 4-43 through 4-45). The Forest Service has asked UDOT for a more extensive analysis. In a letter to UDOT, Regional Forester J .S. Tilder noted that the analysis UDOT provides in the DEIS considers only the impact of vegetation removal, ignoring the effects on the fishery of increased sedimentation due to construction (FEIS, page 9-49). He recommended that UDOT contact Forest Service fisheries biologists for help with quantitatively estimating effects of sedimentation. He supplied names and phone numbers. (Tixier's letter is attached at the end of this section of our appeal.) The quantitative analysis of fish loss in the FEIS is identical in method to that in the DEIS, without a quantitative analysis of sedimentation. In its response to Tixier, UDOT writes that the effects of increased sedimentation are "difficult to predict" (FEIS, pages 9-15,9- 16). In an internal memo, (included at the end of this section), Forest Service fisheries biologist Jill Dufour (1989) expressed her concern that UDOT is underestimating the effects of construction upon fish by neglecting turbidity in its quantitative analysis. The discussion of fishery iropacts in the FEIS is simplistic because UDOT refuses to quantitatively predict the increase in sedimentation and turbidity due to construction. Beyond saying that such an analysis is "difficult," UDOT claims that such an analysis "would greatly oversimplify and probably overestimate sediment related effects." They add that a quantitative analysis would not properly account for UDOT's use of "best management practices" during construction (FEIS, page 4-49). Several fisheries biologists have informed us that, in fact, the models that are used to predict sediment-related effects allow biologists to factor into their analysis the use of practices that limit the sediments entering a river. "Best management practices" are accounted for in the models used by the Forest Service and others. Rather than "overestimating" iropacts, as UDOT claims, such models allow biologists to realistically evaluate the impacts of the disturbance of riparian habitat. By refusing to do a quantitative analysis of sedimentation and turbidity, UDOT is building a "best case" scenario geared, it seems, to make the effects of their construction proposal 36 �• appear palatable--only a 4 to 8% loss of fish . In reality, considering sediment-related effects, the loss will likely be greater than this. In its recent Record of Decision, the Forest Service states categorically that "the environmental effects were adequately disclosed" in UOOT's FEIS (1995, page 2). In saying this, the Forest Service is ignoring the fact that UDOT has refused to provide a quantitative analysis of sedimentation, even after being publicly asked to do so by Regional Forester Tixier. In his request, Tixier cited the "significan ce" of the Logan River fishery. The Forest Service is also ignoring Jill Dufour' s memo, available in th e files in the Regional office, expressing her professional opinion that UDOT is underestimating the effects of increased turbidity by ignoring turbidity in its quantitative analysis. The Forest Service does not indicate why they have ignored the reservations expressed by these Forest Service personnel. For this reason, the Forest Service' s decision to accept UDOT's FEIS appears arbitrary and capricious. It appears to rest upon political expediency rather than good science. UDOT provides a qualitative, and very brief, discussion of sedimentation and turbidity. They write that, "The potential increase in turbidity and possibly siltation will be expected to have a relatively minor and short-term impact on water quality, benthic invertebrates, and fish populations" (FEIS, page 4-48). They support this claim by saying that "only" 10% of Logan River's banks will be impacted through construction, that not all of the affected stream banks will be impacted at the same time, and that measures will be used to control sediments entering the river during and after construction. For example, ground cover will be reestablished along stream banks, they claim, and construction will be limited to the drier months of the year "to the extent practicable." On the other hand, UDOT admits that mature riparian vegetation, with overhanging cover for fish, "will take considerably longer" to reestablish, up to 10 to 40 years (FEIS, pages 4-31 and 4-48). Growth of new cottonwoods and other deciduous trees, "could require 30 to 50 years or might never occur again" (page 43 1) . Since mature riparian plant communities take "considerably longer" to reestablish, the loss of these communities, especially on steep slopes, will likely have some long term impact on the fishery with respect to erosion control. In an undated report, "Effects of Road Building on the Logan River," the late professor of fisheries biology, William Helm, explains that in the drier months runoff into a river during construction can be especially damaging to a fishery. In riparian areas that have had vegetation removed, runoff from summer slonns canies a large load of sediment that, in the lowered flow of the river, is not canied downstream . In the drier mon ths , sediment tends to be deposited in the areas under construction or just downstream. If those areas are critical to fish, providing spawning or feeding grounds, 37 �the effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity can be severe. Helm writes that increased sedimentation can be expected to kill 95-100% of fish eggs. Sediments fill the spaces between gravel and stones, "greatly decreasing the supply of food for trout." Juvenile cutthroat trout are found in Logan River throughout the summer season, and are highly susceptible to sediments clogging their gills. UDOT claims that it will limit construction to the drier months of the year, but, according to Helm, this is actually "the worst possible time" to add sediment to rivers. Helm's assessment has been confirmed by a fisheries biologist with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (personal communication). UDOT has not established its claim that increased sedimentation and turbidity due to construction will have a "relatively minor and short-term impact." As Helm argues, sediment entering a river during the drier months is especially damaging to a fishery, and UDOT has admitted that mature riparian plant communities take from 10 to 40 years to reestablish. Furthermore, UDOT is planning extensive construction just beyond the riparian zone. Six curve cuts are planned along the highway through the Middle Canyon. UDOT is planning to widen the road in the Middle and Upper Canyons, just beyond, and in some places within, the riparian zone. At the Dugway, UDOT is planning to carve 4 to 8 feet into the rock and dirt wall on the mountain side of the highway, for a distance of about 3/4 of a mile. Upstream, Temple Fork intersection is to be widened, with a turning lane installed. Within the narrow riparian area between the road and the river, a retaining wall has been proposed to help stabilize the steep slope. Considering the extent of planned construction along Logan River, UDOT's claim that increased sedimentation and turbidity will have a "relatively minor and short-term impact" is unbelievable. With the loss of 10% of the riparian vegetation, and with extensive road construction in and just beyond the riparian zone, sediment-related effects will likely be major and long term. In fact, at one point in the FEIS, UDOT contradicts its conclusion by admitting that effects of increased sedimentation will be "short- and long-term" (page 4-2). A quantitative discussion of sediment-related effects would help us detennine how serious these effects will be on the fishery. Let us return to UDOT's quantitative analysis of fish mortality. It is simplistic in that it ignores effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity due to construction. It is simplistic, as well, in that it assumes that every length of stream bank is equivalent, with respect to fish spawning and feeding, to every other length of stream bank. If extensive construction takes place adjacent to sections of the river that are of critical importance to trout spawning and feeding, the impacts could exceed the estimated 4 to 8 % mortality. In a letter to CH2M Hill, preparers of the FEIS, Professor Helm (1987) reported that the river just downstream of Lower Twin Bridge in the Middle Canyon is an 38 �important spawning area for brown trout. This area features good pools and substrate, moderate water velocities and good overhanging cover. Helm discovered a relatively high number of brown trout "redds" or nests in this area, 9 redds in a . 15 mile stretch, as compared to 2 redds per mile in the river below this point. Two biologists have looked at this section of the river with us and have confinned that this area may be important for trout spawning. The extensive construction planned along the Dugway will be just above and upstream of Lower Twin Bridge. Sediments in runoff from this construction site will likely enter the river just upstream of the spawning area discovered by Helm, the sediments possibly killing eggs, damaging food production, and clogging the gills of juveniles. This would lead to a greater loss to the fishery than UDOT predicts. Jill Dufour of the Forest Service worries about the impacts construction at the Temple Fork intersection will have on juvenile cutthroat trout, and upon any spawning cutthroat trout, below the intersection. Juvenile cutthroat are found in Logan River throughout the summer, and Dufour has emphasized to us that these juveniles are highly susceptible to clogged gills from sediments (personal communication). Another fisheries biologist, Thomas Pettengill of the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, has told us that, in his opinion, the gradient of the river at the Temple Fork intersection is steep enough that sediments from construction here will likely be carried further downstream, settling out where the gradient is less steep and the river slows, at and below Lower Twin Bridge (personal communication). Sediments from construction at the Temple Fork intersec tion would co mbine with sediments from construction at the Dugway, all dumping into critical brown trout spawning and feeding areas in the lower Middle Canyon. Helm ' s data on brown trout spawning is from 1987. We do not have recent data on trout spawning in the Logan River. We also do not have recent data on fish habitat. We need a better indication of the number and distribution of good quality pools in the river, and the amount and distribution of good substrates for spawning. If good quality pools and good substrates are rare in the Logan River, as has been reported, then extensive construction adjacent to these resources could have an impact on the fishery that is disproportionate to the length of stream bank affected. The single study that UDOT relies upon for habitat information was done by Adams in 1966 (FEIS, Table 3-8, page 3-30). This study is almost 30 years old! In her memo within the Forest Service, Jill Dufour (1989) wrote concerning this study, "I question whether data from 1966 is applicable to conditions in the Logan River today." In spite of Dufour's memo, neither UDOT nor the Forest Service have provided us with any documentation showing that the habitat data Adams gathered in 1966 is relevant today. Let us return to UOOT's quantitative analysis of fish mortality. UOOT relies 39 �heavily upon a study done in 1973 by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. It is from this study that UDOT gets the trout mortality rates of 40 to 70%. This study has not been published. A brief description of methods and results are included within an internal UDOT memo of 1974. This study is twenty-two years old! A copy of the table reporting the data from this study has been included at the end of this section . The blanks or dashes in the table mean, it seems, that no effort was made to catch fish at that station during that "electrofishing effort." Apparently, the stations were sampled unevenly. The Right Hand Fork Station was sampled only once, while the Brachiopod Station was sampled four times. This renders suspect any range of trout reduction values generated in this study, since sampling effort varies considerably from station to station. From the data presented, we cannot conclude, with the authors of this study, that riparian habitat loss will result in a 40 to 70% reduction in numbers of brown and cutthroat trout. At the stations sampled, cutthroat and brown trout numbers were actually reduced by 47 to 80%. At the Brachiopod station, the reported numbers of cutthroat are lOin the unaltered site and 2 in the altered site, a difference of 8 fish, which is an 80% reduction in the number of fish in the altered site. No station had a reduction lower than 47 %. The average percent reduction in brown and cutthroat trout, considered together, is 65 %. Using a paired-data statistical technique for estimating the reduction of trout in the population, with a=.05, we have obtained a range of 58 to 73%. We know of no statistical technique that will provide an estimate for the population of 40 to 70%, given this data with an average reduction of 65%. Unfortunately, the authors of this study do not tell us how they obtained their estimate. Our inquiries to the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, and to CH2M Hill, have produced no information on who did this study or how they obtained their estimate. Another difficulty with this 1973 study is that it does not accurately indicate effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity due to construction. UDOT argues that by providing an estimate of trout reduction in areas that have been altered by the removal of riparian vegetation during construction, this study automatically accounts for sediment-related effects on fish . UDOT bases its refusal to do a separate quantitative analysis of sediment-related effects, in part, on their claim that this study already indicates such effects. This study cannot, however, indicate effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity during and just after construction. It was conducted in the Lower Canyon, where the highway was widened and straightened in 1968. This study was conducted five years later, in 1973. It cannot, then, indicate effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity during and just after the removal of riparian vegetation. when these effects are greatest. 40 �• The most serious problem with this 1973 study, however, is that it is the wrong kind of srudy for the use UDOT makes of it. This srudy is simply a comparison of fish numbers at each sampling station. The number of fish is determined along a length of stream bank with narural vegetation and along an adjacent length of stream bank that has had the vegetation removed. The results are, not surprisingly, that fish prefer to spend time in those areas with natural vegetation. This is actually a preference study. investigating where fish prefer to spend time when there is a choice between adjacent lengths of stream bank. This srudy does not address the question of how many fish will actually be lost to the fishery with the loss of riparian vegetation to road construction. The range of values obtained in this study is not an indication of trout mortality, but rather an indication of where fish prefer to spend time between adjacent lengths of stream bank. The kind of srudy we need to estimate actual loss of fish is a study that measures fish densities along a river prior to and after extensive loss of riparian vegetation to construction. We require an actual alteration study. There is no good reason to base an assessment of fish mortality in' Logan River exclusively on a study that is not designed to answer questions about acrual fish loss. Basing a quantitative analysis of fish mortality upon this 1973 srudy is not "the best we can do." Fisheries biologists have informed us that in the fisheries literature it is common to fmd studies that measure actual fish losses in rivers that have been altered through road construction. Such alteration studies have been done in Montana and in Colorado. We have learned that these srudies can easily be located by the Forest Service through an Internet service. No such srudies are cited by UDOT in its FEIS or in supporting documentation, yet such srudies are relevant. Also, it would be helpful to have a quantitative analysis of the sediment-related effects of construction in the Logan River. It would be helpful to have in hand a recent srudy of fish habitat, with an indication of the use of the habitat by fish, so that we know where cutthroat and brown trout are spawning and feeding in relation to planned construction. By relying exclusively upon this 1973 UDWR srudy in its quantitative analysis, UDOT has provided a simplistic and inaccurate prediction of fish loss. Let us sum up our concerns with UDOT's discussion of fish mortality. UDOT's quantitative analysis incorporates mortality values that are taken from a study that is 22 years old, and is not designed for the use UDOT makes of it. This srudy does not accurately indicate effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity. Reported values of trout reduction are apparently incorrect, and so UDOT's analysis based upon these values appears to be inaccurate. UDOT fails to consider relevant studies of the actual impacts of road construction upon fisheries. UDOT has refused to predict the effects of increased sedimentation and turbidity using models that are widely used for this purpose, even after being publicly asked to do so by the Forest Service, and even after the Forest Service offered to provide help in generating the predictions. UDOT' s claim that sediment-related effects will be "minor and short-term" is contradicted by the fact 41 �that UDOT is planning extensive construction in and just beyond the riparian zone, and by the fact that mature riparian plant communities may take up to 40 years to reestablish, with a longer time for trees. Professor Helm has found that the drier season, when UOOT plans to do most of the construction, is actually the "worst possible time" to add sediment to a river. Those areas of the river that are adjacent to planned major construction may be of vital importance to the fish . Professor Helm has documented an important brown trout spawning area just below Lower Twin Bridge. UDOT is relying upon a study of fish habitat that is almost 30 years old, and, according to one fisheries biologist, is of doubtful relevance today. We do not have current information on fish habitat or fish spawning in Logan River. UDOT will respond that our concerns are no longer as valid as they might have been, since, in its Record of Decision, UDOT has modified the Preferred Alternative so that it is less environmentally destructive. Unfortunately, UDOT is still planning extensive road widening and curve cuts adjacent to, and just upstream of those sections of the river that are believed to be of vital importance to the fishery, especially through the Middle Canyon. The general problem with UDOT's assessment of fishery impacts is that, even with the proposed modifications to the Preferred Alternative, there are too many unknowns, such as sediment-related effects, that are not adequately addressed in this FEIS and supporting documentation. There is still too much potential for unacceptable destruction of this fishery . As it now stands, there is no scientific justification whatsoever for the prediction UDOT has provided of a 4 to 8 % loss of trout. In its Record of Decision (1995), the Forest Service claims that "the environmental effects were adequately disclosed" in the FEIS. Considering fish mortality, this claim is false. The Forest Service is accepting an analysis of losses to this fishery that is scientifically unjustified. A guideline in the Management Plan calls for monitoring the BCI and HCI habitat indices for Logan River. As amended by the Forest Service in its Record of Decision (ROD), this guideline states, "In all streams maintain the existing HCI and BCI where they exceed the minimum of 42 and 75 respectively. Allow decreases not exceeding 5% of existing condition where this decrease is temporary and will not reduce the HCI or BCI below the established minimums" (page IV-3(0). There has been no analysis of the effect of the Preferred Alternative upon the BCI index. No macroinvertibrate baseline data is reported for Logan River. We have no idea what the present BCI value is, so we can have no idea what would constitute a "temporary" 5% decrease in BCI value. The Forest Service's ROD includes no mention of monitoring the components of BCI either before or during construction. By ignoring analysis and monitoring of BCI, the Forest Service is in violation of this guideline in its Management Plan. Guidelines are to be "applied in all situations unless some 42 �• overriding reason to abandon" them is supported by a Forest Service interdisciplinary analysis (page IV -24). Such an analysis for the sake of abandoning guidelines has not been done. On the other hand, the FEIS briefly reports an analysis of the effect of the modified Preferred Alternative upon the HCI index for Logan River (pages 4-2 and 43). This analysis is inadequate. UDOT claims that the predicted decrease in the value of HCI is due to "removal of vegetation and short- and long-term sedimentation" (page 4-2). In fact, the calculated decrease in HCI reflects only an estimation of the amount of riparian vegetation that will be removed (Lynn Foster, CH2M Hill, personal communication). Stream environment is the only component of this index which has been recently estimated to take into account the impact of road construction. Values for the other components were borrowed from the Adams 1966 habitat study. Again there is absolutely no indication of the relevance of this 1966 study to conditions in the river today. There has been no estimation of the effect of construction upon the quality of substrate in the river, and no estimation of the effect upon the number and quality of pools. These components of HCl may be affected by increased sedimentation during and after construction (Forest Service, personal communication). There is no estimation of the effect upon stream bank stability. This is not a genuine analysis of the effect of construction upon the full HCI index. It would have been much less misleading if UDOT had simply reported their fmdings as the percentage of stream bank vegetation that will be lost. In its ROD, the Forest Service states that an analysis of changes in the HCI index "'is included in the FEIS." This statement is false. The Forest Service is accepting an HCI analysis that is based on data of questionable relevance, and which involves an estimation of the effects of construction on only a single component, ignoring effects upon those components that may indicate increased sedimentation and serious loss of fish habitat. The Forest Service is allowing a decrease of 5% in the present HCI value for Logan River. Yet, in its Record of Decision, the Forest Service does not mention any monitoring it will do of HCI. We do not know what the present He] value is, and the Forest Service has made no commitment to monitor Her to ensure compliance. By accepting this inadequate HCI analysis, and by not committing to effective monitoring, the Forest Service is violating a guideline in its Management Plan (page lV-3(0). In the section of the Management Plan, "Desired Future Condition of the Forest," the Forest Service states, "All MIS habitat will be maintained at levels that exceed requirements for minimum viable populations" (page IV-57). Cutthroat trout are listed as an MIS species (page 1I-33). The cutthroat in Logan River may actually be Bonneville Cutthroat, a species listed as "sensitive" by the Regional Forester (paul Cowley, Forest Service, personal communication). In their Record of Decision, the 43 �• • Forest Service states that UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative "will not adversely affect the viability of any Forest Service listed sensitive species" (page 8). In the case of cutthroat in Logan River, the Forest Service has no grounds for saying this. The 1973 UDWR study that UDOT is relyin.g upon for its fish mortality values presents a special difficulty in the case of cutthroat trout. This study was done in the Lower Canyon, well below the upper reaches of Logan River in which most of the cutthroat populations are found and in which they spawn. The cutthroat in Logan River are possibly genetically disposed to prefer the colder temperatures of the upper reaches (Forest Service, personal communication), Cutthroat are found in the Lower Canyon in relatively small numbers. We must question conclusions reached about cutthroat in a "habitat" study that has been conducted well below the primary range and primary habitat of cutthroat, and well below their spawning grounds. We cannot simply assume that the removal of vegetation in the upper reaches will affect cutthroat numbers in the same way that it might in the Lower Canyon. Given this problem, and the other problems with UDOT's analysis of fish mortality, such as the lack of infonnation concerning sedimentation and turbidity, we cannot conclude that only 4 to 8 % of cutthroat will be lost to construction. By accepting UDOT's flawed prediction of fish loss and its inadequate HCI analysis, by ignoring the required BCI analysis, and by failing to commit to proper monitoring of these habitat indices, the Forest Service is abrogating its responsibility for this MIS, and possibly sensitive, species. From UDOT's assessment, we have no idea what impact the modified Preferred Alternative will actually have upon cutthroat habitat or the number of cutthroat. With its decision to permit UDOT's modified Preferred Alternative, the Forest Service is in violation of a guideline in its Management Plan, and in violation of a directive in its Management Plan concerning an MIS species. The Forest Service is also in violation of its policies for sensitive species in the National Forests as outlined in the Forest Service Manual, Title 2600 (1991), section 2672.42, since they have reached a determination of "no adverse affects" based on inadequate analyses. With these violations, the Forest Service is in violation of the National Forest Management Act. We request that before it agrees to amend its Management Plan and grant the required easement allowing UDOT to construct the modified Preferred Alternative, the Forest Service insist that UDOT provide an adequate discussion of impacts to fish numbers and fish habitat in an SEIS. We further request the Forest Service to insist that UDOT maintain the current 26 ft. road width from Lower Twin Bridge to above Ricks Spring. In other words, the 26 ft. width should be maintained throughout the entire Middle Canyon. Also, there should be no curve cuts around the Temple Fork intersection. These changes would protect from construction those stretches of the 44 �., river that are most essential to the fishery in Logan River. We request that the Forest Service insist that UDOT consider again the Conservationists' Alternative for Highway 89 in Logan Canyon. This alternative satisfies traffic needs in the canyon, as we discuss in an earlier section of this appeal, and it better protects the fishery in Logan River. Again, the fishery in Logan River is ranked among the top 5% of stream fisheries in the state. It is considered by the Utah Division of Water Rights to be one of four major fisheries in the state. We urge the Forest Service to abide by its policies in giving this fishery careful attention and adequate protection. Literature Cited Adams, J.K. 1966. Memorandum to B. Reese concerning aquatic habitat quality in Logan Canyon. U.S Forest Service, Cache National Forest. Dufour, J. 1989. Memorandum to D. Baumgartner of January 18. U.S. Forest Service, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Helm, W. 1987. Letter to Stan Nuffer of May 28. Helm reprints collection, Quinney Library, Utah State University. Helm, W. undated. "Effects of Road Building on the Logan River." Helm reprints collection, Quinney Library, Utah State University. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1991. Forest Service Manual, Title 2600, Wildlife, Fish and Sensitive Plant Habitat Management. Washington. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOl). 1993. (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1987. Aquatic Resources Technical Memorandum. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1974. Memorandum from L.A. Abbey to L.R. Jester of June 17. 45 �6. wn,DLIFE IMPACTS AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 1.) UDOT's FEIS and ROD violate the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resources Management Plan. a) UDOT's FEIS and ROD violate Goal #16 of the Management Plan (page IV8) and directives within the Plan concerning wildlife (Plan Responses to Issues, Issue 9, page 1lI-2; Desired Future Condition of the Forest, page IV-56). The current productivity level of wildlife habitat will not be maintained or improved. The current capacity of big game winter range will not be maintained or increased, but will be diminished or adversely impacted. These results violate Management Plan provisions cited above. With the modified Preferred Alternative, 149.3 acres of upland plant communities will be impacted by construction, compared to 6.9 acres for the Conservationists' Alternative, over 2100% more impacted areas for the chosen alternative. According to the FEIS, upland habitat loss and the consequent impacts during construction activity will affect summer big game range and ruffed and blue grouse brood rearing areas. The FEIS states that "habitat loss is especially significant in the case of forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent wetlands and riparian communities (i.e., upland communities) that are of high value to many species of wildlife" and that "habitat fragmentation can be a significant problem for songbirds, amphibians, and small mammals." There is no mention as to which species of songbirds, amphibians, or small mammals may be affected by upland habitat loss or to what extent they may be affected, which prevents informed public participation, and leads to arbitrary and capricious decision making. No mitigation for negative impacts is proposed. , According to the Management Plan, the Wasatch-Cache ranks as the most important wildlife and fisheries Forest in the state (page 1I-3 I). Hunter days use of all key game species except elk ranks first, while the percentage of statewide habitat ranks first or second for all species except mule deer. In addition, the highest proportion of the statewide population of mule deer, moose, and mountain goat inhabits this Forest. The Wasatch-Cache mule deer population is the largest in the National Forest system. The FEIS states, "Loss of (winter range) habitat for (mule deer and moose) is especiaUy critical during severe winters when suitable mule deer winter range covers only a small area compared to the area occupied during normal winters" (page 4-40). In a letter to CH2M Hill, preparers of the FEIS, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) expressed real concern with impacts to winter range, saying, "Loss of these 46 �ranges are particularly critical, and the limiting factor in maintaining viable populations" (George Wilson, UDWR, 13 February 1987). The National Forest Management Act specifically mandates that "habitat be managed to maintain viable populations of existing ... vertebrate species in the planning area" (36 C.F.R., 219.19). Yet, the loss of mule deer and moose wintering range for the chosen Preferred Alternative is 134 acres compared to the loss of 2.3 acres with the Conservationists' Alternative, over 5800% more impacted acres with the chosen alternative. Additionally, illustration of big game winter range in the FEIS includes only Rich County, less than 30% of the entire study area. Another negative impact given only cursory attention in the FEIS involves increased highway mortality to wildlife, especially big game. Risk associated with proximity to the highway increases with vehicle speed, effectively diminishing usable habitat. The FEIS neglects to reveal that increases in highway speeds correlate positively with increased animal-vehicle collision frequency (Puglisi et al. 1974; Arnold 1981; Reed et al. 1982; National Safety Council 1984). The FEIS claims that the mitigation cattle fencing proposed in the modified Preferred Alternative, extending from the Tony Grove intersection to Franklin Basin, 'will likely reduce ... vehicle-deer accidents" (page 4- 13). Research demonstrates, however, that deer readily jump fencing less than 2 meters in height (Feldhammer et al. 1986; Ludwig and Bremicker 1983; Reed et al. 1982), rendering UDOT's claim about the effectiveness of cattle fencing unfounded and unrealistic. The estimated impact on big game species due to increased vehicle collision frequency is not mentioned or compared for the alternatives, nor is any mitigation proposed. b) The FEIS violates Goal #17 of the Management Plan (page IV-8) and a directive in the Desired Future Condition of the Forest section of the Plan (page IV-56). The FEIS also violates National Forest Management Act regulations 16 U.S.C., 1604(g) and 36 C.F.R., 219. 19, and National Environmental Protection Act regulation 40 C.F.R., 1500.I(b). The status of classified species will not be enhanced. Maintenance of several sensitive plant species is not insured . The FEIS neglects to mention or evaluate the potential impact on numerous species of special concern and includes no provision for the description or maintenance of biological diversity. The information in the FEIS does not allow informed public participation or decision making. The FEIS mentions six species that are listed as threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or are listed as 'sensitive" by the Forest Service: Bald Eagle (e) 47 �... Peregrine Falcon (e) Maquire' s Primrose (t) Cronquist Daisy (s) Rydberg Musineon (s) Cache Beardtongue (s) Numerous Forest Service sensitive species receive no mention in the FEIS: Boreal Owl Flammulated Owl Great Gray Owl Northern Goshawk Three-toed Woodpecker Spotted Bat Western Big-eared Bat Wolverine North American Lynx Spotted Frog Maguire Draba Logan Buckwheat Aster kineii var. kingii Many of these sensitive species were mentioned in UDOT's ROD, but at that point, when virtually the whole process was complete, very few people saw the infonnation, so in essence the public has never been presented with meaningful information on th ese species. Waiting until the ROD is published to provide information excludes the public from participation in the process. Western or Townsend's big-eared bat is abundant in Logan Cave and has been captured elsewhere in Logan Canyon; however, throughout its range in the western United States populations are declining (Brad Lengas, unpublished report to WasatchCache Ranger District 1993); Arizona Game and Fish Department 1993). The declining status of this bat warrants consideration, particularl y given its high vulnerability to human disturbance (Schmidly 1991 ; Arizona Game and Fish Department 1993), including disturbance to riparian habitat. Loss of riparian habitat, and the noise and pollution from construction, could lead to the disappearance of this bat from Logan Canyon. If recommended management guidelines do not halt the decline of this bat, it may qualify for federally threatened status (Brad Lengas, personal communication). Evidence supporting the possibility of wolverines in Logan Canyon prompted the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources to grant funding to the Fisheries and Wildlife 48 �Cooperative Unit at Utah State University to investigate this possibility. Researchers have installed automatic photographic equipment to identify which mustelid species is making observed tracks where it is thought wolverine may occur (John Bissonnette, personal communication). Published Forest Service information indicates there are wolverines in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest and cites an observation in Logan Canyon (Forest Service 1994). ~ kingii var. kin2ii. a Forest Service sensitive species, was found in Cache County during a general botanical survey carried out in conjunction with surveys for other sensitive plant species (Franklin 1990a). The discovery of this sensitive species in Cache County never appeared in any UOOT document. Only the Record of Decision even mentioned the aster, but listed its distribution in four counties, not including Cache, making any conclusion by the Forest Service that minimum viable populations will be preserved without a basis in fact, and arbitrary and capricious. A previously undescribed species of Viola. upon discovery named Viola franksmithii, was also found in Logan Canyon during the same general botanical survey (Franklin I990a). This Logan Canyon endemic species was later described in detail (Holmgren 1992). However, it is not mentioned in any UDOT document. It is the fifth known plant species endemic to Logan Canyon, including Maquire's primrose, Cronquist Daisy, Rydberg musineon, and Cache beard tongue. It is considered possible there are other undiscovered endemics occurring in Logan Canyon (Frank Smith, personal communication). The following Fish and Wildlife Service C2 candidate species are not mentioned in the FEIS. Are these listed as sensitive by the Forest Service? Western Small-footed Myotis Long-legged Myotis Long-eared Myotis Fringed Myotis Boreal Toad Discus shemeki cockerelli Oreohelix haydeni haydeni Oreohelix haydeni cQrrugata Oreohelix peripherica wasatchensis All four Myotis species have been captured in Logan Canyon (Brad Lengas, unpublished report submitted to the Logan Ranger District). All depend on the riparian areas adjacent to the river and thus adjacent to the road. These bats are not mentioned in the FEIS, making any claim by the Forest Service that minimum viable populations will be maintained arbitrary and capricious. 49 �... An undescribed snail species, genus PyrgulQPsis. was discovered along the highway at Spring Hollow by Dr. Robert Hershler of the Smithsonian Institution (Hershler 1990). Information on this discovery was provided to UDOT, along with a recommendation for further investigation prior to road construction activities. The habitat in which this and several other C2 snail species are found indicates that any of these species could occur along the highway project site (peter Hovingh, personal communication), The FEIS states, "The undescribed snail species has not been nominated as a candidate species. The species is located down canyon of the project area and will not be affected by construction activities" (page 9-14). There are 20 species of PyrgulQPsis in the western United States listed C2 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (see Federal Register, Part IV; 50 C.F.R., Part 17, November 15,1994). The species identity of this PyrgulQPsis is not known. Therefore, it is not known whether this one is a candidate species. Nevertheless, minimum viable populations must be preserved, and with no analysis there is no factual basis to claim that viable populations will be preserved. No surveys along the project site were conducted. Therefore, it is not known whether this snail species occurs within the project area, or whether it will be affected by construction activities. Pyrgulopsis is the sixth species endemic to Logan Canyon. This suggests an unusually high rate of endemism in this area. The diversity provision of the National Forest Management Act requires that national forest planning "provide for diversity of plant and animal communities based on the suitability and capability of the specific land area" (16 U.S.C.,1604(g)(3)(B». The National Forest Management Act requires inventory data on wildlife populations and distribution (id, 1604(g)(2)(B»; on identification of hazards to various resources (id, 1604(g)(2)(C»; and research on the effects of each management system (id, 1604(g)(3)(C». Likewise, in providing for diversity, "inventories shall include quantitative data making possible the eva luation of diversity in terms of its prior and present condition" (36 C.F.R., 219.26 (1984». None of these Management Indicator Species (MIS) from the Management Plan, which probably occur in Logan Canyon, received mention in the FEIS or ROD: Gray Jay Hairy Woodpecker Pine Siskin Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Warbling Vireo Mountain Bluebird Water Pipit 50 �MacGilvary's Warbler Green-tailed Towhee Vesper Sparrow Identification of Management Indicator Species is required by th e National Forest Management Act (36 C.F.R., 219. 19(a)). This regulation also specifies that "fish and wildlife habitat shall be managed to maintain viable populations of existing native and desired non-native vertebrate species in the planning area." A viable population for planning purposes is defined as "one which has the estimated numbers and distribution of reproductive individuals to insure its continued exis tence is well distributed in the planning area. " Regulations further provide that "population trends of the management indictor species will be monitored and relationships to habitat changes determined" (id, 219.19(a)(6)). But with no analysis of these MIS indicator species in the FEIS or ROD, there is no basis for claiming these provisions will be met. The FEIS makes assertions of no impact when no ground surveys were conducted to collect baseline data for the majority of all aforementioned species. Without further information to describe Logan Canyon's biological diversity, the significance of this diversity, and the potential impacts to the stability of this di versity, compliance with the National Forest Management Act's diversity mandates or the National Environmental Protection Act's assessment mandates is not achieved. 2.) The FEIS violates the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. a) The FEIS violates Section 7(a)(2) and 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act, and directives in the Management Plan concerning wildlife (plan Responses to Issues, Issue 9, page III-2; Desired Future Condition of the Fores t, page IV-56). The potential impact to the only federally threatened species in the project area (Primula maguireO was not thoroughly identified using the best scientific and commercial data available. A Biological Opinion was not written by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in response to a Biological Assessment provided by the project proponent, as required by Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act. Information transferred between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and UDOTIFHW A does not reveal compliance with the Endangered Species Act requirement for a biological assessment and subsequent issuance of a biological opinion by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It is not clear why th e Fish and Wildlife Service eventually concurred with the "no effect" detennination in the absence of an adequate biological assess ment. The following discussion chronologically 51 �summarizes correspondence between the Service and UDOTIFHW A. In March 1987, the Fish and Wildlife Service communicated to FHW A that Section 7 consultation would be required if the highway project would affect the primrose (Robert Ruesink, State Supervisor USFWS, to Duncan Silver, FHW A, March 4, 1987). Subsequently, Daniel Dake (UDOT, July 7, 1987) supplied the Fish and Wildlife Service with a report (Welsh 1987) in order to comply with 50 C.F.R., 402. 12(j). Ruesink replied to Mr. Dake (July 21 , 1987) that the Service was unable to prepare a biological opinion at that time, that mOTe information was necessary, and that any significant reduction of the buffering and road encroachment on the cliff at Wood Camp may have a deleterious effect on that population of primrose due to micro-climate changes, to which Maguire's primrose is sensitive. In August 1989, Ruesink again wrote, this time to Margaret Johnson of CH2M Hill, preparers of the FEIS, that a project proponent must submit a biological assessment so that the Fish and Wildlife Service could prepare a biological opinion in response to the potential impacts to the primrose. UDOT replied with a proposal to eliminate the slow vehicle turnout near Wood Camp Campground to remove the Service's concerns about the project's potential impacts on the primrose (Donald Steinke, UDOT, to Clark Johnson, USFWS, March I, 1990). In April of 1990, Clark Johnson (Assistant Field Supervisor, USFWS) wrote the FHW A and recognized UDOT's proposal to eliminate the slow vehicle turnout. However, the Service again recommended "that the FHW A submit a biological assessment on the preferred alternative of the U.S. 89 Logan Canyon DEIS when the alternative is selected and request formal Section 7 consultation at that time." In February of 1991 , Jonathan Deason (Director, Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of the Interior) wrote the FHW A to clarify that the Fish and Wildlife Service had advised the Office of Environmental Affairs of the possibility of the highway project adversely affecting a federally threatened plant, and that, if so, Section 7 consultation would be necessary in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Deason's letter goes on to say, "Biological opinions are prepared by the FWS in response to formal consultation requests by the Federal Agency. The botanical reports relating to Primula Maeuire and other rare plant species prepared for this project do not constitute a biological opinion as defmed by the act." Eventually, in April of 1992, without further information indicated, Clark Johnson (USFWS) wrote to R. James Naegle (UDOn and concurred with UDOT's determination of no effect to the primrose. This, Johnson wrote, was based on the information which occurs in the FEIS. The only reference cited in the FEIS is Welsh 1987, which had been the basis for prior unfavorable responses by the Fish and 52 �Wildlife Service. Clark lohnson ' s 1992 letter is the fIrst and only correspondence from the Fish and Wildlife Service which concurs with UDOT's no effect determination. In 1987, Welsh' s report did not suffIce for the Fi. h and Wildlife Service to respond with a s biological opinion, and in 1990, the Service recommended the FHW A submit a biological assessment when an alternative was selected and requested formal Section 7 consultation at that time. Deason's 1991 lener from the Office of Environmental Affairs to FHW A reiterated that no report submitted up until that time constituted a biological opinion. A more current and comprehensive survey report (Franklin 1990b) was not utilized by UDOT, in spite of references to this report in a letter from the Bridgerland Audubon Society to UDOT, Feb. 12, 1991. This report systematically surveyed potential habitat in the Bear River Range and made determinations as to whether the primrose's distribution extended beyond the known locations in Logan and Right Fork Canyons. Known locations were derived from Beedlow et al. 1980, Moseley and Mancuso 1990, Padgett 1986, USFWS 1990, and Welsh 1987. One new occurrence was located north of the highway approximately . 1 mile beyond the fIrst river crossing above Wood Camp on a limestone cliff face in the narrow gorge. Franklin' s report states, "This restricted range, its rarity within that range, and the lack of detailed demographic and disturbance information on each occurrence of Maguire primrose indicate that all Logan Canyon occurrences should, at this time, be considered essential habitat. When more detailed demographic and disturbance information is available it will be possible to more defInitely ... ' identify essential habitat and those populations (occurrences) which may best ensure the long term survival of the species .. .' (FWS 1990)." Welsh (1987) states, "If the recommendations cited above are followed there should be minimal or no impact to the Maguire primrose population 4 (and no effect on the other populations)." Welsh's survey covered 2,000 feet on either side of MP 385, in the vicini ty of Wood Camp. In his report, Welsh referen ced data provided in an earlier report (Padgett 1986). Padgett surveyed Logan Canyon from the mouth to 0.7 miles south of the USU Forestry Field Station, and concluded, "Because of their proximity to Highway 89 in Logan Canyon, population numbers 3, 4, 5, 6 and the lower portion of population I could possibly be impacted by highway expansion." The FElS provides no basis to conclude that an adequate biological assessment was ever conducted. Recommendations repeated by the Fish and Wildlife Service and most surveys suggested further study. Franklin (I990b) and FWS (1990) both recommend an inventory and census of the Logan Canyon populations of primrose to "yield precise locations and extent of all P. maguirei populations ... ", yet UDOT 53 �• ignored this information in selecting its modified Preferred Alternative. It is recognized that the primrose is vulnerable to micro-climate alterations, changes in temperature and relative humidity of the atmosphere in the plant's habitat, and that construction-related production of dust particulates could impede stomate functioning on the primrose (Franklin 1990b; FWS 1990; Padgett 1986; Welsh 1986; Beedlow et.al. 1980). In addition, however, recent information suggests that removal of vegetation within the construction corridor could negatively affect primrose pollination by eliminating essential host plants visited by the primrose-pollinating bees (Wolf and Sinclair, unpublished data) . The primrose supplies small quantities of nectar, making it necessary for pollinating bees to derive supplemental nectar from other plants. Removal of vegetation in the vicinity of primrose populations may cause primrose-pollinating bees to move elsewhere, resulting in previously unforeseen negative impacts on the long-term viability of those primrose populations. Clearly, information is lacking in the FEIS, in violation of the National Environmental Protection Act, 1502. 16 and 1502.22. No recognized biological assessment was submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by the project proponent in accordance with 50 C.F.R., 402.12(j). The Endangered Species Act states, "Each Federal agency shall ... insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency ... is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such threatened species which is determined to be critical ... In fulfilling the requirements of this paragraph each agency shall use the best scientific and commercial data available" (16 U.S.C., 1536 (a)(2)), with "species" including plants (id, 1532(16». CEQ regulations provide that impacts in an EIS shall be discussed in proportion to their significance (40 C.F.R., 1502.2 (b» and that "data and analysis ... shall be commensurate with their importance" (40 C.F.R. , 1502.15). The National Forest Management Act states that the plan must "provide for diversity of plant and animal communities ... " (16 U.S.C., 1604 (g)(3)(B)) and requires planners to "preserve and enhance the diversity of plant and animal communities" so that it is at least as great as that which would be expected in a natural forest (36 C.F.R., 219.27 (g». The National Forest Management Act further specifies: "Habitat determined to be critical for threatened and endangered species shall be identified, and measures shall be prescribed to prevent the destruction or adverse modification of such habitat. Objectives shall be determined for threatened and endangered species that shall provide for, where possible, their removal from listing as threatened and endangered through appropriate conservation measures, including the designation of special areas to meet the protection and management needs of such species" 54 �(36 C.F.R.,219.19(a)(7)). Literature Cited Arizona Game and Fish Department. 1993. Bats of Arizona. Arizona Wildlife Views 36(8) :23 . Arnold, D.A. 1979. Deer on the highway . Traffic Safety 79(5):8- 10. Beedlow, P.A., J.G. Carter, and FJ. Smith . 1980. Primula ma~\Iirei L. Wms. (primulaceae), a preliminary report on th e population biology of an endemic plant. Unpublished report on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, Utah . Feldhammer, G.A., J.E. Gates, D.M. Harman, AJ. Loranger, and K.R. Dixon. 1986. Effects of interstate fencing on white-tailed deer activity. 1. Wildt. Manage. 50:497-503. Forest Service. 1994. American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM-254. 184 pp. Franklin, M.A. I 99Oa. Report for 1989 chaUenge cost-share project Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Target species: Eri~eron cronQu istii (Cronquist daisy), Musineon lineare (Rydberg musineon) , and Penstemon cyananthus var. compactus (Cache beardtongue). Utah Natural Heritage Program. Unpublished report on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, Utah. 16 pp. Franklin, M.A. I 990b. Report for 1990 challenge cos t-share project Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Target species: Primula maguire i L.O. Williams (Maguire primrose). Utah Natural Heritage Program. Unpublished report on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake C ity, Utah. 10 pp. Hershler, R. 1990. Field survey and preliminary taxonomy of Great Basin Springsnails. Final Report for Cooperative Agreement P 852-A I-0035 between U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and the Smithsonian Institution. Holmgren, N. 1992. Two new species of Viola (Violaceae) from the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Brittonia 44(3):300-305. Ludwig, J., and T. Bremicker. 1983. Evaluation of 2.4 m fences and one-way gates 55 �for reducing deer-vehicle collisions in Minnesota. Transportation Research Record 913:19-22. Mosely, R.K., and M. Mancuso. 1990. Threatened, endangered, and sensitive plant inventory of the Bear River Range, Caribou National Forest. Unpublished report by the Idaho Natural Heritage Program, on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, Utah. National Safety Council. 1984. Warning: AnimaUvehicle crossing. National Safety News 130(4) :60. Padgett, W.G. 1986. Maguire primrose summary report. Utah Native Plant Society, Cache Valley Chapter. Unpublished report on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, Utah. Puglisi, M.J., J.S. Londzey, and E.D. Bellis. 1974. Factors associated with highway mortality of white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manage. 38:799-807. Reed, D.F., T.D. Beck, and T.N. Woodard. 1982. Methods of reducing deer/vehicle accidents: Benefit-cost analysis. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 10:349-354. Schmidly, David J. 1991. The Bats of Texas. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, TX. pp. 137-141. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Maguire primrose (Primula maeuirei) recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. pp. 1-13. Welsh, S. 1987. Logan Canyon, U.S. 89 study, Biological Assessment. Unpublished report on file at the Utah Natural Heritage Program, Salt Lake City, Utah. 7. VISUAL RETENTION The primary problems associated with the Forest Service's decision to penn it widening and reconstruction of Highway 89 through Logan Canyon, in relation to visual quality, stem from the idea that it is alright to destroy that which we are attempting to preserve. In essence, the Forest Service's decision allows for the destruction of the scenic quality that it is attempting to manage as a highly protected resource within Logan Canyon. This decision is not only arbitrary and capricious, but represents a significant change in the amount of Forest Service land managed for scenic quality. 56 �Scenic Byway Designation In 1987 the U.S. Congress created a National Scenic Byways Program to preserve and to enhance scenic byways for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. According to the Federal Highway Administration, a scenic road is "a road having roadsides or corridors of high natural beauty and cultural or historical value. It gives the traveler glimpses of nature, history, geology, landscaping, and cultural activities along the road. Campgrounds, picnic areas, or other recreational sites may be built within the scenic corridor, or the road may provide a pleasant access to such facilities" (FHW A 1988). A scenic route "gives the driver the opportunity to leave a high-speed Interstate highway or arterial route for a scenic byway that permits safe, leisurely dri ving" (FHWA 1988). The Utah Travel Council, in cooperation with federal, state, and local agencies, has developed the Utah Scenic Byways and Backways publication which provides a description of Utah's scenic road system offering outstanding scenic beauty to the traveler. This publication offers the following: "The beaten path. It gets you there. But for those to whom the reward is in the journey, there are paths less trodden. Panoramas reserved for the adventurous, worlds away from the mainstream. Utah's Scenic Byways and Backways ... These Scenic Byways are all major roads which are regularly traveled. Some routes feature sharp curves and steep grades. Actual travel speeds are generally less than the 55 mile-an-hour speed limit. As with all motor vehicle travel, personal discretion is the key to a safe driving experience." The Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan (CMP) (Forest Service 1994), sets forth the management of the scenic corridor through Logan Canyon. Item #1 under the management plan's mission statement provides for "protect(ion of the) scenic values of the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway through planning and cooperation between all agencies and government entities that have jurisdiction within the byway view shed" (CMP, page 3). One of the "overall objectives" o f the management plan is "to continue developing a consensus between federal agencies. state agencies, county and city governments and private land owners charged with the protection of Logan Canyon to identify equitable means for protecting and improving the scenic and environmental values of Logan Canyon" (CMP, page 3). One of the "overall actions" provided in the management plan for the "protection of scenic qualities" is "to include provisions in the Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan [that] emphasize the protection of scenic value and enhancement of recreation opportunities" (CMP, page 4). It has been estimated that the modified Preferred Alternative will destroy 38 % and 9 % of the most visually sensitive areas , sensitivity levels 6 and 7 , wi thin the 57 �• • canyon, respectively (FEIS, page 4-63, Table 4-12). In addition, the modified Preferred Alternative will destroy 58% and 71 % of the moderately visually sensitive areas, sensitivity levels 4 and 5, within the canyon, respectively (FEIS, page 4-63, Table 4-12). The modified Preferred Alternative does not, therefore, protect the scenic values of the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway. It also does not identify equitable means for protecting and improving the scenic and environmental values of the canyon, nor does it reflect provisions in the Wasatch-Cache Forest Management Plan that emphasize protection of scenic values and enhancement of recreational opportunities. The selection of the modified Preferred Alternative is therefore in direct conflict with the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan (Forest Service 1994). Lack of Forest Plan Consistency The Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Service 1985) sets forth management of Forest Service lands through Management Area designations. The Logan Canyon Scenic Byway is contained in the Logan Canyon Management Area (MA 13) of the Management Plan. The emphasis for this area is to manage the highway as a Scenic Byway and to protect scenic landscape qualities (Forest Service 1985, pages IV-29 I and IV-297). According to the Management Plan, this area is to be managed for the visual quality objective (VQO) of "retention" (page IV-293) . This objective provides for management activities which are not visually evident. Under "retention," activities may only repeat fann, line, color, and texture which are frequently found in the characteristic landscape. Changes in their qualities of size, amount, intensity, direction, pattern, etc. should not be evident (Forest Service 1974). The Forest Service's Record of Decision proposes to amend the Management Plan VQO ' s in MA 13 from "retention" to "modification" for nearly the entire route. A "modification" VQO would allow for management activities that visually dominate the characteristic landscape (Forest Service 1974). The Logan Canyon Management Area encompasses approx imately 12,877 acres of Forest Service land. This corresponds to approximately one percent of Forest Service land within the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. However, the Logan Canyon Management Area makes up approximately eight percent of the area managed as "retention" within the Forest. Compromising eight percent of the area within the Forest managed for retention is particularly significant when one considers that only eleven percent of the Forest is managed for retention (Forest Service 1985, page IV60). Although the Logan Canyon Management Area is a relatively small portion of the Forest, the second largest concentration of developed recreational sites within the entire Forest can be found within this area. The only other area within the Forest with a higher concentration is the Mirror Lake Highway Management Area, which includes 58 �• the only other Scenic Byway within the Forest. Within the Logan Canyon Management Area, the Forest Service administers 12 developed campgrounds, 4 picnic areas, and 3 organizational camps (CMP, page 13). The Logan Canyon Scenic Byway provides access to Beaver Mountain Ski Area, which offers downhill skiing with a lodge, restaurant and shops. It offers access to commercial outfitters offering horseback rides, snowmobile tours, and lodging. This Scenic Byway also provides access to over 300 miles of hiking trails, the Mount Naomi Wilderness area, the Great Western Trail, and miles of scenic back country auto tours (CMP, page 13). The Logan Canyon Scenic Byway is truly unique, offering some of the most outstanding recreational opportunities in the state. Implementation of the modified Preferred Alternative through Logan Canyon will be in direct conflict with the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Management Plan. Since the most visually sensitive areas of the canyon, and the most accessible views, will be impacted an average of 15% (FEIS, Table 4- 16, page 4-77) and cannot be mitigated, a visual quality objective of retention will not be maintained. The highway will not conform to management standards for a Scenic Byway. Altering primary management emphasis of an area, especially an emphasis as critical as scenic retention on a Scenic Byway, is not a non-significant amendment to the Forest Plan, but a highly significant change. Cumulative bnpacts The cumulative impacts discussion in the FEIS (Chapter 4) does not disclose the impacts associated with implementation of the ten projects proposed as part of the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan (Forest Service 1994). In some cases, these projects will have a substantial impact upon the existing environment of their respective project areas. Seven of the ten projects proposed involve clearing and grubbing existing vegetation andlor site grading activities. Five of the ten projects proposed involve the construction of paved parking areas. Four "Romtec" restrooms will be installed at four of the ten proposed project sites. Several of the projects include each of the above impacts combined. Although NEPA documents will be prepared for each of the proposed projects, the FEIS does not disclose the cwnulative impacts associated with highway construction i1l conjunction with the ten projects described in the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan. This is a serious oversight on the part of UDOT and the Forest Service, especially considering that the projects proposed under the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan have been planned since early 1993, and that a planning committee was formed in late 1991 which included a representative from UDOT. 59 �• Literature Cited Federal Highway Administration. 1988. Scenic Byways '88: A National Conference to Map the Future of America's Scenic Roads and Highways. USDA Forest Service. 1995. Record of Decision (ROD), U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1994. Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan: Portraits in Time. Logan Ranger District, Uinta and Wasatch-Cache National Forests. Logan, UT. USDA Forest Service. 1974. (VQO Management Discussion ?????) Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. Final Environmental Impac t Statement (FEIS), U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. 8. ECONOMIC IMPACTS The Fores t Service has violated Goal #53 of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan which states that the Forest Service must "[i]nform the public about National Forest resource management as related to the ... local economy" (page IV-2!J . The local economy is closely tied to recreation and tourism, with Logan Canyon being recognized as one of the area's most valuable economic assets (Cooper 1989) . The unspoiled landscape of the canyon and its outstanding scenic and recreational opportunities have been featured in numerous national magazines and travel guides, including National Parks, National Geographic, Audubon, Glamour Magazine, Scenic America, and America from the Road. It is not only a draw for visitors, but a draw for industry and people who are relocating. The Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan (hereafter referred to as the CMP) states, "Logan Canyon is the focal point for many people who live in the Cache and Bear Lake Valleys. The scenic and spiritual amenities it provides ... are a big reason people choose to live here" (page 21). Efforts are currently underway to enhance the area economy by capitalizing on the scenic assets of Logan Canyon. Chip Sibbemsen, acting District Ranger with the Logan office of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest, is spearheading a major recreation enhancement project with the Bridgerland Travel Region, the Cache Chamber of Commerce, Cache County, Box Elder County, Utah State University, Bear River Association of Governments, and individual city governments, businesses and 60 . �• ; organizations. This project, described in the CMP, emphasizes increased marketing of the Logan Canyon Scenic Byway's recreational and scenic opportunities, devoting five full pages to "Marketing and Promotion" (CMP, Appendix A) Howeve~, UDOT's extensive construction plans may interfere with the promotion of Logan Canyon, and negate the economic benefits of the Scenic Byway project. The CMP records concerns about proposed construction activities: UDOT's construction project "has been extremely controversial and there is concern the improvements may degrade the quality of the environment and the traveling experience" (page 20). A 1989 study of tourism in the area concluded with a strong recommendation that Logan Canyon's scenic assets be preserved intact because of the economic benefits that accrue to the area from its scenic attributes (Cooper, 1989). Appellants believe that the Forest Service's acceptance of the modified Preferred Alternative will degrade one of the primary economic resources of Cache and Rich Counties. UDOT's FEIS and Record of Decision, and the Forest Service' s Record of Decision, neglect to acknowledge any long or short tenn negative economic impacts of proposed construction, including des truction of irreplaceable scenic values, monetary losses caused by disruption of road service, impacts on big game habitat, and harm to a fishery that brings in over $4 million annually (estimate for 1990, UDOT 1987, Table 7, page 18). The Forest Service also neglects to address the postconstruction viability of the area as a tourist destination. National surveys bear out the fact that tourists and recreationists value scenery, especially scenery that is relatively unspoiled. Tourists and recreationists across the country rate "driving for pleasure" and "sightseeing" among the top three recreation activities, out of 37 ranked activities (Report of the President's Commission on Americans Outdoors, 1987; Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission, 1986; and Outdoor Recreation in a Nation of Communities, 1988). These surveys indicate that protection of natural environments is a critical issue for tourists and recreationists. Driving for pleasure and sightseeing are hardly as pleasurable when the view consists of concrete retaining walls, exposed slopes and c1ear zones, rather than lush forests and wild rivers . Surveys conducted in northern Utah find that the most popular recreation activity in Logan Canyon is "viewing the scenery." The third most popular activity, out of 2 1 ranked activities, is "photography" (Hunt and Cadez 1977; Hunsaker 1969). Clearly, the scenic assets of the canyon are of primary importance to its users, who inc1ude local residents and tourists. There is a c10se connection between scenic values in the canyon and the local 61 �• economy, yet UDOT's FEIS and Record of Decision, and the Forest Service's Record of Decision, fail to make any assessment of how permanent degradation of the canyon's scenic values will negatively impact the local economy. The Forest Service has therefore violated Goal /153 of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, which states that the Forest Service must "[ilnform the public about National Forest resource management as related to the ... local economy" (page IV-21). The Forest Service has selected an alternative which may have extremely detrimental impacts to recreation, on a Scenic Byway where data shows that recreation is the primary use. The Forest Service has also neglected to address over 300 letters from forest users and business people who voiced concerns about impacts to scenery and the economy (FEIS, pages 9-3 to 9- 151). Literature Cited Cooper, EJ. 1989. Characteristics of Recreational Visitors in the Bridgerland Area. Hunsaker, L.M . 1969. Tourist recreation interests in Logan, Utah and the surrounding area. Unpublished manuscript, Utah State University, College of Education. Hunt, J.D. and Cadez, G. 1977. Bridgerland profile: From non-resident motor vehicle data 1974-75 (Report /128). Logan, Utah: Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Utah State University. Logan Ranger District, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. 1994. Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan. Prepared by Chip Sibbernsen. Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission. 1986. Report. President's Commission. 1987. The report of the President's Commission on Americans Outdoors. Washington, D.C. Task Force on Outdoor Recreation Resources and Opportunities. 1988. Outdoor Recreation in a Nation of Communities. Washington, D.C. USDA Forest Service. 1995. Record of Decision (ROD), U.S. Highway 89. Utah Department of Transportation (UOOn. 1991111. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill . Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. 62 ., • �• . .. Utah Department of Transportation. 1987. Aquatic Resources Technical Memorandum. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). 1995. Record of Decision (ROD), U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. 9, WETLANDS ISSUFS \.) In regards to existing wetlands within Logan Canyon, the Forest Service has violated the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan by issuing a Record of Decision approving UDOT's FEIS and Record of Decision. a) The FEIS states that there will be 11 .2 acres of jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the Preferred Alternative (Table S- I). UDOT's Record of Decision states that this impact may be reduced by as much as 30% (page 34). Proposed wetlands impacts is in direct conflict with the goal as outlined in the Management Plan, Logan Canyon Management Area, Watershed MIH code F04(G), which clearly states, "Avoid soil disturbing activities on steep, erosive, or unstable slopes, and in wetlands, floodplains , and meadows." This goal is supported by the Federal Register which states, "A record of decision for a National Forest System proposed action must display consistency with the relevant forest plan" (Federal Register, V.57, No. 182, page 43207). This appears to be binding language in terms of preserving existing wetlands within the scope of UDOT's construction project. The Forest Service has amended their own management guidelines concerning visual qualities and fisheries habitat for Logan Canyon, according to the Forest Services' Record of Decision. But there is no mention of amending the Management Plan pertaining to the management of wetlands. For the Forest Service to approve the FEIS and UDOT's Record of Decision, an amendment to the management goal concerning wetlands is required, with allowable period for public comment per requirements of the National Environmental Protection Act. b) Management goals are further violated by the Forest Service's decision to 63 �.. grant a transportation easement for UDOT's highway project. The Forest Service states that the modified Preferred Alternative considers "avoiding and minimizing hann to sensitive resources and maintaining the character of the Logan Canyon" (ROD, page 3). They go on to say, "As a result, minimal construction will occur in the ecologically sensitive middle canyon .. ." (page 3). Maps contained within the FEIS indicate 17 separate areas of jurisdictional wetlands (approximately 1.3 acres) within the Middle Canyon (mp 384 to 391) that will be permanently lost to road construction under the Preferred Alternative. There are 47 areas (approximately 7 acres) within the Upper Canyon (mp 391 to 400) that will be lost. This wou ld suggest that in terms of wetlands impacts, the Upper Canyon is more ecologically sensitive on an acre per mile basis than the Middle Canyon. If environmental concerns are indeed the limiting factors for the upper Middle Canyon, as UDOT claims, then it would seem consistent to keep to that intent throughout the Upper Canyon. In terms of type and the number of wetland areas in the Upper Canyon, and the fact that permanent wetland loss results in "one of the greatest impacts on wildlife," it seems appropriate that the Upper Canyon should receive equal consideration (FEIS, page 4-33). Appellants believe it is commendable that UDOT has agreed to reduce the highway width from 40 ft. to 34 ft. in the Upper Canyon, below the Beaver Mountain intersection. UDOT's Record of Decision states, "This reduces the impact on wetland and riparian areas" (page l). It goes on to say, "It is anticipated that the wetland impacts in this section will be reduced by approximately 30%" (page 34). But as the same document points out, 3.3 miles (41 %) of those first eight miles in the Upper Canyon will be 44 ft. wide to accommodate proposed passing lanes. This is only three feet narrower than the originally planned 47 ft. Without detailed surveys, it is not possible to accurately determine a 30% reduction in wetland impacts in the Upper Canyon. Appellants wonder how UDOT arrived at this 30% value. The method of calculating this has not been disclosed. Does this 30% value take into account the proposed passing lanes that will be constructed in wetlands? 2.) By approving UDOT's Record of Decision, the Forest Service has violated the National Forest Management Act. a) The National Forest Management Act specifically mandates, "Forest Planning shall provide for adoption of measures, as directed in applicable Executive orders, to minimize risk of flood loss, to restore and preserve floodplain values, and to protect wetlands" (36 CFR 2l9.23(1)). Appellants believe that "protect" is strong language requiring the agency to do just that. Appellants believe that this protection 64 • �• clause takes precedence over mitigation. The goal should be avoidance or loss of exi s tin~ wetlands. The Conservationists' Alternative, with its recommendation of slow vehicle turnouts and a smaller number of shorter passing lanes, comes closer to compliance with 36 CFR 219.23(f) . 3.) The Forest Service and UDOT are potentially in violation of section 404 requiremen Is of the Clean Water Act. a) As the Act states, " ... no discharge of dredged or fill material shall be permitted if there is a practicable alternative to the proposed discharge which would have less adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem ... " (40 CFR 230. lOa). UDOT and the Forest Service both state that the Conservationists' Alternative does not satisfy the purpose and need of the project (FEIS, page 4-25, the Forest Service' s ROD, page 12). They are claiming that there is no practicable alternative to construction in wetlands as is proposed in the Preferred Alternative (see FEIS, page 4-28). Appellants believe that slow vehicle turnouts in the Upper Canyon is a practicable alternative. Appellants believe the Forest Service should reverse its decision to allow construction of the modified Preferred Alternative, un til UDOT seriously considers the option of slow vehicle turnouts below th e Beaver Mountain in tersection , combined with one passing lane in lieu of two. This option has been proposed by many within the environmental community, citing that slow vehicle turnouts have been used successfu lly in other states (pendery 1994). The Forest Service should require UDOT to consider slow vehicle turnouts, along with a smaller number of passing lanes, as a practical alternative in order to minimize impacts to wetlands. The Clean Water Act further states, ..... for activities which are not water dependent, practicable alternatives that do not involve special aquatic sites are presumed to be available, unless clearly demonstrated otherwise ... " (40 CFR 230. lOa. 1). Neither the FEIS nor UDOT's Record of Decision present evidence that "clearly demonstrates otherwise." Literature Cited Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Code of Federal RegUlations. Pendery, Bruce. 1994. Letter of August 12 to Dave Berg, Utah Department of Transportation. USDA Forest Service. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. 65 �.. USDA Forest Service. 1992. National Environmental Policy Act. Federal Register, V. 57, No. 182. USDA Forest Service. 1985. Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lake City, UT Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. 11, CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS NOT EVALUATED IN TIlE FEIS UDOT's Record of Decision introduces new construction impacts that were never mentioned in the FEIS. Thus the Forest Service has adopted an FEIS which does not meet the "standards for an adequate statement" required by 40 CFR 1506.3a for the adoption of an FEIS. Rubble and Spoil: UDOT's Record of Decision states, "Excess materials that are not used in roadway construction or restoration of the borrow area near Bear Lake Summi~ will be disposed of in locations determined on a case-by-case basis by the CAT team and approved by the USFS. Excess materials may be ... stock piled (sic) for future use ... " (page 23). Neither the DEIS nor the FEIS ever mentioned the stockpiling of rubble for future use. It was assumed that, for any given section under construction, there would be more than enough material excavated (see FEIS, Table 4-15) and hence no need to store material in the canyon. Storage piles will act as sediment sources that will impact streams, they will directly destroy habitat, and their presence will violate visual quality requirements. Permanent disposal of rubble became a major issue upon release of the DEIS, and was addressed specifically in the FEIS (pages 4-70 and 4-71). The FEIS referred to only one disposal site in the Canyon, the abandoned borrow area near the summit. Other than this one site, it specifically stated, "The balance of surplus material will be deposited outside of the canyon area." Rubble and spoil disposal was a major issue because highway construction in the Lower Canyon in the 1960 's left a large spoil pile that has not yet revegetated to a natural appearance. As with the storage piles, rubble disposal in the canyon will be a sediment source (how can one revegetate this 66 • �• subsoil material effectivel y?), will permanently destroy habitat, and will violate visual quality requirements. None of these impacts were disclosed in the FEIS . Borrow Pits: UDOT's Record of Decis ion mentions "material sources," in other words, borrow pits (page 33). These features were never mentioned in the FEIS, yet they will have undeniable impacts. The wording in the FEIS, such as, "Spoil material will be generated during excavation. Some of this spoil material will be used for embankments and other construction related uses" (page 4-70), implies that excavation for curve cuts, etc. , will be the source of thi s type of construction material. Borrow pits and their attendant haul roads will destroy hab itat, violate visual quality requirements, and be sources of sediment-laden runoff that will impact streams. None of this was disclosed in the EIS process. Further, it appears that UDOT is still trying to suppress this information in th e Record of Decision, since th e "Construction Impacts" section makes no mention of either borrow pits or material sources (pages 23-24). Haul Roads: Haul roads are mentioned for the first time in the EIS process in UDOT's Record of Decision. They are mentioned on page 23 and also on page 33, in relation to borrow pits. There was no reason for the public to suspect their presence in past discussions, since there were no plans for borrow pits or material stockpiles. They represent a new impact with concerns as stated above. Staging Areas: UDOT' s Record of Decision reveals that there will be staging areas needed for construction (page 24). These large areas will destroy habitat, be sources of sediment and pollutant-laden runoff, and violate visual quality requirements. Never in the EIS process were staging areas mentioned. Batch Plants: The potential need for batch plants located in the canyon was never discussed during the EIS process, but is revealed on page 24 of UDOT's Record of Decis ion. In addition to the concerns listed for staging areas, batch plants raise air quality concerns. This should have been dis cussed during the EIS process. General: These issues should have been discussed by UDOT in the EIS process, since technical topics such as batch plants, material sources, etc., are not items which the general public is necessarily informed about. It appears that these technical details were purposely withheld from the public. The Forest Service has therefore adopted an FEIS which does not meet the "standards for an adequate statement" required by 40 CFR 1506.3a for the adoption of an FEIS. Literature Cited Utah Department of Transportation (UOOn. 1995. (ROD) Record of Decision, U.S. 89 Through Logan Canyon. 67 �• Utah Department of Transportation. 1993. (FEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. Utah Department of Transportation. 1990. (DEIS). Draft Environmental Impact Statement, U.S . Highway 89, Logan Canyon. Prepared by CH2M Hill. APPENDIX A Maps of area APPENDIX B Conservationists' Alternative APPENDIX C Photos of Affected Areas 68 �United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington Office File Code: Date: Kevin Kobe, President Logan Canyon Coalition U.S.U. Box 1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 14 th & Independence SW P . O. Box 96090 Washington. DC 20090-6090 1570-1 (L) NF S# 9S-13-00-0018-A21S JUN 2 9 1995 CERTIFIED MAIL -R.R.R. Dear Mr. Kobe: W have completed our revie w of your May 15, 1995, appeal of Regional Forester e Dale Bosworth 's decision to amend the Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan and to consent to issuing an easement to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), in coordination with t he Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), to enable them to perform needed reconstruction and safety work on Nati onal Forest System land associated wi th rehabilitation o f u.s. Highway 89 through Logan Canyon. The Regional Forester's decision is documented in his March 31, 1995, Record of Deci s i o n (ROD) o n the FHWA's Final Environmental Impac t Statement (EI S) for the project. My review of your appeal has been conducted pursuant to 36 CFR 215 o f the Secretary's Appeal Regulations. Whereas your appeal challenges the adequacy of the FHWA 's environmental impact reports, I have limited my review to the Regional Forester's decision. In accordance with 36 CFR 215. 19, the ' Appeal Reviewing Officer has reviewed the appeal record and his wri tten recommendation on the disposition of the appeal is enclosed. As the Reg i onal Forester stat es i n h is Record of Decision, the Forest Service is not (emphasis added) making a decision to improve or how to improve U.S. 89. The FHWA and UOOT have already made the decision to improve the r oadway. See FHWA 's ROD for U.S . Highway 89, project # F -021(7). The bases for the project, as well as known and anticipated environmental effects, are ide nt ified and discussed in the associated Nat ional Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl documents. Mitigation measures have been prescribed for potential and known adve rse environmental impact, including those concerns identified by the Forest Service. In my review of the record, I find that Appellant has actively participated in the NEPA process and that Appellant's concerns have been considered in the formulation of the FHWA 's Fi ••al EIS and ROD. In fact, it appears Appellant's members were involved in a special citizen group formed to advise the FHWA and others on how best t o achieve this project in an environmentally sensitive manner. See faxed letter dated May 31, 1995, from Lauren M. Keller, Chairperson, Citizens for the Protection o f Logan Canyon. The FHWA 's ROD contains many of the reco mmendations proposed by that group (Citi zens f o r the Protection of Logan Canyon). My finding is re i nforced further by Douglas E. Thompson, President of the Cache Chamber of Commerce. In his l ette r as an inte r ested party dated May 31, 1995, Mr . Thompson gives a detailed description of the how the project was developed and the Chamber's opposition to Appellant's current assertions. Cari n g for the Land and Serving People Pnn:eo on Aecyc!ecI Paper FS-6200·28Q (12/93) ."'i .... �Kevin Kobe, President 2 Reasonable people can be expected to disagree, even when given the similar facts . We have carefully examined the decisions and mitigation measures taken by the Regional Forester and find them reasonable and supportable. It is fully appropriate that use and occupancy of National Forest System land be authorized by an easement. It is also required that changes in Forest Plan direction be documented through amendment to the Forest Plan. In this case, the adjustments are minor, thus, the Regional Forester is correct to provide for a non-significant amendment to the Forest Plan. Accordingly, Regional Forester Bosworth's March 31, 1995, decision for the U.S. Highway 89 rehabilitation project is affirmed. My decision on your appeal constitutes the final administrative determination of the Department of Agriculture (36 eFR 215.18). Sincerely, c;2~:1I~XW~~ Appeal Deciding Officer Associate Deputy Chief National Forest System Enc l osures cc: Regional Forester, R- 4 Zachary Frankel, Director, URce Caring for th e Land and Serving P eo p le ?tlnted on Recycled Paper "5-6200·280 {12193) .#f!:a ." �united States Department o f Agriculture Pile Code : Route To: Subject: To: Fores t Serv ice 1570 14th & Independence SW P. O. Box 96090 Washington. DC 20090·6090 Washington Office Date: June 15, 1995 Appea l Reviewing Officer Recommendation Appeal No. 95-13-QQ - Q018-A215 Appeal Deciding Officer This is my review of the substantive quality of the March 31, 1995, decision made by Regional Forester Dale Bosworth to amend the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP ) to be cons i stent with the Fe deral Highway Administration's (FHWA) and the Utah Department of Transportation's (UOOT ) deci si o n to construct improvements to U . S. Highway 89 from Logan to Garden City . This decision adopts the UDOT and FHA U,S, Highway 89 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) . The Forest Service was a cooperating agency for the development of this EIS. The Regional Forester 's decision changes the visual quality objectives from retention to parcial re tenti o n for the highway easement near Logan Cave and to modification for the remainder o f the r o ute. It also changes t he guidel ine s for fisheries habitat indices to permit decreases not e xceeding 5 percent of the existing popUlation when the decreases are temporary and the resulti n g index exceeds established minimum standards. This decision will grant a transportation easement over approximately 72 additional ac r es of the Wasatch· Cache National Fo rest whi ch is required for expansion of the highway corridor . As part of my revi e w, I have 'considered the arguments presented in the appeal by the Logan Canyon Coalition (LCC ) and the Utah Rivers Conservation Council. Addi t ional ly, I have revie wed the comments submitted by UDOT, Cit izens for the Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC l. the Cache Chamber of Commerce. Appeal Summary (al Appellant objections The appellants have raised the following issues : lack of demonstrated purpose ane need, safety, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Of f icials (ASSHTO) standards and highway design, wild and scenic river planning. fishery impacts and Bonneville Cutthroat Trout, wildlife impacts and sensitive species, sensitive plants. visual retention, economic impacts, wetlands, water quality, lack of disclosure of construction impacts, and the application of Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. �Appeal Deciding Officer page 2 (b) Informal meeting results There was no resolution to the issues discussed at the ~~y 30, 1995, informal disposition meeting with LCC. Appeal points discussed were safety, highway design, wild and scenic rivers planning, and impacts to fish including the 80nneville Cutthroat Trout. (c) Intere sted Party comments In their comments, UDOT states the issues raised by the appellants were addressed in the EIS and its Record Of Decision (ROD). They also state the resource requirement s (mitigation ) imposed by the coope rating Federal agencies have been met. In the comments received from CPLC, this group explained that the modifications to the Preferred Alternative for the FHWA ROD was a result of hours of negotiations with UOOT. They also state the LCC was formed from members of CPLC "who felt the compromise did n ot go far enough to protect the canyon. " The Cache Chamber of Commerce provided specific comments on the issues. They stated no new issues are raised by the appellants and the Chamber's fundamental reason for supporting the project is traffic safety. They emphasi zed every writte n opinion by elected officials representing Cache and Rich Counties supports the project. Findinas (a) Clarity of the decision and rationale I find the clarity of the decision and its rationale meets agency standards. The nature of the action under the Regional Forester's decision (FS ROD) is clearly stated. He states the limits of his decision and informs the reader that he is "not making a decision to improve or how to improve u.s. B9" as t~at decision was already made by FHWA and UDOT with Forest Service parti cipation (FS ROD page 1) The FS ROD clearly discloses the logic and rationale for this decision. Comments from both the public and cooperat ing agencies were considered in making the decis i on. Required mitigation measures are disclosed. (b) Comprehension of benefits and purpose of proposal The purpose and need for the project is found in Section 1.2 of the £IS. The need and scope of the Regional Forester's decision is found in the introduction to the fS ROD. This decision reflects the determination found in t~e FHWA ROD {p o 15l that an amendment to the LRMP is necessary to implement the modified Preferred Alternative. The No Action Alternati ve was given full consideration. �Appeal Deciding Officer page 3 This proposal was generated by FHWA and UDQT, and the decision to amend the L~1P will make the proposal consist ent with agency policy and direction. Gr~~ting the transportation easement is an appropriate use of National Forest System Lands. (c ) Consistency of the decision with policy, direction and supporting information Contrary to the appellants concerns that environmental and procedural laws have not been met, I find that the Regional Forester's decision is consistent with agency policy, direction, the EIS, and its supporting documentation. Therefore, I do not believe his decision is arbitrary or capricious. I have not found any violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPAl, the National Forest Management Act, the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield ACt, the Endangered Species Act, the National Hist oric Preservation Act, the Clean Water Act, the Department of Transportation Act, or any other law. Of particular interest was the appellants' statement tha t the "Forest Service management policy for Logan Canyon is inconsistent from document to document" (Appeal p . 4 ) . In reviewing and comparing the Regional Forester's decision , the FHWA ROD, EIS and LRMP, I find no inconsistency. Plans like the appellants mentioned Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan are analysis and evaluation tools and are not part of the Forest Service's two levels of decisionmaking process. The determinat ion that this is a non-significant amendment to the W asatch-Cache National Forest LRMP is appropriate. The decision reflects site-specific amendment needs related to the implementation of the project and not s weeping changes to the Forest-wide standards and guidelines. (d) Effectiveness of public participation activities and use of comments There has been an extensive public participation process for this project. Not o nly were the minimum NEPA scoping and notification requirements met, additional public information meetings were held, a "Citizens Review Committee" was used to determine whether the Draft EI S addressed the issues in an understandable and appropriate manner, and any person who commented on the Draft EIS received a brochure explaining the Preferred Alternative. Comments were taken on concerns raised by the Preferred Alternative prior to the release of the Final EIS. Before making their decision, FHWA and UDOT modified their preferred alternative through nego tiati ons with CPLC to address and mitigate concerns. A£ter the FWHA decision and prior to issuing his own decision, the Regional Forester met with members of the LCC to discuss their concerns over the project . In his decision, the Regional Forester states "these concerns were considered in formulation" of his decision (FS ROD p. 10 ) . The EIS demonstrates other agencies with jurisdiction, the Fish and Wildlife Se~ice and the Army Corps o f Engineers, were contacted and they provided �Appeal Deciding Officer page 4 information for the development of the EIS and its alternatives. State agencies, elected officials, various organizations, and the media were all contacted about the project . (e) Requested changes and objections of the appellants The appellants are very knowledgeable about the project and its environmental consequences . However, mOGt of the appeal points raised by the appellants are outside of the scope of the Regional Forester's decision to amend che LRMP and to grant an easement. In their appeal, the appellants have provided specific information which they believe contradicts the conclusions of the EIS. They have put forth an extensive, site-specific argument for the implementation of ~a less damaging alternative" (Appeal p. 4). Specifically, they believe a reduction of the designated speed for the road would more adequately meet the safety issue without the environmental loss due to construction . Their issues were raised early in the NEPA process and alternatives with appropriate mitigation measures were developed to address their concerns. However, they claim the FHWA ROD ~introduces new construction impacts that were never mentioned" in the EIS (Appeal p. 86). These construction impacts include rubble and spoil disposal, material sources, haul roads, staging areas, and batch plants. Construction impacts are discussed in section 4.25 of the EIS, and were raised as comments to the Draft £IS. Reco1lU!lendation I recommend that the Regional Forester's decision be affirmed. As a result my review, I find the Forest Service was an active cooperating agency in the developmen~ of the EIS, the Regional Forester correctly limited the scope of the decision' to within the jurisdiction of the Forest Service, there was extensive public participation in trying to resolve the environmental issues, and the required mitigation measures are appropriate for the minimizing of environmental impacts while meeting the purpose and need for the project. Furthermore, I find that the issues raised by the appellants were adequately addressed in either the decision or its supporting documents. Atd!/c/ DAVID L. HESSEL Director Timber Management �.' " CPLC Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon P. O . Box 3608, Logan, Utah 84323 - 3608 USDA-FS Appeals Reviewing Officer P.O . Box 96090 Washington, D .C . 20090-6090 Re: Statement of Appeal for Logan Canyon U .S . 89, Logan, Utah. Dear Sir: In the Forest Service Appeal, submitted by the Logan Canyon Coalition and othen, there is no reference to how the Modified Preferred Alternative was created. Members of Qur orgtlnization. Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon, spent countless hours in negotiations with the Utah Department of Transportation. The Modified Preferred Altcmatlve is the result of those negotiations. Logan Canyon Coalition was fonned from members of our group who felt the compromise did not go far enough to protect the canyon. rfyou have any questions please feel free to contact me at 801 - 752-0706. __ tcrdY~~ Lauren M . Keller Chairperson �655 Canyon Road Logan, UT 84321 July 14, 1995 Lauren M. Keller, Chairperson QlLC P.O. Box 3608 Logan, UT 84323-3608 Dear Lauren, I think you'd better take me off the CPLC Steering Committee. I haven't ever done much for the organization, to justify a leadership position, even nominal, and now I am experiencing a certain undeniable discomfort. Given recent events. maybe it's better if I give up the idea of trying to be a bridge between CPLC and LCC. I wasn't consulted about the idea of writing an interestedparty letter to the Forest Service, but if I had been , I would have argued strongly against it. First, the official position of CPLC, the one voted on in October, stated that if the Forest Plan were violated, there could be an appeal. The Forest Plan, quite clearly, is violated several different ways by the ROD. So, even though it's a different group who made the appeal to the Forest Service, CPLC (I would have argued) should at least remain silent. Second is the moral dimension . CPLC's letter to the Appeals Reviewing Officer aligns CPLC with the Modified Preferred Alternative and says, in effect, that LCC is illegitimate. I am afraid this indicates that CPLC may be more interested in political turf than in protecting the Canyon. Why should CPLC have feared a successful LCC appeal? In the appeal, LCC produced the most comprehensive, accurate, detailed, and devastating analysis yet done on the proposed construction . Anyone dedicated to protecting the Canyon should respect its thoroughness, and be gratefu l for the work of the compilers. Nothing better -- nothing even close -- has been done on Logan Canyon . CPLC should not have given the Forest Service any help in this matter, and certainly should not have undercut a fellow environmental organization. That is not simply bad manners -- it denies the whole morality of environmentalism, which is that the environment comes first. Sincerely, Thomas J. Lyon �r r om : (eche Chfimberl Brid e riend FaH phone: B01 153 ~ , ue lity : me CACHE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE /""-160?'\ORTH YiAC-: • LOG.'\.'\ . L"TA H S-B11 • (80 11751-11 6 1· FAX (801 ) 75:--?>. U6 May 3 1. 1995 USDA-Forest Service Appeals Reviewi ng Officer P.O. Box 96090 Washington. D.C. 20090-6090 FAX 202-205-1758 [Eight tQ[al pages including this one] Response to Notice of Appeal and Statement of Reasons From Logan Canyon Coalition Regarding the Re cord of Decision . U.S . Highway 89 . Logan Canyon Wasatch-Cache National Forest I am Douglas E . Thompson. president of the Cache Chamber of Commerce . a 600-member chamber for all Cache County. and supervisor of the Bridgerland Travel Region Board . which promotes tourism for Cache and Rich Counties . As a party interested in the Logan Canyon Highway Project. I am compelled to make comment on the appeal.. Because time constraints and board meeting schedules precluded getting formal approval of thi s statement from the respective board s. this statement is my own . It. however.. is based on past discussions and statements formally approved by both boards . Appellants' appeal is very well written and documented . On the surface . it appears to be forceful and mo tivatin g . However. careful analysis by those familiar with the project and the process that led to the compromise Record of Decision shows many critical flaws in fact and logic in appellants' document.. No matter how good appellants' rhetoric is . simply saying it does not make it so . Errors and misleading sta tements in appellants· document will be deli neated roughly fo11m\/ing the outline they used in the app~al. Introduction Appellants' basic assertions lack foundation in fact.. The record o f public hearings . discu ssio ns. and public input clearly shows that there has been full and earnest compliance with NEPA requirements. The construction project has already been sca led down from the Preferred Alternative recognizing the needs of the Logan Canyon environment. The Conservationists' Alternative has been honestly and straightforwardly considt!red time and again . The compromise represen ted by the ROD leans heavily in favo r of the Conserva tionists' Alternative bu t still provides an acceptable level of service and safety. This project is the best and most complete attempt at compliance with NEPA requirements of any project in UDOT's hi story. It is the apparent opi ni on of o.ppeJl:mts that until eve ry square inch of affected soil.. water and air affected has been analysed and considered . applying only methodologies accepted by appellant s . the project is not in absolute compliance with NEPA reqUirements . That level of proof is infeasible and impractical.. Reaso n should rule. The ROD represents a finely craned compromise that reasonably but not absolu tely protects the environment. On the other hand . it reasonably protects lives anu safery o f the people whtl use the highway . �Cache Chamber ofComme:rce Response To Logan Canyon Coaltion Appeal Page 2 Extreme views have no place in the process now. Extreme views for protection should have no more right to be heard at this time than the extreme views for development. The ROD does not satisfy those who favor greater development but the process does not :lUOW the pro·development extreme to reiterate their positions. The process gives ear only to those who want les~ than the ROD. The group presenting the appeal is a minority within a minority. The large r environmental community that participated in the discussions and the negotia tions that led to the compromise could never document that they represented more than a few thousand people. The appellants are a very small splinter group of a vocal but well orga nized minority. The clear majority of the citizens of Cache and Rich Counties suppo rted the Preferred Alterna ti ve. EVERY. REPEAT EVERY. ELECTED OFFICIAL REPRESENTING CACHE AND RICH COUNTIES W HO HAS WRITTEN AN OPINION SUPPORTS THE PROJECT. The largest local repre se ntative elected bodies. the Cache Counry Council. the Rich County Commission. and the Cache Mayo rs Association. have repeatedly stated their support of UDOT project plans. The vote o f approval of the ROD by the Cache County Council was not unanimous because some council members felt the ROD did not improve the highway eno ugh . I. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND From the very beginning. those most closely associated with tourism in Logan Canyon have had significant input to the project. The proposals for National Scenic Byway status and the recent successfullSTEA grant for Byway Enhancement were carefully coordinated among the Forest Service. UDOT. and the Bridgerland Tra vel Board. Nothing in the ROD will significantly reduce scenic tourism. in fact. the project will improve the safety of and access for tourists. That the scale of the project received "massive opposition" is an exaggeration. The opposition was vocal, media savvy, and very well organized. but it was never very large. Its largest demonstration claimed only 400 participants: I was there and counted about 250. And its petitions were critically flawed. One was so misrepresented that one mayor. to hi s profound embarrassment. signed it t hin~ng it was for the project. On seve ral occasions. the Chamber polled its members regarding th'e project and the plurality for the projec t never dipped below 70 percent. Lack of Demonstr ated Purpose and Need 1 am not a safety engineer and do not feel adequate to respond to the technical questions of safety. However. I drive the canyon often and can speak as a user. When no one else is o n the road. it is safe enough and the travel time from Logan to Garden Cil)' is acceptable. That is why the travel speeds have no t been a major issue with proponents. But no o ne driving the Canyon on a summer weekend would say the canyon highway was safe o r that travel times were acceptable. To completely alleviate delays during peak traffic would reqUire a project acceptable to only a very few. But to leave it essentially as it is. with a few rurnouts. as the Conservationists' Alternative suggests. is neither safe nor reasonable. Bear Lake and Logan Canyon are the region's two most popular tOUlist attractions. dra\\'ing large numbers from the populous Wasatch Front (Sal t Lake City. Ogden and ProvO). The traffic studies do not show the increase in numbers and size o f recreational vehicles and boats traveling to Bear Lake. Without passing lanes to relieve their length. vehicle convoys on summer weekends and holidays become accidents waiting to happen. In the opinion of the Chamb;;!f. the �C ache Chamber of Commerce Response To Logan Canyon Coaltion Appeal Page3 ROD is inadequate [0 alleviate heavy ho liday traffic pressure but it will hdp. On oth e: r days. passin g lanes. wider pavement and safer turn s that the ROD sug gests 3re accept3ble. [h~ When it comes to commerce and demographics. the appeal is wro ng and misleading. 1-80 is n ot the east access road for commerce out of C ache County: Logan Canyon is. The map in the Appeal 's Appendix A is extremely mi sleading becau se it eliminates the criti cal connec ting road between Kemmerer and Little America. where commercial traffic joins 1-80. The following companies (representing ove r 5.000 employees in Cac he Valley ) have weekly and often daily shlpments in and o ut of Cac he Valley using Logan Canyon: Presto Products (plastic bag products. headqu3rters in Wi sconsin ) Cache Valley Cheese (heavy distribution to the east. strong supplie s in the east) Gossner Foods (dairy foods. strong distribution to the east) E.A .Mille r (meat packer. strong distribution to th e east. supplies from eaSL). WeatherShield (window manufactu rer and di stributio n center with \Visconsi n headquarters) L.W . Miller (custom freight) Miller Transportation (custom freight) Pe pperidge Farms (cookies. strong distribution to the east ) LeG rand Johnson (road construction and cement) Jack Parson (construction and cement) Logan Coach (horse trailers. strong midwest distribution) Logan Manufacturing (strong midwest and eas tern distribution) Simplor Dairy Products (custom cheese wrapping. strong eastern distribution ) Schreiber Foods (processed cheese. supplies grocery stories and fast foods from the Mississippi west) These are only the largest. There are many other Cache Valley businesses that depend on a passable and safe Logan Canyon fo r their livelihood. To ask the se businesses to use 1-80 for their eastern based commerce would cost millions of dollars every year in increased miles and delivery time. Logan Canyon is promoted locally. statewide and nationally as the best and most sce ni c route from Salt Lake City to Yello,,:,stone. It is promoted locally by Blidge rland Travel Region. statewide by the Utah Travel Council. and na tio nally by Heart of the Rockie s and the American Automobile Association (AAA). Even tho ugh it is slightly longer in time than 1- 15 and mile s than Idaho 34. and higher elevation than either. Logan Canyon is the ro ute recommended by AAA for Yellowstone to Salt Lake City. not 1- 15 or Idaho 34. The appeal takes pains to poi nt to the 1980-90 decline in Rich County permanent population. It does not reveal the reason for the dec line was the boornlbust o f the sou thweste rn Wyoming oil fields. The 1980 census figures were artificially high because of the boom. The: 1990 figures show a slow but steady grow th from 1970. The se are permanent po pulation numbers. T he primary industry of Rich County has shifted to tourism and Garden City is becoming a resort community with a very high part-time resident population. Now. there are about as many parrtime residents as full-time. Tourism is in creasin g rapidly . Unemployment is running near two percent and assessed property valuati ons have increased dramatically . While not in a boom. Rich County's economy is improving steadily. In summary. :.t si mple analysi s o f Rich County ce nsus figures is misleading when used to predict lower traffi c volumes. Cit ing the decreasing rale of gro\.vth fo r ca nyon tr:.tffic vol umes is al so misle:::tdi ng because thaI analysi s does not consider the underlying rea so ns. Su mmer traffic in LC'gan Canyon will always �',om, :" Cache Chamber of Commerce Response To Logan Canyon Coaltioo Appeal Page4 have a hil.!h correlation to (he water level of Bear Lake. The mid-1980's repre se nt near· record high water levels and consequential higher traffic volumes. The latter years of the study period represent near-record low lake levels. During those years reliable access to the lake was available only on the east side of the lake. persuading Wasatc h Front traffic to go through Wyoming to Laketown. The summer of 1994 was the first year in the last five that large sail boats CQuid be safelY launched. As the lake level increases. as it has alway s done in its historical cycles. Logan Canyon traffic volumes will undoubtedly also increase . Other non-demographic factors will increase Canyon traffic . The improvements and promotion s financed by the ISTEA Byway Enhancement Grant will draw more tourists. The Forest Service 's own Great Western Trail promotions will attract more. And the first new commercial tourism property on Bear Lake in two decades. Harbor Village. will bring even more. With growth in commerce in Cache Valley. in parr-time Rich County residents, and in touri sm at Bear Lake and in Logan Canyon. UDOT traffic volume projections will be low. 2. SAFET Y ISSUES The fundamental reason that the Chamber supports the ROD is safety. As traffic volume increases. and the Chamber firmly believes it will. safety becomes the only reason to improve the highway. C urrent travel time for commerce is acceptable. especially when compared to the 1-80 and Idaho 34 alternatives. But already safety is an issue . It is difficult for semi-trailers to negotiate the tighter turns in the Middle Canyon without having back wheels run off thl! road. It is possible for two commercial vehicles to pass on Burnt Bridge and the T win Bridges but both vehicles will likely lose side mirrors. It is not safe for bicyclists to travel in Logan Canyon past Right Hand Fork because the hard surface shoulder literally disappears for seve ral miles through the middle canyon. With bicycle touring growing in popularity. it is unfair to not allow safe bicycle use of the canyon highway. It is important to note that the majority of the people in Cache Valley re mained publicly silent in this whole processes. The best way to gauge their feeli ngs is by the people whom th ey elected to repre sen t th em. Witho ut exception. at every public hearing and in every written respons.e fro m e lected officials . they unequivocally supP0rled the need for a safe r hi gh way. Regarding the safery o f the lower. improved section of highway and the greater number of accidents: it is qUite Si mple . There is su bstantially more traffic in the lower canyon. that 's where the largest campgrounds are and where the larger fishing facilities are . With more traffic and more frequent entries and exi ts on the highway. there will be more accidents. We accept UDOT safety and accident analysi s and numbers. Appellants do not. If one were to disregard UDOT traffic figures and look only at Forest Service records of usage for lower campgrounds compared to higher ones in relation to accide nts. accidents per camper wou ld be higher in the upper canyon. 3. AASHTO STANDARDS AND HIGHWAY DESIGN Fundame ntal to appellants' arguments is the "arhitrary anll capricious" applicati on of AASHTO standards. 1 can nN speak to ASSHTO stanllards but I can say thOot nothing in thi s ROn is "a rbitrary or capricious." Th e environmental community has see n to that. Although tht> �Cache Chamber of Commerce Response To Logan Canyon Coaltion Appeal Page5 Chamber and extreme environmentalists often disagreed. particularly in the early stages of the process. anyone associated with the process will agree that the environmental community has been te naci ous. Th ey forced UDOT and their consultants to exami ne and reexamine their analysis and conclusions. Working close ly with UDOT. and other State and Federal age ncie s associated with the process. I vouch for the earnestness and sincerity of the. bureaucra ts trying to respond to the questions of the environmentalists. To say that any of the ROD is "arbitrary and capricious" denies the very material and effective role that the environmental community has played in the process. Improve Level of Service of the Highway to Accommodate Projected Traffic Volumes Once again. in their rush to analyse the appellants did not consider why traffic level gro\vth has slowed. Undoubtedly . commerce. real esta te. and tourism will cause traffi c levels to increase. Already. tourism is the greatest contributor to annual cyclica l increases. As promotion increase. so will tourism volumes. Impr ove Traffic Flow On page 27. appellants claim that UDOT has not adequately considered the Conservationists' Altema(ive and have not compromised "for the sake of environmental protection." From the view of the Chamber and Travel Region Board. most of the compromises have come from UDOT. Only in the latest stage s of negoti:ltion did CPLC compromise mu ch. Before that time. all of the changes in the project had been in the direction of the Conservationists' Alternative. So much so. that the Chamber was beginning to wonder when and where it would stop. Until the ROD. Chamber members readily supported UDOT 's proposals. Many Chamber members. particularly commercial truckers had to be persuaded to approve the ROD . In essence. they said. "Not one more inch of reductions." They had compromised their positions enough. To say that UDOT has not genuinely compromised is absurd to anyone who has observed the process. 4. WILD AND SCENIC R{VERS Lacking expe rtise in thi s field: we have little to say excep t that it appears to us thaI bringing up this issue at this late date is only a stalling tactic. If appellants had been sincere in their concern for the status of the river. they should have brought the issue to the table long ago. They had ample opportunity . Furthe r. it is my observation that every precaution is being taken to protect the river. The bridges will be constructed with no piers in the river and the bridges with pi ers in the river will be removed . The ROD should actually improve the free flow of the river. 5. FISHERY IMPACTS AND BONNEVILLE CUTTHROAT TROUT Again. every pre caution is being taken to protect the river. Sedime.nt:ltion will be ke pt to a minimum in volume and duration. Concern about sedimentation from work along the dugway borders on the ludicrous. Th e work along the dugway will be at least dozens of feet away from the liver anu as far away a~ ~ quarter of a mile . �CacheCbamber of Commerce Response To Logan Canyon Coa ltion Appeal Page6 T he disturbing aspect of the appeal is that it clearly places a greater yalue on fish and flowers m than it does on hum:: life and safety. Because of compromise to protect fish habitat. Ihe Temple Fork intersection has been downgraded 10 the point that it will still be da ngerous by design to make a lef! tum going down canyon. The fish and thl! river are being protecteu at the expense of huma n safety . 6. WILDLIFE IMPACTS AND SENSITIVE SPECIES and 7. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS WITH SENSITIVE PLANTS The requests for studies a re for species increasingly obscure and further down the evolutionary chain. In the May 30. 1995. Forest Service hearing. appe ll an ts req uested studies of macroinve rtabrates. Will subseq uent studies be asked for bacteria and vi ru s? T he studies have been reasonably complete. certainly acce ptable fo r NEPA. 8. VISUAL RETENTION Of all the affected groups. the Bridgerland T ravel Region shou ld be the most concerned with the scenic visual aspects of the canyon. The Region has repeatedly voiced its support of the canyon project and has not changed its positio n in the Slightest. 9. ECONOMIC IMPACTS It is the o pinion of the Cache Chamber of Commerce. the BridgerJa nd Travel Region. the Rich Coun£)' Commission. the Bear Lake C hamber of Comme rce (Garden City). the Cache Coun£)' Council and every local governme ntal body that has writte n an opi nion. that the Logan Canyon highway project will have only positive economic impacts. T he on ly possible negati ve impacts may be during actual construction because travelers may :lvoid th e canyon. But that can be minimized by keeping the highway o pe n throughout construction . AAA has indicated they will continue to recommend travel through the canyon during construction. 10. WETLAND ISSUES One of the major compromise~ from the Prefe rred Altemalive 10 the ROD is narrowing (he pavement from (he "cattle guard" to Beaver Mountain to red uce the amo unt of wetlands affecteu by the project. Along with the concern for wetlands demonstrated in the FEIS. the ROD takes great care to avoid damage to wetlands. The concerns of appe llants have been heard at every public hearing on [he proj ect. W etlands conce rns have been more [han adequately addressed. 11. WATER QUALITY AND DESIGNATED USES Concern for Logan River and the quality of wate r have been one o f the d tiving forces for the design of the highway project. The re may be mino r. localized. very short tenn damage done durin g construction but the entire project has been modified to protect the river and irs W:lter quality. Appellants' description of damage a re from the FEIS for the Preferred Allernative. The ROD will subs[antially reduce eve n the short tenn impacts. 12. CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS NOT EVALUATED IN THE FEIS Beca use the very nature of highway cons truction precluues prellicting every possible impact. several prec':lUtions have been taken to adjust Ihe.: projt::ct to elimi nate or minimize unfor..:seen impacts. The project e nvironme ntal engineer anll rhe Coope rative Advi sory T:;!am will \\'::atch for �Cache Chamber of Commerce Response To Logan Canyon Coaltion Appeal Page 7 immediate problems. Design review of each phase will also reduce pOtential impacts. Even though LCC was not given a position on the CAT. legitimate concerns brought to the CAT will surely be acted on. 13 . 4(f) SITES To include the highway and rights-of-way as protected recreation is a stretch in any reasonable person 's imagination. The Forest Service respected the letter and the intent o f secti on 4(f) when it designated the 154(0 sites. -len SUMMARY Appellants have had access to the Environmental Impact Study process from the very beginnin g of the Logan Canyon Highway project. Their concerns have been heard and have had a profound affect on the ROD . Appellants had complete and unfettered access to the process. To alter the project now to suit the appellants is unfair to the cooperators from all sides who worked so hard within the syste m developing the ROD. Appellants had the opporruni ty (0 speak. they were heard . and their concerns we re acted upon. What more can citizens ask of the system unle ss it is their intention to bring process to its knees thro ugh stalling practices. The EIS process panders to an intellecrual elite while it appears to disre gard the wishes of elec ted official and long es tablished community organizations. A very small group. armed with a thorough knowledge of statistics and the willingness to spend the time to analyse each set of data. could effectively stall a project by challenging the methodologie s used to arrive at the data in the E IS. That is happening now . Appellants are abusing the system because their personal agendas for the project have not been mel. Once a group or an individual agrees with an E IS for a project. they no longe r have a place in the process. There is no way to defend a position. After accepting an EIS. aU one can do is watch his position erode away as disagreeing parties are given continued access to the system. As you review the appeaL please bear in mind th at literally thousands of reasonable people of good will have acted in good faith to produce the project represented in the ROD. The !a\VS h:lve been satisfied. The public has been heard. A super-majority represen ted by elected officials. and establi shed civic organizations support the ROD . Now is the time 10 move forward with :l project that will save human lives while it more (han adequate ly protects a canyon that we all love. Sincerely. Douglas E. Thompson_ President Cache Chamber of Commerce cc: Senator Orrin Hatch Congressman James Han sen Marsha BaiT. US Forest Service Regional Appeals CoonJinator �United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401-2310 File Code : 1950 Date : March 31, 1995 Dear Reviewer: In January, most of you received notification of the Utah Department of Transpor tation (UDOT) and Federal Highway Administration's decision to r econstruct portions of U.S. Highway 89 t hrough Logan Canyon . For the next step of t he process, it was necessary that decisions be made pertaining to National Forest System lands. My decis ion and amendment for the Wasatch· Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan are enclosed. This has been a long and arduous task for all parties involved and many of you have participated for several years. I first became familiar with this project as Forest Supervisor of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest . Now several years and many improvements later, I believe the decision made by UDOT and the Federal Highway Administration will protec t the valuable re sources in Logan Canyon yet allow for r oad improvements to be made. Throughout the environmental analys is, the Forest Service wo rked close ly with these agencies. If you have any que st ions about this decision, please contact Chip Sibbernsen, Acting Logan District Ranger, at (801) 755·3620 . Sincerely, - V1 . 6-...... ..----DALE N. BOSWORTH Regional Forester Enclosure Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on R«:vcIecI Paper F5-62O).28b (f2/93) G �• RECORD OF DECISION us HIGHWAY 89 LOGAN CANYON HIGHWAY - CACHE AND RICH COUNTIES, UTAH FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) AMENDMENT OF THE WASATCH-CACHE NATIONAL FOREST LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CONSENT TO GRANT A TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT ACROSS THE WASATCH-CACHE NATIONAL FOREST USDA FOREST SERVICE, INTERMOUNTAIN REGION I. Introduction Th i s document contains my decision to amend the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management plan (Forest Plan) to be consistent with the Fe deral Highway Administration's (FHWA) and the Utah Department of Tra nsportation's (UDOT) decision to construct reasonable and necessary improvements to U . S. 89 from Logan to Garden City. This document also contains my decision to consent to grant a transportation easement over approximately seve nty-two additional acres of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest required for the project. It is important to clarify that I am not making a decision to imp rove o r how to improve u.s . 89; FHWA and UDOT, with our participation, haVE' al ready made the decision to improve the roadway. II. My Decis ion and Rationale Base d on the environmental analysis contained in the FE IS and FHWA's Record of Dec i si on, I have decided t o amend the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Re sourc e Management Plan to be consistent with the decision of FHWA and UDOT t.o cons truct reasonable and necessary improvements on u.s. 89 across National Fore s t lands in Logan Canyon . This non-significant amendment to the Forest Plan is attached as appendix to this Record of Decision. This amendment cha nge s the Visual Quality Objective from retention to partial retention for t he highway easement near Logan Cave and to modification for the remainder of t he r oute . It also changes the guidelines for fisheries habitat indiciee to pe rm i t decreases not exceeding 5 percent of the existing when the decreases al·e tempo rary and the resulting index exceeds est~lished minimum standards set in the 19 85 Forest Plan. Because the project will result in expansion of the highway corridor in some a re as I have also decided to consent to the FHWA's issuance of a Highway Eas ement Deed, or series of deeds, to the Utah Department of Transportation fCor t he phased construction of reasonable and necessary improvements on U.S. 89 . The de cision for which I am amending the Plan is described in the FElS as the Pre f e rred Alternative as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision for this FEIS . To se rve as a basis for this decision, I am adopting the FElS as it relates to the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. This is pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.3. FHWA a nd UDOT issued a Record of Decision on January 18, 1995, to implement the Pr e ferred Alternative as refined in their Record of Decision. The FEIS was pr e pared by FHWA and UDOT with the full participation of the Forest Service a s a cooperating agency ,. The effects on and associated with National Forest �System lands, including consistency with the Forest Plan and meeting transportation needs, are disclosed in the FEIS and further addressed in FHWA's Record of Decision. I concur with their decision that the Preferred Alternative, as refined and described in their Record of Decision, represents t he best approach. As a cooperating agency throughout the analysis process, the Wasatch-Cache National Forest was closely involved in ensuring National Forest needs were met. Of particular importance to the Forest is to protect sensitive and endangered species, water quality and fish and wildlife habitat capability; to maintain the scenic values of Logan Canyon; to maintain the overall character and values of Logan River and Beaver Creek; and to maintain the potential for undeveloped recreation along these water courses. Because of the mitigation measures incorporated into the decision, many of the impacts to the Logan River and Beaver Creek fisheries will be minimized. Most potential impacts to water quality will be effective ly mitigated. Furthermore, impacts to visual quality will be minimized to the extent practical while still allowing for alterations to the existing roadway. Mitigation measures relating to Forest Service decisions are highlighted in the next section. Throughout the drafting of the planning documents for this project both FHWA and UDOT have been sensitive to the concerns of both the Forest Service and the public that Logan Canyon's natural resources and character be preserved. Numerous suggestions for environmental improvement s to the project design and monitoring to ensure environmental protection were incorporated into the FEIS and FHWA's Record of Decision. The Preferred Alternative, as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision, is the only alternative which represents a significant improvement in highway function and service without seriously impacting visua1 resources and water quality in Logan Canyon. The Forest Service staff of resource specialists reviewed the FEIS and determined that the environmental affects were adequately disclosed. In reviewing the Environmental Consequences in Chapter IV of the FEIS and the refinements to the preferred alternative and responses to comments in FHWA's Record of Decision, I have determined that all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental impacts within my authority, have been adopted. It is clear that some impacts will occur, but taking into account the extensive mitigation and the improvement in design and safety of the road, I concur with the decision of FHWA and UOOT that the Preferred Alternative, as refined in their Record of Decision, will best serve the needs of all concerned. III. Mitigation Measure s The Forest Service participated as a cooperating agency in development of the FEIS. In cooperating with FHWA and UDOT, the Forest Service participated in developing the extensive mitigation described in the FEIS. In addition the mitigation measures described in the FEIS for the Preferred Alternative, FHWA incorporated additional mitigation measures in their Record of Decision. I have reviewed these and concur with these. The measures highlighted be low relate to issues pertinent to the decisions I am making as described in Section I of this Record of Decision. These measures are described in detail in the FEI S as further refined in FHWA 's Record of 2 • �Decision. Numerous other mitigation measures were a lso incorporated into the decision of ODOT and FHWA. These are descri bed in their Record of Decision. In addition to these measures, I am also including some additional measures to protect the environment. These are identified with an asterik (*). consenting to arant a transportation easement: Throughout development of the Preferred Alternative, and subsequent refinements as described in FHWA's Record of Decision, consideration was given to avoiding and minimizing harm to sensitive resources and maintaining the character of Logan Canyon. Protection of the river and surrounding wetland/riparian edge, avoidance of threatened and sensitive species, avoidance and minimizing harm to wetland/riparian habitat, visual and recreational resources of the canyon played an important role in its development and selection. As a result, minimal construction will occur in the ecologically sensitive middle canyon, bridges will clear-span the river. retaining walls will be minimized but employed where needed t o limit encroachment into sensitive areas, and treatment of clearzones will be modified from AASHTO recommendations . All practicable measures to avoid impacts and minimize environmental harm have been incorporated into the conceptual design described in the FEIS as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision. The specific measures are described for the Preferred Alternative in the FEIS and further expanded in FHWA's Record of Decision. The Forest Service will participate in the detailed final design phase emphasizing avoidance of impacts and minimization of environmental harm. Horizontal and vertical alignments will be manipulatE:d to provide a "best fit". The Forest Service will participate and coordinate with ODOT in accordanCE: with the terms of the two Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) between the Forest Service, UDOT and FHWA that are applicable to this project (see appendix to this Record of Decision for the general state-wide MOO and the appendix to FHWA's Record of Decision for the supplemental MOU specific to us 89 in Logan Canyon). In addition, the Forest Service will work and coordinate with ODOT and FHWA in the final design, construction and monitoring of specific projects: 1. As a member of the Cooperating Advisory Team in the final design phase for individual projects, the Forest Service will emphasize avoidance of impacts and minimization of environmental harm. 2. In development and subsequent approval of revegetation plan s. construction/post-construction monitoring plans for individual projects. 3. In development of other plans (e . g., Wetlands Mitigation Plan) as described in the FEIS and the "Measures to Minimize Harm" section of FHWA's Record of Decision. 4. By approving on-Forest staging, batch plant, and wetland mitigation areas. 3 �5. ··The mitigation measures prescribed in the F£I5 and this Record of Decision will be monitored and e nforced as described in the "Moni toring or Enforcemen t Program " section of FHWA's Record of Decision. Through its representation on the CAT, the Forest Service will identify contractual measures prior to construction to ensure the measures prescribed in the FEIS and FHWA's and this Records of Decision are implemented. If and where necessary and in accordance with Forest Service Policy. the Forest Service will specify easement stipulations prior to construction to ensure the measures prescribed in the FErs and in this Record of Decision are implemented.** Amending the Fisheries Habita t Requirements in the Forest Plan ; The portions of the Logan River within this project area have been rated by the State as a Class 2 fishery (of great importance to the State) . The river and its tributaries provide habitat for cutthroat trout (possibly Bonneville cutthroat, a USFS sens itive species) and numerous other aquatic species. Issues pertinent to this decision include wetland, water quality and fisheries impacts. Mitigation measures include all those listed in and incorporated by reference f r om the "Water Quality ImpactS", ~ Permits ", "Wet lands and Botanical Resources", and "Water Body Modifications and wil dlife Impacts" parts of the "Measures to Minimize Harm" section of FHWA's Record of Decision. The following mitigation measures, which correspond to other mitigation requirements in FHWA's Record of Decision, provide additional fisheries mitigation: 6. Best Management Practices and UDOT's Standard Erosion Control plans will be employed to control sedimentation and siltation, minimize water quality and habitat degradation, minimize vegetative removal , and minimize cut and fill. Detailed Best Management Practices will be developed during design for each project. 7. A construction/post· construction monitoring plan will be developed and implemented by UDOT and approved by the Forest Service during design of individual projects in order to identify sensitive areas where monitoring is needed. Monitoring required will be identified in the project plans and specifications for each project. B. The design of clearzones will focus on preservation of aesthetic and ecological features to the extent possible while considering safety. The prime directive will be to minimize impacts to wetlands and riparian habitat without jeopardizing safety. 9. All work will be conducted on the inland side of the highway where possible to avoid in· channel activities and minimize riparian habitat and riverbank disturbance. Road widths described in the FEIS as further reduced in FHWA's Record of Decision were incorporated to avoid or minimize impacts. Use of retaining walls or guardrails will be considered where needed to reduce harm to wetlands and related resources. This includes work on the Dugway, Temple Fork, in the lower Upper Canyon, near Rick Springs and other segments described in the FEIS and FHWA ' o Recor d of Deci sio n. , �10. The design o f passing and turn lanes ' will be evaluated further during detailed design to assess additional measures to avoid or minimiz e harm to wetlands. Use of retaining walls or guardrails will be c o nsidered where needed to reduce impacts. This includes work in lower Upper Canyon, culverts near Amazon and Stump Hollows. intersections at Tony Grove, Beaver Mountain and Franklin Basin; and othe r segments described in the FEIS and FHWA's Record of Decision . 11 . A revegetat ion plan will be d e ve l oped by UDOT and approved by the Fore s t Servi ce during design of individual projects to ensure that critical habitat and disturbed areas are appropriately revegetated . 12. Bridge and culvert openings will be sized so that floodplain e levati ons will not be increased . 13. Construction staging sites identified during design and approved by the Forest Service will be kept out of aquatic, wetland and riparian habitat. The contractor will be limited to the use of the identified staging sites. 14. Construct i on work zones will be delineated through the use of fen c ing in sensitive areas to ensu r e contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations. 15. Curbing will be considered at Rick Springs to minimize vehicular off-pavement impacts to vegetation near and along the riverbanks . 16. Prior to the wet season all disturbed areas ··which could contribute sediment into the river·· will be revegetated or reseeded and ··erosion matting installed . ·· 17. Rock and debris generated during the construction will not be indiscriminately placed along the river banks . ··1£ locations with excessive erosion are identified where some of the rock may be beneficial, Forest Service approval will be obtained and the appropriate permits acquired prior to placing the material .•• 18. ··In - river piers will be removed or partially removed where possible with minimal streambed disturbance.·· 19 . ··During design phase and prior to any in-river activities, the Fo rest and UDWR staff will identify when it is necessary for one or both agencies to be contacted and on-site to assist UDOT in minimizing aquatic impacts.·· 20 . ··All concrete work on the bridges being replaced will be designed and completed to minimize any leaks of liquid cement into the river. No washing of cement trucks will take place in locations where the material could wash into the river.·· 5 �Amending the Visual Quality Objectives in the Forest Plan: US 89 through Logan Canyon i s both a Natio nal Fo rest Scen i c Byway and a State of Utah Scenic Byway. I n addition, thi s area li es within the Logan Canyon Management Area . The Forest Plan presc ription for this management area e mphasizes pro te c tion of scenic qua l i tie s . Issue s pertinent t o the de c i sion to amend the VQO ' s include vegetative recovery, road and clearing de sign featur e s and direct visual impacts. Mitigation meaaures include all t hose liste d i n and incorporated by reference from the "Visual Impacts, Batch Plant Locations, and Section 4(£ )" parts of the "Measures to Minimize Harm" section of FHWA ' s Record of Decision. The f ol lowing mitigation measures, whi c h correspond to other mit i gation requirements in FHWA's Re c ord of Deci s ion, provide additional v i~ual mitigation: 21 . Design o f t he Pre ferred Al ternative as refined in FHWA's Record of Decisi on pl aced a strong emphasis on minimizing visual impacts. Road alignments were designed to minimize the amount of visual impact to the e xtent prac t ical wh i le s t ill p roviding f o r reasonable and necessary impro ve ments. Aestheti c impacts will be reduced by manipUlat i ng the horizontal and/or vertical alignment, and by moving the alignme nt away from the river. This includes the work described in the nDesign Considerations " part of the nMeasures to Minimize Harm " section of FHWA's Record of Decision. 22. The design of clearzones will focus on preservation of aesthetic and ecol ogical features to the extent possible while considering safety . No clearzo ne will be provided in the first four miles of the middle canyon; however, substantial hazards within this area will be considered for protection. 23. A revegetation plan will be devel oped by UDOT and approved by the Forest Service during design of individual projects to ensure that areas of high visual quality are a voided, where practicable, and that disturbed areas are appropriately revegetated. 24 . A constructi on / post-construction monitoring plan will be developed and implemented by UDOT and approved by the Forest Service during de sign of individual projects in order to identify sensitive areas where monitoring is needed. These areas and types of monitoring required will be ide ntified in the project plans and specifications for each project. 25 . Best Management Practices will be used to minimize water quality degradation, minimize vegetative removal, and minimize cut and fill. 26. Dust suppression measures will be implemented during construction. These measures will include water sprinkling, speed limits on haul road, and use of environmentally safe stabilization chemicals . 27 . Construction staging sites identified during design and approved by the Fo rest Service will be ke pt o u t o f sens i tive visual areas . The contrac tor will be limited to the u se of the identified staging sites . 28. Construc tio n wor k zone s will be d e lineate d and sensitive areas fenced to ensure contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations . 6 �29. Burnt Bridge will be construc~ed in stages, with widening occurring on the upstream side, eliminating the detour presented in the FEIS. 30. In additi on to the reduced width presented in the FEIS f or the Middle Canyon, the previously proposed nominal roadway width of 40 feet for the first 8 miles of the Upper Canyon section has been reduced to 34 feet to further minimize impacts to wetlands , visual and other resources. (NOTE: this is nominal roadway width .. . passing lanes on 3.3 miles increase roadway width to 44 feet where they are present). 31. The amount and necessity of riprap required f or erosion control at bridges will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis during final design. Riprap will be used only where required to stabilize the streambank and will not exceed 100 feet along both banks up and downstream from each bridge. Although it is possible this could total as much as 1,000 feet of the river's length, it is anticipated that riprap will not be required at each of these locations and the actual use of riprap will be minimal. Existing rive r and c reek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment of required riprap into the channels . 32. Fill slopes will not be steeper than 2:1 to promote bank stability and reclamation. 33. Riparian habitat will be maintained along the river and creek wherever possible. 34. Larger mature trees and their root systems will be protected where it. does not conflict with vehicles and passenger safety. 35 . Prior to the start of the next wet season, disturbed areas, where possible will be stabilized, reseeded and revegetated. 36 . Rock and debris generated during the construction will not be indiscriminately placed along the river banks. ··1£ locations with excessive erosion are identified where some of the rock may be beneficial, Forest Service approval will be obtained and the appropriate permits acquired prior to placing the material .• • Th reatened. Endangered and Sensitive Species; In addition to the mitigation described above, the Forest Service has special concern over impacts to threatened, endangered and sensitive species of fauna and flora. During preparation of the FEIS, UDOT and FHWA consulted with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Utah Division of Natural Resources concerni ng potential impacts to these species. Consultation is documented in the Appendix "Letter From US Fish and Wildlife Service" section of FHWA's Record of Decision . This correspondence documents the US Fish and Wildlife Service's determination that the Preferred Alternative as refined in FHWA's Record of Decisi on and mitigated through measures described in the "Threatened and Endangered speci es" part of the "Measures to Minimize Harm" section of FHWA's Record of Decision would not affect Federally listed threatened and endangered species. This includes the Maguire primrose (Primula maquirei) . These mitigation measures are incorporated by reference into this Record of Decision. 7 �In addition to federally threatened and endangered species, the Forest Service recognizes other sensitive species. The effects of the alternatives on these species were evaluated. Forest Service policy requi r es preparation of a biological assessment and biological evaluation prior to the Forest Service offic ial signing of a decision document. These scientific documents describing impacts to threatened, endangered and sensitive species have been prepared. The original assessment completed in September of 1993 was recently supplemented to include the most current information. The original assessment (included in the appendix to FHWA's Record of Decision) and supplement are included in the project record. These document that the Preferred Alternative, as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision, will not adversely affect the viability of any Forest Service l isted sensitive species. Wild and Scenic Rivers: Consideration of potential wild and Scenic RiverE is an inherent part of the ongoing land and resource management planning process (Forest Service Manual 1924). Forests must eva l uate each river to identify rivers meeting the eligibility crite ria specified in section lib) and 2(b) of the wild and Scenic Rivers Act and determine the river's potential classification (wild, scenic, recreational, or a combination thereof) for those found eligible. wild and Scenic Rivers were evaluated during preparation of the Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan approved in 1985 and it did not propose any rivers for further study as National wild and Scenic Rivers (FE I S for the 1985 Forest Plan, page IV-55). Since t he time period when the Forest Plarl was approved the philosophy for river eligibi li ty assessment has evolved. The Forest determined a re-assessment was appropriate and in December of 1993, the rivers on the Forest were inventoried to identify those eligible for inclusion in the National wild and Scenic Rivers System. Both Beaver Creek and the Logan River were inventoried. Neither were found to be eligible f or inclusion in the National wild and Scenic Rive rs System, though the Logan River upstream of Temple Fork was f o und to possess values significant within the State. Regardless of the 1985 and 1993 Inventory · findings; the effects of the project, should Beaver Creek and/or the Logan River ever be determined eligible, were considered. Forest Service policy (Forest Service Handbook 1909.12, Section 8.14) requires the Forest Plan to provide for protection of a river area considered eligible but where the suitabil ity determination has not been made, until a decis ion is made as to the future use of the river and adjacent lands. For eligible rivers, the Forest has to make a determination whether projected will affect the eligibility or classification of the reaches of the stream influenced by the project. This requires determining if: - the "free-flowing" characteristics of the river are mOdified; - the potential outstandingly remarkable values for the r iver area al·e modified; and - the potential classification of the stream has changed. The effects of the project on river characteristics which affect its free-flowing nature, potential outstandingly remarkable values and potential classification are thoroughly described in the FEIS: 8 �The effects of the alternatives described in Section 4.15 . 1, Water Body Modification, of the FBIS show some minor rip-rapping near bridges may occur where necessary to stabilize the streambank. This would not extend over 100 feet along ' both banks up- and down-stream from each new bridge, It is anticipated that riprap will not be required at each of these locations and the actual use of riprap will be minimal . Existing river and creek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment of required riprap and/or retaining walls into the channels. Therefore, the existing river and stream characteristics pertaining to free-flowing character would not be altered from the present status . The FEIS thoroughly evaluated the effects of the alternatives on the resources and characteristics affecting the scenic, historic, recreational, wildlife and fish, cultural and other values associated with the river and river corridor. As clearly summarized in Table S - 2 and as described in more detail in Chapter 4 of the FEIS, there will either be no or only minor effects from the Preferred Alternative, as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision, on these values . In addition, the FEIS notes that many of the minor effects created will be either temporary in nature or may possibly be mitigated during final design. Consequently, no potential outstandingly remarkable values will be eliminat ed. Highway 89 currently parallels the river for much of its length. As described in the FEIS, no additional · river crossings will be built nor will additional stretches of the river be followed. The FEIS recognizes that some screening vegetation along the river may be disturbed, but again this is estimated in the BIS to be minor and mostly temporary in nature. Therefore, the potential wild and Scenic River classification would not change. Based on the environmental effects summarized above, the road recons t ruction project will not affect the eligibility or classification potentials of the Logan River and therefore, the opportunity for designating these reaches of Logan River and/or Beaver Creek as a recreational river(s) in the future is not foreclosed by allowing the highway improvements described in the Preferred Alternative, as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision. IV. Public Involvement A no tice of intent initiated by FHWA was published in the Federal Register on January 23, 1987. To initiate the scoping process and solicit input, a mailing list containing nearly 100 entries was compiled to include governmental agencies, associations, the media, and interested individuals . Entries on the mailing list received a public involvement pl~ which coordinated public and agency activities. Public information meetings were held in Logan, Utah on September 23, 1986, and in Garden City, Utah on November 3, 1986 . 9 �An Interdisciplinary (10) Team composed of transportation planners. civil and environmental engineers. envi ronmental advocates and recreation and wildlife s pecialists met frequently in 1986 and 1987 to review technical aspects of the project and provide insight and perspectives on issues germane to the project . UDOT used a Citizens Review Committee to review the final Draft Bnvironmental Impact Statement (OEIS) to determine whether the document addressed the issues in an understandable and appropriate fashion. The Committee was composed of representatives of various city and county governments in the project area. Three formal Beoping meetings were held in March, 1987, to identify major concerns and re ceive public comments. The meetings were attended by 333 individuals, 64 of whom offered comments. Nearly 200 letters, commenting o n the proj ect, were received from the public, advocacy groups and government agencies. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the project was issued in November, 1990 . UDOT received 457 comments letters expressing various ideas and sentiments about the Logan Canyon project. Some issues addressed in the comment letters included: safety, travel time through the canyon, scenic values, bicycle traffic, fisheries, alternative routes, wetlands, water and quality and threatened and endangered species. These issues and comments were addressed i n the DEIS and/or the FSIS. The Preferred Alternative was presented to the public in a brochure which was sen t to those who commented on the DEIS . In response to this brochure, a pproximately 400 letters were received prior to release of the FEIS. These comments were reviewed and a determination made that they were addressed in tt.e FEIS or FHWA's Record of Decision. The FEIS for the project was completed in February of 1993 and made available to the public for comment. In response, approximately 200 letters were received . Individual responses to these letters were provided where addresses were available. Detailed comments were not directly answered, but the commenter was informed that they would be considered and where appropriate responded to in FHWA's Record of Decision . In FHWA's Record of Decision, a summary of comments and responses was provided. The comment letters and responses are maintained in the UDOT's project record. All comments received on the FEIS were reviewed and given consideration during development of FHWA's and this Record(s) of Decision. Between issuance of the FEIS and issuance of FHWA's Record of Decision, numerous coordination meetings, field reviews, discussions and correspondence were held. This effort led to the refinements in the Preferred Alternative described in FHWA's Record of Decision and referenced in this Record of Decision. A summary of the comments received on the FEIS and responses is contained on pages 28 through 43 of FHWA's Record of Decision. Since FHWA's Record of Decision was iSBued, members of Logan Canyon Coalition have met and or conversed with Fore st Service representatives regarding concerns over the project. These concern s were c onsidered in formulation of this Record of Decision. 10 �• V. Alternatives Considered The following four alternatives were analyzed in detail in the Final ~nvironmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for U.S. Highway Route 89, Logan Canyon Highway. Preferred Alternative: The Preferred Alternative as described in the FEIS has been refined in response to comments received. A detailed description of this alternative is contained in FHWA's Record of Decision and is incorporated by reference here . In general, this alternative will replace bridges. make minor alignment adjustments, maintain no clearzone and maintain the existing 26 foot roadway in the first 4 . 1 miles of the project area (lower Middle Canyon sectionl. In the 4 miles of upper Middle Canyon the roadway width will be 34 feet, a clearzone provided, bridges and culverts replaced, Temple Fork intersection improved, and minor alignment adjustments made. In lower upper Canyon a 34 feet wide roadway will be maintained (except as modified by passing and turn lanes), a clear zone provided, bridges and culverts replaced, intersections improved, and the range fenced where appropriate. In the remainder of Upper Canyon the roadway will widen to 40 feet (except as modified by passing and turn lanes), intersections improved, a clearzone provided, and alignment adjustments made. From the Bear Lake Summit to Bridgerland subdivision intersection a 47 feet wide roadway (including a continuous passing lane) will be established, clear zone provided, numerous alignment adjustments made, intersections improved, and one landslide area stabilized. From Bridgerland subdivision to Garden City a 40 feet wide roadway width (47 feet where there are passing lanes) will be established, clearzone provided, intersection and access points improved, and several alignment adjustments made. The Preferred Alternative, as refined in FHWA's Record of Decision, would cause a decline in the Habitat Condition Index for the Logan River and Beaver Creek. The refined Preferred Alternative would also result in a Visual Quality Objective of partial retention for the highway easement near Logan Cave and modification for the remainder of the route. The refined Preferred Alternative thus does not comply with the Forest Plan . The Forest Service would consent to grant a transportation easement for approximately 72 additional acres. No Action Alternative: The existing roadway width would be maintained although considerable road maintenance, including improved signing and replacement of bridges and pavement would be necessary. The No Action Alternative complies with the Forest Plan. Transportation easements covering additional lands would not be required. Standard Arterial Alternative: Improve the highway to current national highway standards for a minor arterial road with the construction of passing lanes throughout much of the route and recovery areas resulting in a roadway width of forty to forty· seven feet and a typical improved area of sixty·six to ninety·eight feet. The Standard Arterial Alternative would cause a decline in the Habitat Condition Index for the Logan River and Beaver Creek and would achieve a Visual ~ality Objective of Modification rather than Retention. The Standard Arterial Alternative would therefore not comply with the Forest Plan . The Forest Service would consent to grant transportation easements for approximately 83 additional acres. 11 �Conservationi sts' Alternative: Spot improvements such as improved signing. replacement of bridges, slow vehicle turnouts, climbing lanes and paving and plowing of parking areas . Existing roadway widths would be maintained in most instance s. with a roadway width of forty · three feet for climbing lanes. The Conservationists' Alternative would fail to comply with the Forest Plan Visual Quality Objective in the vicinity of Burnt Bridge. The Conservationists' Alternative would result in a change of the Visual Quality Objective of the Burnt Bridge area from Retention to Partial retention . The Forest Servi ce would consent t o grant transportation easements covering about 11 additional acres . The following alternatives were considered in the OEIS but not advanced in the FEIS. Corridor Alternatives: The Corridor Alternatives considered other potential rout es connecting Cache and Rich Counties. The Corridor Alternatives were dropped because there is no projected need for the additional r outes for the next twenty years, the environmental consequences of additiona l highway construction, and the duplicate spending of operational and maintenance funds for the new route and the existing highway in Logan Canyon . Modified Standard Alternative: The Modified Alterna tive proposed a modified standard along the existing alignment for the road width in the Middle Canyon section only. It was intended to reduce the impacts of the Standard Alternative in the Middle Canyon section. The Modified Alternative was dropped because of unacceptable environmental impacts in the M iddl e Canyon, especially the alternative's impacts on wild trout populations in the Logan River. Spot Improvements: The Spot Improvements Alternative provided a small , incremental modification of the No Action Alternative. The notable difference between the two alternatives was the inclusion of 7.5 miles of climbing lanes in the Spot Improvements Alternative. The Spot Improvements Alternative was not included i n the FEIS because it resulted in no improvement in traffic-carrying capacity or safety and thus did not meet the purposes of the project. Rich County Alte rnative Alignments: Several alternative corridors in the Rich County section of the project were proposed. These alternative alignments would have resulted impacts on ·winter habitat for deer and elk, and disruptions to existing real estate development. Rich County strongly opposed the alternative alignments . Thus, t he Rich County Alternative Alignments were not considered in the FEIS. VI . Findings Required by other Laws The Wasatch-Cache has begun preliminary efforts directed towards the Forest Plan revision scheduled to be completed in 1996 . However, Forest Service policy and regulations provide for implementation of existing Forest Plan decisions until amended or revised and do not mandate retention of future management options. This means the Management Area direction for Management Area 13, as amended, will continue to be imp lemented until the Forest Plan revis ion is finalized. 12 �The Wa satch-Cache Forest Plan has been reviewed and a determination made that while the overall direction and intent of the plan will not be affected, this decision contains inconsistencies with the Forest Plan which will require amendment. The actions in this project comply fully with the goa ls of the Forest Plan, the Management Area Direction, and the Forest-wide standards and guidelines (See Chapter IV of the Wasatch-Cache Land and Resource Management Plan) except for the Visual Quality Objective and the fisheries habitat i ndicies for the Logan River and Beaver Creek. The Visual Quality Objectives will be changed to Partial Retention in one spot in Middle Canyon and modi ficati on throughout the remainder of the highway easement. The Habitat Quality Index for the Logan River and Beaver Creek will be changed to allow temporary minor decreases provided minimum index l eve ls are still exceeded. ~ FEIS 4 - 2. Specific changes are documented in the attached plan amendment . Analysis of these changes is included in the FEIS . I conclude that this is a non - significant amendment to the Forest Plan as defined in 36 CFR 219.10(e) in that it does not significantly alter the multiple use goals and objectives for long term land and resource management for the Forest. VII. Environmenta l ly Preferable Alternative The No Act i on Alternative has been identified as the environmental ly preferable alternative. VIII. Implementation Date and Appeal Opportunities This decision is subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215 . 7. A written NotiCEof Appeal must be postmarked within 45 days after the date this notice is published in the Ogden Standard Examiner, Ogden, Utah. The Notice of Appeal should be sent to: Chief, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 96090, washington, D. C. 20090-6090 Appeals must meet content requirements of 36 CFR 215.14 . For further inf orma tion on this decision, contact Reese Pope at Wasatch-Cache National Forest, 8236 Federal Building, 125 South State Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138 or by phone at (801) 524-5188. If no appeal is received, implementation of this decision may occur on, but not before, 5 business days from the close of the appeal filing period. If an appeal is received, implementation may not occur for 15 days following the date of appea l disposition. - trlAH , I 1995 , Date DALE N. BOSWORTH Regional Forester Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogde n, UT 84403 13 �(2 I. ~ot:> Is Y 01::' 1> ,fGlt tiff . C 17tf1 jill '2-. (001::> 6-at--:; ( c-- . "3 'If • To ttt-/WA- M otVTH$ , ~'tl.Ji) y) -; • R0 p lr-f'i:1If . 6-dt:-s 7/0 U.rPS _ g o ~ D cAtV AMpvf) 17{--c t=fjyLPV!t-tlI· {IV H 4V't' [YO n-{-AT I iD OW r-./ ~o-o 1 \ I 5'1 ( :> r r/E I/-f-f:( r( - AtlfDTM::~ ? MONtH'? ') $0: WE M{u-Hi tf41£ {O /fA. (I,1/Ttis - �r;.r{), ~ &+-e.t,,~ I "I'i? So ~oo I.N 1..--0 a""', U\ ------ --To"" L.y un G ::,-s- CAr-.~o 1\ p. Q. UT 'iN 3;J.., I �Dec. 7, 1994 Dear Tenacious member of the Logan Canyon Coalition, I have enclosed a rough draft of some proposed changes to UDOT's ROD. I've spoken with some of you about this proposal, and I've incorporated many of your ideas, including some ideas from the Conservationists' Alternative. I've tentatively called this new proposal the "Citizens' Alternative." Catchy title, right? It seems to me that the sooner we decide on the changes we wish to see through our Forest Service appeal, the more focused and efficient our work will be. Anyway, we will have to declare, in our appeal, exactly the changes we wish to see. Please look over this draft, and let me know what you think. I'd like to discuss this further at our next meeting. In this proposal we should indicate the changes we want, and also briefly discuss our reasons for requesting each change. Further, indepth, discussions will come in the body of the appeal. This is not a final draft! It is for the sake of discussion at our next meeting. Please feel free to make suggestions that will reflect your own point-of-view. I strongly believe, however, that we should present a proposal to the Forest Service that is not too "radical," rejecting all improvements to the road except for bridge replacement. We should allow for further changes that really might improve safety. We should try, in other words, to appear reasonable, while still defending what needs to be defended. We should, rt we can, reflect concerns that the Forest Service and other agencies might themselves have with UDOT's ROD, for example, UDOT's proposed extensive changes at Temple Fork. With this approach, we might have a good chance of success with our appeal. In our proposal, we should not try to shut down everything UDOT wants to do. If we do, we will likely be dismissed too easily by Forest Service administrators. On the other hand, I do not want us to agree with UDOT's plans rt we really believe they will unnecessarily harm the canyon. Please let me know what you think. I would like to reach a good consensus. Yours in Tenacious Defense of our Canyon, Go rQM S'{-e..I!\\...oqf 753-0497 �Citizens' Alternative Proposal for Improvement of the Logan Canyon Highway 89 Our alternative is identical to the revised Preferred Alternative proposed by UDOT in their recent ROD, with the following changes. 1. Keep the 26' road width up to just beyond Ricks Spring. Extend section 1b, described in the FEIS as remaining at 26', up to just beyond Ricks Spring. This would prevent unnecessary damage to the river, which runs very close to the road along this stretch. This change helps protect the river and its fishery at the lower Twin Bridge and the Temple Fork intersection. 2. At the Temple Fork intersection, keep the road to only two travel lanes, without a right hand or left hand turning lane. The river along this intersection probably provides very good spawning grounds for cutthroat trout. Along the entire river, there are very few good spawning grounds for cutthroat or for brown trout, making this section of the river at Temple Fork extremely valuable to the fishery in the Logan river. The road at Temple Fork passes very close to the river. Widening this section of road to accomodate turning lanes would seriously damage these spawning grounds and so the fishery in the entire river. UDOT presents no data on the number of vehicles that turn into the Temple Fori< road, and emerge from the road. This is an unimproved, dirt road that meanders into an unimproved recreation area. UDOT has not justified the severe damage to this fishery that would occur here with widening and with turning lanes. 3. Do not flatten curves at and around the Temple Fork area. Curves 39 and 40, at milepost 388.8, and curves 43 and 45, at mileposts 389.4 and 390.1, should be left on their present alignments. The road gradually curves along this section as it follows the river. These curves are gradual. They are not sharp, so they are not particularly dangerous at a reasonable speed. UDOT has presented no data showing that these curves are particularly dangerous. The scenery through here is spectacular. There is no loss in "driver comfort" as one negotiates these gentle curves and enjoys the views of the river and canyon walls. The only reason for flattening these curves is to achieve a straighter road so that drivers can "go fast." The resulting slopes may not be revegetated successfully. The run-off from construction would have to enter the river at some point, and the increased sedimentation may seriously damage this sensitive cutthroat spawn· ing area. There would be loss of recreational and scenic values here, with no good justification of the loss. , �4. At Logan Cave, as the road is elevated, use a retaining wall to keep fill out of the river. There should be no more encroachment into the river. This is consistent with the ROD, in which UDOT agrees to maintain the '1ree flowing" nature of the Logan River. (The Conservationists' Alternative called for the road to be "moved away from the rive~' as it is elevated. This would mean that the mountain on one side of the road would have to be carved out to create room for the road as it is shifted away from the river. Is this preferable to use of a retaining wall?) 5. Maintain the 34' road width past the Beaver Mountain intersection and over the summit to just past the Bear Lake overlook. Do not increase the width in the upper canyon to 40'. 6. Do not construct a climbing lane over the summit. End the proposed climbing lane below the summit. Changes 4 and 5 will possibly allow the road to be kept in its present alignment, without too much damage to the old-growth forest. If the road is increased to 40', and a climbing lane over the summit is constructed, the road will need to be moved to a different alignment in order to avoid severe damage to the forest. But this will involve a huge amount of fill in a side canyon, with destruction of deer forage and mountain mahogany. The older road would probably never be completely removed. It would be much less damaging to keep to the original alignment, with a narrower road. Furthermore, a wide, straight highway at the summit, complete with a climbing lane, would encourage drivers to increase speeds to dangerous levels. This is a north· facing slope at about 8000 feet. The grade of the road may approach 10%. In the winter, with ice and snow on the road , higher speeds could be especially deadly. At the summit there is the popular Umber Pine trailhead turnOff, and just past the summit is the Sunrise Campground turnoff. The road would be safer ~ drivers were not rocketing over the summit, past these intersections, at excessive speeds, especially in the ice and snow. 7. Do not construct a passing lane just past the cattle guard. Instead, construct a slowvehicle pullout, and put up a sign informing drivers that a passing lane will begin in a mile. This would eliminate unnecessary destruction of wetlands along the road. The sign would help encourage drivers to be patient until they reach the passing lane. �8. Maintain a 26' road width along Beaver Creek. Do not increase the width here to 34'. The road from Ricks Spring to Beaver Creek will be widened to 34', but through the corridor along Beaver Creek the road will be kept at its current 26', wrth possibly a slightly lower posted speed. Widening this road to 34' would involve unacceptable impacts to the creek and aSSOCiated wetlands. The road is simply too close to the creek and wetlands, on both sides of the road. UDOT claims that it would work in only a narrow construction zone, but any construction here would seriously damage riparian habitat and probably wetlands. Beaver Creek contains important spawning grounds for cutthroat trout, and it contains a population of beaver that have only recently returned after being driven out by road construction 60 years ago. Any slight gain in "driver comfort" by widening here is not worth destruction of the cutthroat trout fishery and important wildlde habitat. UDOT will object to the "bottleneck" in traffic flow that would be created here d our proposal is implemented. In our proposal, there are two "bottlenecks," one in the middle canyon and one at Beaver Creek, with a narrower road and slightly lower posted speeds in each. Possibly, two bottlenecks will better protect the future health of both of these areas. 9. Insist that no new riprap be used in the canyon. UDOT should be required to stabilize all damaged riverbanks using natural vegetation, and UDOT should be required to expend the time and money necessary after construction to ensure that all revegetation efforts are successful. The Logan Canyon has great recreational and scenic values. These values would be harmed with the "easy solution" of riprap. If UDOT goes into the canyon to widen and straighten some sections of the road, and replace bridges, UDOT should be required to mitigate in a manner fully consistent with the recreational and scenic values of this canyon. This means use of natural vegetation that is carefully maintained at UDOTs expense well after construction. 10. UDOT should specdy more explicitly the measures it will take to minimize harm to the river, to fisheries, and to the scenic value of the canyon. It should also specdy more explicitly measures rt will take to mrtigate damage from construction. Too often UDOT simply says that it will use "best management practioes" This is too vague. UDOT wishes to leave detailed discussion of the exact measures it will use to minimize harm to "deSign phase." This does not give the public and appropriate agencies sufficient information to properly evaluate UDOTs proposal before approval of the project is given by the state transportation commission and the federal highway administration. Evaluation of the impacts of proposed construction must include consideration of the exact measures UDOT intends to use to minimize harm and mitigate damage. Especially when construction will seriously impact particular sites, such as Temple Fork, Logan Cave and the lower Twin Bridge and Burnt Bridge, UDOT �should be required to give a site-specdic discussion of exact measures that will be used. When culverts are replaced, does UDOT intend to use culverts that are graded and baffled, allowing fish to move through culverts during high water flows? UDOT mentions that ~ will use' sediment basins to collect sediment from run-off, but does UDOT intend to change the filters in these basins at appropriate times after construction is completed? In the FEIS, UDOT provides no discussion of how revegetation will be accomplished after construction, and no estimates of how successful revegetation efforts will be on the slopes that will be left after curve-cuts. Will UDOT carefully maintain new vegetation after construction is completed? UDOT should be required to speedy and discuss exact measures ~ will use. These discussions should be in an EIS, appearing before approval and funding of the project. �United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta and Wasatch-Cache Nationa l Forests 8236 Federal Building 125 South State Street Sa l t Lake City, UT 841 38 (801) 524-5030 Reply to : Date: 1950 December 7 , 1994 Dear Interested Forest User , The Uinta and Wasatch-Cache National Forests, Ashley National Forest and Bureau of Land Management have begun t he process of preparing a Suppl ement to the North Slope Oil and Gas Leas ing Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The original analysis examined non-Wilderness Federal lands wi t h Federal mineral righ ts that should or should not be made available for oil and gas expl oration, development, and production on the North Slope of the Uinta Mountains. A decision on the EIS was appealed which l ed to the roadle ss a r ea being removed from l easing until further analysis could be completed. This Supplement will focus only on t he issue of roadless areas. Comments and suggestions concerning this ana l ysis will be accepted through January 12. 199~ . Comments should be concise and specific to the fo cus of this Supplement. Please mail comments to Evanston Ranger District. P.O. Box 1880, Evanston, WY 82930. The Draft Supplement is expected to be available fo r publ ic r eview in early February 1995. A 45 day comment period will follow release of the Draft. Upon analysis and consideration of these comments. the Fi nal Supplement and a new Decision will be prepared and released. If you have any questions or concerns. please contact Liz Schuppert at (307) 789-3194 . Sincerely. 0?~","~ P. k.J;.." ~d' PETER W. KARP Forest Supervisor �> • Supplement to North Slope Leasing Environmental Impact Statement Wasatch-Cache and Ashley National Forests Summit and Daggett Counties THE APRIL 94 LEASING DECISIONBeginning in the fall of 1991, the Wasatch· Cache and Ashley National Forests began the analysis to determine whi ch lands across the North Slope of the Uinta Mountains should be administratively available for leasing and if they were to be made available for leasing, what stipulations should be appli ed. A final decision was made in April of 1994 to allow leasing on 219,000 acres and to not allow leasing on about 23,000 acres. Four valid appeals were received on thi s decision. As part of the appeals process the Forest Supervisors met with appellants to discuss resolution of their appeal issues. One of the primary appeal points was whether or not leasing should be allowed in the "road less area" portion of the study area. As the Forest Supervisors took a hard look at the decision made in April and some of the issues raised in the appeals, they determined better information was needed about the "roadless" portion to make a well informed decision since oil and gas leasing cou ld influence the area for a long time. This led to a August 18 decision to withdraw the decision for the "roadless area" portion of the study area (about 80,000 acres). The remaining 160,000 acres within the study area will be leased as determined in the April decision. A BETTER LOOK IN A SUPPLEMENTThe North Slope Leasing EIS analyzed effects for roadless acres across the North Slope and cumulative effects for all roadless acres contiguous with the High Vintas Wilderness. As the Forest Supervisors studied their decision and analysis what they found lacking was a description of the unique roadless characteristics of the major drainages within the study area. For example, what is the solitude of the Middle Fork Blacks Fork drainage? What is the natural integrity of the Beaver Creek drainage? Are there other acti vities ongoing or planned for the future that need to be considered? In other words, they felt there were enough differences in the road less characteristics in each major drainage to warrant a more detailed look in a supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement. Once these characteristics are described , new alternatives will be considered if the 7 alternatives in the EIS do not provide an adequate mix of leasing scenarios. Peter W. Karp, Forest Supervisor of the Uinta and Wasatch· Cache National Forest and Brent McBeth, Acting Forest Supervisor of the Ashley National Forests are the responsible officials for this action. THE SIX ROADLESS CHARACTERISTICSThe following roadless characteristics will be considered in each major drainage across the North Slope: �1 > Natura l int eg r ity is the extent to which long-term ecological processes are intact and operating. Impacts to natural integrity are measured by the presence and magnitude of human induced change to an area. Such impacts include physical developments (e.g roads, utilityrights-of way, fences, lookouts, cabins), recreation developments, domestic livestock grazing, mineral developments, wildlife/fisheries management activities, vegetative manipulation, and fire suppression activities. Appare nt n at u raln ess means that the environment looks natural to most people using the area. It is a measure of importance of visitors' perceptions of human impacts to the area. Even though some of the long-term ecological processes of an area may have been interrupted, the landscape of the area generally appears to be affected by the forces of nature. If the landscape has been modified by human activity, the evidence is not obvious to the casua l observer, or it is disappearing due to natural processes. R em o t e n ess is a perceived condition of being secluded, inaccessible, and out of the way. The physical factors that can create "remote" settings include topography, vegetative screening, distance from human impacts such as roads and logging operations (s ight and sound), and difficulty of travel. A user's sense of remoteness in an area is also influenced by the presence or absence of roads, thei r condition, and whether they are open to motorized vehicles. Solit u d e is a personal, subjective value defined as isolation from the sights, sound and presence of others, and the developments of man. Common indicators of solitude are numbers of individuals or parties one may expect to encounter in an area during a day, or the number of parties camped within sight and sound of other visitors. Impacts related to primitive recreation experiences are normally expressed in changes to t he physical setting, activities occurring in the area, of to the social experiences of users. Spec ia l features are those uni que geological, biological, ecological, cultural, or scenic features that may be located in roadless areas. Unique fis h and wildlife species, un ique plants or plant communities, outstandi ng landscape feat ures such as unique rock formations, and sign ificant cultu ral resource sites are some examples of the items Th e M a n ageability/ B ound ari es elem ent relates to the abili ty of the Forest Service to manage an area to meet size criteria and the five elements discussed above. Changes in the shape of an area influence how it can be managed. If broken into narrow corridors or small islands interspersed with areas of non-conforming management practices, many of the 6 elements may be compromised. WHAT WE NEED FROM YOUTo be most helpful in this analysis, please submit specific comments related to the 6 roadless characteristics within the major drainages (see attached map). Please submit written comments to Liz Schuppert, Evanston Ranger District, Box 1880, Evanston WY 82930 by January 12, 1995 . T he draft supplement is expected in February 1995. If you have any questions or concerns call Liz Schuppert at (307) 789-3194. �Wasatch-Cache &Ashley NatWl1flt forests • . - u~s USFS Regian Faur NORTH SLOPE OIL AND GAS Svpple?l!ntal Analysis • - - - •• •• •• ~ ~ , ·SliIIwater/Heydan 2·Eul Fork Bear 3-Wesl Fork Blackl 4-Middle Fork Blecks 5-E. Fork Blacks Fork S.W. Fork Smith Fork 7-Gilbart Creek 8-e. FOlk Smith Fork 9-Hen'Y' FOlk 10-Belver Creek Mil e s o 6 12 18 11·Burnt Fork{Thomp.onIKabeli 12·No. Fork Sheep Creek 13-Mehogany/Oeath VaJley Ceneral area. Legend ~!ll1l'Tlf ~ Area \4 -----Yf ? ,...,.... Ir IoU ..,. ,"""" J,. r ...., ...... ,.. �To: Keller, lauren 18-5-94 4:45p. FrOll: OCT~-l994 15:34 FRD1 TO ENiItEERIi'I:i SERVICES 918e17536139 p. 1 of l P .01 October 5, 1994 PACSIMD..B TRANSMlTl'AL COVER SHlllIT TIllS TRANSMl'ITAL CONTAINS 3 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER PAGE) SENT BY: LORRAlNB RICHARDS UDOT HNVIRONMENTAL DIVISION 4$01 S 2700 W, SLC, UT 84119 PHONE t: (SOl) 965-4159 FAX I: (SOl) 965-4796 SENT TO: LAUREN KEIJJ<I! FAX #: 753-6139 , COMMBNTSfINSTRUcnONS: Attacbed is • clean copy of the revisions you ...:elved yesterday and the changes we c:U.scuSKd in yCSlCIday's mec:d.n, fur yuur ~view. Pk::a:io::il!lC that Shawn and Paul .mccive a copy. Thanbl ............ PlBASB NQ'IUlY RECIPIENT AS SOON AS POSSmLB •••••••• �18-5-94 4:45p. To: Keller , Lauren OCT-ffi-l994 15:34 FR01 EN3It-EERIt-t3 SERVICES 910017536139 TO p. Z of 3 P.02 PROPOSIW LilNGUAGB CHANGRS TO 9 - 27 REVISION U9-89 LOGAN CANYON Page 2, Last Paragraph. 4th Sentence~ Since the roadway already serves ae a US Higbway and was designated as such in accordance with previous legislation, the determination has been made that this action would not change the use of the highway. Page 6, Insert new p~ragraph "l"h.:I.. :a.eeds JIIOre work, after second paragraph. pu1l some lULgua.ge ~rOJD. previou.s :z paragraphs and add the ~ollowing* A new intersection providing ace... to the sridgerland Subdivision will be constructed~ Intersection improvements to other existing and proposed subdivision accesses will be considered. Page 21. Second Paragr5ph . A band at riparian habitat will be maintained along the river and creek wherever possible to provide overhanging cover tor fish and to filter surface runoff. Page 21, Seventh Paragraph. Fishery studies will be conducted for individual projects which have the potential to ~ct tisheries. Prior to construction, available UDWR fish@ries studies will be assessed and it necessary updated to provide baseline data to dete~ine project impacts to fisheries. Post construction fishery studies wil1 be conducted. It study results show additional mitigation measures are warranted as a result of project activities, mitigation directed at wild fish stocks will be carried out under the direction ot USFS & UDWR biologists as explained in the PBIS on pg 5-6. �To : Ke ller, lauren 18-S-94 4:46p. OCT-05- 1994 15:35 FRD'1 ENitt-EERlt-I:i SERVICES TO 910017536139 p. 3 of 1 P. 03 US-89 LOGAN CANYON RDD REVISION. CHANGES AS PBR 10-3 - 94 MTG Page 12, 2nd Paragraph Replace 5th sentence. This team will participate in the development ot all aspects of design and 1n the resolution of unforeseen problems that ariss during construction and post construction. MOr. inoluded ' on page 26 ( ••• below) . page 24, Batch plant Locations * The traffic, safety. recreatioD, and air quality tmpactB associated with hauling material from the city versus setting up a batch plant in the canyon will be identified on a project by project basis in design. The affect o~ these t.pacta on both the canyon environment and the city environment will be considered. Th. a •••• ~t will inclu~. u.p.ats OD the LoWer Canyon lUlc:l compat1bility with future proj.ct.. The .c.t suitabl. location will be i~entifled in the project -.peoifioatioaB and the contractor wd11 be required to conduct hi. batch plant operations in accordance with the•• ~.QlflQatiOD •• Page 26, 1st paragraph MOnitoring and enforcement of the above proposed measur~s to minimize har.m will be accomplishe~ in accordance with the Memorandum of understandi.ng (MaU) between ut>OT, PHWA, an(l VSFS. The MOU is included in the Appendix of this ROD. It identifies how the individual projects wll1 be selected, identified and managed, and how coordination wi1l be accomplished. The MOU takes each project through design, construction, and postconetruction periods. It commits to the deve10pment of a revegetation plan, wetland mitigation plan, and a construction/post-construction monitoring plan, and commits to the development of a Cooperating Advisory Team (CAT) which consists o~ var~ous agencies and indiv1duals. This team w111 provide recommendations of regulatory and permit requirements, input on enhancement opportunities, mitigative treatments and overal l content of the design of the project, ~th tinal decisions being UDOT's responsibility. Th. CAT t.am. will be invo1ved. throughout the development of: all aspeets o~ de.iSPl, inc1uding' review o~ .lignment options and other d_lgn featur.s. During construction aDd po.t construction, the CAT team will be Coordinated with ~o r.so1v. unEoreseeD eDviroamantal problem. to ensure that ~t1gative e~~ort8 are succe.s~u1. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3323 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2602 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/294">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/294</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2543550165 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource LCC correspondence Description An account of the resource Multiple correspondences from members of the Logan Canyon Coalition including a notice of appeal and statement of reasons, and discussion of the modifications proposed for Logan Canyon. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Morton, Pete Kobe, Kevin Wilcox, Sterling Hessel, David L. Lyon, Tom Thompson, Douglas E. Bosworth, Dale Steinhoff, Gordon Karp, Peter W. Richards, Lorraine Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Environmental policy Department of Transportation--Utah Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1994 1995 1996 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 7 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd7 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/05b4509697d71b211192d00e5e8d3f2d.pdf ad56f6a6ea7d4aa7e33551593c0d90c4 PDF Text Text Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542, as amended) (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287) 1An Act To provide for a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. Be It enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America In Congress assembled, that, (a) this Act may be cited as the 'Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.' Congressional declaration of polley. (b) It Is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational , geologic, fish and wlldllle, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in freeflowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers 01 the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to full ill other vital national conservation purposes. Congressional declaration of purpose, (c) The purpose of this Act is to implement this policy by instituting a national wild and scenic rivers system, by designating the initial components of that system, and by prescribing the methods by which and standards according to which additional components may be added to the system from time to time. Composition of system; requirements for State-administered components_ SECTION 2. (a) The national wild and scenic rivers system shall comprise rivers (i) that are authorized for inclusion therein by Act of Congress, or (ii) that are designated as wild, scenic or recreational rivers by or pursuant to an act of the legislature of the State or States through which they flow, that are to be permanently administered as wild, scenic or recreational rivers by an agency or political subdivision of the State or States concerned, that are found by the Secretary of the Interior, upon application of the Governor of the State or the Governors of the States concerned, or a person or persons thereunto duly appOinted by him or them, to meet the criteria established in this Act and such criteria supplementary thereto as he may prescribe, and that are approved by him for inclusion in the system, including, upon application of the Governor of the State concerned, the Allagash Wilderness Waterway, Maine; that segment of the Wolf River, Wisconsin, which flows through Langlade County; and that segment of the New River in North Carolina extending from its confluence with Dog Creek downstream approximately 26.5 miles to the Virginia State line. Upon receipt of an application under clause (ii) of this subsection, the Secretary shall notify the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and publish such application In the Federal Register. Each river deSignated under clause (ii) shall be administered by the State or political subdivision thereof without expense to the United States other than for administration and management of federally owned lands. For purposes of the preceding sentence, amounts made available to any State or �political subdivision under the Land and Water Conservation [Fund] Act of 1965 or any other provision of law shall not be treated as an expense to the United States. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to provide for the transfer to, or administration by, a State or local authority of any federally owned lands which are within the boundaries of any river included within the system under clause (ii). Cfassification. (b) A wild, scenic or recreational river area eligible to be included in the system is a free-flowing stream and the related adjacent land area that possesses one or more of the values referred to in Section 1, subsection (b) of this Act. Every wild, scenic or recreational river in its free-flowing condition, or upon restoration to this condition, shall be considered eligible for inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system and, if included, shall be classified. deSignated, and administered as one of the following: (1) Wild river areas -- Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of impoundments and generally inaccessible except by trail, with watersheds or shorelines essentially primitive and waters unpolluted. These represent vestiges of primitive America. (2) Scenic river areas -- Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of impoundments. with shorelines or watersheds still largely primitive and shorelines largely undeveloped, but accessible in places by roads. (3) Recreational river areas -- Those rivers or sections of rivers that are readily accessible by road or railroad. that may have some development along their shorelines, and that may have undergone some impoundment or diversion In the past. Congressionally deSignated components. SECTION 3. (a) The following rivers and the land adjacent thereto are hereby deSignated as components of the national wild and scenic rivers system: (1) CLEARWATER, MIDDLE FORK, IDAHO. -- The Middle Fork from the town of Kooskia upstream to the town of Lowell; the Lochsa River from its junction with the Selway at Lowell forming the Middle Fork, upstream to the Powell Ranger Station; and the Selway River from Lowell upstream to Its origin; to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. (2) ELEVEN POINT, MISSOURI. -- The segment of the river extending downstream from Thomasville. to State Highway 142; to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture.l a (3) FEATHER, CALIFORNIA. -- The entire Middle Fork downstream from the confluence of its tributary streams one kilometer south of Beckwourth, California; to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. (4) RIO GRANDE, NEW MEXICO. -- The segment extending from the Colorado State line downstream to the State Highway 96 crossing, and the lower four miles of the Red River; to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior. (5) ROGUE, OREGON. -- The segment of the river extending from the mouth of the Applegate River downstream to the Lobster Creek Bridge; to be administered by agencies of the Departments of the Interior or Agriculture as agreed upon by the Secretaries of said Departments or as directed by the President. (6) SAINT CROIX, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN. -- The segment between the dam near Taylors Falls. Minnesota, and the dam near Gordon, Wisconsin, and its tributary, the Namekagon, from Lake Namekagon downstream to its �Wild and Scenic River Issues STATEMENT OF REASONS Introduction The Original Forest Service Inventory of Potential Wild and Scenic Rjyers Was a Gross Depreciation of the Logan Riyer and Its Significant Tributaries As identified by the Utah Division of Wildlife, The Utah Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy, the Bureau of Reclamation's Western Water Plan, and the American Whitewater Association, portions of the Logan River are 'NCll known and highly valued. Throughout the Inventory, the Logan River and its significant tributaries 'NCre undervalued. An indication of the extent of undervaluing is Ihe Forest Services' revised evaluation that identified five outstandingly remarkable values that might be recognized for the Logan river and its significan tributaries. Wasatch-Cache Revision Planning Record Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Evaluation, Supplement I, June 1994 (hereinafter "Supplement"). The current UDOT ROD (page 38) is based entirely on the superficial treatment of the original inventory. It is inconceivable that the Forest Plan could approve the uoor ROD until a full and complete reevaluation of wild and scenic eligibility for the Logan river and its significant tributaries is completed. The Forest Service ROD ignores inconsistency in there own repons. Even though the original Inventory found no segments of the Logan river and its significant tributaries to be outstandingly remarkable, the identificaiton of five likely to be outstandignly remarkable va1ues in th Supplement resulted in the conclusion that, "No changes were made based upon this reconsideration." (Supplement p. 1-9). How can such a substantial difference in potential eligibility be ignored? In order to protect management standards in the Forest Plan, a detailed stud y of the Logan river and its significant tributaries must be conducted and the criteria used in evaluation must be capable to withstand the scrutiny of all concerned publics. A further example of the lack of appreciation of the regional importance of the Logan river is the fact that the Oneida Narrows of the Bear river has been nominated for eligibility by the Bureau of Land Management. By any reasonable comparison, the Logan river and its significant tributaries far exceeds the Oneida Narrows section of the Bear river in wild and scenic values. Consideration of Potential WUd and Scenic Riyers in the Forest Planning Process Section 5(d) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Pub. L. No. 90-542, 16 U.S.C. §1271 III WI., requires all federal agenCies to consider potential national wild, scenic, ad recreational river areas in all planning for the use and development of water and related land resources. 16 U.S.c. §1276 (d). The planning respnnsibility imposed by §5(d) plainly requires the Forest Service to assess the values of potential Wild and Scenic Rivers on national forest lands during the preparation of land and resource management plans pursuant to the National Forest Management Ae~ 16 U.S.C. §1600 III WI· Section 1924 of the Forest Management Act recognizes the Forest Service's responsibility in tbis regard: "Consideration of potential wild and scenic rivers is an inherent part of the ongoing land and resource management planning process." Chapter 8 of the agency's Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, set forth agency policy and planning requirements for integrating the evaluation of potential wild and scenic rivers into the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) planning process. Pursuant to these directions, consideration of potential �wild and scenic rivers in national forest plans follow a relatively straightforward procedure. Each forest plan should: (I) Determine whether eam river within the forest boundaries is eli&ible for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section I(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Le.• whether the river is free flowing and possesses one or more "outstandingly remarkable" values); (2) Determine the appropriate classification ("wild", "scenic", or "recreational") for rivers found to be eligible; and (3) Either study eam eligible river in the plan itself to determine its suitability for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River System or conduct such an evaluaion as a subsequent, separate river study. Forest Service Land and Resource Management Planning Handbook, Chapter 8, § 8.14 (hereinafter "Handbook Chapter 8"). While eligibility is a threshold determination which properly focuses only upon the statutory criteria, i&., whether a river is free-flowing and possesses ODe or more outstandingly remarkable values, evaluation of a river's suitability for inclusion in the national rivers system involves a balancing of the relative values of the river and its adjoining lands as a part of the national rivers system against other uses for the river area, and practical considerations of the feasibility of administration of the river corridor as a component of the system. Handbook Chapter 8, § 8.23. As a substantive decision regarding the appropriate management of a sensitive area, the planners' decision regarding suitability must be accompanied by environmental analysis pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Ill.. § 8.31. During the study process, the values and potential classifications of eligible rivers must be protected by detailed management standards in the forest plan. Rivers determined to be suitable for designation are to be protected until Congress acts upon the Forest Service's recommendations. ld... The Forest Service ROD violates the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Forest Service administrative direction for compliance with that Act. The Wasatch-Cache Planners erred in certain findings of NonEli&ibility of the Logan River from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek and from Beaver Creek to its source for potential Wild and Scenic Status Section 5 (d) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act establishes a broad mandate to federal agencies to consider potential wild and scenic rivers in their land and resource management planning. Forest Service administrative direction implementing that proviSion makes clear that forest planners should consider all streams on a forest. Chapter 8 of the R)[est Service Land and Resource Handbook directs that forest planners consider rivers identified through Congressional or Secretarial action, through listing on the National Park Service's Nationwide Rivers Inventory ('''NRr'). or through the land management planning process itself. Handbook Chapter 8, §§ 8.11. 8.14. The Handbook stresses that consideration of rivers other than those listed on the NRI is "particularly important" where the NRI is incomplete, and that consideration should be given to rivers identified in other studies, such as the Pacific Northwest Rivers Study, in State river assessments, or by other federal or State agencies or private interests. !d.., § 8.11. The Wasatch-Cache planners complied with the broad mandate of section 5 (d) and Forest Service administrative policy and took an independent look at streams nowing on the Forest, including the Logan River and Beaver Creek. The resulting document, "Inventory of Rivers on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Eligible for Inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System" was published in November 1993 (bere- �inafter "Inventory 1993"). Appellants are concerned that initially, only .one. stream on the entire Wasatch-Cache National Forest, (the Stillwater Fork of the Bear River), was found to be eligible for interim protection until a suitability study was performed. Appellants were involved with studying the Logan River and Beaver Creek, using the eligibility requirements from the Land and Resouoce Management Planning Handbook. Even though over 50 pages of information was provided to the Inventory Team, no reference was made to this material in the Inventory except a footnote. (Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon. 1993). The appellants found that certain segments of the Logan River might possess the free-flowing characteristics and outstandingly remarkable qualities for eligibility if the evaluation was corrected to use current evaluation techniques. These techniques were detailed in two letters to the Forest Supervisor. (J. Logan, in a 3 page, single-spaced letter to Ms. Susan Giannettino, Forest Supervisor; 18 January 1994: Also D Parkin, in a 23 page. single-spaced letter to Ms. Susan Giannettino; 18 February 1994). The letters concurred thm the inventory used an honest and systematic approach in preparing the report, However. the main thrusts of these letters was that there were "significant flaws in both the methodology and interpretation of policy guidelines" (Parkin, 1994). At a later dae (June, 1994) the Logan River was re-segmented in two segments, Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek and Beaver Creek to its source. The segment from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver creek was given five out of nine "might possess outstandingly remarkable values". Neither of the above-mentioned commentors were aware of this document, however, both are mentioned in the document. The responsiveness of the planners to the commentors is reflected in this updated inventory. Eighty-two rivers andlor river segments were identified in the re-evaluation and the only river segment that scores anywhere near what this segment of the Logan river is the East Fork of the Smith's Fork, which scored only three "might possess outstandingly remarkable values". (Supplement to Inventory, 1994). The supplement represents an improvement over the Inventory of 1993 . Appellants are concerned, however, that the planning team did not assess all resource values that would qualify the Logan River for inclusion as an eligible wild and scenic river. Most notably. there is ample evidence to indicate that the Logan River possesses outstandingly remarkable water oriented recreation, botanical, and wildlife values. (CPLC, 1993). The appellants are also concerned that the supplement does not evaluate significant tributaries of the Logan River, most notably Beaver Creek. Study and protection of tributary streams is an important component of the wild and scenic planning process because such streams and creeks are integral components of river systems. The goals of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act can be best achieved through preservation and recognition of river systems as integral wholes, with full recognition for the contribution of tributary steams. Also, management of suc h tributaries as wild and scenic rivers will enhance the r"Orest Service's ability to maintain and enhance downstream riverine values. Tbe Forest Service ROD Fails AdeQuately to Protect The Loean River's Potential Wjld and Scenic Status The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides tha each component of the system shall be "administered in such a manner as to protect and enhance the values which caused it 10 be included in said system ... " Section 100a); 16 U.S.C. § 128I (a). This section of the Act bas been interpreted as stating a " nondegradation and enhancement policy for all designated river areas." S-". Interagency Guidelines,47 Fed. Reg . 39454, 39458. Appellants are concerned that the Logan River segmenl which "may possess outstandingly remarkable values" as indicated in the Supplement to the Inventory will be exposed to inappropriate levels of disturbance by UDal's Preferred Alternative Highway Project due to improper classification. The UDOT ROD states that ..... the road reconstruction project will not affect the potential eligibility or classification on the Logan River" �(p. 38). As stated above, the Logan River segment from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek is most likely eligible and therefore, until an adequate classification is complete, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act mandates no degradation of values that could inhibit the river from eligibility. The UDOT ROD states on Page 37. "The FEIS also evaluated the effects of the alternatives on the resources and characteristics affecting the scenic. historic. recreation, wildlife and fish. cultural and other values associated with the river and river corridor... there will be either no or only minor effects from the Preferred Alternative on these values." The uoor ROD states on Page 38, "The FEIS recognizes that some screening vegetation along the river may be disturbed, but again this is estimated in the EIS to be minor and mostly temporary in nature." Appellants believe that there are numerous construction segments in the Preferred Alternative that will result in significant depreciation of wild and scenic values and will in fact jeopardize the potential classification of the Logan River and Beaver Creek. These will cause enough degradation to the eligibility requirements that the river will be dropped from consideration before it has been honestly evaluated for eligibility. Appellants are concerned that these "minor effects" will be enough to degrade the eligibility requirements and disqualify the river. These include: Scenic yalues 1. The appellants are concerned that the Preferred Alternative will not comply with the Visual Quality Objectives established in the Forest Plan. If this is the case, then the classification of the Logan River will also not meet the outstandingly remarkable scenic values needed to qualify the Logan River. 2. Tbe "Dugway" will be excavated eight feet into the uphill side, creating the potential for a large road cut or retaining wall. Up canyon from the dugway, the curve will be flattened and realignment will start here for the replacement of the upper twin bridge, producing another large road cut. 3. The curve flattening and widening of the road at Temple Fork will produce a large road cut. 4. The eight miles of the Upper Canyon (from mp 391.6 to Beaver Mountain road intersection) will be widened to 34 feet and areas with passing lanes (could be up to two miles in length) will be widened to 44 feet. These construction segments will produce large amounts of cut and fill and a large road base. further degrading the scenic value. Other Impacts I. Bridge rip-rap. Extensive rip-rap (FS ROD p. 7 and p. 9) "could total as mucb as 1,000 feet of the river's length ..... This will depreciate the free-flowing nature of the river and will adversely impact the potential for eligibility in tbe Wild and Scenic program. 