1
50
18
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/81ffaead36a5dcffd498a1d2eea849e1.pdf
23c522720a815305c3176a2cdb2fd9d1
PDF Text
Text
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please contact the Utah State Archives History Research Center at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by : Utah State Archives and Records Service
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2014-10-16
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
561207 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from Henry Blood to F.P. Champ, July 29, 1936
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Utah Governor Henry Blood to F.P. Champ of the Cache Valley Banking Company, reiterating the Governor's interest in having the section of Highway 89 between Logan and Garden City completed early.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Governor (1933-1941 : Blood)
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Champ, F.P.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Traffic engineering
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Highway 89
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1936-07-29
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Garden City (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1930-1939
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State Archives and Records Service, State Agency Correspondence, Series 14207, Box 9, Folder 8
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
Inventory for the Governor Blood State Agency Correspondence collection can be found at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html</a>
Rights Holder
A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.
Utah State Archives and Records Service
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the Utah State Archives, phone (801) 533-3535.
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14207009008_LoganGardenCityHighway
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/37363d7fb42497d29eb3484563159082.pdf
c9dba06fc11125791929b6bed0f2414b
PDF Text
Text
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please contact the Utah State Archives History Research Center at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by : Utah State Archives and Records Service
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2014-10-16
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
812666 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from Henry Blood to E.E. Howe, July 29, 1936
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Utah Governor Henry Blood to State Road Commission Chairman E.E. Howe concerning the diversion of forest highway funds allotted for construction of the road between Logan and Garden City to construction efforts along the Sevier-Summit-Glendale section of Highway 89.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Governor (1933-1941 : Blood)
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Howe, E.E.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Traffic engineering
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Roadside improvement--Utah--Sevier
Highway 89
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1936-07-29
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Garden City (Utah)
Glendale (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Rich County (Utah)
Sevier County (Utah)
Kane County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1930-1939
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State Archives and Records Service, State Agency Correspondence, Series 14207, Box 9, Folder 8
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
Inventory for the Governor Blood State Agency Correspondence collection can be found at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html</a>
Rights Holder
A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.
Utah State Archives and Records Service
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the Utah State Archives, phone (801) 533-3535.
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14207009008_EEHoweCorrespondence.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/b078863d76fa0dd62de34b0bb18feaaf.pdf
4d55e5619ec4a4728add025d5bb2fef3
PDF Text
Text
���
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please contact the Utah State Archives History Research Center at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/index.html</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by : Utah State Archives and Records Service
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2014-10-16
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1931262 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from O.G. Cardon to Abe Murdock, July 27, 1936
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Utah Roads Committee Representative, O.G. Cardon to Utah Congressman Abe Murdock concerning the state of Highway 89 in Logan Canyon, the Roads Committee's contention that money needed for Logan Canyon roads was needlessly diverted to work on southern Utah roads, and a desire that construction and oiling Highway 89 through Logan Canyon proceed as soon as possible.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Governor (1933-1941 : Blood)
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Cardon, O.G.
Hovey, M.R.
Murdock, Abe
Subject
The topic of the resource
Traffic engineering
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Highway 89
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1936-07-27
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Beaver (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Beaver County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1930-1939
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State Archives and Records Service, State Agency Correspondence, Series 14207, Box 9, Folder 6
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
Inventory for the Governor Blood State Agency Correspondence collection can be found at: <a href="http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html">http://archives.utah.gov/research/inventories/14207.html</a>
Rights Holder
A person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource.
Utah State Archives and Records Service
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the Utah State Archives, phone (801) 533-3535.
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14207009006_LoganCanyon.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/803d1968e2d6911e6f55128c3093bd97.pdf
2fbb8450935b3d55b155feb525d1fbdc
PDF Text
Text
November 21 , 1961
Mrs. K thryn H. Young
Triple H Ranch
Stanley , Idaho
Dear Mrs. Young:
Thank you for your lett r r questing a copy of th
-tudy
made by our Univ rsit st ff on he imp ct of hi wa
on
natural r so reese
the pr sent tlme this is in h hands of th print cs
• A s on as copi s are availabl w
ill be
glad to s nd you one. It should b in a very short time.
A
to be pub · ish
incerely your ,
Eunice Peters n , S cretary
o the Dean
ep
,.t
�November 14, 1961
Dean J. Whitney Floyd
Utah State University
Logan, Utah
Dear Mr . Floyd:
A recent editorial in The Salt Lake Tribune dis·
cussed your study and report on the damage being
done by highway builders.
Since some of us in this area are very much interested in this same problem----both on our own
lands and on Forest Service lands, I would like
to obtain a copy of the report.
May I have a copy, and may I quote you?
Sin erely,
It
-U
Kathryn H
Triple H Ranch
Stanley, Idaho
e
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1747">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1747</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
2728535830
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1045967 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from Eunice Peterson to Kathryn Young, November 21, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Eunice Peterson, Secretary to the Dean, to Kathryn Young, Triple H Ranch, November 21, 1961 abot the study on impact of highways on natural resources.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Peterson, Eunice
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Young, Kathryn H.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Stanley (Idaho)
Custer County (Idaho)
Idaho
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 9.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/a934d3bad6364950f7331bc78480c392.pdf
871fdea5b3f4ccc480593ce8fcc87ae3
PDF Text
Text
(
UTAH
STATE
EXTENSION
UNIVERSITY
SERVICE
IN COOPERATION WITH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AND U . S. D EPA RT MEN T 0 FAG RIC U LT U R E
LO GAN, U TA H
September 26, 1961
Dean J. Whitney Floyd
Campus
Dear Dean Floyd:
I enjoyed reading the fourth rought draft of the
statement on Road Construction and Resource Use, prepared
by the faculty of the College of Forest, Range and wildlife
Management, which you were kind enough to send to me. This
statement is well written. It contains some very interesting points which are usually overlooked by the common
ordinary citizen.
I donUt believe I have any suggestions for improving
this manuscript.
VlV trUl'A~
~
"'"~
Carl Frischknecht, Director
Extension Services
Utah State University
CF:lm
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1721">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1721</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
1547336671
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
573317 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from Carl Frischknecht to J. Whitney Floyd, September 26, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Carl Frischknecht to J. Whitney Floyd, September 26, 1961. Utah State University.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Frischknecht, Carl
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Traffic engineering
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 23.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/f00260229bb1e38cdadab3c2bf646c10.pdf
5da66e7933ab19ca3d41bb7c99af4f8a
PDF Text
Text
This letter also
s~nt
to:
Dr. O. Preston Robertson
General Manager
Deseret News
33 Richards Street , SLC
Nov mber 3, 1961
Mr. Ern t H. Linford
Editori 1 Writ r
Salt
k Tribune
l43South .Main
City, Ut h
Salt Lak
Dear Mr. Linford:
A you know, w have h d
Coll ge committe pr paring
a statment on road construction and re ource u , pro pted
in part by th difference of opin10n concerning th Log n
Canyon con truction work. Th t stat m nt i
now compl t ,
nd a copy is ttached.
I\.
\
\
W
nticip te publication with illustr tion. There
will be so
, nor editorial change , but in ess nc th
tat ment will r main the s
It i being ubmitt d in
this for
0 th t it will b
in your h nds as oon
possibl •
Copi
of this tat ment h v b en ant to the U. S.
Forest Servia , th St t
Highway Department, and the St t
Fish and Gam D parcm nt.
Sincerely your ,
J. Whitn y Floyd, Dean
JHB:ep
Att chment
Col leg of Fore t, R nq ,
and ildlif
n gement
'
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1715">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1715</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
741995188
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
635495 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd to Ernest Linford, November 3, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd, Dean College of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Management, to Ernest Linford, Salt Lake Tribune, on November 3, 1961.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Linford, Ernest
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Highway 89
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Salt Lake City (Utah)
Salt Lake County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 17.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/0e024c8e49d722d11bc11523add4f232.pdf
e001e7dc616baab35a70d06a09846e7a
PDF Text
Text
Collea.guE~S
to all 0
it
1
~lD.oe]:-e.ly •
err111
1
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1714">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1714</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
2427205580
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
536477 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from M.R. Merrill, November 6, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from M.R. Merrill, November 6, 1961to his colleagues.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Merrill, M.R.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Berryman, Jack H.
Floyd, J. Whitney
Smith, Arthur D.
Neuhold, John M.
Kearns, Frank W.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 16.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/6a4c06c81888f47595bce09ae7a7cff8.pdf
603191ed9d0bb8c5106ffa7f74f87411
PDF Text
Text
UTAH
STATE
UNIVERSITY
DARYL CHASE, PRESIDENT
LOGAN ,
UTAH
COLLEGE OF FOREST, RANGE , AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
March 15, 1962.
J . WHI TNEY FLOYD, DEAN
Frank S . Bunker ,
Amb er ,
WaShington .
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of "Road Construction and
Resource Use" which I hope you will find of
interest . It is a joint contribution of this College
and the Extension Services aimed at improving land
use planning , specifically as it relates to highway
construction ..
-,It is our hope that the publication will throw
light on one aspect of the many complexities of
highway planning and res ource use .
~~VJ. YOJ~ ~
'
q~ .
Whitney loyd , D an
College of orest , ange
and W
ildlife Management
jwt
Enc .
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1713">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1713</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
980924594
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
559688 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd to Frank S. Bunker, March 15, 1962
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd, Dean College of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Management, to Frank S. Bunker, March 15, 1962.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Bunker, Frank S.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Roads--Design and construction
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 2.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/86f4cd084dfe4805d036788f81dce02d.pdf
a2023b8d1a07c22ba43379b41a01710e
PDF Text
Text
November 3, 1961
Dr. Daryl Chase, President
utah st'ate University
Campus
De a r President Chase:
Following our discussion we have released draft copies
of the statement on roa d construction and resource use to the
Utah state Department of Fish and Ga me , state De partment of
Highways , U. s.- ~orest Service., and U. S. Bureau of Public
Roads. These ag~ncies have expressed an interest in receiving
the statement a t an early date. We are also transmi t ting a
copy to Governor Clyde. A copy of the letter to him is attached.
We -'are releasing copies to the P r ess today , coordina ting
our efforts with Mr. Allred. We are also meeting with Dr .
Frischknecht and hope to have the statement in published form
and ready for general distribution in the near future.
Sincerely yours ,
J. Whitney Floyd, Dean
College of Forest, Ra nge,
and Wildlife Management
JHB:ep
cc: Dr. M. R. Merrill
Dr. Ca e l Frischknecht
Attachment.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1712">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1712</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
4003006108
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
626127 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd to Daryl Chase, November 3, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd, College of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Management, to Daryl Chase, Utah State University, on November 3, 1961.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Chase, Daryl
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 18.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/608809bc993b149fcc450dc0dd1f98f9.pdf
b2084c30c5eeb741ce495ebb4c9e0caa
PDF Text
Text
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1710">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1710</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
1952145455
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
928487 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd to George Dewey Clyde, November 3, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from J. Whitney Floyd to George Dewey Clyde, November 3, 1961
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Clyde, George Dewey
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 19.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/3a87dcc7b46d9417e9c56ba205716273.pdf
9633d0943f4322f9e12ec56bfde23d0e
PDF Text
Text
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION WORK
IN
AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS
STATE OF UTAH
EXTENSION SERVICE
UTAH STATE U N IVERSITY
u.
AND
S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
COOPERATING
December 1, lC)Sl
LOGAN. UTAH
Rio rd H. tro , Executive Vic Pre 1d nt
Sport ish1ng In titute
Bond Building
abington 5, D ~ c.
r Dick:
ill recall that we
d so eorN pondence
liar
1th the Logan Canyon
d controversy. One
ou.tgrowtb of this controversy
a ppo1ntment of a College
committe to pre r
-ta te nt of principle on the br - d
aspects "'_f high Y p~nn1ng. s ~l toed to r ourc
•
Iou
in connection
o copie of the print
r port are at cbed /I' Typed
'c opies re released earlier lJ. st month to the gencies
involved and the ll'Ajor ne spapers ~re in Utah • . The s t
nt sparked ve'r'3 11vely interest,. s indio t
by the
t chad olips pre r.ed by the Forest Service .
ttent.1on
8 turther £ OCU ed by the Fore t S rvic '
retus 1 t · issue
permit until the canyon reaourc
re adeq tel.y proteo"'"oo.
Stat 19h y
rtnent i no ' ravia 1ng p ns for the
entire forty- mile road.
In pite of the fact that our at tement W 5 stimul ted
Logan Canyon
l.ogan C nyon ill re in the oe 1 point,
~ re primarily intere ted, at thi time , in the national
1mpl1c t10ns and in creating t vorable 011
tor leg1.
.. t1ve nd adnu..nistra.tlve processes to permit m()~e ooord1nted high y planning. It 1 our hope t t the ta tenant
will eontr1bute to a better unar tand:i.ng ot on , of' tile nnnrcomplexiti of high y planning.
e ould like to ~ ve our
terial vie d in thi light .
by
Individual copies of the t tement
Y'
writing to
ten10n Service, U h S te Un!
U h.
1
, rr
e
obtained by
ratty, Logan,
Inc1q.en1;AUY, the spec1f10 study on the sfore 8~ after
at 01 hJ.gh: y construction on flshery re ourc a ;.,. st.ill
�underway .
ment .
This is separate ·a nd apart fr-om the attached stateill not e available for some time.
Results
YOU!"
1nteres t is· very lWch a pprec ia. ted.
Sinoerely.
Jack H.
·rryman
WUdlife Specialist
" " .....I ........
IL
eet Dean J .
JJ:IB:Js
it~ Flo)'d
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1709">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1709</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
116771947
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1214058 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Correspondence from Jack Berryman to Richard Stroud, December 1, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Correspondence from Jack H. Berryman to Richard H. Stroud, December 1, 1961 concerning Logan Canyon Road and highway planning.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Berryman, Jack H.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Stroud, Richard H,
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Roads--Design and construction
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Traffic engineering
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Washington D.C.
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 12.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/385d377331c33ea43512c198e2475ab2.pdf
611ecc2e72b9b26640096e17bbc1a669
PDF Text
Text
2 , 1
u
Co
o r
�Pr sid n ' Daryl Ch •
norm 1 coat ot
d for coord!
pped-up •
r
pon,s1bl
bo rd.
o
tob
25, 1 61
th r
I
r
S£loAI~,,&t
1rin
of a
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1708">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1708</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
2773615479
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1264495 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Memorandum from J. Whitney Floyd to Daryl Chase, October 25, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Memorandum from J. Whitney Floyd, Dean, to President Daryl Chase, October 25, 1961
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Floyd, J. Whitney
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Chase, Daryl
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Traffic engineering
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 21.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/a5af34164d2f2d7861c31bf64bf39d5f.pdf
0f1c01404c6e8079ac535115a4a3788f
PDF Text
Text
7, 1
g ,
d
truction
It
Pile
To.
o
1
I
•
ubj ata
the:- i
10 in
th
or th
'1'h
thi
i
i
ry
ot
he
e
t
loyd 1
of 0
Th
r 20 , 1
0,
n
hi
�--
• 7.
ly 10. 1
T
by
7. 1
AU
w
.vi
•
1.
0
.
l ' 1.
,
T
n
cel
•
t
i
t
r
r
•
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1707">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/1707</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Checksum
2559038659
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1306285 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Memorandum from Jack H. Berryman, November 7, 1961
Description
An account of the resource
Memorandum from Jack H. Berryman to files, November 7, 1961, about the College of Forest Range and Wildlife Management.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Berryman, Jack H.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Correspondence
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1960-1969
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, 14.7.17 Box 8, College of Natural Resources, Dean's Files
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
14717Bx8Fd20_Item 15.pdf
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/c820729cd20e24154407dab2a040c450.pdf
f0da73e259e64a0cc0dd405108bdc581
PDF Text
Text
•
RECORD OF DECISION
US Highway 89
Right Fork in Logan Canyon to Garden City
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
Cache and Rich Counties, Utah
A. DECISION
The Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) concurs with the Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT) in its selection of the Preferred Alternative as modified in this Record of Decision (ROD)
for improvements to US Highway 89 (US-89) between Right Fork, milepost (mp) 383.47, and State
Road 30, mp 411.75 , in Garden City . The modified Preferred Alrernative is described in Section
B below. The modified Preferred Alternative is as presented in the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) with the following modifications made as a result of input received on the FEIS
and subsequent meetings and field reviews in order to further minimize harm to wetland/riparian
habitat, visual resources and Section 4(0 resources :
•
The Lower Middle Canyon section has been extended 500 reet to mp 387.57 to better fit
the surrounding terrain. The roadway begins to move further away from the river at
this location.
•
Conso lidation of parking for Section 4(f) Site 6 , Ricks Spring, has been e liminated. This
eliminates the left turn lane and retaining wall adjacent to the river. A shorter retaining wall
set back from the river may still be required just south of the site.