2. Wet-lands mitigation. Wet-lands otitigation, in general, is a farce (Scieoce, 1993, 206: 1890-1892.) It hasn' t 'WOrked in the past and there is no reason to expect it will work now . Any activities that call for wetlands mitigation activities will JesuIt in the depreciation of wild and scenic values of the Logan river, and should, therefore. be found in violation of the Forest Plan. The Forest Plan does not specifically deal with this issue and should be amended to do so. 3. General cut-and-fill that will be required to widen the road. In the original Inventory, restriction of �the potential free-flowing nature of the Logan river was used as justification of finding the lower section of the river to be ineligible (Inventory, p. 12-13). How is it possible that the Forest Plan could allow the same activites on the upper section of the Logan river tha led to disqualification of the lower section? Such action inconsistent with both the intent and the Jetter of Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Forest Service's own Planning Handbook. The Forest Service Failed to AdeQuately Involve Concerned Publics in the Inventory Process. Although Logan Canyon is of high local and national interest, the original Inventory received a very limited distribution. (Audubon, NovemberlDecember 1994). Even so, of those interested parties who responded, the overwhelming majority were critical of the Inventory. Of those that responded, none were notified of the subsequent reevaluation or the changes incorporated in the Table of Appendix D, June 1994 Supplement. The Forest Service has not porvided sufficient documentation required for concerned publics to evaluate the criteria used to draw conclusions in the Inventory. The Inventory refers to "detailed field surveys" (Inventory, pp. A-19 1993), and the Supplement references, "documenlation used to facilitate judging the merits of further study have been incorporated in this supplement.. ... (Supplement. pp 1-10). Yet when appellants requested access to this "documentation", all that was forthcoming were copies of maps with largely unintelligible notations. Apparently. there exists no documentation that can be reviewed by concerned publics. It is irresponisble for the Forst Service to agree to AllY depreciation of wild and scenic values without full involvement of concerned publics. �Literature Cited Bass, R. 1994. Keeping Logan Canyon. Audubon . NovlDec. Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon. 1993. An October 7, 1993, letter containing information about Logan River. Logan Canyon and Beaver Creek. with numerous .. tachments USDA Forest Service. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. 1985. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Salt Lalce City, UT. USDA Forest Service. Wasatch-Cache National Forest. 1993 . Inventory of Rivers on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Eligible for Inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Salt Lake City, UT. USDA Forest Service, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. 1994. Supplement to Inventory of Rivers on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Eligihle for Indusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Salt Lake City, UT. Logan, J. 1994. A January 18 letter to Susan Giannettino. Forest Supervisor, Forest. Wasatch-Cache National Parkin, D. 1994. A February 18 letter to Susan Giannellino, Forest Supervisor, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. �c o A. L Working for the T I protection of I Logan o Canyon This is reprinted from our AURUSt 1996 issue of Can.';an Wind b.y Drew Parkin. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires federal land management agencies to include wild and scenic river evaluations as part of their normal decision-making processes. In the case of the Forest Service this means that forest plans must specifically consider wild and scenic river eligibility. It also means that any Environmental Impact Statement that involves river resources must address this issue. Further - and this is the important part - once the Forest Service identifies a river as being eligible, it must, in adherence with its own administrative directives, manage the river "in a marmer consistent with the purposes of the Act, and such that the outstandingly remarkable values which make it eligible for inclusion are not diminished to the point where eligibility is negated. In no event should the free-flowing characteristics of the river be modified."In response to a threatened law suit, the Forest Service some ten years ago set out in earnest to identify potentially eligible wild and scenic rivers. Individual forests were entrusted with this and many responded admirably. Unfortunately, wild and scenic evaluations have never been high on the list for forest managers in Utah. Pressured by concerened citizens, the Wasatch-Cache National Forest undertook a year-long river study and, in November of 1993, released its inventory. The Inventory started by identifying 37 streams that forest planners deemed worthy of being studied. Next, the larger streams on that list, including the Logan River, were subdivided into "segments." In all, the Forest Service study considered 59 stream segments. Of these, 18 segments were rejected out-of-hand as being insignificant. Beaver Creek was one of these. An additional 11 segments were rejected for not being free-flowing. These included streams that had been subjected to water withdrawals, channelization, or other degradation. All of the Logan downstream of Temple Fork was rejected for this reason. This left 30 stream segments that were actually included in the study. The inventory considered nine separate resource features: cultural, wildlife, botanical, geological / hydrological, scenery, water recreation, general recreation, fisheries, and ecological. The idea was to determine the significance of each of the 30 segments with regard to each resource feature. A stream could be rated as either (1) typical, (2) significant at a statewide USU Box .1674 • L 0 8 a n • U t • h • 843 2 2 - 0 1 9 9 �level, or (3) significant at what the Forest Service termed a "provincial" level (an area compris-ing all of the Rocky Mountains). A rating of 3 for any given resource feature would qualify a stream segment for wild and scenic river designation. The result? Of the original 59 stream segments, only one - the Stillwater Fork of the Bear- was found eligible based on a "3" rating for its scenic features. No other stream received a 3 and all were therefore rejected, including the Logan River. I was stunned when I heard of the findings. Based on several years of professional experience with wild and scenic rivers, and having a detailed knowledge of the Logan River, it was my judgement that the Logan River not only met but exceeded eligibility requirements. After pouring over the report, I concluded that the study team's basic asswnptions were wrong and applying these asswnptions greatly skewed the findings. The decision to use "provincial" significance as the cut-off for eligibility was the most pervasive error. The Forest Service Manuel itself directs that "statewide" significance is an appropriate measure for judging wild and scenic status. Several national forests have used it as the basis for their decisions, and it is accepted practice for National Park Service and BLM planners as well. Had the Wasatch-Cache report used statewide significance as the threshold, the Logan River would have been included easily. If anything, I believe that the above Forest Service ratings for the Logan River are low. I question the ratings for wildlife, water recreation, and, especially, scenery. Even if the Forest Service ratings are correct, it is obvious the Logan River is an extremely important resource with statewide significance. In five of the nine resource categories, the river received a statewide significance rating. No other stream had more than two. The Logan River was rated as the most significant stream in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest for five of the nine resource categories. Again, no other stream could claim more than two. The conclusion is inescapable. The Forest Service report absolutely confirms that, when compared to other streams on the forest, the Logan River is the crown jewel and is most certainly eligible for wild and scenic designation. (Drew Parkin is a river policy consultant in cambridge, Mass., and serves on the board of directors of the Pacific Rivers Council. He previously managed Wild and Scenic River programs for the National Park Service. He is a native of utah and spent several seasons working for the Forest Service in Logan canyon.) USFS data on the Logan River between Temple Fork and White Pine Creek Rating compared to other Wasatch-Cache streams Logan River rating Cultural resources Statewide significance Wildlife Typical Typical Botanical resourses Geology/Hydrology Scenery Water recreation General recreation Fisheries Ecology Highest rating in the forest Rated in top 5 Rated in top 5 Highest rating in the forest Rated in top 10 Highest rating in the forest Rated in top 10 Tied for highest rating Tied for highest rating Statewide Significance Typical Typical Statewide s ignificance Statewide significance Statewide significance This infomtlltion W4S fQkm directly from t~ report For more information visit our web page at: http://www.logancanyon.org �CACHE ANGLERS Support Wild and Scenic designation for the Logan River Cache Anglers would like to express its support of the effort to have the Logan Ri~r designated as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River. While the designation will not affect the regulations nor the current use of the river by sportsmen of all types. we believe that it would be an important step in protecting the river against further private and commercial development which would harm the river and its riparian habitat. We firmly believe that this river. one of the finest cold water fisheries in the state of Utah, needs to be protected and preserved for future generations to enjoy. Regardless of the different purposes for which this beautiful river is used, the Wild and Scenic designation would be a great step in preserving what is left of Logan River's natural water ways and make them available for all sportsmen now and in the future . Jason Swan, President Cache Anglers �A RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE LOGAN CITY COUNCIL OFFERING ITS OFFICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE DESIGNATION OF THE LOGAN RIVER INTO THE NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the Logan City Council recognizes the natural beauty and splendor of the Logan River, the phYSical, economic, and spiritual benefits provided to local citizens by the river, that it is a unique river in its own right, and that it is a river worthy of protecting for our families and our future; WHEREAS, the Council has been requested by local citizens and organizations to offer its official support of the designation of the Logan River into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; WHEREAS, the Council received this official request on December 9, 1998 and again reviewed the request in a public workshop on March 10, 1999, to consider the proposed resolution; WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that the Logan River has been found eligible by the u.s. Forest Service for designation into the System and must now go through a suitability study, that such a designation must then be introduced by legislation for consideration into the U.S. Congress; or, be recommended fo r designation by the Governor to the U.S. Secretary of Interior; WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that said resolution does not in any way carry forth official legislation or regulation regarding the Wild and Scenic deSignation, but that it provides for local support needed as the proposed designation proceeds through the appropriate process; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council has voted in a public meeting on _ _ _ _ _~ in favor of the proposed resolution, offering the official support of this governing body for the designation of the Logan River as a Wild and Scenic River. Passed and Adopted this __ day of _ _ _ _ _~, 1999. Chair �·. • Date: Wednesday, September 30, 19986:54:46 PM Date: Wed, 30 Sap 1998 09:50:46 -0600 From: River Network <rivernet-info@lgc.apc.org> To: rivernet@igc.apc.org. rlvernet-info@igc.apc.org Subject: Dam decommissioning Strategy Workshop Proceedings The proceedings from the July 1998 International Rivers Network (IRN)-sponsored International Dam Decommissioning Strategy Workshop are now available. They contain discussion outcomes. participant information, and a list of articles. press releases and publications of interest, and can be ordered for $10 through IAN's library Coordinator, Yvonne Cuellar (von@irn.org). You can also find much of this information on IAN's decommissioning web page at: www.irn .org At the July workshop, activists formed "Living Rivers: the International Coalition for the Restoration of Rivers and Communities Affected by Dams,· as the seed for growing a global movement on dam decommissioning and river restoration issues. To help service and build this coalition, IRN is not only circulating information, but also encouraging organizations around the world to join Living Rivers, by endorsing the Walker Creek Declaration, which appears below. To sign your organization on to the declaration and join the coalition please contact IAN's Decommissioning Coordinator (rani@irn.org). Please feel free to circulate the declaration to other organizations who may be interested in supporting it as well. WALKER CREEK DECLARATION Founding Statement of LIVING RIVERS The International Coalition for the Restoration of Aivers and Communities Affected by Dams 25 July, 1998 WHEREAS: Free-flowing, living rivers are an essential, life-giving feature of our natural and human environment. They fulfil a multitude of ecological, economic, spiritual, cultural, and aesthetic needs and wants. Worldwide, these invaluable rivers are now degraded by hundreds of thousands of dams, which have flooded huge areas of the world's most beautiful and ecologically rich habitats and the homes and lands of tens of millions of people. Dams have impoverished countless communities which were dependent on the bounty of free-flowing rivers and riverside lands, and endangered public health. Dams have blocked flows of nutrients and sediments and the passage of fish and other aquatic lifeforms. Dams have contaminated river water. Dams have eliminated essential natural flooding regimes thereby degrading the ecosystems, farmlands and fisheries which depend on floods . And dams have caused the decline and extinction of riverine species and the ecological degradation of estuaries and coastlines. Many dams provide services for society, including the generation of electricity, the storage and diversion of water, flood protection, navigation and flat-water recreation. But we now know that these services come at a high economic, ecological and social cost and often can be met in other less damaging ways. We also have learned that costs and benefits of dams are unequally shared - those who reap the rewards are rarely those who must bear the costs. After decades of experience, we now know that the promised benefits of many dam projects have never been realized, and their adverse effects are more serious than predicted. Trying to recreate artificially the complex natural cycles and functions of undammed rivers has proven to be far more difficult than was once thought. Efforts to mitigate the adverse effects of dams have often proven expensive and ineffective. �The knowledge learned over the past decades has led to the continuing improvement of standards for planning. designing. and operating dams. This has included social and environmental impact assessments, access to Information. public participation in decision-making. and periodic re-evaluation of a dam's impacts and operations. Many existing dams would never have been built if they had had to comply with current bestpractice planning principles. procedures and standards. Some are illega l because they were constructed in violation of existing laws. or because required environmental mitigation and social compensation measures were never implemented. Many dams are now obsolete. Many have reached the end of their functional life span and no longer serve a purpose that justifies their negative impacts. Many are unsafe. threatening the lives of millions of peopl e. as well as property, fish and wildlife. For many dams the cost of maintenance and of environmental and social mitigation exceeds the benefits to be gained from dam operation. The cost of removing dams Is In many cases proving less than the cost of continuing to operate them. even without taking full account of the social and ecological benefits of dam removal. A movement Is now growing around the world which recognizes the vital importance of living rivers. People are calling for major changes in the operating patterns of dams to lessen their negative impacts, the decommissioning and removal of obsolete and dangerous dams. the restoration of rivers and the provision of reparations for past damages suffered by riverine communities affected by dams. THEREFORE: We now establish Living Rivers. an international coalition for the restoration of rivers and communities affected by dams, by means of dam reoperation, decommiss ioning or removal. Independent and transparent evaluations must be carried out periodically to identify which dams should continue in operation. which should have their operations altered to mitigate adverse impacts. and which should be decommissioned or removed. The continued existence and operation of individual dams must be justified on the grounds of ecological and social impacts. economics and safety. Decommissioning plans must be prepared for all dams. whether existing. planned or under construction. These plans should Include dam removal and river, reservoir zone and floodplain restoration. The plans should also include mechanisms for raising the funds needed to pay for decommissioning. Dam owners and the beneficiaries of dams must be held responsible for the costs of mitigating the impacts of their continuing operation. of reparations for past damages, and where relevant of decommissioning or removing the dams. Funding mechanisms must be established to pay for decommissioning abandoned dams or for dams where the owner has insufficient financial resources. International agencies which have financed dams should share the responsibility for thei r decommissioning or removal. Rigorous dam safety standards must be developed and enforced. including the preparation and pub lication of flood inundation maps and emergency evacuation plans. and the purchase of liability insurance. The safety records of dams must be made public. The costs of implementing improved dam safety standards should be borne by dam owners and beneficiaries and, where relevant, international funding agencies. Scientific. engineering and sociological research and education on dam decommissioning must be promoted by governments and dam agencies. Watershed management and energy plans must be developed In a participatory and transparent manner. Watershed management plans should integrate sustainable agriculture and fisheries, urban planning, flood management, water supply and environmental restoration. Regional energy services plans should incorporate demand-side management and the most environmentally benign and cost-effective forms of generation. �Dams have had huge negative Impacts on rivers and river communities ~ removing dams Is an economically, technically, socially and environmentally viable and sensible option for reversing these impacts and restoring living rivers. Investment In living river systems will produce substantial benefits for our human and natural communities, today and tomorrow. Let our rivers live! ENDORSED BY: American Rivers, USA; Assembly of the Poor, Thailand; European Rivers Network, France/ Europe; Florida Defenders of the Environment, USA; Friends of the Earth, USA; Friends of the Eel River, USA; Glen Canyon Institute, USA; International Rivers Network, USA; John Muir Project, Earth Island Institute. USA; Let's Help the River Movement, Russia; Narmada Bachao Andolan, India; Pedder 2000, Australia; River Alliance of Wisconsin, USA; Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition, USA; SOS Loire Vivante, France; WaterWatch of Oregon, USA; Wildlife Fund ThaI/and; Zeleny Svit - Green World, Ukraine Since July 25, this declaration has also been endorsed by the following organizations: Foundation to Protect the Hungarian Environment. Hungary; Friends of the River, USA; Global Response, USA; Idaho Rivers United, USA Rani Derasary International Rivers Network (IRN) 1847 Berkeley Way Berkeley, CA 94703 USA Phone: (510) 848-1155 (510)848-1008 Fax: Email: rani@irn.org WWW: www.lrn.org For more information, please contact River Network at <rivernet@igc.apc.org> or visit our website: http://www.rivernetwork.org. �In the 1960s, the country awoke to the fact that our rivers were being dammed, dredged, diked, diverted and degraded at an alarming rate. To lend balance to our history of use and abuse of our waterways, Congress created the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. In October of 1968, the freshly penned Wild and Scenic Rivers Act pronounced, It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dams and other construction at appropriate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be complemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof in their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes. - ---- While ! sometimes criticized as not reaching its full potential, there is little d ~bt that when applied, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act has usually peen a JOlI,sing su<;~, helping to prot some of this nation's ath, Manistee and premiere riveri. Aliagash and Alieghen~Kern an McKenf ie. The Wild\ and Scenic Rivers Stem n prote s many of the ur Muir's rivers lo~ our historYt literature, our n tion' t;YOuth. Jo Tuolum e River and is famous, losing battle t stop the flooding of HetchUJ tchy Valley; t e Delaware ~iver of our American Revolu~n; Zane Grey's famous flyfishing river, the l')Iorth Umpqua; the Missouri of Lewis and Clark''sJpurneys. Great rivers IT om our past, guaranteed to be great rivers in our future. But designation as a wild and scenic river is not designation as a national park. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act does not generally lock up a river like a wilderness designation. The idea is not to halt development and use of a river; instead, the goal is to preserve the character of a river. Uses compatible with the management goals of a particular river are allowed, change is expected to happen. Development not damaging to the outstanding resources of a designated river, or curtailing its free flow, are usually allowed. The term "living landscape" has been frequently applied to wild and scenic rivers. Of course, each river designation is different, and each management plan is unique. But the bottom line is that the Wild and Scenic Rivers System is not something to be feared by landowners or sportsmen _ .;.. As you <!'!!l1.h t guess, a large per~enta~ nd-sceni rivers flow through the PacifiC-Northwest. Oregon's spectacular Klamath I ~ nd - 1- �its incredible abundance of wildlife -- was recently added to the Wild and Scenic Rivers System following a 15-year battle over the proposed Salt Caves Hydroelectric Project. The last section of the Columbia River in Washington not lying behind federal and private dams is being considered for designation. (Curiously enough, this reach is eligible because it has lain protected within the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, the site of Cold War atomic bomb production.) The Wallowa River in northeastern Oregon was recently designated as a wild and scenic river by Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, becoming part of one of the most c ompletely protected river systems in the country. And the closing of the 104 th Congress saw the addition of Elkhorn Creek in Oregon to the list of protected Northwest rivers. (The Lamprey River in New Hampshire and the Clarion River in Pennsylvania were also designated in the closing days of the 104th Congress.) And, hopefully, others will follow. Whether the Wild and Scenic Rivers System grows or not, there are many rivers already protected for you to enjoy. Grab a flyrod, load the kayak on the car, slip on your most comfortable walking shoes. Get out there and savor your natural heritage. But go slow, and enjoy every minute of your trip to the river. Because of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, you've got the time. - 2- �This disc was prepared for the National Park Service by the U.S. Geological Survey with additional contributions from: U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Biological Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, National Resources Conservation Service, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program (202)343-3780 THE NATIONWIDE RIVERS INVENTORY I. Background and Authorizations Section 5.(d) of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271-1287) requires that "In all planning for the use and development of water and related land resources, consideration shall be given by all Federal agencies Involved to potential national wild, scenic, and recreational river areas.· It further requires that -, .. the Secretary of the Interior shall make specific studies and Investigations to determine which additional wild, scenic, and recreational river areas .. . shall be evaluated in planning reports by all Federal agencies as potential alternative uses of water and related land resources Involved." The Nationwide Rivers Inventory - In partial fulfillment of the Section 5(d) requirements, the National Park Service has compiled and maintains a Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI), a register of river segments that potentially qualify as national wild, scenic, or recreational river areas. The NAI qualifies as a comprehensive plan under Section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Power Act. Presidential Directive - A presidential directive requires each Federal agency, as part of its normal planning and environmental review processes, take care to avoid or mitigate adverse effects on rivers Identified in the Nationwide Rivers Inventory compiled by NPS. Further, all agencies are required to consult with the National Park Service prior to taking actions which could effectively foreclose wild, scenic, or recreational status for rivers on the inventory. Stalewide River Assessments and Inventories - Pursuant to Section 11 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, NPS has been providing technical assistance to states in the conduct of statewide river assessments and inventories. These efforts provide a source for potential future additions to Ihe Nationwide Rivers Inventory and the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System especially as State administered components. Public Law 88-29 - Outdoor Recreation Act of 1963 authorizes the Secretary of Interior to prepare and maintain a continuing Inventory and evaluation of outdoor recreation needs and resources including rivers ; provide technical assistance; encourage interstate and regional cooperation in the planning, acquisition, and development of outdoor recreation resources; sponsor and engage In research and education; cooperate with and provide technical assistance to Federal departments and agencies; and promote coordination of Federal plans and activities generally relating to outdoor recreation resources including rivers and associated trail corridors. These responsibilities are also assigned to the National Center for Recreation and Conservation of the National Park Service. �II. Initial Listing and Updates of the NRI The original inventory was conducted to by the Department of Interior with the cooperation of State and local agencies, and completed in 1982. To be listed, river segments had to meet three basic criteria: be free flowing (and generally be 25 miles or longer) be relatively undeveloped (both river and corridor) possess outstanding natural and/or cultural values A major update of the NRI was initiated in 1993. The first phase completed in December, consisted of adding the river segments found to have outstanding wild, scenic. or recreation potential by the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the National Park Service in accordance with 5(d) of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. There is no minimum length specified by this section of the Act. River segments are classified according to extent of development as follows: Wild: Those rivers or sections of rivers that Bre free of impoundments and generally inaccessible except by trail, with watersheds or shorelines essentially primitive and waters unpolluted. These represent vestiges of primitive America. Scenic: Those rivers or sections of rivers that are free of impoundments, with shorelines or watersheds still largely primitive and shorelines largely undeveloped, but accessible in places by roads . Recreational: Those rivers or sections of rivers that are readily accessible by road or railroad. that may have some development along their shorelines, and that may have undergone some impoundment or diversion in the past. The second phase of the NRI update, initiated in 1994, added river segments found eligible through statewide river assessments and inventories. GIS and watershed referencing for all NRI segments will complete the update. �III. How To Contact National Park Service Offices For Information or questions on policy and update status: National Park Service National Center for Recreation and Conservation Post Office Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013 202-343-3780 For information or questions on specific river segments: ROCKY MOUNTAIN STATES Conservation Assistance Branch National Park Service 12795 West Alameda Parkway Post OHlce Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225-0287 303-969-2850 COLORADO, MONTANA, UTAH, and WYOMING �~ -4l'''' """ . - -..-r- 3 ,." ~ (~ '" ," 0 1'rr-r-o!J j) (all,k," ,(A- quO') . r ~ f\ ... ,.... , • c ... ", 1)e.b (f( a /.\ F sL,,/1>1 a '" , ;Y3 t- W loa 5 Lo9lMA , llT 1' "1,, I" I" II ,II J,I", /I ,',,' ,I, ,',',' I, ,I ,11,1"',, ,',,' ,II �1JM fr5hl'/& ___ I/",. l (a c he /11tf)Z.,j p");t.'l'1; 19.(' ~ , , �31 74 Camino Arroyo Carlsbad, CA 92009 December 3, 1998 Logan City Council Logan, UT 84321 Dear City Council , My wife and I lived in Logan from 1955, when we came as college students, until just last year. We raised three sons in Logan, and Logan will always be our hearts' country. We absorbed Cache Valley. The silhouette of the mountains, east up the canyon and west across the valley, is still the horizon line of our life. I wouldn't mention this background if I didn't think a great many people share such feelings. Few things go as deep as the sense of home. Unfortunately, sometimes the deepest values get taken for granted. We're all very busy. We can even forget to think about the absolute beauty and purity of Logan River, coming down the canyon and through the town. Surely there can't be many towns anywhere in the world that can say: a wild, clean river comes down out of the mountains to us; there is no one, no town, upstream. I think about Logan River a lot these days. Our iririgation and drinking water here in coastal California is sparse, it comes a long way, and it has been used several times. There is no way, with all the engineering capability in the world, we could create the kind of situation Logan has. So, speaking from deep care for Logan and from the knowledge of how easy it is to lose natural resources, and how hard if not impossible it is to get them back, I respectfully urge the Council to endorse Logan River as a Wild and Scenic River. Logan River is lifeblood. Please protect it. Sincerely, fl.t ifWt "-' 1-' " Thomas J. Lyon IJ'V, �p.o. 60x 3501 ~tm, Utcdi 84323-3501 25 October, 1998 Mr. Dan Miller, President logan Canyon Coalltion USU Box 1674 Logan, UT 84322-0199 Dear Mr. Miller, Bridgerland Audubon Society wishes to unequivocally endorse your efforts to urge the U.S. Forest Service to designate the Logan River through Logan Canyon as " Scenic" within the Wild and Scenic River System lnventory. The Logan River is a Iynchpin in the history, culture and ecosystem of Cache Valley and the Bear River Range. It is an historical artery of commerce, source of culinary water for Logan City, recreational refuge for land and water users, habitat for many species of migrant and yearround animals, and a source of beauty and wonder in every season. Designating it as " Scenic" should not compromise any of these attributes, but rather help to preserve its value to this and future gene'rations. It would be an honor to have the Logan River designated as the first " Wild and Scenic River" in Utah . There is nothing to lose, and everything to gain in such a designation . Please keep us apprised of the status of the project, and include our support in your efforts to achieve this designation. \1" '::'IY, ~jf=f?'~ t:O). 1:1 _ PrinhKI 01'1 ...... �What is the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act? The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 is unique among environmental laws in the world because of its potential to protect free-flowing rivers and river-sections in their condition at the time of designation. Unfortunately, the potential of this Act still has not been tapped. Less than I percent of the nation's total river miles have been included in the Nation's Wild and Scenic Rivers System. NOT ONE of Utah's beautiful rivers has this outstanding distinction. What Does Designation 001 • offers three levels of protection- Wild. Scenic, and Recreational, which correspond to existing development and the extraordinary values of the river. • provides blanket protection against federally licensed dams, diversion, and other on-river development which cannot be overridden by a FERC hydropower license. • provides flexibility in working with local landowners to protect the designated river's riparian corridor through the creation of a management plan. • will actually increase the market value of surrounding private property. • maintains the conditions existing at the time of designation, including local lifestyles and land uses within the river corridor. • will not stop highway improvements. Although, the Utah Department of Transportation will have to respect Logan River's outstandingly remarkable values and can't change the rivers character. • Designation as a Wild and Scenic River is not deSignation like a national park. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act does not lock up a river like a wilderness designation. The idea is not to halt development and use of a river; instead, the goal is to preserve the character of a river. Uses compatible with the management goals of a particular river are allowed, change is expected to happen. Development not damaging to the outstanding resources of a designated river, or curtailing its free flow, are allowed. The term "living landscape' has been frequently applied to wild and scenic rivers. Of course, each river designation is different, and each management plan is unique. But the bottom line is that the Wild and Scenic Rivers System is not something to be feared by landowners, water users or sportsmen. For more information visit our web page at: http://www.logancanyon.org �Leave A True Legacy The Logan as Utah's First Wild and Scenic River We the undersigned hereby declare our support for segments of the Logan River to be designated as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River under the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, as long as that designation doesn't interfere with traditional uses now enjoyed by the public. Signature Print name Street ctty RETURN COMP LETEO PETITIONS TO THE LOGAN CANYON COALITION, USU BOX '1874 , LOGAN , UTAH 84322·0"111 Stale Zip �c o 4. L Working for the T I protection of I Logan o C;lnyon Leave A True Legacy The Logan as Utah's First Wild and Scenic River Thirty years after the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was passed by Congress, there have been over 154 Wild and Scenic designations in the United States. Not one of Utah's beautiful rivers has this outstanding distinction. The Logan River and its watershed is a critical resource of recreation, economic stability, and most importantly, a source of culinary water for Logan and Cache Valley residents. A Wild and Scenic designation would not encroach upon existing uses of the river, but would provide longterm protection for this precious resource. Utah citizens deserve a Wild and Scenic River. Let's all join together and leave this true legacy for our families and our future. Support the Logan River as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River. For more information visit our web page at: USU Box #1674 • Log a n • http://www.logancanyon.org Uta h • 84322·0199 �c 04. L WorklDS for the I T protection of I LOBan o Canyon Logan Canyon Coalition's Executive Summary Logan Canyon Coalition is a grassroots citizens organization in northern Utah dedicated to promoting reasonable improvements in the narrow, winding canyon while protecting the canyon's scenic and environmental resources. Lee is devoted to protecting logan Canyon. logan River and its eco·systems. Currently. lee's efforts are directed towards protecting the logan RiYer from excessive development from its proximity to a nearby highway and a proposed land swap that will create state and private lands above the river. Lee Is running a campaign to have a portion of the Logan River deSignated as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River. In May, 1998 the Forest Service and other environmental experts gathered to expound on the overwhelming data that argues in favor of deSignation. LCC will direct Its resources through community outreach and initializing several campaigns toward Wild and Scenic designation. For more information visit our web page at http://www.logancanyon .org usu Box '1674 • Log a n • U I • h • 843 2 2 - 0 1 9 9 �c o A. L Working for the T I protection of I Logan o l\T Canyon FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 30th Anniversary of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act The 30th anniversary of the most important piece of federal legislation ever written to protect rivers-The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act-will be celebrated across the country during the month of October. Thanks to the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, many of our nation's most outstanding free-flow- ing rivers are protected from dams and inappropriate development. The Act. signed in 1968, protects rivers with remarkable scenic. recreational. geological. fish and wildlife. historic, cultural. or other similar values. To date, segments of 154 rivers have been designated . cov- ering nearly 10,764 miles. Not one of Utah's beautiful rivers has this outstanding distinction. The logan River was passed by during the first two rounds of Wild and Scenic recommendation by the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. But as a result of public pressure, the Forest Service is currently conducting a third inventory of Wasatch-Cache National Forest rivers Including the Logan. The Logan River and its watershed is a critical resource of recreation, economic stability, and most importantly, a source of culinary water for Logan and Cache Valley residents. A Wild and Scenic designation would not encroach upon existing uses of the river. but would provide long-term protection for this precious resource. "We (LCC) want to leave a true legacy," said Dan Miller. LCC President. "We are seeking to have the Logan River designated as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River. Utah citizens deserve a Wild and Scenic River within their borders, and I ask that we all join together to leave this true legacy for our families and our future ." USU Box '1674 • L 0 8 it n • U I • h • 843 22- 0 1 9 9 �Wild and Scenic rivers are an important part of the country's heritage, offering the public recreation opportunities, enhanced tourism economies, the preservation of plant and animal species, and dependable supplies of clean water. Many communities along Wild and Scenic rivers benefit from an Increase in land values that accompany a Wild and Scenic river designation. While the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act has had great success, much work still remains. According to the National Park Service's Nationwide Rivers Inventory, more than 60.000 miles of rivers qualify for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. American Rivers, the nation's leading river conservation organization, is working to stem the extinction of our most outstanding rivers and bring more rivers into the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. "We hope the Logan River will someday be apart of that system:' Miller said. For more information please visit our web site at http://www.logancanyon.org Dan Miller. President Logan Canyon Coalition e-mail: Dmil123S@aolocom ph#: 435/258-'1432 �Please Write To LEAVE A TRUE LEGACY and Support the Logan as Utah's first Wild and Scenic River NOT ONE of Utah's beautiful rivers is recognized for its outstanding qualities through induction into the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. To be eligible for this status. a river just has to be free-flowing and posses at least one outstandingly remarkable value which may include: fish, wildlife, scenery, geology, archaeology, cultural, historical, and recreational. After studying the river, citizens groups have identified the following outstandingly remarkable values on the Logan River: Fish and Wildlife. Scenic. Geologic, and Recreation. Surprisingly. the Logan was passed by during the first two rounds of Wild and Scenic recommendation by the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. But as a result of public pressure, the Forest Service is conducting a third inventory of Utah's rivers. The opportunity still exists for the logan to be recognized for its outstanding qualities. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT in this process is extremely important. PLEASE WRITE the Wasatch-Cache National Forest and urge them to recommend that the logan River be inducted into the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Attn. Bernie Weingardt Wasatch-Cache National Forest 8230 Federal Building 125 South State Street Salt Lake City. Utah 84138 �ACTION ALERT! The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act was signed into law in 1968. Thirty years later, Utah and Nevada are the only two states in the West without a designated river. The U.s. Forest Service recently determined the Logan to be eligible for designation. Next it must be determined to be suitable, largely dependent upon local sentiment, and then designated by Congress. You can help make the Logan River Utah's first Wild and Scenic river. The Logan City Council has been asked to issue a proclamation supporting such a designation, which will then be forwarded with our petition onto our Congressional delegation. Please call or write OUf City Council members and the Mayor asking them to support such a proclamation. They will be voting on such a measure March 4th. Mayor Doug Thompson 255 North Main Logan, UT 84321 750-9800 Alan Allred, Logan City Council 1535 E. 1500 N. Logan, UT 84341 752-6441 John Harder, Logan City Council 289 E. 200 N. Logan, UT 84321 753-6300 Janice Pearce, Logan City Council Steve Thompson, Logan City Council 37 South 200 West Logan, UT 84321 753-8254 Karen Borg, Logan City Council 1670 N. 1600 E. Logan, UT 84341 753-6963 727 N. 150 W. Logan, UT 84321 753-3599 Sponsored by the Logan Canyon Coalition �LOGAN RIVER DRA INAGE SEGMENT 39.0 Logan River: Ida bo statelin e to confluence with Beaver Creek - 6.6 miles POTENT IAL OUTSTANDINGLY REMARKABLE VA LUES Fish DESC RI PTION Gener al - This segment of Logan River, from the Idaho stateline to its confluence with Beaver Creek, is located on the Logan District in Cache Counry, Utah. A recent land exchange with the State of Utah in the upper reaches of the river have made most of the lands through with it flows pan of the National Forest system, although about 1 mile still flows through private lands. Bio/physica l setting - The segment of the Logan River is a relatively small up river portion of the stream where the river is natural in character and has few highway and road encroadunents and crossings., The stream flow is perennial; however during low flow periods a portion of the stream can go underground for about 100 to 200 yards. Elevations ranges along the stream from about 7,500 feet at the state line to about 6400 feet at Beaver Creek. In the upper reaches of the segment the somewhat confined channel is character· ized by poo!·riffie·run and it runs through a broad open valley. Adjacent uplands are primarily dominated by aspen and sagebrush communities and some conifer communities. Subalpine fir is succeeding aspen communities in some areas. Riparian communities are characterized by thinleaf alder and various willows. Dispersed recreation impacts are common along the upper poslion of the ri\·er segment, resulting in soil compaction, loss of some woody vegetation, and the presence of some introduced herbaceous species. No threatened. endangered, or sensitive plants occur along this segment of the Logan River. Fish species present include rainbow trout, pure strain Bonnevill e cutthroat trout (a sensitive species), brook trout, and brown trout. The Bonneville cutthroat population here is pan of a larger metapopulation of the species that occupies the Logan River basin and tributaries, and is considered to be critical to the overall preservation of the species. The State of Utah rates the fishery here as a Class II, unique. No endangered or threatened mammals exist on this segment. H um an dimension · Acc ess to the base of segment is provided Scenic Byway, and by Forest Road 006 (a din road) whi ch runs veloped Forest Service campgrounds are present in the upper part sian of Parks and Recreation operates a winter sports trailhead Highway 89 and the Franklin Basin Road. V-54 by US Highway 89, a National parallel to the segment. No de· of the segment. The Utah Divi· parking area at the junction of �DETAILED EVALUATION OF ELI GIBILITY Evaluation of Free-flowing Condition - This segment of the Logan River has n Ol been substantially modified by the dirt road that runs along it or by other construction or diversion. The segment is free-flow ing. Evaluation of Outstandingly Remarkable Values - The Bonneville cutthroat population of this stream is pan of a larger self-sustaining continuous meta-population of this species. The fi sh is a sensitive species which is currently incl uded in a conservation agreem ent. Spawning of the species occurs in this stream and other Logan River tributaries. In comparison to other known and documented populations of Bonnevill e cunhroat trout this is a very special population that is and wi ll be important to the overall survival of the species. Eligibility and Classification - Since this segment of the Logan Ri ver is free-flowing and has an outstandingly remarkable fishery popUlation, the segment is eligible for the National Wild and Sceni c Rvers System. The stream can be classifi ed as a scenic river. V-55 �SEGMENT t 39.1 Logan River : Con fluence wit h Beaver C r eek to Third Dam - 20 miles POTENTIAL O UTSTANDING LY REMARKABLE VALUES Scenic, Recreation, Geo logical, Fish, Ecological DESC RIPT ION General - This segment of Logan Ri ver, from the confluence with Beaver Creek to Third Dam is about 19 mil es long. It is located on the Logan Ranger Distri ct in Cache County, Utah. This segment is managed entirely by the Forest Service. Bio/pbysical setting - Elevations range from 5,200 feet near Third Dam to 6400 feet at Beaver Creek. Along this segment the terrain changes from a relatively narrow gorge j ust below Third Dam. and runs through a classic canyon landscape to a much more open and rolling setting in the uppennost 8 miles above the Temple Fork confluence. The geological features mosl apparent along the course of the ri ver are some of the karst fea tures, notably Ricks Springs cave, Logan Cave. and Wi nd Cave. Other caves al so ex ist. and undoubtedly many more remain to be di scovered. Ordovician quartzite strata near Right Fork contain unusually well fonned and preserved fuco idal structures (foss ili zed casts of ancient wonn borrows which appear like seaweed mats frozen in the stone). At the west end of the corridor. lake terrace gravel deposits of prehi stori c Lake Bonneville perch above the ri ver bed and mark the upper level of a lake with enormous significance in the Great Basin. Well-defined faults and shear zones cut and displace the sedi mentary strata in se\'eral road cuts along the corri dor. some of which also show geologically interesting small-scale folding of the strata. Uplands are dominated by Douglas fir on cooler north- facing slopes with mapl e, sagebrush. mountain mahogany, and juniper communities on south-facting and other drier sites. Riparian vegetation is characteri zed bi rch/dogwood, box elder, and yellow willow communi ties. Crack willow, an introduced species. is a common component of some of the camping and ipicnicking areas in the lower sections of the segment. One federall y listed Threatened plant, Primula maguirei (Maguire primrose), occurs along this segmentin more mesic limestone cliffs. In addi tion, several Intermountain Region sensitive species. including Viola frank smithii ffranksmi th violet), Eri geron cronquistii , and Draba maguirei, occur on the dolomitic limestone outcrops. No endangered or threatened wildlife species exist on this segment. However, the western bigeared bat, an Intennountain Region (Forest Service) sensitive species, has been verified here. Fish spec ies present include rainbow. brook. and brown trout, and the sensitive species - Bonneville cutthroat trout with has relati onships to both pure and potentially pure sub populations in adjacent tributaries. This popUlation of Bonneville cutthroat in Logan River can be considered pan of a meta-population that occupies the upper portion of thi s river drainage, (in biological tenn s - a population that has imponance beyond the local scale). I • , [ J t J I r t \ . �Human dimension· Parallel access is provided by State Highway 89, a designated National Scenic Byv..'ay. This highway is used by through travellers driving between the Wasatch Front and Idaho or Wyoming. or by recreati on users who are interested in destinations al ong the river and highway. I I I t 1 • f t I ] 1 I I f t Recreation pressure in the corridor, both dispersed and developed. can be considered moderate to heavy depending on season and day of the week. The Forest Service provides many developed campgrounds and picnic sites in the lower ponicn of the segment, and upstream the most notable is the Tony Grove recreation complex, snowmobile parking and other facilities. Other interesting viewing sites include Rick Springs. Access to the river for fishing and tubing is very easy. Two geological markers are present: one explaining about ancient Lake Bonneville and the other about deposits of fucoidal quartzite. Logan Wind Cave is also a destination for hikers. Rock climbing is very popular aiong the segment. Below Ricks Springs some kayaking occurs depending on the water level. Between Third Dam and Right Hand Fork slopes are quite steep, and vegetation diversity shows a high degree of patterning owing to considerable variability in altitude, slope, aspect, soils, etc. Views are not especially long or vastin the lower section, but are some of the more attractive available in northern Utah. The narrow canyon from Right Hand Fork up [0 Chicken Creek provides pleasant scenery to passing motori sts who are nearly enclosed by the canyon and its heavy riparian forest. For those \\·ho stop, a more leisurely viewing experience may be appreciated at a local campsite or picnic area. Scenery above this point changes considerably and ranges from the deeply encised gorge near the twin bridges to wide-open expansive uplands draped with sagebrush and aspen around Tony Grove and Red Banks. Tony Grove Memorial Ranger Station, a National Regi ster site, is within the seb'lllent. TIlls complex has a unique log cabi n and later CCC period buildings that relate to earlier periods in the hislOry of Nationa l Forest land management. Fishing along the Logan River is common, and the experience is considered to be high quality. The State of Utah ranks the upper portion of the segment at Class II , a unique fishing segment. Hunting is also a common endeavor in areas adjacent to the river. The Utah State University Field Station is located in the upper portion of the segment. Portions of the area are in the Logan Canyon Cattle allotment. There are no commercial fishing, hwlting, or recreation activities on the segment. Although some of the several stream-crossing structures may impede peak stream fl ows, there are no fu ll-scale impoundments in this reach above the inundated area above the Third Dam. No sig-nificant diversions have been made that could have any noticeable effects on stream flows or instream water uses ; however, there are probably several minor diversions for adjacent domestic and irrigation uses . DETAILED EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY Evaluation of Free-flowing Condition· Although Highway 89 runs the length of thi s segment and has some effects on its free-flow, these are not so substanti al that most observers would notice changes from a purely natural character. In general the ecological functions of the river are V-57 �natural along the segment. Over the last several decades construrction efforts and active management have intended that natural appearance and functions might be preserved. The segment is free-flowing. Evalu ation of Outstandingly Remarkable Values - The Bonneville cutthroat population of this stream is part of a larger self-sustaining continuous meta-population of this species. The fish is a sensitive species which is currently included in a conservation agreement. Spawning of the species occurs in this stream and other Logan River tributaries. In comparison to other known and documented populations of Bonneville cutthroat trout this is a very special population that is and wi ll be important to the overall survival of the species. Scenery along the segment has been recognized as outstanding by the creation of the National Scenic Byway fo r Highway 89. This scenery is diverse and variable, a scenic smorgasbord of this part of the Wasatch Range. The recreation opportunities in this segment are about as broad spectrum as are provided in any simil ar setting northern Utah. If one were to look for a typical northern Utah outdoor recreation, the Logan River area might be a good model for the type. For its variety, length of season, quality, and appropriate scale of facilities, the recreation experience along the Logan Ri ver is outstandIng. nti s segment meetS the criteria for outstandingly remarkable geo logical \'alue due to the diversity and abundance of fear. .lfes \vhich together form an area with high educational and scientific interest. In broad scale, the entire river corridor presents an unparalleled cross section of the geo logic structure and middle and lower Paleozoic carbonate stratigraphy of the west flank of the Bear River Range. A myriad of smaller geologic features fall within the confines of the corridor which contains the geologically-interesting meanders of the Logan River. Ecologically, thIS segment contains a wide variety of plant, animal , and aquatic communities that are functioning in a relatively heal thy manner, especially when compared to the proximity to local urban populations. The use of the corridor as a setting for education for local schools and the uini versity community has been appreciated for many decades. Due to the location of the river in close proximity to Utah State, more is known and written about the local natural setting than for most areas of the western U.S. The ecological setting and its value to local and broader communities can be considered outstanding. Eligibility and Classification - Since this segment of the Logan River is free-flowing and has outstandingly remarkable values. the segment is eligible for the National Wlld and Scenic Rvers System. The stream can be classified as a recreational river. V-58 • I r I I �SEGM ENT 39.2 Logan RiYe r : 1 bird Da m to Fo rest Bound a ry - 3 mil es POT E:\TlAL O UTSTA!\" DI:"IGL Y RE~ I A RKA BL E VALUES Ecological. Scenic 1 DESCRl PTl O!\" I Gener a l - This segment of Logan River, from TIlird Dam to the western boundary afthe WasatchCache Nati onal Forest is about 3 miles long. It is located on the Logan Ranger District in Cache County, Utah. I J , I J Bio/ phys ic a l settin g - The narrowest part of Logan Canyon is the sening for this segment. Here the river cuts a gorge through the \Vasatch Range to emerge in Cache \"alley at Logan. Elevations on the segment range from about 5200 feet to 4800 feet. Upland vegetation along this ponion of the stream is characterized by sagebrush and mountain mahogany on dryer sites and bigtooth maple in the foothills: Douglas fir occurs on more mesic nonh-facing slo pes. Riparian communities are dominated by cO llonwood. box elder. and crack willow trees with ycllow willow and coyote willow , river bi rch. and red-osier dOf,'wood along the narrow riparian conidor. One federally listed TItreatened plant. Primula maguieri Maguire primrose), occurs along this segment. In addition , several Intermountain Region (Forest Service) sensitive species. including Afusineon lineare (Rydbcrgs musineon), Erigeron cronquistii. and Draba maguirei. occur on the dolomitic limestone outcrops along this segment. Plant communities along this segment appear somewhat altered in many areas because of road placement which channelizes the river, planting of nonnative trees and shrubs. and building locations. There are no threatened, endangered or sensitive fish species in this segment, nor any endangered or threatened wildlife species. Sensitive wildlife species have not been verified. I • • • I iI Human dimension - US Highway 89, a National Scenic Byway, runs along the segment for its complete length. There are three developed Forest Service recration sites in this segment and a geological marker explaining about ancient Lake Bonneville. No significant archeological or historic sites are present. Because of the relatively narrow stream conidor and traffic density recreation opportunities are limited compared to further upstream on the river. Fishing is common, but not generally so satisfying an experience as that upstream . Tubing and some kayaking are popular activities. While the scenery is that of a narrow rocky canyon and quite pleasant, vistas are not so expansive as further upstream where the canyon opens up. There are no commercial recreation ventures in this segment, and linle opportunity to develop any . There is a restaurant which takes advantage of the riverine sening for dining. No commercial hunting or fishing is permined. Due to highway and dam construction over the past century, thi s segment of the Logan ri ver has been heavily modi fi ed. Adjacent floodplains and meadows have been significantl y modifi ed anddeveloped. Oxbows exist, but usually have been cut off by the highway, or they have been fi lled . V-59 �Highway 89 pinches the stream for much of its length channelizing it and decreaing its naturalness. The Highway corsses the river once in this segment, while five small er bridges span the river for access to summer homes and the National Forest. The stream flow is perenniaL Logan City is required to maintain 20 cfs between Second and Third dam. Below Second Darn no minimwn is required and during dry periods the flow is minimal. . DETAILED EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY Evaluation of Free.flowing Condition - This segment of the Logan River has been substantially modified by construction of Highway 89 which runs along it or by other construction or diversion. The segment is not free-flowing. • • • Evaluation of Outstandingly Remarkable Values· Because the stream has been found to be not free-flowing there is no further consideration of the values for which it might potentially have been eligible. Eligibility and C lassifi cation - This segment of the Logan River is not free-flowing and therefore not eligible as a Wild and Sceni c River. , J F t ! f V-60 �SEGMENTS The discussion and eval uation of th e following rivers have been combined. as all are being considered potentially outstandingly remarkable fo r the same related va lue. the Bonneville cutthroat trout fish population. j 39.3 39.4 39.S 39.6 39.8 39.9 Beaver Creek: Idaho State Line to Mouth - 6.5 miles \Vhite Pine C reek: Source to Mouth - 5.9 miles Temple Fork: Source to Mouth - 5.6 miles Spawn Creek: Source to :'\Iouth - 3.8 miles Bunchgrass C reek: Source to Mouth - 5.0 miles Little Bear Creek: Source to Mouth - 4.0 miles POTENTIAL OUTSTANDINGLY REMARKABLE \' ALUE Fish j i 1 I • I DESCRIPTIONS General - These segments are located on the Logan Ranger District, and are all tributary streams to the upper Logan River. Most of the streams flow exclusively through Nati onal Forest, although recent land exchanges in the area of the upper Logan River, White Pine Creek, and Beaver Creek have change ownership status there. Bio/physical setting - All six of the streams in this section are tributaries of the upper Logan River. As such they have some anributes in common and some that are unique. Each has vegetation in uplands which includes sagebrush. lodgepole pine, SUbalpine fi r. aspen, Douglas fir and some limber pine. Riparian communities are typicall y narrow and include willows. dogwood, aspen and conifers. ~o threatened. endangered or sensiti\'e plants are known to occur within these corridors. The flammulated owl, a sensitive species, has been located within the area. The corridors include habitat suitable for boreal owl, goshawk, wolverine and three-toed woodpeckers; none of these sensiti ve species are known to occur within the corridor. Several beaver ponds lie within these corridors, and the lower reaches of some provide big game winter range (moose, elk and deer). Fish species include rainbow, brown and brook trout, sculpin and Bonnevi lle cutthroat trout (a sensiti ve species). While all the fish species in these tributaries can add to visitor enjoyment or the overall wildlife diversity in the upper Logan River drainage, the Bonnevill e cunhroat trout population is of special interest and value. The range of Bonneville cutthroat includes most of the eastern Great Basin (See Appendix F, Regions of Comparison, Fish Values). These several streams in addition to the upper portions of the main Logan River are occupied with a meta-population (that is a genetically interactive larger population of the species) that, if protected, can insure the preservation of the species, which is currently under some considerable pressure to survive due to pressures of exotic species introduction, fi shing pressure, and habitat fragmentation, destruction, andlor degradation. The upper Logan River population of these fish is probably the largest and most di verse subpopulation with habitat connectivity that remains. Fish abundance for the Bonneville cutthroat is high, and the population is self-sustaining through natural spawning in both the main Logan River and these tributaries. This river system is of critical importance to Bonneville \'-6 1 �r cutthroat because of its lack of migratory obstructions, the large number of connected populations, and the overall strength and diversity afthe population. Human dimension - Access up the main Logan River to the lower portions of most of these streams is by u.s. Highway 89, the Logan Canyon National Scenic Byway. From this main highway smaller Forest Roads are present up Temple Fork and Beaver Creek, while even more ephemeral roads and trails are present along the other streams (e.g. White Pine Creek). At times the presence of these roads has impacted these streams and plans for some roads (e.g. Temple Fork) include reducing these impacts by reconstruction. Developed recreation sites are few within the upper Logan drainages compared to further downstream along the main Logan River. Dispersed camping and hiking use can be light to heavy depending on which stream is in question and season or day of the week. Fishing use is along these streams variable dependent on access and seasons. A catch and release policy has been in place. Several sites providing access and other recreation opportunities are found within these corridors or close by. Included are: a snowmobile parking area and groomed snowmobile and crosscountry ski trails are located near the junction of Highways 89 and 243 ; a snowmobile route connecting Utah to the Yellowstone area passes through the corridor; Beaver Mountain Ski Area; a commercial outfitter/guide offers horseback rides near the ski area; and portions of the Great \Vestem Trail in Beaver Creek and upper Temple Fork. There are few known prehistoric sites within these corridors, although occasional scatters of chipped stone materials attest to Nati ve American use of the streamsides for seasonal hunting and fishing camps, as well as access ways to upland areas. The Temple Fork Sawmill historic site and historic Tony Grove Ranger Station are within the corridors of consideration. Sheep and catt le graze most of the areas within which these rivers flow. There are no dams or di versions on these segments. In some places U.S. Highway 89, and Forest Roads, and other old roads affect the stream channe ls, flood plains, and water quality by crossing the segments or running along side them. DETAILED EVALUATION OF ELiGmILITY Eva lu ation of Free-flowing Condition - These six tributaries of the Logan River have not been modified to any significant extent by human uses. All six may be considered free-flowi ng . Evaluation of Outstandingly Remarkable Values - The Bonneville cunhroat trout fis hery withi n these tributary streams to the upper Logan River is a significant population. because of its size. diversity, di stribution within several suitable habitats. self-sustaining natural reproduction and the size and vigor of the fish. The importance of thi s meta-population of Bonneville cunhroat trout is an outstandingly remarkable value. Eligibility and Classification - All six of the streams listed below are eligible for the !\ational Wild and Scernc Ri vers System as they are free-flowing and fo r their remarkab le Bonnneville cutthroat fishery. V -62 t I �1 , They may be classified as indicated below: Beaver Creek: Idaho State Line to Mouth - Scenic White Pine Creek: Source to Mouth - Wild Temple Fork: Source to Mouth - Scernc Spawn Creek: Source to Mouth - Wild BWlCbgrass Creek: Source to Mouth - \Vild Linle Bear Creek: Source to Mouth - Wild 1 t I J J I I I1 - V-63 �BIO / WEST, Inc. I 063 'West 1400 North Log~n , Utah 84321 Phone: (435) 752·4202 Fax: (435) 752-0507 January 21, 1999 Logan City Mayor and Council . 255 North Main Logan, UT i4321 Re: Log an River Wild and Scenic-River Designation and Logan Canyo n Highway Ladies and Gentlemen: I have been asked to provide you with a brief, independent assessment as to the potential effects of a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) Designation for the Logan river on the ongoing Logan Canyon Highway Improve ment Project. As you are probably aware, a number of the aspects and implications of a WSR designation on the highway project are not totally clear, thus the information below is somewh.at speculative and my own opinion, rather than definitive facts . First, you should be aware that designation on USDA Forest Service land is a threestep process: 1) a determination of eligibility, which includes an inventory (evaluation) of resources and an assessment of the required presen, e of both "free f1owing~ c . characteristic~ and one or more "outstandingly remarkable features"; 2) classification'of eligible portions of a river as either recreational, scenic, or wild, based upon the results of item 1; and 3) an evaluation of the suitability for designation in terms of worthiness for inclusion in to the national system, status of land ownership in the area, potential land uses, local governmental interest, cost, and other issues. Suitability is typically add ressed in a detailed study report which includes environmental consideration (analysis, public involvement, preparation of an enyironmental document, etc.) and integration into th e pertinent local (Wasatch-Cache National Forest in this case) Forest Management Plan. If the river meets all of the above criteria, it can be recommended by the Forest Service (Washington level) for Congressional designation. Obviously, the above process, particularly approval by Congress, can take a very long time. Howeve r, the Forest SerVice is mandated to manage and protect the area in accordance with the selected classification during this interim period once the first two steps are completed, which is apparently the current statu s of the Logan River study. As I understand it, the Forest Service has rece ntly determined that portions of the 'upper Logan river are eligible' for designation, and has tentatively classified the portion from Third Dam to its co~fluence with Beaver Cre'ek (near Franklin Basin) as "recreational " -- .. .. " ,I �, Logan City Mayor and Council January 21 , 1999 Page 2 and the portion from the confluence to the Idaho border as "scenic", They are now working through the details of how to integrate these classifications in their Forest Manqgement Plan and determining at what level approval for any forthcoming proposed activities in the area will be made, My personal opinion is that nothing UD,OT is proposing as a part of the current highway project (some improvements and structural replacements between Tony Grove and Franklin Basin) will impact or be impacted by the anticipated river protection, UDOT has 'continued to be very proactive in developing plans that avoid or minimize any impacts to the river or its associated wetland I riparian communities. Their designers and construction engineers have worked very closely with us to develop and adhere to . mitigative measures, and to insure that their contractors do li~llwise, Given their solid commitment in this regard and the preliminary plans which have been developed thus' far, it would seem unlikely that anyone could reasonably argue for changes or a delay as a result of any level of WSR designation on the river. The only aspect for which I have concern is the potential for someone to delay the project by filing some type of protest (frivolous or otherwise) against it on the basis of a violation of tlie interim protection afforded the river under the Wild and Scenic Rivers ' Act. Unfortunately, it appears that the Forest Service does not have any proscribed process for addressing and responding to such a complaint, and thus some delay could occur. There is some 'effort underway at this time to get a handle on this issue, with the goal of having the Forest clarify exactly how and with what time frame they would deal with it should it arise. . Thank you for your confidence, and I hope this helps you somewhat. At your request: I am more than willing to discuss the matter further with regard to this or other aspects of the project. Sincerely yours, ~~\~ Thomas M.. Twedt, PhD Principal �Ten ways dams damage rivers ( I) Dams reduce ri ver levels Dams remove water needed for heaJthy in-stream ecosystems. (2) Dams block rivers Dams prevent the flow of plants and nutrients, impede the migration of fish and other wildlife, and block recreationaJ use. (3) Dams slow rivers Many fish species depend on steady flows to flush them down river early in their life and guide them upstream years later to spawn. Stagnant reservoir pools disorient migrating fish and significantly increase the duration of their migration. (4) Dams alter water temperatures By slowing water flow, most dams increase water temperatures. Other dams decrease temperatures by releasing cooled water from the reservoir bottom. Fish and other species are sensitive to these temperature irregularities, which often destroy native populations. (5) Dams aJler timing of flows By withholding and then releasing water to generate power for peak demand periods, dams cause downstream stretches to aJtemale between low water and powerful surges that erode soil and vegetation. These irregular releases destroy natural seasonal flow variations that trigger naturaJ growth and reproduction cycles in many species. (6) Dams fluctuate reservoir levels Dramatic changes in reservoir water levels degrade shorelines and disturb fisheries, waterfowl, and bottom-dwelling organisms. (7) Dams decrease oxygen levels in reservoir waters Then the oxygen-deprived water is released from behind the dam, it can kill fish downstream. (8) Dams hold back silt, debris, and nutrients By slowing flows. dams aJlow silt to collect on river bottoms and bury fish spawning habitat. Silt trapped above dams accumulates heavy metals and other pollutants. Gravel, logs and other debris are also trapped by dams, eliminating their use downstream as food and habitat. (9) Dam turbines cut up fish Following currents downstream, fish are drawn into and cut up by power turbines. (10) Dams increase predator risk Warm, murky reservoirs often favor predators of naturaJly occurring species. **************************** s, a cheaper and less hannful SOIUli atts of power, that ************************* ** �Over the past 100 years, the United States has led the world in dam building. The US Army Corps of Engineers has catalogued approximately 75 ,000 dams greater than 6 feet along the waterways of the United States. So "on average, we have constructed one dam every day since the signing of the Declaration of Independence." Dams have depleted fisheries, degraded river ecosystems, and diminished recreational opportunities on nearly all of the nation's rivers. Hydropower s hould not be considered as clean power because of the destruction of river ecosystems and its many social impacts. Dam designers often fail to account for the impacts of droughts, meaning that dams often produce less power than promised. When these risks of low river flows are factored into calculations of the costs of electricity it can be seen that hydropower is now an expensive fonn of power generation. Private investors in power projects are largely avoiding dams and prefer to invest in cheaper and less risky gas-fired power plants. There has been a grow ing movement to remove dams where the costs - including environmental, safety, and sociocultural impacts - outweigh the benefits - including hydropower, flood control, irrigation, or recreation. FLOOD CONTROL can often be accomplished more effectively and for less money by restoring wetlands, maintaining riparian buffers , or moving people out of the floodplain. Updating antiquated irrigation systems and replacing inappropriate crops can dramatically reduce the need for dams and reservoirs in the arid West. *** *** *** *** ********* 10 KEY POINTS **** *** ** **** ** ** The Players: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (PERC) Symbiotics, Rigby Idaho Ecosystems Research Instate, Logan Because of the political climate change in our nations capitol, Symbiotics is attempting to take advan tage of the situation to make a quick buck with no thought, or consideration to the devastation they might leave behind. THE MOTION STATES THAT: the application is invalid Symbiotics' admits that the company has no intention of either building or operating the 100 plus projects it has proposed. Further, the company admits that it has no idea at this point who will build and operate the projects. This is directly contrary to the Federal Power Act and the FERC regulation requirement that an applicant be the person who will operate the project. The law is very clear that when an application is fi led by someone who has no intention of actually operating the proposed project, that the application is invalid. the application is incomplete Symbiotics does not comply with FERC's regulations because it does not include any information on the financial aspects of the project. This is further evidence that the applicant is engaged in an uniformed, unplanned, shot gun approach to grab up any potential hydropower sites in the off chance that it might be able to tum a profit by selling the sites off to another business venture capable of actually carrying a project to fruition. Symbiotics fails to disclose the source or amount of financing available as required by PERC regulations and then makes a vague statement that it "expects" financing to come from "private investors and members of the applicant. " �UINTA NATIONAL FOREST DIRECTORY Forest Supervisor's Office 88 West 100 North PO Box 1428 Provo, Utah 8460 I FTS and COMM 80 1-342-5100 FAX 801-342-5144 Heber Ranger District 2460 South Hi ghway 40 PO Box 190 Heber City, Utah 84032 FTS and COMM 80 1-342-5200 FAX 801-654-5772 Pleasant Grove Ranger District 390 North 100 East Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062 FTS and COMM 801-342-5240 FAX 801 -342-5244 Spanish Fork Ranger District 44 West 400 North Spanish Fork, Utah 84660 FTS and COMM 801-342-5260 FAX 80 1-342-5272 �Protest Bear River Dams! Write, Call or Email Your Elected Official! Legislative District #1 Eli H. Anderson 8790 West Hwy 102 Tremonton, UT 84337 435-854-3760 ehanderson@ut.gov Legislative District #5 Brent D. Parker 2953 W. 6900 s. Mt. Sterling, UT 84401 435-245-6275 brentparker@ut.gQv Legislative District #3 Craig Buttars 540 s. 1600 W. Lewiston, UT 84320 435-258-5015 Senate District #24 Peter C. Knudson 1209 Michelle Dr. Brigham City, UT 84302 435-723-6366 cbuttars@ut.gov pknudson@utahsenate.org Legislative District #4 Loraine Pace 435 E. 900 N. Logan, UT 84321 435-753-6154 lorainepace@ut.gQV Senate District #25 Lyle Hillyard 175 E.IOON. Logan, UT 84321 435-753-0043 Ihillyard@utahsenate.org Find Your Representative or Senator: Legislative District #1. Eli H, Anderson Amalga, Benson, Clarkston, Mendon, Newton Legislative District #3. Craig Buttars Northwest Logan, Cornish, Cove, Hyde Park, Lewiston, N . Logan, Richmond, Smithfield, Trenton Legislative District #4. Loraine Pace Logan, part orN. Logan Legislative District #5. Brent D. Parker Southwest Logan, Collcg/Young Ward, Hyrum, Millville, Nibley, Paradise, Providence, River Heights, Wellsville Senate District #24. Peter C. Knudson Cliffside area and south and west zones in Logan, CollegeNoung Ward, Hyrum, Millville, Nibley, Paradise, Providence, River Heights, Wellsville Senate District #25. Lyle Hillyard Logan, Amalga, Benson, Clarkston, Cornish, Cove, Hyde Park, Lewiston, Mendon, Newton, N. Logan, Richmond, Smithfield, Trenton �NOTEWORTHY AVIAN RESOURCES OF THE GREAT SALT LAKE Prepared by Don Paul o~ th~ Utah Di~si6n of Wildlife Resources The following table outlines ·selected avian population and status values attributed to Great Salt Lake habitats. The Great Salt Lake ecosystem is one of the most important wildlife habitats on ihis hemisphere. . . SPECIES WI1~on's Phalarope - POPULATION AND STATUS VALUES • 800,000, Largest staging concentration in the world. 1998 count Red-Necked Phalarope- 280,000 in a single day estimate, Paul 1986 American Avocet- 250,000, many times higher than any other wetland in the Pacific Flyway, Shuford 1994 Black-Stilt- 65,000 many times higher than any other wetland in the Pacific Flyway, Shuford 1994 Marbled Godwit- 30,000, the onlistaging area in the interior USA, Shuford 1994 S~owy 10,000, the world's largest assembJage, representing 55% of the entire breeding population west of .the Rocky Mnts., Paton 1 .992 Plover- Western Sandpiper- 17,000, on.-flock, Paul 1994 Long-Billed Dowitcher- 32,000, single day count, Shuford 1994 White Pelican- 18,000 breeding adults, one of the three largest colonies in western North America, Paul 1994 White-Faced Ibis- 7,500 breeding adillts, worlds largest breeding population, US Fish & Wddlife Service status reporis 1982 California GoU- 160,000 breeding adults, worlds largest breeding population, White 1992 Eared Grebe- • 1.4I)1jJjj!,n--!O£Ond largest staging population in North America, 1998 count Per~grineFalcon- 11 active pairs of this listed endangered species, Paul 1994 Bald Eagle- Over 500 wintering bald eagles associated with GSL, one of top ten winter populations in the lower 48 stat~s, National Wildlife Federation mid-winter bald eagle survey reports Bank Swallow- Over 10,000 in one flock, GSL represents one of the largest . migratory corridors in Western North America, Paton 1994 �- NOTEWORTIIY WATERFOWL RESOURCES · OF THE GREAT SALT LAKE Prepared by Tom A1dricb oftbe Utah Division ofW~dlifeResources < BREEDING MIGRATION SPECIES Tundra Swan ~ 0 60,000 · Ipoqooo Pintail . Gadwall- . 2000 100,000 40,000 Cinnamon Teal - 80,000 40,000 ~. 500,000 <65,000 60,000 15,000 600,000 Rare 50,000 2,000 150,000 · 20,000 50,000 Minor 100,000 10,000. Mallard Ruddy- . Green-winged TealCanada Geese Redhead - Canvasback ~ Shoveller - "Approximately 30 percenl (3,000,000 of 10,000,000) of the ducb of the Pacific and Central Flyways use the Great Salt Lake marshes". Rawley, Wildlife of the Great Salt Lake · . . �Logan City Mayor Members of the Logan City Council Regarding the "Wild & Scenic" designation of the Logan River, find attached one viewpoint regarding the economic implications that can surround a quality fishery. Thanks for your consideration, Tim King Conservation chair Cache Anglers, a Trout Unlimited chapter �& U€,> &Maybe 1've mellowed some in recent years, or maybe I just got tired of the lopsidedness of having infinite patience with fish and almost none with my fellow humans, but I'm beginning to get a somewhat different perspective on crowded trout streams. It turns out there is more than one way to look at this. For one thing, fish eries conservation-as a subheading under conservation in general-is a serious political issue that will only get more important with time . W ith that in mind I can now som etimes look up and down a river and see not so much a crowd as a constituency: a mob of people that any politician would be happy to see at a rally if they supported him , o r terrified to see if they dido't. There are days when I even wish there we re two or three more people on the water, like maybe the go'·emor and a couple of congressm en . Not even the President of the Un ited States is immune to what he ca ll s, with typica l style. "the environmental thing." Exchange the politician fo r an investment banker and anothe r pe rspective kicks in . Call it environmental economics or , if you prefer, econom ic environmentalism. No fly fi sherman has [ 0 be shown studies to know that large amounts of money are spent on the s port-not just on tackle and licenses, but also on food, travel, lodging, guides, beer and so on . Nor dQC!s he have to be told that trout a re an indicator species that need cold , clean , unspoiled water. When m ost of us look at a hog hole on a normal day, we see a fine piece of trout water that's twenty times m ore crowded than it should be , but a sharp investment type sees something else: H e sees a si tuation where a healthy natura l environment is not an im pediment to the development of industry; he sees that in this case a healthy envi ronment is the industry . Yes, I have been hang ing out with with some of these guys lately . A lot of them like to fish. When access is finall y limited on som e of these waters, most fishermen will see it as a shame, but already some businessmen I know are say ing things like, " Wait a minute. You mean you have a product so good you have to tum away customers ?" I cringe at the thought, but if we assume for the moment that wild trout are a product and fishermen are the custome rs, there are some interesting implications. For instance, m aybe the raving radical environmentalist who was running around a decade ago demanding that the envi ronment be saved and citing truth, beauty and poetry as reason s can now come back and say. "My associates and I would like to show you how minimum flows and special regula tions on your stream could bring somewhere between one and three million dollars a year into the local economy." As an earth-hippie you were treated with strained politeness at best, but now, suddenly. they're calling you "Mister" and paying for your lunch, even though your agenda hasn 't changed a bit . r JOIf<.! 6, £/'LIfB' �To put it another way. you can make conservation work by convincing people that preserving this forest or that trout stream is the right thing to do, or you can show them that it's not only right, but lucrative . What we're talking ahout here is a modest local industry, but it 's one that involves no factories , no pollution , no new housing, schools, sewers, water taps, fire trucks, police, etc. Or you can see it as a tourist anraction that doesn't have to turn the town into a carnival and half its citizens into cheap hucksters in coonskin caps. A good trout stream won't bring in the wealth of an oil field, but it will be clean, Quiet, dignified, permanent and profitable enough to make looking into ih~ wa ter rights WO,1:hwhile~ -;;:;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;;======~-:.:..: ::::~====~ - " Will this actually work?" asks o ne 01 the skeptics In the chamber of commerce. "Well," you can say, "look at that quality stretch of the Such-and-such Riv. r. So many people fish it they're trying to figure out how to cut down on the crowds ." At that moment you remember being elbowed out of your fa vo rite run fondl y, because you can say with conviction, "Trust me, if the trout are here, the people will come ." Hell, they won't even have to advertise. You know how hard it is to keep good fi shing a secret . To man y activists, ,hi s kind of thing amounts to swimming with the sharks. 1 suppose it does when you think about it, but it 's still possible that the most environmentally meaningfll l thing you can do right now is teach a h2n:"cr new to fish and' then take him to the jewel in the crown of the state's fisheries on a Saturda~' :afternoon. From an economic standpoint , this kind of thing requires what can seem like some radical thinking. After all, what we're talking about is existing in some kind of long-term harmony with the natur II environment and making a decent living at it. but we're " at talking about getting fabulou sly rich overnight. We're I. ' king at the possibility-or maybe I should say the necessity --of being reasonabl e for a change . Still (believe it or not) there are some bu sinessmen out there who understand th.. : nur old boom-and-bust, exploitthe- resource-a nd-move-.m program is just not going to work anymore. The problem i:., even if you can bring yourself to sanction rape for profit , the re's getting to be a crucial shortage of victims. And I th ink being reasonable should include us fisherm en , too . Unfortunately, some of us have gotten into a kind of junk bond mentality from fishing the hog holes. I 've actuall y talked to guys who won't admit the fishing was "good" unless they were tuna-boati n~ 20-inch trout all day long. But the fact is. many of our be ho.~ holes are tailwater fi sheri es that have been arti fi cially Haled by the effects of bottom draw dam s. Some of them veren't as good when they were wild rive rs. and I know of . t least one that held carp ins tead of trout before the dam we rll in . �On the other hand, a normal, run-of-the-mill, healthy trout s tream that's managed properly with minimum flows and appropriate regulations will likely produce something less spectacular; say, 12- to 14-inch wild, pretty trout with the occasional 16· to IS-inch bomber. Some of us could easily lin with that, and maybe 3 few more of us ought to. If we spread out a little more, we'll not only have more _ ._.__ ..=_ ====:.=I.~OO: --..... , - ___ = -, _ _ _ ~ ~ ..fi.&h..mou-\Q.l\.t.w4~~~! S5t>2 :oM~:C-'~3tlnU hi iiiOf€ 0') to ~ &ee.-w~:!I~also--opreaa..ttr~·wari:n=dOIM,$"""'\illOuild ~_ _ _ -== y businesses in more little towns.• and the local chambers of commerce will begin to make the obvious connection: The better the fishing is, the more money they'll make. It's just conceivable that if we developed all our fisheries to their full potential, the economic benefits would be enough to make it worthwhile. In the end it's a matter of attitude. (Remember that much of life, not to mention some great ideas, depends on nothing more than your point of view.) Crowded hog holes can be seen as proof that the sport is headed for ruin, or they can be used as evidence of just how much a good trout stream is worth in dollars and cents . And if you measure value in mor.e spiritud and aesthetic terms, fine. Just between you and me, that 's what it really comes down to in the end. All the rest of this is just a convenient illusion , but it is convenient. I know this sounds like an oversimplified romantic idea, but then so did catch-and-release fishing a generation ago. I know there is at least a handful of businessmen out there who are beginning to like the economic approach to conservation (or vice versa), and it 's easy to see how this could be used to lever those politicians who are telling us we can have a healthy environment and a healthy economy. Many of those guys made that promise off the tops of their heads because it sounded good. Imagine how relieved they'd be to learn that it could actually happen. . �March 9, 1999 Mayor Douglas Thompson, Members of the Logan City Council 255 North Main Street Logan, Utah 84321 RE: Logan River Wild and Scenic River Designation Proposal Dear Mayor Thompson and Members of the Logan City Counci1: I am writing to provide information relevant to the proposal that the Logan City Council support designation of the Logan River as a wild and scenic River. By way of introduction, I am a natural resource consultant with 25 years of river policy experience. I am a recognized expert in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, having managed wild and scenic river programs for the National Park Service and consulted with both the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management on wild and scenic river issues. I have drafted Federal Wild and Scenic River legislation and was the originator of many of the guidelines currently used by Federal agencies to evaluate wild and scenic river eligibility. t am also a native Utahn (though exiled to Massachusetts for the past 20 years) and was a resident of Cache Valley for several years. I am very familiar with the Logan River: I served as supervisor of recreational guards for the Logan Ranger District and have visited the canyon frequently since then. I provided substantive comments on the Wasatch-Cache National Forest's 1994 and 1999 draft rivers inventories. The Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act is a complex piece of legislation, and there is no end to the misinformation regarding its effects on land use, private property rights, water rights, etc. To aid in your deliberations, I have taken the liberty to address some of the questions that might arise on this subject (please note that, while I favor protection of the Logan River, I have consciously tried to set my opinion aside and to present objective, verifiable information based on my professional knowledge of the Federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and of rivers that have been designated as wild and scenic rivers): What are the general effects of a river being deSignated as a wild and scenic river? The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act has two primary consequences for designated rivers. First, no new dams may be constructed within a designated river segment. Second, no Federal action may be taken that wouJd have a negative effect on the river's natural functioning or on the natural resource values for which it was designated. The term "Federal action" refers to: (a) Federal permits, (b) Federal funding, and (c) Federal lands management. This does not mean that Federal permits and funding are prohibited, only that these must be compatible with the continued conservation of the river. The effect on Forest Service land management is discussed below. What effect would designation of the Logan River as a wild and scenic river have on forest land use? The Forest Service would continue to manage Logan Canyon and the river corridor. Campgrounds and picniC areas along the river would continue to serve public needs and other land uses couJd continue. However, in making management decisions, the Forest Service would have to explicitly consider the effect of its actions on the river and would be prohibited from taking actions that would harm the river or the natural and recreational resource values for which it was designated. (For Logan River, these values include fisheries, scenery, geological and hydrological values, recreation, and, pOSSibly, wildlife.) This means that campground improvements, trails, etc., would need to respect the river's natural processes (this would be required regardless), and grazing permits would need to be monitored to ensure that the natural condition of riparian areas is maintained and water quality is not impaired. Forestry and hunting would not be affected. How would designation affect private property? Most of the lands along the affected portion of Logan River are in Federal ownership. There are a few private parcels and a block of State land. Private property will continue to be subject to the same State and local land use regulations as is now the case (designation only affects Federal actions). The lands that are part of the State/Federal land swap will likewise be subject to State and local land use regulations. While the �Federal government could not dictate how these lands are used, it is reasonable to think that the State might wish to cooperate with the Forest Service in conserving these important riverine areas. Several creative land management strategies could be employed that both meet State needs and protect the river corridor. Note also that research suggests that wild and scenic designation would have a positive effect on private land values. This is because buyers are willing to pay a premium to live near natural areas when there is a guarantee of continued conservation. What effect would this have on tourism? Only a select few rivers are designated as wild and scenic. No Utah river has been designated as such yet. It stands to reason that designation of the Logan River would be perceived as an attraction for visitors considering coming to the area. Research on the subject bears this out, but also suggests that the extent to which tourism is enhanced depends on how actively local interests publicize this. (I am personally aware of rivers where designation has been publicized and others where it purposely has not been publicized. Both strategies have been used to good effect.) I would suspect that, in the case of the Logan River, Cache Valley civic and business interests would be wise to tastefully publicize designation. For example, the State tourist map could be modified to note this, as could Cache Valley tourism brochures. Tourism-related businesses, Utah State University, and others could use the designation to demonstrate their proximity to important scenic resources. From a national perspective, Federal maps showing important natural areas would include the river. Would designation prohibit highway expansion? Wild and scenic designation does not preclude bridge repair, resurfacing, or even roadway relocation. However, as referenced above, Federal permits (Clean Water Act, 404 permits, Forest Service special use permits, etc.) and Federal funds could only be made available if these actions were compatible with continued conservation of the river and its corridor. With regard to the Logan Canyon, decisions regarding whether or not the proposed action would meet the standards of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act would be made by the Forest Service. Based on the information I have on the highway proposal, it is my professional opinion that .designation as a wild and scenic river would not ereclude improvement to the highway. It would, however, r uire that UDOT take special precautions, bot in desi~ and construction to ensure that the road does not and scenic resources are preserved, an at short-term ISru tions a ter ow re 'mes, that 1m or an na "to t e river are mimnuz . ven if this costs a Itt e more, It wou a resuIfin a supenor project at meets ong: term multiple needs. Would designation affect existing downstream uses? Designation would not affect the existing diversion of water to the North Logan Canal (which is govemed by State law), nor would the downstream dams or power plant be affected. Repairs to and management of these dams could continue as in the past. Designation would not affect downstream diversions, land use, etc., as the river flows through Logan and into the lower valley. How would downstream water quality be affected? This is an area often overlooked. Currently, the City of Logan has very little control over upstream Federal actions that could have an adverse impact on wa ter quality. Designation of a river as wild and scenic places significant constraints on upstream actions that would increase sedimentation, water temperature, or pollutants. It also increases opportunity for local input into the Forest Service decision process. I can think of few other actions that would ensure long-term protection of downstream water quality more than designation of an upstream area as a wild and scenic river. In the long run, this may be the most compelling reason for the City to support wild and scenic designation. Can we trust that future management of the river will be in keeping with the concepts outlined above? If the river is designated as a wild and scenic river, a management plan would be prepared that would guide future management. Active involvement in the development of this plan by the City would help to ensure that local interests are represented. Also, it is entirely appropriate for the Federal designating �legislation to contain specific provisions that will guarantee certain agreements. For example, provisions could be included that guarantee that the existing downstream hydro facility would not be affected by designation. Or, it could be directed that the City of Logan have an active role in implementation of certain aspects of the management plan. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information. If you have further questions about the effects of wild and scenic river designation, please feel free to contact me. [f I don't have the answer, I will research it for you or put you in contact w ith others who can help you. You can reach me by phone, fax, or email. In dosing, I wish to emphasize that the Logan River is a very special place. It is the last intact large river system along Utah's population belt. It is also, as was made evident in the recent Forest Service rivers inventory, the most Significant river in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. You are very fortunate to have this special natural resource in your backyard, and it is in Logan's interest to ensure that it continues to be available for the use and enjoyment of future generations. Sincerely, Drew O. Parkin 15 Thingvalla Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 876-6173 (617) 491-3450 Drew _Parkin@msn.com �February 16, 1999 Bernie Weinga rdt, Forest Supervisor Wasatch-Cache Na tional Forest 8236 Federal Building 125 S. State Salt Lake City, UT 84138 Dear Supervisor Weingardt, Thank you for sending us a copy of the draft Wild and Scenic eligibility study for ri vers in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest. We are pleased to see that seve ral rivers in the Logan River drainage have been identified as eligible for desig nation. We appreciate the opportunity to pro vide some co mments on this study. We are especially concerned about the eligible segment of the Logan Ri ve r from Beaver Creek to Third Dam. We would like to discuss two issues: the tentative classifica tion of this river segment, and the w ildlife a long this segment. 1. Classifica ti on of the Logan River from Beaver Creek to Third Da m This segment has been given a preliminary classification of Recreational. We are curi ous why it has received th is rating, as the stud y provides no reason whatsoever. We believe this classification is not correc t for the upper stretch of th is segment. We recommend that this segment be divided fo r the purpose of classification. The segment from Beaver Creek to just below Lower Twin Bridge should be classified as Scenic, while the segment from just below Lower Twin Bridge to Third Dam can be classified as Recreati onal. The segmen t of the Logan from Beave r Creek to just below Lower Twin Bridge sa tisfies the criteria for a Scenic river as outlined in the draft eligibility study, page E-14. The criteria for a Scenic river are: "'Free of impoundmen t. According to the draft eligibility study, there are no "full-scale" impoundments in this segment (page V-57). "'Largely primitive and und eveloped, with no substantial evidence of human activity. Although highway 89 runs along the length of this segment, the ri ver and its banks are largely primiti ve and undeveloped. The study notes that few obse rvers of the river would notice any changes from a purely natural character (VS7). There is excellent riparian vegetation along much of this segment screening the highway from the river and giving the river and its banks a na tural appea rance. From the perspective of the river and its banks there is no substantial evidence o f human activity. *The presence of grazing, hay production or row crops is acceptable. The study does not identi fy any concerns with grazing, hay production or row crops. "'Evidence of past or ongoing timber harvest is acceptable, provided the forest appears natural from the riverbank The study does not identify any concerns here. �"Accessible in places by road . The river is accessible in places by road. "Roads may occasiona lly reach or bridge the river; the existence of short stretches of conspicuous or longer stre tches of inconspicuous road s or rail roa ds is acceptable. Highway 89 runs along the length of this segment, but for most of this distance the road is screened off from the river by the ripa ria n vegetation. Logan Ri ver ripa rian vegeta tion is considered am ong the "best preserved in the state" (U tah Department of Transportati on, FEIS, U.S. High way 89, 1993, page 9-59). Along most of this segment the road is inconspicuous from the river and its banks. People who fish, kaya k, picnic, and walk along the banks enjoy a na tural ri ver environment w ith little or no intrusion o f highwa y sights and so und s. This segment of the Logan satisfies the criteria for a Scenic river. It far exceeds the stand ard s for a Recreationa l river, which allows low dams, river diversions, development, and "substanti al evidence of human activity" (E-lS). This segment should therefore be classified as Scenic. The segment from just below Lower Twin Bridge to Third Dam contains an impoundm ent, the inunda ted area above Third Dam . Also, the highway is quite close to the river, with little screening. This segment can be class ified as Recreationa L We are pleased to note that, according to the d raft eligibility study, the Logan Ri ver from Beaver Creek to Third Dam has five outstandingly rema rkable va lues, scene ry, the fishery, ecology, geology and recrea tion. The study shows tha t this segment has more outstandingly re ma rkable va lues than any other river in the forest. This provides an argument for a Scenic classifica tion. The Logan fro m Beaver Creek to just below Lower Twin Bridge should be classified as Scenic in ord er to better p rotect its fi ve outsta nd ingly remarkable values. A Scenic classificati on woul d be an effective management too L It is not consistent with the construction of dams and dive rsions, and with the development of the ri ver area for residential or agricultural use. The re may be "no substanti al evidence of hum an activity." This man agement prescripti on would help protect especially the scenery, fishery, and ecology of this river segment. A classificati on of Recreational, on the other hand, might be interpreted as allowing d evelop ment ha rmful to these values. . Wildlife conce rns As we sta ted in our letter of October 20, 1998, we believe tha t the comparison region used in this study for eva lua ting wildlife is too la rge. It stretches north to include Yellowstone and the Bighorn Moun tains, east to include the Colorado Rocky Mounta ins, and south to almost Albuquerq ue. Rivers in the Wasa tch-Cache a re compa red to ri vers in Yellows tone National Park, Grand Teton Na tiona l Pa rk, and Rocky Mountain Na tiona l Pa rk for di versi ty and un iq ueness of species a nd hab itats. It's an unfa ir compa rison. The Wasatch-Ca ch e is not managed for "big and showy" species such as bison, wolves, and grizzly bea rs. The Wild and Scenic Rive r Review in the State of Utah, Process and Criteria for Interagency Use, 1996, states "Compa rative regions should not be so large as to unreasonabl y limit outstandingly remarkable rive rs to only those few that stand out as the very best in the nation." We believe the comparison region fo r wild life in this stud y is inconsistent with this policy. Furthermore, we are concerned that the discussions of w ildlife in the draft eligibility stud y a re incomple te and possibly incorrect. The segment of the Logan from Beaver Creek to Third Darn is about 20 miles long, yet the only wildlife species mentioned in the discussion of this �segment is the western big-eared bat. This d iscussion seems incomplete. There is no men tion of other important wi ldlife species known to occur in Logan Canyon, for example, the boreal owl, flammulated owl, goshawk, and the three- toed woodpecker (Biological Assessment / Evaluation, 1995, Record of Decision, U.s, Highway 89, Logan Canyon, Wasa tch-Cache National Forest), The wolverine has a medium probability of occurrence in Logan Canyon. These are all Forest Service sensitive species. For these species, population and/or habitat viabili ty is of concern. By the wildlife standard reported on page E9 of the study, these species should be included in the discussion o f w ildlife in this segment. The stud y also does not mention moose and mule deer, yet these species a re frequently seen along the Logan Ri ver. Elk are also sighted along the river. For the upper tributaries of the Logan, including Beaver Creek, the study reports the presence of moose, elk and deer. It also reports the presence of the flammulated owl. It reports the presence of suitable habitat for the borea l owl, goshawk, wolverine and three-toed wood pecker, but states that "none of these sensitive species are known to occur" along these tributaries. However, the Wasatch-Cache in its ]995 Biological Assessment / Evaluation reports the presence of these species in Logan Canyon. We recommend tha t the discussions of wildlife in the Logan River drainage be rewritten to be more complete. They should reflect information in the 1995 Biological Assessment/ Evaluation. Also, the study should also adopt a more reasonable region of com parison for w ildlife. We believe the segmen t of the Logan from Beaver Creek to Third Dam is outstandingly remarkab le for wildlife based upon the presence of moose, mule deer, elk, and at least fou r sensitive wildlife species including the western big-eared bat. The upper tributaries are outstandingly remarkable for wild life based upon the presence of moose, mule deer, elk, and at least four sensiti ve species including the flammulated owl. Thank you for considering these comments. Since rely, Dan Miller, President Logan Ca nyon Coalition cc: Gordon Steinhoff, Board Chair Tom Scott, U.s. Forest Service Drew Parkin, Consultant in Ri ver Resource Management, Planning and Policy � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3329 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2602 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/365">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/365</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2445154653 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence/reports related to the Wild and Scenic River designation for the Logan River Description An account of the resource Wild and scenic rivers act, reprints of articles printed in "Canyon Wind" Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Government agencies Environmental policy United States Highway 89 Logan River (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 9 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd9 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/c820729cd20e24154407dab2a040c450.pdf f0da73e259e64a0cc0dd405108bdc581 PDF Text Text • RECORD OF DECISION US Highway 89 Right Fork in Logan Canyon to Garden City Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Cache and Rich Counties, Utah A. DECISION The Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) concurs with the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) in its selection of the Preferred Alternative as modified in this Record of Decision (ROD) for improvements to US Highway 89 (US-89) between Right Fork, milepost (mp) 383.47, and State Road 30, mp 411.75 , in Garden City . The modified Preferred Alrernative is described in Section B below. The modified Preferred Alternative is as presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) with the following modifications made as a result of input received on the FEIS and subsequent meetings and field reviews in order to further minimize harm to wetland/riparian habitat, visual resources and Section 4(0 resources : • The Lower Middle Canyon section has been extended 500 reet to mp 387.57 to better fit the surrounding terrain. The roadway begins to move further away from the river at this location. • Conso lidation of parking for Section 4(f) Site 6 , Ricks Spring, has been e liminated. This eliminates the left turn lane and retaining wall adjacent to the river. A shorter retaining wall set back from the river may still be required just south of the site. • Section 4(f) Site 13 , Winter Access Parking, will be reestablished at a lower elevation so that • Relocation of the Limber Pine Trailhead has been eliminated . • The detour at Burnt Bridge has been eliminated and widening will occur on the upstream side. This reduces the impact on riparian habitat. • For the first eight miles of the Upper Canyon (from mp 391.6 to Beaver Mountain road intersection), the previously proposed roadway width of 40 feet has been reduced to 34 feet. This reduces the impact on wetland and riparian areas , For areas with passing lanes through this eight miles, the previously proposed roadway width of 47 feet has been reduced to 44 feet. • • • The left turn lane at Temple Fork has been eliminated. Minimum roadway improvements at this site include a 34' section on US·89 and an improved vertical grade approach of Temple Fork road. Other improvements , such as an uphill right turn lane and an improved horiwntal angle of approach of Temple Fork Road , are secondary improvements which will only be constructed if they do not impact the river or require a substantial retaining wall . access can be maintained. US·89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Page 1 Section A: Decision �The above modifications are within the scope of the FE IS and their implementation will reduce the impacts from that presented in the FEIS . Therefore , the modifications are not of a nature that would require a Supplemental EIS . • I The purpose of and need for this project is to improve safety and the traffic carrying capacity of US89 from Right Fork in Logan Canyon to State Road 30 in Garden City. Safety will be improved by correcting existing substandard geometries , unsafe conditions. and deteriorated structures. The capacity of the highway will be increased to meet existing and projected traffic demands for a 20year planning horizon . Due to funding restraints , this project will be implemented through the development of several smaller projects. The first includes the urgent bridge upgrading and replacements. Other improvements in the canyon that will be implemented as runding becomes available. The selection of the modified Preferred Alternative was based on substantial input received by various federal and state agencies, local governments and the public , evaluation of technical repons , the Environmental Impact Statement, and further analysis and coordination made during development of this ROD . The sensitivity of the environment played an important role in the development of the modified Preferred Alternative. Numerous compromises to current highway standards (as recommended by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO) were incorporated because impacts on the aquatic , wetland , riparian and visual environment would have been too great, and in some cases constructability was cost-prohibitive. Other actions taken into consideration in making this decision includes the recent nomination of US89 through Logan Canyon for inclusion on the National Highway System. This would change the classification of the highway from a minor arterial to a principal arterial. Though Congressional approval is pending , consideration has been given to how this would affect the decision being made for this project. Since the roadway already serves as a US Hiehway and Was desienated as s uch in accordance with previous luis.ation. the determination has been made that this action would not chanee the use or the hiehway. In this regard, the decision is made that if US-89 through Logan Canyon is included in the National Highway System, this designation will not affect the selection, or subsequent design, of the modified Preferred Alternative identified in this ROD. e • US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Page 2 Section A: Decision �• B. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Eight project alternatives , ranging from preserving the existing roadway to a standard AASHTO design , were considered in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). These include: • • • • • • • • • Standard Arterial Alternative Rich County North Alignment Alternative Rich County South Alignment Alternative Modified Standard Alternative Composite Alternative Spot Improvements Alternative Conservationists' Alternative No Action Alternative Alternate corridors were evaluated and included redesignation of Idaho State Highway 36 from Preston to Ovid , Idaho , and construction of a new highway through Blacksmith Fork Canyon. Because the distance between Logan and Wasatch Front communities and the Bear Lake area is shorter thrQugh Logan Canyon than through these other routes , most traffic would still tend to use US-89. The need to correct existing safety hazards/deficiencies , replace deteriorated bridges and pavement, and increase traffic carrying capacity would still be necessary . Environmental impacts and construction costs to improve the existing highway would be considerably less than for a new route . Furthermore, traffic volume on such a route would not justify a new road . Therefore, alternate corridors were not advanced into the EIS . The FEIS presented four project alternatives . These include: • • • • Preferred Alternative No Action Alternative Standard Arterial Alternative Conservationists' Alternative The Preferred Alternative as modified in this ROD is the environmentally preferred alternative that causes the least damage to the biological and physical environment while meeting the purpose and need . The modified Preferred Alternative was se lected because it offered the best balance berween the transportation needs of the corridor with the sensitive environmental restraints of the canyon. The other alternatives do not achieve this balance: The Standard Arterial Alternative is not sensitive to the environment; and , the Conservationists' and No Action Alternatives do not meet the purpose and need for the project. The Preferred Alternative, as modified, is supponed by federal and state agencies , and alllocaJ government entities. The Preferred Alternative, as presented in the FEIS , met opposition from much of the public. Several meetings and fie ld reviews with key individuals during development of this ROD has led to resolving many of the concerns and reaching a consensus on the modifications made . • The following is a detailed description of the four alternatives carried into the FEIS. The modifications to the Preferred Alternative identified in Section A, above, have been included in its US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October (3, 1994) Considered Page 3 Section B: Alternatives �• description : Prererred Alternative (As Modified) The modified Preferred Alternative was developed to balance the transportation needs of the corridor with the impacts to the canyo n environment. The critical environmental restraints dictated that numerous compromises to AASHTO Design Standards were necessary . These compromises allowed environmental impacts to be minimized while controlling construction costs. Middle Canyon Due to the potential for impact to the threatened species, the Maguire Primrose and other substantial impacts on aquatic , wetland/riparian, and visual environment, the modified Preferred Alternative throughout this section proposes a substantial relaxation bf AASHTO Design Standards (which recommends a 4O-foot width throughout , plus several pasSing lanes) . Beginning at Right Fork (mp 383.47), the first four miles (lower Middle Canyon section) will maintain the existing roadway width of 26 feet. Present design speed and posted speed wi ll remain unchanged . Burnt Bridge (mp 385 .5) will be rep laced with a new structure 34-foot wide to allow for pedestrian use . Burnt Bridge will be constructed in stages, with widening occurring on the upstream side. The detour presented in the FEIS has been eliminated. The roadway wi ll be e levated at mp 386.2 (Logan Cave) and at mp 386.6 to eliminate a flooding potential, and a parking area will be constructed for Logan Cave visitors at mp 386.3. Curb and/or gutter through this section will be considered during design to help define the roadway and control debris rolling onto the highway . Curve 5 at mp 384.and curve 29 at mp 387 will be flattened if a 3-year accident analysis , at the time of construction, shows a concentration of accidents at either location in excess of the expected accident rate . In the year 2010, a Level of Service (LOS) "DIE" would be expected for this four mile section . In the remainder of the Middle Canyon section (from mp 387.57 to mp 391.6) the canyon begins to open up but is still somewhat restrictive. The roadway will be widened to a 34-foot width (two 12foot wide travel lanes and two 5-foot wide shoulders) through this section. Design and posted speeds will be 35 miles per hour (mph) . The 34 foot roadway width will serve as a transition between the 26 and 40 root roadway sections. Lower and Upper Twin Bridges (mp 387 .7 and 388.76, respectively) will be replaced with 38-foot wide structures on new alignment and the structure at Ricks Spring (mp 389.8) will be replaced on the same alignment. The previously proposed consolidation of parking for Section 4(f) Site 6, Ricks Spring, has been eliminated . Intersection improvements at Temple Fork (mp 389.2) include the 34' section on US-89 and an improved vertical grade approach of Temple Fork road . Other improvements , such as an uphill right turn lane and an improved horizontal angle of approach at Temple Fork Road are secondary improvements which will only be constructed if they do not impact the river or require a substantial retaining wall . The left turning lane previously proposed at Temple Fork has been eliminated. Six curves will be flattened through the Upper Middle Canyon. These include curve #33, 37, 39, 40, 43 , and 45. The roadway wi ll be raised about 2 feet from mp 390.2 to mp 391.1 to eliminate a flooding potential. In the year 2010, a LOS "0" would be expected for this section. US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of Oclober 13, 1994) Considered Page 4 Seclion B: AJlemalives e • �• Upper Canyon The Upper Canyon begins at mp 391.6 and continues to the Bear Lake Summit. The first eight miles of this section begins at the cattleguard at mp 391.6 and ends at SR-243 (Beaver Mountain Road Intersection) . The previously proposed roadway width of 40 feet through this first eight miles has been reduced to 34 feel as a result of input received on the FEIS . This 34-foot width provides for two 12-foot wide travel lanes and two 5-fool wide shoulders}. Passing/climbing lanes will be provided from mp 391.6 to mp 393.3 and from mp 394.9 to mp 396.5. Where passing lanes are provided , the previously proposed roadway width of 47 feet has been reduced to 44 feet (two 12-fool wide travel lanes, one 12-foot wide passing lane, one 5-foot shoulder and one 3-foot shoulder on the • passing lane side). Intersection improvements will be made at Tony Grove (mp 393.7), Red Banks Campground (mp 394.5), and Franklin Basin Road (mp 397.01) . Bridges wi ll be replaced on original alignment. Red Banks Bridge will be 38 feet wide unless tapers for the turn lanes into the campground run onto the bridge. The first Beaver Creek: Structure at Franklin Basin Road (mp 396.9) will be at least 52 feet wide to accommodate the Franklin Basin Intersection, and the Beaver Creek Structure at mp 397.5 will be 38 feet wide. Intersection improvements will be made at Beaver Mountain Road (mp 399.75) . The culvert that serves the Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and surrounding drainage areas will be widened to accommodate the widened transitions for the Beaver Mountain intersection. A width of 22 feet from the shoulder line to headwall on each side is required to avoid the need for guardrail protection. The total width would be at least 68 feet unless guardrail protection is selected during the design phase. Retaining wall s will be constructed between Beaver Creek and the roadway at mp 398.1 , mp 398.3, mp 398.6, and mp 398.9 to reduce impacts on the creek and adjacent wetlands . "Lay_downK type fencing will be provided in open range areas from about mp 391.6 to mp 397.2 along both sides of the roadway . Beyond the first eight miles, from the intersection with SR-243 (mp 399.75) and continuing to the Bear Lake Summit, the roadway will be widened to 40 feet (two 12-foot wide travel lanes and two 8-foot wide shoulders) . Passing/climbing lanes will be provided from mp 399.8 to mp 403 .0 , and from mp 404.6 continuing throughout the next section and ending at mp 410.6 . Where these passing/climbing lanes are provided, a 47-foot width (two 12-foot wide travel lanes, one 12-foot wide passing lane , one 8-foot shoulder, and one 3 foot shoulder on the passing lane side) will be required . Intersection improvements will be made at UDOT Maintenance Station (mp 402.38), and Forest Service Access Road (mp 404.75). The Winter Access Parking at mp 402. 1 will be re-established at a lower elevation so access can be provided. The design speed will be 50 mph throughout the Upper Canyon. Curves 69 , 70, 71, 76, and 80 will be flattened . In the year 2010, a LOS "C/O" would be expected throughout the Upper Canyon. Rich County Section • From the Bear Lake Summit to Bridgerland Subdivision (mp 404.75 to mp 409.4) the highway will be widened to 47 feet in order to accommodate a passing lane. (This would allow two 12-foot wide travel lanes, a 12-foot wide passing lane , one 8-fool shoulder, and one 3-foot shoulder on the passing lane side). The design speed will be 40 mph . On the Limberpine trailhead side, improvements will be restricted to be within 23 feet of the edge of the existing roadway. A delineation between the rOadway and parking area will be provided wilhin this 23 foot strip. The previously proposed US-89 Through Loaan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Considered Page 5 Section B: Alternatives �relocation of the trailhead and parking area has been dropped. Curves 85 , 88, 89, 92 , 94, 95 , 98, 101, and 102 will be flattened and curves 103, 104. and 105 will be flattened into a single curve , dependent upon relocation of alignment from Curve 105 to Curve 109. e From Bridgerland Subdivision to Garden City the highway width will be 40 feet (47 feet in passing lane areas), and the design speed will be 50 mph. Curves 109- 112, and 116 will be flattened, and access at mp 410.6 will be relocated. The climbing lane from the previous section will end at mp 410.6. In the year 2010, a LOS "0 " would be expected for the entire Rich County section. Intersection improvements will be made at the Sunrise Campground (mp 405 ,5) whi ch will also provjde access for the Bear Lake View Area, The intersection with SR-30 will be redesjgned with left and right-turn lanes. cyrb. gutter and sidewalk on US-89 and SR-3Q in the vicinity of this intersection. Intersection improvements will also be made at the access to the Brjdgerlaod Subdivjsion Cmp 409.4), A new intersection providing access to the BridgerJaod Subdivision will be constructed . This access will provide safer ingress and egress to the subdjvision. Intersection improvements to other existing and proposed subdivision accesses will be considered based on use requirements, roadway widening possibilities. and other engineering factors, No Action Alternative This alternative does not include any action to alter the width or location of the existing highway , although considerable construction activity would be necessary to conduct normal road maintenance, Such construction would include pavement replacement, replacement of structural elements on bridges and eventual bridge replacement , and improved signage, The existing roadway width of 26 feet would be maintained . In the year 2010, a LOS "DIE" would be expected for the Middle Canyon, LOS ~ D ~ for the Upper Canyon, and LOS "E" for the Rich County section, • This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because it does not meet the purpose and need of the project, Traffic carrying capacity would not be increased to meet the projected traffic volume, Safety hazards and inadequate opportunities for passing slow moving vehicles would not be corrected. This alternative is opposed by local governments and most of the public, Standard Arterial Alternative This alternative would maximize traffic capacity and safety by widening and improving the existing alignment of the highway to current AASHTO standards for a minor anerial road. The roadway wou ld include two 12-foot wide lanes and two 8-foot wide shoulders for a paved width of 40 feet. A third 12-foot wide climbing lane would be constructed along approximately 7,7 miles of the route . The shoulder width would be reduced to 3 feet on the climbing lane side, resulting in a paved width of 47 feet. Recovery areas , sloping gradually from the roadway to the natural grade, would result in a typical improved area of 66-98 feet. Bridges and drainage structures would be replaced , several on new alignments to straighten existing curves. Intersection improvements would also occur. This alternative would provide the best Level of Service. In the year 2010, a LOS "0" wou ld be expected for the Middle Canyon, LOS "C/O" for the Upper Canyon, and LOS "D" for the Rich County section. US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994) Considered Page 6 Section B: Alternatives • �• This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because of the potential impact to the threatened Maguire primrose , substantial impacts to aquatic , riparian , and visual environments, and cost. This alternative would also impact the most Section 4(f) resources. This alternative is opposed by several government agencies and much of the public. Conservationists' Alternative The Conservationists' Alternative provides for improvements at various locations where there would be minimal environmental impacts. This alternative includes improved signing, bridge replacement, slow vehicle turnouts, some climbing lanes, and provides for paving and winter snow plowing of several parking areas. The existing roadway width of 26 feet would be maintained and the pavement would be replaced. Where climbing lanes are provided, the roadway width would be 43 feet. New bridges would be constructed to a 28-foot width, with Lower and Upper Twin Bridges being rep laced on new alignment. Tony Grove Intersection would be improved. Travelers would be advised of safety deficiencies by increasing the number of signs at selected locations. • • This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because it does not meet the purpose and need or the project. This alternative rails to adequately address safety and capacity needs . It would be an incremental improvement over the No Action Alternative by providing limited roadway improvements at selected locations. However, this alternative would fail to increase traffic-carrying capacity to meet projected traffic volumes , and would not eliminate many safety hazards. Bridges proposed to be 28 feet wide would be below AASHTO standards , causing continued hazardous conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians as well as vehicles. Only one intersection would be improved, resulting in unresolved safety concerns at several intersections such as Temple Fork, Red Banks Campground, and others. Additional signs to advise of substandard curves and other safety deficiencies is not adequate to provide long-term benefits as traffic volumes increase and would represent a constant liability situation. Only three climbing lanes , each approximately a half-mile long, would be provided. Climbing lanes would not be provided in the Rich County Section of the road. In the year 2010, a LOS "DIE" would be expected for the Middle Canyon, LOS "0" for the Upper Canyon , and LOS ME" for the Rich County section. This alternative is opposed by local governments, but had strong support from much of the public. US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Considered Page 7 Section B: AJtematives �C. SECTION 4(F) Section 4(f) applies to publicly owned land of a public park, recreation area, wi ldl ife/waterfowl refuge, or land of a historic site of National , State, or local significance as determined by the officials having jurisdiction over the park, recreation area, refuge or site. The Forest Service has determined that 15 recreation areas qualify as Section 4(f) resources within the project area. In addition, the State Historic Preservation Office has identified two historic sites. These 17 Section 4(f) resources are described in the Section 4(f) Statement (included in the FEIS). Constructive use of a Section 4(0 resource results when there is a substantial impairment caused by secondary impacts. There w ill be no substantial impairment caused by secondary impacts , therefore, constructive use of Section 4(0 resources will not occur. Changes to the Section 4(t) Evaluation , as a result of comments received on the FEIS, are addressed be low. The modified Preferred Alternative will impact three Section 4(t) resources. Alternatives considered to avoid Section 4(f) resources include: the No Action Alternative , which does not impact any Section 4(f) resource ; and the Conservationists' Alternative, which impacts one Section 4(f) resource . The Standard Arterial Alternative has a greater impact to Section 4(f) resources, impacting eight sites. These alternatives are described in the FEIS and in Section B, above. In addition to these alternatives, a site specific minor alignment adjustment was considered for avoiding each site. This minor alignment adjustment was presented in the Section 4(f) Statement and is summarized below for each impacted site. Revised Table 6-4 Swnmary of Section 4(f) Properties Used for Each Alternative • Alternative S ite Features Prererred No Action Soandard Arterial Conservationists' (Modified) No. I Fisherman's Access Parking at Righi Fork No No y" No 2 Woodcamp Campground No No y" No 4 Parking for Logan Cave No No y" No 6 Ricks Spring and Parking y" No y" No 7 Dispersed Recreation Parking No No y" No 12 Winter Access Parking Area at Beaver Mountain y" No y" y" 13 Winter Access Parking y" No y", No '15 Limber Pine Trailhead No No No No 3 0 8 I Total Section 4(0 Resources Used @ Alternative US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October lJ , 1994) 4(0 Page 8 Section C: Section • �• *The boundaries of this site have been corrected, because of this it will not be used by any alternative. The No Action , Conservationjsts', and Standard Arterial Alternatives are not feasible and prudent alternatives for reasons stated in Section B above . The site specific minor alignment adjustments are not feasible and prudent alternatives for reasons stated below under each impacted site. A combination of alternatives is not feasible and prudent because it would result in an inconsistent roadway, with unacceptable safety hazards and a reduced Level of Service. Based upon the above considerations , there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of Section 4(f) properties by the modified Preferred Alternative. The modified Preferred Alternative includes aJl possible planning to minimize harm . The basis for the above conclusions is explained below for each site. The three sites impacted by the modified Preferred Alternative include: Site 6 - Ricks Spring and Parking; Site 12 - Winter Access Parking Area at Beaver Mountain Road ; and Site 13 - Winter Access Parking. Each of these sites is used for parking. This use will continue after implementation of the modified Preferred Alternative. Since these sites are on USFS lands and managed by that agency , improvements will be completed consistent with USFS recommendations . Ricks Spring and Parking - Site 6 (mp 389.9) • In the FEISt the Preferred Alternative proposed that parking at this site be consolidated on one side to eliminate pedestrians crossing the roadway . This consolidation was dropped from the Preferred Alternative after a field review with the USFS on August 18. 1993 . At that time, it was determined that even if all parking was placed on one side, people would still park on both sides, and the remaining parking would not allow easy use of the site by recreational vehicles. In addition, the left turn lane to allow north-bound traffic access would require a retaining wall be placed adjacent to the river . A five foot strip on both sides of this site is required adjacent to the roadway to provide for the shoulder. Though the size of the site will be reduced , the modified Preferred Alternative would not reduce the amount of parking ability at this site. The use of this Section 4(0 property has been coordinated with and is supported by the USFS because the modified Preferred Alternative improves safety at this site as much as possible without requiring the retaining wall adjacent to the river. A shorter retaining wall, set back from the river's edge , may still be required just downstream from the site. Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action and Conservationists' Alternative which do not address the safety concerns and are not feasible and prudent for reasons previously stated. Since the site is adjacent to Ricks Springs on one side and the Logan River on the other, there are no minor alignment adjustments that would avoid this site without direct impacts on Ricks Spring or the Logan River. • Measures to minimize harm at this site include consideration of pedestrian safety during design . The passing ability at this location will be eliminated and signing will be provided to warn motorists of pedestrian use at the Spring. Visibility at this location will be improved because of the 5-foot shoulders and replacement of the existing narrow bridge. Curbing of this site will also be considered US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) 4(Q Page 9 Section C: Section �• during design to better identify parking limits. Winter Access Parking at Beaver Mountain Road· Site 12 (mp 399.8) A 20 foot strip is required from this site to accommodate improvements to the intersection of US-89 and Beaver Mountain Road (SR-243). The parking area will be expanded to the northeast so that there will be no loss of parking. The use of this Section 4(f) property has been coordinated with and is supported by the USFS because this alternative will improve vehicle safety at the intersection of US-89 and Beaver Mountain Road, which accesses Beaver Mountain Ski Area. Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action Alternative and a minor alignment adjustment. The Conservationists' and Standard Arterial Alternatives would also impact this site. The No Action Alternative would not provide intersection improvements and is not a feasible or prudent alternative for other reasons stated in Section B. The minor alignment adjustment requires that the road be widened only on the south side of the existing US-89. This adjustment was not se lected because it would require a an approximate to-foot fill and impact the natural drainage for the Amazon Hollow area , Measures to minimize harm include extending the remaining parking area to include at least as much parking as presently ex ists and paving the entire parking area to enhance use. Winter Access Parking - Site 13 (mp 402.1) This site is adjacent to a curve proposed to have the vertical and horizontal alignment improved . There is a difference in elevation of about 12 feet which would eliminate access to this site. However , this site will be reestablished at a lower elevation so that access can be maintained and the site will continue to provide at least as much parking as currently exists. The use of this Section 4(f) property has been coordinated with and is supported by the USFS because the modified Preferred Alternative corrects the deficiencies of the adjacent curve. e Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action and Conservationists' Alternative and a minor alignment adjustment. The Standard Arterial Alternative would also impact this site. The No Action and Conservationists' Alternatives would not improve the vertical and horizontal alignment of this curve and are not a feasible or prudent alternative for other reasons stated in Section B. The minor alignment adjustment would require that the road be moved further away from the site so that access at the current elevation could be maintained. This would require additional cutting into the hillside and was not selected because it would further impact visual resources to a greater extent. Measures to minimize harm include reestablishing the parking site at a lower elevation so that access will be maintained . The site sits on a mound and lowering the elevation will result in approximately 1000 cubic yds of excess material and a small amount of upland vegetation will be eliminated by reestablishing this site. Limber Pine Trailhead - Site IS (mp 404.81) US-89 Througb Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994) 4(1) Page 10 Section C: Section • �• The FEIS Slated that the Preferred Alternative would impact this site. Because of a correction lO the boundaries of this site, the modified Preferred Alternative will not impact this site. The FEIS shows the parking area at this site to be 60 X 300 feet and adjacent to the roadway . It also states that a 24foot strip would be required for the modified Preferred and Standard Arterial Alternatives. During the August 18, 1993 field review held with the USFS , an approximate 23-foot strip prior to the parking area was identified. This 23 feet consists of a 15 foot shoulder and an 8 foot curbed/vegetated median. The parking area was measured to be approximately 75 X 200 feet (see revised map in the Appendix). The USFS stated that the boundary for the Section 4(0 resource includes only the 75 X 200 foot area beyond the median . However, delineation of the parking area from the roadway would need to be maintained in order to avoid impacts to this site. All improvements on the trailhead side will be accomplished within 23 feet of the edge of the roadway , and a delineation will be provided within this 23-foot area in accordance with USFS recommendations. Relocation of the trailhead and parking has been dropped from the Preferred Alternative. The same would apply for the Standard Arterial Alternative. Therefore, there would be no impact to Site 15 by any of the alternatives . • • US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) 4(1) Page 11 Section C: Section �D. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM Throughout development of the Preferred Alternative, and subsequent modifications , consideration has been given to avoiding and minimizing harm to sensitive resources . Protection of the river and surrounding wetland /riparian edge, avoidance of a threatened species , avoidance and minimizing harm to wetland/ riparian habitat, visual , and section 4(f) resources of the canyon played an important role in its development and selection. As a result, minimal construction will occur in the ecologically sensitive Middle Section of the canyon , bridges will c1ear·span the river . retaining walls will be used to limit encroachment into sensitive areas. and treatment of clearzones will be mod ified from AASHTO recommendations. Since the FEIS , the Preferred Alternative has been modified (see Section A of this ROD) to further reduce these impacts. All practicable measures to avoid impacts and minimize environmental harm have been incorporated into the decis ion made in this ROD based on the conceptual level of design utilized in the [IS process . Emphasis will continue to be made throughout detailed design and construction to further avoid impacts and minimize harm to environmental resources. Horizontal and vertical alignments will be manipulated to provide a M best fit M design . Interested government agencies , local governments , the environmental community and the community at large will continue to be involved as part of a Cooperating Advisory Team (CAT) . This team will participate in the development or all &Soecls of desien and in the resolution of unforeseen environmental problems that arise durine construction and post construction. This team will be developed as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the FHW A, UDOT and the USFS . Details regarding the fonnation and operation of this team can be found in the MOU (see Appendix) and is summarized in Section E of this ROD. In addition to the measures taken to avoid impacts and minimize harm, opportunities ror enhancement will be considered, as appropriate. Application ror runding or enhancement projects would be made as provided for in the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (JSTEA). • • Clearzone Considerations Impacts will be minimized by the treatment of c1earzones. Clearzones will be handled by relaxing AASHTO Standards (which recommends removal of hazards within the clearzone area, or protection of those that cannot be removed). The design of clearzones will focus on preservation of aesthetic and ecological features to the extent possible while considering safety. Safety hazards within the c1earzone area will be considered for protection, removal , or no action. The prime directive will be to minimize impacts to wetlands and riparian habitat adjacent to the roadway without jeopardizing safety. Considerable emphasis will be given to protection or no action, and removal of hazards caused by natural conditions will be kept to a minimum . The clearzone area begins at the outside edge of the traffic lane and is 18 feet wide at 25, 35, or 40 mph and 22 feet wide at 50 mph . However, the intent is not to clear a swath 18-22 feet wide adjacent to the travel lane . No clearzone area will be provided in the first four miles or the middle canyon, however, substantial hazards within this area will be considered for protection. US-89 Througb Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Page 12 HanD Section D: Measures to Minimize • �e Design Considerations Through the various meetings and fi eld rev iews held during development of mis ROD , a limited number of site specific areas were identified where design considerations were of panicular interest. The following list is not intended to be all inclus ive, but representative of considerations which will be made during design . Aesthetic impacts at many of these locations was also of concern. These impacts will be minimized in accordance with the revegetation plan. This plan will include the use of native plant species; slope rounding and warping of land form impacts; aging rock faces which contrast with older cuts; removing abandoned roadways and restoring them to blend with surrounding contours. • • • Curves 5 & 29 - Accident studies will be handled by reviewing the current three year accident period at time of construction. The number, type, cause and severity of accidents will be reviewed to determine if correction of geometric deficiencies could alleviate accidents. The UDOT Dynamic Quicklisting and officer's individual accident reports will be the source of this information. Aesthetic impacts will be reduced by manipulating the horizontal andlor vertical alignment, and by moving away fro m the river . LoWer Twin Bridge - The total width of cut will be based on the roadway width requirement combined with the angle of repose of the existing material. • Dugway - Widening at this location will be on the cut side to avoid disturbance of the downhill slope. Only the minimum cut required for necessary widening will be constructed . The width of additional cut will be a maximum of 8 feet. • Upper Twin Bridge - The alignment shift will be based on the minimum amount necessary to allow a new bridge to be constructed while allowing traffic to utilize the existing structure . One or two way traffic control configurations for construction will be considered . • Temple Fork - Minimum roadway improvements at this site include a 34' section on US-89 and an improved vertical grade approach of Temple Fork road . Other improvements such as an uphill right tum lane and an improved horizontal angle of approach of Temple Fork road are secondary improvements which will not be constructed if they impact the river or require a substantial retaining wall. Environmental impacts and construction costs will be weighed against the benefits gained. • Passing Lanes in Lower Upper Canyon of Section 2 - The location of passing lanes in the first eight mi les of the Upper Canyon will be evaluated further during detailed design to assess additional measures to avoid or minimize harm to wetlands. The evaluation will address leaving the lanes in the location described herein , or combining and relocating into a single section. Passing lane(s) in this section are a necessary safety improvement and the decision will be based upon minimizing the impact to the environment (L e .• wetlands, visual) relative to the safety benefit of this improvement. Emphasis will be to shift the alignment away from the river. US-89 1brougb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Hann Page 13 Section D: Measures to Minimize �• Beaver Creek, Franklin Basin Bridge - Horizontal and vertical alignments will be modified to obtain a H best fit alignment relative to the sensitive environmental features . The reduction in the proposed roadway width to 34' also minimizes riparian impacts. Retaining walls andlor guardrail sections are anticipated and will be utilized to reduce or avoid impact to sensitive areas. Specific locations for these treatments will be identified in the detailed H • roadway design process. • Culvert at Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and Surrounding Drainage Area - The impact to wetlands at the Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and surrounding drainage area as a result of roadway widening for the Beaver Mountain turning Janes will be further evaluated during detailed design. This may include shortening the turn lane storage bay lengths and/or utilization of guardrail to shorten the culvert. • Tony Grove, Beaver Mountain, Franklin Basin Intersections - Improvements at these intersections in the form of left and right turning lanes are a necessary safety improvement. Except for the Franklin Basin Intersection, sensitive environmental features will likely not be heavily impacted. The uses of retaining wall and guardrail will be considered in reducing or avoiding impacts. Again, a "best fit " design will be implemented. Remaining impacts will be minimized with mitigative efforts. • Passing Lane Above Beaver Mountain Turnoff - The alignment shift at curves 69, 70, and 71 will be subjected to a best fit design analysis including exceptions to design standards. Realignment around the mature forest will be the design objective. The degree of cut or fill in obtaining the necessary roadway width is not yet known , but will be determined in the detailed design process. * Curve 85, and the Mature Forest near Limber Pine - The footprint of the roadway is affected by design speed (curve flattening) , nominal roadway width, and climbing lane. The use of retaining walls and/or guardrails to limit the extent of fills will be considered . These activities could reduce the extent of the fill by 40-100 feet, whereas eliminating the climbing lane would only gain an additional 7 feet. The use of a structure has also been considered but will not likely be advanced due to potential icing problems at this location. Realignment options at this location may exist and will be evaluated during design . Ending the passing lane on an uphill section would not meet design standards and is not desirable because of the potential safety conflict. Slower moving vehicles would be required to merge into a faster stream of traffic. The abandoned road and existing fill would be removed and the ground restored to blend with the surrounding contours. * Old Road from the Limber Pine Summit to Garden City - Sections of the existing alignment abandoned due to realignments or curve flatlenings will be handled in accordance with the revegetation plan. Abandoned roadway sections will be removed and the ground restored to blend with surrounding contours. In some cases the old road would be necessary for local access and will remain in use. • Section Ib Crom Rick Springs to Section 2 - The alignment will be shifted away from the adjacent riparian habitat and the river. It will be adjusted to obtain a "best fit" design. US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Page 14 Hann Section D: Measures to Minimize • • �• Retaining walls will be considered where needed to avoid or reduce impacts. • Impacts from Mitigation - The first priority will be to reduce the amount of impact through design . Secondly . mitigative areas will be closely evaluated and selected based on potential for success, as well as consideration to impacts caused by construction of the mitigative areas. The Forest Service and the Corps of Engineers will be working with UDOT to ensure that a balance between visual concerns and the need for wetland mitigation in advance of highway construction is achieved. As design is advanced , possible locations where mitigation can be accomplished on site may be identified (i.e. possible strips of wetland adjacent to the roadway in the lower Upper Canyon). In some cases, mitigation areas may be selected that are not as visible from the road. Land Use The modified Preferred Alternative will improve accessibility to various land uses within the area . Forest Service Plan • • A revegetation plan will be developed by UDOT and approved by the USFS during design of individual projects to ensure that areas of high visual quality and critical habitat are avoided, where practicable, and that disturbed areas are appropriately revegetated . • A construction/post-construction monitoring plan will be developed and implemented by UOOT and approved by the USFS during design of individual projects in order to identify sensitive areas where monitoring is needed . These areas and types of monitoring required will be identified in the project plans and specifications for each project. • • Amendment of the Forest Plan for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest is required under the administrative procedures of the US FS for impacts to visual quality and reduction of the habitat condition index. Best Management Practices will be implemented to control erosion, thereby meeting the water and soils management directive of the Forest Plan. Detailed Best Management Practices will be developed during design for each project. Cache County Plan • UOOT's Best Management Practices will be used to minimize water quality degradation, minimize vegetative removal , and minimize cut and fill . This complies with requirements of the Cache County Plan which specifies that destruction of natural vegetation be minimized. cut and fill operations be minimized to reduce runoff and erosion , while providing for appropriate public roads. Rich County Plan • No measures to minimize harm are required . US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Hann Page IS Section D: Measures to Minimize �Social Impacts Measures to . minimize harm are required to address access concerns of the various users . • Access to Existing and Proposed Subdivisions .. A new intersection providing access to the Bridgerland Subdivision will be constructed . This access will provide safer ingress and egress to the subdivision. • Access at mp 410.6 in Garden City would be relocated by closing the present access and providing a new access from another public street, if possible. If the access cannot be closed, then it would be relocated to an improved location , providing the best design possible. A combination with access at mp 410.7 may be practicable. The access at mp 410.7 would be considered accord ing to the same criteria as the access at my 410.6. • Intersection improvements to other existing and proposed subdivision accesses will be considered based on use requirements, roadway widening possibilities, and other engineering factors. Garden City will be involved in identiCying these requirements. Access to Recreation Within the Canyon • Accessibility will be improved by providing intersection improvements , eliminating or mitigating hazards , and improving the Level of Service. • Present parking turnouts will be improved and new turnouts will be placed in recognition of any eliminated rumouts. Additional turnouts which attain at least two parking stalls with adequate sight distance will also be considered. Exact locations will be determined during design and in conjunction with USFS recommendations. • Relocation • The acquisition and relocation program will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended . • Acquisition of publicly-owned lands will be undertaken in accordance with the regulations of each land management agency . • Grazing activities regulated by the USFS and the State of Utah will not be affected . However. fencing along the highway from just below Tony Grove to Franklin Basin will be considered to reduce the number of cattle· vehicle accidents. EmploymentlEconomics • The canyon will remain open during construction to minimize employment/economic impacts related to road closure. A traffic control plan will be developed during design phase. Temporary short·term closures to through traffic are expected. Local access to US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (DJ'ft of October 13. 1994) Page 16 Hann Section D: Measures to Minimize • �• recreation traffic is expected to be maintained. Joint Development • Coordination has been made and will continue to be made with the USFS to develop a highway which meets , to the extent possible, the goals of both UOOT and the USFS . Pedestrians and Bicyclists • • A wider roadway with shoulders is being provided through much of the project. Paving of parking areas will discourage the use of non·designated parking locations which are hazardous to vehicle-passengers who SlOP and leave their vehicle and to bicyclists who may encounter vehicles quickly turning onto or off of the roadway . Burnt Bridge will be constructed to a 34-foot width to allow safer pedestrian and bicyclist use. Water Quality Impacts • • Sedimentation and siltation control during the construction phase will include application of Best Management Practices. UDOT's Standard Temporary Erosion Control plans will be implemented during construction. • During construction, the surface area of erodible soils that are exposed at anyone time will be limited . • Temporary pollution/erosion control provisions will be coordinated with permanent soil erosion control measures to assure maximum attainable erosion control. The use of detailed erosion control plan sheets will be considered that include locations of erosion control facilities. These locations would then be subject to field evaluation. Permits UDOT will coordinate development of permit applications with the various agencies so that their recommendations can be integrated into roadway design. Construction of the project will require the following permits: Stream Alteration Permit • • A Stream Alteration Permit is required by the State Engineer's Office, Utah Division of Water Rights for bridge and culvert replacement. This does not involve channelization or relocation of the stream, but would involve riprap . Section 404 Permit US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Hann Page 17 Section 0: Measures to Minimize �• A Section 404 Permit to discharge dredge or fill materials into a water of the United States is required by the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) where construction activities impact jurisdictional wetlands . • Utah Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit • Utah Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit will be required for any project which disturbs more than 5 acres of surface area during construction. The UPDES General Storm Water Discharge Permit issued to UDOT by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality will apply. As part of the requirements of this permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SWPP) plan will be developed and incorporated in the final design plans. Also a Notice of Intent (NOI) form shall also be submitted to Utah Division of Water Quality prior to construction of the project. For any project disturbing less than 5 acres, the UPDES General Storm Water Discharge Permit will not apply . However, UOOT's standard plans for temporary erosion and sediment control will be implemented during construction to alleviate any potential erosion or sediment. Right-of-Way/Special Use Permit • The FEIS states that a Right-of-Way/Special Use Permit is required from the USFS , Wasatch-Cache National Forest. The USFS has recently advised UOOT that Forest Service policy requires issuance of a transportation easement, rather than a special use permit. This decision will be made in the USFS Record of Decision. Wetlands and Botanical Resources • A wetland mitigation plan will be developed during the design phase under the guidelines of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Executive Order 11990 as administered by the COE. Additional opportunities to avoid or minimize wetland impacts will be identified throughout design . Replacement of eliminated wetlands will be in-kind , based on functional value . The first priority will be to reduce the amount of impact through design. Secondly, mitigative areas will be closely evaluated and selected based on potential for success, as well as consideration of impacts caused by construction of the mitigative areas . • Advance mitigation will be developed with the first project and considered on future projects so that impacts can be mitigated prior to being impacted, where practicable. The acreage , sites , and design of the wetland mitigation sites, and advance mitigation, will continue to be coordinated with and agreed to by the COE and the USFS during design , so that visual and wetland concerns can be balanced. • Construction document specifications will limit encroachment into wetlands and riparian areas to that required for construction. On site inspections in accordance with the construction monitoring plan will ensure compliance with these provisions. • Construction work zones will be delineated through the use of fencing in sensitive areas to ensure contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations. • US-89 Through Logan Hann Canyo~, ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994) Page 18 Section D: Measures to Minimize • �• The construction/post construction monitoring plan will require that qualified UDOT representative(s), acceptable [0 the COE, will be in charge of assisting designers and the project engineer in designing and constructing the wetland mitigation areas . Upon completion of the project, the representative(s) will also monitor the mitigation sites once a year for three years. This includes taking photographs and sending them with a brief progress report to the COE each year . At the end of the three years, if the wetland mitigation areas have not developed to the satisfaction of the CDE, then through consultation with the COE, appropriate steps will be taken by UDOT to fulfill Section 404 permit requirements for the project. • A revegetation plan will be developed and implemented to revegetate disturbed areas. The revegetation plan will be developed with the assistance of USFS and other CAT team members. • Burnt Bridge will be constructed in stages, with widening occurring on the upstream side , eliminating the detour presented in the FEIS. • In addition to the reduced width presented in the FEIS for the Middle Canyon , the previously proposed roadway width of 40' for the fir st eight miles of the Upper Canyon Section has been reduced to 34' to further minimize impacts on wetlands. • Location of passing lanes in the first eight miles of the Upper Canyon will be evaluated further during detailed design to assess additional measures to avoid or minimize harm to wetland s caused by these passing lanes . The evaluation will address leaving the lanes in the location described herein, or combining and relocating into a single section. Safety considerations will also play a role in the final placement. • Impact to wetlands at Amazon Hollow , Stump Hollow and surrounding drainage area as a result of roadway widening for the Beaver Mountain turning lanes will be further evaluated during detailed des ign . This may include shonening the turn lane storage bay lengths and/or utilizing guardrail to shorten the culvert. • • • Requirements identified in the Section 404 Permit will be complied with. Water Body Modifications and Wildlir. Impacts • • Clear span bridges will be used rather than in-river pier suppons to minimize water body modifications. • • Additional animal crossing signs will be provided in high conflict locations in consultation with Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR). The amount and necessity of riprap required for erosion control at bridges will be evaluated on a case by case basis during final design . Riprap will be used only where required to stabilize the streambank. Riprap will not exceed 100 feet along both banks up- and downstream from each new bridge. Since riprap will not be required at each of these locations, US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Page 19 H"m Seclion D: Measures to Minimize �the actual use of riprap will be minimal. • Construction activities in watercourses will be minimized to the extent possible. Construction work zones will be delineated to ensure contractor compliance. • Existing river and creek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment of any required riprap into channels. Impacts to wildlife will be minimized by limiting , to the extent practical , vegetative and riparian habitat clearing. • Highway bridges will be elevated with no part of the bridge suppan systems being placed in the river . Bridge spans will allow for animal runway in cases where this feature is currently provided. • • The following mitigation measures emphasize protection or replacement of vegetative cover for fisheries . These mitigation measures apply 10 the Logan River and Beaver Creek, and will also apply to their tributaries that are important to adult and juvenile fish , as determined by UDWR and USFS. Construction activities near the river will occur during the drier, low-flow month s of the year to the extent practicable . Clear-span bridges rather than in-river pier suppons will be constructed. Culvens will be designed to allow fish passage. Heavy equipment wil l be kept out of the channel during all construction phases to the extent practicable. Unavoidable in-channel activities will be scheduled in coordination with the USFS and UDWR to minimize impacts during critical fisheries periods. Such activities will be brief and local . • Temporary dikes and sediment basins will be constructed during bridge and structure replacement to prevent turbid runoff and any accidental spills of fuels , lubricants, chemicals, or sewage (from portable sanitary facilities) from entering the river , creek, or tributaries . Construction activities will be limited to areas within construction work zones, as delineated through the use of fencing , to minimize habitat losses. All work will be conducted from the inland side of the highway where possible to avoid in-channel activities and minimize riparian habitat and riverbank disturbance. Existing river and creek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment of required riprap into the channels. The free-nowing nature of the river will be maintained. Fill slopes will not be steeper than 2: I to promote bank stability and reclamation . US-89 Through Logan Canyoo, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Hann Page 20 Section 0 : Measures to Minimize • �• Drainage ditches and sediment basins will be located in accordance with the detailed Best Management Practices to minimize erosion and to prevent eroded material from being washed toward the river. Runoff along the river-side of the curb and gutter in the Middle Canyon section will be directed toward the inland side of the highway. where practicable, to minimize the discharge to the river of materials that accumulate on the highway. A band of riparian habitat will be maintained along the river and creek wherever possible to provide overhanging cover for fish and to filter surface runoff. Larger mature trees and their root systems will be protected where it does not conflict with vehicles and passenger safe£}'o Prior to the start of the next wet season. disturbed areas , where possible, will be stabilized, reseeded , and revegetated. Riprap and debris generated during future highway and shoulder maintenance would not be indiscriminately placed along the river banks. • • Mitigation measures described above are intended to minimize impacts on water quality and fisheries . The following will also be accomplished to ensure success of mitigation measures: Fishery studies will be conducted for individual projects which have the potential tQ impact fisheries. Prior tQ construction. available UDWR fisheries studies will be assessed and if necessary updated to provide baseline data to determine project impacts to fisheries . Post construction fishery studies will be conducted . If study results show additional mitigation measures are warranted as a result of project activities. mitigation directed at wild fish stocks will be carried out under the direction of USES and UDWR biologists as exp lained in the FEIS on pg 5-6, Floodplain Impacts • Bridges will c1earspan watercourses in order to minimize floodplain encroachment. Excess fill material will not be placed in the floodway. • Bridge and culvert openings will be sized so that floodplain elevations will not be increased . • Construction activities will be in compliance with Executive Order 11988 to reduce the risk of flood Josses; to minimize the impact of floods on human health, safety and welfare; and to restore and preserve the national and beneficial values served by floodplains. Threatened and Endangered Species • The Middle Canyon contains habitat for the Primyla maguirei (threatened species). The USF&WS has stated that the Preferred Alternative will have no effect on this species. In order to minimize US·89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Harm Page 21 Section 0: Measures to Minimize �potential impacts , the recommendations of Welsh (1987) and the USF&WS will be followed . These recommendations include: • Construction activities from Wood Camp Intersection to mp 385.0 will be restricted to a corridor width of less than 40 feet. • Changes in the geomorphology of Logan Canyon will be limited to the extent practical. • Removal of canyon bottom tree groves will be limited . • Dust suppression measures will be used during construction activities. Construction in the area near populations will be undertaken no earlier than June to avoid potential dust impacts during the flowering period (April-May) , • e Blasting in the Middle Canyon will be avoided whenever possible. Barriers preventing scattering of blast debris on these populations will be provided if blasting is necessary . Visual Impacts • A revegetation plan will be developed during design and coordinated with the USFS to minimize harm to visual resources . This plan will be implemented in the project plans and specifications for each project. This plan will include use of native plant species. Mitigation of landform impacts will be accomplished by slope rounding and warping to make cuts, fills , and ditch edges appear more natural . Rock faces, contrasting with older cuts, will be aged with treatments. In places where the current alignment is abandoned, the roadway will be removed and the ground restored to blend with surrounding contours. The plan will identify seed mixes compatible with local plant communities. • Levels of visual quality adjacent to the roadway of 0, 1 and 2 will be raised to level 3, except when a more appropriate direction is determined by the USFS. • The acreage , sites and design of advance mitigation will be agreed to by the USFS during design so that visual and wetland concerns can be balanced . • • Steel beam guardrail will be the hazard protection device encouraged for use. The use of A588 rusting steel, natural finish material for the guardrail for aesthetic purposes will be considered . Construction Impacts Blasting • A Special Provisiol'} will be included in the project plans to ensure blasting will be controlled to inhibit rock materials from being projected away from the blast area, and removing only designated material . US-89 Through Logan Canyon . ROD (Draft of October 13,1994) Page 22 Hann Section 0 : Measures to Minimize • �• • • If any critical wildlife periods are identified by UDWR during des ign , these will be given consideration , and if appropriate , timing of blasting will be limited. Blasting in the Middle Canyon will be avo ided whenever possible. Barriers preventing blast debris onto Maguire primrose populations will be provided if blasting is necessary . Spoil • Environme ntal clearance will be obtained on the d isposal site, prior to disposal of excess material . • Excess materials that are not used in roadway construction or restoratio n of the borrow area near Bear Lake Summit, will be disposed of in locations determined on a case-by-case basis by the CAT team and approved by USFS . Excess materials may be utilized in the canyon, stock piled for future use, or transported out of the canyon. Air Quality • • Dust suppression measures will be implemented during construction . These measures will include water sprinkling, speed limits on haul road , and use of environmentally safe stabilization chemicals. Noise • The construction contractor will be required to comply with UDOT Specification No . 104. 16 (formerly 107.24) "Noise and Vibration Contro l". Traffic Congestion , Detours and Safety • A detailed traffic control plan will be developed during the design phase to minimize traffic congestion; provide for construction detours and short·term road closures; and address vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle safety. Toxic Material Control • A spill control plan for motor fuels, oil, grease and chemicals will be developed during the design phase. This plan will address measures to minimize accidental releases of toxic materials to the environment and measures to respond to and clean up spilled material. Historic and Archeological Preservation • UOOT Standard Specification No . 104. 15 (formerly 107 .23) , "Discovery Propenies" will be included in all contracts to protect unknown historic and archeological resources . • Hazardous Waste US·89 Through Logan CanYOD, ROD (DOlft of October 13, 1994) Page 23 H.m> SectioD 0 : Measures 10 Minimize �• If evidence of Hazardous Waste is found during construction the Department of Enviro nmental Quality will be consulted and appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented. • Staging Areas • Construction staging sites will be identified and coordinated through the CAT team during design . They will be kept out of aquatic, wetland, and riparian habitat and other sensitive visual areas. • Environmental clearance on construction staging sites will be obtained during design and the contractor will be limited to the use of staging areas identified in the project construction plans. • Staging sites will be approved by the USFS. Batch Plant Locations • The traffic, safety, reneation. and air quality impacts associated with hauling material rrom the city versus setting up a batch plant in the canyon will be identified on a project by project basis in design. The affect of these impacts on both the canyon environment and the city environment will be considered. The assessment will include impacts on the Lower Canyon and compatibility with future projects. The most suitable location will be identified in the prgject specifications. The contractor will be required to conduct his batch plant operations in accordance with these specifications and will comply wilh Utah Air Conservation Regulations identified in UDOr SDeciflcatio,. 10Z21. EnvirQnmenl4l Protection. • Limits of Operation • Construction work zones will be delineated through the use of fencing in sensitive areas to ensure contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations. Section 4(0 • All improvements to Section 4(f) resources will be done in accordance with USFS recommendations. • Site 6 (Ricks Spring and Parking , mp 389.9) - Pedestrian safety will be considered to the extent possible during design . This consideration includes the elimination of passing ability at this location and improved signing. Curbing of this site will also be considered. • Site 12 (Winter Access Parking Area at Beaver Mountain Road, mp 399.8) - Remaining parking area will be extended to include at least as much parking as presently exists, and the entire parking area will be paved to enhance use. US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Page 24 Hann Section 0 : Measures to Minimize • �• • Site 13 (Winter Access Parking , mp 402. 1) - This site will be reestabli shed at a lower elevation to maintain access. .. Site 15 (Limber Pine Trailhead, mp 404.81) - All improvements on the trailhead side will be accomp lished with in 23 feet of the edge of the roadway , and a delineation will be provided within this 23 foot area. • • US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Hann Page 25 Section D: Measures to Minimize �E. MONITORING OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Monitoring and enforcement of the above proposed measures to minimize harm will be accomplished • in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between UDOT. FHWA. and USFS . This MOU is included in the Appendix of this ROD . It identifies how the individual projects will be se lected , identified and managed , and how coordination will be accomplished. The MOU takes each project through design , construction, and post-construction periods. It commits to the development of a revegetation plan, wetland mitigation plan, and a construction/post-construction monitoring plan, and commits to the development of a Cooperating Advisory Team (CAD which consists of various agencies and individuals. This team will provide recommendations of regulatory and permit requirements , input on enhancement opportunities , mitigative treatments and overall content of the design of the project, with final decisions being UDOT's responsibility. The CAT team will be involved throughout the development of all aspects of design. including review of aljgnment oPtions and other design features. During construction and post construction. the CAT team will be coordinated with to reso lve ynforeseen environmental problems to ensure that mitigative efforts are successfu l. Mitigation measures listed in Section 0 above will be incorporated in the contract , plans , and specifications and will be monitored in accordance with the construction/post-construction monitoring plan. The monitoring plan will be developed during design of the individual projects and will include all monitoring commitments made within this ROD, as well as any monitoring required to comply with specific permits. Enforcement of the contract provisions and monitoring of the project is the responsibility of the se lected UDOT Project Manager and UDOT Environmental Engineer , as outlined in the MOU . An independent environmental consultant will be ytilized . The envirOnmental consultant will assisl the • froieer Manager co ensure CQ17Wliance with envirOnmental commitments and mitigation measures. Periodic meetings will be held with the contractor's workforce to advise of sensitive areas . The UDOT Design, Structures, Right-of-Way and Environmental Divisions are responsible to ensure that the measures to minimize harm , listed in Section D above , are incorporated into the plans and right-of-way acquisition activities. The Utah Division of FHW A is respons ible for administering the Federal-Aid Highway Program in Utah and makes period ic inspections of all phases of highway design and construction to assure compliance with federal requirements including NEPA . US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft October 13. 1994) Enforcement Page 26 SectioD E; Monitoring or • �• Logan Canyon Documents UDOT Documents US-89 Logan canyon Preferred Alternative (circa 1992-93). Brochure outlining Preferred Alternative as outlined in FEIS. March 4, 1994 Letter from Dave Berg to Jeff Appel. Conlinnation of compromise elements. July 13, 1994 Letter from Lorraine Richards to CPLC and other agencies. Brief summary of ROD, request for agency input Preliminary Record of Decision July 15, 1994. Cover letter Reoord of Decision Appendix A Traffic Data. agency oorrespondence, MOU. Appendix B Agency Comments, Government Comments, Public Comments. Curve 85 Maps, Cross Sections aod CutIFili Summary • CPLC Documents Logan Canyon: Summarizing Two "Alternatives" Map and brief summary of Consen'ationi st and UDOT Preferred Alternatives. Logan Canyon, Make it Safe, Keep is Beautiful Brochure from 1993 Cache County Fair. Response to Dave Berg letter (March 4, 1994), Jeff Appel. June 28, 1994 Memo from Pendery to Berg outlining hotspots and requesting additional information from UDOT. Response to Preliminary Record of Decision. Bruce Pendery. Steve Rint, Shawn Swaner, August 12, 1994. Memorandum: Time for Filing Lawsuit under NEPA, Appel & Mansson, • August 16, 1994. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3363 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2636 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/393">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/393</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 187114229 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Record of decision, October 13, 1994 Description An account of the resource Record of decision for US Highway 89 stating that the Federal Highway Administration agrees with the Utah Department of Transportaion in its selection of the Preferred Alternative. Subject The topic of the resource Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon Roads--Design and construction Traffic engineering United States Highway 89 Logan Canyon (Utah) Environmental policy Logan Canyon Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/13/94 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 15 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd15 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/3d6ff3d966f70a9c28eb6a7ce384ba69.pdf 000bb71612f5c5ec22029533e7d37362 PDF Text Text ~- .. - EDUCATION CAMPAIGN Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon, Cache Anglers, Logan Canyon Coalition, Bridgerland Audubon Society, Willow Creek Ecology Land Management in Logan Canyon W e, in Cache Valley, are extremely for tunate to have Logan Canyon and surrounding public lands in our backyard. While there are some private and state lands in the Canyon, most is federal land . It is owned by yo u, the citizen. As an owner, yo u have the responsibility to be aware of past, present and proposed activities that can affect the long-term health of this land for future generations. The purpose of this publication is to bring these issues to you and help you become involved. . -- - p J CII .. - Cache Anglers U fCCKOG' ~ ,-, S everal public interest organizations are involved in protecting Logan Canyon. For 30 years Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC), and la ter Logan Canyon Coalition (LCC), have worked to protect the canyon from excessive and costly highway construction. The mission of Bridgerland Audubon Society, a Cache Valley institution, is to conserve, enhance, an d enjoy the na tural environment with special emphasis on birds and their habitats for the benefit and education of humanity and for the biological d iversity of the earth. Willow Creek Ecology is an organization devoted to better management of p ublic lands th rough scientific research, ed ucation and d irect action. Cache Ang lers is an organization dedica ted to the protection and promotion of local fisher ies and their habitats. ~<> BOII/u'vi lle ell IIIrroof • The Logan River is a quality source of life. "Your present localion is designed to you for a refuge, a place of rest; therefore see to it that ye pollute 110t your inheritance, for if you do, you might expect that the judgement of heaven will be poured out upon you." - Brigham Young �.M LOGAN CANYON -D EDUCATION CAMPAIGN Highway Construction Proposed improvements of Highway 89 have been the most visible issue in Logan Canyon for a long time. Although conservation gro ups wanted to protect the canyon from excessive highway construction, they also recognized the need for improvements, such as bridge replacements. Two bridges (Burnt and Lower Twin) have been replaced . The next construction project is the section between Franklin Basin and Tony Grove, including the replacem ent of Upper Twin Bridge. This is a sensitive area since the Logan River is very d ose to the highway. Protection of the river w ill be a crudal concern. Accident statistics for the last three years in this area indicate that 70% of the collisions are animal impacts and the remainder are cars off the road or car swipes with no fatalities, showing that speed is a major factor in canyon accidents. A wider and straighter highway will enc01.lrage drivers to increase speeds, resulting in a more dangerous highway. While highway construction remains a very important issue, it is time to broaden our concern to other issues that impact the canyon and its watershed . What are these issues impacting the natural beauty of Logan Canyon? Wild and Scenic Logan River The Logan River has recently been found eligible by the Forest Service for Wild and Scenic classification. Parts that are eligible are a six mile section from the Idaho stateline to the Beaver Creek confluence and a 20 mile section from the Beaver Creek confluence to Third Dam. A suitability study is next; and following that, an act of Congress to make the designation official. This process will be long and likely contentious; particularly in a state with an unsympathetic congressional delegation and many opponents who have and will make fa lse claims and accusations. The Wild and Scenic Act is an excellent way to protect a river in its natural state and its current form of management. It still allow s for private property rights, hunting and fishing, and other activities that will not harm its remarkable qualities. Certain restrictions do apply that must be spelled out ~n a negotiated management plan. Hundreds of communities across the nation have benefited from such designations. The Logan City Council has been asked to support the Wild and Scenic designation, and we hope they will recognize what an ...... OW' river is to our community. - - LOGAN RIVER ---- WIW&SCENIC .... ,-- ~- , t The Federal-State Land Swap In January, 1999 the long-debated land swap between the State of Utah and the federal government became official. The State of Utah became the owner of apprOximatel y 3(XX) acres near Beaver Mountain and became the landlord for the Beaver Mountain Ski Resort. Since the mission for the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) is to provide income to the public school system, they could sell the land to the highest bidder. Their mandate is to manage lands for thei r "highest and best use." This swap has raised concerns among a number of groups. Bddgerland Audubon, Logan Canyon Coalition (LCC) and Citizens for the Protection of Logan Ca nyon (CPLC), the Great Western Trail Association, Backcountry Horsemen, Cache Valley High Markers and the owners of Beaver Creek Lodge cooperated to form the Beaver Creek Land Alliance. Their primary interest is preserving the scenic vistas and maintaining public access. Although there are county zoning regulations for private lands, SITLA can override local zoning regulations and develop land according to its agenda. ........ 5<_.-. Could tile land around Beaver MO llrlta;n be developed Wit/I cOlldomi"iums a1ld mufti-millio1l dollar IIomes ? YE S! Motorized Recreation In recent years the dramatic rise and ind iscriminate use of motori zed recreation, ind uding ATV's and snowmobiles, has resulted in tremendous impacts. Wildlife and Forest Serv ice enforcement personnel are overwhelmed with countless incidents of new "ghost" roads being forged, vand alized gates, hillsides being denuded, stream banks destroyed, and illegal travel in wilderness areas. Often it is a small per.:entage of users who are the violators. But as the total number of off-road vehicles increases, more impacts are guaranteed and the threa t to w ildlife increases. While such vehicles are valid and legal forms of recreation, there will come a time when the Forest Service w ill need to restrict their access. �LOGAN CANYON'" EDUCATION CAMPAIGN -0Erosion due to lack of vegetative cover from grazing i1l tile North Rich Callie Allotment. Impacts i1lclllde ground cover reduced to 23%, 1055 of soilllll tri~ ell ts vital to plan t Viability, and tile tra mpli1lg of springs arid small stream chari nels to the pairlt where they no longer exist. These problems are serial/sly compoll rlded by tile irrespollsible lise of ORV's over these lands. - - Livestock Grazin g Seventy-two thousand acres of Logan Canyon are divided into 25 allobnents for grazing sheep and cattle. Some areas are being overgrazed and stream banks in riparian areas are being trampled, resulting in increased sediment, loss of aquatic life, and the loss of stream side tree/shrub canopies. This results in warmer water temperatures and loss of fish habitat. Watershed d egradation by livestock has been documented on forest lands in Spawn Creek in the Temple Fork drainage. During the summer of 1997, Spawn Creek had four times the allow~ able count of fecal coliform, at precisely the same time as These bacteria are indi~ ~_ _ cators of disease.causing organisms for-such diseases Allotments near tospirosis. Another example is the Little Bear Sheep and summit. Impacts include ground cover reduced to 23%, loss of soil nutrients vital to plant v i a ~ biIi ty, and the tramp ling of springs and small stream channels to the point where they no longer exist. A loss of diverse ground covers results in the decline of wild life such as snowshoe hare and grouse. This fu rther results in a decline of animals that prey on small mammals, such as the goshawk. In fac t, goshawk numbers have decreased so significantly that it has been listed as a sensitive species, wi th several attempts since the ea rl y 90's to list it as endangered. The Forest Service has recen tly undertaken a project to provide a managemen t d irection that maintains or restores fu nctioning forested habitats for this bi rd . National Forests are OUT watersheds, the source of three- fourths of our d rinking water in the West. A growing sector of the public is demand ing a return to pristine mountain streams ra ther than streams and meadows tra mpled into mud and littered with cow manure. Improved care and proper management are imperative for the l ong~ t e rm health of our forests. Not onl y is g raz~ ing degrad ing o ur public lands when improperly managed, but it also heav il y subsidized by the you, the taxpayer. For every $3 in profit made by the permitee, taxpayers contribu te $4 in subsidies; hence, ano ther reason for needed reforms. - Grolllld cover after grazi/lg. Ground COl'tr witllout grazing. Logging The Bear Hodges Ana lysis project includes plans by the Forest Service to log nearly 3.5 million board feet of timber near the summit of Logan Canyon. This tree harvesting project in both the T. W. Daniels Forest (USU) and Wasatch·Cache National Forest, is an attempt to "restore" the spruce-fir forest to an iII-defined "historic" condition through si lviculture tech niques. Si lvicultu re is the practice of growing and cutting timber. Managi ng pine ba rk beetle infestation by logging this stand of old trees is also a component of this project. It is a doubtful practice, one that has fail ed to control beetle infestations on most other forests; and it is often used as a rationalization for timber harvests. It also ignores the larger his~ to ric role that pine ba rk beetles play in the ecosystem. Dead and d ecay~ ing trees provide necessa ry wildlife habitat and nutrients for new forest growth . There is a larger concern that trees in the Bear Hodges area are a remnant old g row th fo rest, one that sho uld be preserved for the sake of biological d iversity. ClearC/lt ill Bear Hodges area tllat liaS /l ot regt!1lerated ill 30 years. �LOGAN CANYON, EDUCATION CAMPAIGN "Destroying the last wild places ... is like tearing the last pages from the Bible." - Robert F. Kennedy - Updating the Forest Management Plan The Forest Service is currently in the process of revising its forest management plan. This will provide direction for forest management for the next 10-20 years. The new plan will focus on ecosystem management, a form of management that considers all the impacts on the long-term sustainability of the forest, and one that could possibly conflict with the current "multiple-use" concept of permitting logging, grazing, mining, and all types of recreational activities. Resolving these issues in a way that reflects more than special interests will require public input throughout the development of a new forest plan. Citizens must be part of this process if they want healthy forest lands for future generations. Input from grassroots organizations must move forward. If you care and want to know more about these issues, send us your name and address on the form below. We will inform you when there are crucial issues where citizen input is essential. Your name will remain confidential. If the Forest Service knows there is broad support in the community, they will be more likely to act in the broad public interests, rather than special interests. Only through citizen action, with the help of experts in OUf community, can we lobby for meaningful change in forest management. YES! I'd like to help support the Logan Canyon Education Campaign "The last word ir/ ignorance is the person who says of an on;mal "what good;s it ?" if the land mechanism as a whole ;s good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not ... who but a fool would discard seemingly lIseless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of inte/- Tour contributions 10 directly to contlnulaa education proJects lor savlne: Lopn Canyon. H~IT 's a In ded,,'tJb~ (Ullnbution Name' __________________ a Add ress ________________ o S<rnl _ _ _ rop i ~ of t hi~ newsle tter to rcdistnbutc City, Stilte, Zip ____________ a ru t ~ on you r ~mo, 1 Itst a r UI me on tt.;, mo iling ItSt for: ligent tinkering." a - Aida Leopold E-mail _______________ Contribution S ____________ Logan Canyon Education Campaign P.O. Bt))o; 6001 North Log.In, Utah 84341-6001 BndgerlMldAudubon a Cad'" Anglers a C'lIlt'llS for the 1 '1'01(,(,lIen of a a Los-m Canyon I",,*,n Canyon C"ahtiOIl AU t.... lIbm·c �r .-----------------------------------------------, ~ CANYON VIEWS Volu.me 2 Citizen fo r the Protection of Logan Canyon December, 1996 VIEWFROM THE CHAIR By LAUREN KEL LER C PLC continues to broaden its scope in our quest to protect the beauty and d iversity o f Logan Canyon. The Winter Recreati on Group. invo lving skiers, snowmobilers and other agencies, will be meeting again after a summer break. The first phase of the road design and construction, specifically the bridges, will be und er way th is spring. Cattle and sheep grazing in the Canyon is being studied. The Scenic Byways are in the final design phase and, of course, we arc always in need of fund s. One of our many concerns regarding to Logan Canyon is the shared ski and snowmobile use of trai ls and back country. For the past year we have been working with the Chamber of Comm erce, the Cache Vall ey Hi gh Markers (a Snowmobi le Club), and the Forest Servi ce. One of the objectives of thi s gro up is to submit a proposal to the Forest Service which would restrict the use of snowmobiles in some areas. The group is also looking for ways to Improve trai l etiquette, safety, parking, public awareness of motori zed restrictions and wilderness boundari es, and interaction between skiers and I n this issu,.e... S HARED USE FOR S KJER S AND SNOWMOBILERS . . . . . . . . . . . . .. BRIDGE CONSTR UCTION BEGINS IN THE S PRING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VOL UNTEERS ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEMBER S HIP . ........ . ... • ... . .... 2 2 3 3 snowmobiles. C PLC would al so like· to improve communication between ski ers and the Forest Service, so we are hosting a "meet the Forest Service Ski Day" . On Dec. 26, from 9 am through 12 noon, we wi ll be at the Tony Grove parking lot with hot chocolate. The Forest Service will be there, ready to li sten to any of your ideas and concerns. It is important that we let them know there are a Jot o f sk iers in Cache Valley and that there are a lot of ski ers who use Logan Canyon. Also, along thi s theme, we would like to encourage skiers of all levels to keep a ski log for the winter. We need to know the date, the location, the length of the ski, number o f people, and any comments. For example: Jan . 3 - Temple Fo rk - 4 persons - 3hrs. - enj oyed the qui et. Only one person in the group should record the data. This informati on will greatly help us in determining where people ski and when and how to best make recommendation to the Forest Service abo ut the travel plan . Thi s is very important infomlat ion so at the end of your ski season pl ease send us your log. As we come to the end o f the fi rst year being members of the CAT (Cooperati ve Advisory Team Team advising UDOT on road construction and bridge design) we feel we have chosen the best way to effect changes in the future construction of the Canyon. There were certainly fru strating times, and you may recall reading the article in the paper this last fall about our unhappiness with specifi c changes in the bridges design. However, UDOT continues to make concessions, many as a result of that article. We feel good about the designs for Burnt and Lower Twin bridges. We would have liked to have changed the railing design, but compromises from both sides were needed . As a result of o ur experiences on the CAT Team, we are even more aware of how important it is to have experts on our side. We would like to thank Palri ca Ho uston for her expertise in structural engineering and bridge design. Her "? �2 CANYON VIEWS continued contributions wi ll help us in the many phases ahead. CPLC plans to take an active role in the comi ng year in Rangeland Health and the Forest Management Plan issue. We have felt very good about our relationship with the Forest Service and our input into the Scenic BY'vays Proj ect. I went on many field trips with the Fo rest Service to visit specifi c sites and di scuss proposed action. I felt the Forest Service was open to alternatives and ideas which would upgrade services and decrease any visual impacts the project might have on the beauty of the Canyon. The proj ect will begin this next summer. As yo u can see, C PLC is involved in many different and important efforts to protect Logan Canyon. To stay infonned and involved requires long hours on the part of many individuals. We have been fortunate to have people who are willing to give their time and their expertise to help advance the purpose of OUI organization. Aside from time and know ledge, we need money. We need funds to send out newsletters, pay for legal advice, hold meetings, and so on. We are a tax exempt organi zation and have a 50 1 © (3) status. If you have not renewed your membership, please show your support for the protection of Logan Canyon and do so. Any additional contributi ons would be very much appreciated. Our focu s on Logan Canyon is specific; however, the issues related to the Canyon are very broad. If you have concerns about any aspect of the Canyon please feel free to let us know. SHARED USE FOR SKIERS AND SNOWMOBILERS BY LAUREN KELLER With the shortage of snow in the lower elevations last winter, there was a vyi ng between skiers and snowmobilers for trail head parking and trail use. Because of this situation, along with the potential of opening up trail head parking in the Temple Fork area through the development of the Sceni c Byways project, a Winter Recreat ion group was started. The purpose of the group was to see if skiers and snowmobilers cou ld put together a proposal for the Forest SeTVice to amend the current Travel Plan. Last October we called for a meeting of interested ski ers to vo ice their opinion and concerns about the shared use of Logan Canyon with snowmobil ers. The feeling from the meeting was that skiers would like more areas in which to ski without the no ise and pol lution associated with snowmobiles. Skiers would also li ke the areas that are off limits to snowmobil es to be better patrolled. During the winter, CPLC met with Cache Vall ey High Markers, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Forest SeTVice. Some areas of concern were identified: Solitude for skiers seeking a nonmotorized experience, adequate parking, plowing of parking areas for skiers, e.g. Wood Camp, vo lunteers to patrol and disperse informat ion, signs to indi cate motori zed use restrictions, impacts on wi ld life, and enforcement of the ex isting travel pl an. There are two specifi c things you can do to help us. First, as mentioned eariler, keep a sk i log for thi s winter. We need to know where you were skiing, the date, how many hours and any comments you wou ld li ke to make. Also indi cate what level of skier you are, beginning, intermediate, advanced . Please make sure only one person in your group records the data. Then at the end of your ski season, please send it to us. The other thing that would be very he lpful is if you could attend our ski outing with the Forest Service. We are trying to get skiers of all levels to come and meet the Rangers in our district and tell them about your concerns and ideas regarding winter recreat ion use in Cache Valley. Also j ust come fo r fun and to bum off any excess holiday treats. The more ski ers the Forest Service sees are interested in Logan Canyon the better. Dec 26th, 9 am at Tony Grove parking area. We will be there through 12 noon, so come anytime. �3 CANYON VIEWS BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS IN THE SPRING BY SHA WN SWANER It is our relationship with UDOT personnel that has been the largest factor in our success. UDOT engineers have responded positively to public input and recommendation from the CAT Team. There is still much to be wary concerning to how well the contractor wi ll follow the guidelines set forth in the Record of Decision, by the Forest Service and by the CAT Team, during bridge construction. Cooperati on and compromise is new for both sides of the tabl e. If we can work through thi s process with the end result being sa fe bridges and relatively little di sturbance to a beautiful canyon, then we wi ll be successful. If we are not successful, then we will have other options open to us for the future phases of the road construction project. It is certainly worth giving the process a chance. As March draws closer and the im age of bu lldozers in Logan Canyon grows increasingly vivid , I am left wondering ifCPLC has chosen the right path. Maybe it is not too late to dusl off the monkey-wrench or chain myse lf to a road grader. However, on careful consideration, I think CPLC has chosen the onl y reali stic course of action. By working with UDOT, we have assisted in the development of plans that will result in the least amo unt of environm ental impact and will decrease the severity of the unavoidable impacts associated with road construction . To understand how this has com e about, I must first explain the philosophy behi nd our approach to UDOT, the result of our As always we are looking for people who would work over the last year, and our concerns and like to help either with the newsletter, sk i and predictions for the fut ure. snowmob il e group, our annual meeting and other In Apri l of 1994, I was privileged to meet wi th miscellaneous stuff. If you are interested and have Governor Leavitt and discuss concerns about the even a couple of hours, let us know, 752-0706. Canyon project. The intent of the meeting was to Lauren Keller. present the Governor with a petition opposing the Canyon constnlcti on project. The result of that contact was a meeting with UDOT Admini stration whi ch took place the followin g month. I met with We do not send o ut membership renewal notices a dozen o f UDOT' s senior management and those as we do not have the fund s or the time. So we are directly involved with the Logan Canyon Project. At thi s meeting was laid the groundwork for the co unting on you to renew you membership at thi s expansion of a working agreement between the US time. We have continued to keep the cost as low as Forest Service and UDOT which allowed for citi zen possible so that many people are able to receive the invo lvement in the design process of the Canyon newsletter. In order to cover expenses other than the project. The result of all of this was the creation of newsletter, we count on additional contributions. We the CAT (Cooperating Advisory Team) which would do have a tax exempt status with the IRS. We have input in the design phases of the project. Also appreciate your support. from this meeting I learned three things of value. Membership form First, large scale public involvement can be futil e if $25 _$50 $10 Member leuel Other not properly directed; second, the groundwork was laid for d irect involvement with UDOT through the Name _________________ CAT Team; and third, it was possible to established Address_ _ _ _ _-,--_ _ _=-___ a non-confrontational relationship with key UDOT City, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,State_ _Zip, _ _ __ personnel. Phone_---,..,-,-,,--_ _-,---Yes, 1 would like to uolunteer_ _ _ _ _ __ VOLUNTEERS MEMBERSHIP �Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon P.O. Box 3608 Logan, Ulah 84323 · 3608 Vlrqlnl8 Parter 41S0lJth4lJOEast Logan Ur 8432 1 BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID Pennit Ng 39 Logan. Utah �• • CITIZENS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LOGAN CANYO~ NEWSLETTER Dear "citizens", Your presence and enthusiasm at Utesday's meeting i s a welcome and encouraging indication that we can have a major impact on the outcome of the zoning change meetings. We have put together some suggestions for i mmedi ate action: PETITIONS Please take them to your neighborhoods and/ or places of work as soon as possible. As you will note, we have decided to encompass opposition to both Stump Hollow zoning chan ge as well as the Right Hand Fork zoning change. Return them by mail ' or hand to either Ann Schimpf Lee Rentz 715 N 3 E Logan 753-0512 or 459 N 1 E Logan 753-5076 or bring them to the October 14 meeting of the Cache Planning and Zoning Commission and deli ver them to Ann. I f you need additi ana1 pet it ion forms or the "Stump Hollow Development?1I summary sheet, please contact Ann or Lee. Eighty-one of you signed up to receive a petition. If each obtains 25 signatures, we will hear 2,026 voices in Cache County. Fifty signatures would add up to 4.052 recommendations! Please do not hesitate to cal l one of us to clear up any confusion about the issues which may arise. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR A letter to the Herald Journal is a powerful message which potentially reaches about 10,000 readers--and the paper will print everyone. Write to them at 75 West 3 North, Logan. If you have been shy to write on previous issues. now is an excellent and critical time to break your s ilence. ATTEND THE CACHE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON OCTOBER 14 The decision on zone change requests for Right Hand Fork will be made at that time. The Stump Hollow decision has been postponed until the November meeting. Watch the legal notices in the newspaper on Sunday, October 10 to find out the place and time of the Right Hand Fork discussion. It will begin sometime between 2pm and 5pm. The Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon will run ads in the newspaper and spots on the radio encouraging everyone to attend. We feel that although the structures under consideration at Right Hand Fork do not present the negative economic and environmental threat that the Stump Hollow plans do, the precedent of a zoning change is the basic key which will allow roadside development. Because of this, attendance at the October meeting is just as important as your presence at the November meeting. Please speak up at ' the meeting. We need the strongest impact possible. WRITE OR CALL YOUR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSIONERS Let your feelings be known directly to them before the meeting. If you know any of them, great, but contact them even if you have never met. Russ Kearl, chairman Oon G. Williams Aaron P. Leishman Ray Hugie 258 South Main Logan, UT 84321 Granville E. Barlow 140 West Center Lewiston, UT 84320 258-2652 10th North 376 East Smithfield, UT 84335 563-5604 E. Jay Christopherson 585 South Main ! .. Providence, UT 84332 752-5453 319 East 1st North Box 242 Wellsville, UT 84339 Logan, UT 84321 245-3323 752-2008 Cyrus M. McKell 1336 East 1700 North North Logan, UT 84321 753-1556 �• • 2 WRITE OR CALL YOUR COUNTY PLANNER R ck Johnson i 179 North Main Logan, UT 84321 752-8327 WRITE OR CALL YOUR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ma ri on 01 sen Ted Ka rren 8640 South 200 West 1656 East 1140 North Logan, UT 84321 752-7834 Paradise. UT 245-3309 Robert Chambers 331 East 50 North Smithfield, UT 563-6151 POSI TION STATEMENT The position statement committee met on Thursday night to formalize the statement to be presented to the Cache County Pl anning and Zon ing Commission on beha lf of the Citizens to Protect L n Canyon. If you would l ike to read the statement. please oga call An n at 753-0512. ENLIST YOUR FRIENDS More petitions and nStump H ollow Development?!! summary sheets may be obta ined from Ann or Lee. We wi ll be glad to add many more names to the mailing li st. ADVERTISEMENT We particularly need to get the word to the smaller towns in Cache Valley. If you are willing to post IIStump Hollow Deve l opment" sheets in fa r corners and/or travel for petit i on s i gni ng , please ca ll (aga in ) An n or Lee to get more materia l s . NEWSLETTER Another will be sent as soon as there i s news to share. YES, WE NEED CONTRI8UTIONS ! We wou l d apprec i ate any dona ti ons you could gi ve to help our public ity effort (ma iling cos t s . printing cos ts, radio ti me, and Xerox; ng cos t s al l add up! ) ill accept cac h or check L Re ntz, t he chairperson of the Media Committee, w ee donations at: 459 North 1st East Logan, UT 84321 Make checks payabl e to: Lee Rentz (C iti zens for the Protecti on of Logan Ca nyon) STEER ING COMMITTEE Ann Sc himpf 715 North 3rd East Logan, Utah 753-0512 Lee Rentz 459 North 1st East Logan, Utah 753-5076 ,, - Alice Lindahl 48 Mar i ndale Logan, Utah 753-1248 �• A PETITION OPPOSING ZONING CHANGES IN LOGAN CANYON We, as citizens of Cache County. recommend that t he request for a change from zone designation FR-40 (forest recreation) to pun (planned unit devel opment) at Stump Hollow be denied. We further recommend that the land at Right Hand Fork in Logan Canyon remain an FR-40 lone. We feel that these de velopments would i mpose costs on the vast majority of Cache residents which would greatly outweigh the benefits to a few people . A f ev/ of t he issues are: 1. The cos t of county services provided for Stump Ho ll ow \'1Qu l d not be met by its own residents (through ta xes) for 15-20 years, so ta xpayers l'Iou ld have t o bear the burden. 2. Water and sewage problems at Stump Hollow have not been adequately eva luated and they pose a threat to the watershed. 3. A zoning change would set a precedent and open the rest of the canyon to development. 4. Cache County residents would lose a very valuable and much loved recreational land if the canyon is developed for commercial purposes. Fi shermen, snowmobilers, hikers, hunters, cross - country sk iers, picnickers, touri st s, rock hounds, and photographers enjoy l ogan Canyon in its present state . We want to secure these mounta in lands for the futu re . NAME STREET ADDRESS TOWN PHONE �• NAME • STREET ADDRESS TOWN CITIZENS FOR THE PROTECTTOIl O LOGAN CANYON F PHONE �• • STUMP HOLLOW DEVELOPMENT ? A private owner plans to erect condominiums. cabins, a restaurant. gas station, and motel on 477 acres in Stump Hol l ow. To do this, he has to get a recommendation for rezoning from FR-40 (forest recreation) to PUD (planned unit development) from the Cache County Pl anning and Zoning Commission. Negative Consequences of the Devel opment • A possible contamination of downstream waters because of soi l inadequate for septic tanks . • Acc'ording to Pau l Woodbury (Utah Di vis i on of Wildlife Resources). this land i s now summer range fo r el k. deer, moose, grouse, and snowshoe hare. There woul d obvious ly be a negat i ve effect upon these and other anima l s on both the private and surround i ng Forest Service lands. • Stump Holl ow now prov i des a year-round m x of hikers, snowmobilers, hunte r s, and i cross - country skiers with recreational opportunities. The development wou l d make Stump Hol l ow undes i rab l e fo r these forms of recreation. • Logan Canyon has remained an excepti ona lly beautiful wild place . The pressures for urbanization threaten the very natural qualities that the developer uses as his strongest sel l ing point. • According to Cache County Planner, Rick Johnson, the county's taxpayers woul d have to subsidize the developme nt for at l east 15-20 years before taxes from the project met the ser vi ces rendered. Right Hand Fork Homes? Anot her pri vate l andowner wants his land rezoned from FR-40 to allow bui l ding several cabins and homes near the highway at Right Hand Fork. Where Will It Stop? A zon i ng change here . another one there ... Pretty soon, the worl d begi ns . l ooking the same whet her you ' re i n Los Angel es, Detroit . or Logan Canyon . Development everywhere . . . merely to make a few bucks . Let ' s not all ow these proposed devel opments t o set a precedent for others. Keep Logan Canyon green! What You Can Do! Sign the pet i tion ! Write a l etter to the ed i tor: The Hera l d Journal 75 West 3rd Nor t h Logan , Utah 84321 Write a letter of protest to the county planner : Rick Johnson Cache County Pl anner 179 North Main Logan, Utah 84321 Attend the critica l publ i c hearings when they come up. for the Protection . of �• • .1 , , >, ". , ~ ,1 f ) �I C'J7Cf.:< 76J..~~r THE 1 LOGAN CANYON BULLETIN CITIZENS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LOGAN CANYON JANUARY 1991 The Question of Logan Canyon ... is not as big as acid rain, or ozone depletion, to be sure-but it might be an indicator. It can tell us how sincere we are, and how thorough, in our '90s leaning toward the land. Here is a deep . beautiful and winding canyon. gradually shallowing as it ascends into an open country of high meadows and ridge-top forests. For decades now this canyon has held a fairly mooest two-lane road that winds eastward from Logan with the lay of the land. eventually crests a 78oo-fool summit of the Wasatch Range, and then drops swiftly in switchbacks to Bear Lake. The whole forty miles, in any season, is a treat to the eye, because this is one of the few Wasatch Front river canyons where the road has not become the dominant feature of the landscape. It still looks like respected country . -- Tom Lyon Logan Canyon: Here and Now For the last thirty years there has been a drive to punch a wider, straighter, faster highway through Logan Canyon. In 1961 , five miles of the lower canyon were "improved"; in 1968, six more-up to the Right Hand Fork. But then came the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1970, and the road straighteners no longer ha ve a perfectly free hand. Now they have to justify their plans, and di scuss alternatives, and now we too have a say in what happens. Under the requirements of NEPA, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) has been researching the environmental impacts of different construction plans. After several years and the expenditure of over three quarters of a million dollars, they've come up with a draft study that doesn't specify a "preferred alternative." Unfortunately, their study, in the view of many, has been marked by slipshod procedures, insufficient data, and lack of consideration for the environment. Now it is up to those of us who care about the beauty and intactness of Logan Canyon to come forward and make a stand. Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon have made their own study of the canyon and have prepared the Conservationists' Alternative, which is incl uded in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). We urge you to give the Conservationists' Alternative your careful examination, to write a letter, and to make a statement at the public meeting on the DEIS. You can make a difference! �The Conservationists' Alternative The goal of this alternative is a highway that fits into Logan Canyon with minimal ecological disturbance and maximum safety, rather than a hi ghway that moves the greatest number of people through the canyon at the highest rale of speed. The Conservationists' Alternative meets this goal , but it is not a do-nothing al ternative. Current roadway width and alignment wou ld be maintained throughout the canyon. with the following exceptions: Bridges and culverts re placed and widened to 28 feet, with all but Lower Twin Bridges kept on the existing alignment. • Turning lanes constructed at Tony Grove Recreation Area and Beaver Mountain Ski Area. • Climbing lanes constructed above Red Banks Campground, below the state sheds, and in the Sinks area, but not at the Dugway. • Increased traffic law enforcement. • Slow vehicle turnouts and multipurpose parking constructed at several locations. • Roadbed raised near Logan Cave and in several other locations to avoid spring fl ooding. WE URGE YOU TO SUPPORT THIS ALTERNATIVE What Can You Do to Help Protect Logan Canyon? Support the Conservationists' Alternative. Write a letter expressing your concerns. Speak out at the public meetiog in Logan. Writing a Letter is as Easy as One, Two, Three First: Introduce yourself. Mention why you are concerned about Logan Canyon and experiences you have had there. Second: Support the Conservationists' Alternative. Also point out problems in the DEIS. You can refer to the above lists for details, or write to us for more infonnation. Third: Put your return address on the lener, sign it, and date it. Send your letter to : James Naegle Utah Dept. of Transportation 4501 South 2700 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84 11 9 To get a copy of the DEIS, call: James Naegle (80 I) 965-4 160 Letters must be mailed by February 1, 1991. Letter-writing workshops will be held at A Book Store, 130 North 100 East, Logan 7:00 p.m., on Thursday, Jamlary 3; Monday, January 7; and Thursday, January 10. Despite what some say, the road builders do "count votes." So speak out! �Other Alternatives Considered in the DEIS After careful study, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon concluded that these alternatives would compromise safery, destroy the canyon's un ique e nvironment, or both. These alternatives include: • "Standard Arterial" - The widest. straightest. highest- speed alternative. With wide shoulders and "recovery areas" adjacent to the road. well over twice as much land wou ld be disturbed as at present. Large cuts would scar hillsides. and the road would intrude into the river. • "Mod ified Standa rd " - Identical to the Standard Arterial, except the roadway width would be somewhat less in the narrow and scenic middle section of Logan Canyon. There would be fewer cuts than under the Standard Arterial . • " Composite Alte rn ati ve l1 - A combination of the Standard and Mexlified Alternatives. It is a late addition to the list of alternatives and retain s many severe environ mental impacts, such as a climbing lane at the Dugway. It would also have more adverse effec ts on streams in the upper pan of the canyon. • "S pot Improvement" - Road width would not c hange; however, hillsides would be cut to straighten curves, and climbing and turning lanes would be built in environmentally sensitive areas. • " No Action " - NEPA requires agencies to consider this alternative in a DE IS. There are legitimate construction needs in Logan Canyon. however, so conservationi sts have not supponed this alternative. Shaded area shows one of the highway cuts proposed under several of the alternatives. Unfortunately, these alterna ti ves and the DEIS itselr have some serious flaws, incl udin g: • Disturbance of the river and loss of riparian habitats are not adequately addressed. • Impacts on wildlife, especially fish. nongame species, and the threatened Maguire's Primrose, are weakly treated. • Disposal of rubble. many thousands of cubic yards under some alternatives, is ignored . • Greater accident frequency or severity is possible with increased speeds under some al tern atives; this possibility is not addressed. • Site-specific impacts are addressed vaguely; mitigation is put off until the "design ph ase" which is some unspecified time in the future. • Worst-case traffic projections are used to justify major modifications to the highway . yet Logan Canyon is often only lightly travelled. • The safety record for Logan Canyon is not compared with similar mountain road s; yet safety is a major concern and is the rationale for some construction. • Logan Canyon is nationally renowned fo r its scenery, and has been designated a Scenic Byway, yet th is prominence is not di scussed. Logan Canyon Cannot Speak for Itself But you can speak for Logan Canyon. A public hea ring on Logan Canyon is scheduled for T uesday, J anua ry IS, 1991. at the Mt. Loga n Middle School Auditorium, 875 N. 200 East, Logan . If you pla n to speak, you will need to a rri ve ea rly to sign up ir required. The points that apply to letter writing also apply to your spoken comment. It is likely that thetime allotted to each speaker will be about fiv e minutes. so plea se prepare your comments accordingly. If you can both speak at the hearin g and write a lener. do both. Even ir you do not pla n to spea k, please attend the hea ring to show your sup po rt fo r Logan Canyon. Printed on recycled paper Photos by Scott T. Smith �11 Improvement makes strai ght roads; but the crooked roads, without improvement, are roads or genius." •. William Blake LOGAN CANYON is at risk. LOGAN CANYON needs you . ..... '- ., P.O. 80. 3501 Logan, Ulah 84321 \ �I • LOGAN CANYON NEWSLETTER November 8 , 1976 UPDATE : NO l'IElI \'Ie etil l Citizens for the Protection of Logan. Canyon NE~'IS dol'] 1 t know ...:hen the Plenn inA; Z. CPLC lIoiJ:;ETIilG CPLC held a meeting on I;ov. 4 to discus:; plans tor the future o f our group. ~. - ' C WE PAsS {\ CPIJC V ol. I. No.3 ...,-............-:- ON STUMP HCLLQ\" and Zonin g Com ~lssi o n will be asked to make a dec ie1o~ on th i s im~ortont · 1ssue. Unfortunately , we may not have t hat information un til one week b~rore the P ~ Z meeting it self . night Hand Fork zonin R -- requea t - ~e in the 8a~e cnte~ory. NOV. . The followin g ~ene r al plan s of action ra .;ulte d : _ 1. ' Fini.sh off the petition drive with • Durst- of activity next- week:~nd (Hov, 13), ~' have 2,100 a1gnaturea, ~d-..)uI~bl_. th a t nu~ b cr , In e n effort to re a c h t h j ~ ~o~l , CPLC members will man Ret1tion booths 8 t ma ny 3i t ea around tb,, ' valley . on S l;\t llrd ~y . No·r . 1 3 . U.S . U. will host <l booth from Nev. 10 until 12th. You can help by collecting all thane petiti ons yo u ha ve posted and by pre senting' the i s ~u~ to-you-r---rt~~h-bo-p.hee Ii 1 r youo-l.~.~,,~.it-----I no t already cfo ne s o. t;ven if your sheeta h a'l,,' e only a f#!w n tl !'!l .l!'"SOn t ?!.efft--let t hem be counted I ~ E!..ECTl orr RESULTS The Nov, 2 election t" esu l t~ l",ere h o t.h positive en d ne ltrt tive in t heir pot'ential Petition s will be due in b y Mo nday, Nov. 1 5 . effects on CPLC ~oals . Bo'b Char.fb'J r s .....6%1- , 2. Hold onto petition s ignature s until the actual ? & Z m eetin g and Commission meeting ar e h eld. ,. Have ~ doo r-to-do or s~~atur~ campllip:n wh en we kn ow for nu re the actual date of the relev 3nt P & Z me r. tin~ . Th is, hope tully, wil l ale r t re~~den ts e~ain , 4. Turn jn cu r :; i r;n e d r.o :;it ion ntlltp. ment t o t he t;;Jche COlllmis r. ionl'!t"n on l'lbout November 15. 5. Nin l'! CPLC ~embe r a volunte l'!.p. rl t o serve aD a pe rmanent Itovernin" bo;,,;r d. l'hc y wil~ ensur~ th."t tht'! structure and proll;::-e85 of CPLC wi l l no t be lo s t if we hBve 9 lon~ wait for the " s t ump Holl ow" r:teetinl';. t~ } 4- ye ~r Cnche C o mm i s~ion pos t, vo tes. 7h is is stronp;e a t ~o~d-~he ~ tllte~ le nt against de velopmen 't by 429 h as ma de the of any candida t " in Logan Canyon, .1' . HOy f" heurer won the 2- year poet ae eOMmiasionot-r---+b,v'}. al3 voter.) .-- Ria po~\ ition hn ~.; b~l'!n o n(> of non - c:>mmitt. l on ; Sturn,!) lIol 1ow. It i G d i ff icult to say how ~r. l' i'I~~.Hd--l. e-l\-n. --!m- t·h~1-" ... ue . Our I :rl~ ..' tr.'it cl('ct i ~' n lor'1~ ' \.11\ [ : ; ;" rl' , ~' O:::! , I dcfe"t • . lIe \" ''''0 '-I1 11in,.; to i ntl'o;iU <: f) l e p;islation which would allow p',H'c h ass ot the l.;:r.d. It would ha7.e 'bsen ad.:i6 d . tl'•.a-n, to Cache Natio nal Fore~t. STUJ.IPER- STICXERS FINAL PETITICN DRIVE Plea5e turn in your peti.ttons t o Lee or Ann by Uovembcr 15, Hondar_ H!.~ht now we , ,. \'/e ' ve ordered 400 :TIors . They will be avniVtble a t Mount ai n ~!an on North Main ~ n d at the Harmoniou s Living Cen t e r at . U.S.U. for 501l . �~' G li .;t:~~ ·,.,:.t:.. _t:." _h.:-. - ,,_ t:;.ack c;.~ ~ r:.:: l~~'j'i..,: .. '.', ""' . . ,- .. .. l:--:""",}t. ~ _.:..!~'" ,r.:~'::, ," .)"'·~ !JO )~~ :,,~~ ........... _ _ ,,'r. i:!. ~ . ::. ~ e"(."gv ft,," :..;:. l .. '-' . ::\'. "f" :I\:.2 ',,of t~H: 't::"!:..E- ',ro c:-_ ~t ~~~. ';'-:ll.l~.~ ~ :1~:::t -: ri8'~lt ~c!{""·.< t~@ rl l'l.~ ·· ---~ ·j :"'::: ~-:.:.OH'; : !l! -!ix::.J "2; a n d /~n i nr. met: ti't$' .al-~ B r.Lc1.i,e~ Ian J. n~~ A udubon Sj >;! :- n --------- 5..ut VOl! , w ,,,,,,-~,, C -- ' o" ~~_ l:e!"G · .,c.l. .- .... ~,'~'­ ,.f: :1'~ .. 6"'.F T :-:-illIr.g ". f' '" ' .. 1._1 ~. rl ci& rg~ v':: ~t._ ~["J; , :.t.lrf' t o t~e E~r 9.1tj ~~t (ill::' :.r \': :,:,i t~ you r commissiun: r.5. 50 . 0') ?3.2~ E"c.til ;,(> '!" S'a".k€;r s < _nnct.ve. ·,,-.;n- fr l./::• .::!£): a.n d n~i "·:.'~·'··t._ '~"'c~'r>:; .. . :.":J:i. -' f ;.=-';u~ ..... con.:;:-._.. J. { r r;'i.~.1... -,- 50 . 0:; ': h :. ,~ '+ 1.48 '~'H /J li< Prin ting 35. 54 7:",=-C ., £!J. p ~ }_ it:.s 19. 4D 77. 78 f or your he lp, a ll of :--ou . 'Ne 1.1.0 .. :lU:nbe r abc\;;t 140 menw erlh }ee.~:J! :i.. ('!(;I') t. S. :';!'Vl6J.~ r E: r b.ds . h):'t;L tU2 Nove~b ~ r 77 .50 mnpe.r s t i'!lte rs 3251. 70 EY.PE!;:s~:; CFJ/i 11 :-,5 priIl t e d : 2 2 00 Stump Holle ..... fl y e:~ 6 90 I,e w5L; t te r t.tl N e'lfslettp.~· )00 Dumper #2 St ic ke r ~ :rany fl O.f.terB .:ll"d 2 newspa p er a ds in t he Herula L ou::. W.:: ~an a ntici p ate ('li E"::' $100 . 00 i1io rc if al l t he o lj I!r.d !1~\01 St\.~ m ;-e: 'It:'cb,rs sd l. Tr. i a Ilw ne y wil l ~e UQed .{)t:' r a r o !:l.n C ne ~~ s 'pape:r spo ts ':.0 t,'.l;lrt E e7f: :,y one to t.'1 e df'. t.e of t n e F eo( ~ Dleetin~ ~- ~fJ1£ • ...... - ~ J 15 petiti ~o I')"' iea~]ine. D';::)R TO WOR Lal: r y liye has take !, tn~ pt~c. CJ.(';11 tilt'r .. :.!.' . ;t. i n ~~l! s'l!lle a ~l"! ... \_\ 0-'.:.l':: gcn er. !:.i!lg .:l l.:lrg e: n'.;ttI!n~: or !>i&ni.:.u' !> i:i ", active app r oach ;:'0 peti~!(hlit"Z t·crt.;.......I.': ::l';!sE:::t''Iez a c~o;pliIl:e:l.:: Co Ol;! is .1n e:(<--;;~] ~t.i:: others to £0 110\01 , 575 FE- titj ons 500 YOU , •• , - .- . GOVtRllHi G 30.l\!ID He bb1 (1 ta.nn e r 753-001 3 .Oo \' id "A. . Ad a:n3 A '£ELEPHON E TREE h')'6 Lt"<':r. for:ne€.! !;,) ;:,Hl;: l.il1 b e [Iot::.r LI.::<i U) "i;":>:1...... , ..1·1jtr.ing Urj;t-~.,:: CQ::l<;!s up, C~i.r; m er.lb~ r s Lie Rer.tz !i ~.a N 1 !. l>ct: ~ n, UT [)4 32l MI n Schimpf ·7'.5 N 3 ,. " Alice !,1ndahl :"-!S Ms.rinriale 753-1248 l,vgan, UT 753-1476 La:-ry E. Ny~ 245- 3010 \ol~ndy H. Pal o..... 563-3488 J~r. y ou~s 753-;278 i:tlte Packard ~~i! ~ 753-}806 M Shult z . 752 -5447 J·.' hn .L ;;cn.'..Ilt t• . 752-5447 ·t1.<3.ney l~!.u=d' rS2 - j917 A~r.. Schl.n.pf ·\ li("~ !..lr:.dahl ]':3-03 12: 753- J 2!. S 'Lee Rentz 753-5076 SI U KPER 'JTUMP Il JU.O\l VROG.RESS REPORT ! A no tice a ppeared i n cAe Herald Jerurl"l ul No vember] saying t h e re "Will !H! .a pr(\e;n:~H r cpor t (HI Stump ll ollo',J and Rtght Na.n;d l'-t'ri<:. at tj,e N';'QWIlbe r 11 m ~eti ns o ( t he P & z. -:.omrr..t s ~I'J:l (at 41:00 [I -m .) . hccordin.s t(l RId, Jchn'~o!l . Cou n ty Phl.nne r _ he ;.:Hl h'il p.r-t!£oet,tircg t il l! ~ ol'r E: :Jponden ce he ha s [" ec cis~d f:-co;ll die de.,Felopcrs concern ing tli'ese- lWO propos. ·ts pl~s a l l relevant. ncwspaper S I.'!; app e ar~d., Lee Rent.z w~U meet:ing ,' fee l < �, \ -If Turn In ;:>et ltl ons by Monday. tlover.lber 15 * \;C!Y ;..h : he news med i a fo:", new cleve lcrments .-----, BULK RAT-E J ~' DGERlAtID AUDU60N SOC ! ElY ~ Ov Box 3501 { ~c·~n . IJT 84321 postage I '.:J LOCI·.11 c~ PERK IT # ~lerrl.ll L1 brar7 Learning Resow:<:ea P:rograa utah Stat. Univ. UMC :JO LoG"J! . l1I' 84322 l 1 ! Par d ¥ ; " . �Logan Canyon at Risk The time has come to speak out for the preservation of Logan Canyon and Logan River. Two public seoping hearings concerning the future of U.S. Highway 89 through Logan Canyon will be held locally in early March. The first hearing is set for Mar ch 3 at 7 p.m. in the Mountain Fuel Supply Building in Logan. The second hearing will be held March 4 at 7 p.m. at the City Hall in Garden City, Utah. The hearings are required by federal Jaw as part of the process being undertaken by the Utah Department of Transporation (UDOT) and the Denver-based engineering consuhanls, CR2M Hill. to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS ) th at could recommend a larger and faster highway through Log an Canyon. Developing a list of alternatives for the Logan Canyon highway is integral to the EIS process . The final list of alternatives will not be com· piled until after receiving public comment, which includes the comments given at the scoping hearings. "It's Important that people who love Logan Canyon for its scenic beauty and recreational opportunities attend these meet· ings and speak out, " said Jack Spence, a longtime northern Utah conservationist. "Without lots of comments from concerned citizens, the highway engineers will build without regard to the area's natural environment," Spence said. Study cost over $500,000 The current highway scoping hearings are a pa rt of CH2M Hill's $500,000 study contract with UDOT. The contract reo quires t he engineering firm to develop a transportation plan for Logan Canyon 's highw ay through the year 2010. Previous studies have been undertaken to explore major highway construction in Logan Canyon. The most recent study ended in 1980 after local citizens expressed their concern for the canyon. Another highway study in 1971 met a similar fate . "Local residents should at· tend the hearings to explain Scoping Hearin g Schedule Logan March 3 7 p.m. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. Auditorium, 45 E. 200 North. Garden City March 4 Garden City Hall. 7 p.m. Persons planning to speak at the hearing will be asked to register as they enter the building. Before public comments are taken, UDOT and CH2M Hill will make a brief presentation. Comm ents will be heard before discussion is opened . For persons unable to attend the hearing, written comments will be accepted by April 6, 1987 at : Mr. Clifford Forsgren , Project Manager CH2M Hill/ Salt Lake City OUice P .O. Box 2218 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 phone : (801) 363-{l2QO how they enjoy Logan Canyon as it is today," said Rudy Lukez, chair of the Sierra Club's Cache Group. "We do not want to sacrifice Logan Canyon so that a few people can travel from Logan to Bear Lake a few minutes faster," Lukez said. One of Logan Canyon's most scenic and fragile sections is from Right Hand Fork to Ricks Spring (see map page 3). This See Risk on page 2. Memories travel the can yon By C. L. Rawlin s This much is certain : They were married the 28th of June, 1911, and left Logan for a honeymoon at Bear Lake. He drove the team and ~he probably indulged in raptures over the canyon greenery and imposing limestone walls. She may have slapped, daintly, at a mosquito as they passed into the brief, cool shadow of cottonwoods. My grandfather would have pointed out the smokemarked overhang where teamsters hauling stone for the Temple camped a generation before. The road left the main canyon where it narrowed and climbed the Right Fork to Willow Canyon. Alter descending the Temple Fork , they stopped - as we always did on later trips at Ricks Springs for a brillia ntly cold cupful, which Grandfather would have fetched with self·concious courtliness. Where they camped, I don' t know ; a meadow would be chosen, with grazing for the team and a level sleeping spot within the sound of water. Journeys then , when the desirability of automobiles was still hotly debated, were often reckoned not in miles , but in nights CITIZENS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LOGAN CANYON P.O. Box 3580 l oga n. Utah 8432 1 (801l1152-9 102 ,S6H9OfI (e l SCOff T. Sm ittl Winter solitude in Logan Canyon spent out, under the sky. The hill-and-meadowscapes below Beaver Mountain were green then as now , with balsamroot and mule·ear daisies yellowing the slopes. Past the mountain, the road followed - and still follows for those with patience - Beaver Creek In a gradual climb north to the summit. Roads showed the sensitivity to slope and contour that comes when bodies - horse or human - do the work of traveling. Huge cuts and fills were too costly in those sa me terms . Alter frequent halts to rest the horses, they reached the summit : occasion for a picnic and savoring the hard·won view . The descent to St. Charles is steep and my grandfather cam e from a family having much to do with wagons; he checked the brake before laking the grade. The return took them a good. two days. Retelling, my grandmother never complained of the heat, dust, jolts, or slow pace. That there was a road at all seemed sufficient miracle. The canyon , she often said, had never been more beautiful. C.L. Rawlins wr ites, T eaches wr l T iJ and wor ks on field stUdies of acid ln' deposlt1on In The Win d River Ran ge i n Wvom i ng. Bulk Rate- U.S. Postage PAI D Logan, Utah Perm it No. 104 �2 CITIZENS FOR TIlE PROTECT1ON OF LOGAN CANYON _ rEDURARY 1987 CITIZENS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LOGAN CANYON On March 3 and 4, you will have the opportunity to present your views on Logan Canyon and its highway . Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon have prepared the following list of recommendations for the study . We urge you to attend the March scoping meeting and support CPLC's position. _ Protection of Logan Canyon's scenic beauty, fish and wildlife habitat, rare plants, recreation sites and naturalness must be a prime concern. _ An Environmentlllmpad Statement (EIS ) must be prepared for any significant road modification proposals to protect Logan Canyon's natural surroun· dings from haphazard modifications . - Travel speeds between Right Hand Fork and Rick's Spring should remain as currently posted . This area is very scenic and too sensitive to permit any significant roadway modifications. - Bridges which cannot meet structural safety requirements should be replaced when possible. These bridges should be two lanes wide only. Minor alterations to bridge approaches would be acceptable. - Turning lines at Tony Grove Recreation Area and Beaver Mountain Ski Area may be constructed to The Logan Canyon Bulletin is published by Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon - a citizens group of volunteers and non-profit organizations working toward long-term protection of Loga n Canyon's scenic beauty, fish and wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities and naturalness . The Jardine Juniper is CPLC's symbol. Located high above Wood Camp recreation area, this ancient and beautiful tree represents Logan Canyon's recreational diversity and unsurpassed scenery. Every few years, the utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) begins a study of Logan Canyon's highway, U.S. 89. The last study in 1979 and 1980 was left uncompleted after highway expansion proponents found strong local opposition to proposed roadway modifications. Since June, 1986, UDOT and Denver-based engineering consultants, CH2M Hill, have been spending over $500,000 to prepare yet another analysis of the roadway. Perhaps one of the Rocky Mountain's most scenic roadways, Logan Canyon's highway provides many people with access to numerous U.S. Forest Service campgrounds and picnic areas, fishing sites , and snowmobiling and skiing trailheads. Throughout the four seasons, a visitor to Logan Canyon can find beauty through these many recreational opportunities or simply by taking the drive from Logan to Bear Lake . The new UDOT study is moving toward the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and this could be the first step toward major alterations in the Canyon . Before an EIS is prepared, public scoping meetings must be held and citizens must be given a chance to present either written or oral testimony on the study areas . facilitate turning traffic . _ Parklng areas should be built near Temple Fork Road and Cottonwood Canyon (near Logan Cave) to improve traffic flow and safety. _ Additional warning signs should be placed along the highway telling motorists about bicycle traffic, pulloffs and pedestrian travel. _ The road should be resurfaced and restriped where required. This will improve through traffic travel and nighttime safety throughout Logan Canyon. _ No cUmbing (passing) lane should be built at the Dugway (between Lower and Upper Twin ~ridges) . A dim bing lane would affeel a very scemc area hy requiring major cut and fill operations with unsighUy retaining walls. _ No rold modifications should alter the Logan River's watercourse since the river is a major recreational resource. Alterations could destroy im· portant streambanks. _ No new roads or major changes to the existing road should be constructed from the Bear Lake Summit to the Bear Lake Overlook. This highway section is in a very popular and scenic recreation area . ation sites, the U.S. Forest Service decided in the 1984 Wasatch·Cache National Forest Continued. from page 1 Plan to "mana~e Logan Canyon section contains important fish as a scenic highway." Forest and wildlife habitat along with plans are approved and implemented only after a lengthy spectacular cliff formations. " Modifications to the highway public review process. - even with simple widening could have disastrous effects on the river's fish population," said Bill Helm, a fisheries and wildlife professor at Utah State University. Logan Canyon provides ac" The Logan River is very unique since it is a Class II cess to many Forest Service waterway," Helm said. "This recreational sites. More than 30 means that trout can easily campgrounds and picnic sites grow to large sizes and exist in are located along the roadway. Most of the road is located large populations. along Forest Service property " But, the river is fragile and could easily be damaged, " in the Wasatch-Cache National Helm said. " You just cannot Forest. "If sections of the canyon are mitigate everything ." widened to permit increased traffic speeds and wider turns, then some of the forest's cam· ping and picniC sites could become less enjoyable," said Bruce Pendery, chair of the In addition to taking traffic Bridgerland Audubon Society's counts and predicting future Conservation Committee. traffic volumes, the current To help promote long-term study includes a scenery in- protection for Logan Canyon's ventory of Logan Canyon. The scenery, fish and wildlife study was completed by the habitat, and recreational opWasatch-Cache National Forest portunities, Citizens for the Service's landscape architect, Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC) has been reorganized. Clark Ostergard. Ostergard's study shows that CPLC was instrumental in sections of Logan Canyon, stopping major highway particularly from the Right modifications in 1919-1980. "CPLC's purpose is to proBand Fork to Ricks Springs, cannot have si~nificant road vide a common base for aU modifications Without damag- Individuals and organizations ing irreplaceable scenic views . who care about Logan Canyon's Because of Logan Canyon's future ," said Pendery. "CPLC supports a variety of beauty and its popular recre- Risk Recrea ti on Sites Canyon very scen ic small projects for the highway, " Pendery said. "These include several road modifications, such as turning lanes, replacement of unsafe bridges and several new parking areas." Perhaps CPLC's most interesting proposal involves designation of Logan Canyon as a National Scenic Highway . "While National Scenic Highway designation does not guarantee absolute long-term protection of Logan Canyon, it would increase the public's awareness that we have a national treasure in our backyard," Lukez said. DeSignation of U.S. 89 through Logan Canyon as a National Scenic Highway would require action by the U.S. Congress. Cit izens urged to partiCipate The March 3 and 4 hearings will be the best chance for local citizens to inOuence the highway'S design . "And without the voices of those who love the canyon for what it is today," Lukez said, " those who want a larger highway Soon may have their way." If people cannot attend or speak at a hearing, written comments will be accepted unW April 6. Comments should be sent to Mr. Clifford Forsgren, Project Engineer" CH2M Hill/ SaIt Lake City Office, P.O. Box 2218, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. - Congress should designate Logan Canyon Highway as Utah's first National Scenic Highway. This designation would recognize Logan Canyon as a scenic and recreational jewel similar to other attractions in our National Park System. - Logan River above Third Dam should be considered for National Recreation al River designation under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This federal designation will protect the river's quality for all future generations. For more information, please write to Citizens fo r the Protection of Logan Canyon, P .O. Box 3580, Logan, utah 84321. Phone 801/152-9102 or 563-6908 (evenings) . Funding for the Logan Canyon Bulletin is provided by numerous individuals in northern Utah. We welcome your support. Contributor's to TM L.ogan Canyon BulleTin InclUde northern Utllh residents Steve Flint, Rudy L.ukez, Bill Hel m, Jllck Spence, Bruce Pendery-, C.L.. Rlwllns, Tom L.yon, Dllne Browning, Dennis Will Ind Seon T. Smlltt (photogrlphy ), Jlne O' Keefe (Irtwork, copyr ig hted ) Ind John ReeVH (clrtography). Traffic data weak By Steve Flint Highway modifications often are justified by using estimates of future traffic patterns based on past traffic trends. However. when Duduating gas prices and changing travel patterns are considered, traffic flow predictions can be an uncertain adventure at best. The Utah Department of Transportation (uDOT) and engineering consultants, CH2M Hill, are using past traffic trends for Logan Canyon predictions. This information does not establish reliable traffic trends for the canyon. Even the consultants are not completely confident about the available traffic data . In a draft technical report, CB2M Hill reports: "Data point scatter and (the) short period of record make(s) it difficult to forecast future (traffic) volumes with any degree of confidence." If traffic data is reviewed on an annual basis, there is no suggestion of an increase in traffic through the canyon. Over the past 13 years, the annual traffic Dow has fluctuated a bit from year to year without any pattern of increase. However, summer traffic during June, July and August shows a different pattern. There is more traffic in the canyon during these months and, for the past few years, traffic has been increasing slightly during these three summer months. Based on past trends of traffic and population change, the most substantial prediction of summer traHic growth is 1.95 percent per year. The presumed need for major highway modifications is driven by this projected increase . During past studies, UDOT has greaUy oVerestimated future traffic predictions. A review of the 1971 and 1979 Logan Canyon highway studies shows that UDOT's official predictions for 1985 traffic rates were 30 to 55 percent above what eventua lly occurred. The current UDOT /CH2M Hill Logan Canyon Study is using an exponential model to predict future traffic patterns. This model soUers from the same mistakes made in previous studies when summer traffic was analyzed . A more realistic model uses linear growth that predicts a smaller increase in summer traffic. This means that acceptable traffic now levels without major highway modifications are possible in the year 2010. Sleye Fllnl Is II member of 1M Brldgerland Audubon SocieTy's Cons.enlllT lon Commllll!@. Hetin beenreviewlngUDOT 's Tralf1cdlllslnceJuIY1 9116. �FEBRUARY 191r7 - Accident data incomplete By Jack Spence Safety is important for everyone who travels on a roadway . For any highway. safety involves two major Issues - accident rates and accident severity. Yet, accurate accident rates in Logan Canyon cannot be determined because both the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and consultants. CH2M Hill. have refused to complete any comparative studies. This is hard to understand because with its mountainous terrain Utah has many highways comparable to U.S. 89, which runs through Logan Canyon. A comparison of accident rates and severity levels in Logan Canyon with data from Ogden, Little Cottonwood, Provo and Spanish Fork canyons would make sense. ~ITIZENS FOR TIlE PR0TECl10N OF LOCiAN CANYON 3 Logan Canyon Accident Survey T,,"of Accident Speeding a Problem . The collected Utah Highway Patrol information (see box) shows that most accidents are caused by going too fast. And, because of increased speeds, major road improve- ments could increase some ac- cident rates. Safety Studied Twice During the study of accidents in Logan Canyon, two different reviews were completed. First. using data collected by UDOT from 1980 to 1985, engineering consultants CH2M Hill concluded that four of 13 highway sections had accident rates higher than the standard safety guidelines. However, these conclusions were challenged when errors were found in UDOT's rates. When corrected data could not be produced, CH2M Hill decided to use another safety com pari- son method. The second method divided Car runs off ttIe ro.td 56% Driver speeding 46% Car hits an animal Logan Canyon into one-tenth1N Other Improper driving 25" Head·on comslon 12% Driver not looking 23"mile sections. CH2M Hill then Hit car In Intersection .,. Road snow· or la· covered 23'J(, found that 16 of the 374. onRear'end another car ~ Driving under the Influence 10% e-tenth-mile sections had acci2% Driving left of center line ' " 0 ....' dent counts higher than the Driver asleep or III '" highway's average. Vehicle defective 4% Even though 16 sections had Note : The total "cause of accld~ts" is greater than 100 percent higher than average counts, bKause a single acci~nt could have multiple causes. none of these sections were greatly In excess of many of the • Source : Utah Highway Patrol accident reports, 1980· 1985. _ _ _ _,.,jl value. in addition, the average ___________________ remaining 358 sections have a 3) Lower speeds on tight in a serious accident in Logan low number of accidents. corners, especially near ice and Canyon are small at any time. Since there is an absence of animal hazards Safety Alternatives 4) Improved highway sur- valid supporting data , safety Even though road construc- faces and brighter roadway cannot be used to justify major tion is usually considered the striping highway modifications. best way to improve highway 5) Improved road crowns to safety , other alternatives do increase water runoffs from the exist. highway J ac k SpenCt , a wt ll·known constrv.· These include : lion IS! in norlnern Utah, nel ptd organ ll t 1) Better speed enforcement an d ltad CP LC In 1919. Ht has rtll ltwtd Chances Are Small UOOT 's Logan C,!"! von safe lv dal, si nct by the UHP 2) Better advisory signing The chances of being involved Julv, 1986. Fishing threatened By Bill Helm AS it flows through Logan Canyon , the Logan River provides many opportunities for recreation in a natural and scenic setting. A popular four-season activity along Logan River is fishing . The river is one of only a few Class II trout stream s in Utah . Class II trout streams provide good fish habitat. This lets trout grow quickly to a large size. Road construction activities in Logan Canyon already have damaged the river's fish habitats . Channel straightening and elimination of streambank vegetation have decreased the number of trout from 50 to 90 percent in some locations. Class U Defined To be ranked a Class II trout strum in Utah, a waterway must have many slow and quiet resting and hiding areas with adequate plant cover . This lets fish rest while being shielded from potential enemies. Feeding areas must be nearby with moderate flowing water. Class II waterways also require spawning habitats with medium-sized gravel bottoms in an area of moderate river currenL The bottom must be stable with little or no silt. . ",. Changes Could Hurt Trout Major changes to Logan Canyon's highway could damage the Class II fisheries . If the river is straightened , water speeds could increase beyond tolerable levels for trout. Placing fill on a streambank ' or removing streamside vegetation would eliminate resting and hiding cover. Streamside trees, shrubs, and grass provide food for insects. which trout eat, as well as providing hiding cover fo r trout. Streamside vegetation is valuable for many other reasons as well. It slows overland water runoff while trapping silt. This keeps the river clean for increased and healthier trout populations. Streamside vegetation also screens anglers [rom the highway while providing a wilder and more natural outdoor experience . This vegetation allows passing sights and sounds to be muted or even eliminated . While important for fish and fishermen alike, streamside vegetation provides habitat for birds and mammals who live along rivers. It also anchors streambanks. This minimizes bank erosion and stream bed shifting. LOGA N CANYON HIGHWAY m,,,, STUDY Changes Add Up " T. "LitUe" changes throughout the river soon add up to one "big" change. Minor modifications between Logan Canyon's highway and the river could invariably damage the entire Class n trout fishery . l oeAN .'" .' Bill Helm Is a proltsSOt' 01 IiSh t r its a ll(! wil dllft at Ut,h Sla tt Un illersitv. Ht hn <Kl illtly supporttd pr oted ion 01 Loga n Ca nvon a ll(! its r illtr lor ma!"!y vtars . �4 CITIZENS fOR 11-IE PROTEcnON OF l.OO AN CANYON _ FEBURARY 1987 Logan Canyon By Tom Lyon The significance of the Logan Canyon struggle, as I see it, is that it means we are waking up to some implications of the 20th century. Now that is a pretty tall order for a controversy over a highway . But it was nol so long ago (1968, to be precise ) that a six-mile section of the canyon was reamed and dynamited for what is called highway improvements - that was the section from Dewitt Springs to Right Hand Fork with almost no oPPOsition. In 1961, the lower section was similarly manhandled for the same reason, with even less comment. Now we are waking up, and we are taking a stand that has some powerful implications. We are, I think, starting to see Logan Canyon for what it actually is. We are seeing it, in its beauty and naturalness, as a place to be in, not go through. This is a significant change, amounting possibly to the beginning of a whole different orientation. As Americans, we have always been going somewhere else, always looking over the shoulder of what is around us, never quite being where we are. Now we seem to be settling in, some percentage of us , getting ready to live in place. The world is filling up fast, and perhaps finally we are seeing the well-known handwriting on the wall. We ought to - it is all in capital letters. The beauty is that in staying put for a while, we can begin to fee l the inward sense of place, so that for example the way the sun hits the Wellsvilles on winter mornings, of the way the Logan River looks and sounds, charging down the canyon in spring, becomes an unspoken part of consciousness and nol just views. The allegia nce is natural, literally natural. Suddenly it seems perfectly absurd, something out of a different world, to cut and fill Logan Canyon so that tra vellers between Los Angeles and Yellowstone (or between somewhere else and somewhere else, hut always travellers ) can save possibly two minutes of driving time. That different world is where the money and speed are. It is where " what's happening" is happening . It is that world that sends the three-piece suit brigade to Logan, Utah, all the way fro m Seattle or Denver or even New York to testify against wilderness for Mount Naomi, and that has cut and scraped. the hills by Bear Lake and put second homes sticking up everywhere, and that makes each one of us, possibly, wonder at some time if it wouldn't be nice to have a passing lane on the Dugway between Twin Bridges. That is the world of no place, of placeiessness, of AWatershed Tree ca nopies create roadway tunnels along parts of Logan Canyon. always going somewhere and never anywhere, at taking the landscape around you and converting it into something else, perferahly money , with as little delay as possible. (Then you can take the money and go somewhere else.) That world has had its way for a long time. But it runs on unconsciousness, and now not everyone is asleep. Too late for the San Fernando Valley, and too late for the hills of Bear Lake; but maybe we are still in time for Logan Canyon. There is already a road in it, a paved one even, and it is definitely not the Logan Canyon that the mountain man Warren Ferris saw in 1826 - there were grizzly and big horns then. But as they say, you start from where you are, and this is where we are. -:::----:;-_-:-_ _ ....,._ _-:(Tom Lyon is a professor of English at Utah State University. He has been involved (or several years in the movement to protect Logan Canyon.) Logan Canyon Needs Defenders No t striving. unresistilJg. )'ieltlilJg II o .'er t'om es Flowing lo wer tluJII ils tribu taries It ret'eives a ll illlo itself Fulfilling its purpose silnlll)' II makes n o da i", . F r o m L Ull 1'".. VO ICE YOUR SUPPORT FOR LOGAN CANYON'S FUTURE AT THE MARCH PUBLIC HEARINGS : CITIZENS FO R THE MARCH 3, 7 p.m ., MOUNTAIN FUEL AUDITORI UM , LOGAN PROTECTION OF LOGAN CANYON MAR CH 4, 7 p.m ., CITY HALL, GARDEN CITY P.O. Bo)( 3SBO Logan , UTah 84321 (801 )1752-9102 ,56H908 (e l � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4540 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3438 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/422">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/422</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1350707157 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource CPLC Newletters, 1976-1996 Description An account of the resource CPLC Newletters from 1976-1996 (incomplete) discussing the need for the protection of Logan Canyon and examination of the Conservatives' Alternative. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Wilderness areas Public lands--Utah--Logan Canyon Logan Canyon Study Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Newsletters Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 4 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd4 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/6b29ddef4c01b5d8ada410443ab8ad8b.pdf 0cd42a645943d0bf9f845c53619cb026 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3340 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2619 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/631">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/631</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2478930555 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Preliminary Record of Decision, July 14, 1994 Description An account of the resource The preliminary record of decision for US Highway 89, Right Fork in Logan Canyon to Garden City and Final Environmental Impact Statement. The six sections include decision, alternatives considered, section 4(f), measures to minimize harm, monitoring or enforcement program, and comments on the FEIS. Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Environmental policy Roads--Design and construction Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Utah. Department of Transportation Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 7/14/94 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Garden City (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 14 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd14 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/e56c9285f2796f62e1bfe7dc49d529da.pdf 2b9bdf96a5276651e0c88a81c4485039 PDF Text Text • EDUC 677 Ethnographic Study: Stanley Holmes Summer 1997 P rofiles in Activism: T hree Citizens Involved in the Loean Ca nyon Controve rsy Abstract: Thi s qualitative research project involved a multi-case study of adult citizens involved in a local political controversy. Following background research, structured interviews were conducted with three core subjects to identify shared character and bie-historical traits. Int roduction: ... brief his tory of the issue In the spring of 1997, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) began the latest stage of a highway construction project that has been a source of political controversy in the Logan I Bear Lake region for three decades. UDOT's plan to rebuild and expand Route 89 through Logan Canyon spawned a spirited debate among citizens and officials; a debate that may continue for some time. The controversy stretches back at least to the 19605, which saw UDOT's widening of the road in lower Logan Canyon. and the dawn of a national environmental movement whose local manifestation led to delays and adjustments in subsequent highway construction in the canyon. For the first time, UnOT was required to develop an environmental impact statement on its proposed construction. Area citizens formed a group, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC). that opposed the original UDOT plan then. after modifications, agreed in 1995 to participate on the advisory team working with UDOT and other agencies toward an acceptable design plan. CPLC's decision to provisionally accept the revised UDOT plan led to a schi sm in the environmental community that saw the formation of the Logan Canyon Coaliti on (LCC), which proceeded to take legal action aimed at minimizing Logan Canyon highway construction to little more than bridge repairs. In early 1997 a third citizens' group, the Logan Canyon Improvement Group (LCIG), was �,. \ -2- \ created to counter the environmental groups and promote significant expansion of the Logan Canyon highway. At the time of this research report, in August 1997, UDOT construction crews were well into the repair and upgrading of two bridges in the canyon. i I ... scientific relevance of the issue· The ongoing Logan Canyon controversy provides a unique opportunity to study democracy in action; to examine the dynamics of individuals participating as citizens in the process of making decisions that affect their community. This study seeks to better understand why some citizens choose to become actively involved in the political system . At a time in U.S. history when fewer than half the eligible voters bother to cast a ballot in national eJections, I hope to identify key factors that motivate the politically-active minority to dedicate their personal time to the political fray . ... researcher's interest: I am a doctoral candidate at the Utah State University College of Education, currently on sabbatical leave from my social science teaching position at Alta High School, in Sandy, Utah. I wi ll spend the next nine months in India, studying models of citizenship education in the schools of that democratic nation. "Citi zenship" is a key concept underlying my interest in education. In my opinion, the most important function of American public schools is the generation of socially-responsible and productive citizens. My favorite aspect of being a teacher has been the sense that I facilitate the acquisition of infonnation and thinking skills by the next wave of decision-makers in our democratic system . ... An overview of this report: This report covers background infonnation about the political controversy, identifies methodological questions, issues, and procedures that were involved, summarizes biographical �• -3- Ii data on the core subjects, compares similarities and differences in traits of the core subjects, discusses findings and additional research issues, and provides extended comparative data in the appendices. Methodology : Literature Review: Literature concerning various political and technical components of the Logan Canyon controversy were obtained from several sources that included archival files at the Logan Herald Journal newspaper, publications of the Utah Department of Transportation. and newletters of the involved environmental organizations. Owing to time constraints, no literature search was conducted to located similar studies that may have been conducted elsewhere. There was also no effort to build a literature base of research that has addressed aspects of po litical activism. The project rationale, conceptual approach, and imple mentation plan are my responsibility. Resea rch Q uestio ns: While the controversy over the highway through Logan Canyon provided the topical setting for conducting the study. my essential focus was on personal attributes (traits) of persons who have chosen to get involved. From that standpoint, the Logan Canyon controversy is peripheral to the main thrust of this study. Logan Canyon was selected as a vehicle for studying politicallyactive citizens because of its continued high-profile salience in the region served by Utah State University, and the ease of access to key informants. This study looked specifically for identifiable personal character and bio-historical traits that lead indi viduals to commit volunteer time and efforts to a political cause. The research question, then. was: What character and/or bio-historical traits do politically-active adults have in common? �• -4- Research Issues: ... researcher bias Several biases were brought by me to the threshold of this research project. First, I consider activists a special breed. Whatever their political stripe, I consider them more important to democracy than those nominal citizens who don't even bother to vote. This is in part an ego-based bias, since I've participated in several campaigns myself, and since most of my friends are activists of some degree. This type of bias might have led to questions and interview style that were not sufficiently critical or aggressive. In deciding who would he the core-profiled subjects, I arbitrarily narrowed the field to those whose involvement in the Logan Canyon controversy is completely voluntary. Despite the availability of persons with potentially more knowledge of, and greater involvement with, the issue, I ruled out anyone with a job connection to, or direct financial interest in, the controversy. In my view. volunteers are the foundation of citizenship. r arbitrarily decided to have a representative from each of the three local citizens groups serve as a core-profile subject, and did not consider selecting anyone who may be active but is not a member of one of the groups. This was done as a matter of expedience. 1 arbitrarily decided to have at least one member of each sex represented in the group of core profile subjects, and was pleased at the wide age range of the core profile subj ects. The main concern here was achieving more character diversity. Lastly, I must confess to being anything but neutral on environmental issues. The environmentalist in my pantheon of heroes is Edward Abbey. Fortunately for this study, the particular environmental issue --Logan Canyon-- is of marginal relevance to my core research goal. I asked the core-profile subjects exactly the same questions, and tried to maintain the same interv iew demeanor with them all . ... time constraint A proper ethnographic study would entail at least several months worth of investigation and analysis. Since the initiation and final report of this study were required within the timeframe of �., • -5- summer quarter, the entire process has been expedited to meet the time constraint. Hopefully. the data gathering has been broad and deep enough for my narrative and analysis to place the issue, and the actors, into a meaningful context for the reader. Procedures: This study employed a two-stage approach toward data collection that spanned the months of June, July, and August 1997. In the first stage, I gathered information on the Logan Canyon situation from newspaper files at the Logan Herald-Journal, UDOT project documents, and literature from citizens groups involved on different sides of the controversy. This stage involved conducting purposive, semi-structured interviews with persons I determined to be key informants. Their names were gleaned from news articles, and from referrals by other informants. The purpose of stage one was to deepen my background knowledge of the issue through a process that would afford some triangulation validity, and to make sure I understood the different perspectives from which involved parties view the controversy. Travelling between interviews, I also had an opportunity to drive through Logan Canyon and witness both the natural splendor and the challenging highway conditions that figure into the debate over what to do. Background information was gained in interviews with state and local officials, and with members of the three local citizens groups active in this issue. Key informants in an official capacity included the mayor of the Bear Lake community of Garden City, Utah, and the Utah Department of Transportation's head engineer for the Logan Canyon project. Interviewees representing the citizens groups included: two members of the Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC); three members of the Logan Canyon Coalition (LCC); and one member of the Logan Canyon Improvement Group (LCIG). I also gained valuable information and insights from LCIG members who spoke at the group's open meeting on July 21st, in Logan, Utah. All group representatives were interviewed in Logan, with the exception of one LCC member, who was interviewed in Ogden. The first stage interviews were semi-structured, in that a questionnaire was used that asked �-6- both specific and open-ended questions. I read the questions, and took notes as the subjects responded. No one objected to my tape-recording the conversations, although several asked me to tum off the recorder for moments of off-the-record infonnation. The respondents were first asked to summarize the history of the Logan Canyon controversy. Thi s data was used as an indicator of their depth of knowledge and perspective, and as a means to broaden my own understanding of the issues. They were then asked to identify the main players (key actors) on different sides of the debate. Questions that followed sought a description of the interviewee's position on Logan Canyon highway construction, details of their personal involvement, and the main motivation(s) for their participation. On several occasions. responses to these inqui ries led the interview into unexpected areas, such as connections drawn to the Provo Canyon controversy. states' rights issues, and organizational dynamics of both UDOT and the citizens' groups. I imagine one could write a book about the many political aspects and implications of what has transpired in the broader context of the logan Canyon controversy. In the second stage of this study. I narrowed the focus to the personal hi story and attributes of three individuals, each representing one of the three citizens' groups. All three met the criteri a of being sufficiently informed about Logan Canyon, all three have dedicated significant volunteer time to the controversy. and none have ajob or direct financial interest in its resolution. Each of these individuals was interviewed twice, using the first-stage and core-profile questionnaire fonns. The pseudonyms of the persons I selected for core profiles are: "Ezra", of the lCIG; "Vickie",ofCPlC; and "David", oflCC. The second stage, "core profile" interviews were more structured than the first stage interviews. In the interests of validity. I wanted to be sure that each subj ect received the same specific questions as the others. The four-page core profile questionnaire took between 60 - 90 minutes to complete. As was the case with the first stage, I asked questions from the questionnaire and noted responses on the same fonn. No one objected to my tape-recording the interviews. None of the questions mentioned logan Canyon. The three core respondents were asked �-7- biographical information that included: date and place of birth, residences and travels, education and work hi story, and details of their families of origin and procreation. I asked about parents', siblings" spouses', and childrens' occupations and education, as well as political affiliation, philosophy. issues, and activities. The last segment of the interview delved into the respondent's own hi story of civic and political activity, events and individuals who shaped their political beliefs, personal definition of "citi zenship" and conception of civic responsibi lity. Each was asked to explain their own motivation for political action, and whether they feel they've made a difference. Also raised were questions about levels of civic and political involvement in the United States today. and why many citizens do not get involved. They were asked whether the local (Cache Valley, Utah) culture faci litates or inhibits political expression. and if they had personally experienced hostility, stress, or other negative consequences of their civic and political activities. Finally, the three citizen activists were asked to identify the most rewarding aspects of their civic and political activities~ and each was asked how slhe wants to be remembered by hislher great grandchildren. Bioer'phic,' Sketches "Ezra" was born in Paris, Idaho on August 26, 19 12. Raised in Preston, Idaho, Ezra has res ided in Logan, Utah since 1932. He was stationed in Europe during World War 1I. Ezra worked almost 40 years as a linotype setter at the Herald Journal newspaper, in Logan, until a serious inj ury in 1974 forced a career change. He took carpentry and remodeling jobs until his retirement in 1996, at age 84. Ezra is now engaged in full-time political activism: a self-described "rabble rouser." His parents both worked for the postal service, and raised three chi ldren, of whom Ezra was the middle chi ld. Ezra comes from a solidly conservative Republican fami ly. He 'has kept that tradition alive since casting his first ballot (against FOR) in 1936. Ezra's fathe r spoke out on a variety of political issues. and had hi s mother's support ... much as Ezra has the tireless support �-8- \ of his wife today. He credits his parents with having most influenced hi s political beliefs. That generation of Ezra's family also featured two cousins [one paternal, one maternal] in Idaho who were politically outspoken. While Ezra's brother has been active in conservative politics as well, Ezra says hi s sole child (a stepson) prefers noninvolvement, believing that "all politicians are liars". Ezra's political interests range across a wide spectrum, and he is well-known as a regular writer of oftimes provocative letters to the Herald lournal and other Utah newspapers. Over many years of political activism, he has served as a Republican Party preci nct officer, taken part in the citizens effort to prevent construction of a Logan golf course and, most recently, co-founded the Logan Canyon Improvement Group. Once asked to run for local office, Ezra declined , stating that he preferred to remain an "outsider". Still, his living room wall boasts several certificates of appreciation from local and national organizations impressed with hi s efforts in the political realm. "Vickie" was born in Montreal, Canada, in October of 1942. She grew up and attended uni versity in Canada, then moved to the United States in the 1960s. Vickie fi rst arrived in Cache Valley, Utah in 1970, and has lived in Logan continuously since 1976. With degrees in biology and psychology, she has worked at Duke University and, having taken a career break to rai se a family, is now a school psychologist in the Logan area. Vickie became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1995. Explaining that she was raised in a "very 50s", apolitical family, Vickie is not aware of her parents' political affiliations. They voted, she says, but "never talked politics." Talking politics with her brother and sister is a challenge, since they both remain in Canada. Eldest of the three, Vickie is not familiar with Canadian politics, and her siblings are only slightly more aware of politics in the States. She characterizes her brother as conservative, and knows that her sister follows political issues that affect her business. Vickie describes herself as a liberal Democrat, adding that her Canadian-born husband shares the same values. Asked her son's and daughter's political affilia tion and philosophy, she would only di sclose that "they're not Young Republicans." Her daughter has worked for a college �.' -9- environment center, and her son follows zoning issues at his home in Park City, Utah. Vickie has a history of involvement with Canadian and U.S. environmental groups; most recently. Citi zens for the Protection of Logan Canyon. She was first sensitized to citizen initiative in U.S. politics in 1968, when a friend at Duke University sent money to support the campaign of Eugene McCarthy. Vietnam War protests also played an important role in her political socialization. "You couldn't help but take a side," she says. Lacking political direction from her parents, Vickie built a political philosophy from such authors as Paul Hawkins, Robertson Davies, and environmentalist Wallace Stegner. "David" was born in Salt Lake City, Utah, on June 9, 1970. He has lived in Logan, Utah since 1992. with the exception of 18 months spent in Jackson, Wyoming. David attended post-secondary schools in Utah. and is certified as an emergency medical technician and nursing assistant. He has worked with troubled youth as an outdoor acti vities instructor at Aspen Achievement Academy. in Bicknell. and is currently a mail carrier for the postal service. In his off hours, he volunteers time with handicapped children at a Logan elementary school, and with the science department at Logan Hi gh Schoo!.. David is the middle of five children --four boys, one girl-- raised by a father who works for a Salt Lake construction company and a mother who hand les mi ssionary assignments at the LDS (Monnon) Church headquarters. He comes from a solidly Republican family that ranges in philosophy from conservative father to David and an elder brother at the liberal end. Both parents have actively campaigned for Governor Mike Leavitt, and David's mother is past president of the local PTA. He admits, though, that his most po litically influentia1 mentor has been his elder brother, who was president of the University of Utah Young Republicans and supports liberal Republican candidates. A younger brother does volunteer work for Senator Robert Bennett. David is the family environmentalist. Most of the others "hate enviros", he says. While he is also concerned about the country's fiscal health, David's political initiatives have been linked primarily to the environment. He was involved in debates over bicycle lanes in Logan and �" -10- Jackson, has contributed time to the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, and now serves as a spokesman for the Logan Canyon Coalition. His main concern is the "frontier mentality" of older residents who are willing to accept environmental destruction in return for jobs. David is supported by a like-minded wife, who divides her volunteer hours between Lee. a rape crisis center, and learning Spanish to assist in a local literacy program. They plan to have chi ldren someday. Similarities - shared biographical features : All three subjects ..• ..have lived at least 20 years in Utah . .. travelled around the United States, and outside the country . ..graduated from high school and received subsequent education training . .. have worked in jobs involving significant social interaction . ..were raised in a two-parent family . .. have had at least three siblings, including at least one sister and one brother. .. are married to a spouse who is at least a high school graduate. and who has held a full-time job during the marriage . . .have had parents that voted . .. have at least one sibling who actively follows one or more political issues, and has either personally --or is married to someone who has-- held a political position, ranging from college Young Republicans president to party precinct chainnan to local zoning board member. ..identify with a political party, and are clear about their own political philosophy. .. share their spouse's political philosophY· �.. -11- .. have a spouse who actively follows one or more political issues, and who participates with the respondent in at least one political activity, including volunteer involvement with the respondent's Logan Canyon focus group . .. are interested in environmental issues, plus at least one additional political issue . .. have been involved with other political causes prior to involvement in the Logan Canyon debate . .. participated in the Scouts [for Vickie, the Canadian Girl Guides] as children . .. had political beliefs shaped, in part, by economic issues ranging from labor laws to taxes . .. believe that participation is a key aspect of citizenship. For Ezra, citizenship is "a privilege ... a freedom" , "You should vote or you're a fool, and should keep your mouth shut." According to Vickie, "If you're going to be part of a community, you've got to participate." David feels that citizenship means "dedication to the community, without the expectation of reimbursement," adding that "Ezra ... is a good example" of citizenship . .. feel a personal sense of civic responsibility that requires action. To Ezra, it's an issue of "free agency"; and one must share information and ideas outside of the immediate family. Civic responsibility means being "good neighbors." Vickie holds that "voting is important, although it doesn't mean much; but, what is the alternative?" She says that "if you see a problem, you need to deal with it." David's sense of civic responsibility involves "donating time and money; interacting one-on-one with others in the community." .. are motivated to political action, in part, to right a perceived wrong. Ezra admits that there are "things that rub me wrong", and it's up to him to "flush out the termites." Vickie also notices when "things aren't right." "I feel like I can analyze the situation," she says, and feels she can have an impact. Plus, "I enjoy doing it, and the people I meet." David gets angry when he and his group are "mischaracterized" by opponents. In �-12- additional, he feels he is "very fortunate" and therefore obligated to work on behalf of those less fortWlate . .. can cite at least one political accomplishment ('victory'). For Ezra, it was rallying people against the golf course. Then there is the following he has generated among fellow residents. through his letters to the newspapers. Vickie is satisfied that Logan Canyon is being dealt with differently than if she had taken no action. And David feel s his input to the bike lanes debates at least caused people "to view things in a different light. " .. sense that there is a general attitude toward politics shared by the majority of Cache Valley residents, although the perceived nature of this attitude varied among respondents. From Ezra's perspective, "too many people want George to do it. " "People are afraid of what others will think of them ." Vickie senses a mono lithic political culture. "The vast majority of people think alike," she says. According to David, "it's the provincial mentality lhat I love and hate." "I Jike the slower pace," he says, and it's nice that you can talk to your neighbors. But, he is concerned that for many, it is "okay to be nai ve about the impacts of growth." .. menti oned positive social interaction as a rewarding aspect of their civic and political activities. People call Ezra and ask, "when are you going to write another letter?" [Look for it in the Herald Journal every 6th of the month.] Vickie says she enjoys her involvement because "I learn new things, and meet interesting people." For David, it's "getting people to look at something in a different light", and "putting a smile on someone's face." Dissimilarities - biographical differences: Ezra is the sole military veteran. �.. " -13 David and Vickie are college educated [she with an advanced degree] , as are their spouses, w hile Ezra and his wife are not. Ezra and Vickie have children. David does not. Ezra's and David's parents engaged in politics beyond voting, whi le Vickie's did not. Ezra's parents were both conservative, David's split conservative I moderate, and Vickie's "apolitical. " Ezra's stepson is not politically active. Vickie's two chi ldren are. David is child less. Ezra claims a conservative political philosophy. while Vickie and David identify themselves as liberal s. Ezra and David belong to the LDS (Mormon) Church. Vickie does not. Each cites different life events that influenced their political beliefs. For Ezra, it was an adverse reaction to the liberal policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt, along with anger at the minimum age labor law that deprived his farm of the "best beet workers." In Vickie's case, it was the Vietnam War and Watergate that sparked her interest. Dav id says "the first time I debated an issue" was when Governor Leavitt kept the tax on food , but cut property taxes. He adds that he was impressed by accounts of President Harry Truman's political principl es. Ezra and David both follow the pronouncements of political commentator Rush Limbaugh, although Ezra co unts himself a supporter and David simply appreciates Limbaugh's ability to "frame issues in a different light." Vickie did not mention Mr. Limbaugh. They have different ideas about the level of significance of their individual actions. Ezra points proudly to the certificates on his wall , attesting to the impact he's had . Although Vickie feels the impact of one person is rather small , when "the choice is to do something, or to do nothing," she rejects the latter. The important question is o ne of conscienc~ . David claims that, in the context of Logan Canyon, "we are saving the taxpayers money ... although the aesthetic gai n is not that great." �-14- Ezra and Vickie agreed that it is unfortunate more Americans aren't involved in civic and political activities. Ezra says that "people can make a difference, if they get active." On the other hand, David accepts that "some people won't ever get involved. no matter how bad things get." It has always been that way, he maintains. The three have different notions of why many citizens do not get involved. Ezra says that people think they "won't make a difference," and that their opinion doesn't count. Vickie adds that "people feel disenfranchised; they don't know what to do, or how to do it." She also notes that would-he participants know they're "up against powerful vested interests." Vickie and David agree that people have less time to get involved, because of jobs. He says it is important to remember that "some people make their contributions through work", and that "we also need to be sure we include people's church involvement" in the equation. Both Vickie and David spoke to the issue of campaign finance reform. Ezra did not raise that particul ar issue. Ezra and David said they have experienced hosti lity or other negat ive consequences from their civic and political activities. In Ezra's case, it has been l etters~to ~the ~editor that have critici zed him . He is energi zed by the criticism, though, and claimed "I'm real thickskinned. " David said that his car was egged a couple of times, and he sometimes tires of being called an "outsider" and "eco-terrori st" because he has different views. When asked how they want to be remembered by their great grandchildren, Vickie and David prefer a political epitaph. She would like them to know that she "was part of a movement to save natural areas." David hopes that a generation yet to appear wiU remember him as a "fighter for the future" who helped set things aside for them to enjoy. Ezra just wants his stepson's grandchildren to remember him "as their real [great] grandpa." �" '. -15- Additional Observations Ezra and David, who are on opposite sides of environmental issues, both affiliate with the Republican Party. as do their siblings. Vickie and David. who are relatively close in environmental perspective, affiliate with different po litical parti es; she is Democrat, he is Republican. Discussion of Results: The core-profile interview process yielded a broad set of character and bio-historical traits shared by the three subj ects. It is unlikely that all o f these commonly-held traits are causally- related to political activism Were I to extend this line of inquiry into the realm of quantitative research, I would probably seek to operationalize the following traits as variables in a broad survey of political activists. • number of siblings • clarity about political party identification • clarity about politi cal philosophy • supportive spouse • previous political involvement • concept of citi zenship • like/dislike o f social interaction From the standpoint of qualitative research, I would likely seek the replication of this activity, using a similar procedure with different political issues in other communities. Other Research Issues: The fin al stage of research for this report involved "member checking", in which each of the core.profi le subjects was given a draft of the report that included the comparative responses document that is attached, in pseudonymic format, as Appendix B. Unfortunately, the copy given the core·profil e subjects used their real names, which was admittedly a procedural ··if not �-16- ethical-- flaw on my part. During the course of member checking, minor corrections were made to the text. At this point, one of the core-profile subjects expressed strong discomfort at my mention of the possibility that the report might he published as a human interest story in the local newspaper. The continued political sensitivity of issues related to Logan Canyon was cited as the reason for the individual's concern. I agreed that I would not use this report as the basis for a newspaper article, and have marked the front page "Not For Local Publication." �Appendix A: Core Profile Questionnaire Profiles in Activism: Logan Canyon Co re Profile Name: Birthdate: Birthplace: Residences: Travels: Education: (spec. training, degrees) Work hi story: Current occupation: Family [of origin] : Parents' occupations: Siblings (in binh order): Siblings' occupations: Family [procreation] : Spouse's education: Spouse' s occupation: Children: ... education: Date: Location: �-, -2... occupations: Political Background Family [of origin]: Parents' political affiliations: Parents' political philosophies: Parents' key political issues: Parents' political activity: Siblings' po litical affi liations: Siblings' political philosophies: Siblings' key political issues: Siblings' political activity: Exceptional behavior, in the extended family: Family [procreation] : Spouse's political affi liations: Spouse's political phil osophies: �--3- Spouse's key political issues: Spouse's political activity: Childrens' political affi liations: Childrens' political philosophies: Childrens' key political issues: Childrens' political activity: Personal political affi liations: Personal political philosophies: Personal key political issues: Personal political activity: ... first involvement in politics: Personal Politics [continued] : Membership in service-oriented community groups: (egs. scouts, school, church, adult groups, issues groups) Key life events that influenced your political beliefs: Key persons who influenced your political beliefs: �., 4· How do you define "citizenship"? How would you describe your personal sense of civic responsibility? What motivates you to take political action? How much of a difference do you think you make, from a political standpo int? ... Some things you have accomplished: What is your feeling about the level of civic and political involvement in the U.S. today? Why do you think many citizens do not gel involved? What civic I political behaviors are most needed in the United States today? To what extent does the culture of Cache Valley. Utah faci litate or inhibit political expression? Have you experienced hostility, stress, or other negative consequences of your civic and political activities? What do you feel have been the most rewarding aspects of your civic / political activities? How would you like to be remembered by your great grandchildren? �. , " Appendix B: Core Profile Data, Annotated Responses Profiles in Activism: Logan Canyon Core Profiles Name: COMPOSITE E ~ Ezra .. .interviewed 7-9-97 and 7-30-97 V ~ Vickie .. .interviewed 7-10-97 and 7-3 1-97 D ~ David .. .interviewed 7-9-97 and 7-30-97 Birthdate: E ~ August 26, 1912 V ~ October, 1942 D ~ June 9, 1970 Birthplace: E ~ Paris, Idaho V = Montreal , Canada D ~ Salt Lake City Residences: E ~ Preston, Idaho .. , Logan, Utah since 1932 V = raised in Montreat 1960s in N. Carolina; Cache Valley I Logan, 1970-71 & 1976 to present D = raised in Salt Lake City; lived in Alta, Utah ... then Logan for 3 years, Jackson, WY for 2 years, and returned to Logan Travels: E = All states of the USA ; Mexico, Canada; southern Europe in Army during WWIl V = both U.S. coasts, Canada, Europe, Australia D = extended road trips to the east coast U.S. and Pacific Northwest; Canada, Mexico Education: (spec. Iraining, degrees) E = Preston H.S. graduate; radio operator and cook in Army V = high school and college in Canada .. B.S. in ChemistryfBiology; Masters in Psych. USU D ~ high school grad (SLC); attended Salt Lake Community College, the University of Utah, and Utah State University; gained EMT I CNA (certified nursing assistant) at Bridgerland Vocational Work history: E ~ linotype setter at Herald Journal from 1932 to 1974, with 3 year break during WWll . .injured hand in 1974; shifted to carpentry and remodeling until retirement in 1996. V = worked at Duke Univ. med. center, taught school; rai sed fami ly; reswned full-time work in 1985 D = jobs in the food service industry and construction ; provided outdoor experiences for troubled youth at Aspen Achievement Academy (Bicknell); U.S. Postal Service, 3 years �,. -2Current occupation: E = political activist V = school psychologi st in Cache County D = mail carrier Family [o f origin] : Parents' occupations: E = mother: post office worker, then homemaker fath er: postal stage driver; assessor, then city judge in Preston, Idaho V = father: engineer mother: lavvyer. homemaker D = father: office manager for Salt Lake construction company mother : mi ssionary assignments administrator at LDS Church headquarters Siblings (in birth order): E = three children: brother and sister; Ezra is middle child. V = three children: brother and sister; Vickie is eldest D = fi ve children: 3 brothers, I sister; David is middle chi ld. Siblings' occupations: E = sister (deceased) was teacher, slore owner, real estate agent. brother: (retired) defense worker, po lice chief in Preston, ID ; accountant, real estate V = brother: engineer sister: home economist D = brothers: eldest is lawyer; another is in real estate; youngest is an econ. major ("U") sister: just returned from LDS mi ss ion , and is psych. major at the "U" Family [procreation] : Spouse's education: E = high schoo l V = Ph.D. in animal behavior D = USU grad, seeking Masters in Cardiac Rehabi litation; certified EMT Spouse's occupation : E = retail sales; 30 years as proofreader, advertising at Herald Journal (met Ezra there) V = professor at USU D = clinical assistant and community educator for Planned Parenthood Children: E = one (from w ife 's previous marriage) V = two (son and daughter) D = none yet �.. -3- ... education: E ~ USU grad V = daughter: masters degree in journalism son: bachelors in environmental studies D ~N/A ... occupations: E = (retired) Thiokel employee V = daughter: journalist (writer) son: school teacher and ski instructor D ~ N/A Political Background Family [of origin]: Parents' political affiliations: E ~ both Republican (s!might ticket) V = not known D ~ both Republican Parents' political philosophies: E = conservative V ~ an apolitical famil y ("very 50s") o = father: conservative Republi can mother: moderate Republican Parents' key political issues: E = father advocated for "underdog"; comprehensive issues V ~ N/A D = father: pro-business issues; anti-abortion mother: morality issues (for example, anti-pornography); anti-abortion (pro-Life) Parents' political activity: E = father spoke out on Republican issues, with mother's support V = parents voted, but "never talked po litics" 0 = mother: PTA past president at elem. school mother and father: campaign volunteers for Mike Leavitt Siblings' political affiliations: E ~ both Republican V = doesn' t know (Canadian parties) o = all are Republican �-4- Siblings' political philosophies: E = both conservative V = brother: conservative sister: doesn' t know D = eldest hrother is liberal Republican other brothers and sister are moderate Republican Siblings' key political issues: E = brother: comprehensive Republican issues V = sister: issues that affect her business [Vickie and sister are unfamiliar with the other's political issues ... Canadian and U.S .] o = anti~environment ("all hate enviros", except eldest brother); all are anti-abortion Siblings' political activity: E = brother: Republican precinct chairman; letter-writing to newspaper, Congress sister: vice-chair of Republican precinct; husband was Franklin County assessor V = sister's husband has served on local zoning board 0 = eldest brother: "U" Young Republicans president; campaigned for liberal Republican Genevieve Atwood; did volunteer work in D.C. youngest brother: volunteered three years for Sen. Bob Bennett Exceptional behavior, in the extended family: E = maternal and paternal cousins politically outspoken in Idaho V = none D = eldest brother Family [procreat ion] : Spouse' s political affiliations: E = Republican V = "we have the same values" .. .1 assume this means Democrat D = Independent Spouse's political philosophies: E = conservative V = "we have the same values" .. .1 assume this means liberal D = liberal Spouse's key political issues: E = general interest V = environment D = reproductive rights �•• .. -5Spouse's political activity: E = attends all city and county council meetings; supports Ezra V = just became a U.S. citizen (from Canada); belongs to lots of grassroots organizations; seen as an expert; beli eves in building a strong knowledge base, cares what's going on D = volunteers for Lee and rape crisis group; learning Spanish to volunteer with Bridgerland Literacy Childrens' political affiliations: E ~ Republican V = doesn't know; daughter is a U.S . citizen, son is sti ll Canadian D~N/A Childrens' political philosophies: E = "all politicians are liars" V = "they're not Young Republicans" .. .1 assume this means liberal. D ~ N/A Childrens' key political issues: E = not involved V = personal economic issues; wage scales, for example D ~ N/A Childrens' po litical activity: E = not involved V = daughter: worked at environment ctr. at Univ. of Colorado son: fo llows zoning issues at home in Park City D ~ N/A Personal political affiliations: E = Republican V = Democrat D ~ Republican Personal political philosophies: E = conservative V ~ liberal D ~ liberal Personal key political issues: E = mostly domestic; local,state,national comprehensive V = environment; fairness issues, such as a decent minimum wage, and more pay for social service and education workers D = Baby Boomer impacts on social services [will bankrupt the fi scal system]; environmental destruction fo r j obs ... opposes "frontier mentality" of older residents, with "take, take, take" approach to environment �.. ., ·6· Personal political activity: E = participated in citizen effort to prevent golf course; Republican precinct officer; letter-writing, phone calls, networking, organizing; electioneering; won't run for office (prefers to be an outsider); founding member of LelG V = gained U.S. citizenship in 1995 (from Canada); has worked with the Canadian National Parks Association, Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and CPLC D = served with citizens advisory groups on bicycle lanes in Logan and Jackson, WY; volunteered for Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, and attended wilderness hearings; got involved with Lee last year ... first involvement in politics: E ~ 1936.. first voted (against FDR) V = while in North Carolina, K. became aware of the U.S. political system through a friend who sent a campaign contribution to Eugene McCarthy's campaign 0 = 1992 bike lanes issue in Logan Personal Politics [continued]: Membership in service-oriented community groups: (egs. scouts, school, church, adult groups, issues groups) E = boy scouts; active in LOS Church as stake dance director, high priest, "Smokin Oeacons" (bringing back inactive members); LCIG V ~ girl guides (Canadian girl scouts) 0 = Eagle Scout and assistant scoutmaster; worked with handicapped youth in high school; LOS teen service projects; volunteers at local elementary school (hyperacti ve kids) and high schoo l (science dept.), and with Alzheimer's patients at a local nursing home Key life events that influenced your political beliefs: E = FOR's election bothered him ; passage of minimum age work law deprived him of best beet workers (under 16) V = Watergate; Vietnam War protests ("you couldn't help but take a side"); awareness of stagflation in 1970s, and greed in the 1980s 0 = Gov. Leavitt opposed cutting the food tax, yet cut property taxes ... "the first time I debated on an issue."; getting ajob with retirement benefits, having to consider investments, and realizing systemic problems Key persons who influenced your political beliefs: E = father and mother V = authors, such as Paul Hawkins (Ecology of Commerce), Robertson Davies (Canadian), and environmentalist Wallace Stegner 0 = eldest brother; Pres. Harry Truman ("he was above money" ; pushed for accountability, and for the underdog, and saved the taxpayers money; Rush Limbaugh, who "frames issues in a different light", although M doesn't necessarily agree with him �.. . . -7How do you define "citizenship"? E = "a priviiege ... a freedom"; much violated; "you should vote or you're a fool, and should keep your mouth shut"; learn English; obey the laws; convicts should lose citizenship rights V = "participation". "If you're going to be part ofa community. you've got to participate." D = dedication to the community, without the expectation of reimbursement .. "Ezra Allred is a good example. "; "citizenship is being involved"; for example, donating time and resources to a non-profit organization How would you describe your personal sense of civic responsibi lity? E = free agency; one must share info and ideas outside of the immediate fami ly; good neighbors V = voting is important, although it doesn't mean much ... "what is the alternative?"; if you see a problem, you need to deal with it D = donating time and money; interacting one-on-one with others in the community; "Courtesy is contagious." ; "put a smile on a stranger's face" What motivates you to take political action? E = "things that rub me wrong"; follows the news closely; supporter of Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich. gets ideas from both; "flush out the termites" V = "Things aren't right," ... "1 feel like I can analyze the situation,""; feels she can have an impact; "I enjoy doing it, and the people I meet." D = anger, at the LCC and me personally being rnischaracterized; the feeling that I am very fortunate ["I'm so lucky"] , and therefore obligated to share with those less fortunate How much of a difference do you think you make, from a political standpoint? E = has received several awards (local and national) for participation V = "very little" (as an individual); but the choice is to do something, or to do nothing; K agrees it's a matter of conscience o = we are savi ng the taxpayers money [Logan Canyon as a pork barrel], although the aesthetic gain is not that great ...Some things you have accomplished: E = "beat that golf course"; people read and follow his letters V ~ Logan Canyon is being dealt with differently than if [I had taken] no action D = Jackson bike lanes; he's caused people to view things in a different light What is your feeling about the level of civic and political involvement in the U.S. today? E = sad state of affairs when only 49% of eligible people vote; people can make a difference, if they get active V = "it's unfortunate" D = differences in political tolerance (what people wi ll tolerate) hav always been with us; some people won't ever get involved. no matter how bad things get �.. . -8Why do you think many citizens do not get involved? E = "it won't make a difference"; "my opinion doesn' t count" V = "people feel disenfranchised; they don't know what to do, or how to do it"; "people have jobs" [allusion to time?]; "you're up against powerful vested interests." D = now, there are more issues to deal with, and people have less time; some people make their contributions through work; we also need to be sure we include people's church involvement What civic / political behaviors are most needed in the United States today? E = no response V = campaign finance reform, especially at the national level D = people must force more accountability on politicians, & on the money that influences them To what extent does the culture of Cache Valley, Utah facilitate or inhibit political expression? E = too many people want George to do it; people are afraid of what others will think of them; " I'm real thick-skinned" V = feels no inhibitions; but, the vast majority of the people think alike D = "it's the provincial mentality that I love and hate" ; "I like the slower pace, and that you don't feel people are out to get you"; you're not a number, and can talk to your neighbors; but, "It's almost okay to be naive about the impacts of growth."; doesn't like being characterized as an outsider (Back East) because he has diff. views and ideas Have you experienced hostility, stress, or other negative consequences of your civic and political activities? E = yes; letters criticizing me (but never face to face); energized by criticism V = no D = yes; the car was egged a couple times; some work contacts call M the "eco-terrorist"; fee ls anxiety when he writes letters to the editor What do you feel have been the most rewarding aspects of your civic I political activities? E = personal sati sfaction; popular following ("when are you going to write another letter?"); letter in Herald 10urnal every 6th of the month V = "I learn new things, and meet interesting people." D = "getting people to look at something in a different light"; "putting a smile on someone's face" How would you like to be remembered by your great grandchildren? E = "as their real grandpa" V = "I'd like to see natural areas left [for them]"; I was part of a movement to save natural areas D = "A fighter for the future."; someone who looked at the future and asked "what's going to happen then? " rather than "what's it worth [today]?"; someone who set things aside fo~ the future to decide its status . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3323 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2619 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/660">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/660</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2984228977 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Profiles in Activism: Three Citizens Involved in the Logan Canvon Controversy, student paper by Stanley Holmes Description An account of the resource Paper prepared for EDUC 677. This qualitative research project involved a multi-case study of adult citizens involved in a local political controversy. Following background research, structured interviews were conducted with three core subjects to identify shared character and bio-historical traits. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Holmes, Stanley Subject The topic of the resource Traffic engineering Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon Roads--Design and construction United States Highway 89 Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Student projects Essays Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1997 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 12 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd12 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/628753ee7c5e3448132f2c83211c0d56.pdf 08afc57587291439f5836435921b35fd PDF Text Text Volume I Issue 2 "For a safe yet pristine Logan Canyon" LOGAN CANYON GROUP PLANS ANOTHER MEETING - ... . . ~. . ELWIN ALLRED, VICE CHAIRMAN The Logan Canyon Improvement G roup is now heade d by a ni ne member board of directors, Steven Ri c h, Hy rum , c hai rm a n ; E lwin Allred, Logan, vice c hairman; Tom Grover, River Heights, C itizens Alert ed itor ; Ri c hard C ha mbers, Fi s h H av en ; E va n Ko ll e r, Co rni sh ; George B utte r fie ld, Pro vide nce ; All e n J ohn son, Smi thfi e ld; C la ir Wyatt, Provide nce and Dale Allred, Logan. The first public meeting held May I, in Logan proved th at The HeraJd JoumaJ's recent phone·in survey for or against improveme nt was right on the mo ne y. Ninety-eight perce nt want the Hi ghway improved and two percent don' L The second mee ting he ld in Logan June 9 had as our main speaker Dyke leFevre, P.E. (UDOT's director for Regio n One). A fte r his speec h , comments were taken from the fl oor, every person stressing the dire need for a m uc h improve d hi gh way through Logan Canyon. Our next meeti ng is set for July 14 in the Logan City Council Chambers, 255 North M ain, Logan, from 7 to 9 p.m. After the guest speakers have finished, we will again accept three· mi nute comments from the floo r. The new organization vigorously continues their efforts to get a safe, drivable improved highway through Log an C an yo n . The s te ad il y increasing traffi c fl ow speaks louder than all of the screaming of those tree-hu ggi ng. bu g- lov in g, wildweed-sme ll ing e nvironme ntalists th a t we will be r uin ing the environme nt. That highway needs to be improved from the forks. An y pe r so n w ho has trave le d Logan Canyon periodical ly in the last 20, 30, 40 or more years knows full well that there is more traffic in the canyon in one day than there used to be in a two-week span and it is bound to get heavier and heavier. Lord have pity on those e me rgency vehic le dri vers fo r the worst is yet to come, unless that road is made safe to drive. Dyer 's wode is fa st establ ishing itself in the canyon and needs to be eradicated. That noxious wed will do more damage to the e nvironment than an improved highway can do in a thousand years. If those people are so worried about the canyon, why don' t they do something constructive fo r a c ha nge? L ike us ing the ir muscles to help pull up those weeds in stead of thei r mout hs tryi ng to block its improvement. O ur first newsle tte r (C iti ze n's Alert) has been mailed to those who gave us the ir addresses. It is free so . se nd us yo ur ma ilin g address to LCIG. P.O. Box 275. Logan. Ulah 84323-0275. July 1997 PUBLIC SUPPORT IMPORTANT STEVERlCB CHAIRMAN As we embark on th is crusade to save a few of our ri ghts and freedo ms. it is very imponant to show public suppo" and unity for this cause. We are al l very busy wi th work. home. and family, but, we need to be open in our suppon. We need to attend the public meetings in numbers sufficient 10 allow us 10 ask expens in re lated fields to address us. If we are only going 1 have a 0 ha ndful of people it is difficult to ask someone 10 drive from Salt Lake CilY or some whe re else at a sacrifice 10 their families and of their time. It is vitally imponant thai we educate ourselves to the things that are being used to dcny us our access and our rightS. Also it is imponant to know the scope oh he v.oork going on so that we can defe nd againsl the misrepresentations that have become so common. 5H Public Support 011 pg. 2 PUBLIC MEETING JULY 14, 1997 7:00 LOGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAM BERS 255 N. MAIN, LOGAN SPECIAL GUEST SPEAKER: VAL SIDDOWAY EMERGENCY VEHICLE DR IVER LAKETOWN �+2 L.C.I.G. + CONTRIBUTIONS NEEDED Tho Lee rocel_ mighty grants from out of state leftist environmental organization. (what are they doing meddling In our affairs?). w. too need funds to support our newsletter. Any donation of any amount 18 greatly appreciated. Pi.... mall donations to: LelG P.O. Box 275 Public Support from PII. 1 II seems an accepted fact that the more extreme environmentalislS arc bent on Slopping all work of any kind in Logan Canyon. If we evaluate the arguments thaI they pul rOM, for the most pan they sound goOO., but. have little merit. In this agcor couch potatoes, sound bytes and general laziness to study the facts. we arc fighting an uphill battle. I would like also to put OUI a call 10 those people with technical expertise wbocould help our understanding aCthe daims made by lhose who call themselves environmentalists. In closing I would like to SUlte thai all orus arc concerned about the environment I am sure that no one wants to destroy il. I believe that we can have progress and protect the environment al the same lime. So, don'l rall ror the environmental eXlremisl' 8l'gUmenl thai we are agaiosl Ihe environmenl. We are all environmentalisLS. Logan, Utah 84323-0275 Logan Canyon Improvement Group P.O. Box 275 Logan, UT. 84323-0275 LEI IERS TO THE EDITOR IN THE CmZEN ALERT ARE WELCOME FROM ANYONE AND GREATLY APPRECIATED. If you've got an opinion, story or statistic regarding why Logan canyon should be made safer wtth a wider road, please mall them to: Tom Grover 1065 E. Windsor Drive River Heights, UT. 84321 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3317 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2619 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/663">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/663</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 891752503 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Newsletter from the Logan Canyon Improvement Group Description An account of the resource Newsletter from the Logan Canyon Improvement Group, Volume 1 Issue 2, entitled Citizens Alert, with reports on Logan Canyon Group meetings, public support, contribution needs, and welcoming letters to the editor. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Logan Canyon Improvement Group Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Allred, Elwin Rich, Steve Grover, Tom Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Press releases Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Logan Canyon Improvement Group Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1997-07 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999 COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 16 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd16 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/5648eb7ddce2ddbd23e27460a9516347.pdf 6fd070b4998cb8fd497208e5a190afdd PDF Text Text • ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION for Logan Canyon Coalition Article I NAME The name of this corporation is Logan Canyon Coalition. Article II DURATION The period of duration of this corporation is perpetual. Article III PURPOSE (a) Logan Canyon Coalition will act and operate exclusively as a nonprofit corporation pursuant to the laws of the state of Uta h, an d will act and opera te as an educational organization, seeking to increase public awareness of the aesthetic and environmental r esources of Logan Canyon, and will act as an advocate for the preservation-of Logan Canyon. (b) This corporation ma y engage in any or all activities and pursuits, and may support or assist other organiza tions, that are reasonably related to the foregoing purposes. (c) This corporation may engage in an y and all other lawful purposes, activities and pursuits, which are substantially similar to the foregoing purpose and which are or may hereafter be authorized by Section SOl(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and are consistent with those powers described in the Utah Nonprofit Corporation and Cooperation Association Act, as amended and supp lemented. (d) This corporation may solicit and receive contributions, may make contracts, may spend corporate funds for co rporate purposes, and may engage in any activity in fu r therance of, incidental to, or connected with any of the foregoing purposes. 1 �No part of the net earnings of this corporation shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to, its members, trustees, officers, or other persons, except that the corporation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered to the corporation and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth herein. No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall be the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the corporation shall not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements) any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office except as authorized under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. The corporation shall not carryon any other activities not permitted to be carried on by a corporation exempt from federal income tax under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, or the corresponding provision of any future United States Internal Revenue law. Article IV MEMBERS/OBLIGA TIONS Membership is open to all interested individuals or parties. No special requirements or obligations are attached to membership. Trustees, officers and/or members are not individually or personally liable for the debts or obligations of the corporation. Article V BYLAWS Name, Purpose and Location The name of this nonprofit organization is Logan Canyon Coalition. The purpose for which the program is organized is to seek to increase public awareness of the aesthetic and environmental resources of Logan Canyon, and to act as an advocate for the preservation of Logan Canyon. The central office of the Logan Canyon Coalition is 505 South 200 West, Logan, Utah. 2 �Membership Participation by interested parties or individuals is voluntary and shall be open to all qualified persons willing to further the organization's purposes, without regard to race, gender, handicap, national origin and/or religious affiliation. Board of Directors The Logan Canyon Coalition Board of Directors, hereafter called the board, will be the governing body of the Logan Canyon Coalition, providing a system of checks and balances, to include, but not be limited to the following: (a) the board will set policy and direction, and oversee all coalition activities and projects, (b) the board will approve all budgets and expenditures, (c) the board will be responsible for the hiring of staff, or the contracting of projects out to independent parties or individuals, and (d) the board will oversee an annual financial audit and project evaluation. Board Members and Officers The board shall consist of a minimum of five members, who will represent coalition members at large and vote on official actions. The number of members will be determined by the board, with no upward limit. To become a member of the board, an individual's name must be approved by a twothirds majority of the board at a regularly scheduled, publicized meeting. Procedure for Election of Board Officers Any board member is eligible for any board office. Officers will be appointed by a two-thirds majority vote of the active board membership at a regularly scheduled, publicized board meeting. Board officers and members require annual ratification by a two-thirds majority of the board, and otherwise may serve on the board or as an officer for an indefinite period of time. New officers will be appointed as needed, and will assume their office and duties at the adjournment of the meeting at which they were appointed. The names of all board members and their positions will be made available to all coalition members upon request. Positions and Duties of Board Officers 1) The President will: (a) preSide over and conduct board meetings and coalition meetings for members at large, in coordination with coalition officers and members at large, (b) serve as the official spokesperson for the coalition, (c) set the agenda for board meetings, in coordination with and respecting the input of coalition 3 �officers and members at large, and (d) serve as an ex-officio member of all committees. 2) The Vice President will: (a) assume the duties of the president upon the president's request or absence, and (b) assist the preSident and coalition members with special projects and sub-committees. 3) The Treasurer will: (a) prepare an annua l (or special projects) budge t for board approval, (b) manage all revenues and expenditures of the coalition, (c) keep an accurate account of assets, revenues and expenditures, (d) prepare quarterly financial reports for board review, and (e) assume responsibility for contracting out and assisting with legally required external audits, in cooperation with the president, and present the results of external audits to the board for review. 4) The Secretary wi ll: (a) keep an accurate account of all board meetings and special meetings, and (b) prepare and disseminate minutes of the prior meeting at or before each board meeting. Meetings and Official Actions The board will meet as needed, generally at least once a month. All official actions shall require the approval of a two-thirds majority of active members of the board. Amendments Amendments to the bylaws shall require an affirmative vote by a two-thirds majority of board members at a publicized meeting of the board. Ethical Standards Board membership shall be on a voluntary basis. No board member will be remunerated for their services on the board, benefit financially from membership, or serve with another board, committee, or organization that may be construed as conflict of interest. Procedures for Resignation or Removal Board members or board officers who fail to carry out the responsibilities associated with membership or with their appointed or elected position, ~ be removed by a two-thirds majority vote of the board membership at a reg ularly scheduled, publicized board meeting. 4 �Article VI TRUSTEES Logan Canyon Coalition will have three trustees, who will serve in perpe tuity . In the event of death, inca pacity, or resigna tion of a trustee, a successor will be appointed by a two- thirds maj ority . Removal of a trustee will require a unanimous decision of all trustees with the exception of the trustee in ques tion . The names and addresses of the individuals who will serve as trustees are: Kevin Kobe, 45 North 400 West, Logan, UT 84321 Don Hickman, 505 South 200 West, Logan, UT 84321 Dan Miller, 1265 Island Drive, Logan, UT 84321 Article VII INCORPORATORS The names and addresses of the incorporators are: Kevin Kobe, 45 North 400 West, Logan, UT 84321 Don Hickman, 505 South 200 West, Logan, UT 84321 Dan Miller, 1265 Island Drive, Logan, UT 84321 Article VIII REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT The address of the corporation's initial registered office shall be: 505 So uth 200 Wes t, Logan, Utah 84321 The co rporation's initial registered agent at such address shall be: Don Hickman I hereby acknowledge and accept appointment as co rp orate registered agent. Sig nature Date Such office may be changed at any time by the board of directors without amendment of the Articles of Incorpora tion. 5 �Article IX PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS The principal place of business of the Logan Canyon Coalition shall be 505 South 200 West, Logan, Utah. Article X DISTRIBUTIONS No part of the net earnings of this corporation shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to its trustees, officers, or other private persons, except that the corporation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article ill hereof. The corporation shall not attempt to influence legislation, and shall not participate in or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements) any political ca mpaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. Notwithstanding any other provision of these Articles of Incorporation, the corporation shall not carryon any other activities not permitted to be carried on by a corporation exempt from federal income tax under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended or supplemented, or by a corporation, contributions to which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended or supplemented. Article XI DISSOLUTION In case the need for the program ceases, or human or financial resources are insufficient to carry out formulated objectives, the program may be dissolved by a two-thirds majority vote of the board. Upon the dissolution of the corporation, assets shall be distributed for one or m o re exempt purposes within the guidelines of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended or supplemented, preferably to local educational or environmental organizations that pursue similar objectives. Any such assets not so disposed of shall be disposed of by the District Court of Cache County, exclusively for such purposes or to such organization or organizations, as said court shall determine, which are organized and operated exclusively for similar purposes. 6 �• In witness whereof, we, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ have executed these Articles of Incorporation in duplicate this,______ day of , and say that we are all incorporators herein, that we have read the above and foregoing Articles of Incorporation, know the contents thereof, and that the information contained is true to the best of our knowledge and belief. 7 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3323 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2602 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/671">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/671</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 1742615322 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource LCC Articles of Incorporation Description An account of the resource Eleven articles of incorporation for Logan Canyon Coalition Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Logan Canyon Coalition Subject The topic of the resource Nonprofit organizations Logan Canyon Coalition Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1995 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan Canyon (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd6 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/bbc336c4d786ce0afeeab578fa822d63.pdf d7d1fd3e2fee41b388b1906bbdcba57f PDF Text Text ..--- --------- -------- -- -- - - --- --- - -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- ----- --- --- --- ------ -- - -- -- - --- ------- - - - - -------- - - -- .-. - - - -____T __T -.7" . . .r .... __T....,. • ---- --- --- A NEWS BULLETIN FROM LOGAN CANYON COALITION Vol. 1 No.1 March 1, 1995 LCC IS FORMED If the Utah Depart"Until UDOT has lived up to the ment of Transportati on has its way, the na tural law of the land and provided beauty of Logan Canyon truthful analysis and documentaas we know it may soon be just a picture on a tion, we (LCC) will be persistent postcard. Instead of a in our demands for justice," serene mountain byway, - Kevin Kobe, LCC President U.S. Highway 89 will be a high-speed traffic corri dor Hned by scarred hill - spectacular scenery. and along the Dugway to We believe that the sides, reta ining walls, stem erosion problems. and c1earzones. UOOT recent compromise made • Vague wording about would like to begin work beh¥een Citizens for the how c1earzones will be as early as this summer. Protection of Logan treated , with c1earzone Canyon and UOOT is That's why we have a reas compri sing up to unacceptab le. It is merely 22 feet on either side of formed the Logan Canyon Coa lition. LCC is a slightly watered down the road, and the removal of "su bstantial version of the Preferred mad e up of "old timers" Alternative. haza rds" within the midwho have been involved The extent of the con- dle canyon. with the Logan Canyon/ UDOT issue almost from struction planned will • Revegetation of mature the beginning, as well as still necessitate 15-20 trees and shrubs that newcomers who advoyears of work, and will "could require 30 to 50 completely change the years or might never ca te a common sense ambiance of the canyon. occur aga in." approach to road Some of our priority • A potentially devastatimprovement-one that ing impact on cutthroat combines safety, efficien- concerns are: and brown trout popula . Eight curve cuts cy and environmental planned for the middle tions due to extensive sensitivity. LCC is dediriprap nea r the bridges, canyon, along with cated to keeping Logan retaining walls in some River a wild, free flowing UOOT's suggestion that locations, and permanent use of cement retaining river, preserving wildlife walls would be appropri- problems with sedimenhabitat, and protecting tation near ate in the middle canyon Logan Canyon's steep curve cuts. -Two-hundred year-old Douglas Fir at the summit replaced by a mini mum of 47 feet of pave. ment, a nd realignment that will necessitate filling a small side canyon with debris. • Extensive widening, with half of the middle canyon widened from 26 feet to 34 feet, and the remaining 24 miles widened to 40-47 feet to accomodate higher design speeds. • No specifics as far as mitigation plans, with a vague promise to use UOOT's "best management practices." LCC has pledged its resources towards pursuring every available legal op tion. If we pursue litigation, we will need your support. Volunteers are needed . Money will also be needed-litigati on is very costl y. Please plan on donating generously! This is our last opportunity for action. �LCC Prepares for Forest Appeal In its effort to per- suade UDOT to take another look at the Conservationist's Altema tive, the Logan Canyon Coalition is working hard in preparation for the Forest Appeal. After the recent approval of the Record of Decision (ROD) by both UOOT and the Federal Highway Administration, the last phase of the process currently rests with the Forest Service. This agency's approval is widely expected, followed by a 45-day comment period for public input. Lee plans to exercise its legal right by appea ling the Forest Service's decision. The Forest Service is required by the Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan to retain the aesthetic and environmental qualities of the canyon. The Plan will need to be revised due to excessive impacts which would result from the Preferred Alternative. A Forest Plan revision will require public input as manda ted by the NEPA process. Lee Logan Canyon Coalition plans to exercise its legal right by appealing the Forest Service's decision. will base its appea l on the expected Forest Service decision and key concerns not adequately addressed by the FEIS. as federally threatened or endangered species. Neither the Forest Service nor UDOT have s urveyed to identify the presence or absence of these species. These points include the following: 1) UOOT has never clearly demonstrated the purpose and need for the project, as required by NEPA. 4) UOOT's analysis of the safety data is admittedly flawed . 5) UOOT has more flexibility in AASHTO highway design recommendations than it acknowledges. 2) The Logan River is among the top 5% of all stream fisheries in the state, yet the FEIS seriously underestimates the impact to fisheries. 6) The canyon is the number one tourist attraction in the Bridgerland area, yet the FEIS fails to address long-term negative economic impacts resulting from 20 years of construction and loss of scenic values. 3) There are several species which may occur in the canyon. These species are either listed as sensitive by the Forest Service or are candi dates for classification 2 1) The Forest Service plan mandates retention of the canyon's visual and aesthetic qualities. Under the Preferred Alternative this mandate would be violated. These and other concerns represent a legitimate foundation on which to base our appeal. If you have any additional concerns which warrant consideration, please contact Lee ASAP. Thank you. �=-= = ------- _ _ _ _ '=-"'I'" - :-- Economic Benefits or Disaster? Utah's wide geographical diversity and expansive open spaces have filled a void in a time when many of o ur wild places are rap idly falling prey to u rban and economic sprawl. This is resulting in a boom in tourism. Tourism revenues for Cache and Rich Cou nties alone amounted to well over $64 million in 1993. This success can be pa rtly attributed to p romotional efforts by the Cache Chamber of Commerce, which recognizes Logan Canyon as the number one attraction in Bridgerland. The Chamber's 1994 Cache Valley Utah publica tio n mentions Logan Canyon no less than 20 times in the firs t nine pages. In addition, the Bridgerland Travel Region recently received a $436,000 federal grant to promote Logan Canyon and educate visitors about its characteristics. Clearly the canyon has a wide base of support and aCknowledgement in terms of value to the region. "We look at it as a real asset to the community," says Marty Spicer, real estate broker fo r Coldwell Banker. But will the canyon lose its d raw as it undergoes 15 to 20 years of construction, destructio n, and transformation of its natural character? How many moto rists will p refer the Idaho route to Yellowstone versus waiting in d usty traffic for heavy equipment to pass? Will pe0ple still want to d rive to Garden City to view Bear Lake and enjoy a raspberry shake? Mo re importantly, will the increase in con- gestion and traffic speeds after completion of construction have a d etri mental effect on the canyon's appeal? The stark reality may be yes! But still the FEIS provides no assessment of negative economic impacts resulting fro m the highway project. We need more proof, not vagueness and ambig ui- Volunteers Needed 1- Research for Forest Service Appeal 2- Networking 3- Fundraising 4- Education 5- Mailings 6- Letter writing 7- Events 8- Media relations 9- Passing the word 10- Lega l assistance 11- SLC contacts 12- HELP! ty. These are all legitimate concerns which need to be add ressed without prej udice and assumptions. Wha t may look like a road to economic boom may become a path to economic disaster. Equipment Needed 1- Offi ce space 2- Voice mail 3- FAX machine 4- Copier 5- Postage stamps 6- Copy paper 1- Envelopes 8- MONEY' r------------------------, YES! I THE WANT TO JOIN LOGAN CANYON COALITION and receive a subSCription to CANYON WIND $20.00 Annual Membership I would like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Lots more I would like to volunteer. I'm broke! Here's five bucks. Name ______________________________ Street ______________________________ City _ _ _ _ State _ _ _ Zip_ _ Phone * _____________ _ Plnse make check payable and mail to: Logan Canyon Coalition USU Box 1674 L ________ ________ .J �,..----------,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . -.. -=...... . ...... ., ..... _ . . . __ Iii. _ _ .... Iii. iiaiii . . . . . . _iii -------- c: «» .&. L :J: 'T :J: «» :N' , , , , L __________ ..I Wor k l n . f o r th . Pr o te " ti .n of Lo. a " C . " yo " USU Boxll1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 '=' Recycled Recycle �...-- ----.-.-- iiiii_iii_ iiiiiiiiiia. .,. __,. _.T____,. ....r ... __,...... .---- -- - - - --- -- - -- ---- -- - - --- -- - - --- -- -- - --- - - - - ---- - - ----- - ----- - - - -- -- --- -- - -- - -- -- - --- - - - -- ---A NEWS B ULLET I N FROM LO G AN CANYON COALITION Vol. 1 No.2 A ugust 1, 1995 USFS Abandons Logan Canyon LCC Appeal Denied The Loga n Canyon Coal itio n (LeC) recent ly appealed the Forest Service's decision to allow the Uta h Department of Transporta tion (UDOT) to construct its "modified" Prefer red "This unfortunat e decision by the Forest Seroice has left us with only one alternative . .. litigation" - Tom Lyotl , LCC A lternative in Logan Canyon. We were joined in our appeal by the Utah Rivers Co nservation Co uncil. OUT ex tensive ap pea l was 187 pages long, and cove red a ll aspects of UOOT's proposal. V\e arg ued that UDOT has not demonstrated the purpose and need fo r its construction p roject, and that they have not ade- quately disclosed the environmenta l impacts of their project. In June the Forest Service denied o ur ap peal. Comments agai nst our appeal, and in favor of UOOT's project, were submitted to the Forest Service by UDOT, the Cache Chamber o f Co mmerce, a nd Citizens for the Protection of Loga n Canyon. The letter from the chamber emphasized the value of Logan Canyon as a major trucking ro ute. It is remarkab le that, given the many poin ts we raise in ou r appeal, the Fo rest Service up held none of them. Their review of our appea l is brief and superficia l, with inad equate respo nses to critical issues. Without due consid eration, the Forest Service has ru bber-stamped implementaton of an unnecessa ri ly ex pensive and destruc tive h ighway p roject. The Forest Service is in fact responsi ble fo r ensuring tha t p urpose and need fo r construction have been demonstra ted. They are also responsib le fo r ens uring that enviro nmenta l impacts have been adequately assessed, incl uding d amge to scenery, fis heries, wildli fe, wet1 nds, and the potentia 1 a Wi ld a nd Scenic status of the river. This responsibility is cl ea rly stated in the Wasatch-Cache Forest Plan and in federal law. In shirking its responsibility for Logan Canyon, the Forest Service is v iolating its mand ate and acting iIIega ll): LCC is cu rrently ga thering fund s for our lega l d efense of Logan Canyon. All co ntributio ns are welco me a nd w ill be used for legal costs. All who are interested in helping in ou r effort to save Loga n Can yon are invited to contact us. A pp eal H igh lig h ts LCe's appen l is avni/able in the Lognn City Library nnd USU's Merrill Library. (1) UDOT's highway sa fety analysis utilizes arti ficially infla ted and manipulated traffi c volumes, inconsistent with UOOT's own traffic (continued nexl " age) �Appeal ("", Unu"') counts, in an attempt to make the previously widened portion of the road, the Lower Canyon, appear safer than the unwidened sections. UDOT's proposed construction will in fact make the highway less safe. (2) The difference in average travel time between UOOT's Preferred Alternative and the Conservationists' Alternative is, by UDOT's admi ssio n, less than 10 minutes! We question the much grea ter cost and enviro nmental impact of the Preferred Alternative given such a minimal difference in travel time. (3) In its highway design for the Upper Canyon, UDOT is not taking advantage of the fl exibility in road design allowed by AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). Throughout the canyon, UDOT has designed the highway in an arbitrary and capricious fashi on, with little environmental sensitivity. (4) The Forest Service has agreed that the segment of the Logan River from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek might possess mo re "outstandingly remarkable values" than any other river in the Wasatch-Ca che Forest. The Forest Service has agreed that this segment should be reevaluated. for protected Wild and Scenic River status. We are concerned that construction of UOOr's Preferred Alternative will degrade this river segment enough that its classification will be lowered. It may no longer qualify for Wild and Scenic status. (5) There is no scientific justification whatsoever for UOOT's claims that trout pop ulations in Logan River will be reduced only 4 to 8%, and that the effects of increased sedimentation in the river will be "relatively minor and short term." UDOT's claims represen t uneducated "guesstimates" of fi sheries impacts because of the lack of adequate data . (6) The WasatchCache Forest Plan mandates that negative economic impacts of highway construction be eva luated. This has not been done. (7) The Forest Servi ce's assessments of impacts to sensi tive species often rest on inadequate surveys and bald assertions that are either patently false or in need of substantiation. (8) Vi sual quality in Logan Canyon will be impaired in a manner inconsistent with guid elines contained in the Fo rest Service's Logan Canyo n Scenic Byway Corrido r Management Plan. USFS management policy for Logan Canyon is inconsistent from document to document. (9) In its selectio n of specially-protected 4(f) properties, pursuant to the Department of Transportation Act, the Forest Service has acted in an arbitrary and capricious fashion. No rationale is provided for why some sites were selected while others of equal recreational value were not. We Request: Logan Canyon Coalition is not trying to stop all construction in Logan Canyon. (1) There must be honest and straightforward NEPA d ocumentation of the need for, and the environmental and economic impacts of, any proposed highway constructio n. UooT has not provided this. UDOT has in fact admitted that their safety data is "garbage" and that it "may be problematic." (2) The construction proposal should be scaled down so as to proteet the sensitive areas of the canyon and river, particularly throug h the upper Midd le Canyon, Beaver Creek, and the summit. (3) UDOT has never fairly eva luated the Conservationist's Alternative. This Alternative should be honestly and straightforwardly reconsidered . 2 The Conservationists' Alternative is far less expensive and environmentally destructive, while improving safety and level of service of the highway. (4) The Forest Service must reevaluate the eligible segment of the Logan River, from Lower Twin Bridge to Beaver Creek, for protected Wild and Scenic River status, befo re constructio n is allowed. Thi s request is in compliance with 5(d) planning requirements of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act . �August ] , ]995 Lee Fundraiser a Success By Kevin Kobe The Logan Can yon Coali tion would like to thank all those who were involved with our fund rai ser weekend with Rick Bass and Terry Tempest William s. \Ilk would specificall y like to thank The Grapevine Restaurant, Slanting Rain Graphic Design, A Book Store, the Utah Rivers Conservation Council and Director Zacha ry Frankel, Scott Smith Photography, mu sicians Nadene Steinhoff, Chris Carlson and Joe Farmer, and of course, nationally renown authors Rick Bass and Terry Tempest Williams. Rick was kind enough to travel from northern Montana. O ur thanks also goes to the many vo lunteers who spent countless hours working to make the weekend a success, espe- dally Don Hickman and Dan Miller. For those who couldn't make the weekend events, which were May 11-14, here is a rundown. Rick Bass spoke in Salt Lake City at the University of Utah Fine Arts Auditorium sponsored by the Utah Rivers Conservation Council. Rick spoke about the signifi cance of Logan Canyon and the absurdity of the current UOOT highway proposal. Following Rick, the audience clapped and sang to the music of Nadene Steinhoff, Chris Carlson and Joe Farmer. Despi te the rain and unseasonably cool weather, Rick Bass and Tom Lyon jo ined some LCC board members o n a field trip up Logan Canyon on Saturday where film makers were doing a documentary on the canyon. This documentary will be shown on the local cable channel. Rick also managed to squeeze in time to speak with local high school students and to do a radiO interview. But the night everyone was wa iting for was Sa turday night, May 13, when over 300 people packed the Eccles Conference Center. Longtime canyon advocate Tom Lyon emceed the event with inspiring introductions and words of wisdom. Rick Bass was humorous but eloquent as he talked about his years in Logan. Two Logan Canyon so ngs from Nadene Steinhoff and friends hit home, especially "U.S. 89 Blues" in which the crowd erupted with hand clapping, si ngi ng and shouting. Terry Tempest Williams brought the evening full circle with words to motivate people into action. She recognized Tom Lyon for hi s efforts, which range from teaching to advocating. She recalled conversations with environme nta l activists that continue to provide inspiration for her work. The night ended with a raffle, great homemade cooki es and refreshments, book signings, and a T-shirt and book sale. Sunday morning the Grapevine Restaurant lived up to its reputation for excellence at ou r fund raiser brunch. Chef Bill Oblock o utdid himself at the sold -out event, and LCC vol unteers worked hand in hand with the gracious staff of the restaurant to make the brunch successful. It was a "stay as long as you want" kind of morning . . 130 Nonh 100 East Logan UT 84321 753-9089 100% for Logan Canyon �The History of a Highway Editors note: This information was compiled by Nadene Steinhoff and Steve Flint. ---1959--- Chamber of Commerce. The State Department of Fish and Game launched a formal protest against the plan. Their protest was later modified. ject. The Forest Service insisted on additional modifications. UOOT abandoned the project for the time being, hoping the Chamber of Commerce and construction interests would continue the fight for public support. 1960--- The Utah Department Bulldozers began of Transportation work. The first section (UDOT) completed called for widening of "improvement" plans for the road, passing lanes the first section of the 39- and stream channelizamile highway from tion. Construction was Logan to Bear Lake. completed up to the Engineering standards of Malibu Campground. the time dictated that the 1961 route be as straight and Plans to reconstruct direct as possible. It was the section from Malibu also felt that it was too Campground to Right expensive to avoid the Hand Fork were Logan River. At that released. After seeing time, most highway the destruction in the departments didn't feel first phase, the public justified spending public was much more responmoney to protect aesthet- sive, writing a barrage of ic values or environmen- letters to the editor and tal resources. to UDOT. During the first The Forest Service phase, Logan residents and the Utah State were silent. Public hear- University (USU) College ings were poorly attendof Natural Resources ed" except by supporters issued position stateof the project such as the ments opposing the pro- calling for extensive straightening and eightfoot shoulders. An article in National Parks magazine condemned previous construction in the canyon and the new design proposal. 1970 - - - - - - - 1963 - - - - Twelve USU professors formed the zine advocated protecNorthern Utah tion of the canyon in an Environmental Advisory Committee. The group, article. ---1968--led by fisheries biologist UOOT decided to William Helm, was conaccept the Forest Service cerned about additional requirements, and came impacts. At their suggesback to finish the first tion, UOOT incorporated phase, but when the bull- an Environmental dozers moved in it Steering Committee, looked like the same "cut gave scenic consideraand fill" job. The intitions higher priority, and brought a landscape mate, gently winding road under arching trees . architect onto the project. became a fast, wide UOOT still lacked asphalt highway. permission from the 1969--Forest Service, but A public hearing was attempted to rush the held for road reconstruc- project through before they lost available fundtion from Right Hand ing. Fork to Ricks Spring, National Parks maga- Adventure 1 Sports 4 �August 1, 1995 Their assertions that the project was necessary for hig hway effici ency and safety were refu ted by the USU co mmittee, which claimed that the safety data was inadequate. - - - 1971 - - - The USU co mmittee succeeded in d elayi ng the project, ci ting the need for more information on traffic, tourism and fisheri es. There was discussion of the need fo r an Environme ntal Impact Statement (EIS) under the new Na tional Environmental Pol icy Act (NEPAl. UDOT presented a second proposal. This was also co nsid ered u nacceptable by the USU g roup. The plan called for extensive cu rve cutti ng through the middle canyon, elimination o f picnic and campground areas, and retaining walls al ong large sections of the river. The Forest Service 1987 The Interdisciplinary Team was dis solved by UDOT officials, who were uncomfortable with public input. issued an Enviro nmental Analysis Report on the project, outlining 20 requirements UDOT must comply with . In the face of strong public o ppositi on a nd new Forest Service req uirements, UDOT scrapped their plans. They shifted thei r focu s, and funds to Provo Canyon. - - - 1974 - - - UDOT set up a trai ler in Logan Canyon and Ga rden City to distribute informatio n about their eventual plans. 1976 - - - UOOT issued a Route Analysis Statement, indicating a need for reconstructio n. It included eight different alternatives. UDOT's recom- mended action included shoulders a nd passing lanes in the middle canyon, and correctio n of "substand ard" curves. Sharp publiC criticism was directed at UDOT, wi th Bridgerland Audubo n Society, Ci tizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon (CPLC), and the Cache Sierra Club questioning UOOT's stati stical analysis. UDOT pushed ahead. Analysi s was begun for an (E IS). - - - 1979 - -- UOOT presented their latest proposal for reconstruction of the road from Right Hand Fork to Ricks Spring. They claimed that the massive p roject would require minimal enviro n- mental ana lysis, saying that a less d etailed Environmental Analysis would be sufficient, rather than an EIS. CPLC, a group that had begun in opposition to development plans in Stump Hollow, revived to fight the road d evelopment. Gunn McKay, Rep . for Utah's Di strict 1, went to bat for preservation of the ca nyon. Tom Lyon and Dianne Siegfreid visited w ith regional Federal Highway Admini stration (FHWA) offi cials in Denver to press the argument that the project required more ex tensive analysis. The FHWA agreed and informed UDOT that it must prepare an EIS in accordance with new NEPA requirements. UDOT was not financially prepa red to take on a full-b lown environmental analYSiS, and retrea ted . Between 1980 (continued nat page) �History (,on lin,"') and 1986, UDOT made periodic visits to Logan offering modifi cations, but community activists still believed the plans were too excessive. - - - 1986 - - - Funding for an EIS was authorized . CH2M Hill was hired to do the analysis. An Interdiscip lina ry (10) Team began meeting. Env ironmental interests were re presented by Steve Fl int, Bill Helm, Rudy Lukez, Tom Lyon and Jack Spence. - - - 1981 - - - before UDOT dissolved the group. Action Force. - - - 1990 - - - Steve, Bruce and Shawn Swaner began meeting.. again, with UDOT to forge a compromise and avert lega l action. Steve and Bruce felt the need to move on. A new steering committee was appointed fo r CPLC. The new steeri ng committee held additional meetings with UODT. Audubon magazine gave coverage to the controversy in a feature article by nationall y re nown autho r Rick Bass. - - - 1994 - - - UOOT issued their Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). Letters in the OEIS ran 21 in favor of the Modified Standard, similar to the Preferred Alternative, as opposed to 309 in favo r of the Conservationists' Alternative. - - - 1991 - - - Steve a nd Bruce continued to amass technical experti se on the project. They hired enviro nm ental lawyer Jeff Appel. Jeff's co rrespondence with UDOT bro ught a more conciliatory stance. Negotiations began. A public relations effort was begun, with ten thousand brochures sent by local activists. - - - 1995 - - - UOOT released its Reco rd of Decision (ROD) favo ri ng the "mod ified" Preferred Alternative. CPLC and UOOT declared the ROD a compromise. A new highway design advisory team was formed, with CPLC rep resentation . Logan Canyon Scoping meetings held by UOOT drew 400 citizens, with many attendees leaving due to lack of room. Project planners received 200 let- - - 1992 - ters from an aroused Nadene Steinhoff and public. The 10 Team was dis- other volu nteers organized a Hands Across solved by UOOT offiThe Canyon rally. The cials, who were uncomevent, attended by over fo rtable with public 400 people, was covered input. by regional and state Area citizens submitmedia. ted the Conservatio nists' The following week, Alternative, a proposa l calling for wider bridges, UOOT approached Bridgerland Audubon reconstruction of cu lwith a proposal for verts, three passi ng lanes renewed negotiations. in the Upper Canyon, 1993 paved parking areas, UDOT released their road rea lignment at the Lower Twin Bridge, slow Final Enviro nme ntal Impact Statement (FEIS). vehicle turnouts, raised Hundreds of letters were road beds in nood areas, sent protesting the excesimproved intersectio ns sive plans. Petitions and increased signage. were sent by the - - - 1989 Audubon Society, Steve Flint and Bruce Business People for the Pendery were appointed Canyon, CPLC, the to a Citizen's Advi so ry Cache Sierra Club, and Team formed by UDOT. the Loga n Environmental Two meetings were held 6 Coalition (LCC), spearheaded by Kevin Kobe, was formed to seek further modifications through the Forest Service appeal process. The Forest Service released their ROD supporting UOOT. LCC and the Utah Rivers Conserva tion Council submitted a 187page appeal to the Forest Service. The appea 1 was researched and authored by a dozen people, and edited by Gordo n Steinhoff. Requested relief included adequate NEPA documentation, and further protection for the Middle Canyon, Beaver Creek and the s ummit. The Forest Service denied LCe's appea l, refUSing to add ress critical issues. Logan Canyon Coalition is curren tly making plans to take legal action. �Au g u s t 1 , 199 5 Westwater Canyon Run the Rapids with LCC It's true Logan Canyon CoaJition membershi p can be fun. We don' t believe in all work and no play. Frida y, August 18 th rough Sunday, Aug ust 20, we will r un the Westwater section of the Colorado River, locatednorth of Moab. O Uf fea rless Lee leader /p resident, Kevin Kobe, has said that Westwater has "some of the best w hite water in the state." Kevi n and his sister Bri dget are organizing the trip. Kevin feels that Lee shou ld be more than a group that works together, but can be a grou p that "has a fee li ng of commun ity and fri ends hi p." A WORLD Or: A RT A tJD Lee plans to fl oat willing to make the drive, please let us know when you register. On receipt of your registration fee, a confirmation will be sent which will incl ud e the date, time and location of the pretrip meeting. All participants will be asked to help in meal and camp preparation, and, of course, everyone needs to know how to swim! Westwater early Saturday morning, set up camp', and hike and exp lo re the side canyons around the campsite. Sunday the rapids should be rambunctio us. The cost is $30 for LCC members and $50 for non-members (making thi s a perfect time to join!). The trip will be limited to 20 individuals, and oars are being fill ed rapidly. The cost includes food o n the river, the permit and g roup equipment. It does not include transportation, food for the trip to and fro m the river or personal gear. Ca r pooling w ill be arranged during a planning meeting. If you are Registration: Please send you r registration money to Logan Canyo n Coa lition, USU Box #1674, Loga n, UT 84322-0199. ComcTlo tJ IUIAl: vcents 7SS·S497 11·6 7 Volunteers Needed 1- Networking 2- Fundraising 3- Education 4- Mailings 5- Letter writing 6- Events 7- Media relations 8- Passing the word 9- SLC contacts 10- HELP! Equipment Needed 1- Offi ce space 2- Voice mail 3- FAX machine 4- Copier 5- Postage stamps 6- MONEY! �r------------------------, YES! I THE WANT TO JOIN LOGAN CANYON COALITION and receive a subscription to CANYON WIND o $20.00 Annual Membership o I would like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Lots more o I would like to voulnteer. o Here's $12.00 for a great T-Shirt. o I'm broke! Here's five bucks. Name,__________________________________ 5Ireel_______________________________ City _ _ __ _ _ _Zip _ _ __ Phone#'_ _ _ __ PlUM make check payable and mail to: Logan Canyon Coalition U5U Box *1674 L ________________________ J Logan, UT 84322-0199 LCC T-SHIRTS - 512.00 (three colod m.. Re;rcled BULK RATE u.s. POSTJlGe Paid COA.LJl:TJl:ON Workl", fo r Ih' of Lo,a" Ca n yo n USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 """'" UT I'tnrril N'JJJ �- -- -- -- --- --------.- --- ----- -- - ------ - --- --- ----- - - - - - -- - -- ---- - --- - --.-. - - - - - - - .,. --.aT __ -.-.w--.aT • -- ----- ---------- --- ------- ___ ..- -.----.aT ____ - - -- - - ---- A NEWS BULLETIN FROM LOGAN CANYON COALITION August 1, 1996 Vol. 1 No.3 FEI S Violated UDOT Unveils Plans The Utah Depa rtment of Transportation (UOOT) has u nveiled its d esign plans for Bu rnt and Lower Twin Bridges in Logan Canyon. With these plans, UOOT is already in v iolation of its Final Envirorunental Impact Statement (PElS) and its Record of Decision. UOOT is now planning extensive w idening, cuts into the mountainsides, and retaining wa lls that were not disclosed in these environmenta l documents. The brid ges and app roaches to the bridges have not been d esigned in an environmentally-sensitive fashion. A strong response has been sent to UOOT by our attorney, Kate Zimmerman. UOOT is now applying for the construction permits it needs from the state Division of Water Rights and the Corps of Engineers. The Logan Canyon Coalitio n (LCq will submit comments to these agencies and to the Design changes at this late date, after opportunities for public input have closed, is a v iolation of the letter and the spirit of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) - Lee Altornty, Kau ZinrmernuHI Environmental Protection Agency. We are asking for a less d amaging construction proposal, one that allows for needed highway improvemen ts w hile p rotecting the canyon's scenic and environmenta l resou rces. We continue to raise funds for the lega l action we believe is inevitable. The Record of Decision sta tes that "design and posted speeds wiJI be 35 miles per hour" in the upper middle canyon (from Lower Twin Bridge to above Ricks Spring). Yet, at the bridge d esign workshop in February, Rod Terry, UDOT project manager, ind ica ted tha t the brid ges and approaches in this area have been designed for 40 miles per ho ur. Apparent ly, driv ing time throug h the canyon has been a major factor in the perceived need to reconstruct the high way, even thoug h estima ted savings in travel time are quite minimal. "Changing design speeds at this late date, after opportunities fo r p ublic input have closed, is a v iolation o f both the letter and spiri t of the National Environmenta l Policy Act," Zimmerman said. Des ig n plans show Burnt Bridge being w idened on the downstrea m side. Cuts into the mo unta inside up to 750 feet long are now planned both upstream and downstream from the bridge. Two retaining walls of 200 fee t long wiJI be anchored in riparian areas near the bridge. Three more retaining walls, one up to 400 feet long, are planned fo r the mountainside below the bridge. These cuts and retaining walls are for the sake of widening the highway on either side of the bridge fro m 26 feet to 34 feet. These d esign features and their impacts on the scenery and adjacent fishery were not disclosed in the FEIS. In that document, UDOT assured us that the highway in this part of the canyon would not be w idened . Visual impacts w iJI be significant. Burnt Bridge is s urrounded by riparian vegetation and u pland plant communities that have received a visual sensitivity ranking (contilwed /lext page) �Violates ("";.,,,,) of 6 and 7 by the Forest Service, indicating that the roadside in this a rea cannot absorb alte rations and still appear as na tur- allandscape. The affected maple-shrub community on the cut hillsides will take 10-15 years to re-establish, while a ffected juniper and Doug las fir communi ties will take more than 20 years to reestablish. Some wetlands and riparian vegeta tion will be permanently lost. UOOT has pledged to color and texture the extensive retaining walls, but retaining walls will still look like retaining walls, appearing unnatural. Exposed rock faces will still look like exposed rock faces, damaging the scenic beauty of this area. Lee believes these impacts are unnecessary. The bridge could be tapered into the existing highway in a shorter distance, eliminating the need for much of the wid ening and the accompanying cuts and retaining waUs. At Lower Twin Brid ge, mountainsides will be cut up to 600 fee t on either side of the bridge in order to widen the highway from 26 feet to 38 feet. A retaining wall of 200 feet long is planned above the bridge. This retaining wall and cuts above the bridge were no t disclosed in the FEIS. UOOT has yet to show a purpose and need for allY high way widening in this middle section of Logan Canyon. They have adm itted that their an accurate d escription of planned construction and a better idea of its impacts. Surely at this stage of the FEIS, UOOT cou ld have surveyed the relevant features of the can yon, such as the location of wetlands, and applied appropriate design standard s in to provide an accurate description of construction and assessment of impacts. Preliminary plans for Upper Twin Brid ge show a cut into the mountainside of approximately 15 to 24 feet deep and 760 feet long. This cu t and its impacts were not disclosed in the FEIS. We believe that with a fair assessment of the environmental impacts of the elltire highway project, considered as a w hole, a less damaging construction alternative would be more a ttractive. Such an integrated assessment should be given in a Supplemental Environmentallmpact Statement for the entire canyon highway project. There shouJd also be an honest demonstration of the purpose and need for any construction in Logan Canyon. " LCC has g rave concerns about both the need for UOOT's proposal and its impacts on the special values of the canyon. These concerns are only made worse by UOOT's violations of its FE IS and its failure to g ive the public full opportunity to participate in this decision and to comment on potential environmenta l consequences," Zimmennan stated. traffic and safety d ata is "garbage" and "problematic." lmmediately downstream of this bridge is crucial brown trout spawning habitat. LCC is concerned w ith the impact construction and the resulting erosion will have on this fishery. The Logan River fishery is currently ranked in the top 5% of stream fisheries in the sta te. UOOT has not supplied adequate information on sedimentation or on trout mortality. At both bridges, there will be increased erosion into the rive r during and after construction until ground cover can be re-established. Increased sediments can smother trout eggs, clog gills, and kill the aquatic insects upon w hich trout feed . UOOT admits, "Additional loss of fish habitat could potentially occur from riverbank disturbances and introduction of sediments into the Logan River as a result of heavy machinery and activities associated with bridge construction." LCC has suggested replacing Lower Twin Brid ge wi th a wider and sa fer bridge on a new alignment, while maintaining current highway wid th . This would eliminate much cutting into the mo untainsides and protect this va luab le fish ery. UOOT has refused. We are concerned with UOOT's method of segmenting its Logan Can yon Highway proposa l into smaller projects in w hich, well after the FE IS and Record of Decision, we fin al1y get 2 �1 , 19 96 Allglls t Logan River, Wild and Scenic by Drew Parkin The recent appeal of the Forest Service decision to allow highway expansion in Logan Canyon quesHoned, among other things, the resuJ ts of a Forest Service study regarding wild and scenic rivers. For many of you, the idea of a wild and scenic river evokes images of the Sa lmon River in Idaho or the Rogue River in Oregon . What d oes this have to do with the Logan River? A lot. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires federal land management agendes to include w ild and scenic river evaluations as part of their normal decision-making processes. In the case of the Forest Service, this means that forest plans must specifically consider wild and scenic river eligibil ity. It also means that any Environmental Impact Statement that involves river resource must address this issue. Further - and this is the important part - once the Forest Service identifies a river as being eligible, it must, in adherence wi th its own ad ministrative directives, manage the river "in a manner consisten t with the purposes of the Act, and such that the outstand ing remarkable values which make it eHgible for inclusion are not dim inished to the poin t where eligibility is negated. In no event should the free-flowing characteristics of the river be modified." In response to a threatened lawsuit, the Forest Service some 10 years ago set out to identify potentially eligible wild and scenic rivers. Individual forests were entrusted with this and many responded admirably. Unfortunately, wild and scenic evaluations have never been high on the list for forest managers in Utah . That is, not until the controversy over the proposal to widen the roadway through Logan Canyon. Pressu red by citizens concerned about the highway proposal, the Wasa tch-Cache National Forest undertook a yearlong river study and, in November 1993, released its inventory. The inventory started by identifying 37 streams that forest planners deemed wor thy of being s tudied. Nex t, the larger s treams on that list, including the Logan River, were subdivided into "segments." In all, the Forest Service study considered 59 stream segments. Of these, 18 segments were rejected out-of-hand as being insignificant. Beaver Creek was one of these. An ad d itional 11 segments were rejected for not being free-flowing. These included s treams tha t had been s ubjected to water w ithdrawals, channeHzation or other degradation . All of the Logan downs tream of Temple Fork was rejected for this reason. This left 30 segments that were actually included in the study. The inventory considered nine separate resource fea tures. The idea was to determine the significance of each stream with regard to each resource feature. A stream could be ra ted as ei ther (1) typical, (2) Significant a t a statewide level, or (3) significant at what the Forest Service termed a "provincial" level (an area comprising all of the Rocky Mountains). A rating of 3 for any given resource feature would q ualify a stream segmen t for wild and scenic river (conthwed next page) DID YOU KNOW? A b ridge o r a city street must h ave 12 lanes to accommod ate 40,000 automobiles per hour. 1 lane is necessary to 40,000 bicycles per hou r. To elimin ate the need for Midd le East oil, U.S. commuters w ould need to b icycle to w ork only 1.25 times each week. Equating calories to gasoline, the number of miles per gallon that could be tra veled b y the ave rage cyclist is 3,000. ook 130 Nort h 100 EaSI Logan UT 8432 I 753-9089 PL EASE RI DE YOUR B I KE. SU NR:ISE C VC LE R:V 138 NORTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UTAH 84321 801 -753-3294 M ONOAY - SATURDAY 10:00 A.M. - 6:00 100% fo r L ogan Canyo n P.M. 3 �Wild (COlltinlled) designation. The result? Of the original 59 s tream segments, only one - the Stillwater Fork of the Bear River - was found eligible based on the rating for its scenic features. No other stream received a 3, and all were therefore rejected, including the Logan River. I was stunned when I heard the findings. Based on severa l years of professional experience with wild,and scenic rivers, and having detailed knowledge of the Logan River, it was my judgment that the Logan River not only met but exceeded eligibility requirements. After pouring over the report, I concluded that the study team's basic assumptions were wrong and applying these assumptions greatly skewed the findin gs. The decision to use "p rovi ncial" significance as the cu t-off for eligibility was the most pervasive error. The Forest Serv ice Manual itself d irects that "statewide" significance is an appropriate measure for judging wild and scenic status. Several national forests have used it as the basis of their decisions, and it is accepted practice for National Park Service and BLM planners as well. Had the WasatchCache used "statewide" significance as the threshold, the Logan River would have been included easily. If anything, I believe the ratings for the Logan River are low. I question the ratin gs for wildlife, water recreation and, especially, scenery. Even if the Forest Service ratings are correct, it is obvious the Logan River is an extremely important resource with "statewide" significance. [n five of the nine categories, the river received a s tatewide Significance rating. No other stream had more than two. The Logan River was rated as the most significant stream in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest for five of the nine resource categories. Again, no other stream could claim more than two. The conclusion is inescapable. The Forest Service report absolutely confirms that, when compared to other streams on the forest, the Logan River is the crown jewel and is most certainly eligible for national wild and scenic river status. (Drew Parkin is a river policy conslilfant in Cambridge, Mass., alld serves Off the board of dirf"Ctors of till" Pacific RivtrS COlllleil. HI" prf"Violls/y mallaged wild and scenic riuer programs for tire Na tiollal Park Service. He is a Ilative of Utah and Sptllt severa/ seaSOIIS workillgJor tire Forest Service ill Logan Canyon.) USFS data on the Logan River between Temple Fork and White Pine Creek. Logan River rating St.ltewide s ignifiu nce Highest rating in forut Typical reso urces Wildlife Rating compared to other Wasatch..cache streams Rated in top 5 Rated in top 5 Geology/Hydrology Statewide significance Highest rating in forest Rated in to p 10 Scenery Water Typical Highest rating in forest Statewide significance Rated in top 10 Fisheries Statewide Significance Tied for highest rating in forest Ecology St.ltewide sig nifican ce Tied for high est rating in forest This information was taken directly from tile report. Adventure, Sports _. . W l ft ....... tho -_ """".ft,..r.._' ...... in4<.o"" h . .... - ......, • _ _ ;u.. "';. •• ... ....'-ft.. " ... ... •. . . ...... 1".4 t • 4 �- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - ---- -- ---------- - ------- ------ww Augllst 1, 1996 Canyon News Briefs by Tim Wagner Utah citizens lost a serious battle recently when U.s. District Judge Tena Campbell ruled in favor of the Utah Deparhnent of Transportation's (UDOT) plans for further widening of U.s. 189 through Provo Canyon. The Provo River Coalition filed suit February 29 seeking a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to prevent further environmental destruction. Because UDOT had made significant design changes since the origina l plans were drafted in 1989, the group argued that NEPA required a supplemental environmental impact statement. Judge CampbeiJ saw things differently. "Plaintiffs have so far failed to come forward with any evidence for significant environmental effects arising out of the project as currently planned," Campbell wrote. The judge said an agency is not required to supplement an environmental-impact statement every time new information is found. At the same time she acknowledged the design changes included a new road alignment, additional concrete retaining waiJs, and the creation of a dirt haul road. Inside sources say that Campbell's concern for the environment was a cover-up for more important matters: the economy and jobs. With a $34 million price tag for two miles of highway, is it any wonder? A bit of irony is that UDOT's plans for the next phase of the project have been scrapped due to lack of funding. Alan Meecham, director of UDOT's Region Three said, "I've got about five years left (before retirement) and I'd like to see some work completed in the canyon before I'm gone." In the past there was much talk about UDOT becoming more trustworthy and willing to compromise. Facts behind the case give the true p icture of UDOT. This is not an agency as concerned about public transportation, the environment, and highway safety as they are about funding massive, unnecessary highways. . LCC now has a great public education and awareness tool for Logan Canyon. With some tremendous pholos by photographer Scott Smith, LCC has created a fantastic slide show presentation. It debuted at a well attended potluck in February on the USU campus and has since been shown to several groups. The presentation lasts twenty minutes and is easy to fit into a variety of public gatherings. If you know a group that would like to see the show, contact one of the officers. • LCC would like to thank the outpouring of support we have re«!ived from our fundraising letter. The money ($3,155) will help us proceed with our upcoming UDOT battle. The majority of our support comes from Cache Valley, but there are many canyon lovers across the country. Enthusiasm, support and love for the canyon is evident by the following: - "Please accept my donation of $25 to help save Logan Canyon . I'm not sure how you traced me down here in Maine, but I'm sure glad you did. Thanks." - "As I will soon be moving and wish to keep up with these canyon issues, please add my permanent address to your mailing list." - "Thanks again and keep up the good work. See you in the canyon." - "Long live Logan Canyon." - "GOOD LUCK! Just wanted you to know I was impressed with the professional presentation of the latest brochure and letter. You articulated your objections to the project in a straightforward, no nonsense manner and 1 appreciated the compromises tha t you see are necessary. Take Care. "Coffee with a Cause" Logan Blend • regular· organic · decaffeinated · Night and Day ra i n@intele.nel 801 .75 J . 05'J $1.00 is donaled 10 Lee for OV8lYpoond sokJ. 5 �SLOWDOWN WE MOVE TOO FAST by Kevin 1. Kobe On December 3,1995, members of the Logan Canyon Coalition drove from Logan to Garden City. OUf objective was to assess the quality and uniformity of advisory and regulatory signs. We documen ted our assessments and addressed our concerns to Dyke leFevre, Region One Director, Utah Deparbnent of Transportation (UIXJ1). Our fi rst question to Mr. leFevre addressed the inconsistent u se of advisory speed signs on curves. We expected to see an advisory speed sign on any curve which has a design speed below the posted speed. This was the case only from the summit of Logan Canyon to Garden City. There is a 40 mph posted speed limit. There are also in both th e uphill and downhill lanes signs indica ting an approaching cu rve and an advisory speed. Most of these curves have arrows ("chevrons") around them. The Middle p art of Logan Canyon has not one curve with a posted advisory speed. According to the 1987 Technical Memorandum, this part of the canyon has many more curves than Rich County that are below the posted speed. LCe's question was quite simple: Why hasn ' t UOOT posted advisory speed signs on these curves? Mr. leFevre explained how each curve is "unique in its capability of sustaining a reasonable speed through the curve section. Because of the construction, maintenance, and natural ground settlement through each curve, each one will drive differently than originally anticipated or designed. Some curves, as much as 10 MPH below the posted speed, are s till able to reasonably allow travel through the curves at the pos ted speed." "We have been anticipating a project through this canyon fo r a considerable length of time and may have neglected reviewing each o f the curves below the posted s peed limit.;; " I have talked to our Region Traffic Engineer and he has indicated that since we have a completed environmental report and we know what is going to happen, especially through the middle canyon, that he will review the curve signing and advisory speeds and make recommendations to better inform the traveling public." To date, UOOT has fai led to install any advisory speed signs in the Middle and Upper canyon. A related LCC ques tion asked how accident surveys can be done in the midd le LCC T-SHIRTS - 512.00 4th"" colorl canyon if the curves in question are n ot signed properly? We did not get a response. Perhaps UOOT can't come up with good accident and traffic da ta. (So there is no reason for the project.) We also documented the lack of signs warning o f wildlife crossings. The only wildlife sign in the entire project area is located within the Garden City limits. UOOT documented in the FEIS that moto rists collide with animals at least twice as often in the Midd le and Upper parts of Logan Canyon as on the Rich County side. Mr. LeFevre's answer: '' In talking with the Fores t Service, there does not appear to be any location that has a prominence o f animal collisions and that placing the signs at the beginning of the canyon is probably just as effective as having signs throughout the canyon . The wildlife warning signs h ave little effect on driver behavior and would be more of a visual impact in the canyon than it would provide for motoris ts behavior." (And massive construction won't have a visua l impact?) To further make our po int, there was not a concern over vehicle/snowmobile collisions anywhere in the FEIS, and yet there is a sign pos ted in the Upper canyon that reads, "Snowmobile Crossing: Next 9 Miles". Why worry about snowmobiles, and ignore w ild life? LCC also asked why there aren't " Pedestrian Crossing" signs where many people are crossing the road, such as Logan Cave, Blind Ho llow, Ricks Spring (which is s till a planned passing zone) and Bunchgrass C reek? Mr. LeFevre indica ted that " A lot of these socalled pull-outs were created by individuals using them with disregard for safety to themselves and the traveling motorists and have not been an official designated turn-out." With the lack of signs warning motoris ts of pedestrians, animals, and curves one begins to worry about UOOTs mission. Is UOOT really concerned about our safety? �Augllst ] , ]9 96 Lee adds ,fun to activism '96 SUMMER FUNDRAISERS The summer heat and good 01' fashioned ice cream combined to pro· duce a fin ancial bonanza for the Coali tion at KRCL's Day In The Park in Salt Lake City on June 8. Through the efforts of dedicated LCC member Dan Miller and a few other volunteers, over $600 was raised in a sin· gle afternoon as festival geers lined up to pay $2.00 for a Ben & Jerry's ice cream bar. Thanks to Dan and some good connections, the hot weather treats were entirely donated by the socially·conscious ice cream manufacturer. "For awhile we were the most pop ular booth there," said Dan. It shou ld also be noted that many people stopped by A WORLD O. all members and staff of bo th band s who d onated their time and talents, THANK YOU! THANK YOU l Please get out and support these guys . They' re worth it. This event was special for two reasons. One, the amphitheater was per· fect. This venue is beauti· fut yet unused and in need of some repairs. Maybe we could do a fund raiser for the theater itself. Secondly, Jerry Joseph, lead singer and guitarist for the Jack Mormons, spent a good deal of time livi ng in Cache Valley. Thus, it was like returning home for him. They want to come back as soon as possible, so what do you say? just to receive some free information and sign up on our roster list. Way to go Dan! •••••••••••• •••••• The Coalition would like to thank all who attended our fundraiser concert with Euphio Project and the Jack Mormons on June 6. Capping the last day of finals and a beautiful summer evening,. over 200 people came out to enjoy live music on USU's amphitheater on Old Main Hill. The event raised nearly $800 towards protecting Logan Canyon. We would especially like to thank the Baugh Motel for co·sponsoring the event. Of course, to EJ)GINGWE$T 2"1'1 SW Sl'lll'!. (; \11111' S I P OIIIl \'11, OJ{ 'Ii21<l Logan Canyon Your Destination? T ComCTIOtJ CLOnmJG & - Backpacking - Skiing · Climbing · H iking . Snowshoeing - Sightseeing "Ccents 117 North Mai n 5t • Logan, Utah, 84321 • 801 -753-1541 7 �r-----------------------, YES ! I WANT TO J OIN THE LOGAN CANYON COALITION and receive a subscription to CANYON WIND o $20.00 Annual Membership o I wo uld like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Lots m ore o I wo uld like to voluntee r. o Here's $12.00 for a grea t T-Shirt. p/lIs SJ shippillg o I'm broke! Here's five bu cks. o Please add my nam e to your mailing li st. H PRINTING CO. D Name ____________________________ 5treet____________________________ City__________5tate_ Phone# _ _.Zip _______ Em ail ____________ Plene rn,lk, check p,lyablt MI d mai l to: 43 LOGA N , 100 W EST UT A H 8 4321 TEL .80 1 .752, 0 3 1 1 FAX Logan Canyon Coalition SOU TH 80 1 .753.3 1 61 USU Box N1674 Logan, UT 84322-0199 L _______________________ We ask for your continued support at this time, as we prepare for the legal challenge we believe is inevitable. Our ability to mount a legal battle depends upon the moral and financial support of canyon lovers such as yourself. PLEASE consider a generous donation to save Logan Canyon and Logan River. • - ._-=.. .. .. __ __ ... _iii ... _ . . .iii ___ iii na . . . . . __ . . . . . . . . . - --- - - -- -- - - C:O.A.L:J:T:J:ON' , AI'rR.() . yl- ' bE J'f',() 'W BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID &, ' < A fv1. I USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 Tom &Jan Lyon 655 canyon Road Logan ur 8432 1 I I , LOGAN. UT PERMIT 50 - tI' Please relfew your membership today �- ---_ -- -------- -....... -- --- - -..... --- -------.. ---- -- - -- ---- - -- - - - - ----- - - - -- -- - - - -- ---- ---- -- -- --- - - ----------- --- ---- - - - - -- - --- - ------__T • • _ _ _ _T _ • • _____T • _ ---- A NEWS BULLETIN FROM LOGAN CANYON COALITION Vol. 2 No. 4 Summer 1997 Stop Wo rk Order Lifted LCC Files Suit On Ma rch 19 the Logan Canyon Coalltion (Lee) filed a complaint in U.s. District Court against the Utah Department of Transpo rtation (UOOT) and the Forest Service. We requested the cou rt to order a halt to construction at Lower Twin Bridge in Logan Canyon until our concerns over the bridge could be resolved. The judge s uggested UOOT s top construction. UOOT complied . We reached an agreement w ith UOOT that has aUowed us to w ithdraw our request for a halt to cons truction. Lee recognizes the need to replace the bridges, and work is now proceeding. UDOT has conceded some important points: -They ha ve agreed that in the future they will not argue for the need to widen the highway above Lower Twin Bridge simply because they have w idened the "An improvement to the road and consequent increase in operating speed would expectedly increase the accident occurrences." - from a 1974 interna l UOOT memo highway at the bridge. Lee was concerned that widening at the bridge sets an engineering precedent to widen the highway aU the way up the canyon. - UDOT has also agreed to remove the old Lower Twin Bridge in the most environmentally sensitive fashion. They ha ve agreed to present a written plan for removing the old bridge, with a djscussion of the environmental safeguards they will employ, and to consider LCe's comments on their plan. Finally, UOOT has agreed to consider Lee's comments on their water quality monitoring plan and mitigation efforts for the project. Lee is s uggesting more frequent moni to ring during construction. We are recommending that for any future construction better baseline da ta is ga thered prior to constructio n. Unfortunately, for the present project base line da ta goes back only to September, making impossible adequate comparison with past parameter va lues. We are recommending as well that for future construction more complete monitoring be done of sedimentation due to construction. Our lawsuit has already enabled LCC to help make highway construction less environmentally destructive. Lee is grateful to our attorney, Ray mond Scott Berry, for his excellent work on behalf of Logan Canyon. Scott has put many hours into lea rning the details of our case. His advice has been invaluable. We are in good legal hands. Expertise and ad vice has been donated from professionals and environmental organizations across the country. We are especially g rateful to Drew Parkin, Jack Griffith, Steve Flint, Bob Morris, and Pete Frost for their expertise and dedica tion. Lawsuit Highlights Our lawsuit still stands and will be heard by the court in a few months. We will explore the following issues in court: -In an internal 1974 memo conceming the Logan Canyon highway, (COl/Jill/nod Il!!xl page) �Wild and Scenic Rivers system. The Forest Service has not followed UOOT stated, "an these procedures in the improvement to the road case of Logan River. and consequent increase in operating speed would ThE:Y should not be allowing losses to the expected ly increase the scenery, the fishery, the accident occurrences." water quality and other Here UOOT is admitting canyon resources that what we should know by will come with UOOT's common sense. Widening and straighten- proposal until the evaluation procedure is propering this ca nyon highway, wi th an increase in traffic ly ca rried out. We have documented the fai lures speed, wi ll lead to a less of the Forest Service to safe highway. There will abide by its own regulastill be curves in the road, limited sight distance and tions. - The Forest Service is steep inclines. Especially mandated by federal law in the ice and snow of to generate a list of recrewinter we should not ation areas in Logan have traffic hurtling Canyon that are to through the canyon at receive special protection speeds that are not safe. from construction By 1993 UDOT changed impacts. The Forest its mind and presented a Service presented 17 sites, safety argument for its most of which are small proposa l. They promote parking lots. This meathe myth that thei r proger list was generated posed construction w ill with absolutely no ratiolead to a safer highway. nale for why they chose Their traffic and accident data ha ve obviously been these sites and why they manipulated to make the have ignored other important recreation case they wish to make. a reas. For aU we know, -In their 1974 memo the Forest Service threw UDOT admitted, "The darts at a map to generonly conclusion w hich ate its list. LCC has doccan be drawn, therefore, umented 63 addjtiona l is that even the most recreation areas that the minima l improvemen t to Forest Service should the existing highway have included in its list, would have severe areas that are used for adverse impact on the picnicking, fishin g, kaycanyon water resources." acking, rock climbing, Yet, now UOOT c.I aims either no impact or mini- etc. The Forest Service's Management Plan for mal impact to the fishery Logan Canyon lists recreand to water quality. ation as the primary use They must be thinking of the canyon. We will tha t a mirac.le will occur. explore in court the arbiTheir estimations are trary and capricious manbased on fantasy, not ner in which the Forest good science, which is a Service has behaved in its violation of federal law. evaluation of recreation. - The Forest Service - The Forest Service is has la id out a proced ure a lso mandated by fed era l fo r eva luating rivers for law to account for inclusion in the national Lawsui t impacts of construction upon its sensitive species, including Bonneville Cutthroa t Trout. The Forest Service's conclusion of no impacts is based upon no surveys at all or upon surveys that are inadequate. The Forest Serv ice makes bald assertions that are totally mysterious, such as "flora l species have been mitigated for." No explanation of this claim is provided. Other assertions are pa tently false, Stich as "no fauna l sensitive species were found withthe proposed project dIsturbance area,"" a claim contradicted by information known to the F(1rest Service about Bonneville Cutthroa t Trout. UDOT's highway proposal will result in a highway that is less sa fe. It is far more expensive than is needed, and it is far too damaging to the fishery, the scenery, water quality and other resources. It threa tens recreation, the primary use of the canyon. UDOT's hi.hwav PI"OPO'Sal is also porkbarrel project for the sake of bringing taxpayer dol lars through the UOOT burea ucracy. Our own Conservationists' Alternative fea tures sensible highway improvements such as bridge replacement, some passing and turning lanes, while it protects valuable canyon resources. Our lawsuit is essential if we are to save Logan Canyon from UOOT's appetite for asphalt. Our stand has already made a difference. (,0,,1i,,""') ""'g'''" 2 �Summer 1997 The Ultimate Impact Roads Facilitate People By Tim Wagner Over the course of the last eighteen months, I've had the opportunity to speak on behalf of LCC to several groups. After presenting some history and current facts surrounding the Logan Canyon issue, I usually find myself drifting towards what I see as the biggest threat. That is, people. While we are aU rightfully concemed about the many various fonns of environmental dcgradation resulting from fifteen to twenty years of construction, I honestly believe that a new and "improved" U.S. Highway 89 through Logan Canyon will facilitate a tremendous amount of development, and the result, the "ultimate impact." Try to project your thoughts to the fall of 2017. It's a beautiful afternoon and you and your granddaughter have decided to go fishing in Logan Canyon. UOOT contractors are putting the finishing touches on shoulders and drainage facilities. A new widened stretch of asphalt lays before you, extending aU the way to the summit and down to Garden City. Semi-trucks careen by at 60 miles per hour, making deliveries to a convenience store that has been located at FrankUn Basin for the last ten years. Up the road, adjacent to the Beaver Mountain tumoff, lies a brand new restaurant and hotel complex. The facility occupies over 40 acres with a giant parking lot, sending roadg'rime into Beaver Creek. Farther up, a new snowmobile/ ATV dealershjp has located along with a fast-food franchise. Because of the increase in tuming traffic, UOOT has now started construction on another widened intersection, forcing massive cuts into the slope. Throughout the upper section of the canyon, residential construction is booming, along with severa! higher density developments. At times, traffic is so congested that it continues to back up, with increasing accidents. Your fishing trip tums into a nightmare because every place you try to stop is packed with anglers. Many are out-ofstaters staying at the new hotel reading about the wonderful fishing and sight-seeing opporhmities in Logan Canyon, courtesy of Chamber-sponsored national advertising. Frus trated, you decide to take a short hike to view the fall colors. That too is aborted when you realize that every trailhead is jammed with vehicles. So much for quality outdoor recreation. Sound surreal? It shouldn't. If you've spent anytime at aLi in Logan DID YOU KNOW? A bridge OC" cily stTftt must 12 10 40.000 aulomobilal pet' hou,. Only 1 U n«eIINl)' to KIC01I\mOd.;ole 40)100 bicydes pet' hour. To the need fo, Middle oil, US. commuleT\l wou ld nHd lu b iqde 10 work only t.2S times eKh week. Eql1.Jling 10 guoli ,"" the n"moo of milal pe' pilon thOIIt rould boP: lnIveled by the Ivenoge cyclist ;53)100. PLEASE RI DE YOUR BIKE. 138 NoRTH 100 EAST loG.t.N, UIAH 84321 80 1-753-3294 MoN.- SAl. 10:00 A.M.- 6 :00I!M. •---.-.--.--- GRAPEVINE I tiTa,.aIT . 3 Canyon in the past years, you know we are already seeing the first inklings of such a scenario. This is a real situation that can and will occur, if allowed . This is why we are seeing some of the major environmental groups starting to tackle the issue of uncontrolled development. Just this past spring the Sierra Club initiated a national campaign entitJed "ChaUenge to SprawL" According to the club, " ... nothing threatens our air, water, and wild places more than sprawl." Right up front, the club proclaims the campaign starts with stopping inappropriate roads and d evelopments. Sound familiar? One point they take issue with is the myth that development results in increased tax revenues. The cost of infrastructure alone needed to meet the demands of such develop(cont inued /lext page) �PEOPLE (con/itwed) men!, including highways, sewers, water, electricity, and communications, often exceed the long term revenue. These are a ll items subsid ized by you, the taxpaye r. And who reaps the most benefits? The developer and the summer h ome owner who are enabled to build in the canyon beca use they do not pay the true expense. Add in the future costs of decreased air and water quality, traffic congestion, and an overall decline in the quality of life for residents and the price tag goes through the roof. Another way to look at it comes from the n atio na l organization, The Trust for Public Land. It recently cited research showing how zoning and other government regulations actually encourage development into many of our open spaces. There again, government investment (by the taxpayer) into infrastructu re serves to boost land va lues, making them much more attractive for development. Is there anyone who bel ieves that private and state owned land values in Logan Canyon will decrease once the new " modified preferred alter· native" is in place? It all comes back to one central point. Build it and they w ill come. This is an a rgument that can' t be disputed, even by LCe's staunchest opponents. Yet it is this, what I refer to as the "ultimate impacl," that has not been addressed in the Environmenta l Impact Statemen t nor in a ny other serious d iscussions. This is the very issue that helped the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club successfully stop a m ajor interstate highway expansion. In the ruling the judge stated, "Highways create demand for travel and expansion by their very existence." Because the final EIS d id not include the "necessary studies," the court felt the public and other government agencies were not informed of all the consequences. Roads precede developmenl. It is a simple idea and one you will hear more of n o matter w here you live. Not that highway expansion and development is necessarily bad. -_ _-_. _ '- ..... . ' -' .. , • •• " But there are right ways and wrong ways and right places and wrong places. Logan Canyon is the wrong place. And this is why I firmIy believe we need to elevate the discuss ion of this project beyond the hjghway itself. Whenever we have the opportunity to talk with the general public about LCe's position, we must include the issues of people and development. For many, the topics of bridge w idths, fishery impacts, endangered plants, and wild and scenic rivers are too abstract. But ask that person Log"" Canyon Postcards GmT'a y"f Stu d io 404 l'hOlograph y. Alan Hu u li s ... i ...g.. 3-xS- $,SO f usu 16701 Utah 1W322"()I9'.I Adventure, Sports o f ••• . ...... ... ......,,, ...... - 4 how they will feel w hen their favorite fishing hole or ski or s nowmobile trail is too crowded, forcing them to go elsewhere, and you may find a n ew ally. Preventing the " ultimate impact" in Logan Canyon is a lifelong commitment. Achieving reasonable highway sa fety improvements in lieu of a massive pork-barrel project is just one incremental step, but the first step. If you would like to help or would like more information about this issue, please feel free to call me at 755-0286. Get involved now. .:. EDWARD AUEY , ...,ItA;, 0' II I'NII 111.10 ANII 1 ••_ IIII"'N; TO. LCC POSTCARDS USU 101C_ I,"," LO;AN. UTAN "111- 01" �Slimmer 1997 Canyon News Briefs (Tlte follawillg is reprillled from a letter to tlte editor of tlte Utall Slate University All/11m; Magazine.) the shot-crete is for added stabili ty and is falling off in sheets as we stand looking ... Shotcrete on this type of canyon First Provo Canyon, now material is like putting a band- Provo Callyoll Coalilion Logan. Soon there will be nothaid on a gushing artery ... The ing left, only p eople racing recent slide triggered the from one spot to another trying County political and business lead- Coalition's worst fears, fears to find a happiness which can ers are begitmiug to question the that a four-lane road just won' t only be found in slowly savorenviront1lel1tal alld finallcial costs work through a narrow area ing the bea uti es God created. wi th unstable rock. of the Provo Cal1yon fiasco, and are protestil1g tile priority given to Gilda Sims, class oj 1940, the cal/yon road at the expense of Looking at this raw, powerful, currently residing ill Eval1ston, more Jzeavily traveled roads.) exposed scar, boulders tumble Wyomitlg down as we speak. They " ... I can hardly stand to be here appear out of nowhere, crash... I am prone to letting out a ing down, hitting the barrier of primal scream of anger as I concrete and wire fencing (Tlte followillg was sent fr01l1 pass daily the monster dump UDOT has constructed in an friends in Provo WilD are watching trucks hauling away the attempt to protect motorists tlte last of tlteir cat/yol/ behlg innards of the can yon. once the canyon is opened. It devoured by dynamite, bulldozers seems as if someone is up there, and asphalt. Almost-vertical culs We are all looking at the same hurling down the rocks in in file cal/yoll walls Itave caused thing. A massive cut in the anger. It is driving the engimassive slides, flattellil1g a twocanyon wall--70 feet high and neers crazy ... Further up the tOil pickup and closing tlte 300 feet long--that wi ll eventuroad, a waterfall of black mud highway. Tlte fOllr-laue highway, ally make room for two more flo ws from an area scraped by a costing $20 million per mile, is in lanes of de-curved roadway. bulldozer. its Jilwl phase. U DOT begal/ tile The first length of the canyon rec0115tructioll ill the lIIid-1980s face has been drilled with We are frustrated, worried and with a promise to tile enviro1JlIlell- twenty foot spikes and covered sick at heart over what they tal community tltat tlte road wou ld with shot-crete. The drilling is have done to our canyon." be limited to two lmies. Utah an attempt to stabilize the face; " Coffee with a Cause" • regular· organic · decaffelnaled • Night and Day 11.00;' to LCC Ior..-ery pound sold. "We are sick at heart over w hat they h ave done to our canyon." �Recreation Threatened By Kevin f. Kobe nificance, or enjoyment of Commerce). During my recent s ki trip from Logan Canyon to Teton Pass, Wyoming, I saw only two canyons throughout the entire 300 mile stretch that did not have s nowmobile tracks. It made me realize how current highway plans fo r Logan Canyon will further threaten human-powered recreation. How? Most of the recreation resources in Logan Canyon were le ft out of the highway documents (the FEIS, DElS, and ROD). This opinion is s upported by the fac t that only 17 sites were lis ted as recrea tion si tes under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1996. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) states that, " Recreation has been designated as the primary use in Logan Canyon according to the Wasa tch-Cache National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Developed and undeveloped recreation lands occur along the hig hway within the National Forest. .. " The entire stretch of Logan Canyon IS USED FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION and is promoted as s uch (note the many brochures pro- duced by the C hamber o f an UIban park where Recently, Logan Canyon Coalition (LCq inventoried an additiona l 63 sites a long the project area that were not listed in any of the documents. Most of these sites provide access for picnicking, fishing, climbing, kayaking, bird watching, sig ht-seeing and parking for winter activities. Many of the sites will be adversely affected by the proposed highway project. These include direct impacts to the recrea tion resource, such as elintina ting access parking lots, and indirect impacts such as noise and safety. According to the FEIS (p. 6-4), " indirect impacts include exceeding ambient noise criteria, reduction in access, visual impacts, vibratio n, and ecological intrusion. Substantial impairment occurs only when the protected activities, features, or attributes of the resource are substantially diminished." The FEIS d efin es protected activities and features as, " ... performances at an outdoor amphitheater, sleeping in the sleeping area of a ca mpground, enjoyment o f a historic site where a quie t setting is a generalIy recognized fea ture o r a ttribute of the site's sig- serenity and quiet are significant Based on the above criteria, all 63 sites, as well as the entire stretch of Logan Canyon, will s uffer "substantially diminished " recreational resou rces due to the current hig hway project. Many o f the activities in Logan Canyon occur in areas "where a quiet setting is a generally recognized feature o r attribute of the site's sig nificance ... " These areas will be affected by an in crease in traffic no ise levels as a result of: faster speeds, additional passing lanes (d ue to vehicle acceleration), and braking noises. Another indirect impact concerns safety for recreationists; vehid es entering and exiting recreation sites along a faster highway w ill be more dangerous. Additionally, different trends in recreation have occur red in Logan Canyon since the FEIS was written. Activities that have grown in popularity and have not been considered in any documents include backcountry snowboarding, boating, fly fishing, climbing alo ng the rock cliffs adjacent to the highway, and recrea tional and professional cycling. In conclusion, the list of 4(f) sites in the FEIS lacks professional and scientific integrity. It falls short of recognizing the recreation resource in Logan Canyon a nd new recrea tio n trends. It also does not provide enough information conceming all of the recreational pursuits occurring within any onc of the 17 4(f) sites in Logan Canyon. ----. 28 Fed!llIIItft. Lopn. lit 84321 (101) 7Ss-olS7 F Ine & rw-k l I f _ ..............,........" I.CC T-SHiIl:TS - 51 2.00 (3 rob) 6 7Ss.8657 Moo......., · s,."....t "'"' �-- - -- 'iE -- - i --"Ei Slimmer 199 7 Speak Now, Speak Often Make Your Voice Heard G overnment Officials Letters to the Editor What to Do Governor Mike Leavitt The Herald Journal State Capitol Building Salt Lake Ci ty, UT 84114 Ph# 801-538-1000 Fax: 801-538- 1528 75 West 300 North Logan, UT 8432 1 Phil 801-752-2121 Fax: 801·753-6642 Please write and urge ou r government officials and the public to re-evaluate UOOT's plans and to consider the more fi sca lly prudent "Conserva tionis ts' Alternative" that s till addresses the need s o f highway safety and Logan Canyon . It is not a "do nothing" proposal. Be s ure to include your full name, address, s ignature (except e-mail) and daytime phone number. Keep your letter short and to the point. Write about your personal experiences in the canyon and use facts to s upport your a rguments. e-mail: govemori?Jemail .state.u Lus e-mail: hjleUeri?Jhjnews.com The SaIt Lake Tribune Rep. Jim Hansen U.S. House of Representati\'cs Washington D.C. 205 15 Phil \-202-225-0453 Fax: 1-202-225-5857 Rodney Terry Project Manager, UOOT Ave. PO Box 12580 Ogden, UT 844 12 Phil 801-399-592 1, ext30S 169 North Wan Fax: 801-399-5926 liz Schuppert District Ranger USFS, Logan District 1500 East Highway 89 Logan, UT 84321 Phil 801 -755-3620 Fax: 80 1-755-3639 Public Forum PO Box 867 Salt La ke City, UT 84110 Fax: 801·237·2022 Deseret News Readers' Forum PO Box 1257 Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Fax: 801·237-2121 e-mail: Letters@d esnews.com The Standard-Examiner PO Box 951 Ogden, UT 84402-{)951 Phlf 800-234-5505 Phil 801-625-4222 Fax: 801-6254508 e-mail : Letters@standard.ne t Thank you for your h e lp ! L()(H, Hilt Oil! 'E\\ \\EII I'\(a. \I: AW ORLD (!omCTION CLOTHING & Logan Canyon Your Destination? - Silckpil cking - Skiing -Climbing -Hi king - Snowshoeing - Sightseeing Accents 57 SOOT\I lWw • locwI UT 1?4g21 753·3497 htll': I/\"'\\o/l11"rinl'rol'nl11 / ilo o l !JON·SAT 11·6 117 North Meln 81 7 �r-----------------------, YES! I THE WANT TO JOIN LOGAN CANYON COALITION and receive a subscription to CANYON WI ND o $20.00 Annual Membership o I would like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Lois more o I would like to volunteer. o Here's 512.00 for a g reat T-shirt. o I' m broke! Here's five bucks. o Please add my name to your mailing list. pl"JSJ51!ippi"g Name____________________________ PRINTING (0. 5 Ireel____________________________ Cily _ _ _ _ _ _Slale_ _ _. ip _____ Z Email_ __ _ ___ P h one# 43 SOUT H 100 LOGAN , UTAH WEST 84321 TEL . 801.752.031 1 make ch«k payable ilnd m ol;1 to: Logan Canyon Coalition USU Box #1674 L _______________________ Logan, UT 84322·0199 FA X 80 1 . 753 . 316 1 Please consider a donation to LCe. All donations will be used for the protection of Logan Canyon. LCC wants to thank the hundreds of individuals, businesses and foundations who have contributed time, money and expertise towards the legal defense of Logan Canyon. Your generous support is appreciated. .. .. Wi !!!! ...... - ............ __ __ .iii . . __ ... .iii _.:;;;;; ___ • --=- -=-= ==--= = - -== = = -=-=- - - COA.L:J:T:J:ON BULK RATE U.s. POSTAGE Paid lDgall, IJT Pe.",;t N"SO Wor k i n s f or t h e P ro t ec t ion o f USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 ." Please Rellew YOllr Membersllip Today �----...-.. -- -------...- -------- -----_..... --- -- --- -- - ----- ---.-------.- . - ------ - - --- ----- - ---- - - - - ---- - - -- ---- - - ------- - - - -- -- -- - - --- ----- --- - --- -- - - -- -__-.- __ T _ _ _ _-.- - --- - - -- A --- -- -------- - ------- N E W S B U L LE TI N FR OM L OGAN CAN YO N COALI T IO N Vol. 2 No.5 Spril1g 1998 Bass and Parkin to Headline Logan River Summit Have you ever seen an o fficia l Wil d and Scenic rive r? Have you ever wonde red i f the Logan Rive r possesses such qua lities? And ha ve you ever wondered why Utah currently has no rivers that a re being studied fo r possible incl usion in the Wild and Scenic system, let alone a river with the officia l designation? Answers to these questions and more will be presented at the " Logan Ri ve r SummitA Confluence of Ideas/' Saturday May 16, 1998, from 8:30 to 4:30 at the Beaver Mountain Ski Lodge in Logan Can yon. Fea tured guest speakers addreSSing the w ild and scenic issue w ilJ be nationalJy known river policy ex pe rt Drew Par kin and Utah Rivers Council director Zach Frankel. Have you ever wondered w hy Utah currently has no rivers that are being studied for possible inclusion in the Wild and Scenic system? Parkin's expe rtise includes directing wild and scen ic rivers programs for the National Park Service. Currently he consul ts with many river orga niza tions, add ressin g a variety of rive r issues. Parki n also serves on the board of di rectors for the Pacific Rivers Council A native o f Utah, he now lives in Cambrid ge, Massachusetts. Zach Frankel sta rted the Utah Rivers Cou ncil approxim a te ly five yea rs ago a nd has become well known around the state for his knowledge of Utah rivers and the man y threa ts to their wa tershed s. A lso speaking on beha lf of ri ver ecosystems will be na ti ona lly known author Rick Bass, who w ill bring his own style of passion for our na tura l world. He is widely loved by Am erican readers. As a forme r res ident of Logan, Utah a nd a USU alumni , Bass often spea ks of his intimate relationship with Logan Canyon and the Logan Ri ver. "Sustainable Watersheds" w ill be the theme of an afternoon panel di sc ussion , CO I11p lete w ith a ques tion and answer period. Partic ipants include John Ca rter with Willow Creek Ecology who will address riparian and wa tershed issues, Wendy Fisher with U tah Ope n Land s who will educa te attendees on such th ings as conservation easemen ts, Wes Johnson, president of Utah's Trout Unlimited who will talk of the importance of aquatic protections, and Mike Timmons, USU landscape arch itectural professor, who will discuss visual aesthetic issues. Acting as panel moderator will be Logan 's own KUSU program director Lee Aus tin. It should be noted that this conference is (col1lill!u'd 01/ pagt' 4) �Bridge Fight Averted On September 8, 1997 potentia l impacts by ceas- bridge up after it has col· ing construction during the Logan Canyon lapsed into the river? Coalition sent II letter to the spa\vning season. .15 there an envi ronmenTom Twedt of BioWest UDOT's Sto rm Water tally less damaging with questions concernPollution Prevention Plan method of bridge ing the Utah Department clearly stated, removal? Since UDOT of Transportation's "Cons truction activities plans to crane the new wi ll be scheduled to (UDOT) constructi on bridge into place, it avoid period s of aquatic plans for the fall. seems that they could BioWes t is the env ironlife cycles (spawning, crane pieces of the old men ta l consultant on the etc.)." Suddenly UDOr bridge Qu t w i thout droptwo brid ges project in annou nced that it was ping it into the ri verbed. Logan Canyon. Surpris ingly, the Our main conidea of demolishing After LCC's threa t of alt illj uctioll, the old brid ge durcern was over the pOSSibility that UDOY {l l mOItIlCe ri there would be ing spawning seaUDOTwould son, just upstream of 11 0 bridge demolitioll dur;lIg the demolis h the o ld a documented Brow n Trout fall spawning seaso". brown trout spawnLower Twin Bridge in the fall. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ing area, was su pd uri ng brown ported by the Utah trout spawning season. considering construction Division of Wildlife UDOT's Reevaluation of and bridge demolition Resources. the llucc Bridges Project during the spaw ing seaOur attorney, son. for Logan Canyon conRaymond Scott Berry, tains a good discuss io n of We were concerned faxed a memo to UDOT's the brown trout spawnthat UDOT wou ld use attorneys, stating our ing area immedia tely explosives to blast ou t in tention to file for an the brid ge su pports, downstrea m of Lower injunction on all b ridge Tw in Bridge and the a llow ing the bridge to construction and demolipotenti al im pacts of fall into the riverbed. tion during the spawn ing increased sediments They wou ld then drag season. At the CAT u pon the eggs a nd fr y of the b ridge out o f the (Cooperating Adv isory riverbed wi th tractors. spawning trout. Team) meeting of According to U There would be massive ,e Sep tember 24, UDOT a mounts o f sediment Reeva luation, "The announced there wou ld be no bridge demolition Logan River dmvnstrea m introduced in to the ri ver during the fa ll. They of Lower Twin Bridge has as the bridge sank into agreed that all constructhe riverbanks and was been used as a spaw ning tion activity in the fall site by brown trout. ... dragged out. The loss to would be li mited to work riparian areas wou ld be sedi ments released into considerable. on the deck of the bridge, the Logan Rive r by conh igh above the ri ver. s truction activities in la te Our There would be no work su mmer, fa ll , and winter questions included: in the river or o n the could suffocate eggs and - Precisely how much riverbanks. We believe fry, which are expected to sed imen t will be in trothis decision by UDOT be present in this spaw n- duced into the river? - Exactly how wi ll the old helped to protec t spawning area from about ing b rO\'vn trou t in Logan October through March." bridge be removed? Rive r. UDOT had previously - Wha t w ill be the agreed to minimize impacts of cu tting th e 2 �-- - -------- =- - - -= - - = - '= - :-=..:: '::' -- -- = :-=.: - --=-= = =:: = :':.: == ..=..-=..=..=-.= Sprillg 199 8 An Expert Speaks O u t UDOT's Confused Data By LCC Stnff mates or on how accurate their estimates are. more than o ne accid ent per ye<lr, " there is only one site in the entire canyon with more than 2 The Logan Ca nyon Coalition asked Dr. Everett C. Carte r, of the Transportation Studies Cen ter of the University o f Maryland, to exam ine the Utah Department of Transportation's (UOOT) traffic and accident data . In his report, Dr. Carter states, "There is d efiniteIy some confusion concerning acciden ts and traffic volumes in Loga n Canyon." Dr. Carter no tes that the method UDOT used to estimate traffic fl ows in Logan Ca nyon " resu.lted in errors." UDOT used only one counter at o ne location in the ca nyon to count vehicles, and they then used these counts to estim ate traffic volumes in nil sections of the cn nyon. No information is provid ed on how they calculated their esti- Here is one exa mple of error. In the hig her accidents pe r yea r." He states. "One o r two acci- section of the middle dents/year is not ca nyon, and in the uppe r ca nyon, the estimated traffic vo lumes that UDOT used to calculate acciden t rates declined in the years 1986 - 1990 compared to 1980 - 1985. Yet the estimated tra ffi c volumes in the lower ca nyon, and in the lower sectio n of the middle canyon, show a 7% increase in 1986 - 1990 VS. 1980 -1985. Why would traffic volumes increase in the lower secHons of the canyon in 1986 - 1990 and yet d ec line in the upper sections? There is no expla nation of this discrepan- unu sually hi gh"! In o the r words, the Logan Ca nyon hig hway is not an especially dangerous hig hway. Special Report 214 from the na tional Trans portation Resea rch Boa rd (1987) indicates tha t the benefit of w idening beyond 34 feet is "q uite lim ited." Dr. Ca rter states, "Thus a 34 ft. paved section, especiall y in lig ht of the env iro nmen ta l impact, should be the upper limi t in Logn n Cn nyon .... " UooT is planning a 40 foot hi ghway width above Beaver MOu.ntnLn, in s pite of the greater expense and environmental impact o f this cy. Dr. Carter observes that w hil e there are 9 si tes in the canyon \v ith DID YOU KNOW? A bridgt' or .. cit y J tTfl't mu st h .. "c 12 Joint'S to .. 4lJ,000 .. utomobil cs pCt hour. Only I I.. nt' iJ nc.:cssuy to 40,000 bieyclcs pcr hour. To thl' nccd for Middl c Eas t oi l, U.S. commuters would nced to biercit' to work o nl y l.25 tim cs wl't'k. u lo riH to thc numbcr of milt'S could bf tr'''flcd by th f aYf ragc (yelisl i, 3.000. . 'IY • :;- ' 1W..1 PLEASE RIDE YOUR BIKE. 138 NOI»H 100 EASl lOGAN. UrN! 84321 801 -753-3294 MQN.- SAl. 10:00 A.M. - 6:00 P.M. G ,, -_.- ... --_-- PEVJNE ... 3 : ....... width, and in spite of this Specia l Report. Another report UDOT apparently ignored, " Low Cost Methods for Improving Traffic Operations on Two-Lane Roads," wa s published by the Federal Highwa y Administra tion in 1987. This report discusses low-cost but effecti ve highway improvements s uch as slow-vehicle turnouts and better signing. These improvements have been part of LCe's propo5<'11 for many years. Dr. Carter concludes, '' In summary, I a m convinced that there is reasonable doubt that a fu ll scnle/mnjor improvement of the entire Ca nyon is justified." .:. �RIVER (,,,,lim,"') be ing underwritte n th roug h the generos ity of the ational Ri vers Coa liti on, w hich is mad e up of the America n Ca noe Assoc., Ameri ca n Rivers, A meri ca n Whitewate r Affili a tion, Na tio nal Wildli fe Fede ration, Ri ver Management Society, Rive r Ne two rk, Sie rra C lub, and The Wilde rness Soci ety. Loca l co-spo nso rs includ e the Citi zens for the Protection o f Loga n Ca nyon and Brid ge rl and Audubo n. The ir support is commend able! Cost for the enti re day, incl uding a conti ne nta l breakfast and lu nch, includes $10 for adu lts and $7.50 for students. Early reg istra tion is encou raged as seating is limited to 150 people. See the enclosed insert (Uta h mailing o nly) for m o re info rmatio n. Or call at 435 / 755-0286. Why Are Wetlands Important? Wetlands are important for ma ny reasons: Wetlands prevent nooding by hold ing wa ter much like a sponge. By doing so, wetlands help keep river levels norma l and filter and pu rify the s urface wa ter. Wetlands accept wa ter d uring sto rms and w henever water levels arc high. When wa ter levels are low, wetland s slowly release water. Wetlands also release vegetative matter into rivers, which helps feed fis h in the rivers. Wetlands help to counter balance the human effect on rivers by rej uvenating them and surrounding ecosystems. Ma ny anima ls that live in other habitats use wetlands for migra tion or reprod uction. Fo r example. herons nest in la rge old trees, bu t need sha llow areas in order to wad e for fi sh and aquatic life. Am ph ibians often for<lgc in upland areas but return to the water to mate and reproduce. Wetlands must not be thoug ht o f as a unique and independent habitat. They arc vital to the survival of many ecosystems and ...... ---... ,., , wild life in genera l. Unl ike most oth er habita ts, wetlands directly improve other ceo-systems. Becausc of its many clea nsing bmefits. wetlands have been compnred to kid neys. The analogy is correct, wetlands and kid neys help con tro l water flow and cleanse the flow o f liquids within a system. Eros ion Contro l Looking at pictures o f delt"s, o ne cn n tell that rivers d eposit" lo t o f mud . Mud is top soil that has eroded and w"shed away. Emergents (plan ts firmly rooted in the muddy bottom bu t with stalks tha t rise high above the wa te r su rface) a re able to radica lly slow the flow o f water. As a result, they counter the erosive fo rces o f mov ing wa ter along la kes and ri vers. and in rolli ng agricultura l landscapes. Erosion control effo rts in "qua tic areas often incl ude the planting of wetlands plants. Wate r Purifica tion Wetlands also clean thc watcr by filtering o ut sedimentation and d ecomposing vegetable ma tter. Wetlands pla nts help Adventure, Sports -"'- _. , _ "_ _ n ..... ......,. ....... , 4 convert nitrates and other life-givi ng chemica ls. Soil thai is inundated with water is largely oxygen free, and the microbes and bacteria in upla nd soils depend on oxygen to su rvive. TIle activ ity of such bacteria is centra l to the breakdown of n utrients into fo rms usable by the rest of the bio tic comm unity. Some wetland s plants actua lly pi pe oxygen dow n into their roots, to provide to special bacteria. Others, as in peat moss, build up huge, "a rtificial" g round areas on wh ich bacteria can work. Still others, such as many noating leaf plan ts, have d ispensed with the use o f bacteria altogether and ex tract needed nutrients from the water itsel f. The ability o f wetlands to recycle n utrients ma kes them critical in the overa ll fun ctioning of the ea rth . No other ecosystem is as prod uctive nor as un ique in this conversion process. In some p laces, in fa ct. artificial wetlands were d eveloped solely fo r the pu rpose o f water purification. �_ ---------- --------- .. - ------- - - -= - -== = = === = "": = :-=..:: '::" =:-::.: :-=..:: S p r ill g 19 98 Canyon News Briefs LCC LAWSUIT UPDATE Logan Canyon Coa li tion's lawsuit against UDOT and the Forest Service is still in place. We are now compiling a list of docu ments we will req uest from these ngencies during the d iscove ry phase of the lawsuit. We are inte rested in obtai ning copies of UDOT's calcula tions of tra ffic flow in Logan Canyon, for examp le. Based on traffic counts a t a si ngle loca tion, UDOT has esti ma ted traffic flow in a ll sections of the ca nyon highway. Yet there are serious d iscrepa ncies in UOOT's estimations. We wi ll request copies of the surveys the Forest Service has condu cted on sensitive species in Logan Canyon. The Forest Service has cl aimed there will be "no impact" of constructi on upon et these species. Y it appea rs tha t for severa l of these species the surveys have been inadequa te, if they exist at aU . The documents we obtain through d iscovery will help LCC sa ve Logan Canyon from ulU1ecessarily expensive and destructi ve highway construction. Deb Eshelman a CPA and her daughter Amy Casa massa come on boa rd as LCe's new Co-Treasurers. Amy's work w ill apply towards an adva nce placemen t science cred it fo m Jac k Green's Logan High class. Welcome on boa rd. Canyon Wind Ed itor Dan Miller w ill be returning to Cache Va lley to become more active in LCC projects. He has been living in Ogden, Utah and Oregon as his wife pursued her ca reer. Welcome back Dan . • Uuknowu impact 0 11 trollt popllia tiolls. UDOT's estimate is all IIlIeducated guess based 011 il/adeqllate data. COllstrllctiol/ ill the lower cal/yoH reduced tlw trOll t populations ill sOllie areas by 80%. "Coffee with a Cause" • regular ' $1 .00 is dona rBd ro LCC Nigh1and Oay ro.-"""'Y pound sold. Logan Canyon Coalition is up and running on the World Wide Web. Check out our homepage at: http://www.logancanyon.org �Home Canyon by To m LyO l1 Comi ng back from a long trip east, we'd just dri ven a few hundred treeless mi les on a hot and sunny da y. Most of the last hours had been in the mined and p um meled landscape of south west Wyom ing, a scene tha t hurts to look a t. We climbed up fro m Bea r Llke in third gear- getting close now, thirty-odd miles to Logan- a nd then, over the summ it, started to s lip d own into the fold s o f the hills, steeper a nd closer on the sides as we wen t, a nd the trees aga in, the co mpan ionab le river soon to be alongsid e. We g limpsed a good-sized bull moose moving o ff through the w illows along Bea ver Cree k. A certa in sce nt came in on the window-wind , a secret fragrance mad e up of w illow a nd sage, toba cco bush, fir a nd cottonwood, river water, lime rock in the sun, Loga n Canyon dirt ". we were ho me now. When we fi rst s tarted tryin g to p rotec t th e ca nyon from hi ghway d rea ms, we had the id ea that public-works po li cy was p retty much a rational process. You sat d ow n w ith the highway d epartm ent a nd the Fo rest Service, and you entered the canyon 's beauty a nd re la tive intactness in to the mi x, and the peop le's love for it, the fishing, the skiing, the hiking, the peace a nd quiet and s lowness of it, th e way it stood for a w hole diffe ren t life. You always men tioned w ha t w as sadly true, that Loga n Ca nyon was the last of its kind of pl ace in Uta h. It was disappointing that none of this ever go t across to the highway department. Not in all these yea rs. It was as if you were talking a n en tirely d ifferent language. But w hat was rea lly stunning was that the Forest Service did n' t ca re ei the r. The Forest Serv ice b lew off its own Forest Plan, a documen t supposedly having the force of law, in orde r to support the h ighway d rea m. The Forest Service should have been the natural a ll y of the ca nyon. Instead, in the end, they a nswered a d eta iled , 187-page a ppea l (wh ich a mo unted to the Env ironme nta l Impa ct Statement tha t should have been d one by those h ired to d o it) w ith a page and a half of bureaucratic dismissa l. So w ha t we have lea rned is tha t we are on o ur ow n, and we have to be tough a nd pe rsistent if we wa nt to be heard- if we wa nt the canyon to be hea rd . We can' t just expect people to be rationa l, and we can ' t assume tha t everyone loves the canyon more than they love the h ighway drea m. (Probably a lot o f people think we can have the o ld, good ca nyon and a big hig hway through it.) This w ho le time has been a kind of edu ca tion in realism. That's the politica l part. In the hea rt part, it's mad e us th ink about w hat we rea ll y va lue, firmed us down to the home things. POSSESSfONS 28 FaSuai A l.ogan.lJI'. 