•
Section 4(f) Site 13 , Winter Access Parking, will be reestablished at a lower elevation so that
•
Relocation of the Limber Pine Trailhead has been eliminated .
•
The detour at Burnt Bridge has been eliminated and widening will occur on the upstream
side. This reduces the impact on riparian habitat.
•
For the first eight miles of the Upper Canyon (from mp 391.6 to Beaver Mountain road
intersection), the previously proposed roadway width of 40 feet has been reduced to 34 feet.
This reduces the impact on wetland and riparian areas , For areas with passing lanes through
this eight miles, the previously proposed roadway width of 47 feet has been reduced to 44
feet.
•
•
•
The left turn lane at Temple Fork has been eliminated. Minimum roadway improvements
at this site include a 34' section on US·89 and an improved vertical grade approach of
Temple Fork road. Other improvements , such as an uphill right turn lane and an improved
horiwntal angle of approach of Temple Fork Road , are secondary improvements which will
only be constructed if they do not impact the river or require a substantial retaining wall .
access can be maintained.
US·89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Page 1
Section A: Decision
�The above modifications are within the scope of the FE IS and their implementation will reduce the
impacts from that presented in the FEIS . Therefore , the modifications are not of a nature that would
require a Supplemental EIS .
•
I
The purpose of and need for this project is to improve safety and the traffic carrying capacity of US89 from Right Fork in Logan Canyon to State Road 30 in Garden City. Safety will be improved by
correcting existing substandard geometries , unsafe conditions. and deteriorated structures. The
capacity of the highway will be increased to meet existing and projected traffic demands for a 20year planning horizon . Due to funding restraints , this project will be implemented through the
development of several smaller projects.
The first includes the urgent bridge upgrading and
replacements. Other improvements in the canyon that will be implemented as runding becomes
available.
The selection of the modified Preferred Alternative was based on substantial input received by
various federal and state agencies, local governments and the public , evaluation of technical repons ,
the Environmental Impact Statement, and further analysis and coordination made during development
of this ROD . The sensitivity of the environment played an important role in the development of the
modified Preferred Alternative.
Numerous compromises to current highway standards (as
recommended by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
AASHTO) were incorporated because impacts on the aquatic , wetland , riparian and visual
environment would have been too great, and in some cases constructability was cost-prohibitive.
Other actions taken into consideration in making this decision includes the recent nomination of US89 through Logan Canyon for inclusion on the National Highway System. This would change the
classification of the highway from a minor arterial to a principal arterial. Though Congressional
approval is pending , consideration has been given to how this would affect the decision being made
for this project. Since the roadway already serves as a US Hiehway and Was desienated as s uch
in accordance with previous luis.ation. the determination has been made that this action would
not chanee the use or the hiehway. In this regard, the decision is made that if US-89 through
Logan Canyon is included in the National Highway System, this designation will not affect the
selection, or subsequent design, of the modified Preferred Alternative identified in this ROD.
e
•
US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994)
Page 2
Section A: Decision
�•
B. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Eight project alternatives , ranging from preserving the existing roadway to a standard AASHTO
design , were considered in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). These include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Standard Arterial Alternative
Rich County North Alignment Alternative
Rich County South Alignment Alternative
Modified Standard Alternative
Composite Alternative
Spot Improvements Alternative
Conservationists' Alternative
No Action Alternative
Alternate corridors were evaluated and included redesignation of Idaho State Highway 36 from
Preston to Ovid , Idaho , and construction of a new highway through Blacksmith Fork Canyon.
Because the distance between Logan and Wasatch Front communities and the Bear Lake area is
shorter thrQugh Logan Canyon than through these other routes , most traffic would still tend to use
US-89. The need to correct existing safety hazards/deficiencies , replace deteriorated bridges and
pavement, and increase traffic carrying capacity would still be necessary . Environmental impacts
and construction costs to improve the existing highway would be considerably less than for a new
route . Furthermore, traffic volume on such a route would not justify a new road . Therefore,
alternate corridors were not advanced into the EIS .
The FEIS presented four project alternatives . These include:
•
•
•
•
Preferred Alternative
No Action Alternative
Standard Arterial Alternative
Conservationists' Alternative
The Preferred Alternative as modified in this ROD is the environmentally preferred alternative that
causes the least damage to the biological and physical environment while meeting the purpose and
need . The modified Preferred Alternative was se lected because it offered the best balance berween
the transportation needs of the corridor with the sensitive environmental restraints of the canyon.
The other alternatives do not achieve this balance: The Standard Arterial Alternative is not sensitive
to the environment; and , the Conservationists' and No Action Alternatives do not meet the purpose
and need for the project. The Preferred Alternative, as modified, is supponed by federal and state
agencies , and alllocaJ government entities. The Preferred Alternative, as presented in the FEIS , met
opposition from much of the public. Several meetings and fie ld reviews with key individuals during
development of this ROD has led to resolving many of the concerns and reaching a consensus on the
modifications made .
•
The following is a detailed description of the four alternatives carried into the FEIS. The
modifications to the Preferred Alternative identified in Section A, above, have been included in its
US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October (3, 1994)
Considered
Page 3
Section B: Alternatives
�•
description :
Prererred Alternative (As Modified)
The modified Preferred Alternative was developed to balance the transportation needs of the corridor
with the impacts to the canyo n environment. The critical environmental restraints dictated that
numerous compromises to AASHTO Design Standards were necessary . These compromises allowed
environmental impacts to be minimized while controlling construction costs.
Middle Canyon
Due to the potential for impact to the threatened species, the Maguire Primrose and other substantial
impacts on aquatic , wetland/riparian, and visual environment, the modified Preferred Alternative
throughout this section proposes a substantial relaxation bf AASHTO Design Standards (which
recommends a 4O-foot width throughout , plus several pasSing lanes) .
Beginning at Right Fork (mp 383.47), the first four miles (lower Middle Canyon section) will
maintain the existing roadway width of 26 feet. Present design speed and posted speed wi ll remain
unchanged . Burnt Bridge (mp 385 .5) will be rep laced with a new structure 34-foot wide to allow
for pedestrian use . Burnt Bridge will be constructed in stages, with widening occurring on the
upstream side. The detour presented in the FEIS has been eliminated. The roadway wi ll be e levated
at mp 386.2 (Logan Cave) and at mp 386.6 to eliminate a flooding potential, and a parking area will
be constructed for Logan Cave visitors at mp 386.3. Curb and/or gutter through this section will
be considered during design to help define the roadway and control debris rolling onto the highway .
Curve 5 at mp 384.and curve 29 at mp 387 will be flattened if a 3-year accident analysis , at the time
of construction, shows a concentration of accidents at either location in excess of the expected
accident rate . In the year 2010, a Level of Service (LOS) "DIE" would be expected for this four
mile section .
In the remainder of the Middle Canyon section (from mp 387.57 to mp 391.6) the canyon begins to
open up but is still somewhat restrictive. The roadway will be widened to a 34-foot width (two 12foot wide travel lanes and two 5-foot wide shoulders) through this section. Design and posted speeds
will be 35 miles per hour (mph) . The 34 foot roadway width will serve as a transition between the
26 and 40 root roadway sections. Lower and Upper Twin Bridges (mp 387 .7 and 388.76,
respectively) will be replaced with 38-foot wide structures on new alignment and the structure at
Ricks Spring (mp 389.8) will be replaced on the same alignment. The previously proposed
consolidation of parking for Section 4(f) Site 6, Ricks Spring, has been eliminated . Intersection
improvements at Temple Fork (mp 389.2) include the 34' section on US-89 and an improved vertical
grade approach of Temple Fork road . Other improvements , such as an uphill right turn lane and
an improved horizontal angle of approach at Temple Fork Road are secondary improvements which
will only be constructed if they do not impact the river or require a substantial retaining wall . The
left turning lane previously proposed at Temple Fork has been eliminated. Six curves will be
flattened through the Upper Middle Canyon. These include curve #33, 37, 39, 40, 43 , and 45. The
roadway wi ll be raised about 2 feet from mp 390.2 to mp 391.1 to eliminate a flooding potential.
In the year 2010, a LOS "0" would be expected for this section.
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of Oclober 13, 1994)
Considered
Page 4
Seclion B: AJlemalives
e
•
�•
Upper Canyon
The Upper Canyon begins at mp 391.6 and continues to the Bear Lake Summit. The first eight miles
of this section begins at the cattleguard at mp 391.6 and ends at SR-243 (Beaver Mountain Road
Intersection) . The previously proposed roadway width of 40 feet through this first eight miles has
been reduced to 34 feel as a result of input received on the FEIS . This 34-foot width provides for
two 12-foot wide travel lanes and two 5-fool wide shoulders}. Passing/climbing lanes will be
provided from mp 391.6 to mp 393.3 and from mp 394.9 to mp 396.5. Where passing lanes are
provided , the previously proposed roadway width of 47 feet has been reduced to 44 feet (two 12-fool
wide travel lanes, one 12-foot wide passing lane, one 5-foot shoulder and one 3-foot shoulder on the
•
passing lane side). Intersection improvements will be made at Tony Grove (mp 393.7), Red Banks
Campground (mp 394.5), and Franklin Basin Road (mp 397.01) . Bridges wi ll be replaced on
original alignment. Red Banks Bridge will be 38 feet wide unless tapers for the turn lanes into the
campground run onto the bridge. The first Beaver Creek: Structure at Franklin Basin Road (mp
396.9) will be at least 52 feet wide to accommodate the Franklin Basin Intersection, and the Beaver
Creek Structure at mp 397.5 will be 38 feet wide. Intersection improvements will be made at Beaver
Mountain Road (mp 399.75) . The culvert that serves the Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and
surrounding drainage areas will be widened to accommodate the widened transitions for the Beaver
Mountain intersection. A width of 22 feet from the shoulder line to headwall on each side is
required to avoid the need for guardrail protection. The total width would be at least 68 feet unless
guardrail protection is selected during the design phase. Retaining wall s will be constructed
between Beaver Creek and the roadway at mp 398.1 , mp 398.3, mp 398.6, and mp 398.9 to reduce
impacts on the creek and adjacent wetlands . "Lay_downK type fencing will be provided in open
range areas from about mp 391.6 to mp 397.2 along both sides of the roadway .
Beyond the first eight miles, from the intersection with SR-243 (mp 399.75) and continuing to the
Bear Lake Summit, the roadway will be widened to 40 feet (two 12-foot wide travel lanes and two
8-foot wide shoulders) . Passing/climbing lanes will be provided from mp 399.8 to mp 403 .0 , and
from mp 404.6 continuing throughout the next section and ending at mp 410.6 . Where these
passing/climbing lanes are provided, a 47-foot width (two 12-foot wide travel lanes, one 12-foot wide
passing lane , one 8-foot shoulder, and one 3 foot shoulder on the passing lane side) will be required .
Intersection improvements will be made at UDOT Maintenance Station (mp 402.38), and Forest
Service Access Road (mp 404.75). The Winter Access Parking at mp 402. 1 will be re-established
at a lower elevation so access can be provided.
The design speed will be 50 mph throughout the Upper Canyon. Curves 69 , 70, 71, 76, and 80 will
be flattened . In the year 2010, a LOS "C/O" would be expected throughout the Upper Canyon.
Rich County Section
•
From the Bear Lake Summit to Bridgerland Subdivision (mp 404.75 to mp 409.4) the highway will
be widened to 47 feet in order to accommodate a passing lane. (This would allow two 12-foot wide
travel lanes, a 12-foot wide passing lane , one 8-fool shoulder, and one 3-foot shoulder on the passing
lane side). The design speed will be 40 mph . On the Limberpine trailhead side, improvements will
be restricted to be within 23 feet of the edge of the existing roadway. A delineation between the
rOadway and parking area will be provided wilhin this 23 foot strip. The previously proposed
US-89 Through Loaan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Considered
Page 5
Section B: Alternatives
�relocation of the trailhead and parking area has been dropped. Curves 85 , 88, 89, 92 , 94, 95 , 98,
101, and 102 will be flattened and curves 103, 104. and 105 will be flattened into a single curve ,
dependent upon relocation of alignment from Curve 105 to Curve 109.
e
From Bridgerland Subdivision to Garden City the highway width will be 40 feet (47 feet in passing
lane areas), and the design speed will be 50 mph. Curves 109- 112, and 116 will be flattened, and
access at mp 410.6 will be relocated. The climbing lane from the previous section will end at mp
410.6. In the year 2010, a LOS "0 " would be expected for the entire Rich County section.
Intersection improvements will be made at the Sunrise Campground (mp 405 ,5) whi ch will also
provjde access for the Bear Lake View Area, The intersection with SR-30 will be redesjgned with
left and right-turn lanes. cyrb. gutter and sidewalk on US-89 and SR-3Q in the vicinity of this
intersection. Intersection improvements will also be made at the access to the Brjdgerlaod
Subdivjsion Cmp 409.4), A new intersection providing access to the BridgerJaod Subdivision will
be constructed . This access will provide safer ingress and egress to the subdjvision. Intersection
improvements to other existing and proposed subdivision accesses will be considered based on use
requirements, roadway widening possibilities. and other engineering factors,
No Action Alternative
This alternative does not include any action to alter the width or location of the existing highway ,
although considerable construction activity would be necessary to conduct normal road maintenance,
Such construction would include pavement replacement, replacement of structural elements on
bridges and eventual bridge replacement , and improved signage, The existing roadway width of 26
feet would be maintained . In the year 2010, a LOS "DIE" would be expected for the Middle
Canyon, LOS ~ D ~ for the Upper Canyon, and LOS "E" for the Rich County section,
•
This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because it does not
meet the purpose and need of the project, Traffic carrying capacity would not be increased to meet
the projected traffic volume, Safety hazards and inadequate opportunities for passing slow moving
vehicles would not be corrected. This alternative is opposed by local governments and most of the
public,
Standard Arterial Alternative
This alternative would maximize traffic capacity and safety by widening and improving the existing
alignment of the highway to current AASHTO standards for a minor anerial road. The roadway
wou ld include two 12-foot wide lanes and two 8-foot wide shoulders for a paved width of 40 feet.
A third 12-foot wide climbing lane would be constructed along approximately 7,7 miles of the route .
The shoulder width would be reduced to 3 feet on the climbing lane side, resulting in a paved width
of 47 feet. Recovery areas , sloping gradually from the roadway to the natural grade, would result
in a typical improved area of 66-98 feet. Bridges and drainage structures would be replaced , several
on new alignments to straighten existing curves. Intersection improvements would also occur. This
alternative would provide the best Level of Service. In the year 2010, a LOS "0" wou ld be
expected for the Middle Canyon, LOS "C/O" for the Upper Canyon, and LOS "D" for the Rich
County section.
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994)
Considered
Page 6
Section B: Alternatives
•
�•
This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because of the potential
impact to the threatened Maguire primrose , substantial impacts to aquatic , riparian , and visual
environments, and cost. This alternative would also impact the most Section 4(f) resources. This
alternative is opposed by several government agencies and much of the public.
Conservationists' Alternative
The Conservationists' Alternative provides for improvements at various locations where there would
be minimal environmental impacts. This alternative includes improved signing, bridge replacement,
slow vehicle turnouts, some climbing lanes, and provides for paving and winter snow plowing of
several parking areas. The existing roadway width of 26 feet would be maintained and the pavement
would be replaced. Where climbing lanes are provided, the roadway width would be 43 feet. New
bridges would be constructed to a 28-foot width, with Lower and Upper Twin Bridges being rep laced
on new alignment. Tony Grove Intersection would be improved. Travelers would be advised of
safety deficiencies by increasing the number of signs at selected locations.
•
•
This alternative is not a feasible and prudent alternative and was not selected because it does not
meet the purpose and need or the project. This alternative rails to adequately address safety and
capacity needs . It would be an incremental improvement over the No Action Alternative by
providing limited roadway improvements at selected locations. However, this alternative would fail
to increase traffic-carrying capacity to meet projected traffic volumes , and would not eliminate many
safety hazards. Bridges proposed to be 28 feet wide would be below AASHTO standards , causing
continued hazardous conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians as well as vehicles. Only one
intersection would be improved, resulting in unresolved safety concerns at several intersections such
as Temple Fork, Red Banks Campground, and others. Additional signs to advise of substandard
curves and other safety deficiencies is not adequate to provide long-term benefits as traffic volumes
increase and would represent a constant liability situation. Only three climbing lanes , each
approximately a half-mile long, would be provided. Climbing lanes would not be provided in the
Rich County Section of the road. In the year 2010, a LOS "DIE" would be expected for the Middle
Canyon, LOS "0" for the Upper Canyon , and LOS ME" for the Rich County section. This
alternative is opposed by local governments, but had strong support from much of the public.