84321 vt. ....... '7:'. (IIOU 755-0851 FIne l ob .. « o , Logall Ca lly o ll Post cards Co u'!t'Syof S tud io 404 rh o tog r.- phy, Alan Hu es ti s , ...,,, J-. 5· s.5O I 4· , 6- S.75 USU nod log.1n. Ulah 84322.{l L 99 a M .. t dphy , ,, .. L N e rd , ' d l 011, a H('f b , Pon(A1U>:I 0# EDWARD Aaa EV 1[ NO t l t .50 IINO $l .oo lee USU 8 0l( . L OCOIIN. U TilI! Lee T·StliRfli· 512.00 (3 mlor) '011.-0,,, 6 755-8657 �------== = == = S p ri n g 1 9 9 8 Speak Now, Speak Oftell Make Your Voice Heard G overnment Officials Letters to the Editor What to Do Governor Mike Leav itt State Capitol Building 5.111 La ke City, UT 84114 Th e Herald Journa l 75 West 300 North Logan, UT84321 Ph# 801-538-1000 Fax: 801-538-1528 e-mail: governor@email.sta le.u t. us Ph# 801-752-2121 Fax: 801-753-6642 Please w rite and urge our government officials and the public to re-evalua te UOOT's plans and to consider the more fisca lly prudent "Conservationists' Alternative" that s ti ll add resses the needs of h ighway safety and Logan Canyon. It is not a "do nothi ng" proposa l. Be su re to include your fuJI name, address, signature (except e-mail) and d ay time phone number. Keep your letter short and to the point. Write about you r personal experiences in the canyon and usc fac ts to s upport your argumen ts. Rep. Jim Hansen U.S. House of Representatives Washington D.C. 20515 Ph# 1-202-225-0453 Fax: 1-202-225-5857 Rod ney Terry Project Manager, UOOT 169 North Wall Ave. PO Box 12580 Ogden, UT 84412 Ph# 801-399-5921, ext3Q5 Fax: 801-399-5926 Brian Ferebee District Ranger USFS, Logan District 1500 East H ighway 89 Logan, UT 84321 Ph# 801-755-3620 Fax: 801-755-3639 e-mail: hjletter@hjncws.com The Salt Lake Tribu ne Public Forum PO Box 867 $.1[t L.1ke City, UT 84110 Fax: 801-237-2022 Deseret News Readers' Forum PO Box 1257 Salt Lake Ci ty, UT 84110 Fax: 801-237-212 1 e-mail: Letters@desnews.com The Standard-Exam iner PO Box 951 Ogden, UT 84402-095 1 Ph# 800-234-5505 Ph# 801-6254222 Fax: 801-625-4508 ('-mai[: Letters®Standard.net LOOK FOR O[' R :>IE\\ AW ORLD Or Tha n k you for yo u r h e l p! "Ell PA(a: AT: Logan Ca nyon You r Destin ation? & - Backpa ckin g . S kii ng -Climbing -Hiking - Snows hoein g . S ig htseei ng Accent5 57 IANN • loGANUT l?4 g21 117 North Main SI 7 �r-----------------------, YES! I WANT TO JDIN THE LOGAN CANYON COALITION and rece ive a s ubscription to CANYON W1ND o $20.00 Annual Membership o I would like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Lots more o I would like to volunteer. o Here's $12.00 for a great T-s hirt. o I' m broke! Here's five bucks. o Please add m y name to your mailing list. p/IIs SJ shippillK Name _______________________________ H RA PRINTING LD (0. 5Ireel._____________________________ Cily_ _ _ _ _ _ Slale'____ Zip, _____ Email _____________ Phone# Please check p" Y.l ble and mail to: Logan Canyon Coalition USU Box #1674 L _______________________ Logan, UT 84322-0199 43 SOUTH LOGAN , 10 0 UTAH WEST 84321 TEL .43 5 .752. 0311 FA X 435 .753.3 161 Please consider a donation to LCC. All donations will be used for the protection of Logan Can yon. LCC wants to tha nk the hW1dred s of individuals, businesses a nd fOW1dations who have contributed tin1e, money and expertise towa rds the lega l d efense of Logan Canyon. Your generous support is appreciated. BU LK RATE U.S. I'OSTAGE Paid COAL:l:T:l:O:N' Work ing for th .. P rotection of L og.n Canyon Logtl1r. UT N"SO USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 II' Plea se Renew YOllr Melllbership Today �A NEWS B ULLETIN FR OM L OGAN C ANYON C OALITION Vol. 3 No.1 Sum mer 1999 Logan River is Eligible for Wild & Scenic Designation In January the Wasatch-Cache National al value of this river segment. Concerning recreForest released its draft Rivers Eligibility Study. ation, "highly scenic pristine rivers/ corridors are This study reports that Beaver Creek and a twen- of higher value" (draft Eligibility Study). The ty mile-long segment of the Logan River are eligi- Forest Service is mandated to protect the scenery, ble for Wild and Scenic Rivers designation. The recreation, and other outstandingly remarkable Logan River segment has been found to have five, values of rivers eligible for Wild and Scenic desmore than any other river in the forest, outstand- ignation. ingly remarkable values including scenery, fishUDOT is planning cuts into the mountaineries, recreation, ecology, and geology I hydrolo- side at Upper Twin Bridge that will be vertical or gy. The Logan River is truly the jewel of the "as vertical as possible." This was not evaluated Wasatch-Cache National - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - in the FE IS or In Forest. UDOT's Record of We believe that the Decision. We still do of not know how extenUtah Depa rtment the Logan as Utah's first Transportation's (UDOT's) sive these cuts will be. Wild and Scenic River nex t phase of highway Vertical rock cu ts will construction w ill harm ___...._______________ not revegetate and will these values. We are asking that a Supplemental harm the natural appearance and hence the Environmental Impact Statement be required for scenery and recreational value of this river corrithis highway project. dar. Recent design p lans show tha t UooT is We a re concerned that construction planning to build approximately 2,275 feet of impacts on Wild and Scenic values are not being retaining wa lls adjacent to the Logan River seg- evaluated properly. There was no detailed evalument eligible for designation. These wa lls were ation of impacts in either the Final Environmental not evaluated in the FEIS for this project or in Impact Statement or in the Record of Decision. UooT's Record of Decision. Seventy-five percent UooT intends to evaluate the impacts of the next of these walls will be "basket walls," which are phase of construction in a Reevalua tion document. wire baskets filled with rocks. These walls are not This entirely ignores the impacts of the remaining attractive in a na tu ral setting. They will not highway project. appear natura l and will harm the scenery of this UDOT and the Forest Service are segmentriver segment. They will also harm the recreation- ing this project in their evaluation of impacts Leave a True Legacy �Wild & Scenic ("...".."d) which is a violation of Forest Service policy and the National Environm en tal Policy Act (NEPA). From recent design plans, the next phase of construction covers on ly about three and a half miles of highway. UOOT is planning an additional approximate ly thirteen and a half miles of highway const ruction that will potentially impact Wild and Scenic values, from the Dugway to the canyon summit. The danger of segmenting this project is that once the next phase of construction is underway, UOOT will be committed to its larger highway project with uneva luated and potentially damaging impacts to the Wild and Scenic va lues of these rivers. Issues that should be addressed include: what will be the ex tent of the required retaining wa lls and vertical cuts as construction is extended into th e remaining upper Midd le Canyon? Will we see a miniDugway a long Uppe r Twin Bridge and Temp le Fork? In short, how ugly is this going to get? According to Forest Service policy, "Groups of actions, when added together, may have collective or cumulative impacts which are Significant. Consideration must be given to the incremental effects of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable related future actions of the Forest Service, as well as those of other agencies and individuals." We have requested that a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SE IS) be required for this highway project in which the entire project is evaluated with respect to the Wild and Scenic va lues of these rivers. Forest Service policy requires that there be an SEIS whenever there are "significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns .... " Surely the fact that the Logan River segment and Beaver Creek ha ve been found eligib le for Wild and Scenic designation is significant new information. in an SEIS the purpose and need for a ll planned construction should be clearly demonstrated . While we agree that some highway r'OSSESS'ONS 28 Federal Ave. Logan, Uf. 84321 Home Accessories, CoUectibles, Jewelry, Gifts 755-0857 2 improvements are needed, such as replacing the worn bridges, UOOT has never demonstrated the purpose and need for their extensive proposal. We agree with this statement by Drew Parkin, an expert on Wild and Scenic Rivers policy, " . . . designation as a wild and scenic river will not preclude improvement to the highway. It would, however, require that UDOT take special precautions, both in design and construction, to ensure that the road does not alter flow regimes, that important natural and scenic resources are preserved, and that short-term disruptions to the river are minimized. Even if this costs a little more, it would result in a superior project that multiple meets long-term needs." & A«t'ssones M f'taphyslcdl N t'ed .. E.. Oil s & HNbs 11 755-8657 Toys thaL capt.ure a child's ima8inaLion! 14bN l OO[ I. ". ... A ....,nu.,O lo9 .. n UT • · Moon Toys * * 75 HlO'5 5 �- -- -- Summer 19 99 Dear Logan City Council: CANYON LOVERS My wife and I lived in Logan from 1955, when we came as college stud ents, until just last yea r. We raised three sons in Logan, and Logan will always be our heart's country. We absorbed Cache Valley. The silhouette of the mountains, east up the canyon and west across the valley, is still the horizon line of O UT life. I wou ldn't mention this background if I didn't think a great many people share such feelings. Few things go as deep as the sense of home. Unfortunately, sometimes the deepest values get taken for granted. We're all very busy. We can even forget to think about the abso lute beauty and purity of Logan River, coming down the canyon and through the town. Su rely there can't be many towns anywhere in the world that can say: a wild, clean river comes down ou t of the mountains to us; there is no one, no town, upstream. I think about Logan River a lot these days. Our irrigation and drinking wa ter here in coastal California is sparse; it comes a long way, and it has been used several times. There is no way, with all the engineering capability in the world, we could create the kind of situation Logan has. So, speaking from deep care for Logan and from the knowledge of how easy it is to lose natura l resources, and how hard it is to get them back, I respect- fully urge the Council to endorse Logan River as a Wild and Scenic River. Logan is lifeblood. Please protect it. Sincerely, Thomas J. Lyon _ , eo-.-. soo ..... PLEASE RIDE YOUR BIKE W EB SITE D eSIGN, D eVELOPMENT, H OSTING, AND P ROMOTION SERVICES http://zmorlner.com Info@zmoriner.com 435-755-6595 138 Norm'i 100 EAsT lOGAN. UtAH 84321 4351753-3294 MoN. - SM. 10:00 .... 1.4 . - 6:00 P.M. G PEVINE II 3 -_ --- ,t l *" U__l_ ' • ll ... .... ...., we Dan Miller Jaynan Chancellor Deb Eshelman Gordon Steinhoff Derek Staab Graham Hunter Kevin Kobe Tim Wagner John Carter Amanda Th immes Mark Lunt Bridgett Kobe Creed Clayton Carolyn StOnge Brooke Bigelow Jim Vandygriff Coalition Supporters -R ick Bass -Terry Tempest Williams oRobert Redford -C.L. Rawlins -Sierra Club -Utah Rive rs Council -Tom Lyon -National Rive rs Coalition -Maki Foundation �Canyon News Briefs Sincere Gratitude Members of the Logan Canyon Coalition wou ld like to wholehea rtedly thank Dan Miller for all he has done for the orgaruza tion . Dan has lead Lee during his year as president with tremendous energy and insight. Under his leadership several important adva nces have been made for Lee including a commitment to getting the Logan River designated as Utah 's first Wild and Scenic river. Dan continues to be active in Lee, and we are always grateful for his common sense and unwavering support. Tha nks Dan, and we wish you the best w ith your ex tra ti me! Lee Board of Directors LOOKING AH E AD Fall Fundraiser Lee is proud to announce its fall fundraiser: Jerry Joseph and the Jack Mormons. They will be playing in the Amphitheatre on Old Main Hill, USU campus on September 3rd at 7:00 PM . Tickets will be $7 for nonstudents and $5 fo r students. Giardia Run Thursday, September 9th at 5:49 PM. Meet at the HPER on the USU camp us and run to the White Owl. $15 includes a T-shirt; $10 without. This year 's theme: Y2K!! Get Inspired! Announcing the first annua l " Art from the River" celebration. Send your artistic entries inspired by Logan River (painting, d rawing, pottery, writing, textiles, or music) to Brooke Bigelow, 1371 E. 900 N., Loga n, Utah 84321. All entries will be honored at the River Festiva l on September 18th and special recognition will be given to outstanding entires in each of three categories: children 3 to 5 years old; children 6 to 12 years old; and children 13 and over. Be sure to include your name, phone number, and age with your ent ry. Christmas Auction With the completion of Dan's term as preSident, managing and governing responsibilities for LCC are being handled through a temporary board of directors. A permanent board will be installed by vote at the next Lee general meeting in January. Any LCC member interested in being on the board of directors should attend bimonthly meetings, the fi rst and third Tuesday of the month at 7:30 at Merlin Olsen Central Park (100 South 200 East). Logan River Festival The second annual Logan River Festival will be at First Dam from noon to 3 PM on Saturday, September 18th. Bring your kids, neighbors. and friends and come enjoy the Logan River. There w ill be games, canoe rides, art activities and displays, and vendors. (For more informa ti on or to get in volved, contact Jaynan Chancellor at 7532553.) Adventure Sports 4 It's not too early to be thinking about the LCC Christmas auction. Watch fo r fur ther details. In the meanwhile, gather those donations or services suitable for auction, and continue the gift by donating your "classy junque" to be treasured by someone else for a recycled Christmas. For more information or to store donations, contact Jaynan Chancellor at 753-2553 or Brooke Bigelow at 753-5682. Thanks for your generous contribution! �Summer 1999 Memo To: Brian Dixon, Bridgerland Audubon, Chris Wilson, Cache Anglers, Kathy Gilbert, Citizens For Protection of Logan Canyon, Dick Carter, High Uintahs Preservation Council, Jon Marvel. Idaho Watersheds Project, Dan Miller, Logan Canyon Coalition, Ron Younger, Utah Chapter Sierra Club, Barrie Gilbert, Utah Wildlands Heritage From: John Carter, Willow Creek Ecology Re: Logan Canyon/Logan River Protection Zone I am writing this as a result of the many issues and activities involving Logan Canyon/Logan River, includ ing the recent land swap, ongoing highway construction, increasing recreational use, second home development, logging and continued livestock grazing all affecting wildlife, habitat, water quality and aesthetics. Those of us who love Logan Canyon and all it symbolizes, and the reluctance of the Fores t Service to effec t progressive change as evidenced by the recent rejection of our appeal of the Bear Hodges project show us we ca nnot depend on science or logic alone. It also shows us that we need community support and unity among ourselves with SOfl)e common goals and objectives. To this e nd , I am s uggesting the Logan Canyon/Logan River Protection Zone that recognizes the high quality of the scenic and wildli fe attributes of the Logan River Watershed, and urges protection. Because of the many sensitive species or habitats recogni zed by the Forest Service as exis ting in the Logan Canyon area and are threatened, as a group we should demand protection of these watersheds, elimination of livestock grazing and other destructive forest practices and that a p roper value be placed on the natural attributes of the Canyon. Because of the Bonneville Cutthroa t Trout a nd its potential listing as endangered, Willow Creek Ecology expanded its monitoring of the Logan River and its tributaries at the end of 1998. We are collecting samples at up to 20 locations, docume nting s ilt loadings, fecal coliform pollution and other general water quality parameters. We are also assembling a data base of Logan River stud ies of water quality, fisheries, invertebrates, habitat and hydrology. Our initia l purpose is to comment to the Fish and Wildlife Service in support of listing since a large portion of Bonneville Cu tthroat Trout populations in Utah exists in the Logan River. Many factors threaten its continued existence including habitat alteration and whirling disease. I think it is important that we discuss how to combine our efforts and concerns into an effective strategy, gai n public support and pressure the Forest Service and other public entities toward our chosen goals. We saw how iIIinformed the City of Logan was on Wild and Scenic River Status. I think we should use quality of life, economics and watershed health as driving factors in gaining public support for protection. After all, the watersheds above Sa lt Lake City are worthy of protection for a variety of reasons, why not here? �Leave A True Legacy The Logan as Utah's First Wild and Scenic River We the undersigned hereby declare oui' support for segments of the Logan River to be designated as Utah 's first Wild and Scenic River under the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, as long as that designation doesn't interlere with traditional uses now enjoyed by the public. Signature Print name Street City Siale Zip -------------------------+-------------------------+------------------------+---------------------+----t------------ ; • z • .; • • " • , -------------------------f-------------------------+------------------------+----------------------f----t------------ " i -------------------------t-------------------------t------------------------+---------------------1----1------------ 2 • • RETURN CO M P l ET E O P ETITIO N S TO THE LOG A N CA N YON COALITION. USU BOX. fl6H . LOGAN. U TAH U 322·01 99 �NOT LATER WRITE NOW! Wild and Scenic Bernie We ingardt The Wild and Scen ic Rivers Act of 1968 is unique among environmental Jaws in the world because of its p oten tial to protect free-nowing rivers and riversections. Yet less than one percent o f the nation 's total river m iles is included in the National Wild and Scen ic Rivers System, and NOT ONE o f Utah 's beautiful rivers has th is outstanding d is tinction. In 1998 the 30th anniversary of the Wild an d Scenic Act was celebrated across the nation. Lee is hoping to extend thai celebration to Utah before another 30 yea rs passes with the designation o f the Logan River as Wild and Scenic. Pub lic support is crucial to m a king th is happen. Show your su pport by encouraging policy-m a kers to leave a true legacy in Uta h and recomme nd th e Logan Ri ver as the firs t Uta h river inducted into the N a tio na l Wild a nd Scenic Rivers Syste m . T h a nk yo u for your h e l p! T he Salt l ak e Tri bune Wasatch-Cache Nationa l Forest 8230 Federal Building 125 South State Street Salt Lake City. Utah 84138 Public Forum PO Box 867 Salt Lake City, UT 841 10 Fax: Bria n Fe re bee District Ranger U5FS, Logan District 1500 East Highway 89 Logan, UT 84321 Ph# 435-755-3620 Fax: 435-755-3639 Desere t New s Readers' Forum PO Box 1257 Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Fax: 801-237-2121 e-mail: Letters@desnews.com Logan City Counci l 255 North Main, Logan UT,84321 The S ta ndard-Examiner PO Box 951 Ogden, UT 84402-0951 Phil 800-234-5505 Ph# 801--6254222 Alan D. Allred Karen S. Borg John L. Harder e-mail: Lelters@standard.net Ja nice Pearce Stephen C. Thompson Mayor Douglas E. Thompson Lette rs t o the Edit or The H e rald Journ al 75 West 300 North Logan, UT 84321 Ph# 435-752-2121 Fax: 435-753-6642 e-mai l: hjletter@hjnews.com A WORLD Logan Canyon Your Destination? & -BlCkpildc.in g oS ki ing - C lim b ing oHiking oSno ws hotin g oSightstt in g Accents 57 Sourn MAIN • locAII Uni'49 21 753·3497 7 �r--------------------, J WANT TO JOIN THE LOGAN CANYON COALITION LOGAN RIVER and receive a subscription to CANYON WIND SCENIC RIVER YES! """" UTAH'S Uri. WILD aad o $20.00 Annual Membership o I would like to contribute an additional $10 $20 $JO $40 $50 Lots more o I would like to volunteer. o Here's $12.00 for a great T-shirt. o I' m broke! Here's five bucks. o Please add my name to your mailing list. ,llUllu.;,.,;", LEAVE A LEGACY n •• LOG"_ AI UrAl" 'Ian WItD "_D IC'_IC a",. Name ________________________________ Streetl ________________________________ City, ______:State Phone' Zip, _______ E-mail _____________ Plun ..... ke check Support the Logan River and null to, include shipping Logan Canyon Coalition USU Box'1614 L _____ Order these new Wild and Scenic bumper stickers for the Logan River. A $2.00 donation for each sticker will _____ Please consider a donation to Lee. All donations will be used for the protection of Logan Canyon. Lee wants to thank the hundreds of individuals, businesses, and founda tions who have contributed time, money, and expertise towards the legal defense of Logan Canyon. Your generous support is appreciated. .... ................... Wi !! =-=-- . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . _ • •;:.... _ . - - --- !!' --= = - BULK RATE US POSTAGE - - Paid CO.4.L:J:T:J:ON Loga", UT Pnm,' N° 39 WorkIng f o r Ih e Prolullo n of l oga n Canyon USU Box #1674 Logan, Utah 84322-0199 .,t Please Renew Your Membership Today � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3335 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2607 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/716">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/716</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2464155604 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource LCC newletter, "Canyon Wind" Description An account of the resource Newsletters updating the events of Logan Canyon Coalition including but not limited to the formation of LCC, denial of appeal, violations of FEIS, lifting of the stop work order, and the eligibility of Logan River for wild and scenic designation. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Kobe, Kevin Lyon, Tom Wagner, Tim Subject The topic of the resource Logan Canyon (Utah) Wilderness areas Public lands--Utah--Logan Canyon Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Newsletters Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Logan Canyon Coalition Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1990-1999 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS314Bx1Fd8 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/cce6d107fbeceae93adc6dd8327cafd0.pdf 345c7465afee84e31236e6b57811ef03 PDF Text Text September 24 , 1955 Flagstaff, Ariz . The f lirst meeting of the 89 ' er I s Highwc\y Assn . was called to ords r by Pre s. St ewart at 10:55 A. M . RB¥ V. M St ewart then called on M James, President of the nagsta!'f Chamber of.tCommerc e _ r. r. for a few words ,of we lcome . 1I' lr. J ames welcomed us graciously, stated t hatv.'e are Wimarily interested in member shi ps and a sked t ha t we all put our c houlders t 'o the whell to bring in new members . President Stewart thanked M J ames and t hen called r. f or intorductions of members present. The following arose, gave their names and respective businesses: M r. M r. M r. M r. & Mrs . TIalter Repony , ' EI Rio M otel, Tucson, Ariz . Martin Cantwell, Public Rel ations , Salt Lake City, Utah & Mrs . Art Gr eene , Cliff Dweller' s Lodge , Cliff Dwellers, Ari Z. & M rs. Bernie W illiams, Tin Pan Alley Restarant, \,lic kenburg, Ariz . Mr . George Hall, Travel M exico, Tucson, Ariz • .Mr . & M s . W r illiam Waltz, EI Camino M otel, Tucson, Ariz. John L. Perkins M . & Mrs . ~entley M r itchell, M itchell M otel, Logan , Utah r,tr . & M Bi ll Ba ss , La Si est a M rs. otel, W ickenburg, Ariz . M S" O. M r. orrow, M orrow M otors, Flagstaff, Ariz . Mr . Chven W alton , Col onial Motel, Panguitch, Utah M Burnett Hendryx, Cameron M r. otel, Panuitch , Utah fih' . W D. J ames , Southern Union Gas , Flagst a ff , Ariz. . Dr . Philip Fulstow M. D., Kanab, Utah ttl' . & M rs. ~ V . Stewart, W esterner M otel, W illiams , Ariz . M & U r. rs. Demetrio P_ Kyriakis , CAvern Cafe , Nogal es , Sonora, M . exico President ... Stewart stated tha t the first order of business was the appointment of committees and proced ed to make t he following appointments: PUBLICITY Martin Cantwell, Chrm . Bill Bass Burnett Hendryx Demetrio Kyriakis Resolu tions... Geo . Hall, Chrm . Dor is W altz Auditing W aI' Repony , Chrm. alt Hal Jackson B entl~ Mitchel l Nomi na1ng Bill W z , Chrm. alt Hal J ack son Bentley Mitchell Reorganization Committee Martin Cantwell, Chrm . Bi ll W altz Demetri o Kyri akis i!eorge Hall Ber nie W illiams President Stewart then called attention to the new brochure recently published by the associat ion and s t a t ed t hat Mrs . Repony was 100% r esponsible for t he fine job done. �-2- A rousing vote of thanks was given Mrs . Repony , who expressed her a~eciation to LIr . W altz who wrote the introduction, and M St e,vart for compiling the mileage chruit:".. r. The Board of Directors ,held their final meeting l a st night and President Stewart asked _ Mrs. Repony to read the minut es of t hat meeting . Tbe Board r esl.Uned their meeti ng agaln at ... 8 :45 A. M. this morning and t he minutes of that meet ing were also read . Presi dent Stewart then c alled for the Treasurer's report . 1.11'. Bass expl ained that t he report was made up aa of yesterday and that since t hen tno member ships have come in which are not include d in t hi s r eport. M Stewart announced that the A r. udit ing Com- mittee nill audi t t he Trea surer's books and report l ater today . President Stewart then a sked M Perkins to turn over t he organi zation I s books and r. such membership f unds as he had in his possession. Mr . Perkins arose and stat ed that the act ion taken by t he Board last night in hi s opinion Vias ,unjustified. He stated tha t he has been under criticism by the Board . for some t ime, that he felt be was ent i tled to a w itness , and bei ng denied that he left . He s t at ed further t hat the ro ad has not been easy and that he had worked diligently fo r t he organization . He stat ed further t hat his books were on the table and in t hem was $1, 035 . 00 for 69 memberships . 6'ir . Stewart then asked Mr. H. K. M angum, c onsultant la"Yer , to st o p forv;rard and examine the books , but U Mangum advised t hat e r. they be turned over to t he A uditing Committee . President St ewart . stated that t he Board of Director s f elt tha t some c hange in the order of or gani zation should be made and that a st udy be made to determine whet her to r eor ganize, and how this could be done . He a sked. fo r i deas alcmg these lines . There are now six directors . It me:y or ms:;! not be necessar:J to increase this number , but i f so i t must be done by amendment today . According to the By- Laws there are six. member s on t he Board and t hese are supposed to be increased in nrulti ples of three vlhich would mean t hat five would be elected today . Members of the Board of Directors are elected for three y ears wi. tb t wo new ones each year so that one of t he t hree tha t might be el ected tod..v would serve one year and one two years and one three y ears . Mr . Cant iJell of Salt Lake City arose to discuss the question of reor ganization. He said that he had thought over and discussed the matter in the northern pert of Utah for several months . The consensus of tho se with whom he had tnlked wa s that it was~ llnppssible for an or gani zation to extend several thousand miles efficiently. I f possi bl e there should be a breakdown of the parent organization f irs t on a State or c or:mrunity level . He mentioned Utah Park s w hich join in with Northern Arizona attrs.ctions . He suggest ed 8ger Clubs which v;ould deci de their own bounds . Local Clubs..; should be permitted gre at latitude within limitations set by the parent organization. It should be made possibl e for groups in local sectors to sob' e th eir oun wobl ems as to director membe r ship~ He believed there should be one for I daho , one for \1yoming, one for M ontana , three for Ari zona, tvro for Utah , one for M exic o and be thought there should be one for Canada. He said that l oCal. group conc laves should work out.. v ery well and beli eved tha t c ommunitf groups would be mor e flexible. Bernie W lliams , 'i'l ickenburg spoke as to international. organ~tion it would be most i sensi ble to take in directors from M exic o and Canada to wor k in their own area to bring out t he best in local groups . State directors should work out problems with the interna.tional or ganiuitions. Local people should be educated t o r e c ognize the impprtance of Hi ghwa;' 89 . Geor ge Hall, Tucson, gave his opinion that Highway As soc iations are c ommon but that... the differ ence in the 89 l er s association is that it is a part of Canada 2 and JJexico 15 meking it t he onley International H ighv;~ Association . He said t hat reorganiza_ c omes a s a shock tb me and I have not had. time t o think on it, but he believed that . the greatest ' publicity for t he Associa tion would be tri-coUlltry tie-in. It'~ is like nothing that has.. be en done before . Hall had been giving talks to Tucson c ivic groups which are largesly interes t ed in t he M exican stretch and he said tha t he could. easily �- 3include eaneda and Canadian Publicity in those talks . He said i t was too l a te to include Canadian pjlblicity this year but that v:e should get to wor k on it next..year . That is is ea sier to concentra te on publicity in the off senson so that you are ready for the south i n t he winter and t he nortb in the summer . The new brochure 1s the greatest help in promoting eg . It is"wonderful thing and its use increased . He said tha t the M exican Consul a t Tuc son is heartily in accord with publicity for 89 . He beliEWes that at the moment the Int:ernationl aspect is most impo rt~t,... and should be empP.asized to point out:", the difference between 89 and other highway or ganizations . M W r. illiams added tha t he hEd a sked M exico to add 89 International to its No . 15 sign . He has .. dedlcated a song "Bayane the BordeI'll to this , organization . He stated that an Interno.tional Hi ghwq autooat ically becomes a defense highway and in that case the Federal Government would have to pe:y ff7% of the maintenance , construc tion co st, etc., resulting in a terrific saving to the taxpayers. M Hall said t he main r. thing is to get the International High~ on the map.. He believes that slides such aa... Mr . Hendryx shoY/ed l a st night are very important. M Hendryx of Panguitch said r. that he would supply a s many slides of t he map of the Utah area as wanted . Regarding the Organization he said that if Plt on a c ommunity basis it would be in c ompetition with l ocat civic and service clubs. He f e els the needof r egionaJ. coopera tion. He thinks there should be signs and bulletins to att ract tourists to 69 . He agreed with M Cantwell that Utah 1s divided geographical~ north and south and it might be :gosr. sibl e to have northern and southern groups . The northern group allied with the Tetons and V,lyomi ng attractions while the southern group would fell in with t he Grand Canyon area . He was concezmed. about ircorpora tion f or the organization and i nquired how servi ce clubs incorpprate . He '\'7as told th at parent organizations have orerall incor_ ppr ation end charters ere then granted smaller affili ated gcoupp . President Stewart commented that it would not be possible to elect a Canadian Direceor since the 89 1 er St have no Canadian mecber s . ~~ . Cantwell asked it it woul d be possible to appoint three extra directors ~ in c ase Canada. gets member s . Mr . Stewart r eplied by r eading Article 4 , sec. 1 of t he Bynaws stating that there sbal.l be not les s than s ix directors who shall be members of the Organization elected by a pluratity of member s at the e.nnual meeti ng . Vacanc ies ~ be filled by the r ecaining direct ors at r egular or special meetings . A Board meeting c an be called at a:try' time . There is no provision for the appointment of additional directors _ _ r. illiams suggest ed t hat an of fice be rented and maintained with a paid Secre tary M W in c harge so t hat peopl e woul d know where to w rite and would feel tlhat' this is a legitmmate organization . Mr . stev/art r eplied that he we.s quite right in t his and the matter ha s been discussed . M Stewart gave the pre s ent membership a s r. Arizona Ut.Lh W yoming Idaho M ontana M exico Californ ia 245 45 14 29 37 36 2 This was as of Sept . 22nd. There are some 60 other members not yet classilied . He Suggested that he would appoint e. committee and ask f or mol' discussion and to present their id.eas... at an afternoon meeting . Appointed to the meeti ng committee were Cantweil, W altz, M . Kyriakis , U Hall and Mr . W r r. illiams . M . Kyriakis asked for permission to r speak and said that he believed tha t now i s the time for t he organization to grow in International wominence referring to earlier di scus sion a s to i ncorpor4l.t.1.ng Ca.neda 2 �-4and M exico 15 and U. S . 89 on r oad markers , he believed th is wa s a good idea '. . He also thought the local group a good idea because it Vlould be ea sier to gain membersk in the community, somet hing in the wHY of an 89 Boost er Club . He believes it _best not.. to change the name of a highw~ in any country but would add tho se of the other~ c ountries. M Bass mentioned that it was hardly proper to say 89 I ers International. when 89 is r. only within the United State s . Mr . W altz pointed out that 89 t ers brochure explains ~ 1 ers j irternational is an organi zation promoting a system of highways r at her that 89 than a s i ngle highWB\V. The meet ing recessed fo r l unch at 1 2 :15 P . M. Prespec tru~ submitted Helen Fletcher Collins Lenore Bass, Recording Secretaries �( MINUTES OF THE FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF MEMBERS OF 89'ERS INTERNATIONAL IDGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC, The First Annual Meeting of Memhers of 89'ERS INTERNATIONAL IDGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arizona corporation, was held at the office of the Chamher of Commerce, in the city of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, on Friday. the 23rd day of Septemher, 1955, at o'clock P. M.. pursuant to written notice thereof mailed to all members in good standing, at least 10 days hefore said meeting. RAY V. STEWART, president of the corporation, presided, and JOHN L. PERKINS. secretary, acted as secretary at the meeting. Those members present at this duly noticed Annual Meeting constituted a quorum for the transaction of all bUSiness, there being 2.... 2.. me mbers present, and the members proceeded with the transaction of business. The president reported that the original Articles of Incorporation were filed in the office of the Arizona Corporation Commission on the 9th day of May, 1955, and a verified copy of said original Articles, with the certificate of the secr etary thereto attached, was recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County on the 16th day of May, 1955; that the receipt for such recording by tbe County Recorder of said County was filed in the office of the Arizona Corporation Commission, and a Certificate of Incorporation was issued by the Arizona Corpor- ation Commission on the 11th day of July, 1955, which Certificate of Incorporation \ he exhibited at the meeting; that the Articles of Incorporation were duly published �in the Arizona Weekly Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in Maricopa ( County. Arizona. on July 12. 19. 26. August 2. 9 and 16. 1955. and the Affidavit of such publication was thereupon duly filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission on the 16th day of August. 1955. Thereupon, on motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously resolved to accept said Articles of Incorporation, and the secretary was instructed to cause a copy of s uch Articles of Incorporation, Certificate of Incorporation, etc., to be placed in the Minute Book for the purpose of reference . Thereupon. the By-Laws for the regulation of the affairs of this corporation were read, and upon motion duly made and seconded, were unanimously adopted as and for the By- Laws of this corporation, and the secretary was instructed to cause the same to be placed in the Mnute Book for future reference. Thereupon, the president declared nominations in order for members of the Board of Directors of this corporation for the ensuing year. and the following named persons were placed in nomination and elected directors of this corporation for the ensuing year: A report was made to the me mbers of the plans for the corporation during the ensuing year . �There being no further business [he meeting was, on motion, adjourned. PRESIDENT SECRETARy �MINUTES OF THE FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 89'ERS INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION, IN::. The First Annual Meeting of the Board of §irectors of 89'ERS INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arizona corporation, was held at the office of the Chamber of Commerce, in the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County. Arizoa3, on Saturday, the 24th day of September, 1955, at - - 0' clock P~ M., immediately following the FiISt Annual Meeting of the Me mbers of the corporation . RAY V. STEWART, president of the corporation, preSided, and JOHN L. PERKlNS, secretary, kept the record of the meeting. A quorum of the Board of Directors was present, as follows: .-----------------_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ : and The election of officers of the corporation for the ensuing year was declared to be in order. and the following named Directors were duly nominated and elected to the offices set after their names: .:'--__________________________ _ _ __ , Pres ident; 2 ----------------------------------~ Vice-President; _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , Vice-President; ________________________ , Secretary; and -----------------------------------, , 11" .0'" Treasurer. 0 0 monon, dUly made and seconded, the following resolution was adopted: ~\, , },' RESOL YEO, tIli't the seal presented at this meeting, an impression of which is I '1 ) < mMe }'. o~ I the !,'largin of this page, is hereby adopted as the corporate seal of I 1. ) . . .- this ooIiPNaj:lon. SEAL AFFIXED. �A form for making application for membership in the corporation was presented, copy of which is attached to the page following these minutes, and on motion duly made and seconded, the same was unanimously approved and adopted. A Membership Card issued to all paid up members of the corporation, one of which is incorporated in this minute book following these minutes (No. 0(070), was presented, and upon motion duly made and seconded the same was unanimously approved and adopted as the Membership Card to be issued to all members of the corporation in good standing. Current busines¢natters discussed and acted upon by the Boord of Directors we re as follows: There being no further business, the meeting was, on motion, adjourned. President secretary. �OF 89' ERS INTERNATlCNAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION , INC, The First Annual Meeting of Members of 89'ERS INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION , INC" an Arizona corporation, was held at the office of the Chamber of Commerce, in the city of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, on Friday , the 23rd day of September, 1955, at o'clock P. M. I pursuant to written notice thereof mailed to ail members in good standing, at least 10 days before said meeting. RAY V. STEWART, president of the corporation, presided, and J0HN L. PERKINS, secretary, acted as secretarl' at the meeting. Those members present at this duly noticed Annual Meeting constituted a quorum for the transaction of all bUSiness, there being _ _ _ _ members present, and the members proceeded with the transaction of business. The president reported that the original Articles of Incorporation were filed in the office of the Arizona Corporation Commission on the 9th day of May, 1955, and a verified copy of sald original Articles. with the certificate of the secretary thereto attached, was recorded in the offJce of the County Recorder of Maricopa County on the i6th day of May, i ~ 55; that the receipt for such recording by the County Recorder of said County was filed in the offJce of the Arizona Corporation Commission. and a Certificate of Incorporation was iss ued by the Arizona Corporation Commission on the ilth day of July. 1955. which Certificate of Incorporation he exhibited at the meeting; that the Articles of Incorporation were duly published .' �r In the Arizona Weekly Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in Maricopa County, Arizona, on July 12, 19, 26, August 2, 9 and 16, 1955, and the Affidavit of such publication was thereupon duly flled with the Arizona Corporation Commission on the 16th day of August , 1955. Thereupon, on motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously resolved to accept said Articles of Incorporation, and the secretary was instructed to cause a copy of such Articles of Incorporiltlon, Certificate of Incorporation, etc. , to be placed in the Minute Book for the purpose of reference. Thereupon, the By- La",s for the regulation of the affalrs of this corporation were read. and upon motion duly made and seconded, were unanimously adopted as and for the By-Laws of this corporation, and the secretary was ins truc ted to cause the sa;ne to be placed in the Mnute Book for future reference. , Thereupon, the president declared nominations In order for member s of the Board of Dir ectors of this corporation for the ensuing year, and the following named persons were placed in nomination and elected director s of this corporation for the ensuing year: A report was made to the members of the plans for the corporation during the ensuing year. �There being no further business the meeting was, on motion, adjourned. PRESIDENT SECRETARY , �ARTICLE C~ INC R RATION -ot0' IU lNT RNATI NAt. mGBWAY A3.iOClATI N, INC , KNew ALL MEN BY TB Plt5.:II!ONT.i: Thai _ , t • underalgue<!, 0 . .aby associate ours.lve. toaether for th. purpose of for ml".. a corporation not for profit, ate of Ariz a, and A TIC 0 be.. bJ rdopt the I . The n .,. the Ia... of the ArUcle. of Inc rporatlon: [0110 ea , resld.nces and post office addr••••• 01 the tncorpontors are: W.sterner lot ai, RAY V, .>TBWART way, T cson, Arizona 297 Benson • WALTZ UlLLE M , Arlaona Morro.. Motora, Flag taft, Arizona • O. MeR CW W. llIla It AN B , I Fray, arcor. e Nlza, N ale, ~n ra, Mexico La I••ta U el, W. Q. BAJ J UN L. P RKlNj 1519, Ickenb , Arizona hoen"', Arizona. A.RTICL D. The nam8 f th111 corporation Is lNT RNATI NAL mOIBWAY A330 lATI N, INC . ARTICL": corporation Is po.er to the m. The principal place of transact Iclr.an urg, tness 01 thls rleop Cowty, Arizona, but 11 shall have the atntatn oUlc.. and do tn.as .laewhere, botb Wlthtn and.1 out te or Arizona. ARTlCL IV. Thla corporation Ia organized NOT lor prom, the 0 JecLi and purpo.es for which tbe corporation Is for me<! are .. folio•• : (1) T pro ola, fo ter, stimulate , tat. tnternatlonal bwa1 travel over the U. Ullitell tat•• , Canada fa and Uenco flS, r III Alene I. , travel clll -1- an~ irect, encourage, an faclll• 0B way lIysteOl tn the over their varlo trlbutarl.. , and travel ShOW8; to 01 Ivate , promote, �.t ulata , facilitate an4 eocouraie good housekeeping for hlgh"ay, pre 3". and acco"'1Dodations, and c lBanUne I and co. fort for travelers tbroulrhout Hlgbway II and Its tributaries throU3h the Unitd tatea, Canada U and Mexico f1 &; to cement, billd aD4 promote intercity, Interatate IIJId international pu Ue re lations thrOllih the pro otlon aD4 eneour. aIDent of intercity, Int.utata and international travel over BIah"ay 89 In the Unlto!d Jto.t•• , Canada fa and Iimco '15 , anil their various tributarlea; to erect btllboards , dlsaemlnate travallnfor atlon, produce and distribute rocburoa , pa phlota , literature, printed atter , guid es and a.lds to traveler. and ma.nbera ; to construct anil maintain information centera; to aet aa lIab n between traveler, motel, hotel and other related Ine.sea throughout t e BIlIb_, 89 .yate anada fa and ellleo '15, ami their various trl In tbe United ..tat•• , arlea. (3) To purcba9. r otherwise acquire, own, hold, rent, lease, con- vey , s~ll, exchaD\le , uslgn, traufer, ort age , pledge, encumber or hypoth- ecate re I eslate ami the !lxturtU ani per.onal property incidental thereto, reaaonably necessary (or the objects of tha ..aoclatbn, both wlthln and without the .)tate of Arlz~na; aod to transact any anil aU buslne.a relatl". thereto. (3) To print, pu llsh. blrul, buy, sen and deal In bodls, papers, magsaln... , perl04lcala, anil advertising aod printed matter of all kind. and to bold, ""e, sell, Circulate , istrlbute and dispoae of the arne. (4) To enter Into, make arul perform contracts of any kind and de- scription, an:! In carrylnJ on Its ualneas, or for the purp:l•• oC at1eln1ng or furtherlna any of It. objects, to do any an1 all tIliItp which a eo- partnership or natural person could do and exerCise, and which now or hare ter a, be authorized by law. (5) To 0 any and all things necessary, auttabledr proper for the accompllslllllent of aoy of tbe purpose. , or for !be attain ent 0 any of the ob- jects herein enumerated, or which shall at any Urne appear conducive r eJIPed- - 2- �'In nr t~ I"n 'or the I' lei ben~"t ~f , I' ,"'Ill e "w-r. b t no "" tJ>r , t'~n oratl n. Ihls e ah I be e natrued both 18 obl .."b ' n1 ua~~ aore~ I.,n r ,,1 r ation of . e lfie or 8p"el 1 be ..xelual .... ; 111 It ,,~nB' .t ' nt with I • r rr AR .t~ .p., til e, r os y A.cl '. bare t il " ber hwful powers el ua • 01 'I c ,t l 118 0' em al"" to e(I ra . ' t II D< rs ,,' tbl. co . _lI l p th. luI I' of eJ ell"" 0 0 n~ "I' ~u'~ en • ' wa ,f ..~ 1 or. II' tr t sury t I.enn~uet .. for ID la- I' Il 0- t r t l n of "'. b<>rallip "" II II-. ...t fo rth In f"..... tb l Mr o. tl b r IDs u s to be II hI t ~m • "0"aplt by all II b v. • tJun ab r boi l's. Th. 1wll - r ' tI"1l of "I I. e". b reb, I.elu v. Th e., ., tI n In.. • Il t 11l- pu n~ r o. Ills 1.. , -1 . Nn ohtin. re ".,.. , tr MIn r .., Ill' b's m m raillp or JIlY r l,ht • II ~ . y 1,,- rr d eo rsblp In th!. C'lrpOr tt n. AIt-rCT <' VI. "" 114 •• t. to. r n VI I h • ' .~' " rllI!e 1ft ", rnc., onc-m at of r .. U I ~ ,,' 1\ r ' .,n I ",'t Ol " unl - "s r nAY V"' ..-rlll c~m tIm.. of tb (~ ~ n II la ' •• u InMM" .. ' tors wu " uly . 1 "" 'rs,,( thIs Mr ('1 'rh " st'lli ¥ Mt I. , tb' n . ' x (5) '" II <:"""Iat 't~r M r ,!l ' n n· tb r In rs~n y·. r t, , lIb .~rv. Mu- l tb or til WJ ~ .. , t th Cbo.mber of , 0' . -y~ " r t I' pi m • 1'54 • fl . etors of thl" c'Ir""r tloo. 0 110ft ab II "n' uc i by Incorp?r tor. t the comm .~t. D"-thl r" 0' whtcll con- mbon of tbe corp r !lOll. etora wbo ab 1l be Il- .1 ct 1 by the lar Illy .-tlnge I? It", tba C rpor- the m nftl9r r 'f1 .d by t w. I ' nth " th I~ ~ "ab, 1I It all II t.rmln Ie tw 1I1y-' ... ( 5) ' . ('1 AI a mo ling 0' tb. mp for " th'. e rp.,r, tI ,,{ th "' r~ .DCe M 8 0t of tile e ?r- emll-.a r 8.nt all 11 be .. \ cte • ell Ill' unl I til 11'11 ec.. ora •• • I"cled n1 Wll!- �r tb II toro e bel" t neb p"LC. I y b m~ y . I 11 by . I"ct~ 'II ~h ( orAJ: ' Aft t ry m •I r II " all 11 b pr .l:Ient uell r oflleera . 1 " rlo~ ~f tb re ~ tll-" .,1 c 1 ~ rA 0" tr I ll ., th P7ll' r to -t wa n ly w'lhh.ld ,.n by 1 w r by tb nc"rt)t)f t l n :! rt1 " h 11 PI' .crt , r th n 8 -11 • Ir ~ ... C" 0' ntl r 10,. 'II I 0' to subject Itself B II til c ..""ratlOft. r hl II arty of tile mem (0 X. II<' by . 0< ,~ . 11 ~'nt d II Ireet IIty ., r II" pt ' ,."m rs I.. et 8 .. e rpor II' bts D · tl~JIS. ARTlC' '8 lOa or 1 n la t any II I'J',4c to r. f tb'8 "rp"'''' b A,.tlelu ouot of I y_T aws IX. Th I' . .d- c nl h ...blch thIs co Id.. 1 III n r In wblcb all busla vm. ,. AR"n(,"1 .. ~r lI"ellJ n ~ "Pt . tIC' Mt SIll" ~ "m person. Il I by I • y ., d n 'I ar unl SS 80 n r rUllI1M' h. ny_l."8 "" of n or III r. 1'lce- cl. by tho m.,ml>era of .. • r mf\...... by the (4 r II n. cor II", I" II e wll sh I h~l" cur. III IlIlDtr r l,. etora " tre •• r r Jl ttag B 11->1 I)'IIC until , aucc 8.ot for th uD9:I:plr e1 u IIfI-" I " , 8 ,11 ~c t ~r s I) of tha 10r 'ty off' ora • th • e rpn 5 C t - rmll," r' T" " III eh m ah 1\ sll J'1D 1 pI c 1I!>1' c~ III ...r1l at 1'11. Tf "'!ICy 11 l' at week of till> . ' .W8 0' th cnr !>rallou. u.r ' C Y ar wIth r s • 'O r u~r \ b ot 11 cut l' t?rms til Wce. II ItS of Tucson. Plm "nunty. lit of r io.. for At I 1- wlul 9t lui ry -4· Ar1~?a: at t lit of Ihls e rpor tl .. w ? ,..."B • ("I' aad 011 - �• half of this corporation, and upon whom a ll notices and procease , includ aenlce 01 umm 113, a)' be aerved , and wben so saned sball be lawful per- oonal service n sal corporation. A maj ority of tbe Boar of Irectors may, st their option, revoke tbls appointment at any tI e or fill a vaC&DCyln s uch position by fUini t "appoint ent of another agent. I N il lTN . F , we bue bereunto at our band this ' J WB tb .y of April, 1955, at T ucs on, ArIZona • -----.. -BaSB- -- - - - - - - l ~ ~--~wu:·(> W. G. W. I .; .\i.!AlltW - - - - 3TAT FA C UNTY OF 1955, ) ZeNA ) s. - Marlcnpll THIS IN3T UM NT was acknowl edged y RAY V . " A T. fore rna this day l"Stlr April, Pe~, 1Jl&iC- Illy com isalon ."plres : (SEAL) • Sept. STAT FA C UNTY 0 F ZONA -..7.::::1 ) ) .. aricopa- INJTR SNT was a.eknowle fled before • MO"".,u w eggy e thla 15- day of April, seM y Piib""'c - - -- rau ' - My commission expire,.: Sept. - 1]5 T AT FA C UNTY (SEAL) ZONA FPDU ) ) 8S. TBI IN"T RUMENT was acknowledged before ,. 1955, by W. thl~ dey 28th • WALTZ . - -011f<JSUl'ikilliry lIiili~ !Ii Y co,nmlaslon .xptres - 5(SE AL) Apr il, �-- - AT.. F ARI ZCNA UNTY F Santa Cruz TBlJ INJT uu: ) ) .. NT Wlll3 acknuwl edged April, 1955, by GUILLA fore ",e this } 6th day of lIDAN • - Cecilia A. Aguilar - -- -NoWj My eoru 15alon expires: _ M CQIILmlssion E xp!res Nov. 5, 1958 ubllC- - - - (SEAL) .. "TATE F A ZONA COtINTY O F _Ma",~copa __ THlJ lNST UM ' NT was acknowl edged before me thlsl 5!l:!..-day 01 April, 1955, 'I • G. SA • My eomrnis4lloo - - S ept.~ d 957 pin: - • STAT E ,. A ZCNA C UNTY 01', ._ MU.iGOpaT ) ) 8.1. INST RUMENT was eknowl ed ad before me tbl.. 15tliay of April, 1955, oy J GHN L. P ERKIN • _ _l'e~~r~F..tliC- - -.-My commission expires: (SE AL) ept.....8 - ill.. _ _. - 6- �•• Fl agstaff , Ari z . September 24 , 1955 The aft ernoon meeting was called to order at 3:15 P. M by President Ra1 Stewart . . Telegram was read from Deane W iley , Manager of the Chamber of COIlll:lerce, Livingston , Mont., end l ett ers , one f r om Clmrl es L. M ullins, Jr . Manager of t he Nogales Chamber of Commerce , Nogales, Ari z .; 2 , from the Associacion de Hotel es del Noro Este , s i gned by the President Cesar Gandara,. of Hermosillo; 3, a letter from t h.e Camara Naci onal de Comercio de Nogales , Sonor a , si gned by Radollo Jesus LeyvaC ., Vi ce- Presi dente . Pres . Stewart spoke next on the Articles of incorporation . Application for incor_ ppr at ion wa.s...made May 16 , 1955 , and t he c ertificat e of Incorporation was i Ss':leci by t he Ari zona Incorporation Commission , July il , 1955 . The Articles of I ncorp.or atJ.on were publ ished in t he Arizona W eekly Gazett e , a weekly legal newspaper of lJari posa County August~ 16 , 23 , and 30, 1955 . M Cantwell m r. oved and M M r. itchell seconded t h nt t he Art icles of I nc or por ation be acc ept ed as read . M otion carried. President St ewart proceeded with the readi ng of the By- Laws as duJ.¥ filed wi th Corppration Commission. A copy of the By- Laws i s hereby aPR6nded. the~ r.1r. "I1ll1ams moved and Mrs . Repony sec onded that the By- Laws be acc ept ed as read . M otion c arried unanimously . M Canmel l , Chairman of the Reorgani zation Committee presented t.'Ile follo\1ing r. recommendations : 1. 'I'bat t he number of Director s be i ncrea sed. to 12 , that 9 be elected this meeting and t he " By- Laws be amended to wovide three vacant directorships div.i ded bet ween M exico and Canada . 2. That t h e Org an i zation establish an office for a c entral address f or brochures , etc., to be manned by an exeeutive secr etary who is not a member of t he Board and w~o should be hired to take c are of t he c oordination of eff orts . 3 . Necessary changes be made to allow the 8ger s to charter clubs in v.arious , districts under the supervision of the director in t hat area . Suggest ed distribution of directorships M exico 1, Arizona 5, Utah 2 , V lyomin8' 1, I daho 1 , M ontana 1. I n 6hartering new clubs By- Laws be drawn and set up , so that t hese clubs would be unhamRlred in l ocal woblems or fund r aising . They IIlEI\Y' ask for civic_aid in project s so l ong as they do no t conflict with policies of t he ~ent or gani zation. Local clubs YJi l l be urged to form a group and ge t memberships , but only the parent or gani zation may i ssue such member ships , one-t hi rd of the dues to be retained localJ.¥ . Each member present at t he Fl agstaff meeting was appointed to t he member ship c ommittee and del egat ed to organize clubs . Tbe standard name must contain 89ers Inter national. of or __ 8ger s ~ Intern ational . Sr. Kyriakis sugge sted naming Gover nors and other public- officials aB.. honorary directors . He advised that t he names of these offic ial s be added to organization l ette rheads for pres tige purposes . Mr . W s made the s t atement that there seem " to be a large munber of proJX)saJ.s alt ed and he asked that t h e recommendations be broken do\" i nto separa te segments for m discussion. Then Mr . W illiams moved and Hendryx sec onded adoption of an amendment to est ablish a JDiDimum of 12 member s of t he Board of Directors leaving three vacanci es ~ tb be filled later from Canada and M exico when membe r ships so Justified . W altz added t hat the exact phraseology be l eft to the organization I s attorney . M otion carried unanimou sly . .. Recommendation by Mr . Cant well c oncerning instructi ons to nominating committ ee as , to d i stribution of Directorships was held out of order as covered by By- Laws . �" - 2- Mr . Yla1tz-, sugge sted t hat t he Board be authorized to appoint interin direc tors . Owen Vialton mov ed to r escind t he previous motion . motion c arried . U W r. altz seconded and the M W r. altz moved and Mr . Bass seconded that t he Board of Director s be increa sed to 9 members. M otion c arried . 51' . Kyri akis paved the way for a future expansion of t he Board but Mr . Hendryx said his sol ution wouJ.d pose a dilemma for the future an t he suggestion was dropped . Mr . M orrow explained tha t what the group ....as try i ng to do was to try to give the Board power to increase the number of directors w ithout amending t he By- Laws . He suggested a s pecial meeting of the membership for t his purpose . 1. Mr . Cantwell moved and Mr. W altz seconded f.fiat the or ganizat ion expressed the de s ire to make it a matter of record t hat Directors from Canada and M exico be admitted as soon a s . . memberships from t hose two c ountries warrants BUch action . M otion carried . The next~ recommendati on would be a ch ange i n t he By- Laws to permit cha.rf,ering of local. clubs . 2. ~'ir . Cantwell m ed a nd W ov altz seconded th at t he Board be instructed and cause to be prepared ad set of By- Laws governing the granting of chrters to l ocal 8ger . clubs . 5. Uotion carried . It was mov ed by .ir . Hendryx and seconded by M s . Repony th at the Consi tution and r By- LaVIS governing these clubs shall s pecify t hat the membership fee be $15 . 00 , t wo- thirds of which s h all be remitted to t he parent organi zation and one- third should be retained and bec ome t he ~operty of t he locally chart er ed club . M otion c arried . M . Hall mov ed ani Ur s . W r altz seconded that t he Or ganization go on rec ord c onc e rning the s t andardization of s t ickers , brochures and road markers . 4. Motion made by Bernie W illiams , seconded by Ur . Hendryx t k :. t the Or ganization est'llblish an offico, s ecretary and t e l ephone fo r headquarters . M otion c arried . Mr . rJor row pointed out t hat t his recommendation follo wed prOVisions a lready set:, up in the By-LaV1S . Bill Fra:aier , Prescott , offered an amendment to the motion hs to a limit of administra tive c ost , suggesti ng not mor e t h an 50% of funds be used for tha t purpose . ifilliam.s offered offic e f eci lities i n Phoenix at no c ost eger s . T'n e amendment wa s defea ted in a show of hands , 6 for ruld 8 against . M on carried in a show of... oti hands , 11 for and 1 against . Ur . Frazier suggest ed a change in printing of t he brochures to strike ou t wh a t he c alled aChrertising a speeific tovm . M . Hendryx mov ed and Hall s econded t hat memberships run for 12 months ... r etroactiv:e r loti on c &ITied . to Jruruary 1 , 1955 . It was decided that t he selection of a secretary and t he l ocation for such an office be l eft to t he nell' Board of Directors , also that applicants submit their quaJJ..fications to t h e ne\7 Board . Respectful~ submit ted Kelen fletcher Colllns _ Lenore Bass , Recordi ng Secretaries �'. , Flag s taff, Ariz. Sept ember 24, 1955 The evening m eeting was called to order by Pre si dent Stewart in t he Dining Room of the M onte Vista Hotel at 8:15 P. M . Presiden t Stewart c alled for the report of the Auditing Committee . 1I1r . Re pony , Chairman , stat ed t hat h e met with t h e oth er members , Hal Jackson end Bentley M itChell this afternoon , went over the r ep:>rt, bo ok s and c hecking account of t he Trea surer of the Highway 89 Assn . and found t he r ecords to be correct . T'nere are 445 paid up memberships totalling $6 , 675 . 00 Ni ne partially paid member ships totalling 58 . 00 Total $6 , 713. 00 Return ed by .J • Perkins 50 , 00 Total 66 , 765. 00 DEBITS ... Commissions to John Perkins Treasure Trail N ews M ise. Expenses $5, 322 . 50 500. 00 883. 87 Total $4500 . 37 Balance on hand $2, 256 . 65 We have five honorary members whose dues are paid by the As sociat ion end 20 promised , none of whome are i ncluded in this report . Hal Jackson mov ed t hat the report of the Auditing Committee be accepted as re ad . Mr . W altz seconded the motion . M otion clIl'ried . The nominating COmmitte e, M W r. altz at the head , assi sted by Bentley M itchell and Hal J ackson proposed r eplac ements for the three year t er m for northern Utah , ~entley M itchell from Logan and Burnett Hendryx from Panguitch fo r sou thern Utah . The Committee used their preroga tive and according to the Vii sh~s of the ga t hering nominated three new additional directors . They drew l ots to detennine the lenth of each tenure. Frank W . Sor gat z of M ontpelier , Idaho will serve three years . Dallas Klinger , Alpine, W yoming , 2 years , and Dick Fer gus , Grea t Fall s , M ontana, 1 year . HaJ. Jackson moved t hat the nominations be closed , seconded by Geor ge Hall . M otion carried. Presiden t St ewart.. recommended that a unanimous ballot be c ast. Hal Jackson moved and Bill Bass seconded a motion of approval. M otion c arried . Resolu tions Commi ttee J Georg e Hall, Chairman and M . V tz ass isting drew up and rs lal presented t he fo llowing r e solu tions : 1. Whereas,. . t he City of Flags t aff and the Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce have so graciously consented to entertain t h i s meeti ng of 89 1 ers lnt_national, we extend s i ncere apprecia tion for their effo rts. Bill W altz mov ed and Owen W alton sec onded a motion this , r esol u tion be adopted a s rea:l:i-. M on carried. oti 2 . "bare as our s econd meeting was such II successful one , be it hereby resolved that we extend our thanks to Hal Jackson , M anager of t he Flagstaff Chamber ·. of Commerce , and his abl e assistant, Helen "'letcher Collins . Mr . W altz mov ed and Mr . W oodley seconded a motion that thi s r esol u tion De adopted a s read . Motion c arried . 5. W hereas Mr . & r~s . M orrow provided such delightful refreshments for the Cocktail hour, be it resolved that t he 89 1 ers Highw~ As soci ation expre s s their sincere thanks t o t hem . Bi l l W altz moved and Mr. Cantwell s econded a motion to dopt _ thi s reso l ution as_read . M otion carried. 4. W herea s M rs. Repony has spent much time end effort in t he preparation of the broch-ares which are so necessary to an organiza.tion of this kind , be 1 t resolved that the 89 1 ers Highway Assoc iation express their a ppr eciati on for a job well done , by M . Repor:w and her s t aff. Sr . Kyriaki s moved and i'.-ir . Bass seconded a motion t hat rs the resol utions be adopt ed as read . M otion c arried . �., I - 25 . Wherea s any organization is d e pendent upon its offic ers and dir ectors f or any success it may have , be it r esolved that 8gers Inter national Hi ghwccr Associati on expressJ appreciation for t he great amount of time and effort eA~nde d duri ng t he l ast year by our officers s.nd directors. be adopted as read . 6. M oved by W alton and s econded by W oodley t h a t the r e solution M otion carried . W berea s any organization is de pendent upon the knowl edge of all its members of the points of interes t and attractions of our entire route, therefore be it resolved th at we extend our sincere thanks to Mr . Bess and Mr . Hendryx for t heir wofessional showing of pictures at l ast night's meeti ng . Jokingly, Hendryx moved and Bass seconded a motion tha t t his resolution be e.dopt ed a s read . fdo tion c arri ed . 7. W hereas the Tr easure Trail Song and Fronter a Bong i s a most effective means~ of p;ropaganda, and already has contributed to our c ause here"and in M exico t herefore be it resolved that Bernie W illiams be extended the gr atitude and thanks of the Org anization . In like manner , Bernie W illiams moved and Bass seconded t hat this... resolu tion be adopted as read . Motion carried . 8 . Whereas-> there has be en a very pleasant social side to this meeting , t he 8gers extend the appreci ation of t he Or ganization to the quartet from the Arizona State College of Flagstaff , and to Dr . E. C. Slipher , Flagsta ff , evening speaker; to Sr . D. P . Kyriakis , luncheon s peaker, and to t he management of t h e Hotel :\tonte Vista for adding to our pleasure . M . W atz moved and M . Repony seconded a motion t hat t h e r e sol u tion r l r be adopted as r ead . M otion c arried. 9 . W erea s the Sgers i s an Interna tional Or ganization t rans acti ng busi ness i n both h SP.{Ulish and English , be it resolved t hat Sr . Kyriakis be desighated a s official interpreter . W altz moved a nd Mr . WOogla,y s econded a motion that t h e resolution. be adopted as,.. read . Motion c arried . Hal J ackson interpolat ed at this point that a l ot of mon~ i s availabl e to be spent nati onalJ¥ and s tatewise and" t he Or gan ization should suggest a road build ing program to its ~ leg isl ators. 10 . Wherea s -> M rs. Collins and rJrs . Bass have acted a s .r ec ording Secretaries.. we h ereby expr ess our apprellation. W tz IOOVed a nd W ll illiams seconded a motion t hat this resolution be adopt ed as read . M otion c arried . Sr . Kyriakis addressed t h e Chair to s t a te that h e wi ll do everything possi ble to facilitate t h e fo r mation of a Local i n Nogales . He also asked that we write a letter to t he Org anizations who sent him to this meeting , thanking them for sending him. M. M r orrow a s ked the group to d o s erious t hinking on t h e fact that small cities-> are b eing by-passed by changi ng h i ghway s . He gave h is opinion that t he Or gani za tion shouJ.d go on record a s opposing such c hanges and Mrs. W altz added t he same 0p.i nion should apply to by - w.ssi ng existing businesses ~ in the cities . M Bass moved and r. M. W r illiams seconded t hat M Hall draw up such a re solution . M r. otion carried . M Hendryx moved and 17illiams seconded that Air . Hall be instructed to draw up, r. a resolu tion relative to the informa tion given by Mr . Jackson on t he road building program. M otion carried . Sr. Kyriakis ~ asked wh ere the next Convention would be and Pres . Stewart said that no decision would be made at this time . �Pres . St ewart said t hat what to do about highways and alternat es will be a p]:'obl em for the nS'R board. He also said that 8ger s Interna tional had tried to be as3 fair as possibl e whenE!'Ter t liere as a division of a route such as 89A through Oak Creek and 89 through W illiams . Mr . Csntwell suggested that the Director f r om each state list such condi tiona in his area snd polici es be fo r mulated after a study or... tho se lists.• i:iir . W illiams urged that t he 8gers follow up his sugge stion to add 89 International He said tha t the Mexican Tourist Bureau had to exist i ng signs in Mexico and Canada . womised him th at thi s would be done . Sr . Kyriakis agreed to uri t e to t he Mexican Tourist Bureau regardi ng t his matter and Vlili report his f i ndings at a l at er date . M . J ackson IOOVed and M Bass seconded a m r r. otion f or ad journme nt . Before the motion was c arried, Mr. Cantwell, head of the A dvertising Committee , announced that... this c ommittee would report when the new Board of Directors meet s Sunday morning . It. was . announced t..l.at the new Board of Directors will meet a t the Chambera: of Commerce l Office at 7 100 0 I c l ock Sunday morning . eeting ad journed a t , 9 :15 P.M . M Respectfully submitted , Helen fletcher Collins Lenore Bas s Recordi ng Secretaries , � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3294 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2558 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/740">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/740</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 591240479 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource First Annual 89'ers Membership Meeting minutes Description An account of the resource The first meeting of the 89'er's Highway Association. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Collins, Helen Fletcher Bass, Lenore Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource Tourism United States Highway 89 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 9/24/55 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Flagstaff (Arizona) Coconino County (Arizona) Arizona United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 1 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd1 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/7f722067f331119079d7a241dddfa40b.pdf 9e88871198f82030d7aef85df8a151af PDF Text Text 8~ ' .r. Ill TERIiA TIOHAL BIGBJlAY AS SOC lATIOll Minut ee of Eeard of Dir e ctor " u.& ti ng he l d a t the Hotel Newhous e , Sa l t Lake Utah on O ctober 24. 1955 . C it~ . IICf<N mG SESSI ON The me e ting was call ed to order at 101 30 a, m. by Prnldent Stewart. Pre ..nt 'Were Ray V. Stewart , Pretidsnt; Bentley lI1tchlil l, Vloe-Prea1dent ; -W . G. Baas , Secretary- Treasurer; Directcr. Burnett Hendryx , Frank W Sorgatl and Rlcte.rd . C. :r.r~.; IIt.rtin H. Cant_II , Executiv e Secr etary and Berni. W illiams , Guest. A bsent, Directors Dalla. Clinger , excu68d; Guiller mo Sedano I Vice Presid ent S. O. M row , excused . or Seoretary Baa. read the minute. of t he m ornin g se s.ion , first me eting of t he A• • oa1at ion held at Flagstetf , Arizona an September 23, 1955 . Approved •• r.ad . Mr. Cantwell read t he minute. of t he Aft ernoon s el.1OQ held on Se ptem ber 24 . 1 95 5 wich were approwd with one oorrection - - the n Ul. of County mentioned in Paragraph 2 therein wal cbaliged trom "Mlrlp08a" to Maricopa. The minutes ot tba E~ning Sen10n wer e also read by lItr- . Cantwe ll. Mr . Cantwel l pointe d out that t he two resoluti CXlS to have b ee n dra'1lIl up by 1Ir . Gecr p Ban bad not been ree.ind . Mr. Catrtwel l .... . in.truoted to oontaot 1Ir. Ball 1.mr!ltdlately r.gardin& t he re.olution. . There bei I1f; n o other correcti a14 , the minut .. •• r e ap prov ed a. read . Th8 minute s of the Board of Dir ectors U,.ting held Sunday morning , Sep t s mber 25 , 195 5 at Flagatart , Arizona were read by Secretary Ba.a . Hr. Cantwell sta t ed tt..t he felt t he paragraph reterring to b.1a appointment a. Executive Se cretary wa ll not enti re l y correct. Mr . Cant we ll r equa sted t tat an a mendll8nt be added the reto and read t he proposed a mendment to the Board of Dir e otors . 1Ir . Mitohel l motio ned that t he a mendment b e tna.de a par t of t he minute. , seconded by Mr . H endryx . Motion oarried. The amendment i8 a ppend.d hereto and be come . .. part of the mlnutu . President Stewart stated tha t he }ad one a ddi t1 on which /S houl d be ade to the l ast pI!lT lI.Ua ph of the minutes, 1 •• •• the ~rt whioh reads " Ray Stewart. wall in_ Itr ucted to draw up By-Laws for 89 ' er&" . M otlon was made by Vr . ¥1tchell that this i tem b. ohanged to read "The President was a uthorized by t he! Board t o proo.,,,d through the Aaa oo iat ion Attcrney to draw up By-Lnws &nd a Charter unde r whioh to organize load 89 ' er Clubs". Seconded by Mr . I:en dryx. lfotion carr ie d . The minutes "rill ap proved wit h oorre cti eIl8 as shown . Trea surer " Repor t l AmOtmt of mOlle y c olleoted to date for Jle dHtrsh ip . 451 msmbera, is $6, 765. 00 pl us $38.00 on partia l pa id memberships equals II. total of $6 , 803 . 00 . Disbursements I Johnny Perkinl , $3 , )22 . 50; n soe1 lAmous Expense , $1 , 064.27; Johnny Perkins , $300. 00. wa. Balanc. on hand $2.116. 23. It IDllde a -.tter or reoor d that President Stewart and Exeoutive Seoretary Cantwel l had _ de 11 joint &udit of the membership roster em Ootooflr 2]rd . The _udit d1ac1011edi 451 paid - up members an reocrd : 9 partially paid _up me mber s tota l _ ing $38 .00: an undetermined number of honorary IM mbers said to ex ist, t he Dame s of whioh Ilre not on reoordJ 4 n&lMS on reoord a. having receiTe d me mbersh i p plaques , but no reoord of dues payment. Two of t he fo ur n on-pa id DlerOOers wer e in Ar izona �and wwre turned OWl' to Allociation Ofticer' trom tmt State to inTe.tigate. TN ott.r two wer e the Calitcrn1a Court. and Hotel Frtn.oe., both ot Guadalajara . x1oo • .... Cantw.ll 1l1.tructed to place the.e two name. on tM mtmber.hip reeter without further inn.tic.tioD. and carry them paid_up aocount. with the notation tbat there b neither endenoe or reoord. that the $30.00 due ..... reoei...ed by the .1.. 0oiation tre •• urer . -.a. a. h.ymM1t of 8ilh I To ....rtin H. Cantwell, petty oa.h acoount - $64. 64 . Vr. Sorv-ta motioned that the bIll be paid. Seoond. by Mr. Hendryx. JIotion oarried. to Ray V. Stewart, lan& dietame telephcxw caUl parta1nin, to ann.. l .etin, - $32 . 00, and $3.00 tor .ta"P" bill be paid. A total ot $35.00. 111". Bondr1" ..ot1o%lOd that tho 10 erdered. Mr. Sorgata .eoonded the moticm. and it .... 1 To Jarfa Printing Company , llellberahip a pplication tor .. and enTelope. - $61. 50. Mr. Il1tot.ll 'ZOtioDid ttat the bill paid. Seoonded by Mr. ""£Ill . Kotion oarrled . '1'0 Hot.l liewhoule tor uee of room tor Direotor.' lIt.tin, - $10.00 plul rOOln .erTioe. lIot1cm tlat th1. bill be paid by 1Ir. II1tcholl. Secoad by ..... Bolldr)'X. Wotion oarried. 1Ir . Bilndryx motioned that the A.. ocation rehtlurN Direotnr. for attend1nc Direotor. lDMting. a. tollawl. ..18, Roo.. aDd actual mileace trt.'ftU.d by the neoe .. ary automobile. at the rate of 51 per aile or tb. COlt ot publio tranlportation •• requir.d . Mr. Sorpta •• oealed the motion cd it wa. 80 ordered. 1Ir. II1toheU motioned tl'at wher.Tar t_lible Direotor 8 oooperate witb other direotcra in tJ. area to trawl JllQre than one d1reotar in the car to ake the expense a. eoonomical al po.lible. Second.d by 1Ir . rerr;ua. M otion carried . Mr . II1tohdl .otlon.d that . . iuue the oURODlry Corporate cheoking aooount authoriaation, oopy ot whioh is hereto attaohed to the minute.. Seoonded by Mr. 'ergu.. )(otion carried. Mr. Mitohell lIloti med tlat tbl tr....ur.r b. aut h orized to reimbur •• Mr. Martin 11. Cant-nll 1'01' tlw petty ca.h fund AI •• t up in the oontraot betnen the 8 9'er. tntenu.tional Highway A•• ociat ion and MLrtin H. Cant_ll , and aha to pay the .tipulat.d tee at $100. 00 per JIODtb a. l q al the oOl1tract remain. in toroe, plua the $1.00 per _bel' tor an _mber. al pro ... lded tor in the oontract. 8eo_ OI1d.d by Vr . Sergata . )(otion carried • • eting reoe .. ed tfr lunoh at 12135 p . m. .et~ re.uMd at 1.45 p.m. AFTERNOOi SESSIOM The oorre.pondenoe .al read by the Xxeouti...e Seoretary and aoted upon a. required. ElECOTI'IE SECRilTARY'S REP <R T. 1) SURETY 8QfD Ir. Cantwell intcrmed the Beard that he .... unable to .eoure a bond tor hIiUelt beoauN an ellPl~-em.ployer relation.hip cUd. not exist betqeD himlelt and the ••• oc1.tion. Be ltat.d tu:rthtr that .ino. he is neither an ottioer nor an employe. he hal been ad ... iaed tlat th.re i. DO _ani of •• _ ouring the bond UDder the olr oumatanc••• A:rtar oOlldderable dbou .. im lIr. Hendryx s otiomd t1:at the B9'er. re.oind tlw requut for a bond :ror the Exftauti" Seoretary . SeooDded by JIr. Bal.. Motion carr» d. _ 2 _ �lk 2) E~AL RECOCIlITIOI fCll ROUT! S 2 aDd J. re.ol ution to the etreot that the Ca.naara.n-"xIoan route .rpie .hCNld be oluded with the U. s. 8' R1gbway .hield on .tatione17 and other literature 'ft. pre.enwd. lIr. Hendryx motlo:oed that ae.olution :tl, .. oopy of whioh will be attached to the minute. , be .dopted . SeooJ'lied by Mr. Mitohell. Motion oarried. 3) ACC EP1'AIiCE CF APPLICATHIiS FOR IlEllBERW I P . ".olutton #2 . 111'. IIitoholl mOTed that Artlole 2, seoBon I or tb8 By-I .... be amended by the ..dditlm ot the tollow_ tn, pron,lonl "The Beard at Direotor. ay , ..t tbt1r diloretion, authorhe tl:. Preaidmt to delip.ate an indiT1dual or oollD1ttee who ahall b. empowered to "ppro,.. or rej.at new appliDatlOl1a tar lleDiberahip". Seaonded by R'. )(otion carried. President St;elwart d.a1c;nated that 1Ir . Cantwell be .uthori&ed to a p prOTe the member.hip ..pp lioation. aa t h-,y are reoei,..d at his attioe. Ba... 4) IIA IL DIG PEIIIII T. Mr . Sorpt& lI.otiomd that the ... oot.tioa plroh.... tlw tV'.t permit. aeoODd.d the aoti.oa and it wa • • 0 ordered. lIr. rer~ 5) ADDRSS80GRAPH EQU I PII8II f. 110..4 by 111'. II1toholl ••• oond.4 by Kr-. Hendryx that Mr. CantWlill b. authorIsea to proc ••d with haTiDg addrenograph p late. _d. tor the 'ftriOl.lll -il1J:&& lilt. and hire thelD. run until .uah a ti_ •• he oould pur aha •• a ,.oond hand addr•• aograph maOhlDe at a aoat not to .xceed $25.00 to tl:. A.aooi.tion. Mati. OIl oarried. 6) STAl'IQlERY. Mr. liandryx .Oftd. that Mr. CantweU- •• uwat1on regardin« atatlon.ry and other Moeaaary printing and auppl1ea b. authorised. Seoonded by 1Ir. '.rgu.. lAotl on oarr led. 7) DIRECTORY OF TRAVEL ACJIIJICIES. It .... _0T0d by 111' . _ryz am •• oondod by Mr. F.rp. tl"&t Jtr. Cantwell btl authorised to purohaa. an up-to-date 11.t at tra,.l ateno1•• to ao.t $10. 00. Mot ion aarried. REPOR'I' C'N PUBLICITY COYMlHEE held onr fio a Septa.ber 24, 1955 meeting at Fla gataff . a r.ad by lII. B. Cantwell, Cha.1ran. (Copy attaohed and _d• • part hereor) . The report . . a aoo.pwd aa read and all reoo_Dded itema we re tabled pending oompletion ot orr.nhat1on at Stat. and looal 1.,.1 , exc. pt the attar ot _kin, reoordln,a ot 'fr••• ur. TraU" aJ'li "BeyClld the Borti.r" . In tka aa .. at tha reaordiJl& or the otticial song , Mr. Ber n i. W ill1ama waa oalled upon to 4iaau •• the ~loua pha ... i nTOlTed. Mr . W illi. . . . u,gpated that ..... tually two recorda be _4e , an. in Englhh on both .1d•• and 1h. other in Spln1ah on both aidea, with the En, l1ah ,",ralon being reaorded tirat. Sa atated that , "su.lo tod~ 11 a toregon. conolu.ion __ there i. no .pecula tion". 'I'M Initial co.t tor 3,000 reaorda would rtm. around. $100.00, with the reoord. aoating 0I11y $ .22 e.ah . Tha •• in turn w00.1d be ao l d to Juke Bax operator a tor $ .15 per r e acrd and wcu 1d be the fir.t _rket approaohed tor the ole ot the reaord., W illiau atated . To further . h OW' tkat there wwld be no apeoulation involnd lfr . W 1l1bJU point.d out tor .xampl. , that it no reoord ..... r. aold to Juke Box operatora, the r.card. · Gould be ••nt to the diao jock ey. in radio tiona all onr the oountry. E'ftrytialO t he r.cord 1& played on • • tation , BKI, whiah ooatrola the radio publlo p.rtormano. pay. 4i royalty. It it gae. onr the Iillt\al network, re gardl. . . at where it • .rr.anate. trom , it wou ld b. 1100 x 4; that 11 pald by BKI, ao that e'Yell it no r.aorda ... re aold, public pertor-.nc. ro,yaItl.a would exo.. d the ooat ot the reoord, depending upon how man, time. it . .a play.d. .ta- - 3- �Mr. 1filli..rna .aid that " I Get If¥ l ick. on 6£" increa.ed traffio about 67'" on H1g_y &&. It .... J.!r . W 1111.._ ' proposal t1».t the publio perta- c anoe royalties and .n proceed s derhed. t rom the .ale of the records is to &0 to t h e ••• oolat1m. ... . " illl..me a.k. ter no olDpe:n• .,ti on but ,ta.+.ed that Mr. Ba .. felt he . h ould lw.Te .OIM royalty b.ole on bb aon, . Mr. W 1111a. ,aid "that ~ woul d l et t he talent ..nd ,et it em the r ecord at the expense or the a .. celation . at d:1atribut ion of the record would be. Mr. W illiama re plied that M walld distribute them at no oo.t. & omtinued that in thb oountry you lIlUIt haw a liceue trom Petrillo b.tore .. recor ding oan be ade. To tet ....y trOll. thll t Ni reoord will be reoordad in .xioo, duty w111 b. pa.id on the maater and it _ 111 be brou&ht over to t ld.. country tor pr . . . in, . He ,.,ld he would haw to ter • ., oomp-ny wh lo h he wl11 call "The lAtinaar Raoord Ii'r. Mitchell ..k e d . a t t he oo.t Company" • The oo.t on lI8k in& the oomplete Stanish reoord would be thl . ame a. t or aaktn,; tha c omp let. Enc l1ah reoord, but attar the original 3 , 000 reoorda, the coat would be .bout 18; per reoord . Mr. Ball • • lat d if the .a,oolat1011 had 3 , 000 recorda _de in Fngl1.h , how lon, would. i t be betcre the y oould be aold and the or 1t;: 1nal inTO. tl!llD.t and prof ita r e turned to the uaooiatlon. Mr. 11'1111&_ replied" About ttl-ee WNk.". Pre.iden:t Stewart • •• d for opiniona on t h is and it .... the general that ... ~ e ..nted by 1Ir • • Ul1&_, there cOJ.1d b. nothing to lo.e • CDDCeDBU. ..... "'iUau .aid tt.t he dt1n . t want Illy of the CIIOney in .d'ftlnoe to be r;in the 'ftClture im:Ded_ a tely , bt jut ..mted the ' CI. ' trom the Board of Direotcr. to , 0 i a head . 1Ir. Hertdr)"X inquired a. t o how lClllg it would Uk e to ,et t ho wb ob t hin, r e.dy and the reoord. up for ••1e to 1Ihich 1Ir . W Ulams replied "about 30 day''' , • Hendryx . aid that it t he a •• ooiatton i . loin, to undertalot t h la w nture , it moul d enter into. oontract wit h Mr . W 11l1&_ oo",eriD, .n t he d1ftaren t ph•••• d the operation and adftDce lIlanoy . , bt needs it . 1Ir. 1fiUiama .tated t ... t the a .. coiati em. "didn. t need a contraot", a ll t h.t f t . needed ..... an •• ,ilQl_nt froa Mr. W lll1au that a ll profit. 10 to the 89 ' er . . Mr . J!1t ohel1 .aid the '11001.. _ tion needed a performance coutraot to oo••r the Board of Direotor • • Pnddent Stewart telt t .. t a. motion .... s in order to handle thl. eme ..y or amther . M otion • • made by )Ir. "ertua ttw.t t.he Pr•• ident and the Seoretary be .ut h arhed to exeoute a ocm.traot between the ••• 00iAtion and Bernie W illia .. prOTid ing for the re.ord1:a.c; ot "Trea.ure tr.n" and "Beyond the Border " on the fol lowing ba.i., The origina l 3,000 reoord. to be made , di.tributed and aold by Mr . Willla~ .t a total oo.t not to exo.. d $100. 00. All prooeed. reeultin g trom the .ala and public partorDmloe royal tie. to ba cc_ the property of the ... oclation. CI'l all r eco rd. produced in e:xoe .. ot the tirst 3,000, the ... ooia_ tion to pay Bernie W lll1au 2S~ ot t h e net prct"it derl.,..d t rom. the .al e SAd public perforlllUloe royal tie., i t any . Se conded. by Mr. Sorptz . Wotion carried . 1Ir . Cantwell reque.ted aut horisation to .. oure new 1I.8II'ber.hip pla quca •• tlw present supply will be exhau.ted. in t ho near f u1ur e , and produoed a do.ipt be had worked up f or .pprO'ftl of the Board. President Stewar t authoriJed the Exeouti~ Seoretary to ba~ the ~1nl.he d .rtwork made up an the de.ien tor the - .- �mellibersbi p pl aque. the design having been appro'Qd by t he Beard. Mr. Ba .. mond ttat it be ptlrmanent policy of the uaooiation that Chamber of COIlUllerce Oftices neei... honorary mtmber.hip • • ach yeu. Second.d by Mr. Kitche ll . M otion oarr.!ed. Mr. Cantwell n.1 autlxlrh,e d by t he 130ard to give honorary member .h l pa to ,",rioue madlu of pubUcity • • lw .a... tit. Or&Aniaat icm of penranent Exe out ive Committee in each State ..... di80UII Bed . It was de oided t hat the Direot or of each State GhOllld a p point the Chair man of the sub_o ommittees , J. •• IhDber.hi p . Le~. la t i 'ft , H1&:hway . Advertil i ng, Pol icy and Grio'V8noe . The.e .ub-committee ohai r:mn in turn would a ppoint two member. each to hel p them oarry out the dutie. of their re' peotlve oolMlitte... Mr. Mitohell moved the a ss ooia.t1 on a.dopt thll a. p r op o.ed on the State let up. Seoonded by Mr. Sor gat.. llotion oarried. Looa l 89 ' e r s Cluos the Board ot Di re otor . d18 oUl'ed the or ganiu,tion ot local club . a. fo llows I 1) Local 8? ' or. club . ahall be go'Wrned by the X.ticnal By La..I . 2} They wi ll b. permitted to carry aD. furd ra.iling a ctivitie • • 3) Appli cation will be mde to t ru. E~outiT8 Secretary and the necenary luppl ies nil be Bc t to the par ty r eq.l. s ting tat fcr-.t1on of t he club . 4) There muat be a total of 25 fully paid up member . for eaoh club b etore a Charter _ 111 be i uusd , inol ud,lns: b oth old and nfi_ mamber • • 5 ) Tbt perscn or per.ons mak ing appli cati on tor a Charter must del1g:nate on the a.pp l ioation the d.finite geographic al boundar!.s to be covered by their par_ tiou lar club . 6) Each loca l club mu.t ~T8 a dul y a l e ct.d Preald.nt , 1 or more Vice Prsaldenta , Secr etary and 'rre•• \rer , and Directorl (Optional to the looal olub) . 1 ) The local 01 ubi will b. g overned by t he 8 &n'8 oorp crate limitat ions Nati ona l As.ooi.tion . 8a 8) Eaoh l ooa l olub wi l l be require d t o u,se the nama "The 8 9'ers Cl ub ot fi ll ing in the na_ or thdr City or COtmty . 9) Col l ection and turn ing in of Membership d ues. the •• • •• Aa .ach member.bip fee 1, col l eoted it abo uld be forwarded along with t h e member " app lica tion to the Seoretary who , at hi, d1eoretion , will a ffix the applicant's na me t o t bt member.hlp roster a nd _ 111 t h en forward both the due. and t h e a pplication to t he Corpor a tion Seoretary_Treasurer. When t he required 25 msmbersbl ps are r eoe iTed and a Clarter ie issued , the treasurer w111 dra.. a obeck in the am ount of $5. 00 tor eacb new me~r.hip and return it t o the loo al cl ub a s their oo~ mi,.ion . EX8 CU t i .... Discuesion wa. hel d re,arding Ways and mnn. ot securing new members with Mr . Hen dryx 8 u~g.stin g t hat awry medler get e. mmberl t hat tni, shoul d be • proj e ct carried on twice a year . Further that . ach Direotor s hal l deem it his ,.e,Sponai_ b1l1ty t o bring the 89 ' e ra Association be tore the public eye . - 5- �• the prope r a ppro aoh to mmnbership ettort in Canada and Mexico waa aho d1aoUII • • d . tt.t the orde red at 8100 p. m. Mr . Sorptl mand ._tin, b. adjourned , •• eoDied by Mr. Ba •• and ao litl ena W Dover . Re oordint Seoretary .... dt _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ A p~O' Date. _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ ••• ••• •••• - 6 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3271 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2523 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/787">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/787</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 4172086233 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers board of directors meeting minutes, October 24, 1955 Description An account of the resource 89'ers board of directors meeting minutes, October 24, 1955 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Dover, Helena W. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Accounts Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/24/55 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 3 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd3 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/0746706bd695ce1dd044373d75b5445a.pdf 0d11dbad9ec78f6c11949d7f6d774ba9 PDF Text Text giyH- . . . OF THE PERFECT HOST This colorful WELCOME sign displayed in hundreds of business establishments from Edmonton, Alberta to Mexico City greets travelers along this famous Three-Nation BOULEVARD OF NATIONAL PARKS. It is the proud emblem of membership in a rapidly growing International Association founded in 1955 to foster friendship and good will between the three great Nations or North America and to encourage more of you to visit and enjoy the amazing variety of recreational areas, National Parks and Monuments served by t his, the most beautiful Highway in all the World. Establishments displaying this emblem rep resent the substantia l civic leadership in each area listed. The man behind the sign is proud of his community and of his own personal standing and reputation. It is truly "The Sign of the Perfect Hos!." 140 WEST SECOND SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY UTAH �MONTANA BABB, Monl. 12 ... lIe .cenle d.lve .Ion g L a k. Sherburne to Many GI.· cier, Hote' Auort Thorn ... n·, Gener.1 SIO.e CO NNEC TING CANADA AND ( B ) 5 . ROMANTIC OLD MEX ICO NOT a co mple le lis t of . U cilies Your Nor l h 10 Soulh GUIDE Ihru Ihe fa bulous gra nde ur of the on US 89. A Roster of Assoc:iatioD. live s ta te "Eighty-Niner !lest." Me mbers as of July 1. 1957. 89 S T. CHARLES. Ida. • !'I orth end of Bear L.k. M onlOn Clle BROWNING, Mon t. Jct. us 2-Glle w .y to GI.eler MARYSVALE. Utah M lry,val, Motel "8" Mote l N", l ion.1 Plrk. M ultu ... 01 the PI.in. Ind l. n, Ch .... ber 01 Co ...... e.c. Wlllern Motel Sherbu.ne Mercantll. Co . Fir" N .tion a l B.nk Scrive. Ta"lde.my .A.t Studio GI.cier Aeporter CAMERON. Ads. Jet. State At . 64 t o t h. louth R im 0 1 t he Gr",n d Ca n yo n vii t he Ea.t Drive. E.c,lI.nl el •• vate d vl.w 0 1 P aI n te d D ....t . Cameron Tr.dlng P oat • GRAY MOUNTAIN. Aris. J ult .outh o f St", t e At . 64 J unct ion. 51 ... lIea I rom the G r. n d C.n)'on . N ew GrlY Mount.ln Motel a n d Tradlno Pall TOWNSEND. Ariz. F ore.t Aecrea t ion Area C .... p T O... nMnd R uort and Service S t .Uo n • • DUPUYER. Mo nt. F LAGSTAFF. Aria. us H i n d us It Alt . Fab· Sulli v an Mer.t.ntlle Co . Chadwick &. Son Se.vl . . G.r.ge " nd Cl l e Jel u lou . F II g ,ta ll i. t h t m e tro· po lita n c enter 0 1 the "'1" No •• t h er n Arl z o n . . .e n lc. ,por ti ng , an d reern t lo n . ' ... a. Air con di t io n ed by N at ur • • t h . F la g . l tall a r ea il I.vore d by coo l , u ... m e n. a nd mild wl nt e ... w hic h per ... lt com l or t .ble . n d .afe y car '. o und .cen, 10 th t m any near b y loCe n lc a lt rac· li o n l. t h e G r an d Ca n yo n •• n d n umero u . n .tlona l monume n ts. C h am ber 01 Co ...... "'" W eltern H ili M ot el "SS" Motel H I. L.and Motel Kno" Mo t or Co u.1 Arizo n ian M otor I..od g e L Motel T w in P eak, M ot el B ra n ding Iron Mote! I.. a n e Mo te l &. Te"aco B urt·, Skylight T r .il" Pa.k Sh.dy N ook Court C o ... merclal H otel W e.ther l o.d H o te l Wette.ne. Hotel M onte Vi, l . Hotel • GREAT FALLS, Monl. Jcl . us 17·"-Monuna·, Ilr O' H ome 01 l imOI'I n t cltl" N or th M ontana F . lr .nd R o · deo: "Old Tow n " e"hibl l io n It lalrgroundl: An ~ con d l co p per planl: orlol n .1 , t ud io .nd gal lery 0 1 lamo .. . co w boy ar l lll , Ch ar le .. M. "' .... ell; Ol.nt Spri n g. o f t he M lnou r l A lver. Chamber o f Com ... erce Ferou, Motel Shuta N Oltl SunJe t Mottl Tribune· Lnde~ • NEIHART. Monl. 7.3'~ n . 51' ...... 11 of beau EI . t if .. , K inll ', H ill Pan Neihart General Store • WHI TE S ULPHUR SPRINGS. Mo nt. ~:oP:t~';k··~e B;.nding Pop .. lar ...... mer "'lOrt ; c .... · tive minerai health . oring, ; .acellent hunting .nd fI.hing . R OUry Club Berg Chev~olet. Inc . R e ~(I M ot or , Wa',h', Te".co Servi ce Sker~ill &. Aader 011 Co . S ... ith Lumber and Hdwe . Co. Compton C.bl n , Tr .. ck Stop Cale Ed ... ard. O.oce.y Firat N ational B , nk Gamb l ~ Store R.y·, F eed 4. G.al n Meagh e . Co .. nty N ew, ' r .... ~ining AOO'" Sport'''' e n', S i nk H oult J oe Welch Super Unio n "7'" Serv ice Ed . Babbitt Mota. Co. Morrow Moto,.. Deck'" U n ion Service F lag.I,1f Auto Supply Ari zo n a Surply Co. H u t chl .. n Moto .. Boice, B a k er Fire.tone StD •• O . B M otor_ C h eahire M ot otl Wrbber 8 .oa. "luff' , P.ck.ge S t ore Bab b i!! B . OI. Oeot . Store J . C . Pennel' Co, Vln S ick lp oS. S h oc k Fron.ke S t Udio W igwam CUr:OI T he Indian Shan 5 .... Aoebuek Co, V"lIev N.tlo n .1 B.nk Brandin' I.on W nlern Store Har~~r F u~nltu.e Co . F"od l own Market "' 1"n_taU R ~ . lIy B~nk 01 Ar' zo .. ~ "~;zonl D~lIy Sun Coconino Sun - WILSALL. Mont. Pau l', Store LI VI NGS TON, Mo nl. Jct . us 10--0 n the "Great Bend " a t t h e Vello w "one R lv, er AI Ihe he.d 0 ' p •• adlse Valley. Ve . .. ·.ound reaort: hun t lna. lilhl n g .eertUlon .nd Dude Ranch area ; ,cenlc and I ho.te. t Vellowllon. to GI. · cier route. Ch.mber 01 Commerce 1.land R uor l Motel Parkway Mo tel Del Mar Motet Reeder Courl AainbO ... Motel 5 Ba r ' S M otel &. Tralter Cou.t M.rl in ·.. tnc. RUlau • .!nl T .. il Aite .ln C"e Bla '" MOlor Co. Gatewar MotOr Co . Living. on Oil Co, l..ivinOston O~ .. g Store Card inal Dlltribu l intl Co. M c Laughlin Con.t. Co . John J . Wigglnl. Oi.I . F.rk COUnl7 New. Liv lng.ton Enterpri.e I".om FI.g f tall . US It and US 56 run loaether d\Oe W .. , thru William.. o"ew,,~ to th. Grand Canyon. At A'h fork US ~9 turn, !Iou'" to PrClcolI . AI ternate US 89 mlk. ~ '" South w~~1 too" out 0 1 FI.o." " v,. Oak Creek Canyon Joining reg "I,,· US It .o.in at O."n,,, Dell. jutl North of P ,"cott. WI LLIAMS , Ariz. • P RA Y, MonJ. Chico H OI S~r l ng , Lodge W an , G~n St or ~ &. Cablnl I D A H 0 • EMIGRANT, Mom. E m ig ""," S i or e • G ARD INER. Monl. Turn r igh l a l Ge n e" .. J unCl lon 10 folcw US 89 or. North e" lru.ee to Vallowste,,,e MONTPELIER. Ida . Par k ; V"R r 'round l ourlll and recrt.tio n al area: FI," ln\!, big game. o"e 0 ' America's Dr,.t . ut elk t>u n tln ll II round.. A, motlern ci l y in the Soulh ea,1 corner 01 Icen ' e Id aho 10 cated a t the Junclion 0 1 t h e hl. l or;c old Orego n T rail ( US Chamber 0 1 Commerce 30N) an d Amer ic a ' ! Bou tevard 01 Nulo"a, Park. ( US 88) SIO O ovrr Ilol nt lor .... !townt a"( nor l h'loulh travel. Center 01 Bear L. "k" ea ,in; W or ld', I"'QU I ", h olphate depo,itt . Chamber 01 Commerc~ V I• • Day M otel J e ... el! Motet 1Ch;el M ot e I Motel Three Sitter. Sw ' u Motel BurO t'yne C ", le 1 Je ... ell Colin Shop Fro ... Gardin ..•• M onl ., 'et n ;c Sliver Gr ill Cale US.9 continuu due .outh th.u E.rI', Cale the een l er 0 1 Y.llow"one .nd Bud', Bar Gr", nd Telon Na l iona' P"'r k , 10 A leh Th.", •• th' J",cklon Ha l, Cou n t.)', H anun Che v ,ole t Co. Gr.nd C.nyon of the Sn.ke Eddie', Lounge Aiv ... SUr V.lley, cull Ih.u Jenl,n', AG Market • •cenle COrne. 01 Id.ho .Iong Bu_co Produce Co. the .horn 01 Be",. I.. . k , and IGA Food Ce n ter on to S",II I.. .ke Cit), vi", Ihe Gr ime. Barber Shoo O• • ulilul L ooan C.nyon . MO<lern D rug Co. • AO),.I B . k ery MORAN, Wyo. ~:~~e ~a"':ce ':.teo;-'~c~~' C o. Jet. us 26·217 R ul E. t a l e E"ch a n ge F ia g o R.nch Te"aeo Pr oduc t . Ar t Sore n ,on', P hl ll lo, "66 " JACKSON. Wyo. Thie l .nd D',on B.D •. S t ore Mo n toeller L.undry an d A co lo rf u, W eatl.n town, Sou 0.1' Cl e . n er, thern g ate w ay t o t he lab u lou. Buroo),ne P h • • maey J.cklO n H o le Coun lr y li n d T e· ton V ello w llo n e P .... k • . T ou ';'1 Ma llh e w ~ Mor tu ary • n d D u d e Allnc h center. yea r T he Allin ger Co • ' rou n d p rogr.m 0 1 IPor ll •• n . Sunrla.d a ll Co. tert ainment. hun t in o . , I, h lnll. Fr.,nk W SOrOall· S n o ... Ki n g MounUl n Ski Li ft. The N e ..... E"" ... iner ni Oht cl .. b" Ch .... ber ot Co ... merce P ARIS , Ida. The F I. me Mote l B ear L ike C ounty Sea t .nd Rich mond HO l e l M otel area , h op p in g c en t e r . Buu t; Warm Sorin g , R a nch lUi M in neton k a Cav~ o p en to Ragen Point RelOr t tour ltt. . IponlO . ,hip P ari. An v il Motel I..ion. Club , A" , M otel Pari, Lion, Club Silver Spu. C . le M ark'n Chevron Service Old Wyo ... lnll Chuck Wagon ~nd Grocerin Log C.bln C lub Oertech Market and Fred', Super M.rket T o u.itt Su .. oliu Pau l H an.o n Co . Lowe Drug Co. Donald O. M.cLeod . M. D . P~ .r Lake County Abltt.cl Co Oeorge H ul .... i1h Aoenc)' Wanenburg Conll. Co . ""I.v ... an·" COO". Aun .. I"c . !'''e''herd Bro •. Merchandi" JacklOn H ole H .rdware J.cklOn HoI, Mota. C'a.lsen "6fi" Service Gr l ... mett Lumber and Hdwe . Th. Aoundup W W Elmo .... M. D. ''''ar Lake Coun l y Com ... ill io n The P ari, Pall Frank Ho ... er Te.lCO Serv ice Jim Brld l " Court Tow n C ... a n d Mot el Mo ,,"uln Vie ... Mo l el W il.o" Mo t el Gate w ay H ot e ' Yan k n Jim Trading Pelt C. II I... n Drug Co. P •• k', Fly Shop .L"," ,.,S",.,o"""'""'-'C'·'"'·'·"C.___ ,_,' W Y 0 M I NG -,:::::--;;,,::c,,:--,"'::-- ,,::;: • • I Gatew.)' 10 the Orand Canyon, JCI. St.te At . 64 to C.nyo .. VII ' age on the South R I .... Nulled a t the 1001 01 Bill WII . liam" Mounllin high In Ih, ,un k illed cool of Kllb.b N •• t lo n al Forni, Willi ..... il poo· " Iar al .n . 11 l,e . r tOurilt center be.,,,u,, 01 II COOl tum ... e. nigh I,. and ... lId win t er cl l ... ate. F i,hlnll. hu n tlnq. win ttt ,po r ll: H om. 0 1 th e fa ou. B ill W IIII , m, M ount.ln Me n . Ollte w ay to "Arl z cna H 1" .. way," trave led by nine millirn Wllliam,. G r,nd Canyo n Ch"mber 0 1 Com ... er~e belu l y Ice king t ourl." a n K alb a b MO"1 n u ll·y. T hun d erbi r d In n W ea l erner Motel N or r i, MOiel FREDONIA. Ariz. Th e CO ll ee P ot P lpI S"l n g, Nationa l Mo"u Lee'. Ca l e mIni Weat 01 l ow n . Old Smoky Bubeque Wulward Motel Vaughn'. I ndian S t ore B' k e r Service a n d Motel B.oo k aby', Conoco SU l ion ~!~'··OfC U;:r.'on. M lln Mo t or Co . "6fi" Auto Supp ly Shie ld ', , n lurance Agency General Petrol,u'" Co .. p. JACOB LAKE. Ar b . Spr OUII. Ael lz Co. H igh In tha plnea 0 1 the w ... t End Grocery ... illh l y Kaib.b F ornI . Only The William, !'lew, en t rance 10 Ihe N o.th A im o f the Grind Canyo n : H o ... e Of world', only whi l e_tailed Kal STATE RI. U (To So. Rim) bab Squirre l •• Aed L .ke L od ge Auort J.co b L.ke Inn R uort G.a n d Ca nyon Steak H ouse . _ ARIZONA I ... _______________ • • - Fro ... J acob L ak e . US It de_ Kend, the Kaibab P latea u cut t h r u t he V EAM ILL ION C L IFF S. M A ABLE C AN VO N. to I he u"'ou' N AV AJO BRIDGE, a 616 l oot a pa n aero .. Ih e C Olorado Aiver 417 lee l abo ve I he balli ng w ate ... H e re U.. h ig h way tu r n, So u t h • nd h e .d, to r F la g s taft acro .. the co lor f u ' PA INTED DES . ERT a n d N a v ajo I n dia n AU· ervUion . S everal d ue r ! lod g e, I nd l ra d lng 0011, ,,"er e " .. I· len t foo d a nd m o de rn aceo m · mo du lo n ,. an d w h ile n o , t r eel a dd .n, .. are a v ~i l ab le a e ro u the reltr v ltlon. e ac h r tlorl c" n b. rea dily loca t e d , nd Id en tl i led b y w ell DOlled .ign ,. • GRAND CANYON (S ouih Rim ) OP E N A LL Y E AA F re d H arvey H otel' O.and C a ny on I,.,n K o lb B rOl. S tu dio V cr ka ... p ·, Au t h entic I n dl.n H a nd lcra lt a nd So u venl .. • SEDONA (89AI M a gn ificen t "enle retort . . . . 0 1 bea u ll f \J 1 O.k Cree k C. n y on Ch . mber 0 1 Commerce Pu r !)'''' u n ', A d ve nlu re Mot.1 R . ln bo w ·, En d B ar.Ca f. , COTTONWOOD (89AI T .. adlno ce nte r of le fl ll , Y.rd. MARBLE CANYON V. ll ey. TU llo oo t .nd M on tuu · m. Catt le nllio n a l monum.ntl Art Greene" Cli ff Dweller '. L odge V ... de Villey Chlmber Ma r ble C.n y on L od ll e of Co ... merce Vermillio n Cli ff. A. n ch L odge COllon w ood P roO ..... lv . A .. n. The Gap Tradi ng P Oll Eden Cou r t R icha.d, Men', Shop Verde Indepe nden' RAIN B OW BA ID GE NAT ION A L MO N U MENT CLARKS DALE (89A) T hl, Uri n il ' phenomenon m.y be r.ach ed by a hlgh' y ICe n le Clark,dale L .undry drive ac. o .. t he co lo.ful P ai n l. Se ln a Suplr M arket e d O ... r t v ia Tub. Ci t y. Ari z . P ack t.i p. 10 t h e B ridoe ar . nn oed by writin g ARIZONA Coni. N,v'Jo M ountain T radin O Pall OVER T ona le., Arl l . • • �JEROME (B9A ) L.~rgut "ghost city" in Amer · ica--once a roarlnp mining camp. now a crumbling ci'ty of romantic ruin. c linging a mile hillh to the rugged terrain of Mlngu. Mtn. Jerome Mine Mu seum open dally, Jerome Historical Sociely • MESA, A riz. ~ ® In AMERICA PRESCOTT (US a9) Geographical center 01 Arl A R I Z 0 N A zona, county seat and metro . pO litan center 01 Yavapai (Con.linued) County, Prescott ginal capital 01 wa s the ori the stale. Scene of the l int rodeo. Pr es· WIC KENBURG, Ariz. cott i. known .. Ihe "Cowboy Capilal of the World," AUrae. Jct. US 60·70. "Dude Ranch tion, include nnrby mineral Capita l " in the Hassayampa spring resorts, SI>ar ' ot Hall River Valley; lamous pioneer Museum, Bucky O'Neill Manu gold mining camo nOw a popu ment. Smoki Mu s eum, mild lar winler resort, "Gold Rusl> year 'round climate, fishing Days" late in January. Dude and big game, Ranch Rodeo s, and nightly il Chamber of Commerce lustra ted lectures at tl>e new Apache Lodge La Siesta Patio Auditorium Sierra Court are highlights of each .eason. Aula Rest Motel TI>e RoundUP Club Lakeside Motel Brillol Motel Hauayamna Courl Motel Rancho Grande Ca.cade Motel We sterner Court Dan Dee Court La Siesta Motel Mile Hi Motel Restauranl Susan', H i. Acre Motel Ouert Cypress Trailer Ranch Ma nor Motel Crestview Motel Head Hote l Valle Vllta Motel Pine Cone Inn Sun Valley Motel Maxine's R~ s laura"t Circle JR Motel Ricl>lield Oil Co, Motel Mecca Am e rican Laund." BrUtons Bar.7 Rancho a nd Linen Supply Frontier Inn ROltrer.Btoom Dr ug Co, Kelly'. Ca l e Prescott Cigar Store Santa Fe Cafe Harriett S, Banister, R e a ltor Ted's Cale Cline Motor Co , Te~as Cafe ~ :i~~.::,~a ~~:li~Se~!~ ce Valley Nat io nal Bank The Food Ba. ket Petersen', Mens Wear Witaker Oit Co, Circle·S L. a undry Pauley &. Rodgen. Realto rs Ray'. Saddlery Valley Nalional Bank Ward CleanerS B an k of Arizona Ryan. Evan. Oruq Store., In c, Allen', M~rket Fo~worth.Galbraith L.br . Co, Harry Marshall. Rullor C. W Paige. Realty &. In., Union "76" 0; ' CBernard J, Poll rna", Real Prescott Even ing Courier Eltate and , nlurance Yavapai County Mene nge r Sea .. &. H ill Motor Co. • Many Feathers Trading Post . Dr. Jam .. O. Woodson YARNELL , A rIZ. MaISon Plumbing &. Heating Shrine 01 St. J~sepl> of the S Mountains, life.like sUlues 01 Rudy 's hell Service Mall ico at and Craig great beauty in a natu."t se t . Union "76" Producll ling 01 massive boulders, oak Shell Serv ice Station and holly PONray the pass io n Safeway SIOr n, Inc. and deatl> 0 1 Christ, Harry 0 , Cooke, Jr . Yarnell K iawani . Club Ari ' ona Public Service Co . Ranel> House Cafe TI> e Wickenburg Sun Betty'S Gold Nuggett • 1 _-::::::::::::::::::::::-:-::--:__ In C AN A D A CANAOAI Friendly Neighbor a nd Magni,icen t Playground 0 1 the Grtat Northwest, US 89 connecll with ALBERTA Rt, 2 at the border EAST 01 Montana'. Glacier N ational Park, l_FORT MACLEOO In lor. matlon Bure au Reoer. vatlon Headqu ar ters 2-MOUNT REVELSTOKE National Park l-GLACIER National Park 4--VOHO Nation ~ 1 Park 5--KOOTENAV Natl, Park 6--JASPER National Park 1-LAKE LOU ISE &-BANFF Nalion~ 1 Park 9--CROWSNEST PASS lD-WATERTON L.AKES Nalional Park II-ELK ISLANO Nail, Park 12-WOOD BU F FALO National Park 13-0AWSON CREEK Alaska Highway 14--RED DEER VALL.EV Badlandl 89'er • Auoclatlon Members EDMONTO N. Alberta Alberta Travel Bureau Legl alative Building North Star Aula Court 10126 King.way Avenue • CALGARY, Alberta Hepburn Motor Cour t , Ltd , 5809 Macleod Tra;I • CONG RESS JCT. Aru. Je t . State Rt, 91 Congresl Grocery an d Tavern T HI R D MARINETTE, Ariz. Max M. Clayton Clayton and Son. ANNUAL Winter rnort and tr ai ning quarte .. lor the CI> lc ago Cubs. Mel a w,," lounded by Mar· man settle .. in 1877, i. a fer· tile agriculture and fr"it "row. ing area. and i. the s,t e 01 a bea"tlful Mormon T emp le. Na t ural hal mineral springl east 01 Meaa allnct many healtl> leekeu. Chamber 01 Comme.ee Maricopa Inn Buckhorn MineraI Ball>. Motel and Hearth Resort The Mesa Tribune , TUCSON, Ariz. "TI>e Sun s hine City." Ari z . ana's oldest tOwn was once a walled village near severa ' old mi .. ions. Modern T uc.on in addition to being one 01 Ihe major economic centeTi 01 the Southwest, II lamou l lor many fine accommOdalion s . male Is. and guest ranches tl>at abound in tl>i . popular winter reaort. Side trip. into O:d Me xico, an hour' . drive away, add variety 10' Tucson'l w in ter gUUII, T ucson Chamber at Commerce South Tucson C, of C , EI Camino Mot e l Rio Molel Oracle Motel Downtown Motor Hotel Riviera Malar L.odge Sun Tan Motor Court Saddle and Sirloin George Hall'. Travel Me~ ico T ourists Ser~lce Bureau Aritona Daily Star Tucson Daily Citizen • - US 80 turn s eall at Tucson. US 89 continues louth. TUM AC A CORI. Ar iz. N a lional Monument L.oy '. Texaco Service • NO G ALES, Ariz. Port 01 entry InlO Old Me xico. The ' nternational Boundary consist. a t a chain link fence which spliu th e city into two nation_Nogales, Arizona and Noqalu. Sonora, Junction wilh MEXICO RT, 15, Me~ico's newly paved West Coast High. way , SOUlhern t er mlnu . of US 89, 1700 beautiful miles aoull> 01 Monlana's Glacie. National Park. CI>amb er a t Commerce Coronado Motet New U"town Motel Arroyo Mote' Arrowl>ead Motel Bowman H Olel Noga les Daily H erald Nogareo International CONVENTION B9'ers International Highway A8s'n., Inc. JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. OCT. 7 and 8, 1957 In MEXI C O FUN and FIESTA abound lou tl> of the Border along the e n lir e 1500 miles of MEX . ICO'S newly paved West Cout F ed era l RT 15 wl>ich connect. with US ag at NO. GALES, Arizona and Sonora. • 89'e. """Ioeiat ion Members NOGALES. So no ra F i." talte of Mexican hOlpi tality, COlorful c urio sl>ops. The Cavern Cafe American Trave l Bureau Mosaico. Mexicanos S de RL • GUAYMAS, Sonora Modern Mexican Port. sandy beaches, fi.herman', para. dise. Ho t el Playa de Cortez • ALAMOS, Son or a Inlrigu~ng .Ide trip 35 mil .. ea s t Irom NavoJoa . Casa de loa Tesoro. • MAZATLAN, S in a loa " Pearl o f the Pacific". 14 mllu ~IOw the Trop.c of Cancer Palm doUed beacl> e s, eKcellent . deep lea li.hing , Hote l Freem.n H Olel La Siuta • GUADALAJARA. Sinaloa Mexico'• • econd lar9est city, ideal year 'round climate. Californi a Courts �HIGHWAY TO GRANDEUR N alional Parks a nd Monumenll adjacent 10 US 89 ••• the mOil I cenie rout. in aU the World. MONTANA 1. Chas. M. Russell Museum 2. Big Hole Battlefield, N.M. 3. F ish in g, Big Game Area WYOMING 4. GrandCanyonSnake River S. Star Va lley, Fishing,Game IDAHO 6. Minnetonka Cave, Bear Lake Resort Area, World's Larges t Phosphate Deposits. UTAH 7. Sce n ic Logan Canyon 8. Timpanogos Cave N.M. 9. Manti Mormon Temple 10. Ca pitol Reef NaH. Mon. II . 13. 14. 15. C edar Breaks Nat!. Mon. Natural Bridges N .M. Ra inbow Bridge N.M. Monume nt Valley ARIZONA 12. IS. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 2•. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. P ipe Springs Natl. Mon. Nava jo Natl. Mon. Canyo n De Chelly N.M. Wupatki Natl. Mon. Sunset Crater Natl. Mon. P e trifie d Forest N.M. Walnut Canyon Nat!. Mon . Tuzigool Natl. Mon. Montezuma Nat!. Mon. Tonto Nail. Mon. Casa Grande NatL Mon. Sag uaro Nat!. Mon. Chirica hua NaIl. Mon. Tumacacori Nall. Mon. Organ Pipe Cactus N.M . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2764 Image Width Image Width in pixels 1274 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/792">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/792</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1265306893 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Welcome to the Scenic Route of Three Nations brochure Description An account of the resource Welcome to the Scenic Route of Three Nations brochure for businesses from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada to Mexico highlighting places to visit and towns along the route. Subject The topic of the resource Tourism United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Brochures Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Alberta (Canada) Arizona Canada Idaho Mexico Montana Utah United States Wyoming Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 2 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd2 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/fb7aee0f995a02b83f72c8cf4c06db71.pdf 805ee78f3831c96cbd6e49ec7666515b PDF Text Text , ��... tIZONA. OffICE , 1021 f.. COIII.I1:oo(k td . AOMINISTRATION OffiCE .40 WEST SECOND SOUTH Sf '''_"i.," · 7708 Dial Cit SALT LAKE CIT Y 1, UTAH DIAL El9. 9J22 A. i ~o .. o 89eu OffiCE O f omellS, .... V .... Iy STEW."" d,,,, W..II'"'' ",,,,,I Willi ...... A,It" .. S. O . MOIlOW Yln . , ••• lel."t "'or,o.. 104010" f l.",.If, ArllOIII .UHUT Io4ITCHUL v i... , ... Mllchl n Mol'! ,d,,,, lo,"". U•• h W 6 . .... SS SUfl'"'Y'T, "" ~,,, h SI• •,. 1040111 Wlck,,,bIO'9, A.I,o,," OIIiCTOU, GUllLUt.tQ SEDANO HoI,1 104 •• ( ... d. 1'.11 •• 1'.10,.1•• , O"orl , I<oI .. I<.. f.,! IU.HETT A. HENOIYX C.....,,,,, M" N ' ud Tow .. 'U'IUIICh, U,.h flANIC W. SO _lOAn ' 1.. , Sou '; ly a... ~ of 101,110 Id,1Io Mo"'~U .., DALLAS .... CLINGER "rl"~ idoll, Lod,. A pl." Wfoml" 9 IICHAID C. FERGUS Fit,., looI ot<o l &, .. , F.U•. 1-4".h,," IXiCUTlVI 5(CU'AU': ",,,UIH H. CA NTWEu.. 140 W Secoad South s..It llh CI.... U,.h SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERICAS � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 1331 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2913 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/796">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/796</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 4127675602 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. blank letterhead and envelopes Description An account of the resource 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. blank letterhead and envelopes. Subject The topic of the resource Tourism United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 3 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd3 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/0e3779ac2fffa29a2305955fd0d6cf9c.pdf cacfc2bf44510752c2a418d4e0b9257b PDF Text Text , o TOTAl. MI01J:\,T T ill S CHECK II" I.A~CF.: 03 MIOUST THIS ~IIECK BA I.ASCE �IlJ\ L . IIItO"T volfn TOTA l. MJOUNT T ill S c m~C K 105 > , --------------------------------1i , 00 TOTAL }\ ~ I O UNT TIll S GII ECK TOTAL A~IOUNT TIllS CIlECK nAL,\ ~CE ~ "'-;1- - CO ~'A . .D t>D �II,\L , IJHO' T t'OU' I) TOTAL A~IOUNT nus CIII::CK IlALASCE 108 , , --------------~1 , o ,,,,J~"'----_I, TOTAl. S-fJ:a.: ---------------,-,-~--,-- ··-'- S-C-- C-~--~ ,l~ \ 'O m ,- r lI~ II E- K IJA LASCE TOTA L M IOUNT TIll S CUECK HAI.ASCE �, --------------------------~ , : o I ,, ~, TOTAL I A~IOUNT q _- ~ 10 b . JMIO UNT TillS Cm :CK I '/) , -=I £" .. f' ! ~ TOTAL Till S CIIE CK :l..h.3 -V I 112 ~RDE" OF 195!L ~ ..o::u.~~-----j _~ : . ~v ~'OR j ,4 " 10 , : ------------------------~: ~ 1 T01i\ l. I ,\ HOUN T T ill S CIIECK l U; oC �'- , IIAt . HItO'T t"Ol(1) 113 ~ gf.~ MY I ~ :oJi)Enl~· 'j'1'I/// ,-P;;, , 41J ~ 195 . --;{};-. AIJ '7 'I , , • Jo'O~ 8tl144#MJ ~- tr ( ~ , , 0 0 - , TOT,\L I M IOUNT T ill S c m :CK J", "C IJALANC~: l.. t ;~:Ep,OF (q: 114 4"~ ; Fon • DJ. , U ), J , - I 195!:L -;Jj' , , , ~-, 'J , , 0 0 I A~IOUNT I 1'01'''1. 1/ 1,;- 1';'" TillS CHECK 8AI.,\N C.: ... 115 ~hMb< l~'~'W F a Po 'A ) 195;t- ~ Q• . Do A<' /1. .JJ uv v ,.;fllO At?-,C& R /'> v rJ J ~ ~ I TOli\L I Al'lOUN T T ill S c m ;CK BALANCE ( q ." I, �r 116 12-.. &:i ,' "i IJ.\L. II RO'T fQ I!'J) ..£. -4 ~ ~:tJ)E~'j)~ ~, AIiJ W 5..':L , • YOR ~~.: 1:, , ..-\ - - "_'1 " <i ! • , • 0 0 I TOTAL ?l..'J&. pY ANOUNT TillS CIIECK I1ALANCE • j~ 117 b Qltl)lm OF JL. ,9 -<J' <L o 195'1- ,:p- ) .fr/'_ .1 , -d~ i FO,[! , , • 0 , • 0 I T01,\L IM IOUNT Ti ll S CIIECK h ~ IIALMi CE "~ .,~#L, , ,..J i B _~ . ORUEn , 4t- ,' J f ;j . J~o : L L L195~ "~,JI - -Ii O"~-: • , • ~ .~'\'1~~Lio, 0 , • 0 I I ANO UNT TOTAL T ill S c m :CK BALANCE 0 .:3 ,.''1 I .!:L I �Jr' JUL . HRO"T . \ r 'l 'J .' V .•. J ,J C d , FOR ,t. U 1952- OIWE It OF d) {J. ~ • 0 ...... 'iCc:} ft--' I ~ / d ~ FOII' U 119 , • 0 1 T01,\L I MIOUNT TillS CIIECK IJ D - 0 UALASCE 0 1.- 120 ~~[J-J~ .Fon ) . ------ (/. (/ • 1-_., ' , • _ 0 0 ( I TOTAl. I MIOIJNT Till SCHECK '-'76 l.zg BALA;\:CE '1 121 17, . .M J{ d <:;:1---, ;;oRium 01' d . , n G J95 ~ _ ) , , , , • FOR ;? 0 0 1 I A~10U~'T TOTAL THI S CIU;CK IJAlASCt: I ,~' DD I �, ;;t',;;j i ,"p , ?) $ -.G.-" n .. -:p-, . . 122 ([ i:.:: 19?_ 1;L .A . ..., drr P -p. '[r ••. 1... tiEH . ) 9_1 17 V ~Oll ::'it:::!l.r , • , , , 0 """ r;, } IL\L . Il HO'T n)I!' 11 ..:r "" I 0 liLr ,,0 I TOTAl. I M IOUNT THI S CIl t:CK UK' ,, 0 [lAL\NCE "- rr . eli . ~ 123 •..)- :-'> I OIU)EIl Of' .W . .ff.19 5!:;Z... ~, . 7 2Ji!-~ Uf ..P ; '" v , t , 0 , , 0 ' ''J I I ANO UNT I --+> TOTAl. T ill S CUECIi 1 ",,' ,,~ IlALA!\'CE 124 , ' ,,;: :.s:J1 19 '<h 7> /d", %' ) O;EI(r: + ~i / ....' , t , ,"'OR li',1', .J J aJ.' J p, , , / 0 0 I I T OTAL MIO UNT T ill S CIIE CK BALAN CI-: in 1 7 1 �~ IlA I. . 'It BKO'T FQ ll'n 125 &- '7 195..:z- OlHn:n a t' J ~ , f -lnJl&':'!il44~~'- ~4t'il4 • v= roR . > • 0 , • 0 I T01,\ L I }\~IOUN'r T HI S CH ECK 3 11 1 ijAlA!<OCE ,',Lrf9 ./ ' 126 ,'/ .f.· . #; .~r ~ .j,- r: 2J' oJlOJm OF Jt ' .u.><' < 4 t<·d: ~~~ ,, FOR 0 , • 0 I TOTAL I A~IOIJNT T ill S CIU:CK I,/' ijALA NCE 127 • <,g t Lt. } / ' onmmOF ',,0 if'. :j ,.1:',. . 1?-+ 9 I'CL. ,± ' , 'II :2 "''' f ' {4 , .... , > , FOR (/ 0 , • 0 . I I A N OUN T TOTAl• TIll S c m :CK 8AL \ SCE I-U{ liD �IJAL. HKO'T 12 8 fUlfil •.., ' ~~~~~~~~~~=---~~ 'on r • o ---------------------------i', o TOTAl. M IOUNT TIll S c m :CK II,\LAXCt; ,I..C", " 129 TOTA L A:-IOUNT TillS CIIECK • >. 130 TOT,\I. M IOU!'lT T ill S e m :CK KA1.AXC !:: Sf) , �tl.\t . HItQ'T FQ lfI) I TOTAL I M IOUNT 'l'III S c m :CIi IIA1.A!o:CE ,. ItA 132 CJ-: -.,,'. ell' " I - , , ,< 195-Z-, ' OlluEH 0.- J. 7'/_ ) , j r- , J t. . f.,c,,1 • 'OH J f. ~ • > f • , , 0 0 ,- I I MIOUNT TillS TOTAL c m :CIi IJA1.A!o:CE I I A!'IOUNT T ill S TOTA L c m :cli IJAI.A);,CE �II. \ L. " !l O'T FO R' I) , FOR __________________________ • ~1 , o TOTAl. A~IOUNT TI ll S CII ':<.;1i llAL \NCE T OTAl. I\ NO U:-O'T 'rlil S CII':CIi II ALANCE ----------------,F O .--L -----------~ : ~"R c -'C2A4~a/4Ina~N~~~~~~L ~a~,~/~_____)1 , o TOTAL , M IOUXT T ill S CIiECIi IIALANCE �111 . \t HRO'T FOWIl TOTAL MIOUNT TillS c m : Cn a 13 8 LA~ ________ -.~ ____________ ~' > , A:>IOUNT TillS ClIl::: Cn BAI.AXCE 139 TOTAL MIOUNT TillS CII ECK �11.\1 •. HIIO·T fOlf ll , , o ! l/\~10UNT T 01;\I. T HIS CHE CK j _COl ~ ! TOTAL ! MIOUNT TillS Cm ;CK IA~lOml/T ! TOTAL T ill S CIIEt;K 8ALANCE J fJf 0" �""'·1 Il HO'T 143 ~'OIfl) TOTA L Al'lOUNT T HIS CIIECK U"I.Axe..: r 14;~Wct,~~",~~ FOR ~ ...l..£ • ------------------------------~ o ! TO,);\ L A~IO m.' T T ill S CIIECK .0 BALANCE TOTAL Al'lO UNT T ill S c m ;CK , 0 �~ L146 -C' ~' IL-\L. IJHO·T fOJfI) :)JJI ~i r~;: t:J() J Y. "") c Sk;;-~ ~ , > - ;~ -C .l 19~"; t~ • 0 , • 0 <.. I A~IOUNT I TOl i\L ?)" ~ TillS CII ECK • UALASCe ,;, 147 'rfr ""_ "--- onlHm OF f!: -[(~ "-40:; ~-t-. J 195. L 1? , > , 0 , • 0 I TOTAL I M10 tJN T H il S CIlt:CK - g< ;" ~ ... UALA'SCE ~ ;::) 14 8 ':2 onn En OF " /.:) 195_L A1 .J ;x:r~~/l' jf: , > , , • 0 0 I MlOU~T I TOTAL Hil S CIlt;CK BALA'SCE a 00<' I �~~"" (f3.. ;1"/ ;; IMI •. HII:O"T FOIl" 1J 149 ~"EI:;~ ... 195 £ ../ / 13- > -),0" 1 • , , , , .! A~IOUNT T OnI. ~ Till S c m ;CR BALA!\C.: 150 fueL £ ~ f(>,b ' rmRO~ -< n. 1951C ~ rfo-{(/-'~Fu. .~ ~ '.h' :.-, , , , '.J > , I I M IOUN T T OTAL T illS CHECK fA!) I '"" / '7. +-3- j:. IIAw\ XC t; . .§Zd<-- ';Z (-0,.., 151 J!J5. L OI IOEIl 0p ) /13~ Ai L liJ J ..... ./I.-~ .Aj7'~J/14 , > • , , , , I TOTAL A NOUNT THIS c m ;CK HALt\l\Ct; �IL\I. . ---' V ~'" lJI«tT b 152 OIW!-: 1 t"OI(1) o{fif- - W5 TOTAL ANOUNT TillS e ll EeK IJAL\ XCt: k ~ " '-f'j . 153 /1/Oll IHo:J(OF-- I!)~ "1---1 r -~ &-~Ji-(j-~'f------t " --------~"'--~~---{~ . ·OM .. _____________ • ~ 1 , o TOTAL ,\~ IOUNT Ti ll S CHE CK BAi.AS"CE ___________________________ TOTAl. ANOUNT TillS c m ;GK 1 • ~ 1 BALASCE , o � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2735 Image Width Image Width in pixels 1404 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/815">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/815</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 2308497229 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Highway 89 International Promotional Account book Description An account of the resource Highway 89 International Promotional Account book from March 1957 to February 1959. Subject The topic of the resource Accounts Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 17 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd17 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/80508d65cbe546beb2c5aeaded3440c9.pdf 83828aef7c33c641ae42506c8d442ec5 PDF Text Text - - -- - - ... - -- - - OFFI C I.\L \!1llU 'f SS '" ..... - Poard of Directors. 89 'er. Int<J1"llatiooal ll.1&mlOY Aoooeiation, 100. Special l...ction by llail .Ballot M Jrovid...l for in AR'ITCLE IV, SmTIOl1 10 of the COl'jJ07'ation b; ...lan, " mall bal.l<r. "no circulated t.o aU Diroc~.or. thoo in offic. on Fcbru..=,y 16, 19: . H nll the vaeal"'Y ". D:1r""tor iro" t.he Republic of 11_ no provided for in ARTICLE IV. SECTIO/I 3 of the CorpcTration Signed billet. wora returnOO. by eight Directo"" voting "'lE3". Oppooed, NOlIE. 'l'he elccticm of Sr. Freer.an was therofore confirmed by a unarrhoot1B TOte. Ballots attached hereto and recorded in the lU.nute Book or the ArrEST: ~~WtoLiMk&!IlARTIN H. CAli'l'l1ELL Rxacuti"" Socret.a:r,r l/areh 7. 1957 �- -- ~.; r of I .0 • t ',1(' IS 1 '57 I r: r 1 r _!Ldont :_U!'::l tt 6.ni ;'~ocat. • l, e T.'le , etil\fl 1",'15 ca 1 it. '!hE"U, E~corxl {\ b J1U 1.. Bead U(!etine he. h .d st ldied cOl i98 of t ti c;;:r1"i ~ art, Viae 'r r11 B•. : rtin, r. ry lla:--tin H. ear:t to or er .. tQ au t. 9:4'5' l' n .... 1 "'. 13, 1956, in v ru.t~3, ond thnt s to '5 t <Il' 1, 1 "'Y ~C" 1. 'Irs x: d r: t:)f the .ru:u(" I of t;lw , cf ... e flct cl.1 lirOOtol'8 lti.r:u. f S r: 11 ..roved a.s ~T:-it.ten 01 ti )1.r J.., , rn u1 L 13 ... 1" I & neT 12, , 956 am 22, "';8 FI rc an:! ~ by I resi '.IeI. ICIORT "S OF J urs ~ t r til 1 U;U~ P Jd fre 10 ~or.s: Octoo, • I 22, 1957 BalancE' on hand 3.D of ',cit In Kan.:.b J Octo 12, ::'~56 Ler.lJerships roceived ,,0 dat e tram lr Cant;y,ell r:oney turnod in by:r :.cbimon follov.illti Kanab $ 794,64 1 ,305.00 105,77 Com-c'"1tion EXPUIDITURfS $ 300.00 llro Cant\'tSll, Profe-saional fees II II Uernbership tess II II Potty Cash 77.00 Travel. Expenses Directors' Expena€3 Conoiseions Club Ref'ur¥ls Uiscellaneous (Includes Convention expe1l3es such as steno. serv., printing, badges, ribbons, etc.) II II Ddollce on hand a. 266 c 45 l24.30 315.36 35.00 205,00 o of 1/22/57 771,14 Respectfully submitted, ":Silliam G. B-"lSS" Treas o \ 13tter Tihich .:cco~?nniad the report st."'Ited that there are liabilities of ~, 13 0 in rcfunis du v,').rious Clubs, am o.lE;o that s Uaxican checJ<: in the :l.o'"'JOWlt of :')30 Wa.D beinu held for collection, and .;as thsrefore not included in the balanco <hOlm, acretal"'Y Cantwell reported current collections on hand, not included in he tre.-:lsurer l renon. of $420.00 out. of which refu.ros totali.J1.n fJ140 were due Local Clubu, mltine a net gain o· ~280000 in total oash on hanjo ltoved by ltl.tcheli, seconded by l'art.1n, th'\t the report be e.cc6):.tod as l'lI'itten" l:otion c·arried $acretary Canhell re d a letter dr:.t~ October 23, ] S 6 frot). D:"rec:,;..or eloct E.. A. Porter of Ilert:.osillo rexico in vlhich tir. Porter st·ted t..~",t he ~ be ur.able to (lCC3pt the office a:J Dir,,:,ctor for lJaxico due to the press of personal business 0 The f.'Iati:.er was roforr~d fot" nctiou under new business o Dit"ector Hendryx a..,de u brief report. on the lJlal1S for the proposed oeetlng in l:!szatlilIlJ inaloa" which indicated catisfnctoT,l prOg1"€S8 .1 �• .' : Secretary Cantwell r ead l ett ers r eceived from variOUB Radio Stations in Texas where r ecords of uTroo.sure Trail u had been l eft on consignment by Bernie il·i11iruns. A ction on th e correspondence was tabled pending recommendations of t he ProlOOt1on Comnittee . Director Ucndryj:: made a r eport on the mat t er of locating a reliabl e s ign painter whos e s ervices could b e recorrmended to t he membership as rf3Clue ~ted at the Kanab Convmtion . Hendryx r oported. hi ghly s atisf actor y bus i ness relations a.rrl experience "nth }.'ir .. JU ex. Gran, a former SaJ.t Lake City sien painter currently l'lorldng in the Panguitch ar ea . It 7/M moved by Hartin, s econded by ilendryx, t hat the Executive Sec ret<:!.ry bo inst ructed to obtain a cr c-dit report and i west i gate r eferences submitted by 1h-. Grcn for the purpose of cOl1q)Uing an intormn.tion r eport to be available t o int erested members . llotion ca.rried .. Receas for l unch at 12: 00 Noon. Afternoon session called t o or der a t 1: 00 P.. 1O:. The min order of busi ness on the after noon aecndll wa s t he report of the Brochure and EO"'J"ic Comnittees appoint ed in A pril, 1956, and a s si gned to w k out or 1 detail s and cost involved for the pr oduct ion of a :. ...c:..:..: ~ :r f)ri.de-t ype brochure in colors and <l. co101" 00 Hovi e depict ing t he r.n j or at t r actions of the entire internati onal hi ghway sys t em, and to rubmit r cconmcndations on these pr anoti onal projects £01" consi derat ion and act i on by t h o Boar d. Vi ce Pre~ ident ltitchell, Chnirman of the Brochure Cormnitt ee , r eported t he f indings and r ecomncmations of thi s conmittes. In vi O"# of t he importnnc e of these r ecommen::lations , and the & of money i nvolved, V um ice Presi dent lli.tcheU t 6 report is s pread upon these minutes in .full as f ollo\']s: REPORT QE !.!!l! BROCHURE COllMITTEE "Thia conunittee VIas originally appointed by President Stewart at the Board Yeeting held in Salt Lake City in A prU of 1956. If v;e are about to ' lay nn egg, t to borrow an expression from show bus mess , we have a t least had plenty of time to get the job done right . liThe full coI!llTlittee includos m;ysel.f as Chairman, Idaho Director Frank Sorgat z, Utah Director BUrnett Uend.ryx , and our combination executive secret ary and publicity director , lAart in Canty/ell . Other tiIoo consuming assignments invol vi ng considerabl e r esponsi bility , such as t he 89'er M Wie, and the proposed confer enc e at l!aza tlan, in addi t i on to t he travel distance from Pnngu j.tch, have rnede it impractical for Burnet t t o tleet with u s" ':iith h is lmOill1edge and consent, we havs, ther efor e, been handi capp ed by 11 not i c eabl e miss i n our motor, but have pl ugged along the best i~~ could on "three cylinders. Unfortunutely, Dir ector Sor gatz c ould not avoi d a trip t o t he V-K3st coas t pri or to t he final c omplet i on of thi s r eport . The baai c plan and format cf the project , however, was discussed 'with him on several occasions J a..rlli it Can be l"epor t ed that his thi.nking i s in a ccord 'wi t h the reconmenda t iona to f ollot'l. U hat t his conr.tit tee i s about to present does not concern i tself alone W wi th th e publication of a brochure. It i s, on the other hand, a. c anprehensi ve , and th erefore, s ome\'lhat complicated progrum i1hich we b elieve may s olve many of our trOst pressing problems. Considerable thought and pl.anning has eona into the preparation of a present f),t ion aimed at introducine the various phases of the proeram in a logical and weU ordered sequence. ~"!ith your permission, the comnittee, therefore, suggests that notes bo token, and all questions and conments be reserved until the c ompletion of this report. VIe mll tim ourselves in a better positi on to put our jig-saw puzzl e t ogether after w have ~ of the pieces befor e us. e "I n the preliminary study of the problan, one outstanding fact became bas i c ... that r egardless of how nmch money we set out to raise, the same number of m:lles will have to be traveled if we are to include all of the areas on out" three-nation highway system, with the same amount. of time am. effort consumed. rle can aim high t or a im low . .. . and the same sldll am pers everance " ill be re:}.uire::d to hit either mar k. Y w our comnittee has el ect ed to aim high for the dual advantage of r ecoI!!!lending a finer program and at the same time, r educ ing fixed overhead and promotionru. costs percentagevdse. : �.. lilt has already bean stnt ed that this committee haa co~eived and developed t he func tional details of a comprehensive progran l'Alich it believes might Vlell becOJ!le the 80% cure of our Ji'Dst painful problem. tllembarship' , of course, sums up that problem. in one nord. nIt is a tVlo-pe.rt problen, 'r'Ia:ys and means to attract nay ntooiberehip on the one hend, end better mGthods to inspire membership loylllty that results in continued support. It I:'Itl.Y surprise you t o realize that each year \. . 8 greet a sizeable crop of n9'1"l members at our front door •• • and at t he same time, an equal numbor of old memb6!'S slip out thru the ungu.;uoded ~.r entrance. ~ :e will never fill our house this \1ny •• , am someday ue are bouni to run out of potentin.l nevI recruits. IIIn this respect, we are no \',wao off thon JOOst simil.ar org.-mizc.tlone. N o eroup can hold its ll".!-'.mbcrs unl ess they Vlant to stay. '!he organization that demonstrat es the greatest 'service rendered' and 1value received' enjoys the lion' 6 share of membership loyalty and contirrued support . In short • ,. each momber must be sold by practical dBrnonstrat ion on the value of hie manbcrship in this Associat.ion, and mado to reaard t he S9 t er pl..ucqua on his ...m11 as a Ylis e and good investment ••• a thing of real. value ttdch he could i l l af'ford to l ose. tfuen this hue been accomplished, our mn:i:ler ship problen vrlll have vonished. promotion, production, and di!ltribution of a guide-typo brochure covering an aroa a.S extensive as oure, is a project \'b ich will r equire considerilble time. In all prooo.bU1ty a cOI!q)l ot a peak seaBon of aix months or IOOre \'1111 elapse botwean the start and the goal. Something must happen in tho meantime , and keep happening at frequent inte:rvals to eustain enthuDiasm. lI'jhe "Your cc:mmittee presents such a program. A 10 POINT, '!WO YEIJR sohedule of continuous promotional cctivity bullt araum. the BROCHURE which i s Point No.1, a nd serves as the fund-raising modiwn for the entire lot o 'lhe other 9 points, sorne of "mch can bo put to work at once, wUl. fill. t he gaps and keep the ball bouncing twalva months a year. II Proposed TEN POINT PROl.'OTIONAJ, PROGRIJ.! FOR 1957 and 1958 A cornprehensiv G TWO YEIJR planned activity to be p resented as a "package program" in the solicitation of financhl support **"* (I ) - PUBLICATION AND DIS1'RIBUTION OF A COYPR]lUlNSIVll GUlDE-TYPE BROCHURE IN COLOR (Fall !lIld \linter, 1957) Fund-raising medium for the entirC3 program. (2) - PROIlOOTION OF 89'er COLORED JIOVIE - (Distribution \linter of 1957 or sooner) . (3) - REPllES~TATION AT lJAJOR TRAVEL SIlOlVS - (When brochure is ready). (~;) - Ml!lJIlmsHIP ROSTER and D:rrux:TORY OF ASSOOIATE l!1'l!llmS (First issue Spring, 1956) To bG i ssued t,'dce a year with ravisions . "Spring and Summer" OOi 'i:.ion and "Fall and ','IiIrt.er ll edition. COlll'ENTS; Reprodootion of mcmbership placque on f ront cover; map ani l ist of major attra ctiol13 on back cover; cal en:!ar of major conmunity events for season covered; lint of active memb3I"S by to.ms; directory of associate members with brief plug for products a nd services offered by each. 'l11is ros t er would be revised every six IOOnthe to include ONLY paid-up membors in good etanding. lIembers would be notifie d of !'ll>licatlon dead-line, and the committee, thorefor e, suggests thr.t t hiB ros ter could become a powerf'ul and effective medium to st.iJnulAte collection of dues o ·..3- �- .. (5) - 1m. COLORFUl. I!El:!llmSUIP PL\cqW.8 •. (Ir.n-:<ii."it. 0., ,ribulion', Placque to be publicized cr'..d r eproduc:::d in rU.nitl:".' e and all printed promti onal pieces to malte the public conscious of the Associati on and aiUCllted to patronize ita Jllsmbers . (6 ) - NATIO~'-\lIDE DISTIlIBUTION OF 89' er RllJORDniG _ This ""uld probahly be the best uoe of the rocordingD on hand . A brief printed message explaining the OOckground of tho :long and asking the disc jocldes to give it So play and a plug could be inclosed. - PLANNED RJ\DIO FUBLIfrn - lios t of t!le st.etions, on the route at lean'::', would dOl'lC!t e tiM as II public service froture . Fifteon tlinutc scripts i n int.erviet! fom D.lYt 3pot announcer..cnts w ould ~ prepared end. ke;y 89t co m.0I1!bm-s in ch ~ r~ T lOuld 'WOrk n1th their State Director in presenting the program .. (8) - PruSS REL&\SES AND ILLUSTRNfrn TRA'{EL FEATURES - Feature s Il"eads illustr atGd. \7ith maps and photos si.nilo.r to the one ,b ieh appe.u-ed in t he Tuc ~cn paper y.uu1.d be prepared a.~ sent to papers on the r oute and also t ho nati onal. travel pr ess .. (9) - mmOY1iE IT .rnmm PROGRIt!~ - ltaj or recreational areas would be . invited to preparo (at their ann expense ) a milnoographE<i paso containi ng i mportant facts a..?'ld information about their area. A s uch pages furnished would be asoenbl ed i nto an "Information ll Guide" for use by service at.=:Jtion att cnd.,nts, 'rouri sts Tnfor!ll 'l- . '. "i '.).t)) - !~ V..... i.'i.L.:..i1.J.-. ... .114 I.:Ji. .I. Ith~AL l'\..lJ~ .:...:.!.!.Jl~ _ 0UCU a projcc-(. would J;J ryractioal after the brochure is printed, and the schedule could be adjust ed to fit t ho availAble budgot. Probably small display advertisements with coupon to be sent for IIlliustratcd Folder". Special area literaturo could also be i~luded in the packet au1 a small fce aaseS300 to pey the mailing costs o uAftor hearing our financial statement. r ead this moming, the portion of this r eport l'lhich folla.'1s vti.ll prob ably produce a slight shocko liThe. cOllJIlittee reconmtends a .m:inimJ.m goal of $25,000.00 t o be subscribed by Active and Aa sociate, members , both. old and ne-If in advortising support and ISponsorship Contr ibutionB l from Civic Organizations, 'l'rade ASSOCiations, Ind1.1.9'1:,17, Umdcipalities, and Industry. '!he total funds subscribed to be budgoted as fo11011s : Soles Coot, 33- 1/3% to·i;aJ. cost of brochure, including ; art l;ork, print.ing, dis tribution, prom>tion-'ll and administrative expenaos and supplies, $12, 000.00; movie (estimated) 1)1,700.00; aD. remirdng r es erve to be held u..'1tU possi bl e credit l eass are secured and til eIl bUdgeted t o fi.nonco re.1laining itans of the 10 Point PrograIll.o lilt is t he furthe r reconr:tendati on of the Coomitteo that the follcn1ing Administrative s tructure be adopted, and the policy points be approved: l!!!!i!NISTlLITION ''!'ho entire project to be set up as a spcci ru.. operc:.tion wi.th all. revenue to be received and disbursed by tho f our-man Brochure and Movie joint comn1ttee. 11m funds which are in pnyment fol" dues t.o Secr~-Treasurer in the usual mnner v b~ • remitted to the Corporation payment f or advertis ing and sponsorship support to be placed in a special account and administered by Vice~·Presidcnt ll1tchell, wh o vJill also serve as TrGaSUI'er of the Joint Fl'"Omtiorru Comnittee. The Comnittee baing authorized to do all things necessary in the promotion" producti on , and completion of the 10 point program and be required to render a monthly progress r eport and financial nccount.ing to the PreSident , Offid ere , aIld Directors of ths Corporation. This plan i s advantageous Sinc0 the nns s of complica ted t ransactions necessC'.I'y would produce D. Hork load too heavy for our Corporation Troasur er. Also, the Commit teo manbers are clo Bo enoueh to each other to permit close coordination and frequent meetings when nec essaa.-y. IlFuDde in -4- �-' -- ibc .~' ~ .' • }j. i I' r )1; ,1 -w'!"2 ',93 OI,g ~-<) Gi:., t· -:.J.- r;.:···ho:~ o:f.' r..u;-n-~i:1[;. "iE; t.] i,-"-.y:.. nt of \ r.-Dr-.{~ll p'''':':.co, J.lld ~;.t. h: the 1·r0r.o··~J.on :~oD'!ldt\.. , ~p:""" ;;,1, P3'C.'-rJ.il of" -th:'n m.~':' c"o-y( !"' f ~:; .:.-, .:,'C - <; or,,' tt~ ,f; J. fur as :oJ:. rtis:1ne L'iol~'=L[l cut: ~n 1:'. r . . ,) '~i:)'lJ. SUl'l prj. r,. 1 .,r,e {,>: 'i ~t't' .'::3::'m, t:!ct t.h'3 .Y'";,'! ir!,~~t :lS D..d~;~ D'.. y(;:.X' 1:'" TO;' U:!J -;j,iC.1 ";01.:.16 "'srLd:t. tCS LillO'!:. be I;:;: t :;:)T'.5,LL.· L "" c·-:t or ~Jt -:..~ t.:: ;1), >:3.: ') r":~li i',l'*~ IThai~ n'" -IT;;;,; :Ll '~(j,,;' iC ::"1' olliv ~. JChUl''-, ;~0. ...1 '0;",,:.<5.1 _ti;.:..~l 11:}~1 1){ ::'"Cf:l:U'i:>! i', p. .... J.:in ...... 11 ..... " i,,':'Jl :)- .1- c i Iill U .'.11. be~{)j1\t:::; trClTlb("r to over r six... HV.')ilwble to In(~ ,,5i:J,r.cc H. is eXJ)(:,~~_£ wl le ::.lwolvlid in thr p:.:·f'pt'i:"_ tj,C',!)' ..i~~L'cct.:i. i/" 01.1 ... _1l'.'03 ..at j,:i.cT: f;i:";l :lddi'i:.j.c-r.al pros:~ ~t,iV3 ~ U;ic' ~~ 0 the 1:r.:Jc:llU'8 -le'...~eC039ar;f .it..r, ·:..r.l.d :mppli3S. T'tv: Cc·J:.'!!.~~';·~;cet "::.hc.::: e~Or(I, ~··'Jl11_'..ect:-.; ~.~d l' lCCji';~neni!; t~lt:.t ini··':;.<ll )P(~·u.t,:L"r.; c:1,n::':iia1 in the ,:;...te·....'.rr'.. 0:: ,:;:1 50C"QU l~ Lid.€ .':!v.x';.l. 1:-J.'3 to th Co'ltld.t.t,~a ,~ron 1j';!T·::.ra'.;i.()li ft~r,cs ttl b.;:; con:Ji:t.o::.'~ Co ·13 a. 10;'1l"'., l' ri ';'t'lbj,~ct. ';,0 i'C)i'und r.:" ',w Go·~?:~'t;l,E;e 'rom"lGt Jti."')ceods, :i.i' a 1;'.; l"csU: V. '!;,. h·. th ..,!1' r ~r.ct,iono!· obv5e·:.l.s ,e --1' F'c.J~01'j;:,r-~ tha vcl"hll ._. ,""'L;'~":" iuriL:i.c,tur. cJ,ccs port.:l.c-n, '-::,"ling ,'.5-'::.1-: tJ· Point Frogr,.J:'!. ::r:1d the huc[.'t ,','t':re ::list.r1 )n~.L .~!) ~:';-lO :J:t.rf'.C~:'01'S, 'lfl '1 :::r..i:'lfrr'10: (~1.'I!TL!.y ofi:.ho p!'opor:s-d ~T"'C~I1.Ii ':! ~t'ILcC;o j,' '(:;' J:',ClIj :)~.. thc rei_ 'r'~ /0)1.,.:-_, ., .... ¥.- ::.t.:d4' ,0 -:: :')1 ~ " 1 r r~Ol ;.i~ 1- 'i, .c ., :)t l' .... ~ 1 r,.t \. ~l.. .12': I ~ d r(.;:;:~: 'i' I,,", C .~c ~,"''':l.Otl.t., ').f' t.~e .t,. (, r;;!{:o!'ner..rl,' ioa: "i:.l 11 Co t "'e :itc'v~.l' Clot 10 e ~. !"'lPOl't~ "n . . Jy' ·r" t .n:: .)(1 1 V_II '! /~ i·r' t!.~:.;:".\".,l' .bJ ,.,t1ii'·---1 ill' Ell 01 th.'! f,rcci:.J!"ri .':.~ ... (','[.i~k ,,;' iTV ij'.s ....ch "'1,1: ..S:.:::oc~·.r "i":n, "':0 tLE:!'( ·'\:.l·C'~ 1 1" ~! 'TIl :.<:1' '"' Cf 1,1 ,.. co:. OCii I' J :;'l'C:J en~. ~',j" ?:"; '1; 'Was the; (:CllCl':J.l op:inio~l of ',;.;,('1 !1voll?·-l ,.,t t'"CO Ltt5,'c.'.'.de ,::l.Il(l '1'0'':::'''(3 ]?TllX' '(:;d +0 ');- ror t'le'~' r'?t!cnt ',(j Gr 11e '.08;J vr ,.;ocd '::i.'::" anJ. ll';ft ·d.on '.,01 1d jl.?.I"h"l.·:"'~· :proil;'U!c y"r.,f:U::' :;..r til) .. ;ltit;i,1.t~ -l.v~ ::'luctLtLI of ... kG 1" c)6 !l ~'Sp. ,(~:i-c·i l•.'r:1;~_£J.S;l~)lJC,r:: " tJ:,r:;:'x·.E';]. l("" {, 1'1" =1::1" sf ". .J: 1 ... r~ [,,,1(,1 .~- i, ,. ., ,:~C·~ 1','" h"d or.t.1., ",,,1 thl., apropO;l thiC' p;obl0.lJ\ t-,S ~.'o11ow:.J: .,£. ..1i,y' .A;:i so~J.Jl op:: .. UvI".:.,;.. :Zl<t r ,i~' "C:' K 'tj oi' ,Ii v ~CJi..a:u.., ":,,,0 3:1' ""e Tf(7 COn".f,",C.,i)~lJL t..h-i.i~ Ou::.... cor:'i.~~· tion "';~eci.'.i:,i'r", =j··;';~·Cl~"""':/ ar.dJ.:.: ""::~Ol' 01 'It f,!blic R:il.ations, La:,;.,,;,;f n "',i1.nt...'.'cl1~ is tbe 13.(l b{~3t qualj.:;:'iecl. t.) c:.E'fmm.o t,h-~ n;. .spDl:..:db:Llity of p:.'':)t;:octil~; ':;'hc :,oed ...il.l of ·this ;,sf;cciat:'..on, an::. at tb(~ a;:mc timr:J" SCCl"T the necXl8iu'Y -"in:J.n~i"'J.l S',lpport L:ari.:.:!.n has h' J.;:: d.:.yelop 11;" J p":"O[.T.J' 0 j '.'~ pl",:~1( nt ,"- 'J";"., :li';j.. han orl :l:lllY p:!'c1!icus :)' ;, t i'mcn::;l,r t· L:'-.S ·!W;J:t::".;.:;ni:.:i..c'V$ ::<.t. ·tu,ie a,dwDit7 Hi!:': 0': .c1-,' 'O~l 'f" ,,01.' m: '!, 1. ~ ._ <m ~c-·~ .... 0· -..tj,(y'l +, ). ,,_ JU.1:':'ic rE2_,-,tion 11':' i.mc'er C~lT'~J. ,;:-.t.!..1.pS nil::. cor.1itions �.. ." is an assigmcnt which wi.ll require full time concentration in the prel:l.m:l.nary stagos, and run time travel Inter on, and I:IU8t therefore produce full time remuneration in addition to road expenses. ~ IIt A sales cost of 33-1/3% has been approved, and it is t..1te recommenda.tion of this Comnittee t..l-tat a contract be dralm up wh ich will ret.Un the service s of llartin Cantwell to hll.ndle the sales and pranotion of this program, receiving as his fee, one third of all monies subscribed in advertising support of ".he program plus tho usual 33-1/3% 'Field Represent at.:ives' conn:llssion on ell De'." and renevral membership dues resulting from the prolOOtion of this program. All personal travel expense, and conr.ri.ssions to sub-azEJlts to be paid by t:artin out of hi.B f ees and comnissiow cernsd. liThe Comnittee f'urtl'lcr rccomends tha t tho l\SBOciation agree to guarantoe ltart.m an advance dra\'Jir.,g: account of $400 each four weeks for a mi niD'Q] m period of twolve ueelcs, in addition to 0. tro.veliDe axpense account of 7 cents :oar mile traveled plus 36 . 00 per day plus a.ctual cos t of overnight lodBinge. Fun:ls adva..'1Coo to be charged against J and deducted from tho final sottlement of total foes and conmisaions earned, but nat subject to refund in t.he event feea and coumissions earned are not GUfficient to cover. II Discussion of this r ncomenclation brought out the fact, t hat the Association v"O'.lld be UIUlble to transfer tho entire 01 ,500 .. 00 authorized op eroting capi tal to the Committoo in one lump mnn at iliis time, but \1ould do so as additiornl roVerru.6 !ram ~t of dues wns received. D irector s present volunteered to conduct new membership effort and a drive f or collection of delinquent dues in their r espect! ve areas at once in ordor t o stinrulate Association income, and alao agreed thnt each would subscribe to 0. l1s tine in t ho brochUl"'e , and remit for G ame to the Promotion COIiDittee. I t "taS als o acreed tha t tho Directors would submit statement s of expense a1lcrmlllce due in connection luth t he current meeting to be placed on file . with }:'GymeIlt thereof' peIJiing. In view of t he circu.r:et2J'lCes, Secretary Can'tv/all agreed to J><lYlIleIlt of the drauing account in adven:: e \'130kly instal 1mente of SlOO mstend of the ~ lWIq) sum as specified i n the ori.g1.r:la.l reco.n:men:1ation. It was moved by Director l!a.rtin and seconded by Saran, that the proposal. be accepted and approved as atated, and that a Uemorllndum of Agreement covering Ule t erms b e drawn up and presented for final approval at tho Tuesday morning sessi on. llotion carried. Director Hendryx. Cha:lrman of the Hovie Committee J reported. on progrese an::l pralL"1inary plans regarding ·::'he IIIilking of the 89 'cr Colored 1.~ov1e. A letter was read from color p,.oto[;!'apher Haven 'l'recker, a business o.an from. Kankakee, Ill . , who has spent a number of years producing I:'tOvie travelogues as a hobby. llr. Trecker offered in his l etter to make the pic tur e at a fieurc that practical.ly amounts to tlle actual cost of .film and ma.tarinl plus tro.-.-al.ing expenses for hiIoo elf and lJxa. Tracker. lIe stated that he YiOuld consider the trip as his vacation, and moke no chareo for his time. As close as c.ould be e fltirnated in advance, t his arrangement would brirlg the total cost of t he production to somowhere a round :)2 , 000.00, \Vhich according to Director Hendryx, ilould effect a sav1.n.§s of several thousand dollars \'/hen compared to estl nnt es obtained from conoerci al studios . Director Hendryx reported that he was farni.liar with lir. Trecker l B work, nnd had seen numerous of his f ilms and could per aonaJ...1y recommend his ability and sk1.ll o It l'1aB moved by 1H.tche1l, secorxied by l!.artin, tha.t U:1rector Hendryx be authorized to officially accept l!r . 'l 'reekerts offer, and that the Committ ee proceed with the nec ees ary arrangemonts. & tion carried .. It Vias moved by Saran, seconded by s tevig , that the Brochure Committee and tho Movio Canr.dtteo henceforth be coni:dned Wue one comittee for the purpose of canbini.ng efforts in the completion of the 10 Point Program, and that the rum cOlllnittee be called the Promoti on Committee. Uotion carried.. ('!he Promotion Comnittee consis ts of: Mltchcl.l, Chairman; Hendryx, Sorgatz, and Cantwell). Director stevie announced that the Directors and their ,.lives had been extended an invitation to be the dinner guasts of the Afton Lion.'3 Club that evening. The inv~tation was graciously accepted. The meoting lias recossed at 5 :15 at 9:00 A.M . P.u. to r econvene the following rooming �.- TUESDAY. JlJWAllI 29. 1957 The oornins session tillS called to order ilt 10:15 A.l!. Directors ne ot the t:on:lay s ession present. All. Qf'f'ic ers an:1 Vice-President J;1tchcll read a. dr.li't of tho proposoo 1:morandun of f'1gr'CCD)nt rota1n1ne I.;ortin 11. Ccnt",lll to hnndle the sales promtion pro~n on tho IJrochuro. It naB dctcr.oinc-d that t ho .lgreeIilOl'lt QB \:r.1.ttcn \'la B coincident with the term and coIXlit1ons as approvoo and accopt.ed. during the l lm1c.y Session. Iloved by Saran, eeconcled by Hendryx thilt the Agrser:ent be 3pprcwod to becona eff ective on Fcbrtli:.ry 1, 1957 ani U'w.t the }roper officers of the Corr.orilt.ion be auth orized to execute sane. Uotion carr1ad. It wna roved by Hortln, scconi ed by S<ll'nn tha.t tha Corpora.tion Treasurer be instructed to transfer tho SU1!l of :'J.:.OO.OO to the Prolllotion Cor.mttoo as the first installnent of tho apJ.lrovad loan for opor~t1ne c apitcll, and that c. chec.kirlG account be opened in tho Firs t llatiorcl. Bonk of Logan Utcll in the nero of the ProIOOtion COlD1ttoe rCXlUiring the sicmtures of edther J3cntl.ey !'d.tchatl or Fr:ml< H. Sorentz. l!otion oatTi ed. ~ rutual consent, t he nnttC!" of tho "Troo.Oll!' O Trill" rocordiI\1:J \'JUD rof erred to tho Promotion Corrr.d.ttoo rrlth outharity to detarnino tJ10 final disposition. Director ~.:rnest Ii. Saz'rI..l1 rJU.3 nomn. ltcd by l'd.tcholl as a. eorrl1da.t e f or t ho < office of lJicc-Preaiclc:nt of the Corporation. The nocimtion uas seconded by Hendryx. It 17no movod by I'ortin, s""omod by I1mdryx thnt tho nonimtions Ix> alosod Iln:I that Director Saran bo al : cted to the offwo of vic<>ol'rcsidont by acclsmt ion. Cotion ca.ITied. I t rl3. noved by l:.1rtin, s""omod by !'itchell tJu.t the nntter of ale cti"B a D:l.roctor to rol'rosent tho Republic of 1:c:x1co bo 1;:,bled perIlinG t he 1"",,= conferenco to polT.1it tho selcction of a qual1£iod ec11Xl1cJ..'lto. 1~ot1on carried. It use novcd by r.::lI"tln, ssconded by Hmdryx that Directors a.t tmdine tJ"lO l'.:lzatlon rooting 110uld r:aivo their right s umer :J!TICLE IV. =TIOIl 9 of ;,he by. lotls an:! mke th e trip at thall' ow expanse. llotion corriod. Secretary C<l11tmlll r eported tlult the ,' 5socbtion's bill for dUplicnting and lldxlOOC.rnphing had """"",ted to VlS1 ,50 sineo Octobor of 1955, nnd that a spirIt duplicator c ,,"ubl. of hancllln!! this tlOrk, ond oleo the ronborohip rniJ.ine list could bo put"cha.sed for slichtly over .;200.00. He rcquoatGd. permission to sell tho addressograph equill'1cnt on hond for 375 . 00 and appl,y tJle solc price to tho pm:hose of " Hayer Spirit Duplicator. It \to.S liDved by Sor.m and s econ:J.od by Hmdryx tha.t SecretaI7 Cantuell be authoriz0d to ·p roceed as per hi s request . t.::otion carriod. =. Director liortin reported on nenborship aff ort in l<>ntons, ond aMOUr.ced his intentions of cropleting tho or(l!l!1izoti on of a Local Club in the Livingston Prooident st.flart; annou.'lCed that the mtire llaroh issue of ,\ rizom 1I1c1n:nys 'lOuld be dovoted to US 89 as a rCDult of his recent confaronco ,d.th the Editors, and st r030ed tho vnluo of this oxccl.lont publicity l'lhich \"Jill be circulnted natio_-dde into moro than ,00,000 hones. Advnnco proof. of tho ~bl.wity '"lore pr esonted, and Sooretoxy Contm'll nos instruct ed to publlcizo the edition by mo.. .ns of Da\."IS ralcasea a.nd bulld.i.nG to kay members. It llllD oovod by ~a.tcholl and s econded by J:urt:in that the lm3cutivo Socrcrt...lry be o.uthor1zod to p.m:ha s8 50 copies of the l"Dl"Ch .U"1z0no. l1:1gn :oys f or proJX)tionol purpos os.. I!at.1on carried o =""ine Rocees for :Lunch at 12,00 lloon. Afternoon S..sion called to ard or at 2130 P .Il . Vice-Prcsidont Saran spoIco on potmtial t1OI:i>orship nnd financ1<1l support in Alberta nn:I predicted f avorable acceptance and reaction to the Assooiztion'. proposod 10 Point I'roliXltional Proeran. lie announced his intentions t o confer 11ith Provinclol Authorities in i!A:'.lJnt.on at an early dtl.te. -7- �·' • "I"" It """od by ll.ortin, a_mod by l3.tchell that a vote of thanks b e ex.torxied to the Star Valley B9 r ers Club, the id'ton Liana Club, the z:nru.ger.1ent of the Vill.eon Hotel, ani to ol1 r.leDbars of tho Rally Con:d.ttoo, Club I;cr.lbcrs, and citizens for excellent arrangtf!lmts., tTarrn hospitality, am courtesy exten:1od the Officors of the\s3ociation. rotion carried o secretary Cll.lltl'1ell presented 0. flReport of 17G1bership ftcti\'ity and fi ovenue Derived 'l 'hercfronfl far t.~ e first quarter of the ctQ.~re:nt fiscal yoozoo Tho report indic ated t.h.:::t collections nero dr~ f:lr bolrlrrl tho antic1pn.ted quota, .:md that numerous bill..inns <!I1d appeola to Local Club Offic ers f or c oopcr<:.t1on in the collection of dclirv:;,ucmt duos had produced little rosronse o Tho r eport further shor.ed that a eonsidomblc nunbcr of rerlbors, r.nny of tbon in Club arcas were del~uent pa.st the 60 day grace period, but tl~~ t & uspansi on fron ncobcrship had been ",ithhald pondi"1l a study of tho situation by tho Board. It. l'mB pointed out tin t consid er,:-hlo ti.Iie, effort, am~ fundo had bCGll d1scipatod in !:lOiJ,ine cIuo bills and r.rltinB latterc rlhich in tho rn jority of c.sos had been ignored and th:lt t..'1a sit.m.tJ.on had r e:.ched a point \:here l'C!.lOdial action 'tlL!.B :lmicuted. It rlas mvod by tlartin, s<corned by ritcllall that tho deadl ine for H ating in tha 19:57 Sprine <md Sur:t:mr edition of tho I:cnborshi p nooter be oet as April 1, and that the crace pcriod of 011 deliuiuont r."!l!:'.bOZ'Bilips be axtendod t o th..1.t cl:!t e am. that all """"ore rcrn:in1ng dalin'luent on ,\prll 1 , 1957 shall bcoooe fortlmith Buspoooed without hco.ring frot\ nll previllces of ncribarship as provided for in ARTICW n , ~TION 4 Of the Corporation bY~116 0 .Uotion c\U"l'ied~ ,~ A TIle j~ecutive Socretcry \1aS then instructed to notify Club Preaidento a.zxl delirGuent ner.Jbers regc.rdine th e April 1 deadlinoo The open ooetinc; ni th the Doard of Directors scheduled for 3:(X) ? .. r ... , to v.41ich a ll Club Officers and individu.1.l fX1J':l.bors ht:.d been invitoo. for c:. ce:10r:l1 d.iecuseion of llroblons end ide..-w, \'Jas t:!ttondod by IJcl. Tayson, i'rcoi ctalt of tilO :jt.1r volley S9 t ors Cl ub, I.:crlc Pu:J:d,re, Preoident of the 3cQr L"1Jm Jhs1n S9'ero Club, and ~OJith Gertsch, manber of tha n~ Lalro Club, and Pres i dent of tho Puris Lions Club o Follorrinc a general diacuss ion of r;nys and rJa~'1D to achieve bettor orgrudzntion s tronger l ondcl'ship nt 10cnJ. l oval, tho folloo:r.lnc nctions c.iInod at atiJ:ulat ing l.oonl Club cctivity \_ore cwproved: am l~ ~·.'hen ap:!)lic<ltion for a Loco.l Club Cilmer is made, the proposed Club shall bo rcquirod to cOD111atc tho 2,5 manbership quota., or gwnize, o.nd elect officers uithin f:I:J d~s fron tho rotc of 1.'i.linc t ho Charter Appllcc.tion, in ordor to eam tho r of'und of ·~5000 for euch nCri and renG\I':u' menberohip nooured.. UnlOSD tIle above haD boon accooplished \·dthin the 6O-cby timo l imit, the Ch.:!.rter appllc.~tion n ill expire !) nnd all right and clain to any accurul.lltod r ci\u¥:ls forf oitod. Another Chartor Application my bo filed nt 01\Y futur e dat e u it.h tho understanding that "forfeited II r.t:lI,1 berships "Jill be consi der ed as old JTC['hers, countine tcr.Jllrd tho (jUota, but .uith no raf'unC.s earned and peynble unt.il tho second yoa.r r cnG':ral dues ere collooted o l.:otion t o adopt n 'lde by J..:rootin, seconded by St evie, and ca.rried o 20 ·,IH::RR.lS 'fits LOCAL CLUBS rec eive the 05 0 00 per ncrnbeJ'Ghip ,·Thi cl:! is the entirlJ un:l only sun avai.l.nble for fin.:mcinc aalCB and collection crfort, it is , thereforo, t he obllC:1tion of sud local Clubs to C'!.I"l'Y out their end of the bargain c.nd assuz:te tho rosponsibility of oCll"Jling this r efUnd by officiant pel'formnc e in the collcction of rcncua.1 dues and the solicitation of new nembership •dthin tlleir aIm exclusivo orca o .. EFFmTIV~ ,U'RIL 1, 1957, LoonJ. Clubs \/ill forfei t all prior rights and cln.i..t:'l to th.e ,')5000 raf\url on any und all o:;I.1bers which haVG been permit.ted to becorJ.6 delinquent past the l ocal 6Q..s.d.J.Y IIgrace poriod. 1I All such dalinluent member. shell b. considerod suspculod. :.Nfl/OR may be solicited fo!' renmr.u. by a Fiold Ropresent.:ltJ.vQ of tho !nt.orm t1oml A3socio.tion" l:otion to a.dopt r.nde by ll~dryx, seconded by $tcv1~J nmcnlTiecS" �- - • 3. The OG<ll1<b of avrrry iW.!lWll Uooting (Convontian) of tho A• • ",,1ation - sh£lll include II scheduled "Conforence of Club Presidents and Officers n.. a.ai affJt7 Local Club shall bo r"'lUircd to have an Offioer, or ana othor duly authorued delceatc present. at this conference. iihcrevGr possible, loW. Clubo shill aleat offio0I'3 bctr;eon August 1 ani Sept_or 15 each y= in ordor that the incasing Offi cer. can be presented a.t tho Convention, a.nd ·J)<lI't1cip:lte in the Conference. l!otion to adopt mdo . Q\' Saran, sscomod by llartin, ani carried, Thoro being ro further business, tho Special Lioeting of the Boord of Dll'sctors of tho 89' ers International HiIlIT:;ay A ssociation "as edjourned snlll DIE at 5.00 P.l!. Respeetf'ully aubr.z1ttcd, l.!ARTn~ II . CP1l'l'lf'ELt Exeoutiva Secretary - 9- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4369 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3379 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/826">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/826</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 2321997883 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers Special Board of Director Meeting minutes Description An account of the resource On March 7, 1957 - Discussion of the mail ballot that was circulated to all Directors in office on February 16, 1957 to elect Sr. Guillermo Freeman of the Repbublic of Mexico to the Board of Directors. January 28 & 29, 1957 - Discussion of financial report, report of brochure committee, ten-point promotional program for 1957 and 1958, and the overall policy. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957-03-07 1957-01-28 1957-01-29 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Afton (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 10 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd10 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/4fef853680137b9ffb57fa3ee425ba04.pdf 3ca3491ca0ff59a918ee6c743bc8f3b8 PDF Text Text COLLECTION REPORT - RElUTTAllOE FROM: M.B.Oantwell ADVISE OOl1!.lISSION STA TEIlENT NUMBER 6 - 10 10: Bentley M1tchell. Promotion Committee A N v . ARIZ " " " S. ARIZ " " " ThWlderbird Inn(Will1ams ) Coffee PO~ " Vaughns Indian Store II Verkamp ts (G. Canyon) ~o .oo 50. 00 30 . 00 30.00 30.00 30 . 00 Has 56 Units 30 . 00 30. 00 Bowman Hote1(Nogales) 30. 00 Nogales Chamber of Commerce 35 . 00 30. 00 35 .00 El Camino Motel (Tucson) Riviera Motel II 30 . 00 30 . 00 30. 00 30 . 00 • Arrowhead Motel, Nogales Ariz . Rio Motel, Tucson Saddle & Sirloin, Tucson $30.00 BEMI TTANCE .D1lE INTERlIA TI ONAL 30.00 30.00 WilUams-Grand Canyon C of C Jerome Historical Society TOTAL •.••• •• $ 690 . 00 REVENUE ~ 265 . 00 OOl.llUS SI ON $ BALANOE DUE FROM LAST ro:I'ORl' TOTAL COOMISSIONS DllE REMARKS, $ 165.66 88 . 33 ~ 77. 33 - -- ---Wail to: 140 West Second South Salt Lake City. Utah ) �COLLECTION ~'ROld: = REPORT - RElllITTAIfCE M.R.Oantwel l lQ: ]~ntley ADVISE .. COMMIS ION SUTE1IENT NUM1ll'lR 9/23 M itohe ll. Promotion Committee SOOTION Edmonton South Bend M otel El Paso Motel n 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 Sub-agent Leger 45.00 4j.00 n $60 a 50% ••••• $30.00 Edmonton Pan American Motels 60.00 15.00 75.00 REM! TTANOE Edmonton C. ot C•• o •••••• at these orders are S;)r~~C - DUE veritle'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_______ REVENUE $ 120.00 OOMl4I SSI ON REQUES TED i5 0~OO :B.ALAlICE DUE l"ROU LAST REl'ORT TOTAL COMMISSIONS DUE ~e C , t. o '2.1 \ , ('3 tJ v "'- 331/3%•• $20 3 memberships •••• $ 45.00 and oheoks are being mailed. PAYMENT OF COMM ISSION 60.0~ 300.00 City at Edmonton ••••• • ••• 300.00 Both $ REM A - - - --RK - S :L8;37 It request granted tor payment Edmonton City and Edmonton C. at I A $ 21;63 t ?l.b) : oommission on • total oommission will be ••• $ 271.63 ,;? . . P .J!....e?~t- .::rv ;:itYe' ~7' , V'\ /' - ,, ~ :G IS: ( . ,,~lf'.j �• C01LEOTION REPORT - REillTTAiJOE FROM: M.R. Oantwell ro: Bentley ADVISE Mitche~l. A Wyo. COMl.!IS3ION STbTEr.lE:NT Hm.!BllF 9 - 8 Promotion Oomm ittee DUES Star Valley 89'ers ".L'"UI IOO.OO TOTAL 100.00 R E !.I A R A S (Mi tahell has Check) $100 REMITUNCli DlJE @ 33 1/3% •• '33.33 I NTERNATIONAL 3 member.hips tee •••••• $ 45.00 Ii REVENUE $ 220.0 Ol.!lJTSstON BALAN<lli .DUE FRO!;, LAST TOTAt CO!!MISSrONS DIIE ---, S T A REP OR~ $$t , , ib.-..3 $ 81.63 --- see attached commission statement ) �-. COLLECTION FR(J,f: U,R.Cantwell .- 3EOTION . REl'ORT - REldITTAllOE ' A:DVISE . OONLIIS ION STJ.TE!.IEIIT TOTAL A C REl.! SUB- AGENT *::t.* *¥;;c****** *** * "'* ** *: • ********* Bow River Motel 30 . 00 1~ . 00 ~5 . 00 ArlIlS tr ong M el ot 30 . 00 15 . 00 ~5 . 00 TOTAL N1lKl!ER &/31 10: Bentley Mitohell. Fromotion Committee NEW BUSINESS SECURED ~Ir*~~;;t~ Calgary ~ 60 . 00 Grad Gra:! $60 @ 50% •• .. . $30 . 00 REMITTANOE DIlE INTERNA nOl/AL Alberta Gbvt o Travel Bureau City of Cal gary Red Deer ,Alberta C of C The above grants havi ng been officially approved , payment thereof is being cleared thru routine aocount ing perceedure o REVENUE $ 60 . 00 COIJlJISSIOI1 ll.ALANOE DUE PROJ4 LAST TOTAL C~IS5IOIl8 DUE REM~ --- - -- REEOR~ $ 30 . 00 ~ $ R KS ' See attaohed l e tter in reference to "Futur e Payment Contracts" ) �COLLECTION P.EPORl' - .RE!.tlTTAN E FRO!.! : M.B .Can twe11 - ~: cma.u:s ADVlJE I ON TOTA L 8- 27 SUB - AGENT **************** ****** ************ iII rtJ! ) 0. 00 )0 . 00 30. 00 90 . 00 Amyl orne Motel " , NUMBER RE NEW BUSINESS SECURED Bf~~~i~;;!: " .- 'J'J'!.lENT Bentley M itohell, Promotion Commi t t ee AOC O U " S~ Arlo t s Restaurant Barney ' s Fi ne FOod Eamon ' s Tourist Centre Star Motel 15 . 00 15 . 00 15 . 00 15. 00 15 . 00 * 45 . 00 45.00 45 . 00 Grad 45 . 00 Grad Grll,d Gr ad Grad 210 . 00 TOTAL $210.00 @ 50% •• • $1 05 . 0 NEN BUSINESS - NO C l &~ ary 30 . 00 Graddell Mote l 15. 00 $ 30 45 . 00 REl.!I TTANOE DUE @ 33 1/3%.. . 10. 0 INTERNA nON.lL 6 membership fees • •• • • • • $ 90 . 00 S IO N S RE VEliUE . 240 . 00 00lJUISSI O N ~ BALANOE DUE FRO!. LAST llEPORT TOTAl. OOlaUSSIONS DUE REMARKS: ,~ 115. 00 t ---- - -- Air- Mail Ca r e : j Hepburn Mo t or Court 5809 MaCLeod Trail Calgary , Alta , Canada ) �COLLEOTION REPORl - REI.UTTANOE FROY: H.B.Oantwell ADVISE COlaIIS ION STbTEMENT 8- 17 TO: Bentley M1tohell, Promotion Committee = TOTAL AD • Mont . Mont . Mont . NUI.!B1l1 Tr a il Rit e In Martins , Ino . Chadwick & Son 1 5. 00 HEHAR 60 . 00 )0 . 00 45 . 00 • REILI Ti'J.BCJ: Livingston Chamber of Commerce Picture Sponsorship $ )00. 00 1 membership DUE INTERlIA TIONAL $ 15 . 00 NSTATE 11.. REVENUE 0,0 10/0, 0 I,,)' $ /,-,> .t-!'Com!l SSlON lIALANOE DUE FROl.I LAST REPORT TOTAL Com!I S5l DNS DUE R EMARKS : ~ i 'It') ~ $ NO N~ $ ------- Mail care Hepburn Motel 5809 MacLeod Trail Calgary I �-. COLLllOTIOl! FROM: REPORT - RElUTTANOE H.H.OBnt~ell ADVISE _. CO!.lJ.[IS lOll S'l)ATE.llEIiT 10: Bentley Mitohell, Promot i on Oommittee I1UJ(BER 8 - 1 A » Gardine r Chamber of Callison Drus JG ardiner » Town M otel- Cafe " Parks ' Fly Shop M o ant 300 . .. 15 . 00 .. It Ri ver s i de Cabins " " Wilson Motel It e. 1i f f D1V 0/ /.,,,oS Lndu COLLECTIONS RE ~~ETVED Mountain View Motel , Gardin. r e ~30 REMITTANCE DUE !NTE~TIONAL TovID_Motel- Cafe membership fee 15 . 00 S I 0 11 REVENUE . bm~OMIUSSION BALAIICE DUE FROU LA ST REPORT TOTAL OOllMISSIOliS DUE REll A RKS: ------- Mail Care Gene ral Delivery Jacks on , \oVyoming ~ ~CO <7e>_ .~ none $'N:O r �. ~ COI,LllOTION REPORT - REIDTTA!!OE FROII : LI.H.Centwell - ro: Bentley .ADVISE !.Ii tehell, COl<1L1S3IOJ! STbTEMENT lllJUBER 7- 25 Promo,lon Comm1 ttee A - K Motel . Wyo . Snow iClng Courts .. Ed. Hodson Old Wyo • The Roundup Silver Spur Cate Paul Hanson Co . . .. l! . Western Steak HOllse .. .. .. Jackson Hol e C of C Star Valley 89'ers Rich County Commission N. Ariz N. Ariz (two checks , $30 each) 60 300 200 • 50 . 15 (Bel due- $lOO ) Camp Townseild Br anding Iron Din. COLLECTIONS MADE ON PR'~V 'rm ~ Wyo . Corral Motel 30 . (Report 5-6 FUture) llElJITT.ANCE COLONIAL MOTEL- funds remi DOE IN~TIONAL (This r eport) 3 memberships but due from Report 6- 29 45.00 15 . 00 ~j?> , ?5 <"\'10,'-'V REVEIlUE $ q~b ~OOl.!/.lI SSION BALANOE DUE .FROII LAST TOTAL COMMISSIONS DOE .REPORT ~ '3 ; '~ . • '3.;' '1 $ .. 13. 00 REMARKS -------- ) �Complete and KEEP ORIGINAL RETURN COPY WITH CHECK �COLLECTION F.,EPOR:' - REIIJTTAIlCE FROM: M.H.Cantwe l l = SEOTI011 Wyp. ADVISE - O=aSSION STA TEUENT NUMBER 6-29 £0; Bentley Mitohel l . Fromotion Commi ttee A CCOUHT ADV. Sterling Service TOTAL DUES R E M AR K S 30 .00 J100 Wyo Twitchell Service Wyo La Kota Res or t Wyo Wyo Wyo Clark Oil Co Lazy B Motel ThreeK Sisters Moteli Wyo loG.A.Food Center Wyo Wyo Bear Leke Dairy Coo-op Lower Valley Power & Li8 30.00 30.00 ;30 . 00 30 .00 (membership Chief Motel) 30.00 30 .00 30.00 30 • 00 ;30 .00 ;30.00 25.00 100.00 30.00 30.00 25.00 100.00 (apply picture) (apply picture) :rMnous COLLECTIONS MADE ON C NTRA2~ ********************** ******* •• **** Wyo. Wyo Wyo \'Iyo N.ARR Wy ~ Vi:; Valleon Hotel Star Valley Jewelry Swis s Motel 45.00 , )0.00 30.00 30.00 Vir Day Motel 300.00 Williams-G.C. C of C 30.00 Anvil Motel, Jackson G o ID 77 I'a, ) !1o-bor Cau t sa ~ f- 45.00 30.00 30.00 30.0.0 300.00 , 15.0 1.60. 45.00 Report NO. 5-6 (future) " " " , Report NO. 6-10 Report No 5-6 (future ) 11.53 '.,30 DO 3f' 1? "' , IADD REMI T'MHCE $ REMITTANCE DIlE INTERNA TIONAL- Gus Rioh Lake Shore Resort 30.0 - -- C O M MISS I O N S T A'rEME lI'T REVENIlE $ '330 .£J6 0M!.II SSI O N FROM LAST REl'OR:r TOTAL OOM!.!ISSI O DUE llS REMA R KS , BALANCE DUE -....,. -- 101411 Check: ~ ~ 7~, , b '1 \i> 1-; 0 77 <.Q., $ -:l,7 b, h I? - CARE GENERAL DELIVERY lACKS ON HOLE, WYOMING / �COLLECTION . FROM : M.B.Cantwell = ~TIO.!l ~... _ . TO: B~ntley Jacob Lake Inn _ .. _ N . Ariz . N. Ariz . N. Ariz ADVISE COJ8.[IS roN S~TEllENT N1Jl.!llER 6-19 1Ii tchell, Promotion Oommi ttee A 0 N. Ariz .. - REPORT - REI,[!TTA:'!CE . -- - 120 . 00 *. Cameron Trading Pos t Gray Mt . Trading Posy 66 M otel , Flagstaff 30 Dues on the se accounts were paid by separate COIll:CTIONS MADE ON PRE!VIIJUS che~k for remi t tance S . Utah Peach, ' s Trails End 30 . 00 30 . REMITTANCE DUE dihrect to Assn. Treasurer I NTERNA TI ONAL REVENUE ~ 390 .000OWllSSI O N lIALANCE DUE ~'ROllI LAST REPORT TOTAL COMMISSIONS DUE ~ ~ $ 130 .00 nom 130.00 REMARKS ------- ) �NUJlBER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROW : 1I. H. CantweU SECTION ~ CO NTRACTS ACCEPTED FOR FUTURE PAYKENT TO : Bentley lIitchell , Chairman Promotion Committee A CCO U NT ADV . DUES TOTAL " , " , " So . U tah " " " , " Vir-Day 110 tel Star Valley Jewelry Corral Motel Vall eon Hotel AnVil M otel Swiss llotel ( Her ewith) Trail s End Restaurant Art Gl"eene C iff Dweller s l Murray Harri son ConoeD Serv . Dicks utoco Ser vic e Bryce Canyon Cafe Colonial Motel 30. 00 30 .00 30. 00 45 .00 30.00 30.00 30. 00 60. 00 30. 00 30 .00 30. 00 30. 00 15. 00 30. 00 30.00 30 .00 45. 00 45 . 00 30. 00 30 .00 60. 00 30 .00 30 .00 30 .00 30 .00 $ 405 . 00 $ 15. 00 $ 420 .00 Future PROI!ISED PAYUENT DATE (Previous Contracts) Wyoming , " 5- 6 July 8 July 10 June 1 June 10 July 1 I!ay 15 July 1 June 1 June 1 June 1 July 1 July 1 �COLL!I:TION REPORT - REIilTTANC, _ l -"rn E = COILIIlSSION !i!! !,u .H STATEUENT 5 - 6 FR(Jl: M R. Cantwell . SECTION Wyoming " " " , • , , , , , " " ! " " So. Utah , , " " Montana So . Ariz . N. Utah Canada TO: Bentley Mitchell, Chairman Promotion Committee ACCOUNT Paris LiOO IS Club Bear Lake Count ,. Comnission Gertsch llarket Chief lIotel Star Valley Hunt Camp Fr eel ' 8 Super lIarket Mark' s Chevron Service Th e Flame 1.1:0 t el Canyon Camp Valleon Hote~otel Fred' s Cafe Lonnette Wotel Del and Ted ' s Central Texaco Jensen' s A G Market Bur goyne Cate Jewell and New Park Motels Cameron ilotel ani Tours Parry' s Lodge Raiobow Caf e Hi-Way 89 Lodge llountair Motel Aiken ' s Lodge Martin' s Inc. La Siesta llotel II1tchell IIote1 Hepburn Votor Court , Ltd . DUES ADV . 250 . 00 150. 00 )0. 00 )0 . 00 )0. 00 )0. 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 30. 00 V REIIARKS 250. 00 150 . 00 )0 . 00 30.00 30. 00 30 . 00 50.00 )0 . 00 )0. 00 )0.00 )0. 00 )5 , 00 10. 00 )0. 00 )0 . 00 37. 00 30. 00 TOTAL 15 . 00 15 . 00 15 . 00 )0. 00 _ Dues paid by separate check )0 . 00 not deposited in PromotioanFund )0. 00 )0. 00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 30 . 00 )0. 00 45 . 00 )0 . 00 50 . 00 )8 units- $ 8 . 00 bal.due 30 . 00 )0.00 )0 . 00 )0 . 00 )5 . 00 Bal .due on publication $ 20. 00 10. 00 45 . 00 45 . 00 52 . 00 Dues not deposited. in PrOmotiOl )0.00 Fund (\8 1132. 00 COMIIISSION S~ATEIIENT Total Adverti.ing R.venue ••••••• $ 11)2. 00 Commi ••ion • • ••• $ )77 . )) PAYABLE TO: II . H. Cant".l1 60. 00 1192.00 REllITTAtGE CS Pr.vious ~ uar . - 1057. 00 INTIRNATIONAL '-" . ~ � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4353 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3403 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/840">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/840</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 3211616710 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Collection Report, Remittance Advise, Commission Statement Description An account of the resource A collection report, remittance advise, commission statement documenting the membership funds and other payments. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource Accounts United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL 322 Box 1 Folder 21 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd21 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/0fe0c302cbafb6e80e9d8cceb202820e.pdf c23b01025467cf1b31017c168ad3909d PDF Text Text AD M INIST _ ... TION ARIlONA OffiCE, OfFICE 1"0 WEST SECOND SOUTN ST 1021 E. Cao•• lbD(k Rd. Phoa"i_, "',j~D"D DiDI CR " . 7708 " UTAH DI ... l fl9·9J22 S... LT L... KE CITY OffICE Of Saturday P . M . Dear Bentley: Offield: Am _AY V STEWAU , •• , Id . " , w ••'.,ft lIo4 oho l WIIII.m" ",'; .o~. this a t Marks on the way down from Great Falls. I am feelin& too nerTOUS to stay over till Monday to see you , a nd am anxious to ~et home . The sooner I do , and get relaxed , the sooner I will be on my feet again . 5. O. 104 0 U OW 'fic.. " .lId..., 104 ..... 0 .. 104 010t1 FI.q".H AIi.oll. IEN TLU Io4 ITCHELl Vlu., •• o1d .. , IIo4ltcll. lI 110401. 1 Laqu, UI.h W fi. lASS typi~ SK•.,.,.,.T .. .... ~r L. SI. tI. 104 01 . , Wl d . ab<o, 'iI , Ali . ... I will call you ::t::aw' r d'xtlnrxm:lli:xa1: next week , ·.nd eithe r come up, or arra~e to see you in SnIt Lilke . lliter a few days total rest , I should be able to mOYe about a bit without any trouble . Anyway , you ~ nd M rk and I should get toge ther for a a Promotion Comrittee Meeting some day soon . Mark says he would be able to come up to Logan IF he has a few days notice . DIUC10U, $UILl UIo4 0 SED ... NO HoI., F.. , 1Io4 .,co. d. Nl •• Naq.I •• , 50".... , 104 •• lco IU_NETT .... HEND_YlC Com.... 1104 0'" , .. d 'o~ .. ""'iluIlCh, UI.II FlANIC W , 50_fi... n Fin' SKy,lI, auk of Id."" 104.... ,10'11 .., Id.ho D...LLAS .... CLI NGER fI,i" G S.ddl . Lod'il' Apli" " W,oml,,'iI I left Livingston before an)'WBY . he had no checks the inclosed check which sign it a nd send i t down your check to Chnrlie arriTed , and K1JX with your signature . Charlie wrote needs your si~natur e . Pl ease ~ to me ••• sure can use . Thanks . will ca ll you soon . Vlill be at home . 1 «3 East Phone Cr- ?0260 . _ICH .... O C. FERGUS F.,'iI ~' 104 01.1 G ... , F,U. , 1104 0"'... IIUeUTl VI lI e UIA " , Io4 ... UIN H, C... NTWElL W Sacoftd $.0 ..... Salt l6k. City , Utah '* SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERICAS ~080 S. �June 19. 1957 FROM : CANTWELL TO BENTLEY M ITCHELL SUBJECT: Request for re-fund of supplies r e ; Promotion Committee purchased and paid in cash by M. B. Cantwell . Sales slips or receipts for each individual item attached hereto . Grand Central Drug •.•••••••••••••• Friends Off ice Equipment •••••••••• S . La.ke Blue Print ...• .... ...• . . •• • M 'Nest Office Supply •••• • ••••••• id- TOTAL DATE l\.ID,_ _ __ CHECK NI),_ _ _ __ $ 15 . 48 �' GRAN D CoNTRA L DRuG. No... I.PR 23 50 40 ~ $ 000 .06Qr A $ 000.06Qr A 000.0 6Qr A S 000.06Qr A $ 000.0 9Qr A $ 000 .09Qr A $ OOO.0 9Qr A $ OOO.09Qr A $ OOO.09Qr A $ 000.09Qr A $ 000.0 9Qr A $ 000.09Qr A S OOO.09Qr A $ 000.0 9Qr A S OOO.09nr A S OOO .09Qr A $ OOO.09Qr A $ OOO.09Qr A S OOO .09Qr A $ OOO .09Qr A $ 000.09Qr A $ OOO.09Qr A S OOO .09Qr A $ 000 .09Qr A $ 001.5911w A $ S$ 003 .631l A $ O OO.071x A S$ ~ �Office Equipment & Supplies Service Sale. Phone 221 10 W. Aspen Flaqstaff. Arizona Box 762 Customer's Ord~r No._----,,---_ _ _ _ _ _ Dat~~\6t>.!.Y'>.!',,.~'--- 19r;1_ M D~"'--" Addrus _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ ><>-0" V-I I CHARG£ I ON ACCT r c..O.O. OUANTITY OSE. REID PAlO OUT DESCRIPTION ~i'1\ p~ () . 0 "KE , .1lA ., \ :l.. K. II AMOUNT ~ II t; '/ I ".. bill ..d .n .::::. ''!Yo A ~ I _ ,,)l ,J . A LL claims and returned goods MUST b~ attompant~d by thiS bill 74 0 10 R ec'd by I;; u 10;- �I~O /, / com ~ DATE > o· ,. • ;::!: • .. / ... ? ( , ,. • -" .. , •• • • • £.. II " • • , r-;- J ;J ~ V \ F ~ I I.. I ~-~ 1\ ;::; t1A'/ ", 7l /"7 ,. : ! I ~ .. 'I-Ie 0 " • < • •• • •< •• • o. •• ., '< I d.u 10_ ' ~ • ,~ • >I '" . UJ'I " ... '--" 7/ ('-'1 ,">P '0, 'II. ~n .V \l~" YOU' 0''''' NO: M YOU. "QN. NO_ AllCiAiMs FO. "'005 O. - .u" " MAD< . , ONe> & MUST" , L or '0. 39 424 m TN" - , . �IN VO IC E D ESKS • CHAI RS • FILING CA BI N ETS • SA FES • COMPLETE OFFICE SUPPUES TIiLEPHONE EMpire .(-}H7 60 WEST SECOND SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH O AT E IN VOICE NO. YOU " O ROER N o . R EO. N o . TE RMS : .... ::2.. 7 / ~ " ~ 0 0 </ '- ) 2- 07 �BENTLEY IIITCHELL !lay 8, 1957 Re I Report No. 5-0 uu .. unlllllla .. u .. Dear Bentley; Inclosed are two reports • •• one listing paid. salell and. collections , and the other the contracts accepted for tu:Jrure paymSlt . This is the genera1 type ot torm which I plan to use aa a remittance adYia. in sending the orders. They will also serve as a statement of commissions due me as well as a statement of membership tee money owed to the parent organization on the sales included in each report . For reference purpoaes , each rep:lrt will be munbered. in the upper right corner and in each case the number w111 also be the dat. of the report which _111 make them eally to tile . up On this first report No 5-6 I have brought the entire operation/to date by including everything that has been tumed in 110 far . Since I plan to send theae reports in every rew days , or at least once a week in the future, I w111 probably coneolidate the pa.id and future ordera on the lIame form using a space at the bottom. to list the future' . Thill bottom portion could alWayll be detached. 11 you prefer to keep separate files on the two types of contractll . In order to keep Bill Baas out of trouble, it will be hec easary to send the membership dues checks to ms so that I can supply the list of memberships covered, and remit t . Bill _ in the usual manner on my regular "Remittance Advise" fol"&.. Wake these checks out to the International Asan. and. always make a notation on the check including my report number like this •••• " 4 dues No 5-0" • You can mark your check number on your copy of my report showing the date the item waa paid and I will do the same on rq copy of the report and this will give us a simple but easil)' audited set of double records . Aa soon aa I get time , I will unload the duplicator and run off a batch of these forma so that our aystem will remain uniform. On the coll1rlissions , we will use the same aystem. For my record I plan to use a double entry ledger sheet and with each report sent to you I will. make a charge against the Promotion Fund(Report No 5-0 ••• •• $J77 .JJ) and will enter a credit as the itemd are paid. In order to .peed things up, I am going to make every effort to secure lcae sub-agents. It possible, I would like to leave a coiple working here down South while I am up North during late June, JUly, and August . These agents Will eubmit their reports to me , and I will include t heir business along with mine on the reports I send to you . All commissions will be paid to me, and I in turn will pay my own sub-agents and keep my CMa books and recorda on these transactions . As to my debt to the Committee for advance draws • •• I dis cussed this with mr additor before leaving Salt Lake and he advises me as follows: In keeping my tax records , he will list this aivanca as Ugross incoman(which it really i8) and then balanc e the dtem by charging it off as "expense" as it is rapa1d by me . To keep the record simple and 8>1"8 accurate, he recommends that I repay this advance in instal1.m.enh by personal check rather than have it deducted. !'rom eamed. conmis3 i ons . If I am correct, this figure is $ JJ.2O. 77 ( $ 1200 draw plus S 220 . 77 ""Peo.e advance) . It TOU &Uoo that t his oy.tem will be satisfactory, I will enter the item on my ledger as a liability under "accounts payable tl and will li.:quidate it by check in installments at intervals and in such aJD:)unts as I can afford. :tty contract calls for this debt to be refunded out ot the final settle:nent of total comniss i ons earned, but I believe it will be better for i l l concerned to work it as suggested. above and start. paying it ott as s oon a.s I get my head above water . It you choose, you could endorse rq cbecks and send thea on down to Bill BaS 8 as a means of liquidating the debt to the International Assn. It w111 simplify :your accounting to pay rrq c011lDissions in tun as each report i8 received in keeping with the "pay as 1OUu8GII system. Otherwise you would probably have to set up various "reserve funds l1 to cover th1a and other liabilities which could become quite complicated in time. P.S . I will send notices to tne "Future Pay" a ccounts prior to the due date. �FROJ.I: M.E.Cantwell TO: Bentley Mitchell (oopy Ray Stewart) SUBJECT: Report on sOlicitation M ontpelier Idaho April 7, 1957 *** ************ ***********. ************** ******************* ***** **** Inclosed are two Adve rtising orders- one from the JEWELL MOTEL with check for $ 50.00 at tached and the other from the SWISS MOTEL with the notation thet Mr. Emil G1euser hes agreed to mail his check to you within 30 days. On W ednesday, after leaving Dogan, I attended the Lions Club meeting at Paris and solicited their 8uppor~ • All members present more or less ag reed that the Club should spend around 250.00 to sponsor 8 picture of their Cavern 1Ibich they operate during the Summer as e fund ra1s1ng proJeot. The matter was referred to the Boerd of Directors for final deciSion, and a special mee ting of the Board w1ill1 be celled within B few dfWS . They hove around . 750.00 in their speoial ·cavern Fund" and our chances look good on this deal, e specially s1nce Mark Pugmire, Smith Gertsllh , and seversl others of the Direotors are egler Members, and are strong for the Idea. * After the Lions mee ting I wes invited to tell the story to t~e Board of Direc tors of the Be8l" leke Valley Dalrym anB Coop Assn. who were allo meeting Wedneeday nigh t. The Coop i ndioated thet they wouJdsupport the Program, but wIll decide the amount at a later date . Mark 's dad is • member of the Board, and M ark w111 follow it up. W heve set up an appOintment with the Bear Lake County Commissioners e for Monday. Frank Sor g at. has helped to or ganize a deleg ation w hioh will include repres entatives from the Montpelier Chamber of Commerce, .everal 89 1 er members who are pretty heavy taxpayers, and representatives of the Paris Li ons Club will also a ttend. W plan to ask the Commissioners for e a few hundred dollars to publioize the ares and sponsor a pioture of Bear Lake in the brochure. The Commission hes vote. money to support similar projecta in the~past , end Fronk seems tot~ink thet we will ge t something f rom them, Hed planned to get on over to Afton Smurday, but have stayed over in Montpelier to attend the M onday Commission meeting. Del Taysom has arranged to g et the Officers of the Star Valley Club toge ther to meet wi th me on Tuesday for the purpose of planning a fund- raising drive in Star Valley in aupport of the Promotional Program. I will try to pick up s few listings from some of the pre sent members a nd ge t the Club star ted on a campaign to raise a o ommuni ty jack- pot . I will then try to get Jackson Hole set u. the same way ••• picking up wha t li s tings I oan in a ooup1e of days and try to get the. Club to follow thru with their County Commission end other prospeotive supporters . I have, of course made other contaots with individual members here in Montpelie r, and heve a few promise. of future support. Ross Clerk, for example wants to weit until his father, who i s out of town at present gets a chenoe to look it over. During this next week, I hope to get things started pretty well from Montpelier to J eckson ao that so. . progress will be made while I am working down in Ar izono . Should be seeing you in Logan the end of the week, or Mond ay AM at the very latest. �1h."-'. e~,'j~ '.0 . . ' j..AA.~0 \0 ,. t:s"'-~ - oJ1C1.~\ o ..,,,,,.J, '--\ ~ ~ Q.~ ~ ~ 0h.~_ �, PRCIU 1I J1.Cant...u J........,. 16. 1957 TO. 89' or Club Pr",,1donte SUBJECT. IaJJJ' to Star Valley and IlIJmJiTER IIliIBIil'SIIIP IlAliQJI!T _•••••••• ~ ••••••••••••• M a ••••••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 ••• •• 'lbe enclosed bulletin wbieh baa been ....1l.ed to the eut1r<o 89 . ... _bwship gi..... of the detaila on _ lI1d-ldnter ....tina and _rohip benquet to be bald at Afton. lI;ycming on .Ianuar7 29 (TI.Ieedq) f~ a two dq .....tiDg of the Boord or Diroctoro . Preo1dont Ra,:r V. Stewart. ...be 10 _oentl,y 8>ttq traa W llJl_ en a bwtjne•• trip ha. asked ... to invito a nd urge all local Club Presidento to meet ldth tho Board of D1roctoro at 3 . 00 P'" an 1bMdq, Jan. 29 to ofter 1.deas and .UUO"tic:ns wb1ch 1dll _1st )our Otf1c .... in f1ndlng a practical. solution to ....eral of CW' lIOet ..... ioua prci>Jeoe and aloo get a pre-Y1... of tinal plane frr prO<llcticm of tho .,. COlllllW II!OCHtEI and 89' '''' lIOVlE . I14tt4lra on the ag.nda of particular int .... st to 'fOUl' Club 1nclude the work1n& out of & IIOre effective s)'at_ &1Md at ~arlng tile coll.ction of remoml. _ as wall as pl.aDI for en tnt"",,!... a;>&l1&1on and a<lllberobip c-,"gn in fIOC7 area ....l.1 in tho Spring. Several ~rtant ~to th. IIY-lawe daaling with &attar. of local Club or8lll1ization and operation wil.lf"oul:cx1tted for )'OUr approval. betoro final passage • Ra,:r 10 meat anxioua to haw 811 ~ of ~ as possible attend this COnf. .8IlC6 ldtll the Bo ..d and alao bring ... JIWI)' of 7CW' local _ . aa J'OU con "round upi' to _ the triP. It 1dll be an "opon ""etin&" at 3 . 00 p.a. Cll 'I'IMocIa7 and 'fOUl' 1deu , • probl_. and euggeationa on ....ttor. otll... than _ .....tioned abcn 1dll alao he ...e1<:<88 and rec.iw the..,at tboro1l8h conti_.tion. l!AIIQDJl'l' TICKETS I'm SALE TO IOOR JIEl!!!llRS .w! _ I!EIlIG SllNf _ '!be bUlletin adYiaea Ilemberil thet l!anc(Uet Ticket. will he available frca tho Club Prewident. liithin & dq or ao. J'OU 1dll rece!... a fw ticketo direct frca the STAR VAUEr 89 . .... CWB. It 1dll be appreciated i f )'OU will contact aa local 89 ' ...a as possible, and work up a good del.gatiOll to represent )'Our ...... rh10 1dll be one of the lJIOot II!P(J!l'!IIT ..eetings we OWl' beld am 1dll l.auncl1 our ent.... progran of oct1Y1tia. for 1957. = I'UWlI! IIAIL TOUR Jm'ORT 00 TICKET SAlJ'S 1'0 '!HE STAll fAUEl 89' '''0 CWB. 1', 0 , BOX 8'] . Af19!!. liTO. in tjma to reach th. on l'RIDAT. JANUARY 25 . '!he)' are r~ed to adviae the Vallecn Hotel as to the IllII!ber of _ t e d gueato on that date, and )'Our ropart 1dll help avo18 m1e-cakulation and confUe1on. If. however . ....e of )'Our _ore de::1do to c.- at tha laet mnute Bl}NG 'IHllI ALC!IO , \D-j:.. ~ �/ FROM: M. H. CXNT'IIELL TO: January 2, 1957 ALL DIRECTO RS SUBJECT: NOTICE O J ANUARY BO F ARD O DIRECTORS MEETING . F **************** ******************************************************** In response to the preference poll. a major ity of our Direc tors have i ndi cated that the January 28 and 29 dates will be most convenient. This, therefore is of fioial noti ce that a Speoial Mee ting of the Board of Directors of the 89 'ers Inte rnati onal Highway As sooiati on, Ino . will be held a t Aft on , W yoming on Monday and Tuesday, January 28 and 29 , 1957 . PLACE: PROGRAM: Valleon Hotel, Afton , W yoming Call to order, 9:00 A. M. Monday , January 28 Recess by motion Monday P . M. Call to order, 9:00 A. M. Tuesday, January 29 Adjourn by motion Tuesday P. M. On Tuesday evening the Mid- W inter Rall y and M ambership Banquet will be held at the V lleon Hotel at which time deta ils of the Brochure and a 89 t er Movie projects wi ll be announced, as well as complete information on the proposed February meeting in M exioo and other matters of interest to the membership in genera lo Pre sent indi ca ti ons are that upwards ot 100 89'er members and prospective members fr om the Northern Area will attend this Rally Banquet. GENERAL I NFORMATION It wil l not be ne cessary for Directors to make ad vance reservations, as ample a ocomodatloDs will be available both at the Vallean Hotel, and at nearby Motels. Upon arrival, go t b, the lobby of t he Val le on Hotel where a Committee member will be on duty to arrange ac oomodatioDs in acoordanoe wi th your needs and prefereno60 It will facilit a te arrangements if you can advise the Salt Lake Of fio e well in advanoe rega rding your pl anned time of arrival . An advanoe ag enda of bUsiness to come before the meeting will be sent to each Director in t he near future. yours, ¥:I<fu.~~~f&t ..ry- l �March 4. 1 957 Dear Bantle y; Here 1s dra f t of the re portf t o the Dir ectors . It 1s l ong • .• keeps 8 ge tting longer ••• • o I .uddenly decided to stop end let you fini. h it up on B more cheerful no te . I have double spaced i t. so thst you can edIt , wh~tever ch8n~e . and correc t - you wi ll. It IS long . but it takes qutte B few words to get ove r the fac t that we ha ve been trying to g e t something done and sure 88 hell need a little he l p . if a ll we had t o r eport was The copy of my ~ e tter 8 It would be quite .imple f ew t housand dollars revenue received . to Burnet t exple ins itee l f . He should be .endi ng me the dope on t he M e ebout the time you p:e t this back to Sa lt take ovi and I wi ll rush the entii. re po rt into finish ed form. The monthly r ep ort to Bi ll Be ••• how. tha t we took in $ 375 . out of whiah we owe the O lubs $ 70. My bill to the A•• n . fo r Feb. whi ch includ e. my profes siona l fee and al l items of r outine expense tota ls $ 249 . 39 . I d on ' t heve eny idee how m uch Be •• will have l eft . but i t mi ght be e idee to ask f or moe t of it so we can ge t the Re gards . $ 150 to Ba iley. ~o o d �BENTLEY MITCHELL August 2 1957 *•• *.************ Dear Bentley: The deal with the Yellowstone Park Co , Hamilton Stores , and H~ines Studio is in the work. but we will not know the answer for a week or so " Due to .eriou. illness of the !I"I father of the Y. P . CO . President and the rush of the .eason in the park , it became impo.sible to get them all three together , and from the way thing. looked , this could never be accompli.hed on a matter of this kind ••• • o I did the next best thing . Don .atkins , the public relations man for the yP CO . spend. considerable time in the Park and sees a l lot these three men from time tmtime . r have appointed him as a sub- agent to follow thru on the deal, which he has agreed to do . It will . Ie co.t a commission , but will be the be.t way to handle it , because I could probably .pend a week running them down , and he bump. into tham by accident . In the meantime , I got a .tart in Gardiner. Charlie ~ ~ tin came down trom Livingston to the Chamber meeting , and we got some resul ts as you will I. note"trom the report. I called Ernie S~an , and learned that he will be out of town for a week , but is etpecting me around the 15th to 20th . He .aid that he will be able to spend some time with me then , and that it would give u. plenty ot time .ince motel. there do not clo.e till about the middle of September . In the meant~e , Charlie will .pend .ome time with me in Montana getting a start and will help me try to locate a sub- agent to follow thru while I am in Alberta. IVe are of cour.e a.suming that the vote on the increased commission will be favorable . I also mentioned this to Ernie , and he thinks we m18ht be able to locate .omeone to sell the individual li.ting. and .olicite member.hip in Alberta after the key contaots have been made . There i. a big potential here in J a ck.on Hole yet , but .low work due to the ru.h and contusion . Look. like I will have to do what I can pp until about Thur.day ot next week , then fini.h up Gardiner on Fri . and Sat . and go on up to Living.ton on Sunday for a few day. with Charlie who will probably travel a. tar north with me as Great Falls . Then to Alberta . It I am able to locate .ome .ub-agents to leave behing in Jackson , Montana , and Alberta , we will really be in business but I KNOW they are going to be hard to tind , even with an attractive commis.ion to otter . Shoot my check back via air mail a. soon as po •• ible and also any dope you may have on the progress of the ballot etc. ! I thought that Ray may have called you) .ince I have had no word . �• FROM: M.HoCantVlell I August 18, 1957 TO : Bentley M itohell SUBJECT : Request for refund on items paid in cash , and chargable to Promotion Committee . Receipt for each individual item attaohed here too GATEWAY ECHO For wrapping Membership Roster s in packages to be mailed to Club Presidents 0 •• I I POSTAGE (parcel post) on the above packages • 0 $ 3. 71 ••••••••••• 6. 46 TOTAL REFUND DUE , I NOTE : Have been ca77ying a couple thousand around waiting for an opportunity to get , to Southern points . Finally got it done in Choteau o Have distributed them personally stored a g ood bunch at Jac kson to give out $ 10 17 0 of the Membership Rosters them packaged for shipment Livingston . and mailed at North of Afton , and have at the ConventioDo I I �09'm UIHRNATlQNAl HICIIWAY mOCIATIOH, II:C. iUO '1/. SeCllnd So. . S,1t l"e City, Utah �GATEWAY ECHO 302 E. Ca lle nd er Phone 5 LIVINGSTON. MONTANA WULTIGUPN JOIWOlll: HEN .... C. OUE STAO Aug.15. 1957 O"ICl 'U.NITUItl 89 International Hirhway M8ociation "P(W.ITlit SALn 10... 0 SlI¥ICI Packing AOOIMG WACNINI SALlS "NO Sllty.Cl CAtN .leISTl. SALU ...... OnI¥ICI WIWIOGUPM sumlll ALL I.INOI Thank you �BENTLEY MITCHELL August 27 , 1957 Dear Bentley: No wor ~ having been received regarding the outcome of the ballot on the increased sales commission , and in ~iew of the fact that Cecil Grad was ready to go t o work , Er nie decided to phone Ray to find out how the matter stood so that I would be a position to negotiate with the man . Ray advised us tha t the necessary six (2/3) ballots had been cast in favor without a It NO" vote except Charlie Martin , who thru error had signed in the wrong space . Charlie intended to vote "YES" , and advised me that he had done so when I was in Livingston . He is sending in a new ballot properly ma'rked to ma.ke i t legal . On the strength of this information , I have proceeded to hir e Mr . Orad and, and am running classified ads . in Great Falls and Livingston . On the attached report , I have listed the "sub- agent" sales first and drawn a . . 7. sub- total showing the 50% ba siness . My personal 33 1/3% business follows with the total commission due (both kinds) listed at the bottom. This I thin~ will work out O, K., unless you have other ideas . On these orders , I worked with Orad helping him make the sales etc . but had him sign the receipt part of the order which will indicate to you that they are "sub'!'agent sales" For auditing purposes , the signature of the sub-agent on these and future contracts will be your authorization to pay the 50% s~es commission under the terms of the revised contract . ~ Speaking of the contract , I guess Bill Bass never found the two copies Ray claims, he mailed for signature . Fortunately , I retained a third copy and will d~aw up something new. including the amendment . This I will do as soon as I find time , and send them along to you ·for approval . You then can send them down to Ray for signature • •• or it there is any p6int in question , you and I and Ray can work it out when we meet in Jackson. ************* In making out this report , I have assumed that by mow you have mailes the commission due on Report No . 8-17 send a week ago Monday from Browning , and therefore did not show it as a"balance duel! on this current report . Char l le Martin called me here inhaggary the other night to tell me that the Chamber boa~d had not been ~ble to meet yet , as they had planned , so in the event you had been holding payment waiting to include the commissi on the Livingston CLof C. grant , wait no lomg*r • Funds are low , and . getting lower , so shoot up a check for the works including this No . 8- 27 report right away , as it wilm be a hell of a tight squeeze until these prospective $ 300 checks begin to roll in . Exchange is at an all- time high , and it costs $ 1 . 06 in good old U. S . currency to buy a Canadian dollar bill . You will note that most of these "checques" as they call them up here Iii have instructions written on them to the effect th~t they are payable ~i in II U.S . Currency" • On those which do not carry this notation , you should get an extra premium o~ anwhere from 4% up upon deposit at Logan. Ernie and I will be back in Calgery Friday , the 30th, and I will have to get up the ug report for Bil~BaSS , so don ' t forget the dues ~heck also . �• • • PHONE 2064 emitchell emotel 1301 East Highway 89 - Logan. Utah Au/"us t 31, 1957 H . C!l.ntwell Ca l gary , Canada . .~artin e r Martin: I a Dorry tc have ~ e lay e d the ~e turn of your last lette,. '!ntil t ius ,ne 11 rived today . I Ilave been ....way l'or SOti.s time ., nd upon ~y retw'n found t"e n o.t u ral fa) ri pol1ne "us ing the Fotol so havo been swa:cped 1011 th worl< rotting th~ ngs cleaned up after t em . YOU~B of the 27t~ arrIved t his ~orr1~~ an~ t hat brou ~h t me u s hort that :: hA.1 not e.nSl-18r ed tile one of the 17th . I ...' enclosing your oh eok s toeethor with 1r, ur 00P1 of t ,e two reports . You vill also find t.e .mall oheok to cover c oat of mailing rosters etc . You are riGht bout the ballots . W tAvo a olear e majority in favor of the ad ed oommission on subagent s a l e s . B yet we h va not heard from Freelmn or fl'o", llurnett Hendryx . I hot,. o t hat YOUI' worl~ moves forwa!'d more rapidly in Canada than i t ha s do'..m in the U. S . , otherw'se \-18 will nut have mue of a show~ng to report to the con v ontion . I will oloee fOr now and rush th~s l et ter dovn to t he lost Offi c e to t "Y and get i t to yeu on todays 1rmall . Si):"'loer ely yours , )_ -1,J/" !lent cy �T~ : Bentley Mitchell August 31 , 1957 ]'ROM : M. B. Cantwell SUBJECT : Special request re payment of commission mn three financial grants included in Report No . 8- 31 , attached . ************************************************************************ Since the first of August , the majority of my time has been spent in concluding Convention arrangements at Jackson t preliminary"missianaryU effort in Gardiner , Livingston , Choteau , and Great Falls Montana and here in Alberta working with sUb- agents and making key contaots with Vice- Fres . Saean in Calgary , Red Deer , Banff , and Edmonton. Considerable of my time was wasted at Jackson in the non-productive job of getting the Convention arrangements brought to a head in which I was a victim of circumstances beyond my control which offered no alternative except to stick it out . I can assure you that our Convention arrangements would have been in a sad state by now had I not stayed with it . The missionary work done in Montana shows promise of resUlting in tangible support when I have the opportunity to follow thru . . W."" To date the potential support in Alberta , and the favorable reception given indicates a final total far in excess of Ernie's most optimistio estimate . Three sponsorship grants of $ 300 each have been given final approval and tour others , also for $ )00 each , have been favorably recommended and are now pending official approval . Sub- agents have been apPointed in Calgary and Edmonton( The President of the local Motel Assn. in each City) and some 15 lines of listings by new members have been either paid for , or pledged pending a follow- up call . In addition , solioitation has been started on several other sizeable financial grants other than those mentioned above but as yet have not attained a secure enough status to be reported as ~potential" at this time . ! • In spite of all this good work , we have taken in very little tlcash money" as of now. I am sure it does not require a detailed explination as to why we cannot put the "rush act" on these organizations or high pressure such customers as the Provincial Government, Chamber of Commerce , and Calgary City Government into upsetting their normal accounting routine by insisting that they hand us the cash with the order . We are happy to have our grants officially approvea with payment to follow as soon as it can be cleared thru channels . As a result of the foregoing , I have been unable to hold up my ob ~ igations at home which has aggravated an already strained situation since it was never in our plans that I was to spend weeks on end away . During the entire month of August , I have actually only received one check ( $ 200-Report No . 8- 1) from the Promotion , and have only a total of $ 185 actually due from reports Nos . 8- 17 , 27 , 31 a major portion of which is owed to sub- agents . I am therefore in a serious and embarrassing financial position requiring immediate relief . In view of all the above , I am faced with the necessity of making this speCial requewt to the effect that I be paid the commission on the three financial grants included on the attached current report now, rather than waiting until the checks ~ have actuall y been received , which would of course be the normal perceedure . �BENTLEY MITCHELL August 31 - Page 2 All three of these grants have been officially ap proved , and the checks will be mailed as soon as they can clear routine ac counting proceedure . The contracts inclosed do not contain actual signatures for the reason that you simply do not insist that people like Provincial Ministers "sign onn the dotted linelt and in the case of City Council meetings and Chamber meetings , the mat l.. er is approved by motion following our presentation and diSCUSSion! which usu~lly takes up more of their time than they had planned , and t woUld not therefore be good ju4gement to intrude further by holding the meeting up to get a contract signed . I have no reason whatsosver to expect that you would doubt my word regarding these contracts , but from the standpoint of providing you with moral support , Ernie has suggested that he also should , as a Corporati on Vice-Presi dent verify the my request . His letter is attached . contracts , and endorse As your authority in this matter I quote from the minutes of the Directors meeting at Afton which authorizes our committee to !tdo all things necessary in the pranotion , production t and completion of the program , etc" and also deSignates you to administer the financial transactions . Burnett's official resignation will soon be on file to facilitate his replacement , which leaves a three man committee , and I am sure that Frank would not oppose a little detail matter of this kind . I was very much m4fraid that a situation like this would eventually come up , and that ' s the reason why I' was anxious to set up some sort of a finance plan , in the case we han a lot of business pledged for future payment ••• n& tes , however would not apply in the present case , since the payment of the grants will follow shortly , and it is not a case of the sponsors being short of funds . The $ 300 . 00 commission ot these grants will just pass thru my hands to take the pressure off at the moment , and will therefore not put me in a comgortable position for long . While we are on the matter , I would therefore like to request that you also consider the possibility of making it routine to pay commissions on these larger contraot s in cases where the grant has been officially and finally approved and the matter of issuing the check is in the works . I persobally cannot see any possible objection to it , aw long as the ac count balance can afford to hol d the bag for a week or so until the check arrives . From my standpoint , it woul d take a great load off my mind, especially since I will devote most of my efforts in the solicitation of these large chunks now , and leave the line listings tor t¥e sub- agents to tollow up . This is the only way we will ever get the job done . From all indications , we will usually have to wait a short period for the check afeer the grant haw been approved which would kee~ me in hot water most of the time . Traveling expenses total practically $ 100 per week , and I have obligations of about $ 400 monthly in Salt Lake City , so you can see where I really have to keep it comming in to enjoy any peace of mind . In addition, I will be moving pretty fast, and even after you receive the checks , you would in m ost cases have to ~ wait until you heard from me in order to send the commission. On my reports , I will always be able to give a current address , and could get my commissions fast if you were to pay on approved contracts upon receipt of the report . �BENTLEY MITCHELL August 31 - Page 3 Anothe» advantage is the fact that I would like to be in a position to give my sub- agents a check for their commission as soon as they turn in the paid orders . This will help keep their morale up and on the job. 5 it is now, I cannot afford to do this , and have to ask them to wait ~ until I get it back from you and Bill Bass ••• I can ' t send the membership fees to Bass till I get it back from you , so it makes it a hell of a long way around the pond ••• and it will get more involved the more sub- agents I get and leave mil es behind me . If I can get full commissions advanced on my good contracts , I could probably be able to payoff the SUb- agents and hold the bag until I get it back from you . I hope I have made myself clear ••• this letter is getting pretty long and invol ved . This request applies ONLY to good contracts in cases where the grant has been approved , and the check is to tollow in short order . It does not apply to the "future payment contracts" where the guy is short of money and promises to mail the check in 60 or 90 days . On these I would not expect commission until the bill . . is paid . Ernie and I made a fast two day trip up to Edmonton and Red Deer U • '3 rushing back to attend the Calgary Commissioners meeting on Friday . I have one or two deals to follow up here in Calgary right after Labor Day , which will fin i sh me up here . Ernie and Cecil Grad will follow thru in Calgary , and I will p . ~ ceed to Red Deer for a day to make some motel calls and then on to Edmonton to folloY! up on several grants that are in the works , and train my Sub- agent there . Then to Jasper , Banff , Ft . MacLeod etc . I will have to stick around Calgary till I get hold of a good chunk of money , so will conclude by ask ing you to wir e me the $ 300 requested on the Report 8-31 grants , care of the Hepburn Motel . Also please include in the wmre any commissions still unpaid from the two previous reports in the event these checks have not been mailed , as well as the. 30 on Grad ' s two contracts listed in the II. :as report . current You can then mail the reports so that I can let ter ) please advise for immediate payment check for any membership ~ fees due from these get my monthly report tor August off to Bass . In that iII.lmr me regarding my request 'Ni ) i & S • of commissions on future approved grants . I I will wait in Calgary for the wire , and Ernie will knON where to forward the letter . Will get this in the mail now, in hope that i t will reach you at least by Tuesday A.M. Regards , �Dear Bentley: BENl'IEY M ITCHELL August 27 , 1957 Arri ved in Ca~ary as per schedule Monday the 18th . found that Ernie had a busy p~gram ~aid out. I had written him in advanoe asking him to keep an eye open tor a sub- agent . and thru his efforts we were able to sign up 01" Mr . Ceoil Grad , operator of the Gradell Mote l AND President of the M,cel Association of Calgary . He is a very energetic sort of a fellow .1th lots on enthasiasm , and popular with Calgary operators as Well AS other businessmen. He cannot , of course spend full time solioiting memberahip but wi ll be able to do a good job for us since his court is small enou&b that his Wifeland dallghter can can be left ti se" alone for hourjJ.. at a timBo H e a so can make good. use of t~e money he will earno . IN' ;e~~!~ b!~~ t~i~f?~~~~~ ~fa:~~i~~_~:;~ _~ ?r~d ~reaking ~i~.&ll :g~L!-!p~ o~g sn8%s an~ lining up picture sponsorship . We have three pictures pretty well sewed up in Calgary at $ 300 per , but final action is pending on eaoh with the decision to be reached within the next few days, we hope . The1 are : the Chahber of Commerce , the City of Calgary, and the Stampede and Exhibition Board . Meetings have also been set up with several other organizations including the Alberta ~~~\ ~l Associatmon , the Restaurant Assn . eto . The door has also been opened with the Canadian Pacifio R. R. which operates the hotels at Banff and Lake Louise and I will follow thru wit¥ th~ when I visit these resorts next week o Tomorrow ( W ednesday) Ernie and I will go to Ed~onton where a meeting of the local Motel Association has been called for us W ednesday evening . On the way up , we will attend a lunch at Red Deer . Thursday , we have appOintments to meet Dan Campbell , head of the Alberts t ravel Bureau, and the other Government brass . Dan has phoned us several times regarding ideas he has on how to get some pretty go ~ d money out of one or more of the Petroleum. Companies , and is quite excited over the whole deal . All in all , we ha ve a wonderful potential lined up , and unless it all falls down around out ears will cut a nice bit of hay here in Alberta . } The reception DaB been great everywhereo •• due to Ernies advance efforts and popularity AND the fact that these people are apparently ripe for this promotion. The ver y thought of several million, people visiting Yellowstone each season ••• practioally in Alberta ' s front yard thrills them with the possibility of attracting a percentage of these Yellowstone visitors into Alberta . We have had a million dollars worth of publicity and the inclosed EDITORIAL from the Heral d , Calgary ' s leading daily newspaper would indicate that we are turning out a pretty good selling job . It ' s really something for a large daily in a City this size to give unqualified support to a promotion in it ' s EDITORIAL colums (Salt Lake Papers please note) IF we are lucky enough to secure anotheb top - notch sub-agent in Edmonton this will take care of the two major large Cities where the going is the slowest , and I will be free to cover the smaller communities and resorts once I have spent a few days breaking him in . Cecil Grad here is Calgary is about ready to go it on his own . These men will continue to work right up until pr ess time with Ernie to give a little prod if they begin to lose interest . More later , Martino �------------ THE CALGARY HERALD '" SOU TH AM NEWSPAP ER PubUabed bJ' thl Proprietor. The Soutbam Company LImited, at TIl, Herald 8u.lldinl. c.lJlary~.·;dA~'.~"'.~'~";:.;,C~f"i:'~d:'i;' ~~!;".,,, PHfLtP BASIl. DEAN. J mellARO L. £. DUNCAN WAINES. Bu.lneS! Managu Secutary-TTenuru Vol. 74 No. 208 No Statute Makes It has been said many than mankind can never be islated into goodness, and most often the phrase has been used in reply to well-meaning but misguided minorities which seek to impose their own defi· nition of goodness on whole populations. Many of these groups operate under some form of religious sponsorship, and thus it was teresting to observe the marks of one Calgary mini'ste on the subject during day sermon. Rev. C. A. ~~~,~lle~~~~~:'~ of Sl. Stephen's Church, re-asserted the sibility of goodness by and he commented that movements which seek remove abuses, without jog acceptable . themselves destined tual disintegration. The truth of Mr. statement has been before. Prior to D",hibl the U.S. there were abuses of the liquor as there are today, but stitute offere.dd~sii~n:i~;rC;'~ ' row-minded r cd equally unpopular suIt was more abuse and prohibition's itably followed. Mr. McMullen m,.vll.,1e thin~ing purely in convinced that what are getting is better than they are giving up . It be futile, for example. to a law requiring everyone ~ .. '"enQchurch. The probable would be to impair the respect which churches command in Ch ristian society. The same thing is true in the broader application of Mr. McMullen's message. If laws are passed which penalize everyone to prevent abuses by a few, then the law and the groups responsible for its creation will both fall into general disrepute and disfavor. Laws there must be, to punish people who offend society by unacceptable moral or physical conduct. The public supports. in fact demands. such legislation. But the public will not endorse laws which penalize everyone and Umit individual freedoms, unless it is convinced that the laws are sound. The public must be convinced o[ the basic need for any given law if it is to succeed in its purpose. If one individual's behavior is socially inadequate, it is pointless to try to improve him by punishing someone else whose behavior is perfectly all .right, and this is the point which most social legislation fails to consider. When people improve, it is by an inner conviction ,;~=~n o t ~= ~ arbitrary stem- Tourist Gold On The Trail Of 89 With a little imagination, and by co-operation with US. and Mexican tourist centres, AIberta could benefit greatly from a scheme to promote the "trail of 89." The 89'ers International High· way Association has been form ed with the idea of making a 6,500 mile route from Mexico to the jun ction of the Alaska highway north of Edmonton a popular tourist route. Alberta's Highway No.2, the main northsouth route in this province is part of the picture. As has been pointed out frequently iit these pages the pattern of tourist traffic is changing. Where once the best roads to the few good mountain re· 5:orts led through Alberta, now there are alternate routes and alternate mountain resorts. The province of British Columbia has started a vast new highway program and its interior resort areas are developing rapidly. Highway 97 runs through the centre of B.C. from the U.S. border to Alaska and in the U.S. it runs south to California. At present it is receiving publicity and support from tourist groups along the way who hope that they will encourage much more traffic over No. 97 Some of that traffic might come to Alberta, normally. We are not suggesting that there is not enough to go around, or that Alberta should get in some sort of petty fight B.C. The thing is that Alberta must make every effort it can to cash in on the tourist trade in spite o[ changing traffic pat· terns. The Highway 89 plan is one way in which Alberta can get the advantap:e of widespread publicity for the resorts and facilities it has to offer the tour· ist..Ken -Liddell, Herald columnist. who has devoted a. good deal of attention to Alberta's tourist problem, noted in a recent. story on the 89'ers Association that the plan is to divert U.S. tourists into a north-south pattern rather than an eastwest. The number of tourist automobiles entering Yellowstone Park in the U.S. this year was 1,000,000 by August 1. If one car in three could be diverted to Glacier Park in Montana then into Alberta via, say, Waterton, it would be a tremendous boost to the Alberta tourist industry Martin H. Cantwell, executive secretary of the association is visiting in Alberta tr.ying to get groups and individuals along Highway No. 2 to join the association. It would be very much in Alberta's interest to give him full co-operation. Mr Cantwell says selling the value of the tourist business is a communi ty - to - community problem. His remarks underline the necessity of a tourist promotion bureau [or Calgary. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 5 Ah Well, One Man's (Shark) Meat -I " "'rtising ag~ncy �Dear Bentley: It's almost daylight , and time to get packed up and started nor Calgary. The attached letter to Ray will serve to bring you up to date . Had intended to write you also , but am about written out as I have been at it all day Sunday , and all night in an effort to get caught up so I won t t have to unpack the office again for a couple of we eks . Regards , \\;\~ �- . Brow ning , M ontana SundaY AWl 18 lQ5Z .**.* .~ .**¥ Dear Ray: ***4.*** • Have "holed up" here at Browning over the week end to try and get oa ught up on letter writing and detail work , billing delinquent members , eto. bet ore orossing the border Monday A. M to keep my appOintment with Ernie . at Calgary. Wlll probably have one hell of a time with the ouetoms explaining about my equipment , typewriter , adding maohine , wire reoorder, duplicating maohine , two foot lookers tull ot eto . eto., and all sorts ot m.1soelaneous oar tons and paokages . W ith the Auguet Bulletin, Meeting Notioe , and billing put ot the way I hope not to have to unpaok the whole ottioe again until I return to US soil. Will try to get by with just answering mall that is luoky • • ••• , enough to oatoh up with me, and conaentrate on selling memberships and advertising. Getting the oonvention plans brought to a head and getting out ot Jaokson sure slowed things up. While I think ot it il further notioe , add m a ir mail e oare ot KOTOR COURT Lt4 . 5809 MaoLeod Trail Calgary , Alta ., Canada HE~ I have been in touoh th Ernie by phone , but a present have no idea what suggested program he has planned tor me , and knowing nothing about mail routing up there will have all mail> sent to the Hepburn. Ernie will always know where to reaoh me . I t either you or Bentley have written me regarding the outoome ot the ballot , it has not reaohed me yet. Upon leaving Jaokson , I gave Livingston as the tordwarding address , and lett instruotions at Livingston to send it on up to Calgary. It will take s everal additional days tor mail to clear thru this routing , but I will eKentually get it at Calgary. Bentley advieed me that he had talked with you by phone and that b the ballots were mailed , I know that Ernie was out ot town tor about a week and with the possibility that some ot the others might also have been away, it oould happen that the neoessary six ballots have been slow in arriving. In antioipation that the response will be in tavor ot the proposal, I ran ads . in the Livingston and Great Falla papers tor men , and also wrote a letter to Er nie asking him to try and line someone up who oould tollow thru in Albsrta after I have made the ksy calls . In the best interests of both the ASsooiation and myselt I will try to olose allot the deals with Chambers ot Commeroe eto . where a sizaabls sum is involved mysel t so as to keep them in the )) 1/3~ braokst . There may be a tew Oases where we will have to pay the 5~ on these , but I will make every ~ttort to hold it to a ~ On the Listings • • • )O per line , and new memberships sold by sub-agents I teel that the additional volume will more than make up tor ths extra 16 2/) ~ sales oost IF 1 can line up some good men. I know for a positivs taot that in every area I have left so tar there is sevsral hundred dollars more that could have been picked up trom people who were "half- sol d" and required a oall- baok after bueiness pioked up , mem bers who were out of town , gone t . shing, etc . �I MY STEWART 8/18 PAGE 2 This is true ot even small communities like At~on , M ontpelier , eto . and will oertainly be even mor e so in the larger towns where you have less luok ginding the boss at home , and have an unlimited number ot prospeots to work on. I have spent far too muoh time in some of the towns worked , and then with the thoughts ot the long trail ahead sending oold ohills up my spine have pulled out knowing t hat plenty more business oould have been picked up if I dared stay longer. The only answer geems to be to find someone in eaoh general area who oan do tp;efollow- up work in his own town, and up and down the highway in nearby towns. I f I oan find a couple who can make good in their own area and have enough oonfidence to lullh" gambl e that they can make enough to stand traveling expenses, I would enoourage them to move along with me . I must , however a void the mess ot taking mea on the road who might get finanoially stranded . I would be responsible for them , and to date it has kept me plenty busy trying to support myself . I got three answers to my adv. at Liv1ngston ••• none of whioh were suitable prospeots f ~r the job , I just spent the night with Diok Fergus at G eat r Falls , and had to move on early tile next morning to keep a date at a Chamber of Commeroe meeting at Choteau. The adv . had not finished 7MX~ running; and I left instruotions to have the replies, it any , sent to Calgary. , For the present I must concentrate on getting Alberta cleaned up. ASI head back down thru Montana , I will attempt to make the key oontaots and l eave a sub- agent behind to follow thru. Charlie M artin would Ao it if could get away. Li ke everyone else up this way, he is havlnk help trouble during the rush season . He had planned to oome north with me for a stop at White Sulphur Springs , Great Falls , and to attend the Chamber meeting at Choneau . ~ At the last minute , his night cook went on a drunk , and Charlie had to work the shift , and is still probably actiilg as manager by day and oook by night unless he has found another chet . Charlie spent considerable time with me during the several days I spent at Livingston. The Chamber there is in poor tinanoial condition , but will go for • 300 . 00 for a picture . The board is to mee t this week, and will probably send in half then, and the rest in Ootober when the new fiscal year starts . Charlie agreed to pay his $ 7; . 00 19;8 Chamber dues in advance to help make up the first . 1;0 without running the ao count too low. About 2; turned out at the Chamber meeting in Choteau . W have no members e there , and it is a pretty good town of about 3 , 000 pppulation . They took to the idea pretty well, and at their regular meeting on Tuesday ot this week will appoint a membership oommittee , and also discuss ways and means ot sponsoring a picture . Like a lot of Chambers, they h a ve appointed Q.""H I ..... "' . . .. oomitties before , and little it anything happened according to the ourrent president , so unless this time is different , I will probably have to do the job over again when I return , and oan spend some time following thru. The speoial 89 ' er meeting was Friday , and I oould ' nt stay over till Tuesday, but lett all neoessary material etc . They will write me after their Tuesday meeting , and Charlie will oome up and give th6ir oommittee a push if he oan get off the night shift in his kitohen. �J I do not have too muoh taith that advertising in the papers will get good sub- agents , as I have been thru this betore on similar projeots . As a rule, ads. do not attract qualified people , beoause most everyone who oan make a suooess ot this kind! ot work already has a good jo~ and it ' s ea~y to pi ok up some pretty sliok oharaot ers it you 're not very careful. . I am asking all the n Chambers, newspapers, eto. along the line to keep their eyes open tor someone ,and will oontaot the ' ' ' .1''.••.1('· J ,~" . \ l ..r.1i .., Veteran ' s employment bureaus and State Employment Ottioes in some ot the larger towns onoe the proposal has been otfioially OKed . t~'j., I. This started out to be a short note as a pretaoe to the other material inolosed , and is getting to be a book , so I guess I had better stop now. By the looks ot the staok sti~ in tront ot me I probably won't be needing my good lOOking bed tonight but it's only about 250 miles up to Calgary whioh won 't be too tough as it is nioe and 0001 up here right now . Was sure sorry to hear about O~ M orrow. It will take a lotmof extra effort now to hold our own in Flagstaff.Tried to do the best I oould by him in the bullet in. Too bad we did 'nt have a printed bulletin this time so we oo uld run his pioture . W must be sura to present a Memorial Resolution e to the Convention , and send a oopy to ths family . Let me hear tram you 4'''' on the Conventi on program etc . as Boon as you ge t a chanoe to look it over . Regards, �FROO : ' . H.Cantwell TO: ~entley l.!itchell SUBJEcT : !.:arch 16 , 1957 L:isc . ay has been anxious to hear what Enrl.e has to repo'rt , an:! also if Bill Bass had sent you the $ 4:"'0, so I thought I might as ,.,1111 ~end out a lit u.e report to all of the Directors , which will also !lerve to bring you up-to-date . e Ernie sent his 30 for the adv. plus hie additional years nues in the form of a postal money order made out to me p ~rso~]y , so I have attached my check for the advertising nxmey. Bass a <lid his balance W.3.S dOVin to atxmt $ 20 a h h l{ after sending you the check, so I \'1111 turn Ernies dues in to him . I am pushing thL'lSs along as fas:t as possible , and as stated in my report will r.vtke some contacts next week locally with whateverb I can scrape together to work with . The Advertising order blanks, at least will be ready. I have learned from past experience that Bailey gets considerably upset i f you try to rush or push him . He has , of course, an artistic tempenpent , and while he is far from being a sloYI poke, he takes great pride in the quality of the work turned out, ani the bestxxx.: way to get along wit.h him is to give him the facts am instructions , and then keep out of his hair . Looks like Ernie is doing a bang up job of pavine the way for me in Alberta. . ~';iah SOlle of the others would take a hint . I really expect, ho\'Iever that ixx I will fet good support froll them when I work their respective areas . s you note fran the copy of a letter R~r sent you , Bill lialtz has come back into the fold , ani in his letter to p~ he pledged good support . That ' 5 about it for now. ~,j, '/ji l l keep 1n touch . ~ ~ ~ f,~r L-v",,~ 4~ ).JO (2..<. ~ '"- �Flagstaff, Ariz IIondaT A.II . Jubo 10, 1957 Dear Bentley: Had & date t o.' meet the man from the Thunderbird Inn over in Williams at 10 8.111. Sunday , and planned to get back to Flagstaff by noon ani write you a ,long report on acj1Tity down here to date . The gtl3 did1nt show up until three in the afternoon, so I ~ent Ilost ot SWlda,y viait1ng with Ray instead• Wi JJ. !!h . r .f.orO d,. " h O • t !l0 .8 . , " . .. quia:k1e an::l mail it when I start out this morningf(..t IiIliIli - Iiiii !. .& ! a. T he' ? , inclosed ia the businesa actual..l.y" signed up .. . but does not include another $ 300 which the Presscott Chamber ot Comnerce bas pledged ( by Bill Fraser) who does not want to sign the order until otticia.l..l1 ok ' ed. b)" his advertising cOlDnittee . He guaranteea the deal will go thru, but wants to run it thru his comdttee for polic)" reasons . This report does not indicate i l l of the ground work that has been laid down here , however, for follow-up thia late Summer or just after the Convention. All of the Chambers of Ca.unerce have been . . . . . .It contacted. with the exe aptian ot Phoenix, and m st have ¢ 'a ' p indicated. 80_ t1P8 ot support , either financial , moral , or both when I return. The Jereme Historical SOCiety had planned. to give me a check for the $ 300, 'bu.t have just learned that they will have to pa)" count)" taxea on some of the buildings they have ' , 'g boU&ht in their effort to preS8M'8 the "Ghost Toll'll" • Being a non-profit Corp. they had. not planned on this , and so are a little tight at the ooment . They will theretore probably pay it in three installemnts of " 100 each starting in June or JUly . Their president said he would write am advise me as aoon as they getl cleared up with the Tax bo...1l"d , which wa.s to be in a faw dqa after their June 1 .eeting, so there .may be some information waiting tor at Salt Lake. The Williams C. of C. nas turned the $ 300 contract over to their treasurer, who will m.ail the check when he p8J"s the June bills . Ray says he usually gets aroum. to it sometine aftar the Jliddle of the m:>nth, so that should be in before long . .e There are a few of the" FWrur8 Pay" contract8 due about now, and I will not send bills for two reaaoe. First. , Some ot them ~ have mailed ~ checka by now, and I will be passing their door wi thin the next wi thin the next ten days , and w1ll drop in on them. The Convention has been set tor Jackson, and I had planned on just sending out. a story to all of the papers at this time , and then announcing it in a bulletin as soon as some of the details havet been worked out at Jackeon . Ray felt , however that some sort of an anl'rJunc ement should go out to the members right . awq, 80 I got out the inclosed post card to saTe time, but it still takes the best part of a d8J' by the time l'OU run tbaa oft and. address all of them. Plans for the Summer are as follows: Will leu'e Flagstaff Wednesday ( June 12) and make a tew calls on my wa.::t back planning to arrive in Salt Lake City this week-end . Will have to spend two or three days at home, and will then try to finish up the double spread for the Idaho-Wyoming area, working betwean Bear Lake and lacks on • In order not to be stuok in Salt Lake City for a week or R>re getting out the Membership Roster, I plan to arrange with Lee can at the Star Valley Independent to print it which he can do while I am. working in the area. . It will b e handJ' for me to drop in ard. OK the proof s etc ., since I will be working close by. After that , llontana, Alberta, etc . as outlined. in my letter of lla;r 26. �Bentley IIiteholl June 10 PAGE 2 ~ ••••• ft •• *.*** Before taking off tor Star Valley- Jaokson will at Logan. Will calJ. ,YOu in advanc e 80 spend. a few hours with you we can be sure to make connections . As you said in your laet lett8I" , IpOney will have to rollin a lot faster , and I frankly believe that it will once I get up where the season is on and can st\rt the solicitation of a "door to door" b&8ie cleaning up eaoh town as I go . Up until DOW, I have been jumping around, most of the time in areas where we have little or no membership , trying to hit the high spots " and 18,1 some ground work. I suppose this was necessary, and R 7 ' F hope that the time and expense involved in this trip Sl)uth ldll eventually pay oft as I have not come close ... "breaking even" on the actual business written down here . Aa I wrote you on )lay 8, I did Int expect to write too much bu.8ineea down b ere this trip tor the reasons given, and that l s the way it seems to have turned out . Unole Sa. wanta the June installment on ~ 1957 Tax estimate on Saturday, the 15th. and I will need the" 165 . 66 coam1asion check. Pleaeemail it to the Salt lake office, so I can piok it up when I arrive . Ite 8 j )0 and. I had better try to catch ott Morrow before he gets away for the da7. Will be seeing you soon, regards , �Flagstaff, Arizona IIq 8, 1957 Dear Bentley: As you can see from the reports , I have worked my w&7 down thru Southern Utah hitting; some of the high spots . Could have probablJ' pi_ked up a fftW more advertising contra.ets but it is too early in the season, and I was getting too many "Future Pay" orders . None of the Club Presidents, except Owen Walton at Panguitch had made an:r effort to contac:b delinquent mem.bers , and as a result I fo~ far too ID8ll1 manbers who are or will be excellent prospects for advertising , " 's due to be suspended and left out of the Membership Roster . While it broke my heart to have to spend the time, there seemed. to be nothing else to do but try am contact as many as possible and get,.., them. back in good. standing as we will need their support . J.[oney is still vtJry tight in Southern Utah , but I was able to collect dues fran quite a fn, and. most of them. promised to support the brochure later when we conduct the thor ough solicitation in the area . I talkod to RaT last night for tho first ti... sineo arriving in Flagstaff. Ho teab that it would be wiSB to postpone the movie making untU next !n..;:ner i f nec. ssar)" since this is a two year program • •• or at least until we can "pay as we go". I am not speaking for him officially, as he will probabl1' write his opinion to you and. Burnett but am passing the information alone "off the record" in case he does not write for a few days . I will make lIome of the ke,. calls here in Flagstaff and work down 89A expecting to arrive in Wickenburg Saturda,.. Ra,. will meet _ in Phoenix on Uondq A.lI . and go with Jle on down to Tucson to see how much help we may be able to enlist frc:o. Bill Waltz and also to Nogale3 to meet Silva aDd Kyriakis in an effort to get me started off right in the Tucson-Nogales area . He will then return to Williams . I will work the area for all it is worth, and if i t is paying off, will probably spen4 the rest of lla.y' down there. If I tina it too slow, I will have to jump back to Flagstaf't-Grand Canyon area tiber. things are beginning to pick up. At any rate I lIIlst start North in June to take full a.cH"antage of the season. I do not know what ~ recent correspondence i f any you have had with R4tY about finances , and he did not mention it 1n my bait! visit last night . Neither do I lOlow for sure just how much mone,. you have lett, or what Bill Baas will have after he pa;rs tbe April bills Which will include a s1aa.ble printing bill for the stationery and hit him prett,. heavy for club refunds . Ila;r wrote and asked. me to come down to Arizona just as soon as I felt we were in a position to afford. it and in my answer I pointed out that .h1l.e we had made a little financial gain on rq northern trip, you had been required to pay DIY final draw of $ 622. 77 out of the mney I brought in from advertising due to the fact that the parent orgnaization had not supplied the remrln1ng $ 700 of the operating capital . receiving I also pointed out that I would now have to depend on ' ;f It I ~ rq conmissions as earned in order to finance continued operation whict) would be ok as long as ,.ou have the money to pay off, and you would of course been abl e to do so in full had it not been necessar.y to ~ the $ 622 . 77 out ot advertising revenue. At any rate, I will have to have some mne,., and I guess the onl.,. thing you can do at the moment i s to send. as JIlUCh of the $ 377.33 conmission as ;rou can possibly spare at this time and pra,. that I can keep enougtl colDDing in to hold things together for another 30 da;ys . Frankl,., I do not have much faith that we will hit bi g money until I return to the Jackson Hole area and on up North in June . It should really pour in then if it is ever going to 0 �Bentley Mitchell April 8 PAGE 2 There are selreral reascos why lcl do not expect business to be too good. on this trip dOJfIl here . The threat of the Black Ca~n Highway being designated as US 89 has everyone between Flagstaff an! Phoenix up in the air. Except for Wickenbrg, we have practically no membership south of Flagstaff which make the solicitation in Tu.c~son and Nogales strictly IIcold turkey" requiring the double job of selling the idea of joining the orgabisation in addition to the advertising support . You cannot expect prople like BUl Waltz, SUva, and Kyrlald.s to actually get out and. hit the street, even it they wanted to , 80 in spite of their ld..nd words , good wiehes , etc. it will still probably rsain pretty much cold turkey. wil..lIt' As for Wickenburg, our one bright spot, Bill Bass has passed. the word along to Ra;y that the Hwy. 93 boys have juet working the town over to the limit on a new 93 brochure and he thinks it would be poor judgemEnt to try to work right behirxl them. They just left town this week, I understand. In spite of all this , W8 will get some business . If I did 1nt think so, I would have never come down. What I mean to point out is that this *, next 30 days will be tough going and. l'Ie probably won ' t get over the hump untillfell along in June. I guess thats about the story as of now, and I had bet tar get this into the mail and go out looking for a few bucks . I will be in Tucson Wonday sO you can address me there IICare General Deliveryll . Send along a check for what you can spare along with your conment8 on the suggestions regarding the report and booking systEID. Air_mail should make it ok . Regards , �May l3 , 1957. DellI' Martin I I w s very glad to henr fran you, but aorry that I ,"nus not here when your letter arrl ved . I have been away tor a few days . I jU8t returned this mOI'l1in(! . I ~ onoloo1ng a check in the ammount f 300 . 00 as .ati 1 ~ent of your eO~88 10ns up 0 dato . I wi~h tllD. lie could keel' things up to dat and Cluil you ohock for your cO~8.1cn. in f~~~~~ un~t do not have that much money i n the Fromot nt this time . When this check 18 cIl8hod we leSD tha.n fifty dollo.ro l eft I 0 do 00 11 have tnat . e 1I0vie should • W ohoul d not try e celves tba t we &.I'O hoartily aSree witn be deluyed possibly unt1 to 1"UD until we have pro capable of strunding upr1gh own two .rGct~ ':ii;;:;::-oo ...,,,...·..::3K f rom Frunk 1no1we do abuut the o 1 y tod~y d .111 20n d ·nett in Fanrut toh , s o we I .~ h op your effol'ts in th "outhland wl~l'beorowned with success . Unle s s you &ro able t o & 06~I''' m 'ner',I'olling i n we are go l u g to f a il I41 s etr orabl}" n our r r W"m, Sincer ely fOurs . �S~turday p . m. '~ ~~ Dear Bent leYi Had planned to add a l ittle more to the note regarding the payment of membership dues t o the parent organization, but got to the bottom of the page befor e I realized it . The only way I can proteot myself, and guarantee a true balance between Bill ' s annual report and mine, 1s to us e the "remittance advise" system listing all member4hip fees collected, and get a signed receipt from Bill for each transmittal of funds from my office to his . This gives me a set of "fool Iroot" records tor auditing purposes r egar dless of differences which might appear when the two reports a r e compar ed beuause the re ceipted remitta nce advises would i ndicate which of the two reports ar e in error . IDhe only way , therefore that I can r ecord membe rships on his books is to send him the mone~and getlt his receipt • •• that makes my re port of total pa i d membership for the year j ibe with his financial st a tement of revenue received . It wi l l look better to the auditing cOmmittee , and elimina te the possibility of misunderstanding and error if we follow thru with this same system. In most cases now, I am gett ing the membership tees and adve rtlsKlng payment in two different checks , which will save work tor you a nd simplify y our bookeeping . I will continue to du this whenever pos s ible • ••• Commissioner Satterthwaite invited us to attend the Rich County Commissioners meeting on W ed, July 3 aaa ask for some money . M ark will go for sure, a nd will try. to take a d elegation from the Utah end of the Lake . It being the day before the Fourth, he may not ha ve much luck in r egards to a delegation because allot the resort ope rator s I contacted down that way a round Garden City wer e af r aid that they would be t ied up checking in the ir r eservat ions on Wednesday o In view of the fact they I plan to sol'vi t e ALL of the 89 ' er County Commiss ione rs in Utah it is impor tant that we meet with succcess in Rich County as this would r esult in setting a favorable pr ecedent, and probably int_uence the decision at Bome of the other s . At the moment the chances don ' t look too good that I wo uld be able to attend this meeting , but when the day arrives , if there is any possible chance to fit it in , I will try to go along and give Mark a little moral support . I just migJt decide that a couple hundred picked up down there on W ednesday might beat anything I could expect to accomplish a round J a ckson on the eve of the ir most hectic and busiest day of the season . SUNDAY A. M . There is a letter from Ray at Salt Lake which I had my wife read to me last night . He has written to Freeman regarding the visit to Arizona Fre eman and Davis planned for "late in June", a nd i . qui te discouraged that his letter has remained unanswered. May not move my headquar ters to Jackson until after the Fourth . H ve a talked to the C of C there ••• they a re booked solid over the holiday, which would make i t hard to find a place I could afford(for a week) �Bentley M itchell June)O PAGE 2 and also make s oli citation difficult from W ednesday on. I still have call s which can be made in Star Valley , and several deals pend ing up around Thayne and Alpine. We have quite a tew listings from Afton , but as yet no picture sponsorship money trom their area except bthe $100 from Lower Valley Power which must be applied to the entire valley and Jac kson , and cannot be used exclusively tor Afton . Del Taysom has been out ot town t his entir e past week , but is expec t ed home today (Sunda y) so I wil l : on the ball M onday. have to g et him In view of all this , I may stay put at the Valleon at least the first hal f of the week _ •• J .... -..nd commute to Jacks on tor a couple ot days making the contacts in the lower valley as I travel back and forth. Thats the way it looks now, altho these pl ans migh t change suddenly, as the Publio Relations man tor the Yellowstone Park Co . is a rranging a joint conference with the Y.P . Co ., H amilton Store s, and H anes Studios . The meeting would , of course , be set for somewhere in the Park (probably at Mammouth) and I am expecting to hear from him a ny minute which presents~he possibili t y t hat I 23£' might have to take off tor Ye l lowstone on s hort notice. Re gardless of what happens, "General Delivery, mai l addr ess by the time you receive this, and the Va l leon or the Jackson Chamber of Commerce the event ot an emergency . Ray might hear that Ja ckson" will be my a phone call to either would locate me in Freeman 1s on his way to W illiams, and try to reaoh me thru you. It will t a ke me the rest of t oday to fin ish up the copy fo r the M em~ersh i p Roster which I have promised to the printers early M onday, so I had better shut up and get at it. Rag~~ �1"0 WEST SECONO SOUTH e"'I.T 1. ... 'Ut CITY I UTAH Fourth Annual INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION Livingston, Montana Tue,day, October 2 1, 1958 Bentley },'itcheU liitchell }.~tel , logan, Utah { �.. - ,, .... Bentley : Th.i.S is an advaTI('e copy for you . bunch to all m;=mbere will be mriled Tbnraday A.}( . E..~tire �-... • • Fa _ _ ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ A NON PtOflT I NTEtNAT IO N AL HEADQUAtTERS 1 -CO WEST SECON D SO UT H ST COtPO.AT LON ,ROMOTING NOtTH AMER ICA'S SALT lAKf CITY 1, UTAH BEAU Tif UL BOULEVAtO DIAL El 9. 9322 O f NATION AL PARKS 89 15 September 10. 1958 OF fiCE Of MAtliN H. CANTWEll, b ecu li ve 5.,:..lary I -CO W s.cand Soulh • Salt lake City I , Ulah Q. ! ~ ! 9.. ! ! !:. ! Q. !. !. £.! is hereby given to all members of The 89' or:> Internatiotull Highway Association, Inc. that the AttNUAL HBRTING of the l-lEMBE1\S of thic Corporation for the year 1958 and Intern~tlonal Convention of the AnaociQtion will be held Off iCERS , the Fourth 8ENTlEY MITCHEl.L ' _idenl MitdHoll Mol.1 loqen, Ulah Olt"the !LlCS ' ERNEST R. SARAN Vi ...· P, •• id.'1 on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1958 for the purpooe of electing Directors, HeDbu,n Mot.,.. Court, LId. c.fQ''''' Alb.rte , Ce ned. CHA RLIE 8. MAUI N, J., Vi...· ' _ •• M,rti n'\ Inc. R.II.urpot LivingJl"", MOtII''''' *"._T ..... OltECTO.S, SR. GUillERMO fREEMAN Hote l F-t.emu Me.elloo, Sineloe. MUlto W G, SASS Le Sinla Molel Widenb"'Q , Arizone Cu.rn;,n the City of Livingston, Montana at 9:00 n.m . and the transaction of any other busines8 which may be properly preeentc.d. The tima., day. and place of said. Annual l!cet:l.ng having been duly prescribed by tbe Board of Directors of this Corporation. OFPICIAL NOTICE thereof i8 hereby issueu this lOtb day of September. 1958 in the 1IloIDI1er and 48 provided for 1n ARTICLE III, SECTION 3 of the Corperation By-Law.. PAUL J. STEVIG Sla, Valley J_I.,. AIIOII, Wyoming ~ ArrEST~ku~ Executive Secretary "'AU. G. PUG M IU Ma,k', 0>-I'0Il SeN! ... P"i•• ld.ho *~':-"'-.'r-*-~·~-~·:-*-~·:-~'t-~·t-·::-~-.'r-*-*~",*"'~·:-~""'-fr""*"~-*-.";-*-*-*",*-*-"*-.","",* HOMER BANOLEY R. inbow Caf. Ri,hfiald, Ulah ALBERTA GOVl!RNMllt!r OFFICIAL CHA RLES HAGERMAN APO,he lodQa " ..cott, Ar" ..... m l!l!. PRINCIPAL fXfCUTlVE SECUTAtY: The Honorable A. Rueaell Patrick, Minister of £eonomic Affairs of tho Province of Alberta, Canada. utll be the principal speaker at our 1950 Convention At Livincaton. Arrangomout8 uore made by our Canadian Vice Prosident Ernest R. Snran. Kioister Patrick baa won considerAble recognition for bis Department'o effective program aimed at servicing and attracting tourists to Alberta. and has been an ardent supporter of the 89'crs in the Province. "'ARTIN H. CA NTWELL 1 W SecOftd South .0 Sell Lak. City, Uleh :un SPEAKEB. !I.!!.!{ !!. !Ul. £ !!. !!. !!.!!. !!!. Q.!l. !!!.!!. f!!.!!.!!.!!. '111e sixteen-page colorful "Guide to Vacationlands of the International West" is on the press, and vlll be ready for Nation-wide distribution this Pall and Winter . Four~olor printing is a slow proceSD, BUT we expect to be able to mail at least a sample copy to all members within two weeks. (OVER) SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIONS �- 2 - GENERAL COIIVEllrIOli n'FORMATIOII All buaineoo meetings of the 1958 Convention trl.11 be held on ONE DAY--TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21 -- starting at 9:00 A.m. There will, hovevcr. b~ a "eET ACQUAINTED PARrY" at tbe Liviusston Elks' Club on MONDAY BVBNIliG, OCTOm:R 20 a.t. 8:00 p.m . This will be 4 gala affair with entertainment and rcfrev~~ts. YELLO'W'STOUE NATIONAL PARK, just 50 miles south of Livingston will be open this year until November 1, ~nd Convention-bound 89'ers and their friends are urged to include 8 vioit to the Park in their Convention plnno . UPON AaRIVAL--no to the office of the Livingston Chamber of Commerce to pick up your reservations, and register. The Chamber office i8 located on the ground floor of tho Murray Hotel building, opposite the depot (on US 89). If there i . no pa~klng available near the Chcmber office, pull acrose the street to the parking lot of HAnrIn'S ~n while you registar . (Owned by our Vice President Charlie B. Hartin. 3r.) RESOLUTIONS Due to the fact that this in a ono-day Membership Heeting, it will be noceisary to 8trcamllne proceedings in ardor to clear the hall, and Bct up for the International Banquet to follow at a:oo p.m. RESOLUtIONS. must therefore, be typed in adv~ce . double epeccd, and eva copies of e.eh turned over to the &Keeutivc SecretAry either ¥Dnday evening, or prior to the openina of the tuesday Geoting. ~~~~![ll~[ ~!~~!~~ (All events will be held At the Livingston Elks I Club) 11OtmAY, OCTOBER 20 - GET ACQUAnrrED PARTY - 8:00 p.m. TUllSDAY, OCTOBER 21 - G),Jll!RAL BUSIlIBSS SESSION - 9:00 4.m. TOES!)AY, OCTOBER 21 - INTl!RIIATIOllAL MNQ1JlIT - 8 :00 p.m. IU!GISTRATIOli PBI!: ~2 . 00 per Dele!!"te -- llAIlQUET TICIQ;TS: $2.00 per Plate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - ---- - - - - - - DETACH and MAll TO: Chamber of COJ!lll8rcG. Livingston. Montana -- * ." acc~dIltione l atartinn _____ ' * *' All Livingston * Please reserve tho fo11o\.-1.og are good . and ..: Hotels and Hotels 1': prices are about 1'" the lame. NAME,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ADDRBSS, _ _ _ _ _ _ __ * * * ~ * R!HBMBB1l- ..Your non ..mamb~r Friends are WELC<IlB - - BRING 'IHIH ALORG~ 'f: )ly check is enclolJed for _ _ _ _ BANQUBT TICKETS .:it $2 . 00 each. URLESS you have a favorite, let the Committeo place you subject to your approval. �140 WEST S"LT LA1(1[ 5ECONO CITY SOUTH 1 UTAH Dear Bentley: The "rt work ~as been canpleted , and iE'!li vered to F.;.ragon css " I spent rnn~t of ada;, eoine oVP..r i t am making m:tror corrections • • • sure hope it is OK. Deane ,&.llin was Ie. (ving for a. we-eks vJ.ci~tion when ! t.ook the art over y,~_sterday, ani I only had a few minutes with him. He has instMlcted the shop to get on with th'" job ol.'3 f-Ist as possible , and I vdll JOe prcbably hwe more dpj'inite informa.tion nf'IXt week when Deane returns . Am sending out biJJ.s to all accounts r~cf:~_vable an:l a litUe note mcplaining that we IT'l now at the point when we need pur lOOney 13 order not to hold up production. Am inclo~1ng statement frorn Dick Bailey for the $ 300 vlhich i~ now due . Y01'. can mail it dire~t to h:i.r.1 ••• or to me l'ffiichever you pTf'Jfer . �STATEMENT TO Promotion C or~ttee 89 1 q re International Highway Assn. , Inc , Care Bentley lti.tchell, Chair.r.w:1 RICHARD Q. BAILEY nnd ASSOCIATES e>10 SHit \I\I .. lk~"· Luk" AUgu:Jt 1958 2J., OATE' ____~~~~~~~~C_________ e •• " k el<'I' City" EL,..;ltl EL •. ".ln Ut"" Pu .... o ..... .... .. Orde r- N o _______________ 0_09BO c._D"e ruooU'1t due upon completion of Art '":ork ~8 ART pp.r agreement .. • • • • F C> R ... ... • • • • • • co ADVERTISING • $ 300. C'O �Dec . Jl , 1957 Dear Bentley and Mark : Am happy to report that , while I am not running ant foot races , my old ti cke r has started to s e ttle down a bit . You can see that I am still a little nervous by the sloppy typing on the report . I see my doctor again Friday , and will have better understanding of my true condition theno Eaoh day , I am feeling better . Can you ~1inxx feauure me on two cups of coffee and one pack of cigarets per day? Can ' t even believe it myse l f . W ll give Bentley a ring as soon as the new dummies are ready , and i we will start working on Logan and Ogden. I was wrong in thinking I could get a better price on the tracings . Have shopped about ~ and think the best deal is to try and jeVi Dick Bailey down a bit . A fast and GOOD job is most important . Am going to see him later today, and if he will meet us half way , will give him the job . We need these in a hurry. l1a.pr 1 H" ...... 1-0., , w~ �INtfRN"TION"l HEADaU"UE I S 14 0 WEST SECO ND SOUT H ST . " NON P IO f l T (O RP O R "T I O N PROMOT ING NO RTH AMEI IC" 'S S" U lM:e- CITY I, ur" H DIAL El 9. 9322 Be"U lIf Ul BO ULE VARD Of N"Tl ON"l P" IKS January 11, 1958 O FfICE O f MA Rl iN H. ("NTWEll, h e<u l'''. H enlor")' 1 ~ D W Second So ulh • SCllllCl" (i ly 1, UIClh To sponsors of Resolutions ~os. 1,2,7,8,9. and 10 adopted by the 1957 Convention at Afton, Wyoming. O FFICERS : BENTLEY MITCHELL Presiden t Milchell MCllel LC>C;Ian. Ulah ERNUT R. SAM N Vic.·Pre.id.,! Hepburn Mot... Cc>urt . U d . Calgary. Albert. , Can.d. CHARliE 8. MARTIN , JR. Vic •• Pres., Seq .• Tr.... M,rt,n'" Inc. Li~;n9l1"". R I.u'.'" .. MClnlan. DIRECTORS : SR. GUILLERMO H EEMAH Holel Fr ...... aft Mo..lloft. Sin.I~. M... icCl W G. BASS L., Sic.lo Motel Copies of all of the Resolutions adopted at too .\fton Conveution were J!lUl1ed to the vuilous Foderal Bureaus involved, Governors, and Conaressional Delegations of the five 89 t er States. Repli.oJ \'iere received fran. All of ·lii ·..·t , but in IJ3ny cases oonsisted only ot pol..l.to Qokno\'ll~~dgement. Certain correspondence received, ~~wever. contained valuable Infornmtion and indicated t.ht! Vlriters real and genuine interest in the desires of the 89'ers International HighVlay .\ssochtion. Copies of this correspondence is inclosed, am to refresh your memory, the genoral content and purpoao of tho various resolutions referred to is 'lttached. Widenbuf"Q, A,i , ona P"Ut J. STEVIG Slar Valley J._lry Aftor>. W"(Omi nf,l M"RI( G. PUGMI RE M.,k·, Ch.... ,.,., Service P,ri •. ld."" HOMER BAN DlEY hinbo.... Ca l, Richfi.ld, Utah CH"RLES HAGER MAN Apache lc>dq, P'''CClIt. Ni.""a You will note that ~ello.tor .Arthur .. atkins of Utah want to some length in requesting information from the various Federal Bureuuo involved, as did senator James Eo Murray or .u.ontana. T. D. Sherard, Socretary ot the \,Iyo,"ing Hi(lhway COlllll1ission also saw to it that prompt action was taken on Hesolution no. 10., and also reports that Resolutions 1,2,9, wera favorably received by the commission. eXECU TIVE SECRETARY : M"RTIN H. CAN TWB.L 1'10 W Secorod SoutfI Sell u.k, City. UI. h I strongly urge that eaoh of the groups sponsoring these resolutions express thoir appreciation in r",i ting to these friends of ours tor the courtesy and. interest shewn in our problems. I would also suggest, that you tollClv thru with any oorrespondence which you teel might further your best interests in these local problems • .Most sincerely yours, Cantwell Secretary SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIO NS �IN COHH]';Sl'uNDEDoCE .;T'l'ACHllD NO.1 Urging the completion of road construction in Snake River Canyon and protesting construction of unwanted po':;er drua. across the narXO\'/5 of this Canyon NO. 2 .- Protesting the e:A.-tension of a road from Ashton, Idnho on US 191 to connect with US 89 at Flagg Ranch. NO.7 To apply the name "Vluterton-Glacier International Peace Park tl when !'eferrins to these two National Parl(s" NO.8 To Improve the "White Spar!: section of US 89 between the cities of Prescott and '.'Iickenburs, Arizona .. NO.9 He; Year 'round opening of US 89 thru Yellowstone National Park, am expressing gratitude for consideration given to dnte~ NO, 10 Requesting the Wyoming Highway Commiss ion to Include A "SI\ul'l ROAD" olassification in official road condition repol'ts o ��1 November 4, 1957 .£.U.I FROM: Senator Arthur V. ;;·atkil).s--Utal.! Mr. Martin H. Cantwell Exeoutive Secretary 89' ere Interll2tional Highway As socl,rGion 11.0 W 2nd S Sal t Lake City, Utah Dea" lIr. Cantwell: Enclosed herein 1s a reply to "'Y let·ter to the Secr"tary of the Interior, concernj.ng yOt\T.' l"esolu '~ ion on "the Snake Narrows project. You are entitled to request the Secretary to be L,formed on public hearings scheduled on these pro,jeots so that YOV-1' organization will have an 0PPol"tunity t;o pl'ssent testimonyo If you have any further qUGs. ion on this matteI', plsase t don"(j hssitate to communicate with meo Wi th all good 7i1shes IJ Sincerely YOul'S, (Signed) Arthlll' V. Watkins �Q ,H, I FROM: - Ootober 31, 1957 Fret! G. Aandahl--Aeeistant Seoretary of the Interior Dear Senator Watkins: Apparently the resolution of the 89'ers International Highway Ass'n, Ino. refers to the potential Snake Narrows Projeot, Idaho-Wyoming, whioh the Bureau of Reolamation is ourrently investigating. This study includes investigation of the Alpine site on the main stem of the Sneke River about three miles upstream from the Idaho-Wyoming border. A dam at this site would form a storage and regulatory reservoir and appears to be the one to which the 89'ers are objectIng. Reclamation's investigation also inoludes the study of alternative dam sites on the several tributaries to the Snake River in the general vicinity of the Alpine si'l;e in the atteillpt to find sites of a less oontroversial natu1'e whioh if developed might provide adequate regulatory s'oorsge in Ueu of a dam at the Alpine site. During the course at this study Reclamation 1s cooperating with various interested authorities of the State of wyoming and others with the objeotive of de~loping a projeot plan which would be agreeable to the greatest number and have the least adverse etfect upon the area. On the basis Of present sohedules a planning rsport containIng oonclusions will not be oompleted tor about two years. Prior to oompletion at a planning r.eport by the Bureau of Reclamation, all interests will bave an opportunity to review the results at the investigation and to submit opinions. These opinions will be given oareful oonsideration before reoommendations are formulated. As requested in your letter of October 24, 1957, ~ are enclosing the oopy of the resolution for your use and files. Sincerely yours, (Signed) Fred G. Aandahl Assistant Secretary at the Interior �--- SS' • . . .~ r· ~ --:'1 lI"'B.OM: III p,)l .• I.':;:0t:..~ut.~ve E)01.~1"3i.. 89~e:rE 140 '-ry Intm·nai;.t ".1. \~tll3 -;- Sc';~nJl'J. l.ty) SaJi; V·j{E. (J \I'. J~.; .. ()Ci~"t;.~'Jnf Inc '1 Ericlcscc. .h·:';I .Gin Fedc:::ra.t Ageer'j eo i,,;bw..:y t.t:. 1.( ,!'E nd·j·;. t,it.lrtal "hOI· co.p1t;;~ ,31.'.bm:LttQ:''"i c.cpi€ ~ l,f let·t.J-rD fro.R:. of Y'·11.1' recent 1'; ~O. qi;iUJ."""';f.l 1 If' j'''_~'\l : '3,78 I1i£l.i>te~s, :i ... 0e:.ae 'u;;:t'lGj JOll"" J.:.:;n·'i '~o!:runtH.J.i(".1.·;';;} or r0\J·QIIll:aondetiona on ';'lith me \ S:;·!llf. d) A:-: ~.....l' 71> ':;a:;:;ki.ll.S thesB �No:.tembe:r. COP Y ---b'ROM; Sinclair :;eeks--Secl'etary '>, 1957 o~....£.2!!nEJroe Honorable Arthur V. ;'/atk1.ns United States SellBte i'iaabilJgton 25. Do Go Dee.r Senator Watkins: I have your letter of Octobel' 21, 9l:01o.i!'l6 the copy of Resolution lio. 2 a(lopted Qc·.ober 8, 19:;7. by ·th" 89'er5 Internatio!k"ll H it;hway Association, IDeo. conoerning the : ossible Luprove.meat of a ronte oonnec'c1ne Ashton, Idaho, with p tTo So 89 at the Fl.'lgg .Ranch ~outh G:: Yel1o~'{5~jOne Park in \iyoming" Idaho State Route 47 e::tendlng from tT. s. 191 near Ash-;on to the \'Jyoming State line is included in tr.e .Ii'or~st Highway System, which establishes its eligibili'i,;y for ~.m.prove1113nt wi'Gh Forest Highvlay funds, end the 5.8 DLle section from U. S. 191 to the west boundary of the TarG.ilee Nn-~ional Forest is alsc included in the Federal .... aid seconda.l'Y 37stUill. and was recentJy improved with a bituminous surfaoe ~ nd re~\tcd incidental work with Federal-aid secondary funZa ilBrticipa'i;lug in the casto The Idaho Department of Highways he n)t icc1uded in its o~rent 'program involving Forest Bi,)rw,'lY fWl.iS any projeot for improvement of the balanoe of tJ is route to the I/yoming State Line. The extension of this route in~ V/yom.1.ne through Cave F " ll,B to U. s. 89 in the vioinity or the Fh~g Ranch is not includei), in either the Forest Highway or " F.de:r"l-ai~ system. and the"'s1'01'6 is not eligi ole at this time for lmprovemen't; with e1 the~ of these Feder'sl high";sy funds 0 The Jtssooilltion t l3 interest i.n this IQ:ltter is appreciated Sincerel.!i your s *' (Sil>'led) Sinclair \iet.:!:ks Secretary 0:;:' C01'!1mBl'ce �·... rtin :& CaI;T"".'SJ], F:(,'JV1"'~\'e 89'cf'£, r:u t0:;:,n; ':·,CT'fll .il··t~.t:; ~\'''lSJl J.4t" $'300:'::"::;' j( U··..;h 3Fl.l t .L.'l \c ;l t) 1, r iisl' M"i'. Dc r "M-' ~ eel 'r. n nC e ...., - ,.'ou Pc ) .11" -',e ,~tF..I.· 1-"'1: O'-::"~cber 1...';. ~;!l.d the utlJ'iouc re8Qlu l.J-"lS •• 1. c'1 ~o l',c,f,_ed at the :-rh.,.1'(i ,~..n l}ltl CCln"?eilcicu (f' n.) '.':1 r~ . ·c:"llnt:!.on.~l ~.Ij ()n:.ray ,'l~. ,oe .... tl0I'1 I- '! 111 e1:.C1. GO e 1ni'O:i:llled oi' t.he posl;,;! ~ O~ yOlir :~..dSO(;1lt :"1 n... i.l"H~ :r;lriou~~ m::!tters .refel'l'.3d to in "Gu· ('esc .1.ttJ.( ..~ Than~ G afJ. 3,slctng 'i.; h, 13u:t'e"'u ('IX ?u(u,i,~ Roads t'C-1' a rsoort OJ.. the :"vn.d ~lat,t(~r! '.!J:..! oh 'ii'"l'e "i.;he DubjClC~ 0'" yu\U' Pfls,.:;lu Lns liO" :u:Ji 2" .1. .; _n ~ "; l.n:" t'3(l Wl(b X ~''""e -:':'e~ J(l00tOt' �November 7. 1957 GOP Y ---FROM; Refer to FUe 22-10 Department of Commerce BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS Honorable James Murray United States Senate \~·a.shinBton 25, Do Co Dear Senator j4urray! nU' 0 Cm'ties has requested me to reply to your communioation of October 23 and letter of Qctober 14 from lIlr 1:Iartin Ho Cantwell, executl va secretary of the B9' ers International HighYlay I\ssociation, enolosing copies of ti','l0 resolutions adopted October 8, 1957, by that Association. 0 Resolution No. 1 reoommends the improvement of U. S. 89 in Wyoming between Alpine und Jacksono This section at U. soo 89 is included in the Federal-aid primaxy system and also in the Foresot highway system which establishes its eligibility for improvement with the particij)ation of these Federal hi(!hway funds if requested by the State, Inasmuch as the State initiates ind.i vidual proj ects for highway improvements involving either of these funds, it would be appropriate for the Association to direot its presentations to the \(yoming State Hi(!hway Department . Resolution No.2 protests the possible improvement of a route extending from .\shton. Idaho. through Cave Falls. ',;yomin!;, to Uo S. 89 at Flagg Ranch south of the Yellowstone National Park. Idaho state Route 47 is included in the Federal-aid secondary system between U. S. 91 and the Targhee National Forest and the State has recently improved this section by the placing of a bituminous roadmix surfecing with Federal-aid funds participating in the oost. This same seotion of Route 47 and its extension to the ,IYOming State line is included in the Forest higllway system. The State has not included in its our rent program imvolving Forest highway funds, any projeot providing for the improvement of the balanoe of this route o The extension of this route into Wyaming t'rom the Idaho State line through Cave Falls to U. S. 89 as referred to by the Association is not inoluded in a Federalaid system. nor the Forest higb:way systamo 'fherefol'e, improvement of such eo route would not now be eligible for participation of either ot: theBe Federal I!i(!hway fLtnds in the cost. Vie appreoiate the Assooiation's interest in these matters and are forwarding oopies of this oorrespondeno9 and resolutions to our field offices having jurisdiction or Federal-aid matters in IdahO and :1yoll1Ulg tor tbeir InforJna tlon. The letter from AIr. Cantwell and enclosures are returned as requGs ted 0 Sincere)~ yours, Signed, G. M. Williams �-_ C 0 ... F 1. - -- FileM: T --"._- .... .. .- :;. ..1.1.1' '" D, Mr" Hartin 1{, C"~lt",.'ell Exe(!utiVt~ Sr,~:.~ei·J.:~Y 89 1erB Ir:-Lto~r at ,,!l.O.l Hi ",:1"; 140 West SS'lclitl SOl",i;h o~,. t ~nl ......A.!\. "1"',/' T""~-e v. lJ ~, U'\,_ "h Assoct, -t.:.c~ 1, 2~ 9 a.ad 10 OlJ3J.O;::. ::d ';;it.,t J'lflr 1.ct,t.f3l" ',':'1 .1 J0 rl"'o'J,Ch't :;0 !:itc tt. .i..l.t on a? ';:'he l.'iyominc lIi@"_··,...·,~.. COlil!Y: 2' .; Oll lIt. :i..'iiS ne:d; ;; )('~ !:La on. ..:.;~-i.-·oJ,1be:·... 71 Resolutionf; Nos Ul,l' OCtOb'31' J.5, 1957 ! f0e). sln'/) ·~l~.c GC:J',r1.s ..t.n~ is in full'" (;0.-'6 l',;ith r.""so'!",ltions 1'-0::;0 1. wd 2.. ;~esf J:u\j,f)jl :';0., 9 :.~(,d:....~.l'. i", , ,her iI, {)J:,'Imt5_on \,11io11. viill ::'eLt'lt .:.l'CJJ.a 1;,te L;tudy now -·.~i.:lg na..l.de 5.11 ~el1owf;·j~"'.'1'_'3 rark", I have disCU3::Hld Rc,solut,ion Noo 10 r:i'~.u ou'" '~, SU'G'i;Oll and he hus acreeC\. 'i.,n adc'.. the C.eaigna-tion "sn.ow l'C..QQ" 'co au~ d::.dly road and v;eathor l'c.port under 't~h-3 ~R<':;:!6.:rks'f ;ol1.l.mu<: \"J.h.ell the present 3upply of fol'!n.s i.e eXhn.u!::ted ~l (!ol1.ll'lll tor flanaw road'; \'.'ill, be inc.luded in the n3\,1 t'Ol".O"l'3" Ueanwhile~ local com.m.el'ciel l'<:oc.io st[ltlon~ ct:"Jl.u.d be con.-0;.;.ct.ed l.'Y you~ orea.n1zation awl e.ske:t to U5l'} ttl.is til-) 3ignn iii ':'Or! on U!.eil' broadcasts" Very often '&hc luoaJ. bl'c"lQ.cast stuticns lnte:':pra'l; our reDor'ts much differently t.ha:Ll \\'G ,10, ':-;')1 l.:ing t(, ass1.:.tle the sensational 01' so.are type treat!I',e\l~u,:.,h.:i..Ch th6Y feel 1:] 1160BSSal'Y to ntt.xact a wldf;~ J,:l.':rtp.v:tn; auclJ.e. :l(~o 'fhe A1.· ..lion mGe·i;~'. .ug '·as certai::lly an erjuyab.!..f r,-xperlenca &.ud I a.'pI'eciate ~~;i.:~ honor of addra:.:.sing such 'If'~.!la grQu'p~ ",~ ,~ . 'Si U } , " C'n" .i1.]:, 5..!.'l T .. D D61''''OY 3% t~ E L~ hway Engine,r �, " iJ t;::, 1. I.Ib.'. 1. C1.~t i.n ::.. -("'ll'! :L:::el::uLi \ '"' - eJ~', '1,.'-':~" 89' Jr~; I --ije: - ~.,. 11:(' .'est ;j"1'}0!' .. C1. ::>0J.;" k.1.1;; 'v _. ' _1:.'' ~ 1. • .. '\.- elL:,:r, ... .J ~l.. _ Ii 11 h .t '..>n ., ~J 1 Dc.:. ' 1 ~.. ~ of '1y01,15 "'}ll"'!:1 at'L.U;!.!. is I iGl'r. :.r o~ '.( ,c I .:::nLA1 ton It. ~ U~C ~~ ~t'"'l! "~ . ,n Yd!l ";t y PJ. J _:oeth.:J 'i.C' -.8d ~ • tC' t:OVt 11l- '. ~ ~, .... ei,' te r .j O!l 7. 2957 �._---- Nov(:.:mber 15 1557 COP Y tn·o Martin It, C'-', It"," J.l E:::ecuti va Se.e:cetal'Y B9'exa international Hl71~'dY Associat ion, Illc ~ .:v..o ';Jes'" Second South Stl'ect Salt J..a1,e C:i. ty 1, '-1;8.10. D9a.x Ml'o Car~v.eU: 'l'LarJr: y?U for YOli.l' 1 ~',,'i;eI' c(f Octobor 11+ to Direotac Nil'tll,. and. ·~.~e enol.Jned ~ople;a of Hoes "j..u . . 1o..1..S "I and 9;1 concerning U.. a ~ Hi>~hT!e_J 1:9 al1.d its :reluticnS'lip to :tElll::n'Jstone NatJonal p,""".!'!;: ann iatI31'toJ1-Glacie" :'ltt)rn'l"~ i on.'?J. Pea\1G Park:" '.'/e apPZ"30iatG 1'9cs'iv5.nr ' t~~a 'esolutions '{lith the expl'ess::lo.n.s of' n:::t:.:titude th~y ~untLl!ll fo:' t~e i:.!":;erest tl13.t 't;rl!3 llationa 1 Pal'lr Sel'vic:e hg.s allO\11" in ~.;h!l A;'J80Jia,tiouo in all \Ve shall cont.l!me to b -. i,,;.te:~\3sted in the Assooiation v.'he:.:-e tha£:'e is B CC:lL.'I,O:'1 br"ud of ",)olia;r and purpose" matte:"'~B 31Iloe'~ely y01 .i." ,stgM(1) ~'hos, C r,f' ~ Vir.t, Chief Dr-si:;;n. am Cl1nstructicn �C0 F Y ---- r;ovomber 4, 1957 C·:~G"H;.;!. M!- <> Mart in HOI 1 E:::30u·t.ive 8ec:retoIY • • 9'0:r$ In"i;sl"mlti 1001 liJ.O W Secour South SaJ. \i kke C~ 'ty Uti II D'3;.l' fro rent m,.. H:iP;11:JSY ~11: to:" ct Cot::-";e: 1J.; ~ -;",)1;.- t-:er t"{j "l.. ":'~.9clutions .)J.li ... · ...'\nz-:f',;.J., (;cA.~em.. i"!' of tl'1c 8~,fers Tn:teroot'ieocJ. .iG~.· ,y !'___ sscc.i.a·i~.i.cnJ .nc o 'bf" J'l'o\'(:;d very interest..i.ng "",0 .LtL In l~e~.ling C'VG." ;~._OJ ro::wIut}ons, I You'" 1. 2.(l.cptAd C.JtLCU"C a'~ t E: :JhoJ.eh~. l"~c:.dl_y ,\:1ith Odeh ·lU .... e,,~,.r:J one. I dal'esay you knr.)1,\l t.il<:\ f" I am. -1") ing e v '-~l·j.~ f.;binS ill c'''1 po •• a:r to lm.plement mos'~ of til.,7nl :l!~ I t3.~U1'e you of my t;vntiuu3d st:..'p.=':lrt of v JUl" ~C'i.ii oJ" tie'!! dinot3'r'1Jy "ours, (Sign0(1 ~ hUU'lAUD L" SL.1fSON GO',ern02' �October 21, 1957 £OI'Y FROM: Senator FR~ CHURCH-Idaho Martin H. Cantwell Executive Seoretary 89'6r3 International Highway Asa'n rnc" IhO ~,'a9t Second South S't:raot Sal t lake Oit, 1, Utah Dear JAr. Cantwell: I appreoiate your "ending ~i the Resolutions of the 89'era International Higlll;vay Association" With reference to Resolution ~o. 1, r believe you will be interested in noting that the Burns Creek btll of which I run a sponsor and which has passed the senate does not provide for a pO'.'/er d5l1!. in the nar!'oVl of the Upper Snake and it Is my understanding that there is no sentiment fox such a projecto Sincerely. l'rank CI,ureh Uni'ted Stutes Senator �:dr 1.. Sf:I,;.;.·~-!;.a!'y lIa?tin H.> r,·'!.nt';.'el. 89 ers Inte"'nl 't.luL 1 }j~ '.hl''aY so' , 140 ;est SeCf)f'Cl )(1 c>al'u Lak.e City 1, ... 11 ;..u Your lette!' ,:;If Oct -·bcr 15'i;t. ;.'1(. s. ... 8.1 to ·t.!1c :\. .( Zo!'...r: :tu'lie Highway CO.!l'IllissioI! the If" ...·t6r .' ~ o'"l'e ·.louth. £ .. Frank: L Cllzi, .. er.: advised .Jlet.:H1.·.. this p-3.r~icul!ll~ Thank you fo' v'l_ 104 :-<.:.1, t,he 1'3~C upon us allyt;LnG \'11 t 1'3 "'C"~n.i huve j\. ... 1.c·" 11 t,)., a. ld t..o,t' It"'C~ ~ Brf 01 or "n t'.le U.I,.,aa invol-.& 1 l(:1 t· _c'C ~')r five. miles in G r-c; .C --'-1 in 11 '6 f';lture Pl .. ase un :I01 heaitate ,to ca~l ';!:.;;.n ue ..... f '\3si,·tl1r.. c~, Yours VaJ~" tr Illy t (iJ... gn,di Justin Herman, A"I"1zo:t".a St'ltt' Socretn~y JI~.gh'..{ay C.,mrnifJsion �~o7&mber COP Y ---FJ.{OIiI: 5, 1957 C. E. :Jannerow--Cllief, Federal-aid Div1sion-·OfUce of Engineering DepartlllElllt ot Co!llllterae. FILE lIuw.ber 22-10 Hr. 1Jartin H. Cantwell Exeaut1ve tleoretary 89'ers International Highway AS50ciatl0.tl. Ino o 140 '.: Second South Salt Lake City, Utah Dear !""'. Cantwell: !Jr. Curtiss h~:,s requested tie to reply to your letter of October 14 enclosing copies ot three resolutions adopted October 8, 1957 by the G9'ers Internntlonal Assooiation Inc o Resolution No. 4 protests the oontemplated improvements extending from Aehton, Idaho, throll&h Cave ,'alle, '/yoming. to U. s. 89 at Flagg lWnch south of the Yello\'IDtone national Park. Idaho State Route 47 is inoluded in the Federal-aid secondary system betiYlean U. s. 91 and the 'farghee National Forest. and the State has reoently improved this section by the placing of a bitlwUnous road-mix surfacing with Federal-aid funds partioipating in the oost. Thi" same section of Route 47 and its oxtension to the Wyoming State line is included in the Forest hillhwey syst8lll. l'he State hae not included in its current pro3ram involving Forest hi~way funds, any project providing for any improvement of the balance of tilis ratite. The extension of this rotlte into Wyoming fram the Idaho State line throU&h 8ave Falls to U. s. 89 as rcfer£ed to by the Assoaiation is not included in a Federal.aid systeo o~ a Fores·t Hiehway system. Therefore, lmprove.tl8nt of such a route would not now be eli31ble for parUcipatlon at either of these Federal. hiGhway funds in the cost. Resolution lIJo q 8 .l'ccOlfllilends the improvement of U. S. 89 in ft-.l"izona between the cities of Ixescott and ;ackenburg ol This section of U. s. 89 is included in the Federal-aid primary system "hich establishes its eligibility for improvement with the participation of Federal-aid funds i t requested by the State and matched with funds under its control, and if approved by the Bureau of Public Roads. As the State initiates projects for highway improvements involving Federal-aid funds, it would be appropriate for the Association to direct its presentations to the Arizona State IllghVlay Departlllent at Phoenix. The Association may be assured 'hat Publio Roads will give prompt attention to any request received from the State tor particIpation at Federal-aid funds in the improvement at this route. Resolution No.9 oonoerns the park. As this 1s under ~ational Park Servioe, the Association procedure in forwarding copies of this of the Interior. stone ~ational administration of the YelloVlthe jurisdiction 01' the has adopted the aorreot resolution to the Denartment - We are forwarding oop1es of this oorrespondence and resolutions to our tield officos having jurisdiotion of Federal-nid matters in Idaho, ;lyoming. and Arizona for their information. Sinae:rely YOUl's. (Slgnedj Co E !..iannerm'l. Chief, Federal-aid �COP Y - --- Oci;ober 25, 1957 Mr .. ::Tartln H. Cantwell l!:xecu'ti Va Secretar,r B9'ers International Highway Asstn IJ.lo o 140 '"est Second .street, Sou.th Sal'" Lake CHy 1, U"Gah Deti:>" l.u· 0 Cantwell: Thank V()U for the l'o301u'1;ions \';hich ·,:.Jere udonted by yow;' o:f.~,unizo.tioll on October 8, 1957~ concGl'L..i..llG the 'Js uIJprueia te yOUl" vie\'IS hi,.?b.viay pro:')lems :tn VOUl' GO~.:mU1:t·ty in recard. 'GO the etfects tha"t vaX'louf.!. de'volopmen't.s in Idaho and .-.'yomlng ,,':ould hu,vE? u,P0n U080 Hi;;!h"iay 89 in the Jaokson > Hole nl'ea o Wi "lih regard to a power dam! 't'Jhich your relJolu~~ion No" 1 refers to, the Bureau 01' RechlLuo.:tion is cUl'l'entlystudyine the poten'tiel Snake NarrOl.·ls projec'G~ The study C07ers a dam on the main stem of the Snake River~ and in addi'tion, alternatives on the t.ribut,a.l'ieso The study V..8.S not as ye'~ !'eacn.ed the point whel.'e racom.ruendations ca.n be made 0 You.lnay be assu:ceo. that all interests \',ill be given Opp0l'tuni'i;y to present v:i.ews on tl~:ls m.atter before any final actions are taken by th.e Bw,'eau of Reclan.atlon g In the meantime l.'V'e will be hapl)Y' to tal--:e into conslderll.'tion the contents of your Resolution l.,jo<o l, and the only one affecting the EU1'eau ot ReclB.J.I:aJGiot'.• Sirwer ely yours, (Signed) Floyd Eo Dominy Assistant Commissioner �BENTLEY MITCHELL September 8 Re;Reoort # 9-8 ***••• ***** Dear Bentley: ott ~o~~w morning (M onday) tor Red Deer t o work M onday p.m. and Tuesday with a membership committee appointed by the C.ot C. to help them get started on their membership driv. , and also see how they are coming along on the pledged $ 300. 00 . Am taking Will go on to Edmonton Tuesday Might t o tollow thru on petitions which Ernie and I tiled with the City of Edmonton and the C.ot C. tor picture sponsorship, and to work tor a oouple ot days with Ed. Leger, the M otel Assn. Pr esident who will be my sub- agent there •• Then over to Jasper and down the W est sid e ot the Scenio Loop to Lake Louise and Bantt to see what the Bantt C. ot C. has decided to do about a pioture . I met with some ot their Executive Board on Friday , a nd they have cal led a meeting to arrive at a de cision . W pioked up six memberships at Bantt e on Friday , but only 2 listings . There is muoh more to be do.e there, and Grad will tollow up atter I leave (1 hope). Ramsey ot the 93 Assn. is due to arrive in Bantt today to start M onday on sol!oitation for the new Hwy 93 brochure. He got in just ahead ot me at Tucson and Wlokenburg ••• and now .e meet again at Bantt ••• what a lite o The statement attached to the inolosed report should bring our books to an even balanoe showing t 81.63 commissions due as ot this report. I have marked Report # 8-31 to indioate that advance commission was paid by spe.ial request on the three $ 300 sponsorship grants, and I will t oll ow thru on the oollection in case there is too much delay. ***. *.* I will stop back in Calgary tor a day to piok up my mail and oheck with Grad and Ernie on new d evelopments bet ore starting South to Cardson, Ft . MacLeod , W aterton , and the U.S.A. Then into Montana, a nd plan to arrive baok in Jackson just atter the 20th. to tinish t he solicitati on in that area and oheck Convention plans . I have a BIG hunoh that not muoh has happened on the oonvention s i nce I lett. Got a letter tada, trom Don W atkins wh& is wor king on tae Yellowstone deal . No decision yet , but he expeots to bring it to a head this next week. Mail servioe in and out ot Calgary is very unprediotable, but as I am going into town about midnight to get t his posted in the hope that it will leave Calgary on Sunday, it should reach you by Tuesday or so, It you send the cheok by return air- mail it should be waiting tor me here at Ernles when I stop back thru next week end o Thanks tor the wire . It will at least permit me to stiok my head out ot the dog house . Regards , �April 25 , 1958 Dear Bentley: I caller Homer BancUey last night , am apparEntly !" l t hings down there hav e come to a dead standstill . I did not hole him. on the phone to GO into all of the details , but did ask him i f he could take off a couple of days to work with me if I came down . He said that he could make it any day after lbnday, eo I will. take off for Richfield !.:cnday afternoon to be reedy for him Tuesday roorning . This means that I will have to postpone ~ trip to Logan until I return , but I feel that it is important to take advantage of Ho:ner ' s offer to nake the rounds 1fi th me . If 'you will drop me a line giving the balance in the Promotion Fund, I will figuro up what Accounts Receivable we can be sure of, ani try to arrive at eome idea of what we can expef t to have available for the brochure. I ... 111 then consult Dick Bailey am Paragon Pr ess and find out th e most brochure we can expect to get for the money . "t/ith this information, I will come on up to Logan ani you and :L:ark and I will nak:e a dUinite deCision, an::1 get into production. I am worried plenty aoout how Ernie is going to take the letter I wrote . It was a very ha..."'<i letter to write , and. I am afraid that he will think that we let him down ... I wonder if it would be a good idea for you to call him soften the blow a bit . He is a swell guy J and roally has gone to bat for ua . �April 25 , 1958 Sr. Culllermo Freeman, Director 89 'oro Int....natlonol HighwllJ' Aaon., Inc Hotel. Freeman, Kazatlan, Sin ., W aitO Dear - friend. Gu1ll.el'1lOJ Firat of sll I want to ags1n expr... the appreciati on which Pre eident II1tohall and ..... alt t.al tor the wpnd.rtul hoep1talit1 and cooperation ext.n:lod during our brier neit. It wao a long, hard drive, but _ both t eal that it wae well wort.hwh1l• • Inclosed i. a coW' of a let ter lihlch I have maned to 8r. eeau Gandara asking tor sane support trom the Sonora Hotel. A ssoci. tion. W stopped e to aee him. on our return trip, but h. ft. not ava1lable. W would 11ke to get aimUar letters ott to the Preeide nta ot other e Hotel A8sociatlo1U11 along Mexic o 15 am Aco~c o , and 'WOuld appreciate receiving the list ot President e , " hich you lIusltloned that you would secure free. the Nationsl Assooiation . Eva"y dq counts at t hi s stage as we are about to go into production on the brochure . I 'Wt)ooer if you would be k:iD:i enough to phane the manager OYer at the Playa Kaz at.1.an ant rem1.Jx1 him. to send us the picture of his Hotel. along with the descriptive copy he wants . I am UJl:lble to read hie aingature , and. do not remember hie ngne , othtrw1!1e I would write to him direct. It 10 too bed that I did not have a bottor opportunitq to opand 'aB. Um. with Jo••Jil W olf. , When h. arrin.d late that nig.t, I wae d.ad taa-.d. a m haYing helped celebrate lO \~r birUldq, 8lI. atraid. our intern _ wae eoJD8Wh&t unaat1elactory to ),fr IO W olfe. I wae well impresaed. with him, and feel. eure he can do a job for us 1t he finds the to giv. i t a whirl . OUr !'j'f,(~lOU a nd llartin H. Cantwall Executive Secretary • D an. �April 25 , 1958 Sr . Cesar A. Gandara , l'resident Sonora Hotel Assooiation Hotel San Alberto Hermosillo . Sonora. 'ex1co Dear Sr . Gandara President Bentley Mitohell and myselr recently visited Yazatlan to oonter with our Mexican Direotor , Sr . Guillerao Freeman. W hod planned to rly in ur . U1tohell ' . private e plane whioh would have given us plenty or twe to also visit with you in Hermosillo . W were , however prevented rrom e mak1ns the trip by air due to bad weather , and had to spend rive days out or the seven we had available on t he road via automobile . e made a brief stop 1n Hermosillo , in the hope that we could meet with you , but were dissapointed to learn that you were not available at the time . i.e deeply regret thea oiroumstances whioh prevented us from meet1ns you personally , but w1l1 ette to expla1n in this letter the matter whioh we had hoped to d1souss with you . Inolosed is the "dummy lay- out" of a oolorful "Gu1de to the Soenio Highway of Three Nations" whioh we plan to distribute nation- wide here in the United States , W estern Canada aod IIexioo soon . You will note that this broohure will contain sevoral pagss in FULL C<JLOR depiotins so.. of the most popular tourists attraotions 1n all three nations . Most important of a ll , we have divided our enti re hlshway system Into six individual recreation areas , and have devoted a double page to eaoh . Eaoh of these areas represents an outstandins vacation destination in whioh a family oould spend their holidays of three wseks • • • • or three months . In order to publish this beautiful International broohure , and finanoe the pl anned distribution of 150 , 000 (or more) oopies from ooast to coast , financial support in the amount or $3 , 500 . 00 is required from eaoh area in support of it's double pass . This support is bSins obtained from Hotel and Motel Assooiations , Chambers of Commeroe , eto . in eaoh of the Sta tes , and the Provinoe or Alberta in Canada . Othor support is bSins subsoribed by individual busineos establishments . \ �Page 2 Sr . Cesar A Gandara e a r e extre ely a=ioua to make our lIenoo Section as beautiful and attraotive as possible . Thousends of tamilies trom Norther U nited States end .estern Canada spend their winters in Arizona, and we feel oertain that many of them. oan be persuaded to extend their winter vaoation trip into Mexico as a result or this brochure , to say no thing or t he additional thousands f rom all 48 States and Canada who will receive this guide . The s pa oes marked ott on eaoh double page will be piotures of various attraotions and the oolumn at the right will oontain descriptive matter about the Cities and acoommodations oftered . These piotures wi ll be in blaok end white , and the price tor each is . 300 . 00 , whioh will i nclude a briet desoription ot the pioture . the day and than 1 , 000 . 00 was subscribed . 300 . 00 ~eeman Hotel , and and ifotels . Duri~ a half we spent with Sr . ~reaman in Mazatlan , more subsoribed in that City . The Sinaloa Hotel Assooiation to eponsor a genera l picture of t he beaoh . The Playa IIazetlan als o purohased piotures ot their llotels W teel contident that the Senora Hotel Association will also want to be e represented in this tine book , and perhaps some of the individual meobers will want to have a picture of their Hotels inoluded . W respeottully request that you bring t his matter to the attention ot e your ASSOCiation , and individual members wherever possible in order that Sonora may be well represented . All of the supporters ot this broohure are putting up the money in advanoe , in order that we cen pay tor the production ot the brochure as we go along . This is neoessary due to the tact that the International Associetion is unable to tinance a projeot ot this size whioh will total some 20 , 000 . 00 . In eaoh oase , pleass send us a good olear photograph ot the piotures desired , and also include a short description ot eaoh . The pioturos , a s I mentioned above are priced at $ 300 . 00 each , which is extremely reasonable when you consider the International distribution the brochure will recd ve . Again , "e regret that wo were unable to disouos this with you personally. Since we hope to hav the brochure oft tho press , and ready tor distributionoarly in Juno, 0 t ime is very' ahort , and we will appreoiate hearing tram you as Boon as possible . M ost sincerely yours , liar tin H. Cantwell Executive Secretary MHC : e o �Bentley M itchell August 5 , 1958 Dear Bentley: W ill bring you up- to- date on the following : CONVENTION Ballots have been returned with the following voting It Yes" Saran , Pugmire , Bass , Bandley , Freeman , Stevig ,Ml tahsIl , Ma rtin . This makes eight out of the nine . Don ' t know what to thing about Hagerman at Pres cott . He never returned his first ballot . OCharlie promisee to send me a little dope on advance pl ans so that I can get out a news release announCing the da tes , and main speaker if poss ible . I wrote him about it again today . BROCHURE Complete copy, layouts and . . . pictures will be in the hands of nick Bailey and Par agon before the end of this week . M uch of t he type has been set . By this I mean that I will have completed my end of the job except to OK final art etc . before the pl ates are made . Bailey is working the sections up as fast as poss ible . I have been held up vmiting for pictures , but have been notified that the last one is in the mail , and should reach me today or tomorrow . According to my records there is $ 1716 . 59 undeposited funds in the promotion account ( including the inclosed $ 300 ) I ha ve lost track of what the balance is. Would appreCiate it i f l 7 you will f i gure out the amount we have on hand . I wil l add to this our good accounts receivable and give you a statement as to how we stand . W should know e this as soon as possibme, because it won ' t be long before we will have to tell Paragon how many copies to print •• DIRECTORS I tried to reach my at torney today to ask him about the Powe r of M g 3 0: Attorney we discussed for Directors who will not at tend the Convention . He is out of town today , but I will get in touch with h im tomorrow . It would be a mess , I believe , if any of these absent Directors were to appo int someone to represent them who knows nothing of what has been happening , and I doubt i f it would be legal . A Power of Attorney authott'izing you to cast their vote would be far better IF it can be worked out • • That ' s it for now , �FROM : Cantwell TI) : M itchell 5/31/58 The Pa»a.gon conf i rmation of bid was mailed direct to you . I ha ve checked my copy , and find it conforms wmth my verbal understandi ng with Dean Wallin . W ould suggest that you write a letter of acceptance , and mail with che ck for $ 1000.00. It you want me to write the letter , mail me the check and I will deliver it with the letter . The same a~p lies to the new bid confirmation from Bailey . Check f or ~ 500 . 00 required . ADDRESS : Ri chard Q Bai ley and ASS ociate s , 'Nalker Bank Bldg . r S . L . C. �ruch,Jrd • Bailey am ;,ssoci3tes TO : Pror,otion Con..-'ttee, S9 l ers Intern~10nal Hillhltay Association, '!nr.. rn~ : StJDJECT: Conf1rmatd.6n of bi d on nrt work for 89 1 E:'!1'S brochure *-lr*~** RIC!L.!ID . . . 3.ilLEY AND ASSOCIATES agree to furnish the following s'3rVices , and gu~antee th.."I.t the fee for such services will not exceed. the rate:; quoted herein . SERVICES To render a cC'l!lplete agency service , inclurling camera ready copY am art work, and to l'rOrk ,rlth the PARAGa~ ~ furnishing complete supervision on the production 3J'l.d printing of 'i t r 1vel folder consisting of 16 p.::ges with self cover . Front and b,...-.J:k mges to be in tu.ll colora . Inside pages to be in two colors , as per dlJlllJ1Y su1::rnitted. Also to present one comprek El'lsiv e l ayout of each page fo r approval prior to the cr:l1"})letion of finished art wor k Fee for the above services shallb8 j Six inside double Front c.nct b~ k 8p~ eadB ( 2 colors) covers ( fUll color) • Front doubl13 spt"F!.;.rI ~ th at t 110 . 00 each ... large l'Iap 'lrrl pictures • • • • • • • • $ 660.00 • • • • • 110. 00 225 . 00 995. 00 TSRllS OF PAY'~NT 500. 00 to be paid in !<Ivanee of production. An a .ditional ~ 300 . 00 to be paid upon completion of .lrt. work . '.l11e 'lnlance to be paid ",ithin 30 ci.s..y8 following delivery of t h e brochures . lQ2lt The Pronotion Committee to furn i,sh ell nec" ssary photogr3PtS , tr.:mspariences , and type copy. 'Ibis bid takes precedent over c:.I\Y pr ior bids or agreements , whi.ch shall becOMe null a rd void as of this date . Signed tIUB 27th . da,y of l:ay, 1958 at Salt Lake City, Utah . �Feb . 21 , 1958 Dear Bentley: Just a line to let you know that I got your phone message trom Bill. From what he told me I h::lve flgu:red au the following: You have been unable to get a reply from Freeman. Cache County gave us $ 75 . 00 • I am to call you before I leave :Iickenburg. "ill do . Chas. Hagerman and I conta oted the delinquent members if Presoott , and were able to renew most of them in addition to .Licking up several new ones . Only sold two listings , but expect ~ 300 from the Chamber of Commerce after their .~rch 11th . meeting. 'ls yet have not heard what the Flagstaff Chamber did . ,Iill write more detail after a few days in ,ickenburg , and will oall you before I leave. �Prescott J Ariz . February 15 , 1958 Dear Bentley: Will try to bring youl up to date on happenings since I feft you in Richfield . Stopped overnight in Panguitch , and had a talk with Owen ,ialton , the President of the Club there . Owen was of the opinion that~he best thing to do is to a bandon \he Bryce Canyon Club . Says he h~ s never been able to get anyoDe oU3to a meeting , and has no time to work on it . They only have a few members paid up , so 1 agreed with h~ . Next morning I picked up several dues . ', la s surprised that Allen Cameron (Burnetts father) was so cold to the 89 'ers •• •had quite a time talking him into paying up . Everyone is flat Me l• • broke in Panguitch at this time of year , but I may be able to pick up a few more on my way back . Stopped to see Del Robinson as I pas s ed thr~ Kanab , but he was away on a W inter vacation . Left a bill for his dues , and a copy of the Club by- laws , and so will have to see him on the way uP . Spent a couple of days in Flagstaff trying to stir up some interest in the brochure . Hal Jaokson , Secretary of the Flagstaff Chamber seems to have lost all interest in the 89 ' ers • •• at l e ast he took a very dim view of our chancDs. to get anything out of the Chamber . He did , however finally consent to me taking it up with the Chairman of their Advertising Committee . I went over the promotion with this guy , and left a dummy and a written presentation to be taken up before the Chamber Boarl!. meeting today . :1111 probably get the news in a few days , and I have a hunch that it will be bad . Stopped at Jerome to see what they intended to do about their picture , The Historical Sooiety would like to have the picture, but are in bad financial straits due to a recent tax proposition that practically cleaned out their preasury . I suggested that the Verde Valley Chamber might help on the picture , a nd they are gp ing to see what can be done about . There is a possibility that I may save this situation if I can find the time to re- sell the entire deal, and get the Verde Valley Chamber interested . Hagerman was on his way to Phoenix for the week end when I checked in , and I only had a few words with him. He don't sound too hot , but I will see what I can do with him when he returns M onday. I gigure that I might as well put it on the line ~ to the effect that the Directors are expected to pitch in and offer a little help locally . This mi ght scare him off , but I don ' t see how I can expect to get much cooperation out of Prescott i f he won ' t front the deal a bit . Practically all of the Prescott members a re delinquent past 60 days . I talked to Bersanek , President of the Club , and he is in favor of dropping the Club , and did not even offer to renew his own membership . They have never held any meetings , a n~Lnever will get any cooperation as long as Bersanek in the lead man . ~ ill talk to Hagerman about this M onday , and see what he thinks . Bill Frazer , Secretary of the Prescott Chamber practically promised me a • )00 s ponsorship last Spring . He still thinks that they will go for it, but cannot sign up until after their Board Meeting on March 11 . Looks like Glacier Park Co . will go for $ )00 :':F I that they will get an even break with Yellowstone. can satisfy them �---2--I can ' t understand Glacier being so jealous about Yellowstone . I'll bet plenty that they would have very rough going if it were not for the millions . that Yellowstone brings into Montana • I won ' t tell them this , ot c~urse , and wiOl try to get them sweetened up to the point ot writing the check. Had a letter trom Bill Bass crying about how bad things were in Wickenburg this season , and expressing the opinion that we probably could t nt expect much cooperation t here . So what t he hell? Phoenix, like Salt ,take City has many highways, and tor this reason we h~ve never had Bnt support the »e . Looks like our only chance there is to hit the Chamber, and the Arizona Development Board tor a good chUnk . If this fails , I don ' t know what to e~pect . It would take two or three months to make any kind of an effective Canvass O the motels t and cafes . I might be able to hire a sub-agent or two , but judging from what my present agents are dOing , I don t t have much faith . As you probably know, I sold practically every order tor my agents in Alberta . Have you heard anything from Freeman yet? It not , I suggest you e~ther wire or call him and see whats cooking . He never Ray ' s letters tor months until he tinally wrote and said he hospital . It we are going to get this brochure out on time , Mexico in it , there is no time to lose . that answered was in the and have Frankly , Bentley , things look pretty rough here in Arizona at this wtiting , sinoe we have lost practically all of the leadership and support we had here two years ago . Everyone along US 89 between Flagstaft and Phoenix are scared to death that the Black Canyon Hwy . will get the 89 number some day . It may not be as bad as I t h ink , and may turn OuD O. K. , but at the moment I teel pretty blUe about it . My main worry is that I am in such bad tinancial shape that I ' ll reach the end of my rope soon unless something breaks . L don' t Doubt but what Richtield will come thru O. K. as Homer prOmised , but that ' s in the fut ure as is the prefc ott Chamber and the Glacier Park Co . I am wondering it anything has come 0 a head yet in Logan . If ym could get a difinite u commlttment out ot t e City and County , the commission on that deal might save the day . 'Nill conter with Hagerman Monday , and then start out to see what I Can do with about 20 delinquent members here in Prescott. Then to rlickenburg . Am staying at the Apache Lodge in Case you have any thong to phone abou t ,.. . or the mail address is "Care General Deli very , Prescott" .vill probably be here until about the 19th . or 20th , and will leAve a forwarding address . \Vould like to hear from you . Regards, �Sunday A.M . Dear Bentley: Vlill get this in the mail this afternoon , in the hope that i t will reach you Monday . I was pretty well set a week ago to get back into the harness • • obut seems like it never rains but what it pours . A week ago today , Mrs . Cantwell was involved in an auto acc l dent • • • made a total l oss out ot her car , and nearl y killed hersel f • • • but came out luckY with only a few cuts. br uises , shock , etc . Has been discharged t rom the hospital , and is now getting along pretty good . The insurance Co . has been waiting for verif i cation on the policy , which they expect will arri ve tomorrow ( Monday) . I f so , I will have t o spend Monday getting the claims settled etc. If the paper s are not ready t omorrow , I will take off for Logan Tuesday A.M. anyway , and will wai t to settle the claims when I get baok . J~ ~ _.._.\ "V '\) OJ""" I will not be able to start South until ~ut the firs t of Feb . , as t he doctor wants another electr o cardlgraph i t;;tore he turne me l o ose . He says I am f eady to go O.K. , but want s thi s final check i n order to better advise me on just how str ong I can go it . In the me abtime , I thought I might get some work done i n Logan ••• piok up a few members, and talk to the City and County Commissioners . Also I feel very strongly that I should run up to Jaokson . With the extra f ull col or page in t he new layout , I have a verl strong hunch that the Jackson Vlinter Sports Assn . might go about, 500 f or a color t picture . Thought I would call Fred Hauchens, and see if he can get a meeting togbther towards the ene of the week , at which time we could read a ll the letters received in regards to the Resoly tions , which aught to put the Jackson folks in a good mood . Have made duplicator copies of t s e most important letters which are being mailed out to all sponsors of the resol utions , and all Directors . W l l give you yours when I see you , also copies of some correspondence . i The new dummies worked out pretty good , and between the wife and I we have pasted up about fifty copi es , which will be available to mail or leave with prospects . There are so many things to talk about, that it w ou&dtake all day if I were to try and get it in this lette r •• • so will wait till I see you . While we are toget her , we will draft up a letter t o 81' . Freeman . Got a l e~ ter f rom Homer Bandley .•• says he 1s ready to go to work . W onder if it would be possible for you and I " 0 fly down and see him together before I hit Arizona . Just a thought • •• thint it ~ver . I figure I had better h i t pretty st raight for Presco~~ when I leave , not wasting much time 0:0. the way down . Then to Phoenix and Tucson . Should be done I n Arl xona by the end of Feb . and then . inish Utah in M arch . ', all be seeing you TuesdajJ A. M. If you don ' t ha1>pen to be home Tuesday , it won ' t make any di f ference , as I will go right ahead making some cnlls . However , it you should happen to plan-O il to be away most of the week, call me at home ( CR 7- 0260) Monday ni ght . ~~ �J Sat . P. M. Dear Bel!tley: The best , and only eM airpo',rt in W ickenburg is at the FLYING E ranch about three miles ,lest of th., town , and a couple of miles off Hwy 60- 70 . On your chart , you will see another airport close by at the Rancho de los Caballeros . This fi~~ld , however does not have pumps and service . I went out to the Flying E t( ) see i f it would be OK to land there . I thought that perhaps it was limited to guests of the ranch . They will be glad to have you use tr~e field •• • in fact most everyone landing at 'ivickenburg uses it . �Dear Bentley: Cardson, Alta November 1) , 195 7 This is just about the first evening I have had f Bee sinoe arriving baok in Alberta, so will try to bring you up-to-date on a few miscell aneous mat t ers . CHECK AND ORDERS INCLOSED I finally got the forms made up whioh I will use for remit~anoes under the new system. I have started you a file folder on them, which is being mailed under separate cover in a large envelope . For security reasons I thought it would be best to send the check air- mail in this letter. W hen this arrives, it will explain the breakdown on the $ )00 check attached . ~ ,I .. ) I have another report started on additional business secured here in Alberta which I will hold up a few days until I pic~ up a couple of ohecks. ALBERTA MOTEL CONVENTION Ernie and I both feel that our representation at the Convention built a lot of good will for the 89 ' er • • We were quite dissappointed that you were unable to m ake it , because I am sure you would haTe enjoyed making some of the contacts . I had the opportunity to become very wel l acquainted with the Hon. Russel A. Patrick, Minister of Eoonomio Affai r • ••• so well in fact that he has started to call me by my fir s t name • • • also Ed . Bryant , the Advertising Manager of the Province whom you and I talked to at St . Mary . He asked to be remembered to you. Also made another good friend in the pers on of E.J . Madill, the new American Counsul who recently replaced Mr . Oakley ••• you probably also remember meeting Oakley at St . Mary . Most of the City Offioials , Chamber of Commerce offioials , and Motel operator. from Calgary , Red Deer , and Edmonton that I had previously oalled on were present and all seemed surprised , and greatly pleased that I had returned for the convention . We did ' nt talk any 89 ' er business except informally , since there was a very heavy agenda . The 89 t ers were, however given top billing by vi»tue of the fact that I was seated at the head table on all four of the "eating oooasions" along side of the Hon . Mr . Patriok , who was the bigge.t bra •• there which I am sure rai.ed our stock a few pOints on the Canadian market . In fact I could actually FEEL our prestige growing •• , you oan always sense this sort~ of thing, it ' s hard to explain ••• just litt~e things like people going out of their way to be intriduoed to you , e tc . So much for that . NEAR FDTDRE PLANS Ernie was of course very busy all week , as many ot the out or town delegate. stayed with him, and some remained an extra day after the Convent i on was over . W did, however , clean up a tew odds and ends e at Calgary, and pioked up .ome additional business • • I also got the * ) 00 deal from the Calgary Stampede Board on the move, and their agency i. forwarding the pioture and insertion order to me at Great Falls this week (so they promised). Mr . Ryerson Christy of Cards on was eleoted President of the Assn. to succeed Ernie, and he invited me to come to Cardson M onday evening the 11th to attend the Rotary lunoh Tuesday, and the C hamber meeting last night . Got $ 50 from t he Chamber la.t nite, and today the Mayor pr omi.ed at least anothe~ * 50 from the City of Cardson. �- - 2--The president of the Cards on Chamber called Waterton Lakes , and set up a meeting with the Waterton Chamber for tomor row night ( Thursday) . He plans to go over with me . These are the small communities , and we can ' t expect too much this late in Ek the season , as they all have the long winter ahead, but we are a t least building some good bridges an~ making friends and conneotions. So , Thursday at Waterton, and follow up perg aps on Friday, and then to Ft . Maoleod Friday evening and Saturday . Lethbridge probably over the week end , dOing ..xx what I can on Monday, and then baok into Montana . Tims will not permit much in the way of securing individual members in these smaller to\ms this trip ••• it wo ~ ld be a s l ow process since the winter is cloSing in on them , and the Arizona advertisements have started to appear in the papers . About the most I can expeot to accomplish is to get a XXIX._ finanoial grant ot some kind trom the Chambers , and oities wherever possible, and pi ok up the odd mambership here and ther a. If the tour this comming June is succeSSful , and I can arrange to remain for a few weeks and follOW up with a membership drive in all areas visited, I suspeot we can make a real killing . CAllELCADE NEXT JUNE this time you have probably reoeived the suggested line-up from Ernie . It is , you must admit, a very ambitions plan , and I sinoerely hope we can get good support trom all s1des to make it a success . Ernie has his heart set on it , and I fear that a failure would just about break his heart . He figures that the cost for the five days after entering Alberta, meals and l odgings inoluded , would probably not exceed around at $ 25 per hea4 ••• and I don ' t know where in hell anyone could get a 1200 mile . . . oonducted tour of the Canadian Rockies any cheaper , SO it really does have possibilities if we all get on the ball and promote hell out of it . By We composed quite a pointed letter to the Gr eat Falls Chamber of Commerce, more or less making it c ibear that the" volume partioipation" wOllld have to oome from Montana, and asking their pledge of all out support . Ernie sent it out on his stationery, a entioning in a oasual way his oonneotion with the Tourists Committee of the Calgary Chamber, all of which sort of putt Great Falls on the spot to do something about it ••• you recall , of course hearing Dick Fur~us tell how Great Falls does everything possible to oultivate Calgary , and Southern Alberta. I plan to give this tour a big initial plug in our December bulletin , and we must tigure out ways and means of sell ing it strong , to mambers and non members alike . It would be a very economical and worthwhile trip for anyone , and these Canadians will really rol l out the red carpet . NEW DIRECTORS How about these guys? In the event you have written me care of Ernie, he will forward it, and I will pick it up on Saturday at Lethbridge . We are a l l practically out of stationery , as the last printing was limited due to the expected change involving Burnett . Ernie want s to write a lot ot letters , and I am down to just a few s heets . In oase you have not already writ ten me on this, please try to get me the dope as soon as possible . �----2----BULLETIN I made the deal we talked about with the Call boys at the Star Valley Independent to ge,t out the printed bulletin tour times a year. Their price is lower ~ ~ I ever got in Salt ~ake. About $ 80 . 00 tor a thousand copies plus cost prioe ~n the ~ngravings used . They can buy these outs tor about one third the price we would have to pay otherwise . The $ 80 includes putting mas on the address lables • • • and they would mail them from Afton using a bul k rate permit . W would , of course have to pay the e postage . No envelopa would be required, which is a savings of about 2!¢ per bulletin. Would like to have pictures of our new directors for the De cember issue, which is another reason why we should be hearing from them at once . *********** Its almost midnight, and I still have several more letters to go, so will come to a dead stop right here . W ill try to write OFTENER , and not so much in the future . My next address will be " General Delivery". Gre at Falls . Will stop in Browning, Choteau Bab , -4Jlr.l ldQI I~ on the way down , expeoting to arrive In Great Falls about Thursday of next week . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3375 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2633 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/916">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/916</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 3622332713 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence from Martin Cantwell to Bentley Mitchell Description An account of the resource Correspondence from Martin Cantwell to Bentley Mitchell, including receipts and newspapers clippings. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Mitchell, Bentley Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Accounts Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Montpelier (Idaho) Afton (Wyoming) Flagstaff (Arizona) Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Coconino County (Arizona) Bear Lake County (Idaho) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Arizona Idaho Utah Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd6 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/1b70ddff81ab91c7aea2bf724b354031.pdf 553c03efc1697d8d4159a5477f535f82 PDF Text Text AO MIHI S TIA T ION O FFI C E 1-40 WEST SfCON O SOUTH ST . SALT LA IC E CITY 1, UTAH OIAl El9.9lU .... IZON ... OHlef, 102 1 E. Co",.lba(~ Id. 'hoe";., A.;.ong Oiol CR 4· 770 B O fl fCl O f Mr . Ray V. s tewa r t President 69r. Intorna tional OlfICU$: l "Y V. STEWAU ""Id,.'o hlol" W .. 'o.n. W illi,,,,,, ",1 .0.' $. 0 won ow Yln·"...l d ..., """"0,," Mot..... Fl o'l.'off, A.IIC.". I ENTl EY I<oCITCHELL Vlc. · ' r•• id eM l<o4 ilch. II !ooIot.1 L"" ", U I.~ W. 6 .•..,SS S .c,.,.".T t ••• w ... to 51,.10 101010' Wi~h "but. , "',hoft. DIUClOU, 5UlllUt.4 0 S£OAHO De a r RaJ" I hope t hat ~our r eturn trip W a s p1ea nunt e s ourB B. wa • • W had a good time wi t h you i n M za tlan nd wish e a t hAt WI e oul d hav e atayed longer. lie di d atlly ono c.ay i n Pheonix Where we vi.ited wi th 80m of our friend. we hAd e not a e en tor aevera l years . W hope that t he rain we ran in to in Arizona hae exe ten ded into y our area. They told ua at Pheonix that t h o Whole ot northern Arizona W S having a good r a 1n . W had a o to turn W est fraa Pheonix and go clea r into Ca l i1'ol'nia bofore turn1nf, llorth in order to get a r r ound t h e s t orm . I have opened the account her e in thv Fir s t Na tional I U.NEn ,. . HfNOlYX C.,".'o"hlOKl udTo~ .. , .. t" i IC~ 1 Ut,h Sank in the name of Highway 69 ra Int t l Promoti ona1 erna ions. Fund . I de p oe! ted ~ho tour h und r ed dollar a heck whl Gh you chock tor the a dvertising 1n t he Brochure wh ioh ve agreed t hnt we would e a oh purohale in advance in order to have auttlo1ent funds to get the program on the va.,. . :i';:'t~:C~i':';.·"~~~cI.ha8ent me togethel~ wi L my pe r lona l h r.4 .. " I~ti .... h:l,"" ~I~~t;':.:,jl~~~~:'u A lp l .., W~", I ", IICHA.O C . FUCiUS Fe. q u. 10401.1 5 ... tF. U' , Mo",... AI you lmow t h e r e will be conSi derable expense invclved in ge.tlng eve rything ready for l·lI1ot in to go on t he IXICUTIVI nClElAlT: road . I am planning t o go to Salt Lake one day th10 week MAITlNH . C ANfWILL to go over t he final plana tor his work . At t ha t tlr.:e wo ~!t'1~ks:~i~~fU:: mUlt})e pre pa red t o pay tor getting out the r ece1pts and other materia l whioh he will need . By the time I pay him the stipulated . um ot one h undr ed dollar. per week tor t he month ot February we will be broke unl. . . a ll of the Director . send in their advertiaing money as agroed upon a t the meeting i n Afton . W ill you plea se send in y our monoy by re t urn to help t h e Oauae along . SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERICAS ~1l �Cdntwoll - , ~ltc hell COllvsntion A j)8.cty phone 1 as ... roa Fl..lj:s WI .uli..! IWke. fIIO it thd!'.., wtI.. 1.1 .. os,db11!. t. ot havlug ..,ill Coxon , .t..:t8cut1ve ...-ecrotarl \.· r t .. oj rl ...Uf' otor liot.el ·'l8;jc·ui...t.i OD ti.rl->ear on t.hld rot; r u at. J~Ck80 ,1 .·ole to tul, i'Uout p: Y 3nt1l~ b~ pU;S8;J of com..ounities on our l'o.ant 4. .WELlB . Dtlntlu,i' .. 111 r eruner (,,0)'011 f1 " ... 1..0 ..i.3. Ilt1 , to fIo"'- V tuLL to tbd ..~x1can }.;ucple dO·f. t·lO u ~ox()n .2.3 to It by 11 f 6.t OUT l.1t1dti, 111 F~bT'\l:J.ry , lu,ock. uCJ I. I.d dr"", out f1« ht 11. t.u# . . ~ta c C ,lri:a n6. & Vat.:. of.' V...c j'eople ill t III l:OIOl ...Ulll tic:. cOI.f..;e n j . i .l) Certain thu.t Ulllu3h do~thL;g of t.>3 rt i~ ......·..e that \lIver1 (;v u.lt ill be ya;j!8 GVaULW~ ali! I-8T'ilQrs will Ud .... .,.-:.IJ.V , but. t.lla)' nOl,t, b'l ill ~r i~o.. a with",ut ig .• t . ,raJelitl ~"'6inG' A prI\JYtSnt ouch b. p&.::3sirlt:; wi t;".o.. t 1 1fot.;J.J 11.L.$ to hear f"fot! y()~ boU) 1. o4ately t1 to YOU1' lJ.a _b ut h' vin him or. t.tl 1- r",~ram. Tbe party who c 1m! ·. . 111 !JOY t.c.&t h1s dxpo),~eO .;.re fail ;0 no '- at will acrua to t"o . J oc atiof: . I ,10 not. .iUjOIf 'A'h~ther it ls t o:Llh·l .: Io (' b t... get kt:ay fo-r 0 IV " b e1tJler , but b--o.for 1 '" ,j( b1= I .... (l.l. t yO\1.1' op 1110_ :J 8 t.. 11 '!"Ie~ you t ..• id( our toomllef'1lh11 w111 b " i.l ru t • i . ,JUl,l1 • l ~. . • -rloho.ll 1 b<!.1 ve t. H,) .oull for liQ(j,Q ot' l ater avel~ c ru it.. i I t.le til.ito jt'J.tl'~ 111 b:t f (-3 :..t.h U1 t '4:3 11(; an::. 11.. ('81't":Ll ....lill 1"u11. el."o. t IIltUI of t 1 ~ a 1n. el IDJltl, h Vd 1t' 4 b"'~I.t- ... ineu . 1 bd1d!V ..!oxo. • Ll ~! _ tI. etoc. t 1k 01 . . . ~ ubj ct arn b"l .Vt3 110 he 8 l..llu .. ;3 ~XIlctl: .il.l:... i:5 t..tI._~ i D u t. ",hell :1B 1s Q t t :JubJ u\. t . . I think it:. vel" and iAarUn 1t you &1'\:;. give =e your bonest opiJ.lon end ·l.OI.lt. •0 1;) t !1e ro.ll tiOD Tima: 1 6 ah ort if 1 , 1l6nsa . WI! co to 11~ ann ..111 art~.u Q at Ln.ll:t3 ask his fr8.l.l; \' ",1 th me r~jt' 1 C:.II ... \1 at R III I. to h~]J y J;: ~lniou b) VOL' .;.1.1 00 . . 1 3Ase "rorl.~ • 1 {.;;r c.oYon .1.LCural,y , I pill be a tte nd i ng a meeting or.. Sept l Ot h a t which -:.0 .... 0. I coulJ have your '3.Dswer by t ht::u it ;;oul· l be fine . Best regards to all the f/J.:lIil~' . lill 8]:· .uJ.. so if " �T t.il'"~ , . , t rol':lC' ~ u lOuht 'v'.• "'1 .. 1 I v t a-t. .it to I:. rrJ it. .... t tli. 51.\.• l!Ir 15 f r lc:·) .. til c .. !."j bVl..i.l 1 I..:f t: "" \lot i:o (".'·O.i.t,.:.:, [U(' . 1 ';1ol1lJ 'U ,O;;.L YOoL hsvl;:! a 0 ... ", t 1 .... h .tlUl • .o,,: i ! 0) to 01. '" aOJ.uti err.1I t.a ';.1"'6> j)l.: t;. .11 L .. • U:l1. 1 to til:; JO~' t. .... "". O;.U b' QI..,,:t' Oli n n uUJlt\J us 013. Ll h v tc t 1. to it. Lo h031 o .It . 0 I..:ertll.inly c·).f".ot i:o to t.:lI:! ;~oh ... ell,tit'l. _ )Ct",bCl' n- i ret<...'l't 1;.ba t ~ !1·c·.~oti!J loS D~t ~oir'Q 0'1.]1' ~. t t. 1 t" 1&' _.11 1.., ....... k 1,0 .. tot' t. iir.y 11 l.... i .1t 7 lC!6 t t lI:. ",or' ·t ' f tlldfu...... r(tD 1;)' l '\at t1m(l . ... '" W VJry Ji .... -.1. r .1;.>0. -0 nt, I 1 b VI) U3J... no thlr:1 . rh t.hc'J. ,t. 1 V':tT to u:..t,0 Ii 1. g 1 r·~"­ .... t:i i::; co .int: at t ,C UJ.t 10 i r i.11te OU\llI,JU3 tat,;,l fly '«'h· t.ve erG, rr!;) ut.o t~8oIdl..t ....'it p •-ell r \ : ; ! L l , b t l "~ 1 Lr.ir 'o'.l I 1 J., • 8ill , I t TO t t t " " "0 ~ t. it 1. Iih oJ ·n 1 1 ,1 'flu!'- v'!r WOI1t. '- [:'Ft)...tlar·t fot" S'l' but I ..on~ u\f,,m to r lfU1; I t.... 1 'liil1 be , 'P L tl t ~ .1 s ~l .... o it w L I U' t.L V t· .n ].1"]. '0 to:.';. AS. UO"' , 1. t ij .... )0. t , t· v ,r. t. .t rew ~f:Jl 1 " mll A) .t.: I ~ .,.~t.i .~ t .t1 k " .I... I r it lIb r. U!!'J! 1 1 .z 1 ·fJl'dtl;.'l. I; b 1 fin . 1l.!!::.}fH·~ H . .!li..I.t t. .~ COliV ·l,ti..:tJ ~!t~ 1 t.t.ac h.!.lf of ..;it:; ~, 6T' . 1IIl.i.~h 1 iOI'at·t';"Vi' ~ \,.; .r. tI t "ltd £r Tlwt'(j. ;:;ho.:lu va t ,6 ;f.n.~ It,o. . . l- r'il b ~ ... uL. t~ m..l13 tc .il thi .... mont.h, ::att ~~',.tb r..u.i t;,d l~t. ...;..11 to,," 'I'd u.cL 009 .)J)oul·'1 Inti,. .. ! t u~ o't'tl giv11'i A6 _b01Jt t'i'~ ,1. .. t..J..tt!) 11 ,Ii fur It . 1 l".<=j't .. 1r,ly 1 re t.l1l3 Tt'OllhJt~OT.l fulJ..y r<)8L. it;i J t.. ~l' .OU3 .r :... t Ul .l"t LtJ.t 1:. 11 I)!~ :Jl,1 r t'04DQr. mU·:.t fln .n:y teo get. i t Olle r il. Let' . if t. li6 ft"Q'raru !' .lls I ·11 t :I!o'l. ~;.tt· .lJ i!ll t.l"")1.8 00 :!It', itt cokerl . 1 Er"1l:.;t (;1<..,.:..;.;, -C CD bt; ,. ~<;l, ur . ,.l ~et DL..6"*.{ AWi 1 illcer~ll, t~ �AD MIN IS TRAT I O N Of FIC E \ <1 0 W EST SECOND SOUTH ST. SAlT LA KE CITY I , UTAH DIAL EL9 ., J U ARIZONA Off iCE , 10 2 1 E. Co",.l bo<. R . d ' h... ni.o; , A,i.o no Dial CR <1 · 7701 AuiflllUI. O ff iC E O f .... y Y. STEWA R' , , ... dd.nl 5JO W. alii Willlo",. • RAY v. STEWART " •• Id.", Enc lo s ed i s a cop,y of a letter t o t~tin in reply to hi s of the 11th .iith a report on the prol~re :; t o date of the rrocotio:cl r-ro.;ram . W."., n., 101 01.1 Willi.",., A, I.o". 1010,,0" 101 0 ' 0" FI.",.ff, "" ;.0... IHHlEY IoI ITCHiLL W • •" ..ld. nt I< loI il <h. 1I 10101. ' LOQlu, U'.h W. G . .... SS s..<r ••• 'y.T' ........ L. SI..,. 1oI0h ' Wld..nbv, • • A rI. o~ July 20, 1957 Dear Dentley , O'FICE IS, S. O. 1oI0UOW vlu ·".,ld.,,' Willia M. , A.bollO I 8lll very m uch concerneJ about tne .. ay il:. is going 8.", i t seems t o me i t is or ,;,;.gr; i ng much t o slo •.l y . I ful.ly r etl.lize i t is a. tre:....euJ.ous job , and I am c onvinc e ... that 110 or,e C;.d). bet tna .J ob ,lor,e i., t. time aUctL.eu vtithout mort:! nel p . I al..;o _'u1ly re:.J~, ~ the FrubleGl of &ett~r;~ uit .ble larson to help, but I can see no alt ernntive t o .oiLe;: i t c..n.i lioir,s it as ,uil..kly as possi·:lle . The s1.l.l!1:t.er i s half "one 1,0" with onJ...v six weeks of it left and scarec ely hl,~ of our luota raised to date and cons i dercl>ly l ess than that ac t u.:Uly collucteJ . DI_IC T Od , IiUIlLUIotO SEDA NO I :feel very c ertain t hat if we go to the ::oIlventi on and have to report less 1'101.1 F,.! 101.' .... <I. HI.. Ho,.I." ....or. , ", • • i.-than half of t he _~uo:a r aise.l t ha.t it iill very seriou'l:; effect our'fforts . ,ith just 10 weeks lei t u;.l:.i l th~ :onventiOli it L ;ojng to be whale of a f:"';~ii:h~Ul,:~ ...tI TOW 'big job t o eet an:-:thin.,; like half of t he :.J.uot:~ collect e 1. I n f a c t I ha been ~lANK w. SOI/iATl hopil..c i I:. would be j os sible t o repor t t o t :'e Convention t hat t he Brochure F].. , s.c., .., ""k of Id.1oo uld . loIon'p. n" ,ld." W O go t o pr ess ~n c tobcr or 10velllber at lc:..test . IURNErr A . HENDRYX ° DALLAS A. CLI NGER "rin~ S.ddl. lodu A pl u , W,o",;n, RICHARD C . FUGUS h t' u. 10101.1 6,ul F. U. , 101 0,,1... The Br ochure of c our se t o do the greatest Good for ne t year should be r da,iy fo r '.li stribut ioll not l a t er t han Dec ember as that i s rohen people start planui ng fo r next sumr.:ers va<': iit ioI, . No efIort should. b~ s}areU to get. : . t r ead,i by tilen , but I <i..Q ufraic! t he ~ro::;J":':cts /,l:ru .;etti n;;: dimr.;er ever:" day . fllfCUTIV I ffCUTAI'I' , a c onferenc e wi th Mi:.r tin an<l see what l,;an be ·,'Iork,"d out . tii th a l l due 1'9SpeCtS to Aiartin I fee l SW'9 he CtaUoot ,~o t he jo. . . titriout n'i! l p . He has ana i s tioing a g ood job but i t is simply toabig: 8. .. 00 for an: one J,;ersoll . Our s ucc.ess or f a ilure as an Associ a t ion rests s'luarely upon our t.e.];ree of .:.uccesa i n t his Promot ion 60 someho the Job llIust be !lolle . MARTIH H. cAHT w"J'l a v e ~,'t'~~s.-g;h~~:~ I will be 1 00Ling for a repor t from ;:ou on m;' return from Color ado una certainly hore you c an ork ont satta ;oluti oll . alJ. tho fOll1il¥ . ,1r.cert;ly , II SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERI CAS �AIR CONDITIONED 37 UNITS • • PHO NE 2064 crnitchell crnotel President 1IloI ",...t ~lIJf1Wdy 89 Westerner lo'fotel Logan, Utah Williams , Arizona . Dear RBY , Sit down before you get to the bottom ot t he page and .ee who this letter is from , otherwise you may pas. out and injure yourself . I ~ve been foroed to spend much of my dayl ight time out at town during the past few weeks , and by tho time I reached home long atter da7k each n1ght I have been just too bushed to wri t e any letters . I w111 start by g1v1ng you my imprecsions of the Trecker contraot . 1 . I teel that t here Ihould be a detinite time limit plaoed upon the filming of this project. 2 . I feel that M . Treokers minimum expense of tourty r dollars a day is a littl e out of line , unless of oourae he i . expect ing to take his whole f am11y on a nioe vaoat10n at our expense . J . I do not see why M . Treoker ahould be given r full and tinal aWlhori ty aa to what soene9 should be filmed, and as t o what is finall y ed1ted into our film .4. I cannot see why we shoul d suppl y Mr . Trecker w 1th aPPl'ox1matoly eight thousand feet of f11m from which he will make a t1nal f i lm ot less than three thousand feet for us and t hen m ake his own uso of the other five thou8& teet of film from nd Whioh .evernl area !'1lms oould very m,ll be made at our expense . In short I feel that t hi s oontract i 8 all in favor of Mr . Treoker , and does not give U8 suffi cient proteotion . Ilow for the ent1re promotion pr oject . Martin has t he ahow on the road . He 1. up in Jaokson now, and fl>om his letters and the money he has sent in I believe that we are at l a st cn the way with 1t . Last week he sen t 1n $245 . 00 in oash from a few he oontaoted on the way up throU{;h Montpelier and Afton . He seems to be very enthusiastio about the Whol e thing, but wanted this time up here to feel the program out where the clubB were str ong, in or der to develope hie presentation botore he star ts out in earnest . A l in all I teel l that we are go1ng t o be suocessful with the whole thing . It may take more time than we antioipated, but I am oonfident that if we work hard a t it we will make it a suooe.s . �AIR CONDITIONED COMFORT AND REFINEMENT · 37 UNITS • STEAM HEAT • PHO NE 2064 crnitchell crnotel I h:lvl\%~·~L~\jf,;v"tlJll he .h~~n'i~);'.i' out all ot the kink. 1n his presontation of thi. pr oJeot by the end of this week and t hen hend immediat el y for perts South 1n order to take advantaEe ot the leaBon down in southern Ar1zona. and then t o work North with the season . Thi. he pX'o:u1eoB to do . I expeot him to roturn here toni ght oX' tOlllorrow, at Which t i me I will go over everything with him and glve him all the help t he t I can before he leaves tor your ter ritory . I am going to write to Burnett within the next tew days When I can see my way clear to plan a trip into oout hern Ut h . He euggested that when I got down that way por haps the three of us could get together acd talk t hings over . I think he has a good id ea 00 I >1111 let both of you know w hen I can get dollIl tho t way . I lIlust v1sit all of the Be.t ,/est ern ~!otels in the State belfors t he tourist rush 8tarts so perhaps we could get together at that t1ll1o . J UBt as aoon as Martin geta baok here I will writa a full r eport ot the aotivities of the Committee up to dat e so t hat everyone """7 know that we have not died ot .tagnation up hers in this neck of t he >loodl . When are wo going to take another t r ip down South for another try at tho big f1sh? Sincer ely yours , �Cllut:.fell - l0i'i Drochure - Aiiuc. ureko.; lIIWlD.tia hal!! a rrivo J. . Sa. a. 1.t tl3 r fr oll2 )"rOIJa..n with his l='icturlO cn.l corre-ct U~ II!J!)~ .....iJj8'" I.e n.d l eft for Yo",ico :;1t:' t.e !t:\Y .uter .. & l .. ft flh-J hc..J. J UDt retUt"Io8Il br, ri!)y~ ~o . I -"ill 6-LC,,:1 913 his l e tter 1.0,J picture, but rla~t:lo r eturn t.:l l ",'tttlr 1.0 ~ SCo 1 :IL.,y 6.0: wvr it • t.1tle. .lao, b,_l1""Vd it. or bet .I. l"tJce1vdtl ~i 11 ... It ... 1a ch'Jtk i,.. Ul',l <11 tnt All f or hi.1S Jlio..:.lli>err!ihir" e..Fl ..... hI1 off ar to half' 'Wb,lI. t blii ... ould. lie 1$ v _,cy 1 I.er .lStad i~1 the 1~ point jr..:,rli!!ri lnU ll,.UC-it·.. tillil w:si. ef..6 f8'Jl'lc at Tucson ..,eul .. 1.1.# l",t.el'e"t.o. • ':'10':6 tho.) tI'eaaury 1u 1. ~mch 6 1·.. flbn I 11.l1.1. Il(m,t t!:<i> CD :(.;1;. ,ur·!t L.) t.o Oq!t/J t.~ ;,~..Vll t1Jn", ) th~r' is lltt,l" t.aced~- i.ty o.f it ,,'.1: ~ c!o r to S.. lt. L:J..a 11.11 I. b·,d( ~ in . ..t ce I WQllt ha.V3 t.ime t.o 'uS.-t:l-l' it. r Ot' n i ji,W <..i..~ 3 ! .. ill Nr,\.L,.-s ~ 1 t ~":H) uet ;-:- tUl'n it itrull'hl•• i.91y r1e.-,,$;t;l o !"t to rficeni ;:.1 :J:..r .;t;tQTJ 1 ~v rih.ivu ., ... J "" . It 1.8 4 "lory '.. ~, ·1 ruper t ana 1 hOl" ';Jill J;;.r SOIliU 01' thQ J11'd...;.lo r ~ Lose ..n"" Let t uoa Ol, tho bolL 1. aQa1 t I el so lil1I ""t. f:;'\llt , but will try to C01"':'tH.:t t ll<l.t v~;'ty 3001_• • 1 m.>te tilat. tll~ re~-ort. ,:.Od8 n~"t sh()", ULV· tcllitiv.·..J. fuo.;13 r" ",1II .l:lti3~. 1 ".10fh:;lJ bim ;.1l.j c~nt.l~1) ~ep .,,;..ou.ut "OlU..1 :>t.1.0.1 ~ • 1 U-e "ss #1... 1) -hlch c..:.:.me t,;d lA:!.to .1.'.)" , 1 It:-t.l\.' W~tII ric. u.... k to ,.1z; .wJ. r~ .u~-,te .. he let ~ Lr.l1t t.!~ • -.. .. t no.. o,t"t, ,. •./1.• • J. hilV", bot hd t' .. 11"uII< .. .:.it tnl.u .. n .GO 4'01 "lur it' nil ~-.ru!" lieut it. . 1£ ,)0'--- h· Vu •• t I&ot it bofc:t"'(; lJC, 1,1. 113 li.l •..;. .. . I' 1 l~cQ:1.:i.J. h.ir.1; of it ~~J"., 1 -;on•.;. t..i.w U.C: ~ .0._.11: fi.·l,.i.l!I ~;Ul. Welt":: . 0" . ~t. 01' t.iLt ill; ..i .... i>t;ll ~1';.l .U 11. C"lb .. ~ f'~'r b.,,_i.s ...n .... # h"".l~e,-,t.aa .)\J . it .;1_;.8 d.l.i:io 10 If it 1 :1 ~I!sibl~ t or yN;. to poJt.j-"H.O J.r-L.. t1 .. ~ ntH' eto.t.lo •. el"Y fer 6. littl" whi11o:1 IfOu.!. .. ~u...~~st. y U. a:"J ,jO . of \:., .. '•. Je 1! .. Colt :~._ Dvu,-lr out lOU til b v ~ to ill u ... bd, an I'ri,.t it. , but i-'t"iut. t;'J(,! v~ry j,.1ml.<m, \,:Ii ",,un g$t 0: 0;" . '1'-;;)1'e is ite 1....k.... J.y to b<l Q .... han.:. J.ll _ur-.;cW1"8 , uut 801 t~ tlJ 1JC;I 1 CbD.. ot tell you at:y IlI.re toll .. !, t.n •..!" ~t i;.!li3 time . A so }llJll:.e k .. e; it. cl)lf11~t1.;.l . 1 h,t.va on!.:. mldnti ..n:e:i l , it i,-, }l".H,I'l'" t o Dil.V t: 00 stiJ.tl.(.;.uery 3houl .: such, ell', 1 t.~,J...", 11J-ce. :r J.~.inl;\ i1.:1.1 IS tho neceuary .ri~: n dS ill 81)01 f~rt.hl,;omil..g hd 00 l'\;'.:Jl •• / to .gad. th" �Jear Bill, .J:lclotlet1. i3 Ch'_Ci, !'rOts dlll ll h t')T tl .• III· mba\'Shir 1tl t,.l'ld ...BJuciat.ion . j . cel.t it :tir .. ct tor. llilil) 41. t( ~ V~ time 1 :;Ii tse".li~ it .1r .... ct ~ yvu foS I b.ow ~a n!:.:e.l it. ill t.l .... u 1.~ • . !.t,i t,.,.<.t (;.h'.lck "".:3 a ver-:' •• lev 1&V.8l' ", __ 'Hi~; ::l13 t'ltj"'j iL roll "J:f ~o,.'iL.le '.' •. HI) :it. .:i t.eo.! h~ ilJ 11 '-'1") .11....... [; L.p.~,J. U.L i t.l t. e 1_ .....! t. 1 r .;.,,' iii' 8;;1 o:...Ui ... t £l4a ... t.l.:..n • (;!.. ... l .Ji~ yLl•• sen,1 t-.e chaLk. t.o ClltltJ yet .... 1 l~lat *r.;t:lk. . Ii Gv ~..I.;"I;wtJ l.alo Jl40J hlJo" 1l,J.'j l.>UA...b joe 1'<;: se tl.!,1~W..l t . 11. !,. tty lhc.l.e .i8 ~:.t.[,uAlel:; t, 0 rr .. ~ ti.:1 ial t. t,o ;"et. t:8 IH·l~.... JI\., r o out. 0 thl! r.;Lo. .. . ole go iL ~ rvd e v*"ry :/..1)" It sb,Q'i3 ., t_J~ tlh r ~o + 1cs up to un to !,Sst. it out . 1£ t.:,f;J U.l;ih"'l ~.r t,;f ",·r t.le OL...<.J1Ul' c..n bu J Tuduce ... t.,on Car,t le11 £AD ,et. 0 (no rcol.-J ~,J it .i:~;"u.l. p lta , l j . v u r ."ant t.lut euO'J€r. tuuJ true tll~:t·.1 t;. ....i ... (I,i,toJ cu . U:JC, t he ..;",...u h6 00 toll rO.3tar 16 A~,ril let rtic;;n 1.:: L.l','38(, than we t~1.1~ 80 fiat overy 3i.~1~ mambor ..H ) il,t!..· th6 tuU that you cnu oeforot Wnw . 1'ter 'rri.!. lot a. 1 1:tXJr'.. ai. ~ 1,Ll;,..L ~ivU ~il. 1 .rt'-V~ 'ne 1Di...ut.;,e c,r t. o'j . .Itu, ~.tin.; .nieh ,)''>1 ow;, If6 ~ e club:.. ":II .. ~ loOt. 'e.t tneir fivQ Q ll~:r r tun. tofte .... ohj1'1. ... 13tliJ th&t. f 'hi V\.L(:~:J ill t ieD ~o tv vro\tlote t. lid 1,,·£ t..JO lJ p' i t l1."l~l' $ . .. ~inCtl J~ �IInrch , 1. ...7 Cantwell - Mitchell I was very ,~! to .~t tn. t.. !!-....re lIIovlug ~8.l.n . u6n~r~ rr~,rels Rer ~t of rch 1 th n1 10a.rl1 that I ClUmut e:t t'Q8d enOl.i.fiD t;le im).'Crt6.Lce of .cett1l.Ol!, ti."" Ll'lIc.hu.'e off t...'le "row:;:... OD. 6elf c.ust.a11.1I1g \)8.bia IJ ~uic::lll as v-:-s~ 1ble ~'" it 18 c cstir.g a Coo.ea1 ot &oJ.o1' . vary GtQ' 'Qeo t pa3 as until it COJ. ba mt.. 1~ 801£ SU.3taL L :g . 1'.I.l' I ro ,UOl;Stea. BUlB.3 to tranBfal' un::>t:lor 4w . uv to tne iTo.otiar. .i.k:tpt ""'hieh he L ,for ;;19 . . h& 'la .. dO.:..6 . J.t I lmV 8 toe llltaT t_Ol 1 l'eadur/ 1.1 baa. wtJy 1.ho~il (f.J hQ intUnIl:) ~I',J Jl'J ul'). hab , 0.>0 b:J.. Ilca iJ Ln·"! bn.nl!. 'I. hu O.1"tHS l o~ . ill re.i\wi.J W v X'l.QUS l.:ll.ili of il h S .. . .JO i." !IUd llt.Tl . Marti;.. 1.£ )"IJU r bolj l ~i:> Lbo ... ttl\' 1I~.:,bt:!1"Jh_.t8 ~ t.ter :;",rd t.nwa w hiJII ta t. Uu' Ttlt.,IGl' t .c..o hula t .• em ..,u,,_ .i. we IJ..lbt r tht.! m nth . :; yo·J. C Ln r~a .. i l 580 ttle!"';) is n ,' a,- IHy if , •• t.t'ba. :11- to lil a bills .U<J t"Q l", t of 1, 8 m 11th BO IOU 3~8 bo' iar'rt.ant it 'UlY ",b id to i.,.-t ~Ow.:.:: rotduWOl dn J.,t-o ill at. Of... I3 . t.:l9 Oll,y '#1:1 WIl \,:oulj get t..J brcn.....uT'.l .•ut or. t.le r ... l:i:1. a to .r aih t.lle to ut it s1..lil'l;,ad 80 I t.vo~, t.l~ fJu..i.l ll, t.ht! •• vruJ rod j ! o . tlOl! i t is Ull to ;t .... ~ ",,1101\-;.; 1 1 .... lUll will do lvt)r,t l .. r.. j':o3d~1 to .. dt 1 et: l'teIe ,rOG ur full--r u re of h .tlI.~-,cl!tl C:"'JI:11t1~,. of t....... trl3a;;lU/ you w111 ..nder05t~d too 'IIh! t .•e ur~ ent n·...:o "it of otU1lt; f.bol an"w Oli t .• c r~1\ 1. 1 if.j-.t:.W tr~~9ury .. To hel.;. matte1'3 ..1oJ '6 on. of ~yr l"'kl!i I ~b 'lck:e bOlJ.ced JII.;.rJ:.: 1 ~r:o'" ! ido t fut. ' lllti.ts our tr(T. bl t· " , 0' t Lan :n:l.~,.l beli v t.:. t L of hl ld bOIl ,.,.;8. !Jill \III1l!;! . 0 .l.1 to 0 • 1 ba.. l • lith ... ..1, tho t:i h· , i t p<l1' • FoJ.· tJ ta r 88 no uterllativi't ). ~ f f. t Iforl. I i1t ~ a for a hils to et .. lltt.l .;or kiJ'i C pit .1 , trion h & uih and c ... tch i;J. I, and Phoi.n l~ 1fnile their se m ill till on . Th.s S8a.&CIi 8 t..1-..rt~(J tc sL _.... ~1I r. U ~ II ill CO!08 1.0 a haJ. t IJ ml U e r n:y . Of COUTS,. t.le IJOCUC)t' you C!W 8 )1II'nt. rt't b ettA.r , bnt 11 ill be imrollsiDl. u;llJ1 S lie tun ··,,:t'£, a" 1 01 lc. t. ,1""1' 011 rf1 th . 1 ~OO . )l, X-1us t ~le t ruv.ling ."':' n3e l'l will in the eni be +3 u~,t'A fros the COl ..... a. lcl:. eu-ne:1 fr'Ac tho ala of th~ l.lrochure p'ovi ,ed Lt cou:rae t' l It t ,e <.om.... lssioJ.s eat"l-.a,l aro in .7'--C.i,s O! t.."l8 L .;..1 . plU3 tr v.!U· e;:J: r.:J8 • 13 t 'lis c()rr~ct? Al8a i f the :.lbert.oj so• • ru ent cow8:s thru vr1t..~ ;a.T.o\h l' 1... . t"ia yea 43 it ln st Y$&r 'Would 1/,:, t that go to lOU as c O«S1S810n or or,ly 1/» of t e EL:101..L_t tb'J)' oj'el,d to i.r.:1 l .l;! brccbure? Let . ~ bear yo...r 1ntelTret.,t1oH ot t:.;,ls a.sr.ec +. It· unJ.erstanJ.iiog of the contrMo t you encl o' e! 18 tha.t the <;1r.C'lT'sly , �AlllONA O ff ICE , l Oll E. Ca",. lboelt AO M I N ISTIAtlON OffIC E 140 WUT SECONO SOU n . TH SAlT L CITY I . U A AICE TH Id. Pllo." I_, A,i zona D L El'. ' ll 2 IA Olo l CI " · 7708 O ff iCE O f .AY V. STEWA", p, ..;d.nl .53 0 W . 8ill Walla",. OfFIcns, lAY Y. STEWAlT " •• ld ... 1 ole l Wool.,U. ... W ....., A.;, au IUI 5.0 ... OIlOW Y ·, •• tJ d. o1 lu • Bentl ey iJitchell , Chairman Promo tion Comilli t t ee IIi tchell M otel Logan Ut ah Dear BentJ.:,y , looIor.o.. "'010... F-I.~.I.II. A',...... IEH1lET M Ll. ITCHE Vlc• •P•••ld""• ... lIeh.II M••1 o Loqu. U l.h W. G. 'ASS S ••• ".T,...w, ... .u L. SI.,•• Mole l Wlco.nbu,q, A,loon. April 24, 1957 Wl lIi a",., A';Eano analys i s form a nd l imit on we c vuld Your l e t t er rec eieved today and I fully agree wi th your of t he Trecker contract . ITe c ertainly c annot a c c e pt it in i ts present I bel ieve some fur t her negotia t ing ne ens t o be done . li th no time the f ort y dol lars a day expense s (even i f we a ccepte d t h a t fi&ure) fin d t hat film cos ting us twenty thousand doll ar s or more . 11henever y ou decide you can g et t o Pangui tch I ·,{ill do my b_ s t t o meet y ou t her o and pe rha~s the thre~ of us c an go ov_r the whol e s ituati on DUCtOU, 1 and c ome to a c.i. ecisi on as to just wha t i s a f air and e4ui t ab l a of f e r t o nul~e IiUILlUMO SEDANON .,_ . T ' " H ft"! M.,eo. d. I.... oiol rec.:rer en d carry on f r om th era . I c e rt ain l..Y c oula. no t ag r ee t 0 t h a ter .;s " oqol.. ona••. Muleoas t hey are . N 'U~NETT A. HEND~ YX Co....ro~ M ud Tow.. olol '.n qyll~h , Utoh By a l l means Mart in s hould get i nt o southern Ari ~ ona as s oor. ~~AHIC w. SO~GAT2 . the s ea son 7:111 t aper off f as t d own t here pr etty s oon no·,., . I f; .. tSac.rll,"'ft'ofrdo~ i 05Sl.bl e as t.4 .... tp.tillt.ld..... promL ed h im I would go s outh with him if he t hough t it ne ce ssary and perhaps DALLAS A. CLI N . I could be of as sistance t o him in g e t ti .,· ' ' ' ' - 1 3 GU "rl "~ S.dd!o lod, '' s tarted in Tuscon ana. tincal.>s A pI.. , W,O/Olln , s inc e h e i s pr acticall y Ul o-:m doVll, t h er_ . I s ort of f l: el t hat Bill V:alt z ~ ICH A.D c. HlGUS w111 step i n and he l p i f I show up wi th ~brtin and ask him to h el p , but knowing Fe"w. M ol.1 1i, .. IF.tt., M ... W l t z 1 t i s anyb ody!) gues s I/ha t a ttitude h e wi l l take i f rJL.rtin appr oac hes onl a him alone . Tne 3ame g oe s fo:' Ky riak.i~ alJd we \'Iont g e t to fir st bar,e ir, r.:e xico IX lCUTlYf SfCUTA~Y rrithout b i s hel r . MAlTlN H . C AHTWU.l. 1 w . Sacond South .0 s.1t l.h Ci,.,. Ut. h I am g l a d Ua.rt ins t r i p north wa s s uccessf ul e ven t h ough it i s the deade st o5sib l e t ime of y e er up the r e . I t makes i t l ook very e ncourag i ng . Martins wire Sunday sai d t r i p ne t ta":' 1 000 • ..;0 . Tha t s ur~ makes a good Gt o.r t . I BU. JIOse ~ t in "Ri ll be don hel" _ very shortly b ut ha vent heard any thing sinc e his wi r e l as t ~unday . I atten :l.e d a motel m ee ti l ~ a t Veg as ;.iond~ a nd s aid t ney had a wa nd r ful t r i p to ~ey.1co City and g one M other .J week s a f t e r lea ving Ua'_a.t lan . units . I ' l l go b ac k for that oig fish any to see y ou in Par~uitch s aw Da hill' Rob inson or. a r ound the other He is v ary bu sy and time you s s.y . soon , s~n~q, SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERICAS �AIIIONA OffiCE, 1021 E. Camelbock Rd. 'hoen,", A"zono Diol CI "'. 7708 AOMINIS'~Ar I ON OFFICE 1.( 0 WEST SKONO SOUTH ST. S... LT L... KE CI TY 1. UT ... H DI ... l H 9·9322 OffiCE 01 15 RAY V. STEWA Ii:T, " •• ide nt 53 0 W . Bill Willioml • WIlliam" Arizon .. 'lay 9 , 1 957 OfFICEU, . ... y V. STEWART " ••ideol W ..... no'M .. I.1 Bentley Witchell , Chairman Promotion Committee M itchell lIotel Logan Utah Willl.m" Ari.ono S. O. MORROW Dear Bentley , ............. Molon ~I09".U , A,I.on. I had been waiting t o hear from you in r eply to ~ l ast letter , IENTLEY .... ITCHElL Yiu·P •• ,ld •• ' but llar tin informs me the plans are chc.ngt:d an d y ou no longer e il..'""P8ct to Mllckell MOIII l091n, Ullk h ol d a mee t ing in Panguitch . W . G ..... SS So ...,",..,·T... ,.,., ~ince my las t l etter I h ave g iven the movie c onside~ab le thought l. 51. 11. Mol.1 Wlc~ .. b"'9, A.i . on, and I mus t say I am i n agr eement TIith M artin t hat i t should b e po stponed until a l ater dat e , probably next y ear . My reasons f or t h i s are p artly as DIRECTORS, follows : 6UILlUMO SEDANO Th . .. A. Hol.1 fto! M do NI.. .,co. 1 e .aSSOClatl.On J..S proh i bi t eu by the ilY LAVIS from c ontactinb any N0911.., 0"0" , MI.ktiebts in excess of ~2500 . 00 ~~!~~!!" ~~!'IE~~~T~~" 2 Until iTe hav e a balance i n the bank to c over the production of ~'"9uit~h,U'.h t he movie I fee l i t woul d b e unuise to make a contract for i t s pr o,..uction :e:I~:C:iIVs~'~~~~d~ien asi de f r om the fact above s tated . The s ale of t he brochure c ertainly i s MOnipoolilf.ld.ho not f ar enough a l oIlti to b e certain of it s SUC\..6SS anu while I fee l a nd hope DA.Lt.AS .... CllNGE~ it will be i t ~ tar.e lOllt;er than we expec ted end we could easil,,>, fina. "r'"~ 5.ddl. Lod91 Aplno. w,omin9 ourselves very much e m oarr a..; cied financially • 5 Th ere are certa i n parts of Tre<..ker::; c outra.ct which c ould not be • ICH .... DC. FERGOS FO'9U' Malol 6, .. 1FoU,. Monlo.1 accepted as t~ ey are . I b e li ~ ve f urther i nvestiga tion i n to tn~ coot of pr oduc ~ s uch EXECUTIVE SfCm .... n. film shoul..l be made . It s eems t here are a l ot of ~A -tra c ost s n07 coming ........ TlN H C"'NtwEI4lUt that we . .I.i d not know about before and we truST kno·r. what the compl e ted . 1 W S.cond Sou"'. 40 . $4olll. k.ClI... Ullh f l.1m ./l.ll cost bef ore we en t er into a con t ract wi tb anyoI.e to ~ ro.....u.ce it . Viu·',uid.nt I plan t o meet L -tattin in :Phoenix l'lionl.l.8\Y Wlcl go to Tuc son and Nogales wi t n h im. Hope we can Get the pr omoti on i n to h i ; h gear dorm there no.. as their 510'.7 season i s approachin~ very f ast . 1.1so I find t he 93 As s oc . has just c anvasse.l a ll of southern Ari .ona n icki.n& everyone for fifty bucl; e for t heir b r o c hu~ e . ~~ ~ake our p~tch a ~it tle h arder . Let m k'lol'I your uecis ion . e Sincerely , q(~ cc Burnett Hendryx M in Cantwe ll art SCENIC ROU TE OF THE AMERICAS �Ser. ", Cantwoll - IJ57 ~tchell C(\nvention Juet r ocaiv6,j 0 letter fr o BUTueH t.odny ~;i·.ril", hi... n. wl .. ra~:; which will be pet"IUUlent !:Ii"l;O ho ha,i pt.:rcha.~e .. :. a homo . Tbe l..-i .r·esi!. p-o.v will bu 11& Dar.cro,.;·ft p.oad burL~.:.:.JlB , ...... UfO;.·I'il.o . ,lease C01'{'t:rC't ,Yvur ~li. ~ L ..dt End 31;1 t .... t hI:! r ("f~ ... \~ '3 t.ha buUetl'JB et-..c . I have not hal.!' 1 from either or je'u for Jome t_ae, "L-"l:t .i 3U,. ~ th ... i 1.......,3 fot· the &:1'0 go1..tt. '!OL\lo fl.": eXp8(.te..l • .oil'..) Iln:: r';,':ie~·"1,.... ti .. 3 C..·S;il,· i. flo "at? It.. itt just 4. "saku off now an... tUG j~f!VI '1me p.c.3JO.' tbat L03rt .L1:' ·cr.;" btl! !o:-i; . ~oll\l'"~rltiOl, I ho V h~..l no Tej'll1 Hl aa yet froID !o.fiy I.H. Ule ctiH!l' lot.tQT'n G 0 ~ 110 he'\1" [Tilt; t118t! tiOUJ . r sent out to ... ilv' , hct1.l}M.n et.1.. u1 thsl", b'lt he; 11l t~JO h'(Ji:lOtitlfl I iL:k.i1ii tlJ tsxp. (.' ~ to b . kbl·,.. ~.", ... e l . to t "ke ~ . I gua.ls tbat 13 811 for 00':4, ljut ont~ tU te· b(·t~" have L~\Jrnctt:l l'l.Iucit al 1·133~ . }fa eSiecL.11. as. t: tlll<t be b., k It .1 . .ft.·!1n';h a;) to t 3 ,rc;...~·f,; .• of t •. \::1 t·~;Jo.·1or" QI;d t.;)t': o..;j •• odatic,n as 110 s.:..id bi~ be'H't i .... 1 ~ d ~_~ \l"l o.lh he i , ver i .t. "!31te I lo 1. ..C" 1r. h·::'1 t:l1llJ~' turl1 O'l t. 3iJ.c erely , �1.r . 1 , 1 Ct'nt 1011 'i tt:he:l1 II lott-<lt' tod1'l.:,'"' ["-lm !'-'rd ~ .,ilI: ret" ~ l·ng . Ii... B ,1 oJ ~octi.1J fl .. .ad .. l1:3t l';"h.. e1v~~ ab. ... _ ... ~1 .... 1 h b.:Cl:"; tl'ftv~ll1 ~ 1.. 7' ""ie: r I;"ta r ;,:,~ h ..... ~ I 1 !"~co1vs,1 1.;,0 .e an, t.l.!.q; fr ... tt !WV bot hlJ r_. fl'l'!D ... 9: t. rJ foY' tl . r h. t 1 t t n lit', 1... .. \ ' : ' ~ t· 1 ~ try1.t: 3 .. .!lI ",i" is 111 lG h I~e~ It. ,)., cr t...c • a t. 6 woe:ii. . Ye3ter~ h6 So! t. .... ..-,1 nat', t,:d Col tet' "M ~Jl.t<.lc.G11t(J ," lJ c..~l;(..... !, ' j kit. 1'l1ftJ.Gg . f:;x-ptJeta tr:.- "cD l:,d. 11.1' U I ... ! e: 10.•. ~ "~. b v 1.'.\ ~ C • t ..... ''':ollV".Ji,ti 10 , 'v ;tfAi;.~~ ... II'" ',- d I k e V'J-..·:/ l:IUdl t .. l> Ul<.i .... 1 1 if '" Lt 0,11_ L ClJ\ , t'~J'U 1.'1 ~L:J ;rGaoht :;J Jq'c ., L ._. t Ci r13 fi'Ohll .A-rt:.hur Hi! ''''. b-~ It.(.;heatt:.r , '1m. • 1: t. t'o,,:: !l.1 t.o .:'1_ A1....... o "'on.1 .il •• . o. • t I 'n&.9 WI, c:.U I h bC+ J:i t v ~ II t' 1 t;,.. ~.o.;, :...n t~o.~I. him ... .U.~ b.. 1It t~ .-111 f.ut fl 'ut' ~ _!II " _ t 6'':'" i t 1.0J1 t yd, ki::; n, • .11" • e ~ j.... f 11 I' t 1· orv nt..1""' . . ... ~..:. ,. "lf1' t t In �RAY V. STK!lART September ~ 1957 Dea •••••••••• ** •••• * Ernie forwarded your letter of the 7th( addressed to Bentley and myself) up here to Edmonton. By now , you have no doubt reoel ved mine of the 8th br1.Dg1.Dg th1.Dgs upto-date as of that writing . At the moment there is very little else to add except that things have sone off to a fairly good start here in Edlllonton oonilider1.Dg that this is a large oity way up at the jumping ott plaoe into practioally no where , and the end of paved roads in the Provieno8 Tourist tre4. re to date has been so inoidental that even the motel operators do not have "~aA understanding or appreoiation of the potential and seam somewhat amaze'" to learB what similar oities in the States have been able to aocomplish. The whole area is louzy RICH with oil money , whioh makes tourism l ook unimportant , at least at the moment . In faot the Alberta Government just last week paid a "profit ehsr1.Dg" dividend to every adult oitizen in the Provinoe ••• • 20 . 00 eaoh for a grand total of 11 million. This was the oitizen' s split of profits aocumulated by the Provinoial Government from Govt . Oil leases . - Have been work1.Dg with my su agent , Ed . ZllZZO: Leger who will oarry on atter I leave . Only about halt a dozea memberships pioked up to date , but like any large City it is a slow prooess . The population is 248 , 000 spread out over 42 . 6 square miles . Have three pioture sponsorships at • 300 eaoh in the works v/hioh should oome to a d'finite deoision by TUesday (the 17th) and then I will take off leav1.Dg Leger to follow up on membership and listings . AS 0 the Convention" .ws ••• wl have nothing new sinoe my last letter . Last Sunday even1.Dg I wired \'lalt nng at Jaokson to advise me via letter as to general progress and list of roservations . The reply may be av Galgar by now awaiting my return , as I had planned to be there myself today. I am going to oall Ernie tonight , and a ilvise him that I w111 be a couple of days late and IP' there is a l etter from Jaokson will have him Dx read it to me over the phone . I t I ge t any intormation from tonight ' s oall will inclose i t with this before mail1.Dg . It not , will ad v ise you as soon as it does arrive . The way it looks now, I may not get to Jaokson until about the 30tll. as it is too far to oome baok up here , and I mus t therefore get Alberta tied up , piotures and all before I leave . I t the Jaokson folks have gone ahead and done anything as per plans , a week will be ample time to get the whole oonvention pllllgram polished off in good ahape ••• 1t they have laid down on the .1 o~hen it will be another story Whioh I hate to even think about . Somehow , I will mannege to get a bulletin into the mail over this n en week-cnd , whioh v,Ul be just two weeks before the oonvention . Am writ1.lls key people in the Livingston to Logan area today urging tham to Drganiae per&onal solioitation for convention registrations to all olub ~bdrs etc . Am ino+osing copy of a letter to lyn Sergeant 'J! t he Arizona Development Board . I bellave that I sent you aopy q! ~ ~evious l etter to her . Anyway s he t. to attand the aonTention and wr ~te ask.1.Dg if s he would be • ~..... ~\ ... la~ ••'.:.a~ go. her l etter ihast night , d Y/ired her an invi tation ~:r < oe.l ". hi " 1 Attar_ If' vou hannau to be in .Phoenix • .JIll,ltht be a g ood "" .. �RAY V. STEWART Sapt . l l- P.S . Sunday Morning • •• • P.S : ** • •*** ••• *** •• Just talked to Ernie to see it he had a letter tor me trom i alter King at Jaokson. No such luok . o It has been a tull week sinoe I wired him as tollows: - _ ~ , ___ • 0 ____ o w ••• 0 0 ~._ - , AllUIAIL LIST OJ!' CONVENTIO RESERVATIONS Il!' ANY AND ADVISE N REGARDING INVITATI N ACCEPTANCE AND GENl!:RAL liGRESS ::>TATUS UARE HEPBURN WTEL 5809 IlACLEOD TRAIL CALG'IRY NEEDED J!'OR SEPTEIIBER BULLETIN Look~ like a tull week is time to get an a ir mail letter trom Jaokson to Calgary. So ••• here I sit right on the spot a thousand miles trom Jaokson with the oonvention opening three weeks trom today , a bulletin to get out , and no intormation. J!'rankly, knowing alt iJ)Cl ng , this situation soares hell out ot me, and while it burns me up to have to put the ASsooiation to expense whioh should be unneosssary, I do not see how ~ can possibly wait any ~onger tor some word about the Convention p~ess , 80 I have plaoed a oall tor Mr . King. There was no .. answer , so I will keep on oalling until I get hold ot him. I want to get this letter to the P. O. sometime late toda¥, and it I get hold ot King betore it has to be mailed , will inolude the Conve~ion intormation . It I "do not hear trom him betore this has to be mailed , " will get another letter out to you at onoe atter I have talked to him. Ernie mentioned that I have mail trom you at Calgary which he will torward today , and should reaoh me M onday or Tuesday I'o!!ot knowing the contents ot thiS mail , I oannot oomment on i t at thia wrltlng ~ ~ •••••• * Sunday P 10:00 P .M. now , and I w.o..J r~~ just called W alt again , but got no answer . Earlier this afternoon Mrs . King told the operator t hat W alt was out hunting , and had a oooktail party date this evening , but was expeoted home by nine- thirty. Guess the old boy must hat;e had one too many and Mama joined him, so will now wait till morning . W ill advise you soon as I hear trom him. �Se~t . 1 • lv~'1 COllventlon 1'h1s l utter t.bo UQ d(.luOt w111 l O1\:j: rur. it r,ll1 COM De for t.1Q &.i ~OQBth1t1ti. or D hoCli to you both 1 fNuume , but in best no d.oabt • .to navQ JU3t m old Qur moWl ana \Jhero we ;till I!iO (,)1' "h"t ./0 ~i1l cio 1 bavent. t...e Bl1tihtll3t iCllJU Juot 80 l or-s aa gat a lOL;fI \Y tJ alJiQ' f rom touriota . 1 .loot t.hiok lover trant to S~ anotOur c'ne tho CUlYbo I ' U ehmlg6 my aL.d aVbt.tually it lover ,,;ct ro3too. up. A:J thlribs l<..~ ~ it 1') sOGIewhat tol.4bttul if 1 w111 ... 0 a.1:l1d t.o &61:. 1:.0 t.hl :O~.vcn­ tion Ol.. tu.e at> thd noVl O;:.JnOL~9 tL.tli.t1 OliOi' c.\.:to.~o\' 1st ~to.'i o. w.l 't.ho I .erA leu. 1 ....i.l._ ..10 :tV ~ ,..,t t~ .et 1;.091"'6 anti as ~o-..... <.1. looldble, but if. 15 akuot (;ort.J.n tilnt 1 • .J..ll nut· ~il:t then-oj LO" 1~ [._~e t,:..:.' L lti IJi\' l.t.ot'3 eUI~ loll vun....., . I 'Will t1"1 to t.e. mt 1 '\ow.-i.. i ... cu; o. ACCOl"'..iin..:: to tne lly L 101/S it 1;.1 t,jdt uut.,y ot t.:h.. .lor.", •• 8" t to d8~~I.,,~ whhh V1~ Pra;Ji...!clDt .mall t lks chnr(;o io tho a baol.t.B af t .•e .1 £'u~i·...allt I I a m tberafot' 'f0 lU63ting tha.t vica fl'ooiJon t dimtl,f):r lU tellsl t: ..c:.e fu ... l cha1"' 'a of 'unLj. all m6et1t;!s of tbe CoLvent.1.on 111c.:lulil ~ ttl'.: ll:;..l;.tt re-..'1;;lur ouat.il.c> ~.j.' i!le ... Wlu of . . . 1"1...... (; ~.orn . provi~· I ~ ~.o~ to ~et tle~Q : 0 lLO~ . As you might sueaD it ,.ill be bi,. JOb to bot ~d..1N. \lr eu..i mUII(J.J. ... ut. of ~lt:l \.;D the t "Vat . TtHm it .;ill t:.dl~ .!Jo:co lL..e to e:et uiUo ! ...1 J. up an.! t. <.1!.... .1 1i. Sl1uj e 00 ..... C&lJ lBu'Ie . 1 . . 111 (;ontim~.o to I'ltuJ to at.t.onri tho ~, vontiOil evu OO t but. I doubt 1t :..t ... 1...... uo po-i.1Di~:t. to ~t:t.. t ....l·g o::;.i.\.lr"v 1.1/.4.. m ..~ at tiJ.b 1~'_n:.·t.llat . This blU;"~ t-..,I C6.iko I t 1 ... w.:o.J..I.. t.h~t 1 do .!Dds ti.'+; /Iohu,,",,' t:<3";"'11< ti~l ... u .... \.t:ot'....,mce dtb tiw).)'/ we BO t.ho.t i t 1 W2l J.utv t.Ju..J.. I l,i,J c.; .... r-:-.1e bt".\,( Go.. I to sw COY"OI" but.. wilJ. trJ t.o t.-t.I thlJ C:";;;Jt.i.." thlJ vt.i,o~ :Iite. 1 b'.VG b ...... n w:.:..b ... uru;DJ.O tv bat. 0 Joo~\Jt;l1i~ ~t,t;.t 1 .UtS CtJD . 1 ,StiL. " ink it WI,), L~ 00 ",d-ll to ('ol1:>1u.a: my .u....t.a:Jt1o.!J .!t..o~t u10- t1.o& .'\ thrve to J N ~-r 111 vt..Jl t.o T"';",il ,0 vu ..:tt DIU tj.j~u. or~6 :;'0n,1" (U'"•.J. a t.•..r..h,l y ear ..i1 It t.c,;r fol' .ori':Qun. vL..u('"w1.Ju uvlrt JirtJ .. tot'.J.lil s will e • 1. .::; i .t. .1'1.iQl.o t..'1.Ls jOU yaar ... ooth 1n Ukill ~ .... ·t ~ oar . tly ju~t " . . . F. n t:,e to"t'!tS it. 'tiOulG elimiL-lW in botb .ot.ato.:J trvm u)..p1rll .... 1:. Wu \4,.'') time • • t "luht 0 chetlca lli.;.e t...ll:l C('I/8o) ... ui-' d.J.l.I h~.:.l 1 t j,j,L. it WOtll>J. b~ ,,1 ..9 t.o t\..t"~LJo or 1 • lfQth ..J.:.t'Cct ....rah .. I lo~~ t.1aQe, o.Jfore It. t I d.oubt aCl"iouJ.ly 11' LSun;et.t Co4Jl t,et away Lv ,t."'t.-.l. tiw :!o v\;;nt:~.,m but. 1 ti l "rite b nbd.. t it . You. have -1 lilt.tar by l.Of &.Oau t FN m~[; 1 l.Iw...,1r18 h1(.b exrJ.Edn.;; w!) lot b ...,' eOfl' ... that'S . I u vary so~ that thiw!a tmv~ nt1p,pcIl$"l at BlJ(.;h OJ inol oTtww tine Si:) far l,aoJoc1aUoll is C01'll;OrnoJ , but 1 will do It.y u,___ to .et tbsro on t.iM, anJ I OQll . Let IiMt hu&1: fr . you 31xm . J .. llCBt'Oly , ~1 &J> tt>e JI&l:'hrlp8 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3392 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2630 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/933">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/933</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1376813265 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Various correspondence from members of 89'ers, 1957 Description An account of the resource Various correspondence from members of 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. including Ray Stewart, Bentley Mitchell, and Martin Cantwell. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Stewart, Ray V. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Mitchell, Bentley Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 7 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd7 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/37f6330d795f789b86cedaf849764086.pdf 9a40577374e275ffd7cd5505be58d90d PDF Text Text 'f Logan, Utah ,.......................... ......................... 195 \~:;:r 'l ~""' ll 9~ A ~ &.. ~j:q,,,,, ,,-~,(!Cl!'ll) _ )~? Please be advised th at we have changed your deposit ticket of ........1_ _ ~_.L ...2::_ ......1957. from $ ... Y.7. .5.~-. y..1... 0._.:c~. th is is an error as shown below: to $ _ _ S ............................ Item listed on your ticket was missing. $ ............................ of ........ . . .... __ __ on .................... listed as $.......................... . _ ..... •.......;;"'.;;:;:;... of ·····•··········•················ .. $............... :............ error In addItion. Correcti on made by ... 2- M-S..56 · ···C \::\·e.""}'J!Pr;if. / " " '- '--1 ~ W......e ' L _ . ..__. . . ... .... . . . . . . .__. . . . . . _ _. _ Cordially yours, T HE FIRST NATION AL BANK OF LOGAN . t �Peach ' s Trails Knd C afe Kanab , Utah Future pay listed on report 5- 6 CREDIT • • • $ )0 . 00 J �DEPOSITID IN THI! FIRST NATIONAL BANK I, - / ..--f CE>m OOUARS CURlENCY Sl lVf.R CHEClS -t;;l - I• • ;r ., ./ ~ < l-! t - NO' N'GO"'''' IJPllCATE DEPO SIT TlCP;H Itcc.t.ed by - I •• n, 0 1 - ~-:;J 1/ 11. 3~ ....... " t ' «1 ,_ . . . . . . • " . .... , , �Fort Macleod , Al to. W •• Nov 20 ed BentleyAm taking oft for M ontana tomorrow and will stop over a few houfs at Lethbridge on the way out . There are several more good deals hanging fire up here, but the time is so short that I cannot possible stick around waiting for them to hatch . Have done everything possible to get them off to a good start , and will have to trust to l uck that they will come thru . Ernie will follow up a couple in Calgary . Address" General Delivery" Great Falls , M . ont untml further notice. M artin �r A D V E R T I S'l N G * REMITTANCE*ADVISE **** * * ** CHE(iK HEru:IVITH 100 . 109 TO: Bentley Mitohell .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -"'- -"" - A C C 0 SECTI ON U lifO. U - 20 - _.- - - - - - - - FEES - - ~ 33 1/3 Alberta Crossroads Motor Hotel 90 . 00 --- " Royal Hotel Dining Roon 30. 00 --- " " " " Waterton Lakes C. of C .... NET 45 . 00 15. 00 15 . 00 " ----- 16. 66 16 . 66 30. 00 50 ,. ~ . - (Grad) 45 . 00 33 . 33 50 . 00 Carda ton C. ot C. (<<'leens) / «'lea ns Hotel 100. 00 50 . 00 City of Cards ton - - - - --- D E DUe T E D Cantwell SUb -A~ent GROSS N T * 10 . 00 $ 76 . 65 66. 66 33 . 33 --- --60 . 0 $ 33 . 33 20. 00 • 1 .' (tractions total 3¢ added ere) I - , TOTAL Fe e Ie C G ROSS SA L E S $ 350. 00 J DEDUCTED $136. 65 NET DUE $213 35 HENEV/ITH B 1 U N .-. ( 'Oe!; FEE * R E M A a K • �Nov . 13 , 195 7 Cardson. Alta TO : Bentley M itchell FROM Martin H. Cantwell : RE: A dvertising Remit t ance COPY: M ark PuQmire advise *********** ******************** *************¥******************************* * This file contains the remit t ance advise for pa id advertising . It shows: the gross amount of the sa le; professi onal fees deducted indicating whether 33 1/3 S for my personal sales OR 50% where payment of commi ssion to a sub- age nt 1s involved; and the net remittance due t he Corporation Promotion tund . At the top it shows the Check number attached in payment of the net remi t tance due . In the Case of ALL reports, the Report Number is also the date the report was made . This particular one was late in being mailed o ~ portunity to run off the forms . because I was waiting for the You will note a space at the bottom for listing commiss ions due on valid accounts receivable . Please disregard this ••• on second thought I think it will be better to have a special report torm for these ac counts receivable since the commission will be paid by you, rather than wt ••• ~ drawn by me from the Special Account . �~ i * CFE(1{ TO : Be~tley m;1ll:WITH!!!!..: Mitchell ..-*-*-",-' - - - - - - - - - - SECTION A C C ->:<' 0 U N T !.~ontpe li er " Livingston C. GROSS .. ... !fl'_!11"_ ::J!".. , .... II1_,~ _!!I!_.t. _!II!_,_!;...~~~ FE E S D E D U C T E D Oantwell SUb-A~ent 50 33 1/3 ). NE T --- 50 . 00 16 . 66 e-- 33 . 33 ' 8. 33 --- 16 . 66 300 . 00 of C. 25 . 00 25 . 00 Oity of Paris V[ontana ,_;;'~- ':'!II_'_ !I! 50 . 00 Lions " 104 ADVISJ 75 . 00 Montpelier Rotary Idaho ., "****** IlI:MI1'1A~,CE 100 . 00 --- 200 . 00 , ': TOT A L F ~ ~.!!. GR 0 S S D)!!!. ACCOU 0 n NT SAL E S V!!. 1 i $ 450 . 00 DEDUCTED $150. 00 NET DUE ~$300 . 00 g, A.£.'!..2. U l! t!!. R.'!..2..!!. GROSS J!EE ?z .!!. * RE.dL..!.RKS ; '1'k d",<-~ """~ ~.I..WL * ["4"""'~ <'L"-""'- 11/ 1 3/~) �2/15 / 58 Dear Bent l ey : Hope you ca n f i gure out t his report . Looks co~p l ic a t ed , but I don' t know how else to handle i t so that t he total sales , commiss i ons , and r emi t t ance to the Fund wi l l show up on the records . Th e fi rs t item (\l bert a !Jot or Courts As sn) i s ne w bus iness , and I have deduct ed the co~i ss i on t and li sted the NET due t he Fund . The other items a r e Accounts Receiva ble on which t he Commissi on has a lr eady been pa i d . I have the r efor e r emi ~ted t he f ull amount , but have shown t he commissi ons whi ch were paid in a dva nc e dn t hese i tems . Since two of th ese checks also i ncluded due s , i t was nece ssary t o dEpos it them in the SpeCial Acc ount s o that t he dues could be sent on t o Charli e • .Ie had th ought t hat t hese ch a cks cou ld be sen t t o you f or depos i t as t hey come in , but s inc e in many ca se s dues wi ll also be includ ed , i t will be l es s r ed tape i f I deposit them and d i s tr ibut e the f u nds . �A D V E R T 1 S 'I N G ~ ~ * ** ~ IlEMlTT,\NCE ADVISE * * '" * * FROM; M.H. Gantwe11 cmOK HFru: U TH TO ; Bentley M1tchell !!!..: '10. 133 2/15 1:i!*:;-i!i;I;- - , G~;r;O!:-O!:-O!:O!:;r;;r;±:J':::Ol.S~it!·-~·'S::E:E-:Ef~~'-~- ··~-~~~~ - ;r;~ - - - - - ~ - - -' '!' -~3' _!t- - :t, - * _s:te,* _*... F EE S A SECTI ON CCO U GROSS NT Alberta Alberta ******** ACCOUlli~ COMMISS ON mUCH C( ~!ISSION N HAS BEEN PAID . Full *"- * * N ET 50 % $ 16 . 66 ****.**'i<*****************~ ***** **~ *"'**"'****.*~ RECEIVABLE Sub-A~en Ca ntwe l l 33 1/3 ). $ 50 Motor Courts Assn .. D E D U C TED *** . . *********:.1 AD o.NCED amount ,emitt ed . Uontpel /lr C. of C. • • • • • • •••••• $ 50 1.6. 66 Mar 'luiS ~ote l, Lethbridge ••••• • • )0 10 . 00 Yor k Ho1 jel , Calgar y • ••••••••.• . • )0 ~ 110 f------------. ------------- - 110 . 00 ********)+:**** **.******* •• "'*******, r+'****** *r* **'" * •• * **>1 ~ *'1'-* * •• ""***"'*** I TO T A L Fe e a A C c G R 0 S S O u Va - - 1l --d R!!.£!!. 1.!:~b l!!. GRUfS - ... DEDUCTED ~ '> ~ ,.".2... NET DUE or advanced$ ' ' \ HIlHEWITH $ 14) . )4 $ 160 SAL E S r RE1\RK E E - ."..-- .. - " . ......... -_... . ""-'=- - -. ., " �,\ !'ROM: M .B.Cantwell CHZ('h. v n T 1 i • • • * •" ••* • •-"MlT' ~'C j\J)'IISE 138 ur.ru: ~:':Tl! m TO, Bentley Mitohell J ;. 2- 28 - FEES DECUCr~lJ Cantwell :lub -Agellt NET 331/)(' 50% ----- -~--------- -----~--~-~--~_+~~----r_--ACCOUI1T SECTI OH Ariz . GROSS Auto Rest M otel 30 . 00 10.00 20 . 00 n Harry Mqr shall Realty 30.00 10. 00 20 . 00 n Santa Fe Cate 30 . 00 10 . 00 20 . 00 n ickenburg M otel Assn . W 275 . 00 91 . 66 183 . 34 ________L -______________L -__ TOT A L GR 0 S S S ALE S [______ ~ ~ ________L __ _ $ 365 . 00 DEDUCTED $ 1 21 . 6~W~~$ 243 . 34 -Fees Due ,~ l) C ( U 1.1 T GROSS FEE >'; ,', ~ R E-1!........L..l I - q �AD V E R T I S'I N G * REMIT'rANCE *ADVISE * ** * * * * * * FROM: M oRo\J alltwell ClIE(lK HEIU:WI'I'H NO. TO: Bent l ey 'Ut chell ·'_:;:_Sf SECTI ON ACe 0 Utah Wyo . N T Di ck ' s Cate Utah U 14Z lio. 1/ 29 -*-*-,,- $_* ... *-* - *-.. *-¥- *-* -* -*-* -*- *-*- *- *::f!. GROSS FEES DEDUCTED Cantwell Sub-A&ent 33 1/3 ): 50 '" NET $ 60. 0 $ 20 . 00 $ 40 . 00 The Blue Bird 30. 0 10 . 00 20 . 00 Jackson 89 ' ers Club 50. 0 16 . 66 33 . 34 TOT A L G R 0 S S SAL E S G:10SS $ 140 . 00 DEDUCTED $ 46 . 66 NET DUE $ 93 . 34 REREWI TH R E M ARK FEE * S �VERTIS' * * '" * * 'n 'UTTAl';CE AD'- FRe».!: MoHoCantwell. CHECK lII:H:. TO: Ben tley Mitchell \'I~"'H l'c. 5D.l/~8 l'.l"_1 53 . *-*-*. *_*_*. . "_¥_*_._*_*_';t_~_l!_"'~,,.rp~ ==-.!::...~TAce SECTION 0 U N T.___ (lllOS~ 1- lUCTED b A~e~~'G a )l I Utah Logan City Utah Lynx Products Co . Utah O --- Se vier Va l le y $ 16 . 66 $ 50 . DO! 33 . 34 5 00 00 1 6 . 66 33 . 34 l(lO. OO Br oadcasti ng Co . KBVC 33 . 33 66 . 6 7 ***** * ********************************* *********** ACCOUN $ ************* 1 RECE IVlIBLE ON WHI CH COMMI SS ION BEEN PA . IID Full amoun t remitted (advanced ) W o. y I Ye llows t one Pa rk Co . ~, \- c.'h"\~ ~It ·s Q r d.e>,... J 200 . 00 ******* *** ******* ************** *~ ******* 66 . 66 200. 00 ****** ****** ************* -- --------~-------------------~------TOT A L G R 0 S S SAL E S $ 4 00 . 00 j)Ellu"m~ ~ 1 33 . 31 HEl mm ~ 333 . 3 5 Or ad vanaed HE::lEWl'.::-.i 'Ii' ==~~==~==~~~-~ • 0 c - - u , 0 u e e 1 'r a b 1 a F e e ~ !d J e 0 n V- a 1 J d - --- -- " A C ~ J 0 U N 'r .;:'''S= )i' 1!; E ---~ , • -~--..!:- '1 �, I ( V E R 'f I siT *.***** t- '.l! MIT'fAhCE ADV FROM: M.B . Can t well Cm:(K ~c . HERl'WI'!"rl ,'. 2..:. lJ.,7 TO : Bentley Mitchell a 5-10 - 58 1 $ 33 . 33 Utah Lake~de Resort , Fish Lake 33 .33 100 $ 66. 67 66. 67 I I I I. TO T A L GR 0 S S SAL E S $ 200. 00 ===================--===--= Fee s Due }I'0SS .:..... J F. UL l'I.. - & 66. 66 iil!.I Dlj': $133 .31, HE.RBr I'.:rl -- ------- �DVER"ISI *** *;jc** FROM: MoHo Cantwell CHE(K HEKfWtTH~!: TO: Bentley Mitchell ~r-!R_*_ft - P "'0. ~T/y/,g- 61 - .~-~r'-~-~-~·~-~-~-~-[-~-~-~-~-~-!:-~-[·-~~-~-~~~ SECTION ~. R1::MITTAKCE .WV- • S --- CCOUNT . I U C TED u Sl b· A~e l:J.:t. 50% Car Vf-I, 1 .,3.l.! . -r~ I i I ACPOUNTS REVE IV BLE ON .m lCR COMlJ lSS ~ON HAS BEEN m * * *~*** ... **"'*****************~ * •• ****~**"'******** *** FULL AMOUNT , Ii MITTES ************* W o YO J a ckson mot ary Club Utah ******* $ 450 00 I $ Kanab 0 0 of Co (on acc ount) 15 0 00 0 100 00 300 000 33 033 " I TOTA L GROSS Fee s L _ _C 0 o n Due U N .T SALES 550 000 r DEDUCTED 183 033 NET DUE HEREIIITH 366 067 Val i d - coo u n t s P e 0 e 1 v a b 1 a ----- A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GROSS FEE • R E 14 ARK ~ �4/9/58 D ear Bentley: Here ' 5 the report on e verything up to date . My check No. 122 in the amount of $170.84 in payment of the Advertising Report # 12- 31 has not been cleared thru my bank yet . Please deposit it at your convenience. Am f inally rested up from the trip . Hope you have recovered. �A V E R TIS 'I N G * REMITT~Ch *ADVISE * ** *** ** * FROM: MgHoCantwell CIlEC'K IIERJ::WITH!JQ.. TO: Bentley Mitohell - -. SECTION j) ~ -- - GROSS ACCOUNT :,to . 4/9 m -~-.- - ~ FEES DEDUCTi:D Cantwell SUb-Aljjent 33 1/3 ~50 ." NET ----+----·--------~--~!----~~--------r----}lexico " " " " " La Sie sta Motel Hotel Sldorado ~qz atlan HOtel Asen. Playa l/azatlan Hot el Fr eeman Cavern Cafe TOTAL IIEXlCO U ah t Cache County Con:r:rl.ssion Ar iz . Bristol Motel Ari z . 30 . 00 60. 00 300 . 00 300. 00 200. 00 I I I Arrowhead Mot el JO.OO 920. 00 - - - - - - -- E. B.M . - $ 460. 00 460. 00 75. 00 I 30. 00 25 . 00 50. 00 10 . 00 20. 00 3Q. 00 10. 00 20 . 00 COLLECTION- Mitchell has duplicate pr eviously turned i • ,. I TOT A L G R 0 S S Ace 0 U N T SAL E S $ 1055. 00 F II E DEDUCTED $ 505 . 00 .~w~ $ 550. 00 * '" * " * ~ MAR K S �, A D V E R TIS 'I N G * REMITTANCE *ADVISE * ***** *** FROM: M.B.Cantwell CHEC K Imru:WITH TO: Bentl ey Mitohell .. .. -- ...... - - < - - - - - - .. .. SECTION !9..: lio . 171 - - .. DE DU - - - - .. .. FEES- - .. C TED A C C 0 U N T GROSS Cant well (w _ Sub -A~ent 50 % ,~. d'f .. N E ~ 33 1/3 ). ACCOUN'IS RECEIVABIIE 9/6/<;8 · r liIlICI CCllMISSI II HAS BEEN PAl WLL AJ.!OUNT REl!ITTED utah Alberta Kanab Chamber of Commerce 200. 00 66. 66 133 .34 Alberta GOvernment 200. 00 66.66 133 . 34 mll'l1EY You w1ll recall that, 1d th yo permiss on I have been olding the $ 300 fr '" the Alberta Government in orc~r to mai tain a balance in the Special ccount and thereby reduce servj~e charge: • I am sending 200 of this col: action herewith, and will turn oase of he other $ 100 later as it is ne ded . . ______L -__________ TOT A L G ROSS on !L eC OU N T SALES ~ __ % 400. 00 I ~ ____ ~ ____ DEDUCTED 133 .32 ~___ NET DOE $ 266. 68 HEREIVITH V a l i ---- d A - - - - - - - ---------- - 0 a 0 u n t s Rea e i v a b 1 e GROSS FEE * '" * ~ * ~ R E 14 ARK S �AD V E R T I S '1 N G * REMITTANCE *ADVISE * *** * * **• FROM: MoH oCantwell CHEUK TO : Bentley Mitchell 1i_*_ • - - - - - - - -"'- - SECTI ON A 0 0 !to . 8- 5- 58 IlEru:liITlI NO. 1 65 -0 U ----- - -. N ~ -E-ES- DEDU - TED - - .. - - - - C - -- F ~ GROSS T Cantwell 33 1/3 ~: SUb-A~ent - ... NET 50 AOCOUNTS RECEIVAB, ~ ON 'I/HI H COMMISSI OI H.IlS BEEN PAI D F U L L M 0 U T H E MI tr T ED ******** t!' ••••••• ************ ****** Utah Utah Kenne cott Co ppe r 150.00 150 . 00 Utah P ower and Li gh t 50 . 00 50 . 00 100 . 00 100 . 00 • " : TOT A L G R 0 S S SAL E S $ 300 . 00 DEDUCTED $ 1 00 . 00 NET DUE $200 . 00 HEllEWITlI Val i dA c c 0 U n t a o n ----- -- - - -- -- Ace 0 U N T GROSS FE E * " R!!..£ei y !!.bl!!. R EM ARK S �• A D V E R T I S'I N G * .co: Bell'~ley $ * * ~ ~ ** * REMZTT}\!\ rE AD·vIS.r;, ~ Mitichell • SECTION Al berta Calgary Chamber of gomm. M .. ont G. Falls 1!ot el ASSD. $ 50 . 0 $ 16 . 66 $ 1 50 . 0 ~ 50 . 00 100 . 00 I M ontpelier City w'/y o - Idaho iI 7 5 . ( 0 Pugmir e 37 . 50 $37 . 50 I ______ ., ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L __ _ 'eOTAL G rr 0 S S Fe es ---- Due --- SAL E S ! ~ $ 275 . 00 ,_ _ .-1-_ _ _ _ _ _- ' -_ _ _ , DEDUCTE~ 1 04.16 NET DUE HEREWITH $170 . ? 4 R e c e i Va b 1 e ---------- On G~OfS It' E E R .. '.' E 11 ARK S �140 WlI!:iiT SALT LAKII!: SIi:COND CITY SOUTH I, UTAH De~ember 17, 1958 Dear Bentley: 'Ihe enc l osed collection report is for the , BlackRock Beach account. Was sure glad to see this check come in, as I r eally had to go to work on that bunch, a.rxi since they are having troubl e wit h the 11 manager ll whm signed the contract was afraid we might have to go to court , or at least pay some l egal fees i'or collection. This $ 150 will bring our account with Par agon dOVin to a balance of $ 294 . 12 . The $ 300 f r om Preocott C of C which we have reason to believe will be sent before too long will put us in t he clear on the printing . I went over the account with Paragon, and the statement they sent you i s correct. The difference of $ 36.00 between t heir figures and mine was an "extra ll charge for errors not their fault which involved remaldng nega tives and plates . Something like this can always be expected on a job as complicated as ours, am we wer e perhaps l ucky that the extras did not arrount to more. If possible, send me this $ 150 check for Par agon befor e you leave for California. They appreciate receiving the money as fast as we get it in. Have sent the bulleti n form which I discussed with you to Charlie f or approval • • • hop e to have the fir s t one out soon after the holidays . ~ ,ftI �f "{ t .! .'f. v I ,I ./ _ . lh ~ Illeck Rook Beoch, Inc. 217 Judge Bod 1dl,,& Selt Lake CitT. Utah )-. Dear lh . ZaI!tJukos t I II S' { ~~:"""-'-- ¥ I/alIJ thOlllca tor your chock rece1_ t.o<Iq which pqs :IA rull advort1a1n3 account. 1I1th th1e Aaaoc1ation. roq-_ to 111'. De S..-. lOU haw a cOW tor _ ru•• I _ _ 1oa1ng -ithe~~C!1~~g1~,,"~ tar wh1cb we will have ... lIIrthw.... in _ l ot tliti lODt"UiiI'the _ haa _ aettled :IA rull. __ Tbo coW of the ccatract 1n quoeUon _aa gly., bolt n- • haft ...ted _ inat.ruoct:IAoe to the etr.ct that no s1&mt.ure _pi. _ .... will be ld.nct.1"& upon the Corporation ... &1\7 til""" ooatraote, allll will be gOYOl'lled ..c.... ,nglJr. P l _ be .._ that _ accepted th1e caot.raat in goad faith. aIIII de~ ....... &1\7 ad. _ _ ",",,& which _ have relll1_. II. at.aIIII the 5._'. 1959 U m..ok Rook. IlarUn H. Cantotell Rxocative Sec...terT ~, ODII _ ad.ebae tar a ____ tel �CIiB Ii't!·R , .... TO: Bentley MitchelL (1 SECTION c o u N , _. 12/17/58 " J ACCOUN1lS REJ;EI VABIE ON WH ICH COl.!MISSION HAS BEEN PAI D roIL mOUNT REl!ITTED Utah Black Rock Bea ch, Inc. $ 150 . 00 $ 50. 00 $ 100. 00 ------'_.. _------ - - TO T A L G R 0 S S ~ A L =============-==-=-'::.::==-v , 1 50. 00 e. 1 AGe 0 ---- U 'J .t ( = J $50. 00 ~5' .' 1. • $ 100 . 00 �, , A D V E R TIS 'I N C * ** ** * ~ * * ** REMITTANCE ADVISE FROId: M.H .Cantwell tI~ _ cmWK m;ru:.iIm!:!!!.. TO: Bentley Mitchell _ _ _ _ SECTION -- ----- • --- - ACCOUNT CROSS 162 -*- - - - - - - - - FEES DEDUCTED Cantwell SUb-A~ent 33 1/3 ~ - ... - -NET 50 ,., ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ON WHICH C MMISSION HAS BEEN PAID FULL AM UNT .~TTED ******** ******* ***** Alberta Edmonton Chamber c£ Co.m.J erCa $ 300 Utah 100 200.00 33 . 33 66 . 67 Bowery Haven , 100 Fish Lake TOT A L $ C R 0 S S SAL E S G. (X $ 4 00 . 00 EE DEDUCTED $ 133 . 33 NET DUE $ 266 67 HEREWITH • * * • R E hi ARK S � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 1215 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2241 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/957">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/957</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 638088141 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Advertising Remittance Advise Description An account of the resource A report and the attached evidence of total sales, commission, and remittance to the 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. fund. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Accounts Alberta Route 2 Blasting in the Bob Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Edmonton (Alberta) Calgary (Alberta) Cardston (Alberta) Alberta (Canada) Canada Livingston (Montana) Park County (Montana) Great Falls (Montana) Cascade County (Montana) Montpelier (Idaho) Bear Lake County (Idaho) Kanab (Utah) Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Kane County (Utah) Jackson (Wyoming) Teton County (Wyoming) Sinaloa (Mexico) Mazatlan (Sinaloa) Mexico Utah Idaho Montana Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 24 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd24 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/38fc9d6bd9e1b19f540389d66525d604.pdf a19339ba4c63fc7592d799a0dffea1d2 PDF Text Text . ~ ....- .. Opening Session _ Third Annual I!emborship lieeting The 89'ers International Hlghvmy Association, Inc. A1'ton, Wyoming ; October 7, 1957 The opening business sossion was called to order by Vice Pr esident Bentley ;.litchell who ~e"d a letter from P"esidcnt Hay V. Stewart, in wh ich the P"esident stated that he had been unavo i dable detained and was therefore officially desienating Vice P"cs i dent ;.iitchell to act i n his place. Vice President i.Iit chell announced that he had talked with P"ea ident stewart by telephone and that t ho P"csident cxpected t o arrive in Afton :/Ionday evening . The invocation \'ras offered by Puul Stevig , Vvyoming Director of the Associati on. The Honora.ble Doyle L .. Child, 14ayor of Afton, v/elcomed the oonvention t o Star Valley and en~ouraged the Association to be aggress i ve and c o~pc titive in the carrying out of its purposes. Lorenzo S. \1alker, President of the Afton Chamber of Commeroe, we lcomed the delegatss to Af'~on and commented upon the fine spirit of c ooperation which exists between the Chamber and the looal 89'era group. Vice President i,I1tchall raad a wira from the Honorabl e Ernest 11. McFarland., Governor of Arizona, in which the Governor expressed regreta that he had been unable to attend the Convention and extended his best wishes for a successful meeting. Sim..1.1ar messages were read from the Honorable George D. Clyde , Governor of Utah, tho Honorable J. Hugo Axonson , Governor of I'.1ontana, the Honorable lJi lward L. Simpson, Governor of Wyoming, the Honorable 81' Alvaro Obregon, Governor of the State of Sonora, Mexico, D. James Cannon, Direotor of the Utah Touri st and Publioity Councll, Marilyn Sergeant, Research and Promotion Ass istant of the Arizona Development Board, and Demetrio P. K:lriakis, Charter Member and ardent 89'er supportsI' from l~ogales, Sonora, Mexioo. 0 A letter was also read from C. B. Brewster , P"esident of the Chamber of Commerce at Banff, Alberta, Canada, in which !Jr. Brewster had designat ed Mrs. Dorothy Boyce, an executive of the Banff Chamber, to represent the organization in his absenoe. A letter was also read from 81'. GWllel'mo Freeman, Director of the 89 ' ero Hie1may Association for the Republic of I.lexico. Sr. Freeman has be en undergoing medical treatment at the Uayo Clinio in Rochester and expressed apologies and re gre ts that his doctors wou ld not permit him to make the ·~rip. Vice P"esident LI1tchell suggested that inasmuch as the Jrlnutes of the last annual meeting of the ol'ganizatlon uel'e rather lonethy and had been oovered in detailB in bulletins d istributed to the mecbership that he "/ould entertain a motion t hat a reading of said minutes be suspended �/ . • ( I ' ( and that t hey stand approved as \lritten . The motion was made by Direotor Charles illartin, seconded by Vi ce President Ernest Sar an and carried . 'fhe follon i ng committees ner e then appointed by Vice President :J1tchell ; ~'OIllNATING \ CO)==; Ernest Saran , Chairman , ;"1. G. Bas s , Nord II1lkes . Vice President iJitohell announcod that t he d ir ectorships to be aI'e as folloy/s: From Wyoming, one director to s orve a threeyear 'term; from Arlzona, .t wo diroctors to serve a throe-yeur term. eaa.b.; fro," Ut3h , one d ir octor to fill the unexpired one - year term of Burnett Hendryx, who hM left tl'6 89 ' er area and tu:cen r esidenc e in CalHornia. ~t. fil1ed ~~.;' •. AUDITING GOl,1LiU'TEE: RESOLUTIONS Frank Sorgatz, Ch:.!lr man; lkirk PUgmire, Allen Cameron CO~UJIT'=: Charles Martin , Chairman ; Mrs. Dorothy Boyce, Jerry Breen, Ralph Cameron, Ceoil Smith, Fred Hutohins. It Was announced that the standing advertising and promotional committee which had be en appointed t o administer the current advertising and promotional program of tho Association would report their activities at the Tuesday session. This committee consists of Bentley :litchell , Chairman, Frank Sorga t z, Burnett Hendry", and lkirtin Cantwell. Vice President, Ernest Saran, of Calgary, Alberta was asked to introduce the various delegates from Canada. The v8.l"ious committee ohair.men were requested to call meetings of the i r r espeotive committees at onoe so that reports coul d be submitted to the membership at the ma in business sessions on Tuesday . Ther e being no f ur ther business , tho meeting \mB recessed at 10;45 A.;,!. to r econvene on Tuesday lIlo" ning at 11: 00 A.M. Rcspeotfully submitted , Martin H. Cantwell Exeouti ve Seoretary - 2 - �• • • QFF1C1AL iJI N UTES Recessed Session - Third Annual UB!l1berahip I,looting The 69 'ers International HiGhway Association, Inc. Af ton, Wyoming; Ootober B. 1957 rrhe reoessed session was ca.lled to order by President Ray V Stewar t at 11:00 A.M. 0 Minutes of the opening session Y/Gre xead, and it was Lloved by Director Llartin thnt they be approved us wl'itteno Tho mot i on \'18.8 seoonded by Director Saran. l!otion carried. Executive Seoretary Cantlloll (love a verbal. reoap of the membership r eport for the fiscal year from Ootober I, 1956 to October I , 1957. "The grand total of notive and honoxal'Y members on record as of October 1 , 1957 >!as reported t o be 621. Coopared to the 448 aotive member" in good standing on reoord as of Ootober I , 1956, the report ref l ected a membershi p Gain of 173 for t,he fiscal year. A oopy of the membership report is attached heroto and made a part of those official minutes. The report of the Auditing Committee ,vas read by CorJIDittee Chairman Frank W. Sorgatz. The Committee reported that the re oords, fUes, vouchers and books of the Corporation TT6!lsurer W. Go Bass had been audited and examined, and found to be in good order. The Committee further reported that the reoords of the Executive Seoretary Mar tin H. Cant\lell aocounting for Corporation funds cleared through the Sal': Lake City office were found to agree I"JHh the books and reoords of the Corporation Treasurer. A certified oopy of this report Is attaohed hereto and made a part of these minutes. The report of the Resolution Coomittee was read by Charlie B. Martin, Jr., Chairman.. A total of ten resolutions were reco!!ll:l.ended . eaoh boill(l voted upon i ndividually follOldng its reading, All ten resolutions we1'e passed by the unani!l1ous vote of tho membership with several minor amendments beiD3 made. Copies of each of the resolutions as amended and adopted ~e a ttached hereto and made a part of these minutes. At 12:30 P . l!. the morning session Vias recessed by President Ray V. Ste\Jart to rec onvene at 2:00 P.!'!. *********** The afternoon session was called to order by President Ray V. Stewart at 2:00 P.!.!., the first order of unfinished business being the r ~port of the Nominating Committee. Director Ernest R, Saran, Chairman of the NOminating Committee, stated that his coumittee had a reoommendation pertaining to the term of office of certain directorships rJhich i t nished to reooll!llend for the consideration of the delegates. Under the present setup, Director Saran explained, both directorships in Arizona I"Jould oxpire next year and the same rlOuld be true of the two directorships in Utah. Whe r eas it is the intent !lad purpose of the oorporation by-la'"S ,'merever possible to mainJ tain hold-over directors and stagger the elections of new di rectors to the best advantage, it Vias the reoommendation of the Nomlnating Committee that in the case of Arizona one director be eleoted to serve the 3-year �t~l'r nd t he other &. ;,.' GotOl' be elected for 0. l-year term. and that in the . cnoa e r the Stato of Utah ono director bo eloctod to serve a J-yoar ter~. 'Jhai",:,an Saran further announoed thu t tho GxistiIlll vacancy in the director,1hip t ram Utah "as duo to tho resic;nation of f ormer Direotor Burnett liendl';rx who ha d moved to Cali1'o:;,ni a. Cha irman Saran further rep orted tha t -the ros i snation of Director Franlc U. Sorgatz \'Iould require the ele ction of a rep lacemont dir e ctor f e r the State of Idaho to serve the r emal,ni ng one year of the unexpired ysar. 1. vv Direat o ~ship oandida tes sel ected by the t hen announced a s follo\ls: }'OR ARIZCNA: Charles Hagerman of FOR UTAH: ~l oI1l inatiIlll Committee were \1 . G. Bass of ', iickcnburg to sorvo a J-yoar torm; ~ ~eB cott to serve a I-year term. Homer Bandloy of Riehfield to servo a J-year t erm. FOR WYOUING: Pau:i. J . Stavig of Mton to serva a )-year term. FOR IDAHO: ruark rugmir e of Paris to serve the l-year unexpired term va ca t e d by the resIGnation of Fr ank \'1. Sorgatz. Cha irman Saran f u.~the r reported that it was the recommendation of the Noninat i ng Conunitteo t ha t the aC~G1on of the Board of Direotors in tho e l e ction of Sr. Guillermo Freeman to serve a vacated 3-year term as Direct or fr om t he Repull1ic of Mexi co be approved and su.stained by the membership. Dir e ctor Erne st R. Saran , Chairoan of the Nominating Committee, then made t he following motion: "It is moved that all of the foregoing recommendations as made by the Nouinating Committee pertaining to the term of offioe t o be s erved by each of the Directors to be elected be approved and adopted, and it is further moved tha t the recommendation of t he Nominating Committee pertaining to the Dil'eotor f rom the Republio of M exico be approved and adopted , and it is furthe r moved that the nomina tions be closed and that the Seoretary be instruoted to cast a unanlmou.s ballot in favol' of the recommende d nomineos and that they be elected by aoclamation." The motion vms s e conded by Direotor IJartin and carriod by the unanimous vote of a ll delegates present. Vice Pr esiden't BentleJ[ t!itchcll, Chairman of t he Promotion Committee , roported that t o date s ome ~ 7CO O.00 in advertisine support had been secUl' ad for t he guido t ype br oohure to be published und dis tributed early in 1958. Chairman Hitcho ll stated t ha.t \mile the exact publication date could not be a nnounc ed at tho noment , i t was the aim of this colillllittoe to have the broch ur e off t he pr ess in time to oatch certain major travel and spo"t s hows. Chairman llitchell further rsported that the mnking of the 89'er movi e had be en t emporarily postponed in order to permit concentration on tho completi on of tho brochure and to make additional fu.nds availutle for the printine of additional copies of tho broohu.re in exoess of ',he f, ua r anteed minimum of 50 , 000 ciroulation , Exeoutive Seoretary Ijart in Cantwell ",ho has been aSSigned to conduct t he solicita tion of financial support f or t he promotional proGram reported that he has be en out on tho hiGhway constantly since early in April and that a t leas'. prelillinary presenta tion of the proGram has been lIl!lde in - 2 - �I all t,9'e1'9 oO:-.J!.lll.ultJos frc;:_ J>io6~llcs, Sonora J U:xico to Edm.onton, Alberta, Cnna'in. Cantllcll'Ol,orted that tho reoeption in nll al'Gas had been very i'J.vora'Jlc und tha~~ ,,;','htlc 30J.icitat;ion :!.n several of tho sections had been pl'rlctlcally 00,;:'.)1: ted there is still connidel'ubl0 orswization vlOrk 1'emin1n~ to bo do:)}, 1'-'3.rticulal'ly in Utah, Arlzona, and :icxico. Vice P1'es .' Jen~ti El'nost R. Saran Gave a bl'iaf l'G)Ort of t,.16 l'ocGpt1on and support Ci { .. n tho prOcrO,J1 in the Province of Albcr~lia. Vice Prosident Saran stated ..... nt ho ha.d ncco!.lpanicd 3ecretary Gunt\Joll on "i;hc Ill.'l.jor portion of t: . to~ thro~l ~lbart~ and that an excollent iapression of the orsaniz'" / _~on a:1d ito ala .:L11<l objcc"blvos ll.:ld been Civcn. Ho om.phasized the imP0l'tu_';o of "the fuct thut the ol'gOllization has o.chiGvod tho :rocoGnition and upport of t~c Alberta Provinc i al Gove rnment i n addition to tho munic:h ~.l 6ove:!.'nmp.n~1J3 ane. Cil3rJbo~ of Cor.:m.crce in all of lUberta' s tlBjor ci -4j j .5. Fe sto.tcd tha.t to date 34 individual nembershi ps had beon SCOUl'fd ;'.: Albor'~a, and predicted that this ficure would rea ch well over 100 bele:..' tho llOJCG convention. V" ': ;' Frcside.lt Sal'an then proposed that this Association s'ponsor an' or ...(\i.Z8 a Gccd-\'Jill tOUl' of its members into the Provinco of Alber ta t .. -., - "laco curly in June of 1958 just prior to thc start of the heavy ·iioUl'-i /' 803.00n. Vics Prosidont Sal'an sUGGested tha t tho calva oade s tart y,~.t:U J ~'3:·:eL10:1y at thf1 ootder t·) be par·ti cipated in by the Gover nor of l.~:.nt ...} iJ.:Jd thE; Pl'd::i..:.:c of the .-~rovince of Alborta, to be fo l lowed by a 91-i; ' ,.i1l{l tom: up ,\l.bert~ Route 2 through the cities of Cal Gary, Red DI~;;" I <.lnd Ed-lonton, tilon C'lst -tic .Jasper National Parle and around the fC\1 f " ~Ubor'~a scenic loop to Lake Louise, Banff J and baok to Cal gary . Hr fo ~~tcd that the GfJVG1'Il!!!.On-t; of the Province as \lel1 as muni oi pal govern1'" 3 Hould ue happy to gr-eet uncl ent~rtain the v isiting 89 t er s and ex"," -1od ~ cordia.l invitation on their behalf to the entire organization. Vice President S8.ran then l.'e.m,'1~ked that thousands of Albo r tans 1'lere eagerly l ooking forw,,~d to tho ti;;lo when they could dri 7e throue;h YellowstonE Park on the i ::- nay tc tiouthcrn uinter i'osorts and move6. that the incoJl1ng Board of .liroctors be instructed to follow throUGh and continuo t.le efforts pertain:i.lt3 to thin j.ssoclc.tton's pro j ect of scouring yeo.rD.l'ound north-south t:C.lvcl tm.'oueh Yellm.'stone Po.rk. Tho .!:lotion VI8.S seoonded by II. G. Bass, and c'tnied by 'Gho une.niaous vote of all deleGates. President StC\"la2't then introdut'}'3d Guest spoaker t Don \'[at kins of HoL'ltionn Dlrl'lc't;or for the Yello\/stono Park Co. and the Er. \latldns cuve a short ·talk on tho value of inte r cO.".j1U!.ity public rclll,~lons \'Ihich ',:ns follm'lod by a queat10ns and ansuer ~' 1'l!..r] in '4";hich mny 0:: tho dolcGJ.tos present participated. FO~3.i:,eJ.lo, Public E:w:l.lf:;on .sto~os.. r"Gsidcnt St,,·;,~~t then introduced Ly J.e So.rvis. ;.j,uJD.Ger of the Utah A'..1.t::>aouile Association and ~-\..:. . \ Oi'f'ioG at Salt 1akG City, Utah. rt:. Sarvis . o:-:r,lDl!lod tho uethods omployed and various oources from \'lhich t he AAA sccUJ.'es road in:orlntion Gl von to potent i al travoler s and use(\ in supplyina 't'CU~inc;1. Ha G.!:1phasizGd 1:;110 faot that oach local COLiI:l.unit y OQ uld do itself a valuablo favor if arrangements could be made ,mer eby tho AAA orfico and other l'outi"'G aGencies could bo supplied w1th up- t o-date current I nfor!~tion as to the condition of various construoti on ar eas alollG the hiCh';,13.Y. The talk ''''" folloned by a round-t"ble <iiscUDsion of the various problens pertaininG to Qccuxate inforlJ.atlon and proper routing" - 3 - �( Rctirinc PrcGidenJ~ Ray V. StO\'lart then thanked tho off i cer s and ",olUberc for the loyal'vy Ilnd coopcrution thoy had extonded during hi s three terms in office. Thel'o to1ug 210 .:'u:cther bUBincss, the I1hird i\.nnual 1,lombe~8h i p :.roeting of the 59'ers D'l'G0~nationa.l Fi GhvJ:l.Y Association, Inco 'VIas adjourned SINE DIE at 4:20 P.l.!. 0' subrai t;'tcd , I,:artl.n H. CantVlsll Executive Secretar:, - II- - �" " ( ( R I so.!! UTI 0 11 1: O. 1 ;'iIrJlE.\S there 5.8 still con~ldcrablo construction neC6.:l:;:a-L'Y Oll t.ll3.t ror·Gion of Hir;A\'J..Y U~ S .. 89 knmJU as the: Grand Ganyon of ~";~le .=n.::.lce RivCl~'1 in ordCl' to oriL3 ttiG road up to standa.l'cl bot een )\..1.pine '3_ud Juckr,on .. ,'[yamin!), und r 3HERE.;;\S cart?in ~1'~~~. Power I n teI'ests arc i ntent upon building a !I.i:;h pouer daHl o.CI'CSS nn.rroYis of t his Canyon, and 1V1IERE.:\3 the construction of such a da!llt if pC~.Qli tted, would des t roy one of' tha nost sD0ctaculur seanie tow'1st attrac t ions in 'the Sta.te of \;yo,~ing !illd on tl1G ent i re r 'Jute U. s .. 89 J a nd rlHEREAS t he Jackson Hole 69 ' er6 Cl ub, the Jackson Hola Hotary Club, the Jac1;::son Ho l e ChillTlbe:!.' of Commer ce, fl...'lU the Jtar Valley G9 t crs Club,. ond the Dear Lake Basin S9 ' ers 0l ub: repr0sontinG in the aWGgate SO!ii.e five hundred property miners in the Stat e of ',[yominS nnd Id~ho arc unElnimously OPl) Oscd to tl-te dcstl'uctioll of t his beautiful Canyon, NO,'I TlIEIlliFOR<: BE IT RESOLVED that illl poss ib;Lc u n ited, effor·1t be made to encouraae anG. expedi to the ful l vOfllpl ot i on of this :")nnke III ver Canyon sector of U. !:5. C9, and that the 89 f e:rs Int ernational Higil\'I8.Y Associatton, Inc. in convention assGrqbl.ed thi s 8th day of Oct obor, 1957 at :~fton, WYOlili ng do pretost constru,ctioIl of an unwan ted and unneces$al,'Y Federa:J.. PmlsI' Dam in tho narr~:r"/s of the Snake n i vor, und BE 1'1' ElIRT1= RDSOLVJlD that ~his protest be mado lmo;m to, and, a COl'Y of this Rb:SOLUTICll be filed '\Jiti~ the Eoderal ])\.ll' cau of Hecl aplation, an:... t.he respoctive Govornors, Senators) nnd ConGressmen of tho states of J.1ontiQ.ll€l.) ~.'yoL:ing $ Id£lho t Utah J ilnd Arizona. Tho fo~e.eoing RE30LUTIUr lIO. 1 \"'.15 appro',ed dlld. adoptod by the &9 t e1' s ·l~~ ....r\E\'TIClic'\.L iIIGlL,:;lX :H3dv CL .'il I<...1';-) nJ~. by the *uno.niuous vote of dclcGa.toE- on the floor of the Aosociution' s Third Intornc..·;;ional Conven'i;ioll, meetinG at .titan s i'!yominG Octobor 8, 1957. ATTBST" * ~Ol~.?xecutivc seoretary Delcao.tes officially re.pro;;;entin[; Foreign Governments no·t voting �( \'mrni~AS; II :',T117Hbl:"J, he did Ll(ilcJ.~ .. ~" ": J·lo.:~(';lJJ )J.~lS t' ""1'. - -~ ;:~ I.. !.l-~ J.~ 1.. (.t c~.' J:ci.cho, On , ~J" hl,'la~:r knn" /.1 G07,;.J:":lCr S;'!t'{.l.h's ded:1 cc.te a nn"ly O:t:"~0 f~t:~i'-1 ):: nO.ted. as U. '). 191 t .erG!! ,)3.'lt.Jll L:i.!le, and, -.if! . o. ~('JJ,:,,·vc l2. Jr, ... Gilt.> t.ha-/j '~.1.'_; .~:) j' • .) tho:.:c' <J 1)Y-_,1.0dilF" o.l'1.C:! .i.l ~:j1: U: ..i 0 U,:ili.":..d.nr: 0.:' b~,'lU i 'n_ \rll."~i 1. G...u.':' '-I t.?l.!.~ ~c.;:d ~'iou.Ld ... "..c.' • s, os. ~ .;. b8 C,:..dlL "Gj: l.:. ""seL. r. t.:... ",'I'" ~ t1. (r.1"n6. L::;:..lll1Ifl.'l.:.OUq..!, l-:\"'l{~ ... nd .il. .(;1· ..... ::·"3.) ...~roo! -.ild -)7 ",:L ', '. at the )I'csent • "., ~ '! '-.• " ;C.":'\!-l: : .::'" c.r. .J ' tl. 1[' J crdl. v:nm:c:. . ., OCl.S't . . uct,.;. n ,;,: "i;: ~.G :-:'.'0I'O},/;Q Toad .,could dctrec'i; c0;.l.si(1-- J eratlo ·!;::a"la~. r~:·C ..l u . S . 89) ~a:j "JD J r.:·~0r:. ",.(LLch 1 ·\; OGj;"·vcs i'rorl the !;":cuth. c .tl'al'.i.ce of Yolle'.ws'toee "G') :io,"1,00 \,i~~y ; t!J.rc·,JiDG :lddltionnl blli:d.cn an 1l1 roady avel'O' oVl·~ed U. S . 1.9J. ~.nc.. ~;l TU.cll'"f.?YC _ :.md. VlIllREAS ·~.hc Jaclrson IIo13 a9 t u:"o:; LJ.ub , the. JQO!:,20n Hole Rotnxy Clu~: the Jackson LTolc Chamber of.' CC';:i::.1C~C0 ! ;illl} t:'l0 ;YiAr,J:' Va~ley V9' ors Club 2 and th.e Bear I,2.k€ "las in 89 ' ;,rs Club ropI'c.:;ontinG in the 'lccreG].tc GO.l:lO f i ve h.un:lred l)Z'OlVJi.'ty O·.m3I'3 l=: tIw ~tr"~0 of . IyoHing .:illd. Idaho arc un::mir·1C'l."lzl:r ol"JpoJod t o tho 'J0~.::t.:~i..1ct;7.on G:,: t hin llilnBCCGSary ro:l.u, ~m';I' :1.7~:·S:':::'G?'::'~ 3£ IT rL.:'3 ... 1\· .•m i,;ha:t the 09 ' m:s I!J.te~n<ltioIlEll ll:l.OW.l:r .\8.Goc:~Q·\;im.\ , Inc . in conv:).!r~i ~·~1 nssc:...tblod ti).is 8th uay of at .\r·to!!. , ~"[yojlnG do un3.~i.r ")u·-:ll~T i'~(jtt;l:J t any conl:Jtruc'lilon ;i cr. of :["utU!'(; C(/.w°l,iI'lJ.cti:H1 o;~ ··. {d.:.:> ).'01.";0., (lnu ~.l~ D.U ~O_ :.' C~ ;u{.. r . s ('otobcr.) 1957 or o0l1s1dera- ..... '·l··r.) ·1 ' 1- ' " . 1 ·{l·.)V.·; . , ''';.';'; '1.1.'1 i 5 p:,;O"'~S t .co I!laQC .WOilll ~GO ond u ~:,j: :L•. l:'dWll:;:~ i vl! b3"ilr;~ ,.",,:'.th t he "i"lyo.w.inc Higtn"1Q.Y Dcp::u:ti.lOllt. ~ .L·o:.'\:~C·:;1~y Ssrvic'::) ~ t!lC U. J • .Jw~oau of~· ublio Uoads ~ and tho • ·rl ... ~ .~ • • • . ~ ..,., '""f) ..1..1; o~\ ...... - ..J·.r~t.::J.ll 01 T-:cc :·.'·z..l'"ioti , c:r. ·:.;hJ.·:; co1,i;.1s oE this =.'csolution bo placed be..-l fo::.:c;hc GOVCj:l..Ol'Z J .3er.;:1:~O:t'D , 11U<i ~~0.i.l('2'CSS.li1en 0::' ·iJl:;.c stntof3 of j".Jon~Gnnn. t ',Vyorr.l.l:.fj, :Waho, Utah, and i~.i:?;onc\. The f01' 6coi.ne RESOI::J'"Z'ICi. He . 2 i"i..J.3 n.pl-ro·v3d and adoptjcd by the :39 ' 81'G nITl!..""'RNATIC:~AL HIGH.J'. r ~B3CCI.,\·i7IGH, n'l"c . b Jr the*unanimoUJ3 vote : of (lsleGn t~s on the floor Q.t. ~llC ADsocl ..1tioll' s 'i'hir-:.1 Internat i onal COllvol1.tlon t fllOI3·tino: at Aft,:u J Wyo.c1.'.np Oc tober 8 ) 1957 • .\: D!'.1ego.te·s ofrlol'-llly l' 3p:-C'CSc,;:1~Gi,i~g FO'I'elgn GOVeJ..'UIilenta n~votlng �( ( RESOLUTIO N the 89 ' s"s JE:i;fl:i:'natio!2::t .. E::. ~"'13.;r i .. f:,. (cl:l"l,jion for ·;.;hc Hel/ublic of jlfe xico h1.s been iI!.Cnp;i,J':·Lat~)d du. -Co SO]~iOUD oj.Jero.tionn and is s till m:d.e:T 'G}:."." "G!llont. 'l'i,; t ."l C .:'I::'.ro I3::"O'~h0!'S Clinic i....1'1 Roches ter, ..............:,j.• ):; \'1l7O"G!,?',~' ..,..~ ~.l;~ ,·'·l •• _ . " . _. . . .T',.·'c-: . . n ) _~ ",..,··,......., ... _J.o.U._ 1 \1 )):""'cto ... ~ . __ ...... fO~ _ .~ "I, . ti:"ll.!"!..csotD.., n.:i."!'u Vrri..I'.RE/l.S, " ;en the Executi va SeCl' etary 1 ~ c6 reto at beinG unable to a~lit~end. the "i;ui:rd Int;0rl1at~.onal convontion nOYI in assem.bly at Afton, liyoming ll!ld ho.s fmthel: c1.:ts12dod h i s best \'Jishes for a ~l·. l~:;"cGm:-~n hD.s \'.'1'i t e.nd other Board memucrfJ h:..s sincere successful conventiono ~JQW THEREFORE BE IT RmOLVTD , this convention e>"-pl'ess to Sr . Freeman its sincore regrets for his illnesD and oXG ond best nishes for his s1?oedy !'€-covory , a nd BE n' FilllTllliR RUl O LVED , '.ha'. a ooPY of t his resol ution be fOl'Ho.rded to Sr. Fr eeman a~G Rochcsi'01' . Th .. fOl' ago ing RESOLUTION NG . 3 was approved and a dop '~ed by tho 89 ' era INTKlNATION,\L HIGllilAY ASSOCIATICN, nw. by the llll~ allimolls vote of de l ci3a·~m.l on the floor of the .A ssociati on ' s Third I'1te rnati onaJ. Conven·tion, lilCfi!t~~1t-nh P.i'ton, Wyoming October S r 195 7 . AT'['I;ST: '\\\I~'I(J ~kJ<ecutive ~ • Secret al'Y �( ( \'.'HERKI\S, Rny V. S'C31'l.3.l't J co-foundel" and Char'Gol' PJ~esident of the S9 ' ers Intel'national Highway Association, Inc . 1 has cont~ibuted freely of his timo , cucrGY , and pers onal resources in the interest of this orB~nization during tho three years in v/hi ch he has served us its preSident, and \':JlfLREAS, tedious journc, nation highv/ay her husband i~ Ura. Stevlart has a.cco.t:1pnniad him on numerous s up and dovm tho lol1G·oh and breadth of the throe system and has othel'iJ:!.se encotu'a gcd and uss i si;ed his d uties, NOr! TlillREFO!lE BE I T !lESOr,VIm , tha t the 89 ' ers International Highvlay Association, Inc. in convontion assembled this 8th day of October ,. 1957 at Afton, rlyoming ex-Gond an everlastinc vote of confidence and sincere appreciat ion of the sincero effox'i;s and inspiring acconplishmcnts achie ved by President Ray and ~,{!:'so Stewart. 'rhe foreGoing RESOLUTION 1;0. 4 was ajlproved and adopted by ·<he 59 ' ers IN'l'&lNll.TICNAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. by the unanimous vote of del eGatos on the f loor of the A.ssoclation t s 'l'h ird Inter'national 0onvention, meeting at ~O!lli1lG October 6, 1957. ATTEST: ~ t.,. ExecuUve Secretary �r ( rIHErdJ:P3, ~ . O. Iio::::0\'l of Fl::gntaff, .j11':~.zona YlaS one of the i'01mdcrs and Ch:E,""or Vj,c.; - i~I'm:;idcnt of the 89 ' e:rs rn'Gol'uattonal Higl\,ay :~':·30ciati()r;., IilC. J and \'l'.lIErillAS J his unt i.ru.cly death on July 27- h i s an i:r:i'oparable t loss to his .family, :.!.is business associate3 ::md his oommunity, Non TfTRRBFJRE BE rv RESOLV1D, th9.t the third annua l convention of this orG-.lnization 'u llioh he hulpcd t,C o!'canize, pay honor '"0 his meI10ry this 8th day of Oetober, 1957. The i'ol'egoing P..ESO:L.UTICN NO. 5 ''JUS approved a.nd adopted b y the $9 ' ors m 't',,;RNATIGNAL HIGJI,IAY ASSOCIATION, INC. by t he unan1nous vote of dGlegates on 'che floor O.r the Associat ion's Third I!lte1'na~liional Convent i ()n~ meeti ng n't; Afton, ilyoL'ling October 8, 195 7 9 Alrr.rEST;~~ Executive SecI'etary "\ �( RES 0 L UTI 0 ~ N O. 6 ',l!J.:!!REAS, '\jc,o movinG of t he th i rd :.lnnuaJ. Internatiotml 0onvention of tho 69 'crs In tm:na.tlonal HiGh'.iUY .\..ssociatlon, In:}. from. the City of Jacl::oon , \{yo.:...:.i nG, to Af '~on in ::>tar Valloy hus placed u heavy load of xcsponsibil1ty upon our :"lyo.i.:linC Dir ector', Pau.l Stevic, and ot'I.X hosts J the oi'f i cors and mcmbora of the Star Valley B9 t erB Club, and VIilL'RB!\s , the members and supportal's 01' tids oreanization in the entire Star Valley have \lorkcd untlr in<;l y to mnke this conve n- tion a success, NOW THEREFOru: BE IT Illi30LVLD, that the sincer e appreciation of this convention oe extonded to Paul St evi s, the officers and members of the Star Valloy 89 ' 01'5 Club, the mayor of Afton, the PrGsfdent and Llo!Jbor s of the Afton Chamber of Commerce , the management and ataff of the V~lloon Hotel, and to t he entire citizenry of S tnr Vr lley Ur!rl surroundl.J:lg terri tory for the excellent oooperat ion and assistollce, unci BE IT FL'RTIlEIl RESOLv::.D, that a spccial vote of thunke be extonded to i.he editors Md publ1shel's of the Star VE.lley Indopendent fer the excell e nt publici t.y coverage G1 van this convention and oooperation far boyond the cull of duty in tho handlinG of our printine xequi ramcnts. Tho foroGoinG RSSOLUTIC,N riO . 6 was approved and adopted by tho 89'ers IN'Y£IlNA.TIGllAL llIGH,iAY ASS()CIA.l'IGL, n.c. by the unanimous vote of deloso.tes on thc floor of the ,\ssociation's Third I nternational Convention, meeting at Afton, rryoLling October 8, 1957 . ATTEST: ~ecutive Secretary �( WI-r:!.:rm~\S) ona o~" ;;Lo ~L ':oj")o _·u;:s of To.'l':) C9",,:,~ s I1ltc.:.'n.3.tional BiG:,' oy lSSolC "'1.. Lh) L:o. in t: fl'O .:.'Jto en': w.ncolU''-lge rocip:roClll lnte t'llC.tiuHr 1 l.ou..:.:~GJl b .... t\'iouu CilU' f:::icrilly nations t:> the nOl'ti!l en:". r.0U'!:.1., C.l J the United 8t6.t0~, and ~lIIERS·\':-, it; 19 t:. s. 89, ...10x100 15, o~- rUX)OStJ 'lr~d dc;:::;i~c '3.._~ .Ulio:r:tn ..~out:; :; n:J one continuous boulo - ';0 pl'csent hi:;hilujS p~lr}:.J 1'[ t~e:"' than thrr'u scp'lr::ltc rO'ltao, ~GherGby ~lir,t.inattn1 ~_ntor.l.!'.ltioj~')J b01Jld"ri "[, '''\f. ::l dctorl'cn1. 'GO tcurist t ravol bat J' ·n ~;>C&O tll.l'c(:: llT.;lon!:, and v.1.rd of nati;.uaJ. ','118nE~\"'S, this 00.11 t 'J.zt be a.ccoLll,:lished a.t Olll' Canadia n borda"!' b;r )rescntin,], ;.~(n""nna's Gl"10icl' National Par k and .\'lber t o. 's ~·l3.terton L:.!:.'s I:atlun~l rarl~ as Oll~ bOJ.u'tli'ul recrea ti onal arGa rathor' ~h<.l_l ,\'10 c!i~t5..!lr, t .'ll'lrn 10c.lted 1:J tHO separate na tions, NO':1 Ti.u:::r.E}'f$J~ B3 1'/ 'z:.SOL·1J:..D, 'iihu":; in 1.~l publlc!ty releases and i'LltJ.lI'3 )1 ';"nted pr0l~otic..nn:' HJ.ttC"C' l'C"<le,'!sed by this orcr,a.niza tion ·:;.J.cre;ln rJ:::'~ 'once is llU.idc to e5:;hoI' on( O~ bot!1 of those national 1'1:.s t::tQ t V· (, teru l'\'h~ tel ton-C-:'.acicr J.ll :'C111.l tioD.al Peace Park" b,) e.i::'l~loye.j" l:L. 7 rJaB np~roved and adopted by .ASSOC IA'.2IL:, lllC. by the unanimous 1,r otc of dalC{;ates on the floor of t~e ;wJ:Jociationts Third Inte r ll~tlonal 0onvontion. ,~1eti..ilC r.:~~-uGn, .;:,·oming October 8 J 195 7. 'rilO t;~c .:..-'or~tioinc Rl~SOL;j'IGr 8 9 t 61' S n;T;-:IUifA'.e.ILN,U. Hlc!I.:~\Y A·iT~:r:. V~~cut1ve Secretaxy \ �( RES 0 L UTI 0 N N O. 8 \lIillREJ~ I t ho 89 ' 6 1'S Intcrna~~ional High\'IaY Association, Ino 0 vIas created fol' the purpose of inviting and enoouY'aging safe and aOllvenient travel on H i ah~ray 59 in ito er.tire'i'y. and WHERE.r1.S, the 700 members of this Maoeiation are deeply concerned regarding t he s t andards a nd conditions of said hiehway in re~ards to safe and en joyable tourist travel, and W HlID.K\S, the Dar r ow, windine section of HighrJay 89 kn01.'Jfl as "\'/hits Spar" in the State of Al.'izona between the c itics of Prescott and rli ckenburg 1s consider ed hazardous to the extant t hat many Arizona visitors unused to mounta.inous terxain are Immm to use alternate routes J thereby m.i ssi nc one of t.he lilOS·t spectacular scenic drives in the entire State of Arizona, NOri THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVIID t hat t he 89 ' er n International Highway Assochtion , Ino . in oonvention assombled this 8t h day of Ootober , 1957 a t Af ton , .iyoming do una n1m.ously petition t h e High\lay Departme':'lt of the State of .lU'izona and the Federal Bureau of Publi c Roads to a l ~ot a nd appropr i a t e the necessary funds required t o provide safe and adequate travel passaee tl!ld eliminate daneerous curves \'{herevcl' possible and eeneraly improve this oect i on of Highway 89 above described , and BE IT FlJ1lTllER RESOLVED '"ha.t this petition bo made known to and a oopy of this resolutio n be filed with the Arizona Stat e H1ghvlay Department, the Governor and Congrossional deleGation of the State of )11:1zon8 and the Federal Bureau of Publio Hoads. The f orseo i ng RESLLurICN Nt. . 8 'was approv ed and ad opted by the B9 ' ers INTl!HNATIl.NAL HIGH.IAY AGSC 0IATICN, INC. by the unan1m.ous vote of de l ocnte s on the f loor o f t he Associutiont s Third International Convention , eeti at: ton , \iyoI!ling October 8, 1957. A'£TEST :~~Dl~~~~~~~~::~~Ex.outive Seoretary �( \lHl!!,HEAS, tl..c 39 ' 01'8 In-;';crr.atlonnl I-li.;h".'/Uy ~\.Ssociation, :n~. in convention assembled at the cit~~ of Kanab s Utah on Octobor 12, 1956 adop';:'oc!' a resolution protesting tho tl~aditional vlintcr clo~':!lci of that portion of U. So S9 wi th!.n the bounG.a1.'ic.s of Ye:.J.mY:; t.Ln'J P _t:~:. . :\" he'-,l'1.i unr/arran ted in lirht Of l:11u.m f"lcts anI L~'G~:2G '~I.[~t ·~,~:.l .,.O::3~ _~ , ., '-l. JI'tr be i:lade to brin£:', cbcut tJ.0 yotir-armU1d mc.ir..o- ::n:::"n:~L use of t h i s 1n'tcxnatio!".L.i north-sou1:.h lliClur.:..,V ~('r GY~lt;''':;Hl.L .. G,Oll.;;:"Q Ll'T"'~:.(; am rJI-IEHEAS, this A s sooiaticr~ In G021V i nCE'd thu\. tLc yoal·-c.xr_'~JI;.d lil.!.rtenunc e of t his hiGh\'Jay t.h:r ouc)::. Yo l lmm t one [-'urIc . 3 an e vcntt4.:..i..i ty, the realization and comFlc tion of ,-,,"ich the 700 wGmbcrs 01' this AssociatIon are !:lost allxious to sec eff0ctcd at t he earliost po"slbl e ti.fo1C3 in lceepi.n~ with safe vlinter travel, ani W1l:E.llF.AS. the int~:est and cooperatio- ,lis pla:rod duriO{l th" past twe17e mo.aths on the part of the U.. S .. Dell:'D: ;.:uent of the Interior, the Nnt.:_r)no. l Park So:"vicr) ar.d ce:tal n nenfJ'JI' 5 of' ConGressional delegations i :r.. n'3E:.rby st:ttes ha~7e b::::sn -:loth crutityin..; a:J.d above our 9Y.:pe c to..tioUB, NO"a TlfJJ:.HEFCRE J~I' 17:.1 R:!:SCLY£m ·i:;!J.a·~ tUJ 39'0::00 Interna tional IIigh-.,'("8.'Y Ili'3soc:.ation. Inc. i1.1 ~cn~.:ention D.ns0mbled this 8th daj." of O c tob~1", 1957 at :~ton, Hyo.mlr-'t, duly adG]oVlledgc-j ,lith [;ra:~it'J.d'3 "~~e interest displayed nn:, (;,ffol't e~ct.enc.0d by f~b,e "bove LIm..tioned incH.viduals and Fedel'o..l Dll1'f'Ut:.S t and BE IT FWrrITER R£'.S("LVLD that a vote of tlw.n~:s be extended to LaDUel A. (Lon) Gar l' lsori, Sl!.porint~ndent of Yollow-:;'i:ionc P:u'k, and his s"',uff for efforts 1'lhich have, and v!ill be 1l1ndc I an::1 tlnt \'10 _pledGe to Duper in-',8ndel1'~ Garricon OUI lnc1ividua1 PnC. colleot:_ve coopc::atioll c.nd activo [,t:ppor-l; in the do lution of IToblews and the ~.''J.Gili tati0:.l of plo.nE: rcquil'6d 1:'0 j:'.f.lEtGn tho year around cpening to internntio!1Ul t,,:u.1'ls~1.i 1:i:. .'avel of one of l'Jorth America ' s most magnif i cent Nat i cnal P~.r\.'ks t:':_"Jreb:,,- 'Jll.,lina.!iinG ~C.G last exis t ine road -block on North 1lm.er:'ci'.'.., 5:"00 "nile .i..i1.:r0C-Lution DoulevCll'd of National Pa~k5J and B:C r: Fu~~rl~-_l~n HES(.l.V.CD th-s t tho int'Jnt of tb.·: -; action b~ made }~Ov.!l to ...... a (JOpy c-:: this l':3so~_lltio[. be filed. ,,",:1 '';,1 '3:1)) Hintenj ::mt Gnrlson ,l 11(1. the ;:,;:--,tioll:tJ. Parl:- .3orv:~.cot the Departnant of' t"~le ~:lt0 I'ior, and the ,lCSp(\(}tl ~i e Cov"JI'no~~ and CC1...c1"1fJsic-no.l dc).cGJ.t.:.3 or ~:;~le States of .[ont'lna, i.1yorrL,g, Ifls.ho. l-tall auG. Ar:.zC1I'..a. IJ'he i'cre30~r..g RESvl,lY':IGK NQ 9 ~'ns approved. aila n10pted by tho 09 Cf9 lliTEF.lCATICHA1.. HIGF.,'AY AS..)(i,!L'.1'IC1:, n:;. by L;ilc unanimous vouo of' celccutez 0;.: the 11001' or thE. ASDociatior~ 7 S T'rurd. Intc:r:onn t.ion:,l Con"rcntion t meei;ing a t \.fti,.ll,~~~lilibObGr 6) 1957. A~'rEST' __ ~ili±~; ;j'::tQ!iuttvo SecrotrH" �r E. 1l. CO!! u ~' I Q II 11 O. 1 0 i'iIlERU.8, due tc i'.'i.ntGr cli.mat:lc (;C11ditions C;.O.Li.\IUon to mes t p ortions of the S'(jute ai' ~lyolUinG : highways nhcn surfaced vlith \'Jell packed Ot1.0;;, are Gone:rally found to be suitabl e for safe travel at a)'-:>eds in ,l:\.col; ine with C;Jn:'1"·.on. son36 and the obser vance of fundamenii:11 safety :t'a ctors, and \ilThll:lAS, official "sports i ssued by tho \,!yoming State Highway :'Je:1a.rtmcmt :Lor tilo infoI'.n:ltion oi' routi nG agenoies and the trave ling pu1}l ic aro minlcad i !1(; nn:l inadeCluato due to the omission of a "s now r'Yld " clas sification the't'cby creatIng the impression tha. t t he a b ove ~lo;Jcribod Sl1O\'J pacl:ed r O,ld condH;ion is either extremely hazardous (;1' entirely 1.w.pa:01 sa'hle, :.ina ',(JT;.::rm:'.S J tto Jackson Hole 69 ' ex Club J the Jaokson Hol e Ro tary Glllb, ·~he Juckson Hole Cix:lb·:l' 01' COLlrlerce , and the Star Valle y 89 t 81'f'. Clu.b 1'Cpl'<.:ucn:tiD.£; in the aggregate 3006 500 property O\'mGl'S :.i.1 tllo State of \!youlng a!'G c'Jnvinced t t.at the omiss ion of a "s noVi ro~:dn c.i.o~:;;iflcat:'.ol1 in the offici al repor'Lis issued by the Wyoming r:i~:hvIay Do.:'nrtmeht :results in the' intimida:l:.ion of potential w ·inter vif;j:cors s thereby advcl'sely affecting the economy of ~Jyom.ing 01 ties "!nd commt;J.1i ties,. 1m\,: ?BEREFOnE TIE 1'1: P3SULVI:.1) thnt the 89'G:rs International i!.S90clntivn,. Inc .. in ccnvent i on assemblod this 8th day of o J-'&;ober J 1957 at ,\ftoll, dyoruing d o unanimously support the petition 3ubmi tted by its Uyomine delogation requesting the \Iyoming I-IlghVlay !Jel.'artmcnt to include a "3nmJ Rond \I clEl.ssification in all official ·ro~d oondition reports raleased. by t his departmen~ during the "linter of' 1957 Ilnd that ~.;.b.:l:J ola[loillo.:l~v10:'1 boco.mc standard for all times, 1-a.',~h\"D.y an.d m: :cr F1JHTffL"R RESGLVED that thi s petition b e filed with the \i:rmuiDG, Hii])li/ay Departm:3nt, and ~lihat; a copy of this res olution be fm:":J:l~;'ikd to the Gavel.'normd Conr;rcssionul dcl oBil"~es of the Stnt e of rlyar:D.n~ I nl ,d to ChruJliKU' of Conune:- oe Haad CO~Jlm.i t tees in va.r iOllS l,iy"';miJ1.,'; C::·;.':. CG 0 'l""e fOl'cgoing RllSOLunCN 1-;0. 10 "US appr oved and adopted by the 89' ers n~'ITllliAirIC1~Al HIGI;.iAY :~'JSOCL\TIGH. nm. by the unanimous vote of deJeGates on the fi0cr of the Association's Third InterIlD.Gi on:t1 Conve ntion, lle?"jIlg at l.:fton, ':'yoming Ootober 8, 1957. ATTEST: Exeoutive Seoretary �89' e r s I h T i d . A ~ I 0 ~ A L H I G H J A V ASS L. I h C . • ~¥* ••••• *¥~. ** •• ¥.*** ~* ••••••• *••• * •• *.* •• *.*. ( .** •••••••••••• ** "Re:.! : M. H. Cantwell TO : 1 , 1957 Officers and Direotors and Members SUBJECT: Oct o ber tor fiscal yea r Oct . I , 1956 - Oot. I, 1957 Membershi p Repor t Ac'rIVE Lj;SWlERS 1957 ST\TE n. OLO;) 3TAl\VII.G AS OF OCT . I, (compared to) 195 6 LOSS - GATh CANA:JA 36 2 J4 ],ICNTANA 53 60 -7 :',YO:,UKG 81 33 48 IDAHO 44 58 -11,. U'fAH 93 .124 - 31 121 164 - 43 7 7 7;4if =rJ ARIZONA MEXICO l\OTL : 1957 m In addition to the above li s t e d ACTIVE ImL!BERS the Association has a permanent HCI'CRARY Membel'ship consis ting of 0hambers of COillmer ce , Civic OrganIzations, s tate, Provincial , and J;,iunicipal Bodies, l\ewspapers , e tc. which totals 186 H(,l\ORARY l!E;,lBERS . GRUiD TOTAL (Active a nd Honora r y) - LOCAL CLUB j4';;.Lll!:RSHIP IN GeOD 1957 CLUB ,/1 3TAl~DING (compared to) 621 ,\.3 OF OCT . 1956 LOSS -GAlli 16 25 -9 GLilN 0A1YON tl2 29 50 -21 '!3 SEVIER VAL.LEY ,r 23 29 -6 24 35 -11 BEAR LIKE 1}5 44 58 -IL, G TAH VALLl:.Y ,/9 45 32 13 PRESCOTT 1~10 24 ( N ew ~ 24 38 (New\ 38 Bm:CE CANYON ;IIClGiJo.BURG .14 JACKSON ifll .~~ •• *•• ~*¥~ •• * • •••• *.****** 1, 1957 • �89' e r s I N TE o N AT ION A L H I G H • l Y AS S ' N. I N C. * *~********** * ****** ****** ***** *********************** ********************** * * * *** FRO : M M. H. Cantwel l TO: Officers and Directors SUBJECT: ... - -- - Ootober 1 , 1957 Re-Cap of INCOME and EXPENDITURE3 cleared thru the Salt Lake City Offioe for the fiscal year Ootober 1, 1956 - September 30, 1957 • - - - - -- - - - - --- - - - - -- -- r N C O 14 E - 14 E 14 B E R S H MEl" -.!!. TOTAL REVENUE REMITTANCE $645.00 105 .00 405. 00 705 . 00 375. 00 540 . 00 570. 00 210.00 390.00 510 . 00 300 . 00 300 . 00 $645.00 105 . 00 405 . 00 705.00 375. 00 540.00 570.00 210.00 390 .00 510.00 300.00 300 . 00 *********** MONTH RENEW Mar. Apr . May June July Aug. Sept. 23 1 '4 28 7 2 20 9 9 7 14 15 16 6 23 19 16 34 16 5 17 27 6 :2 43 7 27 47 25 36 36 14 26 34 20 20 TOTAL 139 194 337 Oot. Nov. Deo . Jan . Feb. r P FEE S ******************* ******* $5,055.00 , $5,055.00 (Receipt from Corporat1on Treasurer on file for each monthly Remittance ) . OFF ICE MONTH 2-!-E R H E A DAN D S UP P LI E S PHONE POSTAGE Oct. $10.46 Nov. 12.45 Dec. 3 .70 Jan. 9 .74 Feb. 27.26 Mar. 30.41 Apr. 7.74 May 25 . 50 June 4.07 July 14 . 65 Aug . 31.32 Sept . 12,25 TOTAL $169 . 45 $ 8.83 PR~~ ING $11.20 90 . 68 14.97 6.40 34.50 7.50 11.00 19 .24 . 97 .19 24 . 60 135.01 63 .5 6 12.25 20 . 00 38.60 46.08 $221.37 56.24 20 . 35 .-- . $520 .63 MISC. TOTAL $16.92 $ 47 . 41 61.36 179.46 27.48 39.58 12.53 153.96 65.03 124. 39 36.05 214. 47 39.26 149. 80 5.00 30. 50 7.52 23. 84 23 . 80 116.89 12.00 102. 27 ' 2 . 92 61.25 $311 ,87$1.243.5:< .-u ~()A C(..' .. ;1 S ,f ,;;., '1,1 i'? ..l.JjCl- I \ -I. ,,' 'i i b (J _ (Itemized statement of eaoh 1nd1v1dus.1 expenditure sub7 .' ,.. ' mitted to Coroorat1on Treasmel' for audi t prior t o Petty Ca sh Refund) .. I , ..... ~t S' ~ { , & " v , 'J L C' ! �r SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTs No planned sightseeing tour this pom. CONFERENCE OF CLUB OFFICIALS MA IN BUSINESS SESSION 9 a.m. tomorrow morning 10 a.mo tomorrow 'IIill inolude features as follows: DON W ATKINS 7 Publio Relations Direotor Yellowstone Park Co. and Hamilton Stores will speak and conduct discussion on D1JI1'IClltxxxxxx " INTER" COMMUNITY PUBLIC RELATIONS" LYLE SARVIS_ Manager Utah AAA will speak 4IJ( and acoduot disoussion on " Methods used by AAA in seouring ourrent ..K¢x information on road conditions, and how oommunities oan cooperate to their own ad vantage" BANQ,UET TlIlln 8 p.mo tomorrow (ieature speaker~ also ToD Sherard, Deputy Engineer Wyo Sec W Highway Commission yo .. >ow.. ". == , DO .... -_._-- ;.------- Lon Garrison, Supt ellowstone Parko HWY. ep �Opening M eeting M . Oct 7 on ************** INVOCATION AGENDA Paul Stevi g , wyoming Director WELCOME ADDRESS - " " Mayor of Afton and 89'er member Doyle L. Child Lorenzo S. Walker - Fres o Afton C of C. has given exoellent moral and financial support to local 89' ers. ************** CORRESPONDENCE and ANNOUNCEMENTS MINUTES OF 2nd . ANNDAL CONVENTION, Kanab, Utah APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTIES 1)/"~-c( ?-/'.t L/v NOMINATING - Ernest Saran(Ch~ Bill Bass ARIZ:ONA ( 2 ) UTAH AUDITING - Frank Sorgatz (ch) RESOLUTIONS - (someone from W yoming) WYOMING (1) Directorships to be filled- Oct. 12, 1956 (1) Mark Pugmire Chas . Ma»tin (ch) Ralph Cameron J years J years 1 year - unexpired term Burnett Handryx Allen Cameron Mrs. Dorothy Bo 06 , Jerry Breen , . ('~c.i_\ S '" I i"'" Paul Stevig(or ~~§D from W e yoming Fred Houohens(of Jackson. Fred will not be here today but has two resolutions on which he wants to talk fc tomorrow, so wo uld be good to have him on the committee. ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION Standing Committee - M itchell, Chairman , Sorgatz, Hendryx, Cantwell ******** ANNOUNCE: Committee Chairmen will call meeting follOwing adjournment. Delegates with s uggestion., etc. should appear before Resodutlons Committee eta . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4346 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3441 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/978">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/978</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 1878176233 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Third annual 89'ers membership meeting minutes, October 7-8, 1957 Description An account of the resource Third annual 89'ers membership meeting minutes, October 7-8, 1957 from Afton, Wyoming. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Mitchell, Bentley Subject The topic of the resource Accounts United States Highway 89 Nonprofit organizations Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/7/57 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Afton (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 8 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd8 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/32bb236afe99def73fcddf8a076e5bf8.pdf 0dea6a5d9ccaf26cbf46715f6fa81dfa PDF Text Text • ----- --- ------OFFICI A L IlIIiUTES Special Board of Directors lleeting 89'ers Intern£l.tional Highnay Asscciation, Inc. Kanab, Utah; October 12, 1956 Present! President, nay v. Ster!art, Vic e-President, Bentley H itcheJ..l, Secr etary-Treasurer, i7. G. Bass, Directors Fo rI. Sorgatz and furnett Her¥iryx, and Executive Secretary, IJro.-tin II. Cantwell. nus rne et1ne \'ISS called directly following the adjourJllll3nt of the 1956 8J'lJ'UlB.l. membership meeting for t he purpose of organizing the new board and elect ing the association officers fo r tJ1.e new year. New Director s \':hich had been elect ed to the board durinc the membership meeting were; for &ntana~ Charlee !Sartin; for I daho, Paul Stevig ; for Canada, Ernest no Saran; for Mexico.. E. A. Porler . Tne required majority being present J tho meeting wa l!'J called to order by President Ray stewart at 5. 00 P.lI. Nominations for President were in order and Frank W. Sorgatz ~i a 9 nomi.nated by Bentley lti.tchell.. Director Sorgatz thanked the board for the honor, and declined the nominati on due to tile press of personal wsinese and the fa ct that he planne~ to be out of the state a good deal durins the coming year 'Nhich l:ould make it impossible for him to effectively carry out the duties and r esponsi billties of the office.. Director Sorgat? withdrawal VIas accepted by the board .. Another call l-;aS made for nominations BIld Dir ector Sorgatz nominat ed Bentley Mitchell . Director latchell expressed his appreciati on of the honor, and deolined. the nomirotion due to the press of p ersonal and wsiness affairs, expres sing th e desire that he would pref er to concentr ate all available time on the building up of the organization in the Northern Utah area.. Dir ector 1U.tche1l's \'uthdrawal wae accepted by the board. All Directors present then prev.:liJ.ed on retiring President, Ra.y V. s t ewart, to acoept the pos ition for n third term. President St ewart expres sed his appreciation of the honor and further stated that he hrui thoroughly enjoyed hie t wo years in offic e and \'CIuld continue to lend every effort to the furtheranc e of the 89 ' er e International H1g11'.;ay ASSOCi ation, but s~ ted. it was hi s personal and c onscicnciouB bolief that the bost interests of the organization would be served. by t ranD ferring the leadership into new hands. President St ewart 's attenpt to decUne the nomination \'tas overrulled by the body and he was reo-elected atl President f or a third t em by unanimous Vot e. The offic~ of Vic~Pre sident YISS discussed. Last year tl';O Vic~Prcsident 8 .. ;ere elected.D After some dis cuBsion, it was deci ded to start the year with one Vic~Pr esld ent due to the fact that none of newly elected Directors had been officially notified and given th e opportunity to accept the offic e.. It was the expressed desire of the 1::oard t.hat one of these new directors be ele cted to the offic e of Vice-President at a l ater date . Retiring Vice-President Bent ley Mitchell Wa!!! unaniJ:oously elected t o the office of Vice-President for a second term. The next order of wsiness 'was the election of the corporation Sec r et ary_ Treasurer .. This office has been held by W G. Bass since t he incorpor a tion of . t he a s sociation. He was nominated t o continue in the offic e for a third te~ 1~ .. Bass thanked the board for the honor , and stat ed that the increased activity and growth of the organizati on had greatly increased the responsibilities and work l oad of the corpo ration Secretary-Treasurer to the point wh ere it was in s erious c onfli ct with the successful conduct of his own personal b.tsinees .. It was suggested that , r. Bass be authorized to aecure the help of a prof essional M accountant to aBsist him generally in th e keeping of the oorporat ion recor da. llr. BaS8 then agreed. to accept th e office of Secretary-Treasurer for a third term under thes e conditions Dlld "la B unanimously elected.. �• • • '!be new board am officers of the organization now standa as follows: President, Ray V.. Stm'jartj Vice-President .. Bentley l.iitchell; Secretary-Treasurer, ~io G. Bass; Directors, Burnett A. Hendryx, F. VI .. Sorgatz, E. A. Porter, Paul. stev1g, ChllI'les llirtin, imlest Sar<Ul co The :executive Secretary was instructed to notify the four new director s of their election and request them to indic ate their acceptance of the office .. There being no 1\lrther business, the meeting was adjourn.ed at 5 :30 P .ll. Respectfully submitted, IM~~~- l!artin H.. Cantwell , Executive SecretaJ'7 �- - QF . - l.!li..U1 lll!i!!Il<.§. Spec:la1 Board of Directors Meeting 89' 9 1'8 Int ernati onal Higlnlfay Association, Inc .. Kanab, Utah; October 11, 1956 Pres ent: Presi dent Ray V.. steaart, V ce-President, Bentley Mitchell, i Secretary-Treasurer, rio G. Bass, Directors. F. 11 .. Sorgat z and &.lrnett A. Hen:lryx, and Executi ve Sec ret ary, Uartin H. Ca ntwell. The required nnjority President Ray V. s t ewart at 'ceina pr esent , th e meet ing wa s c alled. to order 7 :1~5 by P.ll. The first order of rosiness me a report regarding th e As sociation Director for the s t ate o£ Hyoming. It ltaS pointed out that due to the press of personal affa irs , Director Dallas A. Clinger, had been un.able to at tend any of the Board of Directorts meetings during the paat year, 01' perform any of the functions or fulfill any of the: obligations of the office. FoiloYli ne a discussion of tlle situation , it lias rtDved., by Vice-President M tchell ard seconded by D i irector So rgatz that t he \'Tyoming directorship be declar ed vacant ann that the Nominatin8 Conmittee be instructed to present the name of a new (\:ixector to serve the r~ ye.. r of the unexpired term,. 1 The rot ion VIas curried by a unal'liIoous voteo The Executive Secretary subr:titted a report of income derived from new and r enewal ~mbership for the period from Oct ober 1 , 1955, to October 1, 1956 , as clear ed through the Salt Lake Office,. A copy of the report 1e attach ed. hereto and made a p...-ut of the minutes. The ~~ c utive Sec r et ary r ead a report containing an accounting given by a3 to the outcome of t he sale of the IITreasure Trail ll recordeo This matter was tabled pending the action of the new Bo ard of D irectors . A coW of the report i s attached hereto and made a part of the s e records o tlr. Bernie ~"j11 H arns Secret ary Bass r ead the Treasurer's report f or the period from September 24, 1955 to October 10, 1956 , A copy of this report i. attnchad her eto and mad. a part of t hese minutes o EXecutive Secret ary , Martin Ho Cantwell, pointed out that tJ1ere was a disc repancy in ono item, bet'oleen th e report \mich he had pr esented and that pr esented by Tr easurer, 'J. Go Bass.. The report submitted by Treasurer Bass indico.t ed that 323 memberships t.L.:J.d been received fram t he Salt Lake Office during the peri od o Centl'l el.l' s report indicated that 337 mmber ships had be en r eceived at the So.lt Lake Offico and forwarded to Treosurcr Bass. Moved by Director Hendryx, seconded by Vice-Presi dent liltchell that both r eports be tabled pending audit. There be1.ng no fUrther business, the rooeti.tlg ad j ourned at 11:00 P.ll. R.'pectfully submitt ed. A~()~ ~cmo~H-- ltnrtin Ho Cant\": , Executive Secretary �- AUIlust 5, 1956 SUBJiCT. Report on sale of "Treasure TraU· recorda received by M. II. Cant....ll and BUl Bas. from Barnie WUl1Ulll On J~ 2!l, BUl Be.. and 1 celled on Baml0 ilUU_ at lIi ckanlnl1'& and reque.ted an accounting on the sale at the 3,000 record. and a .tatament at what plano, i t ~, 1Ir. W Uli... had tor tho t uturo proIlotion and aale at the record. lIbioh might result in the retum at lto inn._nt and expected profits to tho 89 'ere Association. 1Ir. WUlimD. stated that ha had attell:ptad to the best of his ah1llt;y to tbs sale of the recorda w1tltout .ucc.... Thil effort, Mr. W 1111am. oa1d, had involved tha opond1ng of oonaidorabl. in personal and that be theretoro did not feel obligated or juotil1ed 1n tha .,attar of IIIk1ng tl!rther ettort. H aloo s tated that ho had 1,000 rocord. mad. in e Spani.h •• bis own reoponalb1llt;y and project, and that be had al.o bean tmable to eell. the_. p~ota fUnd., In view of t he above, .... asleed that the remai ning llltoolc ot reaordl be turned over to tho A.eoelation. Following 10 the accounting gi ..... ' 1iHi!Rll TflE1 ARK NUlIBIlR .lOO • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • .lOO • • • • JiMf 11r1ak18, Nogal... Sonora, Mexico (Jan. 1956) TUrned over to BUl Be•• Jan. , 1956 RIQ" Stawart (Jan. ' 56) Radio Stati on IIDL~, Del Rio, Texu ( Fob '56) • • Radio Station IDl!H, C&rriao Sprin!!., Texas (Fob. '56) • • Radio Station lBCR, Son Benito, TeD. (-Job '56) 300 • • • • • • Radio Station IVOZ, Laredo, rODO ( Fob '56) 63 • • • • • • Sold by Bemie ..Uli..... Check tor i50 g1ven BUl Be.. 8/!;7 . • • • • • On hand at Tin Pan Alle;y, ..1ckenburg. The etock of records on hand. at Tin Pan mey were ~,OOO remoYed to La Si••ta IIotal and .tored by BUl 118. 1'h1. number wu said to be 887, hCJWe'ftr, no actual. count w&e IUd. at the tiM of ranoTal. .a it os l ate on Saturdq night. lIJO 50 lIJO 300 • • • • • • • • The reoord.. in posMseion of th.e yadou. radio . t.t iona ll atec1 abaft ftre l eft on oone1gDlu mt with theae stat1cna at 52 cant. per r eoord b.1 llr. Willi .... No flCOOunting at recorda: sold b.v &JV" ot the .. Radio Stat ion. was available. A receipt f or ••oh s t ock of recorda l eft, 81gned ~ sa. 1nd.1v1::hJal. oonneoted with tho Radio Stati on (no title given) ..... tumed ovor to tha Ao ooc1ation. Barnia WUl1omo stated that be had requelted the return at the cone1gnment recorda trom eome ot the Radio St.ations, but had received no action. a1ll a.•• , A••oci ation Treasurer, ruports 03.25.a tho total revenue received by the Aaoooietion to data frOOll reeord &ale .. Rep ort on Sale 01 "Treasure Trtil" Reoord. �October 10, 1956 TREASURER ' S REPORT Sept. 24, 1955 t o Oct. 10 , 1956 Balance , as of audit Sept. 24, 1955: Receipts from dUBS: Receip ts from record Sales: EXPENDITURES : Mr. C antwell , Professional. services : Yr. Cantl'f911 , l4embership .fees : 1Ir. CantW911, Petty Cash : Mr. C antwell , Travel Expense s : Directors I EJCPsnses : Club Refund. : COmmissions : Mi s cellaneous (Includes 30, 000 brochures and 3, 000 phono. records) $1, :::00. 00 323.00 1, 194.02 311.00 7&:J. 72 6S0.00 6SO.00 1.764.50 Balance on hand as of O ct. 10, 1956 : Respectfully submitted, William G. Bass , Treasurer Treasurer' s Report �. - • October FROM' TO s 8, 1956 M. H. Cantwell, Executive Secretary All Directors, Members and Auditing Committee SUBJECT'l Re-Cap report of income derived from NEW and RENE\olAL memberships for the period from October 1, 1955 to October 1, 1956 as cleared through the Salt Lake office , - mNTH 8 • 13 16 25 Mar. Apr. 11 May June July 18 9 20 Aug. --1 Sept . 129 TOTAL 337 INCOME $ 6 20 11 9 10 12 9 6 53 14 ~ 208 210.00 300 .00 165.00 330.00 390 .00 555.00 300.00 645 .00 930.00 510 .00 1, 005 .00 $5,340.00 14 20 11 Nov. Dec . Jan. Feb. VOIllNTARY TOTAL • Oct. THE TOTAL OF - RENEWAL NEW 22 26 37 20 24 62 34 67 337 ( includes Alberta $300) NEW and RENEWAL MEMBERSHIPS WERE SECURED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER, CONTACT THRU PERSONAL CONTACT CIllB EFFORT FIELD REPRESENTATIVE Bersanek _ -12 135 55 Cantwe11 _ 124 Misc . ___ 11 147 The TOTAL PAID_UP MEMBERSHIP as of October 8, 1956 is 449 (not including Al berta Go vernment) UTAH ___ . ARIZONA __ MEXICO _ _ mNTANA _. 60 lDAHO _ _ 58 ,IYOMING _. 33 124 164 CALIF • .__. 1 CANADA ._. 2 7 O fficial paId-up membership as of 1955 Convention was 445 (pl us 9 partially paid) The total of 449 members now carried on the books as IIpaid_upll will expire as follows : 1956 AUG • ._ ••. 36 SEPT • ..•.• 69 OCT • •_ 6 NOV. __ 1 DEC • .__. 55 19 FEB •._ .._ 29 MAR ••. _. 18 APR • •.• _ 34 MAY __.. 13 JAN • . __ JUNE _ JULY _ AUG. _ SEPT. _ OCT • •. _ NOV. _ 39 25 39 59 6 1 The 105 ..ru.ch expired the last days of August and September, 1956, but are still within the 60 days grace period are practical ly all in Club areas . A total of 167 (about 31% of entire membership) will expire on or before January 1, 1957 . Club Membership is as follows 1 BRYCE CANYON #1 _. __.. _ 25 GLEN CANYON #2 . .........__......._.__ SO SEVIER VALLEY #3 29 WICKENBURG #4_. .._ 35 BEAR LAKE #S 58 SALT RIVER VALIEY #9 32 THE FOLLOWING CHARTER APPLI CATIONS HAVE BEEN FILED: CACHE VALLEY #6 ...... SANPETE COUNTY #8 ... LIVINGSTON #7 _____ ( 4 (15 (14 members to date) members to date) members to date) All of the figures and information contained in the above report are according to the official records as kept at the Salt Lake City office, and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Respectfully submitted, MARTIN H. CANTWELL Executive Secretary � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 5564 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3353 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/985">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/985</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 2930462606 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Special 89'ers board of directors meeting minutes, October 12, 1956 Description An account of the resource Special 89'ers board of directors meeting minutes on October 12, 1956. Report on the sale of "Treasure Trail" records. The treasurers report for that year. Income derived from new and renewal memberships from October 1, 1955 to October 1, 1956. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Bass, William G. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource Accounts Tourism Nonprofit organizations Minutes and proceedings United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/12/56 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Kanab (Utah) Kane County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 6 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd6 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/2ca04ba90c9d8e4cc41e111e16175a7a.pdf c1ea54f6b6486be78c7fef118a9ac407 PDF Text Text • ( A.. n' "Ill Bo:-.X'c. 0:: 8~ t j)::'~el}to::J' !JOC"(i:' l13 ( I' D In':iol'!latiorul H~~:,,h\";ay A:;soci8.t:~oll) Inc" P:;;;'C"1p.!lt : PI'oGidcnt 3r...n"t:.ey F~ ·:; .. l:wl' J V;~_oa I':..::;:.s:i..dDn~-. l'l.'ncst R. Saran, VJc' "T'J~ :/i.(:~~t E.nd Scorc:ri:;IJ:'Y-'l': C~.sUl'C~ uila~J. .. (; il. 11cr'~in, ;:r.; J.;il'cC Go.rs P.: ul J .. ~:/ucv1.s,. H .. G. I11SS, :b:'k P'J.f);L:.r fJ, .L.xecut.ivo SCC1'etu:r;)o i!a.l'tin H. C ..!ltd''311 ':".!ld :r'3t;i l'5.1l? PI'(:r:idcn-:; Ray V. ut(r:m.~'·,;. Zl; ~_' oqu:l.r~d 'i,; .:: T30:1l'cJ of at. ~ : OO A.!:!. '.l..jor1t'J b~~.l:G p:;"Goaat the reGul ar :.nnl.'.o.l lleetlne of DL.... J':',... 's ";-'03 c·-.l~.ed ~(iO orilor by Pre s!den'i:; Bentley If dtchel l '£;10 :~_nrqc i :!.l '3ta.,ek~!l~"; ·f -:;11e Proillo bioll.i..J. COLrut t C0 \\'::1.8 l'ead by G[~tuell ; it; '\':)..r mev-rcd by Vic;) I"1:' 9siclcnt SD.~!lnJ o eoonded by ~' 2"12~3"·"<1cn·:" ".;Ur·~~~" :.1 "u lt ~u:LG rQ.p0x ·t bo a c ccpteu as · ::.~ iJGtel1 . ~ ':otion C.l'.i':t0(\. l~ copy of ·\ihi.s · ~?'jr· .. :i.s attochod hel'cto a nd .mn.do a pa1' t of .... 1l.ln ~-4;;os 0 S U1'O':; Xl ·n tho..se SGc:~'etary ~~'·-:-l['.tiva ·,f t hB Can·i;.:eli pOint ed out 1jhat unde:r t he t e:;:O!lls of his con t ra.ot s olicit a ti on of acivcrt 1nl Il3. c oruniss l ons nora not payablo UJ.""'. Gl l afto:.:' the monoy ho.d a o tual ly beon l' ooeivod fox dop os:1.t by t.hB Jomml t Gee Tl'(,Qs urer . Thio situat ion, Socrct::tl'Y Cant -,jelll co.t:J.Ilcntod, f:roquen t ly ore.;. tad £I. hardshi p ~. n v i eYl or~e a~.ry t::OU"l(;:. e:;{"penso and t h o p...'1ym.ent of a pcrtion 0)' i-;he CCJJ!ll.i~'.G1on 'GO s ;lb - Qccn~s. He xoquontcd the 30a;:>d to can Dider the p ossibility of eha,,<>i ng tho cont"ar.G in ouch a lcanno" e.s to permit tLe payment of ccr.iLlis sions on c.uly nU~Ghorizod adver ti.sing cor.t1"D.c t s i:·::..medi ateJ.y as they '''/el' S secured :rather than ,·/O.:..t lng untl:;" paynsn·i; of the ac.oount h!ld cl:Jsrc:i channels and accountinG rou t i ne. Vic'. ~':,esidonti Sa'~ :lr.. steted that in h:'i.s opini on ouch a p!' ooed ure 1"0 cl~sl2.'3.b l c uril. llo : n·t.;6d out. several cases ....ther ein G l ubs t ant i a l a d .. vt':"r·Gi::il!G 0ontl'G.cts cad boau e e c Ul'cd f r om Cham'Jor s of COJ.lrlOl'Ce and munlc i'P .1:i.tlcs .~";J. ·the Fr07inoe or £"'U~)e r ta ';,1161'e D.C~GUi11 pay.ment of the a ccount Idu1!:l 1:] U :·.ay~a dU3 to a.coour:tinc PJ~oc'3duros invo l ved in 1'1001 cl earano e <) 'Gh~... if(· '.cller • v.~)u.ld 1J'ol .. )\','in,; :;. b::olaf dis:n.s~ i ont Vic~ Fl'oai dunt Cha:rllo B. iJartin . Jr • 1 ·.;.:.w l'C.!..lO·:ling I'SSOl:ltion IlI!d 11 ;red thatj it "be ad op t ed b J the Eoa:::d cf Jil'3c·i;ors : .ii.':::'~·c-duc~ !!.,' SOL U T I Q ,,- B'l rr Ilr,sOLVED by t h o Be tid of Dl~Get or,l of "he 89 ' es3 I!lts r na·t l on;:). HiGhway A.'JO I n . , 1.:-10 . that the cOll:~::act;. oa·l:iwecn Hal' ·;;in H. Cnn~; \10 1 1 end 'i;his Corl)QI' x :;ion :?Gl'ta5.niD..:; '·;0 the 30licitation of a.d v ~?ti isil'-G s11.... 11 be a;..:,.e:lded ·to pl'Qvidc tha.t nll professional f ess and couniosions be coI:le pa.Y.:lble to ~ ,Ia.z'tin Iro Can·GlJOJ.l on a.ocOlmts r eco i vabl o upc n Pl'oso.:1t;ntion of n d uly author i zed Advol"ti sir~ Insor t i on Gx de r, pu:!" o.h::l.ee oruor ox oth er valid verifioation i.:lnica ti ng the n d ye l'~k1,16r ' s :1nt en t t o ass utlo l and suti nfyi;be obliaa'. i on , PROVDED AL',!.\Y3 that pr of e ssional fe es or COLl!:1:i.ssions, 11' a ny, pei d on aocounts rece ivab le as def i ned .. bo'!c ShDll bo a u,)j o ct t o r e f Ulld by 1.l""Un n. Cantl')ol1 i n ~ uch C'.:lSG3 i"!hcr~in pnynen t of t h o ac c ount i s in default ~tjo tho paint �b (lin~ d eOl:'lC':i u"Y.cc, llG c'~ablc, CY.d DE I'J.: F1.iTITIillR RESOLVED ·;ha:c. soid cO)li.' : u(d. ·.:;e o..w.er:.d.cd OI' rc\-iscd in f,uch forn as . ,0 c,c::rxy ol::fj tho l.~ u::.posc and !.n·t;cll'li 0::' ·th:i.s l'csolutiol1 a nd {.~i.'.nt 'Gl: e P;:'fJ3iJ,~r:i, and ~;ocJ:'0tnI':'-'" of' "I.ho Gorpol'J:Gion be !1. 1i;.:,hor:i.z{;",d to :J:".l (,"'J.t.e sa.'.:lC j~()J: '~,nd :tn th\) 1.:2!.J1C of the CorDO~~ '1"~iOll £'IntI e"':; i;a ',11 t.rJ1)~ oto t;h-::: Gor 'o:::,ut :;. -'r:' <'r 1 .. of 1]o':i('';2 to )et C~rGr Qnl ap~}~:~.\;] JcrIi~J b J' "',fico Prer::i- o!. iy r::hG .f:M·o1.;lu::.. 0:[' J( L .. in3 -1C:;;'O cf'lF!c·l;.'.V3 .('.:~"O ,·.....ud f-.:ouns :LOl' the 801ici.; ',·:,iC'! l of n3',J rJ.cr:,be!,,3::'~:.p ;M ';;:10 coll-J.(:ti0n of :i:'C ':'\':'1.:" du'3s uas t h en disn:5. c; '.-:-,::rJe.. .<\. dC'Guilcd ··':'or. ~.t. of 10ljbc~~n.hJ.p .::,c'~iv~:;;i,J;J uu.:o:inc; tho pus t yea!' h: ')~wn :'\.o·:in by Honth::; t.nu Q.1'oas in,licatcc. '(,hat !t COllDic1el'J.b l e portion of H3lJ.OCl'B.I.... ir iefuult 0 ~.:lUl'l·eG. J.n. loJ.<11 elul , U~3ilr.. It r:ns po i nted out tha'(j Uldi3l' l)rG,::;en~G [Jorl'o.nccmr.'llt!3the olubs rleI'e OUPP03CJ 'uO solic it n e t·! members'lip and c ollect r0n';nK~;. dues in Q:;.·do::·~' t.c earn ths .. j .00 r ef und on each i:.t."L'l.borship. In sevcxal COS8:1, hO\'l0V62'; c.v.o '1;0 :t.n,).deqy.ate organization Lld lenc~er shi'p at; lO Jal If.vo:lI J club mcul.boI'S woro becoming d c L~_!lque n·G past tllo loeal 60-day grE'.co pC:'.' ioJ. and vtore t;L(~o:rm:u 8Ui )jCCt 'GO ousponsion f·:,cm. tilE) organ.ization. It wa.s the COl:cm:S1..'.t of ouinion 'Gha.t paid i'io.:.d representa.tives \'lorl{i~lg tinder 8uper-,lisicn i·i~uJ.d do 1201'0 effeot ive job if some means oould he a d'Jv i ood to orgtinize 8ucb 13, system. aud at; tho saru.c tine pI'otect;. clubs ",.,thich 1 ~.d ('e~'Jons~tJratca. a vlillinc,nean to am:mme the r osponn ibl1ity of act ually cnning the xefu.nc"i . FolloYJ:;'nc ·;:;1:.0 J5_scu.~zi.:m , Vi c~ Pl';:)ziden·1i C:harlie B .. ~jaI'tin~ J:r. sub'·.Lt·t;ec:. t1l0 follor,:in,z rc,:.;olutlon and !i;oved thut it -03 edopted by 'i,;he Board o:~ D].):('c·~'J l' s : RES D L U flO --------_. H J:L I~ IISF.EBY E?::,'3(.LVEn by tll'3 Dcaxtl of Dil' uc'Gors of the 89'el's .:::'l1ationCtl :licllway ,:wsociation, Inc. that "i-;ho contract non ~~n effoc ~G l:ctu.)en til.is G::J1'p0:i.'ution and If.n!'tiD. H. Cant\"Je.ll , 1'ei;::.in.i nC th.e s0i:'Yi,~es of :,:B.1'tin H. Cc....'1t.wolJ. as Ezo cu·t;ive 8 0c1'e';ary and Dil'Gc·:jor of Public l!c:;..a·ciollS, be rev:lncd i n such a nanner as to ,P::ODvlde t :1.nt 80.5.(1 Un.:rtin H. Gantc:io:.:_ be assigned alld authorized to p:como·:.;a nnJ. .3uI-Gr'-ise a~.l ne1."/ oembership ef':::Ocrt and the ooll€.ction of ::cn8\!uJ. dUGE> .. l.1.nd 'vhat he be ftU'ther uuthOLtZDQ to a::..poillt; ouch ~/ub -a bC!nt•.:> as he sees fit and t o :L'lx tho l'(l.te of t:1P.::':(' ."}C~;:w::1.B':iian, PHCVIDr;D AL,j.AYS that 100.'3.1 clubs in good st3.ndJ.ng c.hall continue to receive as a refund the sum of :';5 . 00 fo!' O[loh u(r'l .ro.em1nrah1p fee a C'{jually collected by th8 al u.bs and ronit."t;e(.. to 'i;hn pal'ent organ'.zation onri a lilco amount of' rofund 1'01' CGcl:. renmral Llcmberahip fe e actuall y collecteJ. by th3 club UI:..l rO!1i'i:itod to ·Ghe parent organ izc.tion wi thin the fiXG,G 30 dE.;V9 fo} lcraing the expiration of :J.llj cuch mc:.a.bcrship and dUD date of the l'cncy;al fee. The clu.bs to for:~~it .).1}. ::lnirr. and ri3ht ·(-;0 tho .)5 .. 00 refund. on 0.11 ~cnevn l m.?!!.b~!,8.1.1p9 wiiC':i bCCO!i1e 30 da.ys delinquent and on any n!l.d all n ew meJuool'ohipa ::lOcu:,.'cd at Gouy tine by li£\rtin H .. CUI\twell ox his aGents in the tarritory cf tAe club, and BE IT FURTliER PLS,)LV".GD that ';;ho contl'a:J'~ i.:ie re~/ised in Buch manner as to ol.iminnte the l'!ta;-~cJ.l j.n:3 fee!! of Cl .. OO per member as provided for under ItC.)v Gnc.::!.ts of' i'irst PaZ'ty", ParElg.l'a.ph 1, and s ubsti:Cn~,~ - 2 - �• tu'oe in its place provisions t o the effect t hat Martin H. ' Cantwell shall receive, i n addition t o 'the (.;100.00 monthly feo for professional services rendered, a sales commiss i on and collcction fee equal '00 fifty per cent (5 0'';) of all m onies paid 'GO the Association as dues and fees f or e ither acti ve or asso ciate membership bot;h netl and r enEmal out of 'w hich club refunds eal'ned I n accordance wi th '~his resolution "nd commissions 'GO sub-agents shull be paid by lJar'Gin H. Co.nt'rmll , and BE IT : F'URTI1 .lJ"'R RliSCLVlm 'i:;ha t the co ntl'act 1' e fexred to shall be amended or r evised in such form necessaxy as to carry out the purpose and int e nt of this r esolution and 'that the President and SeCl'e'O:lry of the Corporation be authorizod to ex.ecuto samo fo~ and in the na.me of the Corporation and aff i x thereto the Corporation seal. The motion to ad.opt the foregoi ng r es olution was sec onded by Vice Pl'esident Er!!est R" Saran and carl'i ed by a unanimous vo'l;e . Vice Prosident Sa ~an brouGht up the matter of the accounting system in erfec ~\i and painted out 'G hat considerable lost mot.ion and delay OCCl.u'!'sd in the handling of ~!jhe CorlJoration fUIlds due to distanoes involved and th" necessity of transferring funds by <Jail back and forth bet'leen the Executlve Secretary , the COI'po!'at i on Treasurer, and the Promotion CoLlmittee Tre!lSlJIer ;cn order to achieve final distribution of the funds to the credit 01' ths proper account. nOlil It "ma the r e co!!l!Il.Ondation of Vice President Saran that a more eff'icient ,method be devised find in the support of this rec ommo ndation he introduced the foHoY/ing reso lution and moved that H be adopted by the Board of Direotors: RES 0 L UTI 0 N ---------- BE IT HEREBY P~S OLVED that the Boar d of Directors of the 89'ers International High'l'/ay ASSOCiation, I nc. a.uthorize and instruct JIfal'tin H . Cantwell '00 open a checking aocount, requir ing only h:ts slcnature, to be knm"lll as the "Executive Secretary Trust Fund " and that the Bross amount of all funds made payable to the Corporation or t h e Promoti on Committee thereof baing in payment of membership dues, advertising revenue , or other items on which a percentage is due Mar tin H . Cantwell be first deposited , in this trust fund , and tha t Marti n H. Cant\'lell t hen distribute to the proper COl'poration account, t he net amount due this Corporation or i ts Promotion Fund retaining his ear ned portion out of vlh i ch club refunds and sub-agents' commissions are to be paid , and BE IT F1fllTllER llES0LVED that the oertain r esolutions requir ed by a ny bank a uthor izing bTe.xtin H. Cantwe ll to open this account and to endorse, deposit, and issue cheolca aga inst funds made payable to 'this Corporation are hereby approved by this Board of Director s and t ha t the proper officere of the Corporation be authorized and instructed to execute and affix the seal of the Corporation to any such required resolutions, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the terlIlS and conditions of any contracts bet\'/een the Corporation and Martin H. Cantwell found to be in confl i ot with the provisions of this resolution be amended or revised in such form as carry out the purpose a.nd inten'l; of this resolution and t hat the President and Secr etary of the Corporat:ton be authorized to execu'te same for and in the name of the Corporntion, and a ttach thel'eto the Corporation seal. - J - �, TAO motion to adopt the foregoing re&ollttion ''''8 9CIlOnded b:r Direotor Baas al..i.J caI'!'iod u.na:o.1mously. It was t h e concenaus of "pinion that a set of by-laws should be drafted covering the funotion and operation of tho looal clubs. Pl's:s1d.ent Mltcb,elJ. o.?,<:,oi:r..ted a. o onm5_:~tr;.o ('.:)!131.)·~in?, of Exccut1~ Secretary Cant\"lell, Chail'~.r_; f ~ __-:.,.;ct(lr ::ar.., ~ . ~:rte, and J"aokson Hole Club President Fred Rauchens tc dxaft a prOrOseo. set of by-laws for presentation to the Boaxd of. Dil'ectors for flnal approval. Vice Prasident S""- ,u: sroka briofly regar'!ing. the prCiposed goodwill tour into Alberta Lhi:; spring o.nd s tated that he would aeolUS add l tio""l Informtion and " ork ·!!!.th Cl:.al'lie 1:artin in Montana to f ur ther develop the plans. Director Chlll'lio B. IJari,in, ;[1'. extended a verbal invitation ° Cille Board of Dil'ectoj.s "i.;o hold the Foul'~;h Intel"national Conventi on IJ.vlncston, Montana next ..,-ear . He s tated that the matter VJoul d be OUS30o. Ylith the Livings'COll Ghalllb e!' of Commer ce that the formal invitation would be issued. = A.M. to at dlswritt e n There being no furthe r b\lllinesG t lle meeting was adj curned at 11 : 30 !.!artin H. Cantwell Exeoutive Seoretary - 4 - �r FINANCIAL STATEI.1ENT Hi ghway 89 International Promotion Fund RECEIPTS - All Sources EXl'llNDI'l'URE DISTRIBUTICN 05 .217. 00 Ad vertising Dues Premiums - Foreign Ex.ohange 375.00 4.28 800 .00 Loan frOlll Corp. ';6, 396.28 'rotal Depos its Gash on Hand Reoeiva.ble :lefundable Drawing Acct . Total Assets 'fo'tal Expenditures ,)1 4,20. T. 2,2523. 612 Ow 375.0 .-~' 04,660 k RE- CAP OF NET WORTH ASSETS .~ COOU!lts !J. H. Cantwoll - Refundablo D"a\'ling Account U.H . Cantwell - Earned Commissions I.liso. Printing So Supplies Uemberahip Fees Transforrel1. to Corporation .-1 , 736 . 12 2,040. 00 Total ABsots Liability - Loan from Corporation 1 ,420 . 77 ::15 , 196.89 Net l'Io1'th Submitted October 9. 1957 Bentley M itchell, Chairruan and Tro<lsurer 1!artin H. Cant\lell, ExecuUve Sooreta ry :')5,196.0" 800 . " . �( OFFICIAL :IIN UTES A epacial Board 0::' D:trcct.ors J.r.3eting 89 ' ers Intornatl.onul gl.gb.way Association, Inc. Afton, rlyom1nll; Ootober 8, 1957 ~\. opeoial n:'3etinr, of the new Board of Directors ' as called by w :..'p.t1rine pzoesldent Ray V. stewart; d il' cctly follevring the close of the 1,ierr,bership meeting on 'lluesday, October 8th. Present: Vice Presi dent Bentley Mitchell, Vice President Ernest R. S.::::.ran , Sec-:-:'etllry-rheasurer 1'10 Go Bass, Directors Paul J. Stevig, Charles B. lbrtln, Jr., uaTk Pugmire , and Executive Secretory Mar tin Cant' ell. Tho only item of business on tho aBenda ,vas the orcanization of tho neW' BO::ll'd and election of the ASsociation officers for the new year. Tho Chairman called for nominations for t he office of President of tho Association. Dir ecto1' Saran noninuted Ben·nay ~l1tchell for the offico of Pres i dent. It "'as moved by Director Martin , Seoonded by Jirector Pucmire t hat ~h e nominations be closed and that the Se cretory be instructed to cast the unanimous ballot in favor of Bentley "litohell. -lotion carried .. Vi ce P:ccD~tl3nt E!'ncst Saran ,ms nonina.ted by Dlreotol' Stevig to 5(>1''":e a seoond t€lr~11 e.3 northern Vice Pl'oa ident. r-;; v,ras m oved by ?·'oocdent-eleet Bentley i.!! toheD. and Sooonded by Director Pugmil'e that t:lC: He cizu_tions be clo~ed and -Gha:t the Sccret.:ll'Y be instruc ted to cast 3. tu:I'Jlimoi.!s b;:"_llot hl fayor of ,.,100 President cr>I':::,~.cd l~rnest R. Saran. 1,iotion • Di:::'cc:tOI- Char lie B .. r,Iurtin I Jr . was noninated by Vice Presidentell c'~ Sal'ar.. fOI- the off i ce of southern Vice President . It was moved by D:lreC'"0X PUC',ixe and secondeCl. by P:rosidon·~-e l e e ·~ Bentley !.!itchell tho.t the nomin!ltions be c!.osed and that tho Se c re·~ar y be instructed to a. unanir:1ous b~llot in favor of Charlie B. IJartin J Jr. I.1ot l on C;:U:!'G c3.rl'iedo Nominations for "Ghe office of COI''poratlon Scoretary-Treasurer ,'Iere next in order. Director U. G. Bass , one of the founder s and incorporators of the Association, has hel d this important offico f or three s uccess ive ter ~~o Dlr e otor Bass stnted G~~t in his opinion he could do a mor e �f job of build inc up the ol'Gnnizatic..