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Considered
Page 7
Section B: AJtematives
�C. SECTION 4(F)
Section 4(f) applies to publicly owned land of a public park, recreation area, wi ldl ife/waterfowl
refuge, or land of a historic site of National , State, or local significance as determined by the
officials having jurisdiction over the park, recreation area, refuge or site. The Forest Service has
determined that 15 recreation areas qualify as Section 4(f) resources within the project area. In
addition, the State Historic Preservation Office has identified two historic sites. These 17 Section
4(f) resources are described in the Section 4(f) Statement (included in the FEIS).
Constructive use of a Section 4(0 resource results when there is a substantial impairment caused by
secondary impacts. There w ill be no substantial impairment caused by secondary impacts , therefore,
constructive use of Section 4(0 resources will not occur.
Changes to the Section 4(t) Evaluation , as a result of comments received on the FEIS, are addressed
be low. The modified Preferred Alternative will impact three Section 4(t) resources. Alternatives
considered to avoid Section 4(f) resources include: the No Action Alternative , which does not impact
any Section 4(f) resource ; and the Conservationists' Alternative, which impacts one Section 4(f)
resource . The Standard Arterial Alternative has a greater impact to Section 4(f) resources, impacting
eight sites. These alternatives are described in the FEIS and in Section B, above. In addition to
these alternatives, a site specific minor alignment adjustment was considered for avoiding each site.
This minor alignment adjustment was presented in the Section 4(f) Statement and is summarized
below for each impacted site.
Revised Table 6-4
Swnmary of Section 4(f) Properties Used for Each Alternative
•
Alternative
S ite
Features
Prererred
No
Action
Soandard
Arterial
Conservationists'
(Modified)
No.
I
Fisherman's Access Parking at Righi
Fork
No
No
y"
No
2
Woodcamp Campground
No
No
y"
No
4
Parking for Logan Cave
No
No
y"
No
6
Ricks Spring and Parking
y"
No
y"
No
7
Dispersed Recreation Parking
No
No
y"
No
12
Winter Access Parking Area at
Beaver Mountain
y"
No
y"
y"
13
Winter Access Parking
y"
No
y",
No
'15
Limber Pine Trailhead
No
No
No
No
3
0
8
I
Total Section 4(0 Resources Used
@ Alternative
US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October lJ , 1994)
4(0
Page 8
Section C: Section
•
�•
*The boundaries of this site have been corrected, because of this it will not be used by any alternative.
The No Action , Conservationjsts', and Standard Arterial Alternatives are not feasible and prudent
alternatives for reasons stated in Section B above . The site specific minor alignment adjustments are
not feasible and prudent alternatives for reasons stated below under each impacted site. A
combination of alternatives is not feasible and prudent because it would result in an inconsistent
roadway, with unacceptable safety hazards and a reduced Level of Service.
Based upon the above considerations , there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of Section
4(f) properties by the modified Preferred Alternative. The modified Preferred Alternative includes
aJl possible planning to minimize harm . The basis for the above conclusions is explained below for
each site.
The three sites impacted by the modified Preferred Alternative include: Site 6 - Ricks Spring and
Parking; Site 12 - Winter Access Parking Area at Beaver Mountain Road ; and Site 13 - Winter
Access Parking. Each of these sites is used for parking. This use will continue after implementation
of the modified Preferred Alternative. Since these sites are on USFS lands and managed by that
agency , improvements will be completed consistent with USFS recommendations .
Ricks Spring and Parking - Site 6 (mp 389.9)
•
In the FEISt the Preferred Alternative proposed that parking at this site be consolidated on one side
to eliminate pedestrians crossing the roadway . This consolidation was dropped from the Preferred
Alternative after a field review with the USFS on August 18. 1993 . At that time, it was determined
that even if all parking was placed on one side, people would still park on both sides, and the
remaining parking would not allow easy use of the site by recreational vehicles. In addition, the left
turn lane to allow north-bound traffic access would require a retaining wall be placed adjacent to the
river .
A five foot strip on both sides of this site is required adjacent to the roadway to provide for the
shoulder. Though the size of the site will be reduced , the modified Preferred Alternative would not
reduce the amount of parking ability at this site. The use of this Section 4(0 property has been
coordinated with and is supported by the USFS because the modified Preferred Alternative improves
safety at this site as much as possible without requiring the retaining wall adjacent to the river. A
shorter retaining wall, set back from the river's edge , may still be required just downstream from
the site.
Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action and Conservationists' Alternative
which do not address the safety concerns and are not feasible and prudent for reasons previously
stated. Since the site is adjacent to Ricks Springs on one side and the Logan River on the other,
there are no minor alignment adjustments that would avoid this site without direct impacts on Ricks
Spring or the Logan River.
•
Measures to minimize harm at this site include consideration of pedestrian safety during design . The
passing ability at this location will be eliminated and signing will be provided to warn motorists of
pedestrian use at the Spring. Visibility at this location will be improved because of the 5-foot
shoulders and replacement of the existing narrow bridge. Curbing of this site will also be considered
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
4(Q
Page 9
Section C: Section
�•
during design to better identify parking limits.
Winter Access Parking at Beaver Mountain Road· Site 12 (mp 399.8)
A 20 foot strip is required from this site to accommodate improvements to the intersection of US-89
and Beaver Mountain Road (SR-243). The parking area will be expanded to the northeast so that
there will be no loss of parking. The use of this Section 4(f) property has been coordinated with and
is supported by the USFS because this alternative will improve vehicle safety at the intersection of
US-89 and Beaver Mountain Road, which accesses Beaver Mountain Ski Area.
Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action Alternative and a minor alignment
adjustment. The Conservationists' and Standard Arterial Alternatives would also impact this site.
The No Action Alternative would not provide intersection improvements and is not a feasible or
prudent alternative for other reasons stated in Section B. The minor alignment adjustment requires
that the road be widened only on the south side of the existing US-89. This adjustment was not
se lected because it would require a an approximate to-foot fill and impact the natural drainage for
the Amazon Hollow area ,
Measures to minimize harm include extending the remaining parking area to include at least as much
parking as presently ex ists and paving the entire parking area to enhance use.
Winter Access Parking - Site 13 (mp 402.1)
This site is adjacent to a curve proposed to have the vertical and horizontal alignment improved .
There is a difference in elevation of about 12 feet which would eliminate access to this site.
However , this site will be reestablished at a lower elevation so that access can be maintained and the
site will continue to provide at least as much parking as currently exists. The use of this Section 4(f)
property has been coordinated with and is supported by the USFS because the modified Preferred
Alternative corrects the deficiencies of the adjacent curve.
e
Alternatives considered to avoid this site include the No Action and Conservationists' Alternative
and a minor alignment adjustment. The Standard Arterial Alternative would also impact this site.
The No Action and Conservationists' Alternatives would not improve the vertical and horizontal
alignment of this curve and are not a feasible or prudent alternative for other reasons stated in
Section B. The minor alignment adjustment would require that the road be moved further away from
the site so that access at the current elevation could be maintained. This would require additional
cutting into the hillside and was not selected because it would further impact visual resources to a
greater extent.
Measures to minimize harm include reestablishing the parking site at a lower elevation so that access
will be maintained . The site sits on a mound and lowering the elevation will result in approximately
1000 cubic yds of excess material and a small amount of upland vegetation will be eliminated by
reestablishing this site.
Limber Pine Trailhead - Site IS (mp 404.81)
US-89 Througb Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994)
4(1)
Page 10
Section C: Section
•
�•
The FEIS Slated that the Preferred Alternative would impact this site. Because of a correction lO the
boundaries of this site, the modified Preferred Alternative will not impact this site. The FEIS shows
the parking area at this site to be 60 X 300 feet and adjacent to the roadway . It also states that a 24foot strip would be required for the modified Preferred and Standard Arterial Alternatives. During
the August 18, 1993 field review held with the USFS , an approximate 23-foot strip prior to the
parking area was identified. This 23 feet consists of a 15 foot shoulder and an 8 foot
curbed/vegetated median. The parking area was measured to be approximately 75 X 200 feet (see
revised map in the Appendix). The USFS stated that the boundary for the Section 4(0 resource
includes only the 75 X 200 foot area beyond the median . However, delineation of the parking area
from the roadway would need to be maintained in order to avoid impacts to this site. All
improvements on the trailhead side will be accomplished within 23 feet of the edge of the roadway ,
and a delineation will be provided within this 23-foot area in accordance with USFS
recommendations. Relocation of the trailhead and parking has been dropped from the Preferred
Alternative. The same would apply for the Standard Arterial Alternative. Therefore, there would
be no impact to Site 15 by any of the alternatives .
•
•
US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
4(1)
Page 11
Section C: Section
�D. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM
Throughout development of the Preferred Alternative, and subsequent modifications , consideration
has been given to avoiding and minimizing harm to sensitive resources . Protection of the river and
surrounding wetland /riparian edge, avoidance of a threatened species , avoidance and minimizing
harm to wetland/ riparian habitat, visual , and section 4(f) resources of the canyon played an important
role in its development and selection. As a result, minimal construction will occur in the
ecologically sensitive Middle Section of the canyon , bridges will c1ear·span the river . retaining walls
will be used to limit encroachment into sensitive areas. and treatment of clearzones will be mod ified
from AASHTO recommendations. Since the FEIS , the Preferred Alternative has been modified (see
Section A of this ROD) to further reduce these impacts.
All practicable measures to avoid impacts and minimize environmental harm have been incorporated
into the decis ion made in this ROD based on the conceptual level of design utilized in the [IS
process . Emphasis will continue to be made throughout detailed design and construction to further
avoid impacts and minimize harm to environmental resources. Horizontal and vertical alignments
will be manipulated to provide a M
best fit M design . Interested government agencies , local
governments , the environmental community and the community at large will continue to be involved
as part of a Cooperating Advisory Team (CAT) . This team will participate in the development
or all &Soecls of desien and in the resolution of unforeseen environmental problems that arise
durine construction and post construction. This team will be developed as outlined in the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the FHW A, UDOT and the USFS . Details
regarding the fonnation and operation of this team can be found in the MOU (see Appendix) and is
summarized in Section E of this ROD.
In addition to the measures taken to avoid impacts and minimize harm, opportunities ror
enhancement will be considered, as appropriate. Application ror runding or enhancement
projects would be made as provided for in the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
Act (JSTEA).
•
•
Clearzone Considerations
Impacts will be minimized by the treatment of c1earzones. Clearzones will be handled by relaxing
AASHTO Standards (which recommends removal of hazards within the clearzone area, or protection
of those that cannot be removed). The design of clearzones will focus on preservation of aesthetic
and ecological features to the extent possible while considering safety. Safety hazards within the
c1earzone area will be considered for protection, removal , or no action. The prime directive will
be to minimize impacts to wetlands and riparian habitat adjacent to the roadway without jeopardizing
safety. Considerable emphasis will be given to protection or no action, and removal of hazards
caused by natural conditions will be kept to a minimum . The clearzone area begins at the outside
edge of the traffic lane and is 18 feet wide at 25, 35, or 40 mph and 22 feet wide at 50 mph .
However, the intent is not to clear a swath 18-22 feet wide adjacent to the travel lane . No clearzone
area will be provided in the first four miles or the middle canyon, however, substantial hazards
within this area will be considered for protection.
US-89 Througb Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Page 12
HanD
Section D: Measures to Minimize
•
�e
Design Considerations
Through the various meetings and fi eld rev iews held during development of mis ROD , a limited
number of site specific areas were identified where design considerations were of panicular interest.
The following list is not intended to be all inclus ive, but representative of considerations which will
be made during design . Aesthetic impacts at many of these locations was also of concern. These
impacts will be minimized in accordance with the revegetation plan. This plan will include the
use of native plant species; slope rounding and warping of land form impacts; aging rock faces
which contrast with older cuts; removing abandoned roadways and restoring them to blend with
surrounding contours.
•
•
•
Curves 5 & 29 - Accident studies will be handled by reviewing the current three year
accident period at time of construction. The number, type, cause and severity of accidents
will be reviewed to determine if correction of geometric deficiencies could alleviate
accidents. The UDOT Dynamic Quicklisting and officer's individual accident reports will
be the source of this information. Aesthetic impacts will be reduced by manipulating the
horizontal andlor vertical alignment, and by moving away fro m the river .
LoWer Twin Bridge - The total width of cut will be based on the roadway width requirement
combined with the angle of repose of the existing material.
•
Dugway - Widening at this location will be on the cut side to avoid disturbance of the
downhill slope. Only the minimum cut required for necessary widening will be constructed .
The width of additional cut will be a maximum of 8 feet.
•
Upper Twin Bridge - The alignment shift will be based on the minimum amount necessary
to allow a new bridge to be constructed while allowing traffic to utilize the existing structure .
One or two way traffic control configurations for construction will be considered .
•
Temple Fork - Minimum roadway improvements at this site include a 34' section on US-89
and an improved vertical grade approach of Temple Fork road . Other improvements such
as an uphill right tum lane and an improved horizontal angle of approach of Temple Fork
road are secondary improvements which will not be constructed if they impact the river or
require a substantial retaining wall. Environmental impacts and construction costs will be
weighed against the benefits gained.
•
Passing Lanes in Lower Upper Canyon of Section 2 - The location of passing lanes in the
first eight mi les of the Upper Canyon will be evaluated further during detailed design to
assess additional measures to avoid or minimize harm to wetlands. The evaluation will
address leaving the lanes in the location described herein , or combining and relocating into
a single section. Passing lane(s) in this section are a necessary safety improvement and the
decision will be based upon minimizing the impact to the environment (L e .• wetlands, visual)
relative to the safety benefit of this improvement. Emphasis will be to shift the alignment
away from the river.
US-89 1brougb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Hann
Page 13
Section D: Measures to Minimize
�•
Beaver Creek, Franklin Basin Bridge - Horizontal and vertical alignments will be modified
to obtain a H
best fit alignment relative to the sensitive environmental features . The
reduction in the proposed roadway width to 34' also minimizes riparian impacts. Retaining
walls andlor guardrail sections are anticipated and will be utilized to reduce or avoid impact
to sensitive areas. Specific locations for these treatments will be identified in the detailed
H
•
roadway design process.
•
Culvert at Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and Surrounding Drainage Area - The impact
to wetlands at the Amazon Hollow, Stump Hollow and surrounding drainage area as a
result of roadway widening for the Beaver Mountain turning Janes will be further evaluated
during detailed design. This may include shortening the turn lane storage bay lengths and/or
utilization of guardrail to shorten the culvert.
•
Tony Grove, Beaver Mountain, Franklin Basin Intersections - Improvements at these
intersections in the form of left and right turning lanes are a necessary safety improvement.
Except for the Franklin Basin Intersection, sensitive environmental features will likely not
be heavily impacted. The uses of retaining wall and guardrail will be considered in reducing
or avoiding impacts. Again, a "best fit " design will be implemented. Remaining impacts
will be minimized with mitigative efforts.
•
Passing Lane Above Beaver Mountain Turnoff - The alignment shift at curves 69, 70, and
71 will be subjected to a best fit design analysis including exceptions to design standards.
Realignment around the mature forest will be the design objective. The degree of cut or fill
in obtaining the necessary roadway width is not yet known , but will be determined in the
detailed design process.
*
Curve 85, and the Mature Forest near Limber Pine - The footprint of the roadway is
affected by design speed (curve flattening) , nominal roadway width, and climbing lane. The
use of retaining walls and/or guardrails to limit the extent of fills will be considered . These
activities could reduce the extent of the fill by 40-100 feet, whereas eliminating the climbing
lane would only gain an additional 7 feet. The use of a structure has also been considered
but will not likely be advanced due to potential icing problems at this location. Realignment
options at this location may exist and will be evaluated during design . Ending the passing
lane on an uphill section would not meet design standards and is not desirable because of
the potential safety conflict. Slower moving vehicles would be required to merge into a
faster stream of traffic. The abandoned road and existing fill would be removed and the
ground restored to blend with the surrounding contours.
*
Old Road from the Limber Pine Summit to Garden City - Sections of the existing alignment
abandoned due to realignments or curve flatlenings will be handled in accordance with the
revegetation plan. Abandoned roadway sections will be removed and the ground restored to
blend with surrounding contours. In some cases the old road would be necessary for local
access and will remain in use.
•
Section Ib Crom Rick Springs to Section 2 - The alignment will be shifted away from the
adjacent riparian habitat and the river. It will be adjusted to obtain a "best fit" design.
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994) Page 14
Hann
Section D: Measures to Minimize
•
•
�•
Retaining walls will be considered where needed to avoid or reduce impacts.
•
Impacts from Mitigation - The first priority will be to reduce the amount of impact through
design . Secondly . mitigative areas will be closely evaluated and selected based on potential
for success, as well as consideration to impacts caused by construction of the mitigative
areas. The Forest Service and the Corps of Engineers will be working with UDOT to ensure
that a balance between visual concerns and the need for wetland mitigation in advance of
highway construction is achieved. As design is advanced , possible locations where mitigation
can be accomplished on site may be identified (i.e. possible strips of wetland adjacent to the
roadway in the lower Upper Canyon). In some cases, mitigation areas may be selected that
are not as visible from the road.
Land Use
The modified Preferred Alternative will improve accessibility to various land uses within the area .
Forest Service Plan
•
•
A revegetation plan will be developed by UDOT and approved by the USFS during design
of individual projects to ensure that areas of high visual quality and critical habitat are
avoided, where practicable, and that disturbed areas are appropriately revegetated .
•
A construction/post-construction monitoring plan will be developed and implemented by
UOOT and approved by the USFS during design of individual projects in order to identify
sensitive areas where monitoring is needed . These areas and types of monitoring required
will be identified in the project plans and specifications for each project.
•
•
Amendment of the Forest Plan for the Wasatch-Cache National Forest is required under the
administrative procedures of the US FS for impacts to visual quality and reduction of the
habitat condition index.
Best Management Practices will be implemented to control erosion, thereby meeting the
water and soils management directive of the Forest Plan. Detailed Best Management
Practices will be developed during design for each project.
Cache County Plan
•
UOOT's Best Management Practices will be used to minimize water quality degradation,
minimize vegetative removal , and minimize cut and fill . This complies with requirements
of the Cache County Plan which specifies that destruction of natural vegetation be minimized.
cut and fill operations be minimized to reduce runoff and erosion , while providing for
appropriate public roads.
Rich County Plan
•
No measures to minimize harm are required .
US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13. 1994)
Hann
Page IS
Section D: Measures to Minimize
�Social Impacts
Measures to . minimize harm are required to address access concerns of the various users .
•
Access to Existing and Proposed Subdivisions
..
A new intersection providing access to the Bridgerland Subdivision will be constructed . This
access will provide safer ingress and egress to the subdivision.
•
Access at mp 410.6 in Garden City would be relocated by closing the present access and
providing a new access from another public street, if possible. If the access cannot be
closed, then it would be relocated to an improved location , providing the best design
possible. A combination with access at mp 410.7 may be practicable. The access at mp
410.7 would be considered accord ing to the same criteria as the access at my 410.6.
•
Intersection improvements to other existing and proposed subdivision accesses will be
considered based on use requirements, roadway widening possibilities, and other engineering
factors. Garden City will be involved in identiCying these requirements.
Access to Recreation Within the Canyon
•
Accessibility will be improved by providing intersection improvements , eliminating or
mitigating hazards , and improving the Level of Service.
•
Present parking turnouts will be improved and new turnouts will be placed in recognition of
any eliminated rumouts. Additional turnouts which attain at least two parking stalls with
adequate sight distance will also be considered. Exact locations will be determined during
design and in conjunction with USFS recommendations.
•
Relocation
•
The acquisition and relocation program will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended .
•
Acquisition of publicly-owned lands will be undertaken in accordance with the regulations
of each land management agency .
•
Grazing activities regulated by the USFS and the State of Utah will not be affected .
However. fencing along the highway from just below Tony Grove to Franklin Basin will be
considered to reduce the number of cattle· vehicle accidents.
EmploymentlEconomics
•
The canyon will remain open during construction to minimize employment/economic impacts
related to road closure. A traffic control plan will be developed during design phase.
Temporary short·term closures to through traffic are expected. Local access to
US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (DJ'ft of October 13. 1994) Page 16
Hann
Section D: Measures to Minimize
•
�•
recreation traffic is expected to be maintained.
Joint Development
•
Coordination has been made and will continue to be made with the USFS to develop a
highway which meets , to the extent possible, the goals of both UOOT and the USFS .
Pedestrians and Bicyclists
•
•
A wider roadway with shoulders is being provided through much of the project. Paving of
parking areas will discourage the use of non·designated parking locations which are
hazardous to vehicle-passengers who SlOP and leave their vehicle and to bicyclists who may
encounter vehicles quickly turning onto or off of the roadway .
Burnt Bridge will be constructed to a 34-foot width to allow safer pedestrian and bicyclist
use.
Water Quality Impacts
•
•
Sedimentation and siltation control during the construction phase will include application of
Best Management Practices. UDOT's Standard Temporary Erosion Control plans will be
implemented during construction.
•
During construction, the surface area of erodible soils that are exposed at anyone time will
be limited .
•
Temporary pollution/erosion control provisions will be coordinated with permanent soil
erosion control measures to assure maximum attainable erosion control. The use of detailed
erosion control plan sheets will be considered that include locations of erosion control
facilities. These locations would then be subject to field evaluation.
Permits
UDOT will coordinate development of permit applications with the various agencies so that their
recommendations can be integrated into roadway design. Construction of the project will require
the following permits:
Stream Alteration Permit
•
•
A Stream Alteration Permit is required by the State Engineer's Office, Utah Division of
Water Rights for bridge and culvert replacement. This does not involve channelization or
relocation of the stream, but would involve riprap .
Section 404 Permit
US-89 Through Logan Canyon. ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Hann
Page 17
Section 0: Measures to Minimize
�•
A Section 404 Permit to discharge dredge or fill materials into a water of the United States
is required by the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) where construction activities impact
jurisdictional wetlands .
•
Utah Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit
•
Utah Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit will be required for any project which
disturbs more than 5 acres of surface area during construction. The UPDES General Storm
Water Discharge Permit issued to UDOT by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality
will apply. As part of the requirements of this permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention
(SWPP) plan will be developed and incorporated in the final design plans. Also a Notice of
Intent (NOI) form shall also be submitted to Utah Division of Water Quality prior to
construction of the project. For any project disturbing less than 5 acres, the UPDES General
Storm Water Discharge Permit will not apply . However, UOOT's standard plans for
temporary erosion and sediment control will be implemented during construction to alleviate
any potential erosion or sediment.
Right-of-Way/Special Use Permit
•
The FEIS states that a Right-of-Way/Special Use Permit is required from the USFS ,
Wasatch-Cache National Forest. The USFS has recently advised UOOT that Forest Service
policy requires issuance of a transportation easement, rather than a special use permit. This
decision will be made in the USFS Record of Decision.
Wetlands and Botanical Resources
•
A wetland mitigation plan will be developed during the design phase under the guidelines of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Executive Order 11990 as administered by the COE.
Additional opportunities to avoid or minimize wetland impacts will be identified throughout
design . Replacement of eliminated wetlands will be in-kind , based on functional value . The
first priority will be to reduce the amount of impact through design. Secondly, mitigative
areas will be closely evaluated and selected based on potential for success, as well as
consideration of impacts caused by construction of the mitigative areas .
•
Advance mitigation will be developed with the first project and considered on future projects
so that impacts can be mitigated prior to being impacted, where practicable. The acreage ,
sites , and design of the wetland mitigation sites, and advance mitigation, will continue to be
coordinated with and agreed to by the COE and the USFS during design , so that visual and
wetland concerns can be balanced.
•
Construction document specifications will limit encroachment into wetlands and riparian areas
to that required for construction. On site inspections in accordance with the construction
monitoring plan will ensure compliance with these provisions.
•
Construction work zones will be delineated through the use of fencing in sensitive areas to
ensure contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations.
•
US-89 Through Logan
Hann
Canyo~,
ROD (Draft of October 13 , 1994) Page 18
Section D: Measures to Minimize
•
�•
The construction/post construction monitoring plan will require that qualified UDOT
representative(s), acceptable [0 the COE, will be in charge of assisting designers and the
project engineer in designing and constructing the wetland mitigation areas . Upon
completion of the project, the representative(s) will also monitor the mitigation sites once a
year for three years. This includes taking photographs and sending them with a brief
progress report to the COE each year . At the end of the three years, if the wetland
mitigation areas have not developed to the satisfaction of the CDE, then through consultation
with the COE, appropriate steps will be taken by UDOT to fulfill Section 404 permit
requirements for the project.
•
A revegetation plan will be developed and implemented to revegetate disturbed areas. The
revegetation plan will be developed with the assistance of USFS and other CAT team
members.
•
Burnt Bridge will be constructed in stages, with widening occurring on the upstream side ,
eliminating the detour presented in the FEIS.
•
In addition to the reduced width presented in the FEIS for the Middle Canyon , the previously
proposed roadway width of 40' for the fir st eight miles of the Upper Canyon Section has
been reduced to 34' to further minimize impacts on wetlands.
•
Location of passing lanes in the first eight miles of the Upper Canyon will be evaluated
further during detailed design to assess additional measures to avoid or minimize harm to
wetland s caused by these passing lanes . The evaluation will address leaving the lanes in the
location described herein, or combining and relocating into a single section. Safety
considerations will also play a role in the final placement.
•
Impact to wetlands at Amazon Hollow , Stump Hollow and surrounding drainage area as
a result of roadway widening for the Beaver Mountain turning lanes will be further evaluated
during detailed des ign . This may include shonening the turn lane storage bay lengths and/or
utilizing guardrail to shorten the culvert.
•
•
•
Requirements identified in the Section 404 Permit will be complied with.
Water Body Modifications and Wildlir. Impacts
•
•
Clear span bridges will be used rather than in-river pier suppons to minimize water body
modifications.
•
•
Additional animal crossing signs will be provided in high conflict locations in consultation
with Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR).
The amount and necessity of riprap required for erosion control at bridges will be evaluated
on a case by case basis during final design . Riprap will be used only where required to
stabilize the streambank. Riprap will not exceed 100 feet along both banks up- and downstream from each new bridge. Since riprap will not be required at each of these locations,
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Page 19
H"m
Seclion D: Measures to Minimize
�the actual use of riprap will be minimal.
•
Construction activities in watercourses will be minimized to the extent possible.
Construction work zones will be delineated to ensure contractor compliance.
•
Existing river and creek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment of any
required riprap into channels. Impacts to wildlife will be minimized by limiting , to the extent
practical , vegetative and riparian habitat clearing.
•
Highway bridges will be elevated with no part of the bridge suppan systems being placed in
the river . Bridge spans will allow for animal runway in cases where this feature is currently
provided.
•
•
The following mitigation measures emphasize protection or replacement of vegetative cover
for fisheries . These mitigation measures apply 10 the Logan River and Beaver Creek, and
will also apply to their tributaries that are important to adult and juvenile fish , as determined
by UDWR and USFS.
Construction activities near the river will occur during the drier, low-flow month s of
the year to the extent practicable .
Clear-span bridges rather than in-river pier suppons will be constructed. Culvens
will be designed to allow fish passage. Heavy equipment wil l be kept out of the
channel during all construction phases to the extent practicable.
Unavoidable in-channel activities will be scheduled in coordination with the USFS
and UDWR to minimize impacts during critical fisheries periods. Such activities will
be brief and local .
•
Temporary dikes and sediment basins will be constructed during bridge and structure
replacement to prevent turbid runoff and any accidental spills of fuels , lubricants,
chemicals, or sewage (from portable sanitary facilities) from entering the river , creek,
or tributaries .
Construction activities will be limited to areas within construction work zones, as
delineated through the use of fencing , to minimize habitat losses.
All work will be conducted from the inland side of the highway where possible to
avoid in-channel activities and minimize riparian habitat and riverbank disturbance.
Existing river and creek hydraulics will be maintained by avoiding the encroachment
of required riprap into the channels. The free-nowing nature of the river will be
maintained.
Fill slopes will not be steeper than 2: I to promote bank stability and reclamation .
US-89 Through Logan Canyoo, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Hann
Page 20
Section 0 : Measures to Minimize
•
�•
Drainage ditches and sediment basins will be located in accordance with the detailed
Best Management Practices to minimize erosion and to prevent eroded material
from being washed toward the river.
Runoff along the river-side of the curb and gutter in the Middle Canyon section will
be directed toward the inland side of the highway. where practicable, to minimize the
discharge to the river of materials that accumulate on the highway.
A band of riparian habitat will be maintained along the river and creek wherever
possible to provide overhanging cover for fish and to filter surface runoff.
Larger mature trees and their root systems will be protected where it does not conflict
with vehicles and passenger safe£}'o
Prior to the start of the next wet season. disturbed areas , where possible, will be
stabilized, reseeded , and revegetated.
Riprap and debris generated during future highway and shoulder maintenance would
not be indiscriminately placed along the river banks.
•
•
Mitigation measures described above are intended to minimize impacts on water quality and
fisheries . The following will also be accomplished to ensure success of mitigation measures:
Fishery studies will be conducted for individual projects which have the potential tQ
impact fisheries. Prior tQ construction. available UDWR fisheries studies will be
assessed and if necessary updated to provide baseline data to determine project
impacts to fisheries . Post construction fishery studies will be conducted . If study
results show additional mitigation measures are warranted as a result of project
activities. mitigation directed at wild fish stocks will be carried out under the
direction of USES and UDWR biologists as exp lained in the FEIS on pg 5-6,
Floodplain Impacts
•
Bridges will c1earspan watercourses in order to minimize floodplain encroachment. Excess
fill material will not be placed in the floodway.
•
Bridge and culvert openings will be sized so that floodplain elevations will not be increased .
•
Construction activities will be in compliance with Executive Order 11988 to reduce the risk
of flood Josses; to minimize the impact of floods on human health, safety and welfare; and
to restore and preserve the national and beneficial values served by floodplains.
Threatened and Endangered Species
•
The Middle Canyon contains habitat for the Primyla maguirei (threatened species). The USF&WS
has stated that the Preferred Alternative will have no effect on this species. In order to minimize
US·89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Harm
Page 21
Section 0: Measures to Minimize
�potential impacts , the recommendations of Welsh (1987) and the USF&WS will be followed . These
recommendations include:
•
Construction activities from Wood Camp Intersection to mp 385.0 will be restricted to a
corridor width of less than 40 feet.
•
Changes in the geomorphology of Logan Canyon will be limited to the extent practical.
•
Removal of canyon bottom tree groves will be limited .
•
Dust suppression measures will be used during construction activities. Construction in the
area near populations will be undertaken no earlier than June to avoid potential dust impacts
during the flowering period (April-May) ,
•
e
Blasting in the Middle Canyon will be avoided whenever possible. Barriers preventing
scattering of blast debris on these populations will be provided if blasting is necessary .
Visual Impacts
•
A revegetation plan will be developed during design and coordinated with the USFS to
minimize harm to visual resources . This plan will be implemented in the project plans and
specifications for each project. This plan will include use of native plant species. Mitigation
of landform impacts will be accomplished by slope rounding and warping to make cuts, fills ,
and ditch edges appear more natural . Rock faces, contrasting with older cuts, will be aged
with treatments. In places where the current alignment is abandoned, the roadway will be
removed and the ground restored to blend with surrounding contours. The plan will identify
seed mixes compatible with local plant communities.
•
Levels of visual quality adjacent to the roadway of 0, 1 and 2 will be raised to level 3,
except when a more appropriate direction is determined by the USFS.
•
The acreage , sites and design of advance mitigation will be agreed to by the USFS during
design so that visual and wetland concerns can be balanced .
•
•
Steel beam guardrail will be the hazard protection device encouraged for use. The use of
A588 rusting steel, natural finish material for the guardrail for aesthetic purposes will be
considered .
Construction Impacts
Blasting
•
A Special Provisiol'} will be included in the project plans to ensure blasting will be controlled
to inhibit rock materials from being projected away from the blast area, and removing only
designated material .
US-89 Through Logan Canyon . ROD (Draft of October 13,1994) Page 22
Hann
Section 0 : Measures to Minimize
•
�•
•
•
If any critical wildlife periods are identified by UDWR during des ign , these will be given
consideration , and if appropriate , timing of blasting will be limited.
Blasting in the Middle Canyon will be avo ided whenever possible. Barriers preventing blast
debris onto Maguire primrose populations will be provided if blasting is necessary .
Spoil
•
Environme ntal clearance will be obtained on the d isposal site, prior to disposal of excess
material .
•
Excess materials that are not used in roadway construction or restoratio n of the borrow area
near Bear Lake Summit, will be disposed of in locations determined on a case-by-case
basis by the CAT team and approved by USFS . Excess materials may be utilized in the
canyon, stock piled for future use, or transported out of the canyon.
Air Quality
•
•
Dust suppression measures will be implemented during construction . These measures will
include water sprinkling, speed limits on haul road , and use of environmentally safe
stabilization chemicals.
Noise
•
The construction contractor will be required to comply with UDOT Specification No . 104. 16
(formerly 107.24) "Noise and Vibration Contro l".