~ i:1 30uthern Arizona. and incroa.siU3 .'lombo:o;onhip in tllr3 '\.'icke nhU1' G t:9' e~'n C.,.ub l:.'hich he Ol'eanizcd if ho CQuld be l'nlit:ved of tho reoponoibiJ.i+ ~.u::: ooincident to the offic o of Corpo.rn t icn ;:)ocrotary- Tl.'ousw.'Cl' .. e~:u,:rt.f.ve Vice "?reshlen t - elec';'; :jh:,!'lle . j . ' ~rtir, ~'l .od thQt h'J \'lOul d voluntoer to serve the CO~'porat. i on c.S I t s .:..:.Jl'e"i;ury-r.i.1:rcClSUI'E)! if s uch notion \'wUld not conflict '71th 'the 'Ly- lauz. (lU'tia l e 5, Section 1 of t ho by-la\/s provides that " t \'i Q or noX'e offio1S Ii1:ly be held by the s ame per~on't ) • Cba:rll0 B. Martin , Jr. 'O'ias thon no.:ainc.'Ged by Dl rcctol' Bass f or t ho of fic o of Sc cr o t al'y- Tr0u s ~er. 1'1.. ;"/U.S loved 1I;r jJil'octor .Pugc.1r o, sooonded by Dir ect or Bass t hat t he nominati ons bo S(3Cl'Gtar y b o ins t ruct ed to cas t a unanimous B. Marti n, Jr. M tion car ried. o ~)o.lJ.ot Glo~ed and t hat the ir.. favor 0:: Charlie There be i Il{l no f ur tho:o business, t ho moetIng rlas ad journed a t 4 : 30 P.if. Mal'tt n H . Cantuell Exec ut ive S·,;cretal'Y ~ 2 - �L 9 ' e r s I i. T ~L ~ ~ ~ A ii"~{):.:: >1. H. Cantusll ~O: I I 0 L A L H I GH of ~ Y A S D H. I li C. Officers and Directors -jU3J . . . CT.: October 4. 1957 Report on J'lc:;::son Situation On July 9 I went to Jackson for the purpo.r.e of assistinG the lOCE!l Club \':ith pro.·convent i on ,:.Jl:1.!miL.3, v.hich I fiGured CQuld be \"Jorked in duxing the r,:ee!;: or so I had )lanned to s:Dc:c.d lininc up support for the Brochure. '.5 it ttu'ned out) hCf,"1,:'!vcr , D. full L!onth rlC.S conSUL1ed before:: Convontlo!1 rlnr.s hud re:.lchcd. .::l st~tus . . lhich I considered sufficl'3ntly secure 'vO t'_~lrriJnt rrry leaviu.::; for Canada. In br ief f -t;he .!D.3.in reasons for the lone dlulln out visit al'¥: {A} - Duo to ;-1'1068 quoted by the l{ort Hoi;,ol, \"16 found it iml.~~s5ble to use the notol facilities for the Conv6ntio:1., and !~r.(~ to e'lter in-co arran:,;cIllcnts wi t h the hl!:ts Lodee. Decisions on this ·lieI'C del,:,;yed dU3 to tho fuct th3.t key Elk Officials v/ere Ol'.t of t?vm . (D) - 'rho SO<lson was in full avling, and it \V.:lS pra.ctlcally impossible to Get even a u cO~.i!'.dttec. R~l l group together for the purpose of ~ever3.1 such meo:;,tincs \/tUS finally held, orcanizin3 hO\'jevlJr \lith little or Lothing being definitely accomplished unt!.l tho first woele in '~u~ust - one 1!.oDth after roy arrival . (C) - The 89' ers Club l',).d eeen set up as an intregal part of the Chumber of Commsl'ce • •• 1.he same £.et of officers and direotors to Ser7G botll o!'r,::lnlzaticns . '2his ur:anGcmcnt rcde G9 t or business everyono' s rssporl.sibility if a vrtgue cart of \KJ.Y, ~'1ith no one in :Qa.rtlculal' to 1001<: to for l eadership e:~cel)t the C. of C. Prcsident and 30cr~­ tUl'Y. The President . I am told , \'::;,'~n't 67sn SUI'S no to oxactly viA,arc the Ch'uber office is 10C:1 ted. t crr..:i tl-tn Gecreta.ry- I.Iano.3er. r~. '.,'e·J.teI' .i. Kirlt.""; \J3.S ne,J on th.e job, inexporienced in ChaLl[;;JI' 2XOcoJure, anJ up to his earn in problems. I found !.ll' . Kir~ 7e~y cocpsratl ve in .m.:iny \'J-J.ys J btrc reluct.ln'" to reco2,nize ·')nu accopt his responsibility as the Jo.:!:::'ct;o.ry of the Jacl~son 89'Cl'!l Glt!b) and as such, tho losico.l mOon to assume lsnuership ana folle':J throllGh on Con~rcntion arranGomonts and 'promotion at loca.l ldvel on behalf of tt_6 host Club. ~i'lnally, the first ',JE-ok in ':\Ui3US-~ Vie did h.lve a faIrly sat~.s:i'c.c-i;ory meetinc, durins naich varivus .rackson members vol unteoI'od to serve on CO!!lmi t·~ecs. Registration ::'ees J proGrams t menu. speakor and guest list wera aGreed upon. The ChancoI' electj.on \"}us dUEl In a few days, and tho list of volunteer cO!.1Lli ttuCluen \·;as to be present.ed to the incoming Presidont for official apPOintment and follo':I-th2'u. �r 6 7 1 nw:.; ; '£0; e r s :J~ I~. T ~ ~t K \ ~ H. Cantwell I 0 If d L H I G H or ~ Y ASS N. I ~ c. October I.. 1957 Officers and Dir.;cto"s OIl J-uly 9 I \'lent to Jo.olcaon tOl' th.~ plli-:I'0:e of assiDt~.nG tr.e loc~J. Club v:itr pre-convention :) 1 3J~ i IJ.G, ddch I !iGnrod could bn HOj,'1:ccl :~n dur i ng the weel~ or so I had ~<!..annGd to sr~nd lininc up suppo_·t roj;' the B:i.' ochurc.. '..9 j t tLi.l'ned Qut, ho;'/I3ver, a full J..!onth l"lJ.3 consut:l6d before Convon~liloll pIons he.d reached a status \,lhich I consldcI'!";d suffici ently zec:.cro to rnrra.nt fJ.-y leavinc; for Canad.a. In triGf (A) - the main reasons for thr lone drm',::l ou.t visit are: to pr ices quoted by the t':ort Hotel, \'Ie found. it impossible to usc the hotal facilities for tlie Convention, and had to enter into al'r ~ llJemollta witt. the ~lk!3 Lodge. Dec i sions on this Vlere ;JUQ delayed due to the fnot th;1t kay Elk officials ",Iere out of town. (B) - The season wa.s in full m'ring. and it was pr<lctically impossible to get even a Blll.:.;,.ll i.FouP tOGether for the purpose of o:=ganizing n co,;,.;..ll ttee. ~leVerQ l such neet1n.gs i1Gre finally held, hOYlever "lith little or nothinG beinf~ def'initol~r accomplj,shed taltil tho first vmelc in .~UBUS·t - ana flonth af ter my arr iva l. (C I '. The 89' ers Club had baer. sct up us an intregal lart of tl.e CJlI""be~ of COlr.m.el'Ce ••• the same set of officers and dire ;torz tc serve both org~nlzations. 'Ihis ar:..'allgo!I1ont m.:;.de 39'01' bt:.siness everyone's responsibility in a V:l.guo sort of Hay, "'lith ne one in :r-.:.rtlcul'lJ' to look to for leadership CXl:CIlt th.e C. of C. PI'esident an,: ::;ocretr-lxy. The President J I am told, \';,J,3n t t even suro as to oxactly ..:aero the Chamber office is loc'lt.isd J ~:l th~ Uecret.:lry- l.ia.ooBar, ;',ir" '..'al tel' .I. 1Cil'lt~ \l'l:3 no\} on th3 job, inex'1el'ienced in ChD.L:bcr -)1'0ceduro, and up to 11i3 03.1'3 ill proble::1S.'- I found .l~ . Ktr..g voi.~y oooporati va in many vJ.ys, bUG :celulJt'!!l":. to recoBuize and accopt his responsibility as the ,:,;ccretary of '!;he Jackson 89'e1'3 Cl ub, and as such, ttc 10nica1 man to assume leadership and folIo. .·,' thro'l.l;3h on Convention arru.naoments and pl'omot1on n t local 1e1'e1 on behalf of tJ,o host Club. the first ',':Ee~' in ~hleust VJS did have a fairly satisfactory !16I3tinc, duxinS I.'lhich various J ackson members ,.,oluntzcr ed to serve on COJD.nti t.tees. ReeJstra tien fees J procrams , menu, Dpeakcl' a nd guest list Wel'e acre·3d upcm. The Chamber eleotion \'/0.8 duo In a fe"1 days, G.!ld the J. i st of vo l unteer .:!onmltt~0mcn \':<.L9 to be presentod. to t-.Jle incomi.1lg President for o:i'i'icle.l appoint~'1e!1.t and follow·,thru, ~1nally, �• ( that this Board Viould insist on the Jackson Club beinc taken out of the Ghamber of Co.wnercG, and organized as a separate unit Wlder the terms of their cmI'tor . He and J?red Hauchens nssUl'ed me that this "lCuId be <lone 3t once, and 'H i tIl this understanding I went on to _lfton. leaving our Jllch:s on G9'ers to clean thai!' mill house. Fr od Ho.uchcns violted lllB in Afton Thursday, to l'epor't th:lt the house- cleaninc job, althouGh a little messy at times, had been thoroush. J a c !~s on The 89'01'8 Club haD boen orGanized, and offic ers elected. The Jo. clmon Hole ~lotary Club has indol'sed the 89'ers ~'lssociati o n, and pledged support to the :~fton Convention. A deleca J.;ion 6x'pGotcd to number about 25 :ropresontinG both Jackson orGanizations riill be on hand in Afton Tues- day. 'rh o net', lly organized Jo.ckaon Hole D9 ' aI'S Club "Jill funot;ion as the Road ":::o.!Jmi ttiee for both the Chamber o.nd llotal'Y Club t but uill othelY/ise be entir ely independent of both . : I h::1.ve .:l,.lOured Olll" Jaokson friends that, hovina cleanod their cun house, the inc ident is cloned as far os \Je nre concGI'ned, and tha·t they need .eoOl!' n o Gl11b:lI'rassment on Tuesday . At.my sUGGestion, II per s onal invitation vIa s mailed to each Ja.okson 89'er by OUI' hosts the star Valley Club, ': 00 ,_ "red Hauchens reports an excellent react i on . C of C ROAD COMMl'lTEE PROTESTS CANCELLATION OF Iter CONVENTION In an unprecedented move, the Secretary of the J acksoq's Hole Chamber of Commerce withdrew at the last minute the invitation issued on May 14 to the Inter~ national Highway association to hold its annual fan meeting here, The meeting was scheduled for Oct. 7-8, and Afton, Wyoming, is now taking over the mammoth job of getting out aU new pro. grams. advertising, invitations, etc., in two weeks. The Jackoon's Hole Chamber of Commerce appealed. to the 8ger Association last faU to help in the fight to keep 89 from being routed. through Idaho and West Yellowstone, and also to keep the road open through Yellowstone. The association was of great assistance, and 8 local 8ger Club was formed within the Chamber of Commerce. This was a mistake because if the net: Club was out of the Chamber we could have gone a1tead and sponsored this meeting without having to depend on ~ the Chamber of Commerce. , Reasons for withdrawing the invitation?-SomeG1le might have to exert '8 little effort to entertain the visitors. Local members wishing to attend the convention should contact the Afton 8gers club. -Chamber of Comrri.erce Road Committee From The Jackson Hole Guide 8~ers Reorganize To Fight BaiJdiDg Of Proposed Green 1'imJJer Road ~~ineesmen and government the three excess of 5000 well paved miles nations of North America will !lorth and south, giving convenconverge on Afton as delegates to Ient access to fifteen National the two. day Third In~rnational P~ks, and countless major tecreatl on~1 ~on.ven~lon of the 8gers Internat_ Amenca.areas in western North 'th°nal Highway Assn. which opens ere October 7. • •• . Major items on the agenda The .Jackson Hole 8gen Club Include the Association', current was reorganized at a meeting $40,000 promotional program and held Wednesday noon at the Wort ~rts on progress being made Hotel. Newly elected. otricers are lD the five state project to secure Fred A. HOuchens. president. all year north-south travel thru 1':aul Han~ 1st vice presiden": Yellowstone Park. ' Jun MercllI, 2nd vice presidenf . The ~ree nation 8ger highway Clyde ~f'90n, 3rd vice presiden~ . .system tncl~ U.S. 89 thru Mon- and Mike Hawkins secretary<. ~a, Wyommg, Idaho, Utah ' and treasurer. Twenty-fo~ mernbeQ Anzona. MexicQ.'s newly pa...ed attended the meeting; coast Route 15 continues south M~ay and Tuesday a large ~rom ~ogalea, on the Arizona bor- deJ?pbon of Jackson 89Vrs, ROo er,-'to Mexico City. Canad.a's AI- tanana, and Chamber ot Com~r ta Route 2 fonns the nortbern m~ are going to Alton to ask hnk'- h:om t'he Waterton-Glacier the 89 Convention to help JackInterns.tional Peace Park to con_ son fight the extension of U S nect With the A laskan Highway 191 from Ashton to Flagg RM~ a t pawson Creek, on the Alberta- thereby bypaSISing Grand Teton Bntish Columbia border. r PlU:.k and..Jackson. - _ _ _ _..J The entire syStem comprises in . offl~lals representing 'will , (October 3, 1957) - 3 - �, ( ( Spec i a l Board cf Dirac'Gars MeetillG PfBsent : V:tc(~ F~:nsid 31,"; Bontloy ::a tonell J Vice Pl' oside n t :SY':t.6St S:.:·:nll t SGcr eta=cy-'l11'-",'lSUJ.'Ci ·1~ G. B3.fJs; Dil':;ctors, Frank ;I. Sorgat z, PnuJ. J. 8t "Jv1~, Cha l'l L~ 5. 1.b:~ i:.in" Jr. ~ and Ex: cutive Secretary ~..ta.rtln Gantv:ell. R~ Th0 requi r ed n..:1jl):rity being presen~GJ the sp~ci::\l ,J!:3eting of the of Dl1'octc:'s "1O_S culled to order at. 2:20 P.:; .. by V:!.ce President H8ntley '.Iitahell. ~30ard Vice P1'6siden.i:j :.iiti c:1.elJ. read 0. letter from. Frc::.:;ident Ray V. Stewar t , uhe had been unavoiuc.b).j" dcl.:t:.rod, Q.utho:d.zinG Vioe Pl'Gsi:lsnt :t1.tcholl -:;0 conduc t the aft'a5..t::, ~I -:,110 _~...s:)oc:la.tion in iis abscnca. In vi ew of 'tho f~ct tho.i; tho .m.iliU'i,;oS of tho previous Board meeting hold at '\ftOD_s \1yOmJ.llB on January 28 c....nd 29, J.957 hud been submitted to ~n1 studied by tho Jire.otOl'B, Vice Pxesident :Utohe·lJ. en"tertnlned a '..!.o~~ion tha.t reading of the ~ninuteG be Buspended flnG. that they stand n.,tprov..:;d us \'ll'i ttell.. It lo'Ta.'J 80 JI1ov·~d by Direc" 3oI' rJartln t Seconded by Dirootc!' 3t~vi3. ![oti')n cnI'r.~ed.. 'l'r.t3 Pl'o.::notlon Co.,ruttee repol'ted tbn.t o..p",Toximate l y .J7000.CO vml'th Qf cdv:-rtis:L!lG hs_d oec:), ~Gcur!,.;J ~_.() dat.=t !.n .311.I' ,oxt of the brochure, and e:l1ff a t- :lof Sl.lrn:!lllr:r ot t~1G o.Xe~L1 covcL'sd and. 'olicit.ntio:t yet to be eO.nduct?d ~ 3ro · )ia.l minu·t'~3 J:on.taln::.r.~; "h::l 1'3pcrt 0,1 three Ind:t-vidual proposa13 ' t rlhich hen ')':011 pl'eD,!Zl'~'Jd to t~w. l!oo.rd. for act.i.c'n by nuil ballot v"isro :~c:ld. H.1.l}"lng ::'ccel>"ed '~hs neJe: S~.xy tV'iv--thi.r.'iS m3.jor.:i..ty with noncGatlv'3 hallot::. b3ine, 0a.3"G .. eQ.oh of the pro.l)os'lls had Jce::.:J. udop~(jcd iiY n unanmous ,,\,.)t€. r"i; ''0"'8,;:; !loved by DiI'~ct;0;c' 3crG9. t , Seconded by Di:;:occtor Stevie '::;hat thesG special fJi::lutes .3t::!.t"lU approved. ~,~o-'~5_o!l. cn.J"2'1<.~t!" A copy 01' oaoh of those ',;hree sp<3c.ial m~.nu-i:i'J'J le attach":lcl llCl'ctO nnd booo;11es a part hcreofo 'rhe anna..'11 fillan"J i o.l re)ort of the corp0!'at i on "lU~ read hy SecretJl'y-Treast!I'er \;. G. :8o.5R, followed by' the:;; l:xscut 1vt:I ~~c(;l'etary'f) finnnc:in i ropo:ot. It lias r.l.o\'ud by j)i l'sctoI' 3tc.vig J Seconded by Direc t or 11al't in that. theso rr.:lpo:-:'ts be "'iled p-'3nt~illG a.udit~ :.iotiOll clll'rled" It ,'JUS Lloved 'uy J irec tor ~-~'lrtilt Secondf:'.d by Director Saran that tho Eor.rd. Of l)ircoto:..'s approve tL1.6 purchc.se of B. \'lris·twatch to be preoent3d to Qutc;ci'3.g :'?1'6sidarrt Huy Vo St~vJart and a golcl mesh bag for Hrso StCitJ.Xt<> .. :ot i on oU:i:' ~ :ted" EX'3C;J.ti"C"e Secretary lJart:i.n Cant'\lsll suhm itted a . . ;l:'ittell report outlining eVJ::lts and c:.l'OUJ.l lstance3 coiucident to t.he moving of ·the Third AnnuaJ. Convention f ~·Ojn. Jackson, Wyomi ng to P-..fton, a copy of ";'lhich is attfJ.ched hereto and 11~.je a 'pa.:::i. of these minut.::lS D �• r It 'waD moved by Vi ce Pl'Gsidont S:.LJ:'::',ll" Sc·;ondcd by Di ::'G ctor I::lr~:;ill that the o ut 30 i~ BO,1.1'd of D i :::,oc'~ors e.::tend a votG of' t hanks ~m::1 ccnfldcllcC to the :'r olD.otion CO.:J.m.i ttGe and 'i;o ExecutivE) Scoreto.ry ~'!!lrtill C:J.n'tu e ll in l'ococni tioil of the . "'''!lotio!lal proGI'a:n. :otio:'1 Dl·("G~r::;.'·:1 Ii'..'1dc to datG on ~Jl.C ')<lJ:7.'i.';d" ViJ0 ?rcniden.t :itr)hcl~. appointc:.1 Di::'~ot'Jl' Frank SOl'g "G Z, Ch:J.l'l!.e :rart i n, a nd Pc.~.l. l S '~:'~- i G a.s a CGnr:i1~ t oc of t,hroe -to act vlith ~· ~J:cCt:.ti'I!3 Sec11..'ltiary C.::n"Gi:oll in -;:;1l'J !llL.ttcr of ~onf'iX'Dli ne convention c~:t(::t'~_r:D c ontract s bc"l,ncc12 t h 0 Ansociut~_:)n 'In'~ the Va.ll eon Hotel. Tha ~ G being no fu:;:t;hor l)usiness, t he l;.:lO P .. M. l y s ubmi He<l, Ihrtln H, Cantvle ll ;~xe cut 1vo Socr e t a ry I - 2 - J.e:. "Ling \'Jas o.djoUl'n ed at �, ( ( 89 • er s INTERNATIONAL HIGHVIA Y .~S OCIATION. INC. QF FIQIAL IJ INUTE§. On SeptembeT 22, 1957 and in t he Eannex prescribed by the Cor noration by- l o1'ls a ballot vIan cir culated to a ll Officers and Dlrectors- of this ASBocinticn via fir.3t cl ass mail, r e questing a vo t e on the following " question : \l'm!."'RE~i\S , for Good and s uf f i cient r eason it has become adviseable to hold the Annual lJee"OillG of the :.!elllbership and Third Interna tional :Jonvention of the 89 t ers Internat iona l High\'l6.Y' :\.Ssoc i ution. Inc . i n tho City of .'U'ton. l"Iyolll1ng instead of Jackson,. ~'Jyom i ng as has been pr-: vio1!sly planned, NOll THEREFORE BE I T lllliOLV- D , that t he Exe cutive Secretary £ be instructed and. aut hQ i zed to proceed vlith all necessary r al'rancemcnts requi l'ed i n chanGi n.3 the Convent ion to Afton, and that he be a ~ tho r ized t o tra vel to Afton on or about September 28 , 1957 to ass i st i n final Gonvantion arr angemants . and that he a l s o be instr ucted to notify the Offi cers and :,!cmbor n of t he Jac kson Hol e 89'ers Club r egar ding the dociDi on of this Board. HavinG received the necess ary two- t hi rds major i ·~y. with no negative ballots be i ng cas t . t I-le !!loti on ',"las c arried 0 I:.artin :-1. CantvleJ.l ~Wf4~ Execut ive secretary ape c ial Board of Dil'ector s Idea ting _ 1i'ton. HyonillG, Oct ober 6 , 1957 It ·VIes moved by Di rGr'Gor Sor ea'Gz , Seconded by Dir e ctor St evig that th'2 :lbovo minutes be a:Jprovcd 0.8 rea.d . :,Iotion carried. 2os,octfully Submiti;ec l Exeauti Vel Secl'etary �• 89' ers DlTBF.NATION.\L HIGlrii 'lSSOCIATION. DlC. I!INUTES On July 31, 1957 and in the nanner prescribed by the Gorporntion by-lans a ballot \1o.s circulated to all Offioers and Direo'tors of this .\ssociat i on via first class mail, :requesting a vote on the follm'; ing question: Shall the contract bet""oen the 89 ' ers International HillhYffi.Y \98'n •. Inc. and _.Iartin H. Cantuell relatlIlG to the conduct cf tho AssocL.itlon t s cU:Cl"ont fund solicitation be amonded in such a mannor as to provide payment to ;~rtin H. Cantwell of a so.les oOLunisoion totalillB 5lf,;, said percsntG.Cc ,t o n)ly O:t<.'LY in such cases r:hel'ein Hartin H. Cantnell is required to pay a portion of his co.tam1ssion to il sub"'O,ccnt. The 33 1/3~ CowniDsion nO\1 specified in the a.forosaid (';ontract shall continue to al)ply on all adv6rtisillG revenue and membership fees sold \/herein no coupission to n sub-a3ent is involved. HavinG received the necessary two-thirds .I!llljorlty, ballots bei!.l6 cast, the motion \\""dS carried. \'/itl~ no negative l;artin H. Cantwell ~~ Executive Socretary Special Roard of Dirac'Gors M':lstin,3 ..'!..fton, ',:yomJ.n3, October 6, 1957 It 't'i.J,O moved by D:.rec·i;or Sor3atz, Seconded by Director Stevig that '~he "1bove Sd.Ilutcs be ap.;.:.ro7cd as read. ;':o~vion ca.:.'l'ied • .~lr Gub,dt ted :::ecutivQ ~~- �· . r 89' or s INTERIU TIONAL HIGlmAY ASS O C ~~TION, INC o OFFIC I A L MI NU T ES O May 27, 195 7 end i n the manner pr es cr i bed by t he Cor poration n by-la\,ls a ballot was c i r c uJ.a t ed -Co a l l Offi cers and. Di rec t ors of this Association via f i rs t ol ass mail, r equest ing a vot e on the follovJing ques t i on : Shall t he Annual Members hip Mee t ing and Inter national Convent i on of t,he 89' ers Intel'M'tional Hi ghway Asaoc i ation , I nc. be held at J" a clrson Hol e , W yoming on Oct chel' 7th and 8 th, 19577 Hav ing r e ce iv ed the n e CGssar~' t wo -th i rds ma jor! ty , wi th no negative ball ots being cast, the mo t i on 1/,18.8 ca.xri edG r~rt i n Ho C ant well Execut i ve Secr e tary **********:jo: Spec i al Board of Dire c tors Meeting AftO ll , W yomi ng , Oct ober 6, 1957 It v,'as moved. by Di re ct.ox Sorgatz, Se conded by DirBctol' Stev ig that the above .mJ.nut eD be approved as r ead . Motion car ried . Respectfully S ubmit"ted \I/'N¢/Ji;OMk etary iuniSe cr ~xec ut iv e � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4369 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3379 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1001">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1001</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1979801823 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers board of director meeting minutes, October 9, 1957 Description An account of the resource 89'ers board of director meeting minutes, October 9, 1957, welcoming the new board members and Bentley Mitchell as President, attached resolutions, financial statements, and a report on the Jackson situation. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource Accounts Tourism United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/9/57 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Afton (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 9 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd9 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/d296703931166e2bcec65dc8005fe2b7.pdf 588a1f9c80394c1a7845bf7fb837259e PDF Text Text Qrr.!£.Ii1: 1U.!il!!:i<§' Annual. Board of Directors Leeting 89' era Internatior.al 1Ii3h'\:a.y ... ssociation, I nc. Kanab, Utah; October 13. 1956 Present: President, Ray v. Stmlart; Vice-President, Bentley l:itchell; Secretary-Treasurer, n. G. Bass; Directors, F. H. Sorgatz and '&J.rnett A. Hendryxs and 2x.ecutive Sec retary, l:a.rtin H. Cant\'Jell. The required nojority being :pr esent, the reculD.:t' annual meeting of The Board of Directors l'1aS called. to or der by President Ray V" St ewart a t 9: 00 PM. rinutes of the Special D irectors J':1OVed by Burnett Hendryx and a8 read, Cotion caITied. S8C(.Inded ~ecttng of Ontnber 11th were read. It was ~1. Sorgatz that the minutes be approved by F. Executive Secrct~ Cantwell rend a proposed dr hl"t of a letter to Director Dallas .\. Clinger Dotti'ying him tllat the W:rcm!ng dir""torship had been declared vacant. It Has JWvod by Bontley l.lltchell ani seconded by n. Go Bass that the letter be approved as read. }~otion carried. ltlnutes of the Special Directors lieeting of Ck:t cber 12th \'fero read. It was llOvsd by :J. G. Bass am seconded by Durnott A. l!endryx that the minutes be approved as read. 1.'otion carried. . President StswArt announced that tno contracts betv;een the association am &Kecutive S ecr~ta.ry C.:mtflell \1ould expire with the adjoummant of this annual meeting an::l co.lled for a. discussion pertnining to the :"9'lewal of these contracts . The President expla1ned that contr oct III "'a8 an agreement \U1der the teI'IllS of which the association agreed to retain tho acrvices of llirtin Ho Cantwell under the title of uSxecutlvo Secretary and Diroctor of Public Relations. tI President stewart. explained that Contract /ll contained clauses \U1der which it could be cancelled by either party during its terms Wlder certdn c:ircumstances and in certain proscribed manner. It was also pointed out that Contract #1 contained a olo\1(le ,itioh \;ould perr:dt it to be omended "t """ time tnrougbout tile life thereot by DJJtual cone:ent of bC),Ul ~ic:;. In th.o:! discussion "Ihich follolied Jl it l7as pointed out that the tees and experwe Dllonmce spec1fied in Contr:.ct {,E1 had been fOUI!.d to be inadequate to propc:rly compenent l!! Ca.nt.well far ~rvices rendered and travel expenses inc:urre(i in 'l:£h.lllf of the aC30ciation.. tiro Crur'.:.well .?tatoo that while this "NaB true, he roali:!od that tJ.'le prc:ent f1..ru.ncial status of the association vlould not permit an increnso <!.t tr.is ti.l1e. In view of the fact that the amendment clause in Contract t'l -::o'l1.1d })(~l"l:lit such an increase at a I nter date i f warrantedJl ~. Call'b.'!ell ~:')tad th:tt he ,,~s l;i))jn~ to contizrue hie services to the organization under t:1,C prose. "'~ •.:~to of comp-;:,.nsa.tlon ,11th the under!;tand1ng that he Ttll.l d~vote only suc!, ti.!· to the affair.;: of the association a.B is required under the provisions of ContrJct ),'1 and justificd by the remuneration provided for therein, i f and provided that the Board of Directors :ould .authorize the reoowal of Contr<.lct ,';1 fe r a. .f'1vc>-yenr terr.t... l:r. Contrnct 1/2. was then discussed. President Stewart explained that Cont ract #2 All agreGr.l€nt ':lhich gr.....nted to 1.:. H. Cant.~·/ell ~ C"...<.clusive franchise to est ablish am opera t e as a prlV.ltc business GJ:torprise for profit., an oper ation to be called "'!he Official Tourist Relations fu.reau tor the 89' erB Intertllltional Highway .A~ssoc1ationJl Inc.1T and prohibiting the associa.tion !':rom C<I1lsing or pennitting the use of its nru: e on or in connection with all¥ p.lblicatian, advertising item, promotional device or iliing, upon rA-dch a price is placed or which is to be sold .. either for actual co:~t or for prorit~ to a.tl¥ finn, mdividua.l or org'Ul1zation other than!". H. cantt!ell iUld t..l-te 4fOl'esdd bureau. Presidont Stewart axp4ined that this o:!.greernnt could be also wr.:::ndad at OIlY tir.le by the rutual. cons ent of both p.:ll'ties but tha.t no provision."f were included permittine its cDmellation prior to expiration of its t.E>rm. Cont.r~.'::t ,;2 was rca.d to the body by D irector Fr.mk Sorgatz upon r:-:Cj,ucst in ardor thct all of its provisions .r.dght be discussed. Y1.1.S �and thoroughly underst ood by those pres ent.. lir .. Cantwell requested that thie contract also be r enewed for a five-year period.. He al so pointed out that certain minor changes ndght be necessary and rtquired to clarify some of the provisi ons .. It Vias llOved by Direc tor Bentley U ,tchell that botJ.l contract s be renewed for a term of fiv e years each with certain ninor chanecs being permitt ed which would in no way alter the t erms, but \i1 i ch might better define and carry out the purpose am intent of the agreements.. The notion WIlS seconded by D irector i'I .. G.. Bass and passed by a unanimous vote . '!he folla-ving resolutions were read and acted. upon as noted: ~~~~7,~~s1on of Article IV, Section 10$1 of the by-laws, requires a W'UUlimoua vote of all Director s to effect the pass age of resolutions presented by nail, AND ':.HffiEAS in the past this provision has resulted in t he undue delay in the passage of certain measures, thereby obstruc ting the efficient opera tion and functions of the tssociati on through the fallure of sane Directors to regis ter their vot e y"ithin a r easonable ' time, NQ1.7 'IHJ:REFORE BE IT RESOLVED that ;\rticle IV, Section 10, of the by-laws be amended to rea d as fo llows ~ ARTICLE IV SECTION 10, ACTION aY P~ OLUTION The Board of Directors shall have t he potfer to act in the following nrumer: A resolution in Hriting, signed in such a manner as to indicate approval p by not l ess than a two-thirds majority of all Directors at the time in office, shall be deeoed to be act i on by such Board to the affect therein expressed \"lith the 8aT.lE1 force and effect a s i f the saJ:l.C had been duly passed by the 8ar.te vote at a AYS dul.y convened meeting, PROVIlED IlLW 9 that no negative vote has been registered in opposition to the proposal g and all Directors Vlho fail to r espond to any such roll call vote by mail '"I ithin t en days fran the date of ma i 11 ng shall be deemed a s not voting on the proposal o All stlchreeolutions shall be recorded in the 1Iinute Book of the corpora tion under proper date .. It \"Ias mved by B::lntley H tchell and seconded by Frank V.. So rgatz that i I Resolution No .. 1 be adopted as r ead o Hotion carried o RESOLUTION No, 2 Certain Ilm:mdments to the Articles of Incorpora tion of the 89'ers International Hieh-:-:ay ASSOCiation, Inc o "Were officially adopted at the annual meet i.:.1g of the l":l.eJIlbership on October 12, 1956, AND -:~nREAS the adoption of the aforesaid anendments hns nnde it necessarythat certain portions in the by- la\1S of the associa.tion be runmd ed to conform there./ith , NQ;"l 'IH3REFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Article nIl Section 1 , of the by-laws be aoended to read as follows ~ m{E~.EAS ARTICL:l III SECTION 1 . ANNUAL L llliTINGS. The annual meeting of t h e nernbers of this corporation shall be hel d ciuring the period bet ween September 15 and Noven-!ber 15, inclusive, each year at such place, day and hour as may be prescribed. by the Ibard of Directors, for the purpose of electing directors, and for the transa.ction of any ot h er business that may proper~ come before them" It ·....as roved by Bentley latchell and seconded by i"t. G.. Bass that Resolution l~otion carried .. No. 2 be adopted as r ead.. RESOLUTION No, 3 WHEREt\S certain amendments to the Articles of Incorporation of the 89' era International Highway A SSOCiation, Inc. were offici.al.l.y adopted at the arum.a.l meeting of the membership on October 12, 1956Q , AND ':.1IrREAS t he adopt ion of the aforesaid amendment s haa made i t necessary -2- �that certain portions in the by-laws of the association b e amended to conform there-{dth, ilJ.1 T1-QU!F()RE BE IT R:SOLVED that Article IV, Section 5, of the by-ln1!8 be Blr.Omod as follows: ARTICLE IV Sl!X:TION 5, REXlULAR 11::lTmos. Regular llI!etinga of the Board of Directoro shall be held imnediately following the Annual. lleet ing of the member. of the corporation, at the same place and \7ith no notice to be r equired t o be given of the regular A nnual. l.:eet ing of the Board of Directors o day: ,'r. It "las Jmved by Fronk Sorgatz and seconded by Burnett Hendryx that Resolution No. :3 be adopted as read o lIotion carr:1.ed o ~~~~~rft'DJiElldments t o the Articl es of Incorporation of the $9'ers International Higtll7ay Association, Inc . \'Iera officiallya:lopted at the annual Beat ing of the menbership on October 12, 1956 AND l'!lJ!I'(E).S the .:ldoption of the aforesaid (JJ';1ond r.lent s has roo.de it necessary t hat certain portions in the by-la\'lS of the Assoc iation be amended to confono ther".. 1th, UIT.7 1l1:.llEFORE lIZ IT RF.SOLVilll that Article IV, Section 3, of the lIv-l.ans be amended as follow.: ARTICLE IV Sl!X:TION 3, VJ\CANCTIS. If at any time a vacancy in the Be ard of Directors shall occur, said vacancy lOOJ" be filled by a majority vot.e of the re.minin.g D1rectors p and each Director 80 elected shall hold office until a successor for the unexpired t erm i s elected and qualified at an Annual lleet ing of the Corporation. A vacancy in the office of the Ebard of Directors shall be deemed to have aut omaticnlly occurred by the failure of any Director to personally attend three (3) successive r egul.<lI'ly noticed s pecial m.eeting or the Annuall!ceting of the Board of Dir ectors, unless such absence shall hav e been brought about by reason of the illness of such Dir ectoro It was mved by Frank \'1. Sorgatz ar.cl. seconded by EUrnett Heo:lryx that Resolution Noo 4 be adopted as read" Uotion carried o A disoussion as to ...hat might best be clone in regard to the 'ITreasure TraU l! records follO:-led, and the tailORing ootion lIas t.a.kens It v... =ved lIv n.ntlay J.:l.tchcll om seconded lIv Ibrnett Hendryx that the Ex.ocutlve Secretary be instructed to ,.rite to 6D.ch of tho radio stations ' 1hich had received SOLle of the records from Bernie ',"/j l 1 :i :uU8 on consi grunent e.nd roquest an accounting. Motion carried o It \'iO.S roved by T'I. G. Base an.d sooonded by Frank ',f. Sorgatz that the Directors wwk out sons plan LhGreby the remrlning stock of records on hand could be sold or disposed of in ;1 m.lllnor l'.hich .IQuId return a profit to the association. l!.otio.ll carried 0 The suggestion of the AdVl!rtisins: Cor.ni ttee reported on the convention floor to the effect t.hat the ...ssociation contact vnriouB reliable sign painter s wa.s discussed. It was roved by Ihrnett Hendryx and seconded. by Bentley lli.tchell that each Director assume the responsibility of contacting any available sign painters in his respective area.. lbtion carri ed. '!he recommendation of the Auditing CoJllnittee rro.de on the floor of the convention to the effect that a more effici<mt syst em be ',. orked out pertaining to the p8¥lllent of bills was discussed o It was .roved by Burnett Hendryx and seconded by Bentley lr:l.tchel1 that Treasurer 1'/ .. G. Bass be authorizod to consult a profel!lsional a ccountant on tho na.ttcn-. Motion cu.rr1edo B1lls were presented for items of e:<.pense incurred in connection with the convention and the Director's .:luthorizcd travel expens e. It was moved by Bentley -3- �.- U1tche11 arxI seconded by aunett Hendryx that Secretary- Treasurer Ba•• be authorized to pay all convention expe nse bills 80 presented. Motion carried. ElCecutive Secretary Cantwell reported that the orieil'l31 stock of membership plaqUES was about exhausted and i t va)uld, therefor e, be nec essary to secure the nen membership plaques as D.uthorized at a previous Directors meeting. He also reported a suge6stlon r.ude by various fiEmber s to the effect that a t:all et-siz e member ship c ard bo provided which l/ould carry the elCPiration dote of each member_ ship. Authorization to proceed "ith both projects was gr~nte d by ll'Utual consent without a f oroal llX>tiono 'Ihe recOllDel1dation pertaining to the publis hing of a brochure reported by tbe Advertising Conmittee on the n oor of the convent ion, YJa S discussed. In view of the fact that the PJ.blico.tion of a well- illustrat ed hlg}l\lay guide type of brochure could l.~ll involve an exponditure of several thousand dollars, it l'IlIJ the una.nimoua opinion that the funds necessary to finance a project of this magnitude would have to be secured fioo.Tt1 the sale of actvertlsi.n.e in the brochure. Everyone agreed t hat the puhlica.tion of such a brochure ciurizle th e coming year was an absolute necessity .. The brochure cor.mi.ttee consioti.ng of Bentley t i:1.tchell, Chairman, Sorgatz, Hendryx and Cant well, \',h1ch had been previously appointed by President Stewart at the April 21st, 1956 Directors zooeting w instructed to as proceed. ,'lith the planning and axploration of ways and means o '!he lliving Picture Committee, consi ::;ting of Hendryx, Chairman, and Cantwell, "Ihich h.:ld olao bean appointed at the April Board meeting, was instructed to pro ceed with the securing of fact s and figur es relati ve to the project . Director Hendryx st ated that he TIould inve3tiG~te the possibility of a m1d"rlinter neeting in Ee:xico an" that i f such a project appeared to be practical, he would work up an all-EDtpcnse package deal for the trip f or presentation to the llEmbershipo There being no furth er business, the meeting vias adjourned at 11: 45 P.M. llartin Ho Cantwell Executive Secretar:Y � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4190 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2527 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1006">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1006</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 2542143756 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Annual 89'ers board of directors meeting minutes, October 13, 1956 Description An account of the resource Annual board of directors meeting minutes, October 13, 1956 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource Nonprofit organizations Accounts United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10/13/56 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Kanab (Utah) Kane County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 5 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd5 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/addf64e44c154f679abc65f2329d2639.pdf 59bb5ae0d5f0d89eede977f332bb9732 PDF Text Text " N~... c : : n 0l>Onsor Member Add"" HO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. T.-:'(_~ .\.\. : L n.~A . ..~.S!t.l.. \";.. .'l<"",,,,,I,, ,.J/ :k,\:l SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ..... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .. s.,. 1 to . ............. .l $ . ................... -, 0 0 0 ADVERTISING LISTING ; .......::::.. ........ ~- SPONSORSIDP GRAr-."T {,""'o!.- The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS con tained herein. (L;ne I ) DATE •.. TOTAL Rec'd By Field R epresentative $........ TRiH~~y:. N\)\~E:;TI"\\)G"It:Nr'E,fgl\."'~~ ct, l.,v"r\.,/. ..~'\."". ".'.~ (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LIST ING ( Name On ly) The purch ase of LISTIN08 hI Ine 89'er Bl'(()CHURE shall be limited to "Acllve" and "A sso<:late" l>1l':MBERS M Ihe 89'ers International Hlahwu AMOciat\on, Inc. and "SpOnsors:' all subJecl to the follow!n ; terms a nd condlt!on s. Wh ere"s. dlstr!butlon of the IlROCIiURE and th e resuWna beneflts froUt IIsllnll<5 publl. h ed Inere!n ",·m ~ ~ tend OVer II. two lear period. PRESENT members are nquired to pal dues In advance throu l h and Inc!udlna th e cnILre cal endar year of 1958. mnv a nd FORMl'.!R members are required to lOU due. fOt two full yea r. In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Acti" e Mem be rshh>. - '15.00: Auociate Membership - $M.OO whloh fee sball also Inetude FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all «lItton. of the 89' er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER I>ubllshed durlnK Ihe lerm of such A.so<: la te MemberShip. ADVERTISING RATES :_ Ustlnes In Dircrlorf of "SERVICES AND ACOOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (fler lin e ) $1 per unit: Minimum rate. laG _ M ulmum rale. no. Other bus;ne"" cl"s.lt!catlons, no per llne. SPONSORS _ Financial IIra nt of UOO Or mOre In cludes hsUnc of nam e In proper sectlon 01 BROCHURE. The 89'or5 Int~rnBt!on al Hlih"'BY ASM>CIRlIOn. I no. iuaranteu that the MEMBER'S Or SPONSOR'S Hsl!~.g as It as,pean "OO,'e wI!! be pubUshl:<l In not Ie.. thnn 50,01)(1 copIe s of the 89' .. BROCHURE to be distributed durlni the period betwu n October I. 19~7 and ~cember 31. 19~8. The Asso<:laUon ruerve" the rhrhl 10 edll COPY. and re)ect photoeraph. Or olher art work deemed unsult. a ble for Qualit y reproduction In the BROCHURE. and 10 rev I.e and alter tho tlnal form at. ~ ~~"~"'1( ;h~.w--~-t,L: ---- ""'''" VERBAL AGIU:El>IENTS AIU: NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUD£D IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY i STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. II II-w ... ~~ ~o t1(f - h""" 0-\, ..... "B. .v\ -t \ . ~ ['1\,-\ ..." . \\ ) \~~ <S 1'\'\, "\-, \' 0, \ """ \; ~ \ \.- 0 NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball POint Nn on "-"" V~ �!,!!:Aetlve Assoc. N.... ~n.00 SpOn50r s-h DATE M'mb" ~'~~ Addrcss HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. y.,. ~.. ~ y~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to ................ ) Ducs L . Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER I. .................. ~.."k.... SPONSORSHIP GRANT Se, .. The undersigned M.EMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LISTING in the 89'I:R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TE,RMS and CONDITIONS contained he ~ein. (Li", I) ADVERTISING LISTING . $ ... "10 "'" $..........................,. .. TOTAL Rec'd By Field Representative $ ... MJlfl,RA~S. '>,.j1.i>l:£_ ~()I'IQ(u .. ~. KVlCE_ T!.," . . • .I:\.>!leL {l, (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LIST I NG (Name Only) The purchase of LISTINGS In the n· er BP.ocHOR£ .hall be limited 10 ··Acth·c" and ·'A~"oclale·' M.:MBERS 01 the 89'~rs Inte rn aUn".1 HlIrh".. RY Anoel.Unn. Inc. lind ··Spon50rs.·· IIll .ubject 10 the follo ...·!nR lerms and condItion •. Wher.n, dl~Hlbutlon 01 the BROCHURE And thc re.ultlnr;: benefits Irom Ils\lnl$ .,,,bUshed therein ",lit .xtend o'·er a 1...·0 HIlT period. PRESENT members are reQuired to pay duu In IIdvllnce IhroulI'h and Includln .. the entlr o calendar :rear 01 1958. NEW and FORMER members u. rOQulred to pay du •• lor two lull y.... In .dvance. ADVERTISING RATES:. Llsth,lS In O!redon 01 ··SERVICES AND Aceo",. ODATIONS·' MOTt""LS ( per lint) II per unit: Minimum ' IIIt e. 130 • MulmUm rate. '50. Other b"slnc ..~ CI.S5lficallons, no PC' Un.. SPONSORS. FInancial ~ r.nl of UOiI Or mOre Inelud es 1I. tlml of name In prODt •• ectlon Of BROCHURE. The 89·... tmrrna!1onal HI lI'h",RY A..oelatlon. Inc. Ku"rantcu that the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR·S lI .tlng as It R PP~"rs a bove ... m be publl$hed !n not 10" thlln 50.000 cop!cs of the 89· or BROCHURE 10 bo dlstrll:lUt~d durin .. the ~rlod bea·""n Oclob.r I. 19~7 and IHcemb~r 31. 1':\.8. The AS$ocl .. t!oll rcse rvta the r!"llt to edIt COPY~ .. nd ttl.ct photogr .. phs Or<' other BTt work deemed unsult- B ·:"~::·~ ,·'_':4 r,ep UC'./i.'fL,'''_~ . ' ,nd to n ,·lsc _'_",,' M ~'''B''"'' _' ':: ;·".~ t!OIl '"~ ~ " '· "'~ BROCHURE ~ ANNUAL DUES : Active Membersh ip. - 115.00: AuoelBle MemberBhlp • $ 5 0 , 0 i I " ".. hlch fee s h all a lso Includ e !"REE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition s of th~ 89·.. MEMBERSHIP ROST£R nubllshcd durlnll' tile term of such Associate Membe.. hlp. VERBAL AOREI!:MENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUD IN PRIN"I'EO TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE By t THE ASSOCIATION, 3Od.""(' II ~"'~ 8'" f.."",.\" ... f"",J' '\:,'''+\Q ~ !Y\\"\- C~~\\ I TV ...q~ V \-<\-.'1..\\ IM.h\... \\\NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ba ll Point Pen I.-.> 8'" '" li ~ �Active ASSO(:. Ne ... K.,.",..,.",,~ Address .V~ . SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ........ to ... ........... ) $ ............................ ADVERTISING LI STING $ ........................... . SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ .... Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes th e pub lication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TER MS and CON DIT IONS contained herein. J) 7 \)!..J.v,....\A.I=> ... ~..!..I.. Member (L e ;" :J/J DATE . 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ~I Sl>Onsor "3,O~ TOTAL Rec'd By .. $ .. Field R6jlrcsentafi oo D.tc:.- rl. :.~ JJIt:> ~ !l ~~j'"\I \e!:.. , 1-'iH '!vrZ. ~ f:Jl,V(~<1. (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSOR SHIP LI STI NG (Name Only) Th e purehaM of LISTINGS In I h. 89·. r BI~/fURl: sh a l! be i!n,ued to " Active" and "Assocl. te " MF.MBERS el Ihe 89·.rs tnl ~ma U ona l Hll h ... a)' Au oclaUon. Inc . and "Sl>Onso.,." Mil s ubJett \0 Ihe 101L0.. ln ~ terms a nd conditions . ADVERTISING RATES,_ LisU nu In Dlre~ t ory 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATlONS" MOTEU3 ( per lin e) 11 per unit: Min imum r.t~. no _ Mulmum '-Me , n o. Other bu s ln ~5S d us lliutlona. 130 per line. SPONSORS _ Flnapch.1 ;rant of 1100 or mor ~ includes HsHn , ot name In proper s ection 01 BROCHURE. Whereas. dlstrlbuUon 01 th e BROCHURE a nd the result ln . ben efit s Irom Ilstin u pu blls hed th erein ... 1lI utend o,'u a t ..·o yea r period. PRESENT m embeu are required to PaY du e. In advance Ihroua h a nd Includ in g th e enllre calend a r yea r 01 1958. NEW and f'QRM£i't member. Are required 10 pay dues lor t ... o full yeau In advance . Th e 89' c rs In U rnation a l /fla h"·. ' ASSOCia tion. Inc . t uua ntees that the MEMBE'R'S or SPONSOR'S lis ting as II a ppea .. above will be published In pot less tha n 5(1 .000 co p!es of the 89'er BROCHURE \0 be dl strlllUl ed durlna th~ pe riod bet .... e ~n October I , 1957 a nd 1)!,ccm ber 31, 1958. The ASllO\:la tlon r eserve. Ihe rll ht to edit COpy. and reject photolr a ph$ or olher art work d ee med un.ultM ble tor Qua lit y reproduction In Ih e BROCHURE. and to revise And alter th~ final lormat . ANNUAL DUES: AttL,·. Members hip. - l l ~. OO: Assoclale MembershIp _ I SO.OO ... hlch fei! sha ll also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of th" 89·.r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publi sh ed during the tnm or s uch Asooti a!e Membuship. Authorl ~ed L /: ~ . _ . _ ~~_ .. _.__ ._~,__~_! __ '::::....~ II- BY .. _ . _ _____ ...l"---~ _. _ .. ___ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. StJB.JECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. " \-I ""Ii g '\ 1.11 J."f ~v. ",. "h. "- \D . "+\ ~6 t-J\,\-,l<oll l \~ •• s \I\\;.l, ,\\Q NO CARBON REQUIREO Use Sall P oin t P en II ,"",0\-.1 vt47 MEMB£R �~. Activ e Member Add ress UO W, SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH New ~ R<:nu;' /1 pon sor DA~ ~..t..~..~.... ( f\.\.'t:?'" Cd4-0 ' ~o,"~Y\kh~'j• • •. . , . •.• Dues L to ... .. ... ) 3o.!:- ADVERTISI NG LISTING SPONSORSHIP GRANT ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publicati on of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below an d s ubject to all TERMS and CON DITI ONS contained herein, :e,.IS.':\<:I.....~.frl'\.~J) N . ( L; ne I) .. $ ......................... . $ .... , .. TOTA L Rec'd By F ield RepreselltatiV(l ~&S . ~ . ... ~\~\\,,~ '>::'s~<>,.'>I ...vh..h ..:s.".",t ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name Only) The Durch ase 01 LISTINGS In the 89'er BHOCHURE $ha 11 be limited to " ActIVi" and .. As.wclate" MF.~{BERS 01 the gg'crs In t ernational Highway Assoclall on, Inc , and "Sponsors," ~11 subleet to the foliowln, t eT ms and conditions , Wher en, dbtrlbul!on 01 the BROCHURE snd the resultin, benefits Irom IIstinu published therdn " m nt t nd over a \"'0 YUr period, PRESENT rn ernbeT$ a re re<lutTed to Da, du es In advance throutrh and Includlnlr the enUre calenda. year of 19~8. NEW and t'ORMER membe rs are required to pa J' dues lor two full yearS In adnnce. ANNUAL DUES; Active Membership . • 115.00: Msoelate Membership • 150.1)(1 "'hlch fee shall al$O Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of th~ n'.. MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durin\[ the te,m of s uch As.wciate MembershiP. ADV ERTISING RATES :. Llstintr" In Dlrcdor, 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM· ODATIONS" MOT ELS (p.er linl!) II per unit; Minimum ute. no • Muimum ut~, 150. Oth er bu.lne$,' cla.. lfleatlon$, no per Hne. SPONSORS· FiIl a nd .. 1 nant of $1 00 or more lnclud.. II.Un g 01 nam" In ,>roper """tlon of BROCHURE. Th e 89·er. Int~rnll!lonal Hlllh"'1\ J' Association, Inc. gua rantee s thai th e MEMnER'S or SPONSOR'S IIstlng ~'18 It a ppears aboye a'llI be published In not le$.'l tha n :HI,aoo copies Of the 89'., BROCUURE to be distributed durin; Ih~ period bet"'e~n October I . 1957 and n..:ember 31. 1958. TIle A'$OClatlo n re.erves the rl llht to edit copy, . nd reJ';' t j,ljotor raph S Or other UI work deemed un sult. able for quali ty reprO UCtlon /ln ~ C BROCRURE, and to H\ isc .nd a lter th~ IIMI format ./. ~ ~ AUlhorbed / BY - r ' b,... L - __ .,1 ' /" ~ ~ ~L-".;'"_~._ _ .___ ___ VERBAL AGREE MENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AORl:EMENTS NOT INCLUOED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BP.:LOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATlON - o NO CARBON REQUI REO use B all Point Pen MEMlII:I? �c·· • 8 A~. Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .... D" TE I ~~\(l'\;"'\Mdg\ Qa,~~I,i\.l:c,~V:l::,:\\:::L I Dues C __ _......... to ___ _ .. __ _ __ __ ) _ . J............... So,. e~~<;, The undersigned M. EMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COP Y" ap pears below and sub ject to all T ERMS and CON DITI ONS con tained herein. (Une I ) .... e. O\..ON .~(\ Sponsor $ ADVERTISING LISTING . :3.Q . ~.. SPONSORSHI P TOTAL Rec'd By ... GRANT • .. ................ . $-_. Field Repre8entative L ... t'/.\.o::rE..L ...J\.l'\..f\.., .. J\(";<. "\1'~t:.'I;n\l."J.", ...YI... AX.1I. ,o....c:: !\:h. (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI ST ING (Name On ly) The purchue 01 LISTINGS In tlte 89' .r BI~lIURE s h a ll be Un'lted \0 "Actlve" Rnd " A ~. od at." MF-MBERS of the ag'ers international Highway AMOelatlon. Inc , and "Sponson." aU .ubJect to the 101l0",lnlr t .. m. and condttions, ADVERTISINO RATES: _ Listlnn In Dir~c·tory of "SERVICES "NO ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTElS ( Iler Hne) ' 1 per unit: Minimum rate. UG _ Mulmum ute, no. Other busl"e .... clo.s~jflcatlon". no per !lne. SPONSORS _ Fln.neh,l Runt 01 UOO or mor~ Includ e. U$tln~ 01 name III proper .ectlon of BROOHUR£. Whereas, dlstributlon 01 Ihe BROCHURE and Ih. resulUnlr benelit·. fro", Ustlnn pubUshed thereIn "'ill rxtend over a t",o YU. pertod. PRESENT members are required to paf dues In advance throulh and Incl"dln~ Ihe entire calendar fear 01 1958. NEW and FORMER members a •• required to pay dues 10. t"'~ full Years In advanee, Tile U ·. r. Intunatlon~l 1Ilah",af " • ..octallon. Inc. Ir uarant ees th a t the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S listing .. It appears above ""m be J!ubilihed In not le53 than 50,000 cople$ 01 Ihe U ' er BROCHURE to be distributed durtn; th~ period bet ... e ~n October 1. 1957 and Dl'eember 31. 1958. The ASSOCla lton r ...."e. the .I,ht to edit eOPf. and reJeet phOtORraph$ or other .. t .·ork deemed unoull. a ble for QualilY reproduc!lon In the BROCHURE. Ilnd to revise and alte. th~ fjna l lormal. ANNUAL DUES: "ctl" e Members hip . • ' 1~.(J(I: ASsoclat. Membership - I~O.OO "'hlch fee shall also Include FRE"l!: Dl"SPLhY LISTING In an editions 01 th~ as'.r MEMBJl:R.SHIP ROSTER published during the term 01 . uch AMoc:late Membership. #; ~~IhO'lud L_ f.J~-,%._ Z",."ttt'~~._ . . . _ ____ _. M~fB£1I _ _____ VERBAL AGREEMEr.'TS "RE NOT BINDING - AGRE EMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE Cl,.i;ARLY : STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE lIY THE ASSOCIATION. CI)Xj.~,<J."·~ \,,,,J, ~ '1/::'-1- o;i/<I,,,> ~"'t P' J. ~ . ~" ~v~\,,""'.., 1, , """ '" 4 NO C"RBON REQUIR ED U"" Ba ll Point Pen �AUOC. Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Nt. A • S." N'~d S PONSORSHlP GRANT The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publica tion of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appears below and sub jec t to a ll T ER MS and COND ITION S co nta ined herein . (Line 2) • ..... ) ADVERTISING LISTING Lines ...':ZO.. J ~ 1.../ ~Cj"!m~&:~tr SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER DATE 1h\~tAAI'\¢hft'i)",)l\\l~1 Dues (Line 1) SpOnsor TOTAL Rec'd By .. Field Representative s .M 1"....Q,.(1,.\C. <;;.,. "'f'~..... C...").f f .. \)wtl",l"i;\l,~ .. \,," ..9.. <>:.§,,... , . ...... CJ,\Q, .. (L\J.,<:.:1.,.;\'S..~ . ~~\,;,s.., .M...\£,~ .. '9,.~J;.' 9l.,:>~ •... l\:.v...~\~\~ . . . ........... .. (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI S TING (Name Only) The pu reh a.., 01 I..ISTINGS In the 8S·u BltoCHURE .hall be llmlted to ·• ... ctlve .. and ·· ... ssocla t e· ' MEMBERS of the 89'ec. Internatlonal Hl; h,,·ay A5$OCI .. t1on. I nc. a nd "SpOnson.'· all subject to the 101Jowln~ tCTm s a nd ~ondlt\ons. ... DVERTISING RATI:S:· I..lstinn In Directory 01 ··SERVICES ... ND "'CCGM· OD ... TlONS'· MOTELS (per Jlne) II per unIt: MJnlmum ute, no • Mulmum .-ate. l50. Other bu.;ne"" cl ...lllcaUons. $30 per Hne. SPONSORS _ PIn.nclul ~ ran t 01 $100 or more Includl"$ II.Hn ll" of name In propeT -"'Ctlon 01 BROCHURE . Wheru. . dl.trlbutlon 01 th e BROCHURE .11<\ the r .. ultln~ bend!t. fronl IIstln g. published theretn will ~xtend over . t,",o year peclod. PRESENT members .. re required to pa Y due. In . dvance through and Ineludln; th e entire calendar rur 01 19S8. NEW and FORMER members are ceQul red to pay due. lor two full years In .. <Ivane •. The 89·er. Jn t~rnatlonal Il hrh,,·ay ...... oclation. Inc. t:uuanl eu th .. t the MEMlIER'S or SPONSOR·S UStlnK .. It app.. rs above wU\ be pubU,hed In not Ie ... than ~ .OOO cop!u of th e 89·u BROCHURE \.0 be dlstrlhuted durln t: th~ perIod bet,,·ccn October I. 1957 snd necember 31. 1958. Th e .....o<:I. tlon r e.ene. the daht to edit copy. and r eJe.::t pholocr ..ph. or other art work deemed un.ull_ able lor <lU ~ Utf reproduction In the lIROCHURE. and to r~ vl .. and .]t.e r th~ final fo~m"t. . ~ ANNU"'I.. DUES: "'cth·e Membe rship. • $15.00: ... swelBle MrmbeTllhlp • '50 ,00 which fee shall .1'0 Includ e FREE DISPI.AY I..ISTING In . 11 edition. of th~ 8S· er MEMBERSHI P ROSTER publl. hed du r ln t: the te rm 01 such Associate MembershIp. ~~th~~I"'~L:C{-4 ~~ _____ ..• VERB ... I.. ... GREEMENTS ...RE NOT BI NDING _ ... GREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT ST ... TED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ... SSOCI ...TlON. " ~ VJ ':) g~ V • "':" .~\ ., '" y ~R""~\.~ M\-\-''''~\\ \'io.,\''''Il.\\ N\U\~ l 1.-0 be;, "'I v\-o.,'" NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen ____ .. _.. __ ________ ~WST BE CI..E ... RI..Y I If MEMBeR �Active Mcmbcr Addrcss 140 W , SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ............. to . L ines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ) ~f'tR~1~~O~ ~\O" .c s., . .\i.~. . 3,9~ SPONSORSHIP GRANT L fl.fU,\ : l)u.r'" •• Al)VERTISING LISTING The undersi gned MEMBER hereby au thorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and sub jec t to all TERM S and CONDITIONS co ntained herein. (Un. I . .... .. ..l $.; - TOTAL Rec'd By F'ield Re'pres(J lltati l1C ~o~ $ ............... -_ ... J:\\("!$ :-t<E,'~FQ91 -d3.!3?11l~() ,.,...., _ L.:.:.:?_~.~~'f..~.~.~ ....] ..................................................... _ ... ' _ (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) The p urchase of LISTINGS' In th~ 89 'er B!l.OCHU~£ sh,,11 be llmlted to "ActIVe" Rnd " A•• ocIBtC" MEMBERS or th e 8~'eT! Intern allon .. l Hll h ..,., AI<S6Clatlon. I nc. and "Spon.ou," all .ub!tet to the 10\lo..'ln~ terms ~nd condltlons, Wh ereu, distribution of the BROCHU RE and the resultln!\" bendll. fronl Ibtlnn published therein ..'m ntend o,'er a t ..·o yCar pcrlo-d, PRESENT membeu a rc required to pay du e. In advance throu!l"h and Includln!\" the entire ."Iendar year of 19~8. NEW and FORMER member. are reClulr"",, to pay du •• for t ... o tull 'Uri In "dunce. ANNUAL Dur.5 : Active Mcmbershh" -115.00: ASSOCiate Membership· UO.GO ... hleh t ee shall "Iso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition" of the U 'e r MEMBERSHI P ROSTER publish ed dur in" Ihe ternl of s uch A$&OClate Member.hlp. ADVERTISING H.AT!:S :. LisUnl$ In Olr~tou 01 "~ERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOT~'LS (pe r line) $I per unit: Minimum rate, no _ Maximum rate , l~O. other busin "s.~ cI" ... lfleatlon . , UO per line. SPONSORS _ P'lnanc!ul ~ rant of 1100 or nlOre Inelude. ll.tln~ of name In prope r s tetlon of BROCHURE. The 89'cr . Im rrnatlonal HIgh ..·ay Associ .. Uon. Inc. lIuarantees that the :l.IEMB ER'S or SPONSOR'S IIsUr.g U It .PPeRrs above ..'m be pubUshed In not Ie ... than 5(1,000 copIes Of the 89'.. BROCHURE 10 "" dt.t rlhuted dUrin .. th~ perto-d between October I, 19~7 and Deeember 31, 19~. 'nl e Assodatlon reUrves the rlRht to edit copy, a nd re) e<:t 1phot Dl'r aphs Or ot he r a rt work deemed unSUItable for CluRlity .... eproductlon In the BROCRURE, Rnd to re,'l s. and alter thr final tornlRt . ) A ~~Ih~~"--~ .~~_._.t~..__. 1!1_t!_ ____ ______.._ /-.. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST a£ CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SOlJJ£CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQU IRED U", Sail Point Pen MEMBeR �I Aeth'e Member Address 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .. L' ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~jj ~:'~~(';}d pthy~. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizc'O' publica iObnJ of a LISTING in the S9'ER BROCHURE as the" appears e ow and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIO NS co ntained herein. ( Lin' 1) (Line 2) to • .. ______ .. _1 ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORsm"l . GRAJIT TOTAL Rec'd ~9..L~ __ .9. S.... .. • B~.. I $ .$&J.1'1 .KOt.JJ .(,£!.FE ....J\f\...I=\.... ..B.\:': . ~· .:'.~A., ~; ~4 .. ~ ui . Tr. _~O_ ~ - .e. F'ield Reprcacn/utive ytti:!'-;::wI .:d31< <;;) ; .... .. .,. (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LISTING (Name Only) ...... .... , ~ The purchaMl of LISTINGS In !h~ 89'or DROCUt/RE shall be limited 10 "AG\lve" Rnd "As5OClal." :'fF-MBERS of the 80'trs Int ernallonal Hl,hway ASI;oel~tlon. Inc . a nd "Spon80u," all subject 10 the fol101l'ln, t e rm s and condition s. ADVERTISING RATE$,_ Listl n rs In Directory ~I "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTElS ( per line) II per unit: Minimum ratf . UO _ Maximum ,ate, t w. Other business cluslflcatlons, 130 per line. SPONSORS _ Plnanellll Kcant of $100 or mar~ Inchldu llSUnK Of n a me In proper section of BROCHURE. Whereu, dlsnlbutlon 01 th e BROCUURE and the resulUn , beneflu Iroo\ llstlnn published therein will utend oyer a 1>\'0 fear period, PRESENT membeu are reQuired to pa f due. In adva nce Ihroulh and Includln l the entire calendu Tear of 1958. NEW and FOR~1ER members Rre required 10 pa y dues for h'" full Yea" In advance . The 89'... In ternat10nal HlirhwBY AssO(:lation. Inc, JUaranlecl that th~ l<.I EMBER'S or SPONSOR'S liltlng as It a ppear. above wm be publl$hed In not Ius than M),OOO coolu of I-he 89'U BROCHURE to be dl.trUmted durlns Ihe Period bet,,·.cn October 1, 1951 and nr.:ember 31. 1958. n.e A.soclatlon ruen es lhe .llhl to edit COPY. and reject photoJ.a.phs or other art wo rk deemed unsuitable for o.U. llt, reprod,u cUan..ln we BROCHURE. Rnd to re"1~1 8nd alte r th~ final format. ANNUAL DUES: A.tlve Membership, - $15.00; A580eiRte Membership _ $50.00 "'hleh fee shall also Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In a U edition. of th~ 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publis hed durlnl the lerm of l ueh A""""late Member.hlp. 0 / /' / . ._ _:_ . .S ._ _ . __ ~~th~_.? ~~ ~·_ .-"-. r_ <-, . MEMBCII VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRI NTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. -/ ~ NO CARBON REQUIRED U.e B all P~lnt Pen ~~-------------------------------------" �Active Member Q --- ....... ) Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Q.,"'if."LJ... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COP Y" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. ( L'" e I) .... $ .. ·,o~ $....\.., ........= ...... . ADVERTISING LISTING Lines ... s.,. Dm p9,\,n ",t ..\"L\i\qb SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH J... . . . . .... Sl>Onsor HLW"-j2lkA"9,,,.. ... . . . . . Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. ~ Ne.... SPONSORSlUP GRAN)' TOTAL Rec'd By Field Representative t:\.\ . \V .&. \I K'i ..lQ.~. (- .;,....... B: .11.\\ . 1...D..~ .\!,l .l1Ao".. ,~" ( 3&~ $............... -_ .. . F (po .. 1= ,l. \" ~"'" ~~. f.~ ) ..~<?! ... ~',;""",j,,6.8 .2/). (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LISTING (Name Only ) Th e I>urchasc of LISTINGS' in the ag' •• BROCHURE shaH be limited tu "Aclh'e" " nd "Associat e" MEMBERS of the 89' en Internatlonal Hlihwa, Auoeiatlon. Inc . a nd "SlXInsou," aU s ubject. 10 the follo ... ln, Urms and condl!!on •. Wherea s. distribution of th e BROCHURE a nd the resultln, ben.flts from IIsUn!;S pubU.hed therein "'Ill f ~t " nd o,..r & two yur period. PRESENT members are reQuired to pay dues In advanc e throuKh and IncludinK th e entire cRlendar nar "f 1958. NEW and FORMER members ue required to "a, dues for t ..." full Jtars In adnnee. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership, - us.oo; Auoelat. Membership - $50.00 "'bleh fe. s hall also Include PRE"E DISPLAY LISTINO In all editions of Ih . 89' er MEMBERSHIP ROSTE"R publl~ hed durIn!: the term of auch A&SOcl a t. Membership. \ ADVERTISING RATES :_ LisUuu In Dlrectou of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ QOATIONS" MOTElS (per li n e) $I IX'f unit: Minimum r ate, no _ Maximum rat • . 550. Olhtr bU$in e.s cta .... lllcaUon •• no per line. SPONSORS _ Plna ncl,,1 gra nt of U(l(J or more h,dud"S HStlnR of name in I>roper section 01 BROCHURE. The U·e .. I nternational lIl,hwu Assoctation. tne. luanntet. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S UsUng as tt al>l)ears a bove ... m be l>ubU.hed In not than SO.()(l(I coplu ot the 89'.r BROCHURE 10 be distributed dUrini th~ period ben.. ..." October I. 1957 a nd D<'cember 31. 195.8. n.e Association .curv e, Ihe tllht to edit copy. and . eJect "hot"" ... ph . or other art. work deemed un. ultRble for Quality .eproductlon In the BROCHURE. and to ,.,·Is. and alt er th ~ final fo.mat I ..... 1. Authorized BY _ ._ _ .L r\ _ ___ f) •• /i ' __ C~ _ ... u. Z~_. t- 0- _ -r ____...:.._____U MEMBI:R VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATEO BELOW, SUIlJEOT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TlfE A~IATION. NG CARBON REQUlRI!:D Use Ball Point Pen .------~--------------~ �"clh'c H() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ASIIOC. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lin·~Jt : , y ",•. \<,I;&i"'Q 4 The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subjec t to all TERMS and COND ITION S con tained herein. .......... l ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSHlP GRANT • TOTAL Re(!'d By 35£.0. $.............- (Line I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING ( Name Only) The purchase <>f LISTIN08 In the 89'cr BI:.QCHURE s h all be llmlted 10 "Acth' e" lUtd "Assocl" Ie" M.:MBERS of th e 89' ers I ntern a tional Hl;hwu AMOclatlon, Inc . and ··SpOnsors .'· " l! subj ect to the fol!owln r terms " nd condition s . Whereas. dis tribution of the BROCHURE And t h e resultlna beneilt s from llsUn u publlshed Iherc!n ",m ~ ~tend o"e, It 1"'0 , ear period. PRESENT me mbe .. "'e required to pa Y dues In adn nce throu s h and Includln l Ihe enUre calendar year of 1958. NEW " nd FORMER membeu are required to pay dues for t"'~ full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Me mb ..$hl!>. _ $15.00: "ssoelMe "I embenhlp _ 150.00 which fu shall also Include FREE DISPLA.Y LISTING In a ll editions 01 Ih~ 89" e r ME.\lBE"R8IIIP ROSTER ImbUlh ed durln a th e te rm of such " ..OClate Membership. "DVE.RTlSINO RATES : _ LI.Unn In Dlr~dory ot "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTf.'LS ( per !tile ) 'I per un It: MInimum rate. UO _ Mnlmum rate. no . Other bU Sirlts8 c1an lflclltlon • . no per line. SPONSORS _ Financl,,1 i ranl 01 1100 o. mOre Includes ll stlnc 01 n am e In proper sectlon of BROCHURE. The 89' ers tnt ~ .natlonal Hlaha':<1 AMoelallon, Ine. luarantees that tbe ~IEMaER'S Or SFONSOR'S H.tln g a5 It a ppears .bon "'llI be published In not less than 50.000 copl es 01 the 89· . r BROCHURE to be di stri buted durln K tl'~ period bet"'~cn Octobe r 1. 1951 a nd Dtccmber 31. 1958. TIle Association r eserve. the rl J h t to ed tt COPY. o,pd reject I>hotoll'l"phs or other art work deemed un sult" bl e for Qu a l l l pro uctlon In tb. BROCHURE. nnd to revise and a lter th~ r final format ~ • ". . ) ~~tb~~~_ _ _ . l:L.L:'_ ftlt0!!J.1.I!~L" ________.. VERBAL AOREE!I.!ENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY t STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball POint Pen MEMBEn �Ac!h'e New A~. A-;",~,~ Member SALT LAKE CITY I , UTAH to Dues L L ines .... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER 1.. . . . . . .. ( Li ne I ) DATE . k. 4," <>... . !I~ .......... ) .. "3,O~ A'DVERTISING LISTING s., ~. ~ The undersigned MEM BER hereby authorizes the publicat ion of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY" appears bel ow a nd s ubject to all TE RMS and CONDITI ONS contained herein. Sponsor K"","{'- Address H O W , SECOND SOUTH ST. 8 $ ........................... . , .. SPONSORSHl P GR ANT TOT AL Re c'd By .... F iel d Rcprcstmta tivc l!\.I\!C;N ·;;h()\)H~Pt , \\,\l . '.1"S~ ; < c~,,¥ ,+:."' ..Jl)..l6..I:± . L ; 0 ................Lk~k:~FlJ2.. ~........ . ( Li ne 2) ~ , 82/j (Li ne 3) SPONSOR SH I P LI STI NG (Name O nly) The pllrchase of LISTISQ g In the 89' • • BROCHORE shall be Hmll ed to "Active" a nd "A:ISOCla le " MF.MBERS o f the 89'~ u Int ern ationa l Hllh ..a, AssOCla Uon, Inc . a nd "SpOn sou," all l uble.:t to the foJlo .. IUlI' term s a nd conditions. Whe . eu, dlstrlbuUon of t b e BROCHURE a nd t he ru ultln~ benefit s frOOl \l sUnn P"bU 5 h ~ d therein will u tend ov er a 1"0 yur period, PRESENT ", e",ben are reQuired 10 par due. in a dva nce throulI'h a nd in clud ln ll th e enUre cBlenda r nRr of 18~8. NEW a nd FORMER members are reQuired to oay dues for t ... o full , ea.. In advanc e. ANNUAL DUES : Act h 'e Mcm bershlo, _ $1 5.00 : " . soclate Membership _ '50 ,00 which r~ $hall . lso Includ e FREE DISJ>LAY LISTI NG In . 1I ed ition, of th~ 88'cr MEMBERSHIF ROSTER oubl\s hed du r ln ll Ihe te rm of such A... ocl a t e Member. hlp. ADVER.TISI NQ RATES , _ LlstJrllrl In Dl r e ~to r , of "SERVICES AN D ACCOMODATIONS" MOTE'l,s (pe r line) U ner unit; MinImum ra t., n o - MUlmum t~. Oth er bu s in." da~lf ieR UOM, no pe, Une. SPONSORS - P1nanclal na M of UOO or mo r ~ Includu \lotin i' of n a me In pro,"" se.:tlon of BROCHURE. ,ite, Tbe 89'er. In terna tIona l H ilrh ~'B1 Assocla tlon. loc. luarantees tha t the M EMBER 'S or SPONSOR 'S Iis Ung .. II a ppea r. a bove .. m be oubl\shed In not leM t ha n 50,00(1 eoplu of Ole 89' . r BROCHURE to be dlstrU.>uted dllrlnl tb ~ pe riod bet ",,,,,n Oct obeJ I. 1957 a nd December 31, 1 9~8 Th e Association rese rvn th e ,ll bt to ed It COPY, a nd r~e.: t photorr"pl>~ \Or ot h er IITt work deemed unoult able fOT Qu a lit y TtPrOd et l z In I hez a : to Te,'I." Bnd alt u t b . R E, nd fin a l forma ) £ t fl Aulhorized BY _ _ ._, / ,_ _ _ _ __. . ___ _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS AR E NOT BINDI NG _ AGREE ME NTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRI NTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE 8 Y THE "SSOCI"'I'ION. NO CARBON ll.EQU IRED U ~ Ball Point Pen _____ M EMB EI! �R ( ':t t 'b\t~ t'" (! • b l l'h' <ku �Active Member Addre8s HO W, SECOND SOUTH ST. Ne" ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L .. ,....._ . s" ~"'li.,,-;t-J.v, The undersigned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publica t ion of a LI STI NG in the 89'£R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DITI ONS contained herein, DATE ~o,"1,Y\±(I:\\L~\"1 to Dues C ..... ..... Span sor (I<>"l'\\gHI<I\¥._~+~gL S ALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH Lines 6~~ •~.P ...~..~.. • 7-.0 ... _---- --) $.. AnVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSl-UP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By 60_ $.-....... -_ ......... Field- R epresentative ( Li ne I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI ST ING (Name On ly) Tbe J>urchsoe III LlSTINOg In the 89'er BIUX:HURE s ball be limited to "Acth'e" Rnd "AsaocIRte" MEMBERS of tb e U'ers International HIi:h".y A.... oel.Uon. Inc. and "SDOnsou," all subl..,t to the 101l0... lng t erms and conditions . Whereas, distribution of tbe BROCHURE Rnd the ruultl " 1 benellU Irom lI$tlnu publlsbed therein "m utend over a t..-o yur period. PRESENT m embe's Rre required to PRY due. In advance throulth a nd Includlllll' tbe entire calendar Y r 01 1958. NEW and FORMER member! ue .eQulred to pay du u tor t'\l;'o U full , ears In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Aetl,'e Menlbersblp . • U5.00: Associate Mem be rShip - 15(1.00 .. hleh tee sh a ll also Inelude FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions at tbe 89' ". MEMBERSHIP ROBT£R publl.hed durln.- the lerm ot such AsaoclRte Me mbership. ADVERTISINO RATES : _ LUtlnn In Dlr~ctor J at "SERVICES ANO ACCOM· OJ)ATIONS" MOTF.'L8 (Pt T Une) $1 J)fT unit: Minimum rate. no • Mu:lmum I ale, $50. Otber bu.lneM c1u.itlcRtiOn •. no per line. SPONSORS _ Flnanch,l na nt ot $100 Or mar e Include. liotlnlt of n ame In proper $eCllon of BROCHURE , Th e 89·e ,. Int ern allonal Hliih"'ay Al;Soelatlon, Inc. SUR rante •• ~h.t t he l>IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIstlr.g a$ 1\ appears a l>on will be published In not leu than 50.000 cople. of tbe 89' er BROCHURE to be dl strli.>uted durin, tb ~ period bet,,·.en OctOber I. 1951 a nd Dl'Ce mber 31. 1958. The Assocla Uon resen '.,. the rlgbt to edit COPY, and reJeet phOtoiira.phs or other art work d ee med unsuit_ able for <tuallt, reproduction In the BROCHURE. and to ,-"vl3e a nd ane r the tln~l tormU ¥M!__ _ ~ AUthorized BY _ _ . ________ . ___ ._. __ _ _ VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUOED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY t STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIAnON. NO CARBON REQUIRE'!) U..., Ball Point Pen M E'MB£1l �Active .... ssoc. N~w 8 sponsor D .... TE 1.-)/1 Member Address 14Q W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues Lines .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .1... ADVERTISING LISTING Seo. . ~ .... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in th e S9'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appea rs below and subject to all TERMS and CO ND ITION S contained herein. SPONSORSHIP GRANT $. __ TOTAL R ec· d By F ield Represen!atioo 52. ." 0 $..... ......... -.-.-. (Line I) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI ST ING (Name Only ) The purchase 01 LISTINGS' In the 89·.r BROCHURE shall be limited to ·· ... ct!n·· And '·A"'IocIAle·' MEMBERS of th e 8§·ers In ternationAl Hll h ..·u· .... $$OCI .. l\on. Inc . and ··Sponso,,:' All BubJect to Ihe followlniC term . and conditions. Whereu. dl$trlbutlon of the BROCHURE .. nd t he r., ullln, il<"neflt s from I13Un u published therein will utend o,·c r a \ ..·0 rear peri od. PRESENT member. are reQ.ulred to J»l1 dUM In adunce throulh and Including thc enllrc calendar ~ear of 19S8. NEW and POR~IER membeu a re re<tulred to 1'31 dues fo r nlO full yea rs In Kdvance. .... NNUAL DUES, Active Membership . • U~.OO: ....... ocl .. le M.embershlp _ $50.00 which tee shall a lllO Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In AI\ edltlon$ of th~ 89·e r MEMBE'RS!lIP ROSTER published durinG Ihe term or $uch ,usoclale Membership. .... DVERTISING R ... TES :. Lhllnn In Olrc~ ~ or 7 of ··SERVICES AND ... OOOM· ODATIONS·· MOTELS (~r line ) $I per unit; Minimum rate. 130 _ Mulmum ..ate, UO. Othu bushlU' claosUlcatJons. no per Hne. SPONSORS _ F1nanch. l Hant of 1100 Or mOr e Include-s II sUng 01 nam e In proper "",lion of BROCHURE The 89·e," Inlrrnatlonal IIIlh,,·sJ A$Soclat!on. Inc. guarante es that the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR'S listin g U It a"pears above ..·m be published In not le$S than ~.ooo cople. of the 89·u BROCHURE to b~ dlstrlhuted durlnll' th~ period bet ..·~~n October I. 1951 a nd D.-.:ember 31. 1958. The Association reserves the rl l ht to edit copy. and reJ""t photocra"hs or othe r art work deemed unsuit_ able tor Qu ality reprodUction In the BROCRURE. and to revl&< and alter the fin al format. IA~ • ~ . _I .... Ulho rlud ,n~ BY _____ .. _. ___ ._._. _____ .. _.. _ ______ .__ ._._... ____ .. _. __ ._ __ M&MB£IJ . ._ VERB .... L .... OREEMENTS ARE NOT BI NDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE .... RLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCE PT .... NCE BY THE ASSOCII\TION. NO CARBON REQUJRED Use Salt POint Pen �n , • Active " Membe r AssO(:. N~w ( Re~ Sponsor O ... TE I 'M9.\\:\~s:r:,,,,,-, b\v \"'1t§\"",t-I\~~:\: Dues (8/~1 to r/~g) Address 140 W, SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LA KE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lin'l .. ) . ............. s,, ~~ Th e unders igned MEMBER hereby autho rizes the publica tion of a LI S TI NG in the 89' E,R BROCH URE as th e "CO PY" appears below a nd subjec t to all TER MS a nd CON DITIONS contained he rein. , • 1) ADVERTI SING LISTI NG SPONSORSffiP GRANT $... ~ ~t.q,.J. .. .. TOTAL Rec· d By .............. _ Field R eprc8cnro(illc (Li ne \ ) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) SPONSORS H I P LI STI NG (Name Only) ADVERTISING RATES :. Listtnn In Dlrcr t ofl of ··SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS· ' MOTElS (p~ . Un.) $1 per unit: Minimum rat., no . Mulmum rale. $~. Other buslnrs.' classlflea tlons, no per Une. SPONSORS - Flnanelo.l ~ra n t 01 1100 or mor ~ Includrs U$tlne 01 nam e In orOJ)f!r section of BROCHURE. The 89'ers Inlu natlonal Hll h",·a, A&$oelatlon. Inc. eua rantees that the ME.MBER·S or SPONSOR'S listing a$ It a ppears above ...1lI be DubUshed In not less than 50.000 copies of the 89' er BROCHUEE to be distributed durlnll th ~ period bt:t ..·.~n October I. 1951 and ~cember 31. 1958. The ... ssocla tlon r eserves the rl , ht to edIt COpY. a nd reject photol ra phs or other art work deemed unsuitable lor QualLty reproduction In the BROCHURE. a nd to revise . nd alte r the fIn al format. 1 Th e Durohase of LISTING9 In the 89·.r BP.<>CHURE .h~ n be Umlted to ·· ...ctlye'· and ··ASIO(:IA\C" ~n:MBER$ of the 89'''r! Inte nIM!ono.! HI,hway A$.WCl atlon. Inc. and ·'Sponsors." aU 8ubjcct to the foUowln:: terma and conditions. Wh ere... dlstrlbutlon of the BROCHURE and th e resuiUn. bend Its trom Ilsllnu Dubllshed th ~ r eln ",·m ~ xtend oyer a t ... o yea r J)f!rtod, PRESENT membe .. lITe required to pay dues In adyance t·hroull h and Includln. the enti re calendar rear ot 1958. NEW a nd .'ORMER members are re"ulred to pay duu for t",·o tull years In a dvance. ... NNU ... L DUES: Actlve Me mber$hID. _ $15. 00: "'&$O(:lo.t" Memb. nhlo • no.oo which t. e shall a lso Include FREE DISPLAY LlSTING In all edltlOM of th~ MEMBERSmp ROSTER published durln ll th e term of s uch .usoelat. Membership. Authorl ""d •• . ~ BY _______ .~. __ ._. ____ ._ .. ______ . __ ~---- .. J 89"er VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED BELOW. SUBJeCT TO "'CCEPT... NCE BY TilE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball POInt Pen , " .. . MEMB£!l �.,- .. . Actlv e N..... 8 Spon sor DATE 1. I Member Address 140 W, SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADVERTISING LISTING "I.. Se,.w.""'e~~.!,~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LIST ING in the 89'!::R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein, SPONSORSHlP GRANT $ .. TOTAL Rec'd By Fi{)l d Repre8entativc (Line I) (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LIST ING (Name Only ) The purch aI;C ot L1STINCiS In lh e n'er BltoCHURE . hall be llmlted to "Active" and "AS'0<:1 81e" MF.MBERS of the 89'~rs In ternatlollal m ¥hwu Association. In c. and "Sl>On50<5:' lOll A ublec! to th e 10Uo"'ln~ terms and condition •. Whereas , dl$trlbutlon 01 the BROCHURE and the result!n K benellt5 from ll.Unn pubUshed ther ein "'Ill utcnd o\'er a h'o year II<!rlod, PRESENT members are reoulred to pay due. In a dv ~ nc e through and Including the entlr. calend.. year 01 19M!. NEW a nd f'OR~t ER members are require<! to pa, dues lor t ... " full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membershlo, • $15.00: As&oelat. Membersh Ip • 150.00 which tee shall aloo Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a U editIons ot t·he MEMBE'nSfflP ROSTER publis hed durlnr the term 01 s uch Associ at e Membe .. hlp. 89' u ADVERTISING RATES :_ Listlnn In Dlrcdory of "SERVICES AND ACOOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (lI ~ r 11ne) $I IIflr unit; Minimum u te, nil • Max im um !'at e, $50. Oth~r busine ...~ classltleulon s , no IIflr !tne. SPONSORS· F'tnanclul IIrant 01 $1 00 or mor ~ Includes llstlnl of nam e in propor seetlon of BROCH URE, The U' e.s In t~rnRtlnnal Hl l h,,'u A»<>elatlon, Inc. guarantees that the ~IEMBER'S nr SPONSOR'S llstlr./I: U It Kppoar5 Rbo,·. w!ll be pub11shed In not lellS th an ~o.ooo copi e" of th e 89'or BROCHURE to be dlstrl buud during th e porlod between October I, 1957 and Dfocember 31. 19 ~8. The A&5o<: la tion reS",VM the r lRM to edIt CO P f, and reject photona ph. or other art .. ork deemed unsult. able lor Quallty reproduction In the BROCHURE, And to r .vlse and alur th~ final format. Vv, ,• AuthoT!ud I BY . _ _ _ _ .. ____ ._.. _. ___ .. _._. ___ ._.. _ _ .. ______~ VERBAL AGIIEEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTEO TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ball Point P en MEMB£II �Acllve AS90<:. Ne,", ~ev.. ) SI>Onsor DATE Lf/1 Member Address UO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH Dues Lines .1. ADVERTISING LISTING . A~h~~:::~:~: ~~:::RTlh~'~Y ~:~,~,:, theS.;~~~~4; a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERM S and CON DITI ONS contained herein. SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By .. _ ... $ '-I S, tJ J~ . $....................0 Fiold. Representative ( Li ne I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) .. . Th e purch ase of LISTI NGS In ~h e U'er lIl/.OCHURE shall ~ llmUed ~o "Ac~h'e" and "A$so<:;a~e" MF.MlIERS of the 89'ul Intunatlonal Highway Auocla tlon. Inc. and "SI>On""n." all subjec~ to the follo .... lnl ternlS and conditions. ADVERTISING RATES: . Llstlnu In Dlr«tou of "SERVICES AND AOCOM. ODATlONS" MOTI':U> (per Hne) n per unit: MinImum rat e. 130 • Maximum I'at e. S5O. Other bus lneM oIaMlflcatlon •• 130 ~r Itl1e . SI'ONSORS · Plnanclat ~ ra nt of BOO o. mOre Includ es Hs lln, of name In prope r ~t!on of BROCHURE. Whereu . distribution of t·he lIROCHURE and the ,.sulttnl benetlts from lI.linl'S published tllt' el" "'Ill ~~t.nd over a t ... o yea. ~rlod. PRESENT members are reQu~red to paY dues In a dvanc e throulrh and Indudlnl the entire oa lendar year or ID$8. NEW and FORMER me mbers are reQuired to pa r due. for t ... o full yean In advano •. The 89'trs InternaUonal Hllrh ...'RY Assoclatlon. Inc. IU"Untees that the ~IEMBER'S or SI'ONSOR'S ll$tlnll as It appean above "'\!l be published In not leS$ than 50.()OO copiu ot the 89'e r BROCHURE to be dlstrHmted du.lnlr the perIod bet", ,,,, n October I. 1957 and o.-c em~r 31. I&~. The Assoclatlon reserves the rl~ht to edit copy, and Tejut photonaphs or other art work deemed unsult. 3ble for QUaltt1 reproduetlon In Ihe lIROCHURE, and to ."vI St Bnd alt er the final format. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership . • U~.I)O: ASSOCiate Membcrllblp .150.00 which fee sh a ll al"" Include FREE DISI'LAY LISTING In all editions of th" 89' er MEMBERSHlI' ROSTER published durlnlr Ihe term of such AssocIate Membership. ~~lh~~I.e~_..... __ . _ ___ _ .____ ._.~_. __ _ _ ._. ___ ._.~o Ii uJ _______ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTB NOT INCLUDED IN I'RINTEI) TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCtATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Sal! I'olnt I'tn MEMBJ:R �..... AellYe New ~~ Sponsor Dm ! M ember Add rc311 UO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAK E CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER D Uell C ... Li",,\ ADVJo~ RTI SING I 1T Sce.rpC.],..... !:':~._. :'0°0 LISTING $ ........................... . $............................ SPONSORSHIP GRANT Th e undersi gned MEMB ER hereby auth orizes the publica tion of a LI STING in the 89'ER BROCHURE as th e "COPY " appears below and subject to all T ERM S an d CO NDITIONS co ntained herein . ( Lioe I ) ... $ ......................... . to ............... l T OTAL Rcc'd F ield Repre8entat ive . jl \1.\1"..G.Q ..1N.. r.. ...... c.', .P\f.€.. ......... f\ . r"'~ .<>J.l..';; .......\S.~. ":\:<>y,.g.,,.t .... ___ .____ ._. _________ ._ ._ . __ ._ ................ . ( Lin e 2) ............................................ ............................. _ ( Lin e 3) SPONSORS HIP Ll ST:NG ( Na:r.e Only) ....... . ADVERTISINO RATEB : _ Li .U n ... In 0lr«tor7 01 "SER VICES ANO ACCOU_ OOATIOSS" MOTELS (per line) II per unit; MinImum nte. UO _ Ynimum ,Itt. 150. Othe r buslne... damfteulon • • 130 pt. Une. SPONSORS - Plnanet:.! ;- rlnl of 1100 or more In ~ludH 1I0lin. of nlm! In proper secllon 01 BROCHURE The n'erl Jnl ~matlonal Hllh ..·., AasoeLatlon. Inc. ,Uatantul that the :\fElfBER'S or SPONSOR'S II,Un!! .. It ap»eaT>l above ..·m be pubn. hed In not lu~ than 50.000 copln of the 8g'er S ROCHURE 10 be dl.t r lbuted dunn;- th e pe riod boa'u n Octobe. I. 19~7 and J)<octmber 31. 1953. The Auoe latlon rue r ve$ the rl'hl to edit eop1. and reject pholorr.phs or other .. t work deemed un suitable lor \lUk!ltr reproduction In the BROCHURE . and to revi se I nd l iter the :!"",': ~ ~ ,',::. at. m The purch ue of LISTfN081n th~ U'er BP-OCHURE ,haLl be limited to " Actlyo" and "AUQelat t" ME"IBERS of th e "'en I nternaUona] Hllh ..a, Aaaoclallon. Inc . and "8ponllOr...... L1 lubJ.tct to the foll".. ln. I tTmi and condition •. Where ... dl.otrlbuUon of the BROCHURE and the rtlulllnl benetlll 1.0IU Lulln.. publl$hed thertln .-11\ txtend O,'er I two leu perlocl. PRESENT m emben are re<lulred to Pll due. In ad"l nce throu r h and tnetudlnc the entire calendar rear of lUI. r.. ;;w Ind f'OR;\tER members He re<lulred to I'll duel for two , full Jel,. In Id'·anee. ANNlJAL DUES: Active Membeuhtp. _ $15.00: AolJO(:llte Membe rShip - no,OiI " 'hleh fee s ha U a lso Include PREE DIS PLAY LISTING In al! Nlttlon . o f the ROSTER published du rln r Ihe te r m 01 oueh Aaaoclat~ R" :~;~be~~~~~ERSHIP BY _ _ ..... _ . _ ,.. __ ~ __ . __ VERBAL AQREEMENTS ARE NOT BI NDI NG - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUD£D I N PRI NTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY r STATED Bf:LOW. SUBJECT TO AOC'E"PTANCE BY TIlE ASSOCI ATION . • NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ban ~lnL P en M E/l.fB.tR �As"oc_ No. Member E. \ 'M ..... Tc\q.". Address 10(1 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L. ..... to .............. .) . j~,()g ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSHIf GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears belo w and sub ject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. (L;ne I ) ... $ TOTAL Rec'd By Field • • JF..I'I.:&.&.N"'...... R . §, . t'AA:K~G . ~ ... r~~.~. . s:t..§... . '>."rr.\ .I.~. ~... ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LIST ING (Name On ly) ..... Th e purcha$C of LISTINGS In the 89'er Bll.OCHURE ijh a l1 be limited to "Ac~h' e " and "As.oclole· ' MJ,!MBERS of the 89'ers In~ernR!!Ona l Hl ihwar A"oclltiOD, In e. Rnd "SlIOn5O"," lOll subject 10 the fol1owlnll terms and conditions. Whereas, dl ~t tlbutlon 01 t·h e BROCH UR E a nd t he resultln!: beneflts from IIIt1ngs pu bUshed thn.ln will pxtend o,"er a h-O year J>erlod. PRESENT members are ' eQulred to pu' dues In advance throu r h and IncludinK Ihe entire calend ar )"tar 01 195-8. NEW and ~'ORMER me mbers Rte required to p ar due. tor h ·o full yea rs In a<l~ance. ANNUAL DUES: A~th'e lIIembershlp. • '15.00 : AUQClate Mem bership - '50 .CO " 'h leb tee shall also Indude PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editIon. Of th~ 89'", lIIE!l.fBE'RSIIiP ROSTER publl. h"d durln ll the term of such ASSOCiat e Membership_ ADVERTISINO RATES;_ Listin n in DirectorY of "SERVICES AND ACOOM. ODATIOSS" MOTELS (pcr line) SI per unit; Minimum rate. no - Mn.lmum nlte. n o. Oiher bu~lne"" clas. Wcatlon., no per llne. SPONSORS· FlnaDclal IIrant of noo or mOt ~ Inelude. Ustln ," of nam e In proper sec!!on of BROCHURE The 39'er. Internation a l Hillha'ay Assoclatlon, Inc. lIua ra ntcn that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR·S llsUnK .. it appears above will be pub!l sh ed In not Ie •• than 50.00/1 cople. of the n' er BROCHURE to be di stributed durln ~ ~h e period bea·e"n Oclober 1. 1957 and o.c~mber 31. 1958. The A.';Soclallon reserve s the rll:ht 10 edit copy, and r~kct photoJraphs Or other art work deemed unsult. able tor Quality r~ roductlon fn the BROCHURE, an d to r~"lsc and alter th~ tin a] torm .. ~ U AuthorIzed BY - - .-5-.---- _.___. ___ _ VERBAL AOREEMEN"I'S ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRIN EXT MUST BE CLEARLY STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED UI<i BaU Potnt Pen i MElIIBr:R �No • ... oun ~Q.\ Member Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. '\ ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Unu 1.................... Sec.) ... .!.~ ... .I.:.:....... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication 't f a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appea rs below and s ubject to all T ERMS and COND ITIONS co ntained herein. 1 D''''' 410.. ~_f?.. r.t.±.tA. ....... ~.r~ . . .,;;..r...1>.......~!: !..~..I.-'..:\... .. ~*~ ,\Y ~ LI ' SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH DUell Ren .... ..... . .. .... . to ................ ) $ ... .. ADVERTISING LISTING o~ $ .. ~..... .-.,.. SPONSORStflP GRANT $.. -...................... .. TOTAL Rcc'd By \'b~~ .. . . . . . . . ,:;,Q<>~ Field RcprC861!tatiue (U", I) :-:r. f~BCO .... ::;l)'.,VJc:~ ....M\)i:t.b .....N.~ . ~....1>.~."" .h±.~. ~ .t\ .. V".~+ .s. .................................................... ........ .. (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHI P LIST ING (Name Onl y) ...... . Th e pu ,ehue of LISTIN GS In I he U 'u UltOCHURl<: sha n be limited 10 . ... cllve " and .. ... uoc: l. te.. MEMBERS Of the 19'er' Intern a tlcnal HI.. h.,., "'UOC:lallon, l~ . • nd "Sl>On50":' all . ubJecl 10 Ihe foUc ... ln .. term • • nd condition •. Wh erell. d lJ;trlbulion of the BROCHURE and l he rel uilin.. benefit. fron' III Un ,. pubUshed tbereln ...m nlend <Wer .. t"'o J e ar perlO(l, PRESENT member. a re required IQ 1>&7 dues tn ad u nce IhrOUlh a nd Includh>l Ihe entire c.. lendar rur of 19~' . NEW a nd FORMeR members U e required 10 pn dun for ,.,,, fuU J""r' In a d~ance. ... NNU ... L DU ES: "'clh'e Men,be'shlp. - $15.00: As6ocI .. te Membership· "0.00 which tee s hall .. 110 Includ e FR!:E DISPLAY LISTING In an edItions of the 89·e. MEMBERSHIP ROSTEn publis h ed durin. Ih e term of l ucb M3OO:llle Mtmbeflblp . ,\[lVl:;.RTI6IN' 1 nATi:8 :_ Lin in .. In DI~ edOr,. of "SERVICES ... ND ACCOMOD ... TIONS" MOTELS ( per line ) $I oer un it: Minimum rate. SSO _ Ya:rlmum .. a te. I~ . Other bU5lne ... elaulfloaUon • . $SO per lint. SPONSORS _ PIn .. ndal I ra nt ot 1100 or more Inoludeo UI Un .. 01 name In proper lltetlon 0 1 BROCHURE. The U 'n. Jnlu nanon a l H le b .·.. r "'NOelaUon. Ino. . u .... nlet1l that the ME).{BER·S cr SPONSOR'S UoUr.1{ ... It a pl>UU .. bove ..m be published tn not leos Iha n MJ .OOO copies ot the SD' er BROCHURE t(I be d lll rihuled durlne th~ period bt:t"' r~ n Oclober I. 19S7 And l)Ioce mber 31. 19$8. The "'"""Iatlon re. erve. the 'l l bt 10 Wit tOPJ. and reject photoluaph l or other art ... ork duml!'d un.ult_ able for Qu~lIlr reproduotlon In the BROC IWRE. and to revln and .. ltcr the fInal form at. "'ulhorlud BY VERBAL AG REEMEh'TS ...RE NOT BINDI NO _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED T!:XT MUST BE STATED SEt.OW. SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ...TION. a NO CARBON REQUIRED Ulle Ball Point Pen o CLE.~LY 1 �, Active Membe r Address SALT LAKE CITY I , UTA H ItO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lin" 8 Spon"". ~ fR _ lot. 1t:f1~~~{:V. ..... . /...01< f' .................................................. ......... Due.!! <. .............. to ............... ) . 30.,.DD.. SPONSORSHIP GRANT Se,. %~ $ .......... ............... .. ADVERTISING LISTING .J . .......... . The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROC H URE as the "COPY" appears below and s ubject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein. (L;n, I) .. J.o..N.. N... $ ........ . , TOTAL Rec'd By Field Rcprcacntatioo ........ $ ..~ '3.O __ r:.::CLf........ MO.l .E...l ........1.,I.. t:n\!A.'.tn...\,L~.+.5 ......... f.\.;TI..B,N,,,.,~(r ................... . ( Line 2) ( Lin e 3) SPONSO I~S H I P LISTING (Name Only) ... Th e lIurch ase of LISTINGS In Ihc U'u BltoCHURE . h a ll be limited \0 "Atth'e" and "An oc la tt" ~n:MBER8 of the 89' er. InternaUonal m a h .. ., A$$<xiatlon. Inc. a nd ·'8I>On.MI":' all aubject to Ih e lollowlnl term. a nd condillon •. Where.., distribution 01 Ihe BROCHURE a nd the rnuitlnl' ben"lIt. trom IIst ln u pUbli shed lhe.eln "'Ill ~Xl.nd onr a \11'0 pu r pedod. PRESENT member. are r~1I 1 ..d to par dun In a dunce lhroul h I nd lnchldln. th" entire ealendar feu of list. NEW a nd PORMER membeno are required 10 !>U' dun for t ..o fult , ear, In aClunee. ANNUAL DUES: AcU,·" ~.mberahh', • I I~ . OO : .u.ocla te M~mber&hl!> • no .GO .. hlch fee ,hall a bo Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a n editions of Ih ~ 19'er MEMBERSIIJP ROSTER publl. hed durlne the term of s uch As.ociate Membeuhl\l. ADVERTISING RATES :. LlItln ll In Dlre.to., of "SKRV lCE8 AND AOCOM· ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per Une ) I I \Ie. unit: Minimum ralt, no - M.... lmum l a te. 1$0 , Othu bus;ne ... ctu s trlca Uons, no pc. line. SPONSORS· Pinancbl J ra nt of SlOG or more Includes UaunJ 01 n a me In proper "",Uon of BROCHURE. The In te rnation a l Hll h .. a , Auoetatlon, Inc. I Ul ra nl"". thai Ih" ME'-IBER'S or SPONSOR'S 1t' lIn; It appear$ ahove .. \II be PUblished In not lHi than MI.OOO copies of the all'er SROCHURE 10 be d llu lbuled durlnJ tb~ per iod betorren Oclober I , 11l~1 . nd r>rcember 31 , 19sa. The AuoelaUon nH.nl the rllht 10 edit COP1, a nd reject IIhOtocn"h. or other art. .. ork dceme<1 unlult. a ble for o.uI UI1 ' ""rOOue Ion In t h e BROCHURE. Rnd to .ev lH a nd alter Ihe fin al fonn al. U'... a, _____..._.__.~_. ~~\hOrlzed ~....J.._~~ VER.aA!.. AGREEMENTS ARE NOT lHNDI NG AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PR.INTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STAT!:O llJl;LOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCtATION. ~\J(I!'+ o.W> ~ \-0 ':>~ .,3J.vQ~ WI\\ b. t'~4 b - f'" I NO CARBON REQUIRED U.se Ba ll Point ~n MEMBeR �AcUn 1\lember Addrc 5.!l IfO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER J:~ If/1'/27 .. .) • • 00 $, .....- ....)..:::::::," _ -'SP N::::=Hl:::;.P,,-i'iVf::i'r-""'-i-= 'J07'i ..•••••.•••••• :;.:O::"S RS O . ....... So, ....•.•. .. F.~r...}).•,s;. . ..~. .I'\ . ';-s:. ., . ~. .~ . ~,,,Q .')\'\'~ DATE ADVJ.JRTISING LISTING The undersigned M.EMB ER here by authorizes th e publica tIon of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and s ubject 10 a ll TERMS and CON DITI ONS contained he rein. ( Li ne 1) Renn· FB~\;?·~~m . . . .~.m~ m~ Dues 1................. l..ines ... .0' ~D.EE$ ................... . TOTAL Rec'd By Field RcprClentative "~ \ )).1""'0 (&Q.~.......~ .. .PtI';\.. M.\!~ ~\~~1 (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H I P LI ST ING (Name On ly) ... ...... . . .. .... .. ............. .................... ..... ................. ........................-.......... ...................... . The purcb u e 01 LISTINOS' ln the all'e, Bll.OCllURE wall be limited 10 " Acllve" a nd " AMOclate" MF.~IB EELS of the 8!I·e. s Internatlonll HI,h"17 A.uoclatlon. Inc . and .. Sl)Onsor .. ·· all lublKt 10 the follo .. lnr l erm , . nd condition •. Wherus , dl~lrlbutlon of the BROCHU R E a nd the . u ultlng benefU . f.om lIatin" publ!$hed therein ...m Ulend ol'er a 1."'0 rur IH'rloll, PRESENT members a re reQuired 10 par due. In advance throu. h and Inciudln. I h e entire ca lendar rear 0 1 llisa. NEW and PORMER members a re required to pa r dues lor t.·o lull rea .. In a dunce , ANNUAL DUES : Active Membership, _ U5.00: Assoclale Member.!.hIP ·150.00 "hleb fee ahall also tnclude FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edltlOni o f the 89'CT MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl. hed durln l the te.m of such Alloelale Member, hlp. ADVERTISING RATES ;. U stl n n In Dlr«lorr of "gRVICES AND AOCOM· ODATlONS" MOTElS (IH" line) U IH" unll; MInimum r"e, S30 • Mulmum ,al~. U O. Other ba.lnt... daulrlcaUono. 130 Pf-r IIn~. SPONSOELS· Plnancl~1 . rant of $100 or mo.~ Includ es 1I.tlnK of name In prolH" oKllon of BROOIIURE The n'e ra IM~rnRtlonal HI,ha'ay A_&<XI.llon, Inc. .uarRnlcn that the MEMBl.'R·S or SPONSOR'S II _Unll: I I It aplH'ar. a bove .. !II be publisbed In nOI lell than .loO,OOO copies 01 the n'er BROOHURE 1<1 be dlltrlbuled durlnl the ~rjod bet ....... n October I . 1~~7 an d DN:~mber 31 . 1~53. The oUIOelaUon ruene. the tlcbt to edl1 COOY. and re jKI photocrapha or other .rt work deemed unsult· a ble for QU'UIY rU>ToIluct lon In tbe BROOHURE, a nd to reVIse and l iter tht L "",' ''',m,'. 'L ~• ....,J..-,-L.,.. Author! >Y C,,<V-~ VERBAL AGREE!I.IENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED T'8XT MUST BE CLEARLY! STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE AssoctATlON. NO CARBON REQUIRED Ute Ba\l Point Pen ___ . MEMB£F! �Act!>·c Member Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT UKE CITY 1, UT AH L ines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Sl>On ~ or , .J .U19\S-.l'I.",Q.<>,.xrdr" .oM., o~~~'!\!~I_ LH,j.J'trt.• '\('~\\rr: ADVERTI SING LISTING • 2()~ . . SPONSORSIDP GR ANT $... ~. Due-s (.. ............. to . J Scc.B..~Y ..~.~ .~ .. The undersigned MEMBE R hereby au thorizes the publica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and sub ject to all T ERM S and COND ITI ONS contain ed herein . ( Line I ) A..oc. .........) W:f)~. . TOTAL R ec'd By Field Representative ~OD~ $ .................... ..... .'l f'l:J .f:1,1:: ..<>, .~.~....N.~IAJ... r ~.(1,.1\....\"!,Q~h t s (Li ne 2) ( Line 3) S PONSORS HI P LI STING (Name Only) The pu rchase of LISTiNOS' in the 89'cr BPvOCllURE shall be limited 10 "Actlvc" and " Assoclatc" "t EMBERS of th ~ l!9'crs In tunallona l Hl l ho/BY ,usoclaUon . Inc. and "Sl>Onso rs:' all subject to the followh'1l' terms a nd conditions . Whereas . distribution of the BROCIIURE and the resulting ben efits Irom 1!511n n Dubl! . hed therein 11"111 ~xtcnd o,'er a U,'O year period. PRESENT me mber$ are req uired to Da, dues In ad"ance throu.,h and Includin g the enUre calendar yea r of 19~8. NEW and POR~IER membeu are required to PU dues lor two full Years In a d vance. ANNUAL DUES: Active MembershlD. • '1 5.00; ....... oclate Membe rshlp _ ' SO.DO "'hleh fee sh a ll also lnelud c FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edlUoM of th~ 89'e r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durln l th e t erm 01 3uch ....... oclat. Membership. ADVE-KrISINO RA1i:5 : _ Ll>Uau In Dlr"cto r y or ""t;EIINI C£S AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (pe r Une) II nl! r unit; Minimum rate. no . Mulmum Ute. no. Other busln"s. e1as.ltleatlons, n o per line. SPONSORS _ Plnanclal Iffant of $ 100 or mOr ~ Includes Il sUnl of n a me In proper secllon 01 BROCHURE. The 89'ers In tprnallonal Hla h,,·lI.Y Assoclall on . Inc . l uarantets that the ~IE~mER'S or SPONSOR'S listing u It a ppears a bove will be published tn not le$$ than ~ .ooo cOlli es 01 the 89'n BROCIIURE to be d lstdhu t e<l durlnl th e period bet"'een Octobe r I. 1951 a nd nt.<:e mbcr 31. 19~8. Th e ASSOCiation reserve$ the right to edit CODY. and reject photographs or other art 1I"0rk d ee med unsult _ ablc tor Qualit y reproduction In the BROCfJURE. and to r ev ise and a lter the final form a t. ~~\h~~.~'1_.__~.~.L_. "-:.~~~MBtl? VERBAL AOREEMENT"S ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTEO TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY t STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ~ ~< ~1'1~ ~ NO CARBON REQUIRED U!Ie Bal! point P en �~ ""-'" ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..,.,.:.u. . If-....J. ~ ~ { cJ-,.~ct- ---b, ~- ~ ~~ if"A. ~ �Active Rcn ..., AMOC. SpOn sor DATE Member ~. .,.,.\s.~ . . Y'v\. <lt~l Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. fuaJ<~~q~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to .. Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines Be,. I The u ndersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LI S TING in the 89'E,R BROCHUR E as th e "COPY " appears below and s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIONS con tained herein. (L'", I ) SW.LS ..s .. N\C>Jf, L ...... ) ' 30::£2:m •.. _ s ADVERTISING LISTING f!" .... ~. I ",..yv .....';"'-O (\ lAh •• SPONSORSHIP GR A NT TOTA L Rec'd By ..... $ F ield Reprellentative .,Ll .. b\~WU. ,,~:l::sTY;:.'\:.l'.!.~'S ...fl..6 .f t ... .......... . (Line 2) ( Line 3) S PONSOR S HI P LI S TING (Name Only) ............................ .. ........ . The purchRU 01 LISTII'OS in the U'er BltCCH ORE , h a ll be Undt ed to " Active" and "Associ a te " MF.MBERS of the 89'ero Internati(mal Hla hwu AsSOCiation. Inc. and "SpOn$Ors:' all subject to the fOllowin g terms and conditions. Whereas. distribution of the BROCIIURE and the r.sultln ,," benefits from !lltln... pub!ls hed therein ... m utend over a 1'0'0 fur period. PRESENT members are required to pay due. In advanoe thT<lu~h a nd Indudln,," Ihe enllre calendar YU' of 1958. NEW and !'ORMER member! a re requi red to par due. lor t ... o lun rears In advance . ANNUAL DUES : Active Membership. - $15,00: As.wclate Membershtp - $50 ,00 " 'hleh tee shall Bl-'O Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edition s of th~ ::~~be~~;-:'~ERSIlIP ROSTER nubllshcd durtnl" the term 01 sueh A$O<:late ADVERTISING nATES :. I.;.tl n .... In Directory 01 "SERVICES AND ACCGM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (per line) $I i>C r unit: Mlnlmu", ute . 130 _ M..,.lmurn rate. 'SO. Other bu.;ne"" c1as.lflcatlons, $30 per line. SPONSORS. Fln anclul ~unt of 1100 Or nl0r~ Include. lI . t.1n&" of nam e In prope r section of BROCHURE The 89'e<5 In ternational IIllI h ..·.. y AMOClatlon. Inc. 8"uarantees that t he ~I£MBER'S or SPONSOR'S Il.Ur.g as II a ppears abon ... m be publl. hed In nOt leu Ihan SO.OOO coptes of the 89' e, BROCHURE to be dl .lrilluted durln$ the period ben.... n Oct ober 1. 1957 a nd Dfo<:ember 31. 1958, The A""oclatlon r eServes the rl ... ht to edit cOJ!;f, and reject photOllra.ph$ Or other art work deemed uns uit_ able lor Quallt t -r.pfoducllon In the BROCHURE. a nd to rC" lse and alter th~ final 10rm ' 2 2 ~~Ih~d }:7-i11~ _____ f~ ll!4t;;.1. n ____••_ VERBAL AOREEM£NTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUOeo IN PRINTED TEXT MUST :In: CL EARLY_l.. STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TilE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen .__ MEMB£R �, Now Rentw Sl>Onsor Dm Member A ddr ess 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. J~Ly",\MLL hk",,\.&l(f.L SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to D ues C .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .t . . . .. ... . . s.o.~ _.......J _ ADVERTISI NG LISTING SPONSORSHIP G RANT Th e undersigned MEM BE R hereby aut horizes the puBlica tio n of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY " ap pea rs below and s ubjec t to a ll TE RMS an d CONDITI O NS con tained he re in . • ~=. $...~.Q! , .. TOTAL Rcc'd By Field Re prese ntative (Un' I) t1DRRl\lM.o::rf.. \.._ .:;r."t\~;lul\.l... fY..nl".". b01;('•..\';,,5 ... (Line 2) ( L in e 3) SPON SORSHIP LI STING ( Name On ly) 'rh e purch u e of LISTINGS jn Ih e 89' or BIU>CIIURE shall be limite<! to "Acth",," ~nd "AMoelalc" MEMBERS of Ihe 89'"" International m~hwu Association. Inc. and ··5I1On8Or.:' ~n subject to Ihe 101101<1"1 terms and cond ition •. Whereu , dl~tr!butlon el the BROCHURE ~nd the re.ullinl' benellt. ITom UsUn n fJubUshed th~Te!n ",m pxtend o,'eT II '1<'0 yeRr pe riod. PRESENT members are requIred to pal' due. In advance throu /r h and Includln/r the enUre calendar )"eRr of 195-8. NEW a nd PORMeR members arc reQujred to (JaY dues tor t ... " fUll years In IIdvance. ANNUAL DUES: Acth'e Membe rship. _ $15.00: A5&oclB\e Membership - IMI.OO "'hleh fee shall 11100 Includ e FREE DISI'LA 'f LISTING In all O'dltLona 01 tha ::~~be~!~t~~msHIP ROSTER published durln /r the term ef .uch A&so<:late "OVERT ISINO RATE8 : _ Ll. lin lr' In Dlre~torJ ef "SeRVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (J>\'r lind II per unit: Minimum rate, no _ Maximum I ate, 15(1. Other bu.lness cluslflcatlens, no per line, SPO NSORS - I"Inandul ~ ranl or $100 or mor ~ Include. Uslin/r ot name In proper leCtlon e f BROCHUR e , The 8~' e r s International HI8h"'ay A&SOCla tion. Inc. 8uarantuR tha t the ~le~lBeR'S or SPONSOR'S U.llr.g as It a ppeau above ... m be publl.hed In not Ie'" than 50.000 eoples of the 89'u BROCHURe to be d Istributed durin; tll~ ""riO<! be"". en (ktobe r 1. 1951 knd Drcembcr 31, 1958. 'MIe AssoelaUen re.erve. the rllhl to edit COpy. and reject Ilhotolrra.ph$ or ether art work deem ed un.ult_ a ble for Qualltl' reproducllon In the BROCHURE. lind to r~"lse and alter the tlnal lormat. -:zt. ~~th~~,t::::~::::::;z~,_.. & d ._ . ldL..-:. _. ~ME~IBCU _ "f.-} 2 l _.. __ VeRBAL AOREEME/Io'TS ARE NOT BI Nl) INO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST B E CLE ARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CA RBON REQUIRED UK B all Point P~ n �Rene ... Active 61>On10' DATE lIl) Ii , Member Address 1'0 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Sec. ld q..:1c..l..."" .f'J>- ) SPONSORSHlP GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'f.R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appears below and s ubject to all T ERMS and CON DITION S contained herein . (Line I ) $.. ~... :~ - ..- ... ...... ADVERTISING LISTING Lincs ._ .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER s ...... .) to .. Dues $.... ...... $ .. TOTAL Rcc'd B y F w /d ReprCSC lllative ... \, ..t.l.L\ .CC't .....i.\.....::t.I ..........c....I:!\., .. L.b .\- .. !;..,:, ..• ..<•.0 ... •.... , ' .. C~ .!.........f ..'1..r ... . (L ine 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LIST I NG ( Name Only ) . The purcbase of LISTINOS In tb~ 89'or BHOCHURE . b~H be litnlted to "Actlve" and " A~s o<:late" MF.MBERS of Ihe '9'tr~ Internationa l HIKh,,·u A$.Welalion. Inc. and "S»On50","' ~ ll subject to the [ollowlna terms ~nd conditiOns. Wh oreu, dist ribution ot the BROCHURE and the resultln", bcnem . trom ll.tln u publl~h e d Ihe reln ",II! . xt ~n d over a ("-"0 YeRr period. PRESENT membe r. arc required to P& 1 dues In ad,·anc. th rough and Including the entl , . calend ... year ot 1958. NEW a nd ~'ORMER moml>l'r. are ' eQul red to pay duel to. 190"0 full )"e .... In advance. ANNUAL DUES: A"II,'e Mem ber.hlp. • $15.00; A"5O(:late Membusblp _ $50.00 which tee s hall ~I!IO Include FREE DISPLAY LtSTING In all edlUon. or t h e 89'e, MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publls bed durin, Ihe term ot such A&soclal" Membersblp. ADVERTISING RATES. . U.IIU..-s In OI,ectorY ot "S ERVICES AND ACCO M_ ODATIONS" MOTI:."LS ( JI<'r line ) U per unit: Minimum rate. 130 - Maxlmum uu. no. Oth~r buslnc,," clao.trleatlon •. no P~f lln~. SPONSORS - l"In ancl~1 ~ rant ot $100 Or mO,,, Include. lIotln", ot name In proper se<:tlon of BROCHUR.E The 89' crs I nl.rnat!onal Hllh ..·&)" A&soeialion. Inc. ~uarantees thU the ~U;l>IBE'R'S or SPONSOR'S listing U It a llpearS above "'1lI b~ publl$hed In not lets than MI.OOO tOple. or the 8P· • • BR.OCHURE to be dl. lrlbuted durin", I h~ period bet"'"e" Oclober 1. 19~1 lind Dfotember 31 . 1 9~8. "MI . A""oela tlon .eServu the r l~ht to edit cO Il '. _a nd reject pbologuph. or other art "'ork dee med un.ult . J a bl e ror Qua? ll J" ,prodUction In the BR OCHURE. and 10 r~ .. Jse and .ltu th~ tlnal formRt. / ' , Autho,lted BY ___ .._ ... _. --/.. "..J. / --=FL.:.......k:C."'" __ ..L.::...~~..J.. VERlIAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRIt."TED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEI'TA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ~.A\.~ 1-'1,-\-<\-."" ~I\'~Q' l- b~"" NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball P oInt Pen 0 ,,) \ " ~ .- ~ ""MEMB[~ �Active Me mbe r Address 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Ne", ~O!1,i:V!I 'ar:::::tJ~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:k~:W:~ The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein . Sponsor IJIRcDf\~Mct:JLL Dues L (Line I) e ..... to . ............. J ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSHIP GRANT • • ;'l)~O • TOTAL Rec'd By ............. -.... $ .. Ficld RcprcllclI/ative .1LR c.ll ..f\.'IM.OTI;'=........!:'4~"' ..~~""" .O."'.\:h. ,. Q,.·. " .L . & .£(1.. ........................... (Line 2) (Line 3) S PON SORS HIP LI STING ( Nam e Only ) ..... ............ . The p urchase 01 LISTINOS' ln th e 89· ~ r Bn.ocHURE shall 1>1: limIt ed ~o ··Actlve'· And "Associate" MP..'dBERS of the 89'er$ Intuna\ional Hi ah" a y Asso.:lallon, Ine . and ·'SPOn sors "· aU .ubJ~ct to th~ follo ..·lnl" terms a nd conditIons. Wherus. dlstrlbullon of the BROCH URE and t-h e resu lUna beneflts from lI.tlnll'5 publl.hed therein ",!II ~~t~nd O... er a t ..·o , ear ~rlod. PRESENT membe .. are required to P aJ duea In ad'·.nce thrOUKh and lnc1udlnJ the enllre calendar Yea r of 1958. NEW a nd rolt~IER members are requIred to pay ducs tor t",o full yean tn ad ... ance. ANNUAL DUES: Acth·. Moonbl:<shl p. - $15.00; ASsocIate l>!embeuhlp ·150.00 ",hteh fee shall also lnclud e FRI!:E DISPLAY LISTING In all edlttoM 01 th~ 89·~r MEMBERSffiP ROSTER pubUshed durin; the term 01 . ueh Al!. o<:!ale Membershll'. ADVERTI SING ItATE5 :_ Lullnu In DIrectory 01 ··SER ... lCES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS·· MOTELS ( ~ r Un~ ) II ~r unit; M!nlmum rate. no - Mnlmum >ate . no. OtMr bu,ln ••• cla.,1f!eatlon •. n o lIer line. SPONSORS _ Finanel,,1 Hanl ot noo Or mor e Include. !lstln!!" 01 n a me in proi>tt section 01 BROCHURE. The 89·eu In t~rnatlonBI Htllh ..·ay AssoeIBt1on . Inc. gua ra nt ees th at th~ MEMB&R·S or SPONSOR·S listing a ~ It a p ~a r . above "ill be publiShed In not le~$ than 50.000 copies 01 the 89·u BROCHURE to be dl strlbuted during Ih~ period bl:t ..· e~ " Celobl:r I. 1957 an d Dfoc~mbl:r 31. 1958. The Assoc\a ll on r e.erves the ri~ht to edIt COllY, and reject photographs or other art work deemed un l ul t _ ab le for qU~ltty ,"productIon In the BROCllUR.E. and to rev ise ~nd alter th~ Iinal form at. I ~~th~~~~_~j_':l_Ii_L:=. {S_f.. ~_ .2~_~_._. __ __ MEMBER VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREE ~lENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PItINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJEC'I' TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATiON. ~v~y~",-\ o.\lOS 1"($ 8 J..VQ~ ~'" I '" -ho l'I--\J ~u.,,-\ 1'\ S'1 . +<> P. f"';~ \,-( ~Y'- 'fV\>" f'-\.O,", 0+ NO CARBON REQUIRED Ulle Ball Point Pen - �~. Assoc. N•• Rene .. Sponsor DATE Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LA KE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER I to s... . -----.-> . ;:'{J ADVERTISING LISTING S P ONSOI}SffiP Se•. The undersigned MEMBER hereby autho rizes th e pub lication of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COP Y" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DIT IONS cont ained herein. GRANT ,.,: 00 ..... -/-- .. TOT AL Ree'd B FWld" 'kePTeSen!a!im! Ii ) 3>TBH"IJf\ l-l- t',~l~"\,l.) p.\n} + ~o""~" ': n~;'\ .J.................... (Lio" 1 ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG .! Name Only) Th ~ purcha$e or LISTINOg In t he 89"er BIlOCHOR(: shall be lImitea to "Act!ve" .. nd ··Associo.te " MEMBERS of t_ e aB' ers InternationAL HI~ h"'ay ASliodation. h Inc. and ·'Sponsor''"· all sublect 10 the fo)lo .. lnll: terms and conditions. Wher eas. dllltribution of the BROCHURE and Ihe ruultlnK benefits from i!5tinn published therein wHi nt end o,'er R t..-o year period. PRESENT ",embers are required to paf dun In advance Ihrough and including the enltre calendar yur 01 19~8 . NEW and PORMER members ar e re(lulred to pay du •• fOT t.'o full year. in advance. ANNUAL DUES, ACtlH Membersh ip. - $15.00: As.!:oclate MemMrshlp - no.oo which fee shall a lso Include FREE D1SPLAY LISTING In all edlt\ons of th~ ROSTER pubU.hed durin; the t erm or su ch Anoel .. te ::~:':-be~~l'!~ERSHIP ADVERTlsmo flATES :_ Lis Un"s In Director)" 01 ··Si.tlVmES AND ,"'CCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (ller Une) ! 1 per unit: Minimum rate. no _ Mu:lmum ,ate. $SO. Other buslnu• cluslflcation • . no per lin e. SPONSORS _ P'l1I.ncl ~ 1 • "ant of UOO or mor~ Include~ Ustln,J Of name In IIrop ~ r section 01 BROCHURE Th~ n'e's Inter national HI ,h .. ay AlISOClation. Inc. $'uaranteu that the MEMBER 'S or SPONSOR'S listing- a. It appear$ above wlll be pub!lsh~d In no! IO$S than ~.OOO copies of the 89' er BROCHURE to be di stributed during !h~ period beh".~n _O<:tober I. 19$7 and Otcember 31 . 1958/ The AssoclaUou r eServu Ihe rl ~ ht--- to-edlt copr. and reject photograph . or ot r art a'ork deemed unauitable for Quality reproduction In the BROCHlJl\E. nd to re,'ise ~nd aiter thT finAl format. / (J \t- I/i ~~u~~~. __ "~~~ .....__ ~ __ .,{)-_ ..:':__~~_. ____ . MEMBcn VERBAL .... GRSEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CIfEARLY 1 STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ""SSOCIATION. I / t-A,+c\-. o\\ tvI O+ Q \ 1-0'1:1"" ~ '" , NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball P oint Pen 1-1 ...., ~8" ~ro~o-\-.." rv"q �Member Addre s~ 10&0 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L ines to ......... ...... ) .11. . . . . . . (L'"e 1) "3- oE..! AD VERTI SrNG LISTING ....\ $._ •..••.................... SPONSORSHIP GRANT Se c . ...• :.~J.~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby aut ho rizes [he publication of R LI S TING in the S9'I:;R BROCHURE as th e "COPY " appears below and subject to all T ER MS and CONDIT IONS cont ained herein. $ ........•..•..... $ .................. , <, it TOTAL Rec'd By Fiel d Rcprc.sC/ltati ve $.S¥..;~ ,>?, .VI\l.L\:..O.t4 .. c. .O..r:.r,Lto..S .I:1 (,? ....D ,.;"''i'l ..\:c·~'''·''''I··.c·L\'\.\<!\J.1.···~·"..r.········;i"; ......~ ...... " ..................... ........ -- .. ......................... .. .......................................... -........ .............. ... ..................... ..... (Line 2) (Lin e 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only ) .......... .. ...... ....... ..... ...... The I>Urchase 01 LlSTI N08 In 1M 89' er BltOCh UR E I h l li be lim it ed to ··I\.cuu·· and " A$.WClatt " MR\IBERS 01 the H'en In! ern:ltlonal Hllh ...,. M$OclatlOn , Inc . a nd "Sl>OnlOrl ," "n l ubke t to the follo .. lnll terms I nd condition • . ADVER'rISINO KATE8 :_ LUUn li In Dlretto r,. o f "SERVICRJ AND AOCOM · ODATIONS" MQT1.'LS ( per line ) I I per un it : Minimum rate. no _ Ya:rlmum ' " t e. ISO. oth er bUllne", clau llle_Uon .. no per lin e. SPONSORS· PinanelMI Ira nt 01 U OO Or more lncludps 1I"lnl 01 n a me In proper lleetlon 01 BROCHURE. Where... db UlbuUon of the BROCHURE I nd the ru ul t1n l bendl tJ froP' Ib Un ... J)uhllahed thue ln ..m ul end 01."e r a 1" '0 rur period. PRESENT members are reQu ired to I>U' dUCI In a d " a nte IhroUlh . nd Ineludlnl th e enllre .alendar n a r 01 U~. NEW and F'ORMER membe rs u e required to I>" r due. for 1,,'0 lull r ea .. In " d".n.o. The I n tfrn a Uon l 1 Hllh "'a , Auoclatlon, I nc . l uaranteel th a t the ~I EMBER ' S or SPONSOR'S Ustl nJ[ .s It Il>pear. a bo"e ..·m be I>ublished In nOt len t h a n r.o.OOO copies or the 8P' er BROCHURE to be dist ributed durtn !' th o period bel "'~n Oc tober I . 1957 a nd I ~e mber II. 1958. The A_ Iulon re. eITts Ihe .l r ht to e<l 1t cop)". a nd rej ect photol.aphs Or other a rt .. ark de..med un . ult· able lor QU "m,. repTOdZ tlon 11\ Ih e BROCHURE. 10 Ttvl., and alte r th~ which fee .DUES: Act h'c Membership. • $15.00:LISTINO In Membersh ip -01 th~ AN NlJAL ha U ,,110 Includ e FREE DISf'loAY Auoclue a ll edltlon. ,r.o.OO 89'er Mi'.MB £:RSHIP ~ Ilubllahed durin , the term 01 ! ueh "-1"le Membeublp. VERB1\.L AOR EEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ ag'... _ C !~'~o,."'~ . ',•• Rt . o rm _ _ _.__( ;fo AG REEMENTS NOT INCLUO£O IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOOEPTANCE BY TIll!: ASSOCIATION. <'V II' '''' 1 '1~S " . ._ . M"""<' 2 l'-! .~t \)V t vps 1.0;\\ NO CARBON REQUIR£D Use Bi n POint ~n �UNION PACIFIC DATE Dear BE: Report 6-29 Bentle~ The attached checks are in payment of contracts turned in on previous reports •• the first tour li sted under "colleotions" on this current report. The two payments whioh were received by mail ot whioh I was oertaln- W illiams C ot C and Anvil Motel are also listed. You oan add additional colleoti ons received by mail , total the columna, and complete the report. Sinoe the Anvil Motel membership fee inolude. in his oheok involves a refUDd to the Jaokson Club, please send me this 15 oheck so it oan be turned in to Bill and the Club refund paid. * -4 j u The same also applies to Jensen Ma rket and La Siesta Motel(report # 5-6). * In t a ct, it you feel we can turn loose of 75.00 at this time, it would be a good idea to clean up all tive memberships due the parent Association. The system between Bill and I i s based on a "remittance advise" basis and there is no way provided to record membership dues on e'ther of our books until I remit to him and get his return reOeiKt. It would cause contusion to start somet i~ new this close to the annual conve ntl ~n a -- ~vdl'h,..., �Active , Membcr Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. lli •.l .I.l.'L::,... ':\Q"y ..·.C........ fl~'<4~~\~ tL\a\'" SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Du~ ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .... .I.............. "" flf l!"[,11. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pu'bJication of a LISTING in the S9'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. L ...... to . __ _ ... _ ____ ) $ __ ADVERTISING LISTING $ ..]:,.9. SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ ;30°_ ........... -.-_._ .. . TOTAL Rec'd (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LISTING (Name Only) The purchase of LIST INGS' In th .. 89'~~ Ul!OCHURE . hall be limited to "Actlve" and "A$$OclBte" M~~fBERS of the 89'ers International ltI~hOl\'''' ASsodllt!on, Inc. and "Sponsors," RII sub!""t to the 10110... 11>11" t erm s Bnd conditions. Whereas. distribution of the BROCHURE and the ,esulUni ben efits from IIstinu publiShed therdn "'111 utend o"c' a t ..·o JUr perlO<l. PltESENT m embers are r.nulred to PaY dues In advance through and Indudln. th e entire calendar yur nl 1958. NEW and FORMER members are required to pay dues for t ..'n full yeRra In adnnce. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membersblp. - 115_00: Msoclue Mem ber.hl p - ,~.oo ... hlch fcc shall al110 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING in all edition. of the ::~~be~~~~ERSIUP ROSTER publish ed durlna the lerm of s uch A'SOCiate ADVERTISING ItATEB : _ LlsUnn In Dlre(Ctory of "SERII1CEB AND A<XlOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (per line) II per unit: Minimum rate, $30 _ M.."lmum nte. 1~O. Other business da~slflcaUons. no per 11ne. SPONSORS _ Financial lC an~ of 1100 or D'or~ luC1Udt'll Hs\inR of name In proper ~ ""tinn of BROCliURE. The U·e, . I"t ~rnallonal IflRh"'ay A•• OClation. Inc. Ruaranlee. that the ME~mER'S or SPONSOR'S Ilstln g .. It Rppeara above .. ill be publlshed In not Ie ... than 5(1.000 coplu of the 89'tr BROCHURE to be dlstrihut ed durlnR the Period bet"'~<n October 1. 1957 ~nd I~ember 31. 1958. The Association restrve$ th e ,Iaht to edit COPY. and rel""t photono.phs or other art work deemed unsuit able for <luaU!)' 'eproduction I" the BROCHURE. and In rnlse and aite, th ~ final format ,/} j! ~~thOrl.e~_ _ ~_ ~ ~~ MEMBJ:P v( .i£2__ _ ___ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED BELOW SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION / o NO CARBON REQUIRED U&e Ball Point Pcn o �Active , Membcr Add res~ HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER T'<>,..J&&.o.lk~\,lL q"", J ~ . D. .... Cf .......~.....C' 1~ \v...\t::a.N .~ .. . ~ ;,or.-•• __ •• • Dues L .............. to ................ ) "" ~&"_ ~ $ .......... . ADVJoJRTISING LISTING .1.. Th e undersigned .MEMB ER hereby author izes the pu blica tion of a LISTING in the 89 'E,R BR OCH UR E as the "CO PY " appea rs below and s ubjec t 10 a ll T ERM S and CO ND ITIO NS co ntained he rein. ( Lin e I ) I "?. D 0 f:) S.... ~ ........~ SPONSORSHIP G~lIT •• ~~o!.~"""''J: ...... •3Q~; ........... .. TOTAL Rec·d F ield Rcp rC 4Cll tative T\N lICH.L LL .. UTo{(' .......\=... V.L.C:!:.... ~.f:H .!o'.....:::r• S>.. ., . . t···~·f{'·\ ·\!··S....................................... . ( Line 2) ( Line 3) S PONSOR S H I P LI S TING ( Name Onl y) ...... . Th e purchau of LISTING S L the "'n BI!.OCHURE sha ll be lImLted to ·· ACllye" n and ··Auoclate" MEMBERS of the 19' e .1 lntem a tLona l !fI.h... ., ASSOCla Uon, I nc . a nd " Swnso r"" a n l ub Jec~ to the foUo ... ln &" term. a nd condition" Wh ere.., d lJltrlbutiOll ot the BROCIIURE and Ihe reluil ln. bene llt l tro", 1I11l n u uubU shed tbereln .. m r~tend over a to.·o )'tar period. PRES ENT me mber. a re reQuIred to Pl\7 dues In ad n mee t broU l b . nd Ineludln l tbe enti re ca lend ar u ar ot 19~1. NEW a nd f'ORMfm. members are reQuired to PRJ dut'S for t ... o tull ~ earl In . dva nee. ANNUAL OUES : AC t"·. Membe . $h.lp. - l a .GO ; Aqoc il l e Members bl p • »0.00 _ h Leh ree shall alao Inc lude FREE OIBPLA Y LIS"nNO In .. n edition. nr t h~ at' er MEMBERS HI P ROSTER pubUlll ed d u rln e th e term or l ueh A_ I.. t~ Memberah lp. AOVERTISING RATES ;. ~tl n u In DI.«.tO'7 of ··SI!RV ICES AND ACOONODATIONS·· !UQTl:L6 ( per line) 11 per un it; Mlu lmum . a tf. SSO - )( u.lmum .. a u , 1$0 . Othe r bu.L ne ... cl assifica tion •. no per line. SPONSORS _ FlII. neLal E. a nt of 11 00 or mOr~ Lntludel lislln; 01 n am e In praper .... Uon 0 1 BROCH URE. The I II' er. I nt. rll . llon.1 Hll h . ·a , Allo<:lIlIon. I nc . .u ... nttea I b .. t Ihe MEMBfm.·S or SPONSOR·S lI. tI,,!:" •• It I Pl>Ca r. a bove ..·m be published In not Ie •• than ~ . OOO copi es ot the 89·er BROCHURE to be dll lTll luted durIn. Ib ~ period bet .· e ~" Octobe r I . 19 ~ 1 . "d ~e mber 31. 1951. The Assocl" Uon reU ... e. Ih e rl l hl to edit cop,. a n d reject phOtOl ra pb. or other a rt work deemed u n l Ult.. ble tor QUl1ll7 reprod Uction I,., Ihe BROC HURE, a nd to revLse a nd a lte r tbe tln al tonn . l . Aut h ot lted .. ..,. BY :t--K...-.....L...-~~--~-":!------- _____ VERBA L AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AORE EMENTS NOT I NCLUDED I N PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATEO BELOW. SUBJ ECT TO ACCEPTANC E BY T HE ASSOCIATI ON. t """"'" o NO CARBON REQUl REO 1.1..: Ball Point Pen , II ~ 1~11 MEMB eR �140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT J4.KE CITY 1, UTAH to _____ _ ________ ) Dues C .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER , ;3.1' M SPONSORSIDP GRANT ......... ~... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject 10 all TERMS and CONDITION S con ta ined herein. (L;n, I ) ADVERTISING LISTING Linh.;l ... . . ;,r.: ~. , $ .. -. TOTAL Rec'd By Fie d R~e8entative ..,f ' .\...~P%. I'\OT.F\. ... Rf~Q.RY:::. N\"~.~.~ .~ . "'ch\. +~"~;l1.::'L . ~ ... ¥~",",l '1. :t.J",I/ ...... (Line 2) ( Line 3) " SPONSORSH IP LISTING (Name On ly) ,~ ... ...... ........... .. . ~ The purchase of LISTINOS In the SII·e. BROCHURE Shall be Umlted to "Active" and "Associate" Ml:MBERS of the &{I'ers International HI~h"" n Assoelnlon. Inc. and ··Soon1l-Qr.... all $ubJect to th e followlmr te rms and conditions. AOVeRTlSINO RATES,_ Llstln;s In Directory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTElS (per Une) JI per unit: Minimu m rate. no _ Mulmum rate, $SO. Othe. busln"s~ c1uslflcaUon, . 130 per Hne. SPONSORS _ Fln .. ncl,,1 ;-rant of $100 or mor e Includes IIs\lna- of nam ... ln prope r ,,",ctlon of BROCHURE'. Whereas. distribution of the BROCHURE and the resultlm;: benefits from listings pubUshed therein ,,·m ~_ xtend over II. t ...·o fear period, PRESENT members are reQuired to pay dues In ad"ance throu~h and Includln; the entire calendar yeRr 01 1&~8. NE'W and FOR~lER member. Rre reQuired to pay duu lor 1"'0 fun years In advance. The 89' e<$ In t"TnMional Hli, h"'af A, sool .. tlon, Inc , l uaranteu that the ~IEMBE'R'S or SPONSOR'S Hs tlr.g u It appear5 above ",m be published In not Ie •• Ihan 50,000 copl e' or the 89'e, BROCHURE t·o be d istributed durin; th~ period bet"'e~ll Octobe r I. 1951 and ~ember 31. 1958. The AS5OClation re.erveS the .liM to ed it COPf. and reject I'hotonal'hs 0' other a rt ",ork deeme<: Un5ulttl~.el I~r:'~~~lb reproduction tn the BROCHURE. and to revise and aUn tllt ANNUAL DUES: Active !\Iembershlp. - US.OO: ASIIOClate MembershIp _ $50.00 ..,hleh fee shall also Includ e FREE OISPLAY LISTING In aU editions of the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durin; the term of s uch Asso<:la\~ Membership. ~~tV~~_ .. _. 6_S. ,(:~-c<a.._._13~_. __ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINOING - AGREEMENTS Nryf INCLUDED IN PRlNTI!;O TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ___ l .. l'\~ "" J. IvA ('~ ~ ~~,<t lWk~ c..k ,j., 1411 NO CARBON ReQUIRED U.sc Ball Poin t Pen ME'"mJ:R �No. Activ e SponSOl' Member Address 140 W. SECOND SmITH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1. UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .(1.\... ... c:il:AIC..oC L ... .... f ""'. ~~..~.. Dues L ... _......... lo . un·\~Jj· r . t Sec . ........•..':.. .......... The undersigned MEMBER hereby autho rizes the pub licat io of a LISTING in the 89'~R BROCHURE as the " COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDI TION S contalOed herein. (Lme I ) ~,"~ . . '&,&k; ~ ... . . . .. ADVERTISING LISTING .... $ ................... $... SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ ........................... . 3 . Q.e..~. U.... 30 °..!::-- . \Wl-\.\~~\(turto1 TOTAI.. Ree d ;~,d···R;;~·~~·~t~;:i~·····... ·· :> I L. $. .............. C \.. A £ .\\ .~ . m. \ ):-?hvt:- .~1 .&1 QU s,. '\<!" r ~tL " . .. .........~.". l .. P~n:.~ ........ . (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) The pureh".., of LIBTINOff In the U ' e. BltQCHURE ohaU be limited to ..... cUve" a nd "AIIIIO<:I. te" MEMBERS of the SO' en Int ernati onal m .. h .... ., ASsOci.llon. Inc. a nd "Sl>OnllO..... . U l ubjut 10 the tollowln ; t erm s a nd conditions. ADVERTISING RATES :. LlU ln u In DlrutoTY of "SERVICES AND AOCOMODATlONS" MOTI'! UI ( per line ) SI per unit ; Minimum rale. 130 - Mulmum n t • . UO. Other bualn tO$ clau lrlea Uon •• no per lin . . SPONSORS - Plnancl~l ~ .. nt of $1 00 Or n.Or. Inelud ea UaUn c of name In proper ....,Uon of BROCHURE. Whereal. dln.lbutlon of th e BROCHURE a nd the ru ultlnl benefit. from II .Un ... pn bllahed therein ... 1Il ntend ovu a t ..·o yu r po:.Lod . PRESENT membe.. ou. requ ired to pa 7 dun In a d ~anc. ttlrou eh a nd lncludln .. Ihe entire ca lendar 7." of IDIli. NI:W and FORMER me mbe .. . re requIred to 1>&1 due. for t ..." full lear. In a d u nce. The U ' ers Internation a l III,h ""u' A..odllion. Inc. lua.. nle.. that the MEMBER 'S or SPONSOR'S lIoUrllC as It a ppo:a rs above will be Pllblilhed In not leso th a n .!>II.OOO copl .. o f the Ill' .. BRoctn1RE to b. dilt. lbuted durin, the ..... Iod betwe-en Oc:tober I. 1051 a nd r>ec:ember 31. 1953. The ASIOClaUon .uen u lh. rlaht t o ed it cooy •• nd reje-et phot Ol: raph& or olbe. a rt ... ork deemed unaun.bl. for Qualll7 r. productlon In IhJ i HURE • • nd to revix a nd alter Iht B fin a l tormat. /......., ~ , / ~~lh~ L MEMBCR ANNlJAL DUES : ",cllve Mem be r&hl p. - 11$.00 : A.I'IOClate Memberahlp - ,!to .OO whlch fft ah. ll . 1110 Includ e PREE DISPLAY LJSTING In . 11 edition., of th~ R08TER publis hed du r ln. the term of such """,, I.te ~;~be~:~~f:R.8lfIP _ f1 . VERB"L "'OREEMENTS ... RE NOT BINDINO _ ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLUOID IN PRINTED ~T MUST BE CLEAlU.Y I 8T...TID BELOW. SUBJECT TO AOCEPT ... NCE BY THE ASSOClAnON. NO C... RBON REQUIRED use Ba ll PoInt Pen �No. SpOnsor DAT E Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines Dues L ............. to . (L;ne I ) $ .... ...................... ADVERTISING LISTING Se,. ~..~ .. . . 3Q~O SPONSORSHIP GRANT l .................... The undersigned MEMB ER hercby authorizes the pub lication of a LI STIN G in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears belo ... and subject to al\ TER MS and CON DITION S con tained herein. ....... ) _ $ ........... . J .• ~ $ ......•...••. TOTAL Re(!-d By .. Field Repre8clltatiue H ••••• .Laz.l. .b ...b'\.6T£.L. ..:.....L~...l::'I,.~.... \( .~ .}<> ..'\. \)."'\1:. . •.LI.c.'. .Q!.!1.......... (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI STI NG (Name Only) The purch ...e 01 L IST INGS In Ihe ' ~ ' er BROCHURE .hall be limited to " Active" a nd "A5SOCIlte" MRMBERS 01 the g9'eu tnternatlonal HI,II .... , AssoclaUon. I nc. and ··9ppnso... ·· Rll fubject to the 10110... lnl terms Ind conditions. Wherul. dlltrlbuUon 01 the BROClIURE and the ,"sulttnl ben~flts fronl IIstinu oubllshed thudn ... m utend over. h'O rear POrlod. PRESENT m~mbt! .. are re'lulred to PlY dU~1 In advance throu,h and Indudln, the enUre calendar Y r of 10». NEW and FORMER members are required to pu dun lor t ... o n luH narl In IdYance. ANNUAL DUES : A(th'e Membenhl p. • U5 .00: A5IOC:IUe Membfcubll> _ $!o1l .GO ... bld> ree &ha ll alao Indude PRn DISPLAY LISTING In III IOd.ltlon. 01 the 8g'er ML'dBEJtslUP ROSTER oubU&hed durl.... the term 01 such Auoe late Member&h lo. ADVERT ISING RATES :. L!I Unll!n OIrfo(to ry ot "'SERV ICES AND ACCOM_ GDATIONS" MOT~ (per Hne) II per unit: Minimum rate. IlO - M u!mum ra te. no. Other bUI !ne... claulflclUons. no pCr Une. SPONSORS _ PIn,neh.1 Jra nt 0 1 111)0 Or mOre Intludes UIUn. of name In proJ)Cr seellon of BROCHURE. The I nternational UI,h"'a7 A5SOClaUon. Inc. luaranteH that the MEMBER'S o r SPONSOR'S Hilln, II It apJ)Cu. above ... Ill be I>ubllihed In not leN thin .!oO.OOO cooln o f the 89·e. BROCHURE to be distributed durin, til~ J)Crlod bet ... een Ottober l. t9~1 and or-cember 31. 1958. The AsaoclaUon rllH,yel the . tlllt to edit COPY. Ind reject pllotoUaohl o r other art ... ork deemed unlultable lor QUIIlIY reproduction In the BROCmJRE. a.n'd to revise and alter tht final format. ~ U·t.. ~~lhorl·1 . . ._~._ . / d2 V&RBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDBD IN PRI~ "nPCT MUBT BE CLJ!ARLY 1 STATED B£LOW_ SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE A88OCJATION. .:-r • I , NO CARBON REQUIRED Use 8 a ll Point Pen It MEMBeR �Active Addreu SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Soon50r DATE Member H O W. SECOND SOlITH ST. N•• ....110<:. ~&~ h~A1. . . . .. ···· r ················· .. ) L .............. to ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER J · ....... Seo. ~~.L __ Lines ... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication or a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY " appears below and subject to all T ERMS and CON DIT IONS contained herein. (Un. I ) .:1..\..iI,( .r:: .. I $ ...... . ~.~ -'?..~....... ADVERTISI NG LISTING $ ... SPONSOHSHIP GRAl\"'T $ .......... - TOTAL Rcc'd By .... "-ica -;l- ,; <-:. - rtl:JilirlL m $ _................. . RcprC8clltalioo S;.I,s.::rf. ..... ~ ..... \-A,.([1:.[ ., ... A,.,.f\ .JL" ...kiL.. .\.\...,...\."'....('\.~.~ "-\;".q,,~ ................................. (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HIP LI STING (Name Only) The I>ureb."" at LISTINOY In Ib p at'pr BROCHUR~ shall be llmUcd to "Actlve"' and " Auoellte" :l.IEMBERS 01 the 89'er, International Hlfh ... , AiUOGi.tlolI. Illc. a nd "SJ>Qn50U." all lubject to the 10Uo... lnl term. and condilions. Whereu. d lltrlbutlon 01 the BROCHURE and tbe rtsultlnl bendlts from ll.t!n n publlohe<l lher ein wlll eXlend over a t.,o Ju r perLod. PRESENT mpmbers are requ ired 10 PlY dun In .dnnct throulh and IncJudln. the entire calend .. year 01 111:1-1. NEW .nd FORMER member. ue re<lulre<l to "aY dun for two full yeara In .dunee. "NNU"L DUES: " ctlve Membenbh,. _ 115.00: _ l a t e Member.lhll> - 1$0.00 .... blch f~ .han allO Include f'REE DISPLAY L1ST1NO In an e<lllIon. of tbe U'pr ME:.t:BEIt5HIP ROSTER "ubll.be<l durin.. Ibe term of sllcb " u<xlate Memberah l". ADVERTISINO ElATES:. l..Istln ... In Dlre~tot7 of "SERVICES ANO AOCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTEUJ (~r LIne) $I ~r unit: Minimum nte, no • MllIlmllm rate, 1:10. Otller bu si nellll ellloiliulion • . J30 per line. SPONSORS· rtn .. nc! ..1 ..rani of 1100 or mar e Includu iLlllinl of name In proper """tlon of BROCHURE. The U'eu Intp.rn .. Uon.1 HI'h .... ' Auoel .. Uon. Inc . , uar.Mtes tll.1 the MEiUBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ul linII' II It .ppear. .. bove .-1lL be published In not Ie.. than ~lj.(IOO co"lu of the 89'er BROCHURE 10 be dlstrl bute<l durin .. tb e period bet.,et n Odober I . li51 a nd Dt>comber 31. 19:w1, Th. A__ laUon reser... the r ilM to e<llt eoro,.. _nd rdtd pholocraplu; or otber art work deemed unslllt· a ble t or o.u.llt , rpProductlon L 1h BROClIURJ'!. ~nd to n~l"" and _Itn lb. 1 n fina l form_'. _ AUlhorl BY ~.,.... /. ! ~~ ~ I r. laIEMBCn VERBAL AGREE:l.I£NTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREEM&NTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED 'l'EXT :l.ruST BE CLEARLY I STATEO BELOW. SUBJECT TO AOC&PTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . I NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen �... ctlve SpOnso r DATE ~/ ., Y 1 Member Address UO W . SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER I ........ ,.~ ... _ .. Li nes .. _ Scc.~ ~ Th e unde rsigned MEMB ER herCbEY au thorizc'O' pthy~. PUblica t io ", of a. LI STIN G in the 89' E,R BROCHUR ~ as the" appears be ow and subject to all TER MS and CON DITION S contained herein. (U", ' ) .. $.. ... .. 1 Du es L .............. to AD VERTISING LISTING SPONSORSHIp, TOTAL Rec'd GRA!\;~ . .............•..... ~ a ~v_ $-_.-......... _........... '1 ········· I BJrfiJ!Jz~._ $~D~_ . ................... Field ReprC3cntaUoo .I.. (, ...B.......FP.9.1) ... (!,J':,y::Dl:,«,.~. ~~J.;.!>;.:\ ..\:!'::J.... ~:\'\ .. L(.~·5···:·",.+.:I::\\>~~fS (Line 2) ( Line 3) S PONSOR SHIP LI STIN G ( Name Only) T1>e PU rch .... of LISTINOa In the S~' c r BROClnJR£ s hall bo limited to ..... ctln .. and "A......,I.1e" MF.MBBRS of the 89',.a I n t ematlon .. 1 HI.h ..... ' "'uoel.Uon. I nc . •nd "SllOnI01l," ~ Ll s ubject t o the fo110\lllnl ~nml and condition s. Whe.eu. dlltrlbullon o f th e BROCIIUR E Rud Ib.e ruultlnl: bone m. f rom Ualln.. pubLlab.ed Ihereln .. Ul Ulend over. 1"'0 lu r period, PRESENT membor. Bre reQui red \0 Pl7 dUes In I d"l nce Ihroulh .nd lncLudln. Ihe entire ellendar Tur of usa. Nl:\\' Ind FORMER members are required 10 P'7 dues for 1.. 0 full J ' I" In .dnnce, ... NNU ... L DUES : Acllve Membt rllhlp, ·1 15.00 ; ... uocille Membtnhlp - 1$0.00 ",hleh fee ,hall . bo Include P'RZE DISPLAY LISTING In .11 edition . of Ih~ 89'u MDIBERSIDP ROSTER published durln l the tum of I Uch A.HocI. le Membtrllhlp. VERB ... L "'GREE~IENTS ADVERTISING RATES :. LL ~ tlnu In Ol.utory of "SERVICES AND AOCOM· ODATIONS" MOTELS (per line) II per unit: Min imum rat e, no • Mulmum r.t~. I~. Other bll 'l n~ ... d .... WeaUons. 130 per Un... 6PONSORS _ Pln .ntl~ l ~ r .M 0 1 til)!) or mOre Includ e. U.tlnl of n . m~ tn orope. ndlon 01 BROCH URE. The U'tr. l utunat\onat IIl l h ..." ~ 1.t1on. lilt. luaUllttes tha t the iotEldBER '8 or 8PONSOR'8 II l l1nll: U it a ppe.r. a bo"e ", m bo publlahed In no~ leu th a n MI.OOO copi.. of the St'e r BROCHURE 10 bo dlatrlbuled durlnt: ~ht period btt"'Un October I. IO~7 .n d De<:embo r 31. I$SS. The ....uocI.Uon rUeU tl the rlt:ht 10 edit COP1, .nd reject pholOll r.phl or other art .. ork deemed unsult.ble for QU .lII7 reproduction In the BR OCHURE .... nd to revl", . nd .IIOT Ihe ~ fln.l form at . ~~'"~#d~r_ db,·L .....". ...RE NOT BINDING - ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLlJDED I N PRINTZI) nXT MUST BE CLEARLY! ST...TED Bf:LOW. SUBJECT TO ... CCr:PT ... NC£ BY THB ASSOCI ... TlON. NO C... RBON REQUIRE'D u se B.II Point Pen �, - 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. .. \ ~ Actlve New b 'J ~ SALT LAK E CITY 1, UTA H Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ""0. $............................ ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSIUP GRANT , "'S-gg.-...................... . . ~ The unders igned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publica t ion of a LI S TI NG in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to all TER MS and CON DIT IONS contained herein. (Li ne 1) ( Line 2) :~~~";~~;~~~,T~::i:"~?.~~:::v~~~:'"~~;o ~:.~; . . ~~:,:N;~!;~~~;;,~~;; ~;~,f:~ ~~,,=~;~·~"OM. Rnd "A&&ocillte " ~U:MBERS of the 89'tr. tntematlOnlll Hllfhway Assoclatlon. Inc. lind "Spon.on," ..U subject to the foUo,,'lna terms and conditions. \VbtreU, dlsUlbution of the BROCHURE and the r.sultln~ benefits from lI.tlnn publiShed the reIn will uund onr a h'o yell r II"r lo<l, PRESENT members o.rt requIred to pay dun In advance throulfh and Includln; Iht cntire calen da r year 01 1958. NEW a nd FOR.\l.ER member~ o.re required to pa y dut'll l OT two lull years In advance. ANNUAL OUES; Active Memberahlp, - $15.00; AsslI<'lBte MembershIp _ $50.00 which fee sh all a bo Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltlon. of the 89' 0' MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published du rin; the te rm at ouch AssocIate Membership. V£RB.-I.L AGREE~IEN'J'S ODATIONS" MOTELS (per lint) II per unit; MlnlmulU rate. 530 - Maximum no. Other bu.l"e.... clau1t!clltlo"., no pcr Hne. SPONSORS - l"lnandal If ra nt or $ 100 or more Include. l1s\!nlf 01 name In proper section of BROCHURE. 'The 89' . r. Int~rnationa] Hllfh,,'.y A5SlI<'latlon, Inc. iuarante •• that t he MeMBER'S or SPONSOR'S H.tlng U It appears abon ...ill be published In not leu thBn 50,000 cOllie. ot the 89' er BROCHURE to be dlsUlhuted durtnR th~ perlo<l bet"'~~ n OcLOber I. 1951 a nd December 31, 1958. 'The AssocIation re.er"eS the rllfht to e<I!t copy, a nd reject photolfTaphs or other art ·.,ork deemed un.uttable for quality reproductIon In the BROCHURE, ~nd to rcv!u and alter th~ final format. !"aU, e:, Q, '","o"u' ._.. .__......".<>-'Y' ._._._.L .___ ~_~._._. d \ I BY' ______ .~ _ _ ._ ... __ '- ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TeXT MUST BE CLEARLY' ! STATED BELOW, SUlIJECT TO ACX::EP'TANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. o NO CAR BON REQUIRED use Ball Point Pen a MEMBCR �\. No. Active Rentw SI>OIlsor Dm I-J" ,/ ....., V' Mem\)er Address SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH HO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. Dues (.. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER to ...............l s /), ADVERTISING LISTING "",. ly<y) The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the g9'ER BROC HUR E as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERM S a nd CONDITIONS conta ined herein. s .............. SPONSORSHIP G RA:;:.'T Lines s. IM::;::, TOTAL Rcc'd By Field ( Line 1) (Line 2) (Line 3) ~ .... ..... ... y ..... .....c \<J o ... SPONSORSHI P LI S TING (Name Onl y) Th e purchase o! LISTI NGS In the U'e r BROCIiUR£ shall be IhnUcd to "'AC\h't" a nd "A&OOClate" MEMBERS of the 89'ers InternRlIGnll[ Hlr hway Association, Inc. lind "SPOnsors:' All s ubject to the foilo".. ln. t e rms .nd condition •. Wh ereu, dIstrIbution 01 the BROCHURE and the r.suIUn, bendlts Iron. \lstin" pullUshed lhe.. ln .. 1Il utend over a h'o ~ca r period. P RESENT members are required to PAY dues In advanc~ thronch and Inoludln' the entire calendar ,-ear 01 19~. NB'W and FORMER member. Rre requIred to p ay due. lor tw" full YUU In IId'· ance. \T~\ I:"c ...................... . ","'~h\% ADVERTISING RATEB :_ Listlnu In D!r.,.,tor~ 01 "SERVICES AND AOCOM. ODATlONS" MOTELS ( p ~ r lIn~) II per unIt; Mlulmum r at~, 130 • Mazlmum r. t e, ISO. Other bU5 in~M cla",WcaUons, no per Un~ . SPONSORS· Pln. nclal ~ rant 01 Sloe or mOre In.lud es 1i&tlllll' 01 name \n proper sectIon 01 BROCHURE. The ID' er. lnt ~ rnaC\onal Hl ch ... ay ASSOCiation, Int. cuaranteu that the MEMBER'S or S PONSOR'S listing as It a ppears above .. m be published In not Ie .. than 50,000 copIes 01 the 89'e r BROCHURE to be dIstributed du rlne Iht period bet",'i!'C n October I. ID57 lind Dfocember 31. 1958. The A",oclauon ruerv e. the .lih! to edit copy, . nd reject pholocraphs Or other art work deemed unsult· a ble lor Qualit y reproduct ion In the BROCRURE, and to revise and a lter Ihe tlnal tor~ ... ANNUAL DUES: Active ~lCmbershl p, • 115.00; Aasoclate Membership· 150 ,00 "'hleb t ee shall also Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edition. Of tht ~ 89'e. MEMBERSHI P ROS'l'ER Ilub l!&hed dutln. t he term of .uch A ..oclat e AuUlotlte l>iembershlp . llY ~ VERB AL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEME NTS NOT ';~~~ED ~N PRI~D ··~XT ~~~~ ..~.~ -~ .... - .. - ..- . STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ASSOCIATION. " .... NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point ~n MEMBCR ��, \ A$&DC. N. ... Ren ..., Sponso r DATE ~/ I I? 1 ~ Membe r Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .. A~h~E":~~~:~: ':~~::RTlh~~Y ~~h~'~':' th,~;l~~~Of a LI STI NG in the 89' ER BROCHUR E as the "COPY " appears below a nd subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. ( Lio, 1) $_ .. .. ,) to ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ .. - •.. T OTAL Rec'd By Field Rep rc.,ento/ive .G\)S .....R\C8\S ... LI'\:t\i:: ..~l+¢p..L .. l~\)G,.I'..... 'M.•+QI . . .I.\"" .nC>.> ..... ( Lin e 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI S TING (Name Only) 'fh e nurchase of LISTINGS In the 89'or BROCtW~E Shall be limIted to ..... ctlve" ftnd "A~soelate" MF.MSERS of the 89'NS Interna\10!lal H\i; h ..·.. y "SSOClatlon, tnc . and "SpOn$O<$," all subJ~t t o the tollowln " t erms and condItions. Wher"as, dIstribution of the BROCHURE snd the resultl" " wneflts from US!!!!IU published therein "'1lI utend over a t wo fe a r period. PRESENT member. are nqulred to pa, du". In advance Ihroul h and tncludlnll< th e entire calendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMER mem be rs are reQuired 10 pu' dues for tw" full , ears In adva nce. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership, - US.DO: Associate Membership • J50,OO which fee shall alMl Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edilion s of the 89' . r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publiSh ed durlnlO the Urm of such A$&DClate MemberShip, ADVERTIS INO RATES; . LlsthlU In D!r ..dorf of "SERVICES ANO AOCOM. ODATIONS" MOTnJ> (per line) Sl per unIt ; MInimum rat e, ISO • Madmum rate, $50. Other busin."" d"sslrtcUlOII$, no Pl'r Une, SPONSORS _ FInancial I rani of $100 Or mOre Inelude. lI.llnli' of name In proper s ..dlon of BROCHURE. Th e 89'"r. tnl ernBtJon,,1 Hllrhwu Aslsoelatlon, Inc. Iruarant.es that th e ~IEMBE"R'S or SPONSOR'S UsUng as It appears abo,·. will be publiShed tn not le!;S than SO,OOO eOplts of the 89'or BROCHURE 10 be distributed durIn, Ih ~ p<:rlod bet" e.. " October I, 1951 and J)(ocembe. 31, 19S!1. Th. A$SOClatlon reserve. Ihe rllht to edit eDDy. a nd r eject photOirlaphS Or othe r art ... ork deemed unsu lt. able for \lUnllt, r~product!on In tile BROCHURE, and to re"lse . nd a lter th o final • format. _ ._ y /' ~~tht_~~'--"-.-!::!..2. ___ ._......... ~_ _ _____ .__ ,_____ VERBAL AGREEMENTS AilE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY STATED BELOW, SUUJECT TO ACCePTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION a MEMB£R i NO CARBON REQUIRE:D Use Ban Point P~n . �No. Actlve .....\ ... Address SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH s.,. .1. L~ .\... ... .)...l' .. r... .........\ ... ,J.,.; .. · " ' 1'" ' - ......x .............l ..........,. s. . . . . •J.~ . ,. ... S SPONSORSHIP GRANT ..........,. The undersigned M.EMBER hereby authoriz:es the pub lication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the " COPY" appears below and s ubject to all TERA\ S and CON DITIONS con tained herein. (Line I ) .•_______ •___ •••••..•••••...•... 1::.••••.•••••.•••.• - ADVERTISING LISTING s.. Dues L ............. to . Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Sl>Onsor DATE .....r.. Member 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Renn.. TOTAL Roo'. By .. ........ ~......... .... _ ... :l ..·. .. L - .f\. \ . ,. £.H1 ....!l!.I.t e . . .Ic. ~ • Field R6JlrC$tmt(Jtive -'..~I .~.\ ..~ .~ .\...(.\ ... ~ . Y.'!:\.. ..... , .•.). .... t~ • J.. ' . ......~ .. . , . t\ .\J. . ~ .... . Q, ~ ! ..~ ...~ .. S....\.1:\.:.~.~.. ...o.c.,\:1-.1 (Uno 3) ...\j'\ .::l:- ... "' .•. ..... .. .\:? ...bd..... 0. ;.\ . t , \~L\" :,."",. .;S ... ... 't' .... , . " y..IA . :'>.... SPONSORSHI P LISTING (N ..", Only) .. .o..I ...L1< ....'.I..1 ..' .•.L .. "."'.:I: ...."'.\ .J .... L .:.;>,. ....<!.h. ...... ...n ·. U ....Li.. ,.. . (Line 2) ... w.;......~ .....(..\tl. .....~ .....l.-.._.r.l. :......... .\... __ - - ..__ :...c... ..\... ....., .::\ ~.~ ~' ......... ) .r.: . <' 1.... . ,10 ••• The pu",h l H of LISTINOS In thc 8t'~r BltoCHURE oha n be IImlled!'o ··.Aelh·... Ind ··Assoc.llt,,· ' MEMBERS of the IG'r ... InternationAl Hlihw.., A~l.tlon. tnc ... nd "'Spon..,r.," ..11 A ubj."t to Ihe follo.ln l t.rm. Rnd conditions. AOVERTISING RATES :. Llillpil In Dlre"or, of " BKRVICE8 AND Aceol.!· ODATIONS" MOTELS (per Une ) II per unit: Minimum , .. te. no - Muimum I·.. tt, 1$0. Oth.r bus lne ... d .... lfltl llon • . no per lint. 8PON80R8 - J'tnlncl.1 , . .. nt 01 $100 Dr mOre Ineiudtil Ui lln.- 01 n .. mt In proper HClion of BROCHURE. WhU.... . distribution ot the BROCII URE and Ihe ruulUnl bend Ita fronl I!I Un .. published the r. ln .. Ill nt.Dd Onr .. t . o ""T period. PRESENT membtro .. re required to oar dun In .. dnnce lhrou . h . nd LnCludlnl the enti re c .. lend .. rt ... ot lOst. NEW .. nd POR~IER m.mber. ITe requIred to pa, dU" tor twO full , ..... In adunce. The U ' eu mlnn.tlon.l Hllh"I, Assocl.Uon. Inc. III .. r .. th.t the :MEMBER' S or SPONSOR'S HI lln. II II .. ppea rs lbove ... m be publllhe<l In lIot leu tha n ~.OOO copies Of Lho U ' er BROCHURE to be dlstrlbuled dunna the perIod het..-e.-n October I. iU? .. nd Dtcembtr 31. 19sa. 'lbe -"'-llIlon '~"e& Ihe .ll ht to tdlt C""Y, a nd ~eJec t ohotocnohl o r other ..rt ,,"or_ deemed IInlUlt.. ble t or \lu .. Utr reprod uction In Ih e JlROCRURE, Ind to n"I H .. nd .. lIer the fln l l form a t . ANNUAL DUES: Actln Mcmber"'h,. - II ~ . OO : ,,-1..1. Membership· UO.OG which t"" .hl ll . lao Include f'REE DISPLAY LISTING In . n e<!lUon. ot tho> n·. r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publlohe<! durlnl Ihe Itrm ot luch A'-"XI.te Mtmbershlp. nt"". AUlhorlttd ~ BY l--~.L- . . . -.-.-..,.--.-.--'~..! ...--.--?f-~ " VER.BAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREE~{EN1'8 NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY j STATF.D BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. " -a NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Bin Point Pen o MEMBeR �AClive Sl>Onsor DATE " emb<, Add"u 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. . . - . .-- .- - -. .- - - . ~ UMti~ .....a..~ .. .. SALT LAKE CITY 1. UTAH Dues C .............. to ...............) Lines A DVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ,.l.\..... .... . ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSHlI! GRANT Sec . ....~ ..!.. Th e undersigned MEMBER hcreby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'£R BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and s ubjec t to all TERMS and COND ITION S conta ined hcrein . ( L ine 1) .. 0o....w"""""'. !.",J." '')mp.~:\m.m TOTAL Rec'd $.-- B, Field C_ ..f'tL .. t. _.,Q_ __ .I ._ ·.•_ .l.\N._" .\:. ~.... ..I...... r......~.~_~!.."" ..... __ .....' _ _"".",,. _,. _.. ~¢~,_l ... _..... ....... .. . lo,, hl 1 " ~:.~.. ~..t?~.9..~.~.~ ...,.:;~.! ...~.~ ..~:!:~...~.. _h~.f.l ..._ \ .1\.\h..C.._.\?ki.·'~ ··\&\.···,.···~·I<:·.:r ····~ · ~;~~.~ .. .L~.~.~t.~.~J.R_ ...... (Line 3) .X",<Al_ .J.A _p.,.-A_ ... ,,_ yJ_ 0'{(!,.~+. ": _ _ ._.""::\"I . ,, _ :1\. .S_ :_. _ .,~ .. _. , _. .0\.\ ... _ _.. _..... _.. _..... .. t'!.., .. .... _ SPONSORSH I P LI ST I NG ( Nam e On ly) .....'Q.~.I? .~i... ...":-.!.,l .... t . ~.~;g..'t.. ~ .. y.'tv. ~ ..!h~.!':'..r.\..I. :.~.~ _ .. · Qf·· ~·':"·, ··L~..\ .J.~.~ .:C \3 (Li ne 2) ... '! • • • The pu.ch ue of L1ST1NOS'in thr U ' er B I ~IlURE Nia n be Ihnlted to ··ACtly e" and ··Assoel lte ·' MEMBERS of the Internltlon a l HI II'hwu A$5OC1_\lon. Inc. and " SPOnso. II." a U ~ubject to the follo.,lnl term • • nd cond ltlons. ".@f, \Vh~re... d llu lbutlon of tile BROCHURE ~nd Ihe . n ult;n . beDdlt . rrom U,Un ll pubUalled tllerein wm fxtmd on. a two :rur !>etlod, PRESENT member. are reQu tred to pn dues In a dn nce llIrou. 1I .nd Includ lnl tile ~ ntlre calendar :rta. of "Y. NI>W a nd POR:o.tER m~mbe .. are re<!u lred to P. :r due. for two fun :ru r. In adunce . • ANNUAL DUES : AcUye Membership. - U S.OO : AI&OCIUe Mrmbershlp • '!to .DO ..·lIleb fee sha U . 110 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTtNO In a U edItions of ~h~ 8g·", MEMBERSInP ROSTER pubUsh~d durIn. tile term of l uch Assoet. t e MembershIp. ADVERTISINO RATES :. LtsU n .. in DlredorJ of ··SERVICES AND AoooM· ODATlOI'iS·· MOTELS (lM! f line) U IM!r unit: Mlntmum . a te. no - Maximum I ate . 1$(1. Otlle. bu s.l n~n cl ....lllu Uon • • no IM!r Une . SPONSORS - l"lDa nclat na nt of 1100 or nlOr ~ Include. Ultln , of n a m" tn ptope. SKtlOn of BROCHURE. The n·e tl lnl r m a tlon. l HI,h" " ASsocia tion. Inc . l u.nnteu Iha t the :l&EMBER·S or SPONSOR ·S UsUnll II It a p!>ear. abOy" "' m be publis hed In nOlleu tha n !tII.ooo coplu Of tile " 'n BROCIiURE to be dlstr tllut ed du.ln l: the !>e.lod bet w« n October I. 1057 and Dl'cember ll . 19:508. The AuoctaUon .u~nu tile . 1 1111 10 edtt CDP'. a ud .lelte! ph.o lolraphs or otlln art wo.t deemed u ... ulta ble lor Qu a llt , rep.oduct lon In Ole BROCHURE. • Dd to rn lse . nd a lter th e fin a l format. /" ~~tll~~~_.~._._;,. __j:. . . ..:!I _~~._. ___ .__..___ MDlBI:R n:RB "L AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN P RINTED TEXT MUST BE CU:ARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO AOCEl'TANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. ~~ ct~ ~n. evv-..A a.J!"..,.- ~0A.'\lt -- ~ W-'i" I~ ~ NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ba n Point P m u.,,,, tj ~1 fr ~ O... o-h V'1 -- hJII ! �S ponlOr No. Actin DATE ~~ ;11--- :Mem ber Ad d r eSll HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H A 'DVE RTISING LISTING SP ONSORSm p GRANT Lines .. ,."" ...... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Th e undersigned MEM BER hereby au th orizes the publica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TER MS an d CON DITI ONS contained he rei n. (L;" e 1) . N.c."",... ",e,n~... tT., ( Li ne 2) ...... :.)\.h ( Uoe 3) ...... ~ .., • iC. ~. . . $........................... Dues ........ to . ......J $.-................. . TOTAL Rec'd By ..... Field Rc prUCfltaHve .s. . . . . . ... . . . .. L, ..........., ... ,>: .............. J'J\~ . . . ,!i ...... ... " . . • :1 .. :c:. ..~ J\~\'.~~.. v.:~ ~ \.!..'f. " .).. ~?~.~... .....~.~ . f.~ ..~~~." ....... ................ . t-. 1. ·, ; ..> ..........?.\ ....... G-..\<'.'f1.1:',... .. ...C'. PltLVU::I. . \.~~ .R.tH\.).'J\..... .. L ..... S PON SORS HIP LI STING ( Name O nl y) ....... The pureh ue 01 LISTIN08 In the ag'tr Bll.OCHURE ,hall be limited to " ActlVC" ud "Auoellle" MEMBERS of the lIl'eT. I nternat ion. 1 Hl;h .... ,. AssodaUOn. Ine . •nd "8I1OnlO... " &11 submt 10 the follo,..h" turns .nd condltlons. ADVERT ISI NG RATES ;. Linin .. In Dlr«torJ of "SERVICEi:! AND AOCO M· ODATfONS" :"IOTELS (per IIn~\ 11 per unit ; Mlnjmum rat e. 130 . .... lmUm , ate. 1$0. Othtr buslneM d .... ltlcatlonl, no per line . SPONSORS· Pln. nel,,1 I r.n t o f SlOG or n.Or ~ Indudes IInlnl of name In proper K<:t\on of BROOIIURE. Where.., dl.ltrlbu!lon of th e BROCHURE and the relultln, benefits fron. Ullin ... pubUshed therein ..-m extend Ol'U a ~,,·o 1tar period. PRESENT memben are te<lulre<!. to I'll duel 'n Id,'anee th .... ulh and Indudln. the enUre ulendar ytar of 19~ . !'fEW and fOR:l.IER members are ,..quire<!. to pa, dues tor tWO full In a d ... nce. The " 'e rs Inte rn.C1ona l II I,h ... )' A.soclaUon. I DC. lua.. nteu that the MEMBER 'S or SPONSOR'S II lllns .. II a "pea r. abOve will be publl.lhed In n"" Ie... Ih an ~.OOO copleo o f the U'u BROCflURE t<I be dloUlhuted durlnl the period bet ... ~ October I. 1957 and l'Jo'cember 31. 19~ . The Auoc:I.Uon reunes Ihe . IIM to edIt COP'. and reJeet I>hotoe r'l>h. or other art work deemed un,ult· ..ble for Quality ~prod\lc tlon In Ihe BROCHURE. a nd to rel'lH: a nd alle r the fin al fo rm"t. ,"rI ANNUAL DUES : Active Membe rshi p. ·115.00; AIIOeiUe Membenhlp ·1$0.00 .. hlch fee ahaJJ allO Include PRI':E DISPLAY L IIfnNO In all edItion. 01 the U'er ME MBERSHIP ROSTER publl~hed durin; the t erm of sueh ASSocI.te Membership. Authorlted BY _ _ __ j. • ____ . :::::.. ____ ._--.--___ .. __ . _ ________ .__ _ _ _ • MEMIII:FI VER.BAL AG REEMENT6 ARE NOT B INDINO - AOR.I! EMENTB NOT INC'LUDED I N PR.INTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED B ELOW. SUBJlI:CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ASSOCI ATI ON. ,I ~,o..'t\ vJ. ":. ~'" '" \t-. <) 1 0 "" \-1. . \Q,4 s 0- ~ ~ ~6¥ '\ Y\f" '" \tvt ~r ~(}.J:f ~ '\fV.atl ~ n... NO CARBON REQUI RED 0 ..... BRII Point Pt'n �----- --- ------~~ -- - -- - -- - - --------- -- ------ ---- ---- - - - -- --- --- -------~- -- ---------- - - - - -AeUve ASloe. N. ... 8 Spon l or DATE 0 {I Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH =============================r==== Li ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER \ Se:'£t;;::- ~[t The unders ig ned MEMBER hereby auth orizes th e pub lica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and s ubject to all TERMS and CONDITION S contained herein. (Un. I ) .. (- Dues L. ............ to ..... -.........> ADVERTISING LISTING $.~.Q~..... $ ....... . SPONSORS",P GR1NT ....__k c, \l\lll "r1',. "on!j u TOTAL Rec'd .. ;~I:~~~~;;~ ~"'" ~o;... $..............-:::::- i.9LN\Ql£.L ......... \yclN\.I, ..I2." .o"bL . Kl.~. 'n.~hy,s_"sT·., \. ~"'\\:!',:\. .... ~II,,!'>~~~ (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only ) ....................... .. _ ........... ... ........................ .. The purchu e of LI8TI NGll in th~ Ii''', 81tOC HURE Ihall be limited to "Activo" a nd .. A....oelat.·' MF..MBERS or the 89'na t ntematlona l Hll h,,·a,. Assoelatlon. Inc . and "Sponsotl." a U $ublKt 10 the tollo .. lnl It"'" a nd rondltlons. Wheru s. dbtrlbutlOn of th e B ROCHURE I nd the reaultln£ hencm, IroOl lutlnu pubUlhed Ihereln _IlL utend O\·u a t",o Jear ~rlod. PRESENT memben art reoul red 10 IOU dues In advance throu.h and lndudlnl Ihe enUre alen dar ,. .. ot 195'. NEW a nd FORM ER. members arc requi red to pa, duel tor , .. A full rear. In advance. AN NUAL DUES; AcUv. Memberl h lp . • 115.00 : Auoclate MelDberlhlp - ISO.OO ... hlch ree . hall also Include PRn DISPLAY LISTING In al\ editions o r th~ R08TER publl. htd durin. the tern, or such Auoelat e ::~:be~~I'!~ERSHIP ADVERTISI NG RATE8 ;_ Lls tlngs In D!re~tOf1 ot "SERVICES AND AOCOM· ODATIONS" MOTl."L8 (~r line) U ptr un it ; Minimum ra t e. no . Mulmutn ute. UO. O\her bUlln ess dlSl!lluUons. no ~r line. SPONSORS _ Plnand.1 ~ ran l or 1100 Or mare Inc\ud.,. n$lln. of n ame In prope r se<Uon of BROCIHIRE. Th e ag·e.. Intprn.Uonal IIl l h ... ., ...... ocl.Uon, loc. lu ar.ote.. that the MEMBER'S or SPON SOR'S II IUnJ .. It I pl><'a.. lbo,·, "'IIL be pubUl hed In not leu than :wI.OOO cOpl.,. of the U·u BROCHURE to be d llt rlhuted durIn. tbe ...,rlo<! bet",un (letoher 1. 1957 a nd ~ember 31. 19~ . Auocla Uon "'se rves Ihe .llbt 10 edi t (01", and reject photorr.phl or ot·her art .. a rk deemed unSUitable tor ou am, reprodUction In the BROCHtIR.E an d to revl.., a nd a lter tb~ tln a l torma t. . \ " • "'e 1/ 'lJ J / ' ~~th~~~~. __ 'i~ .. 1J_ ._ f.1L.:___ _ _ .~.~.~. VERB AL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDI:O IN P RIHTZD TEXT MUST BE CLURLY r STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO AOCEI'TANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED U M B a n P<lln t p cn MEMBER �,,&Soc. SpOn sor N•• DATil '-I/It/ , I Membe r Addre ~s 140 w. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Dues Lines J mm . . $ ... SPONSORSIDP GRANT ""0. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub icalion of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears bel ow and s ubject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. (L;ne I) .. 1::tP..J .. O...d.... ADVERTISING LISTING $ ........... ............... . TOTAL Rec'tI By . Field Reprc8fm/utioo E.N.VI.L .tJJ..01 . EL ····t.·· ..,uf·Ji·······I..··········v,· '''C}'·L,·JJrA ..• J1<f···· u :..... (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LISTING (Name Only) hOVERTISINO RATES:· Llstln u In DI.«torr or ··SZR.VICES AND ACCOM_ OOATlONS" MOTELS (~ r line) U per unit; MInImum .alt. no - Wa :rlmllm SM!. Othtr bll& p!<& c.I.....lfle. Uon •• no per [""e. SPONSORS· l"Inanel,.\ Ln ~r.nt or UII3 or mote Includes Ullin. of name In proper ...:tlon of BROCHURE. Th e p ... rch ... .se of LISTINGS' Ln th. U·e. BROCHURE & hlL be limited to ·'Actin'· .nd ·· A&SOCLa te·' ?>U:ltIBf:RS o f the 89'CTS Intcm ... Uon.L Hl.h.·u ASsoelatLon, Inc. and ··SpOnsors.·· all & ubJect 10 the foU01l' Lni te'm' .n d condition,. '.'t. Where... dllltribution of the BROCHURE and the reiulllne benem. from lLalln .. o ... bll,hed therein _III uttnd over. \ 11'0 lu r period. PRESENT memben .re requ ired to 1'. ' dues In ... d un ce thro .... h and Lncludln. the tntlre ealcnda. lear of 1051. NEW and FORMER members are reQ ... Lred to 0.0.1 d ... es for 1"10 full lear. In .duncc. The U ·n a tnt~rn a t1on a l HI'h ..·. ' A~la tlon. ln~. • .... u ntee. th.t the MEMBER·S or 8PO~SOR·S nou!:, .. It appe ... a bove _IlL be. DubUahed tn not Lt" th an .Y.I.OOO cODies of the H·n BROCHURE to I>e diatrLbuted dUrln&, tb e pe.Lod bet.·cen OcLobe.r I. 19~ 7 . nd Di-ceml>er 31. 195-8. The AnoeL.uoD .eaenu the .illM \0 edLt cnpy • • nd reject Dhotolr. pbs 0. othcr ..t _ork deemed unsult. able for Qu ft lLt, re D.od ... ctLon BROCHURE. ftnd to . c,·L. e .nd alter Ih~ fin ... l format . ,,.{ l"lh ANNUAL DUES: MtNe Membe.r, hll,. • $15.00; AUOI;L a te Membership. UO .OO "1hLch fee IhalL .0. 1$0 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING in a U edlllona Of tho U·u MEMBERSmp ROSTER pubLl, hed d ... rlnK the te rm of auet> AMOelat c Mtmberahlp. ~~thorl\ed LL-. l'"1t +1 ...-:~ .(--0 ~ : _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEM ENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY r STATED BELOW. SUB.JECI' TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. " \-\ vJ ~ g" \!""~\ ' ;, M\\-(\t1~\ \ M\'h~ .1\ ~ .~\ ~ ' 0"" V~ <\~ NO CARBON REQUIRED UM Ba IL POint P en JruBClI ��,,,"~, Activ e Member Address uo W. SECOND SOlli'H ST. ~o,fL~±J-<l."'::0 to Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER $ .. $.3..0 ..~.,g ... SPONSORSHIP GRANT ""o. Q.Q~.. M.ftK.I:\:S .... ~ .)::I .fy. (I.,()~ .... ~I;,\~ ... \I\<,E ... ...... ,) ADVIDRTISING LISTING .t........ ....... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. (Un. I) .. .. £7 41;1 'hAQ.LKs.C.\LY_'O"l~'J'\l\g SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Lines om $ .. TOTAL Rcc'd By \'MA: .~c;;tJ:;;:i:u 00 30 $...........--~ Field ReprCSCJlt(ltioo ...~.~... (Line 2) (Line 3) ...... , SPONSORS HI P LISTING (Name Only) The purchase of LISTINGS In the 89'"r BIOOCHURE shall be limited to "Actlve" and "Assoxlate" MEMBERS of the 89'~u International Hlsh ..·&), Association . Inc. and ·'Sponso..."· all oubJect 10 the fOIlO"'lnl terms and condltloM. AOVERTISING RATES :. LisUnso In Dlr.dory 01 "SERVICES ANO ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTEL8 (per lin e) II pl!r unll: Minimum nle. no . Mulmum rate, 150. Other buslu.,", elas.lflcaUons. no per line. SPONSORS· Fhlaneto.1 ",anI of $100 or mor~ h.elud<'l5 II stlnr of name In proper !leCtlnn 01 BROCHURE . Whereu, dlsUlbuUon of Ihe BROCHURE and the r~sultln' benefits IrOnl th~rdn ..Ill rxtend O,'U .. 1"'0 "ear pertod. PRESENT members The 89'ers Int ~rn a Uonal Hlllhwaf A&!Iocla tion. Inc . lua rantee. tha~ ~he MEMBER'S or SPONSOR·S listing u I~ a ppears above "'1Il be publl.hed In not Ie ... Ihan 50.000 copl • • of th e 89'er BROCHURE to be distributed durlnl tb~ period bel..-ecQ October I. 1957 and I}fi:cmber 31. 1958. Th e A.~I.tton reserves the rllhVIO edll COpY. and reject photoel.. phs . o r other art work d ee med unsult. able for' c.uaU t eproductlon In the BR HURE, aud to re .. l.., and a Uer tht flnftl form t. r IIstlm.. publ l$hed are rec.ulred to pay dues In advance throush and lucludlns th e enlln calendar year 01 1958. NEW and FORMER m.mlx rs ue r"'lulred to PAll' dues for t ..o full ,.eara In ad"a nce. ANNUAL DUES: Aclh'e Memberahlp. - lIS.OO: ASIIoelale Member.hl p - lM.1XI which fee shall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of th" 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl.hed durlns Ihe term of such A""""l ate Membe rship. AuthorIzed BY _ _ _ _ __~J-" VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRlNnO TEXT MUST BE' CllEA1U.Y : STATED BELOW. SUB.JECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY TaE ASSOCIATION. ( v NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Polnl Pen �-------------------------------------------Sponsor No. Aotlve O ... TE 1 Member Address Dues L ............. to .......... ___ J ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:'~fi:l. The undersigned MEMBER hercby authorizes the pub licat ion or a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COP Y" appears below and subject to all TERM S and CON DITIONS con tained herein . (Line 2) .. . c'B N "10 N \. . . . . A\.~ .\ .lI\. £ .........\))....~A •........................ SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. (Line I ) ..~A\\.~u.J/'. ...... CtJ,..Y'i. .. \,~ .................... . • ADVJ.JRTISING LISTING $.. 311.~ SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ ... TOTAL R,,'d .. BY ¥~Y~~ ... •3" . ~" Field R ellrt::llcntative . . 0. 8l'!\~- N\o1!\ .::.. ~~t 'I. .., .~<\.b\", ~-:PQ..(h r:;\,~ .... ..... ............... . - .... ............ .. . ... ...... .... . . ............ . J,,ujM~WJ;1.J.P./ (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) Th e p\lrch ue at LISTINGS In the 811·er BltoCHURE Ih~1l be Umlted to " Active·· and ·· ... uoelate·' ~IF.MBERS of the a~·er~ inte rn. tlon.t Htlh .... )' .....od.Uon. Ine. and ··Sl>OI1sor.. " aU lubJeet to the toUo ... ln.- terms .nd conditions. Wherell. dlnrLbuUon at the BROCIIURE . nd the rU\lIUnl benettls tron. IlsUnn pubU.hed therein ... tII extend over a h·O )'ear nerlod. PRESEl'o"T li\eli\beu ue TequLred to Pfo)' d\lu In a dunce Ihroulh and tncLudlnl th e enUre u lend.. Year at IO~ . N"EW .nd POR.\tER meli\bera ..e requ ired to d\lel tor ,a·o lull )'Url In a dunee. pa, ... NNUAL DUES : Acth·e Membe rshi p. • II~.OO: _ l l I e Memben.hlp - UO.OO ... hleh fee sh.1I aloo Includ e PRE!!: DISPLAY LISTING tn .U edition. a t the SO'e. MEMBE'RSmp ROBTER published durlns the tum of .ueh A.uoclale Mtmberahll). ... DVERTISING RATES : _ Llllinn In DLr ... tot7 at '· SERVICES AND AOOOM_ ODATIONS·' MOTELS lne r !lne} U per unll: Mlnlm\lli\ rate, no - WUlmum ,.te. $~ . Other bu.lneM du,Ulcatlons, no per Une. SPONSORS _ PlDand,,1 , rani o f 1100 0' more Include. !lallnl of n a me In proper secllon at BROCHURl!!. The U ·uo Interna t lon. l Ifl,hw.), Auoel.tlon. Inc. I\la.. nte", th.t the ~ 1£:\.tBBR ·S or SPONSOR·S ILslln, .. II a ppear. .bove wm be publLshed In n ot leu than SO.OOO eODles of the 89'er BROCHURE 10 be dlstrlb\lted durlnl tb e period beU ;'et'U October I. 19~1 . nd Dtc:tmber lI. 19:;.a. The "'uoet.llon rUUTU the . ll hI 10 edtl ""Dr. and reJee, PhOlOerapho or other ..t wort deeli\ed unlutt. . ble for qu .U ll reprod\lcllon In the BROCHURE. I nd to re,·IN and .lter th e tlnal tonn.l. /J /J ~~th~ !'___4:!..._(f _~_______ VERB ... L ... OREEMENTS ... RE NOT BINDINO - ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE ... RLY I ST ... TED B!:LOW. SUBJECT TO "'OC EPT ... NCE BY THE ... SSOCI ... TION. NO CARBON REQUIRED UN BI U Polnt Pen MEMBeR �Memb er Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to Dues L ADVERTIS ING INSERTION ORDER _______ __ ._ ..l , ADVERTISING LISTING Lines SPONSORsmp GRANT Sec•.... The undersigned MEMBER hereby auth orizes the publication of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appears below and s ubj ect to all TERMS an d CON DITION S contained herein. TOTAL Ree'd By [<'ield Rep re8c lltatioo (Line I ) (Line 2) ( Line 3) The pu rchase of LISTI NGS In the 89·.r IH«)CHURE s hall be llmlted to "Actlve" and " Associate" MEMBERS of the 89'.r. In tunatlonal Htehway AMOCIRtlon, Inc. and "spOnson." an su bject to the follo .. ln~ terms a nd cond!tlon$. Whereas, distribution of the BROCHURE and t-he r e su It ln~ bend!!s Crom lI.tlnn publI.hed thoreln .. m extend O\'er II t ..·o :rear peril><!, PRESENT memben are required to pay due. In adunce throu$h and Inc!udln. the entire calendar rear oC 1958. NEW and PORMER members are required to P U dun tor two full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES : Ac t !ve Mcmber&h.lp. - U~.OO: ASsoc!a t. Membership - I~O.OO .. hlch fee shall also Include FR£E DISPLAY LISTING In all edmon. of th~ 89'U MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published dur!nl th e t erm of such ASlIOelate Membership. ADVERTISING RATES: _ Listlnll'5 In Directory 01 "SERVICES AND AOCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (pe r !lne) U per unit: Minimum tate, 130 • Mulmum rate, ,:500. Otb er buslne$!) clusLfleatJoM, no per Line. SPONSORS _ Pln a nC!~1 nan! of 1100 or more IncLud<'S llsUn. ot name In proper se<:tlon 01 BROCl-IURE. Th e 89'eu Jnt ~rnatlon.l KI, h"' BY ASSOC iation, Inc. ~uarantees that th e MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIstlng as !t a ppears above .. 1Il be pub1!sbed In not Ie ... than &0,000 copies 01 th e 89'tr BROCHURE to be distributed durln;- Ih e period bet ... ~cn October I, 1951 o.nd ~ e mber 31, 1958. The ASlIOel alion rese rvu the tl aM to edit COpy, a nd reJe<::t photonaphs or other art worl< deemed unsuit_ able for o.uallh reproduction In Ihe lIROCHURE, Bnd to .evl se and a Uer t he final format. , ~~th~_ '__ ...!!,c!:'''''''''Y\,{Ai(J,,-o'''''''''. '..l .•. _.. __ .. _.. ________. "_ " _ . . _ VERBAL AOREEl>!ENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TilE ASSOCIATION. ! NO CARBON REQUIRED U..., Ba ll Point Pcn MEMBe!l �Active Membe r Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH to ................ ) Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:'h;;!:!J& The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI S TI NG in the g9'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to a ll TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained he rein. $. -- ADVERTJSING LISTING $_ SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ .4,.,f.~.. ~... ~S()~ TOTAL Rec'd $............... F ield R eprc811"tativc (Line I) (Line 2) ( Li ne 3) (1.\,,'0 .. ......................... ............. SPONSORS HI P LISTI NG (Name Only) TIl e lIurcha"" of LISTINGS In th. 89·". BROCHURE shall be llmiled to "AClh·c·' and "A.~ocIRte" MF.MBERS 01 thc S9' crs IniemRtionai HlahwlIY Association. Inc. and ··SlIOnsou,·' all subject to the foUo"'ln ~ terms Rnd condition s. Whe reas, distribution 01 Ihe BROCHURE and tile .esultlna beneflts frOIll llstln$"' published the rein ",m utend O"er a 1"·0 fur perIod, PRESENT memben Rre required to pay due. In a d>"& nce throu ~ h a nd Includlnl th e enUre calendar )·oar of 1&51. NEW and FORMER member. are required to pay dun for two fuJ1 yearS In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Acth·c Membership, - $15.00: ASsociate Membership - 150. 00 which fee shall abo Inelud e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edLUon. ot th~ 89'.r MEMBERSHIP ROST£R pubJ1shed durin . the term of such A5SO<: Ia t e Membership. ADVERT ISING RATES :_ L,.Uln u In Dlrtclory of "SeRVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTELS (llcr Hn e) II per unit: Minimum rate, $30 _ Muimum J~. Other buslnc"5 clus!fleaUon., no per Une . SPONSORS _ Plnancl" l uaM 01 UO(I or mor~ Includes I!stlnl of n&me In prOl)er .ect lon of BROCHURE. .ate. The U'en Jn t~rnatlonal Hl ghwBY Association, Inc. luarantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR·S lisUng .. it RIIPtRrS above w!1i be pubUsh ed In nOt Ie •• than 50,()OO copies o f Ihe 89'.r BROCHURE to be dlst rihuted durlnl th e ~rlod bet",·e-..n October I. 1957 nnd ~eember 31, 195-8. Th e Assoclatlon rese "'o s the rla ht to edit COP1. a nd reject phOlonaph . or other art .. ork deemed UMUItablc for <lua!lty .eproductlon In thc aROCHURE , ~nd to rev lsc an d alter Ihr finaJ format. '"",,'u, Il. w.:...,. •.1 . ~ -- - . MElIIBI:R ,. . n -.-.-~n-- __ BY - - ----.---.---.--.. VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREE~IENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TffE ASSOCIATION 10 L . 0 ___ ~============== V NO CARBON REQUIRED U_ _ .. ' _ "' __ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ UB ~'_ "" c ~ �JOINT DEPOSIT SIGNAT URE O F Authorized Signatur" of FOR THE TRANS ACT ION OF BUSINESS WITH FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF" LOGAN, UTAH [ AgYe<l 10 AC<:<lI'! Conditions of Deposit .... Indicated on Rcv~"e Sid~ of Th O. Card S IGNATURE """" SIG NATURE BUSI NESS ADDRESS PATE'c===============================================================> 3~5 �''f''10 'ull a", JO '1"uH [~uO!l~ N ISIl." ~'[l ui p<>td!',,rap"u a'i l JO lunro~8 IU)"! a'il u, ~"".. "I{l l1$Odap 01 '~'l '0 wi'! 01 ~I'lu,,"d '1"~"'''. .11'''! "1'llIrlo!l~" ' J'lIO ~J"'P '''pmp ,lUll .1\1ll1 u ,all m "4 U! "IJOpU~ "I ,(~tUOUu [''IN.''I "! '! "" H,!IO "'II W!oddu Aq'''~'1 .ao]> p.>u~! ... ~pun "'II JO '10''' 3 . ' '''1 .I., ,I" apllll! "'''10)'''''41 ""..,.' a p OJ noll"I'" V!'" '''P''''''''''! IJ01!ro<lap PIus 10 'lun a ~ I JO I'[S!, ;)'11 J"" JJ1' IO U 11 " 4" "~I!OU 'pn< pUll ·~u"g Pflll 01 '»)I(IU ".1l1!L'o\ Aq I<I""~" p"J~Ul""al .0 P"1I""11~ "" IOU 11"'1 " j""lU":Ul1B "!IU -''''[1'3 JO ."11!<.,, .I" 'SJOj",,"! U!lUl'U •...ol "(lo:>xa ' '''1'''l ~'11 '0 '.I3'1I!" 01 AIm'!"!! wOll '!""H P!U " JI.r'''['''11' 11"'[" jO''''''I1 I"'"U' -,(lId ell! P"" 'tu"'-II JO UOAIAUnS "'II .0 'W"'ll JO ""[II" JO H'!""'" 10 .... plO .0 .~~" '''I I 01 J""[qn< aq p."" '<I!,!",,,,!,,,,,, JO 1.[lI! , "'n I[l!'" 'A II"!O! w~'n.(q p"u.....,;tq 118'1$ ·$.IQllso<l~l' I'"O! '1~"'''' I'T'~'~ "~'!l uj ,,-uVII PfUS '111M 'w~ql I~'m~ 10 !.lOI!!iOd~P IU!O! p'." "'I p.'llsO<.I~p 1 ~IJ~~1~4 10 aIOJOI ~1J'! . wns 11" Ill'll .0 HVl n 'Nvo<n .'10 ;<t!\VU 'lVNorlVN J.SH r .~ '1.'}'Oa 'u!'" q~a . "",~ .(q~I~ '1 ·$.Io l .. o<laa jUrof ·p au~!!.lal' un ~11.L lNm~33\1:)V SHOlJSOJ3 0 lNIO f .1 "'11&<><[.11' AHp 110 ''''''''''q 10 3>OF' IV pool! 10" '(""f[ "'II "" ""'~Ip Wal! A"" ""I" " 0" 10 !",,,.nla, , a'll a'I'" 'jU ~wAnd l~ "'J alo!",[ aW11 AtL~ j_ IUJ II .\ U1I ''P-'I ~1l.n: 4 ~ A1I rn II :"... ~ JO naf! "! jU"U"' ~ " I ~U"!I! pUU~Un .., 111'3'0 ,0 IJI"P 'J! '1<133"" pm. ·IO.(~ " ~' n 1""1"'13"1 ~u _ q A UI U1I 'Al1~'IP"1 10 ,111""""1' '''''31! pu". A.'" 'IU.>puodl'UIO~ Ol! ,0 ~""H ' 1'l.L ·aou,'ll'l~a11 "",0 "'! ,oJ Id;•• ua " ['lUll "<t IOU p ap"la, .... jU"l'uod"'JJoa '109.) puv '1"" "'1 UI """'1 '01 .ou Oju;>pnO<.t ..·>.Uoa P.>'''''I'''' OIl 10 aou~ !Ilia" .0 ll"uPI' ' 01 ~!q~n a'l l<>U m." ~U~~! .''1J. ·OJ' P''''' IIIa.'los . 0 '1""0 UI IUOW • lid ['''l, 01 P "'I n. p.:l1!pO a.v "'''·'I! IIV 'a,uo anI' j O o",o,~"a ~'!I p"o.("'l .(l!I!'I!.uoo ,a, ou .~wn''''' JO 1''''' I U~'" !Ju!l""1I0J ','~l><><l~p '" ~luO lPU ~uuf[ "!'11 '''0!l''''no~ '0 !!><><lap ,oJ I U"'I! Slll"'!~.u, ul 411'" puv 'lnp 1~qlO 11"1' HSOd30 .:10 SNO llIO.\,O:> n VLn ','\IV:)Q'l .:10 "NVn 'YNOI LVN lSUI.:I �JOINT DEPOSIT SIGNATURE OF AuUmrizcd Signahllc of FOR THE T RANSACTIO:>.' OF BUSINESS WITH FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF" LOGAN, UTAH I Agree to AC<:<ol't Conditio". of D<:posit as Indicated on Reve ... e Side of Thilt Card SHiNAT U RE 'h S I GNATUR E BUSINESS ADDRESS ! / �~'JI\ST NATtO:-lAL llANK OF LOGAN, IJTAH COND1T IOll:S O~· DE POSIT In receiving item. for d~ pos i t or ~ol1cdio" . th;" Bank acts only a< <.lell",oito,', collecting agent and assumes no H::sponsibilily 1l<!)'ond Ihe exercise of due carc. . All i' e"" "'" cred ited ."beet to final nl"'" in "ash or . olven! credIts . T hiJ Bank will nO' he h able for default 0' n"!lIi!!"nce of jtJ du y 0"[""' <'<1 cotr'-'$pondcnt. nOr for 10'_ in ltnnsit. and each cu",",pond"" l so ,de<:le<l shall not be liable e.cept for its own "eghge""", T his Bank fiT " , COrr""l'o,,<ll-nts may scnd it"''''', di,,,,,,tly o r indirectly, to IIny hank including the pa yor, and ac~..,pts its dralt or ",",<Ii I as uncandi:;on "lp"-y",,,,,1 in lie" of cash; it may ell/Use back anv item at any Ii,,,,, before final paynwnt, w hdhe • •"huned ,n not, auo any i.em drawn on this Ihuk not good at dose of hu,on""s Oil uny deposi ted , J OI NT DEPOSITOR S "CRF.E~ I ENT The lind~ .. i!;ned, JOin t nCposHOl.. , hereby a!;rc<>, each with each other and with FIIIST NATIONAL BANK OF LOGAN, UTAH that all surns heretofore ur hereafte. depOSI ted by said join' depos i'o", Or eith.". of tbem , with , aid BMk, to Ihei . Ct<~!lt .... uch )omt deposito .., shall be own,-d by th"m Jointly, with the right of survivorship, and be .uhjcet to the check. or oltlct or r~'Ce'I't of caher of Ihem , or th" SURVIVOR of them, and Ih" pay_ ment thereof sh ali disch",!;" said B:m~ f.om liabi'ity to e ither, or the heirs, executors, administrato' ., or .... i~..,'" of eithe', T his agrccment shall not be eh",nged or tenninnted excep t by written notice to . aid Bonk, and such nohce , hall not alke! the ,ight 01 the Bank 0' . aid depositors "e.eunde, with relation 10 deposits theretofore '.'nd~ I!:...:l, of the unde",'gncd docs It"."by ~ppnint the other as his d. he. lnwful atlorney to codo .. e in hi. 0' her ,,,une 8n y ~h,'Cks. dral .. 0. <lther ne.,minble instruments parable 10 him <I, he. to deposit the .a."" in the joint aCCO\1nt of the ulld",,;gned in the F irst National Bank <II Logan, Utah. par- �( Active 140 W . SECOl\'D SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Dues C __ .1 ..... "" l!!.illi.ql!>('O _ " to. __ _ .... __ > __ __ ADVERTISING LISTING Lines . The undersigned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COP Y" appears below and sub j ec I 10 all T E RMSan d CO N 0 ITI 0 NS co n la i ne d he rei n. (U oe I) SpOnso r TOTAL Rec'd • 5tJ2f4 $............. ~ .. Field Rep rcse.llatlue L __-;,:-_--.:..:::::::...:::;c:.::=::::::::'--_--.:~:;::::L-J 1"J\VN V~K'\?,lR l'I:1.N NiQo.-kc \/,' ">'\ ':,.~, .. q::l\\) ·.Jte ,~\ N£I!/ ( U oe 2) y d~",k d3 2lZ¢' (Li ne 3) S PONSOR S HI P LI STI NG (Name Only) The purchas. of LISTiNOS> In the 89·.r BHOCUUR€ sh~ll be limited to "Aotive" nnd "Associate" MF.~!BERS of th e 89'~r~ InternatJonal HI ~ h"'ay AssoctaUon. Inc. and "SpOn sou ." ~ll Sub)e<:t to the 101l0"'lna terms and cond itions. Wherus. dlotrlbutlon of the BROCHURE lind Ihe resuiUn" benelln from 1l8tinu publis hed therein will Hrend ovcr a two year period, PRESENT m~mber s are required to paf dues In ad"Rnee throullh an d Inoludln, the enU re calendar yen ot 1 9~8. NEW a nd PORMER membeu are required to nay dues tor t'OIO full JeRrS In . dunce. ANNUAL DUES: Acth' e MembershIp. ,115.00: AMOelate Membership - 150.00 which tee shall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTINO in all edltlona Of th~ 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publiShed durin, th e term of SUCh Assocla le MemberShIp. ADVERTISlNO RATES:_ Llstlnu In Dlrector)- of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATrONS" MOTElS (pe r line) $I per unit; M!n!mUm rat e. 130 _ Mn!mum ute. 1M1. Other busines. cluslflcul ons. no per line. SPONSORS _ P'inanc1ul Erant of t100 or mor~ Includes !ls!!n; 01 nam e In nro~r section ot BROCHURE The 89'e'$ Intu natlon al Hlllh ... ay AssociaUon, Inc. lIua rantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S HsUr.1;" a s it a n~ars above will be pub!lsh ed In not 1 ... than SO.OOO conies 01 the 89·.r BROCHURE to be dlstrlhuted durtnll th~ n •• iod bet"'een October 1. 1951 and necember 31. 1958. The AssodaUon reserve. the ri ght to edit OOpf. and reJeel "hotoll raphs or other art work d.emed UMult_ able for Qu.lIb r eprOduction f\ the BROCHURE. lind to revl"" lI ' d a lter Ihe tlna l for~ . , Authorlu BY INCL~~;- I~·-~~~;;;;~- ~:; .. VERBAL AOR£m.-tENnI AR E NOT BINDI NO - AGREEMENTS NOT STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY T){g ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON ru:QUIRED ~5C Ball Point Pen ... _.. ___ _ ._.. ___ .. _._.. MUST BE CLEARLY! MEMB£:R �( Acth'e Member Address !fO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ... ) to Dues C .. $ ·······'i;- Lines . ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ATIVERTISING LISTING "SO~ $............... --.... . s". W.Jk... ...... SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ . ........................ . .1._ _ .......... . The undersigned MEMBER he reby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" a ppears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein. (L; oe 1) TOTAL Rec'd BY . ·_~ Field Representative .(!QE.f ..~.f~.... l' . Q.T ....Q,..B.E.. f ........ £,~~t ..<;'~ ..!tHT".:tQ.w."' ...'C... \o ~.a ( Line 2) . to.•.~..... · · · · · · · · · · r ··············· ~2{., -i.<!f J r !3' /.... .................. ,!. ..J................................C/...' .. ..... ....... I (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) ..." ... ... , ................ . Th . I>urch"$e 0' LIS TINGS III the 89'e r aI\.OCHURE sh a ll be limited to "Acti". " and "Assoelate" MEMBERS of the BD'crs Internlllio"aj Hli:hwar AS~GClatlon. Inc. and "SpOn$Ou," ~!1 subJ~t to the 101l0..'ln; terms and eondltloM. Whereu, dlnrlbuUon 0 1 the BROCIIURE and the resultln K bendlu frou' IIstin u published therein ... 111 utend over a two y"ar period, PRESENT m embers are reQuired to paJ dues In adnnce throuKh and IncludlnK the entire calendar Year Of 1958. NEW and PORMER members are reQuired to P U' due. for 10;" full year$ in ~ dvanee. ANNUAL DUES: Active "! embershlp, - US.OO: Associate Membership • $~.OO "'hleh t ee sha U also include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edlt!on s of th" ::~~be~~~~~ERSHIP ROSTER pubU l hed durin" the term of sue h Associate ADVERTISING RAT&S :. LI $~lnK$ In Dlrett011 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOT!."LS (pe r line) 11 per uni t ; Minimum rat e, no . Maximum rate, f~ . Other bu shles. cla.si flcallons, no per Une. SPONSORS _ Fln an cl~1 ~ra n t o f $100 or more Indudu IIstinll' 01 name In proper section 01 BROCHURE. The 89'ers Int ~ rn atlonal Hirl'h,,·ay Association, Inc. ~uarantees tha t th e :'!.IE1,fBSR'S Or SPONSOR'S listing as It appears abov" ... 111 be published In not leS$ thnn SO,OOO copies of the 89'"r BROCHURE to be dlst r lbnted durin .. the u" rlod bet"',,en October I, 1957 and December 31. 1958. The Associa tion restrves Ihe rlll'llt 10 edit copy, and r eJ~ t photo;rra ph s or othe r art ... ork deemed unsuit_ able far QUa~ l tf r. roducUo" l; { 2OCHllRE. an the B to re,'lse and a lter thc final format r ~~Ih~~'~d__ __ --7- ___._ ~I d ;. _ / :"'_':<I'--:1~~<-<:'<'~ VERB.\L AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRIN'FED TEXT MUST B STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED U..., Ball Point Pen MEMBI:R �Sponsor A~ . Member Ad dress HO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. II~ .. I ' ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines ..1 . ......• ........ ADVERTI SING LISTING •3 Q~...... . Sec . .......................... SPONSORSID P GRANT , $..-- w~"""'" The undersigned MEMBE R hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the g9'ER BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and subject to all T ERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. ) V&\l<>:I::IN' ~?;,N'i)\&I'/ '\\_ \<) Mo.~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to ..... _ ........ .l Dues L. (Uoo I cl O· ~ ....... ~~«M~ . $3~~ .................-.. TOTAL Rec'd Field Representative ~J() ~\:. ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name Only) Tile purcha se 01 LISTINGS In thc 8S'cr BROCHURE shall b< limited to ·• ... ctln·· and •·... ssoclate" "-IEMBERS 01 the 89'er~ Int~rnRtional KI Khll/ay As socl.tlon. Inc . and ··Sponsoro."· aU ,ublt<:t to the lolloll/Inll term s Rnd condition •. ADV£RTISING R ... TES : _ Li $tlnu In Dlr ~e lo" of "SERVICES AND "'CCOMODATIONS" MOTEJa ( per line) S1 per unit: Minimum rate. no • Mu.lmum rate. $5(1. Other bus]n",.. elassJtlc.tlons. 130 per line. SPONSORS _ Financial grant of $ 100 or mor" Include. IIs t]n.- of n ame in proper .ectlon of BROCHURE . Whereas. distribution 01 the BROCHURE . nd the res uitin.. b<neflt. Irom Ibllnn publlUled Ih ...ln wHl extend over . ("'0 yeRr period. PRESENT me mb< rs are reQuired to pay due. In ad\"Rnce Ihroulh and Includln K the entire calendar f ear 01 1958. NEW and FORMER mtmb<rs are reQuired to PU dues fo r t ..·o lull 'Ur. In advance . The 89'e,s Int .. natlonal 1I1.-h ..·"y "'""oclat]on. Inc. Iluarant"u that the ME~mER'S or SPONSOR'S IIStl~.g as It "ppears above will be publish ed In not le8& than SO.OOD copl •• 01 the 89'er BROCHURE to be dl strlhuted dUrln.- tll~ perIod b<t ..·.en Ootob<r 1. 1951 a nd Dtcemb<r 31, 19$8. n.e Association reserves the rJiht to ,~jt f. and reject photographs,.{jr 0 her art "'ork deemed un aultcO able for Quallt , rOductlon In the BROCHURE. •nd to t e,lse and a lter th . fin al lorm"t ANNU ... L DUES : Actin Membership •• $15.00: A&$PClal . M.mb~rsh!p _ I~O.OO whleh fee . hall also Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of th~ 89'er M EM8ERSHIP ROSTER published durln~ I h e term of . uth An od.t. Mem bership. ~~t~ ___ _ _ J ___ :z:;':':';_ _ ":~:-,...._ '" ___ .• . _ e! < _ ___ _ :t. " VERBAL AGREE}IENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - ... GREEMENTS NOT INCLUDiD IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY i ST ... TED BELOW. SUBJECT TO "'CCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ... TION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Bat! Point Pen \ I MEMBcn �/ Active Member A5SOC. I %'J.~". J",,,,"i <;[\", SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH Duell L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:J4,~ to .J $ ..... . 1.0 0n ADVERTISI NG LISTING ioA "of $- .-. -•... -...::::::::: SPONSORSHIP GRANT ' The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the public a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below an d sub ject to al l T ERMS and CON DITIONS contained herein. ( L;ne I) .. {phis; DATI: \hO('ls."~"1s,. ·­ Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ·~ POnlor Ne .. $ ...•... .;'9~ TOTAL Rcc'd By I Field RcprcllcJltatioo Ver,.. I\I\""?'~CF<;J..... L'O~) . :±"';~~,, ... ~.u!io5 .." .<;"'\\',\6.", . :;""'YY.~"'.\r.s. ·············~~;4(J5!Jl:2 (Line 2) (Line 3) _" _ A~ _ SPONSORS HI P LISTI NG (Name On ly) The purchase of LlSTfNO S in the 89'e r BROCHURE shall be llm!led to " Active" and ·''':<.Welat'''' l\IEMBERS (If the 89'"r$ IMemation9. [ Hla h ..'ay AMoclallon, rne. and "8IX1n. on," all subject to the tollo1dog terms and conditions. Whereas. dlstrlbutlon of the BROCIIURE and the resultl". benefit. frau' lIstln lrS J>ubllshed therein w ill ute nd over a t ... o yea. perlod. PRESENT memben are reo.u[. ed to pay dun In adva nce throulrh and Indudlnl the ~Iltlr~ calendu fear 01 1958. mnv and ~'OR:"!ER membtr. ue re-Qulred to par du es for t.,(1 luU rear. In a dvance . ANNUAL DUES: Active MembeTShlp. • $15.00: As&oclate Membushlp • $50.00 .. hleh lee s hall also Indud e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all ~dltlo ns of th~ 8g' er Me:"f BERSIUP ROSTER published durlnlr the term 01 such ASSII(:la!e Member~hlp. ADVERTISING RATES:. Lls!l nrs In Directory or "SERVICES AND ACOOM· ODATIONS" MOTEl..$ ( ""r line) U p,,. unit: Minimum nte , 130 - Maximum I ate, n o. Oth~r bU$ln~"'l e1ass lllcatloM, no per line. SPONSORS - FInancial nant 01 $100 or mor ~ Include$ lI "tln l 01 name In proper section 0 1 BROCHURE. Th e U 'n. Int~;natlonal Hi, hwoY Association, Inc. Iruarantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIstlnJl: u It a ppears above a'lll be published In not less than ~,OOO coplu 01 the 89'u BROCf\'URE to be dlstrlhuted durlnll' th~ perlod beta"cen October I. 1957 and n ~ c ' mber 31. 19~8. Th e A$$OCIBtlon reServe. Ihe d l h t to edl~ (01)>'. and reJ~ t pho\Ofl'raPhs or othe r a r~ work de~med unsult· ~ble lor Q,uaUtY r~prO<luctlon In the BROCHURE, and t o '." ise and a lter th ~ final lormal . ~~thori ~ __ . _ __ __ ... _.. _.. _._ .. _ .. __ _ _ . __ ._.. _ ._..____ • ___ .~ ___.. _._. ___ _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS AltE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTEO TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BV TIlE ASSOCIATION. 8>o~i C-l2.I\I'\(, C1't1'1 '\0 N (".v ~ (2,,~) NO CARBON REQUIRED U..., Ball Point P~n MEMB[R �Active No . AUOC. Rtne ..· Spon sor DATE Bqeulil }'{ embe r ~~~1:c Add"" HO W. SECOND SOtrrH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines Dues C_.. _. L- - . ..... .......... . to .J $.... ~O~ ADVERTISING LISTING $-- .. -- .••.....~ •.-. SPONSORSmp GRANT So'.'iWt-~ ' Th e undersigned MEMBER hereby Iluthorizes th e publication of a LI STI NG in the 89' E,R BROCHUR E as the "COPY" appears, belo,v.; and subject to all TERMS and CON DIT IONS contained herein . (Line 1) ~....~. ___ _ $......... . TOTAL Rec'd By " \ i ,h.~ lYlt: .__ ._ _... _ ..... _ .............. _ . ...... Field Representative .- DO" _. ........ .BQW/AflN.... H01:E.L_.~ M.:A~t\'l , . .A)x{Qi!I~>' ~~"" '~r ..R"""I>Mbll?_ .. ( Line 2) • .-&~t(§ .~.~ • ( Lin e 3) S PONSOR S HIP LI STING (Name On ly) The purch ase o f LISTI NGg ':1 the 89·cr BPvOCHURE ~ h .. ll b<: lIm lled III " Ad ln and " ASSociate" MEMBERS of t ile 89·er. lntecnatlonal Hl l h,,'n As.soc:lat!on. Inc. and "Sponsors," all subject to the 10110..,ln., terms Rnd cllnd ltion • . Wh ereas . dis tribution of the BROCHURE a nd lhe resultln~ benellt. from 1I.l lnn published Ih erein ,,·m e~tend over a two ,ese period. PRESENT ", embe r. a re required to pay dues In a dvance throuEIl and Includln l the enti re calendar Y ese of 1958. NEW Bnd FORMER memhe rs are require<! Co PU duu for Cwn full yeses In a dnnce. ANNUAL DUES : Acun Membership . • t l $. I)(!: Associate )'lembershlp • tMl.GO ~;hlc h fee shall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all e<lltlon. of tho> U'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publish ed durln.- th e term of s uch A""oclate Membership. --- - - . . _. . ............ UO." .... ""''''''.' L'S""" '" Dlreetorf Of ··SERVICES AND AOCOM · ODATIONS·· MOTEtS ( per Un e ) U per untt: Min imum ra te. no • MaxlInum rate. ,~. Otb ~ r bU$jn~$.~ class!l!caUons. no per line. SPONSOI't8· Plnanolat " rant or U OO or mor~ Includes llstlnl: Of name In proper se<:tion of BROCHURE Tbe U·ers IntHnQ\ton~1 HIK b..,ay AssociaUon. Ine. I:uarantees that the MEMBi:Ft·S or SPOSSOR·S listing as It appears abOve ..,Ill be publls bed In not Ie" than $0.000 cOllies of the alI·er BROCHURE to be dis tributed durinl: the period betwepn Octobe r I. 1951 and o.cember 31. 1958. The A$$OClation rcurves th e ri l ht 10 e<llt COPY. and reject photOKra.Phs or other a rt work deeme<l unsult· able for QUality reproduction In the BROCfIURE. and to revise a nd alt er thr fin al format. Auth orized :1. BY .. ___ _ ~_ , . -__ .L_.:......:... __.. __ ._ ____.___ -t ~ ____ __ _ ,~::~ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. , • NO CAR BON REQUIRED Use Ball Point; Pen o - K.. MEMBER �140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Li ne!! SPONSORSHIP GRANf Se" Th e undersigned MEMBE R hereby authorizes the pub li catio n o f a LI STING in th e 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" ap pears below and sub ject to all TER MS and CO NDITI ONS con tai ned herein . TOT A L Rec'd By F ield Representative $................. -_ . ( Li ne I ) (Line 2) ( Li ne 3) S PONSOR S HIP LI STI NG ( Nam e O nly) ~~:'Il,~ a CW.,WAiI. I.«i£:,.Ll'(1'6i ;§:~./c . The purch".e of LISTINGS In the 89'e. Bll.OCHURE sha ll be limited to "Active' and "AMOelate" ;I.! F.MBERS of the 89'... Int ernational HIKhlllU Association. Inc. and "S\lOnson," ~11 subJe-et to the fonoa'ini' term s and conditiOns . \Vhereu , dlstrlbullon 01 the BROCHURE and Ihe re.ullln i' ben"1l1S Irom 1I"llnu published therein .. Ill ntend over R tWO r ear period, PRESENT m.mber ~ are re<lulred to pay due. In advance l-hroU>th and Includlnl the enUre calendar ~nr of 19~8. NEW and FOR~ ! E"R membe r. are re<lulte;:! to par dues for two full YeU! In ~dnnce. ANNUAL. DU£8: Aetlve Membership, - 115.00: ASsociate Membe rship - 1&11.00 a'hich fee ~ haU also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edlUons Of th~ :~~~be~~i'i.~ERSHIP ROSTER pubUsh ed durlnl Ihe term of s uch hSsoclate / Ai':iVERTlSI;Q"" RATES;. Llsl1nn In Dlreeton of "SERVlCES AND ACCOMODATtON$" MOT; (pe r l1n~) SI per unit; MinImum raU. no • MaXimum no. othe.. l b Inc"" clas.Wcatlon •. no per line. SPONSORS _ Flnanel"l .~ra nt of $100 Or !nO Include. Ustlnc of n a me In proper $eCUon of BROCHURE. \ Th e , at' qs \ Int~ l'lI atlonal High ..·.,. A~!at!on. Ine. ~uara n t"u tbat tht j. al~. " E"WI!:R' S "o r, 8 1!t>N80R'S 1l.tl~.g as it ap.,.,..., above "m be l>ubU.hod In not le"'f_ ~han r.o,Ol101'i:opln of the 89' er BROCHURE to be di stributed durlnl the perlOd. be t.,· ........Octobcr I. 1 9~1 an d Dfocembcr 31, 1958. The Association rese ....". the rl'ht to e;:!lt eoPY, Rnd reject photocraohs or other art work deemed unsunable for Qua lity reproduction In the BROCHURE, lind to re,'I!\.e and alter th~ finRI format,,: / ' ~-) ;e.;:L. ~~t~_tr_.i"~_~ ~ L _.LL. j . ------T . . - ? VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT 1I1NUING _ AOREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PR INTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED B£t.OW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use BRn P Oint pen I ~ . ..J MEMBER �Member Ad d reSl'; HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. \J. S~ . .~. ~ . 3"",~ .. ~...................... i SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to D ue!'! L Lines ADVERTIS ING INSERTION ORDER ............ ) $ .. ADVERTISING LISTING .J Se, -ri)C~Qq The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appears below and s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIO NS contai ned herein. $ :Sl?,,~ SPONSORSHlP GRANT $ .. '-w.._J12J..a!JiJ.1J1J.J1 ,3,Q. %.#. y V TOTA L Rec'd By Field ReprCSC ll tatioo (Line I ) (Line 2) ( Line 3) ,i?~~~j;;J.J3*2.- SPONSORSHIP LI STING ( Name Only ) The purchase of LISTING8 In Ul" 89'er B!l.OCHURE s hall be llmlled to .. ....,tlve .. and "Assoclate" MEMBERS of the 89'ers Inte rnatIonal HI Khll/aY Association, Inc_ and "SPOn so",," all subject to Ihe folloll/lnK terms a nd cond itions . Wherus. distribution of the BROCHURE and the rnu!linl" benefits from ILstinu pubHshed the rei n ",HI extend ove r a '90' 0 yeRr period. PRESENT members are reQuired to p.ay dues In adunce throul"h and Includlnr the ~ntlre ca lendar yur of 1958. NEW and FORMER membeu are reQuired to PaY dues for UIO full years In adunce. ANNUAL DUES : ACtiH Me mberllhlp, _ '15.00: A5$OCiate MembershIp _ '50.00 which fee shall a illO Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltlons Of the 89'e r MEMBE'RSInP ROSTER published durin, th e term ot such Associate Membe,shlJl. ADVERTISINQ-RATE9:_ - Listlnu In Dlre<lory of "SERV ICES .... ND .... OOOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (J)Cr line) n per unit; Mln!mum rate. no - Mu!mum rate, '50. Othe r business clas.lfieatlon s , 130 per line. SPONSORS · l"inanelu! irant of HOO or mOr~ Inoludes IIstinc of nam e In proper section Of BROCHURE. The ag·e .. In t~rnBtlona l HlKhll/ a r Association . Inc. luarantees that the ~{El\IBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIsling U It appears above ,,'m be publi shed In not less than ~o.ooo copies o f Ihe U' .. BROCflURE to be dlstrihuted durin\: the period betll/eell October I. 1951 and rHcember 31. 1958. The AUOClalion reserve_ Ihe rl iM to ed it copr. and reject phOtOKraJlhs or olher ut work deemed un5u!t. able for QUBUly reoro "'c"tion In the BROCHURE. Bnd to revise and . It er the f!nal format. Author; ';..~ BY _ -:~.~ _" VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PR INTE STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . • NO CARBON REQUIRED Use BaH Point Pen MEMB£1l CLEARLY i �Now AS~"W DATE ')?-" Is Active Member Add ress HO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. (\,W \g(~ 'M()~'!:\<}~ 3\)(S~':::'lfu)"" SALT LA KE CITY 1, UTAH to .. ............. ) D ues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .1. s.". 1')~~Q~ Lines .. Th e u ndersigned MEMBER hereby authonzes the publi catIOn of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH UR E as the "CO PY " ap pears below and s ubjec t to all TERM S an d CO NDITI ONS contained herein . ( Line I ) ( Line 2) ADVERTISING LI STING • 39 ° ~ . ... . • TOTAL Rcc'd By Field ReprC8entativc . R\w.\.;.. ....H .!ITQ ... LQt>C!.f.. .....1 .6.1\ , . 1.?p\ .... ¥-.'-\l'v>..~. ~+ ..~~l,(lr~J ~4 I ~I\ K \ . J.?~~" .."~.J~. :!J<'/ ............... ( Line 3) S PON SO RS HIP LI STING ( Name Only) The purchase of LISTINGS Il, the 89·e< BROCH UHE shan be Umlled to ·'ACllve'· and "ASsociate" ~n: MBERS of the 89' . r$ International Hl r hwn Association. Inc . Rnd ·'8I1On50<o." aU s ubject to Ih e f01l0wln8" terms a nd cond itions. Wh ereas, distribution or the BROCHURE and the resultln" benefJt5 trom lIn ln n published thud n will ~xt.nd over a Iwo year period, PRESE NT membu" are reQuired to 0..,' duu In advance throuih and Includln" the enUre cal rndar ,·ear ot 1958. NEW and ~'ORMER members are reQuired to oa , dUe" tor t ..·o tull year. In adva nce. ANNUAL DUES: Acth·. Me mbershlo, • SIS.OO: ASMlClat e ~lembef$hlo _ $50.00 which tee shan . 1.0 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edltlon. o f Ihe 89'u MEMlIENSHIP ROSTER pubUs hed durln i the te rm of such A.s.soelat e Member5hlp. ADVERTISING RATES :_ Lis tln n In DIrectory ot "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS· ' MOTELS (per line) S1 per unit; Minimum rate, no _ Maximum ra t e, ISO. Other busine5o' class!llca Uon., 130 per line. 8PONSORS _ :!"In.nelal i ranl of 1100 or mOr~ Includ es lI"tln l of name !n proper s.-ctlon of lIROC HURE The U 'ers Internation a l Hl l hwn Assoclatlon, Inc. l uarantee. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S li sting U It appea r5 above "'Ill be published In not Ie" than 50.000 eoolu 01 th e ag'er BROCHURE to be distributed during th~ oerlod bet"· e<:n OctOber 1. 19S7 a nd December 31, 195-8. Th e A.s.soelation re$e rves the ril M to edit COpy. a nd reject photo. ro.ph. or other Brt work deemed unsult. able for QualltY l tp J ] ; ( ) the lIROCHURE. and to re,'I "t and .U er the ! oductlon In . tln . l format. I AuthOrl~edl .<{ ~ BY . ____ ._.. ~ __.. _._ .. ___ .. _. __ .__ .... __ ... __ . ._._._._.. ~ __ .. ~___ VERBAL AGREE!lIENT'S ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRI NTEO TEXT MU8T BE Ci..£ARLY 1 8TATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANC E BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED U"" Ball Point Pen MEMBI:R �· - �Acllve Assoc. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines &,. l.. . . . . . ..... DATE ~) 1 7 J . , .) •• l.OW ADVJo:;RTISING LISTING $.................,.".,.,.,. SPONSORSHIP GRANT ~.~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authOrizes the pubhcatlon of a LI STING in the 89'gR BROCHURE as the "COPY" appea rs below and subjec t to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein. ( L; n, I) Sponsor V\()'t,i!\les. , fut3. Address W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Ren .... I±'(Xl)\.\)h~~.MLd~j Member uo Q •• ,. TOTAL Rec'd By . Field ReprC8CIltatioo !\?,Ro Wt\'i~J'\\) . NI. .6TE. L , . ?tA.,?'.", 1'\'\"-; <.11, "" ..s . ~s..!<>"""""\"a.P.a"" " ~ H. , 1. " (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) AOVERTISING RATES :. Listlnlf' In Dlr"dor~ or ··SERVICES ANO AceoMODATIONS·· MOTELS (per Une) It per unit; Minimum ute. UO • Maximum ute, $511. Other busine5< clas. lflcaUons. no per line. SPONSORS· Flnancl~l I'rant of $ 100 or mo<~ Include. Ustlnlf el name In proper .ectlon of BROCHURE. The 89'tr$ In ternational Hlll h .... a ' AssoclaUon. Inc. rua.ant ..." that the l>fEMBER·S or SPONSOR·S U.tinl! as It appear. above ..,m be pubU.ht1l In not Ie"" than !>(I,OOD copies of the 89·et BROCHURE to be dl.trlbuted durlnll tb~ nerled bet ..·een October I. 1951 and Dfocember 31. 1958. The As socIation ' eservts the rlrht to edit COPf . ancL.r.eJjI<:t photorraphs or other art ... ork deemt1l unsult. a ble tor Qual2tf repr 'n~ In Ihe BROCHURE, and to re,lse and alte r the !lna1 format ~ The purchase of LISTINGS In the 89·~r Bn.ocHURE shall be llmlted to ··Aellve·· and ··Assoclafe·' MF:MBERS Of Ihe 81I'crs ln lernallon .. l Hl " hlllu ASsocl"tlon. Inc. and ··8pon so .... ' .,11 .ubJect 10 the 101101llln1l" term. and conditIon • . Whercu. dl$trlbullon of the BROCHURE and the re.ultln lf beneflt. from llstlnu published th erein will ~:tt"nd nver B t ..·o yeat period. PRESENT members are <t<tuired to pay due" In ad\"Rnce throulfh nnd Includlnr the enUrt calendar yea r of 1958. NEW and PORMER members are .e<tulud to pQ1 dues for t ... o full year. In advance. 2 Uctl ANNUAL OUES; Aellv e Membershln. _ $15.00; ...... oclat e l>lembershlp - S50 .00 ..,bleh tee shall a lso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edillons Of the 89·er MEMBERStllP ROSTER nubllshed durlnlf the t erm 01 such ASSOCIate Membershh.. Autho.bed BY _ _ _ _ ~ ,... I~ P~INTE~- .;;;~. - . ;US;:;~~;RLY VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINOING - AGREEM£NTS NOT INCLUDED STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ,I t\vJ 1-. ~ 1\ ~ , '(t) " ' .-\, '" ' " \). ,,\\<> 6 l'I\'\\~~" \\ -' • \--I\; "~y,"1\ NI.\-.o. \ NO CAABON REQUIRED US<! Ball Point Pen ____ •• _ I MEMBER �--. AUoe. Ne .. Member Address H O W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CIT Y 1, UTAH D u el!! C .. __ to • ~p,E::."'?. .... _____ ...... > _ ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER The undersi g ned MEM BER hereby au thorizes th e publica t ion of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the " COPY " appears below a nd s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIO NS conta ined he rein . ( L ine I ) • SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By ... Field R epresentaHve .\<1 ..o . M .01.. f: . h . ; .. 1;.\\.khl?\l."b .~'S.", ... e~Q\, . . I:h'.'(:-('I\~\ ·4, . . .~.\~t~~OCl"') . (Line 2) ( Li ne 3) S PON SORS H IP LI ST ING (Name Only) The purcha se of "ISTINOS 'ln Lh~ n'~r BP.ocHl'rtE . hall be limited to "Ac\ln" and "Associate " MEMBERS of the 89'er. lnter;lat!(ma: HhlhwRY Assoclatlon. Inc . and "8»0"50"." 1111 subject to the lollowlnll' terms and condition s. Whereas, distrlbutlon or the BROCIIURE a nd the . e.u!tina beneflta f roll' llslln u publish ed therein .. !II ~ xtcnd over .. \lIco year period. PRESENT memben are reQuired t o oa y dues In advance thruulI'h and inc!ud!nl" the entire calen d ar fe&T of 1958. NEW and FORMER memben are r equired to pay due. for t .." tull year. In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Mem be rship. • $1 5.00: AMOelate Members hip· $50.00 ",·hleh tee .hall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all ed!tton. 01 th~ ~~::':-b.~~~!~J!:R.SHIl" FtOSTER publis hed durln K the term of such Assocla !e ADVERTIBING R,\TEf;;. L!stlill.' In D1reetorY ot "SERV ICES AND AOCOM- ODATIONS·· MOT('"LS (per lm e) II per unit; MinImum rat e, no • Maximum ,ate. ,~o. Other business claSS!rlcnt!ons. no per line . SPONSORS· Financial z ra nt of 11 00 o r more Includes Ust!nr of name In proper S<'etlon of BROCHURE Th e 89· er. I nt~ rnRtlonal m~hwaf Association, Ine. ruanntu. tha t the MEMa~ ·S or SPONSOFt·S lI stln\l: as It a ppears abo,·. wm be publlshed In no! less than 50.000 eoplu ot Ihe 89·. r BROCHURE to b. dlstrlIJuted du rlnlf th ~ period between Oclober I. 1957 and l)ecembf'r 31. 1&5lI. n. A&5OClallon rese rv e. Ihe rll ht to edit COPY. a nd reJeCI PhOto, ... phs or oth er art work d •• med un,ult . able lor Quality reproduction In the BROCHURE. and to re,·I.e and a ltu ih . linsl format. ~~th~~~~'~.'"Cr __"':'~ , ...... L ...... ~ .. h _ __.\--.-..J-::"11C ... _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NG _ AGREEME NTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST ATED BELOW. SU8JECT TO ACCEPTANCE 8Y THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ball Point Pen O "MBr:1I �... - ., • · Ro"" e '1J7/y A~ ,~"'" nm ~ M ~Mk;,c;,.lr\p)~",\jz.J,\W ,m'" Actin .. Add"" HO W. SECOND SOlITH ST. -r,,)~$ 9.':::\fu:L~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH DuC.!i L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines See. ....... .. ) $ ... ADVERTISING LISTING I.u Tl..(S~':\. .. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as th e "COPY " appears below and subject to all TE RMS and CON DITION S con tained herein . (Line I) to $.~p.l'Ai.-. SPONsbRSHlP GRANT $ .... TOTAL Rec'd By.. .............. $ ... Field Representative .S,f\l)D\"J=".<>..".ci, ... 'i?f. \P1.N ..?Tt':.'I.'-.... \\9\i:S~ R I" ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LI ST ING (Name Only) The purchase of LISTINOS in ~he e9' e: lIItOCHURE shall be limned to ..... ctlve" and "Associate" MEMBERS 01 the B9'crs Internatlonal KI\lhway "'SSOCIRtlon, Inc. a nd "SOOMors." RU subject to Ihe foUowln ll terms and condition s. Wherea. , dl.tdbut!on of the BROCHURE and the re oulUn e bentlits from lIslirlliS published the reln ,,·m . ~t~nd over . 1"'0 year pedod. PRESENT m emben are reouired to Pal' dues in .dvance throueh and Inc!udin~ Ihe entire calendn ,ear of 19S8. NEW a nd FORMER m embers are required to pa1 dues for t"-I> full years In advance. ... NNU ... L DUES: ... cllve Membershh>, _ US.OO' Au oclate MembershIp - l.YI.OO whlcb tee 5ball al80 Inelude FREE DISPLAY LISTINO In aU edition . ot th t ::~~be~~~:-:'~ERsmp ROSTER publlshed durin. the tum 01 s uch A&SOclate ... DVERTISINO R"'TE$:_ LI.tlnu In Direo:-IOrY 01 "SERVICES ... ND "'CCOM. OCATIONS" MOTEroS (per line) U per unit: Minimum rat e, no _ Maximum mte. 'so. Oth er busIness clus trlcaUons. no J>f!r Une. SPONSORS _ Flnancl~1 : ranl ot U OO or n.o re Includes Ust!n. ot name In proper seeUon of BROCHURE. The U'u. Int. mational Hl . h,..ay "'s. oclallon, Inc . • uaranteeo that the MEMBER'S or SPO~SOR'S Ustt nll: as It a ppea rs abo,·c wm be publls hed In not Ie ... than 50.000 co"lt~ of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dls trlhuted durIn. tho period bcto.. ccn October I. 1957 and December 31, 1958. The Association reServe. the rl~ bt to etllt copJ'. and reJe<: t photonaph. or other a rt work deemed un.ultable for OUlUty reprOduct!O~ BROCHURE, and to nvl se and a lter th~ in e IInal tormat. ~ I {}"' .i.i~ 1-" ;~tho~~e~~ R".t.:]:':~. ___ ~. ____ . _. __ .. _~ __._ MEMBI:R / VERB ... L AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NO - AOREEMEN'T~ NOT INpLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT ST ... TED BELOW, SUBJECT TO "'CCEPTANCE BY TlfE ASSOCI ...TION. ---- NO CARBON REQUlRJI:D U se B RII Point Pen ST BE CLE ...RLY 1 �-- " -'ctlv~ -'MOC. New Rene.; (I; 8lX1Mor M,mb) .udb4"'" . ~,~ . . J _f'l:~HL Add"" 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. \A!.\ hl<.\,.1 t . Sec. • • to ............ .. J ADVERTISING LISTING Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~.~.H\a.».r. .. . L The undersigned MEMBER he reby aut horizes th e publica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and sub ject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS con ta ined herein . 4{ \n\~' SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues C .. A- . 3.Q g .. .o SPONSORSfllP G RANT TOTAL Rec'd By '....... $ ... Field Repl"C8clltative (Line 1) (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPON SORSH I P LI ST! NG (N ,me Only ) .U1 \\ \""'.'>.~ . Q,'{"'''.'\ ...~'''.'C<Q.", .....~~""'Q''<1>:Ai<:\",.",, o< ,..~ The purch ase 01 Li STINOS" h' t l>t 89' ''r Bll.OCHUR E sb all be ltn,l ted 10 "Actlve " and " AsSOCla lc" MRMBI!:RS 0 1 t he 8~' e r5 I ntu uat!onai HI K ha'" ASSOCiation, Inc. and "Spon . on ," Ril subject to th e follo ... lnll t erm s lind cond ition. . Whe reas, dlst r lbullon of the BROCHURE a nd lh e resullinll bendU s frool Ilstln n publish ed therein will ~ xtend ove r R ""0 year nerlod, PRESENT membt! . s a re reQuired to nay dues In advance lhroullh a nd Includin g t h e cnUre calendar year of 1958. NEW and PORMER m ~ m beu a re reQuire<! to p n dues tor 1"'0 lull Y rS In advance. ea ANNUAL DUES: Activ e Membershln • • U5 .00: AS$OClate Membeuhlp _ 150.33 which fee 6haH also include PREE DISPLAY LISTINO In all editions of the n'el MEMBERSHlP ROSTER nubUshed durln ll th e te rm of such ASSOCiat e Membership. Jl OVJ;;RTISINO RATcl-?-_ Li$t ln n In Dlrcolou 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS ( uer Une) n per unit: MlulmUm rate, no - Mu!mum , a te. $50. Ot her bus lnu .s ela.-;slf!ea Uou •• UII oer !lne . SPONSORS - Plnanel,,! Gran t of $1 33 or mor ~ Inclu des IIstln 8 of n a me In nrnoer section of BROCHURE The U' eu I nt~ rnRtlon R I H I8 h ..·u A ~soclatlon, Ine. IIUarRntee$ that the ~I EMBER' S or SPONSOR'S 1I.Ur.g as It appears ab< e will bt! publish ed In not ... less than M,OOO coplu of th e M' .. BROCHURE to be dbtr lhuted durlnf th e period bt!t ... eo n October I. t9~7 a nd D<-crmber 31. 19~. Th e Assoelailon rturves the r lirht to cdlt oopy, a nd rel""t nhOIOIllRPh. or other a rt work deemed un. ult. a ble tor QuaUtt rCnroducllon In the BROCHURE, and to rc~ l.., and a lt er thr flul formal. ~~th~~J..j..L":rt..li..k...Ii..LLb.u·.c.:.L..A\fJ;...A_...J}.?..:..",-~ VERBAL AOREEMENTS AR I!: NOT BINDING - AOREEM ENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . ~\ 1l ( 1-VYI!. MEMBCR i p~ ~ (!'---.l 0"" ~ T ru.~ J;; "", .......t. cJ:.. p.~ .NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen -J...L;. ~ �, 0 A_. A~Uve N,. Rene ..' DAn Membe r Address H(l W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues ~, . .:.9 ..~ ... ......, .. .1 ;.' .!.' : .. .\ 3 ..~ ..'::.~. Q ... ..J~ (t\.~.fl. , " ,.hl.'o f . . \ ..~. ADVERTISING LISTING s.". SPONSORSHIP GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. c\ ..................... ~ \ '" ", .. Tl , Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER lory I SpOnsor .. ................. ... ,::>'QO;'.O TOTAL Ree'd By $..... Field R e))rcse'ltative (Line I ) (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LISTING (Name Only ) Whereas. dl.1tr!butlon of the BROCHURE and the res ultlnll tw.n~rJts from )l ~ Tlod. PRESENT memtw.rs reQuired 10 pay dU~$ In advanc e throu lrh .. nd lndudln. th e entire CRtend~r ~ea r of 1958. NEW and f'ORMER mcm be rs are required to Oil ' dues for twa full fearl In adva nce. lIstlncs pubUshed therein ,,'m uund o,'cr a t,,·o yeAr arc ANNU"L DUES: AcU,'. "l.mbe rshlp. • US .OO: Associate MembershIp • l 50.00 "'hleh tee ~ha\l a lso Includc FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition s Of th~ ~~~tw.~~~t!~E'RSHIP ROSTER publl.h~d .....t _ . ,). ... O ...... . ......... ...i', .. . The purch ase of I.,lSTING.!:I m Ih e U'pr BROCHURE shall be limited 10 " A~ l h'e " and " Asaocl " t e" "IF-MBERS of the 89'ers Internat ional Hll:hwlY AS&OeIRtlon . Inc. lind ··Sponsors."· all 5ubJecl 10 the follo"'ln ll' terms . nd conditions. durln;- the term Of su~h A..soclal . - .. ' ADVERTISINO R"TE$:. Lb tln .. In Dlrerlor~ of "SERVICES "ND ACCOM. ODATIO~S'" MOTElS ( peT nn e) n per unit: MinImum tale. 1311 • Max imum rate. SM. Other bus !ne$~ da.&Slf!catlon •. Ull per lln . . SPONSORS. Plnaneial KrRnt Of U OO or more Includes Us tln a of name In proper ..,etlon Of BROCHURE The 89'er3 I nternational Hl i h..-ay "~soclatlon. Ine. l uarantees that the ME~mER'S o. SPONSOR'S lI.tlng as It a ppears abOve " 'Il! be publlshod In not Ie .. th .. n SO.OOO copl ea of Ihe 89'or BROCHURE 10 be dbtrlhuted durin .. th~ Period tw.t,,· een O<::tobe r I. 1957 and INcember 31. 1&». Th e A~soclat!on r ...erVM Ihe thrht to edll COP)'. a nd reject photonaph . Or olher art work deemed un5ult, a ble for QURUt~ reprQ(\ucl1on In lhe BROCRURE. and 10 re,· I.e and .. Iter lhe flnal forma t . ~~thOrl'.d --.-.-.-.,t .. +-.---'--"""'._...A....::.....!,._~',...: __:::. .:" ;:._ ":::--_,,__ . VERBAL AGREEMENTS "RE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST Bf,; CLE"R LY 1 STATED BELOW. SUBJf,;CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATiON. == 0 S.\I\\-'D(~ cl(3c.'t'r~v~ ~ ... ", ~ 0,1''/1 ' 0'" e. . .... 0 ..... i", +i-\--\~ , tlV\ 1k '\~<:Q.-\-\. -h:. Q.\"d"' (,:(.-\-ur\ .)O,o_t "'\ , . \<- \:l "- , " IV J d '''' 1j'<I\ • .,. d,,-,, ~ -;. ,ts NO CMtBON REQUIRED U.., Ball Point Pen MEMBI:Il �No. Ac!lve l\lembcr DATE 3Ir\"\<>'", A ddres.. 140 W. SECOND SOUTH S T . Sponsor ~..,,~.. ""''0,..> .. SALT LAKE CIT Y 1, UTAH Duell L J s., ~~ The u ndersigned l\'\ EMB ER hereby authorizes thy~' PUbli cation\ o f a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO P appears be ow ...•• J A:DVERTI SI NG LIS TING Lines .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER to ... 'tA.<i\..... S P ONSORSIflP TOTAL Rcc'd By . GRANT $.... $. , .3..9. ..~.~... --~WiU~ ~-- Field R eprtlscntatioo . ;::":u~:e;;:~\\.~E:;~~d.::~I;::s~:::;e~;e~~"""+~~,, .c ¢. ~" .. l\~\..,\"~~ .... c,kj; ~~I1/ ( Lin e 2) ( Li ne 3) S PONSOR S H I P LI STI NG (N am e Only) The I>u,..,hau ot LISTINGS I;> the 89'~c BltOCHURE ~ hall be llmlted \0 " ACU"c" and "AS!<QCI&tc" lIIE ~ IBERS of the 89'crs Imcrnatlonal HI~hll'ay Assoclatlon. Inc. and "81>011$0"'" all 5ubJect 10 the followln; lerms and condition s. Whereas, dll!trlbulton ot the BROCHURE and t he rcsuUlni benefits trop! lI.tlm,. pubUs hed therdn wm t"und over a 1"'0 ,ear perlOO. PRESENT m t mbera are renulred to PaY dllU In ad,'ance throurh and Indudln" th e entire ca lendar year 01 195'. NEW and ~'ORME"R mt mbers ore rcqulred to pa, du es lor two lun Jurs In adunct. ANNUAL DUES: Ac!lve Membnshlp. _ ' 15.00 : AS80cllt t Member. hlp _ 15-0.00 which I"" sh a n al50 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edition. PI thi> U'er ME:'oIBERSIIlP ROSTER publish ed durlni: Ihe term of such Asaoclate Membership. ADVERTISING RATES :. ListlnKS In olr<rtory of ··SERVICl:5 AN D AOCOM ODATIONS· · MOTE"LS ( per IInel 11 per unit: Minimum rat e. 130 - Mulmum late. U O. Oth er business daos\f lcatlons. no Ptr Unto SPONSORS _ FIna ncial ~ ranl of UO{I or more Illdudta lIsll",,, of name In proper .utlon 01 BROCHURE. Th e U·us InlrrnBtlonal HIi:hwBY Assoc iation. Inc. luarantecs that the :'oIE M13ER·S or SPONSOR·S itsting U II a ope3.r. a bove ,,·111 be published In not less than SIl.OOO copln 01 the 89·u BROCHURE to be distributed durlnl th~ period bet,,·u n October I . IgS7 and Df'eember 31. 19~. Th e As&o<:lation r ue rvu Ihe rll h! to edit copy. and .. )ut pholOtr raph . or othe r a rt work deemed unlultable tor qU~lIt, reproduction in the BROCHURE. and 10 revi se and a lter Ihr IInal forma!. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BI NDI NG - AG REEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED 13ELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCJ::PTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. ~. tL..ocfH. ~. 1'{58 . 1i1S'il'1>v. , '''\>, '\'''''~ 101,0,. ~,,\>\\(,l.~~ NO CARBON REQUiRED use Ba ll Point P ~n �.-... ctlve ...- . Ne .. ( Rene .. ) SPClnlOT f//L/S 7 DAT E I Member loW W. SEOQI\T{) SOUTH ST. .1......... _ . ..... A~h~E"~~~~:~: A:~:::Tlh~~Y ~~h~'~'~ ' theS.;~~;~;; :;:; a LI STI NG in the 89' E,R BR OCHURE liS the "CO PY " appea rs below and subject to all T ER MS and CO ND ITIO NS co ntai ne d he rein . ( Line 2) f.~~. . ~.~f..!. .Y. ..J~~,...61... .!. .................... .t~" ... Add:::. (97?i~ ~s~ ; I,AJQ~ SALT l..A K E CITY 1, UTAH L ines . ( L1"e 1) ... • ADVERTISI NG USTlNG . SPONSORSHI P GRANT S..~ ...... ~ ..Q ... v... .. •.. TOTA L Rec'd Field Rcpre.!entative FfZ~. I)'~....~.\J~.~ R . M.t\}: .... ~O""~\ ....,,.~il'\;· .L ..':'s . S;t\f;,,~~ ........................................ . ............... .................... ...J;""'I~4<w«~,1l~.. (Lin e 3) S PON SO RS HIP LI ST ING (Name Onl y) Th~ purch u~ of Ll~TlNG8 HI U\~ n'tr 311.OCHlJRE , b , 1l be lur\l,ed to " Aetwe lnd " A.lOGllte" MP;MBERS th e l19·er. I ntern a lional Hlih",. )' A$liiodlUon , Inc. and "SpOn.ors." 1111 lubJect to the folla.dn. terms and condUlon •. or Wbernl, dl.5trlbutlon at the BROCHURE and Ibe resuhtnl benem a from lI.tlnn pubUl<hed Ihereln ..ILl ntend o,'er • t .. o ,-u. ~rlod, PRESENT member. are reaulred to P U duel In advance Ih'OUlh and Includlnl the Mlilre calendar Jcar 01 1115'. NEW and PORMl!:R member. are .eaulred 10 pa,- duu for twa fun year. In .dunce. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membe • .s.hlp, _ 115.OD: AaaoeJlle Memberahlp • 150 .00 .. hlcb tee Ih. n al50 Include PREE DISPLAY LIS'n NG In .11 edition, of t h" "·e. I\IEM BERSIIIP R 08T£R published durlnl the term of such A,....,.;late Member.hl p. :\DV£RT1SINO RATES :_ LIsII" ... In Dlt ~ c\O., of "Siffi.VIC£S AND ACCO/ol· ODATIONS" MOTELS (~ r line) $I per unit: Mini mum nte. 130 - Mutm um ut~. IMI. Otht< bu.ln~aIJ duslfleUlon • . 130 per Ilne. SPONSORS - ""and .. l Bunt of 1100 Or mOre Include. !bUnl 01 name In proper seellon of BROCHURE. The lI'era l"t~rn .. llon.1 KJlb ... , ~1.lIon. Ine . luar .. nlUI Ihat Ihe lI.IEMBER·S or SPONSOR'S \I&lI", •• It a p pear• • bo,·e be publl,h~ In not leu tban :.0.000 cople, Of the 89'e r BROCHURE to be dl$l rlbu t ed durln~ I h e period bet ... t~n October!, 1957 Rnd Dt!ce mbtt. 31. 1958. The "'UOC:IU!on re,trWU the .IIM 10 edit COPJ. a nd reject pholocraph l or other art .. ark dHmed unlu!table tor au.lItJ reproduction In Ibe BR OC1It1RJ'!, and to re.- iH and .. Iter th~ tlnal torma t . .·m jJ ., ~~tho.JZCf ___ ~_L_ f::....~.~.....-~EMBCR . VERBAL "'OREEMENTS ARE NOT BI ND I NG _ ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED I N PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CI.E.t.RLY I ST ... TED BELOW, SlJBJECT TO "'OCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ~Q. o,fo.+'Z N 1>-\ d '(0" ,--\- 0. \ • NO CARBON REQUIRED Ule Ball Point P"n �"'&IOC. ~ to.eU ..e SJ>On5Or O ... T£ (/tb L j)j '-.\...O ,<~ UA "> \) ~ ~, i (. M,m'" '!;,T.f\.~ ..\i.i\.)".\S'~ ...~ ..\:\..v.l\!I ... ..&lY\ Add r ess If() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ~.~.!:'\ ..£.-t....W ...~ ..Q............................ . SALT UKE CI TY 1, UTAH to ............... .1 Duell C ........ . ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .. 1. $ ................... . 3,0 00 ADVERTISING LISTING "', :t'v:-~~ SPONSORSHlP GRA\'IT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publ ication of a LI STING in the 89' ER BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and subject to a ll TER MS and COND ITIONS co ntained he rein. $... :.: .......::::: ..... . . I $.......- .................. ~o~ $ .................... TOTAL Ree'd By Field RcprC3clltatiue :~::: :: ~1~R \J~'-\-~ \l·..· ~.~. ~.~. · . ~ ~~~~ ' ~~ tV\(I~Jf::J~~~~J311i (Line 3) SPONSO RS HI P LI ST ING (Name On ly) .......... . ...DVERTISING R ...TES :. Ll3Un.. In Dlr .... IG., 01 "SERVICZ8 ... ND ...CCOM· OD ... TIONS·· MOTELS l Der line) It per un it : Minimum ute. no • Mu:imum ,al e. nG. Other bu. lnta.'l claSlllflcaUon a, no per line. SPONSORS· Pln.neL .. 1 ..ra nt of 1100 Or more Includel 1I.llnl of n.me In proper Retion o f BROCHURE. Th ~ ag'era In lf:rn a tlon . l Hlah"'a, ... &Sod.lIon. Inc. .. u. rantees thl~ the ;\1r.MBER·S or SPONSOR'S Unlng a. I~ a ppear, . bOve will be lOublLmtd .n nOI leu t ha n MI.OOO .oplel of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dlllributtd durlnR the "",loci bet"'e ~n October I . 1951 a nd ~ e mber 31. 