Traffic Congestion , Detours and Safety
•
A detailed traffic control plan will be developed during the design phase to minimize traffic
congestion; provide for construction detours and short·term road closures; and address
vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle safety.
Toxic Material Control
•
A spill control plan for motor fuels, oil, grease and chemicals will be developed during the
design phase. This plan will address measures to minimize accidental releases of toxic
materials to the environment and measures to respond to and clean up spilled material.
Historic and Archeological Preservation
•
UOOT Standard Specification No . 104. 15 (formerly 107 .23) , "Discovery Propenies" will
be included in all contracts to protect unknown historic and archeological resources .
•
Hazardous Waste
US·89 Through Logan CanYOD, ROD (DOlft of October 13, 1994) Page 23
H.m>
SectioD 0 : Measures 10 Minimize
�•
If evidence of Hazardous Waste is found during construction the Department of
Enviro nmental Quality will be consulted and appropriate mitigation measures will be
implemented.
•
Staging Areas
•
Construction staging sites will be identified and coordinated through the CAT team during
design . They will be kept out of aquatic, wetland, and riparian habitat and other sensitive
visual areas.
•
Environmental clearance on construction staging sites will be obtained during design and the
contractor will be limited to the use of staging areas identified in the project construction
plans.
•
Staging sites will be approved by the USFS.
Batch Plant Locations
•
The traffic, safety, reneation. and air quality impacts associated with hauling material
rrom the city versus setting up a batch plant in the canyon will be identified on a
project by project basis in design. The affect of these impacts on both the canyon
environment and the city environment will be considered. The assessment will include
impacts on the Lower Canyon and compatibility with future projects. The most suitable
location will be identified in the prgject specifications. The contractor will be required
to conduct his batch plant operations in accordance with these specifications and will
comply wilh Utah Air Conservation Regulations identified in UDOr SDeciflcatio,. 10Z21.
EnvirQnmenl4l Protection.
•
Limits of Operation
•
Construction work zones will be delineated through the use of fencing in sensitive areas
to ensure contractor compliance with environmental limits of operations.
Section 4(0
•
All improvements to Section 4(f) resources will be done in accordance with USFS
recommendations.
•
Site 6 (Ricks Spring and Parking , mp 389.9) - Pedestrian safety will be considered to the
extent possible during design . This consideration includes the elimination of passing ability
at this location and improved signing. Curbing of this site will also be considered.
•
Site 12 (Winter Access Parking Area at Beaver Mountain Road, mp 399.8) - Remaining
parking area will be extended to include at least as much parking as presently exists, and the
entire parking area will be paved to enhance use.
US-89 Througb Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994) Page 24
Hann
Section 0 : Measures to Minimize
•
�•
•
Site 13 (Winter Access Parking , mp 402. 1) - This site will be reestabli shed at a lower
elevation to maintain access.
..
Site 15 (Limber Pine Trailhead, mp 404.81) - All improvements on the trailhead side will
be accomp lished with in 23 feet of the edge of the roadway , and a delineation will be
provided within this 23 foot area.
•
•
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft of October 13, 1994)
Hann
Page 25
Section D: Measures to Minimize
�E. MONITORING OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Monitoring
and enforcement of the above proposed measures to minimize harm will be accomplished
•
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between UDOT. FHWA. and USFS .
This MOU is included in the Appendix of this ROD . It identifies how the individual projects will
be se lected , identified and managed , and how coordination will be accomplished. The MOU takes
each project through design , construction, and post-construction periods. It commits to the
development of a revegetation plan, wetland mitigation plan, and a construction/post-construction
monitoring plan, and commits to the development of a Cooperating Advisory Team (CAD which
consists of various agencies and individuals. This team will provide recommendations of regulatory
and permit requirements , input on enhancement opportunities , mitigative treatments and overall
content of the design of the project, with final decisions being UDOT's responsibility. The CAT
team will be involved throughout the development of all aspects of design. including review of
aljgnment oPtions and other design features. During construction and post construction. the CAT
team will be coordinated with to reso lve ynforeseen environmental problems to ensure that mitigative
efforts are successfu l.
Mitigation measures listed in Section 0 above will be incorporated in the contract , plans , and
specifications and will be monitored in accordance with the construction/post-construction monitoring
plan. The monitoring plan will be developed during design of the individual projects and will
include all monitoring commitments made within this ROD, as well as any monitoring required to
comply with specific permits.
Enforcement of the contract provisions and monitoring of the project is the responsibility of the
se lected UDOT Project Manager and UDOT Environmental Engineer , as outlined in the MOU . An
independent environmental consultant will be ytilized . The envirOnmental consultant will assisl the
•
froieer Manager co ensure CQ17Wliance with envirOnmental commitments and mitigation measures.
Periodic meetings will be held with the contractor's workforce to advise of sensitive areas .
The UDOT Design, Structures, Right-of-Way and Environmental Divisions are responsible to ensure
that the measures to minimize harm , listed in Section D above , are incorporated into the plans and
right-of-way acquisition activities.
The Utah Division of FHW A is respons ible for administering the Federal-Aid Highway Program in
Utah and makes period ic inspections of all phases of highway design and construction to assure
compliance with federal requirements including NEPA .
US-89 Through Logan Canyon, ROD (Draft October 13. 1994)
Enforcement
Page 26
SectioD E; Monitoring or
•
�•
Logan Canyon Documents
UDOT Documents
US-89 Logan canyon Preferred Alternative (circa 1992-93).
Brochure outlining Preferred Alternative as outlined in FEIS.
March 4, 1994 Letter from Dave Berg to Jeff Appel.
Conlinnation of compromise elements.
July 13, 1994 Letter from Lorraine Richards to CPLC and other agencies.
Brief summary of ROD, request for agency input
Preliminary Record of Decision July 15, 1994.
Cover letter
Reoord of Decision
Appendix A
Traffic Data. agency oorrespondence, MOU.
Appendix B
Agency Comments, Government Comments, Public Comments.
Curve 85 Maps, Cross Sections aod CutIFili Summary
•
CPLC Documents
Logan Canyon: Summarizing Two "Alternatives"
Map and brief summary of Consen'ationi st and UDOT Preferred
Alternatives.
Logan Canyon, Make it Safe, Keep is Beautiful
Brochure from 1993 Cache County Fair.
Response to Dave Berg letter (March 4, 1994), Jeff Appel.
June 28, 1994 Memo from Pendery to Berg outlining hotspots and requesting additional
information from UDOT.
Response to Preliminary Record of Decision. Bruce Pendery. Steve Rint, Shawn Swaner,
August 12, 1994.
Memorandum: Time for Filing Lawsuit under NEPA, Appel & Mansson,
•
August 16, 1994.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Image Height
3363
Image Width
Image Width in pixels
2636
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/393">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/393</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2013
Conversion Specs
Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner.
Scanning resolution
Resolution in DPI
300
Colorspace
RGB or Grayscale, for example
Grayscale
Checksum
187114229
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Record of decision, October 13, 1994
Description
An account of the resource
Record of decision for US Highway 89 stating that the Federal Highway Administration agrees with the Utah Department of Transportaion in its selection of the Preferred Alternative.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Roads--Design and construction
Traffic engineering
United States Highway 89
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Environmental policy
Logan Canyon Study
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Administrative records
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
10/13/94
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Rich County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1990-1999
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Citizens for the Protection of Logan Canyon/Logan Canyon Coalition Papers, 1963-1999, COLL MSS 314 Box 1 Folder 15
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv63458</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Special Collections and Archives, phone (435) 797-2663.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
image/jpeg
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MSS314Bx1Fd15
Highway 89;
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/4c57fcb956bc84df61ba6e04c681dff3.pdf
8deb4538a67b79ae4939e5bc8318213e
PDF Text
Text
LOGAN CANYON ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
ID TEAM MEETING MINUTES
May 4, 1987
Attendance:
Jim Naegle, UDOT
Howard Richardson, UDOT
Lynn Zollinger, UDOT
Stan Nuffer, CH2M HILL
Cliff Forsgren, CH2M HILL
Clark Ostergaard, USFS
Fred Labar, USFS
Jack Spence, Utah Wilderness Association
Duncan Silver, FHWA
Gale Larson, Valley Engineers
Bill Helm, Unattached
Item 1 - Review of Minutes
April 20, 1987 Meeting
During the review of the minutes of the April 20 meeting,
Stan Nuffer told the ID Team that he felt that input from
the regulatory agencies could be obtained just as· effectively
on a one-on-one basis as it could in another meeting. Duncan
Silver had discussed this with Stan Nuffer and Stan is goLng
to follow up on it. Bill Helm indicated that he had gathered some additional information on fish counts and spawning habitat and would bring it to the next meeting. Lynn
Zollinger asked about a rare disease which occurred in some
varieties of trees in Logan Canyon. Fred LaBar indicated
that he knew what Lynn was referring to and that he would
get some information on the disease to Lynn.
April 21, 1987 Meeting
There was considerable discussion on the minutes of the tour
of the Canyon and there were a number of changes made. Most
of those present asked for revised copies of the minutes
when they were completed.
After the review of the minutes, Jack Spence reported that
the environmental groups had met and reviewed the project to
date and had some concerns. They had looked at all of the
alternatives and none are acceptable, except spot improvements on a case-by-case basis. Jack reported the environmental community felt that the size of the project was
growing beyond the original scope and that it appeared that
FHWA was driving this increase. Jack explained that the
existing forest plan, which has been approved, left little
room for improvements of any size in the Canyon. There is
some concern that the study is progressing without regard to
�MEETING MINUTES
Page 2
the forest plan and its limitations.
If the study results
in recommended improvements requiring a change in the forest
plan, that change would be appealed and the entire process
delayed indefinitely. The belief of · the environmental community is that the forest plan allows only spot improvements
and that all environmental sections of the report must
address how each alternative would affect the plan.
Item 2 - Discussion of the Existing Conditions Portion of
the Socio-Economic Technical Memorandum
(Due to the lack of time discussion of this item was postponed)
Item 3 - Discussion of Spot Improvement Alternative
Specific spot improvements were identified.
These include:
1.
A nominal deceleration and turn-lane at Right Fork
2.
An improved intersection at Wood Camp
3.
Flattening the first sharp curve above Right Fork
4.
Slow vehicle turnout above Wood Carnp and just
beyond the area where the Maquire Primrose is
located
5.
Replacing Burnt Bridge
6.
Improvements to allow parking near Logan Cave,
raising the grade along the river at the cave and
possibly doing a better job of placing riprap.
Options for flattening the curve are to be
evaluated.
7.
Replacing Lower Twin Bridge, possibly on a new
alignment
8.
Passing lane in the Lower Twin Bridge and Dugway
area
9.
Intersection improvements at the Temple Fork
intersection.
10.
Shift the alignment of the road at Ricks Springs
to allow parking on one side of the road only.
11.
Intersection improvements at Tony Grove
12.
Intersection improvements at Red Banks
�MEETING MINUTES
Page 3
13.
A climbing lane beginning approximately 2 miles
above Ricks Springs
14.
Intersection improvements at Franklin Basin
15.
Replace the drainage structure at Beaver Creek
16.
Intersection improvements at Beaver Mountain
17.
Climbing lane between Beaver Mountain and the
state maintenance shed
18.
Climbing lane in the Sinks area
19.
Intersection improvements at Sunrise Campground
20.
Some curve flattening in Rich County
21.
Intersection improvement in Rich County
Each spot improvement will be evaluated individually to
determine its impact and benefit.
There was not enough time to address the other agenda items
and they will be discussed at a later date.
SLC-STN/51
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/73">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/73</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2013
Conversion Specs
Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner, at 800 dpi. Archival file is PDF (800 dpi), display file is JPEG2000.
Checksum
1647843634
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1759223 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Minutes from May 4, 1987 Interdisciplinary team meeting
Description
An account of the resource
Review of April 20, 1987 meeting minutes, recommendations of spot improvments with a specific list of locations.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Nuffer, Stanton S.
Helm, William
LaBar, Fred
Zollinger, Lynn
Spence, Jack
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Administrative records
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1987-05-04
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan (Utah)
Utah
United States
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1980-1989
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 27 Folder 3
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Libraries Photograph Curator, phone (435) 797-0890.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MSS148VIIIB27_Fd3_Page_5.pdf
Highway 89;
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/cd6efe244de617807eba980ea5ae5f21.pdf
8f09d4bab7e3fc9d96f44c6f84ee8e8b
PDF Text
Text
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Interdisciplinary Study Team Members
FROM:
Stan Nuffer, CH2M HILL
DATE:
June 22, 1987
RE:
Public Comments on the Proposed Logan Canyon Road
Project
PROJECT:
B21163.GO
Comments received at the public scoping meetings in Logan
and Garden City during March 1987 are summarized in the
attachments. Separate sheets are presented for each public
meeting site and date. Written comments that were submitted
following the public scoping meetings are summarized in two
additional attachments (one for individual responses, one
for group and governmental agency responses). These comments
form the basis for completing a portion of Section 7 of the
DEIS (Public and Agency Involvement).
Please contact me if you have any questions.
SLC-STN1/02
�encourage. exoect positive .f~ect
dlscourage. ex~ct negative effect
neutral. exoect no su~nif' • . or 1· 5t inq .ef·fect
a
......-a~ .. ~
CANVON E.I.S.
SCOPING MEETI ....G NU. 1
MRCH 3 • . - _______ z~ _ _=_a_K __ ~ __ ~--------------------~-~~---~--~--- _________ ~ ________________________ ~p----~-&------------------1987
l:OGAN. UTAH
__ma____
1<:1
II
II
II
I
"
.
_ .......H.L DESlU. II
ACTIlJN f4...TERtIIATlVES
Trno~t_
A/~t"
11-R~F~IC C~II--~.-------.--~--------
EX~'ANOED
I.~t;rloesl
~
.----.--------.----.------.--~--.-------.-------II-------.-------.-------.--------.------.-------.--------11
I_===.-~""""=""""""==""=== I I "'=========== I I ===_
===£"',."::,,.O:=-""=_-==OZE===="",.== .... =====O:==;.=..O: .....O:=s ....O:====c'= ======= I I __.. ~.. ~cc== .. =========.. ="' .... ===== .. =""=="'.. -====== ..
"Marqar-et Pett is
I I
IICindy
II
I I Geor"e W. P .... est.:.n I I
1, IRichard Ca",oar,ellall
I Johr. D •.Je .... sch
I I
IE .... i c Hash
i I
1 John Pau 1 Reeus
I i
I Cor.rad Pete.'soY.
I I
IBetty Bc.el<.e.'
II
IT i M Dav is
I I
IRudy Lukez
II
I
Ke"i~s
ISteve Flint
IClyde Hoth
IBlair Francis
IBruce Brotherson
IDa'vid Buys
IAI ice Stoke s
I Nancy Warne.'
I Mi ke Jabl.::)y,sk. i
• I Ka,·er. Kroah
I IToM Lye.n
I I Shawn St arks
I I L. C. Demars
IIRussel1 Goodwin
liKen Theis
I Mary
I Bedir.t;JField-Srn i th
IScott Smith
IDougl.AS Brin9hurst
I
I
I
I
?
e __ c _____________________________________________ -------------------------------------------~----~--
IHEtiLIGNMNnWiOe;"IU H PHMorovel
sP£EO..
II
EXD@Ct Slonlfacant POSITIVE OR NEGETIVE IMPACTS Fro. Action Alternatives
II
WANT
sco.:.E 0: sruUy TO I'klRC:: FULLY COVtR:
- . It
I Saeed I blans
______
" I iScer.ic I Nec. I I No I &t"09
t I
"& ILoaanl thch I
..
I LiMit I
1-----. - - - - - I 19ii;! IFiora <OOar.a Soec Scenic I H2O I Rivr Ecol Mult IA11-Vr IE_rg I ECOnoMY I EconQ!llY I I TouriSM I Tt"afficlScenic I &lcks...tn I Enoar.g ICost vs!" Pub! i c l I'
15oo
., \
I IHiwavl River I IAct:1 Reo.llirnorl(;l iMO Lr.1 Lan. I Coo I Laroes' t:.r.frc
.
Lower I Ralsel. 1 GaMeIHaoi tat ''':·'ar.1: " Ar.l 1 Dearad IO .... allFishing IUse ISafetYI Trar.s I Rich Col Cache C I 11Moacts I .. L 0 51 Rat ings Ifork Car. I
I Benefit Hiuopc..... t ' I /
.
"~OMM~""TS 11------.-~--II---.~--.----.~--- ---I~----.----IFull .
·
NAME
________
I I ..
II'"
I I
II
I I
I I
I I
' I
I
I
I
I
I'"
Refe.· .... ed
I
I
I I
I I
i I
I;
I'"
...
- I
I
II
II
I
II
... I
"
II
...
...
...
...
I
...
I
I
I
I
?
,,
...
II
II
...
II
II
II
?
...
?
?
?
?
?
...
...
...
I·
I '
II
II
...
-
II
I'
, I
I'
. f.
? 2
I'
II
Cost/BeneFit
~> !
_ 1..
- I
1/
i/
+t?-
.
-~
Study needed
~!
~. \
with
D
: I
D
,,
t !
I'
II
II
... 3
~
).
i:
,
,
stacewide cc·,.,oarisol'"••=.f needs
:; 4 ·
I'
I'
2
I'
,
i'
I·
II
2)
I
I
II
II
+
II
...
II
II
II
II
II
...
I'
II
II
II
...
"
, I
II
1
II
...
Ii
II
II
II
' ;I
, I
, I
, I
...
...
i i
, I
II
II
II
II
I I·
'11
II
...
II
II
II
II
...
II
II
II
...
...
...
Ii
I'
,,
II
II
...
, I
"
II
II
II
....
II
I I
II
It
II
II
II
II
...
I I
I I
i I
II
...
; ,
, ;
I !
II
: I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
II
II
II
II
...
...
I
_.
I
II
?
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
I
II
...
...
1f
If ·
I
II
, I
, I
I
II
i I
...
...
.
II
II
...
I ...
I'"
I
I
I i
I
...
I
I
II
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
?
I'
II
...
I I
I
I
I
I
,
I
II
I I
,.
I I ======""====~"""",.,==== .. ="'=====:===,::-o:;: .. ====:o:=== .. = ........ ~=c==="" I ,
I I
.- 1
-,
II
I I
I I
II
t I
...
I I
' -I
I
I
I
I'"
I I
I'"
I I
I
to oreviously stated c.:once .... r.s and ey,dc"'ce'(fe.r.ts
I I
IRoy Hugie
II
i I
ICrai'l Pil'",der
IMonte Freeman
I'
II
I Er i c Hansoy,
II
ICraig CaUDO
, I
IRon Ryel
Ii
IJiM Frankenfield
II
1M. P. Co.:ove.'
IRichard K. Winte.'sll
I Bruce Pendery
I I
lOon Cundy
II
IDean F. Peterson
II
IDarrel1 Kunzler
II
IMay Coover
II
I Joyce Anders o n
II
I B r uce Bucbee
II
I
I ,
II
i I
II
II
II
II '
i I
II
II
I
I
S~c.
""-_s'"'z= ........ ",_ce .. ';'_===_",,, •• ,,,,,,,=====
-f- q
3)
I j
Olve
Dreference
to bicycle I.tses.
�r:-'
-8S 'LOGAN CANYOfIf E. I.~.
1P1ING MEETING - WAITTE;N R£SPONCES
•__.-'_____________
. , '
'"
"
.
.
:'
+
,
" , ' ,
,
:,
-
,
'
•
, , ' ,
,
,
? -
.ft~~.
I ------------It------___
1----.-------.---------__ .________ ~.--------.----.------.~----.-------.---~---II-~-----.-------.--~----.-------~.------.-------.---~-.--"
18iq .IF.1or. . . . .:.¥.d.nq SO~i:&ceniC~~ ' i~ivr EcoIMu.t -'AI1-Yt", 'C:_ruIECOf'tOM¥.EconoMVII Touri ... ITr.ff'c'SC.ni~ , . 11Hck~tnIEno.r.qICOst v.," Puol lcl I
& A" 11D.ur.d IQuAllf'isninQ IUse c ____
___ :________________________ ' IS.fet,,·, Tr.r•• , Afch ColC.cne CII I - - - -____________
______________________ & I IMPacts' &' L 0 SIR.I; ir.t;JsIFork C .... ISoec. Il<enefit ISUODO."t ,I
•• :1
~
,
\ \
, Raise
•_____ ______ R____ "Hiw.y I River' I,Act I Real ' ,hlor c ______ Lr. I Can. I Co. c _ c ____ c ____ I SI;t;'l DeS 'Lower __ ___ I 'Gi...e IHabi t'.t I;:>lant
c _ c s ICI ifllb
__
________ I Lenes 'E.nfrc __
~
'
encour.qe. eMa.ct oo.~tiv• • t~ect
di.co~":-.D. . . . . . pect .... Q.t~v• • ffect . .
nautr., . . . . o.ct roo stQn~t'. or ta.tl.n!tl
--~-------------~---~---.-~------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------~-~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------~----------IINAT'L OESUi. II ACTION ALTERIllATIVES
I wEf.lLIGNMNTlWid.nIU H ~11"'Drovel
SPEE:.O £
II
t::Mpect SiQnl flc.nt ~S ITIVE O~ NEG€TIVE IflWACTS FroM Action Altern.tiv.s' , t I ,
IoIAIIIT ElCPAfIoQtD ~'Or-' SrUUY TO' rwRc: FlJl..LY COVt::R.
I:
~~S 11--'----.-----II-,-.------.----.--------I-----.----IFull I Saeed I Sipns ITRAFFIC CAPI
\\
IIScenicl Rec. IINo I Brag I~DOt I Trnout &ILog.nl Richl
~
ILi_it'l &Ior
1----. -----I
t.,-1. Allen
-
'
,
irwee P-.nderv
~
~R
~
c_ccc~_=c_=
I
1/
I
I
,
'
I'"
I +
I
I
I
,
Wri1:ten resoonce duolicates statement or ser.teo at' Scooinq l'Ieetina
I
,
I
I
I
I
"
~
I
.,_2C~&&C~_=_=_c==~_.~.
I I'
._.e ____ e___________________________
s~
I
' ,
I
I
I
,
II
"
II
i
II
II
' I
I I
I
I
I
I
a~
I
I
,
1\
: I
::
'I
I i
:
II
II
II
I
I
,'
I
11
1I
I 1
II
I
' I
,
I I
i
I
I I
II
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
I I
I!
;
//
II
I,
, I
, 1
II
II
0
I
I i
1i
; I
"
"
I
I
I I
:
I!
-I
1i
!
! ;
1i
II
II
II
11
II
I I
II
i I
/1
,
I :
I I
II
I.
I I
II
II
Ii
II
;
I :
; :
I t
I.
I .
~
I
'I
i I
.
:,'
L "'
(
:
l
1
I'
t I
t'
('
a
.......
~
a
,... ..
i I
a
�, ts-'89 1:...OGAM cANYON E. I. S.-
+
SCOPING MEETING NO.2 '
~
---------~-------~----~-- _______ r - -____ =~~~ __________________c
MARCH 4. 1987
- , LOGAN_ UT~
"
II
: I
"
"
COMMENTS
\\
IINAT'L
~SICi.
II -ocnlJrf ALTERNATIVES
IfCE~IGNI'INrIWloenIU
H PII.orovel
___ ~ ____ ~ __________ c ___ c __ ~
SPEE.D ..
'II
Expect
exoect positive .~~ect
exoect negatiye e~fect
eKoect no signi~. or la.tinG_ .f~Wc~
encour.ge.
~iscour.pe_
___________________________________ ~ ______________________________________ a a . ___ ~~ __________________________ _
?
SiQn~hcan:...~;TIYE
OR NEGETive
II'IPACTS FroM
Acti~n
AlternatiYes
• I
-neutral.
'-'ANT I:JePANDED 'SCOPE Or"" sruuY TO ...<lAl:: fULLY _ COVERs
I
11------.-----"---.----.:~--.--------,-----_----IFuJl I~ORedl Siuns 'TRAFFIC CAP"----.-------.-------______ - - - . - - - - . - - - - - - - - . - - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - . - - 1
I
l~er.lcIR~.
IINo tliroplSPOt I Trnout "ILoganl R1C",1
~
IL1Mit'
&/~r
1-----. -----IIB1Q
IFlora &IEnclanu
&:J~SceniCIH20
I Rlyr E:.co'l'Iult IAl ,I-:'trIE_rg I EConoMY 'ECOnoMY' • TouriSM'
Tr.~flcIScenlc f~lcksM~nlE.no.naleo.t
vs'" Pubilcl
.:---~--.ac_-~~~c::~::::=~~!:::::~~~~~::~~~:::!~!~::c~:!c::::~_~~~!~::::~~:~~~~!:::::~~::::~::!::::~:::!~::~~::~:!:::c~~~:~~:::~!~~:~~~!:~~::=~~:==~~:~::~~~::::~~!~=~:~~:~:~::!:::~::~~::~~=~~~::!:::~~~~:=~::!~~:c~~::~!!!~~~::.:
• I Georue- Preston
I I
IIRobOt Fothet-inl;maf'lll
I I Bryan Booth
I I
1 I Richard De r-,t or.
I j
I I Bt-llce K i r.Q
If
I -I Newe 1 Da i nes
, f
I I Ted Wi Isor-,
, I
I I Gc.rdc.r. Lowe
II
?
I
I I
II
I I
I I
II
I
+
I
+
,
f
•
,-
I
,
I
,+
I,
I
I
I I
II
'f
I..
I +
+
"
II
f
+
J.,~
, .;..
v
be
issuinQ wt'itten recomrner.o a t i or.s
0/
-
II
I
..
-f't \
-
I
,
1
-}
+-
I
I
+
II
I
.....
/
L/
.f~
i-
---i
.:.
i
/
"
(/
~
//
()
.J.
,
II
I
'
I
I. +
I
I
+
I I
Lache Countv G.=.v't wi 11
I +
I
I
II
I
I
+
I
I
.
II
II
I I
, I
2
..,111
enec.uraIJe sahle fron4 r/layors ar,eI ci ty _
cour-.ei Is
I
,
+
f '
I
,
I
?
,
I
1)
f l l l actlc·r-, a1ter-r-.atives will
~.;
'.! ./
2)
flll action alternatives will
,-
0
c/
I
"
."
(
(
(
(
i,
-.
I
I
I
I
t i l
, _
,
I
II
II
II
II
+
t-eouit-e State Engineer's clearar-.ce fc·t' ar-.y wc.rk c.n the river.
reouire Bureau of water- Pc.llution Cc.ntrol cleat'ance.
+
~\
+
o
II
II
o
�$
LOGAN _ _ £.1.6..
INS MEETING NO. 3
~. 1987
GARDEN -CITY. UTAH
_ ___________________
I
I
"
~
+
~---~---------------------
_______
~
____
~---------~--------~-------~---~----~na~----------~-------~----------------------~--------~
encour.qe • • M~ ~Itive effect
discour.ge. exoect ne9ative .ftect
neutr.1. exoecC no .aDni~. or la.tinQ .ffect
________
?
.~
___
~~-----------------------------
IINATtL DESII3. II ACTION ALTERNATIVES
IREf.LIGNMNTIWide"IU H PllMOrovel
SPEEO &
II
Expect SiDnificant
ITIVE OR NEGETIVE II'tPACTS FrOM Action Alte~tiv_
...
WANT ~X~D ~ OF ,srUlJY TO I'klRc FUi...t..YCOYER.
- II
, , 'CQI'IMENTS II--!--.
IFull iSoeedl Sign, ITRAFFIC CAP I 1 - - . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - :-.----. - - . -...:----. - - - . ------. - - - . - - - - - . - - -- 1 1 - -- - . '-----~. - - - - - - . - ...- - - - . - - - - . - - - , - - . --,-~. --I, '
'
'
IISCanicIHec. llNo IBrdglSootlTrnout &lLoganlRichl
~
ILiMitl &/ar
1---.-----IIBig IFlora &IEnaan~ 5
ISceniclH20 IRivr Ecol"ultIAll-VrIE~~r9IECOnoMyIEconoMyIITouri5MITr.~~icISCenic l&lck~Mthlcnd.n~ICo.t vsl~ Publici I
"
"
IIHi ....v I River. tAct I RepillMDrlCI iMb Lnl Can.' Co. IL.na.Uin1'rcIS~ripesILowerl R.i~eIIGa_l~bitat IPleant & .... 1 I Degrad I Queal IFishin" IUse ISa~etvl Trans I Rich Co'-Cache en IMoaCtsl& L 0 51 Rat inoslFork' Canl5oec. IBena~it ISupoort U
---.11--. --. -:----.
.--,--. - -
lOtto Mattson
IKl'!'n Brown
IDee Johnso ....
I Barrv Ne,,'.ls
IVaI Petersc.....
IBryce Nielso ....
ITed Seeholtzer
IEcryce Stringham
I John Fla .... nery
lGeorge ~resto ....
IRuss Currel
lOwen Wahlstrom
IPaul Webb
IEcil1 Peterson
ICathy Webb
IRay Elliott
f Lynr. Hi 11 sma ....
lOon Huffner
'
..
..
..
..
..
+
f.
+
I
II
II
A.
v-
0
...
...
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
..
+
+
?
?
.1
II
...
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
II
II
II
II
I I
II
.
..
..
...
II
II
II
II
II
?
It
t I
+
...
+
II
II
+
...... ,r:
;,-'
.... t
·~· I
~"
o
I
o
c· . .·
6
- d
\
, ----- ----
~---
(
(,
------------------_.
I
,1
:
�)
)
.
)
)
)
\~ \ I
I
~3
y.
~
I .r
l/?- . -tZ
.3
<~
1-1'5
/-1-
{ -; 7-
. . . .-::....
j I
i ~ 2 (r)...
I . . . .3
\
u
·r")....
~~
-fJ..1.t(/!-tJ,'). ~4;
'
'-
H '..
I·
(
"
",
I I!;~ I'. . ') . . ("
j).
--ll \
A
;;/10
I
2\ I
l'1-"}7
I
I ,:)
i
h 3 I
I
~ ~I
-
r;
t=
positive effect
~ 3 r • did,,,,., "~,,,I neg.1i ,..if.ct
.\ \.r
I
l'
,l
\
'
:UDit!
pt;bilC;;
;;5cenic;Rec.
;Brdg:Spot;Trnout ';Logan:Rich ;' >
:Floril.
Spec ;Scenic;H20 :Rivr ECC';I\Ult:lll-vriECerglECOnCIY;ECOnOIY;;TOuris.;Traffic:scenic ;Slcksmth:Endang:Cost vs;,;
:!Hillay :Ri'/er: :Ad:Repl:hlpr-:Clia:b Ln: Can.: Co.:Lanes:Enfrc:Stripes:lower:Raise::Salle:Habitat\Plant ft AnI :llegrad:Qual:Fishlng :Use lilfetY!1rans/Rich Co:Cache c::rapacts:L L S:Ratings:Fork etc:Sllec. :Benefit:Sapport ::
::==================: :============: :================================================================: ~======================= ==========================T=====;:=====~===============: : ======================================================::: :
::Karla Allen"
::
!
:: :
!:
: + : +:
:
:
:
:
::::
I!
:!
: r -+!
!
:
::
!
:
:
:
:::
: ! Brilce Pennery
::
:
:: :
!:
::
l
:
:
:
i
!~
!:
::
:
::
;?:
:!
:
:
:
:
+:
;:
II
::
)
I -
' ~f
I l~-:z.' ~.h I ~ ( ~
en[()~rage, e~pect
1
(
r I ,\
~~;;;~~~:~~~~~f~f~~~~:~~ J~~ ~~~~~~~:~~~t~~,~~;;~~:~:l;;;;;;;{:L~ic;~:;:::~!~~~1~~~~~~:~~ i;~~;:i;;f,~;~~:~~~;~'i~~:~~t;~m~;t:::i::=~~~f~~~~~;j;:~~~~~:~:~~1~~~:~~~~~:~mt:=~
C~~!'!ENT5
i~~~s ;-~-~-:----~;;Bi9
~~Endang
LJ5-89 LDSAN CANYON E.I.S.
SCDPING ""WIS - 'R ITTE. RESPCOCES
)
1" \ D
~s I ~>
I
\\
NAME
\\
!
: ! Eerdon
LO)l
::
: : Robert Eri ckson "
: !llennis Pi=per
"
"
: !Da:liel Horton
"
: : J. Steven Larsen ::
: !Wil SOIl Wahi stroll "
: :Doug S?ence
II
.,
: : E. H. Berry
: :Eric Hash
"
! : T Wi 1son
01
::Til Davis
! : Don Hancey
"
: : 6eorge Roohr
: :Don Huefner
I.
: :Pilul Johnson
: :Eldon Stubhs
: !Keith Stubbs
: !Rcss Wilson
: :!'!i ke Lockhart
: !!!ar jorie !lizard
: :C. 5harpsteen
+
: !Anne Jones
: : Boyd Bradford
: :Larry Jardine
: :C. Val Grant
:: Ja:tes Frankenfield::
: :Richard Calpanella::
: : Lilrri ssa Pl!tko
::
:
: : Stephl!n Boyd
: : D. Brent Jensen
: :Julia Sold
: :Sandy Borthwick
: : Alan Carpenter
+
: !Karri Sli th
: :Frank Salisbury
: IPatricia Sordon
: : Jaaes WilsDn
: : Kathy lIebb
: :John Spic:Heaan ':: ..