19~8. The "'' 'Gclatlon resenes Ihe .I,M to edit cop, . • nd reject phOIOCUphs 0. other ar~ .. ark d eemed IIn,ult· . ble for /lua Ut , reprodue llon In t h e BROCHURE. a nd to .e vJ.se a nd .lte r thf fln.1 formlt • The pU •• h .H of LI STINO!:t In Ih e Ii·e. BltOCtltJRE ' h a U be IImlied 10 " ... cl l. ..·· and "i\ssoelate" MEMBERS of t he 89' f r, Intern a tlonll "Ich"" "'uocII Uon . Inc. Ind " SPOn.., r,," a U l ubJect to th e (ollo ... ln , term, a nd condltlonl. Where... dlatrlbutLon of tht BROCHURE . nd th e re. ulUnl" benellU fron, U. Un n lOubU.hed therein ""Ill utend ove r a t ..·o n a r period, PRESENT membe .. are required to PaY du e. In . dvance thrOul h .nd IncludlnR the entire c. lendar yttor ot 1958. NEW a nd PORMER member. .u required to IOU dUN tor two tull ,ea" In . d va nce. ... NNU"'L DUES : .... U.-e Memberllblp. ·11 5.00 : AUocI. te Membeuh1p • no.co .. hlch fee 1Ib. 1I .110 Include FREE DI.8PLAY LISTING In .n edition. of the W~r MBMBBRSIIIP ROBr!:R publli hed durin.. the term of s uch ... uocl.tt Membersh ip . - -/. ~ __ "-t_&:.""'-_~.lI<:_.~'-''''''-__ "'ulhorlte<V """--- . BY ~...z VERB ... L .... OREEMENTS "'RE NOT BIImI NG - ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED I N PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST... TED B,~W. SUBJECT TO ... CCEPT... NCE BY THE "'SSOCI...TION. ~ t II" ~ ~ '1 :;rs ", ' ",,> .11 0 \ ' II. f\ ) O' i:) = \ 1\ W4'l' 1 \ <:,"\ I'l-(\... ~'1\ NO C",RBON REQUIRED UM B. lt PoInt Pen \ \ \ \ Vi il , , \ V A- L\. (: \) G\, ~R , \ MEMBl:fI �Actlve Mem ber Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. e AiSOC. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Lines ..... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .1. _ . ._ 01.. "', ~rb.,., The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publicatIOn of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIO NS co ntained herein. DATE .~k\.tL\~*, . . M~,. .~.... p ~...I . I...e .<C....TJ,., . Dues (.. ( Line I ) Spon..,r • ~ L3Q to ................ ) ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORS • P GRANT TOTAL Rcc'd By ................ . Field Representative 'J:.'Lv ~)~ ~ / flJ I),fL (\o.\. 9u V\~., L'H.\. ;.E ..M .~.T.i:; ..I.,,::: ] .";";:h"1: ...d (Line 2) ....... . "'-.. . 1..T >-I7 ..... (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI STING (Name Onl y) ....... ..... ............... . The nurchue of LISTINGS' In th~ 8D'er BHOCIlURE shall be limited to "Actlve" and. " Assoelate" MF.~IBERS of the 8g'cr~ In ternational HI~ h"'ay Association. Inc. and "SpOn.ors," all subject to the follo ... lnll' t erms and conditions. Wherus. distribution or the BROCHURE and Ihe res ultlnll' benefit s from UsUnn published Ihereln ...111 ntend over a 1... 0 ,.ear pe riod. PRESENT membe r. are required to PII1 du es In advance Ihroul<h and Including the enUre calendar Year of 1 9~a. NEW and PORMER membeu a re required to pay dul'$ fo' tlllO ful! yurs In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership. ,115.00: ""soclale Mcmbe .. h!1> _ $50.00 ... hlch fee .hall also Include FREE DISPLAY LIB"nNG In all editlon. of the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durlnll the term of such ASsociate MemberShip. ADVERTISING RA'l"ES,_ LI.llnu In DI , ,,,,tory or "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTEI.'3 (per line) U per unit: Mln!mum Tate. no • Maximum ute. $50. Other bu~ln ' $ ~ claoslfleatlons. no per Un.. SPONSORS _ PlDancj~1 Hanl of SIOO or mo,~ Includn II.Un c or name In prope r 5eetion Of BROCHURE. The Sg'e'$ Int . rnaUonal lfii"hwaf AssoclaUon. Inc. c uaranteu that th e ~IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIstlr.g u It Appears "'bove ... m be published In nOl Ie ... than 50,000 coplu of th e 89'er BROCHURE to be di.trlbuted durln$ the period bet'recn Octol>er 1. 1957 and ~cmber 31, 1958. The A'5O(:Iat!on reStTves Ihe rllht to odlt COpy. a nd reJe<:t photOl>ra.phs Qr other a.rt "'0,1< deemed un sult. able for Quallb reproduction In Ih e BROCHURE. and to revise and a lter th. final format. A ~~~~~~~~-·~·tt.- . -·-~·-··~·!.-··-·~!'!..-.--?.l~-..____._ M~m£n . VER BAL AOIU:B:>.IENT'S AR E NOT BINOINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACC EPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. \.y.t - s 1 'S S ~Iu r:'~ \,.t\."J" \) '-"(l f '" 1,."" NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ban Polnl P en �Active A_ N« Rene,,· , Spon sor DATE ... \.. Member Address H() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. .. 'r.- ........, < , , , SALT LAKE C ITY 1, U T A H Dues !. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .....L/ .. I'\ "',. ...... ,........................ ~ to .... J ADVERTISING LISTI NG Lines I" SPONSORSIUP GRAN T --, Th e undersigned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publica ti on of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY" appears below and s ubject to all T ERM S and CON DITI ONS contained he rein. ( Line I ) \ ..~ .y. -- TOTAL Rec·d By lL Field. 1 ~ cb RCjW~cnt(ltioo • ~ , , ......... ... .. (Line 2) ( Line 3) S PONSORS H IP LI ST ING (Name On ly) The purchase of l-ISTINOS In the 89'e, BROCHURE ~hal1 be llmited to "MU,"" and "A$$oclate" ME~mERS or t.he 89'cr ~ International Highway AMOelatlon, Inc, and "SpoMors," all $ubJec~ 10 the lollo"'iml terms and conditions, ADVERTISINO RATES: . Li. tinu In DlroNor)" of "SERV ICES AND ACCOM ~ ODATIONS" MOTELS (per line) $I per uni~: MILllmum rat~, no . Maximum rate, $SO. Other bu.I" • ." c1a •• Ulcatlon$, no per line. SPONSORS _ P1n .. nel~1 II"ranl 01 1 100 or mOr~ Include. 1I.tinll" of name In prope r U<::t!on of BROCHURl:. Whereas, dl ~ trlbutJon of Ihe BROCHURE and the resulUng bendlt. from lls~;nl<8 pubUahed Iheroin \I'll! .~tend over a IWO YUr per iod, PRESENT members are required to pay duea In ad,'anee throulh and Includlnl the enUre calendar :rear 01 lD58, NEW and ~'ORMER members are required to paJ due. lor 1\1'0 lull years In advance, 89·1''" I nternational Hla!>\I' ... Y A.\.Soclat!on, Inc. II"Uaranle"$ tbal Ih. or SPONSOR'S lIsllr.g as it appur. above ... lll be publl.hed In not than 50,000 capl es 01 the 89' •• B ROCHURE to be dl. trlbuted durin ; Ih" period bct,,·ocn October I, 1951 and l)(ocember 31, 1958. The AuoelatJoll resen es the rlrht to edit eopy, and reject photo8raphs or othe r art work deemed un.ult. abl. for Quality reprodUction In the BROCHURE, and to re"lse and aUer Ihe final format . The ~IEMBER·S 1~S5 ANNUAl- nUES: Actl". Membership, • $15_00; Anociale Membership . 'SO.OO ... hleh tee .hall abo Include F REE DISPLAY LISTI NO In all editions o[ Ihe 89' . , ME!l.IBERSKlP ROSTER pubH5hed durin" the terln o[ such A.\.SOClate Membersbip. Authorlud BY __ ____.. _. ______ .. _._ ,____ .. _._._. __ . ______ .___ ._..... _.. ____ . VERBAL AGREEM ENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRI NTJ;D TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STAT ED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ASSOCI ATION. J ~• > , NO CARBON R EQUIRl'O UJ\e Ball Point Pen M st-taeI! �, . .. - 0 1.71 '" MAT -6 011 For prints of pictUres of ),{aZ1f.~~.tP.t"'U . bov. ,,"ow _mounl paid or ch.,~cd 89' era HighWAY Assn. 8"~S~ PHOTO 111 $0\1 ' " MAIN - - ------,,-=____________ N.mL'_ _ _ _ _ eler' Arn't R.o:.'d ~, . 1/ / / ,::v '" -/ p 'J/" / 1/ / :.ly ~ I .""no on" lLH ~C, ".0' " rr;; ~ I """, ,')C' -4U 5· 11· �FR(J.{ : 1I .H.Cantwall TO: Bentl~ Mitchell The f ollowing valid ace payment of cOllllli.ssion . Yay ts receivable are presentEd for Yellowstone Park Company $ 200. 00 100. 00 Bowery Haven, Fish Lake ~ No su b-agent 10, 1958 Commission $ 100. 00 300. 00 �N• • Rene ... S""nsor Member Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. D ues C .............. t o .. SPONSORSHlP GRAr..'T s." The unde rsigned MEMB ER hereby au th orizes the publica ti on of a LI STING in the gO 'f.n BROC H URE as th e "COPY " appea rs below and s ubjec t to all T ERM S an d COND ITI ONS co nta ined he rei n. ( Lin e 3) ....... ) ADVl--;RTISI NG LISTING Li nes (Lin e 2) rl ,~h.J~t,~,~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ( Lin e I ) . .8.. Q.. ~........( ...~......T. ..2: .. '!..~.~......... • • /(}O~ $ ..........................- TOTAL Rcc'd By F ield R epre8entative ...................................... ...................... ...... ........... .................................. ..................... ...... ........................... .. ...... .... ~9":!:>.~..'\.....\~ . : .......· '::'...... hs . \:1. \,~~.."...................... ... S PON SORS HIP LISTING ( Name Onl y) ..... .. ..... . The "urchue of LISTINOH In th e U' er BJl.OCHUR E s h a n be limit ed to "AcUve" . nd " AUOClete " MEMBER8 Or the 19'ers Internation al HIghw'f Assoc:llllon . Inc . a nd "S""n sor"," .. U l ubkct 10 t h e follo ... ln l Inm. a nd condition •. Where... dl5lrlbuUon o f Ihe BROCHURE . nd t he rn ulUn l benellU from 11. tln .. tlubU6hed tb~rdn will ulend o,'e r ... t ... o f u r period, PRESENT m embeu are reQUi red to Pl 7 durl In a d V nte lhrouch . nd indud ln l lhe entire calend ar " n a r 01 It~. NEW I n d FORMER me mbe rs are re<lul red to " 17 d uel for 1.'0 lun nus tn adu n ce. ANKU AL DUES: Active MClIIbe rsh h>. ·1\5.00: AA30\:l a le Memberah lp - 150.00 ... hlch ree . h aU a loo Indud e FR &!: DISPUY LISTI NG In .n ed ttlona 0 1 the U'u MI!MBt:'RSHI P R.08'M:R pUblll hed d ... rlnr t he term 01 . uch A, _I. tt. Mem ber6hlp. ADVERTIS I NG RATES :_ Li, tlnll In Dlr(ctor7 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ OUATlONS" MOTElS I ~r line ) It \M! r unit : Minimum ut~. no - Mulmwn , a te, ' M. Oth ~r bu, tn~ ... eleutftca t lon •. 130 ~r ltne. St'ONSORS - PIn.. nd:t1 ; un l 0 1 UOO o r more lnclud ... It. Un .. 01 name In "ro~ r aecliOD 01 BROCHURE. The n 'era In tunatlon. 1 Hll h .... ' A_ I.tlon. IDe . I ...... nleel thU the M~ER'S o r SPONSOR'S Ilstll! lI" • • It . pOt!aI:1 . bove .,Ill be pu blt, hed In nOI less Ihan ~, OOO copi es 01 tht. 8S' er BROCHIlRE t.o be dl'tr lhuled durlnlf th e Ot!rlod. be l . ·er n ~Iober I . 1951 a nd ~ e mber SI . 1~53 . The ASloc l.lIon rue rve. the rlll"h i to edit COOT. and reject phou»rraph , or other lIt .,ork deemed un$utt a ble for Qu. nt , rePToducllon In the BROCHURE . and to rev ise and a ll er t he I!L,.\ form a t . An _ _ BY, ho rtu _ _ •_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.___ ._ _ __ VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT B INDINO _ AOREEM ENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRI NTED T!:n MUST B E CLEA.RLY r STATED B E"LOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE B Y TRE ASSOCIATION. N NO CARBON REQUIRED Use B. II Poln l Pen , �Active ASSOC , Renc,,' SI>QI' ~or ... om /6/ 5'>S Member Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST, Yellcnm'!-one t'<,rk c.P .. . E. ..C•.Bax._ .599... Poc:.l.t.ollG.,....I J ..J!lG.. · SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .............. to . ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .. .... ) • ADVERT I SING LISTING L ine s "",- SPONSORSHIP GRANT Th e undersigned MEM BER here by authorizes the publicat ion of a LI STING in the S9'E,R BROCH UR E as the "COPY" appea rs below and s ubject to all T ER MS and CON DITION S contained herein. TOTA L R ec'd By Field Reprellcn tatioo ...... $...200-00 . ( Line I) ( Li ne 2) ( Line 3) S PON SO RS H IP LI STI NG (Name Only) · :b:.·1, 1.~ · ;;. "o.n ,'), 'L:fibI!k . G~fI8-qy.... - -........... __ Th e purch ase of LISTI NOS In th e 89' tr BI«>CIiURE s h ~ n be Umlted to "ACtl"o" and "A55oclate" MEMBERS of the a9'u. In terna tional Hl a-h""n Associa t ion , I nc. an d "SpOnsors," an subject to th e tollowina- te rms and condition s . ADVERTISING RATES ;. Li ltlnl" In Directory ot "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATlONS" MOTELS ( pe r line) $I per unit: Minimum nte. UO _ Mulm wn ,'a , e. Sf>(!. Other busl "."" cla ~. lf!ca tionl . no per lin e. SPONSORS _ Pln . nell.l Ll'rant of $100 or mOr ~ Include. \loUnl' 01 n a me In prope. se<:t\on 01 BROCHURE, Wh ereas . dis tribution of the BROCIIURE a nd th e ... ulllnll\' bene fit . from ]I. U"n published therein wlH extend o, 'er a t,,·o year II<'rlod, PRESE NT membe r. are required to pa y dues In a dva nce throu gh and Includlnl' t h e enti re calend ar :rear Of 19 ~ 8. NEW and FOR~IER members Rre required to I>ay duf't! lor two full yea rS In a dvanc e. The 89' eu I n te rno.Uonnl HIK h"'''1 ASSOCI"Uon, Inc, l u a rant eu that the MEl\.fBER'S or SPONSOR'S ll~tl !!g as It "ppta r. 1.1>11\'" ... HI be published In not less than ~ O . OOO eop lu of the 89' er BROCllURE to be dl . trlb uted du rln K the per Iod be t"'"e,, o.::obe r I, 1957 " nd Decembe r 31. 1958, The A.socll.tlon reserv es the rla-ht to edit eOl>1 , a nd r eJe ~t photon "ph. or other ..t work deemed unaul!" bl e tor Qu a lity reproduct ion In the BROCHURE, ~ nd to revise and alter th~ fina l torm at. ANNUAL DUES: Act h '. Membersh ip. - 1 15.00 ; As.wclate Mcmbersbll> _ 150.00 wblch fee s h all also Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll ed itions of the 89'.r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER pub Ushcd durln K the term of ~ u c h A.';SOCla l e Member. hlp . Confirmed by l et tar Au t horized BY .. -~- ..-..- .. ~ -·5.i by Don ..-lB58-.---.-.-- - .-_...____ ~. __.._. __ . ___. -- VERBAL AGRi.'ElI'IENTS ARE NOT BI NDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTEO TEXT I\ruST B E CLEARLY i STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TH E ASSOCIATION. To apply to soonsorship of full c.,lor picture of Ol d Faithful on front cover . Tr'll13parency to be furnished by Yellowstone Park ConP':llW . , o NO CARBON R EQUIR ED Use B a ll POint ~n o M EMBEIl �From j M.H. Cant we ll TO: Bentley M itche ll July 3 , 1958 The following valid ac c ounts receiveble are presented for payment of commiss i on . Black Rock Beach Co ., Inc Utah Powe r and Li ght Co , 150 . 00 150 . 00 $ 300 . 00 Commission at 33 1/3 % •• • •• $ 100 . 00 • �~ New Member A dd ress 140 W , SECOND SOUTH ST, 13J(lch ~o c h, _ B,,"-Lk,. ±:~ \lLa.."b ", ,,,,, Q,O· f;4 SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .. to .............. .l Lines A'DVERTISING LISTING Sec, , ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSfUP GRANT The undersigned MEMB ER hereby auth orizes the publicatio n of a LI STI NG in the 89' E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" a ppears bel ow and subjec t to all TERM S a nd CONDITION S con tained herein , - -..;,;,' ( Li ne 1) (Line 2) SpOnso. Renew L.b.3 • •1:rCJ~ , :J,Qr.tdtu.I..Q!/, .................. . -- ...................... . ....... . .. ... · .. · ..•• .. .. ·1 · .... · .... · .. · (Line 3) S PON SOR SHIP LI STIN G (Name O nly) ADVERTISI NO RAT ES:. U .tln u ! n Dlreet or,. of "SERVICES AND ACCOM . ODATIONS" MOTh'LS (J)f! T line ) $I J)f!r unit; N lllimum rate. no • M u:l mum rate, no. Othe r busllle"" classification., 130 per line. SPONSORS· l"In an clul grallt 01 1100 or mOt e Inelude. IIstln ll" 01 nam e In proper section ot B ROCHURE. The 89' eu Inte rnational HllI'h,,'a1 Assoelatlon, Inc. iuarantees t h at the MEl>I"9EFt'S Or S POS SOR'S IIslf ng II! It APnea .. abo"e ...111 he p "bUshed In 1I 0t less than 50.000 copies of the U' er BROCHURE to be distributed du rln~ tht pe.lod bet"'e~n October I, 1 9~7 and Drccmber 31, 19~8. The ASSOC iation reserve. the rirht 10 cdll COPY, and teject vhotoll' raphs or olh e. art " '!lrk deemed unsult. a bl e lor Quallt ,. reproduction In the BllOCfIURE, And to .e,'I.. and a lt er thr final fo rm ~ • The purchase of LISTINGS' In the 89'cr BH.oCHU RE s hall bfl limited to "Aetln" Rnd "Associate" MEMBERS of the 8D'ers Int.rnatlonal HI~hwRY ASSOClatlon, I nc. And "SPOn"ou," All sub/eet to the lollo ..'ln ~ terms And conditions . Whereas. dlst.lbutlon 01 the BROCHURE and the resu lUni: beneflU fron' USl ln .. pubHShed therein "'1Il extend o,'e. R t ... o ru. pe . lod. PRESENT membe. s a.e .eoulred to vaY due. In a d'"ance throuah and Includlnr the ~ntt.e calendar yur o f 1958. NEW and FQRMER members ar e .~oulred to pay due. for two full yea •• In Rdvanc~. ,.,7 ANNUAL DUES: Actlve Membership, • U~.OO: A~late Membership - 150.00 "'hlch te. shall also Include FREE DIS PLA Y LISTING In all editions 01 th~ 89'or MEM BERS.mp R08T'ER pu bllshed durin!: the t e.m of . uch A.SO(:late :"t em beuhl p. ~:}th~~~ c8t:LiL~~. ___ ~._ . L. VERBAL AGREnl E NTS ARE NOT BI NDING _ AGREE MENTS NOT INCLUDED TN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NC E BY THE ASSOCIATION. o~ 13 \ a.~ y, R ",-,I<:... '0 1-0 b-,,- \fV\ 0. c4 ~ lJ \ 'CI NO CARBON REQUIRED Use B all Point Pen MEMB J:11 �... ctlve 0".0<:. ; Member Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Ne ... R . n ...· Sponsor Dues L .. to ................l Lines ADVERTISING LISTING "'e. SPONSORSHlP GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. ""7/7 1/;' \....:\o...b'?o""":< _±\\~I:r'5lt>: ..... \((,. .. '.!!5'D\0 ":-.bS. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER OATE V • •• . L=Ft?~ TO'I'AL Rcc'd By Field. Representative (Line I) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI ST ING (Name Only) . __ ~.~ .. ..?£.\...u.~.\. _ . The p urch ase 01 LISTINGS' In the 89'or B1l.QOHURE ~ h R Il be lim It ed to "Actlve" Bnd "A"~ocl ate" l>IEMBERS 01 th e 89' . r& Jnte rnation~1 HI ~ h\llay "'s socI.Uon. Inc. and "Sponsors,"' all l ubJut to the 101l0"'lnl< term. a nd conditions . Whereas. distribution of the BROCHURE a mI th e reo ultln. ben ellt. f rom IIstin U pubH.hed there in will extend O,'er a two ,ear period, PRESENT m embers are reQu ired to pay dues In advance through and Includln r the entire calendar yea r of 1958. NEW a nd FORMER mem bers are reQuired to PRY duu tor u .. o lull yeB r! In BdvBnce. ... NNUAL DUES : Aeti,- e Member. hlp . • $I ~.OO: .... $O(:ll.\ e Membership _ n o .oo "'hlch lee . hall Blso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all .-dltlolll 01 th~ 89' er MEMBE'RSMlP ROSTER publl . he<l durlni Ih e t erm 01 " ueh ... . soclate Membership. ADVERTISI NG R ... TES ;. Llst lnn In Dlr. dorf of "SERVICES AND AOCOM_ OO ... TIONS·· MOTELS (pc r lin e) II per unit: Minimum rat e. no • Maxlmum ra te . $50. Other bu . in e ... dus l/leRUon •• no per line. SPONSORS _ Pinaneiul c rant of 1100 Or n,Ore Includ« lI~ tln r of name In proper sec tion 01 BROCHURE. Th e S9·er . Int r rnatlonal H lrh,,'. y AssO(:latlon. Inc. l uarantees that the l>IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIs tlr.g U It Rppears abOve will be published In not Jess than :;.0.000 cnplu of th e 89' u BROCHURE 10 be dlstrlhut ed durinIII' th e period i>et ,,'Mn October I. nS7 and o.-cember 31. 19~. Th e AssO(:lallon reserves Ih e r hlhl to edi t COPY. 8nd . eJ ut photoiltaph . or other a rt work de<:med un~ult. able lor <luailly rcprO<luetloll In the BROCHURE. a nd to r evl. e and alt.r Ihr flnnl lormat. AUlhorl~e BY VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREEMENTS NOT n~OLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPT ... NCE BY THE ASSOCt ... TION. i- ll~'" 1);-0. \'I lJ 1a k l '" II fI, "" "<- + I.J\-" ~ .... l.., ~ ... -t- P6\JJor NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Bait Point Pen �SpOn!lOr DATE Member Address 10&0 W , SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Dues .." . A . .... t\Alu .~..~. Q~.KQ.,.,. ~s . M ~h,yt:1o::\f. \ '8.0 ., Q> Hlal\ \ . . .... ,uj:S1 to !'/::>Z.) • .1 $,1> .0 ADVERTISING LISTING S<'~ '''''J: authorizes the publication of The undersigned MEMBER hereby a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein. . .... q .. . ,. I?..l> v SPONSORSlflPI Lines}§.S ...._ ..... s........................... TOTAL Rec'd By 1- _, (Line 2) ... C .(Lo~.\;..(\Q.f\\)S. .....MOTOfl.... .....\:\.(iI£.\... , . 8 , B.·,· I\T·······\~·"""t ............... , ..... ... l:\w~.'i> ... L"'.".A .'.L , S. ~.,.o .:1'}'f."'- .f.Z.~ .u~":. . ....C~.x . f'...<>.ds ~I (Line 3) ....... F'l .•.ll.. .::T.,)j , (Line I) l)., .",:;,<:, .. (t,.H .W\, .t'Ii.1tt "..~ ..~."-' •.y; . . \<'."9.,,> '~>" T Y.I'.~ ...... . SPONSORS HIP LI STING ( Name On ly) :(!\"\.~ ~X 0\1 ""i-~:;IQ The l>urc ....1Ie 01 LISTIN081n tilt a9' e. BR.UCHURE . lIall be limited to "A.Uve" and " Al4OClate" MEMBERS or tile P' el"$ I nte rnational HI,h""aJ' A.!.sOclallOn , Inc. a nd "SpOnsors, " ,,1I . ubl"'t 10 Ille follo ... ln , luna a nd condition •. WIIereu, dl.otrlbullon of Ille BROCHURE a nd tile ru ulUnl bene!!la Ironl UsUn" publls lled therein ...111 Ulend over a t ... o r ea r perlOO, PRESENT ",embe.. are required to pa r dues In advanct III",u l lI a nd Includlnl til e enUre calendar , , t ar or 1II!1. NEW and f'ORM ER member. art rt<Iulred to pa , duee for twO rull ,ean In " dvance. ANNUAL ~ UES: Active Memberslllp, • $15.00; A3aoelnte lIIIembeulllp - ISO .OO ", l'I lcll tee &ba ll abo IneLud e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In a U editions 0 1 th~ ag·er MEMBERSlUP ROSTER publlslled durlnl tile lerm 0 1 snell ..usoclalt Member&blp. n, .1:- 0 I (p I .... ADVl!RTISI NO RA'l't;:S : _ I4t1n .. In DlrtttOu of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIOl'.'S'· MOTELB (per lin e) $I per unit ; MlnlmulD rate, $3G • Mnlmurn u te , ISO. Otll er bUIln e" d aO$lflea tlonl, $30 per lint. SPONSORS _ FInancial ..ant or 1100 Or mOre IneLudCl Ul tln , of name In proper K<Uon of BROCHURE The at't tl Inurna tlona l Hii'll ... , Auoc:iaUon, loc. ,ua nnIH. tlla t tile MEltBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ustlng a. II appea n a bO,·e ... 1lI be publl slled In not Ie ... Illan !to.ODO copies 01 tile "'er BROCHURE 10 be dlllribuled durln~ tbe pc.iOO bet "'een October I. 1957 and Dt<:ember 31, 19S8. n.e AIIOCIlltion reserve. Ihe rllrllt to edit COPY, and reject plloto..a pl'ls or otller art work deemed unsuitable for QUam, reproduction In tile BrtOCllURE, lind to revi se and alter III ~ lin,,] torm Rt . Autllorlud BY _ hfd~ htc.. K --' _ _ __ ' ,~~_. .~ VERBAL AOREr..IENTS ARE NOT BINDINO _ AOR&EMENTti NOT INCLUDED I N PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY t STATED BELOW. SUB..rEC'l' TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. l'Pi T .... '!"hE O RDER. Of Fli FIR \" I, }\ 1UTH OFF ICE , .' (\" 1I1'·iI, IU. !-Vk. ULi"U ;.. t (.,. , .~ ( 89'ERS INlERN kTlotlkl HIGHVlkY ASSll', INC. . S PECIAL 'CCColil NO CARBON REQUIRED Uae B.U Point Pen M,,"," �Active 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Renew -/5'7 Sponsor '" Dm ,.... SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lill'~ I. ~~1If' m SPONSORSHIP G~ I'F/ . $. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pu (Jic·atio/l of ' LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHUR E as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERM S find CONDITIONS contained herein. , (Line I ) .. ./ ...... . .. L~.I ................'_ . ~r ...6n,'i'.. ....i2.}~ ~ cM£., z..<c"' ( Line 2) ...........•. . .• .. . ...........•..... .•• ~ (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI STI NG (Name Onl y) Th e pure, ,,,.., ot LISTINGS In the SQ'er BlevcHURE shall be limited ~o "Actlve" and "ASSOClate" MEMBERS of the 89'or8 Internatlonal HI8h"'a~ Association. Int. and ·'Sponsors."' all . ubJect to the fol!owlni: terml and tQndltloM. Whereas, distribution of the BROCHURE and the ruulUn K bendlts from lIstlnu pubUshed therein wm utend OVer n (,,'0 yUr period. PRESENT memben are required to pay dues In advante throua-h and Ineludln K the entire calendar yur of 1958. NEW and FORMER member. arc required to pay dues for twa tull years In advance. ANNUAL DUES; Active Membershlp. _ U~.OO, Associate Membership • $50.00 which tee shall al.., Include FREE DISPLAY LISTINO In all edition . or th ~ ::~~be~~~~~£RSm p ROSTER l>ublJ l h ed durlnl the term of such Associate ADVERTISING RAT£S;. LI.tlnu In Dlredou of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTI>'Ui (per lin e ) n per unit; MInimum rat e. no • MIIKlmum rate. 550. Other buslne"" claOSlllflcatlon., $30 per Une. SPONSORS _ Flnand,,1 n an! of U OO or more htcludcs lI.tlllll of name In proper .edlon of BROCHURE The 89'ers Internation al Hlgh .... ay ASSOCiation. Inc. 'l.Iaruntees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S llstir..g as It oppears abo,·. will be published In not Ie ... than 50.000 cople. Of th e 80·er BROCHURE U> he distributed durin; th e period bet"''''''' October I. 19~7 and D~cember 31. 1958. The ASSOCiation reservu th e r llht to edit copy, and reJ ed photOiraph . or other art worl< d eem ed unsult. able for Quality reprodUction In the BROCHURE ... nd to r evise and alte r tho final formac. ..,. ~~th~~~~~_. __ 1.;:r~~_~_.Q -;.~.:.U_. ~_ MEMBCl? · L . ___ . _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PR.INTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATEO BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. PAY TO THE ORDER OF F OU:1TH SO UTH OFF IC E FIRST SEC,oiTY ~!,:" O UTAH, N . f .A SA!.! l!:C CH'f. UTAH r Ci I: D~;'OS 1T ONLY anas iNTE, .I;ATICiU,L i;lGt1WA Y !SStr, 11K.. S CIAL ACCCUllT PE NO CARBON REQUIRED U... Ball Point Pen �, ·.' hctlve .~ Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. "'HCIe. ~ne ..· New SpOnsor Iii \. _ . DATE "~ lJJ",J••~h ,\l~ \\~~ ~"':\:\. ~.. (~ 0. ~.~m'o!L ~ C <W\ 1M" <, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues C.... to ................ ) Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSlllP GRANT L. ADVERTISING LISTING Sec . .... $ ... . ' The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E:R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITION S contained herein. TOTAL Rec'd By .. sJ tJ.4....!!... .k1tJ.\Qii.~!~i#:ql_ .. /.~~.~.~. _ Field Rep>'C3cntatioo (Line I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) W :&"If~OJ\}Lf\I~S,I'{(\"]J, ~e&'t;,t\\\I:\\:6\,)~\~Qf:J'!l!'II!0~i~t;f:.. SPONSORSH I P LI STI NG (Name Only) .... ... . Th e pur~l'''se o>{ LISTINOS' In the S9'er BltOcilURE ,hall be limited t <l "Actlve" "Auo<:late" MEMBERS of tbe 89'ers InternaUonal Klahway A5$OClaUon. Inc . and "Swnso"." all subject to the loUowlnK terms and conditions, and Whereas. distribution of the BROCHURE and the resultim!" benefits Iron' lbUnt. published therein ,,'m utend over a two year period. PRESENT member. are re<lulred to pay dues In advance throuih and lncludln .. the cnUre calendar Year of 19M. NEW and .'OR MER members ue reQ;ulred to pay duc, for two full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership. - II~.OO: Aswclate Membeuhlp • $M.OO which fee shall al,o Include FREE DISPLAY' LISTING In all edltlon. of th~ 89' er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl.hed durin. the term of . uch "",oclate Membership. l'_DVERTISINO RATJ;:$:. LI~Un u In Dlrcetory or "S&R.VlCES AND ACCOM· ODATIONS" MOTElS (per llnel $I per unit; Minimum rate. 130 • Ma ximum rate. $~ O. Other bU$lneu classi fica tions. no per Une. SPONSORS· Financial Krant of UOO or more I"ctud~ lI$t1nl or name In proper sed Ion of BROCHURE . The 89·.r. Int~rnatlonal Hi i hwaY Assoc iation. Inc. luarantee. that Ih e ME~lB£R'S or SPONSOR'S lISling as It appeau above wm be publl$hed In not Ie.. than 50.000 coplu of the 89'er BROCHURE to be distributed durln K th o period bet wee" October I. 19&7 and December 31. 19~8. The A5$OCiatLon reserves ~he ria-lit to edit COPY. and reject photonaph . or other art work deemed un.ult· Able for Quallty reproductlo" In the BaOCHURE. and to revln and alter the Iinal format. ~~thorlzed -_'':''~_'~_~--'"-_' ___''~~___ '_~ __ _''_'''''-''...J... __ ME MBt:R VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BIND1NO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY' i STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEl'TANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. ~<>, 1'u , "r."'!O'(S\,,'f C·\ ~\ (,\,,,-\ o-\lh ¢V I ,,,;, to..-\ \> 'i '3..fo", S 0'(, IV" . \ (,.."v;" PAY TO THE ORDER OF F OURT H SO UTH OFF ICE FIRST S C RITY 61:';K OF UTAH IH . EU , , SALT LA!:~ C:TY. UTAH f OP. 0 1:7051T O NLY 89'fRS INTERNATIONAL HIGHWA'( JoSSH', IIlC. • S PECIAL A U. CCOUI NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ball Point P on Pa �, .e Actlve .. .... _. l.-__ t.~ ~.o.f _ Member SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER om ._ ..l. •. •.~...~ _ton ...... ..... ~. l _ i _. .... :.. it. J.lc .. _ C .,. Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Sponsor ASIIO<:. ..... ) .......3....-.0:':._ ADVERTISING LISTING Lines Sec • •. l .. _.~ _ ....... . The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears bel ow and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. , SPONSORSIUP GRANT $ .....•...l. ....... .:'l..... lAM.,\Q;,.~ TOTAL Rec'd By Field Representative (Line I) (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LIST ING ( Name On l y) ._ • ..L • • _.". _ • • __ ___ J ••• • " . _ . . .. . . u)J .... TIte purc!l Q.e of LISTINOS In the 89'cr Bll.OCHORE s hall be Ihnlted to "Active" And "Associate" MFJIIBERS of the U'ers InternMlonal Hl~h""ay Association, Inc. and "Sl>Onso rs," all subject to th e fol1owlml tums and condition • . ADVERTISING RA1'ES:_ Lls tlnn In Dire.;,tory of "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTELS ( per line) *1 per unit: MInimum rate. $30 _ Maximum ,.,\\ e, *50. Other buslne$.S cla ~ trlcntlon •. 130 per lin e. SPONSORS _ Plnancl,,1 grant of *100 or mor~ Inc ludes \lotln . 01 nam e In proper sectIon or BROCHURE Whereas. distribution 01 the BROCHURE a nd the resultina- benellts Iron, n.lln gs published therein wIU ~ ~tend over a t,,·o yeu period, PRESENT memlu:rs are reQuired t o pay duu In .. dv.nce thrOU l h and Includlnf the entire calendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMER membeu are reqUired to pay duel for two full yean In advance. The 89' ers In ternational Hl a hwQY A..oclatlon, Inc. lI'uaranteu that the MEMBER"S Qr SPONSOR'S nsUng a. It appea rs above wlll be published In not Ius than 50.000 copies of the 69'er BROCHURE to be dl3trlbut~d durlnl: th ~ period betw .... n October I. 1957 and Ll<'c~mber 31. l&~. The As sociaUon rue.ves the rla-ht to edit COPY. a nd reject phOtolm.ph s or oth er art work d~en'ed uns uitable for Quality reproduction In the BROCHURE. and to revloc and alter Ih. tlnal format. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membe rship, _ *15.00: A.\$OClate MemberShip _ 550.00 whlcb tee s h all al.o Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTINO !n aU edition. of th~ S9' u MEMBERSffiP ROSTER published durlnK the ttrm of such ASSOCiat e Membership, ~~thorlzed .Sl::''rl~..\-_~B.!I( __ '''.uJ_ __- -----. l _ 'I'EXl VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINOINO - AO}l.EEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN P}l.INTEO STATEO BELOW. SUBJECT 1'0 ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. MUST BE CLEARLY i PAY TO THE O nDER OF F OU RT H SOU'-H O FFIC E fiRS SEC'r'TY , 1',;( 0' UTAH, N.! . T SALT l A~ : , Ci:-', vT/-,H FO P. DEPOSIT ONLY 8m S INIU:ATIONAL I!IGWY HA ASSN', 11K. . SPEC A IAL CCOUNT NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball poInt Pen MEMBr:n �• ~sor Me mbcr AddrCl:Il:I S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 1f() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. • Ducs L ...C.~~. to • .;':{,. ........) ADVJoJ RTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER $ ............t. ............. SPONSORSffiP GRANT Lines ............... ___ ... • $.::7~).~.Q"';. ......... ..t.~.. . . . . ~... $ 'j.0-•.~4{) Th e un dersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publica tion of a LI STING in the S9'ER BROCH URE 85 the "COPY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITION S contained herein. TOTAL Rcc'd By .. F ield. RcprcscntatilJ(l (Line I ) (Line 2) ( Lin e 3) - -.., J SPONSORSH IP LIST ING ( Name O nly) ..~..... '-.,J_ .., ........... L.... ••• ••••• •• _ ••• Tt>~ l>ur.J;...... .:.t LISTINOS In lilt 18'ft Bl'(.QCHtlRE Iban be limIted to " Active" and " Assoclate" MEMBERS Of the 59'e•• IntunaUonal Hlah .."y Auoc laUon. Inc . and "Sponsors'" .. n subject to the tollowln. lenn. and condltlon •. Where... dllltTlbuUon of th e BROCliURE a nd the .nulllni beneUti from Iillin ... pubU.htd therdn will ntend ovu a t wo n a T pe.tod.. PRESENT membera a.e 'e(!ulrtd to "ay duel In a dvance throUlh and Indudln. th e entire calenda r yeu of le~a . NEW and FORMER me mber. are 'lKIulred to "a, duel 10. tw" lull rea .. In "dvance. "-NNU"-L DUES: Active Memberlhlp. • U5.OO: "-noelale M. mberahlp • 1& 0.00 which lee ' hall a l... Includ e FREE DISPLAY LI8T1NO In a ll edition. of the 89'er MEMBERSmp ROSTER "ubllahed durln l the te rm of such A_late Mem be.ahhl. ' _ 0 < . .. ...... .... , .... . ..... . . .. . ... . . ...... ... . . .I. lo.'. . . ..... . ...... :.,.1 . .•••• . • . ••• . •••••. • .• 1d>VERTISINO R"-TES : _ WIll" ... In DI.ecI0'7 01 "n!lVIC£8 .AND ,,-ceoM· OD"-TlONS" MOTKLS ("". lint) II per unit: Minimum nte. 130 - Maximul!I nle. no. ~her buaineu e1aaai lieaUcml. 130 per line. SPONSORS· Pln l nelal .rant of 1100 O. rno", Inelud ... UIUn. Of name In p.olM'. ae<:Uon of BROCHURE TIl e 8\1'era Inl~matlonal Hll h ... ., "-_ Iatlon. lnc . .uuantee. that the ;\U;~rBl!:R·S 0' SPONSOR'S IlsUIlIl .. It a ppear. abo'·e .. m be pubUl hed In not leu tha n W.OOO coplu Q,I the 89'er BjtOCHURE to p.e distributed durin. th e period belWfl!n October I. 19S7 alld Dfooomber ,..1: 19f>11. The Anoelatlon reune. the .I",ht 10 cdl~ COPT. a nd r eje c~ pholOl raph l O. oth er art work 'temed \In. ul~· able for (lIIR ljk.. reprO<l \,ct!2.n In. the IiIR~HURE. lind: tot ...... lId a lter th r fln a ] lorma t v a r a , LC " ~.t 1-...11:::1 T-.r ..... ~~thorlzed C~ ~ _. <"""r""'l""\~'':' ... r~ 'X': ... ~; - . I VERlML AOREEMENTS "-RE NOT BINDING ~ ,,-ORE-EMENTS NOT INCLUl:)E:D i PRINT80 TEXT MUST BE Cl£.\Jd.y ST"-TED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ,,-CCEPT"-NCE BY THE MISOCIATION. ' 1'0 . lv to rfoon onsQXs 1 e ple • • ub:l~at c c t1 ~i S .It ot pl"·ure t ~e 8", at rt one d. JC ........1'" ble ~1 NO CARBON REQUIRED UK Ball PtIlnt Pen Y OJ t ! MEMBER t A r. t- \ N I.:T �, Active N•• Renew DATE Member Ad dress UO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. lAol~ Ei ,\1Ao, C\ QQ ... ~ Dues c~.vv .............. to ............... ) SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER QlIHt{S A"DVERTISING LISTING Lines s.,. The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to an TERMS and CON DI TI ONS contained herein. ~ ~ L,- . I S 2° . ?PL~. O • TOTAL Rec'd By .. . .. .. Field Representati ve ~ t-IU\')0,OO!&\lbUILA ( Li ne I) (Line 2) ( Li ne 3) SPONSORS H IP LI STING (Name Only ) - h e pu rr" . "" or LISTINGS 111 the 3l1'u 61/.CCH (lRE shall be limited \ /1 "Acti ve" T and ·'Assoda.\e" MEMBERS 01 the 89'eTs Internatlonal HhilhWay Associatlon. Inc. and "SponMln," ftll subject 10 the followln $" term . and condition s. ADVERTISIN G RATES:_ t. jsUn~. in OITtdOU of ··SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS·· MOTE"LS (per Un e) 11 per unit: Minimum rate. no _ Ma:ldmurn nto. ISO. Oth er busln eS$ cluslficatlon • . 130 per Une. SPONSORS _ f'lnancial grant of uno or mor~ !l\clude ~ ll~tln ;: ot name In proper seo::tlon ot BROCHURE. Whereas, dlstrlbuUon of the BROCH URE and the ruult!nl bcn~fl\$ from Ustlnu pubUshed therein ,,·m uund (I'"eT n I"''' l"ear period, PRESENT m embers are re<lulred to pa~ dues In advanc e ttlrourh and lncLudln l th e entire calendar year of 19r.t. NEW and FORMER member. are reQuired to pay dues tor t,.." tull years In Mlvance. Th e U'e rs Internatlonal Hl;:h,,·ay A..oclation. I nc. iJuarantees that the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR·S listin g as It al>peus abo ve wm be I>ubll$hed In uot Ie"" than 50.000 copies of ~he 89·er BROCHURE t o be distributed dudnK th~ period bet ...""n October I. 1957 ~nd Ott.mber 31. 1958. The Association reserves th e right to edit copy. and reject photoll"r"l>hs or other art work deemed un suit able ier <luam, r eproduction In the BROCHURE. and to r evise and alter t h e tlnal format. , ANNUAL DUES: AcUve Mcmbcuhll>, _ $15.00: A.s$OC!ate Mtmbershlp _ 150.00 ,,·hleh tee shall abo Include FREE DISPLAY L1STINO In aU edition. ot th~ 89' er MEMBERSHIP R08TE"R I>ubllshed durin;: the ttrm ot such As&O<:lale M~mbershll>. ~~lhorlu~._...Y~tl_G . ~~_!..-L..\..Ag.___ :k!_~..___. MEMBER Vf:.""RBi\L AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY! STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Poln~ Pen J �"'ctlve Rene,,· N.w A.s.soe. Sponsor DATE Member Address 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. . . ..... ~ ~ ....") .. ...! SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH Dues to .... ) A"DVERTISI NG LISTING Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER . ~ ..j . SPONSORSIDP Be•. The undersigned M.EMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all T ERMS and CON DITI ONS con t ained herein . GRANT $ .. . • • TOTAL Rec 'd By ......T -........ ~ ...................._. .1...... $......... ~ _, Field R epresentative (Line I) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPON ·S ORSH I P LI STI NG (Name On ly) ......... ...... ... ........... _ .......... 1 .. The purchase of LISTINOS in th e 89'''r IU~HURE shaH be Umit"d to "Actlve" and ·· ... ssoclate·' MEMBERS of the lIg'n.. International Hia-hway Association. Inc. and "Sl>On$o<8:' aU subJec ~ to Ihe follo'lllln,;r term$ and condition s . ... DVERTISING RATES : _ Lis tlnlS In Dlre-t_ tory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM· ODATIONS" MOTElS ( per lin e) 11 per unit : Minimum rate. $30 _ Max!mum !'ate, n o. Other buslne ... cla ... lfica~jon •. $30 per line. SPONSORS· Flnanclal Ktant (If HOD or more Inclu des lblln ,;r e f name in proper secUon of BROCHURE Wherea 5. dlstributlon of the BROCHURE and the resultlnl benem . fronI lISl ln u pubUshed therein w111 extend ever a twe year period. PRESENT members are required to pay dues In advance threuKlI and Indudln. th e tnllre calcndar Year of 19~8. NEW and FORMER members are required to pay dues for Iwp full year. In ad,·ance. The 89' eu tnt~rnat1(1nal Hl i hwa y AS5QCiati(ln. IUc. ;-uarantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIoUns as it appears above wlll be publi shed !n not less than 50.000 copi es of the 89' er BROCHURE to be dlstrllmted durllli: tht period between Oct(lber I . 19~7 a nd lNcember 31, 1958. The Ass(IClation reserves the ri' hl t(l edit copy, lind reject ph(ltoll raphs or other art w(lrk deemed un suit. able for Quallt, rrpt(lduClion in Ihe BROCHURE. lind 10 revise and a!tef th ~ fina l format . ANNUAL DUES' ACt h'" Membership. • ' l~ .OO; .... soclate Membership - $50.00 "'Mch fee shall al$(I Include FREE DISPLAY LISTINO In all e".lU(lns 01 th~ 89' e r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER pubUshed durln ,;r the term of such Associate Member. hlp . "'uthorlzed BY" ._ ____ .______.', VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE ... RLY" i STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY" THE ASSOCIATION_ b ... .•• ... .I, .. t ... NO CARBON REQUIRED U.e Ball Point Pen MEMBcn �Actlve Au oe. ) New lU'n ew Spon$Or Il DATE ( ( J d Member Address 14{) W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDE R __ _ ........ to _____________ __ J ___ Dues ADVERTI SING LISTING Lines SPONSORSHIP GRANT Sec. .. The undersigned MEMB ER hereby au thorizes the publ icat ion of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and s ubject to all T ERMS and CON DITI ONS con tained herein, S $......... -.-.-.-.-..-. '; 7 . 7'S"~ TOTAL Rec'u F ield RcprC8C1lta tive ( Li ne I) ( Li ne 2) ~~~::~RSHIP LI STI NG (N,m, O"'Y) M~h-\~~ ~ ~ .~.. I~~\~\ '0 Tl, . purc h ase of LISTINGS In th e 89'.r B1I.OCHURE shall be lim ited to "AC~Ve" and "Ass""lata" MEMBERS ot the 89'e l'S Internatlonal Hlirhway Assoclatlon. I nc. and "Spon$Ou," all subject to the follol\' lna t erms and condItions Whe~eas, dIstribution of the BROCHURE and the resultln$ benefits from IIsllnu published thereIn will extend o,'e, R two j'car perIod, PRESENT m embers are reQuired to "ay due. In advance throu irh and IncLudlnir th e entire calendar ye ar of U58, NEW and FORMER members arc NlQul,ed to pa y dues for two full yea rs In aclvRnce, ANNUAL DUES: Active Members hIp, • U5 .OO: AssocIate Membership _ t50,1l\l whIch tee shan 0.1$0 Include FREE DISP/..hY LISTING In all editIon s of the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durlnlO the term of s uch A$$O(:late ~I.mbershl". ("\~•~ ...... • ADVERTISING RATES: . LbUnn In Dlrerto,y of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per lin e ) $1 per untl; Minimum rate, $30 - Maximum ,at e, $50 , Other bus lne ... classiflca tlon s , no per Un e, SPONSORS _ Flnancl,,1 lItant of H OD 0, mor~ Includes llst lllli of name In proper . cetlon of BROCHURE The 89'".. Int~rnatlonal Highway A:;S""latlon, I nc. lIuarantecs that the ~n;::~mER'S or SPONSOR' S Il. Ung U 11 appears abo"e ",'m be publiShed In not leu than 50,000 eoplu of the 811' er BROCHURE to be distributed durlnil' the period bet ..'e." Oct ober I , 1957 a nd Dl'cembe, 31 . 1958, The o\S,""lallon rese r vu the riIOM to edIt COpy, and r eject photograph. or other art work deemed unsul~­ able for Quality reproduction In the BROCHURE, and to ,e,' I.. and a lter tho flna] formnt. AuthorIzed BY · _ _ _ ... _ _ __ _ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEAFlI,i~ : STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. , tl~~ 0 " So (L.,-vv'l~ ~ '(k~ _ O'-~ ~"'- ~~\L~ NO CARBON REQUI FIED use Ball PoInt Pen MEMBI:I'I �Active :Mem ber Ad d ress 140 W. SECX>ND SOUTH ST . SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH Dues <. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER The un dersigned M.EMB ER hereby au th orizes the pu bli ca ti on of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH UR E as the "CO PY " ap pea rs below and s ubject to all T ERMS and CO NDIT IO NS contain ed herein. $ SPONSORS HIP .qRANT Sec . ..... $ AD VERTI SING LI STING Lin es . ...... t o ............... ) $ ...............'2-0 TOTAL Rec'd By 5'" '='" .... " / . /~~jj. 5..~.~~ Field Represen tative ( Line I) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) ........... .......................... ...... .. ..... SPO NSOR S HI P LISTI NG (N ,m, O' ly) ..... ....... .................. .. ........ ................ . . f\!\ Q. ~.~.~,.\\<?~, l::'. ~. ",s. ..C.\y.b.................. "nIe purch~ott ~f LISTINOS In the 19'U BlWCHURE sh.U be limited to "Active" .n d "Anodato" MEMBERS of the ag'UI Inte rnational HI; hea, "uoclatlon. Ine. and .. SJ)Onsor.....11 aubJect to Ihe foUowlnlJ term. and conditions. Where... dlltributlon of the BROCHURE an d Ihe re.ullll,.. be"dlll lrom nsu" .. pubU l hNl therein .. Ill utend onr • IwO J'CU period. PRESENT member. . re reQuired 10 !nJ' du~ In advance throlll l> I nd Ineludlnl the en ti re c. lendar 1ear of liM! . NEW . nd FORMER merube.. ate requIred 10 paJ' du~ fo r ten lull nat. In a(lunce. ANNUAL DUES: Active Memben;hlp. , 115.00: .u&oelate /oumbershlp • $500.00 .. hlch f~ ~han al.,., Include FREE DISPLA Y LISTING In .1L edltlon~ of the 89'u MEMBERSHIP ROSTER pubUshed durin. the term Of s ueh Assoclalf! Member.hlp. ADVERTISING R ATES :. LIsUnll In Di rettoTJ o f "SERV ICES AND ACCOM· ODATIONS" MOTELS (~r Une) 11 per unit; Mini mum r.te. 130 • Maximum nlle. no. Otller bllslnes.. claAlflcaUon •. no per line. SPONSORS· Pl n anch.J ' rlmt of '100 or more Includel iI.tln, Of n a me In proper section Of B ROCHURE . Tile U'en; Inte rnallonal HI'II.·.' A..oelatlon. Ine. auaranlu. Ihat Ille ME~IBER'S or SPOSSOR'S nlll ... as It a ppears above elll be pubUlhed In not. I.... than Y.I.OOO cople> 01 Ihe "'er BROCHUR E to be d l$\rlbUltd dunn. th e period botl ... een October I . IU1 and Drctmber 31. 19sa. "nit AuoclUlon rueuel Ih,·.111It to edit cop>,. Ind reJecl phOtorraphs or other.rt work deemed un~ult· Rble for ","allt, reprodUCtion In the BROCHURE, and to r evise and .lIer Ihf fina l format. Authorized BY ._ _ _ • _ _ _ . M EMB eR VERBAL AGREEM ENTS AIlE NOT DINOtNO - AOREEME NTS NOT INCLUDED I N PRI NTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT 1"0 ACCEPTANC E BY T HE ASSOCI ATION. r- ~ I. I FOU R'- H sa un : O}," , :C 6 fiRST SEc: ••.•. , '...: ( : ; • .~ itA. \'" PAY 10 T.... ti OROER Of Ii.". , L,.Y-; F O ,~ NO CARBON REQU I REO Use BBIi Potnt Pen '::1 ;·'f.~ ! A H DE, oSn ONLY ' a9'ERS INTERNATIONAL HIGH(AY V ISIN', INC•• SPECIAL ACCOU "-'-"~ �Actlve Rene ..' DATE 1 1 :It:,' '7 Member 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H Dues L ADVERTISING LISTING L ines .... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER •• to ...... Sec~O "" tL;..!l. ~_.. The undersigned MEMBER he reby authorizes the publicat ion of a LI STING in the g9'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and sub ject to a ll TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. SPONSORSHIP • GRANT ~~~'~..~~~~. ~ ~~..~~ ~ }O O ~~ II TOTAL Rec'u By Field R epresentative $ ... ~OO.(.6o ( Line I ) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) ...... .............. ....... . SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) .....LIVA..... !~rOl.l. • ..•. ~:...~.J.:... J.., •. • Tbe "ur~bnse nf I .T8Tfl"Og In tne 8Q'~r B"«X:tfUI'I.£ . b ~l! be limIted to "Ac!I" ~ " nnd "Assoclate t MF.MBERS of the 89'urs Intcrn!lUon al Hlahway AssocIation. Inc. and "spnilkors," all subject to the follo"'ln~ terms and condltlOM. ~nh0BR.OcHUR~the Whereas. • wltma b"ii>eflts f rom lI5tlnu publlshed thoreln '"wHl rxtend Over a lwei year period. PRESENT members are required to PBY dues In advance thrOugh and Includlnll' the enti re, calendar Yea. of 1958. NEW and FORMeR members are requIred to pay du"" fDr two full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES : Actlve M"mberShl n . • U~.OO; AssocIate Membership - 1r.G. OO which fee sh all al$O Include FREE OISPLAY LISTING tn all ~dlt lon~ DI th~ MEMBeRSIDP ROSTER pubUshed during the t er m 01 such As"",late 89 'u M ~m b e r8hlp. ADVE: ~TISIN () P.ATE:Z;. Li1tln ; ~ In ;;l:r~t,;.rl 01 "SEnVi~ /ili"j Ac.:::UNi_ OOATIONS" MOTEl,s (pe r Une) $I per unit: Minimum rate. no . Maximum rate. 1r.G. Other bu slne.s c1as.lflcRtlon s. no per Hne. SPONSORS. Financial II rant of SlOO or more Includes Hstln ll' DI nam e In proper secUon of BROCHURE. The 89'ers Intrrnat10n al Hlihway Assoclatiop. Inc . iua rantees that the "'E~!BER'S Or SPONSOR'S llstlng as It a ppenr. above will be published In not less thsn 5<1.000 copies of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dIstributed durlna th~ perIod bet"'ccn Qetober 1. 19~1 and December 31. 1 9~8. The AS$ociation reserve. th e dRht to !!<lit copy, and reject phDtOgraph s Or other art work dee med un.ult. Bble for QUBllt, rtproduetlon In lhe BROCHURE. and to rc\' lse a nd alter tht !Inal !Drmat. ~~thorl"ed_ -t. -+....(~ .. ..;...... _h.u._~_L__.-'..1...I..L- /, Ehmen VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY i STATEO BELOW SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCB BY THE ASSOCIATION Fer pu;llcatlon 01 ~io t uxe to De ru>nlshed by Or (,-9.mzat1 on . the pon.;orinB P,\ Y1 ~. f F C U fC I ! ~~'-.IH O FFI CE FIRST SEW".lTV S':;" r ' :;1' " tLA . SALT lA~S c;-, ~ t FOR o~"o s n O J, ~ y o NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ball Point Pen o 89'E S nn"t. .;;J,W l Iii.. '~ :AY R j;;A ASSN', II tC. ' SPECIA ACCGUilf L �Wiokenburg , Ariz . February 27 , 1958 Dear Bentley : The Glacier Park Company tinally came thru with their signed order for $ 300 subject to the conditicns which I arraJlged with them , and included i n their contract . I menti(;ned in my last letter to them that we wou ld appreciate t he check with the order , and also the pi cture . The order was mailed to me from DesMoins IOVla , where t pe PubliC- Re ia tions Director is apparently visiting , and the check a nd p ic j ur e will p robably follow from St . Paul main office . Nould l i ke to have my commission on this as soon as possible. Don ' t know exact ly what my next addr ess will be , so send it to the La Siesta . 'IIill be ther e at least until M onday , and Bill will forward i t if necessary _ Nill probably talk to you on the phone before this arri v es and tell you what was done in ;'l lckenb1ll'g . J �, No . Actlve aenn.· 8!>onsor DATE Member .21d Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST . ?;, ,., 15 f! .. '"'~ .,;.c ,L _l. ........:1.r..k ...~o... ~r t ljOXt.... rn il u'" .~ .t- .•.........cil .J. .......!:., ~ ................. S ALT LAKE C ITY I, U T AH Dues C .... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER I- ADVERTIS ING LISTING Lines Sec. to ............... ) M..?.N.t ...... < The undersigned ME MB ER hereby au thorizes th e publication of a LI S TI NG in the 89'E;R BROCHU RE as the "CO PY" appears below a nd subject to all TER MS and CO NDITIO NS conta ined he rein. I SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By ..... Field Represen tative $.... .............. . (Line 1) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) S PONSOR S HI P LI S TI NG (Name O nly) .. ..G14•.cio.:r....J__ a.r ..~... .r.:O.nil &."lY_ _ T t.e pUle],,,,,,, 01 LIS'rIl\OS In (he 8 9'~r aR.OCnORE .hall be limIted ~o " Acth'c" and "Ass()(:late" 1.1EMBERS of the 89'ers Internallon al Highway ASsociatIon , Inc . and "'Sl>Onsou.'· all s ubJe<:t to the lollowlni: term s and condltlons . Whereas . distrIbution of the BROCHURE and t h e resultln l ben el!U from lIatlnu publ!&hed therdn ..·m utend OVer n 1"'0 YUr period. PRESENT members ure renu!red to PaY du es In ~dvance Ihroulth and Ineladlnl the enti re calendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMER members are required to pay dues for twn lull year. In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Activ e Membeuhlp. - $15. 0(1: Ms<><:late Membushlp - s~.gO which l ee .hall al50 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edI t Ion. 01 Ih~ ag'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publish ed durin" Ihe lerm 01 s uch AS3OC!ale Member sh!p. ~ AD\'ERTISINO RA"T"ES ;. LI .tlnn In Dlre<:tou 01 "SERVICES ANO AC'COM_ ODATlONS" MOTt:t.s (per line) $I per unit: MinImum lBt~. 530 _ Maximum ra te. $SO. Other busln e'lS cluslflcatlon • . $30 per Hne. SPONSORS _ Flnandal g rant 01 $100 or more Includes IIsUng 01 name In pro;>er secllon 01 BROCHURE. Th e 89 'ers Int t_ malion al Hlgh"'ay Ass<><:latJon. Inc. Iruarantees Iha~ the ME~mER'S or SPONSO~'S l1stlll g a . It a ppears ahove "'Ill be pubHshed In not Ie.. than MI.OOO copIes 01 the 89'., BROCHURE 10 be dIstri buted durlnl th .. perIod btt,,'een Detober I. 1951 Rnd D...,e mbe. 31. 1958 . Th e AssoclatLon r eServes I he .l l ht to edit copy. and . eJect photoi r .. phs or other a rl work d ~ m ed un sultable for oualltr rpp roductlon ~ the BROCHURE. and to revise and a lter thr tlnal lormat. -" -". ,""-f< Q / ... uthorlzed y,' ...... /;; h ....... BY ________ ___ .. ___ .____ . ___________ __ . _ _ ~ ____ .____ MEMBeR _ ..: VERBAL ... GREEME NTS ARE NOT B I NOtNG - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE ... RLY ! STATED BELOW. SUaJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE "'SSOCIATION. :,' or publi cat i on o f .rlaclf;;r plc t ur in 'o r~t IDa sect on . In3e t of -';laci,. r a t tro.c ti on.3 to be i ncluded i n title appear on ont r..D."l. Par K to be inclujt:td on .ont illa sect i cnu l Ul8.p and _j a r l i sted under " .t'o i nt::... of Intl.. ..I.es t " . Glacier ark to bf" 0 " onto.nQ. spread . Top pcrtion only of Yellowston' t o page map . -11:.0 06 . . ~ ~A _ - 1----'1 I IJ _ ~ (!oM-M(SStol'{ ,bave terms lccept cd 't~\~vt'\LJ ...:...x. C:..l iVI ecre .. ry I NO CARBON REQUIRED Use BaH PoInt Pen /tJO~ �____________________________- '' -__~ ~___=cL___, 'j D!AT E , ' i ._.e:.c. __.____.il_ .........._._.. __ Member SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. C .. _. _ Due~ to ..............J .,.1,. ....... ¥ $.......... ADV,",RTISI NG LISTING $ ...•..••••................ Sec. .. ,Lt.!.:... '"'" .,....... SPONSORSI-fl P GRANT $. ~7-::f .• .v1J. .... Th e unde rsigned MEMBE R he reby authorizes the publ ica tion of a LI STI NG in the a9' ER BROCH URE as the "COPY " appea rs below and subjec t to all T ERM S and CO NDITIONS con tained he rein . . '!l~ , ~ TafAL Reed B}'. ................................................... . Field Rcp rC8cntu ti vc . .,\\\ ' ,~,~ ..... ··~1t '\1\'",S.... )1·"Sd. ,bL ............... \.~\\OJ ' I \~\'i!J\~~~..\: -~C-! .. . ....... · .~ liI\I~"\ ..... "'''.,O·'f rotS ....... r··· ""0°',,10;>' .-~J'> i>~\ ............... tJ,"ll.l. .... ·':·. 'U "'~,'- .. ('\0:5," ...... . N (Line I) ( Lin e 2) ( Li ne 3) . '\'\ ' \\,~~i\ ~\) ,.' ('lOS \\.1.'d"i 1lo .. ··~··~tr.. -··· .. ·,y·..· ..l ·..··t.1 .. :r·. ···· ... ,"1, .\1 • :,1;30 .\-:\~. :~n G},. ·~"· ......... . be limited 10 " Ac<iu" ADt,'I:Il.T1SINC n,-\TES . _ ~\~,~,r&g~or1 of "SERVICES AND AOCOMIII,h .. a, "-"'>elaUon, ODATIONS" :'IOTKLS (~r IIne9 '1 1 pe r unit : Minimu m r.te. no - M ...lmwn S PON SORS H IP LI ST ING (Name Only) .. ···i ·cr th~ The J)urch ue of LlSTIN08 In 19' er BHOCHUllE sha ll and " ANoc:late" ME:'dBER8 of the H'e rl I"tun rollona] Inc, and "8ooouor.... aU lublocl to the follo ..ln.. term. a nd condillona. Whereu . dinrlbuUon of the BROCIlURt; and the relu]Unr ~ndlta from II.Unn pUblllhed therein will fXtmd over .. two 7ear period, PRESENT m""'~ .. are re<lulred 10 on duu In .dunce throulh .nd Includlnr the enUre ealend.r ,eat of In.. NEW . nd PORMF:R members are required to Pl., dues for IWO full 7e" , In .. dvanee. ,\ NNU,\L DUES: '\eti"e Memberahip. - U5.00: ,usoc:iale MemberShi p - 'MUG "'hleh tee sha ll 0.150 Include P'RR D ISPL.\Y LISTING In .11 edillons of the 89'.. ME!'oIB"ERSHlP R OSTER published durIn.. the term of s uch ,\uoelate Memberlhlp. ute. S50. Other bUllne$& da u lflutLon • . no ~r line. 8PONSORS - Pln.nelal .... nl of SlOG or more Includes II, Unl of name In proper aectlon of BROCHURE" The IV'e.. Inl ~ ma llonal HI .. h"" Auoc laUon. tnc. ,u ... ntUI thU the :\IE"MBER'S or 8PONSOR'8 IbU"K .. It a p~ara above wlll be pubUlhed In not Ie ... tha n $0.000 coplu of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dlll rihund du rin .. Ihe ~rlod ~t .. e ~ " Octo~r I. 1957 and D<'cember 31. 19~. The Aatocl.t1on ret;e rVU Ihe rilhl 10 edit C0il1. a nd r eJo-c.~ J)hOlOl"raPhl or olher art work deemed unsullable for IIUK!1t1 reproduction In the BROCKURE. and 10 re"I , e a nd a lter the flna] format. VERBAL AOREt;)lE"NTS ARE" NOT Bt NDINO - AOR.E"EMENT8 NOT INCLUDED I N PRtNTl:D TEXT MU8T BI: CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. 8UB.1ECT TO AOC£PT,-\ NCE: BY THE ASSOCIATION. o F:"r epvDSOrSr Id ~~ b~ t t <75 . tcv 8 ;.,tl·. ·..·· .... - Lines ..."11. ..........-. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER e .... u )(J L o J has later • ~ h t led gsa o NO CARBON R I!Q U ~ Uae Ball POlnl Pen • ie "b, ,, ipt1 1 + • �-,..,---- -- - - --- -- - --- --- ------ - -- - -- ----~-~ - - ~~~--- -~ ~ -A~~~~~'~~:=== ~==.=- -N:•::::==.;:===.=~=":~ ::::~~F::- :I:~ A= :: • ~ :' :f ;: ::~DATE Member Addrc !l.\l lfO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. f\v+Q ....\".".~+,,"'\_ . f..\:::............... Lt.:..1 ... DuclI c?1 .....~~ .. SALT LAKE CITY 1. UTA H ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSHlP GRAI\'T Th e undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST ING In the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appea rs bel ow and subject to a ll TERMS and COND IT IONS contained herein. (Line 1) .............................. "'-J. . . $ .... m ... ~ ... o.o.· 3..................... TOTAL Rcc'd By Field Rcwe.,c lIWtive J./~O D $ ......... __ ......... -- _.................................. ......................................................•.................................... (Line 2) (Line 3) .... ......................................... ....................... ..................... .. .. ...... ............................ .. ... ................... SPONSQRSH!P LI ST I NG (Name On ly) ........... ·······l .... The tlu rch Hl' 01 LISTINOIJ In t h e . g·er BIl.QCH URE ah dl boe limited t o " Act in" a nd ··A.u<x.late·' MEMBERS of t h e Ilf~,.. Internation a l Hl r h ... r As.aocl.Uon. Inc. and "Soon so . ... " a U , u bJect to th e 101l0 .. ln, ter .... a nd condlt lons. Whereu . dist.lbutlon of the BROCH URE and the .el u ltl n l MneliU f.om Ii. lln n nubll&hed therein ..Ill ut end over a t .. o rear !>trlod. PRESENT ",emboe.. are reQ u ired to pa7 du el In a dv ~nce throul"h and In cl ud ln l t h~ ~nll.e ca lendar yu r of IU' . NEW a nd FORMER ",e",boerl Are reQu lr"", to par du es for t.o full u a .. In a dvance. ANNUAL DUES : Active Mc",ber&hlp, • lI 5. DO : A..oelate ~I tm be r&hlp • 160 .00 ... hleh fee , h all a lso Include PREZ DISPLAY LISTINO In all edition . of the U ' u MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl&hed durln l t he t erm 01 l uch Auoc:la te Memboer&hl p. ADVERTISINO RATES :_ LUt ln .. In Dtrtt"to rr of '"SERV l aEB AND AOOOI.!.· ODATIONS" MOTEI.8 C ...,. Un e ) I I per un it ; Minimum .. t e. UO - Maximum '" e. I ~. Ot her bualn"" classifica tion, . n o per line. SPONSORS - ptn .ncl~1 at l rant of liDO or more In clud ... Ilsllnl 01 n ame In proper section of SROCHURE. The U ' er. Inlf rnaUon a l H ll h .. a , Auoc:lat!on, tnc. l ua ra nten that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lilti ng .. it a ppur. s bove ..Ill boe publl, hed In not Ie" tha n r,o,OOO cop ies 01 t he 8B' er BROCHURE to boe d l'trlb uted durin, the period Mt S'ren Oc tOM. I , 1951 a nd I>«e mboer 31. 19~8 . The A",ocla \lon re l ~IYU the rl , M 10 edI t copy, and reject photo, r a phs or other art ,,'ork deemed unsuita ble for <lU~Ut 1 reproduction In Ih e BROOIIURE. and 10 r evI se a nd alter Ih~ IInal fonnat . Autho.l""d BY . VERBAL AO REEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUBYD~INA!..~TnJATION= T .MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE ..... ........,.... , o NO CARBON RE<:!UIREO Ulit S a il P(lln ~ Pen �ACllve Member ,_. ••• 1 1 .l.~... Rent .. Sponsor OATE r .. ~ .. F',.ir I 8 sL ....... Addrc!II! HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST . SALT LA KE CITY I , UTAH Dues s.o. L...........::::':i. ......H I\\:•. ......J !JJ\..i:.. .•.. ~ .. f\\.L, "'.·I = ( Line 2) ;.<............................ SPONSORSID P GRANT The un dersigned MEMBER hereby au t horizes the publica tio n of a LI STIN G in the 89'E.R BROCH URE as the "COPY " appea rs below and s ubjec t to all TERM S a nd CON DITI ONS contained herein. ( Line I) .. $ ........~.A !...•~..•O ADVERTISI NG L ISTING Li n ell ...................... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ,1 to uL~) ,:1:;1 TOTAL Rec·d Field ReWc~fJntatioo ..•....,"-............................... rh ~.~.J . . ..... = ( Li ne 3) SPONSO RS H IP LI STING (Name Only) ...... ........... . The purch lH of LLSTING!1 In Ih~ n·n BI«XlHURE shaU be limited to ··AetlYf·· and ··Assocllle·' MF.X1BER8 01 the $9'er~ Intern atlon.1 Hllh .. ., Auoclltlon , Inc. and ·'Sponsor .. ·' aU .ubJect 10 Ihe follo ..!nl term. Ind conditions. Where... dlAtrlbuUon 01 the BROCHURE and the ruuhln . benefits from n.Un .. published therein ..Ill ntend ever a t ..o yur period, PRESENT memberl are rtqulred ~e 1>&7 dun In ,dnnte IhroUlh and IncJudtnl the .ntlre Cllendar year 01 l eU. NEW and FORMI':R members Ire reQutred to pay du ... lor ~ .. a luU lea .. In a4vanee. ANNUAL DUES: Active MembeuhlJl . • US.()o: Anocl.te Membe r. hlp • UO.OO which I U .hl ll , bo tncluda FREE DiSPLAY LISTING In alt edttlon. of th~ MEMBERSHIP R08T£R Jlubllihed durin.. the ttrm or l uch A_tate MembershiP. U·U VERBAL AGR£E~n::NTS ADV&RTISINO RATES :. Lisunu In Olrc~\or7 oi ··IOERV ICI::8 AND ACCON.· ODATlONS·· MOTELS (~ f UncI I I per unit; Minimum ralf. ISO • Mnlmlllll ral~, UG. Other bUllne ... cl ....lflcatlOnl. no per line. SPONSORS· P1nandal Innt 01 noo or more IneludH lulln. of n a me In proper Iftllon of BROCHURE. Thc '~' e" IIIt~. rn.tlon a l HI,h,·" A_laUoII. lne. luar.nte-el that the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR'S Ul lin,. .. It appear. above .. Ill be publlihed In not lUI thi n 50.000 copies of the 89·er BROCHURE to be dlSlrH,uted durlnl the period bet .ret n October I. 1 9~1 and ~ember 31. 19S$. The AUOClatlon re.enes the r ilM to edit COOY, a nd relect ohot O$raph . or other art .. ork deemed un.ult. able ler QUant1 renroductlen In the BROCHURE, and to re\"l ~e and I lter th. final lormai. ')I Authorlzed BY 1-2' .A t v! . INC'LUD~ \Ar l: ' . NO CARBON R EQUIRED UK sin Potn~ P"n ~. - , .! ~T ~ST~; ct.&\~~'; ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT "!:PR STAT&D BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIAnON. o r :..4 L! ... o �, Member AddrcS5 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH DUell ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .ft . . . ADVERTISING LISTING Sec • WI..-';' .. _ _____ __ .. _ __ ,_ SPONSQRSlUP GRAN'T The undersigned MEMBER hereby autho rizes the publi cation of a LIST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCH,uRE as the "CO PY" appears be low and sub ject to all TERM S an'd CONDITIONS con tained herein. (Un' 1) ;)!'\l'1lJ\f§S,1'\ r E. d.. TOTAL R.ed By $.. - :'0 , o f') - s... '\,}M4g~.!J,;J • tf?)!! Field Rc prelle n/ativc .\ (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name }lnly) T h e purehaS<l of LISTING S In \h~ U'e. BBOCH URE shali be limited to " AcUve" and "AssocIMe" MEMBERS of the 89'crs Internation al Hll h.-ay Association, Inc, and "5I>On5O"," All subject 10 the follo.-In g terms and conditions . Whereu , dlstrlbutlon of Ih e BROCHURE lind the r es"ltlni b<neflt s from IIslln n publish ed the rein .... 111 utend over a h-O YUr period, PRESENT member! are roQulred to pay duu In adv.nce throu,h and Inciudlna Ihe enti re calendar r ear of 1958, NEW and FORMER memben arc reqUired to PaY dues for \.-" full rears In allva nce, ANNUAL DUES: AcU,'e Membership. - Sl 5,OO: AS&O<:lnte MemberShip - 150,00 .'hlch tee ~h al1 al.o Include PREE DISPLAY' LISTING In all elIltlon, of the .g'er MEMBERSlIIP ROSTER publl . h~lI during the term of sueh Associate Membership. J\OVERTISINO RATES;. LisUnu In DirectorY o! "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATlONS" MOTEI,s (per lln e) $I per unit: MinImum rate. no - M aximum rate. ,~o. Other busineS$ c1a!iSltlea Uons, no per Une. SPONSORS _ Financial i ra'll or , 1(1(1 or more jncludes Ustl'll of nam e In proper . eet\on of BROCHURE. The U'e,. In t~rnnt1onal Hl r hway Assoclatlon, Inc, iuarantees that the ~ IEMa ER'S or SPONSO\t'S listing as It a ppear. above .... 111 be puhllsh ed In not leu than 50,000 copi es of th e 89'er BROCHURE to he distributed durlni th e period bel ween Octoher I, 1957 and D<oeember 31, 1958, The "'.$Sodatlon reserves the .Ia ht 10 edit copy, and reject photol."ph. 0. olher art .... o. k deemed uns"lta.ble for Quality HProducllon In the BROCHURE, a.nd to revl3l: and alter th~ final for mat, "'uthorlz.e<l '" '" --'~ -"-' ''' ''-'7'{......,..c:: _'''.k,t- ,-. _ ___________ .,...,_.____ VERSAL AGJU:J;;MJ;;l>o"'l'S ARE NOT BINDING - AGJU:EMENT5 NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATEO BeLOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION, o NO CARBON REQUIRED U ... Ball Poin t Pen MEMBeR �/ No. Activ e Rene~ Sponsor OATE Addref!S 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ............. to ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ......... ) • Lines AnVERTISING LISTING $ .... Sec . . SPONSORSHIP GRANT $. ...2 .... 9 .. __ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89 ' E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject 10 all TERM S and COND ITION S contained herein. ._ . ~ . T OTAL Rec'd By ......... __ ....... ___ ..._.___ .1._ Field ReprCSClltatioo ( Line 1) (Line 2) (Line 3) S PONSORSHI P LI STING ( Name Only) .. ...Q.to-. .. ....( ...c~-t P.- .•.1-l h .. ... ..".IS"' .. -_1 .. .... ~;-. '"' p. __(\f' -.-.. _ - ·. _.__ .__ ~.·L _ l _ Th. pu rch ase 01 LlSTIN08 ln th e 8S"eT SItOCHURE Sh Rll be li mi t ed to "Active" lind " " s.""ia 1e" MEMBERS or th e 89'~T 3 Int ern a tion a l HIK a y "'$!IOC I" IlOn, h", Inc. and "Spon 50rs, " a ll subject to th e toUowln\: terms Rnd conditiOns . ADVE RTISI NO RATJ;;S :. L isti n n In Dlr . ~tor 1 ot "SI'!RVICES AND AOCOI>!. ODATIONS" MOTl'.'LS (pt , Une} $I per unit: MinImum rate , no _ MaJ:lm\ll:1 rat e , 15-0. Olh er bu slne .~ cl usttlcaUons , .sO per Hne. SPONSORS· Plnantl,,1 Kra nt of $100 or more Include. !lslln \: ot name In proper s eo:tLon ot BROCHURE. Wherea . , dls trlbutton ot the BROCH URE a n d t he resultin" b<>neut s trom Hatln n publlsh ed (hueln ... m p.xtend ove r a t •• o ,.lI r I>Crlod, PRES ENT members are requ ired to P H dUM In ad"llnc. throuKh and intludln i' the enti re calend ar Year ot 1958. NEW a nd PORMER members are re<tul r ed to oBY dues for U .. ~ tull yea rS In a dva nce. The 89' •• s International Hl. h,,·a y Association. I nc. i" uara ntees that th e ~IEMBER' S or SPONSOR'S U ~ tln l< . s n a ppears a bove will be pubH&hed In not Ie" than 00,000 eop les of t h e 89'er BROCHURE to be dl. tri hute(! durlnR th~ per Iod be t "'e~n Oc tober I, 1957 a nd Otte mber 31, 1958. 'I1Ie Assoclatlon r e.erve. the rIght to tdlt COpy, a nd rejec t phot ou&pbs or other a rt work de emed un.ult_ a bl e for QU" ltt, r eprOduction In the BROCHURE, Rnd to revl.e a nd altu thr fin&! tormat. ANI'lUAL DUES : Acth'e Me mbership . • fI5 .oo : A$SOCl a t e Membeuhlp _ 150.00 " 'Meh tee s hall a lao Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edition. ot the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publis hed durin g the te rm at such Associ a te Members hip. AUt borlzed OY IS ~ I.._.....J t:__~Q....~_."-__. :1 -1:1-._._. ... _._ __._.. - - _..... _-_ .._ ._.. _..__ VERBAL AOR.EEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLU DED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. in. no1>1l ,r ~t una t to ap iy to k 'lcturee . NO CARBON REQUIRED Use B nll P oint P en r 0'" , MEM B£R �No. Active Address If() W. SF.XX)ND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY I, UTAH Du~ ..... Renew '" ,C" ' -~ .,.., om ....• ,..,.'.- , ......;-.,--...- .......... -- L.............. to ................ ) Li nes .....__ ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADVERTI SI NG LISTING 50" S P ONSORSRl P The undersig ned MEMBER hereby authori zes th e pub licat ion of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as th e "CO P Y" appears bel ow and s ubject to all TERMS an d CONDITI ONS contained herei n. ( Line I) $........ • GRA NT TOTAL Rcc'd By ........................ ............... $._ . +.-:n.. _;.) i ' Field RcprC3C tl tative ............................. ........................................................................ - --_ .......................... ........... . ( Line 2) o ( Li ne 3) (.J.'J.~ :!1lcn ...~o l£... ...ha.;.;:b.'..r ...Q •. .. .cOr.r:::.:rc.e ..... .Q:r....{3.;:'.?;:t.~g!. .......!:1 p. 'Ml.'l ~~...~ ...~ • 1".;.~ t) ... } .. . ___•...........• S PONSOR SHI P LI STIN G (Name O nly) ..tl~ ~e l)t1 ·· ; "-()l.Q ·· .,;.h~~"r....O', ... .,Q•... ,•..-'.{;I., ...................•...... The purchase of LIST I NGS In Ihe " 'e r BltoC tWRE Ihan be lim ited to " Acllve" a nd " A$5O(;II \ C" MKMBERS 01 the "'era Intern .llona L Hll h .. ar Auoel at Lon. 'nc . a nd ..Spon..,r..•• a ll l ubJect 10 Ihe followlnl term . .. nd condlUon,. Whereu . distribution 01 the BROCIIURE and Ihe rel ulllni benefit . from nnln u publi shed the rein wm uteI'd over .. u.'o year I>Crlod. PRESENT members a re required to pa , duu In /ldunce throuKh and lncludln .. Ihe entire ca lendu nu of 1958. NEW a nd FORMfrn members ue required to PRY dul'll for t ..n lull ,ea.rs In advance. ANNUAL DUES : Acth'c Me mber5hil>. - U~.OO; AMOc la tt Memberahlp _ no.oo .hleb fee shan alllO Include FREE DISPLAY LIS'nNG In all edmon. PI the U'er MEMBERSlnp ROE!TEFI. I>ubllllhe<l durlnl the lerm of sueh AaIOc:l ale Membenh lp . ADVERTISIN'O RATES :. thun u In Dln~lar7 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTELS IlH'f Une) $I IH'f unit ; Minimum rate. no - Mulmum ' ''Ie. ua . Other bU ll nfM el ..... Ule .. Uon .. ISO ~r Une. SPONSORS· ptnanel.l ; .... nt of $100 Or more Inelurt" I;~t!nc 01 n .. me In pro~r IleCllon 01 B ROCHURE. The lII'en tntrrn .tlonal Hllh ..·.. ' AuoelaUon. t nc. l un .. n t ees th .. t the .\lE}IBfrn·S or SPONSOR'S USU"I> aa I~ .. PI>fU. above .. m be published In not Ie.. thln MI.OOO copl n 01 the 89' er BROCHURE t o be dl& trlhuttd durln8 t he period bet "' e ~ n October I . I~S1 a nd D...:~mber 31. 1~$8. Th~ Auoel a Uon rel~ rv u the r lr ht to e<llt COP7. and reJecl phot ... ra ph. or othe r art warlt d~med unl ull_ a ble for ",\l1t7 reproduction In Ihe BROCRUR.!!:. a nd to rul ... a nd alter the fin al ~~th~rl~ ,",,--A.-l--05L.~-~____ M~Bl:1l . VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NG _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED l Y PRINTII.D TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANC E BY THE ASSOCIATION. ~t Ie rBet.l.m 0' ... J. c on !e] e t.ary I)t.:i.. r1 "as m&..e IUlQ. !la.9sed to the pf!ect that the Jackson Role Potu]' ':::lub 8 nsor an.z. un erwr1te 11 JI'ant of hS'oo ()!) to ap0:jor -f:.he publicatl.on. of 'J color..-d <I_e "T'P in \.-oft B ~:t'oc .:.Ire • ,d t.o bo r'm und"r tu' name of' Jacksor: ~ole Gla b !l" '" 1(> J -J } .oo _all b re "unded. to t.."le J ac Ie ~n 01(> l.aaJltl er 0 ?+..,.. Club. co ... .1 u !CU ~ .ID ••• ,,-------------------------------("'\t------::.NOUse Ban Point CARBON REQUIRED ( ~n �Ac tlve Ren .... Sponsor DAT E ~ z.. "S M'mb,c (l!l\~<t'~ ~klM ~,o,J,,Q Add c' " 14{l W . SECOND SOUTH ST. \:£:+cI",\'c 1 ~9"b1:cA . SALT LAKE CITY 1, UT AH Dues c .. . t o ................ ) L ines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ATIVERTISING LISTING Se,. SPONSORS IDP GRANT The undersig ned J\l EMB ER hereb y au thorizes th e pu blica tion of a LI STING in th e 89'ER BROCHUR E as th e "COPY " ap pears below and s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIO NS cont ain ed herein. , $ ..... •.::3:. .)(2~~=$ TOT AL R cc'd By . Ficld Represcntative ......... $ .. ( Line I ) (L ine 2) ( Line 3) ··· ··· T ············· S PONSORS H IP LI ST ING ( Name On ly) .(I>."\1."''2r ...I'O:.:I .\'~~d:lli~. "' . <;.~"' \"~" .b-\J. ... TIl e purch as. of LlSTlNGS In the 89'e, BP..ocH iJRE sha ll Ix: Umlted to "ACtlve" a nd "Au oclat e" MEMBERS of t h e 89'."0 Internationa l Hl i h ... u ASSOClatlon . I nc. and "Sponsors/' all subject to the follo"'ln!! terms and condition s . Wh ereao. dis t ribution of the BROOHURE a nd the res ulting beneliU fro m Ilot ln u published therein will ~ x tcnd OVer a two year period, PRESENT members are required to p ~ y dues In advance through and Ineludln . the cnUre calendar year of 1958. N£W and FORMER members are reQulrcd to PaY duu for two full years In ad vance. ANNUAL DUES: ACtiv e Membership . • sa.oo; AssocIa t e Membership - 1:;0.00 whIch fee shall also Includ e FREE DISPLAY L ISTING In all edlt!ons of Ih~ 89'cr MEMBERSHI P ROSTER published durln lr t h e t erm of s uch i\Sl;oclatp MembershI p . ADVERTiSING RAT~ ' _ U stln u In Dl rc~tory of "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" l lOTELS (I>I' r IIn p) $ 1 I>Cr unit' Minimum rale. $30 • Ma xlmur.1 r:.te , $MI. Other busi n ••• cla ss ifications. 130 per Une. S PONSORS - F in ancial II" rant of n oo or mOr~ Inclu<les 1I 0lin ll of name In proper section <>f BR OC HUR E The 89'era I n t ernatIonal Hlirhw u Au ocl a tlon, I nc . Kuarantec. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIst lr.it U It a puea u ahove wlll be pubU. hed In not leu than 50.000 cople. of th e 89'er BROCHURE t o be distrIbuted d u rln ll" th ~ pcrlod bet .... e. " October I. 1951 a nd D<>cember 31. 19~. The AssocIation reserves the rli M to edit COPY. and re leel pho\ oH aph. or olher a rt ... ork dc~med unsult. able for Q.uall t y reprodUclion In til e BROCH1lFtE. and to revise a n d a lter tho final format. AUlhorl.ed BY . _ ______ ~._._ •. _. _______ .. ____ .. _ _ _ ._~____ M EMBER VERB.-\L AGREElT.IENTS i\R I': NOT BINDI NG - AOLU;EMENTS NOT INCLUDED I N PRINTED T EXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED B€LOW. SUBJECT TO ACC EPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. f ';>..fl>" s. .... s \";If ·Q,-1HV\' ~~~ \:>11 <;,r·"'~<' 1>< \~':"\\"'M"\.""d - ~V\.~.,-\ ~ NO CARBON REQUlR ED U.,. B all Point Pen • ) �SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. • ....J to ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSfllP GRANT Sec • ...............•.......... The undersigned MEMBER hereby au thorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROC HU RE as the "CO PY " appears below and s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIONS co ntained herein. $ ......... . ~~~...... ..... $ ................... TarA T Rec'd By .. /1'wld R Cl'l"ClIcntutiv(l ( Li ne I) (Line 2) ~~~~";~~;~~:,~~~;:ON,~..~~::~~:~! ~~CL~~~~.,$ u~;,;·~~;,~~ ,;~~~~. and ··A.Uociate·' MF.:\IS£RS of the B9'~rs In ternallonal lII,h"aT ... uoelatlon. tn~. and ·'SpOnsors."" aU lubJect to the follo .. lnl ltrms snd condltlonl. Whe....... d i5trlbuUon ot tne SROCtiURE and the relu]tlnl beneUU from II"Un .. publlihed therein ,..Ill t~tend OVer a t .. o TUT period.. PRESENT membe ... are reoulred IG pa J" due. In a d" nnee thTQu.h and Intludlnl the ~ntl r e calendar Yeat ot 1958. NF;W and !'ORMER members are rt(lulrt d tG p ~T dues for t .. n full Ye~r, In advance. ANNUAL DUES: ACth' e Mcmbeulllp. - $1 5.00: Anooia]e Membership - UO.(l{l which fee ,hall al$O Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. ot th~ all'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publllhtd durin. the leT'" ot s uch Auoelue Memberahh•. ODATIONS" MOTEI.8 (per llne) 1I ptr unIt: Minimum rat e. no - Ma ~lmuo ute. 1M. OIher buune.,. cLa.dflcQt!Onl. $30 per line. SPONSORS - Pln.ncl,,1 Ira nt ot 1100 OT mor~ Inchlde. IIstln, ot name In proper IlecUI>fI of BROCtiURE Th e at'er. Intrrnational Ht.nyU A.Uoclalll>fl, Ipe . luaranteel that the :\IEM13&R'S or SPONSOR'S 1i5t1no: .. It a p""ara a bo~e .. Ill be pubUl hed In no] less than 50.000 enples of the 89'u BROCHURE to be dl.lrlbuUd durin!! th ~ period belll'Cen October I. 1 9~7 a nd o..;ember 31. 1\15.8. n e ....uoo laUon reserv e" the rll\"ht to edit copy. and reject phGtOr raph s or Gther Brt wGrk deem~d UMUl tpble tGr "uaUly reproduction In the BROCtiURE. and to rcvl~e Bnd .~ter th ~ final format. / "'uthorlzed BY ----...6....- / .,F. "c-: ~~_ -'- .J- 3... I ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST SE CLEAR LY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . 10 ~~ Ov-. ~(,~ NY-~~\o ~~ I. ~ I ., I '<t ~ - NO CARBON REQUI RED Uze Ball Point Pen • �AcUve lo . __ Sponsor DATE fl(fV" Member Address SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 1«1 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines 1:"~" " Se,. f1AYI.~.. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LI STIN G in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TER MS and CON DI TI ONS contained herein. ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSIDP GRANT $ TOT AL Rec'd By ....................... Field Repre8entutive ~\S .E\;/::':;"_.io;:~..\"!~J~~ .~",cl!.~~;I!!I"l~,;;1~ 2) ..... f-.A.Fl.R.GlU\s. ...\:\.QTLL.:::.. &;fo.(\, ... g,..~I""T.\J"'.. ~:t.~ ~ . .. <t.Y"",,, - "'I. ~. \=>o.wwh,w,,,,- (Li,e I) (Li,e ( Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LISTING (Name Only ) .. The pu rchase of LlSTINGg III th~ 89'er BIWCHURE shall be Umlted to "Actlve" and ··As.OC!ate" M.:MBERS of the 89'e,·. Internallonai fl1 l hwn A&Soc:laUon. Inc. and "SpOnsors."' All subject to the follawl,,;- t.rm . and condillons. ADVERTISING RATES:. Lh tlnu In Dlre~torr 01 "SERVICES AND AOOOM· ODATIONS" MOTJ;:I.S (pe r lind II per unit: Minimum ute. $30 - Maximum ate. ,~. O~hor buslneu classificAtiOns. $30 per line. SPONSORS· Financial ;-r" nt of 1100 or ",ore Inoludes 110Unl of name In proper ..."tlon at BROOHURE . Whereas. dl.trlbutlon of the BROCHURE "",I the r •• uIUn;- benetll . froln IIsUngs published therein will ~ "t"nd over a two year period, PRESENT m embers are required to paY dues In advance t_ hrous h and Including the enU r. CAlendar year of 1958. NEW And FORMER membeu are r"nulre-d. to pay duu for two full YeArs In advance. The 8~' eTS Int ernational Hlah .... f Assocl .. tlon. Inc . a uarantees th .. t the MEMBeR'S or SPONSOR'S IlsUng as It appears Above ..-Ill be publlshed In not leu than SO.OOO copies of the 89'tr BROCHURE to be dlstrlbute-d. durtn .. th ~ period bet"' ~ en October I , 1951 Rnd PM:ember 31. 1958. Th e ASSOClatlon reSUVe3 the rlaht to e-d.lt copy. and reject photoaraphs or other ... t ""ork deemed unsuit_ able for nualily reproduction In the lIROCHURE, And to revi se and alter Ihe fin al lormat. ANNUAL DUES: Active Member&hlp, • $15.00: .usoclate Membership· nO.GO which fee shall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In aU e-d.ltloM 01 th~ ag'or MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publlshe-d. during the term 01 such AS!;oclate Members hip. I MEMBeR VERlIAL AGREE MENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AO REEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST liE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE lIY THE ASSOCIATION. " I I I " .1 17 /) \'1(,( V 1"\ U '1 9 r , , rt c <. \ . /z"ro,VqO !" ~ O~ ~o./ d """ NO CARBON REQUIRED Use lIa!! Point Pen �Active A.'l$OC. 8 81>Onsor Renew DATE Y\tsv'( Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes th e pub lication r a LI STI NG in the 89'E;R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to all TER MS Rnd CONDITION S con tai ned herein. (Li oe 1) ADVERTISING LISTING • SPONSORSfflP GRANT .-l ------m ... . Sc,Q.~~ ....... Lines $ ... TOTAL Rcc·d By F iel d Representative .\I. o..~\<" . .HQI~.b .fj,A,.& .... f<>,m'\\,\ ..e\ql1 t. r y,}r..:!.. XK,,,.~.., . '),piJ~Q.m 5 (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI S TING (Name Only) Tile "urehase of LISTINGS In th~ 89'er BROCHUil£ shall be llmited to "Active" and ""'..."elate " MEMBERS Of the 89'en International tn~h ... ay ASSOCiRtion, Inc. and "Sponsors," all subject to the (0110'0'1'111: terms and condlt!ons . hD\'ERTISINO RAT£S:. Li5tlnu In Dlr.,.,torf of ··SERV ICES AND ACCOMODATIONS·· MOTEI.s (per Hne) 51 per unit; Minimum r ate. no _ Maximum fa te, SSO. Other buslne" classtrlca~lon •. no per lin e. SPONSORS _ FInancial grant of 11M or mor~ Includes listlng of nam e In proper section of BROCHURE. wher eas, dIstribution of the BROCHURE and the resultlnK bendlt. Iron. llst!nn publ!$hed therein "'m PJ<tcnd over a two year perlO<!, PRESENT m embers are required to PRJ due. In advance ~hrough and Includlnl the enUre calendar fur of 1958. NEW and FORMER members are reQuired to pa, dues for t .. o full nan In advance. The U'el S In ternational Hl ahwaf As. oclatlan, Inc. luarantees ~ha~ the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR·S Usth:!!' QO It a ppeau above wUl bi! publlsbed In not less than 50.000 cop!u of the 89·er BROCHURE to bi! distrIbuted durin .. tb ~ period bi!t"·c<'n October I. 1957 and ~cember 31. 19~. 'MIe AssocIation re...,rvev the rlabt to edIt COPf. and reject nbotoa rapbs or ot·h er art work deemed uns~lt . able for Quality reprOduction In the BROCHURE. and to r e,·lse and alter Ibe nnal format.' It J... '; ANNUAL DUES: Actlv e Membership. - $15.00: As$oc!ate Membership· $50.00 which fee .hall ,,130 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltlop. of th e ::~~be~~t~~ERSIUP ROSTER publl. bed durlnlf the t erm of s uch ASSOCIate j ~~th:~... _,_.S~ . . __ . _ __._ __.. '_. ~ - j--- .. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED U..., Ball PoLnt Pen / ~~_ r_c~w..-~~.~:.I/ ·MEMBCR A. · �Active A_.B Address SALT [.AKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues DATI!: " '" F- E: ... ~ __ .!.:1................. Member HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Sponsor Rene..- l:\.Q ...<;.!·.\'\I..Q," \'~····T·L. o.%.\1,"'- .... d....~.~ to .!j..5.1 ) SING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSHIP GRANT .P. \.s.. ~ . .s...... ~ .. J3. ...£ ..E-..~ ...r..r::.~.. ( Line 2) .... ~..l .•.•.""'........? (Line 3) v,.. . . s? ..~.~.. h .. .. $............................ ~~.tA..i-:.L......., ....... $].~_~, The undersigned MEMBEH hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to all TERMS and CONDIT IONS contained herein . ( Li ne \ ) • .... if'!..:.J) 0 oV TOTAL Rec'd By Field Rcpre~enta.tioo :r.~...,..:'..~.~ ....~.'h ...1:;:,..\.."Y.... ~..~..~.. :.~.....y.J.~.Q-.Y: .~.~ .~.t .. JL.... ~."'.......\...JL~.' .y ..... <1\ .."A......P .\.J'I..ti.L ..I .. ....... t\\, ..!!>..1 ....0.,1':0...... .. .......~~~ .~ .:t......L,!.! ..~.,..... h .~... ~ ...... SPONSORSH I P LI STING (Name On ly) ..... , .. The pu rch8~ e of L18TINQg In the SO'er Bll.OCHURE lh.n be limited to "Acllve" .nd ··.uso-clate" MRMBERS 01 the n'e .. I ntern"Uonal Hlt:hwa, Aqoelatlon , Ine. and .. SpOnsor .... aU .ubi..,t to the lollo..-In. t erm • • nd condition • . \Vhereo. , distribution of the BROCHURE a nd the rflultlnl benellll from ll. tlnll publillhed thereIn will utend O"e' " two yur period. PRESENT memben are reQuIred to P.~ du el In advanCf thrnUih and lncludlnl the ~ntlre cRlend .. ~e .. of 19~8. NEW a nd FORMER members are reQuired to PR, du •• for twn full Year' In a dvance . ANNUAL OUES : ... etlye Memberahlp, _ $15.00: AMocI&te Mcmbe rllhlp _ UO.OG which f.., shall also Inelude PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltlon. of the 10'.. MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durin. the term of such A.....,lat" Memberlhlp. ADYERTISINO RATES : _ LiJlUn.s In DlredOrJ 01 "SERYICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MO'I"KLS (pe r line) II pj!r unit: Minimum .. tf. no - Ma"hnut:\ nle. no. Other bu slnfM c\ .....lfjca~lons . no per line. SPONSORS _ Plnanel~l t: .snt 01 1100 or more IneludH lIoUn. of name In pr<>per section 01 BROCUURE The n·er. In t~rnatlonal HI.h... ., .uso-cla Uon, Inc. Juarontees that the l>!EMBE'R'S or SPONSOR'S II.Ur.g as It . ppeR" .bove will be published In nOt leu than ~n.ooo copleo of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dll trlhuted durIn. th e period bet"'een October I. a~7 and ~ember 31. 19s.8. The AaIOC:latlon rese rveo the .II M to edit COP1. and reject phot .... RPh. or other .rl ..-ork deemed un.ult_ a ble for '1U.Ut1 r~produ"Uon In the B:lOCRURI!:, an d to revl ... a nd . Un the tlnal fotmat. _ -r. _ _ _ _ ~~ Authorlu:d BY 1 ___ ::~" ~,'-_"C _~::;..=---L __ ~ _ YBRBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUlIJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use B. U Point Pen _. _ MEMB£Jf �Active M,mb" Address 140 W, SECOND SOUTH ST . SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER 1 Lines ...I:o\ ..... . \-<\ '\ \ ..... 1\4.., II\. Rene ... SPonsor om 'fI.I.!,>II,J~~\·v:cA_ tj, . .J:l<....~ L'/~1. to I/?¥ ) (q /6,0 D • ;,O,DU ADVERTISING LISTING Se,. .tl.+:.~A The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'l;R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to all TER MS and CON DI TIONS contained herein. (Line I) .. ...1~ A&lOC. I SPONSORSHIP GRANT $" - .\~~M_ _~ - TOTAL Rec'd By __ Field. R6Prese1'tative t...f\- )".,,)'!'L{ L'~'~ $ ..... :........... -. ............ . ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI STI NG (Name Only) The \>urcha"" ot L1STINOg In the 89 'er BltOCHURE ahall be limited to "Active" and "A. soclate" l>!t~MBERS of Ihe 89'era International HIRh ..'ar A..oclatlon, fne , and "Swn. ors," all sub!«t 10 the tollo ... ln~ term s and conditions, ADVERTISINO RATES:. L.. tlnu In Dlr.,.,torr 01 "SERVICES AND AOCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTf.,'U3 (pe r lin e) U per unit: Minimum rate, no • Maximum rate, ISO. Ot.her business cla""lflcatloru , no per line. SPONSORS _ PinanClnl n an! of 1100 or more Includes \lsUn~ of name In proper sectlon 01 BROCHURE. Whereas, distribution of Ihe BROCHURE and the reoultln ~ beneflU Irom listings published th~reln ...1lI extend o,'e. a two year period, PRESENT membeu are reoulred to PRY dues In adnnce IhrouRh and Includlnl the entire calendar Year of 1958, NEW and FORMER member. are reQuired to P3Y dues for two full year$ In advance, The 89'e rs I" t~r "atlonal H! ~h"'ay AlI'oc lallou , Inc. ~u .. rantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSO~'S llstln g as It a ppe .. u above \l'lIl be publlsbed In nol It &!: than 50,000 copies 01 th e 89·.r BROCHURE to ~ distributed durln~ th ~ period bet'.. een Oclober I. 1951 and Decomber 31, 1958. The Association reserVe5 the right to edit COpy, and rt Jeet photoIl"r .. phs or other art ""orl< deemed unSuIt_ able fer <luaUt, reproduction In the B~OCHURE. and to revise and all cr the (lna! lorma i "-'" ANNUAL OUES: ActiYe MembershIp, • U5.00: Associate Mem~r.hlp • 1:1-0.00 whlcb fee sh all al30 Include f'REE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltlop s ot th~ ::~~~~~t!~ERSHIP ROSTER pubtJ. hed durlnll' Ihe term 01 such AssoclaV I A . . _h +-_:::..~...... -.----~~- A ' r: ~_ ~~thorlzed ' _. _.. _ _ _ _ _ ~ VERBAL AOREEMEN'f'S ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED use Ball Point Pen MEMBeR �ActiVe Member AUoc. Ne. DATE , ...9.1.~..s.....::1:P.&..........·· Add ress .......) • ADVERTISING LISTING $... SPONSORSHIP GRANT $....... _ ... ........_... Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER &>on$Or :~_ .. 'Dt!t......... ~...l..i. _.~.c.n ...l:01...:... .............. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH HO W. SBCOND SOUTH ST. Rene. Lines .................... . Sec • .... _ .. ~ ..t .•..••.••.•. The undersigned MEMBER hereby auth orizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subjec t to a ll TERMS and COND ITI ONS con tained he rei n. ............... to .. TOTAL Field. Reprco!cntatioo ( Li ne I) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LI S T ING (Name Onl y) ... _.... (.\ ......0:-:"1..\-'.-·· .. ,.0.1&;. ... ;.. ,...1... ..:',-;... -......... :~. - .. The p"retlaH of LISTINGS' In Ihe at' er JlII.OCI-fURE Ihall be limited lO " Actlve" and " Assoc:la ~e" IolF.MBERS of Ihe aII'us Inlernallon.1 HI ,h.u AUocI.Uon. I n~. and "spOn sors." aU . ubJtet to the follo.lnl tum. a nd eondlUonl. Wherea~. dll trlbutlon Of the BR.QCHURE and the relultlnlr benefits from linin " pubU shed the rein VIm utend o\'er a t ... o 70ar I>Orlod. PRESENT members are r~ulred to J)a, dues In .dvanee throu,h . nd Ineludln, the entire talend.. Jur ot 19 ~. N&W a nd PORMER member. are r ..... lllred 10 PU dlln tor t.o tull Jean In a(lvanet. ANNUAL DUES : Activ e Memberlhlp. _ 115.00: t.uoelate Member.hlp • no.oo which fee sh.n .1.., Inelude PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. of Ihi! n'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publlshe(l durlnlr the term of " ueh AMOclate Membership. ADVERTISING RATES :. Lbllnra In OIr«IO., or "SERVICES ... ND "'OCOM· OD ... T10N8" MOTELS (per line) " I>I'r unit : Minimum rite. no . Mnlmllm ,.a te. $50. other buslnu.• dusltlcattonl . 110 I>Or line. SPONSORS· Plnanclal .. rant of 1100 or more Includ~1 Uslln .. of n.m~ In PTOper &ection of BROCHURE. The 89'e" I nternallonal Hlah"'''1 ...... oelation. Ine . ,,"aranteel th at the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S Uatlnlr AI II a pl>Ol .. abo ve ... 1Il be published In not Ie ... than 50.000 copies Of Ihe ag'er BROCHURE 1.0 be (llstrl bule(l durin. th~ I>I'rlOC\ bet"'een October I . 1851 .nd December 31. Ig~ . TIle ... uoclallon rt"'rvu the ril M to ed.lt COp7. and rtJtct "hol.... r.pltl or "ther art .ork deeme(l unl ult· a ble for <1111 111, reproductlon In the BROCHURE. a n(l to .ewl.., and alter the tlnal lormat. Authorl. ed BY _ ____ .. _ _ . ___ ___ _ .. _ __ __ . ~_. _ _ _. VERB ... L ... OREEMENTS ... RE NOT BINDING - ... OREEMENTS NOT INCLUOED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST... TED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ... CCEPT... NCE BY TIlE "'SSOCI...T10N. 1y c"" a maor hi " b nl11dby r "let ~e l-0nsors NO CARBON REQUI RED U.., Ba ll Point Pen c _ _ . MEMBeR �No. Active SpOnsor DATB 5 / ]115[; Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ~y~~..... TO~ .~9..~~ ..... :g .:" . ................. . .13.7.0. .......•.......t ..... !..c ...._... ::r._c.t . .. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines to ...... .l ADVERTISING LISTING .1 . s." 1 Dues L.. t SPONSORSHIP The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. (Li ne 1) .......~.: ........L ...l. ..):•. J. ~ ....._, ........... .J. ~. "' ... l ...... O.-r: .. .. .!..! !... .. l .,. ...T $... $.).C'..• ..}Q.. G~~ $ ... ,..-0., .... 0 TOTAL Rec'd By ..... ... :t. ..... Field Representative l ..~ .~ ......................·'.-i- ...r.·,.,.l" .....:,.. (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LISTING (Name Only ) T he purch""" of LlSTINOS' In thc 89'er !UtQCIIURE shall be Umlled to "Ac!l\'e" and "A""",late" MEMBERS of the 89'cn Internatlonal tn~h"'u AssocIation. Inc. and "SpOnsors'" Rll . ub;".,t to the 10110"'lnll t e rms and conditions. Whereu. duUlbutlon of th e BROCHURE ~nd the rosu1tln~ benefits irom Ilstlngs published therein will utcnd onr a (,,'0 yur period. PRESEr..'T member s are rec.ulred to PU dues In ad,'ance throu r h nnd Indudln& Ihe entire calendar fenr of 1958. NEW and FORMER members are re-c.ulred to pay dues for 1"'0 full ~ear s In advance. ANNUAL DUES, Active Membership. • 1I5.00: Associate Membership • $50.CO "'hlch tee ohal! abo Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edlUons of tht 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl.h~d durln r the term of such AMoclal e Membership. ADVERTISINO RATES:_ Lhtlnu In Directory Of " SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" "IOTELS (I>" r !lne ) II per unit: MIl,lmum nte . 130 _ Maximum ,ale. ISO. Otller buslnes. classllluLlons, no peT line. SPONSORS _ Fln anchtl ~ra nt or $100 or mOr. Include ~ IIstlnr of name In PTOl>"r ,",cUon of BROCHURE. Tile 89' ers Internaflonal Hl;h,,'U A" oclatlon. Inc . ; uaranl ee, that th e MEMBER'S or SPONSon'S l!sU"1't as It appears above will be published In nOt Ie» than ~o.ooo copl u of t ile 89'n BROCHURE to be dlstrlhuted durln r Ih ~ period bel"'~Nl October 1. 1951 and I)«cmber 31. 19~8. The ASSOCiation r esene, tile r liM to edit copy. and reject photo~ r ... phs or other art work deemed unsult. able for Quam,. r.productlon In the BROCHURE. Rnd to rev! •• and _Iter the finRI iormat. Authorized BY -----... ---l~_~l __ .Ll.C_b.S_.----....- ____... _ ... _____ __ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRlr..'TEO TEXT "fUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQOIRE1) U"" B all Point Pen MEMBER �Active Rene .. ,~"'O, om < . +'1 M ember Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER "1A f> · i;:;D .';j." .." ... ··· \,..", ·"'n Dues C_ ............ to ................ ) $ Lines ATIVERTISING LISTING $ ..... . &,.L.h .j, SPONSORSIDP GRANT $·-· ·5 ·· 0 ·· ~ The undersigned ME~\BER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERM S and CONDITIONS contained herein. TOTAL Rcc'd By cO t.f.r\-4(h~2;,b.,t(lT.~if~Qh·-5·e-··('~ Fleldv Rep'f.~ entatiVtl (Line I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) ..('.. I.'T 'I , ··· \ · I~ ..R,H: SPONSORS HIP LI STING (Name Only) The purchase 01 LISTING!J In the 89' er Bl'..ocHURE shall be lim It ed to ·'Actlve" Bnd " Anocl.tt " ",U':MBERS 01 th e 89' tr~ Internat ional HlKbwu' A•• oclft tlon . Inc. and "SpOnsors ." all ,ubt u t to the 10I!o"'lna lerm s a nd condltioM. Whereas, dll<trlbul!on Of tbe BROCHUH£ and t h e res ult ln l b~nefl u froo, Ustlngs pubUshed th erei n ",m t ~l e od o,'e< a t ..·o year period. PHESENT members arc reQu ired to PaY dues In a dvance Ihroull h and locludlna tb e entire calendar year Of 19~8. NEW and FORMER members a re reQuired to pay due. for tw" fUll years In a dva nce . ANNUAL DVES : Acllv e Members blp. _ $ 15.00: A050Cla te Momberlhlp • $50.00 "'hleh t ee ~haU also Include P'REE DISPLAY LISTING In a U editions of th~ ag·.r MEl>IBERSHIP R06TER pubH ~ h . d durln r t he term of ouch Assoc iat e Membershlp. ADVERTISING RATEl'I :_ Llstln u In Dlrc<:.(ou 0/ "SERVICES AND AOCOM- ODATIONS" MOTELS (per Un el ' I per unIt; MInimum ute. '30 - Maximum ra te , ' 50. Oth er bus lne .... cta .... lrtca tlon •. 130 per Une. SPONSORS· P'lnancl~1 " ant 01 or mOre Includ es lls tln $" of nam e In proper . cellon of BROCHURE , The n' e.. International Hla h ..·u· A.... oelatlon. Inc. a uaran! ee. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIoling as It appear. a bove wlll be publt . h ed In not In.. th a n 50.000 copi es of the 89'er BHOCHURE to be d lstrliJuted durlna Ihe pedod between o.:t obe r I. 19~7 a nd Drcember 31, 1958. The A, SOCI"lIon reserves t he rla M to edit copy, and reject photouapbs or oth e r art work d.emed un.ult. able for "u a ll!y reproduction In the BROCmJRE. and to rovlse a nd alte r Ihe fin a l format. "CO Authorlted rA _ ,y .._______ .-'l.""~-. - .------ ...-..-.------ MEMBeR VERBAL AGREEMENT'S AHE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. To"",~,4 IVI !;opO~"O"~k:'I' \)' 0 C"'u ,"-. WO CARBON REQUIRED u ae B a ll Point Pen �AeUv~ Member Address 1-40 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Sponsor Renn.. om 5/31 / 5 .J.e.v.: ..c.r....V:".lJ...Q .....•1:~BP. I:l~h'.S·t±·n·6·· .y .. f K.".;:?."Y".Q ......,.i.c.hf:i .cl d , .... t>:<h .. .J. :!. • •. 1• ......J $ .. . SPONSORSHIP GRANT See . .... '" ..~ , ~ n ··· G r::l · .,.. t .. to . A"DVERTISI NG LISTING Lines The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LISTI NG in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears belo w and subject to all TERMS and CON DI TIONS contained herein . .... . ··s Now SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues ( Line 1) ..... 1.. ... ... ASSOC. l'...·····-1···1t·r TOTAL Rec'd By Field. Rcpre.sentativc .......... $ .... ····P. ···l1 ....1 ..... £ . · ··· · · ~ ·· ·· · ,~· · · ·, · ··· · · i·t · .. ·····} :t · · ···"" ~· ·' · · E/1 · ·· ~... (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LI ST ING (Name On ly) The pureha"" of LISTINGS In the 8g'er BROCHURE s hall be llmlted to "AcU"e" and "A»<>clatc" MF.MlIERS or th e 89'''''8 International Hll h"'a r ASSOCiation. Inc. and ·'8pOn80.... · ~11 .ubJoct to the (ollo"'ln l lerm . and condition •. ADVERTISINO RATES :. L;s tlnn In Dlrc~tof7 of "SERVICES AND AOCOM. ODATIO:-;S" MOTElS (per lin e ) $1 per unit; Minimum rate. UO • M ..;lmum 'at o. 550 . Oth~r busln~s5 cl ..sWcatlon •. no per line. SPONSORS - Plnanclal e un! of H OG or n,or~ Includes lIStlnl of nam e in proper section o( BROCHURE. Whereas. dlstrlbuUon of the BROCHURE a nd Ih e resultln e ~n.Ut. from U.tln u pubUshed thtreln ... m txtend o,'er a 1"'0 yea r period, PRESENT membeu are required to paf du o. In advance throu!fh a nd Includln e th e e nUre calendar Year of 19~8. NEW and FORME'R members ~r. re<lulre-d to pay dues tor t.:n full l ea rs In advance . The U· e.. International lIj ~ hW . ' A»<>clatlon, Inc. !fUa ranlee. that the MEMBER'S or SPONson'S !latin!; as It a ppears above will be publlsbe-d In not Ie... tban 50.000 copies or the 89'or BROCHURE to be di stributed durin. th~ period betwe en October I. 1957 and IHccmber 31. 1958. The Association reserves the rlaht to edit copy. and reject photogra ph s or other art "'ork deeme-d unsult. able for <luauty repro<!l1ctlon In tbe BROCHURE. and to revise and alter tb. final (or mal. ANNUAL DUES: Active Members hip . • S I~.OG : As socia te MemM.shlp • no.oo "'hleh fee shall .Iso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition . o( t b~ 89'u MEMBERSHIP ROSTF.:R publl.hed durin . th e term 01 s uch A!l$OClate Membership. Authorized BY _ _ .__ ._ ___ - .. -4T. ~O€__ ., ! .. _ .._..,... ~.:.Ll~.,.. .._.. _... __ _____ _ VERBAL AGREOIENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANQE BY THE ASSOCIATION. .il.L be uno~ c ppmicd on pjc,ur tl oru ors sccured . NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point P en ufr":' cl au i ulonJ. l MEMBen • �"'ctlv e Sl>Onsor D ... TE Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. S1.'I<O"'(;"' '''X''' '_ f!~~l~ l:'~ (\a ...FI,'(J"K ~.. S" A- 0tJ S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UT AH Dues C ............. to .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ..... ) L ines ADVERTISI NG LISTING Sec . . SPONSORS The undersigned ME MB ER hereby aut horizes the publicat ion of a LI STI NG in the 89' E,R BR OCH URE as the "COPY" appea rs below and s ubject to all T ERM S and COND ITI ONS contained he rein. $ ...... .tLsJ. ... _._ ...~.. ~ ( Line I ) ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) S PONSO RS HIP LI STI NG (Name Only) The purch ase of LJOTI NG8 In the 89'e, 1I1(OCHURE s h all be lim Ited to .. t.c\!ve" lind "AlI.oclllte" MEMBERS 01 the 8~·e, . IntnnaUon al lilll'hwQJ' Au ocla llon . Inc. Bnd .. SlIOn . or .... 1111 subject to. th e lollo.dn .. term. a nd con dill ana. Whereas. dlstrlbuUon of the BROCH URE a nd the re"ulllnll' benet!u I'Dm n sUnn publlshed therein ..' m ~ xtcnd over a 1..'0. ,oar ~ r lod. PRESEN'l' members a re requIred to Pll1 dun In advance th roull h Bnd Includln l the t nllre calendar Jear Of 19~1. NEW a nd FOR~IER members ue reo.ulred to PaY dues lor twa full yea .. In IIdvance. ANNU ... L DUES : "'cth'e Membership. • $15.00 ; AssocIat e MembershIp· 150.00 whIch fee s hall al.o Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTlNG In all edillons 01 the 89'cr MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durlnll Ihe term 01 . ueh "' SS OCl at~ Membe .. hlp. ADVERTISING R ... TES;. Llstlnu In Dl rertou of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS· · MOTELS (pcr lin e ) II ~r unit; MIn imum rate. no - M n.lmum rate. $SO. Other bUlln eK claulfleaUon •• no per line. SPONSORS · Plnancl .. l gra nt of $100 or mQ re Includes UsUn$ of name In proper seellon ot BROCHURE. Th e U'ns Inl ernatlonal iIl J hwa, .....oclatlan. Ine. .ua rantee. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S listing as It BPpe:uS .bove wm be publish ed In not less Iha n 50.000 caple. of the 89'er BROClIUR£ to be dlstrlhuted du rin .. the "".lad bet"'cen October I. IS57 and D«:emb~. 31. 1&511. The AssocIa tion ruenes the rlRht to edIt copy. and reJt<:t phOtOllraphs or other Brt .. ork deemed unsuitable for o.UBUt~ repraduction In the BROCHURE. and to re"lse and a ltu the tlnal tDrmAt. ./' ~ ~ AuthOrlzed .J • . ' : A' ':7 :,../.-- _ .. 7":' __ -;:r: ,;" BY ~__ ..... __ ._..... ____ .... _______._ _._ .. _._ .. _ ._.. _._ ....... _ _ MEMB I:!l VERB... L AGREEMENTS ... RE NOT BINDI NG - ... GREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE ... RLY 1 ST ... TED BE'LOW. SUBJECT TO "'CCEPT... NCE BY TUE ASSOCI ...TI ON. o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball P oint Pen • �hfll:£' New )knew SI>OI1$O' I~ OATE ( ' Member Add ress HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST . SALT lA K E CITY 1, UTAH Dues C ....... ADVI'~RTISING LInes ............... _..... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER LISTING s,, ~ . • •····.·{··) Q3~:·O:.-.:: ·.·· S.. $.1..4.P.~ The undersign ed MEMBER hereby authorizes the publica tion of a LISTI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY " appears below an d sub ject t o all T ERM S and CO NDITI ONS con tained herein. ( Line I) to ................ ) Field Representative ............................................................................................... ................ ....................................................... ..................... ........... .... .. ( Line 2) The purch ue of LISTINOIJ In Iht U ' t, BIU)CHURE alla n be li m ited 10 "Actlve" a nd ··.usoclale·' MEMBERS of Ih t Intern aUonal Hleh ....,· Au odaUon , Inc. and "Sponsors.'" a ll aub.le<;t to Ihe foUo... lna terma a nd conditions. "'·u. AOVERTlSINO RATES :. LI$Un u In OI.«tofJ of "SERVICES AND ACCOM· ODATlONS" MOTELS ( poer lin e) $I poer unl\; Minimum .ale, UII • Ma.lmum n te . $$0. OCher bUIlneM clau lflutlon" no poer Unto SPONSORS· Plnanclal Ifanl of SlOG or mOr ~ Include.. UsUn, of n a me In "roper I«tion of BROCHURE. Whe re... d 1.StrlbuUon of the BROC"IIUIU:; .. n<'l t h e reo;ul tl n ~ benetltl frou, ll, tln u publlsh~d therein .m ut .... d on, .. two Jtar ~rlo<'l, PRESENT m .. mben are re<lu lrO<! t.o par dU~1 In adva nce Ihrou.-h a nd Indudtn .. the . ntlre ultndar ,car Of 115.. NEW and FORMER member• • rt ' tfOIulrO<! to lOa, due. for two full rU" In "dunce. Tht U 'er. Int~m.nona l III.h ..·. 7 A..uoc:II Uon . I nc. .ua r. nIH= UI.o.t the :>.IEMBER·S or SPONSOR'S UI Ue/l .. It . pp.c ..... . bove will be l>ublllhO<! In not ItA than $O. ()OO conle. of the "'e. BROCHURE to be dl , ulbuled durlne th~ l)C.lod betWH " Oct ober 1, 1957 ... nd l)Iocember 31. 1951. The A.IO\>laUon ~$en el the .ll ht to edit eOPf, I nd reject "holon", ph, Or other art work deemO<! unsult· able for QUallt7 ,.productlon In Ulo BROC lUR a and to re" be and . lt~ r thf final format. ~ ~ ANNUAL DUES: Acth'~ M~mbe, sh!l>. • n~.oo : Associ ate Membe rship • '~O. OO .... hleh fo-e ~h ... 11 aIM> Inclu<'le PRE"E: OISPLAY LISTINO In ..n editions o f th ~ 89·.r MEMBERSHIP R09TI:R publll llO<! durin. the tetm of luch AN oeL .. l e ~ftmbershlp. Autllorl, O<! BY "\_1 y ' . _ . VERSAL AOR£EllEr."TS ARE NOT 8 1NDINO _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDIID IN PRJNTED STATBO BELOW. SuaJECT TO ,\(,,'CBPTANCE BY THB Io.S8OCL\TlON. j •• NO CARBON REQUmlID UM S -. ll PalM Pen ,~I ~ ;. ~ _ _ _ MUST BE CLEARLY I \~c, �FROM : M H. Cantwell . June 11 , L958 TO : Bentley I itohe11 The following valid account receivabl e verified by the letter atta ched is pr esented for payment of commission . KANAB CHAMBER O COMMERCE •. • . ••• $ }OO. OO F Com missio n ..• $ 1 00 �Active Now /)6 '0. Member Address HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. .... _______ ...... .$- SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER • to ._ ____ _ ,) . _ .... Dues L Lines Sec. • A"DVJo]RTISING LISTING SPONSORSmp GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby au thorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and sub ject to all TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. $ ...... c.c_.L ..... TOTAL Rec'd By ._ ............. $__ .. Field Representative ( Line I) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LIST ING (Name On ly) .. --......, ... -........C......~ .... ".J ........::OL'1.·;·,[.r :l ..'l. ~ .... L. .~ ... .. !~. " ... , •. The purcbue of LISTINGS In tb~ 89·.r BROCHURE shall be limited to "Actlve" and ··As.oclate·' MEMBERS ef tbe .9'er! Intern ationa l Hlgbway AM<I(:latlon, Inc. and · ·S»On..., rs, " ..11 s ubject to tbe foUowln, term. and conditions. Wbere... distribution of t_ e BROCHVRE and tbe r esultlnl bendlts fron' b IIstlnu publlsb ed tbueln will utcud over a ,'0'0 yur ""rlod. PRESENT members are ,eQutred to PU due. In advance tbrou r h and Includlnr the entir. calendar :rcar of 195-8. NEW and roR~IER members ..e required to pay due" for two full fUrs In advance . ANNUAL DUES: Act!>·. ~I e n,beublp. • U5.00: Associate MembershIp· $Ml.OO whleb t ee shall al..., Indud e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition s of tb~ 8P'er ME!ToIB£'R8HlP ROSTE."R publlsb ed durin, the term of "ucb AM<I(:late Membersblp. ADVERTISING RATES :. L"Unn In Directory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" ~IOTELS (pe r line) $I per unit: Minimum rate. no • MaXImum rate. $00. Otber boslneM clas"ttlcatlon~, no per line. SPONSORS· Plnandal "rant of 1100 Or mOr e Includes IIstin .. of naote In proper $<!Cllon of BROCHURE . Tbe 89'e<8 Int~.nattonal Hhlb"'a y Au oclallon. Inc. e uarantees tbat the ME]\,HIER'S or SPONSOR'S listing as It appears above ... 111 be publlsbed In net le.s than $(1.000 copies of tbe a9' er BROCHURE to be dl strlhuted du'ln~ th~ period bet"'een October \ . 1957 an d December 31. 1958. The AM<I(:l a tion reserves tbe .1..1It Ie edit copy, . nd reject pbotograpbs or other art work deemed un sult. able for Quality re prodUction In the BROCHURE, and to revis e and a lter tb~ fln a l formRl . Autborlzed GC. 'OJ • .... . odv~n BY - ------.. - .. -----.-------- .. --.- 7---rnrt"",:-V-.----:r.:;:rn,,.:'"=-Y" MEMBClI VERBAL AGREEMEN'I"S ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDf:O IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY i STATEO BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCtATION. For Z-011S0. of . ...:turc r. o 4i.l.' l(C·c;].h NG CARBON REQUIRf:O U... Ba ll Point Pen to .11 u 1_.J~ 1 lieu on or J )~ O:r'-:l , v. <.July .20 , 19 8 �FROM : M.H. Cantwell July 12 , 1958 TO : Bentley M itchell The following valid accounts receiva ble a re pre sented f or payment of commi ssions . Account Kennecott Copper Co Aiiount $ 150 . 00 Conunissi on $ 50.00 W eber County Commission . 75 . 00 25 . 00 Ogden City 75 . 00 25 . 00 175 . 00 47 5. 00 58. 33 Utah State Universi ty COMI.rrsSION �N•• Assoc. 51>011$0' DATE Member L.-;.;.vth.......l . ... . . . . !...._ ...••.•.•• i .~._ ..!..!l::.. .t:y. Address ....,.:r!'rl:.,.-:::::., ·········,,····:1 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Dues-P'~9'y... to-.~......J. .~ j ,m: $ .. . Lines . A"DVERTISING LISTING •.. Sec. .... SPONSORSHIP GRANT $....J.7~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. TOTAL Rec'd By ... ...,....!.Q... ...•• $: Field Representative (Line I) (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LISTING (Name Only ) .. . •. ••.. • _. 1.0. • ••. _. ... .. . . . . .. . . . .... . . _ . ./.. . ••• Th e purchase ot LISTINOS In ~h e 89·c. BltQCHURE shall be llmlLed ~o "Acll"e" lind "A&ao<:IRte " MY,l.fB£R8 ot the 89'N ~ International lIlih"'aJ A s ~oci ll tlon. Inc. and "Sl>On$Ou."· Rll .ubje<:t to ~h t fOllowlna term s and conditIon s. ADVERTISING R,\T£$;. L!$Un n In Djrector~ of "'SERVICES AND AOCOMOD,\TIONS" MOTELS ( p~r lin e) 51 per unit: Minimum ra t e. 130 • Maximum rat e. S50. Other busin ~s.~ cla~s!flea Uon s. no pe, Un e. SPONSORS· Flnanelal grant of UOO 0' mor ~ Ineludes Us Una of name In propu section of BROCHURE Wher.... distribution 01 tht BROCHURE and the resulttna be"em, from Ustlnu publis hed Ihue ln wm extend 0"" a t,,·o yeu perlo-d. PR£S£NT m embers arc required to "a~ dun In advance Ihroul:h and [ndudlna the enllre calendar Yea r of 19~8. NEW and ~'ORMER members ue , eQulre<! to P3J dues for tWO full years In adnnet . The U' ero In\p.rnational Ui ~hw R1 As. oclatlon, Ine . lI'uaranteeS tha t the ME)o.IBER·S or SPONSOR'S listing a s It appears above "'m be publlshe<1 In not less than ~.OOO copies of the BROCHURE t<I be dis tributed durlnll' the I>C rio<! btt"·.~ n October I. 1957 and IJo'cember 31. 1958. The Associallon reMrvu the rlsht to edit (opr. and r el ec t photolTa.ph s or othcr a rt work deemed un.ult. able for quality rel>roductlon In the BROCHURE. and to nvlse and a ltcr th" final format. ANNUAL DUES: Actl"e Member&hlp . • U5.00: As. oclate Membership • U O.CO "'hleh fee shall also Include l"REE DISPLAY LISTINO In all edlUonl of the 89· . r MEMBERSHIP ROSTeR pubU she<l dur!n~ Ihe ttrm of s uch Associate Membership. 89'., Authorl~ed 1'\1'Cr ;c rr'l.r BY .. -_ _ _ .. __ ._ ..•.. _. __ ..... , .. _____ .. _ . _____ . _ 95.>1.6 ____________ ._ . VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEM£NTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED T£XT MUST .8£ OLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANOE BY THE ASSOCIATION. '0 .; OIi.C8_ .ith ..{,; ....r.. City lnrJ. ::;lC: .l!:-l: U:3 NO OARBON REQUIRED UM Ball Point Pen 'x! ticn MEMBI:P �/ Mem ber Addrelill HQ W. SECOND SOtrI'H ST. SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH Duell L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ...... to ...... ) A"DVERTISI NG LISTING Lines . SP ONSORStnP GRANT Sec. .................. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appea rs below and s ubject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS co ntained herein . . • .. . 7;;~ TOTAL Rec'd By $ .................. . Field Reprellenta/ive (Line I ) ( Line 2) (Line 3) S PONSORSHI P LIST ING ( Name Only ) ...... . Th e I>ureha.., of LISTINGS' In Ih e U'er SIUXlHURE I hail be Umlted \0 "AcUve" and " A4$OCla l t " Mg~IBERS of th e 19·c .. InternaUonal HI~h ... u Au.oclaUon. Inc. and " SlIOnlO'"'' a U lubJect to Ihe 'ollo.- In ll l erml and condltlons . Whereu, d l.5trlbuUon of Iht BROCHURE " nd Ihe ,t!"IUnll bf:ndlla l ronl n atln ll publll hfd Ihueln .1lI utend over a 1.. 0 ,.ur period. PRESENT me mbf:r. "ft reQul,ed 10 J>aJ' dun In a dva nce throul h a nd Includ ln l the entlre ca lendn yen of l iM!. NInY a nd roRMER ,"embf:.. are reQuired tl) PU' du .. tl)' t.-o fuJI ,.e... In " dunce . ANNUAL DUES ; Aellve Mtmbf:,M1lp. • Ji $.DO ; ASaoclllle MemberMllp • nO.DO . ·hlch ft<: ah . U allO Include FREE DISPLAY LISTINa In ,,11 editions 01 the 19'., MEMBERSIIIP ROSTER published durin. the term of such A.uoclllle MembershiP. ADVERTISING R"TES ;. Lll lln ll In DI'"~tory of "SERV ICES "NO AOCOM· OOATIONS" MOTELS (poer Une l $I per unIt; MinImum r.te. 130 • Mulmum , a te. no. Other bUl ln eM da MlIlu tLonl . no poer Une. SPONSORS· PlnaDclal ..."1 of 1100 or mor~ Indud.. Ultln . Of name In proper """tlon of BROCHURE. The U ·e., Inurn.tlona l Hl r h ..",. Assoda UGn. Ine. Il u ..a nte.. that the ~IEMBER' S or SPONSOR'S tllUnlt .. II . ppeaTII a bo,'e .-111 be pubilihed In not I.... tha n 5<0.000 COI>IU of the d ' er BROCHURE t<> bf: dl, t.lhuted durlnr tha pe riod bf:t ..C<'n O<:tobf:r I. le ~ 7 a nd Qo-eember 31, 1953. The Assocla Uon n .le."ea tile t l.hI to edit cOP~ . " nd reject photOl raphs or othe' a rt .-ork deemed ""sult· a ble 10. Qualit y reproduc\lo" In the RaocHURE . • ne! to re,'11e . nd a lter thr ::::,,::riJ""'-----. ()yJor "" ----- "S12-. *- 1..'1 103 VERB'I.L AGREEMENT"S ARE NOT BIND INO - AORE£MENT8 NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CL"£ARLY! STATED BELOW. 8UBJ"£CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. -\ 0 ~ \C '\JY~ a NO CARBON REQUIRED Ule BaIL Poln~ Pcn a MEMB£R �!fO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L ines A"DVERTISI NG LISTING &0. SPONSOR.":>HIP GRA...'IT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TER MS and CON DITI ONS contained herein. $ ...................... . . 7.5 00 TOT AL Rec'd By Field Repre8c nfat iV(; $ .... ( Li ne I ) ( Li ne 2) ~ ~~;~::~RSHIP L1S;I~~;N.m' O"ly) \J)g'P~~g;;~\~ ~Ch~.:.~\~S(~~ ... . . ....••.• •.••••..••.. . .... AD~kTISING Th e ""rehu e et LISTINGS In the 89'er BItOCIiORE: shall be limited te "Aolh'e" and ··A..soclate" MF.MBERS ef the 89'er& International Hh;hway AS8O;elation. Inc . and ·'Soonsou."· all s ubject In the tnllewln .. terms and .nndIUon . . nATES: . Llstlnn In Dl r ertor, et "SERVICES AND AOOOM· ODATIONS" MOTJ;:LS (per Hnel 'I ~r unit; Minimum rat~. no - Mnlmum late. 'so. Other bUSlne~ clusltleatlen •• no ~r line. SPONSORS· Plnanelu l grant ot UOO nr mnr~ Includes Ilsnn", of name In pro~. se-ctlon ot BROCHURE. Whueao. distribution of th e BROCHURE ~nd the res ulting benttlts tram U~tln,.s published therein will ut en d O'·.r ~ 1'0'0 ,ear per led. PRESENT members RTe re<lulr.d tn PaY due. In a d .... nce Ihrnu l h and Indud!n, Ih e entire c~!endar l'ur nt 1958. NEW and FORMER member. Rre re.qulred tn pa r dues fnr t,,'n tull ,ear& In advance. The 19' ... Jnt t rnatlon.1 Hillll ..,o., AMOClaUon, Inc. lIuaranlees thaI the MEMBER 'S er SPONSOR'S lI.tlr:1Il U It a pPf'a r& above wll! be p"bU sh . d In ne\ leu than SO.()OO eeples or the 89·e. BROCHURE In be dlstrlhuted durlnl< th e period bet"'ern October I. 1957 and ~cemb~r 31. IP~8. The Assoc iation ru .. vu the .li M to ~dlt COPY. a nd reJe-c\ nhote;r .. phs er other art .. erk deemed unsult . able ter QU "uty r e product!en In tll~ BROCHURE. ftnd te .. e,·I.., Rnd altn Ih~ ANNUAL DUES: Active Membershln. - $15.00: ASSocI~te Mem bership • UO.OO which tM shall aiM Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In aU edition. of th~ S9' er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durln~ the term ot s uch A.......,lal . Membership. ~;::,,::~:' ~§___7/£ / .r-<P._ TEXT~~~~CLEARLY i VERBAL AGREE MENTS ARE NOT BINDING AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PltlNTED STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOClATlON. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Pelnt ~n ME MBI:n �Active A&soc. Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Nt.. Rell~" ~ ~ DATE .'f..~~. . . ~"i~.~ . \6g~Jlo0~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER 7 '5 S".) d' to .......... l • Lines ADVERTISING LISTING s.... Se,. SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ .....................~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub li cation of a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DIT IONS contained herein. j ~O,~ TOTAL Rec'd By F ield Reprcstmt(1tioo $ ..... (Line \) ( Line 2) ( Lin e 3) ..•••..•.••. . ••..••...•.•• .. . .•. 1; .. •. .. •. ..• .....• . • . • ... \.) .:\:".h .~"'\'yQ."."\) \\l\ " \ <>:...,'vS."'.'~ntt~~o+Fy· <', ·Q·Vl' .... S PONSORS HI P LISTI NG (Name Only) Th e purchuc of LISTINGS In Ihe 89'er BltoCHURE ShRll be llmlled to ·'Actlv~·· and "Auoclate" MEMBERS of th e 89' ~rs Intern ational Hl~hway A.soclallon . Inc . and "Sponsou," aU .ubJ.-et 10 the followin g t erms and c~ndltlons. Whereas. dlstrlbutlon of the BROCHURE knd the ruultlnl bcn eflU lrom II stlnu pubUshed therein ",m Ulend O" ~ r a 111'0 year per iod, PRESENT memben P al du es In ",dnnt e throurh and Indud!n r th e entire calen dn 1'ur 01 1958 , NEW and FORMER member. are required 10 pa,. du es for two full ,.ears In adnnce. are re"ulrod to ANNUAL DUES: Ac!lv e !\!"mberslllp . • U S. OO: AUoclate Membe .. hlp • $~.CO "'hlch fee .hal! a lso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durin; Ihe term of suc h Auoclat e Membe rship. ADVERTISINO RATEB :_ Listlnu In Directory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per Une) 11 per unit; Minimum ra t e. 130 _ M.,..lmwn Olher bus!n"",, olU8Weations, no per Une, SPONSORS _ FInancial KTftn t of 1100 Or mOre hldudes lIstlnl of nam e !n proper seetlon of BROCHURE. IM e. $5(1 . Th e ag'us Inl ernatlonal Hlrh"'B7 Association, lllc. luarante." that the MEMBeR'S or SPO!oISOR'S IIsllng as It IIPpears a bo,'. ,,·m be pubUshed. In nO( less Ihan SO,OOO copies ot the 89' .. BROCHURE 10 be distributed during th~ period bet",".n October 1. U~7 alld IHcember 3t, 19~. The Association re.o;.erves the rllht 10 edit copy, and r eJ~t PhOIOlTaPh" r t r art .. ork deemed un.uit. : 0 !Je able for quaUI,. r~product!on In the BROCHURE nd to r~v lse Rnd a lter tho fin a l format l <tI..~ I I:',L }. •!L -,,"-.A... JJ. • AUlhorl •• ~!~ (~ .J. INCLUD~-·t:-P~;NTED ~x;· MUS;'~;~LEA~~-:"'-l VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO _ AGREEMENTS : : STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. \6'- ~c ~ o--l'~ ~.J---­ ~~~~4 ~ ~ NO CARBON REQUIRED U$t Bal! Point Pen ___ MEMBeR �Bentley ; Kou have duplic a t e order on ARROWHEAD llO TEL, Nogal es �Acth'e Ren e,,- New / Sponaor DATE :Member A ddress 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST . j...~ .. ...... .... .. .... ,J. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H D ues I ...~Y.~lL. Sec. . . t .... I .......... A 11'1 r rJ.!.f~ to \ 1.j5J ) SPONSORS Hl f\ t G~ANT The unders igned MEMB ER hereby au th orizes the publication of a LI STI NG in th e 89'E.R BROCHUR E as the "COPY " ap pears bel ow and subject to al1 TE RMS and CON DIT IO NS con tained herein. ( Line I) 0A~ ,\+,c ADVERTISI NG LISTING Lilies ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER "- TOT AL Rec'd By """ IS. V' • •.:2.<:1 "'" $ v..~.!.~~.aV Field R eprC8cnta tivc 00 .. \ \ " ....L.".. '/ I ( Li ne 2) ( Line 3) S PONSORS HIP LI STING ( Name Onl y) ......... ..... .... "I he I'u r cl1s F.e of L TSl"IN08 In \h r. 89· . r BP..QCHURE sh r.U b. limit ed to ·· ,\~tl y ~" and ·· As.oc!ate"' MF.:..r BERS 01 the 89'er$ I nt ernat ional H! ~ hway A... oclatlon. Inc . a nd "Spon . or. "· RII subject to the follo .dna t erms and cond!t!ons . ADII ER1'!SI NO RATES: _ List lnl " In D:ru lo u' of ··SER.. lc;>S M ID ACCO~_ ODA1'I O N5" )o,tOT1.'LS (pe. line ) It per un!!; Minimum rate. n o - M aximum rate. 150 . Other bu sineSl; cla ssiflca tlons , no per lIpe. SPONSORS - Flnanel .. l II rant or $100 or mo,,, Includes IIstlna- 01 n ame In proper """lion 01 B R OCH URE . Wh er eas. d istrIbution of the BROCIlURE a n d t-h e res ultln l ben e!!u f rom i!s tin n publis hed thereIn ...!II extend over r. twO) r ea r perlO)d. PRESENT mem ben are reQuired to pay du .. In adv ance Ihrourh and I ncludln ~ the en ti r e calendar year 0/ 19~8. NEW and PORMER member. are r eQulrO'li 10 par dues f or t1ll0 full Yea n In Rdvance . 89"er$ I nt~rn.!lo" . l H hl h ... a ~ ASSOCiation. Inc. luuant " ea I hM t he or SPONSOR' S lIstlng a. It "PlOurs a bove .·m be published In not 01 the 89'er BROCHURE to be distributed durlnK the period betwe~n Octol>cr I. 1951 a nd Dece mber 31. 19~8 . The Association r eserves th e rl .. hl to edit coP~ . and r eject IOhoto8raphs or other a rt work d eemed un l nltabl e for Quality reproduct l o~e llROCHURE, . a nd to ' C"I St and alte r th~ ln tl final format ~ ANNUAL DUES! Active Membership. - U 5.00 ; ASsocia te Mem be rship - $M1.CO ... hlch l ee $hall al$O Include F R EE DISPLAY LISTING In aU edi t ion s of the 89'e r MEMBERSH I P ROSTER published durlnr the term of s uch ASSOCiate MembershllO. The ~IEMBER' S Ie... th a n roo ,GOO copl u AUthOri ted BY ______ { ~~ _~_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~L _ . VERBAL AGREEM E NTS ARE NOT B I NDING - AOR EEMEN1'S NOT INCLUDED IN PRlNTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED B ELOW. SUBJECT TO ACC EPTANCE B Y THE ASSOCIAnON. NO CARBON REQUI RED U IIf: Ball P oint Pen _ ____ . MEMBe R �Actll· . AHOC. e Rent.· Sponsor Member SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER :1:-::............ _ . Sec. ~........ ~ ..~. The undersigned MEMB ER hereby au thorizes the publica tion of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subjeci to a ll TERMS and COND ITION S contained herein. (Line 1) (t.ine 2) . yQ . ,.i ... \-.... r: ... JL , " L ,,1\ '~ .. SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd .\/'wv.,k 0. iJ:;;;I:{____ ___ ...__ ................................... _. B~ -;:75 -::: $.................... Field Rep!'eselltative r " ., ... ,.......'! ..... , . .. ~ .. ~. .. .,t~ .,. r , .. ~? ...~ r'r ADVffiRTISING LISTING . .. .. ..... . ... . .. , .. . . . ! ... :": ... ~ .. .. I '" , . , (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) ........... ... .... ........ .. .- Th e !>urch u e of LISTINGS in th e 89 '"r BROCH UR E shall be limited to"""' Ac(l Vt" and "As sociate" MEMBl:R8 Of the 89'... Inlen>B tionai Hlrhway A"""iaUon, In c. and "Sponsors," "ll subject to th e fo!lowllllr t e rms a nd condition s. Wh ereas, dl.tributlon 01 the BROCHURE Qnd the res ullh'~ beneflt s fronl ll stin u pub!l sh ed the rein wlll p.xlend over a two year ""rlod. PRESI';NT members a re required 10 pay dues In ad,'ance throu$h and lnc!udln.- the entire ca lendar )'ear of 1958. NEW a nd FORMER membe rs a re requlr"" to PBY dues lor \'"n lull yea rs In a<'lva ne • . h:€S~t~~~~:~tc~~~~:~~~~fl:~ls7!~::~ ~~r~~t~~~.-~rl~ VERBAL AOREE~IENTS ADVERTISINO RATEB :_ List lnru In O1re< l or.- of "SERVICES AND ACCO!.!· ODATlONS" MOTELS (l><!r Une ) SI per unlt: Minimum rate. S30 - Mu:lmurn !'Ate. , ~. Other busin .... cla ssWeation • . no pcr line. SPONSORS· !"Inand.. l ;ra nt of HOO or mOr~ Includes lI otlna- 0 1 n a ",. in proper 5e(:llon of BROCHURE. The 89' e>5 Inle rnatlon . l Hlllh ..'4 Y A&.'jocla UolI, Inc . .-uarant.cs that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ilstlr:i\' as It ap pea rS 8bove .. m b. publl.hed In not ... less Ihnn ~.OOO coples of th<:/89'cr BROCHURE 10 be diStri buted durlnll Ih. perlod bel,,'e~n Oc tober I, 1 9~ 7 lind D.-.:embev 31( 1958. The Au oclatlon n.ene. the ri ght to edit eopy, and rde ct photoll ra PM or other art .. ork d eem"" un sult· a ble tor QU81Lt.- re produ":).~;;; r · , ~nd to ,..,vlse and a lter th~ ~~;~~~;~~~---.-.1/~!.. . ;,....--.-- _._. _.__~. _ _ . ___ ARE NOT J:lINDING - AGRE EMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY :O't ,. STATEO BE'LOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ~f)~v. f \C1:Oo NO CARBON REQUIRE'[) U.e Ball Polnt Pen MEMBeR �Sponsor AClive DATE Membcr AddrC8ll HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. , •.. ,. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH DUCll L LinCll ..................... . ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Se~&""" . The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publrcatlOn of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appears below and subject to all TEHM S and CONDITIONS contained herei n. ........ to ................ ) ADVJoJRTISING LISTING ~r. S PONSORSHIP GRANT k1!~ TOTAL Rcc'd By ___ Fwld R eprescntatioo 3t>o~ $.---.---_ .•••..••••. (Line I) (Line 2) (L;ne 3) .... .... ,....... .. t"""................ . SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) I. " fJ:::\ .... f:t I " Tbe "urchale 01 LISTINOS In the 89'et BROCHURE shall be lImhed to "Actlve" and ··A.uocla te" MEMBERS of th e 89'er. Int ernational Hli: hwa1 A..oclatlon, Inc_ and "Sponsors," all subjut to thc fono,,'ln l terms and conditions. Wherea s. dIStribution 01 th e BROCHURE Rnd the ,"s ulUn l bene m . from Il stlnu "ubUshed th erein will utend over a t,,·o year nerlod. PRESENT m"",bers are reQuired to " 81 dues In ad"anc e Ihrou J h and Includln i: Ih e entire calendar year 01 , gS8. NEW and FORMER membe rs are rCQul red 10 pa1 dues for t ... o lull " eau In adva nce . ANmJAL DUES: AClh'e Membership. - 115.00: AsSOCiate Member&bl" _ '50.00 .. hleh fee shall . 1"" Include PREE DISPLAY LIS"nNG In all editions of th~ 89'et MEMBERSH IP ROSTER publl. h ed dUrill i: the te rm of such Assooistr. Membership. \ ~ ADVERTISING RATES, _ L I5tln 8s In DlredOTY of "SERVICES AND AOCOMODATIONS" MOTELS ( pu lin e) U per unit: Mmlmum rat e, UO _ Ma",lmulll rate, '50. Other bus iness c!a ... lflcnllon., UO ner line. SPONSORS _ Plnancl~! gUIll 01 1100 or ",or~ Includ es IIs lln. 01 name In proner seetion of BROCHURE. The 89' eu I nL ~ rnat1onlll Hi i:hway Asosoclatlon. Inc. Kuarantee. that the ME~IBER'S or SPONSOR'S II sUns U It a"nears abo"e wl1l be pubUshed In not Ie" th an 50.000 copies of the 8i'er BROCHURE to be dbtrlbuted durin .. th e perIod bet "'c~n Oct obu I. 19S7 a nd i)(ocembu 31. 1953. The A...""laUon reurve s the rl~ht 10 edit copy , and reJeet photor ra ph . or other .. t ... ork deemed unsuit_ a ble for qU ft !lty reprodllc!lon In the BROCHURE. a nd to TCvl "" a nd a lter Ih~ fln~l forma t --I Authorized , ~ I <....-_________ BY _____ . _____ . __ . __ ___________________ MEMBER I. ,/J VERBAL AG REEM ENTS ARE NOT BINUINO _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLl!:ARLY I STATED BIi:LOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. 't-O'- (Lr~~~ 1f ay{lC~ O~ CA'M NO CARBON REQUIRED Ule Ball Point ~n �Renew d Sponsor 4? DATEJ'i) ~ / Member SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING LI STING ",,,f/':¥ :. 1fI The undersigned M. EM BER hereby au thOrizes t he publica ti on of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY " appears below and subjec t to all TER M S and CO ND I TI ONS contained he rein. I SPONSORSl-ilP GRANT Lin'es ...... ~. _ ......... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .P. f' i3.47fZp 7 '1!:''i{ 1 $ .. ..I.:~...t;!.... _ l!. Dues (,~/~~,. to~~, __!. .. . ) Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. r \C\ ':s"'V'6 :1 :1\'\l:iJ!,r"V- :30~,. $- -_ .• -.................... . TOTAL Rec'd /) ~ I ...... ~ BYrntt~ '";t.·~. Field. $.:: .......... ~ Reprls~;" ( Line I ) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) SPONSORSHI P LI STI NG (Name On l y) The ,,\lTehaS<! of LISTINGS In the 89'u SItOCHURE shall ~ lImlled 10 "Acllve" .nd "Associate" MEMBERS of the 89'e'-5 Jntematlonal fIi ¥h .."u AuoclaUon. Inc . and "S!>Onsou," all a\lbject to the tollowln~ term s and condition., Whereas , dll;trlbution of th e BROCHURE and the ruultlnll' ~ndlU from IIstinu published therdn wlll fxund over a t ..,o yur period, PRESENT members are reQulre<i to PaY dues In advanc e throu i'h and Indudln.-: the entire calendar YeU ot 195a, NEW and FORMER membe rs are required to pay dues tor two tull years In adnnce, ANKUAL DUES: Active Membership, ·115.00, ..... soclRle Mem be rship _ SSO.IX! "'hlch tee shall a lso Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTINO In all edltlone of the 89'or MEMBERSHlP ROBTE"R published durlnil' Ihe term ot such Associat e Membership. ADVERTISING RATES :. Listlnu In Dlreotory ot "SERVICES AND ACCOM ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per line) II per unit: Minimum rate, no . Maximum rate . '50. OIh er bus;ne"" c!assltlcatlon •. no per line . SPONSORS· Plnanel"l ~ r3nt ot 1l1Xl or mOr ~ Includes lI.tlni: ot name In proper s~tlon 01 BROCHURE. The U 'eu Int ~r nBtlonal HI.-:h ..·ay ASSociation, Inc. lI'uarantees that the ;\IE~lBER'S or SPONSOIt'S llstlnll as It a ppea rs abo,'e will be published In not less thBn ~o,ooo raples of the 89' er BROCllURE to be dis tributed durin. the pe riod bet..- ee n\ October I , 11I~7 and ","cember 31, 19~. Th e Assocla tlOIl rUerves the r ll ht to edit copy, and re!ecl photograph . or othe r . 'rt work deemed unsul~­ ~I~l:l t1~T:;,':.~lItr rep roduction In th~BROC7E' ftn 'Yto rey lS<! and alter tho ~~th~~~. ___ .3 .. _ ,,-, i_ ~£_ ..... ~___ VERBAL AOREEMENTS AItE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PItINTI'!D nXT :.-lUST BE STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY 3"E ASSOCIATION. J, I NO CARBON REQU~ U"" Ball Point Pen CLEARL Y~ '_\1. 0 ~ " . \ MEMB I:I1 v~ �I Member Add res.!i 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER } \Qj~Jfx~ ~ m \1.~0,4~ \~ (tie ,o-vEf, • I~() O ./ ADV~-;RTISING SP ONSORsm p ~:ty,'Jl:t?F-- LI STING GRANT •1UJ o ~ $ .................. The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub licatio n of a LI S Ti NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the " COP Y" appears below and subject to all TER MS and CON DITi ONS contained herein. - (Line 1) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) I..l......L.~ ..\ . <l~ SPONSORS HI P LI S TI NG (Name On ly) ... p f y<;, H The pure]""", 01 LISTINGS' In Ihe 89"« SROCHURE shall be limited to "Actlve" And "'\""1)(:18tO" MEMBERS of the 89'. ,& International Hl$ h"'8f AsscdaUon. Inc . and "SP'!nSors," all subject to the toHowln; terms and condition s. Where.. , distribution of th e BROCHURE and the res ... ltlnl henems from UaUnn pubUshed therdn wm Ulend o"e' a 1"'0 rur period, PRESENT m.mbeu are reQuired to pay dues In ad"Rnee through and IneludlnK ,·h e entire calendar fur of 1958. NEW and FORMER memhe r s are reQuired to PaY du es for twa full nars In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Aell,'. Members.hlp . • U5.DO: Associate Membe r .hlp _ $&O.IXI "'hlth tee .hall aIM> Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In a ll edltlolls of tll~ 89'er MEMBeRSHIP ROSTER publi shed durilli' Ihe term of sucll AS$OCIQte Mcmbershlp. ADVERTISING RATES ;. l.10I11I" III Dlrertorf of "SERVICES AND AOCOM. ODATIONS" MOTEI,s <pcr Hne) $I per Ulltt; Mln!mum rate. 130 • Madmum rQte. 550. Other bus!lIe" cla-Sl fleHlolI •. no per 1Int. SPONSORS· PlnMne!al na nt of $100 or more Includes lI.tllIIl' ot name In p roper • ...,tlOIl ot BROCHURE. The U'c," InternMtlonal Hlllh",'u AMoclaUolI. Illc. lIuaralllees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIstlr.g .. I~ appears Mbo,'e .. m be publlshed In not Ius thall 50.000 coplu ot tile 89'u BROCHURE to be dl$trlhu~ed durini' tll~ period bet .. een October I. 1951 and ~.mber 31. 1958. "nIe A.$O(:lallon reservu the right to edit copr. and reJ ...,t pllot QS"raplls or other art "'ork deemed unsuitable for <luallty repro u tlon in the .BR'i HURE alld to revise .nd MIt er t ilT L fin .. , tormat ~utIlOri~ed y --_. - f- - - .- - - - - -- ~ •_ _ ........ _. _. _ _ . _ _ ._ ••• _ . VERBAl. AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MuST BE Cl.EARl.Y t STATED BELOW, SUBJECT" TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON R EQUIRED U.., B.U Point Pen MEMBeR �Ne,,· Ac\lve Rene ,,' Sponsor D... TE Member 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. ( .9". ..11. .... 1... SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to .............. l Dues L . ADVERTISI NG INSERTION ORDER Lines ADVERTISING LISTING • &c . ........ ,.......... p .. SPONSORSHIP GRAN'T •• The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TEHMS and CO NDITIONS contained herein. (Line I) .....1L....: .. ... ....... f......'.'... . - $ .. . - 0'-' TOTAL R cc'd By Field Reweselltative ...x ...... r ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LISTING (Name Only) The purchase of LISTINGS' In t h ~ 89'er Bt<OCHiJ RE s h a ll !;~ llmlt ed t o ""'r.t lve·· and ·· .... soclate·' MEMBERS of th e ag· ,r. Interna tiona l Hlll h ... a ,. .... . oclatlon. Inc . and "Spon son ."· all subject to the (ollO"']n z t-e.ms and condltlons. Wherus. d istribution at tile BROCHURE a nd t he rtsultln ll ben e fit s tron' Us!!u u nublls hed th erein ..-m extend over a t ... o )'ca r I><'rlo<l. PRESENT m embe .. nre re<lulred 10 pay du e. In advance throUilh and Includln ll th e entire calendar j-ear of 19 ~ 8. NEW and FORMER members are re<lulred to pa ,. du u for t",o full year. In advance . ANNU ... L DUES ' "'ctlve MemberShip, • $1 5.00: ASsociate Membership· ' :;0.00 "'hleh fee shall also \nelude f'REl!: OISPLAY LISTING In all editions of th .. MEMBERSHIP ROSTER nubU sh ed durin$" th e term ot s uch .... """Iate Membership. U'u ADVERTISING R ... TES:. L isti n gs In DlredorJ at "SERVICE'''; "'SO ... C;;OMOO ... TIONS" MOTELS ( per lin e) H per unit: Minimum rate, no . Maxlmu", ,ate, ,~o. other bu.lnes.. cla.slflc ntlons , UO per lln~. SPONSORS _ Plr&ncbl ifant of HOC Or more IllCiudu llStlll lf Of name In nroper ! eo::tion of BROCHURE. Th e 89'.r . Int ernational Highway A... oclatlon , Inc. iluaranlee. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S liStin g as It a pl><'3r$ a bo"e will be nubH. hed In not le'$ tha n :>(I,COO eopies of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dis trI buted durin&: the nerlod bet "'e~1l Oct.ober 1. W~1 a nd Decombet 31, 1958. The "'s.socl a tJon reserVeS th e rl~ht to edit con,., and r ej ect I>hotolfra.phs or oth er art " ' ork deemed unsuitable for <luRltly rcnroductlon til .he BROCHURE, and to te" lse and alter I h. final fonnat . Aut herlzed _ BY -·-----·-.---. ~- ..-. -.-"'" __ l:.~_t~ VERBAL AGREE!>.tENTS ...RE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEX'I' ST... TED BELOW, SUBJECT TO "'CCEPTANCE DY TI-fE ... SSOCI ...T10N. NO C... RBON . REQUIRED U&e Ball Point Pen . - --.:¥.L ... ~fUST - - - ."r".-T . .,_____ MEMBeR BE CLEARLY I �Aet!ve Spon . or N •• DATE Member . 9.~.h~....9.?~.~~y....9.~:._.~.~ ~?':?~.. rB Xh ... J!.t..~b Address 140 W . SECO!\'D SOUTH ST. SALT LA KE CITY 1, UTAH Dues to ADV~~RTlSJNG Lines ADVERTISI NG INSERTION ORDER <.. .) LISTING •• $... SPONSORSHIP GRANT So,. ~.{1!.~~&'... $ 7 5JfL'". ................... The undersigned MEMBE R hereby a uthorizes the publi cation of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the " COP Y" ap pears below a nd subject to all TERMS and CON DITI ONS contained herein. TOTAL Ree'd B y ... Field RepI"cacn/atiue ( Li ne I ) ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LI ST ING (Name Only) . •• k •• . l~ . ft~ .,,> ..... Y. ... The purch ase of LISTINOS' ln th e RD' er B!l.OCHURE sh ll il be ltmlted to "Actlve" and ··As. ocla te· ' MF.MBERS of the 89'er. Inte mallonal Hill"hwu A5SCICIRllon, Inc. and ·'SpOnsors."· 1111 subject to th e 10Uo",ln>J t erms and condlllon s . Wherus . dlstrlbutlon of th e BROCII URE a nd th e re.ulUn>J benellt . tro,n IIsUn gs publl . h ed therein ..... m ~xte nd over 1\ \",,0 HU p(:rlod. PRESENT member. are required to PII¥ duC5 In ad" a nee throu r h and Inc!udln>J the tnUre ca lendar )'ear ot 1958. NEW and FORMER members are requIred to PRJ due. for two full rea •• In adva nee. ANNUAL DUES : Aeth·. Mem bership. · 115.00; ASsociate Membership· Ir.o.OO ..' hlch fee , h ..11 . 1. 0 includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In an edltlon. 01 th~ 89'er MEMBERSIIIP ROSTER publ b hed durlnll' th e term 01 . uch AMOClate MemberShIp. ..J ..... :.o..r............... . ADVERTISINO RATES :. Llsllnu In Dlr c~tory of "SERVI<2S AND ACCOM. ODATIOl'S" MOTELS ( p(:r Une) II potr unit: MinImum nte, no _ l'dalllmur.1 15G. Othe r bu.ln~ SII ela ssltfea tlon • . no per llne. SPONSORS _ Pln .nel,,1 ~ rant of 1100 o. mor e include. ll s\ln>J 01 n a me In p.opoer u ctfon o f BROCHURE. The 89'era I nternational Hlilh ..... ,. A... oclat\on, Inc. lIuBrantees that the MEMBEU'S Or SPONSOR'S Hstlr. 8" 113 It a ppea rs a bon will be publlshed In not Ie ... than $(1.000 cop ies ot the 89'er BROCIIURE to be dl. lrlbuted durlnl th~ period bet " 'een October I. 1951 a nd Inc.mber 31. 1958. The A..oclaUon reSe ..... S the rl K to edit cop¥. a nd releet photolraphs or other art work dee med un.ulthl a ble tor Qua1Lt,. reproductlon In th e BROCHURE. and to revi se and alte r the Iin al format . a u. Authorized , BY _ __...•.•.. ......e.eting.__....... _._ ..._ .....__ ...... ___ ..__.. __ VERBAL AQREE!l.IENTS ARE NOT BINDI NG _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. ro ~~ ~1~ on publication of pioture from NO CARBON REQUIRED U..., Ball Point Pen ~ cho C oun~y MEMBER �1• ActIve Ne,.. "';;;:0 B!>onsor K!CJsh l M oJ9J f,rt,;,; ?f!iLu ...Ll'iq'lbLX~ ' M,mb" 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .l. . . . . . . .. (Line I ) -=> 0 ,,0 $ ..,;;:........... ~--- SP ONSORSHIP GRANT s" ..~ ..... . The undersigned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publica tion of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the " CO PY " appears below an d sub ject to a ll T ERM S an d CONDITIO NS contained herein . $ ..... ADVERTISI NG LISTING Lines .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER t o .______ ___ ___ .. ) _ • TOT AL ""'" ReC'dBY ~.. $) ........... -.-_. - Field Representati ve .......B.K .\..':2>.T q ..l" .../Y)Q:rS.\",...~ .... f\J'I A: ( Line 2) ( Lin e 3) SPONSO RS HIP LI STING (N ame Only) The purch ase 01 LISTINOS In Lhe and " Au""lat"" d9'~r BltoCHURE shall bI! Umlted to "Active" />'IF-MaBRS 01 the 89'"r$ I nternational Inc . and "SpOnsors," all s ubJ~cl Hh, hOlay A&SO(:lation. to the foUO"'l nf term s and condItions. Wh erua, dla\rlbutlon of the BROCIlURE an d t h e rt8ultlni bendllB fron' l!stln u Imbllmed therein .. HI pxtend over a tw" year period, PRESENT member. are req uired to pay dU e8 In adunce throUllh and Includln~ the ~ntl r e ca lendar fear of 19~8 . NEW and FORMER membeu a re requIred to pay duu for two tuU years In advance. ANNUAL DUES : Actlv e MemberShIp , - IIS.DO: Associate Mem bership· 150.00 whIch fe~ ShAn also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING in aU edltlons of th~ ::~:'.:"be~~~l!~ER8HIP ROSTER publi shed durin &, the t erm of . uch A..""IAte .r\DVERTlBING R.r\TES :. L, s~! nlS In Dlre<tc ry of " SERVIC;,:s AND ACCOM · ODATIONS" MOTEI.s (per !lne) II per umt: MinImum rate. no _ Maximum rue. I ~. Other bu sl ne$!! clu~llicaUon • . no I>I'r lin e. SPONSORS _ Financl,,] a nnt of 5100 or more Includes U~tlnJ of nam e In prOl>l'r section of BROCHURE , The 89'eT& Int~rna t1onal H hlh way A",ocla tlon, Inc. Juaranteu that t he MEl>HIER'S Or SPONSOR'S llIUr:J as It appears abon will be published In not Ie •• than 50.000 cople. of the 89'er BROCHURE to be distributed durln ~ th~ period bet"'e~n October I, 1957 a nd December 31. 1958. The /u;soclatlon reserves the riaht to ed it copy , snd reject p!lOtosra phs or other art work deemed un suit_ able for Quality Hproductlon In the BROCHURE. and i<> reVIse and alte r the fina l fo r m X '. I} 0 ~~Ih~~~ .J.~)i..l!1:L;1;.':-- -7_' __ ..::1~.~~ _ ed_ ______._ VERBAL AGREO! ENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJ"ECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQU IRED U"" Ball Point Pen MEMBr:1' �Active "'"'. N•• Rentw OATH Member Address 1.fQ W. SECOND S01ITH ST. ...:~..;:..~Y.. ....9..~. :.'f.T~.~._:.'lJ.+..}~.. ....... .i.L.l.f ... _• ..w.l .. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues C .............. to ................ ) ADVERTISING LI STING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ,. The undersigned MEMBER hereby auth orizes the publicati on of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROC HURE as the "CO PY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DITI ON S contained herein. $... SPONSORStnP GRANT . .. Lines $ .......... . . ··c·;;·. !lO..... . TQollA~ ..................c4,1;'.~ .......... Ree:d By ... $ ............._ .... . F ield Repre8c"tatioo H i~{J0 . . .• • ·• •.· .• ( Line I) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) ...... .. ................................................... ...... ········· ······1 ............................................ . ...... SPONSORS HIP LI STI NG (Name Only) ..(?,./..') ....... ~ .....M .. :...·,..-....,'..f . i..\ .l.. :~.C .................................... . The purch aoe of LISTINGS In Ih e 811·", BltQCHURE o.ha U be limit""" 10 ··Actlve" and ··Aasoclale·' ldRMBERS of the U'ua International Hl lh • • ., Auoc:laUon. Inc. Ind ··SPOnso r .... atl . ubjee! to the lotlow lna terma and conditions. ADVERTISING RATES :· Listln ... In OI'«lor., of ··SERVICES AND ACCOllC · ODATIONS" MOTELS (per tine) II per ... nit: Nlnlm ... m ute. no - Ma :rlmum , ate. 1$0. Other bualneas elusi licationi. no per Une. SPONSORS - Plnanel~1 . .... nt of 1 100 or mOr~ Inel ... dn 115Unl of name In proper section 01 BROCHURE Where-a. dl5t rlb ... tlon 01 the BROCHURE a nd the reaultln.. benettta f rom nsUnu pubnshed thuein .. Ill txt.nd over a two .,ear period. PRESENT memben a re required to PlY duel In advance thrOull h and indudln. tbe e nu re calendar fear o f 1 9~8 . NEW and I'ORMER memben are required to PaY dues lor twn lull yeus In advance. Th e U'ero In t~rnatlonal Hh/hw.f Auoc L tion. Inc. l uaunlees that tbe a MEMBER'S or SPONson 'S UsUr.g .. It kPpeara above will be published In n ot tba n ~.GOO copl.. of tb e 89·cr BROCIIURE to be distributed d ... rln .. the period bet ween October I . 19~7 and Dffember 31. 1G~8 . Th e AJI.6OClatlon ' ",e rvu the .llhI to edi t copy. and reltct pbolOirapha or othu a rt work deemed un . ... ll· a ble lor Qua !!ty reprod ... CtlOn In tbe BROCHURE . and to revise an d altt> Ih e fina l format. ANNUAL DUES : Active Membenhlp. _ II~.OO: Auocla te Member$hlp - 1500.00 which fee $hall also Incl ... de PRR DISPLAY LISTING In aU edltlolll of th" IB'er MEM BERSH IP ROSTER p ... bllahed durin" the term of such ANoclate Memberahlp. leu Autborlzed " MEMB£1f VERIHL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT IllNOING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOC IATION . ,0 yOl nsorshl p of ictUI'i o NO CARBON REQUIRED UN Ban Pplnt Pen unt 1 or "":..\\ , �3S :AODllRN .10'I'BlS offe ri ng f ..,ir ptl'ioed oomfort Invito you to visit l~nt!lna 's Lo.rgest d yest City ••• Shopp1nc d Entertai o ••t centor of the orth"/est . Dine und J nce , enjoy oxoellont food and. top t alont floor ohows . - G rea t Falls ' ~otcl ..san . �SpOnsor ActIve JrS..it Member llS ..otel ...::~.?.g.• _J.!' Address SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. L ines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .. ( Li ne 2) ...., ............... .......... .. - ' ..........................-.-- .... .......................... .. ... ...... ........ ., • $ .... l SPONSORSInP GRANT .JJ. .. J The un dersigned !llEMB ER hereby auth orizes the public ation of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY " appea rs beiow an d s ubject to all TER MS an d CON DITI O NS conta ined herein. ( Li ne I ) .....~~..... ... . $ .. - A'DVERTISI NG LISTING 5 ............. Sec. .....Q.Qt ......... ) to Dues L $ ......... .. TOTAL Rec'd By :}.,u ... DO'. .~~ $~5.iJ_ • . Q:) Fiel d Representative }u tC ....,. _ .......~ ..... t.. ............. .. ... , .............,....................... -. ( Li ne 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) The purcha~e 01 LISTINGS In the 89'er BROCHURE s hnll be llmlted to "Active" and "As.soclate" MF.MBEfiS of the 89' en InternatIonal HJ~bwa1 Association, Inc. and "Spon sors." RIl suble<:t to the fol1o"'lnl terms and condJt!on s. ADVERTISING RATES,. L,sUn n In Dlre<'tory 01 "SERVICES AND AOCOM· ~DATIONS" MOTELS (pe r line) 11 per unIt: MinImum rate. no . Maxlmu", late . '50. Otllcr busIness du, lflenUons, 130 per Hne. SPONSORS· l"Inancl,,1 s rant of ' 100 or more Ineludu llstln l of name In proper oee\J<>n 01 BROCHURE Whereas. distrIbution of til e BROCHURE and the resultlns benefIts frcm Us!!n.... pubUobed thereIn "'Ill utend over a t ..·o year perIod. PRESENT m embeu QTe re<lulre<! to pay dues In a d,'ance throu~h and Including tbe U1Ure ca lendar nar of 195a. NEW and FORMER members lire re<lulred to 1'111 dues for two full 1earo In a<lvance. Th e 89'ers Int ernational HI l h""ay A" Oelatlon. Inc. l uataMees that the MEMBER'S Or SPONSOR'S IIsUng as It appears above will be nublls hed In no~ le$$ than 50.000 conlu of the 89' u BROCIIURE to be dIst ributed durlnll' th ~ perIod bet",""n October I. 1957 and o.-cember 31. 195a. Th e A$$ocla\lon resenes the r181lt to edIt (OnY. a nd r eject nbotoltTaph s or Olh er art work deemed unsuit · able lor Quality r!.1'roduet!on In the BROCHURE , and to revl.., nnd alter tho final format ) ~ ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership. ·11 5.00; Auocla te lI-Iembershln ·150.00 whIch fee s hall aloo Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edItions of the ::~~be~;~~~~ERStUP ROSTER publl.hed durin l the term of . uch ASsocIate :':'y_ " ~ n .@_ :"> ~~thor~~~::: . _ . _____._ P ],~n VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE' NOT BINOING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST Bf: CLEARLY STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCBP'l'ANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. 1'0 nIsa to .uikf1 .J. picjru1'e 5.·0IlSOrS ..lp l-? of . n ~d itiun:.J.l 150 . GO . O~ i liothor ,,,,y TO THE ORDER Of FOURT\-I SOUTH OF f iCE f1RST S \1Y ShNK Of III iIll. U. ECUR SALT LAKIi CL TY, UTAH FOR DEPOSLT ~ U LY NO CARBON REQUIRED U se Ball Point Pcn Sq'[RS IKm,liAT IOHil 111 (i1\WlY ASSN', 11K.. SPECIAl iCCOUI\T �.... ctlve NOW Renew ;onv '1'oUJ.. i s t s 1.01 In va l "tc Member 14{) W . SECOND SOUTH ST . SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H D ues C ........ to ........ ) $.. . L ines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER A"DVERTI SI NG LISTING $ ... s., . SP ONSORSHIP GRANT $ ... ) ..~ .• ...J.O ... The un dersigned MEM BER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COP Y" appears below an d s ubject to all TERM S an d CON DITI ONS co ntained herein. ~ TOTAL Rec'd By ... .. $...:..D. ... G.O' (Line I ) ( Line 2) (Line 3) . SPONSOR SH I P LI STI NG ( Name O nly) ._.,. ...~........ . ...f ....• .... • •• _ ...L_ .. .. .... .... ...... "~ ...... _. .. " " •• ,, The purchase of LISTINGS In the 89'u altOCHORE shall be llmlted to ·• .... ctlve·· and ·· .... ssoclate·' MF.MBERS of the 89'crs Internationa l Hlihway .... ssoclatlon. Inc . and "S""n~o u:' all s ubject to the follow In a terms and conditions. ADVE~TISINO R ....TES :. .I..isttnRs In Dlr.,.,torY ot "SERVICES .... ND .... CCOMOD.ATIONS" MOTEI.B ( per llne) 51 per unit ; Minimum rate. no • Maximum ra t e. $SO. Other buslne.,. claS$lf!caUons. UO per line. SPONSORS - Flnanel"l Ll ran~ of noo or mOre Includes UsttnLl ot name In prOper .ec\!on of B~OCHURE Whereas . dlstrlbutlon of the BROCHURE a nd the resu\t!nl ~ntflt" fronl IIslfnu published thereln will extend over a two ycar period. PRESENT mernben arc reQu ire<! to paY due. In advance throuih and Includill" the pntire calendar YeaT of 19~8 . NEW and FORMER mem~Tl &Te reQuired to pay dues lor twn full yeau In a<lvanee. Th e 89'ers International Hli hway ..... """'laUon. Inc. I: uaranteu ~hat the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S ll.tlng as It appears above "dll be publiShed In not len than ~o.ooo copL e. of the 89'er B~OCHURE to be di Stributed durln Ll Ih a period ~t"'e~n Octo~r I. 1957 and Dtcc"'~r 31. 1958. The Association r e.erve. the ri ght to edit COI>Y, and reject phOtoz raphs or other art work deemed unsuitabl e for Quallty r~productlon In t he BROCHURE. and to revise and alter th~ fin al tormRt. .... NNUAL DUES: Actl,·. Mem~r s hlp. _ $15.00; As"""late MemberShip • , ~ O.OO which fee shall also Indu<le PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. of th~ 89' er ME MBERSHIP ROSTER published durlni the term 01 . uch A..oelate Mem~rohlp. Authorized SY ...•. _ ___ ._. __ ._._._ .. __ "' __ ._ _. __ . ~._ . ___ , ___ .. _._,.._ ... _ VERBAL .... OREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - .... OREEMt;:NTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST ATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO .... CCEPTA NCE BY THE .... SSOCI ATION. '0 of e !J , ... ied lber-t; to . r:l s~onsor_h l p of <S • NO CARBON REQUI~ED U.e B~ll Point Pen MEMBCIl ~ �BentleTaThis order from the Edmonton Chamber ot Commeroe he. been signed bT Mr. Marlett, the manager. The oheok will be mailed direot to Toa oa Ootober 1. Martin �Active '>l Auoc. New Renew S!>Onsor DATE Mem ber Address 140 W . S ECOND SOUTH ST . e.\"n",.~fr.. I1... \ ....~.o""~~." . ~. ,r:J.ly,,, Iv LOL.r. 'lJ.~{) ..~,4"""",io.,\ S ALT LA K E C I TY 1, UTAH Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER to _______ .__ __ ____ ) ,. L ines ADVERTI SI NG LIS TING $. __ Sec. SPO NSORSIU P GRANT o~ $ .......O....... ~ t~~, "< T~c'i:I r.\\M;\F~.-. $.39.Q.~ The undersigned ME MBER hereby au th oriZc'O s pUb lica t io n of b a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the" P appea rs e l ow Field Representative a nd subj ect to all T ERM S and CO NDIT IONS contai ned here i~"~___~========:::C:=======~=--_J ~ , ( Line I ) ( Line 2) The purch a s~ QI LI:JTINOS!n the 89' er BI:.ocHURE sha ll be Illnlted to "Actlve" And ··As."cl .. te ·' l.!E!\'fBERS 01 the M'ers I nternational HllI'hwaJ' Association. Inc. and "S:><","o","' All subject to the lollowln~ Urm. and co:>dltlotl$. Whercu. distrIbution 01 the BROCHURE and the re.ullinK benellts Irom IIstinu published thereIn will ~xtend ""er " tw" Y~"r perIod. PRESENT memben are required to par dues In adv~"c e throuKh and includlnK the entire clliendar Year Of 1958. NEW lind FORMER members arc required to paY dues tor twn lul1 Years In IIdvance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membe rshi p. _ $1S.00: Associate Membership _ no.co which fee shall IIlso Includ e FREE DISPLA Y LISTING In all .-ditlons 01 th~ ~:;~~be~!~t!~ERSHIP /0\ / ' .' fJ !lOSTER published durin. the t erm ot i Uch Associate .~DVr::RTISING RATES ;. L' ~ tl!.:.u In Directory 01 ··SER.VlCES AND ACCOli . ODATIONS" MOTEI.B (per Un.) $I per unit; MinImum rate. no • MaxImum ute. S50. othe< bu slneu clusWcations. $30 per Une. SPONSORS · Fl n ane!"l Krant of UOO or more Includes U. tlnK of name In proper seetlon 01 BROCHURE The 89'ers Int~mlltlonal HllI'hway AssocIation . Inc. lIuauntec. that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIsUng as It appears abOve wU! b. publ1.hed In not less than SO.OI){l copies ot the 89·.r BROCHURE to be dbtrlbuted du rlnl the periOd bc!twt'C" October I. 19~7 and J)(ocember 31. 19~. The ASSOCiation reserves Lhe rla ht to edit copy. and reject photoHaphs Or other art work deemed uns uit _ rl~1:1 1~~r~~~~ltY reproduction In the BROCHURE. Rnd 10 reVIse and alter th . /.. ~~thorIZ"dh ____ . _._...... -~-;..-.--- .-,*:-rt......,...,.,.Tv:---71F: VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT B I NDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED I N PRINTED TEXT "MuST B"E CLEARLY I STATED B£LOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE B Y THE ASSOCIATION. NO CAR BON REQUIRED Use Ball P", nt Pen MEMBeR �N•• Active sponsor DATE Member ••••>....... .. ...~.~ __ ._ ~ -u.J.. .. Addre ss HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Dues L --- ........ ) to »-...... , SALT LAKE CITY 1. UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER 9/1 IS? ADVERTISING LISTING Sec ........ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publ ication of a LI S TI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the " COPY" appears below and subject to all TERM S and CON DITION S contained herein. •• SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lines $ ····.;.O.. ···... ·,J.:... · .. T€)TAb Rec'd By ....u ...... - "'mi ld , ......... .. .~ .. ....... Repre8entative (Lin e I) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) S PONSORS HIP LI S TI NG (Name Only) ...::: . ~ .:; _ _',__ ! ' -' _ ... (.'l.4Q •.. .,.-- .... J,.. .. -.• .., -- I . .. . - ............. Whereas, dist ribution of Ihe BROCH URE and Ihe reSultln;- bene fits fron, HsUnn pubUshed thneln ",111 u tcnd over a too·o fu r J><!rlod. PRESENT m~bers arc required to paJ' dues In adv~nce throu~h and lncludln~ the entir e calendar J'ear 01 19~. NEW and ~'ORIIIER m embe rs ue required to pay dues for two full r eus In advance . ANInlAL DUES: Active Membershi p. • $15.00: Associ a te McmberMllp _ $50.00 which fee all.U alsG Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edlttons 01 th~ 89'or MEl.1BERSHIP R.OSTER pubU. hed during Ihe term of sueh A.!-Socla( e Membership. ~ . ... Autho,lud , . • .' . , BY ·-_._._._~..-..:ll"--'-..:.. ..J....I.._....... t , IF U, t -'.LY-'--"'_"...;L.__ -'-·_. ______._. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE' NOT BINDING - AGRE'E'l>lENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST B E CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. l r<l.. C) nsor hip 0 i ·turf! to ue __• __ _............. .. ADVERTIS ING RATES:. LIst lnn In Dlr e~ t ory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM • GDATIONS" MOTL'LS (pu nn e) $1 ...,r unit: Minimum rate. no _ M..:dm um r.'te. $50. Other busin ..... c1asslflcaUons, no per Un c. SPONSORS· Pln.neh.l ; rant 01 $100 or mor ~ Includes IIstlnl 01 n a m e In pro...,r """tlon of BROCHURE. The 89'er$ ln l~ rnation a l Hl,h,..ay A.snclatiOn. Inc. luarantees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ilst!r.g as It a ppears above "'lll be pubUshed In not Ie$/; than ~.ooo copies of Ihe Sg' e, BROCHURE 10 be dlstrlhuted durin, th~ perIod bel .. ccn October I. 1957 and December 31. 1958. The Associa tion r eserves the rli"ht to edit COP~ . .. nd reJecl photographs or other art work deemed unsult. able for Qu ality reproduction In the BROCHURE. and · 10 rev!..., ftnd alter Ih~ fin al format. J.~ 0 01 The purchase of LISTINGS In th e U'er llROCHURE shan be Ihnlted to "Acth'e" .. nd "Associate"' ~fIo;M BER8 of th e 89'ers In tematlonal H!l:h"'n~ Auoe!Mlon. I nc . .. nd "'Sponsors, " Rn subject to the follo",ln" terms a nd conditions. 3 lected NO CARBON RllQUffiEO Use Ball POint Pen 4 f~ ... nishe~ Y by ~ onso~ ME'MBEIt �o 'SSE ? ??,? ncr 7 T EDMONTON ALaERTA L AND DIVISION of l'illmonton I called baok on Mr. Rault before he mailed my copy of this letter to Bal~ Lake. I will get the origina l from Ernie and attach to order in my file. I gave Mr. Rault the invoices, and the check is being mailed direct to you ••••• Martin SaptebeJo 16th, 1957. M Ernest S. Saran, r. Vice-President, 89'era International S809 Ka~ Trail, CA lGARY, Alberta H1ghv~ Ass 'n., Inc., OeAr M Sararu r. It you 'WOUld torward an invoice, in dup- licate,, to thlo O ttica tor an ..ount ot $300.00 tor a one page picture in the "Boulevard ot National Parka", .... would be pleased to a ppro" that _oW'lt tor Plt)"llent. Youra sincerely, No-.. A. Rault, DIII8CTOR CC - M Hartin H. Cantw r. eU, 140 W est Secon:1 SOUth St., Salt Lalcol City 1, Utah • .. LL S "Lln. I,..' II ... TH ( ,,..0 PRICE . Ti:Il1o! S .. ,..0 CQ,..OITIO,.. •• ' '''"JECT TO R[ ' ~ .. NO ...... RQV .. L COU,..CIL OR CITY CO/ol/olIS. ,O,..[II . ... T .. ,.. ... T!/01[ w'T ,.~U T ,..OTICE �Acll ve NeW ) Member Addrc!l.\l 1-'0 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER 1) ( Li" Z) Qfh~1ILl{(",W91,,\' LPIa:'P' ..X\~~ ,'3:".j,l to ~' f:1. ) . . .'•.~'I'.~.~O ~\JJ bo J ADVERTISING LISTING ""'.£,,~~ ~ $ ................1. ......... SPONSORSKlP GRANT Line.!! .. ~ ......... _ Th e undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publicatio n of a LI STING in th e 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and sub jec t 10 all TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein. ( L i" Rfne ... $......... TOTAL Rcc'd By ................................ $,7S..~. ~ Field RCWC8cntativ6 P l'tN. .... J\.b\i, ..R\cn.N..... r..A.f;>:T. ~L::... Af\.f\ ... .B.!Y\Q .... , ..I,$ ...... \~.,:\. ...)..j!.).L. .. "'\:,t ..~J . ...0,1: .. . .Y,.,." .'t;" ..~Q, ..6.. . K·,'\.(.. t:!. ...! .I... .'C."·~ ·"'. ·y ·lI.h"."..~,....T •.iI..,..... .eo··P!g..~· .. ·~·.",Il·r ....· ' (Line 3) SPONSORS HIP LI ST ING (Name Only ) The pureh u. of LISTIN091n the U'e. BIWCHURE . han ~ IIml\ed 1(1 "A\:tlve" a nd ··l&.UOc:llle" MEMBERS of the ag'er$ I nternational IIIlh ...., Aasncl.Uon, Inc . • nd "SpOt\SGta." a ll lubJect to the 10110.11'11 term, and condition •. Wher..I, dllt ribullon of lI't BROCHURE a nd the re."lttnl lIenelill f rom UaUnu Pllblilhed therein .111 u\end o,'er 0. t ..o JUt JH!rlod. PRESENT memilera Ire reQUITed 10 Pal du el In .dun~e Ihroufh and Incllldlni the enllre catendar tur o f 115., NEW and FORMER member. a re reQuired to pu' dues for ,"'(1 full ,e... In adunce. ANNUAL DUES: ACtive M.m~Tlhlp, - "5.00: Msoelue Membe rlhlll • no.oo ... hlch fee lb.aU al$O Inelude PREE DISPLAY LISTiNO In . 11 e<lllion. ot the U'n MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publtlhed durin. the te rn of s uch Auocto.te Ne m~rahlp. ADVERTlSINO RATES : _ Wlli n .. In DI. e~ t(lry ot "SERVICES AND AceO:.!ODATIONS" ~IOTELS (JH! r Une) II per unil: Minimum nte. taO - N nwurn ,.' e . no. Other bU li n eM c1a MLflcatlonl, UO JH!' line. SPONSORS - PLDan~ h.1 na nt of 1100 or mOrs Includes nlUnl of n l me In PnlJH!r .ceUon of BROCHURE. Th e 89'uI In\unatlon a l Hllh .. ., ANOelaUon. Inc. S UlTantetl that the :.tE~flIER·S or SPONSOR'S UltLns .. It a pJH!ua above wm ~ pubU.hed In not leM Itun ~,OOO copies ot the 19'er BROCHURE 10 ~ dllt rlbllted du.rlPlr th e JH!rlod ~t"'Cfn Oetobft I. 1&~7 a nd ~em~r 31, 19~. The AAIOCIMlon rese rVe. the .llhl (I edit ~OPY • • nd rcjlOd phOlotro.ph. or otbtof. ... r,t; U~ d IIn.ultable for QU RlI(J rep roduetiot\ In tile BIlQQ ~~oJ.Jt~. alter Ih t tlnal for t. Tj A~ A~1 f'IH r ".;"rri I . '''''II'' AUlho BY d • • •. _= _._ MEMBER _--'' / '...... VERBAL AORf:!:)lENTS ARE NOT R I~DlNG - AOREEMENTS NOT IN OED IN RINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY t STATW BELOW, St1B.1!:CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TH E ASSOCIATION, ~ NO CARBON REQUIRE'[) Use B.l! hint Pen I �Active Sl>onsor DATE J 16 M ember Add"" 14() W . SECOND SOUTH ST. ...0\. ~.. 1~/\D+(?L L."':13.J,\\O .L"oh'1.JH:\:.I I 3 D I D "'l S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L .............. &,. \.J,,~.\ ..:,h Lines ... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 8!J'E,R BROCHURE as th e "COPY" appears below and subjec t to all TERMS and COND ITIONS co nta ined herein. (Line I) .... ~QI).T.\c\...~i:::\. . l.\\. ..ly\ . O .T.[l. \-c:\ -'r' tll/Pr' to ··'ti"ii . ..lSdl..P. .. ADVERTISING LISTING •....:::I..QJ ..C.Q ... SPONSORSHIP GRAN'l' $ .. .. L ... TOTAL Rec'd By .d,/I?~'i.:f:!.- Field RClll'csentative , , ... y\f\ ..B.... P:.. MA ... ~ ... C\t.~ .J-," . \:t.l .1:1.""'67: (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) The I>urcha"" 0: L1S1'INOS In the 89'er BROCHURE shall be llmlled 10 "Acl!\'e" and "Assoclate "' MF-MEERS of th e 89' ers Int e rnnllonal Hlllh ... ay A..oda llon, Inc . and "SpOnson:' ~11 subj ect to the fol1oo.-ln ll terms and cond!tlons. ADVERTISING RAT".:s: _ Listln c. In Olrcctorf at " SF.RVICES AND ACCO!'!. ODATIONS" MOTELS (pe ' lin,,) $1 per unit: MlI,lmum rat e, no _ Maximum nte. 150. Other bu s ines.~ dus lt leHlons. 130 !>tr line. SPONSORS _ Pluanelal Krant of 1100 or mo re Includes Il~tlnll ot name In I>ro!>t r ••,dlon 01 BROCHURE Whereas. dl.otrlbuUon at the EROCHURE and t h e result'n~ bcnetlU Iron' lIstlnn published therein ..·m ~~tcnd ovCr a two n ar perIod. PRESENT members Are required to I>af du es In advance throUllh and Inc1udlnll the entire calendar year ot 19~8. NEW and f'OnMF.R mcmbcn are required to Pa]I' dues tor t ..'o tull years In a dvance. The U'cr8 I nUrnational HI l h"'kf A•• ocl atlon. Int. IIU'!;rBntecS that the l>I E~mER'S o. SPONSOR'S llstlr.g B. It a ppean abo"e will be publiShed In n Ot Ie.. than 5-0.000 co ple.~ 01 the 119'u BROCHURE to be dlstrlhuted durlnll the !>trlod bet"'e~n Oclober I. U57 and IJo!,cember 31. I!H;'8. Th e Aasoclatlon ruerves Ihe .IIM to edit copy. a.nd reject photQfraph . or! oth er art work deemed un5ult _ able lor o.UkUtY reproduetlon In Ihe BROCHURE ,- a n d 10 re,'I"" Rnd Rit er thr tlnai format. ~--.;I..' ANNUAL OUf.;$ : Acti,·c Membersblp. - US.OO: M . oclate McmberShlp - .~. OO which lee shall also Include f "nEE: OISPLAY LISTING In all edition . ot tb" Author ized . 89' .. MEMBERSHIP ROST~'R publi shed durln~ Ihe t er m or s uch Associate Member.hlp. BY ,....... ~ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY TilE ASSOCIATION. . ~~~ - ~~ __ ~ C~:-7-.~"':'1 ..- ';~" ~~;';TED-" ~'~'~-~~~~;~~ C~~ R:~--:" --'-----' NO CARBON REQUIRED U ... ERn Point Pen MEMBEIl �r AcUve Sponsor • 'I. .J .;../f" DATE ...... Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH 81'. SALT LAKE CITY 1. UTAH Dues !~~2,1?2",l, .....~. ) ,"1fi..7 to '1/55.) •J ;',.Q 0. Lines ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADVE TISING LISTING s..3,Q.,.. t ..!'? .. ..". SPONSORSIllP GRANT S.. __ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDitiONS contained herein . (Line 1) ... [b .t '\\,Q ...M .D .IEL .... H,I:-!\.~ ...: ..A.\-\I;\,-: .....~ .;I::~. \,,\"'. \+..S . I ..\t"~...?. ..c .. .T..v. , .................. . ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH IP L ISTING (Name Only) The purchase or LISTINGS' In th~ 89'c r BnocHURE shall be llmUed to "Active" and "Auoclatc" MF."f BERS ot the 89'cu Interna Uonal Hlll hwar AssoclUlon. Inc. and "SPOI'lSOf$," aU subject 10 the [ollo ..'J" 1I terms and conditions. Whereas, dis tribution of the BROCllURE and the resultlllll' belld!l s frolll Hstlll u pUbHshed therein ,..m ext elld o,'er B 1"'0 1'e.. r pertod, PRESENT members are reQuired to PaY due. III ad"ance throus h and Includlni the enUre calenda r year of 1958. Nl:W a nd PORMER member . are requIred to pay due. for 1"'0 full HU. In advance. ANNUAL DUES; Acth' e MembershIp. _ lI ~.OO: Associate Membership. UG.OO IIIhlch tee shaH al. o Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltloll5 of the 89' e r MEMBi!:R8!IJP ROSTER uubUshed duriniii' Ihe lerm of . uch Associate MembershIp, ADVERTISING RATES:_ Ll $ tln~ $ \11 Dl reotory Of "SERVICES :'ND /lOCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS (per IIl1e) $1 per unit: MInImum rale. $30 _ Maximum nt e. 150. Olher busin ess cl ... ~lflea~lOIl$, $30 per Une. SPONSORS _ Plnanelul II rant of $100 or mOr~ ]ncludl'5 IIstlllll' of lI a me In proper .eetloll of BROCHURE. The U'ers International Hlllhway Assoc latlon, Inc. IUarantcu that the !>fE~IBER'S or SPOS$OR 'S ll . tlnl as It appears a bo,·. "'Ill be pubH5hed In not Ie.!;/; than ~O.OOO caples of the 89' er BROCHURE to be distrIbuted durin; the pe riod bet,,'u ll October I. 1951 and Dec ember 31. I&~. The A."ocl a tlon reserves the rlKht to edIt COPY. a nd rel""t nbototrrapbs or other a rt lIIork deemed un.ult_ able for quallty reproduction In Ihe BROCHURE. and to revI se and aiter t he Ilna! forlllat. /1 ~~th~~~:~_..VCL _ ._.(:___ . ~_~..;. __ .!::..:._~-:! ._ _ ~ VERB ... L AGREE!>IENTS AR£ NOT BINDINO - AGRE£M£NTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLI!:ARLY : STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIR'-'D Use a a ll PoInt Pen MEMBt:R �BENTLEY MITCHELL neal' Bentley: Seot. 23 1957 **.*****l* ** **** Attaohed is report. What a ~hame I had to drop everything right when the going was getting good. Have oonsiderable more good potential in Southern Alberta. W ill do what I oan tomorrow and Wed., and will then have to head for Afton, and probably come baok up here for a week atter the convention. Have been running around in circles the last few days, and the only real desire I have right now is to sleep for about a week •• obut no such luoko You will note that I have requested commissi on payment on the two Edmonton oontraots oontained in this report. Both have bee. verified, and oheoks being ~iled. If faot would'nt be surprised if you have already reoeived the. 300 from Edmont on City. Expeot to arrive in Afton Saturday or Sunday, and if possible would like to have the check waiting tor me there. W ill give yo u a phone oall from Afton soon as I size up the situation. \f\K �Active ASOIOC, Now Renn' Sponsor OATE Member Add ress HO W, SECOND SOUTH ST, S ALT LAKE CIT Y I , UTAH Dues L" ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L ines " ADVi'JRTISING L ISTING s.o, SP ONSOHSHIP GRANT The undersigned ME MBER hereby au th orizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appea rs below and subjec t to a ll TERM S and COND ITIONS contained herein. ---_._---) • • • TOT AL Rcc'd By .......... Field RCIJre8Cnta!iv6 $ ... ................ ( Line \ ) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) SPONSORS HIP LI STI NG (Name O nly) The pureh","" of LIST1N08 In Ih~ 8~'e, BHOCHURE shall be limited to "Active" and "AS$OClate" MEMBERS of th e 89' era Intunatlona] Hl,h.-ay Auoclatlon, Inc. and "5I>OnOor.," all lubi..,t to the lollo.-lnl t er ms and condltlon5, Whereas, dl.st . JtmUon of the BROCHURE and Ihe resu]Unll' wneflU from 11.thlU publl! hed therei n .... m ~xtend ever 0. t ..'o u ar period, PRESENT mflnbe.s are reQuired to pay due$ In o.dvance throu, h and IncludlnJ Ihe entire calendar yur 01 1958, NEW a nd FORMER m~mb e u are reQuired to Pal dues tor t"'~ full Ynr. in advance. ANNUAL DUES: Aoth'e Membe rship . • U ~,GO: A,!.SOCia l e Memberahlp _ $[,0,00 which tee Shall . 1.0 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edltlono of t h~ publis hed durin, th e te,m of SUch Associa te Membership, 89'e" MEMBImSHIP R08TER ... OVE RTISING IUTES : _ LI~Un u In Olrc ~tor y or "SERVICES AND AOCOM_ ODATlONS'" MOTf:LB ,per lin e} $I per unit: :o.lInlmum rate. no _ Mulmur.l fBte, I SoIl. Other b~ s ln e.." cla.slfltaUOM, 130 per Une. SPONSORS _ Plnanch. 1 nant ot I}oo Or mOre Include. HsUnll' ot name In proper .edlon of BROCHURE. The Sg'eu Int._ matlona] HllI'h",a y Association. Inc. l uarantees that the M~ER'S or SPONSOR'S H.llng .. It a ppears above ",III be publJahed In not le.5 thnn MI,OOO cop ies at t he 89'cr BROCHURE to be d istribut ed durlnll' t he period bet ..·.en October I. 1957 Rnd ~..,nber 31. 1958. TIl t A. ""elation reser V e3 the rlrht to edit copy, and reject photona ph. or other art work deemed Ul1!Ultable tor Quality reprodUction In th e BROCHURE, Rnd to re vise a nd alter lht tln al format , Authorlud B Y _ _ . ___ ._ _ . _ _ _ _____ .. ____ _ _ ______ _ __ _____ ~. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT SINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUOED IN PRINTED 'TEXT MUST SE CLEARLY ! STATEO BELOW. SUSJECT TO ACCEPTANCE SY THE ASSOCIATlON. This is a sample of the advertising cmtra.ct fonD. ..e are vaing NO CARBON REQUIRED use s . n Point P en MEMBeR �Now Ac~lv e S])On.$O r Rene '" M'mb';~~<l\\Hd~~=!,"\. Address b.1.~.. 1}1."~~:\n ~ ~.t...~:1. ..... to ...............l · TRfl I\.- e\T C:-o 1: N .. Sec. ~-=. SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL R ,,'d B y ! .. ,(gOCJo., . $... .......... ~W\~ll] . lao Field Re presentative C f1fr_:- ~l'''''~'1 .. "'j. . Q"'\'" )\, .. ~.,.. \±C\ \,q. . f.l",.. ', "' 1 .. $ .... ADVERTISING LISTING Lines ..1:. ......•.......... The undersigned MEMBER he re by authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROC HUR E as the "COPY" a ppears below and s ubject to all TERMS and CON DITI ON S contained herein . (Line 2) .. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER (Line I ) ..... Dues L . H{) W . SECOND SmITH ST. )ok th s , 1\.Ix . (~",J.~ .;: ""1- ""L 'Mt!. J..~ "..'3,. :h~ (Line 3) SPON SORS H IP LI STING ( Name Onl y) Th ~ I>urchase 01 LISTINOS in (he 89' •• BltOCHURE s ha ll lit! limited to "AeU~ e " lind " A.soclate" MF.MBERS 01 the a9'e" s I nternatlonal H I Khwn AMOclatlon. I nc. and "SpOnoors," all subject to th e lo!lowlmr term. a n d cond itions . ADVERTISI NO RATES:. Listlnu In Dlrector1 ot "SERVICES AND ACCOM . ODATIONS" MOT ELS ( i>\'r line) $I per unit: Minimum rate, 130 • MaJI:lmUl!"l I"IIte , $~. Olhe r bu sineS$ cl usltlc ation • . $30 per line. SPO NSORS _ Flna nel~1 crant ot noo or more Includes 1I01l<lIr of n a me In prope r se<:~lon of BROCHURE. Wherea. . dlst r lbutlon 01 the Bf'. .ocHURE a nd the •• • uliin.. benellt . irom ll. tln u I>ublll h e d thueln ",m .xtend over II two ,.aT J)erlod , PR ESENT me mber. a re required 10 Pll1 due. in advance IhroUKh and Includlnlr the enti re calendar yeat of 1958. NEW .nd FORMER membeu are required 10 PRY dun tor ~ ... o tull yea r. In a dvan ce. The 89' ors In ternational Hlz h ..·.1 A......,lallon , I nc . IrUBrantees ~h a t Ihe ME"~mER'S or SPONSOR'S listing as It a ppea r. a l>ove wm be publlohed In not less ~h .. n ~.OOO copi es 01 the 89·e. 8ROCHURE to be dl. trlbute<!. d urlnl t h ~ period bet,,·.en Octobe r 1. 1951 and Dtccmbe r 31, 1958. The Ass...,latlon reser VeS th e righ t to edit COHo and reject ohotolrr. ph. or othet art work dee med u nsultIIbl e tor Quallf.:j· r eproduction In t·he SROCHURE. ~ nd to revise and alter the fina l fo rma t . ANNUAL DUES: A.th·e Membershlp. ·1 15.00: AlISOClate Membership _ $50.00 wh ich tee s hall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In RI! editions or th~ ::~~be~~~~ERSHIP ROSTER /lu bl bhed durlnl the te rm 01 such A.'IlI...,IR! e ~ ~\hi¢:d _ _ L_. ___ .. _.. _ _ ,..._:..!_.!..-::!:...., c_:....W..~-k:L.. ____ _ 1. VERBAL AGREEl'>II;;NTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGR EE MENTS NOT INCLUD ED I N PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. S UB= TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ~SSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUURKD Use B a l! Pol nl Pen MEMB£R �1 N•• Rene .. Sponsor Member Address SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH !fO W . SECOND SOU'l'H ST. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines ....b Dues L .......... _.. to ............... ) ADVF.RTISING LISTING C't .. ~ "'I 1 SPONSORSHIP G RANT ............. Sec. 'i.I..oJJ....•_ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authoriz.es the publication of a LI STING ill the 89'ER BROCHURE li S the "COPY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND IT IONS contained herein . •··········..·······0-·0 • $.......- ....... 1 ....... TOTAL Rec'd Fwld Representative . . . . ~o22 ................ :s. l'..\hl:..\\.. \J"f.l.+, ..J..{ .. \, ...~ ... h ..... .... ,1 ........ ~'~S .. cl..: ,. ........ ~.Ih.. ....................... s ..... ~~._._ ...us.J ..~ . ~.~ ~ ~ \.V~.. .-._ .... ~ ...... --'t ........~.i ...C\O.... X'-..~....._...~ .....J... ~·.~ ...W:'..~ .......,. ................ . ¢ .' (LI"e I ) .... (Line 2) $ ................. , I .• . ... • . .. ....... .. (Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LI ST ING ( Name Onl y) The p'lrch ase 01 LISTINOIJ In the U' tr BnocHURE ' h i ll be limit ed to " Actlve" Ind ··Auocl.te" "'IK\lBERS of Ih e 19' tr. ">t emaUona l HllI'h .. IY ASSOC ll tlon. Inc. Ind " 8pOnSOn..' · a U s ub).ect 10 the fono.-In ; urm. I nd condltlons. Where... distribution of the SnocHUR& I nd t he ru ulUn J benefit. from II,Unn publlo.hed therein .. m Ul t nd ""er I 1." '0 Jta r period. PResENT membeu a re reoulred to IOU dues In a dva nce Ihrou .. h Ind Inel .. dln.- th e ellllre caltndn ~ear of 19~ . N£W and FORMER members n e required to pay du e. for t ..n lull Yen , In "dunce. ANNUAL DUES: ACtive Membership . • n~.oo: Associate MemberShip • 150.00 .. htch tee 'ha ll .. t.w Include FREE: DISPLAY LISTINO In IU edltlonl of the 89'or MEMBERSffiP ROSTER pubH, hed durln~ the term of . uch Assoc ia t e Memberl hlp. ADVERTISINO RATES:. List Lnn In D!rtctotJ ot "SERVlCES AND ACCON· ODATIONS" MOTI."L8 (per Hne) n per unit ; Minimum Ult. $141 - ),Inlmu", u t • . $:;0. Other bu&Il\t1l3 claostflu Uon l, no per SPONSORS· PIn.nelal " a nt of 1100 Or mo. e I.. dud.." II,Un.- 01 n a me In proper oect lon of BROCHURE. The It·er. I nttm ulona l HI.b .. I Y Au oell Uon. Inc. • .. a rlnl _ Ih .. t tile :\1£)fBER'S Or SPONSOR'S IIstl"" I. It I PIle" ' 1 above .. 1tI be publtl hed In not Ie.. ~hu> $O.GOO cople, of the 89' er BROCHURE to be dll UI l>uted durin, the period bel"'e~ n October 1. 1951 And ~cember 31. 19~ . "I1>e Auocll Uon r eserve. the rl' hl to edit COPf. a nd reject photo~r a l>h . Or Plher .. rt " 'ork deemed un sult· able for QUAlih rt PrOduclion In the BROCHURE. and to rut ile a nd alter thr final forma t . II.... Au thorized BY W --~~~-J+....,A.:r;- __ t-;-J'_ _ MEMBr.n VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO ~ AORE£M£NT6 NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJ"ECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY TKJ: ASSOCIATION. .s ~ -3C'" - ~C b off NO CARBON Rl!QUlREO UN Bin Poillt ~n �• "'etlve SpOnsor ASiOC. Address HQ W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:" ~ SPONSORSHIP GRANT Th e unde rsigned MEM BER hereby authorizes the publicati on of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appea rs below a nd s ubject to all TER MS and CONDITI ONS con ta in ed herein. ( U ne I ) TOTAL R ec·d $ BY 'Kwi~~ Field Representative Q.!1.,j .ollJ\Cr\ .(!.o.t-lDC .D..... G.B.(',l\(,- .t ...:::..H.n.Hl..e,.... <!.att...... Q 1'f'Jr...... 01.:is.. . ( Li ne 2) (Line 3) S PON SORS H I P LI ST ING (Name On ly) ... .. Th e purchase of LISTINOS' In the 89'~r lUtoCliURB shall be limited to .. ""tlv." and "Ass""l.t,," MEMBERS of th" 89'''"5 Internat!on~l HI~h"' Rf ASSOCiation. Inc. and ·'SJ)OnsoT!." RH subject to Ihe foUow!" .. terms and condition •. Wher~u, dlnrlbullon of Ihe nRQCHURE and the result in; bendl! _ fron' ll.tlnu pabUs h ed therein wlll utend "vcr " h'o yu r Jl<'rlod. PRESENT members arc required to pay due. In advance thrnU llh and Includlnor th e entire calendar Yeu 01 19~8. NEW and FORMER member ~ are re-<lulred to p n du es lot ~"·n full years In advonce. ANNUAL DUES: Act"·. Membership . • U5 .00: As.soclat. ","mbeuhlp _ '50 .00 ,,·hleb f•• $hall abo Include PREE DISPLAY LISTINO In a ll editions 01 th~ 80·er ME!-.1.BERSHIP ROSTE"R publlsh ed durln l the term of such ... .!SOClat e Membership. ADVERTISING RATES :. LbUnu In Dlreetou or ··SERVICES AND ACCOM_ OD ... TIONS· · MOTELS (lH' r lind $I per unit; Minimum r<&t e. no _ Maximum late. Othe r busln."" clas.meatlonl. $30 per Une. SPONSORS _ Pinanc\u\ nant of '100 or mnr e Include. !lstlnE 01 name In proper section of BROCHURE. The 89·er~ Internallona1 Hl .. h,,·ay ..... oelatlon. Inc. oruarantee. that the MEMBER·S or SPONSOR·S HsUr-1;" U I~ appears above will be publiShed In not less than !>(I,OOO capl e. of the 89· . r BROCHURE to be dist ributed durlnor tho period be~wecn Oetober 1. 1951 a nd December 31. 1958. The Assocla Wm r.snve. the rl~ht to edit coP)". and reject pho~ocraphs or other a rt work dumed un.ult_ ;;~l:l tt~r~~~~ltY r eproduction In the BROCHURE. and to r evise . "'\ a ite r lht 'SO. .. Aulhorlud . ---t~ -.--J4..-._ .1 _.~_- >Y , .(£A&. ...- ...L.:..-rL ...<__ ._.___.__ _ -.. VERBAL AOREEMENTS ... RE NOT BINDINO - AGlU:EMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLE ... RLY : ST ... T ED BELOW. SUBJECT TO "'CCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CAR BON REQUIRED Uu Ball Point Pen MEMBI:R �Sponsor AcUve Member 14(1 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. om 8/15/5 hi . ~ ..1.rk.!:;_ a n __~. ~L ... _ b.Cl'. ...0 ._....:: .0...:.....1 ::,_ .. c SALT UKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER $-- . ADVERTISING LISTING Lines Sec. .... to .............. .l ................... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the S9'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS con tained herein. $.. SPONSORSHIP GRANT L .., .~ ....Q... t TOTAL Rec'd By ........ $ .... Field Representative (Line 1) 7 ····· ···· · · · ·•·•.·.. . . . (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) The purchase or LISTINGS' In th~ 89· e r BROCHURE s hall be Hml\ed to ··Actlve'· a nd ··Anoelate ·' MF.MBERS of th e 89' eu Interna tlon a ] Hill'hway A..oclatlon. Inc. and ·'SPOnsou,,· all subject to the followlnll terms and conditions . Wher eas. distribution of the BXOCHURE a nd the ruul\ln l ben efit . fcom Us tlnu publ!shed therein will ~xtend ovec a two f U r peclod. PHESENT member. ace reuulred to PnY dues In advance throuah and Includln K the entire calendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMER member. are reuulred t o paf du~s for t~' a full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Active Mel1lb ~ rshlp. - $1 5.00: ASsociate Membec.hll> - S5O.CO which f.e shall al$<l Include FREE DISPLAY LiSTING In all edition s of th~ 89·cr MEMBE'RSHIP ROSTl."R publl shed durin'!" Ih e term of . uch AS30elale Memb~uhlp. ADV ERTISING RATES;. Li. tlnu In Dlr.~tor1 or "SERVICES AND AOCOM_ ODATIONS" MO'tJ'.'I.8 ( per line) $I per unlt: MinImum rat e, Madmu"" no _ rate. 150. Other business cla s.lflcatlona, 530 per line. SPONSORS _ Flnanc!al ~ can~ of $100 0. more Includes nlUn. of nam ~ In prop(" section of BROCHURE. Th e 89·crs lnt ~rnatlonal HIlJhway AssoclaUon. Inc. aua.anlees that the MEMBER-·S or SPONSOR·S USU". as I~ al>pears a bove ..·m be l>ubHShed In no~ less than 50.000 cOl>les or the 89·er BROCHURE to be dt.trU,uted durin&" th~ period bet"·ecn October I. 1957 and n ec ember 31. 1958. The Association rese "·u the right to edit COI>Y. a nd rej ec t photoi:ral>hs or othn art work deemed unsuit able for <luaUt, reproduction In th e BROCHURE. and 10 revi se and alter \ hr final format. t Co,.-ni ·t Authori zed BY ____ ...•. .J.~url•.• __ .. ~ _ _ ~ .• _~_~ .. _.~ ____ ~ .• ____ •._ _ _~ •. ___ ~ MEMBeR VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING ~ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACC EPTANCE lIY 'rHE ASSOCIATION ... .J: 150.00 tc be _n" i o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ba ll Point Pen 0_ c u, 21, 1,57 I �Acllve o Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues 1 Lines ... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADV ERTISING LISTING s." SPONSORSffiP GRANT Q~a!."'V The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publication lP f a LI STING in th e 89'£.R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appears below and subject to all TERM S and CONDIT IONS con tained herein . (Line I ) TOTAL Rec'd By """{;t~;f.-t:n.~",,wrl$­ Field Representative .f\ MlLQRH.:t_... /'!1 tnf.L'c.:">, C:,-\ ......~.~1;~.. 1I"L.3..'6ol4 , .. s;.C\,,>'.q •.. U ~.& .S. ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HIP LI STING (Name Only ) TIl e purchas< of LISTINGS In the 89'er lIROCHURE shall be llm lted 10 "Aellve"' and "'A ... OClal." MY,MBERS of lhe 89·er. InternnUonal HI ~hwRY Association. Inc. and "SpOnsors," ~ll subject to the fo!lOll' lnK t~rms and condlllon., Whereas, distribution of Ih e BROCHURE and the ..sulttnl bendlts trOll' lI.tlnu published therein ",111 utend Over a \1I'0 year period, PRESENT members are r e<lulred to pay due. In ad~ance throu l h an d Indudln;- Ihe entire calendar year ot 1958. NltW and FORMER member! are required to pa 1 dU el tor to!." full yea .. In ~dvance. hNNUAL DUES: hctlve Membership, • U~_OO: Al lIOClat. Member.hl" • 150.00 lI'hlch t ee UlaU a150 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions ot the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl. hcd durlni the term of such AlISOClat e Membership. VERBAL AGREE~tENTS AOV:;':RTISINQ RATES :_ Listln ll$ In Dtreetory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM· OOATIONS"' MOTELS (per lin e) 51 per unit: Mh'imum r ate, 130 _ Maximum rate, $50. Other buslne"'! cls.,.Wcatlon s, no per line. SPONSORS _ Flnanel", ' rant of UOO Or mor ~ Includ e!! Ultln l of name In proper section ot lIROCHURE. Tn. 89'or. Internatlonal HI ~ nwaY h"oclaUon, Inc, I UaUnte •• tnat tne .\fEMlIJi:J{'S or SPONSOR'S listing as It appears a bove "'Ill be publis hed In not 1. ... than SO,OOO coplea of the ag'.r BROCHURE to be dis trIbuted durln;- the ~rlod betw. ~n October I, 1&57 and o.,cember 31, 1058 _ Th e A"oclatlon re •• rves the rllht to edit copy, and rekct " hoto;-raph . or olher art work deemed unsult. able for <lU Uty "production In the B8OCIruRE, and to revise and aiter Iho ~ """ '0'.". Authorized BY ~____ . '-L~ ... ~ • . :7&.. ______ . _ ,...~ ~ hRE NOT BINDINO hGREEMENTS NOT INCLUD IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEhRLY : STATED BELOW, Sl/lIJECT TO ACCEPThNCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen o ____ MEMlICR �Active HQ W . SECOND SOUTH ST. DATE ~I:t-,.,. S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Lines \ ADVJ.::RTJSING LISTING _ ...... __ A~h~E":~:~:~: .:~:::RTlh~~Y ~~h~'~~' theSe;~~ ;~;~ ~ a LI STING ill the g9'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY " appears below and sub ject to a ll TERMS and COND ITIONS con tained herein. (L;n e I ) ... Sponsor SPONSORSHTP GRA?jT / ' ./ TOTAL Rec'd $ .........}'"". BY , , ~ IL. £J' .1:/5:<>.0 F ield. R eprC80ntaUve FtRl..O' ~... K:( <;'I.A\>RJt."IT. " Bg",.'<:.:tO.~. . ::t:h 'l..tJ,~t,QL~ g\~ .·: .·· I((1,'<.\:\'·!;"d ..... . (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSOR SHIP LI STI NG (Name Only) Tht purchase of LISTINGS'ln the 89'., BPvOCllURE Shall be limited 10 "Attl\'c" and ·'.\ssoe!ate" MEMBERS of the 89' ... Int ernational Hl llh"., .\£5O(:I&lIon. Inc . and "Sponsors," all subject to Ih e follo ... lull' terms and condltlo"s. Wherus, distribution Of the SROCIIURE and the resulUnr ben.1l1S Irom llsllnu publl.hed t herein "'Ill ~xtend (Wer a tw" year pertod, PRESEN'T members ace reQuired to J>a, due, In .dunce thrOUllh and Includlna: the enti re calendar y~ar of 1958. NEW a nd FORMER; members aTe re'lulred to. pay dues tor two full years In advance. ANNUAL DUES : Active Membership. _ 115.00: AMoclate Membe rShIp _ '50.00 ..·hlch fee shall also Include FREE DISi"LAY LISTING In all edition. of th~ U·er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER l>ubUshed durln~ the t erm 01 sueh AMoclat. Membership . ADVERTISING RATES:. L lsUnu In Dlr.dorr 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS·· MOTELS (per line) II per unit; Minimum ute. 530 • M ...:lmum rate. $50. Oth er busl" e •• classifications. 530 per line. SPONSORS. Plnancl,,1 lrfant 01 S100 or more lnciudu UsUnw of nam e In proper se.tlon Of BROCHURE. The 89>.<5 I nt r rnatlonal Hhlh way A.-soclaUon, Inc. &-uarantee. that th e l>f E"fBER·S or SPONSOR·B Ustlr.1j" as It a ppear. above wlll be l>ubll.hed In not Ie ..... than 50,000 cople~ or th e 89·.r BROCHURE to be distributed durlnll tbe period betw.~n October I. 1951 and D'9'mber 31. 1958. The AssoclaUon resenes the .llht to o<1lt copy, a nd reject photolf.ph. or olher art work deemed unsull_ a ble for o.uaUt1 TeprodUCUDn! J BROCHURE. and to . e,'I.e an d altu th. ' lnI 'e ! final formal. . ~ < ... ? ' LL~ Authorl ""d , j/ BY ___ ._ ... .. _ . ~ .. _... ._ _._ ... ... __ .. ________ . VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT SINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PIUNTED TEXT '-!.UST BE CLEARLY! STATEO BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE AS8OCIATION o NO CARBON R EQUIR£D US<! B811 Point Ppn o MEMBe R �, Sl)On $Or Active OATE 1'60 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVF.R'I'ISING LISTING Lines ..................... . A~h~E"~::~:~: .:~:::RTlh~~Y ~~h~'~~' the&;~~~RO:; a LISTING in the S!)'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TER,MS and COND ITIONS contained herein. SPONSORSHIP "GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By <.. > $ C/.!. .......! . :?ld:..:~J. $.!1..?:.:~.~ - Jj'wld ReprC8cntative t·~tVJl~·ti ""~~'I,;c~"r,)o~ . c,,,\.c l\'-'\ ..... (Line (Line 2) (Line 3) S.PONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) .. ,··i The purchase ot LISTINQS In the 8g'er BROCHURE shall be llmlted to "Aetlve" Bnd "AsaocIRte" MEMBERS ot the 89'ers Internatlon.1 Hla-h ..·.y A... ocl.lion. I nc. and "Soon$OU," all .ubJed to the followlllil term. and eondltlons. Whereas. dlstrlbutlon of the BROCHURE and the resultlna- benefits f ron' II.U" ... publiShed thereln "'1lI uteI'd over a 1"'0 year nerlod, PRESENT memben are re"ulred to PaY du~s In advanc e th rourh .n d Indud!IUI th e Hlttre calendar ~ur of 1958. NEW Bnd FORMER members ue r Miulred, to pay due. for t~o full yeau In advance. ANNUAL DUES: AcU"e Membersh!p, - US 00. .....50date Membullhlp - '50.00 fee sh. 1l .t.o Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all ed!t1on. of th~ ROSTER publl.hed durlnr the te rm of such A.soclat~ ~hlch ::~~be~~:-;;~ERSHIP ADVERTISING RATES:_ List!nn!n Directory of "SERVlCES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTElS (per line) $I per unit: Mln!mum r.t e, UO _ Muhnum ..aa, 'M. Other bus!ne~ cluslllcaUons. no per line. SPONSORS _ Pinanciul ¥r.nt of P()(J or more Includes Usttnlr of name In proper sectIon of BROCHURE. The U ' ers lnternatlonal Hlih",ay AssoclaUon, Inc. IU&tantua thBt the ~fE~fBER'S or SPONSOR'S !l.tll:;!: u It appears above ",!II be publl.hed In not Ie •• than 50.000 coplu of the 89' er BROCHURE to be dlstrlbute<l durlnr the perlO<! het",""n October I. 1957 and Dt'cember 31, 1958. The A.sool.tlon ruene$ the '!Iht to edit copy • • nd reject photOlro.ph. or other art ~ort' deemed ull$ultable for QuaU!y reproductlon n the BROC ~~ and to re,' k and alter th. ftn . 1 form.t ~~Ih~~~ .~ 'd £, .-' _ _ . _ _:;. _ _ _ VER8AL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT' MUS STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY ' THE ASSOCIATION NO CARBON REQUIR!,'D Use Ball POint Pen BE CLEARLY I MEMBr:R �Active Sponsor Member Addrc.!:l.!:l 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT I..AKE C ITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines .. ~............ . So'C:~'1i SPONSORSHIP GRANT / . The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publica tion 0 a LI STI NG in the 89'ER BROCH UR E as the "CO PY" appears below and sub jec t to all T ER MS and COND ITI O NS con tained herein. ( L;ne I) .. ; ...... .1/.. .. Field Representative £.f\M.D.N.~.... .o.IAQ .~\olf'T()\J.x.\\+: ... (jl..9..Y\:tYIL, ...... ~J"I..t\ ... ~V .." .'0o,\A"".3 ... .r ... ~.yV \.t~ ....... 0o .~~9.'S\..(,.'f...~y.1»). "'\ . "'.~. . .. .......Q..I.>."'.V)"\....~.<I..bLr.\i" . :::s...... ~3::"f,\.K ..S.. "'-"'t\ ... LYI.\ .(n~.h, . . ... ~ . . ~ .I. .... . :> ( L; ne 2) .. ( L;ne 3) ADVERTISING LISTING :::rc'?::\::,.<I..LD .....";;;,.v~" S PON SORS HIP LI ST ING ( N,me Onl y) ....... Q ..Y\ ... .R~"t..I.. ....... ~..\\. ......1f.<tbOo . ~ ............. . The pu.ch ase 01 LISTINGS In the 89· e. BR.OCHURE s hall be I1 mlte<l to "Actin" lind "ASsocillte" MEMBERS of th e 89'e;8 Internatlonal Hl roh"'u Association. Inc. and ·'SlIOnsoro,. · 1111 subject to the 10110"'inll t erms and condltlOna. ADVERTISING RATES,_ Listlnu In Dlroctory 01 "SERVICES ... ND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTi.U (po r lin e) II per unit: Minimum rate, no _ Maxlm lUn ute, tSO. Other bu . ln .... dasslflcatiOn s. no per Une. SPONSORS _ l"Inanclal g rant of $laO or mor ~ Include. IIst!"~ of name In prope r seetin" of BROCHURE. whereas . dlstributlon of the BROCHURE and the r es ultin l lIfcneflt. from l!.Un KS publlshed th er ei n "'m ntend over a t .... n year perlnd, PRESENT member. are reQuired to pay dUe5 In advance throul h and Includlnl the enti r e calmdar fear of 1958. NEW a nd FORMER members are reQuired to pny duu for t .... o ful! yearS In advance. The Sg'ers I nurnaUonal Hli h .... ay "'ssoclation. Inc. ~ u .. rantee, that the ~IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S llstlnl!" as It a ppear. abo ve .·m be published In not less than 50.000 co])le' of the 89· . r BROCHURE to be dl. trl but ed durln~ t he perIod bet,,'cen October 1. 1951 a nd n !"<:t mber 31, 1955. The "'ssociatlon re •• rves the r lllht to edit COpy. and, re ;f photo~nph. o r ot·her art work d ee med unsuIt_ able for Quality rcproduet In th e BROCHURE. and to rc"lse a nd altu the Ilnal format. ... NNU ... L DUES : ... ctlve Membership. - $15.00: ....... oclate Membership _ $50.00 "'hleh fei: shall a lso Include f'REE DISPLAY LISTING In an edil!ons of the 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publis hed durlnl the term of such ... ssoclate Members hIp. AUlhorlted BY ~ _ .. _.. _ <}"1"""'C~U"''\IV'-'''V VERBAL "'GREE~{ENTS ... RE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY ! ST ...TED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ... CCEPT ... NCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. o NO CAR BON REQUI RED Use Bal! Point P en MEMBCR �j'L 8ponsor "'ctlve Member Address 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes a LISTING and subject ( L;", D"" L;n'"L'L:~;i/ ';;l.::\l'\\1".MD1-11.\ _ . ... .......... ~.Q.H) (SI;;] '2,,:\~ ~A: , toO'I~ ) .J ~QO . ~,Q.o ADVJ.JRTISING LISTING theSe;~~;.~~!:~ SPONSORS!;Jl,P GRAI('') N!W, cuJ.'b9-' . . • .. W .... ·. · the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY " appears below 10 all TERMS and CO NDITION S contai ned herein. 111 i) ~}I'\\1.,(,6~:rj:k~A~£L~~'61!Mlsr ... <;:'I'A."'t11-Dl';N~\sz>",eh~~2J,3.~ ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LIST ING (Name Only) Tile pu r ch ase of LISTINOS In th e 89'er BROCHURE shall be lim it ed to "Activ e" and " A..odale" MEMBERS of the 8~' eu Intern a tional HI , h"".,· AJS.SD<:I .. Uon. Inc. and ·'SPOnso rs." a ll . ubject to the folln .. lnl' t erm! and conditio" •. ... DVERTl8INO R,o\TES:. Listln u In DLrectory of "SERVICES ,o\ND ,o\CCOM· OO,o\TIONS" MQTEl.8 (pe r Une) $I I"'r unit: Minimum rat", no . Mulmum rate, 1:;.0. Other hu sl n""" cla ssWe- tion • • no Dtr line. SPONSORS· Flnanel,,1 lTa nt ot $ 100 Or mOre Ine\udes lI . tln~ ot name In proper s ection ot BROCflURE. Wh e re as. distribution of the BROCHURE a nd t h e re. ultj n ~ bendlu Irom lI. tlngs pubUShed th er d n ..ill Htend O,"cr Q two yur I>O'rlod , PRESENT m embers are requ ir ed to P aY du es In adv a nce IhToul h and Includln l Ibe ~ntlre calenda r ea Y r of 1958 . NEW Rnd FORMER membe r. are r eqUired 10 DU' due. for tW(l full years In advance . 89'e , s Internallonal f11 J hw RY ,o\ .s""latlon. Inc. I llauntee, that the or SPONSOR'S lIs tlr. g as It appea r. a bOve wIlL be publls bed In not Ie" tblln 50.000 cop!u of t b e 89' " r BROCHURE 10 be dis tri buted durlnl th ~ period bel", cen Oclober I . 1957 Bnd ~ e mbcr 31. Ina. The ,o\.sueIBtlOn re$trvu the .11 b! to edit copy. a nd reJeet nhOIOl< rBph. or olber art ... ork deemed unsult· ..hie for Qu a lity reproduct ion In tho BROCHURE. and to r C"lse a nd a lter the tln a l fo rmat • ... NNUAL DUES: "'Clh·. Membersblp. • 515 .00: "'S$OCIRte Mrmbcrabip • t50.1J1I ... blcb f ee sball a lso include FREE DISf>L..\Y LISTINO LD a ll edltLons of tb ~ S9'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publLsbed du r lnlr tbe t e rm of , uch .... . ""Lat e Me mbersbl p. Th e ME~fBER'S Autllorlzed BY __ ._ ........ L _.... __ ._ . ____._._ ..~.: :o!. .__:r._ __ ._.._ _ \, ~ .. _ ...._.........._ . VERB,o\L ... OREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NG _ ,o\GREE~lENTS NOT I NCLUDSD IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ,o\CCEPT,o\NCE BY THE ,o\SSOCIATlON. o NO CARBON REQUlR~~ U$t Ball POInt Pen o .... . MEMBER �Aetlv ~ Memb(!r Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ..j 0-....3 (t... Dues L ....... I g S to ··· .. B ······ ) ADVERTISING LISTING Lilies ._ ..__ . ____ ........... A~h~Eu:::~:~: ':~:::RT~~~y ~~h~'~~S th:';:~~~ . /5:, J!{) •....:3>.9 ..1.9 () SPONSORSIDP GR;A,NT "SaO _ _---;._ _..:::::::c..::~~::::::::::..._________' TOTAL Rec'd By Field Representative a LI S TING in the 89'J:R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appears below and subject to all TERMS an d CONDITION S contai ned herein. ( Line \ ) ... (lJ-<'\ L ...... $ ..~.... ....~ . c.. \l,.Pt~'\>.~..",.~ .b"'.~1.;:. b .....h:.&f\ ......W ." ..~·,:\":!\."w.'':\.:'>.+A.\i'\..~..<;.\\~ ..t'stJ!'1 . ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSOR S HI P LI STING (Name Only) Th e purch ase 01 LISTINGS In lh~ 89'''r BltOCHURE Shall be limit ed to "ACtive" and "Assoe late" MF,MBERS 01 the 89'crs lntcrnatinnBI Hllfhwa y "-ssoelatlon. Inc. Bnd "SpOn30U." all subJtct tn ~he fOllow In K t ~ rm s and condItions. Wh erus , distribution 01 the BROCHURE and t he ,es ulUn K benefits fro"" IIstin u published ther ein will utend over a two year period. PRESEN"r membe.. are required to PU ' due. In advance throu ah and Includln K the entlr. calendar 1e u or 1953. NEW a nd PORMER member. are required to pay du u lor two full rears In advane e. ANNU,,-L DUES: "-ctlve Membership. - $15.00: "-.soclal. Membe rship - $50.011 whIch fee shaU aiM Indud e FREE DISPLAY LISTING in a U edition . of th~ 89· e. MEMBE:R.SIIiP ROSTER publiShed dudn ~ the term 01 s uch "-!;SOCIal. Membe .. hlp. ADVER.TISING RATES; . LtSUII IS In O lce<:tou of " SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTh"UI ( per lin t) u per unit : Minimum rat e. no _ Maxlmum I ate. $~O. oth er busln es" da ... lfleaUons , $30 per Une. SPONSORS _ Plnanelal se<:tlo~ o f BROCHURE. The 89'er. lnt ernallona l HI.hwBY A$SodaUon. Inc. ~uauntees that the l>IEMBEJt'S 0, SPONSOR'S Uattr.1O" U I~ appeus abO ve wm b. ,,,,blt.hed In not Ie .... than $(1.000 coplu of the 89'"r BROCHURE to bI! distributed dudn; the pe riod bel"c~n Ocl0be, I. 1957 and D«embe, 31. 1958 ,..n o ,,-ssocl .. tton reserves th e ,IRht to edll coP)" ..... and , .Ject ph01011r&ph. Or other a rt work deemed unl ult_ able for <lualtty up duett0 1n he B:lOCHiiRE. and to r evise a na alter the 7 flnai lormat t' ~ H an! of UOO 0, mOre Includes U. ll'lII: of name In proper " 1 -< ~ "-uthorlzedot .1/ BY ---v-'.. _...4;.._ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ._ VERBAL AOREEMEN"rS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE "-SSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED Uu Ball point Pen o I!- __ __ M E~mCR �Active Member 140 W . SECOND SOUTH ST . SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Lin e s ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER s.,. UJ~ The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes th e pu blica tion of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO P Y" appe ars below a nd subject to all TERM S and CONDIT IONS cont aine d he rein. (Line I SPONSORS HIP GRANT • TOTA L Rcc'd By . Field Represetltatioo ) "-::I5'MoTI.L. - A .l:lfL~?::~)U:-"!l,,,:ts ( Li ne 2) ( L ine 3) SPON SORS HI P LI STI NG ( Name Only) .. .. .. .... ... ... .. . The pu<chase of LISTI NGS In Ihe 89'e, BROCHURE ,hal! .,., Umlted to """tlve" and ",\.o;sodate" MEMBERS of the 89'er, International Hli'hwBY ASMlclatlon. Ine. and ''81101l50<O,'' ..11 Bubject 10 th. foUo",lnl" terms and condItions. Where ... , dlsHlbutl,m or the BROCIIURE and the ,e.uliin. bendlts from llstln n published therein wlll utend over .. two year period. PRESE NT members are reQuired to pay duu In adv l nce throulI'h and lncludlnIO the entire c .. lendar f e .. r of 1958. NEW .. nd FOR~IER members are reQuIred to pay duro for two full yean In IIdvancr. ANNUAL DUES: Acth'e Memb<:rohlp. • $15.00: A!Sociate Membership· $50.00 which tee shall 1.1.0 Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edltlon. of th~ 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durln~ the term o f such A&SOCI .. t. Member.!hlp. ADVERTISI NG RATES:. Llstinn In Directory at "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATION"S" MOTElS (per line) $I per unit; Minimum rate. 136 _ M aximum I"ate. 150. Othe, busluess c!assitlcatlon •• n\l per Un e. SPONSORS. P!nanclul ~ Tllnt Of $100 or more h'clude. U.tln~ of name In prope, .ect!on at BROCHURE. The 89'.,. I nt~ rnatlanal H1~ha'ay A$SOOlatlon. I nc. lIuaranteu that the MEMBER'S Or SPONSOR'S Ilstlr:g as It apPUu above wll! be pubUahed In not Ie •• than 50.000 caple. Of ~hc 89'e r BROCHURE to be distributed durlnll" the period bet""""" October I. 1957 lind December 31. 19:>8. The Association re3e TV M the rliht 10 edl! copy, and reject photorra.phs Or other art work deemed .msult_ able for qualit y reprodUction In the BROCHURE. and to re,·I.e and a lter \he !lnal fo rmat. AuthO, Ize 1 BY _ ___ '_,.,__ ______ . __ __ .__ ... ~ __ .-' ~,_. __ ._ ... ___ ,_. __ .. ____ . VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BI NDING - AGREEME NTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY i ST ATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen a - MEMBER �Actlve Q R ene ... Member Address U() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION •.. J .S,. oD • ADVERTISING LISTING • ..... '3.lh ...O.O SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lines •.. TOTAL Rec'd By . . Field Repre8entative (Line 2) ( L ine 3) SPONSORS H IP LISTING (Name Only) Th e pun;h a.\.e of LISTINGS In ~h" !IS'er BROCHURE sh a ll be Umlted to "AeUve" and "As.oclate" MEMBERS of the a9'cu In ternatlonal Hhrhwu ASSOCla tlon. Inc. and "Sponsors /' all .ubJec~ to Ih. follO"'lni terms and condition •. Whereu , <I!.tributlon of the BROCHURE and the relulttn, I><neflt. fronl Hstln u I>ubllshed Ihereln VIm ~xt.nd over a 1""0 s U r period. PRESENT meml><rs a re required to pa r dun in advance throullh and Indudlni Ih e entire calendar year of 1958. NEW a nd FORMER meml><rs arc required to P U due. for two full years In advanc • . ANNUAL DUES: Actlve Membership . • $15.00: As.oclate Membershlll _ $r.o.OO ""hleh fee shall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edltloM of the U'e r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl.hed durlnll Ih e term 01 s uch I\.ssoclate Membershill. ADVERTISING RI\.TE8 :_ Llstinn In Dln'dory of "SERVICES I\.ND I\.OCOMOOI\.TIONS" MOTELS (per lin e ) $I per unit; Minimum rate, no - Maximum ra te, '50. OtheI buslne •.' dasslf!cQt\on •• $30 peI Une. SPONSORS · Ptn Bnclol ~ ran~ of $1 00 or mor~ Includ es Us UnR of name In proper .ectlon of BROCHURE, The 89'er$ Intunatlonal Hlllhway 1\.$3O<:latlon, Inc. gua rantees ~hat the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S H. llng a . It appear. abov e wm be publish ed In nOt Ie •• Ihan SO,OOO cople . of the 89'.r BROCHURE to be dbtrlbuted durlna th~ period between October I. 19~ 7 and OttembeI 31. 1958. The As sociation rnen .. the right to edit COpy, Bnd reject photo;raphs OI other Brt work deemed unsult· able fOI QuaHly reprodUction In the BROCHURE, and to Ie,-Ise a nd a lter the final formRt. Authorl ~ 1 BY _ ..l,,-_.~ ___ ._ .. __ .. _._._ .. __ .. _. __ ..-. __ . _ ... _...:._L __ __ , .. _._. ___ ._ VERBAL I\.OREEMENTS Aft£ NOT SINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRlNTED TEXT MUST BE rGb8ARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTI\.NCE BY THE ASSOCII\.TION. NO CI\.RBON REQUIRED Un Ball Point Pen MEMBeR �Now Renew Spon sor DATE :;:::: 4~1t~~0j~dIJl~/ll<J~ 14(1 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L .. Lines ... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .. ...... J $ ADVERTISING LISTING J .. "",. \!J~ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITION S contained herein, (Li" I to . . ?Q"C> " SPONSORSJ-UP GRA!\"T • TOTAL Rec'd By Field Representative J 3l>~ $ ................... . ) 1-:\(l~~~>()h\,)W~O.~\~I)So'!\Wf\.t;QH ~ B\\~~ .\lct.:ll).o, L m 1 _ ( Line 2) (Line 3) S PONSORSHI P LI STI NG (Name Only ) The pu.cha..., ot LISTIt>lGa In the U'e . BII.OCHURE sh a il be lim ited to "Act!>'c" and "Associat e" MEMBERS of the 89'CTS IntcmnUonll HllI'h,,'u Association. Inc . lind "Spon$Ou," ,,11 subject \0 t.hc followln~ U.ms and conditions. Whereas, distribution of the BROCHURE a nd the , e"ullinl' benefits trom lIslinil'l pubUshed therein will ~xt ~ nd over Il t wo year ~rlod, PRESENT membe" are required to paJ' dues In advance UlrouKh and Includlnil' Ihe entire calendar Year of 19». NEW and FORMER members are 'eQulred to Pa .. dues for two full yeat$ In ad,·ance. ANNUAL DUES: Acll" e Membership, - U5.DO: Associate Membeuhlp - ' 50 ,00 which fee s hall a lso Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In aU edition. of the ~;~be~~t!~ERsmp ROSTER nubllshed durlnK the te rm of such A$Soclale ADVERTISING RATES:. Lialinn In Dlredory ... 1 "SERVICES At>lD AOCOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (PCT Uncl II per unit: MinimUm rlltf, no _ Mu.imul!I rale, $50. Olher bustn."" classlt!clltlons, no per line. SPONSORS _ l"Inanclal grant of $100 Or mOr ~ Includ es listlnl' of name In proper section of BROCHURE. The 89'er8 In ternBtion,, 1 Hlch .... ay A$SOC\at1on , I nc. ~uarantee$ that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IlltlnJj as It appears above ,;Ill be publlshed In not Ie ... th an ~O,OOO copi n of the 89'er BROCHURE to be dlst.rlbuted durlnc th~ period bel,,'een October I, 1957 and Df-<:ember 31, 1958. The Association reSery .. the rll'ht 10 edit COnY. and reject photoilfaphs Or other art work. deemed unaultable for Quality renroducllon In the BROCHURE, and to r.,'lse and alter Ihr final formal. @ ~~Ih~rl""~. __ . _.. \..L -.- AiL..:4.-, --.- VERBAL AGREE!.fEN'J'S ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION \ o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ba ll Point Pen o I v ._. . __. ... . ARLY I MEMBCR �, AC tlyC Renew SpOn&or DATE Member Address !fO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. •.. S ALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues 2.. ........... ..... to .............. ) L ines .. SPONSORSHIP, GRANTI . 0f;f;# m ADVERTISING LISTING s.,. J§~ ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER . $......... ··11 ···· .. ····•• The undersigned ME MBER hereby aut horizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appea rs below and subject 10 a ll TERMS and CON DITI ONS co ntained he rein. ( Li ne I ) Ttt~£.QlIHIlJJP .. ( Line 2) .... ......... f:,~~.~-t ... ll.), .::t.,... .- ~r<?,. .............. ( Li ne 3) S PONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) . The purchase 01 Ll8TINOg in tile 89'., BUOCHURE s hall be llmlted to "Active" Bnd "Associate" ;'\!F.!T.ffiERS of the 89'crs Intern aliona] Hlgb ..·.. )' A5~ClClation. I nc. Bnd "SpOnsors," ~U subject to the 101l0.. lnll" t er ms and condltlon • . Wher eas. distribution of the BROCHURE and the resulUn~ benefits f rom Ustlnu published therein ... m rxt md O\'C. a t ... o rear period. PRESENT members are r.<lulred 10 par du e. In advance IhrouKh and including the cntlre calendar yur Of 19~8. NEW and f'OFlMI>R members are re<lulred. to pay duts for t"o full yurs In Bdunce, ANNUAL DUES: Actlv e Membership, - $1 5.00: A.soclale Membership _ no.oo which fee shall BI$O Include FREE OISPLAY LISTING In all edltloM 01 the 89 ' er MEMBERSHIP ROSTE"R publi shed dudn. Ihe term 01 s uch A.soclate Membership. ADVERTISI NG RATES ;. Llstl nu In Dlr«lory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTEI.S ( per line) II per unit: Minimum rate. no • MUlmum tate . $SO. Oth er buslne.,. olasslfleatlon., no per Une . SPONSORS· Plna nci"1 Han t of $100 or mOre includcs IIs tln l of name In proper section 01 BROCHURE. Th e 89'e.. Inurnatlona l Hi ghway ASsociation . Inc. guarantee. that the ME"MBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ustlng as It appears above "Ul be publbhed In no! leu tha n :>11.000 cople. of the 89'u BROCHURE to be distributed durin .. th ~ pe riod belll'een October I. 1957 and o.-cember 31. 1058. Th e Association re$erYU the rl l ht to edit copy. and re Jut photOll"raphs or othe r Brt .. ork deemed ''''sult- :::~ofr~:~~ltJ ~Odu~t!o~n . the B:P~) revise BY '~'r:;:.-..-.-~-.- ..-..-.-.---..- ..--.-.-...__l . . _-..-. __ VE"RBAL AGREEMEl<o"TS ARE NOT BINDING - AGRE"EMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE" CLEARLY I STATE"D BELOW. SUSJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. [-'t> k" --------NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen and alter tho MEMBJ:I'I �Member Add ress uo W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LA K E C I TY 1, UTAH A~h~E"::~~:~: .:~::::lh~~Y ~~h~'~'~ S th,Se;~~~r.~ Of a LISTI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all T ERMS and CON DITI ONS contained herein . .. SJlVSf?"... ~.~vr". ....<!'..f'lF. ~ .. ...... .l $... "JOq2 ADVERTISING LISTING $ ............. .".,,~ .. SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lincs (L ine I) to . Dues C ..... $ ..... TOTAL Roo·' By 'iIII,,\(1()'Mt.tl.il $30~ .. ................ -- FieIJ·Ji~';e8entatioo ...B.Pt ..\'\, .... ... \)1.1"'[""' ...\::hI!l~s) ..Rp\Cl,"'.~ . . IA~J\ . . ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) Th~ purcha se of LISTINGS In th e 89' er EI(ocHURE ~ h a ll be limi t ed to "Active" And "ASlQCla te" l>U:MB£RS of the BY'en International HI~ hwa)' A&Socl.Uon. Inc. and "Spon,ol5," All sub)ect to the lollowlnll' ter ..... ad d conditlons. Wher.... . d l$lrlbuUon or Ihe BROCHURE and th e re.ultln l bend!! s from Ils tln u publiShed th erdn "'!II extend ovtr a 1.'0 year period, PRESENT membera are re<tulred to PRJ du u In advance through and [nclud ln l Ihe entire calendar yea r 01 1958. NEW and FORMER members are reqplred to pa l' due. fo r two lull year. In aOvance. ANNUAL DUES: AcUve Membership, - US .OO : A.saoelate Membership - 150.00 which fee shall a lSO Include J'RE'E DISPLAY LIS'I'lNG In aU edlUons 01 th~ 89' er MEMBERSH IP ROSTEn publish ed durjn~ the tum of such A,"oclat e Membershh,. ADVERTISING RATES,. U . tJn u In Dlreet ory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ lin P) U per unit: Minimum rate. no _ Maximum rate . 1SO. Other bus lne"" elass lflcatlon s. no per line. SPONSORS _ FInancial II ranl of $100 or mor~ Inc\udu lI. tln ll of name In prope r s""tlon of BROCHURE 'th e 89' n~ Iutemallonal Hl gh .... ay A"""latlon, Ine. lIuauntees that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lis ting as It a ppeau above will be pubUshed \n not Ie"" than 50.000 coplu 01 the 89'er BROCHURE \0 be db trlbuted durlnll' the ""rlod bet.· ..,,, October I. 19S7 and Deeember 31. 19sa. Th e As sociation ruerve. the rllht 10 edit copy. and rel..,t photollra phs or other art work deemed unsuitable lor quamy reprodUctIon I th BROCR"t1R£, and to rev ise and alter th t ~ fina l tormat' ~::e ' on.. TIONS" MOTEU) (per Autho ,U' ~ BY _ _ -I-~ P~;~: TEXT VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUD STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION'. NO CARBON REQUIRED use Bnll POint p e" ~ ~~~T B~" ~:;~~ ________ .__ . MEMBER _ _ j �No. ASlO<:. Rent .. Sponsor OATE Member Address 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Ql\\J\,l\<l,.l SQ>\.(lQ ~1,,"1\""b .",,\'!"L'(sQ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH to Dues C .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines 0 0 m J- AD VJ<JRTISTNG LISTING SPONSORS "'" UJ¥ The undersigned MEMBER hereby au th orizes the publication of a LI ST IN G in the 89'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY:' appears. below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITION S con tained herein. r _ ~~ I ( Uoo I ) ~ ~ Field \ ...lOW cpresClltatiVEl '( ") .?!'\Vb... l{.&.\.\.~~ ..N... ('i)•......A.".:\:\-.~,,:b\". ..t1. ~*.. ..~ .~ .. ..y.H.h1,.r.~".H... \~ ""f (Line 2) .. . ? .~..v...V.R.~.~~':\.S .. ~... \..JJo~.\~... f~.y. .. 9Y.~ .... ~\~.~.~~.\ ... f ..~.b. . {~ . . ~. (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LI STING (Name Only) TIle purch a se of 1,ISTlNGS In the n 'c r BnocHURE . hall be lim ited to "Actlve" and "AI;SOc!&te" MF.MBERS or the 89' eu InternRtlonal HI;h ...., MSo<:latlon. Inc. and ··Spon. ors,·· all . ublect to the follo,dn ll t e rm~ a nd eondltlon •. ADVERTfSING RATES , _ Lls llnn In D1ret'toTY of " SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per line) U per un it: Minimum rat e, $30 • Maxi mu m r ate . 150, Other bUl ln eos da$sl l leHlona. no per line. SPONSORS - l"Inanclul ~ rant 01 $100 or mo re Includes 1I . tln~ of name In proper aeetlon or BROCHURE. Whereas. dl5trlbuUon of th e BROCHURE and the resultln l benefits fron' lI . tln .. publiShed the,"ln .. Ill utend over a t,,·o year period. PRESENT member! are re<lulred to pay dues In a d,'anee throulh a nd lncludlrlll the entire calendar , e ar 01 1958. NEW and FORMER memt><:r. a re r"'lulred to par due. lor t .. o full yeara In a<lvan.e . The 89 ·ec. Interna tional H;~h .. ay Association. I nc. ~ uaranteu that the MEMBER'S or SPO~SOR'S Ibtl,,!!, as I ~ a ppuu a bo"e .. Ill be published In not I."" tha n SOO.OOO eoole, of th e 89'u BROCHURE to be d istributed durIn. the Peelod bet .. een October I. 1957 and Pee. mber 31. 1958. The Association re.erve! the .llbt to edit COpy. and . e lee t pho(.O\:r .. ph$ or other art work deemed un.ult_ able. for <lu .. !!t, reproduction In the BROCHURE. .. nd to r.vl ~ e and a lter the final forma t . ANNUAL OUES: Active Membersnlo. • n ~ .oo : M . oclue Membenhlp • ' ~O.1lO fee shall alao Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edition. of th~ ME!\!BERSIUP ROSTEa publl. hed durln~ Ihe tnm of such Assocl a t . Member. hip. "' hl~h 89' ", Authorized V BY .., ____ ~ __ - .•. -.-.-•. - .. - ..- - - -..• - .• - -_ . _ _ . ____ •_ ........ _____ . _ VEaBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO _ AOREEMEWfS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY ! STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AOCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point ~n MEMBeR �Rene<; Jl.ssoc. Momb" Addrclls H() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Sponsor DATE - , /0 ~-\;;,j "'- ~\~ " . t::\<:> ~ ~ . . . . ~. ...... _r.~~ ~ Du~ ¥71 t07/::iE, S ALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSHI P GRANT The undersigned MEMB ER hereby authorizes the publica ti on of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY" appears bel ow an d s ubject to all TE RMS and CON DITIO NS con t ~ined herein . ( Line I ) ( Line 2) $.. S1....... _____ ~W TOTAL R ec'd By F ield. Rcwesellta-tive ... \lI.f..~T":R\\j ...~-Il:t\r\ ... B(\\J~ .E. "~~\\~~.Y\.<;,\t",~ .~~\:: .. ", ,,,4 . .t).".·.~:t (\J).U..UL .....~..t<>.l.\. .A....~j\.)\ ..'S. ...<M .. \.... & . .,'.'» .."<., .. :\,,.':;\; .. .... '\?~"''' ..t .S .. ............... . e \ ( Line 3) SPONSO RS H IP LI STING (Name Only) .... The purch ase of LISTINOS In the U'er Bll.OQHURE $haH be Un,lttd to "1\.Cllve" ""d "AS8Oelate" 1.IF.MI!£RS of the 89' e rs ,,,tern Rilcnal Hlihway Jl.SI;OciRtlon. Inc. and "Sponso ..:' "U subject to the followtn i terms a nd conditions. Whereas. dlnrlbutlon of tbe BROCHURE and the resulUnl bendlts from Ils:h,i1"O pUbushed therein "'Ill utend o".r & t,,·o Year !>Crlod. PRESENT memben are reQuired to pay dutS In advance through a nd Includlm: th e ~ntlTe calendar nar of 1958. NEW and !'ORMER members a re required to pay du eo for t,,·o full "ears In ,,,::I,'ance. ANNUAL OUES: Jl.ctlve )'Iembershlp, _ $15.00: ,••ssoclnt~ Membership _ J50.CO .. hleh re~ shall aloo Include FREE DISPLAY LISTI NG In all edition. o f th~ 89'e. MEMBERSHIP ROSTER pubU~hcd du rlnJ: th~ term of ouch Jl.MOCl a te Mcmb-er~hlp. Jl.OVERTISING RJl.TE6 :_ Listlnu In DlrcrtorJ o f "SERV ICES Jl. NO Jl.CCOM. ODJl.T10NS" MOTELS ( per 1Ine) U per unit: MInimum rat •. $30 • Mulmum I"ale. ' 50. Other bu si n~ ... class!llcaUon., 130 per Un e. SPONSORS _ Financlul l rant or 1100 Or mOr~ Include. U. Une of nam e In prop.r .ectlon of BROCHURE. The 89' e.. Inte rnallona l Hl l h",,,y Jl.s.wclaUon. Inc. J:uaran tees that the MS~laER'S or SPONSOR'S Uslln!: &$ It appear. abo". will be publl.hed In not lesa; than 50.000 ccpies of the 19'," BROCHURE to b. dlatr lbut~d durin , th~ period bet"' ",, n Octobe r I. 1957 And D<-cember 31. 1958, The Association ruen' u the rl;ht to edIt COllY, a nd reject photograph. or oth er art .. ork deemed UMult. ~bl. for QuaU ty rep roductIon In the BROCHURE, "nd to revise and a lte r th r fln a ] fo rm a t. r; ~~th~~~_~L!JLIf:.__._L'!~X)y _____ . VERBAL AOREEMENTS 1I.RE NOT B I NDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTEO TEXT MUST BE CLEJl.ltLY : STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE Jl.SSOCIJl.T10N. I NO CARBON REQUIRED U.se Ball Plllnt Pen MEMBI:F �", No. Sl>Onoor .2. .........4 .•...... ~ ..... __ ___ ......... --......;) ...... .c.,c.c . Member .......,... i-- ......... -e... Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. om SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues $... - -- -- _.,) ADVERTISING LISTING Lines . ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .... to $.- . SPONSORSHIP GRANT Sec ...• ~·C .• - The undersigned M.EMB ER hereby authorizes the pub lica tion of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COP Y" appears below and s ubject to all TERM S and CONDITIONS contained herein. TOTAL Rec'd By . Field R epre8entative S.:;:.L .... ...... \,. (Line I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) .. ! • .. _ . ..; .... "'~. __ .. ........ . . ..... . . ,. . - - • • J .•,.... ... .J •••• _••• • __ •• _ Th o ."'.chase of LISTI:>lOS In the 89' or BROCHORE . h a ll be \lmit.~d to " Act.h e" and "A ... oelate" MF.MBERS of the 89'crs IntemattonAI Hli ha'" AS5OCIAllon, Inc. And "Sl>On30<$," all s ubject to thc foUo",ln l t.erm~ and conditions. AD ...·E RTI8I NG RAT&S:_ L1stln ll'5 In Dlr"~tory 01 "SERVICES AND ACCOM· DOATIONS" MOTEl..'