: :IIargaret Pi ersall ::
! :Allen Stokes
I:
-n
: :IIax Lyon
: :Nancy lIillius
'
II
I
II
..
+
.,
II
II
I I
"
II
.,
..
..
.,
I.
.
I.
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
!!
t ,.
II
II
II
II
.,
II
.,
..
.,
.,
II
II
I I
II
II
II
II
II
I I
..
..
+
,.
II
..
..
II
'1
I.
+
II
+
II
II
.,
?
II
"
II
II
"
II
II
+
..
: :Sadfi! Hanson
II
"
.,
..
II
II
II
..
II
II
II
"
+
II
II
..
I I
II
I I
"
II
II
II
II
"
"
"
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
?
.
II
"
"
II
II
"
II
II
II
I
"I
:+/-
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
.. :+/-
?
+/+/-
..
?
II
II
•
I
II
II
I
?I+
I '
"
II
-
I ,
II
II
..
+
II
II
I I
+/-
' 1
..
I
..
II
II
II
I.
II
II
II
::
..
II
II
..
II
I
II
: :Russ Lirson
II
"
II
I •
+/+/+
II
..
II
..
I.
?
II
II
II
II
II
::
II
I
)
II
II
"
"
I
+
"
II
II
I!
! I
+
,.
"
II
II
II
.,
+
+
..
II
"
:~
::
..
"
II
I.
"
I.
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
..
II
I.
.1
I I
"
II
:i
"
II
II
II
II
II
)
+
II
II
)
+
II
II
II
::
II
I I
II
I.
)
II
II
..
II
II
..
II
:!
II
II
"
II
II
)
!:
-+
II
II
)
+
::
(14)
II
I
L
II
II
+
II
II
::
::
::
I
I '
1
..
::
?
II
II
?
1/-
:.
:
..
1
II
II
- II
"
II
(15)
II
II
I
I ,
..
I ·
I
:
II
\
:
..
::
::
'
.;~
: J'~
l:
--~
II
It
-/
-
.
I
�'::: ..::::.J :' ' "."'~'''''_''''''''''''''''...,__....... . ..... . . . .....";.; . ....'...(.'."..:.":''';.'' . ..~ ........ ~ .
)
"
)
II
II
.,
II
II
.1
.,
..
.,
II
:Seorgie Leighton
II
I.
: Steve Ryder
.,
II
II
II
II
II
II
..
.,
)
l :Bonnie Hallin
)
)
.J
)
.)
II
II
II
II
II
II
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.,
:: Ann Spring
: :Eric Rexstad
: l Di ane Behl
: l Jehn Nicholson
: : Daria Wighhan
: l Ri chard Perkes
: :Sylvia ilight=an
: :Paul ilighhan
: l Bruce Bugbee
II
II
"
II
)
.)
+
"
II
.,
II
..
: l Cathy Welsh
I.
II
I I
: : lIayne Padgett
:'l J. R.Allred
: : Margaret Petti 5 :: +
l l 11. Bedingfiel dSlith: :
l : Jerry Jayne
::
: l Ri chard Cazpanell a: l
: : IIi II i am Boy 1e
l:
:: Al ice StoKes
::
: : !Ireta Satterwai te ::
II
l : Dave Burkhard
I.
II
:: J. Kent Hartin
: lilendell Anderson .,
II
: ~J. lIaidl!r
II
I.
: l Alice Lindahl
I.
: : Ll yn DwelUs
:!
II
+
+/-
"
II
II
II
II
"
I I
"
"
+/-
"
:
"
"
II
"
"
:: +
II
II
II
?
+/-
+
I.
..
"
II
"
::
II
II
II
.,
.,
.. ..
.,
II
?
II
.,
"
"
..
::
+
"
I"
+
- ::-
I
?
+
n
I ·
+/-
,.
,.
+
II
I
(113)
II
II'
I I
.
.,
,
"
II
II
..
"
..
I
"
II
.,
II
II
I I
+
"
I.
II
II
,
I I
II
I.
II
II
II
II
II
II
I '
:: +
II
II
"
"
"
..
II
,
II
II
II
II
..
..
..
..
I.
II
I.
II
I.
II
I.
(15)
I
".
II
+
II
II
I •
"
II
+I?
II
..
II
+
I I
"
.,
..
..
..
..
...
..
I.
II
(t!4)
I'
..
.,
i
.. .-'
II
II
II
I
• 'l'J\
I I
I I
.
.J
"
!I
I.
II
.,
.,
"
I
II
II
"
.,
II
..
..
"
II
II
II
I.
II
II
II
II
,.
I.
II
I.
"
II
I •
I
".
I I
..
.,
.,
..,
.
II
+
II
I.
..
II
II
.,
.,
(1m
II
I'
"
+/-
(113)
II
I •
+
.
..,
!I
II
I I
:! +
.,
~:
..
..
..
...
..
..
.,
+
II
II
II
I .
II
+
.,
"
II
.,
II
II
"
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
.,
.,
.,
+
II
II
II
II
II
II
'1
"
+/-
II
II
II
"
"
II
I
"I
II
II
II
I'
+
II
II
::
I I
II
I.
II
.,
.,
"
,.
.,
+
II
II
.,
..
,.
I I
I I
+
II
: :Rebert CaldlieH
: l Char Ies Carpenter
l : James Ri chards
: : El don Drake
: : Ri chard !'Ii chaud
l :Charles Salzberg
l l Lucy Jordan
: : Mar jori e Lelli s
: :Ron Hinkley
l l Lei h Shultz
"
II
.,
II
II
'1
.,
+
..
..
(tb)
II
I.
I.
"
II
II
II
I'
II
II
I I
II
(to)
I I
II
II
)
: (46):
..
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
l : Ronal d Lanner
l lililliam Furlong
)
+1-
.,
.,
II
II
: :Ken Theis
::Eric Johnson
+,\'i:
"
"
'1
II
I'
I.
: (t6) l
II
+
I I
II
..
II
I.
II
..
..
.,
"
"I
I
.,
"
..
.,
..
'1
II
II
II
II
II
+
II
II
II
I.
'1
II
II
..
.1
..
..
..
(is)
II
II
I I
"
"
II
I I
II
II
I
II
.,
II
I.
r
I
"
"
I I
'1
+
"
"
.,
" '"t' •...... /l .. >."
II
I.
..
+
II
I.
•••• , ..... ~)~ ••••• ,., • • •
II
+/- ::
II
II
oJ ·
II
II
I.
.,
.~.
II
?I-
.,
"
: : Karen Leach
.
II
'1
"
II
II
: : Mark Hashovsky
l :Danald Sanda
l: Roni PeKins
: : Judy !'Ioff att
I
-""
"
II
II
II
..
: : Sarth Bar ker
+
I
, "'
I'
'1I
'
'1
"
II
: : Bryan Booth
)
"
..
..
IBetsy Neely
:Lee Hiller
: :Anon.
)
"
"
II
I'
"
I •
....... .... , - . ,- -' ' i '
\
II
I.
I.
II
~,
II
: Terry Hall
)
. - -' - -' -
!
..
..
..
+f-
: Jose~h Weston
~ ' -
\
i
i
+1-
II
I .
: Karen Sanz .11 ez
:ThaClas BakI er
-,
(IW
illS)
I.
.,
.,
.,
.,
II '
..
II
�)
)
: :!1adeline Mazursh
: : Des:lOnd Anders:);)
! : Jales Haefner
: : Rebert Niel son
: : Cl a~ke Cam~bel!
: :t!e~d2l1 Morse
! :Craia Caupp
::£. A. Soeker
: : Jan Yaung
.,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
:
+
"
"
"
"
"
"
f/-
:+
I
"I
"
"
"
"
"
I
+
"
.., ]
1
. , : .,: ~ .
.'~'.
,.
.
}
m6 )
"
I I
.,
II
"
II
II
"
"
"
,
.
II
II
II
I I
"
"
II
"
.,
!I
"
II
ed!1catior.~ etc.
t2l rllpro.es $ liabihty for safety of eller. trans. personnel
13l Modify cross-drai nage structures to allow -Ii sh passage into vi abl e side streams
t4l Re=edial mitigation in tOKer canyon (beloll Right Fork>
IS) McSui res Pri IIfOSe
ibl Highly detailed specifics in the final LI.S.
m Fer.ce or bar livestock grazing in canyon (conflicts tr1ith vehicle traHid
tBl Expect no illpacts IIi thir. Agency jurisdiction
II
"
"
"
.,
"
"
"
"
II 1 Upgrades a vital link for gov't services,
.
,
,.
I I
II
.,
"
"
"
~
I;
"
"
.~
I,
,.
II
"
"
!,
+1-
"
19) Cor.cern e;! Ki th wetland d!' l ini ation/mi tigatio:\ ptan clearances
E ~ p"ct no i~voJveite;)t of ~i3tin!1al Natural La;;d:arks, b:: t need more details
#11) /1i tigat ion :;:easures suggested - olant salt-resista:1t .eg.
112) Int2rfe r!!~[e ~i th a~uders ~ear Bear La ke SlJui t; affects on groundwa.ter recharge
i13) Study p r2fere~:::e5 ·to bi~y::les ! _r.d closure of Logan Ca:lyon b motor v"hides
114) Close ~ D to tr~d traffic
ute
t15) Statew; d<? crior i ty - Cocpare IIi t h other canyon roads.
U6) Re::ledii I :;ti tigaticn fer Logar, River - restore past highway-related channelization.
I
HM
II
II
�() 5
)
)
f, "t - (0 <:r
AIJ (!.J...~ Y<J /J
£" L S
. .
.
.
•
_
+ ~!:"~,.~OCQ.1 ..,~~~t P¢ S; +; v ~ "'_!.~ c-14.,
. , .. . "
~~~~~~~J~~~~~~~~~~~§~¥~~~~~~~~
:--.----I--'-----1~---.----:FUl1
\\ COtl!!EHTS : :-----.---:
:Spe!d: Signs :TRAFFIC CAP: :---.----j-------.------. ---.------.----.----.:----:------.-------, ,-------·-------·r------!-------·-----·---·----·--,
\\
: :Scenic :Rec. : :No' :erdg:Spot !Trnout I: Logiln :Rich: 4 :Lili t: "or :---.--:--: :Big :FIon rr:Endang Spec :Scenic: H2O :Ri vr Eco:lM t:All-Yr !Elerg !EconoIlY: EconolY! :Touri ~.:Traffic}Scenic ~Blds.th:Endang : east vs:t PubliC:
ItA~E
\\ ::Hiuy :River::Act:Repl:lllpr:Clilb Ln: Ciln.: Co.:Lilnes!Enfrc:Stripes:Lolfl!f'lRai51!::Sale:Habitat}Phnt rr AnI !Oegrad:l2ual!fishing !Use lS~fety:Trans:Rich Co:Cache C!lIlpad!l:z. L 0 ~:RatingslFort etc:Spl!e. !Bl!nl!fit:Support :
::==================: :==========: : ======================================================: : ==~================= ===============':===================================: : ======~===::====r=======================~=========='
::n PRIVATE SRmJPS, ASSOCIATl!l~5, ETC. ! f
2+
: :!..ugan High
:!
!: !2f! b+ bf
9+
1+
B+
3+
1+
3+
2+
3+ :: 1+
"
II
4I I
School Students ::
!: 1-:
4313121- " 47"
(36 letters)
3?
1?
2?
" 1?: 3?
1?
I?
I?
:: 2?
.,
II
I,
,
(13)
: :A:er Fisheries Soc::
+
,
"
II
+
+
: :Friends Bear Lake ::
+
"
+~ ;;
+/::c. Prot. Logan Can::
+
+
"
"I
tl
I
II
+
+/: :Suui t Cycli sts "
?
?
II
+/+
: : eri dgr la~d Auduhon::
+
.,
"
"
::
::
::
.,
..
..
.,
,.
.,
If
..
It
II
"
.,
..
If
)
)
)
)
)
J
)
)
"
"
..
..
..
II
.>
..
..
..
,.
..
..
"
"
II
::+1
+
"
,
"'
,.
,"
~
+
+
I
(m
..
..
..
"
"
"
"
"
..
"
..
+
+
+
+
I .
"
"
+
+
.1
i. ::
+
+
+
?
-~
+
+
"
STATE II FEDERAl SDVER~ME~TS,
: :ut.SLllildlife Res::
: :Ut.St.Lands It For.:!
::Ut.Off.Mang't Bdgt::
: :U. S. Bureau of Ree:: {tlB
: :U.S. ArlY - C.O,E.::
::Nat'l Park Service::
::Fish z. IUdlife Ser::
: :Farlers HOII! Admin:: (IB)
,.
"
II
"
"
II
"
II
"
II
:
,.
,.
..
.,
"
"
"
"
-(131
:(m:
;(11):
: <121:
"
"
Upgrades a vi tal link for gllv·t services, education, etc.
hproves S liability for safety of Her. trans. personnel
lIodify cross-drain~ge structures to alllMl fish pilssage into viilbll! side streams
Reledial litigation in lower canyon (bdow Right Forkl
.
ItcSuires Prilrose
~
"
"
"
"
"
..
"
:.
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
"
"
"
"I
I
II
"
"
(19)
: mOl
(15)
"
"
II
II
"
II
,.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
..
II
II
II
It
+
"
"
"
"
II
+
II
II
II
,
.'
I.
II
It
II
,
,.
::
"
"
II
"
"
"
II
+
+
+
.,
"
II
.
"
II
AGENCIES, SERV!CE DISTRICTS, ETC. h
.,
+
II
.,
"
"
+
I.
II
"
"
"
"
"
II
..
..
'""
.,
+
II
It
"
"
"
+
?
?
:Ull!
+
+
+/?
?
?
+
+
II
II
"
"
"
,
"
II
II
19) Concern ed lIith wl!tland deliniation/litigation plan clearances
110)
till
1121
113)
Expect
!litigat
Interf
Study p
no i nvol velent of National N~tural landurks, but nel!d lore details
ion lI!~sures suggested - plant salt-resishnt veg.
rence .ith aquifers near Bear Lake SUlli t; affects on groundllater recharge
references to bicycles, and closure of Logan Canyon to lIotor vehicles
I
_ '1.
!'
J
i
)
)
161 Highly "debited specifics in the fin.} E.I.S.
I7J Flnee. or bar livestock gruing in canyon !conflicts with vehieh traffic) .
181 .Expect no i.pacts within Ac]rncy jllri'di~ion
','
~:.
.
II
II
"
"
)
)
"
II
+ ~ !~
?
II
II
II
"
"
"
"
II
+
•
,
,
II
II
tl
.
"
II
,.
111
121
13)
141
151
+
"
.,
<tIl
::
II
I
".
II
II
{Ill
(111
?
"
I •
"
+
:!
II
"
II
?
?
"
"
I.
~
..
,.
II
II
::
II
"
I •
II
"
"
::ff LOCAL SOYERNMENTS, AGENCIES, SERVICE DISTRICTS, ETC.
: :Hyrul Ci ty Mayor
: :Fur Lake Co. COI=::
: :Rich County COli. ::
: !Bear lake S.S.D. ::
: :Sarden City !!ayor ::
: :Rich Co. SheriH I I
! : Hyde Park llayor
: :a.R.A.S.
: :logan "ayor
::
::Logan City Council::
: :Sci thfield !layer ::
: :Ri ver H2ights !'Iayr::
::C.of C.- Bear Lake::
::C. of C. - Cache Co. ::
: : Cache Co. Cound 1 ::
: :Logan Hospital
::
: :Bl!ar River R.C.1f D::
II
"
"
"
II
IW C1OS. r out. to trud traffic
1151 Sht",. dl priority - Colpare with other canyon roads.
U61 Reletlil 1 Ii tigation for Logan River - restor! past highway-related channeli zation.
.~I .;.
..1
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/66">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/66</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2013
Conversion Specs
Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner, at 800 dpi. Archival file is PDF (800 dpi), display file is JPEG2000.
Checksum
1085875997
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
7576656 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Summary of public scoping meetings in Logan and Garden City
Description
An account of the resource
Summary of the comments received from the public scoping meetings in Logan and Garden City in March 1987 concerning the proposed Logan Canyon Road project. Legend deliniates + as improvements encouraged, - as improvements discouraged, and ? as neutral expecting no signficant or lasting effect. Graphs are broken down between individuals and groups.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Nuffer, Stanton S.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside Improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
Roads--Design and construction
United States Highway 89
Logan Canyon Study
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Administrative records
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1987-03
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Utah
United States
Garden City (Utah)
Logan (Utah)
Cache County (Utah)
Rich County (Utah)
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1980-1989
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 27 Folder 4
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Libraries Photograph Curator, phone (435) 797-0890.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MSS148VIIIB27_Fd4_006.pdf
Highway 89;
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/4038b7921c9612c213b6165be6f65f44.pdf
e4730b7646d6b520ab44b840022ec1c5
PDF Text
Text
'i
ClOd HIll
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Interdisciplinary Team
FROM:
Stan Nuffer
DATE:
June 19, 1986
SUBJECT:
Logan Canyon Environmental Study
PROJECT:
B21163.AO
Your attendance and participation in the first Interdisciplinary Team meeting held on June 10, 1986 was appreciated.
Enclosed are minutes of the meeting for your review, and an
agenda for the next meeting on June 23, at 2:00 p.m. at the
UDOT District office in Ogden.
We look forward to seeing you there.
BOC5/025
slc76/d.101
�AGENDA - LOGAN CANYON STUDY
INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY TEAM
MEETING NO. 2 - OGDEN, UTAH
JUNE 23, 1986 - 7:00 p.m.
1.
Review minutes of June 10, meeting.
2.
Discussion of role of interdisciplinary team.
3.
Discussion of Level of Documentation required by NEPA
for environmental studies.
4.
Public involvement program outline.
5.
Schedule of interdisciplinary team meetings.
BOC5/026
slc76/d.102
�LOGAN CANYON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
MINUTES OF INTERDISCIPLINE TEAM MEETING
June 10, 1986
ATTENDANCE:
Lynn Zollinger - UDOT
Jim Naegle - UDOT
John Neal - UDOT
Gale Larson - Valley Engineering
Rudy Lukez - Cache Group Sierra Club
Todd G. Weston - UDOT
Al Stilley - Northern Engineering & Testing
Dave Baumgartner - USFS-Logan
Stan Nuffer - CH2M HILL
Cliff Forsgren - CH2M HILL
Duncan Silver - FHWA
Howard Richardson - UDOT
Sheldon Barker - CH2M HILL
Tom Haislip - CH2M HILL
John D'Amico - CH2M HILL
Frank Grover - USFS-SLC
Steve Flint - Bridgerland Audobon Association
Stan Nuffer called the meeting to order and asked members of
the group to introduce themselves. Following the introductions, some of the members were asked to briefly describe
their views of the project and its objectives.
Jim Naegle indicated that UDOT wants a thorough investigation
and has no preconceived idea as to what, if anything, should
be done in the canyon. He expressed appreciation for the
interest of the environmental cowmunity and the public in
general. He also wants members of the I.D. Team to have
full input into all phases of the project. The most serious
problems in the canyon presently are narrow and obsolete
bridges which are in need of repair or replacement.
Lynn Zollinger explained that UDOT has a responsibility to
the traveling public to provide safe, efficient transportation.
UDOT wants to satisfy the needs of the traveling
public and the environmental community. He expects an openminded study with adequate input from all of the interested
public.
Dave Baumgartner said that the rules of the environmental
"ball game" have changed since the '70's. A successful
study is dependant upon public support and understanding.
This project will be a challenging one and standard
solutions will probably not work in every instance.
1
�Todd Weston stated that he does not have any notion that
there will ever be a freeway or a 4-lane highway through the
canyon. He feels that there are more problems in the canyon
than old bridges and the study must address those problems
without being locked into one concept. He does expect ideas
to improve transportation can be implemented.
Rudy Lukez stated that there are many personal feelings about
the canyon and that some people will be upset if there is a
large construction project in it. The canyon is an environmentally sensitive area and there is a need for careful study
and analysis before any work can begin. The environmental
community desires to be kept informed. Rudy also expressed
concern that meetings held during the day may be difficult
for those who work elsewhere to attend.
Steve Flint stated that there were many people who questioned
the transportation needs in the canyon.
Stan Nuffer then explained the I.D. Team and the role of
each I.D. Team member. The I.D. Team is to function as the
group which reviews scope, data, methodology and conclusions
of the study and determines whether each stage of the study
adequately addresses the critical issues and meets the objectives of the study.
Gale Larson said that Valley Engineering's office in Logan
will be the local contact point and someone will be available
for questions at least 10 hours per week. Valley Engineering
will also perform the field surveys and traffic counts.
Some traffic counts were conducted during the ski season in
order to have the information available for the study this
summer. Gale expects to work closely with Sheldon Barker
with the public involvement task work.
Stan Nuffer then introduced the Scope of Work, as included
in the consulting agreement between UDOT and CH2M HILL, and
led the discussion on the tasks outlined in the agreement.
Task 1 - ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
The discussion covered the major areas of potential need
covered in the agreement; safety, maintenance, substandard
geometrics, and congestion.
If areas with substandard geometries are identified, options to correct the problems will
be identified, these may include road re-alignment. During
the discussion of congestion, Rudy Lukez asked what was
meant by levels of service c,d,e. Stan Nuffer gave a brief
description and said that detailed descriptions will be provided to members of the I.D. Team in a Technical Memo. Rudy
Lukez also asked how traffic projections were determined.
Stan Nuffer said that UDOT uses projections of population
2
�prepared by local councils of governments and other agencies
who are charged with the task of preparing proj'ections of
that type.
TASK 2 - LOCATION STUDIES
The study area will include the roadway between Right Hand
Fork and Garden City.
The alternatives listed in the contract scope will be evaluated as well as others identified
during the course of the study. New roadway alignments may
also be considered from the summit to Garden City.
John
Neal asked what the termini of the project were.
FHWA must
approve the termini in order for the project to be eligible
for funding.
Lynn Zollinger said that Logan City to Garden
City had been proposed to the FWHA and he expects approval
shortly.
Since Logan to Right Hand Fork has already been
improved there would be no action considered on that stretch
of road.
Tom Haislip said that the development of the alternatives will be one of the biggest phases of the project.
Mapping was also discussed.
Existing mapping available
through UDOT will be used on the project wherever possible,
however adequate mapping is not available over the entire
route. As the mapping is completed, maps will be made
available to members of the I.D. Team.
TASK 3 - GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
The extent of the geotechnical investigations will be determined as alternatives are developed.
It is expected that
they will be needed primarily in areas where re-alignment is
considered.
Dave Baumgartner expressed concern about the role of the
I.D. Team in this study.
If the team is to be advisory
only, he does not think a satisfactory solution to identified problems can be found.
To be successful, the I.D. Team
should have a role in establishing study criteria and in
formulating recommendations. Other team members expressed
their views on the subject, and expressed their belief that
the I.D. Team would function in a manner that would lead to
a successful resolution of the transportation problems identified in the study.
TASK4 - PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
Sheldon Barker said that CH2M HILL would make three promises
in the public involvement program; (1) to be a good listener,
(2) to get input from all interested individuals and groups
and to treat each with respect, 3) when the report is prepared, it would contain no surprises because everyone had
been involved in the process.
3
�The scoping process was also discussed.
It will include the
development of the project objective, holding informationai
meetings to educate the public, meetings with small groups
as well as large, preparation of a video tape, and maintaining a project office in Logan where interested parties could
come to obtain information on the project. Rudy Lukez suggested that information also be made available at the USU
Library and the Logan Public Library so that it would be
available during evening hours. Sheldon Barker said that
the suggestion was a good one and it will be implemented.
There was considerable discussion on the number and scheduling of meetings. Rudy Lukez did not feel that a lot of
meetings was necessarily a good thing. He used as an example
the recent meetings held by the Division of Water Resources
on the proposal to build a dam on the Bear River. Meetings
should be proceeded by 2 or 3 weeks of media coverage and
should be well prepared. Rudy was also not certain if there
would be any value to meeting with small groups because it
would not give people with differing views an opportunity to
hear the opinions of others. Sheldon Barker indicated that
the different views would come out in the larger public
meetings and that meeting with small groups would give the
project team the opportunity to better prepare for the larger
meetings. Rudy Lukez said that fall would be the best time
to hold the scoping meetings because more -people would be
able to attend.
TASK 5 - COORDINATION
Tom Haislip discussed the I.D. Team and its organization and
the need to have each member involved.
TASK 6 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSl-lENT
Tom Haislip said that the I.D. Team would playa key role in
the project by providing input and direction to the study
team. Tom also asked for help from the environmental community.
If there were any data or studies that are available
and not in UDOT files, they may be of great help in the study.
Rudy Lukez said that there was a study underway at USU investigating the impact that high speed traffic has on deer.
Tom Haislip indicated that field studies were not planned
because there is extensive information available. Tom also
explained that it is intended that Technical Memos be prepared presenting in detail the findings of each phase of the
study. After the I.D. Team has reviewed, discussed, and
revised the Technical Memos, the information would be summarized and placed in the report.
4
�There was more discussion on the role of the I.D. Team.
Dave Baumgartner again expressed his concern that I.D. Team
members be in a position to do more than simply review conclusions and give their comments. Stan Nuffer said that
study data, methodology, and conclusions would all be presented to the I.D. Team and discussed before incorporating
anything into the report. Tom Haislip said that CH2M HILL's
job would be to the "doers" who would gather information,
review data and prepare Technical Memos for the I.D. Team.
The I.D. Team would then review and discuss the memos and
hopefully resolve any differences. Dave Baumgartner said
that it may be necessary for superiors in each agency to
resolve conflicts if they could not be handled on the I.D.
Team level.
He also indicated that the whole process would
work much better if each alternative developed offered a
real solution to the problems so that the alternative evaluation would be believable.
Todd Weston pointed out that the Forest Service, UDOT, and
FHWA must all agree to whatever solutions are presented in
the report.
If any of the three agencies disagree with the
findings, the project will never be completed.
In discussions at the end of the meeting, there was no agreement as to when the first public information meeting should
be held, or what purpose it should serve. After further
discussion, it was decided that the date of the first meeting
should be set after the next I.D. Team meeting.
It was recommended that a feature article on the project be prepared
for the Logan paper. This should be published prior to the
Logan public information meeting.
The next meeting will be held on Monday June 23, at
7:00 p.m. at District 1 headquarters in Ogden.
SLC73/39
5
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/40">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/40</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2013
Conversion Specs
Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner, at 800 dpi. Archival file is PDF (800 dpi), display file is JPEG2000.
Checksum
46884717
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
4338797 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Minutes from June 10, 1986 Interdisciplinary Team meeting
Description
An account of the resource
A memo from Stan Nuffer detailing the minutes from the Interdisciplinary Team meeting from June 10, 1986.
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Nuffer, Stanton S.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Zollinger, Lynn
Naegle, Jim
Neal, John
Larson, Gale
Lukez, Rudy
Weston, Todd
Stilley, Al
Baumgartner, Dave
Silver, Duncan
Richardson, Howard
Barker, Sheldon
Haislip, Tom
D'Amico, John
Grover, Frank
Flint, Steve
Forsgren, Clifford
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside Improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
United States Highway 89
Logan Canyon Study
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Administrative records
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1986-06-19
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Ogden (Utah)
Weber County (Utah)
Utah
United States
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1980-1989
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 27 Folder 1
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Libraries Photograph Curator, phone (435) 797-0890.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MSS148VIIIB27_Fd1_Page_8.pdf
Highway 89;
-
http://highway89.org/files/original/0d9d39033a34a89061062edbbfce32ae.pdf
499a8339e30a7783450d7680bded936d
PDF Text
Text
LOGAN CANYON
Minutes of ID Team Meeting
July 28, 1986
Attendance:
Clark Ostergaard - USFS
Fred LaBar - USFS
Todd Weston - UDOT
Stan Nuffer - CH2M HILL
John D'Amico - CH2M HILL
Cliff Forsgren - CH2M HILL
Bill Helm - Unattached
Rudy Lukez - Sierra Club
Howard Richardson - UDOT
John Neil - UDOT
ITEM 1 - REVIEW OF MINUTES
The minutes were reviewed. There was some confusion about
the sources of additional names for the mailing list which
were listed in the minutes.
It was noted that Fred LaBar
and Bill Helm had mailed names and not turned them in at the
last meeting.
There was no other discussion on the minutes.
ITEM 2 - TFAFFIC COUNT DATA
(
The sources of traffic data were discussed. Permanent
stations on US 89-91 at Webster Junction, on US 89 at Card
Guard Station in Logan Canyon (later moved to Garden City),
and on US 89 north of Garden City are being used in the
preparation of the traffic forecast.
ITEM 3 - PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED TRAFFIC FORECAST
A past trends based forecast had been prepared using a least
squares best fit linear function.
This approach produced an
annual increase in ADT which was less than one percent, a
rate which was felt to be low.
The Utah State, Office of
Planning and Budget was prepared its forecast of economic
and population growth through the year 2010. The overall
rate of population increase for northern Utah was approximately 2 percent.
If traffic in Logan Canyon were to increase at the same rate as the population, the summer ADT in
Logan Canyon would reach approximately 6,000 vehicles per
day in 2,010. Supporting data for this forecast is available
and will be presented at the next ID Team (Team) meeting.
There was also some discussion on the traffic classification
counts. The summer counts will begin on July 29, 1987. The
counts will include a classification for recreational vehicles
and record turning movements.
�r
(
ITEM 4 - DISCUSSION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
DETERMINATION
The roadway will be evaluated on the basis of the level of
service which is possible at a given traffic volume. The
Transportation Research Board describes a procedure for establishing levels of service (A through E) for rural roads.
Copies of portions of the procedure description were distributed to team members to help them become familiar with
the level of service concept. There was some discussion on
which level of service would be planned for in the Canyon.
UDOT would like to plan for a "C" level, but the actual level
of service used will be determined by the Team.
ITEM 5 - REVIEW OF ACCIDENT DATA
The accident data for 6 years (1980 - 1985) has been
tabulated using a UDOT computer program. The UDOT program
was used because the program performs the types of analysis
required for roadways and the accident data base was already
on the UDOT computer.
The computer runs had only recently
been completed and there had not been sufficient time to
review the results.
Hopefully this will be completed by the
next meeting.
ITEM 6 - UPDATE ON STATUS OF BASE MAP PREPARATION
An example of the base maps was shown to the
of the set will be available, when they have
to Team members who wish to have one. Clark
requested a set to get started on the visual
Team. Copies
been completed,
Ostergaard
survey.
MISCELLANEOUS
The approved forest plan has a section on Logan Canyon which
t may be of interest to Team members.
Clark Ostergaard will
bring a number of copies of that section to the next meeting.
SLC8I/II
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Local URL
The URL of the local directory containing all assets of the website
<a href="http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/34">http://digital.lib.usu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/highway89/id/34</a>
Purchasing Information
Describe or link to information about purchasing copies of this item.
To order photocopies, scans, or prints of this item for fair use purposes, please see Utah State University's Reproduction Order Form at: <a href="https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php">https://library.usu.edu/specol/using/copies.php</a>
Digital Publisher
List the name of the entity that digitized and published this item online.
Digitized by: Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library
Date Digital
Record the date the item was digitized.
2013
Conversion Specs
Scanned by Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library using Epson Expression 10000 scanner, at 800 dpi. Archival file is PDF (800 dpi), display file is JPEG2000.
Checksum
3001645539
File Size
Size of the file in bytes.
1261682 Bytes
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Minutes from July 28, 1986 Interdisciplinary Team meeting
Description
An account of the resource
Minutes from July 28, 1986 Interdisciplinary Team meeting. Review minutes, traffic count data, presentation of proposed traffic forecast, discussion of highway capacity and level of service determination, review of accident data, and update on status of base map preparation.
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Ostergard, Clark
LaBar, Fred
Weston, Todd
D'Amico, John
Helm, Bill
Lukez, Rudy
Richardson, Howard
Neil, John
Forsgren, Clifford
Nuffer, Stanton S.
Subject
The topic of the resource
Roadside Improvement--Utah--Logan Canyon
United States Highway 89
Traffic engineering
Logan Canyon Study
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Administrative records
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1986-07-28
Spatial Coverage
Spatial characteristics of the resource.
Logan Canyon (Utah)
Utah
United States
Cache County (Utah)
Temporal Coverage
Temporal characteristics of the resource.
1980-1989
20th century
Language
A language of the resource
eng
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives, Sierra Club, Utah Chapter Archives, 1972-1986, COLL MSS 148 Series VIII Box 27 Folder 2
Is Referenced By
A related resource that references, cites, or otherwise points to the described resource.
View the inventory for this collection at: <a href="http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390">http://uda-db.orbiscascade.org/findaid/ark:/80444/xv03390</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Reproduction for publication, exhibition, web display or commercial use is only permissible with the consent of the USU Libraries Photograph Curator, phone (435) 797-0890.
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Highway 89 Digital Collections
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Text
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
application/pdf
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
MSS148VIIIB27_Fd2_Page_17.pdf
Highway 89;