> ( pe r line) $I per unit: Minimum rat!. 130 - Maximum rate. 150. O!.h er bu s ln c .... cla."lflcaUon s. no per line. SPONSORS· Pina ndul ~rAnt. o f U OO or mOre Includ es n sun l of name In prope r seetlon of BROCHURE. Wh er eas , distribution of th e BROCHURE and thc rosu\tlnG btndll. frOIll UsUnn publl$hed Ihneln will utend over a 1"'0 yea r per iod, P RESENT members are required to pa,. due. In Advance th r ou K a nd Including th e entire ca l. ndar h year 01 1958. NEW a nd FORMER m . mbtu reQuired to pay due. for two full ~ean In advance. The 89'. .. I n ttrnatlonal Hl l hwBY Association. Inc. i u"untee. that the ME MBER'S or SPONSOR'S lis t ing as It a ppea .. a bove will be published In not leu th an 50/),000 copiu of the 89'er BROCHURE to be d lstrlhuted durinG the period bet"' u n Oct ober I. 19~7 a nd o.-cembe r 31. Us.e. The A• .octatlon TCse rves Ihe right to edit. COPY, a nd reject phOlol raph . or other a r t worl< deemed un. ult_ able lor QUBllI y repr oductlon In the BROCHURE, and 10 r evi se and a lter Ih. final IWmat. u . ANNUAL DUES : AC llve MembershIp. - 115 .00 : A"$OCiate Mco,bershlp - '50.00 whleh fee shall a lso Inclnde PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edillon. 01 th~ 89'~r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER pub lished durln K the term of . uch Au oclat e Membmhlp. it I I Authorl1;ied BY c.."':'._!::..(i::,Ji::::__C---.!.. _ ~ CJ'2'J,.~ ..t,+,_ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUOEO IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION, by ,tl'or NO CARBON REQUIRED U ... Ball P oint P en Lr -.-~ -.r:...."-"' _-J~ ~fiCJI r �Active "',mb" Addrcu ..... 01: . New R~new 8P11n.or om ' ? //0 //r{ SJ" '1.\)11 \ to. ~ gq, ~,../~ \~\~ 1a.D.~ \]~ ..... .h~... \~.~... .. Cv.k\..... SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Dues C .............. to _ .......... ) ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADVfo;RTISING LISTING Se,. ~L~{) _ The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITIONS contained herein. $ . ......... _ .............. . SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lines ...................... $ .. "SOD~ $ ...'. ............ - TOTAL Rec'd Field Representative (Line I) ( Line 2) ( Li ne 3) SPONSORSH IP LISTI NG (Name Only) The pur.h u e 01 L1STINOS' In the U'er BII.OCHURE sh.1I be IIndted 10 .. Atth·e· and "A.soc:late·' MEMBERS 01 the 89'ul Intern aUonal Hlih"'n AuOc!RUon, Inc. and "SPlln.ors:· RlI l ub)ett to the follo"'ln &" terms .nd conditions. Where... distrIbution 01 the BROCHURE and the r .. ullln&" bene/lIs from IIstln .. published Ihudn will Utend OVer . t ...·o ,ur perIod. PRESENT member. an TtQulred to pa, du", In adv.nce throulh and Ineludlnr the entire c.lendar n.r of 1U8. NEW .nd FORMER membera are reQul.ed to pa, dUH for two full ,uri In /lGnnce. ANNUAL DUES: Actin Mtmberihlp. ·115.(1(1: AUoc:late Membership· no.GO .. bleh fee shall also Inelude PR!:!! DISPLAY WS'nNG In all editions of tb~ " 'e r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publlJht<l durin. the tum of suth ~!ate Membetlblp. ADVERTISINO RATES: . Llatlnu In Diretto", of "SERVICES AND ACCOM· ODATIONS" MOTtLS (ptT Une) II pt. unit: Minimum rate. 130 • Mnlmum ralt, no. Other bu. !ne.... c!au lflcaUons. no per line. SPONSORS· Plnanc\~1 , T. nt 01 liDO or mOre Include. Ul lin, 01 name In proper .«lIon of BROCHURE The 19'u. l "tunlClon l l H ll h,... , Asaoc:IBtlon, Inc. luar.n leta that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S Ullinll: •• It appear. l bove -.111 be pubUshed In not Ie.. Ihan MI.OOO copln of the 19't. BROCHURE to be distributed durin. the period bet .. e-en October 1. 1 9~7 and iN<:ember 31. 1958. The A.....,lalion UU"'U the rilM to edit cop" and rt)ed phot .... . phs or other Brt wort deemed un.un. a ble for Qu.lII, reproduelion In the BROCHURE, and to revise .nd alur thf flnll forma t . Author-lIed ," BY / + VERBAL AGREDIENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MU8T BE CLEARLY r STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. r ~ \'." S oysh \:> h<",~h.! "IJ\. a NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ban POint Pen a f1 (d- �Actlve Member Address lW W. SECOND SOUTH ST, SALT LAK E CITY 1, UTAH Dues L ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER I Lines to ................ ) ADVERTISING LISTING ",, "!'j.P SPONSORSmp The undersigned ME MBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears below and sub jec t to all T ERM S and COND ITI ONS contained he rein. TOTAL Rec'd GRANT $ $ .. _ $ BY ViN'A~ Field ReprC8entatiV!l ( Li ne 1) ,. .... .......... ........... ..... .... . ( Line 2) (L;ne 3) ..... RlC.I.> ...~..O.v,..+~ ,J H".k ...~O.'"'.."'. L~'U'':l.~. ~.:s. SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) The purctlas. of LISTINGS In ttle 89'.r BROCHURE stlaLl be LImited to "Active" and "A""O(:IAtc " MEMBERS 01 the 89'e'8 Jntematlonai HL;h .. ar AuoclAtlon. Inc. and "Spon"ou," all subJut to the toU""ln ; t erm s and condlt!ons. Whereas. dl.tr!buUon 01 ~he BROCHURE and the ruuit!nll' benefits fron, Ustlnu pubLIShed therein ... Ill ulend O,'U a t,,·o year ""rlO<l, PRESENT member. ar ~ re<lulred to I>U dues In advance IhroulI'h and lncludln&: ~he entire calenda r ye ar of 1958. KEW and FORMER members are r ~ <lul . e d 10 pa J dues lor t ... " full :rears In Belvanee. ANNUAL DUES: AotLve Men,beuhll>, _ U S.GO: AM;oclate Membership _ S5D.DlI .. hleh f ee .hall abo Incl~de l"REE DISPLAY LISTI NG In a l! editions of I·he 89' e. MEMBE'RSflIP ROSTrn I>ubll.hed durin; Ihe term of s uch As.wclale Membe.shlp. ADVERTISING RAT£S;. LLs tlnn In m,cttOry of "SERVICES AND ACOOM. OOATIONS" MOTELS (per Hne) $I per unit! MInimum ,ate, UD • Maximum rat e. J5D. OIhe, b~sine ..~ c!a""lrlcatlon •• UO per Une. SPONSORS _ Jl'Lnanclui II' rant of UOO Or mO", jnc!~de8 UstLnll 01 n a me In I>rope. seetLon 01 BROCHURE. The U'ers Intr.rnBtlonal HlIl'h ..'ay Association, Inc. ~uarRnl e U that the ~f£:MBER'S or SPONSOR'S llstlnl: as It al>,,",ara above ... 111 be l>ubUah ed In n ot less than 50.000 copI es ot th e 89'er BROCHURE to be dl$trl b ~ted durin&: the P'Crlod bet ..'~e n October 1. 1957 Rnd Dtocember 31. 19511. The A.'l$ocla\!on reserves the rl&:ht to edit copy, a nd reject photogra.ph s or other art ... ork deemed unault_ able for Quality rel>roductlon In the BROCHURE, and to revi se a nd a lter thr IInai format. ~~'"o"u' _J1..~~_ J : ·_ t. p _tJjr:z M""''' VE1lBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT I NCLUDED IN PRINTED T!;;XT STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ASSOCIATION. 'T o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ban POint ~n .:r~:~EARLY I �Active No. A~. Member 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. - ..... ~ - . SpOnsor DATE , ....... L L ..LL .'.. .. .......L ..._..'?.. Address Rent..- L !- ......·4 J SALT LAKE CITY I, UTAH , 1'~S{ 1 to ............... .) Duel'! ( ADVERTISING LISTING ADVERT ISING INSERTION ORDER Sec•. ,;,~ .. Ll~ .. ~ "'j The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein . .. (Line I) .. ..~ .. n. ~ J ... ~. _ ......\ .:.....:.!..t....... f _ .. , $ .......... :. SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lines •• TOTAL Roo" ~ By .,X..\ _IL,,_.Vll!.,L $ .....u/olJ..... - iFidfd Rcprg entlltive • ... f ._ ... .........L .. . - -- .. - .... ....~ ... . -.. , .... . . I (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH I P LISTING (Name On ly) Th ~ pur~h """ of LISTINGS In th~ 89'"r SltoCHURE sh.\11 1>1: I1n,lted to "Active" Rne! "AMoe!ate " MF.MBERS of th e 89'ers IntemaUonal Hlsh ... ay Assor.lation. Inc _ and "Sl>Qnsou," all sub/ed to the followlna ter[Jl$ nnd condl!lOM. ADVERTlSINO RATES :_ Ll ~ tjn ,," In Directer,. of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. OOATIONS" MOTe"l"s IlM'r Iln ~ 1 51 per unIt: MinImum rate. 1311 - !!a,.;l m\w.l Tate. 1:5-11. O\h .. busln es" claoslflcatlon • . per Une. SPONSORS · l"Inanch.1 ar~nt of 1 100 or mor~ Incluclc~ llsUnr ef name In croper .....,Uon of BROCHURE. Whe roa . . dl.trlbution of th~ BROCHURE and th e resultlnJ benefits fron, IIsUnu published Ih eretn .. Ill utend OHr a two f ear period. PRESENT meml>l:ra nre reQuIre<! to 1'81 dues In advance throul h and Includlnl the ent ire calend ... year of 1~58. NEW and FORMER members are required to pay du~s for ta'n full :rear8 In advance. The 89'crs Int ~ rn a Uonal Hll h " 'ay Au""latlon. Inc . ruuan te. . that th e l>!EMBER'S or SPONSOR'S lIS!l"R as it ap""ar5 a bo"e "'111 be DubU. hed In not I~ ... tha n :5-11.000 caples or the 89'tr BROCHURE 10 be dlstrlhuted durin, the nerlod bet"'~~ n October I. 1957 and ~c e ml>l:r 31. 1958. The ASlioctation re.ervu Ih e rl ll bt to edit CODY. a nd reJ~t photonaDh. or other art work d ""med unsuit_ able for quaUt, reproduction In the BROCHURE. and to revi se and 81t .. Ih~ tlnal format. ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership . • $15.00: A.sMe!ate MemberSh!p • nll.oo which fee sha ll 8100 Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. of th" 89'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durina' the term of such AM<lCI.t ~ Mtmber. hh'. VERBAL AOREE~fENTS no ~uthor!.e d BY -----.--- -7 -........-.-1---.--.--..:.-.. --=......----.--7-.-.....--- ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. I' • NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen , MEMBJ:I? �Active 140 W, SECOND SOUTH ST, I0 !.. Spon sor DATE CI SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues L Lines _ __ ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .L to ................ ) $ ... 3.o..E..!?-. A:DVERTISING LISTING Se,. E\~O The undersigned .MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LIST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein, $.-_ .........._ .......... SPONSORSHlP GRANT $ ..... 3D0! f $............-.-..... (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSH IP LIST ING (Name On ly) The purch ase of LISTINOS In th~ 8 9' ~ r BII.OCHUHE sha ll be limi ted to "ACtlv. " a nd "Associ a t e·' MEMBERS or the 39' c r~ In ternational Hllrhw ay Assoclatl{m , Inc. and "SpOnso rs:· ,,11 subject to the foUowln a terms And condItion s. Wheru,s , dlstributlon ot th e BROCHURE and t he .. sult!ni bend lls!in ll'5 oubll sh ed Ihuein wlH ._ xtend over" t ,,·o Har periOd. PRESENT "r. requ ired to pa l' dues In advance IhroU K and Inc!udln'l th e entlre h year of 19~8. NEW a nd f'O!l.MER mem beta ue required to pay due. full reus In Adva nce. lts tro". member. calend a r for two ANNUAL DUES: Act h 'e Mem be r"'!!), - U~.OO : AMOcl"t. Membership - $50.00 which fee shall II. lso Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll editions of th~ ::;~be~!~r!~msHIP ROSTER publish ed durln J the lerm of such AJ!.I;ocla le ADVERTISING R~TES : _ Llst!n n In Directory of ·'SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATION"S·' MOTELS ( per Un e) II per unit ; MinimUm rate, S3G - Mnlmum , a te. $M . Other b\l bl n u.~ claa.o;1flca tlon s , no per line. SPONSORS _ Plnanel"j ~ ran! of U OO or mOte Inclu de. lI.tln a of nam e in proper seelion ot BROCHURE. The 89' e .. Illt~ rnRtlon R l Hhl' hwRY Associallon, Inc. auuRnteu thBt the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S li sting as It . p!>tars Bbov. w!ll be publish ed In not I~" th a n 50.000 copie s of the tII '.r BROCHURE \.0 be dls t rlhnted durlnl th~ ""rlod ben, ,,,, n Oct ober I, 1957 and o.-cember 31 . 195.. The Association rUen .. the Tia ht 10 ed It copy, a nd reJec! phOtol raphs Or other art ..·ork deemed unsult. a bl e for QU a l11y reproduction In I he BROCHURE, and 10 rev ise a nd alter th e final forma t . :/.I.... ".____'--J.__.._,U.L.;-:--_~_ ~~Ih~~~~_ --...._ _ ._.._. ___ .__________ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMEN'lS NOT LNCLUDEO IN PRINTED TEXT M}J T BE C't'fARLY I I STATED BELOW, SUSJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . \). ,. H- 0..."1' \ NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen 0. d Q MEMB£n (\.t-. �Co ;/ecf, ;'" 14A.ad Q (j '1 h l2.lIt O~ S (6)t-h-trd- fJ"d/~J I+. s c(lwj1'~.c..;t.. --- �UNION . PACIFIC ?oadofde9~ DATE_ _ _ __ �l A"""". New Member Address HO W. SIOOOND SOUTH ST. SALT I..AKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER to ................) Lines ........ L......... ADVERTISING LISTING ""o.I&"",A9M.\ SPONSORSHIP GRANT The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI STIN G in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to a ll TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein. •"OO~ S.......................... .. ~Ob -..! ...... $.................... (Line I) (Line 2) (Line 3) The pureh".., of LISTING!:t In the 89'cr BIl.OCHURE sh a ll be Umlted ti> "'Active" and "'Associate" MF.MBERS of th e 89'er. International HIKhwav AssocIation. Inc. a nd "'SlXInsors.'" IIll subject to the 101l0~'lnK terms and condlUons . Whereas. dlstrlbuUon of the BROCHURE lind Ihe res ulting benefits from Uatlnn pubHahed thereln wUl txtcnd o,'e r a t~'D )"ear ""rl"", PRESENT mMtlbers a re re<lulrt d tD pay dues In advance through and IncludlnK the enll re calendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMER members a re re<lulred to 1181 dues fDr two full 7ears In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Actlv e Membershlp. _ $1 5.00: ....... ocl .. le MembershIp _ $50.00 which fee .haH also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all editions of tile 89'el MEMBERSHIP ROSTER publl.h"" durlnK the term of s uch ",UOClate Membership. AD,'ERTISINO RA=:_ LisUon In DIrectory 01 "S ERVICES ANO ",CCOMODATIONS" MOT£hS I""r line) $I pe r unit: MinImum rate . l30 - Mulmum rate. $50. Otber buslne"" clas. itlcatlona, 130 ner ]lne. SPONSORS _ Flnanell.1 g rBnt of $100 or mOr ~ Includ es II sllng of name In proper stctlon Of BROCHURE. The 89' ers Int •.rnatlonal Hl l h~'''Y AS.'ioclatlon. Inc. guarant ees that ~h e ~IEMBE"R'S or SPONSOR'S Ustlng as It ap""ars above ~'lll be lIubHl hed In not less '·hftn ~.ooo copl e. 01 the 89'er BROCHURE to be dlsVIl>uted durlml th~ perIod bet"'een October I. 1951 and De.:ember 31. 1958. The Assodatlon , eserves the rl ~ht to edIt tallY . and nJe<:1 photollra."h. or othe r art work deemed unsuIt_ a ble for Quallt, .. pr ductlon In the BaOCHUR ' nd to revise an d aner the ~ f ln~1 form a. VEil-HAL AGREEMENT'S ARE NOT BINDING - ],_ ?:~'Q- ~ __. M£~," AOREEMENT:; NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. 'S pO", S.OY '" \..- \'(-' b O 'S.~.~ S 0 * OV. NO CARBON REQUIRED U lle Ball PoInt Pen UST BE CLP!AkLY ! �"'cUve Member •• • h Address 14() W. SECOND SOUTH 81'. • • •• • •• • • , ..... .. . .. .. 8pon~or i .. ;:: .~. ........ :~ ......~ .. .....•..J.• SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Dues (.. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines Sec... .L .. .1.,...... ,., ....... l ADVl<JRTISING LISTING n ...... The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publicati on of a LISTI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears bel ow and s ubject to all TERMS and COND ITI ONS con tained herein . ( Line I ) .... ~ .b. ~ne" J Ne ... "'SIlOC. .....\.......n.. SPONSORSHIP GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By t ...... ~.:t: ..... ..... l ... \ .. ..,., .. . ....... I O ...TE ···r·····~"\··· "" A·, .LJ..........•......... • o $ .. $.. /.l!.fJ;J.J::. .. . !.i!; j- $ ... Field Rewe8entatiue L(1 .\ ..•... . . 1 ............ , !.1 ........ 1 .1\ ....IJ. .~. t (Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name On ly) The purch ~se 01 LISTINGS !n th e n' er BROCHURE shall be limited to •· ...ctlv ... and ·• ... $.ocillte·' MF.MBERS of tnt 89'ers International HI ~h a'aY A$SO(;lation. Inc. and "SlIOnsor.:· 1111 s ub)ec' to foUoa·in" le rml lind condition •. tl,. Whereal, d!strlbutlon or the BROCHURE Qnd th e r •• ultlni bene!!t. trom Hs Un u oubllshed therein w!1l '.xtcnd over II two yur period, PRESENT members lire requIred lo PIIY duu In advance throuch a nd !ncludlnc lhe entire calendar yeQr ot 1958. NEW an d ~'ORMER membeu are requIred to p ay dUel tor ~wo tull YearS !n advance. ANNU ... L DUES: Act"'e MembershIp. • $15.00: AswclRte Membeun!p _ $SO.()O whleh tee shall Rlso Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTINQ In all edltlons of the 89'~r MEMBERSHIP ROSTER published durln~ the term 01 such A~I.te MembershIp. ADVERTISING RATES :_ Lhllnu!n DI'~tory of "SY-RVICEf. AND ACCOM. OOATIONS" MOTELS ( pee Une) $1 per unit: Minimum ral •. $30 _ Muimurn ...,e. 150. Other busin~M ,lusme.,lon • . no per Une. SPONSORS · Plnanell. ) ~ rant or U()O or mor~ Includes lIstlnlr of name In proper sectlon ot BROCHURE, Th ~ U 'ers Int~rnation al HI.h ...·a' A$SO(;lation. Ine. Iruarantees that the ~IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S listing a. It appea .. above wlU be published in not less th Qn 50.000 copIes 01 the 89' er BROCHURE to be dl strllmted durlnlr th~ perIod between October 1. 1957 and Offember 31. 1958. The ,,",soclaUon ruervcs the r!i'ht to edit COpy. And reJe~t photoaraph. or other art "'ork deemed unsult. able for Qu am, re production In the BROCHURE. a nd to re,'!se and alter tht t !n.1 tormAt. "'uthorl~d BY ... _ ._._ .. _ _ . __ ~ _ . __~_.-:... .. ______ . __ ._...::_ .. ___ . MEMBen VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - "'OREE:\IEN"l'S NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION a NO CARBON REQUIRED U.e Blll PoInt Pen a ._. - �, 11... 00. New DATE~h.(s-1 8pon.or Renew M'mb" 1~,,,MA ~~~. .. .. . Du", (¥lSI tD g/:d ) ~ . O. qo, 00. AD VERTI SING LISTING . ...• Address H{l W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER SPONSORSHIP GRAr-.'T . Th e u ndersigned M.EMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and COND ITION S contained herein. { (U n' I ) (Line 2) ( Line 3) TOTAL Roo" By $_.~ \WVlUli&.uhl~ ~1 ~ Field Repres6t1taUue T<::>WNl'A()r:E\"c ..~,\!,h ..M,~f>i\1:~~,,~.ho~ J.(lbJ~~g. ~.h~ f.., .... "'. ".~ ...1l.)y).,,,..~....RQ.•.h"',, . f~. (\\.\ .....\. .. br. .•l<\''A.~.. ,... '\rH . ""l ..~".~~.•; .. \o . ...!>.~..of-;... ,. ...,,>-:h>, .• J'b..l ....(!.,.\<::>"l".'C' . "'?"'>J. l .C~.." .. .. ...~!? .,,:\.~., ... 9..!.. ::to..w..,,, ... . SPON SORS HIP LI STING ( Nam e Only) The purchase of LlSTINO!:t In the 89"er BH.OCHU RE shall I>e Hmlle<.l to ' ·;'ct!,~ .. Bnd "AsSOCiate" MI:MBERS of the 8P'ers Intern"UOnal HIKhway Association. Inc . and "Sponsors," all subject to th e 10Uowin i t erm s and conditions. Wherns. dlstrlbuUon of the BROCHURE a nd the re.ultln i benefits I rom !loUnu pubH.hed Ihe r eln ",HI u t.nd O'·er a ' ..·0 ye", per iod, PRESENT members are requ Ired to pay du es In advance Ihroullh and Ineludln r the entire calendar Year 01 1958. NEW and FORMER members Rre requIred 10 Pal dues for t ... o lull yurs In advance. ANNUAL DUES: Actln MembershIp. _ $15. 00: Anoclale Membership _ ,~.OO ..·h lch f ee .hall abo Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edlUon s of th~ U·e, MEl>tBERS1UP ROSTER publl . hed durln~ the term of s uch AssocI.tf. MembershIp. "'DVERT1SI~! O RATES :· LUiln ... In Dlre~tory of ··SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS·· MOTELS (pe r line) $I per unit: Min Imum ra te, no • Mtulmum ute. 150. Other bus lne$.' ~la ulfjcatlon • . 130 per \lne. SPONSORS· Plnanelul ha nt of $100 or mor~ Include. \l otln r of name In proper sectlon 01 BROCHURE. Th e 89'e1$ Int er n.Uon a l Hlih,,·a y At.llociatlon. Inc. ruarantees that the :-.IEMBER' S or SPONSOR' S Ustln" U It a ppear. above •.-111 be published In not less than r.o,OOO cople. 01 the 89·or BROCHURE \0 be dIst ributed durln r th e period bet,,·ecn October i. 1951 and Dl'ce mber 31. 1958. The A. soclatlo n reserves th e r ight to o<llt cOP~. and reject photo.raphs or other art work deemed unsuitable for Qualit y reproduction In the BROCHURE. and to r~vl "e and alter th~ flnRI format . Authorlted ay ___ .. _._._ .. _ .... __ ._. _ _ .. -,--,-~ .. ..l..L" ~_ . _ ..... _ _ _ VER8AL AOREEME!<."'TS ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BeLOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED U.... Ba ll Poln; P en MEMB£R �Aotlve DATE eQ<. :a..c. . -1.... s, ho J Membe r Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER L ines Se,. (Li. , I ) (L i., 2) '1SJ 1/ 1 g , r.:.. · · m ••• ... . ....... .. ... • 'r,~l) AD VERTI SING LISTING . .bo.,. q.. .C!. SP ONSORSHIP GRANT .r.0<:t. ... . The un dersigned MEMBE R hereby authorizes the publicat io n of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "CO PY" appea rs below an d s ubject to all TERMS and CON DIT IONS co ntained herein. M.p. ~1..J. .Iti.Qr. .. to 1:;............. . I .~ o...:--... t 7 $ ........................... . .\w~:\~M. . . . $. 1 . ~. .~ TOTA L R ec'd By Field RcprCo'lcntative ~, I .Pf\.\\KS .... '\ .\,.i ...... S.[\.o.\'.. ~ ...y ...,..*Q."...ll.~.A .....£,···\.\·, ·~··J:·"'·II.··,··"'·,.,.\,·i,·"'·,··r..fS .......... . .......<>, "'..1. .... C r f>. ...... ..( \,"-.d ....::..: ...~ .:4.,<" ......... ~.1."...\J. ~ .." ..... r,,;.! . ..c......r. \.u:I... . 1.Y~{l. :';..................... . , ! ( Li ne 3) .......... . S PON SORS HIP LI STING (Name Only) ........ The pUleha se of LI3TINGB In the U ' er BI:.QCHURE . ha ll be limited to "Active" a nd "AUodate" MF,MBERS or tile at'en In te rn.tlon.] Hlahln7 AasocJ.Uon, Inc . a nd "SlIOn"," ." a U subject to the 101l0.ln. lerrn& and cond!tlonl . Where... d\Jtrlbut!on ot the BROCHURE . nd t he ruulttn. benefit . f ron, III Un,. pUbUalled therein .111 utwd o"er a t .. o 7ur period, PRESENT members a re reQu ired to PU duel In a dnnce throu. 1I Ind Indlld lnl the enure calendar yur 01 t'U. NEW . nd J'OR!'>IER members are reQuired 10 1'17 du es fo. t ..o full 7"r. III I dn nce . ANNUAL DUES : Active MNn~ulllp, • au.oo : .uaocl lte Membership· ISO.OO .. hleb fee shall liso Indud e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edition. of tll~ 89'er ME~fBmsHIP ROSTER publl-llled durlnr the term of ouch AMOelat.. Mernber-lllip. ADVERTISING R ATES :. U l lin.. In Dlreelor7 of "SERV ICES AND ACCO"'· ODATlONS" MOTELS (I>"r line) II 1>'" unll: Minimum ute • • 30 • Maximum u u. no. 0/.11.0 busillea.. cl lulflcatlonl . UO ~r Ulle. SPONSORS· PlaAIldIiI ....,1 of $100 or mor~ Illelude. I\JUn. of name III pro~r &eCHon of BROCHtlRE. 1 TIle U ' e'" Int ernallon a ] HI, II,," .usocta Uon. Inc. lIuaranletl Illat tile MEMBDt'S or SPONSOR'S Ul ttllil' .. It a ppears above .. Ill be puljllli lled In no~ IH.I tha n :10,000 copies of th e .g'er BROCHURE to be d ls trl bu~ durin. th e period bet"'een October I. IU 7 a nd December SI , 19M!. 1'he Auotlallon reur~u tile fil M to edl~ COP7 • • nd re!e.::t ohototrr.plul or other '1o rt .. ork deemed unl ult· . ble for Quallt1 r~productlon In the BROCHURE. and to re.' lse .nd atter tllr f!nal forma t Authorized BY :J ' 1..1. .. _.L... __ ... _. ':1_~..l....,r _ ~ .____ .>1._._ _____. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST ATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY T HE ASSOCI ATION . NO CARBON REQUI R!:D U3t B.II Point Pen 1 MEMBeR �, ? AS6OC. ow Renew Sponsor O"TE 7,/" " II...J u Member Address U() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CI TY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines __ Sec. 1_ . .. . . . .. J1.~JH.'i..~.... Th e u ndersigned MEM BER hereby aut horizes the publication of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "CO PY" appears below and subject to all TER MS and CON DITI ONS containe d herein. (Li,e I ) to ..... ___ ._._) Dues ADV~JRTISING LISTING SPONSORSHIP GRANT , .. , ~!'.o , .. TOTAL Rec'd F'ield Representative .K\VE.R.?J\)f-, ....QA(l,.U\JS..c......IA"9J'..~."' ... '\\J.c.~.t .,,.S ...~ ..f ..I " .•....ap~<, ".?J. ;{;,Y. ~ ., .............. ( Li ne 2) ( Li ne 3) SPO NSORS H I P LI STING ( Name Only) The purch,,~e 01 LI5TINOg In Ih~ 89'cr BI!.OCItURE s h a ll be lImltecl to "Activo" and """' ...ociale" MF.MBERS of Ih e 89' . " Inten,aHon a L Hl ; h"'.J A.uocIIl.Uon . Inc. and "Sponsors," ~1I subJe<:t to the to1Lnwln z terms and condltlon • . Whereas, dl.strlbuUon of (_ be BROCHURE Rlld t he ruultln~ JH,ne!!ts from IIsllnn pubU5hed thereln wm utend over .. 1"'0 fea r period. PRESENT m . mbeu are re<lulred to pay due. In ad,' anCe throuirh ftnd IncludlnK the enUre calendar J'ear of 1&58. NEW and FOR"lER me mbe., are required to par dues for two lull f ears In .. dvnnc e. ANNUAL DUES : Ac th 'e Membership. • $15.00: A'&Ocl a te Members hip - $50.00 which fee s hall also Include FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a U editions 01 th~ ROSTER publl.hed durlll~ Ihe tum of . uch A&&Oc Ia.te ~~~be~~~!~ERSHIP A D V E RTISI.~G RATES :. LlStinn In OlrCetorJ' 01 "S£RVICES AND ACCOM· aDATIONS" MOTEU!! (per !ine ) $I pe r Unit: Minimum rate. no - MulmuJ:l Tale. ' 50. Other bu.in e... c\aSlllllcaUons . UO J)Cr IInc, SPONSORS _ Pln .. ndnl Hanl 01 $100 or mor~ Includes 1I. lIn ll of name In proJ)Cr . edlon 01 BROCHURE. Th e 89'c ," InurnaUona l HllrhwRf Association, Inc. ~ uar 8 nt e e . that the .\l.£~mER·S or SPONSOR'S llstinll: as It a ppeau ab< lI"e ,,·m be publis hed In not Ie •• tha n 500.000 coplc. of t h e 89' c r BROCHUR£ t o be dl. trlhuted durin!: th~ period be!"' ecn October I. 1957 and lHcember 31. 19~8. ~ e Auoelation reu ,vea Ihe .!orhl t o ed it COP1, and reject phot oiTaph s 0. other ,I,.t work deemed uns uitable for Qunll t f reprodUction In Ihe BROCHURE. and to re,· tse _ and alter Ih. linal format. /~' ~~th~~:(:-::~i. . ..J....f.::~._•. ~~t(.L MEMBel! fA :t; ._.2/_- " Q £' '7", _R..f:::t..t...)!/' ... .. VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDINO - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CiXARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. NO CARBON REQUI RED UM! Ball Point Pen �AcUve New M.mb" 140 W. SEOOND SOUTH ST. AddD'~::' ., SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Lines ,L1.:.-- ........ ... s.,. W~A._ The unde rsigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DI TIONS contained herein. (L;ne ') e Ss>onaor / !{;~I1Y?I~ ,". 0,71 . . .) . Q. to~r ". .• '8. . .,..... .. '. 015..1 C1A . ~/ ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSfllP GRANT TOTAL Rood By ;S-, @~;V 00 $ I'\\t\.HhuE Field Representative \JJlf-.${}t/ ... M,..DTfL A8,Jh. ~\J!r..± ...l.o..r.,ch ..." .. V1."g. , .~,~~\ ."1:' ..r ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG (Name Only) Th e pureha"" of LISTINGS In Ihe 89'er SI\.OCHURE s hall be llmlted to "AcUve" and "AuoeJate" /l,!gMBERS of the 89'ers Intemallon a l Hlihwaf As,oelatlon, Inc. and "SpOnso..," ~U subject to the followlnz ternu and conditions. Whereu, distribution or the BROCflURE and the re$ultln r beneflts frOD' ll ~tl D IU published therein ... HI ~ "tend Over a Iwo :year period, PRESENT members a re required to PU dues In a dvance Ihrou" h a nd Includlnl the cntl re c alendar year of 1958. NEW and FORMeR members ... required to pay ducI for two full years tn adunee, ANNUAL DUES: AcUv e MemberShip. - U~.OO: ASsociate MembershIp - n o.oo ... bleh tu shall al50 Include FREE OISPLAY LISTING In all editIons of th~ 19'er MEMBERSHIP ROSTeR publiSh ed durlnr the term of s uch Associate Membership. ADV ER'l'JSING RAT&S ;. L illi".. In Director)' of "SERV ICES ANO '\C<:OM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (pe r lin e) $I per unit: Minimum rRt t . no _ Maximum nte. 150. Other busln e .. c1" .slflcaUon5, no per line. SPONSORS _ Pln .ncl~1 ",R nt of UOO or more Includes ll.Un" of name In proper section 01 BROCHURE. Th e 89'ers In t~rnatlonQl HI.-h ... "y AJS.Sodatlop, Inc , luaran Ues that the MEMBeR'S Or SPONSOR'S I!stlnl/: U It a ppear. above .'l!1 be published In not less than 50.000 COPies ot the 89'u BROCHURE to be dIstributed d urin" th ~ perIod bet,,'een October 1. 195 7 and Dpcember 31, 1958, Th e Assoelatlon reserves th e rJRht to edit copy, a nd reject Phl tOI'IaPhs Or othe r a rt ... ork deemed unsult. able for quant: i e PNlduetlon ln m h BROCHURE and to revl~e Rnd altu the fin al format M~ \.. t1 ~~th~~~d_ .:. ,,-, _ ~.L1J.=~1:::} ~ • • VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUD£D IN PRINTED TF;XT MUST Ill: CLEARLY! STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO AC<:EPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION' a NO CARBON ftl!:QutRt:D U.., Ball Pclnt Pom o MEMBI:I? �• - M:th'c A_. No. 'nei ) Span40r DA"' ~ /3/)<;, I Member HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY -l , UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ···19..c1..~···································· Dues L ..... . 1............ Lines .. Sec. ~.~ ........ The undersigned MEM BER hereby authorizes the publica lion of a LI ST ING in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CON DITI ONS contained herei n. (L;ne 1) .. N~l...,......, ..... lJ.u.MJ ...~~ Addre!;.9 7 . $...... . to ..... . H )$S - ADVERTISING LISTING $ ... ~ ...........- ........ . SPONSORSHIP GRANT $..... TOTAL Rec'd By ......... $........ . Field ReJ}rc3f.)nt<dive MO ,f!'hl>Hti ····V.. lli\,W . Mo:rr...L. .. J\.f\. .....a ."'" ...• .. Of!.'C"·:\~~· · ·· 11" B :·· L~s~.~.!..<.. ..... ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS HIP LISTI NG (Name On ly) The Pllrch ...e of L1STINGfJ In the SP'er BI/.OCHUHE sh.U be Umlted lO ··.\cllve" .nd ·· .... nocl.t e·· MEMBERS of the ,g·er. Ill terll 8110ll.1 lII~h .. a7 Auoclatioll. Inc. •nd ·'SI>OIl4O<I." All l ubJect to the 10no"'ln~ ler",. .nd condition • . Where.... dist rIbution 01 the BROCIIURE .nd the relultln.. bene/III Irom IIltln ... publillhed thereIn ....!II ~xtend over. t .. o Har IICrlod. PRESENT m.mbera .r. rtflUlred to dues In advance throu .. h and Includln , the enUre calend.. ren of I~S'. NEW .nd PaRMER member. . .e reClulr",,- to PI7 dues for t ..o full le.r. In .dvance. pa, ANNUAL DUES : Actin MembershIp . • II~.OO: Auodue Membe rshIp • 1;1.0.00 .. hleh lee shall al..o Inelude FREE OISPLAY LISTING In . 11 edItIon . o t tht n'tr MEMBERSIII P ROSTER pubU . hed durin. the term at such Aasoelatp. Mtmbcuhlp. AOVERTISING RATES :. LI.otln ... I ~ Olredor7 01 "SERVIC'ES ANO AOCOM· OOATIONS" MOTEL8 (IIC r Une) II per unIt: MInImum ratc. no • M•• lmum ute. no. Other bu .IIl.'~ clu.lllc.tlOn • . no per line. SPONSORS _ Fin. ncll.1 HBnt of 1100 or mo. e Include. 1I .lln~ of n a me In prOllCr ltcllon of BROCHURE The Sg'~u Jnl ~rnaUonal III .. h ..·.' AQO(:IIUon, Inc. lll ..ante« that the MEMBER'S 0' SPONSOR'S 1I5t1r..g •• It . ppears abov. . .m be publllbed In not leu th.n 50,000 co!>le. of the Sg'u BROCHURE to be dIstributed durin' Ih~ perIod bet .. «n Oclabe. I. 1151 and Df<eembe. 31. 1$51. "!tie AQO(:I.Uon RHrn. the rllht to edIt eOP7. and RJect photos.a!>l" or other art York d«med un.ult_ a ble for OU.ltt1 reproduction In the B:lOOHURI!. I nd to N!~llt a nd alter th~ final form.t . Authorlzed ...i. BY •_ _ ___ ~ ___ II n#. .. __ . Y. .,L•. ___ ~ "..... .",._.~_~ ~ ::. _. _ __ _ ;\tEMBCR VERBAL A GREE~n:NTS -'llt: NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PR INTED TEXT MUST 'BE OLEARLY I STATEO BELOW. SUBJ"I!CT TO ACC!?:PTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ATION. ~ ~_ .......... r"A~ 1:0 . ~ ~ ~ ~~ rf'\- NY'--.J J,... <h w ~ {,o d~ \. o NO CARBON REQUIRED UM Ba ll Point P en o - �Active IUnew ASSOC. Sponsor DATE 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT L.AKE CITY 1, ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Un" UTA ~ I ;,l::r Se, ~~,t The unde~signed ~EMBBREORCh H'U,eRbEY authhor~,zC'O' pt~~ , Ptlblicatibon of a LI ST ING m the 89 foR . as t e . appears. el ow an d''subject to all TERMS and COND ITI ON S co n tam ed here in. - (Un' I ) .. . - SPONSORSKlJ ' TOTAL Rec'd GRANf /- /" <' $ ......~....... ~ ('j~.) ...!c'.~(f.. . . $ . S.~ .H Field R eprC8fmtativc . , ~'~A ~ ... ~ F a .I. J.t"\~~Rb\N.E,.....\1.oTCL ......Jh~.~.. m ,.\h... (\\i\''l..''.L..m Q ~ p ,, ~~ex ....(!lY'' m lP. •. (Line 2) ··· ····7·· ... ...... ..- (Line 3) . ... . .. ..Ph. l.,:2.-:Rl . S PONSORS H IP LISTI NG (Nam e Only ) The purch ase of LISTINOS III th~ 89' er BP.ocUURE shal! be limited to "ACtlve " and ··As.ocl"le" MEMBERS of the U· .. r~ Illtern a tlonal Hl l hwRY A ~ SOClat!on. Inc. a nd ·'SpOn.o rs: · aU subject to th e foUowln l t e rms a nd condition • . Whereu . dis t rlbutlon of the BROCHURE a nd the resullin .. benef its trom IIs Un iS pubU.hed the rein wlll " xtend over a Iwo nar period. PRESENT membe .. are required to pay dues In adva nce th rou lI' h and includln .. the entire cBlend a r !"ear of 1958. NEW and f'ORMER members are required to " a, du""S for 1.'0 full years In advanc e. ANNUAL DUES: Aeth'e ~Iembershlp. • SI5.00: A.ssoclate Membershl" _ 550.0D ""hlch fee ~ hall a lso Includ e FREE DISPLAY LISTING In a ll edltlons of the :~;~be~!~l'!~ERSHIP ROSTER publlshed durln ~ the te rm of such Associat e ADVERTISING RATEB :_ Li5tln u I" DIrecto ry of "SERVICES AND ACCO!.'!ODATIONS" MOTELS ( ~r Une) S1 per ulIlt: MInImum rate, Ull • M ulmum ,.at e. 550. Other busln e ... cl at;$ lflcatlo" ~ , no per Un e. SPONSORS _ Flllallcl"1 Krant of $100 or mor ~ Includes l!5tln r of n a me In proper sectlon of BROCHURE. The U 'eu In tern a non a l Hl l hwaY ASSOCiation. Inc. !lunallt.. e$ tha t the ~IEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S UsUna Q8 It appears a bove ""m be publl . hed In not leA t han ~o.ooo copln o f th e 8!I' er BROCHURE to be distributed durin .. th~ period be\ ..· ~n Oct ober I. 1957 and fHcember 31. 1958. The A..ocl a llon ruenes the rllhl to edit COpy. and reject "hotol raph . or oth er art .. ork deemed un$ulta ble for Quallty re productlon in the BROCHURE. and to revl~ and alter th e fIna l format. Li" ~~lh~:$._;.d...z:._~t::::_ .._4"'(_4-L .".£?-_~ '_:'_.. _ VERBAL AGR!!:EMENTS ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED;J:' PRINTEO :n:XT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTA NCE BY TH!!: ASSOCI5PON. ~ o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen a MEMBER �Active AlISO<:. 8 n.:new SpOnsor , DATE .. ......~ .. Membc /':z.~ 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH . I~"{)o ADVERTISING LISTING $... :~{]J{-'.c.!. SPONSORSHIP GRANT $ ... . TOTA L Rec'd B :;v.f!I4Lf.: ,1I<'1r.a Field Representative (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) The purcha,;e of LlSTINGS' In the 89'e, BR.OCHURE shall be llmlted to ·· ... ctl,· e! ' and ·'... ssoeIRte" :'!F:MSERS of the 89' ers Int ernational Hlllhway ASSOCIation. Inc. and ·'8I1On.ou.. · al1 sublect to the follo"'hllr t erm s and conditions. Whereu. dlst.rlbuUon of the BROCHURE and the resultlnlr benefits t rom UsUnu publl.hed therei n wLH ext end o,'er a t ..·o year period. PRESENT members are required to pay dun In .. dunce Ihrou .. h and lncludln .. th .. enll re calendar Year Of 1958 . NEW and PORMER membe rs He reQul re-d to pa y du. ~ for t ..,o full ltar$ In a dv.nce. ANNU ... L OUES , ... <Un MembershiP. - SI5.00: AMoc!ale Membership· n o.oo which fee shall 0.1.0 Inclu de FREE DI8PLAY LISTING In all edil ion s of ~h" 89' " r MEMBERSHIP ROSTEn published durln~ Ih" term of such A$$OClat e Member shIP. VERBAL AG REE~{ENT5 ADVERTISING RATES :. LlsUn u In OlreetOrY of "SERVICES "'1'10 ... ceOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS Ipe r line) $I per unIt: MinImUm rat e. no . Maxtmum I ate . 150. other busin e "~ daSSl flea~lon •. no per line. SPONSORS· Plna ncj~1 Hant of 1100 or more !ncludes llstln; of name In prope r section of BROCHURE. Th e 89'en In! ~rnatlonal Hhrhway AIIS<>clatlon, Inc. lI"uaTante~s that the ;l.1I;:;l.fBSR"8 or SPONSOR'S Ustlr.g as It u >pears abo,'. wLH be publl$hed In not leu thau M1.000 cOnIeS of the 89' e r BROCHURe tQ be dIstributed durln~ th ~ perIod bet"'t en October I. 19~7 Rnd Dl'ecmber 31. 1958. The A""<>cla Uon .ese'vea th e r lll'h! to edit copy . • nd rtJed phot.,..,&ph. 0' other art work deemed un.ult Bble tor <lu~UI1• ..(~p_r~duet!on In the BROCHURE. and to nvlse and a lleT t he final fo.mllt V l'VVilJ. ~~!hOr!.e':.. __ ._~ W - - :._1. ______._. _. W ..>-L _ _ ____ ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTE D TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED BELOW , S!JJUECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED U.,., BaU Point Pen MEMBC" �Active HO W . SECOND SOUTH ST. ADV}<~RTlSING Lines ..................... . &'~Q~. LISTING SPONSOR§,HIP C R ANT / . ' om t1j.~ I. . ~.9 . 00 $./". .lit.:?I-...... •':l.$..~ . : The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the pu blicAtion of a LI STING in the 89'ER BROC HUR E as the "COPY" appears below and s ubject to all TERM S and COND ITIONS co ntained he rein . (L;", I) SpOnsor M,m"', i-\", \(OV.J.I ~Md:" l' Add,,~ l'lp~.. ?::l} :1,tldJ'/, ................ . ..1.': > ...9.. 0. Do" (~/SI " 1/~~) SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH t DVERTISING INSERTION ORDER R~nt ... TOTAL FieedJi' •. / Y.4 .. l-' icld Rcprc"entative h9' . tlD.~\,)Y' .....'!\\... &gilO.\",0"6""' ..1:D\"'1>""H~v.1~N .W, J'h8.'j' ...2,J.'2,.3 .. (Line 2) (Line 3) ...... ................ ......... ..................... .. ........... ........ .. SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG ( Name On ly) ... .... ...... ........ ......... .. ........ ...... .. .. .. .. . The pureMM 01 LlSTINOS'ln the aD'er BR.QCIIURE a b~U 1M. limIted to "Aetln" .nd "A~I.te" ME~fBERS of tb e aD'era Inte rnlUonl1 IIlah ... y A~la tlOn , Inc. and ··SpOnlOrI.. ·· .U lubie<:t to the 101:0.ln, terml .nd conditions. Where.., dl.ltrlbu!lon ot tbe BROCH URE a nd Ihe ruulUnc ~ndlU from Uslln ... pubUahed th~reln ...m extend over a t ... o ,.tar perIod. PRESENT me-m~ .. are re<lulrtd to p.,. duel In advance throu .. h and Includ lnl the enllre calendar ,.u r of 11M. NIW and roRMER mem~ .. art re<lulred 10 pa,. du el 10. t ... o run TUri In adva nce . ANNUAL DUES : Acllve .l.um~ rshlp, _ 115.00: Aloocl.te MemIM. . shlp - SSO.OO "'lIleh lee ahdl al$O Include PREE DISPLAY LISTINO In a U editions ot th e 89'er MEMBERSH IP ROSTER pubUaheel du rlnl t he term o f such Aaoocl .. l P. MembeTlltlp. ADVER.TlSINO ~A1"ES :_ LII!!n.. In Dlrt~IOr,. 01 "SERVICES ANI) ACCO"'OCATlONS" MOTBLS (per Une) II per unit: MinImum ut~. no - MUlm um n t~. n&. ou>er bUlln~tI-!I ci ...ll1culon • . no per Une. SPONSORS - Pln.nch,1 ..nnt of lIOO or more Includes UsUn .. of name In prope r ItCtlon of BROCHURE. The U'eu Internallon.1 HI'h .... ' AUoclaUon. Inc . I UIT.ntt" that the MEMBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIsUn!! •• It appear. abovt will ~ publlahed In not I""" than 50,000 copIes of tlte U'er BROCHURE to J>.. elll trlbuted d urin .. th e period ~t"'Hn Octo~r I . "51 anel ~em~r 31. 11:11. "nIe Aaoocla Uon rese rves Ihe rl,hl to edIt cop,.. and reJfCt I>hotoc raphl or olher art ... o.k dnmed un,ult..ble for <lU.UIT reproduction In tlte BROCHURE. a nel to revIse and alter Ih t flna , format . AuthorIzed BY .----------.-.~ •• ~- •. - •. ~.'T" ------~ .. -.-.~~~-- .. ~. MEMBER VERBAL AGREEMENTS Ail E NOT BI trolNO - AOREEME NTfl NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST ATED BE"LOW. SUBJECT TO ACf:EPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . o NO CARBON REQU IRED Use BaIL POInt Pen o �Actlve Sl>On~or DATE "'mb« 14() W. SECOND SOUTH ST. Add""~ i: '] 0 D ~"'''~ , SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~.L'(,t'" ~ .~.!J:-'I..'i"\t,,,,.s .. ~'rT ~n'Zl Scc'~':f"'" The undersigned MEMBEH hereby authorizes the publicat ion of a LIST I NG in the 89'E,R BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDIT IONS contained herein. Do" ''/157 <07)5>'8, . ADVERTISING L ISTING SPONS0';tHlP - ,.. J::'"Of). , ;;'Q.•..O..!) GR~ / . ~" "Il'" - .... .. QYl.rts.t .D'tl.~.Y\....\:<;>~f\:(~lla.c~5 . . ~~ (Line I ) (Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORSHIP LISTING (Name Only) The " urebase of LISTINGS' In th e 89' •• BltoCHURF; shall be Undted to "AcUvo" and "Assoc!ale" MEMBERS of the 89'''' 0 Interna!!!>n .. ! Hlirh ... ar A~socjBtLon. Inc. and "SpOnsors," ~n s ubject to the followln ; terms and conditions. Whereu . distribution 01 the BROCHURE and the r""ult!n ~ bendlts from IIslln n publi shed Iherein wlll ulend over a h'o Har period, PRESENT members are required to 1>"" due" In advance throuJh and lneludlml Ihe ~n!lre eRI~nd ... Year ot 19~8. NEW and FORMER membe .. are re-Qulred 10 pay du,", lor ~wn lull yeaTS In .. dvance. ANNUAL DUES: Acth'e MembershIp . • $15.00; ""&<>elate Member&hlp ·150.GO "'Meh lee ~ haU a l ~o Inclnd e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In aU .dlllons or the ROSTER pubilihed durln~ the term 01 sueh hMoclat e Member!hl p. 89'u MEMBERSHIP VERBAL ~GREEMENTS ADVERTISING RATES :. LIstlnu In Dtr~.tory 01 ··SERVH.:E8 AND AOCOM.. ODATIONS" MOTELS ( per line) II per ~ntt: Minimum rate. no • Muimum lat e. 550. OIher business clu. !IleaUons, no per !lne . SPONSORS· FInancial II' raM al liDO or mar ~ Includes U.tinll' 01 name In proper .eetton ot BROCHURE. The ag·er. In l~rnaUonal Hllrh,,·u A5SOClatlon. Inc. luarantees tha t the ME~rBER'S or SPONSOR'S IIsUng as It a ppear! a bove will be published In not I..... than ~O.OOO cap!u of th e 89'er BROCHURE to be distributed durinll' the period bet"'e en October I. 1957 a nd fl<'cember 31. 19~. The AlISOClatlon reurves the rtiht to edit eOP1. and r.J~1 pholorrRPh. or oth er Rrt wark deemed un.ult. able for <luallty reproductIon In Ihe BROCHURE. and to n"l se and alter the flnal torm a t. AUlho.bed BY .._ _ .__ .• ___ .•. ....: .. _.. -/_._. __ .__ .. __ .. _ ... ..•_. _____._ ._ .. ______ . _ _ ARE NOT BINDING - AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEX "I'- ~ruST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ~SSOCIATION. o NO CARBON REQUIRED U... Ball Point Pen MEMBeR �, Acti ve 140 W , SECO!\'D SOUTH ST, SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH Line~ . ... A~h~~:::~:~: ,:~::::lh~~Y ~~~,~,~S theS.;UbI er 3 ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSOR.<;HIP .9RANT / . $. __ . . . ,I/eSJOf} a LI STING in Ihe 89'E,R BROCHUR E as Ihe "COPY" appears below and subjeci 10 all TERMS and CON DITION S conlained herein, (L;,e (L;,e I llr:.n~<4/1.,,~t:L17RHl1r4j1/' 2) Tl/j/?rJl.Y-:7'/z60 ( Line 3) SPONSO RS HIP LI STING (Name Onl y) .......... ... ...... ...... ..... .... ...... .......... . ~ The purch ase of LISTINGS' In l h e U' er BROCHURE shall be Umlt ed to "ACtive" a nd "Assoc Iat e" MF.MBERS ot t he 89' c rs In tern a tional Hljfhway ASSOCiation, Inc. and "Spen""r!:' all subject t o the follow ln , te rms and eondltlon s, Wh ereu, d lstrlbutlon of Ihe BROCHURE and the re.u\tin, benefIt . from IIni n n pubUs hed the rein wlll ~. xtend over a \"'0 yea r period, PRESENT membe .. are r equired to PRY du • • In a d,'a nce throu lI'h Rnd Includlnll' the entire cRlendar :rear ot 1958. NEW a nd FORMEn member. are requIred to p ay dues tor two tull Y rS In advance. ea AN/'fUAL DUES: Active ~Iemberoh l p, • $15.00: Alisa<:late Member.hlp - 150.00 ..' hleh tee s hall also Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In . ll edltlons of th~ ::;~be~~~ER.SHIP ROSTER publl&hcd durIn, the tum of such Ass<x:la t e ADVERTlSINO RATES : _ Llstlnn In DI<eetory Of "SERVICES AND ACCOMODATIONS" MOTEL8 ( pe r line) $I per unit: !\flnlmum rate, no _ MaxImum late. 150. Othe r bu sl ne$.') cl u.ltlca tlons , 130 per Hne. S PONSORS - l"tna.ncl,,1 ~ rant ot $1 00 or more Includes ll sUnl< ot name In prope r u ctlon Of BROCHURE . The 89'era I nt~ ",ational Hlilhway Assa<:laUon, Inc. ilu a ra nt ees ~ha.t the MElI.!BEn'S Or SPOSSOR'S 1!5tln ~ a s It a ppears a bove ... 1l1 be pubHs hed In not len tha n 50,000 cop Ies ot the 89' er BROCHURE to be dll trllmtw durin. tho per Iod t>et ..·. en October 1. 1951 a nd Dr-<:. mber 31, 1958. Th e Assoelntion r e.erve. t he rl ~ht to edit copy, Rnd reject photo",a ph . or othe r arl " ' ork d eemw Un . ull. a ble tor Quality reproduct ion In t he BROCHURE, and to re vise . nd alter the fin al formu, ;If? A.L ~~lh~'!...~-~-_l-!~ .~ ..4 ).1.... , // M /J/} Lk;::. . .~f _........ _' VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BF; CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJ£CT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball Point Pen o ...... _.. . MEMBCIf �Spon:JQr NO. Acllve DATE 57 :) 1.1ember l .... J...I.____.... _'O:v..........._ ..~..J.:..J.. ... _,- " .............. Addrc Sll ~ SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH 1060 W . SECOND SOUTH ST. Dues L .. ... 1 '" •• '.V to ... .....) Lines ,.1I,.•"" ••..........• So,Q/""""-t!!..... ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ADVERTISING LISTING SPONSORSI{lP GRANT The undersigned MEMBER he reby authorizes the publication of a LI STING in the 89' E.R BROC HUR E as the "COPY " appears below and subject to all TERMS and CONDITIONS contained herein . ntc.n $ ... • .•, .... ,.3)9. TO'FAb 1 (Line I ) (Line 2) _ . (L ine 3) "C SPONSORSH I P LI STING (Name On ly) . _ ,V 6 _ The purchft"" CIt LISTINOS' In the 19'er BIIOCIIURE $h,U be limIted ICI '"Actlu'" and uAuoelUe" Mi':MB£RS CIt th e S9'ers In te rnatlonll HI"hwar AssocIIUon. Ine. and .. SPOnsor .... ,II l ubJect to the 10llClwln, term, Ind eondltlona. Where-I. dil;trlbuUop 01 the BROCH UR£ apd the ruultlpJ: bendlU from liI;t!nn publlahed therein w1l] Uletld oYer, IwCl ten perlGd. PR&SBNT member. ne requIred to pn dun In advance IhrouJ:h and Includlnl tbe enure calendar 1en 01 I'~. NEW and FOR.\lER membe .. a re required to pu' dun tor t.·o 1,,]1 1UTI In aelnnee. ANNUAL DUES: Acllve " t emberahlp. • $15.00: A.Uoelate Membership • $$0.00 whleh tee ah,11 a1so lndude PREE DIS PLAY LISTINO In all editions ot th e 19'er ME MBERSHIP R OSTER publlaheel durlllJ: the term ot such Aasoelate Membership. ...,. .U " ADVERTISING RATES :. Lut!nn In DIrect or, 01 '"SERVICES AND AceO)/[· OOATIONS" MOTELS (per line) II per unit: Minimum n t e, no • Maximum 'ate. no. Other bu ~jnts.O c1.sa.tfleuICIDa, 130 per line. SPONSORS· Plnanel,.1 J: r.nt 01 1100 or mor~ Ine\uel", Il\IUnJ: of name In prope r le<:tlon 0 1 BROCHURE. The U'en In\ ~maUonal IIllh"'7 A.UoelaUon. tnc. lua.. nteu that the M!::o.rB£R·S 0' SPONSOR'S U. Ur.$ II I~ a "ptars above .. m be pubU.hed In n ot lea than r.&,OOO eOl>lta of the P'e. BROCHURE to be dl.ulhuted d"rlnJ: th e ptrlO<! bet.,een Octobu I , It51 a lld ~ember 31, ,,5-8. Th e Aasoela Uon relene. the rllhl to edit eOP7. anel reject I>hOI ...... phl Or other art "0.11: deemed unau1].. able lor 0."aUt7 reproductlon In the BROCftURl!;. a nel to reyloe and , Iter th~ rln. . format. 11 MEMSJ:U VERBAL AOREEMEN1'S ARE NOT BINDINO - AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION. is ,:r nt , eena 1e o()r e , ....t..lcri:l.e rt lrDo Cb ,ek in pay ent + .... reof b i n iSBU d NO CARBON REQUIRED use B~U Point ~n epl.. ty t List_r i.Led . �-DATE rt Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER Dues c... to ...... . .l $ ..... .. ADV"-;RTIS ING LISTI NG See, ....... _................. $....... .................... SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lin ~. $ ..,;. ..)..... .00..... The unders ign ed MEMBER hereby authorizes the pub lication of a LI ST ING in the 89'ER BROCH URE as the "COpy " a ppears below and s ubject to all TERMS and CONDIT IONS co ntained herein, ( Line 1) ( Line 2) (Line 3) SPONSORS H IP LISTING ( Name Onl y) .. ··..T i :t .. ~r. .. ~n ... , :I . .. J ........\y:~ "· T.b.J."~'*'r;' · J " · ·(} "· " · "' · l. · .. ·.. . ...... ............... .. ADVERTI81NO RATES :_ Li ~tLn .. In Olre<:IO'J' or "SERVIOEB AND ACCOId· ODATIONS" MOTELS (~r Und II ~r unit; Minimum rate. no _ Wll:Ilmum nlte. ISO. Othtr bUIlneu dan!fLcaUon., ISO per line. SPONSORS - Plnanclal crant o( UDO or mora Includ", lisllnl 01 name Ln D ro~r section of BROCHURE. 'fbe n·er. ln ttrnlltlonal lIl,hl'a, A&IO(;I.lloD, I nc. ,unant"" th.t the MnmE.'R·S or SPONSOR'S Uitlll£" .1 11 all~ar. above ..111 be DubLL&btd In not les& Iha n SO,OOO cOlllel 01 the 89'ft SROCKURE to be dlltrLbuled duMnll th e ptrlod bet,,'oen October I, 1957 a nd Dt<!~mbe r Si, 1958. n.e A_Iallon reservea the ri ght to edit eOD1, an d reJ«t Dhotol raphl or othe r art worlt deemed un ~uLt· able for QUllnt)' reDroduellon tn the BROOfJURE. and to rco'i se and a lter the Iinal format . n.e purth ue o f LISTINOg In Ihe 89'e. 1I11.OCHURE 1t.IU be Ihnlted 10 "ACIL ve" Ind "Associate" MEMBERS of the 89'er. Intern atlona l m.. h",., A&IO(;t lUon , Inc. and "Sponso. s," all lubled to the follo",ln. term. an d condillon.. Wherea., disirlbution of tile SROCIIURE and the reouilln, bend It. froln II.Unn publil hed Ihe reLn ",111 extend oO'er a 1"'0 )'tar period, PRESENT members are .e<1ulred to lin dueo In advance throu'lI and Includlnl 111e enU.e calmdar fear o f IG51. NEW a nd FORM!:R members are re"ul,ed 10 Da)' du" for t"'~ ("n yta .. 1n 14va nc~. ANNUAL DUES : Attlo".. Membership, • II ~.()(J: ,usodate Member.hLp • 'MI.OO .. hleh fee .haH Ilso Include J"RE'E DISPLAY LlSTINO In all editlono of tho! n'er MEMSE'R8HIP R08TE.'R I>ubll.hed durin. the term of ~uch ,,-tate Membershlp. Aulhorlttd BY Lr-d, . _... _ C 10J . ,f U0]' 0 Id\..L ----0:-:01; VERBAL AOREEMENTS ARE NOT SINDING - AOREIUJ ENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTIW TEXT MUST BI: CLEARLY I STATED BELOW, SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE A88OCIATION. hi .It 1 1.nt ,/au l'l~horlzed by -r;he Docr.: of 0ity CO.tll 1 tine hel~ Ucu~t ;0 • d e u.s soon as the y nt tl:c r.o~ to I e r_o~e~ c)runting routine . till:u ,/,; or .a on~o slJ.l .0 c NO CARBON REQUIRKO UII! Bi ll Point P en tu. ~ishe<.. !::liOh 1'0 r Oln be c1 o.red by sponsor t~ 1 J. l>~01 �~M*. 'O ACtln Ne Renew Sponsor DATE Member · · c.: · . "l. ~.11.. ...·.;r: ....O .. .... Addre'JS ~i.e.d ...I-~o. .e.!'..,. 140 W. SECOI'.'U SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTA H Dues L ............. to ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER . 1°''''', 'gj . ,.;.g ..:!.•. •..,...",:!·oa ·· ...tter:l;.ttn.!s. .........l h _..r.f: ....._... ) $ .. ADVERTISING LISTING $ SPONSORSHIP GRANT Lines $ ....<tG-..\ .t-..(.)t:, n ' The undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publication of a LISTING in the S9'ER BROCHURE as the "COPY" appears below a nd subject to all TERMS and COND ITI ONS contained herein . (Line I) ( Li ne 2) (L ine 3) SPONSORSH I P LI STI NG (Name On ly) '.I~ , ,,"1 .. l.D4..l' ...O .... -.... .o_........... r.ca. ... ., .. _¥,,!l ..J...cL.l.".., ...~_ l~J ...:.,;. D. ......... t The purchase of LISTI NOS In the 89'er Bll.OCHURE shall be !lmltcd 10 "Actlvc" and " Assoclate" "U:MBERS of the 89'ers International Hla-h",'sY ASSOCiation. Inc. and ··Sponsors"· all subject to the follo"'ln; terms and conditions. ADVERTISING RATES :. U s Unu In Dlrutory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM. ODATIONS" MOTELS (per line) n per uplt: Minimum TIIte. no . Mllltmur.l rau. $50. Other busin~S8 clas.Uleatlous , 130 per Une. S PONSORS· Plllallcl:tl ITllnt 01 $100 or mor!! Include. U .t!n~ 01 name In proper .cellou of BROCHURE , Whereas. dl.trlbutlon of the BROCHURE and thc resulUne bendJts fronI UsUn u uubUshed therein wlU ~xtend O,'er a t,,·o YeRC period. PR·E SENT members are required to pay duu In ad"ance thrOU I b and Includlna th e entire calendar Year of 1958. NEW and f'ORMER members are required to pay due. lor two ful! Yeu. In a<lvance. The 89'"ro Intu natlonal Hlll bwa1 ASSOCiation. Inc. aua rant ees tbat tbe MElI-fBER'S or SPONSOR'S UsUns as it appears above will be pubUlhed In not Ie", than 50.000 copies of the U'er BROCHURE to be dIstributed durln a the period bel ween October 1. 1957 a nd n..eembe r 31 . 19~8. The Association rUerves tbe rla ht to edit COPY. and reject photoKraphs or other art work deem ed un.ult. able tor ouallty reproductIon In the BROCHURE. and to rel'ise and a lter the final format , ANNUAL DUES : Active Membership. • ' 15 .00 : Auodate M.",ber&hlp • 150,00 "'hleb fee wall al.o Includ e PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. of tb~ 89'er M.EMBEltSHlP ROSTER pubUsbed d u rln ~ tbe term of s uch ASM>(:late Member. hlp. o. ,1. )0: X( C~Ol' Authorized BY -.. - -_____ ..•. __ .._ .._._ ..•..• ._ _ __ ._. __ •. _ .. ..__ .. _.~ .. __ ... _.___ .. MEMBCll VER8AL AGREEM.ENTS ARE NOT 81NDING _ AOREEMENTS NOT INCLUDE"[) IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY 1 STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION . rhis r mt Directors utholized cy t a runoul, x i1 un~nLnoUB vot~ ~t1n.:" ~:ust h ,ld of the 0, .:rd of 300 The uthorizinc lotion rete. red t.ae .t ~er to th 'lourist; romotion Co .dttee to select a picture nd nu.ke t ll " necear"ary TraIl ;Xllents for payment of th grant (I NO CARBON REQUJRE:D Use Bal! POint Pen - $ he . �HO W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CITY 1, UTAH ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER ~:~,i:~~;;;: Th e undersigned M.EMBER hereby authorizes the public tion I.of a LISTING in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COPY" appears bdAw and sub ject to all TERMS and CON DITIO NS cont ined herein. (Une I (Une ADV}O~RTISING LISTING SPONSORS~~ GRANT TOTAL Rec'd By $ ...... ·71 .,(J~~ ...1:.. _ _ _ __ ___ 1LL. "" Field Reprc8cntative )j?J:!L~t:.A.LlfLjt23 : ,I::t\LiL(1.l'L ,1 . h1 2) ~J'lf./1.dl:t1Mt-: . -1' ~I..:.'3.~'. .. . ~? .. !.l~l ... J. (Line 3) __ .. .. _ .• , •. <A SPONSORS HIP LI STING (Name Onl y) The purchase 01 LISTINGS In th~ 89' er BP.ocnUlU; sha ll be llmlted to "Ac\lv e" and "AsMclal~ " l>IEMBERS 01 the 89' ers IntemallonaIHlih ...!!.y ASSod~tlon. Inc. and "Sponsors." aU subJe<:1 10 the 101l0whlJ terms and condltlon •. ADVERTISINQ RATES,_ L.lsllnu In DIrectory 01 "SERVICES AND AOCOMODATIONS" MOTEloS (per line) II per unll : Minimum rate. no _ MaxImum rate. UO. Other bU$lnes.~ ctusl!lca~lons. 130 per line. SPONSORS _ Plnanclal nant of 1100 or more lllcludu llstln . 01 name In proper settlon of BROCHURE. whereas, distrIbution of the BROCHURE and the resultin l benefltl I rom It.tlnn publis hed thereIn "'Ill extend over B t ... o )'ear period. PRESENT m emben are reoulred 10 pay du •• In advance Ihrou!l'h and Includln~ the entire calendar yea r 01 1958. NEW a nd FORMER members are reoulre<! to pay dues for two lull ,.us In advance. The U'e rs Int ernational HI ~ hl\'Q7 Assoclatlon. Inc. luarantees thaI Ihe )'IEMBI;iR'S o. SPONSOR'S listing as It appears a bove will be publtshe<! in not Ie"" than 5-0.000 copies of the 89'u BROCHURE 10 be distributed durin$" th~ perIod between October I. 1957 and Decembu 3!, Ur.8. The "'""ocl.tlon reu'yes the rI. ht t o edIt copy. a nd r ele<:~ photon .. phs or oth er art work deemed unaUltable I<>r oualtty reproduci!on In the BROCHURE, and to revise Bnd alter tho fln a ! format , ANNUAL DUES: Active Membership. - 115.00: Assoclale Membership • S&O.OO which lee shall aIM Include FREE DISPLA Y LISTING In all edilion. of th" 89' er MEMBERSlilP ROSTER published durln~ the term 01 s uch ASM>I:IBte Membnshlp. ~/1 ,A\..:.,.f...~ ,I ..- ..--.-..- -----.__ ~ .._.~~ Authorl.ed '?'1 . .... BY ..- -----.-.----. l. ...: -.-..-..:;;r.:..... ___ VERBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDING _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY: STATED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCIATION o NO CARBON REQUIRED U ... Ball Point Pen MEMBJ:1l �'~~ ­ ~~~~c4U~ "~" fU-~ �ASSOc. NUl 8 SJ>Onsor D ... TE '-1/1 Member Address 140 W. SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LA K E CI TY I, UTAH Dues Lines .. ADVERTISING INSERTION ORDER .1... ATIV.,JRTI SI NG L ISTING ,"". 4a~ . SPONSORSHIP GRANT Th e undersigned MEMBER hereby authorizes the publicatio n of a LI STI NG in the 89'E,R BROCH URE as the "COP Y" appears below and subject to all T EHMS a nd CO NDITI O NS contained herein. ~~. TOTA L Rec'd By ....... F ield Repl'e8elltative 5" 2.," 0 $ ............_ . ...... ( Li ne \ ) ( Line 2) ( Line 3) SPONSORS HI P LI STI NG ( Name O nly) The purch"",, of LISTINGS In the 89'er BIU>CUUUE .hall be limited to "Actlve" and "AuocIMe" MVoMBERS of the 89· el". I nterna\Jonal Hlllh way "'ssoclatlon. I nc . a nd ··Sponsou.·· all ~ ubJut to the 10IlG,..ln; term. Qlld eondltlGnl. ... DVER.TISiNO RATF-S:. Li stl nu In Dlr e~lory of "SERVICES AND ACCOM_ ODATIONS" MOTEl.8 (J)C r line) SI J)Cr unlt: Minimum nte. 130 • Maximum ,RIc . S:HI. Other bu.llle.. clas.lfle~tlon3. no per line. SPONSORS· Plnanclul "811t of " 00 or more lnchldel Ullin; 01 lIame III pToper !lC<:lIon of BROCHURE . Whereas. dlstrlbuUGn of the BROCHURE alld the re.ultlnll bendlts froUt lI.tlnu published therein "'111 utend O,'er .. t ..·o l'ear period. PRESENT members arc r e'"l1red to pay due. In ad vance thTOUgh a nd Includlnll the entire calendar Year or 1958. NEW and FORMER members are reQuired \0 pay due. fo r two full yeaTs In a dvance. Th e 89'en Int ernat10nal Hlih,..ay ...... o<:lallon. Inc_ Iruaralltees that the MEMBEIt'S or SPONSOIl'S IIsllP-1i" as It a ppears above •.-111 be publl~ hed In not Ie ... than $0.000 copies of the 89'OT BROCHURE to be dl~trlbuted dUTln, th e period bet,,'ecll October I. 1957 and ~ember 31. 1958. The A3M>cla tion reserves the rl,ht to edit copy. and r eJe<:t photocraphs or other art work dee med unsuitable for qU" Utf r~producllon In Ihe BROCHURE. and to Te"!se and alte r th~ final fOTm~t. IA~ ' •• _ 1 Authorized ,n~ BY ___________ . _ ____ .______ . ______ .. _ .. _ _ .._ __ __ _ ___ ______ MEMBCIl ... NNUAL DUES: A~tI"e Membership • • lIS.GO: Associate Membership _ ':HI.DO which fe.. ~h.lI aiM> Include PREE DISPLAY LISTING In all edition. of the 89' er MEMBERSIIIP ROSTER published during the term of such .... socIRle Membership. • VEItBAL AGREEMENTS ARE NOT BINDI NG _ AGREEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN PRINTED TEXT MUST BE CLEARLY I ST ... TED BELOW. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ASSOCI ...TIDN. NO CARBON REQUIRED Use Ball P oint P en � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2953 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3341 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1190">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1190</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 1782769858 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Advertising Insertion Orders Description An account of the resource Advertising insertion orders is the purchase of the membership or sponsorship to 89'ers International Association, Inc. and guarantees that they will be listed in no less than 50,000 copies of the brochure to be distributed during the period of October 1, 1957 and December 31, 1958. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource Tourism United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Panguitch (Utah) Garfield (Utah) Kanab (Utah) Kane County (Utah) Garden City (Utah) Rich County (Utah) Richfield (Utah) Sevier County (Utah) Calgary (Alberta) Cardston (Alberta) Edmonton (Alberta) Banff (Alberta) Sinaloa (Mexico) Mexico Ogden (Utah) Weber County (Utah) Pocatello (Idaho) Bannock County (Idaho) Paris (Idaho) Montpelier (Idaho) Bear Lake County (Idaho) Afton (Wyoming) Jackson (Wyoming) Teton County (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Flagstaff (Arizona) Williams (Arizona) Cameron (Arizona) Grand Canyon (Arizona) Coconino County (Arizona) Tuscon (Arizona) Pima County (Arizona) Nogales (Arizona) Santa Cruz County (Arizona) Livingston (Montana) Gardiner (Montana) Park County (Montana) Utah Idaho Arizona Wyoming Montana Alberta (Canada) United States Canada Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 23 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd23 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/98cdf74948f0b46fedca345bf88d72dd.pdf 43644091afccada83e989acfc5f3c4b1 PDF Text Text uo WE3T SfCOr-.:O SOU TH SALT LAKE CITY . UTAH THIRD ANNUAL MEMBERSH IP MEETIN G - AND - • ~"Wd'l ' St..4t<ge~ · CONVENTION OCTOBER 6-7-8, 1957 B. P. O . E. LODGE 1713 i IN JACKSON JACK~ON'S HOLE, WYOMI NG I �..e. ~ tk 7'~ SU NDAY , OCT. 6-{8 PM.)- Gel Acquointed " Howdy. Strong", ,, Pony Food ?11 ••.. Fun .... and f,, ' erloinmenl . MONDAY , OC T. 7 -(I O A M.)_ Oll i. ;ol Opening S. ..ion. 1957 Con ."nlion. MC NDAl' AFTERNOON -(3 P.M.l- YOllR CHOiCE ..•• Rid. :h. Cho', l ift , " 'o fe, but thrilling 15 minul. oU t nl to th. roof of Ih . world atop Iofly Snow King MounTa in _ OR _ a G~ jded ""'0' To ur th':>\llIh Jocklon Hole to Grand T. tonl, Je nny Loke and Jac hon Lak e. MONDAY NIGHT -( 7 P.M.)_ CHUCK WAGON . :y le Buffel Supper. All you WAN T cnd mOre Ih on you ~ H OU LD e ol. R, fr ashm , nll. Enle, ' o ,nme n ' ond moU anylhing , I. e we can Ihin k of in Ihe me anlime. ,h. bring your FAMILY and your FRIENDS Enioy ,hi, ,II, iIl:"" Au'umn hoiidoy in Wyoming' . lobvioul " Jackson Hole (,un . uy" wh.r. , h. m :Slt.tl' T.,on. ri .. inlo Ih. cloud. from ,h. 'po,kling wol ... of Mauli'u' Je nny ond Jochon Lak ••. You 'll lov. JACKSON , II.. " Howdy, St, onger" lawn gate way 10 Grand Te ton ond 1'. lIowJlo" . National Parh. TUESDAY, OCT. B -( 10 A.M.)_ fa, a louch of .. o,iely , I, ,' , ge l in a bi l of wo, • . MAIN BUSINESS SESSION . Elec' ion, Comm:II" R,p::>,h, Inle' e"ing Gue . I Spe ak, ... TUE SDAY NIG HT -C8 P.M.)- Annuol BANQUET and G rand INTUN ATlONA l BALl. E.tceUe n, menu f,ol c, ing Choic, Ptime Rib. DiUingui,hed G ue . I•. Populo, Dance Bond. ALL THIS f . . JUST TEN BUCKS . SPEC IAL Ba nq uet Tickeh Inc1ud :ng R_gi. I,clion fe , Tu e. doy Bu,in", Mae:in g o .. oileble e l S~.!'O p er plole . ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------ADVANCE REGISTRATIONS URGENTlY REQUESTED - USE THIS FORM 89'e,s Conve ntion CommiHee CHAMBER OF COMM.ERCE, JACKSON , WYO. DETACH MAIL TO: ALL EVENTS - SUNDAY , MONDAY, TUESDAY Check e nclo ..d fo' $ ~ _ _ ._._.. in poymenl of NO DEPOSIT REQUI RED _",_ RfQI 5lRA1'IQN fu. for ,h . following p. "en. 01 $\0.00 , och. (All EVENTS) NAME TOWN " 'erv, occ:>mmodo'ion. wilh b e d . c. checked: NAME TOWN DOUBLE ... _ .. _ NAME TOWN Ot: NAME TOWN TUESDAY ONLY - MEETING AND BANQUET TWIN _ .... __ • ,:. :,. Chl,k en,losed fc: r S .... ____ ._... _ .... in pcym,nt for _ _ _ Bonq ue' T,c;;e" 0 1 S~.SO each . HOLD f OR: NAME ... _ ........... __ ._........................ __ ._ ... _._. TOWN ........................ _ ..•.. _ .. (All Jochon 89'e, Mote" or. GOOD ond role. 0" compo ,obll. PlIO" leI committee piau you .) �RAY V. STEWART President Willioms, Arizona The Officers and Directors of the 89'ers Internationa l Highwoy Associotion, Inc., join in extend ing a personal invitation lo each and everyone of you to ottend this Third Annuol Convention, and pa rticipate in the constructiv~ octivities of your Association. Your friends will olso be welcome. OFfiCERS AND DIRECTORS RAY V. STEWART, President, Williams, Arizona BENTlEY MITC HELL, Vice-Pres., l ogon, Utah ERNEST R. SARAN, V.-P., Calgary, Alte ., Canada W. G. BASS, Sec. & Treas., Wickenbv~g, Arizona Sr. GUillERMO FREEMAN, Mozallon, Sin., Mex. BURNETT A. HE NDRYX, Panguitch, Utah FRANK W. SORGATZ, Montpelier, Idaho PAUL J. STEVIG, Afton, Wyoming CHARLIE B. MARTIN, Jr. , livingston, Montana INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 140 W. Second S. St. Salt lake City , Utah MARTI N H. CAN TWEll, Executive Secretary � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2002 Image Width Image Width in pixels 1208 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1194">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1194</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 3280684449 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Third Annual 89'ers Membership Meeting announcements Description An account of the resource Third Annual 89'ers International Highway Assocation Inc. Membership Meeting and "Howdy, Stranger" convention announcements Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource Tourism United States Highway 89 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Pamphlets Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957-10-06 1957-10-07 1957-10-08 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Jackson (Wyoming) Teton County (Wyoming) Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL 322 Box 1 Folder 11 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd11 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/d139c3a0eec4fd306570284f74a3cfd7.pdf d949420aa1db37f642f7d91ac095325b PDF Text Text JIlIl,\lary 11, 1956 Ernie : A tt ched is a lot tor I received from tho Ron . Gordon fllld my ro ply to samo . • Taylor This is soueth1ng \.e should try and do a good job with , and , as stated in my reply to Taylor , .~uld like to have you help me with it . If there is no hurry, !ind vro c ould ~et a CODy of lberta's Brief it would give us something to go by. I did not V/I1ut to displuy t oo muoh DIp""""""", ignorance in my reply to Tuylor , but I 1m0\1 not!l1ng about the ,laBka International Rail and II1ghylllY G=1ssion , or VIllo runs it nd why . I Im",/ in a gMeral sort of WIly what typo 01' Briet they "ould wflllt us to present , but we should have lllDre informatiou on tho whole projeot before wo will be in a ,.ositi on to turn out a good job. I have sllSgosted in my letter thnt perhaps you would contaot ir . Taylor for further inforlalltlon, Qn~ it would be n ood i dea for yo ! rtin to do so if p ossible . �• COP Y ---- Deoember II, 1957 FRCII : File 50042 GORDON E TAn.OR--Minister ot Highways Edmonton, Alberta Io!r . llartin H. Cantwell , Exeoutive Seoretary 89 ' ers International Highway Ass ' n ., 140 W Seoond South . SALT LAKE CITY 1 , 'Utah Dear Sir: Re: Alaska International Rail and Highway Commission I wish to advise that the Government ot Alberta is preparing a Briet tor presentation to the above Commission in whioh we will endeavour to point out the advantages and benetits ot travelling trom U. S. A. to Alaska via this Provinoe , Our Briet will outline the major roads and Alternative roads and will in addition deal with tourist and defenoe requirements , railway linka , airports , energy potential and industrial potential , etc . It ooourred to us that your organization might be interested in supporting the route through Alberta and , it so , it may be that you would oonsider a letter or a Briet to the Commission. With kindest regards , I remain , Sinoerely yours , (Signed) Gordon E. Taylor MINISTER OF HIGHWAYS �.Tan m.<lh_,. Ron. Oordon I . l'II7101' o1aur ot LlSl.1st1Te uul1dlng ldAontOll . Albo1'U. Caneda Deal' Ra: r'T 6. J'u. 19~a 50042 • Alaska Int81'D4tlonal !aU a.Il4 HJ.eh-J eo-. • 'raT101': lUn.... rather tbAll lao!< ot inter •• t 1s napona1blo tctl! U. dalaT in anne:rlng JOur. ot Deoember 9 . Olll! or&&n1zation 1. ex\1'emely anxlou. to do •••r,thlns with1n our power 1n U. _tt.r ot P1'aootlng a.Il4 anooll1'o.a1n& tr8••1 trom the ••tarn Uo1tod Stat.. into 1barta. DIl1'1n& • delt to 701l1' Fl'orlnc. thie. 111' , I r.oohad the U\pron1on tAllt B. O. haa Hoont1J bean ce\tlnS _ tbAll U' " ehaN or AlallkAl bouD4 tr"U10. . wele<ae tho oPP01'tun1tJ to Join Alber in 1t. b14 tor th1a bU.in."• • J'ranItl,.. H1s/l1III.T COIIIIi ..1onwith the Alun InurDaUonal. I ... not taalll BaU and we100llll8 turthar detaUs a.Il4 woul.4 as to how 0Il1' lIII1et ehollld be addre••ad . Alao , wAIlt is tAIl t1Ju a1lJunt 1n.olYe4 in IIItI kl '18 the pre ••ntation? I aaldna DIU' CsD4d1u Vice aldent , noat 11.. <ltU'Wl ot CalcarJ to work With _ on tbAI pra}l81'8tlon ot tbia 1.t. aJI4 11; ...,. be thd h • •111 oonteot JOu tor further S:U Sc1anoe. oslO dncara17 ,.oura . Jliu'tin B . Cantwell Ex8ou~1.. .oretar,. �JanUSZT 20, 1958 Noil T. or , Ottloe or Edmonton Chamber 01' Coomerco 9905 101 A Avenue Mloonton. Alberta, C nnda Dear J.lr . Uohor: I haTe ;rour l etter ot Nonmbar 4th and the print ot the photogro}>h reterred to In yours ot Januar;r 13. I regret that your lettor ...... not answered , but I did not teel that Ita content indicated a reply until aueh a time as we ""1'. able to submit the rough lay-out at the Alberta seotion ot the brOOhure . e are not Tot in a position to submit this layout,duo to the tuct that several at tho berta pioture. have not bean reoeived to date . You under.tend , at oourse that it is impo.slble to O<IIl\Plet. the layout untll we havo all ot the vsrioua parU allllWllbled . You aay rost assured, hOwovel' that we are hard at work on the oOlliplotion at the broohUl'S . Finanoial support north ot Utah is in emellent shape , and thare still remains 8011oUation to be conducted in A1"izona , wIl10h will take place in FebruuT . Ploa.. e realize that "" have a 5, 000 &110 highwa:r extending into throe natioll8 , and proper solicitation, tharetor requires conaidorable tiJne . Zt1.aIonton ."ill be given its tair share of the apace . You recall that the layout I precented tor the cOll8idaratlon at TOur Chamber indicated about seven piottros on each ot the double apreade . I might add that Edmonton and Calsar:r will eaoh have two picture • • It ...e tirst thought that CalgarT would have three. but the Calgar:r Chamber h • wisoly deoided to apply theIr contribution tor tha publloatlon at picturoe at Alberta la Parke and aoenio attraotiOll8 . I Bay wlaely , beoause thesa ara the th.1.llgs Whioh attrnot touristu • •a "ill eubmit tho 1'1IlIll layout , es BOon as pouibla atter allot the piotures have boon reoeived . st einoerely TOur. �O. F . TE I. EPIlO N f. 25 11 8 ~ I A R tE TT f. ... . . , . . ..... , • •• EDMONTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ' N C O.P O .~TIID pHSROAlr . . . Q EDMONTON , A LB ERTA . C A NAD A January 13, 1958. 89' ers International Highway Assoc. Inc., 140 West Second SOllth Street, Salt Lake City I , Utah, U. S. A. Dear Sirs : I wrote YOIl November 4th, 1957, concerning advertising In the 1958 brochllre. With the letter, I enclosed a print of a photograph to be Ilsed. I have received no reply to Ollr letter and wollld like some confirmation by retllrn mall that the brochure Is being prepared. As s oon as we receive a rOllgb draft of the flnallayollt showing the size and position of Ollr advertising and picture, we wUl gladly send YOIl a cbeqlle fo r $ 300.00. I wollld greatly appreCiate an Immediate reply to this lette r . Sincerely Y Ollrs, NEIL T. MOHER, Office Manager. NTM:lk v.;-c: Mr . Bentley MltcheU, Treasurer, Highway 89 P romotion Fund, Mitchell Motel, Logan, Utah. �ARIZON" OffICE, 1021 E. C"",.l b"d; ltd. AOMINISTRATION OFfiCE 1"0 WE$T SECOND SOUTH ST. S.... LT L.... KE CIT Y I . UTAH DIAL H 9 ·9322 PhO.lli~ , ",i~ono Oi,,1 C R " · 7708 Of f iC E O f Mr . Pa~ Stevl g Director 89r s Iu t~rnat1 onal ."ft on t:,,·~ nG . Dear Paul: omellS, lAY Y. SUW"U "flidl"1 Wllt.,U' tooIalo l Wim."". A,il o" , J ust a l 1ne to let you know that we mios ed you at the ",eeti ngs 1n Maz!ttlan , }lex i co . s. O. tooIOUOW Vlu ·"o. idul tooI a<fOW tooI oto .. ~ I.q". '/ , A,i,au I teel that t he wh ole th:ng W S vory uah wo~ th a our t ' e and e ffort . Wo Il~d S008 vel"! fine !!I8llt 1ngs wi th the fol l!8 fran down t"lare . Thoy wer s vory onthusl~s t ic about our pr o pos ed pramot i olml proerrun f or t h i s yoa I' • IENTUY tooIlTCHE ll Vlc • . Pr •• id.nt tooI ilcklli tooIol.1 loqln . Ullk W . G. I .... S$ Socro,".,-T, ..,., • • l . Sio,l. tooIoiol Wldu bu,q. A,I ,o". DluttORS, 6U IL LHtooIO SEDANO Hotl l Fr"j tooIltc" ,d • . Nlu No,. I.,. Ofto," . tooI .. ,u> IUlNETT .... . HENDnX' C''''lrO" Malol . nd flOW ," '.n, ui lch. Uloh flANiC w. SOlG .... n lie elected M . Gu1l1ermo Froe= . Pr oside'lt ,,1' th e r Sinal oa. Hotel A13 s o c1o.ti on and l\ mel bor of the bon~,j ot "-"1rec tors ot i:he "1exle an :ba tt onsl Hot el Ass ocia ti on , aD our Direo t or frorn. Hax1co • You have proba.bl J ho I'd t hi n f rom M 'lrtin Ca ntwell even bofor e thls . 1 Our 8 r oehure program i s mOl" .ne a l eng f ai . . .11 wel.l. . F1"'S,c~'ilY"ft kol ( d.ko I r tln has t hin[.s about read t o r ut the program on the tooIo"'poli o••1 0 ' . " " . • rOBd SO" $nould b e seei ns h m befor e t " g lone I n y our DAtLAS ..... CLINGER S.ddl . lao', • a.rea. . .... lp!n • • W,o",i" , ~ 1 ,1"~ RICHARD C_ FUGUS I pl an t o mee t wi t h him one day t his we ek t o go over the promotI onal lit erature anl make t he final nr- fo., ", tooIol.1 6 ... , ~. II , . tooIO ",.. o EXICUTIVE neUTAItY , ranG e~ enta tooIARTfN H. C .... NfWEU 14(1 W . Slco"d 50"111 Soil l • • o City. Ut.h under way . for everyth1 ng before the j ob of selling Go t . I wondering i t you lIould be so k ind as t o Dend me your c heck f r your a dver t isomon t and your 1958 ~nber ­ .hip ao WaO agre e d a t the meeting i n Afton . We have re c eived the four hundI'ed d ollaY's fl'om tho Or ' za tion ;,i t h ;1!l1ch to l.Iet the pr c er_ s tar t ed , but a o you know that money W S a l ready e " I'!llarked t a l" H ~ r t ln ' a s a.lary If we 0:. .1 1 Cet a our own a d ver ti oing mOlloy in I nme di fl.t~ly t:'en "0 .,111 h'ws to get the prow ,., s t ar t ed . It ."Oolle! bo self ;:'' '''lQIlj)O.in.1ne 1 "1'01" tlH t poi n t on . 0 send you c hock t o ne here in LogLUl . P-.ake 1 t HiGh"-'" 891'0 Inter-nutional Hi ghway r:'omotlonal .1'6£Sl ei nc erel y h o. s t hat we >1111 havo something really repaort by th e end of March. S1nc erel r youra SCENIC ROU TE OF THE AM:ERI CAoS Bent l ey ~" t cnc ll J I( �ADMINISTIATION AIIZONA OffiCE, OffiCE uo weST SECOND SOUTH ST . 1021 E. C"melb"d; Id . SAlT lAICE CITY Ph ... nlx. A.l."n" Di,,1 CR -4 · 7708 AuItlIIIb. OffiCE O f Mr . Ernest R. Saran Director 89rs Inte rnational O alG~ry , OffICEIS , •. u De ~r A~bor t a , C da . Ernest l V. STEWAIT - ~,.,id.n' W.,I., .., 1ot",.1 WiIIl,tn,. AtI ,on. S. O. IotOUOW V ic .·~ •• oId •• t Ioto"o .. Iototon FI.q.t.lf. A,i,on' We cortninly wi sh that you c~uld have bean with un on tri p into old Mexico . Our l~co ~ 1ng D thore a.nn ent-11.ue1a stlaally rece!.vod . O~ or6 ~ nizat1 ona l ~"'ors Hell atte ndod IENTLEY IotITCHELL V!u · ',uid •• , lot i/C h.llloto l. 1 Lo", • •• UI.h W . G . lASS We ol eo ted !{r . Guiller!!!o Fl"ee=, !Ted ent of the Si na- Ion Hot el As s oc i a t ion, and a member 01' the Board ot lt Direotor s S.".I••y.T.... ", • • of the M oan National Ho t el Assoc io.tion , t o rep}!itoent us oxi on our board . He 111 a tine m.:m Who I am SU!.' e 11!11 Q O~t.,.. but e 0. great de al. to o' u" Bl~ O\'l tb fin prosr el."'ity inHex1co . DALLAS A. CLINGER Fl,lni S.ddl . Lod". Al pin •. W,om i" ", \~e would gre_l t l y apprec iate it i f you would be 00 kind us to " end i n ~our oheck fo r y our e d , t ogeth e~ Wi th t he f i ft een dolla ra fo r your 1958 a dvanoe membe r Ship as agree d at our me e t i ng in ".!'ton. Uyom::nS e L. 5,.". 1<0401.1 Wlck •• b",q, Arho • • RICHA.D C. fERGUS lotot. 1 F.",", 6,.. , F.lI., 1<o40","n. fXfCUTlVE SEeU' A .... : I<o4AITIN H. CANTWf.U 140 W. Suo"d South s. lI L.h City. Utah I , UTAH DIAL £l9 · 9J22 The to n.ost road i t wee k if Brocburo pr OeraT1 10 nO\·T uoll unde!" ,,'ay , but in u~'dc:r our advanc e expon oe s and ge t Hr . CW"ltuoll out Ol"'. the will be nooessary to h " ve thoB o fund. ill hand thi s possibl e . I la', to "pond at lB', at one d~y in Salt L9ke City thi s " e ek, a t "hi oh tiee I hor e t o be ablo to pay for t h o prooo t10n ul materia l , re o ~ipt books otoo teru s o the progr am can Bet undor way wi t hout fUrthe r delay . --Sinc erel:Fl?uro, JO ( // '\ ,91z~&fl/iL./ Bentl ey K)I't{he lL,L_ - Chairman : r-romotion Commi t t eo . SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMER ICAS �.... D MIN ISf ..... TION OFfiCE 140 WEST SE COND SOUTH ST. S .... LT L KE CITY I , UT .... H .... "RIZONA O" ICE, 1021 E. Co ... lbo<:l, Rd . DIAL H9. 9312 OHlCf O f ~r . ~oar1 6. ~~r ttn Direc tor 39re Int e nati onal !1artln ' 8 Ca.ts , LiVingston, Montana . OHIClU, lAY V. STEWART , ••• 1011.' Dear Charlie I W"t,,"", 1.4 01, 1 William" A,ilo" s. O . 1oI 0U.O W We cer ta1nly missed you at our .",ot1nC3 1n I!aza nnn . ~Ie had a turn out of b out thirty members f r om a ll p ortl ons of the Hl ghway . Ev8I70ne seemed to have a g ood time, we ho pe t h t we d i ~ .~. good f or t he OrBanization . Mr . Gu111lermo Freeman, Preai dent o f the Sina10a Hotel Associ(lt10n, and a D1reotor of the Hexloan lJati onal Hotsl As s oc ia tion 'liaS chose:n. to repre s ent UD in I.(ex1a o . He Deems to be a nne nIIln 9n d I bl:l s =e that he will e o u • • ""'" goo~ down t he r e . vie c ame back with t.he money f or oic.ht n O \l membership s in I.f:e.xioo . I t 1s to b e h o}:e d that tbis in only Y lu,', . old.~1 Motto .. Moto" FI19 ,,"fI , .... '1,011. .UHUY MITCHEl L Vic•. , ... id.nt MlIch. 1t lo4ot.! lo9.ft, Uteh w. 6 . ..... 55 s.c,.,." .T, ••,., .. L. 51.". 1004 01 . 1 W ldu b.'9, .... '1 ,00. DIU(TOlS, CiUILLUMO SEDANO a star t t her e . Evel""'<#7one that we tal ked to WaS mora than l int~ re sted i n the Organization and ita pr oposed proera..t tho ye r . Hot, 1 Fr,! Mltea,d, H' •• No" I,., ......... . 104,.1 <0 IUUlm • . MfNDIYX c:.ml.OfI !oIot.l ud 'O~" '.~,viICh, UI'~ flANK W. SOIGAlZ Fi,tlSoc".ilya." kofld.ho 1040n' pell .. , ld.'''' ~trj~';':.~I:~~~;.EI A p l•• , Wyo",l"t RIC HAID C. FUGU S FI.tu. 1004 0,"1 G, •• If.II"1>4 0"" " I)((CUTI VI Slcm.....Y, Io4AUlN H. CA NTWEU I* W . Second S-,.. SaHl • •• Cih . U,"h tor 1 am. pl a l"'J ll ng to 80 t o Salt Lake City t.hia weak to Got f>:art1n star ted on the Brochure pro am . Th1ngc DOom to b e moving a long f a 1rly wal l Wi t h t ho. t \for k , t hough we a re about out of :funds . Ra,- Stewa r t sent me tho ch eck !'rom the Orean1zat1on in t ho QJ:IIlount o~ four hundred dollarD , OJ"1 th!a ha s bo cr. depo31ted 1n t h o F1r s t Ih\ t 1ono.l Bank here 1n Logan 1n tho n ,.,me of tho R1 ~ av 89rs Int ornat1onal r ro~ o t -., anal F\md • ...l-..... ~ v Thi s l. a a ccording t o the agreen:ont r oa ohod at Afton . lie would Breatly a p preo iate i t i f y ou weule s ond ln your O\ffi pll)'lllent tlor t he advertising whi oh ;you a r e g oing to t ~ke in the Brochure t oget her w1 t h y our members p f or 1958 in advanoe, a. we all a greed we would in order to havj luft10 i ent ftmd. with whioh to get our proeram on tl~ r Otid . Thi ng. have progreBaed nov t o t he p o~t t h · j; we n 'e ~~~;~t~o~l~et the o ontroot. for t h e reoe!pt books nO the ~ lite rature whi oh will be necessa ry in order to of selling tha p r ogram to our m embors . In order' uet have the money Bgl"'e ed u pon '..Li s w eek 11' �A'IZONA O ff IC E, 102 I E. Co","lbock Pholni_, A,izo"" Oiol CR . · 7708 AOMINISTRATION OFfiCI 140 WEST SECOND SOUTH ST. S ... lT l ... kE CITY I , UTAH DI"'l El9.9l 22 ' d. OffICE Of t.r Burnett Hendryx Di r ector 89re International . Dea r Burnett: Off ICEU, .... Y V. STIiW ... U ',o.ld,n' We oer talnly d l d ml • • you at our me eting. 1n M azatlan . I f eel tha t we d 1d Dome Good t or t he organ '.!<nti on thoro , bub we would have b een able to do muoh more i f you had been ther e to hel p us . WI.t".I' i00i,,111 Will i,,,,., "',I,,,n, s. O. ~OUOW V I",', n ld,n' 1ooI00,,,w ~"I"" F ".'f....","U I" IENTlEY ~ITCHElL Mr . Guill1ermo Freeman, Presldent ot the Sinaloa Hotel A•• oolatlon and a D1reotOl" ot the ~x1 o an lJatl onal Hotel A•• oeiation Vall chosen to he d our lIork thore . You have no doubt heard of this from 14artln Co.ntwell before tJ.OW . I f e el . ure that • Freeman wlll be able to do us eoae good in M exioo. Bot h be and Mr . :00.'91 11, of tho atel La Siesta "leo·" •• ld o.' IooIlIckll1 .... "1. 1 l","". U t.~ W. 6 . .... SS Slcto"ty.Tt ... ~, .. l. Sin" .... 01.1 Wid •• bIO" , A,b"n" DIItCTOl$: ~UllLU ~O in M3.xatlan &'loe planning t o t r e.vel up over Uighway 89 a t co,doN .lea at aa tar aa the CanadIan border thi s 8 I · or so you wi ll n o doubt got aqualnt ed wi th him at tha t t1oe . SEDANO Ho'OHt.yt.4 •• No,_I •• , mot • . ", ..lu 'U~NETT A . HEHOR'fX Com.,OK 101.,.1 .ftef T.~tI ::'::c:.U;:RG . . rz \'10 bad a def1r!i te promiae trom Senor Ruis of t he M exlcr..D. F I"I$.cw'lty ... kofld.~.oovernru"'n t t.r a val organizatIon thc.t be would AEt8 to it that we have aome new r ootage at tull color tilm to be used in our ~;"rl~~:.:,jl:t~~:.u mo.,ie. Ho pr omised t hat h e would oen& t hi s fi lm to us I'ight Apl~. , W~om;n, aw07 BO that 18 !l nove in the right di reotion . klCHA'O C . FERGUS h"., lo4oftlpoller, ld. h. ~o"1 I h r. ve received the four hundred d ollar s trom t.."'le ~ dB eol aotlan and have de posite d lt in 0. fun d 1n t he Firs t Uationa l fXfCUT nCUlAlY, Bank he r e in Logan as we agre od uhi 1 e we 'U"e!"o in Afton . ~ o IVI ~e:.I~.~~n;~};:'u. money W S alrea dy e annarked to pay Hartina Ba le.!.'.,. f or t hi s a S.ItLl k. Clty. Ultk month. The res t of t he money nooesaary to get our p ro grom star ted wo.. to have oome fran t h e lIir ectors in the f Ol'" ot an advo.nce p yment fo r t helr own adver t i sing and a dvanoe m....ber.hip to be reii11 tted l mmedlo.te17 to t h e Adve r tlal ng C~ttee . As yet none of that money ha l been recei vod so we wlll be unable to prooeed unle •• l t 1. reoelved l mm3 dlately . G,.. , hili, ~o ""n" W ould you plea se send us y our oha ol: by j."'at'lll'll ,u~ l so ue 0 n get ~le program on t he road . I no plannin g to '_l:-:~~s~e~l~t;"LBke Cl ty toward the end of thi . week to h elp ~ fi nal arrangement. t o get th1ng. under way . Si noerely youre, .t>,)-<' h Bent l ey L [tchell ~ SCENIC ROUTE OF THE ;\MERICAS �A NON · PROFIT CO RPOR A TION PR OMOTIN G N O RTH AMERICA 'S BE AU TIFUL BOUleVARD OF NATIONAL PA RKS INT ERNA TI O NAL HEAD QUA RTEIS l-iD WEST SECON D SOUTH ST. SAlt LAKE CITY 1. UTAH DI A L El 9 . 932 2 AuItl!Hb. OffiCE OF OffICERS: RAY V. SHWAU Pr..idul W... terne.Mot.1 Will'aml. A,ilona & ntpelier, Idaho 9, 19S 7 May BENT LEY MITCHEll Vice· P,eliden! Milchell Motel Logon. Utah ER N EST R. SA RA N Vice· Pre,ide.t Hepburn 1.1010. Cou,t . Ltd. CeIIlOry. Alberla. Cuod. W. G. BASS Sec.e'a,y. T.euu •• , La Sic"" 1.1 01.1 W ickenbu'Q, Ati.o •• Mr . Bentley M1tch~ll, Chairman A dvertising Committee Y litchell Mo tel DI RECt ORS, Lo gan , Utah SR. ING. GUILLERM O FRE EM AN Hotel F.eemon MOI. tlo., Si.aloo. Me.:co Dear Bentley : 8UR NEn A. HE ND RYX C.me.on Mo'. l and Tou .. Pan9uilCh. Ulah H A NK w. SO RG ATZ Fi ..1 Secu,i ly Ba nk of Id.ho MOOII",li .. ,. Idaho PAUL J. STEVIG S'.t Volley J e welry Alton. Wyo"i oll CHARLIE B. MARTIN . JR. Motl i.·. Inc . R• •I... ... I Li. in IlSlon. Mo n' , .a UECUTIVE SEC U r ARY: MARTIN H. CA NTWE LL 14G w. s.,oood Soulh s" lI l. ~e C ity, Ulah Referring to Cantwell ' s letter, regarding 89 t ers Movie - wlU le the program is a splendid undertaking , I feel this s hould be postponed f or the time being . We are in the midst of the Brochure program and haven 1t enough cash to meet t hat expense .. To obligate ourselves b~y ond our ability to pay 1s bad business and could spell a com~ plate breakdown of our O rganization, regardles s of the advertising merit o I am definitely op posed to this expansion at the present 1ime . Lets, as Mar tin suggests , f eel ourselves along si nce postponing will in no way i njure Treoher in any way by reas on of the postponement o With kind r egards J I am Va so:';):-:~ ;tor - Idaho FWS: gmc CC j truly you r lS, Ray V. Stewart, Presi dent Martin A. Ca ntwell , Secretar SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIONS �January 20 , 1958 Homer ilandley , Direotor 89'ers International Hwy. Ass ' n ., Ino . Rainbow Cate, Riohfield. Utah Dear Bomer: Thanks tor your letter ot January 5 , and the information it oontained . W have not published the bulletin as yet , e but plan to do so ~tore long . I will be leaving Salt Luke tor a trip south along about the tirst ot February. end w ill plen to epen some time wi th you as I pess thru Richfield . In the meantime, it you ere able to get the pioture taken , hold it t here , and I will pi ok it up . There is also a ohanoe that President Bentley }!1tohell and I lIIIlY tly down to see you before I star. tor Ilrizone. , but this 1a only e. gWlSS , and I will not know tor surs till I gee Bentley in a tew days . At any r ~ te , hold the pioture till you either soe , or hear trom c.e . e have reoeived a number ot very encouraging lettors in responae to the Resolutions passed at our 1957 ALcual Convention ot whiah I am 1nolosing oopies . Our big problem at t he moment is to oomplete the tina cial support necessary to publish our boautiful oolored broohurq and thi8 i8 one ot the probleaB I will want to disoU88 with you . Till I see you , best regards , rtin H. Cantwell Executive .~ eoretary ��/J'L.< v t"- -t:-<L.<'" --<-~~ ~ -CU,--<,--<~-,-, A'"" It L X [ J! ,r'< r ~ "-" 0 (J /1L<-.- .-:J Z '-«---t-"-.- (...<,-<. z-(, .A "'-- A';"')<2-< <.-{, 7 t' ;Z.. '--<- "-' /-<-<~ /H-,<._u fr ? ~'---' /. ,--.,f --e'~( ;! ) ""_"<-<.-/ .It "70 A< ~ /.><--<'_< < '-«- _ ,cG d-e .(. a../~/> �, -t'(~ [(L<.~e-<.- /~..c - c:L r~ ! -'??1 ~ f.t'--c---..,;c. ,,£(/ ,.< ~<:<-<' 2 ~(.c. Ct~ t-<~<....,0 p~ etL---?' t-L> ~r ~~~ ~ tL ...e~u ~~ -C~ ~-C«~<--< -ty /::2.,:) -;?-'~...-<~ L..,-<,-<-<J /"--' "C~ c:<-T-Io~L/ ~ L(/_____ ;z{/A!.r~ ~J ~ ~~( ?~ ..c .. '-,(. ;t-l<--<,r!{-.J 'i?;ll'<~~. <-(. /7? ~ <J .2" d-<- U , /<-<.~ ~.,,(~ ~., d~C7 .;< /c-<- " ~ ??L~ ""<-t'- ~4- -<'''<-<-<-./ aL A...t~~~ ~~/~ -/<....<..A.../. ~~'-- ~ ~~4~v~~ . Ja/ 74~ ~ .....,.{<---v JL<..AJ Ad<-<--<._<--e/ 7?V<~<...<.A./ ~ ~ ~-L/ a~ ����em. .uguet 31st 1957 . l"r . I~ ~entley }~itc'te1l. tenell U"otel , Logan. Utah . De3.I' ~en""ley : The last t\o:o \/ee''"8 "-las seen fti i te a on beh~lf of tne 8ger~ associat10n. It \tent better than I eX'Jected , I guess "'lY missio nary worl.:: hn.e had a Ii ttle effect. I ,..;ould Bay u!at 'ffl are su~e of t~e ~ini,u, of tne 3 , 200 . 0 0 req"tireri. f'lr a two nage snre'1.d 1")lus nrob~bly 30 Or 40 ,!nbere fro, ~Uberta . bit ot ac~~v~ty T!1.ere snou:d be qni te a ' re-"'reeentat.Lon fron .Uberta at the convent10n , at least I hOl"")e so. One t!ling botners ,e . rartin cant wor!< .~ thout m.one:r for ever a..''ld all the subscriyt10ne \.,e have BO far have to go through c''l.c'Ulnels before the ~oney conee in . '::8 have a definite 900 . 00 cneques for ~lich should be ~ailed in tne not too d.stant future , 300 fro~ the city of CaLgary, 300 fron t~e aha~ber of Con,erce in Ca1X. Red ~ e r and ~ 300 from the G07ern~ent of the PrOV.Lnce . I believe it would heln everybode if you could send -r"art i n his cOrrl!il ssi -0 on tnis I!loney no".",. of 300 fro~ uns~ecified Besides t~e coney ~entioned I am sure the dalgary C of C and an addit 10nal a'":1ount fro., the l'rovince . "During the next yea.r 1,;'e should see qUite an increase in tne Bu~port fro~ Alberta. In the '""lean tine I B1'1 loo''''in forward to eeeing you again in october . cc Ray ste"m.rt lIart1n t,;~ 1""CW6:..I....I.. . �Lowell L. parks 1551 11 0 . 400 VI . Bountiful , u t a h larch 2 7, 1 957 Inv oice to: 8 I rs Internat iona l Hi ghway J.r . 1.brtin Cantwe ll 140 ~'1est Second outh J:..8S I n . ?~ 5a lt Lake City , Ut ah or ; br t work fo r ro s ter map $ 30 . 00 Please make c heck to ; Lowell L. Sparks 1551 11 0 4 00 lie s t Bountiful . Utah Thank you I I �A NO N · PR O F IT CO RI' O R A T ION PROMOTING NORT H AME RICA 'S BEAU Tif UL BOULEVA RD OF NATIONAL PAR KS IN TE R NA TI ONAL H E ADQUARTERS 140 W EST SECON D SOUTH ST. SA LT LAKE CITY I , UTAH DIAL El 9·9322 OFF ICE OF 15 BENnEY MITCHElL, Choi , .. on , P,o",oti on CO"' ''' " ' ' Mitch,,11 Mot"l , Highway US 89 • l ogan , Utoh Hr . ";'rh.osr 11. . 'ctobe 14. 1957 Sal'an Vice , ·esl.d,mt ~9r s Intl . Calgary . lbortn , C.,nada . O Ff iCERS : RAY v, STeWART Pr •• ide.1 W•• te,n., Moiol Will ia ..... A,ilOn" r ear D.·Bfle t : BENTLEY MITCHELL Vice·',eiiden l Mitchell Motet 0 , Loq"._ Ut"h ER NEST R, SARAN Viu·Pte .iden! Hepburn Motor Court, Lid. C4IIQa"" Albert" , C"o"d. W. G, BASS Secrot4lry. Tte<l.u,e, Lo Sien41 Malel Wid:.nbu'Q. A,iza .. DIRECTORS: SR. ING. GUILLERMO ~RHMAN Hotel f,e..men Mazotlu, Sinaloa, M..ico aURNETI A, HENDRYX Came,an Mal.l .. d Tours PenQuirch, utoh fkANX w. $ORGAiZ Fi"t Security auk Qlldo~o Mon l ~li~" Id4lha PAUL J, STEVIG Stor Vollev J ..... lry AUon, WVailillq CHARLIE B, MAR TIN, J R. M"rtin', Inc. Re.'au,,,n l LivinQsta", Mo"t4ln~ EXECU TIV E SECRETARY: MARTIN H, CANTWEll 140 W, SecQtld South S"l t lo~e City, Utah ~ . .. ""'- ~ . Todays =11 brourht t he forms l1b1ch you an<' I trust aim 1n oreer for Charloy to on an account with t i.O ''1rst "ational Bank in Liv1nroton, nt una . I huvo s igl'ed Lom o.no \1111 oncloGo tLom In this lettor for your oigna t ure one aak that y ou . 1(;11 t her.1 and .end them to Charley "Ilr tin a t Livi ngston . This \1111 mal", i t posnible for hi", to open our Assoo1ation ccount tho;"G wi th the mln1ruum of delay . Upon my return hero I 9cnt n to' o£!,. m to I~r . Frco~ at his Hotol in ochoster 'i1nn1 sota . T ~e tolegram WaC re t urI"led un~ eli ve!' ablo . I t hen plnced e. person to erson telephone c all fo!'" him 01 t iler at the Hotol or at t h e :o.yo C11.nio and Wo.B informed that hO h d fin.' s lleci his tre t :cents and had ch oc ked out on the eir~th of ctober , rOLumably to return to axie e . I t s eem t bnt we have ad our hands tiod in ! oxico aver s ince our orCanization started . I shall ",,1te to .r . Froe.nan in t ho very near fUture aDO ooe if it wi ll be possible to sot up a moeting s omewhere o.lone. t h e lino botlolOon her9 a nd ~az a tlan .onco . If t his i s not r ossiblo I arha' s ,men .a,· tin is roO. dy to move dmm that 'It-lay my wife and I oan a ranee to take OUI' va cation down that \lay as in this yea)." . Pl ease koe- mo informed of the dovelo~ .ants u . in Canada , and let me know if any t hinc new o o~e. uP . I feel sure tha t if we al l wor k tore t he ' nS a. te::un, pool1nC our 1dol, 0 , th.. t we wil l be able to mako c ons 10orab1e rocracs tlLs year . I want y ou to kn:·w that I will \le l c oI,~o your Buu:estlons ond oonstructive criticimns a t 11 times . SInce oly youra , <~ j • Don t f II tel,ell SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIONS • �'larch 12tn 1957 . - 1"".r . Bentley H1tchell , Cha1rmnn and ne~berB of tne Promotion Co~lttee , 89 ters International. ::Ilgh\o/ay AssociR.tlon , 140 ,lest Second South, Salt Lake City , Utah. Friends : ~d Q<>" /o/.H.t,Ie. I would li~e to give a report on my activeties on behalf of our association since I returned from Ashton . Since cost of i t is concerned ,rlth the pro motion prograMme I am addressing this letter to you. As far as ~e~ber8hip is concerned I have not tried to solicit l"Il6mbers for t,yO reasons : f J..rst we are in the mi dst of a membershiu drive for the Canadian b Rockies Tourist Association uhien is our Alberta association , secondly I tnought it better to \'1ait until :Iartin Comes to Alberta and t:16n conbine t"te me~bershi'P dr! ve \11 th the promotion progra.'ml6 . In the m.ean ti..,e I have done the follo,o/ing : 1 . ) r have s])01:en to a meeting of the Calgary Hotel Association and found a very favor~ble reception for oy re!:1ar'':B . 2 . ) I had a long conversation with Alex l"ltchell . a. notel oTler3.tor 1n Ed...,onton about tne ag ters , he ,·,il1 b be a booster for our associa.tion . I also had similar -..l talks with Claude Brewster , a very influential citi of Banff and Ryerson Christie of Cardston . Theee people will be of great help to Hartin when be CQT"1ee to Alberta. In tTle !:lean time r shall try and contact some otners 1n Dreuaration for lIa.rtin ' e visit . 3. ) r have wntten an article in t'le bull etin of tnr lfotor Courts a:1d '{esorts AssOCiation of Alberta which has G20 members in every part of the Pr ovince in which I 9xplaint the 89 t ers associntion and the pro motion progra~e and as~ed to give the matter some thought and be of assistance to l!artln when he comes Uorth. 4 . ) I had a long talk >lith Dan Ca.,pbell , Director of the LUberta Travel Bureau in Zd~onton and he has ,.fc-il!n tI.. ~...,. c.1-l'. e~ · }lkt/ru "if: , A A �til:V[lUl;)i'oo/ M()T()I;) {;()UI;)T LT(). - 2 - promised hie full oo - oneration . Tne Alberta Govern ment will again take out an assoc~ate ~e~berBhiu as l~Bt year and will also hein s~onsor pictures for the brochure . Dan does not thin~ it will be dificult to £et Bvonsors for the Alberta page in tne brochure. He also promised any help he can give in the making of the moving picture . All in all I believe that the 80'ere pro motion will have good su~port in .tlberta. Wl*hing you success at the outset of our pr ogrBMMe and assuring you of any help or support I can g i ve , Yours sincer el y AMA AA �INTfRNATIONAL Hf A OOUAITERS 1-40 WEST SECONO SOUTH ST. SALT lAKf CITY I , UTAH OIAL fl 9 ·9322 A NON . 'ROflT CO R' OI A TION PROMOTING NOUH AMERICA'S IUUTlfUL 10UlEVARO Of NAtiONAL ' .... KS OffiCE Of 100 Vle s t Park St r e et Livine st on , M a ne ont Ootober 12 , 1957 OF FICERS: RAY v. STeWART """d,nt Wr'!".e, Motel W,ll,.""" A"lou !aJ.- . Bentley lJi t chell ¢ Mitoh ell Kotel Logan , Ut ah lENTLEY t.,jITCHtLl VlceP,H,d.nt t.,j<tchll t.,jot,1 Dear Bentley , L<>';I'.' Ut.~ Enclosed pl ea s e find two Corporate Aut horiza tion Resolut i ons UNEST I, SARAN Vice·P,."d,.1 Hepbu,. t.,jot ... Cou". Ud. C.IQAry ..... lbert •• CA.Ada w. G. lASS P1 ea s e s i g:n t h e s e a n d t h en S,c.,tory·T,ea.y", LI s •••It t.,j ot,1 Wjc~,nb"'Q. AtiIO"' DIRECtOftS: a nd one signature ca rd for y our signat ure . r or\'re.r d t h em on t 0 Ern i e saran i n Cal gary t a sking him t o sign t h em and forward t hem back t o me as SI . ING. GUILlERt.,jO ~RHM""N Holel F...S'.,lw, t.,j •• ;co t.,j.leU ••. ",e. soon as poss i bl e s o that we may t r a ns r er th e a c c ount t IURNt" A HENDRYX C.m,ro.t.,jolll,ftdTo." PII\(I.'!Ch, Uteh 1 st Nat iona l Park Bank h ere i n Livings t on FRANK w. SO RG.... rr Fi .. t Seeu,;ty "nk of Ideho Mon,pel'lI. Id'ho run ou t · gned ch eo k S t 00 soon. of s ~ PAUL J. STEVIG Ste, Velley J ...... I,y .... flo •. Wyo,,;oQ 88 W ith kindes t personel rega r ds , v~ y ours , C. B. EXECUTIVE nCUTAIY : t.,j .... UIN H, CANTWELL 140 W. Second South Sell l. k, City, Uteh th e boot we will not I remain CHARLI~ •• t.,jMTIN . JR. t.,jlrli.', loe. h,l,y"nl LlyinQ"o., t.,jo.t •• , 0 I~ , Jr . ENC. SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIONS �A N O N · 'ROFIT COR'ORAT I ON nOMO TING NO RTH AMERICA 'S IEAUTlFUL lOUlfVARD Of NATIONAL ' ARKS INT ERNATIONA L HE A DQ U ARTERS 1"0 WEST SECOND SOUTH ST. SALT LAKE CIT V I , UTAH DIAL n 9 .9 3 22 O ffiCE O f 15 I ENTlEY MITCHEll. Ch ai ,ma n. Pro",otlo.. CO.. ",;II•• M ikh. 1I Mot.I, Hig hwa y US 19 • Logo .. , Ul oll lir . ChLlt'ley B . dart1n , JT' . H rUns C"to Li v 1nrston, ..lsnt""" . O FF IC US : RAY v. STEWAR! "...id40nr W.... 'n.' Mclel Willi."". A,i,c.8 8ENTleY MITCHEll Vi".p,..idenl I.Mchll Mal.1 LoQu, UI.~ ERNEST R, SA""N Vi~.P",ld,,' Hepbu,n MOIO' Ca~", Ud. C.I",8,.., Alb.II4. Cene:!. W. G. SASS *'Ollry·T""u'" La Sill'4 1.401.1 W!c.'nbu'G.A'izan" I ~e oe ~ved your letter totothor with the) ne c esBlry forms for sotting up t 0 69 3 b nk acoount in tho First I, .. tior.al Bank a t Livinrston . Thoso forms havo beAn 'rorol'ly si(7'ted nd will bo sent to .=1 0 uO,I'fln in C. ry today . I suprose th t it will bo nocesoary to oond tDe chocks Signature until sucL tl 0 as we ~.avo tho eet to(et11or . ~o 0 for my ol"por tun~. ty to down DIRECTORS: Upon arrival he'O I tried to oend telegram to ir . Fr09ClBn ba ck 1n Roch estor inno8ota . fIte teleGram. v s returned UIl"elivor:.ble . I then tr~od to telophune him either at the Hotel or a.t the ~ avo Clin1c an, fOW1 t.)D.t he hnd checkod out J both placos on the . ' Chth of Octobor . 'l'i:.ds turn or ovents will mako 1t impossiblo to moot 111th him until SOl.lot 1n t he no').r future 01 thor w~1on ho CCClOS U' hero or 1 t ay be that my \l1 fo nntI I . ill BITBll[O a few dBYS v o .. tion do>m that way this , ter . \/e had such n Good t'me thel'8 laot wintor tha t we woulc 11ke to EO aSc.l.in . SR. ING. GUILLERMO HHM"N Hal.1 F,.. ",.. MauU .. , Si,..IO<I, Muico IU.NETT". HENORYX C."'ero"Malele"dTa~f1 P.nG~"clt, F""NI( UI.h SORG"rz w, Fi"'Sec",i""k,,kafld.ha Monllllli... ld.~o PAUL J. STEVIG S18' V.lley J ...... I'y "Hon, W~a."i"", CHARLIE S. MARTIN. JR, 101411;,,', I~c, Rel!lU'4nl Li~in9110n, Maftl,", EXecUTIVE SECR £TAU : M"lTIN H. ",NTWELl 140 W. Second Soulh I t is .incero y hored toot t" nts ,111 mcve forwr d Bt rs dur~n8 t h' 8 yet r . 0 rece1ved SOL10 tnvorable publi c i ty ho"e \lh' ch I em su,'o \lill n< t hurt us . With t, e 58l1l••• Citv, Uteh ,- If at any timo you have a sua ostion which you ~ oel woul.1:' help us ~n any way ple.,so teel tree to (11'0 it to De . I fool my innbi' i ty to ro' orly fill the .!loes of hUY utowar t , boc aus e ho has been a fino lresicent . I do fool tl t if wo can all pool our resourcos nd 1,.10 8 ..n \o1o!'k toccthror o,s 0. team toot \le wl1l bo able to show so...'10 rocross dur t-;.a ttl S year . I shall l ook iDrward to sooiOE you bofore too long . I'~ '" Sinc orely yours , E . Bent oy ;Vtc 011 SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIONS �Sen. Mike Mansfield ...... 30, 19S'7 Rep . Lee Metcolf Rep _ Leroy Anderson _tor J _ - . IIIzrI'87 v. S . Seate Offi.. Blq • ...h1n,tob, D. C. Dear Sen. ~. Pl.. . . be adYUeeI tbat Sup«r1n_ _ 0errtta0ll at T.U _ _ .UOIIIJ. Park, rlll be :lao .uh1n,tob 011 AprU 11th, 9th ami 10th • • baa CplII.eeI • _ du1ft to _ t with tho _ _ C""llN8a1011Ol I)olo.,._11111 cIur1.nc th10 tloo . I GOD ' t tell TOIl haw hilh17 ploue4 . . woul.4 be U 70U .... arnnae t ar a tinl with Sup«r1n_ Oerrttaon at th1& tioo . • I aa .nclooinl a O"PJ' at .... 0errtta0ll8 l.tter to _ :lao _ to _ or ........ 19th, at whiob 70U ha... a cOJIT :lao 1otlJ' ru.. . I ........ that otter ;you ha... read h10 l.tter 70U rlll 1.Dldc8t0n4 our ..... "" tar •• kinI that ;you _ with hill. I. 1& • t:luo .... ami certa1nl:r 10 -.t COC>pG"flU... :lao lUll' ....".,. that he ..... be . CharlO)' B. lartln, Jr . Cbaiftan or !our1at c-tttn LIYIliQSTOW CIW!BER CBI.ac ~ CCWERCI MONTANA D IRECTOR 89'ERS I NTERNATIONAL ASSN. �llllITED STATES OF HE INTERIOR DEP.\H~"·· '1T NAtIONAL PAFJ( SERVICE Yellonstone National Park Y"!:.low:.::to:le Park, ITyoming COP Y March 28, 1957 Office of the Superintendent Mr. Charley B. Martin, Jr. Chairman ot Tourist Committee Livingston Chamber of Commerce LivIngston, Montana near Mr. Martin: ~ de~k When I returned from m1 vaoation in A rizona Monday I found on your letter of March 19 with regard to the longer opening of the roads in Yellowstone National Park. I have becn greatl y pleased with the attitude ~88ed by your group nnd the clear vision you people havo with regard to our problems. I havo tried to bo f air i n giving you TI1!J views of tho problems with which '1'10 are f aced and l t ried to express thoso viC\1S frankly in lIlY tnlk to tho group at Chico Tucsdt>.y night uhcn I \las s peaking on Q longer lIoason far tho park. Wo have pushed up the opening datos for this year and hnvo act target datos of May 1 for tho Wost Entranco , iiI th tho rood to Old Pnlthful baing open nt tho same time, ~ 15 for tho East and South ontrnnoc and Juno 10 f or tbo Northeast Entranco. W intend t o l:IB.ko n nOT1 and thore ough sUl"Y'Dy of the costs of kooping tho no:,th and south roods open through tho park, "hiob " ould monn higlmay 89 t hr ough tho park. Wo aro also con.idoring tho pos.ibility of keoping tho rood opon to Old F~ ithful in tho "inter montM and this olso is to be the s ubject of Q s cpnrato study. I canlt tell you hon much Inger and I enjoyed mooting nlth your group at Chioo Tuesdoy night Uhd h~7 muoh I onjoyod tho opportunity to tclk informlly on park affairs to such Co fine gathoring. Since I have been in the park I havo heard nothing but praiso for tho finc cooporation and friendly spirit lJ'hlch hns existed batt/con the Livings t on, Gtll"diner and Poradise Valley people 171th tho park people end this is cvidc.:ncGd mora nnd more oach tlmo a group gets togethor. W nil f elt Q nero uolcomo from thos e present at Chico, o ond onjoYed so t'lUoh meoting and ta.lking nlth people nho bnd such ll. keen interest in park r..ft l'.irs. It liQS n revolation to ne t o s oo tho fine piotures "!l1ah Mrs. W hithorn presonted and to observo hor kn0l71odgo of tho perk and ite foatures . Sbe like so I:lWIY Living.ton o.nd othor peoplo living in th1e vicinity ha.vo a keen intcrost r.nd love of tho park. I uou1d liko to be abl e to toll you that no onn op:m the r ood to Wost Y ollonstone nnd Old Faithful by April 15 but it is not likely thnt t7e cnn push tho date up any this yonr tron tho dat a DOll s ot for May 1. Hcxrevor, if it is ~t all possible for us to opan it to publio trevel n fet7 dnye enrlior tle 17111 m ost certo1nly da so. Perhnps next year t1G cc.n plc.n on an enrlior opening date. Hnmiltonts crcrts c.ro not oxpoctod to nrrivo in tho park untU around April 26 and t10 m ust hnvo tho store c.nd s ervico au.ti on open thero boforo no cnn lot visitors in that nron. Tho tourist cnblns and cafoteria \7111 not open until MP~ 10. I am sending you horouith nn inforck tion shoet ~ lla issuod on Mc.roh 11 uhich \70 are sonding to all persons \1riting in fo!' information on an oC'~lY visit to tho perk. I unnt to cgain thcnk you for tho expressions cont~ined in your fino letter e.nd f or the oooperetion and friendline.s " hiob hoe bson cxtondod to M and Inger by the Livingston Chamber of Commorco and tho people of tho Livingston community and I uant to assure y ou that I no looking farcrrxd to o contlnua.tion of this fine rolc:.tlonahip. I hope thnt nhoncvor you and oth01"8 from Liv1ngaten visit tho perk you will drop in nt tho offico to soy "hello·. ICy l atch string is nltmy& out! Sinoorely youra, Lemuel A. GnrriaoD Superintendant copy �245 S OUTH FIRST WEST , SALT LAKE CITY 1. U T A H . TELEPHONE EL 9 · 77 33 PRIN TERS · LITH OGRAPHERS Ma y 28 , 1958 M . Be ntl ey Mitche l l , Ch airman r 89 'ers International Highway Assn . , Inc M itchel l Mote l Logan, Utah Dear M . Mitche l l l r M . Cantwell has discussed fu lly with us the desired r changes and budget situation that e xists for the coming Highway 89 Brochure . We are pleased to confirm the followin g for the production as per the rough full color dummy submittedt 50,000 Copies Highway 89 Brochure 16 pages , self cover - lithogra phed in four colors on the outside cover pages - two co lors on t he inside pages - page size to be 8" x 9 " $4287 . 00 Comp lete Additiona l copies over 80 . 00 Per M Book s ~O , OOO Less copies pe r thousand un de r 50,000 Less 72.00 Per M Boo ks (to 5 , 000 Copies ) If front cover i s simplified from original layout as per our d iscussion with M . r Can twell Ded uct 125 . 00 If duotones are used on th e back cover in place of two full co l or pictur es making two 4-color pictures and two duo tone pictures Deduct 110 . 00 Delivery wi ll be made with in 30 days following receipt of fina l copy . �89'ers International Highway Assn . , Inc Page 2 Terms of Payment I $ 1 ,000 . 00 to be paid in advance of production . $600 . 00 to be pa id upon receipt of press proofs . $ 1, 200 . 00 to be paid before f i na l running of book . Balance to b e paid at final delivery. W will be pl eased to cooperate with M . Cantwell or e r whoever may b e do ing the distribution and ho l d on our floor those copies that a re necessary for stora ge in between shi pment s. We hope the above meets with your ap pr oval so t hat i mmed i ate production may get under way since there has been a very long delay in your antici pat i ons . Best pe rsona l r egards, Dea DW/jr CCI M r. Ca ntwe ll W l lin a �Mr . Ch c. MartinI rle y Mar tin Li vings , tauran • Ma n lana ~a~:s t, I �WALLACE F . BENNETT L.. RALPH M EC H A M UTAH IlXccvnvr WASHINGTON . D . c. (Dictated April 15 , 1957) HC"IITARY NEAL M AXWI!L1. UOISl.llTlVC "".,IITIIHT EDWI N Co M.JSS ....... HCRCTA .... Gt..OfDOH IE. JOI-INaoH "" .. ,HIIJTAATlv& "".,nAHT April 16, 1957 Mr . Burnett A. Hendryx Vice President and Manager The Allen Cameron Company Panguitch, utah Dear Mr . Hendryx : The superintendent of the Yellowstone National Park visited my office last week at my request and I am writing to report on the meeting . The road from West Yellowstone up to Mammoth and down to Old Faithful will be kept open on a experimental basis this winter or next. In addition , a study will be made this winter to determine whether or not the park should be kept open on a year- around basis and this report is to be completed by July 1, 1958 . I appreciate your interest 1n Yellowstone and I am happy to cooper te with you. S cerely yours , Wallace F. Bennett WFB : rl �THE ALLEN CAMERON COMPANY CAMERON HOTEL, MOTEL - SCEN IC TOURS PANG UI TCH, UTAH Apr i 1 20 , 1957 e~t-fe7. '" the 7{w P4-:k4 S~...£u, Dear Charley : Enclo se d Is a letter I received from our Sena t or Benne tt , with informati on wh ich you prob ab ly a lr eady have , but whic h I th ou gh t mt gh t lnteres t you to see t he response fr om ou r S ta te • I feel that t his is an impo r tant first step , and if these r oad s mentioned can be kep t open , or at least if the y agree t o expe ri men t on keeping r oads open in the we wi 11 win out . Please pa ~k , eventua ll y r eturn the leller when you have finished wi th i t . Bes t personal re gards , and keep up you r good work . S l nC~[ ly , Burnett A . Hend r yx . LAKE CITY < - �, hbruarT 27, 1957 l1(li. IIart1D B. Cautnll 10 Charli. ». IIaJUn Jr. ( OOPr. llent.lq II1tchell) 7 :':"".J-'- - ~ Attached 18 a report 1!b1eh I modo ""t _ _ <lYe" with - l a 7 when I "f1e1ted h1a recent],y to clean up th. f1Dal ohl1c/ltiona _ on the brochure projeot. _nt Ilentla7 1 ..ued ch_ for 111 tul.l ot; all outetan:\'1W bUl.a, and .. arc . - l1na117 out of dabt. on th. projeot. the • u..oJlMted Aocounte aaeod."ablA" liat.. 111 th. report are, 111 rq opiD1on to be cona1d0re4 _ for all practioal purpoee•• I 11111 cont1nue to b1ll th_ , and . _ of tI!oa aq or aq not ccaa in at __ t\lture _ . ~ .-ina hald pr10r to the tOIl 1I1ll recall that 1t wa. d.1ded at tho D:l.roctare Comen\1on th. h_tiDn c_ttoe ... to roaa1D ... ti.... until ouoh a ~ u U ' . affalra ware olaaned up. 1h1II _ . - bean "'~1ohad with the _option of th... bad accounte. 111... 111 • littJ.e ........ 20. 00 latt 111 the ~iDn ~, _ -leT 11111 (or _ ) ~ GIlt th. ",count _ NIlt th1. ~ to JCU far d_1t 111 the Corp • ..count. U I . . able to pth.. 111 _ of th... 1W outetandlna accounte roood.nbla, _ _ tuDd8 1I1ll 81110 be be .en\ for dapoe1t 111 the Corp. Account. _ ---- 111111 _ that the coat of dlIItrlbutiDn of th. brochure 1I1ll haft to be po.1d out of " ..... _ _ • 111•• 315. 00 loot 00 bod ...oounte plDe mnq OIlvanoed to _ wb1ah I _ unable to repq wwl4 haft d_ • f1Da job of dlIItrlbu.t1Dn. out as faat .. A. 1t 111, •• wUl have do th. beet . . can, and pt th. _ tuDd8 wUl PGWlt. Aa • •ttar. of record, I wUl 1Delud. 111 thi. report th. fact that th. parent Aoaeo1at1otj _ • 100. 00 to the ~iDn C-',to. at the tiM .&1d • .-.ittoe w --d.eaol"eri. �IN TER NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1.0 WEST SECOND SOUT H ST . SALT LAK E CITY I , UTA H DIAL H 9 _9322 A NON . PRO f i T CORPORAT I ON PROMOTING NORTH AME RI CA' S BEAUTIfUL 80ULEVARD Of N ATIONAL PARKS O ffi CE Of ERNEST R. SARAN. Vite· P, u id e nt He pburn MOlor Court. ltd. 5809 Mod e od Troil Colgory . Albe,'o , Conodo O f fiCERS , BENT LEY MITCH ELL President Mitchell Motel L09U. U te ~ ER NEST R. SARAN Vice.Pre.ide,t HeDburn Motor Court. Ltd . ealqory. Al b,rta . eo ""da CHA RLIE B. MARTI N, JR. Vice. P", ... Sety,-Treo., Mortin'llnc . Raslau,ut Livinqtlon. Montana April 26,1958 , To the directors, members and friends of the 8gers International Highway Ass' n who have helped in the preparation of the 8gers Cavalcade to Alberta planned for June 1958. Dear friends: SR. GUILLERMO FREEMAN 1-10101 ~ ... me n Mo.otlen, Sinelo". M. , ico It ts \'IHh regret that I have to report tt.at the Motor Cav.alcade of 8gers to Alberta, which was planned for next June had to be postponed. The postponement is w. G. BASS Le Sias l" Motel Widenbu"l. A,iro .. southern part of the highway because of the bad weather DlltECTOR5: PAUL J. STEV IG $Ie. Volley J ......el ty Alton, Wyominq MA RK G. PUG MIR E M "r~'1 Chevron Se",ice P",is, Ide ho HOMER BA NO LEY Reinbo .. Co l, RitMie ld. Uta h CHARLES HAGER MAN Apoche Lodge p,...eolt. Ati. one EXECUTIVE SECRETARY , MARTI N H, CANTWEll 140 W. Second South Sell le ke City, Utah due to two reasons; bUsineso has been poor alone the expel'ienced last winter and because of the "recession" which has had an effect on the abil1 ty or wiLingness of small businessmen to spend money they do not absolutely have to spend. Rather than h ~ve this Cavalcade this spring with only few !:lembero of the Association taking part, probably no one from south of the Utah - Arizona border, 've felt it would be better to postpone the trip around Alberta'S Scenic Circle for a year. \7e could posaibly have the trip in June of 1959 or a3k the Association to hold the 1959 convention in Alberta and combine the trip wi~h it. May I take this opportunity to thank all of you for the help you have given in the preparation of the planned Cavalcade and may expressrthe hope that I may call upon you again at some future time for help when this International Goodwill Tour would have a better chance of success. "",''' Yours Sincerely, ~- E.R. Sara.n SCENIC ROUTE OF THREE NATIO NS �Suggested schedule for the 8gers Cavo.lcade i nto Alberta planne ..d f or next, June. Tentative dates June 2nd to June 6th 1958 . Monda;y June 1st 6 PM Gathering at Great Palls, Montana for dinner. Tueeda;y June 2nd 8 AM Start fo~ the border 12 noon ceremony at the border at Carway. 1.30 PI! Lunch at Waterton. 3.30 PI! lort !l!acLeod Information Bureau. Short stops in other towns if desired. 7. 30 Dinner at Ca.l8ary. Wednesda;y June 3rd 8 . 30 Breakfast and tour of Ca.l8ary. 12 noon Lunch in Ca.l8ary 3 PI! Stop In Red Deer. Short stops in other towns if desired. 7.3C PM Dinner in Edmonton. Thursda;y June 4th 8 . 30 Breakfast and tour of Edmonton. 12 noon lunch in Edmonton. 7 . 30 PM Dinner in Jasper. l!'r1da;y June 5th Trip to Banff with box lunch at the Ice fields. Sight seeing in Jasper, along the way and at Leke Lotise. 7.30 PM Dinner at Banff. Saturday June 6th 7 AM Breakfast at Banff. 1 m Lunoh at Lethbridge. After lunch the Cavalcade will disperse homeward bound. A directors meeting of the 8gers International H1ehway is to take place in Lethbridge in the afternoon of June 6th, it is suggested. Alberta oars will meet 8gers at Great l!'alls, more Alberta cars will meet the Cavalcade at the border. lor 8gers Coming by other means than car, transportation will be provided by Albertans. Approximate cost of the five da;y trip of Alberta will be • 25.00 excluding trall8portat1on. Total milage from port of entry at iJDIt Carway back to the border at Couts is 1278 miles. Please let us have your comments so that Charlie and I can get down to details . E. R. Saran. 5809-MacLeod Trail, Ca.l8ary, Alberta. Canada. &Cvf 73"w~ , --f -<r ~, ~.( ~~~ 4-""«,?ee • '/ "-<-r ,;:. ~ ~ ~ ~~t..' ""'~ ( r ~~,-,{...u< A!..-<;-r ,r ~'¥, -dc- r a.~.k r.f'«A- da/I ~ ~~ ......., -ct~ u.e.",~ ~'r tc.,. ~~ .....~ ~ 1kf;vu ~ -', r' r ~<' ,?,/U-e ~ ~ ~a.y.AA,c ~/ F"""-- ���II July 1958 Deane ,filey t Uanager Livingston Chamber ot Commeroo Livingston , M ontana Dear Dears : you have probably heard tram Charlie by now we have seleoted Tuesday , 0ctober 14 for the main business meeting ot our 1958 Convcntion to be tollowed by a ban~uet that sace evening . I attempted to reach you by phmne to verifi this date , ot t own, 1 00 sultod wfth Charlie • • 9 a result , a mail ballot has boen conduoted among the Direotors , and the date and locale has been approved. and as you were out Now that Livingston is to have the Convention , I must tell you very f rankly that the matter of whether or not it will be suocess or a disaster will depend entirely upon the a.count ot hard Vlor~ Livingston tollm are willing to do . beoause unless a bout 90% ot financial suppert oan be secured in the Livingston-Gardiner' area it will be just that . I usa tho word (I dl6aster lf Due to distanoes and travel time involved , we have never been able to draw more than jus; a handful ot delegates from areas more than 100 miles distant tr~ the Convention oity . Practioally none ot these !clegates , except the otficers QUd directors will send in advance ressrvations , so Vie have no dependable idea as to just how many to expeot until the day a rrives . It ther eforo beoomes necessary for enoueh banquet tickets to be sold locally to underwrite the , expenses of~the ontire Convention . This year in particular due to~he fact that I have devoted praotically all of my efforts to selling spaoe in the brochure, rather than memberships , the Corp . trel1sur,r,-is depleted to the pollnt where it would be 1m ossible for the association to " pay ott" in the event that the Convention oannot be medee selt supporting . I am sure you ,vill agree that this situation would be "disastorouH �Deane li ley Page 2 It is not purpose to discourage you , Deane . I feel confident tha; we cnn have a fine Convention in LiVingston , but I felt that you should have a claar statement ot the problems involved . Having been thru three of theso Conventions , I suggest the following a 8 the only so~ution ; Make a deal for the banquet at a prioe per plate that will assure a good mea l ••• not a plate lunch . Got tiokets printed , adding at l east a dollar profit or more , if you feel it is pra ctioa l . This profit t o cover misoelaneous Convention expenses , yOU? guests , etc . Get a good aotive oomcittee out selling t hese tickets i n Livings t on a nd Gard i ner . Also try to g st a dvance sales in Great ?aIls , Choteau , hite Sulphur Springs . W In addition to the ·profit· on the banquet tiokets , I would sugeest a Registration Feo of . 2 . 00 for each membe r delecate ••• that is , ono fee per vote . Each member sh&p is entitled to only one vote . Far example i n the csse of Char lie there wo uld be only one feo ••• s .Martib would not have to pay this registration foe . You and Charl ie will act a8 co-chairmen for the Convention , a nd enlist hel p i n the form of co~ ttee membe rs ss you Bee fit . It will be up to you to arrange the banquet program, speakers , and any s uch entertal ant as you Can afford and see fmi t . It i s IMPORTf~ that y ou b~nquet tickets , etc . as work out details as to the pric e of the soon as posnlble so that I can get out a bulletin to the meabership including this informatio~ On the inolosed sheet , I have outlinod the program of events , and a list of fa cilities etc . which will be needed . Keep in close t ouch lvith me , Deane as we will noed all possible informatllon fr om your end as fas t as it is avai lable . I aa sure that Charlie will give you every poss i bl e assistance as long as he remains in Livingoton . Kindost personal regards , /}U~ , rtln H. 0antwoll Exeoutive Je cretary COFY: Bent l ey _ itchell Charlie !.:artin �CON V E N TID N ---------MONDAY , OCT 1.'3 Spociol meeting of current Board at Directors 'l'\T.mD. Y , OCT . at g P.M . 14 l:orning and attornoon business ""'sting of the membership • International Banquet in evening ( 8 P .M . ~ \\'l!DNESDAY, OCT . 15 AnDlUll Meeting of Board of Diroctors FAOILITIES probably around 10, A. M. RE~UIRED (1) Convention Headquarters , rogistration desk, and eeno ral informntion clearing house . C ot C orrice , i t available would probably be best tor this purposo . It same hall or building ie to be U3ed t or all Convention activities , .his Of course would be.tha bost spot . ( 2) Room for two Board of Directors moetings . Tables and ohairs and sP*'e to aocomodate 15 to 20 persona . D) Room for main business meetings . I t banquet hall is to be used , 1t must be remembered that meeting mieht not breo.k up untll luto afternoon . would this permit n set up· tor 8 P. M banquet ? . (4) stenographer to onoist Executivo Deoretory . Expe~ienced with shorthand and diotophona . Thin girl should bo availoble daytima and evening as needed . Also betoro and after the Convontion if required . It would a lso bo a g_cd idea to establish conr:eotions with wire Borvioes and tho looal press • •Uso a photo6l'apher ",ho could be called "hen neoded . PS : W still hove enough badgos and ribbobs for n oouple of Conventions . e �- BILL BASS December 7 , 195.Z .*** •••• Dear Blll ; Attaohed are bills for 15 of your olub members . Eleven of them a re delinquent for past the 60 days graoe period , and are the~ole no longer "legal" members . If they we re to pay their baok dues no ~ most of them would have another $ 15 . 00 to pay in a few months , because their membershi ps •• ould be due again . The best thing to do in a case like this , is to sll~t them off again as a "new member" . You "ill note that on each of these eleven bills , I have ohanged tbe dates to be effective fram Jan., 1958 to Jan ., 1959 • This will also have an ad ~antage , as winter Is probably a bet~er time of year for them to pay out money . We oannot aftord to loose these members . so I urge ypu to 1Iontact them. ... , and see if you oan re- sell them on the above basis . The deadline for the ,linter lJembership Roster ie January 1 , and i t you ' re able to get them baok"in the fo ld" their names oan be listed, and your Club Vlill also receive the refund . The other four bills are on members who are ourrently due (with the ~m. exoeption of Safeway) I did not think it would make any differenoe to Safewny when thdir membership was due . BE SURE to return the top part of the statement with ench cheek . %~ ......,..--4) • . ,= .• , �'. j I~' Mr . Charles Hagerman Apaohe Lodge P . O. Box 1827 Presoott , Arizona Dear Mr . Hagerman : Since the Afton oonvention , I have been more or 1es8 out ot touoh with things due to the taot that I was moving pretty tast on a h1ghly suoosssful membership oampaign up in Alberta . Too tast , in taot to risk having my mail forwarded . • Upon returning to the Stat es , several days ago , I was most happy to learn that you have aooepted the Direotorship tor the Arizona Northlands . Now that allot th, new d1reotore have aooepted , I have advised our printers , Ths Star Valley Indspendent , to prooeed with the 1958 stationery . You will reoeive an initial supply in the ver y near tuture , shipped direot from Afton , \\yoming . Additional stationery will be available as required . I plan to be back in Utah about Christmae time , and will visit you Boon atter , aooording to present plane . At that time I will provide you with a oomplete set ot baok minutes ot the various Membership and Dir eotors meetings , by-laws , eto. , and go over the entire "ineide workings" of the Aseooiation . Later th1s month , we will be publishing our quarterly Bulletin giving a tull aooount ot the Convention . e have piotures ot ell ot our ottioers and directors , with outs made to e standard Size , and will need your pioture to oomplete the group . Pleaee send Q portra1t of yourselt , a glosey print it possible . The e1zs will not matter . Also , a briet notation regarding yourselt , inoluding the various other positions you hold , or have held reoently in the oivio attairs ot Prescott and Arizona . �Page 2 December 9, 1957 • Charle8 Hagerman e will need this picture and data at your elrliest possible convenienoe , AD the Bulletin 1s now being prepared . ;'loa80 11 i t to e , caro or the Star Valley Independent , et A1'ton , .yoming. I h..ve 1rmtruotad t ho pr1nters to heve the cut ~d e a8 soon as the p10ture arrives , and I expeot to be 1n A1'ton just beror" Chrlst::lo.a . ~ost sincerely yours , Ilartin H. Cantwell Execut1ve Seoretary ~ m:C:eo Copr : Bentler Mitchell Star Valley Independant �Deoember 9 , 1957 Homer Baudley , Di rector 89 ' ers International Hwy. As s ' n ., Inc . a in bow Caf e Ri chfi eld , Utah Dea.r Homer : Sinoe the Af t on oonvention , I ha ve been m e or l es s out or of to uch wi th t hi ngs due to t he f a ct tha t I was moving pr etty f as t on a hi ghly suooessful member shi p campai gn up in Al berta . Too f as t , i n f a ct to ri sk ha vi ng my ma il f orwar ded . Upon return i ng to the s t a t es , several days ago , I was mos t happy t o learn t ha t you ha ve a ooepted t he Di re otor ship f or oent r al and s outher n Ut ah . Now t ha t a l l of t he new di r e ct or s have ac oept ed , I ha ve ad vi s ed our print ers , The St ar V l ley Independe nt , t o a pr ooeed wi t h the 1958 sta ti oner y . You wi l l r ecei ve an initi a l suppl y in t he ver y nea r f ut ure , shi pped direct f r om Afton , W yoming . Addi tiona l sta t i onery will be ava i l abl e a s required . I plan t o be ba ck i n Ut about Christmas time , d wi ll vi s it you soon a ft er, a ccord i ng to pr esent plans . At t hat t ime I wi ll pr ovide you with a compl et e s et of back minutes o f t he va r ious M embershi p and Dire ct or s me etings , by- l aws J e t c ., and go over t he entir e "inside wor ki ngs" of t he Assooiat ion . Later t his mont h , we will be publishi ng our quar t er l y Bulletin g i ving a f ull a ccount of t he Convention . W e have pi ctures of a l l of our of ficers and di r eot or s , wi t h out s made to a s t anda r d Si ze , and will need your pi ct ure to compl et e t he gr oup . Pl ease send a por tra it of yo urs el f , a glossy print if poss ibl e . The s i ze wi ll not mut t er. Also , a br ief nota t i on r egar d i ng yours elf incl uding t he var i ous other pOSi tions you hold , or have hal d re cently in t he ci vic aff a irs of Ri chfi eld , and Utah . �Page 2 De oember 9 , 1957 • Homer Bendley , Direotor e will need this picture and da ta a t your earli est possible oonvenience , 8S t he Bulletin is now being prepared . Plea s e ma il it to me , care ot t he Star Va lley Independent , at Afton , W yoming . I have instructed t he printers t o have the cut made a s soon as the picture arrives , d I expect to be i n Afton just before Christmas . M ost sinoer ely yours , uartin H. C antwell Executive S eoretary ~C : eo Copy : Bentley tchell St ar V alley Independent �April 5. 1957 Dear Haven: Thanks for the pictures of your new projecti on- editing t oo:UJ i t Is c ertainly a beautIful .-td we l l .. ar r an ged room . To slart t he bal l r olling on the conten t of the 8 9 ' 8rs movI e , 1 am submIttIng herewi t h a few ideas , and am asking Bentley and Ray t o wr it. you the ir t hou ~ h t s a l so . Although t h e pIctu r e wi l l bc mad e by the 89 1e r 5 Inte r naliona l Highway Association , and the titlin g and ar t wo r k will feature thei r emblem , as above , the purpose of t he movIe will not be to advertise the AssociatIon , but the scenic attract! 'ns of t he hi ghway . OVe r one mi l l i on pe r s ons per yea r, v i sit Yel l owstone, and ano t he r mi l li on vrand Canyon . W wan t to sta rt e s ome of these peop le t o go Ing no r th and sou t h , up and down U. S . 89 . and get them t o .pend l ng t heir vacat ion. Vis i ting the . c enlc attraction. a l on g U. s . 89 . We will therefo r l want to hit as many ot the major att r ac t ions a s WI can in the ti m ~ al l oted . W~ W ll start with Al berta , i Canada, with some of their most ou t standing s cenery; the Bantf Lake Louise area , Wa terton Lakes , etc . The Province has offe r ed to film thei r attractions for us; how this would work , 1 do not know . Next i, Gla c ier re gion of M ontana ; then Ye l l owstone and the Grand Tetons; in passing , a shot of St ar Valley , wyomin g, and t he Bear Lake area of I daho , and Logan Ca nyon , f oll owed by some foota ge on Sa lt Lake CIty and i t s best · known att r ac t ions . Southwa r d , next will be Ca p itol Reef , Br yce , Zi on , and Grand Canyon J I n passing , a .hot o f th e Indian r u i ns of either M ontezuma's Castle , W t kl , or Wa l nut Canyon ; Phoe n i x and upa t he Southern Ari zona de sert , (and fo r this , we can use lome of Bil l ea •• ' deser t f lowe r footage), Ol d Tucs on , and the border at Nogales ; en ough to g l ~. a lIt tl e Uexi can t l avo r . It 1. doubttu l I t we can include mu c h of Mex i co othe r than the •• brl.t shote . You know about haw many di fferen t "shots" 27 - m.1nute fi l m, wi t hou t appea r ing t o ski p Give me an idea of hoW many p l aces ca n be them, and a l so by Jus t a shot of the c a r you can us e 1n a a r ound t oo fast . wo r ked i n , by featu r ing go ing down the road �through aome n i ce coun try . The whole ide a ot t his pi c ture , is to pr oduc e something that will be acceptable t o TV as entertainmen t, not as co~~e rcial advertis i ng . Al l of us who are pu tti ng up t he dough , will be sati.fied if the net re s ult is increased trave l up and down the highway; we Cee l we wil l a l l sha re I n t he r e su lt ing inc r e as e in busine ss , wi t hou t a ctual l y advertising Joe Blow l s hash house , or ote l . W want t o . make peop l e droo l to see the great Inte rmoun t aIn p l aygroundJ the way you r fi l m on Yellowstone , made me want to go the re ; the fIrst tioe 1 ever had any r8al desire to visIt the place . Does t h is give you a .tartlng point t o plan on) 1 arn •• klng as 1 said , to have 13 8ntl , y and Ray 81so write you thei r i deas . The t l r ee of us wi l l have t o ge t togethe r s oon , and work it ove r af t e r we have you r com~ e nt on this l e tter , and cont i nue working out the con t en t . How do you thlhk we can take Al berta up on t hei r offe r of foota ge1 How can they fi lm the ir c .Junt ry in s uc h a way t ha t It wi ll tie right In with t he restl Or wou l d It be bettor for you to ge t wha t we need yourse l C1 Con tinu ity of the ent i re film i s of major i mportanc e . Le t' s have your thinking , and we wil l c ont i nue t o wri te u til we have deve lope d a more c omple t e ou tl i ne . W ithin t hi s ou t line , you have a f ree hand to make 18m dr ool . Regards to you bo t h , (I Bu r nett A. hendryx . Bentley : What do you think of the above? Will you wri te Haven you r idea s , send me a copy? What do you thi h k of you r fl y ing down he re when the we ather s t abIlizes a l ittle, for a ge t-together? Maybe we can ge t Ray up here , and th e three of us ge t together after we have traded a few more letters wi th h i m. How are t h in gs going? 1 assume "Aa rtin Is on the road now . Travel is beg i nning to piCK up a little a r ound here, and people will begin to be mo re optimistic a bo ut ) 0 days from now t han they have been t o da te. ~~ �THE ALLEN CAMERON COMPANY CAMERON HOTEL, MOTEL - SCENIC TOURS PANGUITCH . UTAH Ma rch 31 , 1957 Dear Bentley: Enclosed is our check for $)0 . 00 fa- ou r listing in the brochure . Sorry I could not get i t to you sooner , but times have been t ough down here t his winter . 1hings are leokln g u p , thou gh ; and i t Is Just as well that we did not st a rt solicitation here any sooner; people will be a lot more op timi sti c as business p ic ks up. Have had some correspondence wi th Haven Trecker re the moviej gist of i t 15 that (1) we will buy the film before he starts ou t, about $600j (2) he will do the filming during July , and () we will pay hIs expenses d u ring the trip . He had a contract made up to pro tect us both , which I sen t t o Ray fo r his ins pection and signature. How are t h in gs pro g re ssing? Owen Walton, our local Pres . , went out and contacted seve ra l members the o t he r do} , and got in a few membe rships . Mar tin's la s t letter Jo gged h im into ac tI on . Keep me 'Jos ted , and wi 11 do the same for you rel y , \l HIGHWAY. rne t t . SCENI C kOUTE �llareh 28. 1957 W E.waltz. . El. Camino IIotel. 2'l7 Benson 1I1&hwa:r. eon, Arizona.. Dear Bill; n_ You han probahlJ' be... lIIOnd....ing 1Iby it baa taken"" long to rae.he -.nbereh1p paque. and I f olt that I obould aplain that the nea tbree color desing. approved at the recant Afton !bard ....t1ng. baa jUt co... off the pr.. e . 7f1f1r In vi... or the fact that all of the AseoehUon ' . tIltur. adverti.ing and ~iOll8J. matter r i l l featur. this emhl_ as " 'llIE SIGN OF 'llIS PmFEI:'I' IIOS'I'" • i t ties in with our program to have a bright and colorful plaque which will qu1cld7 idant1f:r our """""'" eatablialmumta. a.:r has pas.ed alGng )'Our auggaation that we 1lUR':Q' intol'lllltion on oull 3D point promotional program to Tucaon fnlks in acme tangihlo form. Thi. 10 a verr practicol idea. and it could probab:Q' beat be acccmpl10bed ~ placing a coPT or our nut bW.latin in the hs>da of )'OW' Tueoon IIotel Aam. geub8l'8 aa well. as other kelT civic leadm"lI . Thia belletin will contain 1'I1l.l cov .....ge in word and )d.cture of the recant rel:Q' at Afton.w"om1n& whore l.44 - . . . and booatero turned out 001 a ).:! IIELOf ZERO night to att_ an 89' .... baDlUet. and hear an outline of our proposed puhlicit;r c.",p.lip. It will olae contain coverage of the lIaZatlan Conference ••• am mat important ot all, a cCJII)lete presentation or our two ;rear 3D Point Prco:DUonol Program. W plan to han some <actra copiea printed for promotional use. and will . be haPPT to cov... 8l1T llat frca the Tuceon area whicb y'" f1llq SUU..t . I f )'Ou will . _ .... _ such a list. We will address and mall th... direct from Solt Lake Cit;r ••• ar • i t it would be more conven1ant for )'Ou. we can ehip t _ to )'Ou in bulk with postage attached to be addr... ed and lIIliled at Tucacm. Ra;r and BontJ.e;r llitcball have both COOlll_ on )'Our won6lrfUl. help and guidance wb:1ch contr:1bu.ted 80 IIIlCh to the success of the lIazatl.aD .....t1ng. and ha.... 0100 _1oned that ;rou are pre.ent:Q' in an adYalltageeWl _ition to aealot in deYelop1ng 89' er _ a h i p in the Tueenn area. �If .l!.laltc - I/ar"..b 28 - PAGl! 2 1'b1a i.e YfII7 n J . - _ . bee ..... with the _ept.1on tit II""'onMrg wb_ Blll Boo bu doDo .... ~ job tha -,-",' .t.1011 bu ~ ooDll1dertabl.e tit ita Charter a-.Jl1p &lid • IIOIlth of P r _ t. !brv. tile rec_ organ1zatSoD of a l<lCaJ. 89' .. Clabo the Pr_L ..... i.e .to&! ng a , .. I back. &lid last 5 _ with tile bel;p of OI;t IiOrhM &lid 1Iq. 111&8 able to ..... "",at at the Flaptatt ~ and 8100 picked up quite • t_ .,. _ _ in the Flagatelt-Will ..... _ . ...-L 1_. oar great.tBt &aim have - . in Iltab. &lid 'I\)'aa1JII1I1th _ . bc>tdlllg ita """" n.. stage i . all. _ tOl: a nll organS ..... -.borahip .~ .. in Alberta t.h1.e the bleoo1ngo &lid """I'lat. cooPC'lltSoD tit the Pro'v1nc1al 00_ _ and the .Il.berta J.!otor' Court. &lid lleaJrf.a As...,iatian. or Wh1cb OIU' C."",,1on D1rector i.e Prsa1d_. Cha1'l1. 1Iart1n...... .,. IIontaaa Director i. 0100 a .... tit ""Uon 1I1th plana. and troa all1nd1••tiD.... wUl &leo _ a strong gain Spr1Dg with thi._. 110_ I IBltlca the above to 1l.l.IlOt.rate _ car _ _ -.rwb1p of about. 50 in _ ..... Arizoaa. (wblch includ. . the 31 _ _ of the ick""ilw's Club) teada to thr........ ge<I8l'&l -.ber8h1,p etructure ""t of b&laIlce. . . to opuIr, IlDd top..Ma"7 _ tit the ~tah line. l!h1le we are pl..... ed. of ........ e. 1I1th the pre_a ill our _ _ statae. w. mat mt lJ>H aigjlt at the r ...t that a ai_tion wh1ch tI....- the balaDce at _ into CJT £1.""" area, and oreat.. mlnor1t;y ropreaentat.1OJl in ot.MN s.. "" anbaalth;y ocnd1tiDn wh1cb harbors a ~ent1al throat to the pregr ... IlDd ...u_ or the ""eraIl organiaaUOIl. haft tangible baDet1to to tlttflr lOb1ch ldll 81aveta 1nLo a poait1on at ~. and recoga1sed 1'8J.ue. '%he prospecti.... m<IIl>er will be 1nY1ted to 1meat ill a d8t1n1ta pUn &lid program in which h1a .... 1nd1"fit1ual 18 plh1~c1aod ... beldll. we b.ape. lID long.. teal that b1a -""b1p f _ are little 111>"" than a cont.riIluU... in the ""PJlCIl't tit a • cause' • It ldll alDDst be lik. beg;1m'ng all over agala, &IId ..til re:<u1re faith, 0IlS'/!7 &lid etturt on th. part of a little hand.fUl of .,." lObo at tJ-. bave bee pratt;y.all • beaten _ . , but. all tRl that once this ...... foundation baa _ bu1lt, 1t 1I1ll 1DlIInl. III 0Ilr 111 I'I:I1nI; P.rogra, . . . . . 89' fIr tBibsrablp eBf.a!>J'._ r.,_ w. III e;4.te of & lata start, I hope to pt. in at lAut )0 do;yo of pt'Oductiw work in Soa.t.h_ Arisoaa bof\:lre the curront ......... oI1ea ocooplct.401.;y, and nu nlCOl!l8 with grat.1t1lde th. aaral ouwart and iU1dsnce ;you have tittered. It thlnp liP ftll , I plan to ..,.,.1"", in JOur aft& toward the J..ut ot A jll'il. and I that 1:\1 that tlJea the ....... ' . rusb 1I1ll have l ....81ed ott to th6 po1at. -.bere :rour local operators aDd. oth_ w1ll find it ...... c .... cd._ llot ... to our atoI7. l&at J1me &lid ~ in the Grand C_n ..... I round i t -aal7 cI1tt1cult to obt.o1n a ver;y oat.1at""tc&7 iotllll'ri.o!lr with _ t ot the "",tal people. It. ...... alDDat. ~ & " . . . ot Catching _ " OIl the 1Iiag" , _ 0Ul' ..... progrOla cannot be prepC'~ proaenteol under _ concl1t1cDo. ae_ -.a I ldll opprectato bearing JOur reaction to !IV euggoetiDn regarding ac.e 4istr1bot1oa at our prcoot1onal bullat1a in 'lIlc8aa "" ...u as an:r additi onal auggest1ona;you 11187 have to otf er • .1.180, would the _ _ ted t:lae ot lIV arrival b. coann1ent ill vi... ot JOur arm perecoal plana tor late April IlDd earl)' IIa;y ? lIoat s1.,oral7 .)'OU1'8, COPr. 5twert llitcball �Sent individually typed to a l ist of 29 Canadian Chambers of Commer suggested by Ernie July 29. 1957 Ilr . F . Rlchardeoa, Se cretary Pe~ce River Cha mber of Pesce River , Albert n , Com~erce Canada Dear . Mr . Richardson . A cting u~on the r eco~end8.t lon of Vice President Ernest R . SArqQ of Clllg ArYJ Al bert8 , t he Board of Dire otors of the 89 t ere Intern" tlon l!ll Hlghw8 y ASEo clR tioD, Inc. I s / , plea sed to extend HonorAry Kemt er~bl , In t h is Inter n~tlonal Assocta tioa to the Peqce Rlve r Cbqnhe r of Corn:oorce . We are cartain thst your c itlzens Bad cIvic le 8.ders share o ur ryrlde In the fine frlend8hl ~ whlob has and 1J1W818 "if Ill exist bat\\'ee n our r e s a ctive g ov e rn~atl!l end neo" le. Be Heving that the pir petuet10a of this goodwi ll ella beat be Assured tbru the medium of increased personal contact Aod fellowshlo, th i s Assooiation Is dedloa ted to the "lr ollo t1on aod encourage'Ueo t of reCiprocal 10 terns tional tOur18:n . Your Honorar y ~e~b e r e hin n l~cque 1 s be ing forwarded under l!Ieptr!llte cover, "nd the inclosures will serve to brie r you 00 rece nt activIties ~nd future plaos . I .,lan to vIsit Vice President ~~ran at C", l gQ ry early In August, aod bope to ~~ke a brief tour of the Proviace wbich I trus t wIl l .fford t he 0~po r tunit1 to greet you in ~r80n. Yoat sinoerely yours , M artIn B. Executive C~ntwe ll, Seoret~ry Incl. COryy; Erne st R. S ~r8n �TO : Charlie B. Martin FRO : },! ' rtin H. Oant'le11 October 15, 1957 ** •• *.************** .....**.""..... ** ••• ** •• *** •••• *.:t-* •••• *** •• ******...... **•••• ST., 'lE!JENT of oommissions duo M. H. Cant"",ll on FINAL for mer Trea surer , VI. a . Bass , ~ O·~~SS ION lIB RELlITTM or; mado to per itemized report submittod herewith . on items due at 3) 1/3 ~ •••••• • •••• • •••••••••• • 70. 00 % ••••••••••••••• 37. 50 " liUNDLING FEB" on 44 m emberships at $ 1 . 00 per ••••••••••••••• (a s por contra ct in e f fect prior to O ctober 9 , 1957) 44. 00 SALES OO llMISSIOn on sub- agent items due at 50 TOTAL COl rssIONiJ D . .. ... . ... . . . . . . 151 . 50 UE ******* *.***** •• *** •• NOTE : In view Of oiroumstanoes or some of tho Clubs listed on r eport, I r e oaDmend t hat you Vii thold payment or refunds until I disouss tho matter lIith President :Aitohell , s nd have an opportunity to t a l k it over with you. "M~~ �F 014 'I. R.Cantwell TO: Charlie !.IaJltin October 15 1957 •••••••• * .................................................... . . ...... . Funds in paytlent tor the 44 moobershlps listed on the attaohed report were reoeived by W. A. llass tor deposit to the oredit ot the Corporation as tollows : ( 38 mambershipa - $ 570 . 00) Cheoks turned over to Trea ourer Baso at A1'ton, and torwarded to ~; iokenburg tor deposit •••• • 570. 00 ( RECEIPl' ATTAIlHED HERETO ) ( 6 meobershipa .. $ 90 . 00) Colleoted by Vi. G. llass from members of Iliokenburg Club and hold in liokenburg tor deposit T/1th reoeipt thereot sent to Salt Lake Oftioe ... . ...... . . . ....... FINAL RI:lIITTANCE trom JoI .R. Cantvlell to W. G. BASS ....... 90 . 00 • 660. 00 �FROM : M. H. Cantwell TO : Charli e Mar¥in O otober 15 , 195 7 The t oll owi ne: is an aooountin!! oovor 1ne: the 38 member ship tees turned over t o Bill Bass a t Af t on (beine: t he $ 570 sent to Woke nburg tor depos it ) i pl us t he j 6 membershi ps whioh Bass had oolleot ed t r am hie W okenburg Club i members and depos i t ed , but w hioh had not oleared ~ r eoords . Thi s r epor t will ol ose tho books on membershi ps and oommissions duo bet ween ~ ott i oe and the tormer Cor por a tion Treasur er , with all t r ansaoti ons trom t hi s point on be1ne: oonduoted aooording to the new set - up. ********* •• ******** *** •••• ***************** •• *****************.************* FIEID REP SENTATIVES CO I SSION at 33 1/3~ due II. H. Cant we ll on t hese j,[ aooounts . The Arizona r enewals wer e solio i tsd on ,,,Ix trip Sout h oar lier t h i s Summer . The Cho*eau members resulted tram solioit ati on there Just be tor e going t o Al ber t a. Kol b Bros St udi o , G and Oanyon r Mar i oopa Inn, M esa Ariz. M s Cat e , Sa l ina , Utah. om' 66 Auto Supply, " ~i lli ams , Ar i z . Foodtown Market , "Flagstat f Fl ags t aff Realty! Fl agstagt Brandin4 Iron, "F ags t at f Congr ess G oo ., Congre s s Ari z . r O bernolt e S tandard St a ., Chot eau , Sohroed er Har dware , Choteau Balla Vis t a M otel , Chot eau Front ier M otel , ehot eau Chot eau Drug Co ., Chot eau O nol t e Furnit ur e , Chot eau . ber 14 M embershi ps V ~n t . • $15 • •• $ 210 . 00 CO!.WISSION DUE M H. C . ANTIVELL '1 • 5. 00 each ••••••• • 70. 00 ************.******.*.***** •••• * •••• *******.* •••• *****.*******.****.******* 00 SI ON OF 50 % DUE O THESE . Thef f ollowing membarshi ps wer e s ol d N in oonneotion with t he Pr omotion in Alberta . Payment of a sub- agent s oommiss ion was i nvolved in eaoh , which puts them i nto t he 5 ~ br aoket aocord1ne: to set- up in effe ot a t t he time . ~ South Bend M el , Edmont on ot El Paso M el , Edmont on ot Pan - Am . Ala t el , "Edmonton Bow Ri ver M el , Cal gary ot Arms t r one: Motel , Cal ga ry 2 Membershi ps V $ 15 ••• • •$ 72. 00 COMMISSION D II . H. CANTI"iELL UE a 5 ~ .• ; ..... •• . • . • 37. 50 ******************** •••• **** **.*.* ********.*.****** •••••• ****************** W ICKENBURG CLUB ( 8 member ships ) Toms Cafe- Ryan, Evans- Purpl e Sage T. V.Front i er I nn- 1lest er ner O ourt - Sun Val ley otel - Malliooat &; Crai g- M . View Mot . t 8 IlEMBERSHIPS - REFUND 40 • 00 BEAR LAKE CLUB ( 6 membershi ps ) Hensen Chev .-Swi s s Uot el - lewel l Fi sh Haven- Vir Day Mot el - Doyl e Sl ei ght Sinol air Service 6 I4EMBmSHIPS- REBUND $ 30. 00 Cotfee Saop- PRESOOTT CLUB ( 3 m Gmb8rshi.pB Ari z Publio Servio e- Hassa~Jla Ct .- Casoade Hot J 3ldEMBERSHIPS • 15. 00 @'t'1__ ~1'lIlING=woRT 0 S IDS OF CLUB R~h ~d~ _. BRYCEOANYON CLUB ( 2 member shi ps ) Rook Candy M .- Barlow M t otor Sal es . 2 MEdBERSHIPS - REFUND $ 10. 00 • <egIJT PElIDING EPORT O STATUS OF CLUB N GLEN CANYO CLUB ( 6 membershi ps ) Kanab M N otel - Br andon M el -9hady Rest M ot otel Canyon Ranoho- 4t . Vi ew Court- Trail ' s End Cafe . 6!.IEMBERSHI FS- REFUND $ 30 . 00 IIOlll PENDING REPORT O STATUS OF CLUB N \ �AFTON, WYOMING Ootober 12, 1957 Mr . Homer Bandley Rainbow CtU:e Riohfield , Utah Dear Homer: It is indeed a pleasure to issue this ofticial notioe to the effeot that you have been elected to serve a three-year term on the Board of Directors of the 89 ' ers International Highway Association , Ino . Your election was oarried by the unanimous vote of all delegates attending the third International Convention of this Association at Afton , Wyoming on October 8th . Final verifioation of your election is , ot course . oontingent upon your acceptance of the office , and President Bentley Mitchell has asked me t o request a deoision at your earliest convenienoe . In view of the faot that I am spending most of my timB out in the territory these days I would suggest that you write direot to President Bentley Mitohell at tho Mitohell Mote l in Logan , Utah . My sinoere congratulations . lIe are all hoping that you will find it convenient to aooept the Direotorship . Very sinoerely yours , l/ar tin H. Cantwell Executive Seoretary MHC:pfh �AFTON , WYOIolIKG October 12 , 1957 1Ir . Oharles Hagerman Apache Lodge P. O. Box 1827 Presoott, Arizona Dear 1oIr . Hagerman. It is indeed a pleasurs to issue this offioial notioe to the sffeot that you havs bssn eleoted to serve a one - year term on the Board ot Directors ot the 89 ' ers International Highway Association , Inc . Your election was carried by the unanimous vote of all delegates attsnding the third International Oonvention ot this Association at Afton , Wyoming on Ootober 8th . Final verifioation ot your ele ction is, ot oourse , oontingent upon your aoceptance ot the ottioe, and Prss i dent Bsntl ey IoI1tchell has asked me to request a decision at your sarliest convsnisnce . ot the fa ct that I am spending most ot my time out in the territory those days I would suggest that you write direct to President Bentley IoI1tchell at the M itchell M otel in Logan , Utah . In view MY sincere congratulations . W are all hoping that you s will find it convenient to accept ths Directorship. Very sinoerely yours . Martin H. cantwell Exeoutiv e Se oretary IoII!O :pfh �AFTON , WYOMING Ootober 12 , 1957 Salt Lake Costume Company 248 S . Main Street Salt Lake City I, Utah Gentlemen : The three flags rented by this Association in oonneotion with its Convention at Afton have been ahipped to you prepaid today via M & N Truok Lines . In ordering theso tlags over lons distanoe telephone , I explained to Io!r . Latimer that we had used them last year in connection with our Convention at Kanab , Utah and would take them again this yoar provided we could be given the Sal!le proposition . Last year I explained to Mr . Allen that while our oonvention was aotually only a three- day attair it was necessary tor l!le to leave for the Convention Oity several days ahead of the meeting and a lso that I could not return to Salt Lake until several days after the meeting was over . Mr . Allen agreed not to charge us for the aotual t1llle the tlags were in our posseosion and only billed us tor ths three days they were aotually in use . Praotioally the Sal!le condition existed this year . It was neoessary t o have the flags shipped far enough ahead of time to be here for the opening ot our convention on Ootober 6th and whil e the convention was over on the 8th I al!l not yet in a position to come to 3alt Lake to return them personally and have therefore shipped them . The flags were rented oontingent upon rental being paid only for the three days during whioh they were actually - �Salt Lake Costume Co . Page 2 in use pluss express oharges both waye . I am theretore returning your original invoice and it you will be kind enough to mail a revised statement to our Salt Lake ottice, it will be turned over to the Corporation Treasurer tor prompt payment . Sinoerely yours , Martin H. Cantwell Exeoutive Seoretary MHC : pth , �February 6, 1954 ~ I>ly dear dongrcssman: I am writing to you to urge your support for the Echo Park Dam and for the Colorado River Stcrage Project . The Echo Park Dam is of vital importcnce to the entire developme~t in the Upper Basin state~ of Colorado, Utah, Wyo~ ng a~~ New Nexico. If these st ates are to use their ~t.are of the water in the Colorado Ri'rer, these dams must be const : . ..h:ted . Contrary to propaganda published by the c')nservatiortists, there are no alternate dum sites which are comparable to Echo Park . In 1936 the National Park Service guaranteed to the people that if it were necessary in the future, dams could be constructed in Dinosaur National MonumE:nt. For these reasons and many more, I urge your vigorous support for Echo Park Dam. Respectfully yours , � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 1730 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2665 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1253">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1253</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 2044488453 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers miscellaneous correspondence Description An account of the resource 89'ers miscellaneous correspondence from various members Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Martin, Charles Hendryx, Burnett Saran, Ernie Mitchell, Bentley Moher, Neil T. Taylor, Gordon E. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Correspondence Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Panguitch (Utah) Garfield County (Utah) Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah Tuscon (Arizona) Pima County (Arizona) Prescott (Arizona) Yavapai County (Arizona) Arizona Livingston (Montana) Park County (Montana) Montana Afton (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Wyoming United States Calgary (Alberta) Alberta (Canada) Canada Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 9 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd9 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/a16d56999aaf64073f1cd89b4d1266dc.pdf 259770c9c3bc224f0acdf4263abb9faa PDF Text Text ofr NG11mHJJ~ �I I r- I �MEXICO \J MI1l<"q, ci-ry J£A~"" �.'"· . / - - ---_----.. ---------------- �- » \I • ~.... Ii , ~--~\ ,I __= = = = I i , - --- , --==.-;.;. 1- I Ii , (I I --- \ \ ==, _--.__ \ I :::::::0=:::::::::::::'= ::~=..= =.=. I I __ .--'L \ �• , <) \ I ~ r@ j----o-J .--------.0--\- I i ----r-o-- [ I ! . \ j ! I I ... ,. - ,---- -----------,----------------,I -! �·wE1..'CME~ S&wicfJ 'I~~ )11.ACCC11WdrZMui : - - - -..:....:..-...;..-=.-1 .j..:::::':'-=''::':'::::'-j , '-'$< d J - FF' --- -- -- ---- --- :::::::::::::::::::;-:::::c::::__ .. -- -- -- - ~ -------.~ . fie - r,* -- �" --- -, \ I • �" ~, - =::=:::-.-.:..:::::.=- --- ,, �"J'rn/b[b®\'0J2uO~ @l ~IDr? JJ~@,~8Q[?(l fF[lC /bl:§ I IJlv I - .~- e- "~ , ) ....-.- _J t - ~ --~ • SpollSG!' Listings �------~ '\ ~---­ --.-.-- --. -".\ / -" , /- ), l I I -- --------,-"'- - . -"'- ------ - . ---,._- ... _ - . - - - - ..-- ..._ --- - .. - --.-- .---- ... - --- ----- -~ -- ---.- - -- , I �- - -\ \ ,--- .. \ �• - • -. .... -~ toO . - -- - .... - ... r ' .,'-' --- .. - • • • - . = --- - �'7cm~@~I~ , -1 - __ _ L- .' , I N I;... -\- "" • . Sponsor Listings .. �f , • II -If • �I L - ��_ I lira I POIISOR ;I'.I5'1'II1GS � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 2592 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2449 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1272">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1272</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 3662890257 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers proof for "Highway to Grandeur" brochure Description An account of the resource Draft brochure highlighting Highway 89 and the locations along the way with slogan of "Scenic Route through three Nations." Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Brochures Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Arizona Canada Mexico Montana Idaho Utah Wyoming United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 1 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd1 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/d4bb725390b99cec67e7ce6eec4fad73.pdf f3d18e5e6ad02fef0d245b3462ec892c PDF Text Text CoPT II1toh I Srwart Your letter 2/l!! re IIOVIE Director Sorgatz 1[M unable to make it dawn to Salt J..ake tor t he Promot.1on COI!II:I1.ttee mo.ting hold Frl.dq, but Bontlo,y ...... h .... , and we _ )'Our corrreopondonc. with Trock". Here i. our thinking on the various pointe in question. 0""" CHOICE OF FIlM 1- '!M. and all oth.r toohnical matt er ••hould b. loft to Tocker with trnwlodge ••Min& aa a double sheck. )'OUl' TIllE OF FIIKIIIG - Thi. aloo ahpuld b ....""kad out. by you and rocker , and will probably depe.ntl JILlch on arrangements moat convenient for him. U h. can clear t he "torrid ZODe " aarl;r and be North ot PrMoott by aarl:r July i t will make hie trip more .njoyable. '!M. of course would make it necessary t o 1!'ork from. South to North which.might not tie in with tho plan ot mald.JIA tho fila n- North to South. If possible, it would be log1cal t or him to FOUCM' me in the various arey bSfWlBe thie "ould make it pooa1ble to gin hill an outJ.in. ot support aecurad in aach arei7I could pDbabI;r l1na up k.,. people tor hill to contact lIbon h. arriyad. W _ . not, however plan on this, unleee it juat happens to work out dnc. I 1dl.l have to work ent1rel¥ ind.pendent ot all other operatione end could not poasibly grauant.e to be in any given area at ant partlwul..ar tae . Treckar will alao have to work on hie own s chedule if he gete the job done in tour week II ••• in t act neither ot us "til have 4Dir tim. to 10 ••• AND TI TLE - '!M. 10 a point which depends to a great _ent on one quootion ••• cwmercial can _ tho t1lm be end got distribution. B:r that I meeD ho ... tar can ... f!P in Pl'ClllOt1ng our A ssociation and its members. For a:xa.mplel mJg[E _ ],.. lie plan to feat.ure tho MW lIIOIIIb....ahip pleoque in the Ihmborohip Bootor, the Brochure, and all of our future _tional publicity mald.JIA a direct appeal t or patrol>&&" ot JIIOIl!bore to tho total exclusion of all other.. Could.... car,.,. th1a th_ into tho III01r1<o_~ by uaing tho placque in tho titlea? Or by mention in the eound . 2 _ The Aasociation has gone on record to the eftect tb& all three highWllJ' emb~ JruST be giTen equal bll Hng in all of our promotion.W would there.f'ore haTe be use e th_ together aa th.y appaar qJl the stetion...,. in tho s moral ti.:l.... Thi. do .. not mean -however that ahote or t he 1nd1Y1d.uol markers could not be pickad up along tho line. However, the International th _ _ t be maintelnad throughout. 3- ,. to title, .... will ceo. up shortly with a h1ghl;r dramatio end deacriptiYO Pu"aae to uae as the title l.1De on the cover of the brochure. l' this same }iLrue turns ont to b. suitable alec tor tho mavie title, it would be an ideal .ituatiCII. The brochure, moT1e , roster . etc. sbould. a.a tar all possible all be considered u int.rlocking unite ot on pr<JDDt1onal th_ , and tiad tog.ther as clo.ol:r as 10 practical. Aneth .. thought on the title 1 Could a " Name the lIoY1e" cont .. t be promotad ? It thi8 were doM , the first prize would, ot course have to be somet hing worth while s uch BIJ an all e.xpm.ae weeks Tacation in one of 0lU' various recreati onal areas Etc . SUch a conteet, U han:Ued, would r esult in consid able publicity. There is, howsvor , one dr_leo Such a project would require a considerable �Henir;p?== 3N57 - PAtil 2 \ ~onal budget ( wh1ch we do not have available) aM alo o far IlO1'O tilllo and .ffort tban aI\YODO will haft to .pare an a 01d. 1a.u.. M to 1'ra this point em I lIIU&t .hoke off fJYC7 _dblell bit of time ob1:la1n& routine work and tunot10n about _:If, m aa a aal..mon and t1ald r"",eeentati". , conc..trat1n& r1&ht k1nd of """ m....b<l,..h1p. I plan, of cour.., to .taT to h&n«l. nec ..15Ol7 ropol'te to BUl keep the books will attaapt to maintain neceas&l7 correepondence aa best Baa., on oelling aM -urins the pIlt a f.". de,yo each JDOnth and recorda up to dat., and I can. On thio .ubjoctn of th .... aM tW., Bentlq and I both ago. that ~t would not he practical to feature !ll\Y particular "",tal. It, howewr _pl. lik. rod H.......y and IellCllretone Park Co. c _ thru big in a financial wq, ... would probably b. obligated t o gin their fac1liti .. sa. plaT. But f or a • 30.00 li.ting • • • Ill. lI.AP, ART. ETC. l'h1s can b. a Tf1I:7 a:penaiva it_. am. wherever possible we IIIIl8t t17 to make one piece ot art do double duty for both the ,.,n. and brochure . II. have arranged with our Art Pirm to mak. up a c_eheno1Ye 11 proopectivo" but """" of tho f1n1ahed art will be done "" any ... tion ofnt the brochure lUltil we have t1n1ahed solic1ting the area lCO _ aM ha.. raieod ALL the ..,nq necul5Ol7 t o financ. that particular opraad. Th. big ...p of tho _ira three-nation eyota w111 probably ba the laat piec. of art to ba dODO, ao ... ha" no wa::r nf k:now1ng h"" far oaat aM wet nft US 89 we will have to go to t1nd tho .tc. """'1'. AlII I correct in aolllllling that· the ti/ilee , mapa, will come laat after ell nf the footage haa baen ahot, edited, .tc., and the t1n1ahed production 1. being out together1 It this 18 correct, wa can sit tight WltU ,.. 8.8 how th1.n,ga ara working out. IIl!mll!&SllrP LIST l'OR TRPl:1CER I will. aeM him a dupl.1cated list within the next f"" de,yo , and alec tho prea • • lIh1le out in the field , and kay people who can holp him in of a:y mailing" n 7 2 2 PI r 77 at1ck"B a cow nf the Jlembarah1p Roeter when i t 10 oft I will alec keep him advioed ca new membera, Yeri",," ar..... 3 CANADIAN )IQOTAGE I Ernie Saran penciled a briar not. on the ballot he returned aa::r1ng that -he had been to lrdmonton and had & talk with Dan C_ball, Deputy _ . ter RaHil Moore. and also Hon. 1Ir. Patr1ck, lI1n1ater ot Econam.c Affaire . He gave no hint .. t o the reeulte of theee canteren_, and did not indicate in any wa::r i t the n.a was good or bad. He meraly aaid that he " ould write me in detail in a few de,yo , and I have been watching 8Very mall """oct1ng to hoar f rom him. In vi . . of this , I feal it will be bast to get the 1"" dOllD on the current nft1. 1ol att1tudr in Edmonton bator. corr..ponding with th_ about their portion nf the film. Ern1.. letter should arri..- &I\l'day, and I will rolq 1t. contento to you at ODW. liar. on th1. subject as soon as I bear traa Saran. ~I Beutly mentioned that someone connected with the touriet proIIW>t1on eot-<lp !i&ifllromi8ed to .upply .01lI0 lIaxi.an footage . I underetood him to aay that he had written to 1'OU about it. REPalT Bentlq 10 preparing the "Progr .... Report • on the _ t i o n to date wh1ch we hope to duplic ate and mall to all Directors th1a next ....ek. It will deal .nt1roly with what _ have done on the brochure, i,.,Uate pl.anII , financial statanant» eto. lie will ha.... to depend on you to _ t the dope an what 10 heppening re the movie, and for this purpose , I am. .,ending 8OIIl8 master. tor the duplicator. Please type up whatever meeeage you have tor the Directors on the ma.et ... a, and shoot th. back to..me. �UNION PACIFIC DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Bentley: Am making up a s ales and. collection report which I will mail tonight. It is not quit. readr. and I wanted you lID t o got this mElnO on the movie as soon as possible, 80 will take this to the P. O. now in time to catcb the P .... plane(I bope) and will mail the report later todq. Am mailing the copies to the others alonl\ with yours and will talk to Ray D!! tonight . 0 lIartin �FROIl: ll~H . Cantwell TO: Bentley Witchell COPY: Stewart, Hendryx, Sorgatz IIa,y 7, 1956 SUBJECT : Cos t data etc . on making the 89 ' ir llovie Haven Tracker has adviaed Burnett that i f w. still plan on having the movie made this SWJJn8r he rlll be abl e t o leave Chi c880 on June 22, and wi.ll have 28 da,y8 available to take the f ootage, returnins to Chic ago on about July 20 . It we decide to prooeed, finances will be required as follows: BEFORE JUNE 22 JULY 22 -AUG.l For film •••••••••••••••• S 600.00 Advance on expenaes o • • • • 400. 00 • ••• •• •• ••• • • • •• • • •••• • •••• 1000. 00 Final settlement on expens es (minimum) •••• • ••••••••••••••••• 800 . 00 (It is 111¥ underst anding that this would be eatisfaetory) AFTER FIUIlNG After Treckar has finished With his end of the job, shooting, cutting, editing, etc . the following inveatment will be required to produce finished prints readr tor showing. Lab. fee for making master "ana"ar printll • •••••••••••••••••••lOOO.OO Finished prints for projsction (at $ 100 each) with a probable minimum of at least six required to permit. &n.1 sort of effective distribution •••••••• • • •••• • ••••••••• • ••• • • 600. 00 TOTAL (known) COST •••• , J , 400.00 The $ 34Q:).OO is referred. to as t.he "known cost" due to the tact that. all of the items lil!lted. are III1n1.mum estimate. with no eu.hieD provideJt to take care of unexpected incidentw . Also , to ucr knowledge we have never tulJ.y l ooked into upenae which may be involved. in securing distribution . (Th!!! may have been done but if so I do not recall the details ) Mr .. Tracker wishes to b. advised at. the earliest. possible date whether or not. we plan to proceed with the til.ming in June . 80 that he can arrange hie SUJI:IIl8r plana accordingly. As explained to me by Burnett the situation is like thia • • • if' we decide to go ahead, Jbo . Tracker will proceed 8S per the above. It, however, we decide to hold of! paneling a more secure financial. statue , llr. Tracker wti.l auffer no inconvenience as he hal another ti..lJaing project lined. up which can be substituted during the 28 d&1S he will have available. In this cormection, Burnett assurea me that no embarrassment will result in the event we decide t o postpone our fi lming. In t&irneae to Mr. Tracker, w. must theretore arrive at an iImlediate decidoD, ani adviae him accordingly. The entire s ituation, ot coure e, revolve. around the problem ot finances, and it i. somewhat unfortunate that the decision mu.t be made at this particular moment . Our program got ott to & late start, and progress has been slow since it haa been necesa arr to conduct all solicitation up to thi s point in " oft seaeon" areas and little, it arrr, improvement can be expected until about mid-June • From that point on, progress should be rapid. The quastion is ••• would it be wiee to take on this' 3400.00 obligation at this stage and gamble on the funds being aYa1lable by paY-9tr time. CIt , would it be better to p~ l eate and give the egga a chance t o hatch betore we count OU. chickens. �B~lex Mitchell - Stewart. HendEfx. Sorgatz • • • • May 7 2 1957,. " , PAGE 2 As the individual responsible for raising the DJ)ney to finance this program, I peD80nally opposed. to the assuming of obligatiol1.8 which must be met on certain dates and payable with ANTICIPATED revenue. In support of this attitide, I advance the followings 811. TIrl.s is a two-year program in which we propose to raise a sizeable promotional fund with the brochure as our only fund- raising medium. In presenting the project to our membership in the Uay bulletin we mentioned the movie along ldth several other items as being major activities in the proposed 10 point promotional program but didnnot promise that it would be made at any certain time o It was made very clear that the entire program must be financed thru advertising support in the brochure, and that the total success of the program would be in direct ratio to the financial support given. Two items only have been dated and promised,. and must therefore have priority. Dist ribution of the first Membership Roster has been promised for sometime in June, and advertisers in the Brochure have been guaranteea that a m1n1U1lm of 50, 000 copies would be distributec1 between October 1 , 1957 and December 31, 1958, These two items are being emphasized in the solicitation as "for sure" with the understa.nd1ng that the other points in the program will follow it, and .!:h!n, fund. are available o It is my understamlng that the Promotion CoIllllittee has more or 1,"5 agreed on a up&)' as you go " policy for the complete protection of the AS8ociation and all concerned. Contracts made with the printer and art agency provide for payment in II advance installments in amounts sufficient to cover the cost of scheduled productionll This means that no production involving expenae lIil.l be authorized. until we are able to iasue a check covering the cost of that particular operation. This will ~ ep us out of debt •• , and out of trouble . *** The making of the JIDvie i8 one or the most important projects in our proposed program, and I am. sure we will be able to go ahead with it at a future date during our two year program, but I question the advisability ot assuming the obligation in our present insecure financial status. *** I am going t o talk t o Ray tonight , and wU1 ask him to let you have his opinion on this at once. You can probably call Frank, and then get in touch with Burnett so that he can pass the decision along to I(r . Trecker. 1 �ARIZON ... OffiCE, 1021 E. Comelbock Rd. Phoe"i~, A.izono Diol CR -4 . 77D8 ADMINIST.ATION OffiCE 1-40 WEST SECONO SOUTH ST SALT LAKE CIty 1, UtAH OIM H 9 . 9322 Au II!!Ilb. OffiCE Of RAY V. STEWART, p,..idenl 530 W. lIiII Williom. • Williom., Ari%ono March 29, 1957 OffiCERS , .... Y V STEWAU , ••• id ..1 W ..lo.n •• t.!ot.1 Willi. m., A,I.on. S. O. t.40lROW Yi,,_'.u;d ••1 t.4orrow t.4010 .. f I09 .,.fI. A.ilo.. IENTLEY t.4ITCHElL Vic,·', •• idul t.4itch.1I t.4ot.1 L09". Utoh W G . .... S5 Su,.tory_T....u•• , L. Siuto t.!otOi Wi<~."r.~." A,bono OIUCTOItS , ~~:;lL:,~~~o~:~t:'°Ni" N09· 1 Sono.o . M•• ico ••. IURHEfT .... HENonx Como.o" Mol.1 ud To~tI '.n9u;tc~, Utoh FR ... NK W 50RG"'rz FI.. tS.cu,i t,lu~ofldo~o MontlMli.',l d.ho O... LLAS A. CLIN6ER ~r~~:o~~~!~~::q· • ICH ... lO C . FUGUS F"9U. t.!ot.1 6, .. , h ll •• Mont... Dear Bentley , I have today r ec eived f r om Burnett a c ontract to Haven Trec ker for making t he movie ~ As Chairman of t he Promoti on Committee I believe you should also c heck t h e c ontract over carefully . I !'liU enclose t he entire file as i t was s ent t o me . I f y ou approve send t he \·/bo le Ylor ks bac k to me a nd I ·.rill sign it end bet Bill Bas s to aut o:;r a.pl1 i t also ane. get i t into .. the wor ks . T~e i s short , but I felt it best you OK it first . As i ,e fr om the poi nt s mentiolled by .vurnett in h is 1 t ter to Tr ecker I wondered a b out item 4 which calls f or all of hi" expenees , said e:>..-pen ses to be n ot l es s than ,4 0 . 00 per uay . I s ee n o limit as to time he may s penf.l on t he road . In oth er worU.s u.S t he con tr~t r eadG he c ould spend 0 months at ;;40 . vO per day l·r more am.. 'lIe would rea l Js b e i n t .le soup . I shoul d t hi nk t llere shoul be a tine limit spr...cifi ed duri n.:. which t ime he must c omple l.e t he f ilm . Bur-nett pro;'ably would have a much be l-t ar i ciea t han I as to wha.t such limit should be . U un . . .el'ste.nd.i r.g we.s t hat i t should. be y c omrleted i n thirty days, ~ut t .ler~ c ert..inl y is nothing in t he contract t 0 " - ' t h ow 1 ong th .... f ~ "lmiDe; ~s t 0 t ake . Item " h ~ sJ.ll.-c if" es t h a t t . e e dO t ed ~ ~ film i s to be ir. th e ba1](is of t he Association 60 days after filming: , but the filming could take 6 mont hs e.:;J a~ t He COl.trc.ct i s c oncerneu. • far Burnett I would s~g est you write Bentley a t onc e gi vins h im your opini on on t his sending a. copy t o me . EXECUTI\lE SECRETAn, t.4 ... kTlN H. C ... NTWEU 1010 W S.co .. d SOYI~ Soli Lol. City. UI.h One more thing we must k8 sure of 10 t he a vailability of t rie mor.ey to c ....rry out t .~e S!ontrE.(;t 1f entere. i : to . B:; tlIile llnrtin i .:;; on t ile r oad il l ittle '~hi1c ....e shoW..:.. have an irJclilJg a.;;. to t he suc~ess of our fUIld raisin... . Bass i nformeu me c ou ple days liJo t hat the 9.) assoc . 8T1U the 70 assac . both had been w-orY.ing ickenburt, for a ll t hey are worth and be \londers if anyone will have &.ll; money ltdft foY' u s by tiI::e Y! .... get tbere . l!. idently oath AS30 • ax ~ raisi .• i::, mOlle for s. brochure . v Hope t he b rachm 'e i s out of t he woods n ow nne. Martin c a n get th e b~l r olling a t once . Si nc erely , cc Burnett Hendryx M artin Cantwell SCENIC ROUTE OF THE AMERI CAS �.t )//1 . h . J.<.-,'4. .. L ,rtt i.·,f ,L .r (I,~.J: ' ) " " 4 {f .//~ ,tv, ;'" ""~ 41 'e'i ~'. Ct I I ~ I J (-; ',- " " '1." l' '}r- , '-<.( V J.".C 'L. A 'I ., ). :... ...... > <lk./.' .6 I .1.1- f . . -. -I't-Iz:. , , '" '--.5' , , /c7 ! cF '" I~ I 'i .j-" .. c... " ./ ,"I , ".. 1 'I ,/~L , -, 11 , • ." cj {; . It {'" ,f;, II 7 ' --:l I ., .... , c ,. .:t If /: ,:±"I( '. I nl{.., c...::i- I v"-..., ., t k. " '!..!2 L J.H1 J;J~. .Jh /' 'J/~.;[ I~ "'-'-- j'cc L L' " ~_f:" ~ "40 ) ~. ;j /" t / . f-d .-, .7.. J ) ,I -< .. ~£ ) jN 'J ".- 6- t/l ';j • "!twa- J. '-'I • 'if fb,... t;:---U .. ':L ..J J <C , J_ . ..:1,'W...... ,.. y • '/ If J )tcij 1< 'I C ,I ;r-" " >'..'7 . It. Lot.J //(..';[. .. + '~ ~r\L '" ''';'J<..l, 'k E / '...... ~<- <,t;' .......... III ' I '7 .;f II 1--1 I, -."" , ~ 'f .. R", /I ' '-\.-"", I r ; ( :." 1.a.J;.j } r-~-- . t 5) //( It" !".;:-i. ,I f ./ ~I • 1("-- . ;,,; k- h " ~+ 'I ,, 7 / I • I '1" " :..'( 41 # -or- )~ (l4:;-;;f; ,..;/ 4/-_< It r- C I " ~l-I ) 't- 6,,, ::t d/ ~ I 'l,? , ,. r ..... ;0-' c ....~c.-· • -- '~' [.' C , • ~ t. -1-1' • • 1 . j J;[.; ( ~ _-t..< __ ~ uJ.e f I. I" - . '7 ~ ~I'",,_ If.. I!L I-c/ ,, ~.,. -, ....t.:..-:- ~: " ".n ~ / /, Ie., "-"" /' - I 'I II '3 \' ..:.J/. ':I 1.[ e-<" ~I Jj / cS: ( ~ • -,,·,of"/ oJ ••• &0. .l.. ;; , J r __ fH ~J.7""- .,;- t e,fl t-. , " . '~ •3 ), .. D , ~ ~~, ).)..... ~ ~ '- 'Z. _ .:- c ~ ~I I ~" '. ".. }~.c ? • a- ....,. ~, /;' /-{ ~I ... ,,-" ,.~ . [t, , i . -[.0 -"." . ~.:. ~ I,' ,a jc"~ 7 f'/ b, ,~ < ~? � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3375 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2667 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1304">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1304</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 2442046068 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource 89'ers promotional movie Description An account of the resource Documents pertaining to the promotional movie for the 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Stewart, Ray V. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1956-05-07 1957-03-01 1957-03-29 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 5 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd5 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/44cc949f4d1ab54af154f544720ffd87.pdf a42c30fc7c7fe8afebeccab8505d6a3e PDF Text Text Ii -All -.» IlIte 2D4 day of t.oft.1Xll»r. Tlil A...., .. ",MliHT. ILLIA - .ot "'G"",.ot.I".r. ud." jlUNT abut,. 931. Wle leopa COIIllIJ. Arizona. NATIONAL HI 1 AY A I corpor.1! • otF'. O. 195:1. bel_ IAnoN. I C., • IcUnM,. Mulcopa r. •ArIZlOtl.. IT,., 'S 5 Ttl.It two loa" I ... IllOtJlI millie lhGr ot. I -wll 11lla • .orda J r.ll .ad ..,0lI<l til. lor r. " hoIh ttl " kb ere Ie eoIe. llIelual•••-ad ('rl,11III "ort . •ad 10 hoIh ot wllldllle 11M Ibe exdul ... copyrl frlDe 1_ tr 10: . ID«Itponlec1 (8. M.l.). ead. Iroadcuc bleb aD, aily""" cl.1m "" l1«eHld prod' CII<: Ibn.ot. ubi r COll- 1l1li DOt~ II • •lro.ll 01 blYlq u.. two .~ tor 411RrllMlon. 1m ead ptrfonn- II &lid rat r rue ttl II.' pIIbIlc: nrlatlona pra.rem III pro orlllJ f ID u tal; S, tb H 'r.eMure Ad tc Cor Ip trlbulert , iii ~. partlel lI.ve • .. foUowa: • and 1. TbC ced ..... rill orde4 tbr.. tboUHnCI (3000) ttl 110r. . .14 IIOD 011 _ r record or bave pro.lniq orda, qcb tba odIer ot tbI afor....Id .1 tbareCII••"" tarillut. ud _ Ii re orllllo tM Nil ot hll • Ully for I _ (75;) per r t;Ord. {il}'lna and .ceountl 110( II Hid pboao;.., Ie. . IIIUI IIIIftDl,-tlft ce•• ello;jl III a"... melll 10 tboo retery-Treuurer of ce..da {COllI tba lale at AI tcc rda lad pllbllabl Clurla lIIe tum at mi. ..ponaor corporation tor all pro.r~ pertcrm crt ... d _Ip. lIIcludJIl _Dly-ti .. (75 ) per CIDI crt (/Ie royelll•• r4Celye4 WIder Ille coou ... tr ", Ir . 8. for 1M Illla asv II 2. e COIICI... in •• 14 II<III,IJI .1. elt ar ..rill or _ _ Ie 18 rr CI. poaer fun r 8 rae. to pr""'.cd and r.cord or baY pro- �afor..aldllOllp .. atcr ..I • or pwbll ttlnllljJ til aama. at tile optiCD of ability lor: a .&lm 0« •• Ihao 15; PH' record, paylna and accounUag each .. ellb • a;ifee r llll tile (OnA Ibe Secntary-Tr...unr of I ..my-IIVilt (75 ) piJr C"'nt oJ' the net prell' .>pOnaor torpontloa for tc_ tile eat IX 10 (but nol Includ\n;l gratia 4t.trlbultlon by $pcnaor) of a "raUli ••1 lOlli- or for the tina tI1l8 ag_ _ la In 1I. T ~V I ~ ~ yam 01 ea:. ••1 ! !1;rmlnatU ¥ and rccor 8um of procluclJIg and record"', afOl ••alel. and ther.afl r 9.Y the CCflt eI pr or latrlblltl n r4 aU of of the Sponaoc. before the '1111 (r r 8. M.I. . ellbe.. d rlllj ael", .. d~ . . . It may de m AIIvlubla, 1'1\ VID ud r.eorCllna or puN tbbr.u record Spcnwor nerelly • rcu tha, Ir wW pay oor 10 eXc;IIt.lil 3000 pUOIIOItapb ..ecor OJ! f~OlA JiliN!) 0.) ( 700. (0) OCI.L.ARS tOl' the CGllt (Ilar I" rlwel unI".. I .. rl lnal 3000 pilono of, ia &;;r __lit. t Spo'UOJ', tph reemellt .1W1 '.t _Ice, fonllwltb n.rc..... Itt ackIllIOll8l pllotzOirapil re erda r4 tbe afcc-e..ld d or bave addltl nal cop a of ..aid 80JlIJlI publl a~ produced ell. 4. Tbl. egeemcm ahall tel' 1.0&1:" II tilt . .plrallcD of flvo (5) ye .... l.a fcom due herod, u. nJ.l;~ IIOQMr ' ....mlDatQI! 11 .. I ... o!Jlbelor t:OP . the p.rue. barato pro.,14ed. rGulll lie( lbelr IIlIDdIIlbo day and y ar flrat abcwe wrlll D. -- ~~~~~=-"------­ ral WWIIIIII8, Compc.er 9' S INT I\NATIONAL HIGHWAY II a corporatlen, Spoa.or AT! . _\11.,._0-._BA,,ss.- - - - - I[a !icicreufY -2- OCIATION. INC., �5~O • Bill ,illiamn kvo . ~ 1ll1&J:l5 tlri1.0D8 b: ov . 6, I tl55 To all Directora, clo~ is a c OIY ot the contrect e nt~i into y e ! s:soc1ation ""ith Berny h.l11!~ f ol' t.ht;. prouuction or thG ....ger suDi' 011 records . fie terl:Ul of the (oont.r....ct. are liS direc;..tocl by tho J oard fit. th,* JtGll t1JiQ: in Salt Lt.,ko City Oct. . 2(j, t.h. 'I'he 8M103U t:::o W 1 3 f ol' y our r~co:.:.gIS . Berny a D he ael:JurCi:l tni :: lIonth. ~e 1111ama 1& ow ,torti · Oll the reC\)I".l9 SbO'l1lf be r e:.Lly for the r l.c or l1nJ CIt the :longs di~tr.l.Out1oli 081'01'0 the ODd 0 ThB A.ssociation ht\!I III s ecura i e.n tf£1ca i n l'ho8c lx "'hieh ..111 be thfl J.ruoDa otfice. 'l111:; (Itfi.c o, U50 Qf tho. ;,~b~ue, n:1 s"cr tcry to a.wer pholiO callG fot us 111 cost U le AiUCC1e.tiOll D cth1T~ .. S1r.cs 4ccot'.il.n," to too oontro.ct w1 t b B(U' be i:. to u1,str i ute the l"cc oro.e 1 t '11 o.ff'ord .. 'very h a.od,)"" , '·ln08 fl'Oll which to d..i.str1but.e tho1ti. It 1 s 1! I pl .w t.ha t. 1 ( 1 t'6 ueGte t or rooords be sent d b "J,t to t hat .!J.resB which wUl f.tciUt.te toe f.star handling of tbe r ecorda. be addres s of CUT ArizonA o!ri(:$ i& 1\) ...1 l!: . C3Jlmlback Rce.d boen1x .Ar1zQna Phone en 4- 7'fOU . Floft$l ma.k$ Q. record ot t hin for .fu ture r efe rence . I kV fI h &i no t'''~l¥ "ould " ppre~lat. bet\r1ll& tr05 yo-u. a t to our stt.ornoy. l\8 yet fT0;4 you t:'fJ{l icrdW. t e Cbtxter. r 8Q t.hat 1 cant tha lr fot'll.'lt 10D o ~o How 13 t he local cl\ b ilea "OT~ out? I w o ul ~ ap~r ~clc te nearing what progl'O:Ja. 15 br:lng 'IIIttdB in your corLlUDitio lSetting peoplo irrtel"6l1too. in tb ol'ganb t iOD anJ ,,'bother 4Ilj' clubn .1.£'O ae: y.t i n pl'oce3B or t ortidng. j;'l ,·.~c be of hlp . do l1_ot hee1tllte to call OD me i n ImY 'slip.; t a:t I c " n �r\. ,,--r-----~~~----~--//~ A"t<."tlm"" 1 THIS A 1 E 'MENT, made this 2nd day of November, 1955. between BERNIE WILLIAMS. of P. O. Box 931, Wickenburg. Maricopa County, Artzona. 2 "Composer. " and 89' ERS INTERNATIONAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. , a corporation, of P. O. Box 865, Wickenburg, Mar icopa County. Arizona, "Sponso , " WITNESSETH: THA T WHEREAS, the Composer warrants that he I. the composer of 7 8 two songs. including the t itle. word. and music thereat. to-wit: "Treasure 9 TraU" and "Beyond the Border, " both of which are his s ole , exclusive and 1 - 10 original work. and to both of which he has th exclusive copyright under con- I tract franchise to Broadcast MUSic , Incorporated (8. M. l.). and 11 12 ainat neither of which any adverse claim exists; 13 AND WHEReAS. the Sponsor Is desirous of having the two songs 14 15 aforesaid produced, publish d and recorded for distribut ion, sale and perform 16 ance thereof. in the furtherance of Its publlc relations program in promoting 17 its objects Including travel on O. S. Highway 89 and its foreign tributaries; 18 N , , THE EFOR!l. the parrtes have agreed as follows: 19 1. The Composer hereby agrees to produce and r ecor d or have pro- 20 duced an recorde three thousand (3000) phono 21 one of the aforesaid songB on one side thereat and the other of the aforesaid 22 23 aph recor ds. each containing I songs on the other side thereof. and distribute and sell the said phonograph 1 , 24 I r ecor s to the best of his abUity for a sum not less than seventy-five cents 2~ I (75¢) per record, paying and accounting each month during the ter m of this 2e agreement to the Sa::retary-Treasurer of the Sponsor cor porat ion for all pro- 27 ceeds from the sale of said records and publishing and performance of said 28 29 songs, including s eventy-five (75%) per cent of the royalties received under 30 the contract franchise concerning said songs from B. M.1. either during or 31 for the time this agreement is In effect. 32 2. The Composer further agrees to produce and r ecord or have pr o- OTHC B OOKS ATTOIlH.Y AT LAW T\.IClloH 1. ARI1C1NA -1- OTHO B OOKS "nORNEY AT LAW TUCSON . ARIZONA �duced and recorded such number of additional. pbonograpn r ecoros, eacn con1 taining the aforesaid songs as afor esaid, or publish the same , at the option of 2 the Sponsor , and distribute and s ell said pho~ograph r ecords to the best of his 3 abUity for a sum not less than 75¢ per r ecord, paying and accounting e ach 4 month dur ing tile term of this agreement to the Secretary -T r easurer of the 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sponsor corporation for seventy-five (75%) per cent of the net profit derived I from the sale (but not including gratis distribution by Sponsor) of said records I and publishing and performance of said songs , Including the royalties received under the contract franchise concerning said Bongs from D, M. l., either during or for the t ime this agreement Is In effect . 11 12 3. The Sponsor lIereby agrees that it w1ll pay not to exceed the sum of saVEN HUNDRED ($700. 00) DOLLARS for the cost of producing and r ecording 13 14 the 3000 phonograph records aforesaid, and thereafter pay the cost of producing 15 and r ecor ding or publishing said songs, 16 that In the event of the sale or distribution of all of the original 3000 phonograph 17 records together with all thos e produced and r ecorded therenfter at the option 18 of the Sponsor, before the full term of this agreement , the agreement shall 19 88 It may deem advisable; PROVIDED, ther eupon terminate unless the Sponsor, after notice, forthwith exercises Its 20 21 22 option to have additional phonograph r ecords of the afore said songs produced and r ecorded or have additional caples of said s ongs publlshed. 4. This agreement shall ter minate at the expiration of five (5) years 23 24 from date hereof, unless sooner terminated 20 26 her einbefor e provided, IN WITNESS WHER 'OF , the parties hereto have her eunto set their hlIods the day and year first abeve written . ~~ 27 28 29 89'E S INTERNATIONAL HlGHW AY ASSOCIATION, INC. , a corporation, Sponsor 30 31 88 ATT T: ~ By: I('{J v' ~ , Its Pr esident --~'~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~-- I 32 OTHO B OOK S ATTOII N I:Y A T I,.AW T\lCJlON I ..... II .ZO"" -2- O T H O B OOKS ATTOR N Ii:Y AT LA W TUCSON , ARIZO N A �LATIN AIRt RECORDS Lotin Aire Recording Co ., Inc. Nogales, Sonora , Mexico Vocal 3000·1 by ~ Mickey Hunt BEYOND THE BORDER (Bernie Wiliiams·Frank Barker) FRANK BARKER and his �-. ~ « .' LATIN' AlltL RECORDS latin Aire Recording Co " (nc. Nogales, Sonora, Mexico I 3000-2 Vocol by Mic ke y HUI TREASURE TRAIL (Be rnie William s -fronk BOrke r) " THE OFFICIAL 89'RS SONG " FRANK BARKER and his ~ C!:) • • ~, J 1 ~ .... ~. . ~ �LATIN AIRE RECORDS Latin Aire Recordi ng Co ., Inc . Nogales, Sonora , Mexico Vocal by , 3000·1 Mickey Hunter BEYOND THE BORDER (Bernie Williams- Frank Barke r) FRANK BARKER and his LATIN AIRES 45R·l080 �LATIN AIRE RECORDS Latin Aire Recording Co ., Inc. Nogales, Sonora , Mexico Vocol by: 3000-2 Mickey Hunter TREASURE TRAIL ( Bernie Williams-Frank Barker) " THE OFFICIAL 89'RS SONG" FRANK BARKER and his LATIN AIRES 45R-l081 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 4025 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2564 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1314">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1314</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example Grayscale Checksum 1891671966 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Treasure Trail and "Beyond the Border" by Frank Barker Description An account of the resource Treasure Trail and "Beyond the Border" by Frank Barker and Latin Aires, 45 record album, with the agreements by 89'ers for the production of these two songs. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Barker, Frank Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Williams, Bernie Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Music Tourism Alberta Route 2 Mexico Route 15 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Music Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Research Craft Company Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 11/2/55 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Nogales (Mexico) Sonora (Mexico) Mexico Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 2 Folder 4 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx2Fd4 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/793b662c0d84ac0bf43afb1e6845a7fd.pdf f5dad99b1b154ec4000c51037ab74298 PDF Text Text ( April 19 . 1967 FROK: .H.Cant wall TO·: BanUey Mi tahen. Chairman Treasurer Pr omotion Fund Statement of authori.ed expense acoount to be advanoed snd oharged against total oommissions earned MI LES KOTEL DATl< April 3 4.00 3.00 3.00 6 Salt Lake, Logan, Montpelier and around Bear !ale Basin area 6. MILEAGE FOR WEEK 210 3 . 00 April 7 3 . 00 8 3.00 3.00 9 10 Bear Lake Ba.in-Afton- Star Vaney 3.00 Afton to Jackson Bnd return 6.00 11 6 . 00 18 MILEAGE FOR WEEK 13 240 April 14 15 16 17 3 . 00 3.00 Afton -Alpine 3.00 end return Afton-Thayne and return 3 . 00 Afton to Pari. to Poa.tello Pocatello to Salt Lake City Wi 18 5.00 MILEAGE FOR WEEK 19 461 911 17 911 day. @ • 6.00 p.r • ••••••• • •• 102.00 miles C 7¢ per .••••••• •• •• • )(01;81a •• • ••••••••••••••• • •••••• 63.77 55 . 00 \ • 55.00 �FROJ& : 1I. II . Cantwell Ootober 31 , :1.957 TO : Charl! e B. 1lartin , Jr . SUBJECT : Sta telIlent of I toJ!l.S Due M. R. Cant loll M onth of O otober , 1957 * •• *.*. *....... .,.** •••• ***•••• PROFESSIONAL !'EE ( Ootober) ... . ..... . ..... . .. 100 . 00 REFUND to PETTY CASH ••••• • •••••••••• • •••••• CONVENTION TRAVEL EXP. ( L D~ance) • • • • ••••• 101. 60 60. 00 �ooto TO: Charlie B. Martin. f r . FR O~I ; U. Il . ClllltVlBll SUBoTECT ; Retund due Petty Cash t or ",ont h at October . NO : Some TE at t hi s erpense was incurred i n SeptBJ:lbor a t t er t he Sopt . sta tem nt "US sent to Bl l 1 BasS early i n ardor t hat he e could closo his books tor the y, ar . POSTAGE •••• •••• •• • ••••• • •.• • • •••••• • • • • TELEFHONE ( $ 13. 25 Di st anoe )........... . .. 33 . ) 8 MISC. and SUPPLIES including Clip Servioe , Duplicator paper s etc . •••••••• 54 . 97 Lang TOTAL _ . , Sal es Recei pts and Itemized Statement at each individual it er&t ~ _ Can wo ~ . Execut1ve Secretary ~ , L._ _ 31, 1957 _ _ _ __ $ 101 . 60 �TO : Charlie B. :'artin FROM M.B.Oantllell : SUBJECT: , "ober 31, 1957 • Statement of uthorized Travel Third Annual Comvontion . llowanoe in oonneotion with !lILEAQE - Cal.gary to Afton and return 1616 miles Q 5¢ ••••••••••• DAILY EXPENSE - 24 days 0 $10 per t ••••.•••••• TOTAL 240 . 00 $ )20 . 80 CREDIT ( 10/9 Ck. flo . 376). . .. ........ BI\L . DUE 80 . 80 260 . 80 e 60 . 00 �STATE M ENT STRR VRllEY InDEPEnDEnT P UBLISHED I N WYOMING'S D A I RY CENTER A ,.T O N , WYOMING 11ay 1, 1957 I 89 1 ers International Higlnlay Assn. Pro~otion Connittee c/o Bentley l·utchell Logan, Utah L April 25 I 1200 NeHs Bulletins Cuts Postage 80 00 ( 16 70' 2 89 9959 �FR<JI. 1!,JI.Cant well TO. February 14, 1959 CharUe B. l!ertin, Jr. - Bentl ey Mitchell SUBJECT, a ccOWlts receivable and obligations . Status of Broohure COnmittee re i As of this date , our printing bill is paid in full , and Remittance Advise /I 2/12/59 in t he amount of $ 175.00 t urned over to t he Promotion Fum tadso' will permit ue to make f i nal payment to our artist, Richard IJ . Bailey and a small item f or photos I purchased • • • leaving a balanc e of less tjlan • 30.00 in tm Prozoot ion Fund. af ter all bills incurred i n the public ation of the brochure have been paid i n full. UN COILEC'IElI ACCOUNTS RECE I VABIE sre as f ollows: F.1am1ngos Motel, Wazatlan • • • • • • • • • 0 Aiken I oS Lodge , Kanab • • • • • • • • • Rancho G rande M otel, W ickenburg Rio lo!otel, Tucson • • • Bryce Canyon C afe, Panguitch • • Saddle and Sirloin, Tucson • • • lOSS - ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Cal.gary Stampede Board • • • • • • • • • • • e 30. m 20. 00 25 . 00 30. 00 30. 00 30. 00 0 ( This outfit claimed a 50 ~ loss of value because brochure was not out in time to carry 1958 Stampede dat es, and onlY paid half of $ t he • 300. 00 contracted for ) 315.00 NOTE : I n view of the fact that we have been billing, and XVi'h writing l etters to all of these small acc ounts far t he past five months with no results, I doubt i f we 1',111 ever get any of this money. I will contime to bID them, but we ca.n.oot count on being paid. There is, of course a chance t hat some of it may come in, but from the practical st andpoint we must at this time consi der them l ost . �I FROM: M.H.Cantwell TO: Bentley Mit~hell September 8,1957 COMMISSION RE-CAP - To be attaohed to Report # 9 - 8 • • *.*.**** •••• ***** Telegraph Money Order September 6 - Prinoipal amount Servioe Cost • D5.00 6.70 TOTAL to be oredited against oommission. •••••••••• • 341.70 The tollowing re-oap i. oompiled to determSne the ooamission balanoe due aa ot Report # 9-8 due to the tact that the above oredit ot • 341.70 is an odd tigure whioh does not balanoe with any given Colleotion Report **.*.************* •• ********* REPORT I 8- 31 Advanoe Commission allowed on:Alberta Travel Bureaul Citr at Calgary 1 Red Deer C.ot CI sponsorship grants at, 300.00 eaoh. Total. 900.00 COMKlSSION • • •••••••••• $ 300.00 Other Commissions due this report REPORT •••••.. .••...•••••••••••• ~o.oo $ 3 0.00 I 9-8 Commissions due this report ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• TOTAL COMMISSIONS(both reports) 93.33 • 1+23.33 CREDIT Telegraph M oney Ordsr BALANCE OF COMMISSION DUB ON REPORT # 9-8 ••••••••••••••••• .*.*******.************.* Re-oap ot Membership Fee. due Association: aeport ., 8-31 Report # 9-8 2 member.hipa •••••• 30.00 J memberships, •• o. 45.00 • 75.00 31+1.70 81.63 �THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK rtD IR ... L R[ S lRVE .H.. I'. 0' SYS TEM fEDEII", L Dt~ OSIf INS UR AM CE e O Il~OIl"' Tl OM L OGAN, UTAH To the Printer , The f ollowing are instructions for impr inting checks for customer s of this De s ign a m printing must conform to A. B. A. specifications . bank . Title of account : H I GHWA Y 89 IN T EAN A T t ON ~ L FUND 130 1 EAST H I GHW AY 89 LOGAN . UTAH Bank name to appear on checks: 'mE = T NA TIONAL BANK of Logan LOGAN , UTAH Transit- Routing number: 97-22 1243 MICR encoding : Cust omer A ccount Number , A u xilia r y O N US Fiel d* ~ T rans it Num be r F ie ld ON US F ie ld 0022 "' ) M gnetic Ink check serial number printed. in the Auxiliary ON US Field must a 1ncl ude high order zeroes . The starting number should be suppli ed by the customer. Your cooper ati on will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours , AUthorlZ srgnature �THE fIRST NATIONAL BANK MUII[R FEDERAL R[ ' [~V[ S YSTEM 'EOER,o. L 0' DlP O,' T I IIB U R"" C [ C OR "O ~"'TION L OGAN, UTAH Dear First National Bank Customer: For greater speed and accuracy in handling your account we are converting to a new elec tronic bookkeeping system. To meet the r equirements of t his system , all checks must have an account number and other identifying numbers printed on them in magneti c ink . Through the use of these numbers your hank will be able to provide you with the most modern and efficient banking service available . IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO HUNT MORE COMPANY CHECKS in the near future please see that these checks are imprinted in magneti c ink with your account number and other identifying numbers as they appear on the attached printer' s instruction sheet. Either take the sheet to your printer or r eturn it to us with your reorder i f you have been obtaining your checks through us. IF YOUR PRESENT SUPPLY OF CCMPANY CHECKS IS ADEQUATE please retain the enclosed instruction sheet until such time as you r eorder c hecks. We will be happy to wor k with you or your printer in making whatever minor modificati ons in check format may be necessary to ac commodate the new code numbers . May we suggest that you make a t en-minute inspection of our check catalog. We have many types and styles of rusiness checks available in y our choice of six colors . We are sure their uae could result in considerable saving of time and money in your operation. This is another step in this bank ' s continuing effort to serve you better. We appreciate ver,y much your cooper ation. �Feb 6, 1958 Dear Bentley: This rrornings mail brought the other $ 150 . 00 from Pr escott Chamber of COIllllerce, so at long last we a re able to payoff Paragon Press in full. The balance due is $ 119.12 • I would like to take this check over to Paragon persorolly 80 that I can have them give me a receipt in full on the entire deal, so please mail it to me . This will leave us liith only a small balance du:e lJick Bailey which we should be abl e to clean up this month . Did not get out of to.m this past week as I had planned. Have been having nothing but trouble with the electrical system on the Buick, and am afraid to hit the road until it is cleared up . Have had new volt regulator and battery installed, but there is a short or something that has not yet been located. Best r egards , � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 5003 Image Width Image Width in pixels 3153 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1325">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1325</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 400 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 3152502625 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Miscellaneous financial material for 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Description An account of the resource Miscellaneous financial material for 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Cantwell, Martin H. Subject The topic of the resource Accounts United States Highway 89 Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Correspondence Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1957 1958 1959 1967 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Salt Lake City (Utah) Salt Lake County (Utah) Utah United States Afton (Wyoming) Lincoln County (Wyoming) Jackson (Wyoming) Teton County (Wyoming) Pocatello (Idaho) Bannock County (Idaho) Idaho Wyoming Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 1960-1969 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 26 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd26 Highway 89; https://highway89.org/files/original/2c1cec7063eae4f39326b270702406ef.pdf 37584bca4286ab0f31898078a2b106f2 PDF Text Text ( ( BY-LAWS of l\9'ERS INT,;RNATIONI.L lIIGHl'IAY AS50CIATI~, INC. ARTICLE 1 NAUE The name of t his c orp o,.ation i8 and shall be 59'ERS I NTERNATI ONAL lIIGHliAY ASSOClAn ON, INC., and its prtncipal place of business shall be in Wickenburg, M aricopa County, Arizona. ARTICLE 11 li~~'f B8RSHIP SECTIO!I 1 . lIEIIF£RS. liambership in thQ 89'ars Iwt'ERllATIONAL HIGHWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. ehall conaist of those persona, over 2l years of age, partnershi ps or cOlJlorations who shall apply tor m6T.1berebip in wri tlng on a form preecr1bed by the Board of D 1rectore and who shall thereupon be electod. to membership by a majority vote of the Board of Dlrector8 preeent at 8J:G' annual. or special meeting, AND the Board of Director. may at their discretion, authorize the President to deeignate an indIvidual or c on:mlttee who shall be etnpO\"mred to approve or rej ect nsw applications for membership. Membership shall consiBt of tlfO classification.! which shall. be "ACTIVE l.!E.'iBim" and "ASSOCIATE MEMBER" and shall not be trmlste rable, and every member of this corporation sllall be deemed Q. s tockholder thereof, and entitled. to all rights and priVileges as suah. SECTION 2. ANNUAL DIJl:S. The annual dues for each ACl'IVE !tEMBER shall be iO..5.00, payable in a dvance. am. the annuol dues for each ASSOCIATE .Y&I.(BZR shall. be any BUIll to be detern1ned by a.n:i at the discretion of each such member. assessment shall. be made on t:i.31r.ber~. in excess of il5.00, No special �( ( PAGE 2 SECTION 3. CLASSES OF MEMSERS. The Board of Directors shall 018881.1)' all members on a basis of tbe volume of bUfline s5 done by t:tac,', "nombt'" -." hts O",n ' 1nz~:t. l S ,~ . Arry ill,: lher wishi..'lg his class- ification changed shall a pply in writing to the Board of Directore for a re-clael!tif1cation am such member shall be entit led to a hearing hefore the Board of Directors to p:::-esent his grol.mde for re-clas.!lificatlon.. SECTION J.,. 'lllRi!S OF IlEJISERSHIP. Any member mD\Y be a1 ther suspended or eJIPelled from membership f or cause by • majority vote of t he Board of Directors attar first being served with • writ ten notice of the chu,;es against him and given en opport\mity for a hearing t her eof at the meet ing at which any such vote eha1l be ta!ren. Any member in default of payment of dues for s. period of more thCUl &J da;yo shall be fo rtlnr1th susp ended without hearing frot!! all privileges of romber8hip~ ARTICLE III WlETINGS SECTI ON 1 . ANNUAL IAEBTINGS. The 2Mual meeting of tho members of thie corporati on Bhall be held during the pe riod betlteen September 15 and November 15, inclusive, each year at s uch place , dq and hour as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors, for the purpose of el ecting directors, and f or tho traneaction of any other business tha t ma;y properly" ccma before them. seCTI ON 2. SPeCIAL IlEETIIIGS. Special meetings of the member s of this corporation shall be hel d at such place, day and time as ~ be prescribed by said Board. �( ( PAG<: SECTIOn}. 3 NOTICE. Not ice in m-iting ot th\3 t1M9 , dq and pl aca of 8l\V annual or Epedal. meeting shall be sent to all memberG in good standing at least 10 days before arr:/ s uch • caeting, unless said notice 1s waived in wr1 ting by the member. SECTIOII 4. Q!XRIII. Those members present at arry duly not iced annual or speci al meeting ot the membership of this corporation shall canst! tute a quortID f or the t r ansact i on ot Bl'I3 and all busine 68. SECTI ON 5. VOTING. Each member pre:;ent in person at any annual. or ep8Cial meet.ing or the member. of this corporat1 on shall be entitled to one (1 ) vote t or hi e individual. membel'- ship or for the partnership or corporation membership he in person represents. Voting for Director.l, and upon demand of any member, upon arrr questi on at 8l't3 meeting, ~ be by ballot, but said mothod may not be mandatory. ARTICLE IV OOARD OF DIRECTCRS SECTI ON 1 . NllIIBER. The affairs of this corporation shall be conducted by a Board at not l es8 than six (6) Directors MO shall be members of the c orporation. SECT! ON 2. TERlI. Said Directors 3hall consist of the incorporators at the commencement the cozporation, and thorea1'ter thall. be elected by the plurali~ ot vote of the members p re sent in person a t t he annual meetings, one-third (1/3) of which Board shall be elected each year to Derve a three-year term, or until their BUCC9S8ors are elected and qualified. terms in otfice. No Director may be elected to more than two consecutive �( ( PAGE SECTION 3. 4 VACANCIES. If at any time a vacancy in the Board of D1rectore: shall occur, said vacancy ~ 80 be tilled by a majority vote of the remaining Directors, and each Director el e c t ed sh all hol d office until a successor for the un9p1red term is ele cted and qualified a t an Annual lIaetlng ot the corporatlon. A vacancy in the of f ice ot the Board of Directors ah3J.l. be deemed to have aut..o!ir!.at lcaUy occurred by the failure of any D irector to personally attend three (3) succe ssive regularly called epactal m i ng or the Annua Meeti ng of the Board 01 Directors, unle s s such eet l absence shall have been brought about SECTION 4. ~ J reason ot the illness of BUch Direotor . IlEETIIlOS. The Board ot Direct or s m21' meet at any time f or the purpose of or ganization, the e l ecti on of officer s, rux1 t he t r ansacti on ot any SECTION 5. b US in8 3 S . REGULAR lIEETIWS. Regular mee t ings of the Board of Director . ohall be hel d inlnediatel;y f ollowing the Annual. Meeting at th~ members ot the corporation, at the s ame place and dq, with no notice t o bs requir ed to be g1 ven ot tho r e gular Annual. Meeting of the Board of Directors . SECTION 6. SPECIAL ItEETUlGS. Special meetings of the Board ot Directors shall be held at the place noticed whenever called. SECTI ON 7. NOTICE. Notice in wr1 ting of' the t1me, dq and place of any spe cial meeting of t he: 8:tard of Director s shall be sent to each Director at l east three days p rior to s uch mee ting, unless 8uch notico is lfa1ved. in writing by the Director . �( ( PAGE 5 SECTI ON S. QUORlII. A majority of the Boarel. of Directors, at the time in office, shall. constitute a quorum for the t ransacti on of any and all buBinefts, but a roajority ot those present at the time and place of any regular or special meeting, although lees than a quorum, mq recess t'rom time to t ime, without notice, until a quorum be had. SECTI ON 9. CCilPENSATION. The Director s and Off1 ce~ 8 of th ~ corpor ation thatl serve without compensation, but they shall be re1mburssd their expenses actually incurred in attending m ings and on behalf of tha corporationc. eet SECTION 10. ACTION I!i RESCLl1l'ION. The Board of Directors Stall have the power to act in the following manner! A resolution in writing, signed in such a canner as to indicate apprO'f'8l, by not less than a tlro-thirds majority of aJ.l Directors at the time in office, shall be deemed to be action by such Board to the affect therein 8"Pr8SSed with the same .corce an:i ef'f'ect as i f the same had been duly pa8s&d by the same vote at a duly oonvened meeting, PROVIDED AL-r/AYS, that no negative vote has been registered. in opposition to the proposal, and all Directors ,mo fail to respond to any such roll call vote by mall wi thin ten days from the date of mailing shall be deemed as not voting on the pro90sal. All such resolutions shall be recorded in t he Minute Book of the corporation under proper date. �( ( PAGE 6 ARTICLE V. OFFICERS SECTION 1. OFFIC~RS. The officers of this corporation Bhall be a President, one or more VicePresidents, Secret.ary, and Treasurer, wo shall be elected from and by the Board of D1rectors. SECTI ON 2. 1\:-0 or more officee mB3 be held by the s ame person . TERlI. Officers a~all hold officA tor the period of O)~e year mUess sooner re signed. or removed. b,r the Board of Di rGctore. SECTION 3. PRESIDErrr. The President shall preside at all meetings ot the Members and Directors, and shall eee that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. 1'.8 shall glvo, or causa to be given, not1ce of all meet ings ot the Uembers or of t.he Board ot Directors 1Ihen raquired by these By-Laws. He shall execute all instruments requiring a s eal, Wider t he seal of the corporation, which have been first requires SECTIUN Tile .:1. C;l3al 4. ~proved by the Doard of Direot ors. it shnli be cttosted by the signature When any instrument ot the Secretary. "'HE VICF_PRESID2NTS. Vlcc-Pre8ident~, in the order designated by the PreSident, shall, in the absence or disaDil1ty cf tho President, perform 'tJ-.re duties and exercise the powers of the Pr'l.s1d'Slnt) and shall perform such other duties a e the Board of Directors shall. prescribe" �( ( PAGE SECTION 5. The 7 SECRETARY. ~eC l~tar.r shall atte~d all meetings of the Board of Director8 and all meet ings of the members of the corporation, end record all notes in the J.(1nutes of all proceedings, in a book to be kept f or that purpoee. He shall keep the cOIporate s eal. of the corporation, and he shall affix the same to all papers requiring a seal.. He shall givG or cause to be given when instructed by the President, notice of all meetl~es of the Members and of the Board of Directors when such notice Is required bJ law or by these By- Laws to be given , and shal.1 perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or President, under whose supol"n.Bion he shall be. SECTION 6 . TREASlRER. The treasurer shell have thO custody of the corporate f"unds and s ecuritie s s and keep f'ull and accurate accounts of re ceipts and disbursements in books belonging to the corporation, and shall deposit all monies and other valuabl e effects in the name of and to the crel}! t of the corporation, be desi~ated by the Board of Directors. :L~ such deposi tor1es as mq He shall disburse the funds of the corporation as mq be ordered by the Board, taking prop",r vou::hers for such disbursements, and s.'1al.l render to the Presi dent and Directors, at t he Regular Meetings of the Board, or whenever they may require it, an account of all hie transactions as Trea.surer, and of t.he financial condition of the corporation. ARTICLE VI LIIIIT OF INDEBTEDNESS The highest amount of the indebtedness or liability, direct or contingent , to which this corporation is at c.ny time to subject i t self, shal1 be the sum of TWENTY-FIVE HUl/DRED ond no/loo (;;2.500.00) DOLLARS. �( ( PAGE g I.RTICr-R VII SEAL The BoE.rd of Directors shall provide a sui t.!'ble seaJ. containing the name of the corporat ion, .'/hieh seal. shall be in charge of the Se cretary, and mcq be affixed to p~ certificates of m ember ship, and other documents, contracts and instrumenta, as the Board of D rectors i ~ prescribe. ARTICLE VIII AJlEND!!ENTS These By- laws may be amer.doo, rescinded, repe aled, or altered, or new ByLaws Ir'. ay be adopted, other then By- La'.'1s and amendments t t,ereot changing the authori zed rumbar of Directors, by a majority vote of the Board of Directors at any Regular or Speci al Meeting. �BY- LAVIS ot 89 ' EHS I N TERNATICM L HIGH~iAY ASSuCI!.TI uN, I l>C . ARTICLE 1 N!\lI!E The name ot this oorporat ion is and shall be 89 'ERS HIGIf~AY I ~T~rut\T IuN AL ASSOCBTICN. !liC . , and its principal place ot busi ness shall be in W ickenburg , Maricopa County . Arizona . AR'rICLE 11 MElIBEHSHIP SECTI~t. 1. IlEMBERS • lIembership in the 89 ' ers ThTEIUlATIC N HIGH ,YAY AL shall consist ot those persons , over 21 years ot A.3S0CL\TI~ti . nge ~ ThC . partnerships or corporations who shall apply tor mllJllbership in writing on a torm prescribed by t he Board ot Directors and who shall thereupon be elected to membership by a ma j o rity vote ot the Boaxd or Directors present at any annual or s pecial meeting, AED t he Board ot Directors may at their disor etion , aut hori ze the Pr esident to desig nate an iJ" dlvldual or committee who shall be empowered to approve or reJeot Dew applioations tor membershi p . M ember- shi p shall consist ot two olassifioations which shall be "ACTIVE MEMBER" a nd "ASSOCI. TE blliMDER" a nd shall not be transterable , a Dd every member ot this corporati on sball be deemed a stockholder thereot , and entitled to all rights and SECTICN 2 privilege . a. such . AhNUAL DUES . The annual dues tor each ACTIVE ~ BER shall be advance , a nd tbe annual dues tor each ASSOCIATE i n excess ot such member . ~ 15 . 00 . ~ZMB ER ~15 . 00 . pa ya ble in .hall be any sum to be determined by and at the discretion ot eaoh No special a s sessment shall be made on members . • I �• PAGB 2 SECTION J . CLASSES CF MEMBERS . The Board of Direotors s hall olassify a l l members on a basis of the volume ot business done by each member in his oVin business ", Any member wishing his classif ioation chauged shall apply in writing to the Board of Direotors tor a re- olassification and suoh member shall be e ntitled ' to a hea ring before the Board of Direotors to present his sr ounds tor re ~ olass - 1ricatioh . SECTION 4 . TERMS OF biafBERSHIP . Any membe r may be ei tiler s uspended or expelled from mem bership for cause by a majority vote of the Board of Directors after first being served with a written notice ot the ch~ r ge8 against him and g iven an opportunity for a hearing thereof at the meeting at which any suoh vote shell be taken . Any member in default of payment of dues tor a period of more t h&1 60 days s hall be forthwith suspended without hearing from all privileges ot membershlp o ARTI CLE 111 J,WTlI;CS SECTlON 1 . ANNUAl I4EETII' CS . The annual meeting of the membsrs of thie oorp o r~ti on shall be held the l as t week ot September each year at suoh place, day and hour 8S may be prescribed by the Board of Direotors , tor the purpoee of electing direotors , and tor the transaotion ot any other business t hat may properly oome before them ", SECTILN 2 . SPECIAL MEE1'lJ,GS . Special meetings of the member. of this oorpora tion shall be held at suoh plaoe , day and time as may be prescribed by said Board . SECTION J. ~o tloe N0TICE . in writi ng ot the time, day and place ot any annual or speCial meeting shall be sent to all members in good standing at least 10 days , I �• PACK 3 before any suoh Qeeting , unless said notioe is waived in writing by the member 0 SECTION 4 . ~UORUM . Those members present at an y duly no t I oed annual or s pecial meeting ot the :!'",e mbershlp of this corporat i on shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of auy SECTION 5. al~ all business . VOTING . Eaoh member present in person at any SlJnual or s pec i a l me e .11l8 ot the members of this oorporation shall be entitled to one (1) vote for his individual membership or for the partnership or oorporation membership be in person represents. Voting for Direotors , and upon demand ot any member, upon any question at any meeting , may be by ballo t , but saId method may not be mandatory . ARTICLK lV BOARD CF DIRECTORS SECTION 1 . NUMBER . The affairs of this oorporation shall be oonduot ed by a Board of not less thsn six (6) Direotors who shall be members of the oorporation . SECTION 2 . TERM . Said Directors 8h~11 oonsist of the incorporators at the commenoe- ment ot the corporatIon, and thereafter shall be elected by the pluralIty vote of the members present in person at the annual meetings , one- third (1/3) of whioh Board shall be eleoted eaoh year to serve a three- year term , or until their suocessors are elected and qualltled D No Direotor may be elected to more than two conseoutive terms in offlo8 o SECTION 3 . VACANCIES: Va oanoie s on the Board ot Direotors shall be filled by a majority vote ot the remaining direotors , and each director 80 elected hall serve until his suooessor is eleoted and qualified at the next Anllusl :"eeting •• I �• • !-AGl! 4 of the membership , or st a Speoi al Mee t ing of the member~hip called for the purpose of eleoting a new director for the unexpired term of that direotorship . SEC1'IeN 4 . lJn:TINGS . The Board of Directors may meet at any time for the purpos e of organizatIon , the election ot off1cers , and the transaotion ot any bualne s8 0 SECrION 5 . RXGULAf! MEETlkGS . Regular Meetings of the Board of Direotors shall be held the last week in Saptember each year at the same plaoe and ~QY , following the annual meeting of the member. of the corp alld 1Jnmediately ltion . No notioe shsll be required to be given of the regular annual meeting of the Board of Direotors . SECTION 6 . SPECIAL IWlTIIoGS . Special meetings of the Board of Director s shall be held at the place notioed whenever 0811ed . SECTION 7. l><OTICE. Notioe in writing or '. he time , day and plaoe of any speoial ceeting or the Board of Direotors ahall be sent to eaoh Direotor at leaat thrae days prior to suoh ma~t ing . unless suoh notioe is waived in writing by the Direotor . SECTION 8 . ~UORUY. A meJority of the Board of Directors , at the time in office , shell constitute a quorum for the transaction or any and all business , but a majority of those present ot the time and plaoe or any regular or speoial meetIng , although 1888 than a quorum , may ~eoe •• tram time to t1m8 ~ without notice , unt1l a quorum be bad o SECTIC,II 9 . GOI!PENSATI~N . The Direotors and Crficers ot the oorporation shell serve without compensation , but thsy shall be reimbursed their expenses aotually inourred . ,... �, • PAGE 5 1n atteDdi ng meet ing. and 011 behalf of the corporat10n SECTI ON 10 ACTI ON BY Rl!SCJLUTn.N . The board of D1reotors shall nave power t o aot tn the follow1 ng manner : A resol ution 1n writ1ng, signed by all of the membera of th ;" ard of D1rector5 , ahall be deemed to be a ot ion by suoh Board to the affeot t herin expressed , with the same fo r oe and effeot . s if the same had been duly passed by the same vote a t a duly convened meet ing ; a nd s uoh r s s olutions shal l be r eoorded in the Minute Dook of t he corpor a tion unde r proper date . SECTIO ll . N SPECIAL PERSONNEL . The Board of Direotor a may appoint suoh Agsnt. Or Subordinate Offioe rs fram time to tlma as the businesa of the oorporation.., require , f1x their tenure of off10e , aDd allow tham suitable ooapansation for their s ervioes . ARTICLE V. OFl!'ICEIIS SECTION 1 . OFFICERS. The off1cere of this oorporation ahall be a President , one or more Vioe- Presidenta , Seoretary, aDd Treaaurer , who shall be elacted t r om and by the Board of Directo1a . Two or more offioe. may be held by t he same persoo Q SECTION 2 . TERM. Officera ahall hold office for the period ot one year unless 800ner reSigned or removed by the Board ot Direotors . SECTION J . PRESIDENT . The President .hall preaide at all meeting. of the Mambers aDd Direotors , aDd shall see that all order. and resolutions of the Board of Direotors are carried into effeot . He shall gl ve ~ or oause to be g l ve n p notice of all meetings of the Mambers or of the Board of Direotors when required by these By-Laws . He shall exeoute all instruments requiri ng 8 �• F GI -6 seal under the seal of the corporation by the Board ot Directors 0 which hive heen tirst approved ,{hen any instrument r:equ res a seal it shall be attested by the sigl1ature of the Secret/jry . SECTIC,N 4 THE VICE· ·PRESIDEI,TS . The Vice ~residents , in the order designated by the President, shall, in the absence or disability of the President, pertorm the duties and exercise the powers ot the President , and shall perform such other duties 8S SECTION 5 the Board ot Direotors ahall preBcrlbe ~ SECRETARY The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Board of Direotors and all meetings ot the members ot the corporation, and r~oord all notos in the IIinutes of all proceedings , in a be.ok to be kept tor that purpose. He shall keep the corporate seal ot the corporation , and he shall affix the same to all papers requiring a seal. given wh a iustructed by the President He shall give or cause to be notice of all meetings ot the Members and ot the Board ot Direotors when such notioe 1s required by law or by these By ~ Laws to be given, and sh 11 pertorm such other duties 8S may be presoribed by the Board ot Direotors or Pre s ident , under whoee supervi sion be shall be. SECTION 6 . ASURER . The treasurer shall ha ve the oustody ot the oorporate funds and sdcurltlsa and keep full 8.Ld acourate acoounts or l"eceipts and disburse· ments in books belonging to the corporation , and s hall deposit all monies and other valuable etfeots in the name ot aud to the oredi t ot the corporation, in such dspositories as may be designated by the Board ot Directors He shall di sburse the funds of the oorporation as may be ordered by the Board 8 taking proper vouchers tor suoh disbursements p nd shall render to the President and Directors , at the Regular Meetings . the Board p or whenever they may require itD an account or all his • �, PAGE 7 transactions as Treasurer p and ot the financial condition of the cor poratl oD o ARTICLE Vl LIMIT ~F ThDEBTEDNESS The h1ghest, arno'lOt of the 1ndebtedness or Hab111ty. d1r eo t or contlngnnt, to which ttls corporation Is at any time to subject ltself . Rhall be tve sum of T;:ENTY- l'lVE HUNDRED an ~ no/100 (~2 , 500 . 00 ) DOLLARS . ARTICLE Vll SEAL The Board ot Directors shall provide a suitable seal containing the name or the corporations which sea l shal l be in oha r ge of the Seoretary , and may be affixed to all certificates o t membership , and other do cuments , contract s end instruments , as the Board ot D ~ rectors may prescribe o ARTI~LE Vlll A.I4l!r.D1i.I!:t<TS Th",se By- Laws lB. !' be amended . rescinded . re peal ed I or a ... d , or new By- Laws may be adop;;ed . other than By- LaWS auu amendmelJ ts ther eof chauglng the "luthorlzed number ot Dir ec tors , .JV a major1 ty vote ot the Board ot Directors at any RegulHr or Special Meetlng o � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Image Height 3282 Image Width Image Width in pixels 2558 Local URL The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website <a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1341">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1341</a> Purchasing Information Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item. To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a> Digital Publisher List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online. Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library Date Digital Record the date the item was digitized. 2013 Conversion Specs Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner. Scanning resolution Resolution in DPI 300 Colorspace RGB or Grayscale, for example RGB Checksum 833555506 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Bylaws of 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Description An account of the resource Eight articles of the bylaws of 89'ers International Highway Association, Inc. Subject The topic of the resource United States Highway 89 Tourism Medium The material or physical carrier of the resource. Administrative records Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 Spatial Coverage Spatial characteristics of the resource. Logan (Utah) Cache County (Utah) Utah United States Temporal Coverage Temporal characteristics of the resource. 1950-1959 20th century Language A language of the resource eng Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Edgar Bentley Mitchell Papers, 1950-1959, COLL MSS 322 Box 1 Folder 13 Is Referenced By A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource. View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv06356</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663. Is Part Of A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included. Highway 89 Digital Collections Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource image/jpeg Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context MSS322Bx1Fd13 Highway 89;